Slashdot Mirror


iPod Mini Sells Out

burgburgburg writes "According to USATODAY.com, the iPod mini is virtually sold out after two weeks. As we know, it had 100,000 on pre-order. It's the top seller at the Apple Store, where they advise people that there will be a one to three week wait. And it isn't a component shortage that's causing the delays. It's the huge demand amongst teens (for the colors) and athletes who like exercising with the ultralight device. While many here on /. felt that the mini was overpriced and pointed out that for $50 extra, you could buy a regular iPod with 15GB of storage instead of the 4 GB of the mini, Apple seems to have correctly identified the price point and the market they were going after. The space has become so hot that Creative's MuVo2 has also been selling well, but also for a slightly different reason. The MuVo2, which also has 4 GB of capacity, uses a CompactFlash card (which can be used in a digital camera). People have been buying the MP3 player and taking it apart for the card, which would cost more than the $200 dollars for the MuVo2."

499 comments

  1. Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Say it ain't so!

    While many here on /. felt that the mini was overpriced and pointed out that for $50 extra, you could buy a regular iPod with 15GB of storage instead of the 4 GB of the mini, Apple seems to have correctly identified the price point and the market they were going after.

    Which should tell /. readers a couple things:

    /.'ers don't fit the target demographics (Ow! That hurts!)

    /.'ers are apparently sedentary, they sit at their screens so much that weight isn't a consideration, for that matter, they can listen to stuff while sitting at the screen, so why bother?

    /.'ers are more interested in pushing consumer technology to its more than whether there's a need. (It's all about the game!)

    /.'ers must be colorblind (I'm R/G) so the colors aren't interesting, let along exciting.

    /.'ers were wrong, and can't stand being wrong and are currently working on a strategy to change that rather than get a date for a Friday night. (Hey! This is important!)

    So what's the average age of a slashdotter? Undoubtably there must be a few in the target demographic, now how many have kids in the group?

    I identify more with Homer Simpson than Britney Spears and I'm cool with that, inspite of the tone of that post. Now if you'll excuse me I need to go buy some cargo pants, Justin Timberlake CD's, and iPod mini and a stone of oatmeal (because it's the right thing to do.)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by henrik · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, the main selling point to me is that it is smaller. If I wanted to maximize hard drive space for the dollar I could drag around a IDE tower.

      Size and weight is _everything_.

    2. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yeah, the main selling point to me is that it is smaller. If I wanted to maximize hard drive space for the dollar I could drag around a IDE tower.

      Sure, and you could hack the thing, install Linux on it, and play Ogg tunes. I'm sure there's people whose eyes don't glaze over as we go into the technical details and merits of our accomplishments. I'm always shocked when I run into someone who knows what I'm talking about.

      "A left handed 9.4GB veeblefetzer with interchangeable 3.0 GHz portrzebie, no kidding?"

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      and the fact that they are sending for free to random VW beetle owners to further the hype.

      I know of 2 people that recieved them unsolicited in the mail, and no none of them own a aplle anything.. the only thing that is common is they both own a VW beetle.

      I have also heard of at least 5 other reports of this happening.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Cthefuture · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You have to remember, the couple hundred posts you see on any given Slashdot thread are only a couple hundred opinions of the most active posters. It in no way respresents what the majority of people reading Slashdot think.

      I mean, you're talking tens of thousands of people versus only a couple hundred posts. Think about it.

      There are many regular lemmings lurking about.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    5. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Tofino · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you bought a convertible beetle between around May and November of last year, you got a free iPod, if I remember the promotion correctly. My wife was annoyed as she bought a Beetle but being Canadian was screwed out of the free iPod :|.

    6. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
      I know of 2 people that recieved them unsolicited in the mail, and no none of them own a aplle anything.. the only thing that is common is they both own a VW beetle.

      !

      I knew that I'd regret getting that pickup truck. First it was the faulty wiring, then the price of gas, now it denies me free schwag.

      sigh

      I guess I'm just not random enough anymore...

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by darkonc · · Score: 5, Interesting
      While many here on /. felt that the mini was overpriced and pointed out that for $50 extra, you could buy a regular iPod with 15GB of storage instead of the 4 GB of the mini,

      From a geek "my pod's bigger than your pod", point of view, this might make some sense.. From a consumer "I want something to listen to while I'm jogging" point of view, 4GB is how many hours of ogg audio?? Chances are that you're gonna have to change your batteries long before you have to change your playlist.

      15GB is so that I can backup my home partition with a decade's worth of email... Not many people are going to care to do that.

      The fact that I've got enough storage for a day's worth of music and a knoppix image for $50.00 less than a full sized ipod sounds just peachy to me.

      The smaller package is just a bonus.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    8. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by moonbender · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, size and weight isn't everything, but the iPod mini does seem to have a fairly nice balance. I'd rather settle for half the storage if it allow a 20% decrease in size, but it's still a lot better than the traditional HD players while retaining mostly all their pro's.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    9. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by gmhowell · · Score: 5, Funny

      My wife was annoyed as she bought a Beetle but being Canadian was screwed out of the free iPod :|.

      Boy, talk about 'three strikes and you're out':

      1) Canadian
      2) Beetle owner, and now
      3) No free iPod.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    10. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by earlytime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good point,

      I've been trolling around here for years, and I've only made about 200 posts in all that time. There's a handful of sexual intellectuals who post about everything. They're the ones who make up the bulk of the posts.

      --

    11. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      So what's the average age of a slashdotter? Undoubtably there must be a few in the target demographic, now how many have kids in the group?

      Well, I'm 28 and I'd love the regular iPod in that blue. The size doesn't matter - at under a pound, on my 190 lb frame, I wouldn't even notice.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    12. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Kenja · · Score: 0, Insightful

      For a consumer "I want something to listen to while I'm jogging" means that they dont get an iPod, unless they also want "moving parts that can break making it so that every time you trip you need to shell out another 250$ for another iPod". If its got a hard disk in it, its not good for jogging.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    13. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are many regular lemmings lurking about.

      Really? I kind of thought they all committed suicide =).

    14. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by ender- · · Score: 1, Informative

      While for me [still a geek of course], I was happy getting the 1.5G iRiver igp-100 for $159 at Best Buy. It's small enough to work out with, and holds plenty of music for me. Plus it's enough to hold 2 iso's worth of data if I need.

      Of course, the other advantages that got me to buy it were the ogg support, and the fact that it requires NO software at all. Just plug it into a windows or linux [and presumably mac] box, and drag and drop your music.

      And the battery lasts long enough that I can play it all day while I'm at work.

      It [mini-ipod] just wasn't worth the extra $100 to me for a player that won't play the oggs, and requires annoying software setup to work. The extra space would have been nice, but not terribly necessary.

      Just my take on things.

      Ender-

    15. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Kenja · · Score: 4, Informative
      "4GB is how many hours of ogg audio??"

      Zero. The iPod dosn't support ogg.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    16. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by pavon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, but it is the rest of the readers that moderate them up. The active posters are actually less like to get moderation points than casual readers - says so in the moderation rules. For example I have excellent karma, meta moderate daily, and it has been over two years since I have gotten moderation points.

      That is what surprises me most when I see completely wrong posts moderated up to +5. I can understand someone saying a stupid thing, and I can even understand some people being fooled by it, but when all the moderators are fooled all the time it makes me worry about humanity :)

    17. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by brucmack · · Score: 1

      From a geek "my pod's bigger than your pod", point of view, this might make some sense.

      And from a non-geek point of view, the smaller and lighter model is probably the one with the highest "wow, cool" factor.

      It's kind of like tablet PCs... One day one of my profs came in with one to use for presenting his slides. It was definitely the most a prof has ever been mobbed at the end of a lecture :) Just because it's got that coolness factor, it doesn't matter that it doesn't compete performance-wise with ultra light weight laptops.

      I'm sure this kind of image thing influences the success of the iPod as well. That is perhaps something that doesn't parallel to tablet PCs so well though :)

    18. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by pavon · · Score: 1

      4GB is how many hours of ogg audio??

      I know that one! Zero - the iPod Mini doesn't play ogg vorbis :)

    19. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the hell trips while jogging?

    20. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by register_ax · · Score: 1
      Quiet please, we like to be left out of the limelight.

      But seriously, I read slashdot for a couple years before finally getting an account at around ~630,000 because I finally had something I "had" to say. Then I didn't use it again for about 6 months (despite reading just about every day) and had to get a new one cause I forgot the password.

      I'd still lay quietly as AC, but it's kinda neat to look back over discussions I've had. That, and I've decided it's important to give back to the community (modding).

    21. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by aengblom · · Score: 3, Informative

      do you have one documented iPod death due to jogging?. Yeah, I haven't heard of one either.

      --


      So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    22. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by tacotruckcmdr · · Score: 1

      Now, if only apple could make their laptops iPod mini sized, maybe some of us geeks would get sun once in awhile and exercise.

      Sun? Whats that?!

    23. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by henrik · · Score: 0

      Yes, a good start would be to rip out the useless junk you normall won't need in a laptop. Like CD drive, DVD drive, 20 different ports (USB, video, SVHS, Firewire). Then of course offering 10 inch screens and also a smaller form factor by using smaller components.

      It is quite sad how few options you have concerning the above when it comes to Apple. Youi can basically choose if you want more memory and a WiFi card or not. There is no way to choose you do not want a optical drive.

    24. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hi!

      But hey, at least a pickup truck helps to compensate for your tiny penis.

      Cheers,
      GNU/Wolfgang

    25. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 1

      Why do you think the ID numbers are in the hundreds of thousands?

      The turnover rate here is astounding.

      ~UP

      --
      Eat the Path.
    26. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...and requires annoying software setup to work.

      Talk about role reversal...Used to be just the opposite. I remember just copying almost any program to my hard drive and just run it and then just delete it if I didn't like it. Luckily, some people writing (mostly free) software for windows (mozilla is a good example) do it the same way. All program related files going into that program's directory. Copy, run, delete if necessary, no registry mods, nothing. Sad to see Apple going the wrong way on this.

      --
      What?
    27. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by darkonc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      They've got CD players that do fine while jogging, so I'm sure you can do much the same thing with a submini HD. I wouldn't suggest putting a running card into a tennis ball, but I'm going to presume that they're designed to survive the kind of G forces that they'd get from being clipped to a jogger's chest.

      Note, that the physics is easier for a smaller disk than it is for a large one. It's like the difference between dropping an elephant 10 feet and dropping a cat the same distance.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    28. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by p4ul13 · · Score: 1

      Why Oh why can't there be +6 funny. Oh well. =)

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    29. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by BRonsk · · Score: 5, Funny

      You forgot: 4) Married and wife is annoyed That can't be good.

    30. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by buddydawgofdavis · · Score: 2, Insightful


      /.'ers don't fit the target demographics (Ow! That hurts!)

      Well, I'm pretty sure I'm not in the target demographics-- middle-aged, male, middle-class, blue collar.

      I really tried to like the iPod thing, just couldn't do it. You could say that I don't "get it." The design concept is just too radical for me. I'm of the mind set that portable music devices cost less than 30USD, comes in blister-paks, and requires 2 AA batteries not included. You know, the kind you pick up at WalMart off of a hook. I'm not color blind, I can appreciate the color schemes and slick packaging of the mini-iPods. Unfortunately, 20+ years of loud industrial environments have taken its toll on my hearing. The quality of sound from the iPod is probably much higher than the cheap WalMart unit, but I can no longer distinguish the difference.

      The last "cool" motto that I uttered was "disco sucks" back in the late '70's or early '80's. Yeah, this product definately didn't target me, and yeah, its success caught me by surprise. I guess I'll have to admit that I'm not cool and haven't been cool for over two decades. It sucks growing old :(

    31. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You won't hear about failures unless you actually look.

      Try this: iPod Reliability Reports.

    32. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Sun? Whats that?!

      It's a tech company. You've never heard of them?

    33. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Nexum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You'll be happy to hear that things are really still a they always have been... deleting the folder is still how you delete an app in OS X, and it's a great way of working.

      The parent is talking about setting up a hardware device... but even then, there's so little that you need to do when using the iPod in a standard way I don't know what he's on about.

      Rest assured

      --

      This sig has been deprecated.
    34. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you underestimated that number.

    35. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      oh man mod this guy up!

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    36. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      if you really don't want those features then don't buy from apple. apple does not strip its laptops down just for size. apple seems proud that they only sell full featured notebooks.

      apple laptops are used for interacting with stuff. DV camera, movies, ipod, screen projector, etc. if all you do with your laptop is surf the web and email then sure, you don't need those other things. apple laptops are made for doing more than just web and email.

    37. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by vena · · Score: 1

      commander taco is quick with the umbrellas, man.

    38. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by efuseekay · · Score: 1

      That's a strawman argument (I know you are semi-jesting but...)

      # /.'ers don't fit the target demographics (Ow! That hurts!)

      I don't see what's so wrong about this. Why does it hurt?

      # /.'ers are apparently sedentary, they sit at their screens so much that weight isn't a consideration, for that matter, they can listen to stuff while sitting at the screen, so why bother?

      I play soccer, which as a contact sport, does not go well with wearable consumer electronics. Unlike, say, less violent and wimpy sports like "jogging".

      # /.'ers are more interested in pushing consumer technology to its more than whether there's a need. (It's all about the game!)

      Which is fine. I like to get a good deal.

      # /.'ers must be colorblind (I'm R/G) so the colors aren't interesting, let along exciting.

      I'm B/G. But I like blue, it's just not as important as some people who finds them "exciting" which, IMHO, boggles my mind. I mean, why would colors excite so much?

      # /.'ers were wrong, and can't stand being wrong and are currently working on a strategy to change that rather than get a date for a Friday night. (Hey! This is important!)

      What does disagreeing with Apple's pricing has anything to do with "can't stand being wrong"? Besides, I'm already happily getting some :P.

      --
      Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
    39. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by pyite · · Score: 1

      Well, you're in luck. Colorware sells painted Apple (and some non-Apple) hardware and will also paint your existing iPod or Powerbook or iBook.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    40. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "From a consumer "I want something to listen to while I'm jogging" point of view, 4GB is how many hours of ogg audio??" More like MP3. 4 out of 5 consumers want to know: What in the name of Gaia is ogg??

    41. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by ultranon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I actually have one of these ridiculously overpriced pieces of pop-garbage. Here are my thoughts about it.

      I consider myself a power user of gear. I'm an older geek with some disposable income, but I hate wasting money. I usually take weeks to shop for and decide on a new toy. I have an older flash player and before buying the mini, I purchased and returned many other players currently on the market. I found that they were all either poorly constructed, or suffered from poor interfaces.

      For example, the battery cover on the Rio Chiba falls off at the slightest touch. You have to snap the player into the belt clip if you want to keep your battery cover.

      The Nitrus seems nice until you start using it. The volume buttons are mushy and don't always work. The only button on this player that works and feels nice is the "Riostick." But even that doesn't hold a candle to the clickwheel on the mini.

      I have also used some of the RCA players, but Music Match is a horrible, crashy piece of software and getting files onto the player is unnecessarily difficult. My old flash player uses Music Match, and I found that as a result, the player tended to collect dust. I only went through the hassle when I really needed to. Usually only for long flights.

      I did like the Rio Cali, even though the battery cover on this is a bit wonky too. But the player is $179. After adding an $80 256 meg SD card, I would be at $259. Why not buy better design and 4 gig for the same price? The marketing guys at Apple knew what they were doing. Though, if I were in the market for a solid state player, I would probably pick up the Cali or one of the iRiver players.

      So, after trying many players, I decided to look at the iPod. When I first picked one up, I instantly knew that I had just moved into a new world. These things (minis and full-size iPods alike) are industrial design masterpieces. They feel good in your hand, they are solidly built, the backlight and display are beautiful, the wheel control is BRILLIANT, the GUI is transparent and iTunes is a simple pleasure to use. With the aluminum case, I feel like I could stand on this thing and not hurt it. The On-The-Go playlist deserves mention too.

      The whole iPod experience is unobtrusive and pleasant. The mini fits seamlessly into your life. I have several gadgets that I carry with me. I wish they were integrated into one well-designed device. Until that happens, I need my pocket gear to be SMALL so that I can actually take it with me and use it. I can't even feel the mini in my front pocket.

      I thought about getting a full-sized iPod, but I'm glad I didn't. The trade-off for size is worth it. I think the "for only $50 more" argument is silly. How many damn songs can you listen to on one charge? The mini holds 3 days worth of music! Your battery will drain after about 9 hours. With your firewire or USB 2 cable, you can quickly swap out music while you charge. iTunes is so easy to use, that the swappage is no hassle at all. And I have not found an easier way to rip CDs and organize files than iTunes.

      For the record, I don't fit the "Mac Trendoid" stereotype (although I don't know many Mac users who do.) I have a beer gut, poor social skills, and I'm balding. I pretty damn practical and far from stylish. My wardrobe consists of jeans, t-shirts and sneakers and I only replace them once a year, if my wife is lucky. I'm probably one of the Curmudgeons mentioned above. But I do enjoy the finer things in life, and well designed electronics is one of the finer things.

      This is also the first Apple pro

    42. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by darc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One of the reasons they do not allow you to remove the optical drive is to standardize installation and support procedures, as well as software distribution. Although you might not need an optical drive, the majority of people do. It is rather difficult to install the operating system with one computer that lacks an optical drive, and even more difficult to tell the user that when they are on the tech support line, having not bought a cdrom drive.

      The fact of the matter is that most people DO indeed need a cdrom drive to install applications and lack the technical expertise to stream a cdrom over the network. Further, crazy options make it much more complicated to support. "Does your system have the following ports ...." Never mind how difficult it is to get them to identify their computer if they need to read off a 20 feature list with it.

      At some point, you have to be practical, and i'd say this is the line.

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
    43. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Octagon+Most · · Score: 4, Funny

      From a consumer "I want something to listen to while I'm jogging" point of view, 4GB is how many hours of ogg audio??

      There's a target demographic for you. Someone who listens to ogg formatted audio and jogs. Gotta be at least three or four people in that group.

    44. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by nessus42 · · Score: 0

      Yes, sometimes Slashdotters amaze me. Back when the mini iPod was first announced, I modded down a Score 5 post as flamebait which said that someone at Apple was going to lose their job over this product. My moderation was then meta-moderated as unfair.

      The fact that the original poster could be so out of touch with reality, and that then so many moderators could be so out of touch was reality, and then that the meta-moderator could so out of touch with reality just stunned me. This clearly was going to be a HUGE product because it is small, light, and cute, while preserving the wonder iPod interface. And most people (unlike me) don't need to carry around more than 100 CD's in their pocket at any given time. Personally, I want a 500 gig iPod, but I'll settle for my 20 gig one for the time being.

      In any case, I have the last laugh: original poster who was so cocky and sure of himself, and meta-moderator, don't you feel silly now!

      |>oug

    45. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. Is there a joke?

    46. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Belgand · · Score: 0

      The iPod is pretty small itself. I have a 2nd gen model and I can barely feel it most of the time. Enough that on more than one occasion I've had to check my pocket to be certain it was still in there.

      The colors are, by and large, garish. The original iPod didn't need to come in colors because it was simple and well designed. The same reason almost all stereo equipment is a simple, dignified black rather than brink pink.

      Now, as for being in the target demographic I can't say exactly. I'm 22 and I doubt that many people in my age group or younger could afford one of these. Especially not quickly enough to have them sell out so quickly. Likewise I understand the basic principle of "getting a lot more for the money".

      Yes, people are going to buy the mini iPod, but people have also bought much worse things, especially youth. Over time though I doubt that the iPod mini will account for nearly the market penetration or consumer lust that the standard iPod inspires.

    47. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Nice MAD Magizine reference...

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    48. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by rufo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's from almost two years ago, and none of the few failures mention the word "run" or "jog". Sorry, please play again. :P

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    49. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Because in the old days, people made 10 or 20 accounts each; and don't forget about the bots that automatically registered x number of users to get some meaningful uid#, or just to do it for the sake of doing it.

      There certianly haven't been 726,856 people that have registered.

      I'd say that 90% of the posting activity is done by 15% of the accounts at any given time

    50. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kind of thought they all committed suicide =).

      I know I did.

    51. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      Some counterpoints, just to throw some perspective into the mix:

      Anything remotely active (running, climbing, cycling) is not good with hard drive players.

      The iPods don't play any formats I'm fond of like FLACs. Yes, they are overkill for portables but when over 75 gigs of your music is in the format (in my listening room, lossy formats are easy to spot), it's an annoying bear to keep a mirrored version of the files in lossy formats just so you have the option of transferring to your portable.

      iTunes is terrible at managing very large, centrally located music repositories. I have a very well broken down music collection, carefully coded with tags, and stuffed into proper directories. iTunes is slow accessing the files over the network and navigating artist - album - track can be cumbersome. I tried it for awhile on my powerbooks, and just gave up.

    52. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Phroggy · · Score: 5, Funny

      1) Canadian
      2) Beetle owner, and now
      3) No free iPod.


      4) ???
      5) Profit! ...oh wait.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    53. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Ashen · · Score: 3, Funny

      you haven't been trolling around here quite as long as i have, though. =)

      close.

    54. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by ultranon · · Score: 1

      Good counterpoints, although I think the mini would work very well while cycling, especially on the road. I have even heard from a couple of mountain bikers who use their 3G iPods without trouble.

      I first wanted to stick to flash players for durability reasons, but I couldn't find many actual, first-hand complaints about skipping or drive failure. I began to wonder if it was just a reasonable myth. But I mainly just walk and take my road bike out occasionaly, so I think I'll be OK. The biggest weakness with iPod hardware seems to be the non-removable battery.

      I suspect we use our music differently. If you have a quality listening room, a box with a big hard drive is probably more appropriate than a portable player. Unfortunately, I'm usually only in my home long enough to sleep.

      What do you play your music on? I don't think there are many portable players that play FLACS. What do you use to manage that 75 gig music collection?

    55. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Ashen · · Score: 1

      Shit I shelled out $400 for my iPod and I run with it all the time, without problems. It has enough RAM in it to read about 25 minutes ahead, which is about how long I spend on the treadmill, so it isn't always accessing the hard drive.

    56. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by a8o · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Absolutely, 4gb is not excessive, but definately enough to serve the most important purposes of the iPod - disc space and portability. Now, if it were a mobile phone too it would sell even _MORE_.

    57. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The meta-moderator got you because a differing opinion from your own is NOT flamebait. If you didn't think his opinion was that good or worth reading (non-informative) then you should have rated it as OVER-RATED.

    58. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by mdwh2 · · Score: 0, Troll

      /.'ers were wrong, and can't stand being wrong

      No, they weren't wrong. Someone saying a product is poor value for money in their opinion isn't contradicted by other people buying it. Unless you're the school of thought that says something is true because a lot of people think it.

    59. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well maybe when you get a little older you'll learn to stop taking people serious on slashdot and just enjoy trolling them for being the perverts, assholes, and illogical hypocrites that they sometimes are.

    60. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by e3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the bad news is that my ipod died while i was jogging. the relative good news is that it survived training for 3 marathons through the hot, humid summer and cold, cold midwestern winters. personally i was amazed that it lasted a year and half through 15+ miles runs and lots and lots of sweat [ it was tightly wrapped to by arm with an ace bandage and would accumulate lots of salt ].

      --
      http://snowdeal.org [mutated daily]
    61. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      For example I have excellent karma, meta moderate daily, and it has been over two years since I have gotten moderation points.

      Really? How peculiar. I have excellent karma as well, and I meta-moderate only sometimes, but I've had mod points multiple times this year already.

      No, I don't think my karma is "better" or anything; I think there must be something messed up in Slashdot somewhere (yeah, I know, that's a setup for some joke about obviousness...)

    62. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. One person keels over from a heart attack while jogging, and now they blame it on the iPod. Typical!

    63. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A post that claims that someone is going to be FIRED is in my opinion a flame -- not just overrated. If he had said, instead, with a bit more modesty, that he didn't think that anyone would want such a thing, then that would have been merely an overrated opinion.

      In any case, who cares? Does the poster get worse karma hits for "flamebait" than for "overrated"?

    64. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Nah, they're surrounded by blockers to either side. This level could go on forever so long as the user doesn't click the nuclear icon.

    65. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1, Funny


      They gave out the iPods so that Beetle owners can entertain themselves while waiting for the towtruck.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    66. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by sjs132 · · Score: 1

      There are many regular lemmings lurking about.

      Really? I kind of thought they all committed suicide =).


      Not true... Disney needed a good story in the 1958 White wilderness film... Lemmings don't commit suicide.. they'd rather eat each other.

      Here's the link from SNOPES:



      www.snopes.com/disney/films/lemmings.htm

      Just trying to set the record straight for those poor little lemmings...

      --
      --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
    67. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Patik · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That is what surprises me most when I see completely wrong posts moderated up to +5 .... when all the moderators are fooled all the time it makes me worry about humanity :)
      I think moderators are persuaded by previous moderations. When you see a post and you're not quite sure if it's a good one or not, but someone else has already modded it up, then you start to think that it is good and you're probably just missing something, so you mod it up as well.
    68. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Patik · · Score: 1
      4GB is how many hours of ogg audio??
      Not enough for my whole collection, which is why I went with a regular (30GB) iPod and am not personally interested in owning a Mini. The whole reason I got into MP3 players was to eliminate not having the song I want to listen to when I'm away from home.

      I could see you make a case for a small (512MB-1GB) player, but the 'medium-sized' Mini doesn't make much sense to me. Either you want a tiny, light player to use for a couple hours while jogging or you want a jukebox, but I don't see why people would want something in the middle unless they just really want an iPod but couldn't justify paying for 30GB that they wouldn't ever use.

    69. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I mean, why would colors excite so much?

      How about this: How about a ratio of who is buying these things. Male/Female? If you're around women much you know how they like to accessorize. Pink is probably the most purchased color.

      The impression I get is that most slashdotters, in mostly male-centric site, tend to think in their own terms, thus leaving out the choices of women.

      For me, black would be OK, but you'd never catch me listening to tunes while running (which I don't do anymore) or cycling (which I do religiously) because I believe having 100% of the senses focused on not getting run over is a good way to work out.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    70. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Kethinov · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I completely understand your point of view, and even meta modded your insightul as fair. But I disagree with you.

      The way I see it, the original ipods are MORE than small enough. If it fits in my pocket, it's small enough for me. And the way I see it 4gb is crap. Keep in mind, though, that my music collection spans 23 gigs, and I wouldn't settle for anything LESS than a 40gb ipod.

      That said, I understand that there are plenty of people who would never harbor such a massive music collection. And to that end, I can understand the mini's popularity.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    71. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      I'd wager he's talking about using an iPOD in windows.... from everything I've seen it's a hassle and a half.

      Personally I went the iRiver iHP route and couldn't be happier.

    72. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know what? The 12" Powerbook is just about perfect. It's teeny, light, and full-featured. It seems to me that if you want less features than that (and I can certainly understand why you might) you might be better served by a PDA like the Tungsten T3 or the Zaurus.

      Now being able to swap the optical drive for another battery would be awesome, but in such a compact package that would be an engineering challenge.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    73. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've spent HOURS AND HOURS trying to find the Registry on my MacOS X machine so that I could, er, do...something to it.

      Oh wait. I'm a CRACK FIEND.

      Want to install an OSX app? Most of the time, you copy a folder from the CD or disk image to wherever you want it. Want to delete it? Pitch the folder. It's hard for me to imagine how this is anything other than OPTIMAL BEHAVIOR.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    74. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Well, she got screwed out of the iPod, so that's sorta like negative profit...

    75. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by addaon · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's interesting to note, however, that the cat looks much more surprised by this experiment than the elephant. Who would have guessed?

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    76. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by packeteer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wouldn't settle for anything less tha 40gb? Wouldn't 15 or 20 be fine? Im sure you can select a few albums you can live without untill you can get to a computer again and change what songs are on there. I mean, do you need all couple hundred hours of your music on you when you go jogging? 4gb is plenty for most people that only want a few albums and are willing to wait untill they get home after a trip in teh car to change what they have.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    77. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Kethinov · · Score: 0

      I just don't work that way. All or nothing for me. If I bought an ipod I'd buy one that I could use to contain my entire music collection with enough space to accomodate the growth of my music collection for at least two years.

      Currently I only own two portable devices capable of playing mp3s. My mp3 cd player which was ridiculously cheap and serves its purpose well, and my ibook which isnt really just an mp3 player. ;)

      For the moment the 40gb ipod is out of my price range and I have no great desire to buy an mp3 player. But surely the development of new and exponentially higher capacity ipods will eventually outpace my music collection's growth and I shall have my portable musical empire...

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    78. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by packeteer · · Score: 1

      Its all or nothing for people like you and in some ways people like me too. If i had a 23GB mp3 collection i would settle with 15 but 20 would be better. With 15 GB i could have anything i really want becuase some of my collection is music i dont really care to listen to unless im in a particular mood. Most people however listen to the same 50 cent or britany spears cd over and over and over again. Thats not how i do it but then again i have a lot less money that all of the people who listen to music like that combined. So who is the company going to aim for?

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    79. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      The 'missing' Ogg Vorbis support and low battery life on the iPods were the two main things that made me buy an iRiver player instead.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    80. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by IainMH · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's a target demographic for you. Someone who listens to ogg formatted audio and jogs. Gotta be at least three or four people in that group.

      Jogggers?

    81. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by ozric99 · · Score: 1
      I instantly knew that I had just moved into a new world...
      The whole iPod experience...
      The mini fits seamlessly into your life...

      For the record, I don't fit the "Mac Trendoid" stereotype..

      Are you sure of that? ;)

    82. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by sam0ht · · Score: 1


      Some users will set personal modifiers on different categories, ie flamebait = -3.

      The point of the mod system is not to filter out views you don't agree with, it's to filter out junk that's of no use to anyone. If someone thought the iPod Mini was going to bomb, that's worth knowing, even if it turns out to be wrong.

      Moderation is to get rid of the 'noise' (GNAA, repetition, etc) and leave the 'signal'. It is not a tool to shape the signal into one you agree with.

    83. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      The ogg support only matters if you intend to copy files back from the ipod to the pc. I don't do that, I encoded to AAC. Yes, my files are stuck on the ipod, but I don't care, and they sound identical to the CD at decent bitrates (encoded at 192k, 256k for classical music).

      Honestly, I don't see the point behind ogg support. If you were to be all "principled", yes then I understand. But if you make a fuss about something unimportant like that, either you're ignoring the more important of life's problems, or you spend every waking moment protesting something.

      The battery thing ... that I understand, I wish they never cut battery life from 10 to 8 hours. Still, 8 hours is a long time between wall plugs.

    84. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by AigariusDebian · · Score: 1

      That's kind of strange, I have been to ./ for less then 6 month and I get moderation points almost weekly for last 3 month.

    85. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by ultranon · · Score: 1

      Look man, my Apple tattoo isn't even that big!

    86. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by myc · · Score: 1

      since when could you get an iGP-100 for under 200 bucks? The cheapest I could find was $210 on pricewatch.

      --
      NO CARRIER
    87. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I have one question -

      In the past, I've read complaints that iPods don't remember the second it was turned off at when the device is turned off and doesn't restart at that point. Is this true? I think would be nice for songs, but it is critical for audio books and other tapes.

    88. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by chialea · · Score: 1

      are you saying that when people /do/ understand you, they want to kill you?

    89. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Oh, I really am interested in getting an iPod some day, I'm not sure which version or when. From checking a few of my encoded directories, Mini does store 50+ CDs worth of songs.

    90. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by ultranon · · Score: 1

      Yes, it remembers and restarts where you left off. If you listen to a lot of audio books, you might look at one of the Rio players (just don't buy a Chiba, it's crap) because they have a bookmarking system.

    91. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by William+R.+Dickson · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between "it doesn't suit my needs" and not being able to see a case being made for the Mini's size and price point. As they're flying off the shelves faster than Apple can supply them, it's pretty clear that Apple's made a resounding case for the Mini, whether you can see it or not. And that's kind of the point of the article, isn't it: it ain't Apple who's out of touch with the demands of consumers (at least, not this time).

      I saw one in the store myself a couple weeks ago. Holding the Mini in my hand while my 40GB iPod knocked around in my pocket made me feel kind of jealous. Frankly, the form factor is absolutely perfect; small enough and light enough to go in my pocket much more comfortably than the full-size model, while big enough for easy operation. And shaped very nicely to fit the hand. In 2-3 years, when the Mini's available in considerably larger capacities, I expect I'll be looking to replace my 40GB model with one.

    92. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by moonbender · · Score: 1

      My music collection is of the same size, but I just don't share your all or nothing perspective - I don't mind returning to the PC to change what's on the iPod once in a while. 4 GB, or even 2 GB, would give me enough space to enjoy a fairly huge diversity of music on the go. As long as the process is painless enough, I've got no problem re-arranging the music on the iPod once in a while, writing my current favorite album on it and so on - especially considering that the device like the iPod mini aren't that well suited to managing music collections beyond a certain limit.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    93. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by stripes · · Score: 1
      Slashdotters==Curmudgeons

      Well, duh! The consensus on the original iPod was "5G for $300! It'll never sell!". I bought one anyway, and it's been great. If I were to get another iPod I would give the mini a hard look, but I probably wouldn't pick it up because while I walk and hike a lot I don't do much running.

      So I'm unsurprised that after predicting that the original iPod would fail (and having it turn out to be a run away success) that the iPod mini's prediction of "suck" would also be off the mark.

    94. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...For example I have excellent karma, meta moderate daily, and it has been over two years since I have gotten moderation points.

      I can understand someone saying a stupid thing, and I can even understand some people being fooled by it, but when all the moderators are fooled all the time it makes me worry about humanity :)


      Wow, one look at your life should be enough to make you worry about humanity!
    95. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Beer_Smurf · · Score: 1

      It's called a PowerBook Duo. They made it years ago, didn't you buy one?

    96. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by phpsocialclub · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My mp3 collection is 230GB, what I am I to do,

      really, if you can not decide on 4gb of music to go on run or to the gym, you probably should spend the extra money and buy the big one

      Remember the people buying these are the same people that might have just retired the disc man or shockingly, a walkman.

      once again, Steve Jobs has hit the nail on the head, even with the pundits and ./s disagreeing the whole time.

      Isn't apple going out of business any ways,

    97. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by pavon · · Score: 1

      Wow, one look at your life should be enough to make you worry about humanity!

      Hehe, no it just makes me worry about me :)

    98. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. A single guy driving around his full-size dooley pickup always gives me that impression too.

      "Gee, I WONDER what he's compensating for?"

    99. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Patik · · Score: 1
      There's a big difference between "it doesn't suit my needs" and not being able to see a case being made for the Mini's size and price point.
      I understand that, I just can't think of why you would want a 4GB player. And I, too, am eagerly awaiting a 30-40GB iPod the size of the mini. Going from my original Nomad Jukebox to the iPod was like going from CRT to LCD, but now that I've gotten over the size difference I would like to shave off even more if possible.
    100. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you know, either directly or indirectly, of 7 people who don't really pay much attention to what the dealer says when buying a car.

      Car salesmen love these people. They may as well write "sucker" on their forehead before walking into the dealership, they'd walk out the door faster with just as lousy a deal.

    101. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by pastafazou · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your first counterpoint is FUD. The hard drive only needs to access data a few seconds every minute, and there are no reports of iPods failing due to jogging etc. I've seen teenagers using iPods and dancing more vigorously than a jogger ever does, and they said they've never had a problem. Your second point is crap too. Who cares if your iPod doesn't support high-end lossless formats? You're listening to your music on a portable device through tiny headphones. Do you really think you'll be able to tell a difference in that situation? As far as keeping a mirrored version for transferring, why don't you just get the 40GB and fill it up. You'll have enough music that you'll never need to transfer again, and can delete them from your main system. Finally, the assertion about iTunes is utter crap. I have 7000+ songs in my library, and I have no problems at all navigating, even over a network. I've had multiple systems playing from the same archive, and there were no problems. You must still be using Token Ring if you're having problems over a network!

    102. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite sad that you actually think a laptop would be useful without a CD drive or any kind of external port.

      BTW, what the hell is SVHS? Are you referring to S-Video? Man, you're acting the part of a cranky old fart to perfection, using terms that nobody's used in 10+ years...

      I bet you'd skip the LCD screen and a VGA port. Kids today have it too easy, always getting visual feedback on what their system is doing...

    103. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, he's just a Linux zealot who's pissy about there not being a Linux version of iTunes.

      Shhh! Nobody tell him he can copy songs to an iPod without using iTunes! Better yet, let's judge by how quickly he figures it out as to whether he's geek or management.

    104. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but only because the other 20 keeled over and died of a heart attack after the first block.

    105. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er. Jogging isn't a sport. It's exercise. One that's particularly punishing on the cartilage in your legs.

      For the record, your hand does not count as a date.

    106. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whassamatta, someone LIKES an Apple product so therefore they're automatically a Mac fanatic?

      Next thing you know you'll start calling someone a Mac fanatic because they don't like Linux.

    107. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the record, I don't fit the "Mac Trendoid" stereotype (although I don't know many Mac users who do.) I [realbeer.com] have a beer gut, poor social skills, and I'm balding. I pretty damn practical and far from stylish. My wardrobe consists of jeans, t-shirts and sneakers and I only replace them once a year, if my wife is lucky. I'm probably one of the Curmudgeons mentioned above. But I do enjoy the finer things in life, and well designed electronics is one of the finer things.

      Jesus, no one gives a shit about your life story... Just get to the point and say what you do or don't like about it.

    108. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Wah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      with 512 MB SD cards currently around $140, you can get much of the functionality on smart phones. Some even have passable external speakers. Mines an mp3 player 7th instead of 1st, but it fills the gadget slot nicely for me.

      --
      +&x
    109. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      But you don't have to keep your whole music collection on your player, that's what your computer (with iTunes) is there for. You just copy the stuff you want to listen to in the next couple of hours to the iPod mini - thanks to Firewire (or USB 2.0) this only takes a couple of minutes. Unless you are one of those who get the urge to listen to that song you haven't heard in ages right now

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    110. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      Or you can free up all that space on your disk and make the ipod your stereo. And whenever you get a new album, as soon as it's ripped into mp3s, goes on the ipod never to return to the hdd.

      The whole point of my argument is that I don't want to have to pick and choose between my music. Because maybe you can't understand this, but I really do listen to all of it. Currently I have my entire music collection loaded in Winamp5, XMMS, itunes (depending on which of my computers I'm using) set at random play. And when I have to start dividing it up into playlists, I start to miss what isn't there after a while.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    111. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by ender- · · Score: 1

      I got it at Best Buy. They are going to stop carrying it ,so it was on for $179 with a $20 rebate.

      They may already be completely out though.

      Ender-

    112. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by _Spirit · · Score: 1

      I just figured out why it's called a pickup truck....nevermind

      --

      beauty is only a light switch away

    113. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's spelled "dualie," for anyone who cares...

    114. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a troll?

      Since when did popularity affect an opinion on value and technical merit of a product? I guess all the people who criticise chart music are wrong too, since it must be genuinely good music if it can make the Top 10!

      Claiming that all Slashdotters are wrong, don't move from their seats, are colorblind, and are immature sounds more of a Troll to me..

    115. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I have about 60 of my CDs encoded in Ogg... I think that's reason enough for me to want Ogg support in a portable player ;)

      (I'm not really keen on ripping all those CDs again...)

      --
      Eat the rich.
    116. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by IvanXQZ · · Score: 1

      OGG vs AAC has nothing to do with principle or being able to copy from the iPod. It is not AAC that makes the iPod a one-way device; MP3's behave exactly the same way. There are about fifty shareware and freeware apps that will copy them off; they just live in an invisible folder. If Apple were to ever support OGG on the iPod, which they won't, I'm sure they would implement it the same way: can't copy the songs back from the iPod, at least out of the box.

      Perhaps you are confusing the protected AAC's sold on the iTunes music store; the movement of those is indeed restricted. But those you rip yourself behave no differently than MP3 or OGG.

    117. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      But hey, at least a pickup truck helps to compensate for your tiny penis.

      Bad news, Wolfgang, I can't help you move, and I'm too depressed about my tiny penis to loan you my pickup.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    118. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for other moderators, but I don't mod people up because I agree with them. I mod people up if they have in interesting viewpoint or state something well that nobody else has stated. I have modded people up when I've strongly disagreed with them, because I think their post is worth reading.

      --
      No sig? Sigh...
    119. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of the mod system is not to filter out views you don't agree with

      Of course not, but what about posts that are just obviously wrong and ill-conceived? Why should anyone care to read those? The idea that the mini iPod was so overpriced that people were going to get fired over it, was just obviously wrong. (The fact that a 4 gig micro drive sells for more than the cost of the mini iPod should be enough to immediately tell you this!) You might as well post that the moon is made of green cheese or that cars should have five tires (not including a spare).

      I shoud think that people would want to read ideas that are at least plausible and well-considered, if not necessarily correct.

    120. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Gorbag · · Score: 1
      If you bought a convertible beetle between around May and November of last year, you got a free iPod
      Wow, imagine a beowulf cluster of ... oh, nevermind.
      --
      -- I speak only for myself
    121. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by pknoll · · Score: 1
      This is a great example of why, when you have mod points, you should browse at -1 and turn off score displays.

      But then, that would make moderation work better, so...

    122. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by k4v1 · · Score: 1

      The only problem with the iPod Mini, is that the damn thing freezes all of the time. Smaller may not be better, and Apple has no answers for me.

    123. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What in the name of Jesus is Gaia?

  2. 4GB Compact Flash for $200? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The MuVo2, which also has 4 GB of capacity, uses a CompactFlash card (which can be used in a digital camera). People have been buying the MP3 player and taking it apart for the card, which would cost more than the $200 dollars for the MuVo2.

    More is right... a lot more! I was just pricing cards for my new digital camera (the $12 Ritz model got me hooked), and found out that the going price for 4GB is a whopping $1,130! Yikes!

    After dividing out, that came to 28c/meg -- about a penny more per meg than the Lexar-brand 256 MB cards ($70). So I figured a kilobuck must not be bad, if you need that kind of storage.

    But 4096 meg for $200 is less than 5c/meg!

    How on earth did MuVo get such a low price on their components?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      How on earth did MuVo get such a low price on their components?

      High accetable failure rate and software that works around it?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by ankit · · Score: 5, Informative

      The muvo uses a 4GB hard disk, which is far cheaper than 4GB CF. It retails for around $350-400. OEM prices are rumored to be *much* lower.

      --
      Don't Panic
    3. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by BFedRec · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's actually a 4meg Microdrive that's CF compatable... not actual CF.

      CharlesP

    4. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Simple, its a CF type II compatible card but it doesn't use flash. Its actually a 4GB hard drive. You have been able to get the 1GB model (IBM Microdrive) for years. The 4GB model (now made by Hitachi) is fairly new and costs ~$400 retail. Apple and Creative are getting deep discounts due to volume.

    5. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 4, Informative

      You might have priced a solid state CF card. Those are much much more desireable than the MUVO2's minidrive based CF card. Those minidrive CF cards still cost around $400, afaik.

      Hitachi is scalping people for the $400 because they're only competing with the $1130 solid state cards. It apparently didn't occur to them that they were underselling themselves via the MUVO2.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by tgd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, the MuVo is a 4G compact flash hard drive, not flash card.

    7. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 1, Informative

      wrong, a 2gb compact flash card is down to $155 shipped, so 4gb is worth $300 not $1100. I'm actually suprised that apple has decent prices for the first time since the original iMac.

    8. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      But 4096 meg for $200 is less than 5c/meg!

      How on earth did MuVo get such a low price on their components

      [Crazy Gideon voice]We stack 'em deep and sell 'em cheap![/Crazy Gideon voice]

    9. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by moonbender · · Score: 2, Informative

      (Nowadays) CompactFlash is an interface standard, it doesn't entail solid state memory or anything, even though the Google directory positioning might suggest otherwise. There are CompactFlash devices that don't "store" anything at all, like modems or NIC.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    10. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thank goodness. Flash cards always bugged me, with all their "5 x 9 = 45" and "6 + 13 = 19" and "400 / 2^32 = 9.31322574615478515625 x 10^-8"...

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    11. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by gnu-sucks · · Score: 2, Funny

      You might have priced a solid state CF card.

      Yeah, and, the Tube-Type ones are much larger

    12. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Plus they have to interface via paper tape.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    13. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Bullshit!

      Provide the link to a 2G CF card for $155....

    14. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, slashdot has a RAIC bulletin board up. Redundant Array of Independent (or Inexpensive (i.e., cheap)) Comments. If 80% are lost we'll retain 99% thread integrity!

    15. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Bullshit! Provide the link to a 2G CF card for $155...."

      Some products have insanely high profit margins if you don't know where to shop around. For example your local WorstBuy routinely charges twice as much for generic ram as what it would cost to get better ram from a reputable website.

      ~$160 for a 2.2gb CF drive
      http://www.memorylabs.net/comflasmem.html
      http://store.yahoo.com/digi4me/tr2coflcacac.html
      http://www.pcsupplysource.com/


      Although if you want it shipped from a very well-known and reputable website, it's $179 from Newegg.com, shipped fedex express saver.
      http://www.newegg.com/app/viewProductDesc.asp?desc ription=20-160-136&depa=0

    16. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Mc_Anthony · · Score: 0

      The MuVo uses the same storage device, (a mini disk drive in a Compact Flash Type II form factor) as the iPod mini. The drive alone sells for around $500 US and works in many a digital camera. In fact, I know a few people who have purchased the MuVo with the sole intent of cracking it open, ripping out the compact drive and chucking the rest. They then use the drive in their cameras! The MuVo currently sells for ~$200 US.

    17. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      (Score: -5, Wrong)

      Wow. Didn't even bother to read the /. blurb. Impressive. Most impressive.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    18. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by fredu · · Score: 1

      Has anyone been able to use the 4gb memorycard from a MuVo2 actually inside a e.g. Canon Powershot 400? Just wondering, because this article's second last picture shows that it's a little thicker than the normal one...(?) Any experience?

      --

      I came up with this tag first!
      /fredu
    19. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Because we know that the /. blurbs are always 100% accurate.

    20. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      umm those are microdrives NOT solidstate CF cards... Thou they are 2G CF cards, just not solid state like parent was probally refering to.

    21. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 1

      what the hell? Name a Compact flash based storage device that ISN'T solid state!

    22. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 2, Informative

      well given your link:
      http://www.memorylabs.net/comflasmem.html

      i take it you wre refering to this product:
      http://www.memorylabs.net/macoflha.html

      read down and look at the specs:

      SpecificationModel 1024C/1022C
      Configuration:
      Capacity 2,400 MB/2,200 MB
      Heads 2
      Disk 1
      Interface CF+ Type (ATA and PCMCIA
      Compatible)
      Sectors 512
      Areal density 30 Gbits/
      Media type Glass

      Performance:
      Rotational speed 4,200 RPM
      Media transfer rate 52.4-99.6 Mbits/sec
      Transfer rate 3.3-6.5 Mbytes/sec
      Seek time (avg) 10 msec

      Thats a solid state storage device huh?

    23. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 1

      is the mini ipod even solid state?

    24. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      no:
      http://www.techtv.com/freshgear/products/stor y/0,2 3008,3622601,00.html

      "the major difference between the iPod and the mini is hard-drive capacity. The mini's tiny Hitachi hard drive can hold 4GB of music"

  3. For the inevitable ridiculous battery questions... by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

    For the inevitable ridiculous battery questions:

    iPod Battery FAQ

  4. Fucking mainstream by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    You knew it the moment that it became popular. The iPod totally sold out. Those of us who supported it back in the old days when it was little more than a cassette player in a garage are left wincing at how they've totally gone mainstream.

    White case. Headphones. LED screen. Fucking sellouts.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Fucking mainstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was allergy medication and they were orangutans. It was like, a bummer.

      -- from the desk of Ellen Feiss

    2. Re:Fucking mainstream by Imperator · · Score: 1

      Yeah man. It used to be about the music.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
  5. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>How on earth did MuVo get such a low price on their components?

    They make it up in volume! =)

  6. Andy Mack deserves credit by g0qi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Andy Mack deserves credit for that compact flash card hack. I saw it published on his website many weeks ago.

    The quality of the photos on his website always amazes me.

    --
    Yea. I know.
    1. Re:Andy Mack deserves credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      so in thanks you /. him?

    2. Re:Andy Mack deserves credit by tvh2k · · Score: 5, Funny

      And as thanks we slashdot him, again :-D

    3. Re:Andy Mack deserves credit by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Of course they're high quality...he's got 4 gig of ram on that camera, he can afford to take all of his shots uncompressed!

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Andy Mack deserves credit by AaronStJ · · Score: 3, Funny

      He also deserves credit for the most annoying flash intro ever. It took forevfer to get to the navigation, even after spressing 'skip intro'

      --
      Stupid like a fox!
    5. Re:Andy Mack deserves credit by rzbx · · Score: 1

      The question is then, did he do it twice to two camera's? How can he take pictures of modifications to his camera with the camera he is supposedly taking pictures of?

      --
      Question everything.
  7. Sell out! by Orien · · Score: 5, Funny
    iPod Mini Sells Out

    Was I the only one that was thinking "The iPod sold out? What a poser! Down with conformity! Sold out luser!"

    1. Re:Sell out! by bwalling · · Score: 1

      Was I the only one that was thinking "The iPod sold out? What a poser! Down with conformity! Sold out luser!"


      Nope, this guy was too.

  8. This just goes to show you.... by adamgreenfield · · Score: 3, Funny

    SIZE DOES MATTER!

    --
    -Adam C. Greenfield
    1. Re:This just goes to show you.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...and it was the mini. Things are looking up for me! :)

  9. Supply and Demand? by mikeboone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And it isn't a component shortage that's causing the delays. It's the huge demand amongst teens...

    Huh? If there wasn't a component shortage, why aren't they able to fulfill the "huge demand?"

    1. Re:Supply and Demand? by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe they could sell the parts in a box and let consumers put them together? It takes time to assemble them, hence the shortage.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    2. Re:Supply and Demand? by The+Salamander · · Score: 1

      Production shortage?
      Distribution shortage?

      the possibilities are endless if you use your brain.

    3. Re:Supply and Demand? by BFedRec · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the point is that the components aren't hard to come by, they've just not slapped enough of them together to meet the demand. Assembly time is the bottle neck not component availablity.

      CharlesP

    4. Re:Supply and Demand? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They have the components to makes the minis - they just haven't made them. "Component shortage" does not refer to the product itself, but the parts that make it up...

    5. Re:Supply and Demand? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Maybe they could sell the parts in a box and let consumers put them together? It takes time to assemble them, hence the shortage. "

      And a small handful of Linux users rejoice!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Supply and Demand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, actually (and you have to read into this and have some knowledge fashion) it sounds like to limit may be in certian colors. Teens and others may be specific on the color they want. So, maybe the pink ones are selling well in one place and theu they may have the green and yellow ones sitting around but no one really wants those.

    7. Re:Supply and Demand? by mikeboone · · Score: 1

      The replies make some good points as to where the holdup occurs. I guess I would've rewritten the Slashdot blurb to say: "it's not a component shortage that's causing the delays, it's assembly and distribution schedules."

    8. Re:Supply and Demand? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      How long do you think it takes a ship full of iPods to get to the US from Taiwan?

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    9. Re:Supply and Demand? by THotze · · Score: 1

      Hey, it worked for them and the Apple I. Too bad the Apple II came pre-assembled. Maybe they could increase their mindshare by going back to their roots.

    10. Re:Supply and Demand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then the "Battery cannot be consumer-replaced" argument is moot. The consumer installed it, so obviosly, he/she/it can replace it

    11. Re:Supply and Demand? by Zelet · · Score: 1

      Honestly, if they took $25 off - I would SO buy a box of parts. That would be fun as hell putting it together.

      Like a really rewarding puzzle.

      --
      ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    12. Re:Supply and Demand? by Mc_Anthony · · Score: 0

      It's the old "Nintendo" way of doing business. Create demand by creating a shortage (don't build enough for the demand). Nintendo was infamous for doing this in the 80's.

      I see a price raise in the future!!!

      I love my iPod mini! But wont use it for music so much as I am an audio snob. (Grado phones and a high end amp, connected to a nice CD player) However!... I love to download books, the WSJ, and various NPR shows from audible.com to listen while working out, on long walks on the beach, chores...

    13. Re:Supply and Demand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont suppose apple is waiting for the US $ to get its balls back?

  10. Disassembling for fun and profit by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 5, Funny
    People have been buying the MP3 player and taking it apart for the card, which would cost more than the $200 dollars for the MuVo2.

    Wow. Seeing as how 4 GB flash cards seem to be going for a great deal more than that on eBay, I think I just found myself a new work-at-home job.

    --
    True story.
    1. Re:Disassembling for fun and profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just be careful about the negative feedback you'll get from calling them flash cards instead of minidrives with CF interfaces...

    2. Re:Disassembling for fun and profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, not only did I not RTFA, I didn't RTFComments on the article.

    3. Re:Disassembling for fun and profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the idea. Now you have at least one competitor.

  11. Answer should be obvious... by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Informative

    With whatever manufacturing capability they have, they can only be built so fast. Demand currently outstrips supply.

    1. Re:Answer should be obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I'm glad someone here took econ 101.

  12. Most MuVo sales are likely regular users by bwalling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The space has become so hot that Creative's MuVo2 has also been selling well, but also for a slightly different reason. The MuVo2, which also has 4 GB of capacity, uses a CompactFlash card (which can be used in a digital camera). People have been buying the MP3 player and taking it apart for the card, which would cost more than the $200 dollars for the MuVo2

    Some of their sales can be attributed to this, however I doubt that it is statistically significant. The majority of consumers are not doing this.

    1. Re:Most MuVo sales are likely regular users by lambent · · Score: 1


      Statistically significant != majority

      a majority is anything greater that 50%.

      statistically significant varies depending on your analysis; could be as little as 1% or less, or maybe clocks in at 10%.

      For example, if a million people bought the muvo2, and 1% were scratching it for the storage hack, that's 10,000 people right there. At 200$ a pop ... i'd call that significant.

    2. Re:Most MuVo sales are likely regular users by vena · · Score: 1

      Some of their sales can be attributed to this, however I doubt that it is statistically significant. The majority of consumers are not doing this.

      psh not anymore!

    3. Re:Most MuVo sales are likely regular users by CoderDevo · · Score: 1
      statistically significant varies depending on your analysis; could be as little as 1% or less, or maybe clocks in at 10%.

      For example, if a million people bought the muvo2, and 1% were scratching it for the storage hack, that's 10,000 people right there. At 200$ a pop ... i'd call that significant.

      I think if you follow accepted survey practices, then sample error is accounted for by saying your reported results are accurate within plus or minus 3 percent. That would mean a sample result of 1 percent is not statistically significant. The margin of error could put it at zero, or even less ;)

  13. No shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you can't even get them to replace the goddamn battery without them charging you an arm and a leg for it.

    I used to love the iPod, but nowadays they seem more interested in the money than their fans.

    1. Re:No shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps you should skip the battery and get your sense of humor replaced. It seems to be faulty.

    2. Re:No shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The grandparent's sense of humor is probably outside the warranty. Not that the iPod haters care about when the warranty *actually* ends, but just wanted to point that out.

  14. Not just MuVo2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    People have been buying the MP3 player and taking it apart for the card, which would cost more than the $200 dollars for the MuVo2.

    Apparently, the same is true for the iPod Mini. Accedemics are buying them just for the micro-drives.

  15. Kinda validate their price point by joshv · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know a lot of people complained about the price, but given the fact that they've now sold out, Apple would have been stupid to set a lower price.

    1. Re:Kinda validate their price point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, that's great. Based on this experience, I guess the next Powerbook should be priced at $9000.00.

    2. Re:Kinda validate their price point by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      In your post "people" being defined as "slashbots"... more specifically "slashbots who had never seen or held one." Seriously, once you hold one, and play with it, it's hard to say they're not worth $250 if not more.
      I still expect the price to drop to $199 within a year, though.

    3. Re:Kinda validate their price point by Mitleid · · Score: 1, Insightful

      All it really validates is that most consumers are fools and will fall for any hype the Apple marketing department throws at them. If people were intelligent enough to do a little research, they could find that buying a full-blown iPod for only 50 dollars more would be a much wiser decision, space wise, or another portable mp3 player entirely, rather than shelling out an insane amount of money for an Apple iPod that is shiny, pretty, and has "cool" commercials...

      I seriously never was a huge fan of Apple, but as the days go on and I see how their marketing machine works, I frankly see them as no worse than Microsoft... The reason they can afford to churn out higher quality products that keep the customers happy more often than MS is because they have so much control over Apple-based hardware. If the tables were turned, and they had the market share that MS does, I personally only see two possibilities: 1. They either keep selling their Apple-branded hardware for the absurd amount of prices because hey, the only hardware that works with Apple products is the stuff you can get from...APPLE!; or 2. They go the way of the "PC" hardware model, and you can buy any hardware you want from any vendor you want, but at the sake of losing stability/compatibility. I'm sure this topic has been talked to death here, but I never see anyone addressing this; so many people seem to go on worshipping whatever overhyped nonsense Apple throws at them. How does this make them any better than a "power hungry" monopoly like Microsoft? I seriously would like to hear, because maybe I'm just missing what Apple is all about and why people are so fanatically devoted...

      I'll stop the rant now, but basically all I'm saying is that Apple is as money-hungry Microsoft and I don't think they have any more scruples than MS does in getting paid. To think otherwise is foolish, and frankly for the community here on Slashdot that is often so anti-MS I see way many people kissing the ol' Apple, if you know what I mean...

      BTW, I'm not making generalizations about ALL slashdot readers; just those "types". Heh. I'm sure you all know who I'm talking about...

      --

      --
      Is it me, or did it just get fatter in here?
    4. Re:Kinda validate their price point by .pentai. · · Score: 1

      If they can sell 100,000 powerbooks for $9000, selling out country-wide for the most part, yes, they SHOULD sell them for $9000...

      Welcome to business...

    5. Re:Kinda validate their price point by prockcore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know a lot of people complained about the price, but given the fact that they've now sold out, Apple would have been stupid to set a lower price.

      I dunno, Apple may be forced to drop the price in a bit. What percentage of those buyers already own an iPod? Is Apple really increasing its marketshare or is it just selling a device to its most diehard fans?

      Selling out on launch isn't impressive, the dreamcast did that, continuing to make sales after you sold to your hardcore fanbase is what matters. In 2 months if the miPod is still selling at a brisk pace, then we can say that Apple was right about the price point.

    6. Re:Kinda validate their price point by .pentai. · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Umm, you're saying $250 is WAY too expensive when the only real competitor is the MuVo, which is *only* $50 cheaper. As for saying if they were smart they'd have gotten a 15gig...I have a 15gig iPod, and after playing with the minis, I'd trade down to a 4gig mini...I don't need 15gigs of music on me at any given time (in fact, I can't listen to more than 4 gigs in a day...). And if I don't need 15gigs of music, I KNOW my wife doesn't.

      Plus, iTunes smart playlists makes it a breeze to make sure I always have my favorite music, some variety I haven't heard in a while, and any songs I've listened to a lot lately (figuring if I've listened a lot lately I'm in the mood for it) and keeps those synced to my iPod so I don't have to worry... I just plug it in to my computer, and let iTunes handle the rest.

    7. Re:Kinda validate their price point by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Can't speak for anyone else... but I'm going to be buying one as soon as I can afford it. For me, the price is right.

    8. Re:Kinda validate their price point by cnkeller · · Score: 1
      Selling out on launch isn't impressive, the dreamcast did that, continuing to make sales after you sold to your hardcore fanbase is what matters.

      But it's not a new product. I'm not a big console person, but wasn't the dreamcast a new product, the follow-on to genesis? What's impressive is that it sold out in a market that's been iPod saturated for years. It's not like the mini-iPod has any new functionality. I'm baffled...

      --

      there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    9. Re:Kinda validate their price point by Phroggy · · Score: 5, Informative

      How does this make them any better than a "power hungry" monopoly like Microsoft? ....basically all I'm saying is that Apple is as money-hungry Microsoft and I don't think they have any more scruples than MS does in getting paid. To think otherwise is foolish...

      All publicly-traded corporations are legally required to be money-hungry, and Apple is certainly no exception. However, one of the things that makes them better than Microsoft is that Apple is not a monopoly and does not abuse its position the way Microsoft always has. How many times has Microsoft been found guilty of breaking the law? How does that compare to Apple?

      Besides that, Apple makes better quality products.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    10. Re:Kinda validate their price point by Mitleid · · Score: 1

      How can one say that Apple is not a monopoly? Does not abuse their position? If you want to buy an Apple product, you have the choice of purchasing a product from Apple, Apple or...well, Apple. Yeah, they're products are better designed, but that's because they can control nearly every factor that goes into their hardware. To say Apple is better than Microsoft because they aren't a monopoly just sounds delusional. If you want to split hairs and go the legal mumbo-jumbo route, then yeah, Apple isn't a monopoly.

      If you prefer Apple because it's a better product, fine. Apple might not have broken the law like Microsoft, but that's because a move like that, for a company without the shady connections that MS has, would totally break them. Maybe they know this, and instead they take the route of producing a reliable product, but the only way to do that in a computer industry is to make sure there is something like a hardware standard. Thus, Apple has the control over everything Apple, and technically has more control over Apple-related hardware/software than Microsoft ever will, but whether or not they leverage it in a shady manner like Microsoft has is a different story... Either way, it's a trade-off.

      My original point wasn't that being money-hungry is inherently evil, but more that Apple has/can/will play just as dirty as Microsoft has, "superior" products aside.

      --

      --
      Is it me, or did it just get fatter in here?
    11. Re:Kinda validate their price point by ball-lightning · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All it really validates is that most consumers are fools and will fall for any hype the Apple marketing department throws at them. If people were intelligent enough to do a little research, they could find that buying a full-blown iPod for only 50 dollars more would be a much wiser decision, space wise, or another portable mp3 player entirely, rather than shelling out an insane amount of money for an Apple iPod that is shiny, pretty, and has "cool" commercials...


      Right... because looking just a little to the right on apple.com to see the bigger iPod for $50 bucks more is beyond most "foolish" consumers... I think someone else's post hit the nail on the head here perfectly: That to us geeks "oh! you get more space for only 50 bucks!" it makes sense, but to the consumer, they see they can put like 2 solid days of music on it, and its smaller, and comes in colors! My father owns one (bought a mini the first day it came out), and he understands the concept of a gigabyte, and he also understood the concept of "50 dollars cheaper, and still holds more music than he needs it to, and is incredibly small" And the best part? It Syncs with iTunes, so songs purchased off of their go straight to the iPod, instead of having to burn to CD then re-ripping (As I have to do, I have one of these, its great for my car, but it doesn't hold as much)

    12. Re:Kinda validate their price point by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Selling out on launch isn't impressive?

      Okay, that's your opinion, fine. However, couple that with, "but given the fact that they've now sold out, Apple would have been stupid to set a lower price," and you're being somewhat silly.

      A) Set a price at $250. Sell out
      B) Set a price at $200. Sell out

      Which one *logically* is more intelligent.

      Apple chose A. *If* they need to lower the price, they have that choice. If they don't, they can keep the price high.

      What you imply is Apple should have set B; and if they did that, they would have lost at least $5,000,000 in preorders as it were, not counting the sales channel!

    13. Re:Kinda validate their price point by Moofie · · Score: 2, Funny

      But if you set the price at $200, you'd sell out EVEN FASTER and then everybody would get more time to make fun of Apple because...look at the silly corporation! They're so beleaguered, they can't even manufacture enough product to sell to people. They must be dying.

      Oh wait. I seem to have had a stupid attack.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    14. Re:Kinda validate their price point by Moofie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't be ridiculous. If you want to buy a Sony product, you have to buy a Sony product.

      But you can just as easily buy one from a dozen other manufacturers.

      Microsoft, on the other hand, has a monopoly on the entire personal computer industry. If you don't think they use that monopoly power to destroy competition, you're a poor student of history.

      Yes, Apple killed the clone manufacturers. However, the deal struck with the clone mfr's was absolutely murdering Apple. They were losing enormous sales to competitors (who didn't have to do their own R&D), and couldn't sustain their own in-house development.

      Apple decided to stop doing this, and they've been doing great since. However, seeing as how they have, what? Five percent of the PC market, calling them a monopoly and comparing them to Microsoft makes you look pretty silly.

      Of course Apple is money hungry. That's OK, in and of itself. They make some great products to get money, and I think thats just fine.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    15. Re:Kinda validate their price point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How can one say that Apple is not a monopoly? Does not abuse their position? If you want to buy an Apple product, you have the choice of purchasing a product from Apple, Apple or...well, Apple. Yeah, they're products are better designed, but that's because they can control nearly every factor that goes into their hardware. To say Apple is better than Microsoft because they aren't a monopoly just sounds delusional. If you want to split hairs and go the legal mumbo-jumbo route, then yeah, Apple isn't a monopoly.


      Please check you definition. Monopoly is not defined for a brand (Apple, Dell, HP etc.), it is defined for a comodity (PC, or the OS on a PC etc.).
    16. Re:Kinda validate their price point by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      The mini is quite a bit smaller than its older sibling. Rather than being like a small tape player, it is practically the size of a cell phone. Thus, a lot of people buying it are ones who wanted more portability than previous models afforded. I'm going to buy a MuVo2 as soon as they are in stock again; I expect the small HD mp3 players to dominate the market eventually.

  16. Remember kids... by baryon351 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...always listen to the most vocal people after macworld. Remember the iPod mini sucks, it won't sell, it's too expensive, nobody will like it, it'll flop. As read on Spymac! Macnn! macworld! Slashdot!.

    And look how right they were!. pfft.

    Congrats Apple. One more insanely succesful product :)

    1. Re:Remember kids... by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'll put it this way: I have a lot more faith in Apple than I do in the rumor sites. Apple does their homework before they release something; they haven't really had a flop since the G4 Cube (which was a cool idea regardless, it kind of predated the SFF PCs with the same concept.) I guess their strategy now is to stay one step ahead of everyone who tries to copy them. It seems to be working, at least for now.

    2. Re:Remember kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On the other hand, the Creative product got ZERO coverage at Slashdot or any other trendy tech site, and still sold as well as the super-hyped iPod. Congratulations Creative, on creating yet another insanely successful product, even without the endless coverage on Slashdot and drama-queen flair of the Apple marketing machine.

    3. Re:Remember kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you say, Newton?

    4. Re:Remember kids... by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess their strategy now is to stay one step ahead of everyone who tries to copy them. It seems to be working, at least for now.

      And it will continue to work. Apple has an R&D budget: most of the PC makers don't (or it is insignificant in size, or lacks any kind of vision). As long as this remains the case, Apple will always have something 'different'.

      (And spare me the MS to F/OSS comparisons. It costs much less to code up a new driver or window manager widget than it does to tool up production on an actual, physical object.)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    5. Re:Remember kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However if you look more closely than vanity you'll see that you're payeing a slight drop in price (what is it $fifty?) for less than one third the HD space. That's on an object which is up in the 300+400 mark.

      In my mind that's a flop and A BIG ONE. I'll laugh at anyone who own's one near me

    6. Re:Remember kids... by Long-EZ · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Apple does their homework before they release something

      Apple was hammered by their loyal customers quite a bit last year. Black Cider ripped them a new one for widespread problems with the logic boards in the iBook, and made even more bad press for them by exposing their attempt to convince everyone who complained that they were the only ones having problems. The "screw through the apple" Black Cider T-shirts at MacWorld received a lot of press attention.

      Meanwhile, the Neistat brothers distributed a hilarious video protesting the 18 month life of the nonreplaceable battery in the original iPod, forcing Apple into emergency spin control mode which resulted in a $99 battery replacement policy to avoid bad press during the launch of the iPod Mini.

      Overall, the past year has seen the devout Apple crowd stand up on their hind legs and protest for a change. I think that's a good thing, even though I also think Apple designs innovative and high quality products. If they were starting to slip a bit, vocal consumers put them back on track, and that's good for everyone. A lesser company would have remained in denial while trying to cling to their shrinking monopoly (and here I'm definitely thinking SCO, Microsoft, RIAA, etc.)

      --
      >> My ultraviolent Linux switch video.
    7. Re:Remember kids... by Tiro · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The goal of capitalists: Capture niche(s), force out the competition, expand your market.

      Apple's doing a great job of all three, and now the iPod is expanding their exposure for the rest of their products.

    8. Re:Remember kids... by MuckSavage · · Score: 1

      I'll agree about the flop at the time, but they sell for amazing amounts on ebay. My father has two that he has vowed not to get rid of. One runs his fileserver for his business. An amazing little machine.

    9. Re:Remember kids... by Graff · · Score: 3, Informative
      Meanwhile, the Neistat brothers distributed a hilarious video protesting the 18 month life of the nonreplaceable battery in the original iPod, forcing Apple into emergency spin control mode which resulted in a $99 battery replacement policy to avoid bad press during the launch of the iPod Mini.

      Nope, if you check the dates Apple had its battery replacement program and iPod warranty extension program in place BEFORE the Neistat video and website was opened. Apple had been planning the program for months before the Neistat brothers even called them. Not only that but for several months other companies had been offering battery replacement services for about $15 more than the battery.

      The Neistat brothers were told of these things, they knew about them but they still went ahead and badmouthed Apple for not having these programs. One of their original web hosts even gave them free bandwidth in exchange for them posting both the video and information about Apple's battery alternatives. The Neistat brothers ignored the web host and they only posted their negative video without seeking to really help others who needed similar services.

      Overall it is only a few people who have had battery problems in as short of a time as 18 months. Many people have had their iPods much longer and still have good battery life. Apple has been very up front in saying that the batteries have a life of about 500 complete discharge/recharge cycles, a standard for that type of battery.
    10. Re:Remember kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > they haven't really had a flop since the G4 Cube

      I consider the LCD iMacs to be at least semi-flopped.

    11. Re:Remember kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And look how right they were!."[ALERT! THIS POST CONTAINS VIRUS IN A pfft EXTENSION, POST HAS BEEN DELETED.]

      Damned virus alerts.

    12. Re:Remember kids... by tf23 · · Score: 1

      Now, I'm not defending the Neistat's in any way, but...

      The Neistat brothers were told of these things, they knew about them but they still went ahead and badmouthed Apple for not having these programs.


      *IF* the Neistat's knew about the upcoming programs from Apple, they would have been under NDA and *couldn't* have said anything about them w/o the Apple legal hourds coming down from on high unleashing hell upon them.

      Your claim that they knew ahead-of-time seems absurd.

    13. Re:Remember kids... by Graff · · Score: 1
      *IF* the Neistat's knew about the upcoming programs from Apple, they would have been under NDA and *couldn't* have said anything about them w/o the Apple legal hourds coming down from on high unleashing hell upon them.

      I may have not been exactly clear in the way I phrased what I said. The chronology was:
      • companies start selling batteries and the replacement service
      • Neistats have problems and call Apple, Apple says not under warranty, etc.
      • Neistats buy a battery from a company that also sells a replacement service
      • Neistats break their iPod trying to replace it themselves
      • Neistats make their video and vandalize Apple posters
      • Apple begins its own replacement program after what is likely months of planning
      • Neistats get their video hosted by a generous person who gives them free high-bandwidth hosting as long as they also post about Apple's and other companies replacement programs
      • Neistats ignore the hosting requirements and post nothing about safe alternatives to replacing the battery yourself

      So no NDAs would have been violated. The Neistats chose to not post information that would actually help people who were having battery problems. Instead they chose to flame Apple and sensationalize the whole affair. Yeah, Apple wasn't extremely helpful by saying that it would cost $250 to repair the iPod when they had a program coming out in a few weeks for $100 but then again at that time that was the cost of a repair and the tech who mentioned the $250 cost probably didn't yet know about the soon-to-be-released replacement program.

      The fact is that for a charge of about $15 over the cost of the battery the Neistats could have gotten the battery replaced at no risk. They chose to save $15 and an iPod worth a couple of hundred dollars. Is Apple to blame for this? No, these batteries are an industry standard and pretty much all have a 500 charge life-cycle, which Apple mentions in the literature. The non-user-replaceable aspect could be seen by anyone who just looked at the device for a few seconds. Caveat emptor, if you buy a product with a non-user-replaceable part then don't expect to be able to replace that part later.
    14. Re:Remember kids... by Graff · · Score: 1
      They chose to save $15 and an iPod worth a couple of hundred dollars.

      Somehow I lost part of this sentence, it should have read:
      They chose to save $15 and they instead ruined an iPod worth a couple of hundred dollars.
    15. Re:Remember kids... by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I loved the cubes too. Everyone did; but it was a poor marketing price point, as the cube cost more and was less powerful than a comparable PowerMac. They sell for lots of money now because they've achieved this cool cult status, kind of like the Newton (another excellent product that was about 5 years ahead of its time.) So it basically got relegated to people who didn't need a super powerful computer but were willing to shell out $2000 for a stylish one. The funny thing now is they could just rip the monitor off the iMac and essentially have the same thing.

  17. Mini iPod... by TheKidWho · · Score: 0, Funny

    Mini iPod... With a not so mini demand!

  18. 4GB muvo2 memory by vistic · · Score: 3, Informative

    It seems the 4GB storage isn't flash memory... it's a hard drive that can interface with a compactflash port.

    It seemed unreasonable to think they could possibly sell 4GB of flash memory at that price.

    Since it's just a hard drive with a CF interface, it will be much slower than actual flash memory.

    1. Re:4GB muvo2 memory by vistic · · Score: 1

      It's still a good deal though... apparently the 4GB drive sells for $500 regularly.

      Someone elsewhere here mentioned a price point of $1,130

    2. Re:4GB muvo2 memory by tokaok · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but fast enough it seems which is what matters in the end.

    3. Re:4GB muvo2 memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is flash memory fast? Lexar's 4GB Pro CF modules are rated at 6MB/sec. Hitachi's 4GB Microdrive is 4-7MB/sec. The seek time will no doubt be worse, but it's unreasonable to call the hard drive "much slower" than actual flash memory, especially given that there's plenty of flash memory out there that gets less than 1MB/sec.

    4. Re:4GB muvo2 memory by QuantumRiff · · Score: 4, Informative
      My girlfriend is a camera Freak, and spent alot of time researching CF/Microdrive cards for her new Nikon digital SLR. On slashdot, that makes me an expert, especially the GF part ;)

      The Microdrive is slower at pulling the data off the drive, but much quicker than CF at writing the data to the disk. (i believe on her 1GB IBM/Hitachi, its 2 seconds for a 15Meg pic, vs 5 sec for a CF card. While the flash cards are more resilient to shock and abuse, the flash cards have a limited number of writes before they start having errors. (its a very, very high number, but no-where near the level of the microdive)

      when doing quick photography (like nature or action pics) the limiting factor on most cameras is how fast the memory buffer can dump the huge pics to the disk..

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    5. Re:4GB muvo2 memory by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it is writable more times than flash memory, assuming the MTBF isn't too bad. The real question is, how does the power consumption compare, and how many Gs of shock can the hard disk handle when spinning?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:4GB muvo2 memory by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Since it's just a hard drive with a CF interface, it will be much slower than actual flash memory. "

      Does that mean that it would survive more read/writes, though? Pardon my naievety, I'm not up to speed on micro-drives.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:4GB muvo2 memory by Bushcat · · Score: 1

      Here you can see that the drive is rated for 300,000 head load/unload cycles. Here you can pick out the OEM design specs (it's 156 pages)and read that it's rated for 140 operating hours a month. So I'd use it in my MP3 player and camera, but I'm not sure I'd want one in a PC yet.

  19. Remember Slashdot's History by Pave+Low · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Slashdot doesn't have a very good track record with iPods.

    Remember this about the original iPod?
    No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

    And now their criticisms of the iPod Mini before it even came out are biting them in the ass.Bottom line, the editors and most of the readers are out of touch with reality sometimes.

    --
    SIG:Slashdot: indymedia for nerds.
    1. Re:Remember Slashdot's History by rev063 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Now that's funny. Thanks for posting it!

      Here's a great quote from a comment in that article:

      Agree with the article poster - Lame. Not only is this a lackluster MP3 unit (which by virtue of being firewire will be limited to Apple Mac owners), but it has virtually no UI wizardry that might define it as an Apple product.
      This about a product which has garnered more admiration from its interface than just about anything else.
    2. Re:Remember Slashdot's History by All+Names+Have+Been · · Score: 1

      ..Bottom line, the editors and most of the readers are out of touch with reality sometimes

      Read that "sometimes" as "nearly always."

    3. Re:Remember Slashdot's History by radish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, obviously we differ, but I base my opinion of a product on how well it matches my requirements, and how good value it is _to_me_. The fact that 100,000 idiots have been suckered into buying a vastly over priced and under featured unit only tells me their marketing department is very good.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    4. Re:Remember Slashdot's History by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      "vastly over priced and under featured" is quite subjective. I have just under 5 GB of music , so I can drop more than enough of my music onto a Mini. I held one in the store - and I fell in love. Oh, to be one of those 100,000 "idiots"... I wish I had $250. I'm saving.

      I've said it before: someone having a different opinion - or in this case, different needs - than you does not make them wrong or an idiot.

    5. Re:Remember Slashdot's History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I base my opinion of a product on how well it matches my requirements ..and if my requirements don't match yours, I am a sucker. Woohooo!

    6. Re:Remember Slashdot's History by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Just because something is Lame (the iPod isn't, but only because they increased the storage - the wireless was a pretty irrelevant feature) doesn't mean it won't sell like proverbial hotcakes.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Remember Slashdot's History by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because anybody who disagrees with you must be stupid, right? Couldn't agree with you more.

      Except that I disagree with you about the iPod. Wait, that means I think you're stupid. Wait, hang on, but I agree with you. It's almost like, gosh! Some people have different opinions and sets of priorities, but might not actually be stupid! What an epiphany! Holy crap, I have to sit down for a minute.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    8. Re:Remember Slashdot's History by protohiro1 · · Score: 2, Funny
      The comments in that article are hilarious, a lot of "apple is dying" stuff:
      There is no future in a $400 (about $250 too expensive) firewire-only (5% of computer users) hardrive-based (read: fragile) mp3 player. Any one of these critical flaws might doom the product - take them all together and you have another classic corporate farce....This just reinforces my steadily growing sense of foreboding about Apple. Yes, I've said this before and been wrong, but I'll say it again anyway. They're living on borrowed time. -DaveWood

      Raise your hand if you have $400 to spend on a cute Apple device ...

      There is Apple's market. Pretty slim, eh? I don't see many sales in the future of iPod.
      -LoudMusic

      I'm just glad I didn't post on that story...a lot of word eating going on.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    9. Re:Remember Slashdot's History by radish · · Score: 1

      But there are products out there which meet a lot of people's needs, and which are better in other ways, and which cost less. So when those people still go out and buy an iPod, to my eyes that does make them an idiot. Just like we on /. frequently call people idiot's for running unpatched WinME and Outlook Express with no firewall. It meets their needs for an OS, but we know there are better, cheaper products. So they're idiots (or at least uninformed). It's not fair, but that is a pretty common point of view.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    10. Re:Remember Slashdot's History by dhamsaic · · Score: 1
      Here's my favorite one:
      Raise your hand if you have iTunes ...

      Raise your hand if you have a FireWire port ...

      Raise your hand if you have both ...

      Raise your hand if you have $400 to spend on a cute Apple device ...

      There is Apple's market. Pretty slim, eh? I don't see many sales in the future of iPod.
      ... he says, about the best selling MP3 player, in terms of dollar amount and units sold, of all time.

      You know, I remember that day, and I remember being disappointed it wasn't the iWalk from the rumors... and now, of course, I'm on my third iPod (no battery issues, I just can't resist upgrading) and my girlfriend just got an iPod mini (which has me lusting over one for the gym - you can't understand how cool it is until you hold it in your hand). I got my dad and my sister iPods this Christmas season and I'm about to pick one up for a friend. Most of my friends have one too (they got iPod envy after I got my very first 5GB one). Some people just misjudged the importance of the iPod. :)
      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
  20. I AM WILLING TO PAY FOR TOP QUALITY! ARG! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Apart from starving students (lots of them on Slashdot, I was one only a few years) and idiots (most Windows users) I am HAPPY to pay MORE for QUALITY. I don't want some shitty little player for only $150. I want an awesome GUI that only lots of expensive R&D will bring, along with a high quality build. AND I WILL PAY MORE FOR IT GLADLY.

    Because this is the real world, even a company like Apple that delivers quality can fuck up (think iPod battery fiasco) but they are quick to fix the sitation. Much quicker than most any other company for sure.

    Anyway, people who complain about expensive apple products should shut their mouth for several reasons. 1) Because you are cheap, does not mean others are not willing to pay for quality. We are. 2) Lots of good G5 rack comps from Apple give more power for lest $ than even Dell (the defacto standard for good'n'cheat).

    To all the iPod owners out there, "Enjoy!"

    1. Re:I AM WILLING TO PAY FOR TOP QUALITY! ARG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bah, I have a off-brand that has 4gig storage + 802.11 wireless + a Rf transmitter built in as well as 2 headphone jacks and usb2.0

      $250.00 and it act's like a Windows Share on the wireless side.

      makes the ipod look pretty darn stupid to everyone I meet with an ipod.

    2. Re:I AM WILLING TO PAY FOR TOP QUALITY! ARG! by Master+Bait · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Why then do you settle for a low-quality, low-fi mp3 listening experience?

      --
      "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
      --Tom Schulman
    3. Re:I AM WILLING TO PAY FOR TOP QUALITY! ARG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what brand/model is yours?

    4. Re:I AM WILLING TO PAY FOR TOP QUALITY! ARG! by lotsofno · · Score: 1

      why was this modded as flamebait? independent testing has shown that other MP3 players like the karma and iRiver products sport audio quality much more impressive than the iPods... Plus, they support gapless playback, which iPod doesn't.

    5. Re:I AM WILLING TO PAY FOR TOP QUALITY! ARG! by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      Quality? When you can't play any lossless compression codec without down converting it to some kind of iPod compatible codec? Sorry, but 75 gigs of FLACs will take some time to mirror into whatever amount of mp3s that is, or AACs. Not to mention the terrible iTunes app for managing such a LARGE collection (and yes, I know all about that - I own 2 powerbooks and a G5, and having them all dip into the central linux repository for music can be a royal pain!).

      I like Apple. But this is not the most user friendly thing they've designed. It is very consumer driven which is fine, but unlike the rest of their products, is not easily adaptable to different situations beyond the normal consumer mindset.

    6. Re:I AM WILLING TO PAY FOR TOP QUALITY! ARG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is as independant a testing as it gets. And what do they say for sound quality?
      The Apple iPod is great, no doubt, and it sounds good, too; every bit as good as the best sounding portable CD players around these days and better."

      And how does it compare with the competition?
      We think the Creative Zen Xtra, and most of the devices below are almost as good sounding as the iPod; falling slightly short with a bit withdrawn midrange.

      Certainly the exact opposite of your "much more impressive than the iPods" or the AC's "low-quality, low-fi".

      Bye now.
  21. I wonder what bill gates thinks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Does this mean there's 100K kids who MS won't be able to sell their ipod clone to? If demand is that much greater than supply, does that mean by the time MS comes out with their lame version, they may already be 500K-1million ipod mini out there.

    1. Re:I wonder what bill gates thinks? by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Why is every hard disk MP3 player made after the iPod an iPod clone while the iPod is not a clone of the hard disk MP3 players around before it? I've been wondering.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:I wonder what bill gates thinks? by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Because of the whole iPod package: small size, great interface, and good styling. Previous to the iPod, the HD-based players were large and/or clunky. There just wasn't that came close to the iPod.

      New HD-based players have now seen the gold standard of the iPod and copying that.

    3. Re:I wonder what bill gates thinks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing he thinks every morning: "I'm the richest man in the world, and no matter who you, are, you're not - because I've got a big chunk of your money!"

      Then there's some paranoid rambling about the free market and the conspiracy to deprive him of his hard-earned (cough) wealth. At that point I usually poof out for a smoke break down in the lower circles. Then it's back to his shoulder for some more...inspiration.

      Hope that helps.

      Sincerely,

      Bill Gates's personal demon

  22. Demo Nitrus2 at CES, pics and article by rtilghman · · Score: 0


    Forgot to post a link to the CES coverage of the demo:

    http://gear.ign.com/articles/461/461850p1.html?f ro mint=1

    -rt

    1. Re:Demo Nitrus2 at CES, pics and article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Little mixed up at your "I will never understand how people can be talked into spending enormous sums on an inferior product". I see from your web link that "Rio is also pricing the new Nitrus very aggressively. It will retail for $249.00 and will ship this month." Isn't that the same price as the mini?

    2. Re:Demo Nitrus2 at CES, pics and article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      $249 will be the MSRP but the street price will be less. The Rio Karma's MSRP is $300 but you can find it for $240 or so.

    3. Re:Demo Nitrus2 at CES, pics and article by rtilghman · · Score: 1, Troll


      It may be the same price as the miniu, But it is a SUPERIOR product. Note that I said "I will never understand how people can be talked into spending enormous sums on an inferior product". I'm more than willing to pay more for a quality product that DELIVERS on the cost.

      Besides, unlike Apple's pricing scheme the MSRP on most consumer electronics (like Rios line) is never the same as the price retailers end up charging for them. Take the Rio Karma: it has an MSRP of about $350, and it retails at CC and other stores for as low as $240 before tax.

      -rt

    4. Re:Demo Nitrus2 at CES, pics and article by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      1) They have identical "audio quality."
      2) Those things look like crap.
      3) Those things don't have the iPod UI.
      4) They cost the same amount.
      5) WTF is wrong with you people?

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    5. Re:Demo Nitrus2 at CES, pics and article by rtilghman · · Score: 0

      1) They don't have identical audio quality. The SNR of the Nitrus is -4db higher than the mini iPod.

      2) Aesthetic appearance is a personal call. I think the white ipod looks like a toaster and the mini ipod looks like a cosmetics compact. I'm a man, I'd like a device that doesn't look like it belongs in a purse.

      3) The iPod UI is, IMPO, overrated. Not only does it lack the ability to create customized playlists on the fly or NAMED playlists, but it also lacks a bunch of other features found on the Rio system. I also find the stick more dependable than the touch sensitive pad of the iPod which is FAR too sensitive to movement.

      4) Argument already invalidated. The nitrus 1.5gb is $164 at computers4sure, I have no doubt the 4gb will be similarly priced given Rios pricing history with other products.

      5) Nothing. If I remember correctly your the dude who posted this flamebait. My initial post was just a comment on where all the Slashdot people are... from experience I know that a vast majority of Karma and Nitrus owners happen to be slashdot people. The attraction has a lot to do wih the support for open source codecs like Flac and Ogg.

      Thanks for playing, please come back and try your luck again someday.

      -rt

    6. Re:Demo Nitrus2 at CES, pics and article by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They don't have identical audio quality. The SNR of the Nitrus is -4db higher than the mini iPod.

      Weird. I believe you, but I'm sure you understand why I voiced my (apparently) uninformed opinion: Both devices have their audio components designed by portal player. My understanding was that they were practically identical in this regard.

      Aesthetic appearance is a personal call.

      Right, but it's still very important. It's wrong to denigrate iPod buyers for using it as a major part of their purchasing decision.

      The iPod UI is, IMPO, overrated. Not only does it lack the ability...

      You might not like its feature set, but... what about it's UI? (And your comment suggests you might not know about the iPod's on-the-go playlist feature.)

      Argument already invalidated. The nitrus 1.5gb is $164 at computers4sure

      Touche. But you have to buy it from some weird web company with a number in their name. You're still right.

      Nothing. If I remember correctly your the dude who posted this flamebait. My initial post was just a comment on where all the Slashdot people are...

      Um, what? Your post was self congratulatory horseshit.

      the mini iPod is just a rip-off of the Rio Nitrus, and slashdotters are all hanging out on the Rio Karma and Nitrus boards laughing at the herd of iPod "individuals" buying minis with sub-par audio quality. ...

      I will never understand how people can be talked into spending enormous sums on an inferior product through a snazzy marketing campaign. The species is doomed.


      Why not accept that iPod purchasers have different desires than you? They don't want a product that appeals to your manly aesthetics. They want a product that is guaranteed to be easy to use, easy to purchase, and has already made a million people very happy. Leave them alone. Iduno, maybe you were joking, but you sounded like an asshole.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    7. Re:Demo Nitrus2 at CES, pics and article by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1
      You like the mini you don't neeed to post in reply to a guy talking up a Nitrus.
      If that were all you were doing, I wouldn't have said a damn thing. If you like the Nitrus, why insist that the iPod is trash and its purchasers are morons?
      The mini-iPod IS a rip-off of the nitrus, PERIOD. There isn't any arguing that point.
      Dude, RIo and Apple both get their device platform from PortalPlayer. There isn't any arguing that point. I don't see how either can be a rip off of the other when they both paid for the concept and design of their internals.
      "They want a product that is guaranteed to be easy to use, easy to purchase"

      Underhandedly slamming other products by implying they DON'T do any of that.
      I didn't mean to be underhanded. I meant that explicitly: Most people don't know for sure that the Rio is perfectly easy to use. They don't know that shopping at "computers4sure" is going to be a safe bet. They have no guarantee. One million people have paved the way for them with Apple. Their grandma already has one. No, this doesn't make the iPod a better product, but it's not a horrible thought process for a non-technical user.
      Note that in this post AND in my first post I constantly use the word "I". Not like your posts which make broad claims about "They," as though you know exactly what everyone else thinks.
      It was in fact your broad claims about iPod purchasers that originally raised my ire:

      the herd of iPod "individuals" buying minis

      I will never understand how people can be talked into spending enormous sums on an inferior product through a snazzy marketing campaign. The species is doomed.

      We both refered to the herd of iPod "individuals" with very similar levels of specificity. I'm just trying to point out that we're not all jackasses and we have decent reasons for our preference. Just like you. Do you see why I took exception to your post?
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    8. Re:Demo Nitrus2 at CES, pics and article by w3weasel · · Score: 1
      They don't have identical audio quality. The SNR of the Nitrus is -4db higher than the mini iPod

      from ZDNet: "Apple won't release the signal-to-noise ratio, but the player sounds quite clean to our ears". Please quote your source... or else you sound like a fanboi.

      the term "superior" is purely subjective... please make note of this before shoving your opinions down people's throat. Just as the Nitrus might be "superior" due to lower price and more supported formats, the iPod might be "superior" due to its integration with the leading music download site, and its outstanding interface especially when compared to the Nitrus' control clit.

      it began shipping in the beginning of February A search of Pricewatch, Pricegrabber, and Amazon only finds the original Nitrus, and we are well into March... where are they selling them?
      if the nitrus 2 makes it to market and if they are able to better the price of the iPod, it will definitely be a device to consider. Now that you have heard a reasonable response to your flamebait, please take yourself back to the unbiased news source that is the forums-riovolution.com and tell someone who won't expose you for the fool you sound like.
      --

      Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

  23. MWBF? (W=Writes) Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #More is right... a lot more! I was just pricing cards for my new digital camera (the $12 Ritz model got me hooked), and found out that the going price for 4GB is a whopping $1,130! Yikes!#

    YEESH ==\

    I read that flash memory can only be written
    to X number of times before it begins to crap
    out (I can't remember the figure, but I believe
    it was far less than your typical hard disk)

  24. Re:In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple: It's an Apple product. What else do you need to know?

  25. Three things about the mini... by diamondsw · · Score: 5, Informative

    1) I was firmly in the "it costs too much for too little" (no pun intended) crowd. Then I saw one in person, and held it in my hand. The thing is light as a feather, and still feels more "solid", largely thanks to the all aluminum body. I have a 20GB 2nd-gen iPod, but as soon as the iPod mini has at least 12GB of capacity (size of my current music collection), I'm buying one. It's just incredible.

    2) Don't forget that even though the iPod is only $50 more, this sets the entry level iPod price even lower. Before to get any iPod you had to spend $300. Now it's $250, and will probably get lower with future generations of the mini line.

    3) Just to clarify, the iPod mini also uses a Compact Flash compatible drive - the Hitachi 4GB Microdrive. I'd bet all you have to do is format it as FAT32 and then stick it in your camera.

    --
    I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    1. Re:Three things about the mini... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I haven't got a link handy - this comes from comments/links in one of the prior iPod mini stories, but a Hitachi engineer had claimed that the I/O mode used by digital cameras/etc had been disabled in the microdrives used by the iPods. (There are something like two or more ways of communicating with them - dma/io/?)

    2. Re:Three things about the mini... by wadey+fh · · Score: 1
      but as soon as the iPod mini has at least 12GB of capacity (size of my current music collection), I'm buying one.
      And when the iPod mini gets to 12GB capacity, your music collection will have probably grown past it ;).
    3. Re:Three things about the mini... by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      3) Just to clarify, the iPod mini also uses a Compact Flash compatible drive - the Hitachi 4GB Microdrive. I'd bet all you have to do is format it as FAT32 and then stick it in your camera.

      From what I've read, it can be jimmied to work in laptops and such, but digital cameras have problems reading it.

    4. Re:Three things about the mini... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      And when the iPod mini gets to 12GB capacity, your music collection will have probably grown past it ;).

      My collection has been stuck at about 25 gigs for a while. I don't forsee it growing by leaps and bounds. There ain't much new stuff, and I don't have the drive (heh, no pun intended) to fill out my back catalogs.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    5. Re:Three things about the mini... by HoldenCaulfield · · Score: 4, Informative

      This thread over on DPReview talks about why the mini iPod drive doesn't work, as opposed to the muvo2 drive. Rumors are that newer Muvo's are using the same drive as the mini does now, so you can't stick them in a camera . . .

    6. Re:Three things about the mini... by Bushcat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a 4GB drive so needs to be formatted as FAT32. Not all digital cameras support FAT32, so they're limited to 2GB. You can test this by creating, say, a 1GB partition on the drive and retrying it a camera that didn't recognise it previously.

    7. Re:Three things about the mini... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DMA (direct memory access) and PIO (programmed I/O)

    8. Re:Three things about the mini... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > There are something like two or more ways of communicating with them - dma/io/?

      There are three ways to use Compactflash: IO, Memory, and IDE. This is all in the Compactflash standard. Normal CF memory cards do Memory and IDE, the iPod drive only does IDE, cameras mostly use Memory.

  26. Go Apple! by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm glad Apple remains a contender and a nagging thorn in the sleep of Billy Gates' mind. The fact that Apple is still around and won't go away has to bug him on some level.

    In fact, my next purchase will be an Apple laptop.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
    1. Re:Go Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -?

      Machiavelli.

      Lameness filter.

    2. Re:Go Apple! by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I'm glad Apple remains a contender and a nagging thorn in the sleep of Billy Gates' mind. The fact that Apple is still around and won't go away has to bug him on some level.

      To the best of my knowledge, Microsoft does not produce an MP3 player.

      Apple and Microsoft compete in application software, OS software, and certain input peripherals. Microsoft is overwhelmingly dominant in each of these markets.

    3. Re:Go Apple! by Puggs · · Score: 1

      lol exactly the way I feel

      And my last (big) purchase WAS an Apple laptop :)

    4. Re:Go Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget format wars, aka aac vs wma.

      It seems wma's monopoly plans will be postponed for a while. Thanks Apple.

      Also Real Networks move to AAC soon as default format...

      I can't speak objective since I have to live with POS Wmedia 9 on my OSX, for some sites.

      note: I speak about drm enabled formats, not mp3

    5. Re:Go Apple! by BinxBolling · · Score: 1

      If Apple bothers Gates so much, then why does MS continue to sell Office for the Mac? In fact, Microsoft even gives away some pretty useful software for the Mac. If that RDC client didn't exist, my decision to stick with the Mac at home after I started working in a Windows shop would have been much harder.

    6. Re:Go Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was evidence to prove that Overly Critical Guy is a lying cocksucker, but he deleted it. Think independently.

    7. Re:Go Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct about the MP3 player.

      However, Microsoft has well-publicized plans to release both an MP3 player and an online music store.

      In all likelihood they will not release an actual MP3 player though - instead it'll be a WMA player. As in it only plays WMA files. Microsoft is a big believer in the Not Invented Here syndrome, and WMA & WMV are their crown jewels in DRM (laughing stock as they are in tech circles, the media companies have bought MS's DRM lies lock, stock, and barrel).

      Both will occur, by all accounts, within the next year, and will be released to the public at the same time.

      However, seeing how MS has announced many, many products in the past that never got past the concept phase, it's entirely possible this was done for the same reasons - namely, to stifle competition by freezing buyers with the promise of a theoretically better-selling MS-branded and MS-marketed product.

    8. Re:Go Apple! by Atryn · · Score: 1
      To the best of my knowledge, Microsoft does not produce an MP3 player.
      My manager won a 40GB iPod in some sort of radio contest. Roughly 1 year later he bought a high-end Powerbook. Apple does know what they're doing.

      iPod -> iTunes -> Powerbook

      I think this is a great customer acquisition strategy.
      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
  27. What other... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...hardware do you know people kept buying just to take it apart to pick components hard to obtain or very expensive otherwise?

    I'm about to take a $20 printer apart, just to extract 2 optical encoders, $50 or so each.

  28. Directions on Taking Apart the Muvo2 by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 5, Informative
    I can't believe /. finally told about the awesome Muvo2 hack, but didn't give a link for directions to do it. Here are some taken from http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1 023&message=7308713.

    Before you do anything else, visit this link:

    http://www.nomadworld.com/downloads/firmware/wma-m uvo_2_4.asp

    And upgrade the firmware of the unit. This is VITAL. If you do not upgrade ahead of time, you will have serious issues later on. Upgrade the firmware FIRST. It has some auto-recovery features that will prove necessary in later steps. Remove the battery when you are done. Now ground yourself.

    2. At the top of the Muvo2 there are two small screws. With a very small philips screwdriver, remove these screws.

    3. Open the battery compartment. At the bottom, there are two very small screws. Remove these as well.

    4. Remove the back of the unit.

    5. Lift the circuit board carefully. It was held in place by the previous 4 screws.

    6. Underneath the top circuit board, there is a plate holding down the microdrive. At the top, there are two screws. Remove them. On the side, there is a very very small silver screw. It is smaller than the two black ones. Remove it.

    7. There is a piece of black tape in the lower corner. Underneath that tape is the last screw holding down the MD plate. Remove the tape carefully, and unscrew the screw.

    8. Lift the plate out. Now, CAREFULLY pry the pin-array from the microdrive. Very gently use a small flat screwdriver to work your way down the black plastic strip. DO NOT FORCE ANYTHING. It should come out easily.

    9. Take the 4gb MD and format it in your camera. You should have a 4gb MD now.

    10. Put the 1gb MD back into the array. Carefully press it down. Again, do not force anything, it should slide in very easily. 11. Replace the screws, place the tape over the black screw where you found it, and reassemble the Nomad. 12. Turn it on. It will report that there is a media error and go into recovery mode. 13. Select Reload firmware from the recovery menu. It will take a few seconds, reload the firmware, and then report a media error. 14. Select Connect to PC. Now, connect the USB connector to your PC. 15. Run the Firmware upgrade again, and allow it to upgrade the firmware. 16. Power it down. Then back up. 17. When it turns on, it will report a scansearch error, or a media error then throw you into recovery mode. Select Format. It should take a few seconds to format. 18. Power it off, power it back on, and you should have a working 1gb Muvo2, a working 4gb MD in your camera, and a big smile on your face.

    I know it is easy to find on the web, but after reading some of the questions (many of the mod +5) on /. I wonder if some people even know google exists. ;)

    1. Re:Directions on Taking Apart the Muvo2 by Bilestoad · · Score: 5, Informative

      You don't necessarily have to upgrade the firmware to be able to make the Muvo2 function again with CF media, only if your Muvo2 does not come up in auto-recover mode when the Microdrive is removed. Re-flashing takes place after the CF card replaces the Microdrive. Good luck finding the firmware, Creative seem to have removed it but Google is your friend.

      The battery compartment comes completely off - makes it much easier to take it apart and put it back together again.

      When I did this procedure, "Media Error" turned out to mean incompatible CF card. On the two working CF cards I tried there was no "Media Error".

      The author of the instructions on dpreview seems to have done this to a Muvo2 with an older revision of firmware than what you get if buying today.

  29. Apparently not.. by jefdiesel · · Score: 5, Informative

    The iPod mini drive is reportedly NOT working in digital cameras, something to do with formatting..

    Wired News has more on this whole thing about the MuVo2..

    Guess I'll have to use this damn iPod mini for listening to music, instead of.. um.. tolkien ring??

    --

    I hate spyware and spies
  30. original ipod article by makeyourself · · Score: 1

    the original article on /. bout the first gen ipod is funny... after alll these years

  31. But what about market share? by argent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think I was ever worried about it not selling. My thought was (and is) that it's not going to make that much difference long-term to market share.

    The thing that I saw Jobs hammer over and over agan was market share. He wanted the iPod to not just be the biggest seller, but to be the majority of the market. So... the question is, are these new iPod Mini sales new iPod sales, or are they existing iPod users trading "up"?

    According to Jobs, there's three market segments. I thnk he was a bit deceptive about the details of the segments with his "$50 more" line, but the basic outlines seem to be pretty solid. There's the low end flash based devices, there's the midrange flash and maybe small disk, and there's the high end. The iPod owns the high end.

    In terms of market size, the low end and the high end are the biggest. It seems to me that someone interested in market share would go for the wide open low end with a flash based $180 "iPod micro". Not dive in to the most competitive part of the market with a price that seems designed to cannibalise their own sales.

    1. Re:But what about market share? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      There's the low end flash based devices, there's the midrange flash and maybe small disk, and there's the high end.

      Don't forget to add CD based ones to the low end. Maybe not as portable, but store a lot more than low end flash even on a single disc, and it's a lot easier to change what's on there - just pop in a new CD.

    2. Re:But what about market share? by dadman · · Score: 1


      1. Market Size [Volume] is not the same as Maket Share [Ratio]. You gain control on the market by dominating the % - like you own 30% of the market while the next runners up owns less than 5%, then you are the King.

      2. It is not just the technicalbility of the product that would define the market segment. Rather it is how you position your product so that it's image / functions / price / outlook fit for a group of consumer and if this group could imply large profit margin because they are willing to spend if they *want* to, not if they can.

      3. Having a large market volume does not necessary mean you can turn it into profit, which is the ultimate goal. For example, a large market volume on low-spending consumers with high product service cost usually equate to loss in profit, not to mention the money spent on marketing and advertisement in order to penerate into this sector.

    3. Re:But what about market share? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You seem to be forgetting that MARKETSHARE MEANS FUCK-ALL to Apple.

      They don't need it. They are not dying because they don't have it. It is not important to their business model.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:But what about market share? by argent · · Score: 1

      I understand, Apple doesn't normally worry about market share, but this time Jobs was beating the market share drum loud enough to hear in Redmond. That *was* surprising, which is why it stuck in my mind and made the actual strategy seem so strange.

    5. Re:But what about market share? by argent · · Score: 1

      Same comment here: Jobs brought up "Market Share [ratio]" over and over again. Not volume. And he named specific market share figures, and said that's what he wanted to increase. That was highly unusual for Apple, to say the least.

      My assumption was that he wants to use the iPod's market share to promote AAC over WMV for DRM-protected audio, which *would* make the low end important... and the iTunes advertising blitz starting with the Superbowl has made that assumption even more credible, at least to me.

    6. Re:But what about market share? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Uh huh. And the fact that Apple has 70 percent of portable player revenue (by virtue of the fact that they FUCKING OWN the top end) makes your "worries" about Apple all come true.

      They're beleaguered. They must be dying.

      Steve has a drum to beat. He's got a world-beating product, and he's selling the hell out of it. Nobody can seem to understand that, you know what? Apple seems to be doing just fine.

      EVEN IF their marketshare is tiny. Or if their marketshare (of the high-capacity portable music player sector) is 30 plus percent. Since Apple HAPPENS to have a killer marketshare in this segment, should they NOT say anything?

      Marketshare is not important to the health and profitability of the company, which Apple understands just fine. However, it works real good in a sound bite to get stupid people to buy the stock.

      Damn, the silly sumbitch can't seem to make people happy. Make a good product, sell not too many of them (albeit profitably), and Apple's dying. Make a good product, sell more of them you can make (at an even better profit) and we're worrying about Apple's long-term marketshare (like that means anything) and they're STILL dying.

      Damn, I wish I was dying like that.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:But what about market share? by argent · · Score: 1

      You seem tense.

      Seriously. I mean, you really sound aggravated. What's the problem? Did you miss the keynote or something? Couldn't get to the TV during the Superbowl? Don't like Pepsi?

      I didn't bring up market share. I didn't say I wanted the iPod to have 70 or 80 or whatever percent it was of the market. I didn't start a marketing blitz with a superbowl ad and a massive giveaway to promote my music business (using my proprietary AAC format) at the same time I released new music players (that play the AAC format) and talked about how much my market share was going to increase...

      No, I sat there going "what's happened to Steve, this isn't his usual line".

      So...

      What do you think, maybe it's something to do with AAC versus WMA. That's why market share is suddenly important?

      Nah, couldn't be. Anyone who doesn't take Steve's words as Gospel and isn't uncritically accepting of Apple is just another Apple Basher. Can't possibly have anything important to say...

  32. Rip, Mix, Burn (now == Sync) by michaeldot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, if you have the White Album on CD, you can still use iTunes to rip it into MP3 and sync it with your iPod.

    That's legal and with a fast CPU/drive probably takes less time than typing in a credit card number.

    After all, iTunes started out with "Rip, Mix, Burn." The Store is just a new thing that builds on the old.

  33. it's known for much, much longer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People on DPReview have known about this for much longer. Just search for "muvo" on the forums at www.dpreview.com.

    1. Re:it's known for much, much longer by g0qi · · Score: 1

      I did : http://search.dpreview.com/forums/search.asp?query =muvo&page=20 .

      That is the earliest occurence of the discussion on the muvo. Guess who the first article posted on 1/7 quotes?

      Yea.

      --
      Yea. I know.
  34. F%ck! by Cpl+Laque · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was hoping the mini was going to bomb and maybe the price would come down but if I was Steve I wouldn't bring the preice down till they stopped selling. I used to think M$ was the marketting king but I think His Royal Majesty Steve Jobs has surpassed them.

    1. Re:F%ck! by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      Even if it were a bomb, the price wouldn't come down. That's not how Apple works. Even as the Newton was being cut loose, Apple never lowered the price or had any kind of clearance sale. Never.

      Steve Jobs is a king of marketing style. He's been able to fool a fair amount of Mac users into paying a premium for an average (but good-looking) product for years. Bill Gates is a godhead, though. He's been able to turn a sub-par product into the world standard more than once (MS-DOS, Outlook, Windows 9x)

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    2. Re:F%ck! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid that doesn't seem to work for Apple products. I keep hoping to pick up a cheap G4 Cube on eBay, but they're still expensive.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  35. Re:Apple by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's called "sales." I think it must be new, because nobody on slashdot seems to understand it. Maybe there's a FAQ somewhere.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  36. Aw man, Sell Out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was all about the music, man!

  37. IDE mode by michaeldot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The story goes that the iPod drive is configured to only work in IDE mode, whereas digital cameras need the memory mode.

  38. Many offer better price/performance than Dell by AZPhysics · · Score: 1
    : Lots of good G5 rack comps from Apple give more power for lest $ than even Dell (the defacto standard for good'n'cheat).

    --

    Dell is only "De-facto" among the pointy-haired bosses. You can get much better price/performance almost everywhere. If Dell starts offering AMD processors along with Intel, that may change. But, until that happens, don't waste your money on Mike Dell's big paycheck. I find it real interesting how Apple fans *always* compare themselves to Dell and Intel, never to AMD powered systems.

    1. Re:Many offer better price/performance than Dell by diamondsw · · Score: 1

      Probably because we don't have much against people who run Linux on AMD's. No Microsoft, no Intel, no Dell - what's the point? Anyway, you have to be somewhat informed just to be running an AMD - the same cannot be said for most of the Windows masses.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
  39. Re:The real problem is simple... by gmhowell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dude, yer sooooo coool. I wish I could rail against Apple/Jobs with all your self-righteousness.

    I will never understand how people can be talked into spending enormous sums on an inferior product through a snazzy marketing campaign.

    No kidding. For $170, I can get a 1.5 GB Nitrus. For only $80 more (less than 50% increase in price) I can get a product with about 240% more capacity (the iPod mini).

    "Oh, but what about the Muvo2?" According to Amazon, it's not yet available.

    So, for $50, I get a better looking unit (arguable, I agree) FireWire support, AAC support (you can tout WMA all you want, but when the vast, vast majority of online sales are AAC, I could care less about WMA) And I don't have to explain to the average person why I bought such a ghetto player.

    Sorry, but there is nothing standout between the iPod and the Rio offerings from a purely objective standpoint. Judging by the sellout of the first run, $50 doesn't mean anything to people in this marketplace, so the choice of one over the other is purely subjective. Trying to pretend otherwise just makes you look like a whiner.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  40. Saw it firsthand by Matey-O · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was at the local Apple Store Yesterday picking up an iTrip for the 10gb iPod I got on clearance from amazon. In my 10 minutes there, I saw three mini sales and the following conversation between two stereotypical female blonde mallrats:

    bmr1: "Man, I really WANT one of these things"
    bmr2: "So BUY it, what color would you get?"
    bmr1: "Blue-no-pink, I like the pink, but my credit card bill already sucks."
    bmr2: "Girlfriend, untill your visa's got three grand on it, I don't even wanna hear you bitch about your credit card bill."

    I'm thinking 'Bravo for managing your debt' and 'Good god, I thought bmr's only existed in movies'. Shows what happens when you got to a mall less than twice a year, I guess.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  41. Re:To Do What? by PetWolverine · · Score: 3, Informative

    Now if you could just legally obtain music for it, you'd be all set!

    If you don't like the iTunes Music Store, you can always buy CDs or borrow them from friends, rip them, and put them on your iPod.

    Hell, even iTunes can't offer The Beatles.

    The Beatles' record label is once again being stubborn about adopting a new method of distribution. They also took a long time to allow Beatles albums to be released on CD. They haven't made a deal with any music download service, and it's anyone's guess when they will choose to make the Beatles' music available electronically.

    As noted above, however, you can still buy the CDs.

    --
    I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  42. Re:In other news.... by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Interesting

    iPod is the best selling portable mp3 player. They own 2/3 of the market. Maybe you don't care how stylish your mp3 player, car, clothes, or girlfriend is, but many people do.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  43. Nostradamus would be proud by eclectic4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Raise your hand if you have iTunes ...

    Raise your hand if you have a FireWire port ...

    Raise your hand if you have both ...

    Raise your hand if you have $400 to spend on a cute Apple device ...

    There is Apple's market. Pretty slim, eh? I don't see many sales in the future of iPod.

    ~LoudMusic"


    This was modded up, 4 insightful.

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    1. Re:Nostradamus would be proud by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Raise your hand if you have a FireWire port ...

      Wasn't the original iPod FireWire (and Mac) only?

      If I'm correctly remembering, it seems that the quote you took was referring to that (I don't know when it was written - I dunno why slashdot doesn't seem to give years on the dates of articles).

      The iPods now are new models which have USB and are Windows-compatible, which would hardly be a fair comparison to the post you quoted out of context, so this is a bit misleading. If it had remained Mac-only, I don't think it would be too unreasonable to suggest its market would be somewhat limited.

    2. Re:Nostradamus would be proud by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the original iPod FireWire (and Mac) only?

      I think that's what the original poster was commenting about. Apple fixed all these problems with the iPod and now in it's 3rd iteration it's a runaway hit, supposedly.

      Now everyone can get iTunes, it doesn't use Firewire only, and it costs $250.

      I believe the original poster was commenting on the astuteness of the reviewer.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    3. Re:Nostradamus would be proud by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "problems"? They sold out of those first-gen iPods too, if I remember correctly.

      Boy, I wish I had problems like that.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Nostradamus would be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well I gota say yes to all of those. But more importantly and OT I have to say is that USB ports SUCK! Why didn't the fucken moron who designed them make it so that is could only go in oneway. OK I know it can only go in one way, but the only way to tell which way is trial and error or looking inside the cable plug and the port. The damn thing is sysmetrical... DUMB! The more I see USB taking over high speed interfaces that firewire was designed for fucking pisses me off with its total shit/hacked design.

      long live firewire

  44. Re:To Do What? by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How to legally obtain music for your iPod.

    Step One: Buy used CDs of the music you want on your iPod

    Step Two: Rip to MP3 or AAC.

    Step Four: Transfer files to iPod

    Step Five: Sell all those CDs you just bought to another used CD shop

    And as a plus, you've thumbed your nose at the RIAA by buying used CDs.

    Of course, if you're a really cheap sod, you just borrow CDs from your local library and rip them.

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  45. Three iPods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One for Disco.
    One for 80's synthopop dance
    and one for country western music which i am going to throw into the river when i fill it up.

  46. What if space is a premium? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All it really validates is that most consumers are fools and will fall for any hype the Apple marketing department throws at them. If people were intelligent enough to do a little research, they could find that buying a full-blown iPod for only 50 dollars more would be a much wiser decision, space wise, or another portable mp3 player entirely, rather than shelling out an insane amount of money for an Apple iPod that is shiny, pretty, and has "cool" commercials...

    People can see themselves, rather easily, that the larger iPod is only $50 more.

    But here's a mind-boggling concept - perhaps they know, but are basing choice on something other than $/MB!!!

    A smaller device can be carried more often. I got one of the original palm pilots, but really didn't use it. Then I got a Palm V which has been in my pocket every day for the last few years. Similarily, the smaller size of the iPod mini makes it much more practical to carry about. For my use of an iPod the larger version is fine, but there are a lot of people that want as small a device as possible to work out with. Heck, one of the standard accessories you can buy with the iPod mini is a armband! Although a normal iPod is small, I would not want it bound to my arm for any length of time.

    Now in addition consider a further possibility - perhaps, there are a lot of people that don't even have 4MB of music. Perhaps they only like boy bands and the collected greatest works fit into a few hundred k. For whatever reason, there are a lot of people that are not that in to music and do not have a huge variety, or a need for a large library on the go. For these people, the new iPod is simply $50 less for an even smaller product. In fact I have a 5GB iPod, not much larger, and have never really felt that much of a pull to go for a larger one as long as this works - it holds enough somgs for a ten hour roadtrip, and I can re-load when I want to switch it up. Again, if I were buying now I might go for a $50 less device just because I lived with 5MB for so long as was perfectly happy.

    I'm not even going to go into fashion because I am pretty sure that's a minorty of what is making this device popular.

    Last question - do you always supersize every fast food meal you buy? Why, it's only $0.20 more for a pound of frys!! Who would be stupid enough to not buy that!!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:What if space is a premium? by Mitleid · · Score: 1

      I understand where some people might want to weigh carrying capacity vs. size/weight/shape, so stating that for only 50 dollars more one can get a higher capacity iPod was a more opinionated statement on my part. I hadn't considered that. I make use of a large music libary, so my primary concern with portable MP3 players is space. I just figured if people didn't care about space, they'd buy a MuVo for 150 or something... I'm at a loss for words with this one, though:

      I'm not even going to go into fashion because I am pretty sure that's a minorty of what is making this device popular.

      Is this sarcasm? If so, sorry I missed that one, but it seems like a HUGE selling point for the iPod and mini iPod is fashion. Unless you've been totally oblivious to Apples incredibly asthetic product line over the past few years, you're in denial about the fact that Apple uses fashion to sell their products. I've heard a lot of people say the iPod color schemes look hideous, and I tend to agree, but pop-culture hype has the tendency to make ANYTHING look "fashionable", and I'm sure Apple knows exactly what they're doing in this regard.

      --

      --
      Is it me, or did it just get fatter in here?
    2. Re:What if space is a premium? by Talez · · Score: 1

      If so, sorry I missed that one, but it seems like a HUGE selling point for the iPod and mini iPod is fashion.

      Like my girlfriend. She loves the look of the iPod mini because they're so tiny, look fantastic and they come in pink and green.

    3. Re:What if space is a premium? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I understand where some people might want to weigh carrying capacity vs. size/weight/shape, so stating that for only 50 dollars more one can get a higher capacity iPod was a more opinionated statement on my part. I hadn't considered that. I make use of a large music library, so my primary concern with portable MP3 players is space. I just figured if people didn't care about space, they'd buy a MuVo for 150 or something...

      The thing that makes the iPod so great (well, one of them) is how practical it is to have a music player that is much smaller than your full library - everything about the iPod was designed with this one key factor in mind. It's very fast to transfer songs so updating does not make you wait. The smartlists help create content that is most meaningful to you and/or fresh (for instance I have a list of 200 unrated songs) at every resync. I also have a very large music library and the temptation to grab a 40GB iPod to stuff the whole thing is in mighty, from the technical side of me - but the practical side is plenty happy with even 5GB of storage because it's so easy to swap out for different needs - like an all Christmas music load for christmas parties or a mix of songs I know passengers will like for road trips.

      I'm at a loss for words with this one, though:

      I'm not even going to go into fashion because I am pretty sure that's a minority of what is making this device popular.


      I am dead serious on this one. This is the factor that everyone misses - the iPods sexiness does NOT originate from the cool designs. Instead, the functionality of the devices exudes through the design and THATS where popularity comes from. The design is only a reflection of makes makes them popular to begin with. There are plenty of things that have great industrial design, but what Apple excels at is carrying the design much further into the software and user interaction with the device and making THAT the focus, not just fulfilling the dreams of a master metal former.

      I will draw on something you said:

      pop-culture hype has the tendency to make ANYTHING look "fashionable"

      I totally agree. So given that just about anything can become fashionable or not fashionable, how is Apple able to keep up a tremendous track record of making things people want to buy and are perceived as "fashionable"? Through the interaction of the user with the object. Since they start with interaction, it permeates the design in various ways (like the way the ease of positioning the imac monitor drives the form it takes, or how the centrality of the wheel control on the iPod drives the look of what is otherwise a small box).

      I actually think the colors are a bit odd myself. But I can see the appeal of the device itself for the even better form factor. In fact I am pretty sure I would be buying one of these if my old 5GB iPod were not so durable (and it has undergone some violent events).

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:What if space is a premium? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Don't be ridiculous. The ONLY reason anybody would buy ANYTHING from Apple is because Steve Jobs came to their house and put the Reality Distortion Field on them. The fact that the products are actually pretty darn good is just a figment of your imagination.

      Drink your Kool Aid.

      : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  47. Perhaps your requirements... by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    are not reasonable, or mainstream. Perhaps Apple has figured out what most people's requirements really are. Marketing alone can carry a product only for so long, products with legs have more going for them than marketing.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Perhaps your requirements... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now apply that logic to TOP 40 radio.

    2. Re:Perhaps your requirements... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Now apply that logic to TOP 40 radio.

      There's a difference between marketing to a world where anyone can choose anything, and having a captive audience.

      That said, one of the things that helps drive sales of devices like the iPod is that you can replace radio with them, and listen to radio in a pinch. I'm not sure I've been in any of my friends cars recently where they did not have a CD going when I got in the car instead of the radio (and the ONLY one I can remember was on NPR!).

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Perhaps your requirements... by radish · · Score: 1

      Perhaps your requirements are not reasonable, or mainstream

      Maybe. But that doesn't matter in the slightest to me. You can't persuade me that a product is wonderful just because other people like it. I don't. I am entitled to that opinion. I am entitled to purchase whatever product _does_ meet my requirements. Everyone's different.

      What I object to _strongly_ is the notion that just because a lot of people buy a product that means it must automatically be the best in the market. I mean - a lot of people bought Windows....

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  48. linkify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those URLs have spaces in it. These should work better (1,2)

  49. Yes for... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    ...about the four minutes it retains power.

    Not to mention the bad karma of carrying around a Windows share all day long. Do you get many strangers swapping out your music for static?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  50. sold out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, iPod-Mini sold out? You know, they always said they wanted to be independent. I thought they were cool. Now it turns out they're just another corporate act in it for the money. I guess that means pretty soon we'll hear about heroine binges and downward spirals, and twenty years from now VH-1 will do a "Behind the Music" on it all. How sad.

  51. Wait list? PAH! by nahorniak · · Score: 2, Informative

    I called the Apple Store at Tyson's Corner yesterday, asking if they had any iPod Minis in stock. They said no, but they had a waiting list. I asked if there was a waiting list online, and they said "Yes, about a 3 week wait." I got a call today from the store saying that they just received a shipment of iPod Minis, and that mine was in, should I still want it. 30 minutes later, it is in my posession. :D These things are even smaller in person! Damn it's nice to have a local Apple store :D

    --
    P.S. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated.
    1. Re:Wait list? PAH! by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0

      Yeah! The photos just don't do the thing justice. I got mine at the iPod mini release event at the Clarendon store.

      --
      Karma Schmarma
    2. Re:Wait list? PAH! by geniusj · · Score: 1

      I won mine off of the radio (WHFS).. Good Times :-).. Just picked it up the other day.. The design is brilliant. Does anyone else notice iPods/iTunes being promoted like crazy on the radio lately?

  52. Flash only web pages... by Saiyine · · Score: 0

    ... makes baby Jesus cry!

    What about a link "enter to the web" in html?

    --
    Hosting 20G hd, 1Tb bw! ssh $7.95
  53. Ogg? by niko9 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is not a troll, I would happily buy one if my music was encoded in mp3, but it's not. All my tunes are ogg encoded, is there anyway to get this thing to play ogg short of putting Linux on it?

    1. Re:Ogg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Troll.

    2. Re:Ogg? by damiam · · Score: 2, Informative

      No.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  54. Strategy? by Atario · · Score: 1
    I guess their strategy now is to stay one step ahead of everyone who tries to copy them. It seems to be working, at least for now.
    Well, it has to work a lot better than staying a step behind the people who copy you.
    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  55. If anything, the mini iPod price was too LOW by alispguru · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To an economist, "demand is far greater than supply" is just another way of saying "the price is too low".

    Can you imagine the Slashdot collective opinion, though, if Apple had priced it at $300? "You can get three times as much storage for the same price? Apple is insane!"

    Goes to show that geeks are not Apple's target market, at least for consumer gear.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
    1. Re:If anything, the mini iPod price was too LOW by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I bet you a nickel that the price elasticity on the iPod mini was teeny teeny teeny. Good for them for selling out, but I don't think that raising the price to $300 would have done them much good.

      I mean, yeah, some people spent $700 for PS2's when they first came out. But all those people were stupid. : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:If anything, the mini iPod price was too LOW by klang · · Score: 1

      Maybe the early adapters are stupid, but that's the kind of people that drives the marked. Without them, the rest of us wouldn't get into a buying mood when the price is right.

      Everybody has their price. I salute stupid people with money, for driving prices down to my point! :-)

  56. Beware of altitutue or extreme temps!!! by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the reasons why I stay away from Microdrives is that I hike a lot in the mountains, and most microdrives don't seem to like being above 10k feet.

    I'm also worried about what happens when it's extremely hot or cold, though that worry has not been proven out as much I think.

    One last thing to think about is battery life, microdrives will chew through batteries quicker than solid state.

    I also have a Digital SLR, and GF, so I should have at least as much credibility. :-)

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Beware of altitutue or extreme temps!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Temperature extremes will kill flash RAM as well, but you have a good point regarding altitude. No drive I've seen is rated to work above 10k feet / 3000 metres. Doesn't mean they won't, of course, but there does have to be a point where the air pressure is too low to sustain the head, and finding where that happens will be lethal to the drive.

      I personally wouldn't buy a very large flash card for a variety of reasons - price is one, but mainly that it has a fairly short life span if you actually use it (in particular, the cells mapped to lower sectors will wear out long before the "upper" ones, and there's no particularly good way to map them out). So it'd be a handful of smaller cards for me.

      As for battery life, with the way these things handle spinup/spindown now, I doubt it's that big an issue. In some cases every bit counts, though.

    2. Re:Beware of altitutue or extreme temps!!! by Annamite · · Score: 1

      One of the reasons why I stay away from Microdrives is that I hike a lot in the mountains, and most microdrives don't seem to like being above 10k feet.

      I have used my IBM 1GB Microdrive over 10K ft several times and it worked okay, albeit during day trips only: San Gorgonio (11,499 ft) and San Jacinto (10,804 ft). The camera used is a Canon G1.

      I do agree with you about the battery life tho. I tend to bring 2 extra with me just in case.


      I'm also worried about what happens when it's extremely hot or cold, though that worry has not been proven out as much I think.


      I went up San G during March, there was snow but it was not that cold. I donot know if I want to go up when it is extremely cold to know. but I have also been to Las Vegas during DeFCON 9 or something when the temp was 117F, Death Valley during May, and Burningman 2001-2003 during duststorms and winds up to 50-60 miles/hr (2003). Camera has been working fine with the Microdrive in all situations.

      I think that IBM build much better devices than many of the companies out there. They do grade it to 10000ft in their specs, but I think it is a conservative spec, just like Intel's chips.

      My opinions might change later this fall when I attemp Whitney . Just in case, I will bring an extra CF. :-) Also I will try to live several (2-3) days over 10K ft (San Bernadino 9 Peaks Challenge) to see if the Microdrive works after several days up in the Ten Thousand Feet Range.

      Regards,

  57. Especially when it comes to women.... by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Funny

    *ducks*

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  58. Surprize!! by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The reason is, like a lot of slashdot readers, the media also does not think that something like the iPod mini will do well at all. So when they consistently do something surprising (like actually selling the devices at a tremendous rate) it's news because the news people are all astonished, and assume the rest of us are as well. They are basically saying "Can you believe this?".

    And of course there's a bit of infiltration - not by the Apple diehards, but by the products themselves which convert confused people such as yourself to an Apple fan once they start using the product. The trick is that you assume it's all marketing fluff with no substance, and that's where the disconnect lies. I'm not even sure why people like you think the interest is from marketing as I do not see that much marketing from Apple compared to many other things.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  59. I've held it... by cryptochrome · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Saw one of these at an Apple Store. By then I had already determined that it WAS in fact quite competitive with the 256mb players price wise, was about the same size, and of course had much more space to boot. And therefore, the price was appropriate and I thought it would sell well.

    Anyway, after seeing it in person I realized something important - it's better designed than the regular iPod too! Firstly it's lighter and smaller - in fact I'd say the mini's size is probably optimal and they won't go smaller in the future. The rounded aluminum case feels and looks a lot nicer and more durable. The colors are a nice touch. And most importantly, the new scroll wheel and button layout is much better than the current white pods. You no longer have to move your thumb out of the wheel area to hit any of the buttons, as the scroll wheel itself now operates kind of like a d-pad for button operation in addition to the touch-sensitive scrolling, producing some nice tactile feedback. Try it for yourself to see what I mean. The (patented) iPod scroll wheel is the critical feature that makes the iPod's design worlds better than the alternatives, and they've improved it.

    So to sum up, the mini is wonderful from the design area, especially in the tactile sense. They really hit the sweet spot this time.

    I must admit, after handling it I was tempted to buy, but I've been waiting for an iPod to go under $200 and I'll wait longer if I have to. I don't listen to music enough to justify more than that.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:I've held it... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      How does it handle in the dock? I have a 20GB iPod (3G), and it has two states, in my pocket or in the dock connected to speakers. It's about as big as I would tolerate for my pocket (the first generation ones were just a bit too big), but it's ideal sized when in the dock.

      While the iPod mini is a nicer size for the pocket, I'm intrigued as to how well the form factor works with a hi-fi.

      For me, the hard drive in the Mini is a bit small at the moment. 20GB seems nice though (roughly 10GB of music and the rest for backups), so I'll probably retire my current one to living in the dock full time when the Minis get 20GB drives, and get one of them for portable use.

      The product I would be most interested in from Apple at the moment would be an Airport Extreme base station with the iPod's decoder in it, so you could stream MP3/AAC music to it from and Mac on the network.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  60. Timing is everything. by Surefoot · · Score: 1

    It sold out because it's tax refund time.

    1. Re:Timing is everything. by grioghar · · Score: 1

      That's EXACTLY right.

      I'm sitting here with my brand new 20GB iPod, and that's exactly the reason why. Got $1,200 back from Uncle Sam, and planned on blowing half that on a 20GB and an iTrip, iSkin, PowerPod, and a custom-built car mount for my baby.

      I say Apple's genious for timing it like they did. I personally could be happier. Now I can bring my whole music collection to work without potentially legally compromising my employer by keeping mp3s on my work machine. Now I just hook up my iPod to a set of speakers and groove all day. Using the power adapter, I can listen to my music all day, and have a full charge for the drive home as well.

      Bravo to Apple. Now I'm just gonna be pissed when the color screens come out. I suspect that's the next piece of the evolution. Color screens and albums covers being displayed have got to be the next step in my mind.

      --
      Can you ping me now? Gooood! | Manhappenin.Net - Things to do
  61. Re:The silver one has problems by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0

    Yeah, AC! Something is flaking off and it ain't the silver on the mini! Apple hasn't posted anything about it because the problem doesn't exist.

    --
    Karma Schmarma
  62. Idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What country do you live in?

  63. Re:The hard drive is already wearing out by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are you sure it's only the pod that's three days old?

    --
    Karma Schmarma
  64. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Understanding sales is one thing. Surpressing the gag reflex when confronted with it is another.

  65. Re:Virtually? by Nintendork · · Score: 1

    They're big enough to do it.

  66. Re:Are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft can always say they don't have a monopoly.

    Who cares what MS says?

  67. Re:The real problem is simple... by mperham · · Score: 1

    That's funny because your comments appear to be nothing but marketing. Would you please post a link to a single website that has the Nitrus 2 for sale?

  68. Re:The real problem is simple... by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0

    So, what's stopping you from screwing the mini and getting the Nitrus2?

    Apparently, what really bothers you is that some people make more money and can purchase higher quality products than you!

    --
    Karma Schmarma
  69. buying the mini ipod for the same reason by koan · · Score: 0

    I was pricing micro drives for my camera and the woman told me people are snapping up the minipod because of the 4 gig drive.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  70. Re:To Do What? by vena · · Score: 1

    they also have a slightly significant problem with Apple even being in the music business.

  71. No. Are you kidding ME? by soft_guy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm sick of this "Microsoft saved/bought Apple" crap that I keep hearing from uninformed retards.

    *After* it was totally apparent that Steve Jobs had saved Apple, Microsoft took the opportunity to buy a real small amount of Apple's stock at at an artificially low price (they made a killing on it as the stock went up 10x in value from that over the next year).

    Microsoft also got some good PR for their Mac Office product which had long been a cash cow for Microsoft. In the year leading up to the release of Office 98 and the announcement, Microsoft's sales of Office for Mac had been surpased by Nissus Writer. After they got their big PR boost thanks to Steve they were back raking in the dough from selling Office for Mac.

    The amount of stock they bought was $150 million. At the time, Apple had a $7 Billion price cap and $2 Billion in cash on hand. The quarter that MS made their "investment", Apple's profits were more than $150 million.

    Also Apple was forced to cross license patents with Microsoft and ship Microsoft's crappy IE browser as the default on Mac systems.

    Did Microsoft "prop up" Apple. Hardly. They took advantage of a weak moment and robbed Apple blind.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    1. Re:No. Are you kidding ME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The amount of stock they bought was $150 million.

      $150 million of non-voting stock in fact.

    2. Re:No. Are you kidding ME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the IE on Windows was like Mac IE 5.2, it would be my default browser.

      MS'es decision to drop further development (except bugfixes) was bad for Apple users.

      Oh, Safari? Don't make me talk about that... ...waiting for Opera 7 on OS X, that concludes my thoughts about Safari.

    3. Re:No. Are you kidding ME? by Moofie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      MS's lock on the Office market made it impossible for Apple to pursue its lawsuit (which was a stone cold cinch) re: the theft of the QuickTime code that made up MS's media player solutions.

      The $150M and the continuing support of Office Mac (which, by the way, is absurdly profitable for MS) were part of the settlement deal.

      Had Microsoft not had the power to utterly destroy Apple (by stopping development of Office, and making a big stink about it) Apple would have been able to wring far, far, far more money out of MS.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:No. Are you kidding ME? by Gorbag · · Score: 1

      $150 million non voting stock that they shorted the same day.

      --
      -- I speak only for myself
  72. Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish Microsoft had put this out... maybe then I wouldn't have to hear about what a "great idea" this overpriced piece of crap is.

    You're all a bunch of Jobs' bitches.

  73. Re:To Do What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not legal. You sold your license to the shop and still have the music, therefore it's cr infringement.

  74. Ah-Ha! by telly333 · · Score: 1

    It's actually a 4meg Microdrive that's CF compatable

    Well no wonder the *4 GB* iPod mini is outselling the MuVo at a similar price!

  75. Fashion? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    Fashion or, as I prefer to think of it, good industrial design, really works best as a tie breaker feature for consumer electronics. Industrial design by itself will not sell a product. It will not make up a huge difference in cost.

    Size doesn't help for non-portable devices either. For example, people were not willing to pay $1700 for the PowerMac G4 Cube when they could get the same hardware in a tower for $1200. Even though the cube was *really* cool. I have a G4 cube right here (no, I didn't buy it myself and I have no idea why my company bought it). I can tell you that the cube is *very cool*. The industrial design is awesome. On the other hand, If I had been buying a computer at the time, I would have bought the tower.

    On the other hand, the iPod mini is a portable device. People will pay more for a smaller portable device. Phones, laptops, MP3 players, etc. The smaller the better and people will pay for it!

    I think that the iPod mini is selling because it is a good device that is well made, that has good value. It is better than most of its competitors. Also, it costs less dollars than any other iPod. Some people care about price more than price per anything.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  76. Sell Out by chewy_2000 · · Score: 0
    'The iPod Mini Sells Out'

    Does this mean they're not cool any more?

  77. Re:The silver one has problems by sribe · · Score: 4, Informative

    It looks like the anodized finish on the silver minis is flaking off already.

    It's the TI book all over again. Apple hasn't posted anything about it on their forums yet.


    You're a pathetic liar! I mean that in both senses--that you're pathetic and that you're not a good liar!!

    You see "anodized" means that the surface of the aluminum has been chemically altered to become an extremely hard and durable surface. "Anodization" is not something that is spread onto the surface, it is part of the metal itself, it does not "flake off"; about the only way to damage it is to scratch it, and that's not easy to do. The TiBook was painted, and paint, if not done well, can flake off under various circumstances.

    OK, I suppose you could always have been making an attempt at humor... If so, you got me good ;-)

  78. Good product? Good marketing. by sadangel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whenever an item sells out, you have to wonder, was it a good product? or just good marketing? By orchestrating insufficient supplies, many news sources, ./ and USA today at least, are reporting the fact. That's free advertising for Apple, the kind traditional ads cannot buy. So when huge stockpiles of the things mysteriously turn up next week, we will all be more likely to pick them up because:
    1. They are percieved as rare.
    2. They are percieved as desired.
    Perception is reality and marketers really know how to pull our consumer strings.

  79. I like pretty colours and blinky lights by Solosoft · · Score: 1

    I like those kinda things. When people see some plain MP3 player they think it sucks ... but show them somthing pretty and they will be all awwed. "You mean it can play music AND look good". I setup a 33.6 Modem just for the blinky lights. For sure blinky lights and a nice design sells for me.

    If it works out for cars why not computers ?
    Just cause you don't like it doesn't mean 50,000 people don't like it. Im sure apple will make a nice pretty colour "normal" IPOD and it will sell better then the plain white one.

  80. -1, tard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  81. Of course... by nicedream · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can also take apart the iPod mini for its hard drive.

  82. As the owner of a nice blue mini ipod I say: by Ghostx13 · · Score: 0

    neeiner neeiner neeiner I got mine and you have to wait 3 weeks!

    Hahahaha! Suckers!

  83. if only by aixou · · Score: 1

    If /.ers had more business sense, maybe more of them could get out of their parents' basement. ; )

  84. What a sell-out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, I told him not to lose sight of his punk roots.

  85. Bad language on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've noticed a proliferation of bad language usage here on Slashdot. I'm a Christian and feel that such language ought not be used at all.

    Couldn't the same joke here about "selling out" have been made without resorting to the use of the F and S words?

  86. Windows iTunes a different story? by jvonk · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Anything remotely active (running, climbing, cycling) is not good with hard drive players.

    This has been beaten to death in thousands of /. threads before. No one has ever heard of an iPod dying for this reason... it is just due to your general sense of unease about hard drives and head crashes. However, it doesnt happen with the iPod, and no, the iPod doesnt skip on active use either. Anyway, I digress...

    I have no problem having Windows iTunes manage my 64 GB collection over the network. Of course, I have a dedicated Win 2k3 server and gigabit ethernet. Whatever. SMB on NT is great for filesystem access (fuck Apple's Rendezvous, it sucks... use SMB).

    The only gripe I have with iTunes (and this holds for Winamp 5 as well) is that files without ID3 tags are "lost" in the library, as a rule. Dont know how that would be solved, though. For instance, my .aiff's and .wav's cannot be ID3 tagged.

    "Well, shit."

    1. Re:Windows iTunes a different story? by notsoclever · · Score: 4, Informative
      AIFFs can be tagged though. It's got a lot of rich metadata support, which all Apple tools make heavy use of; as a demonstration of this, take an AIFF file, then use iTunes to edit its information. YOu can remove the AIFF from the library and then load it back in, and it will still have the metadata.

      WAV is a subset of RIFF, which (being another IFF derivative) shares a lot more in common with AIFF than people realize, and so it might be able to do metadata also, but I don't think any tools actually support it, and most stuff working with .wavs that I've seen just seem to assume that you only have a single WAVE chunk in the file so they'd probably break horribly if you gave it anything more complex anyway.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people: ones who understand ternary, ones who don't, and ones who think this joke is about binary
    2. Re:Windows iTunes a different story? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wave files support all kinds of metadata. In the wave editor I like to use you can have information for: Title, subject, engineer, copyright, genere, artist, keywords, orignator software, creation date, orignal medium and comments. This is just in the standard information pane. There is also a broadcast audio extension pane for more information. Putting information in the standard pane and saving it does not seem to cause playback problems with any other programs.

    3. Re:Windows iTunes a different story? by jcomand · · Score: 1

      There ARE tools that support WAV tagging. Try ATWavTag, designed to be used with the Turtle Beach AudioTron , a network connected MP3/WMA/WAV player.

      The AudioTron is a neat gadget by the way, you should check out the geeks who support it.

    4. Re:Windows iTunes a different story? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I have no problem having Windows iTunes manage my 64 GB collection over the network. Of course, I have a dedicated Win 2k3 server and gigabit ethernet. Whatever. SMB on NT is great for filesystem access (fuck Apple's Rendezvous, it sucks... use SMB).

      I used the first release of iTunes for Windows, and found that it skipped and often crashed when I tried to play music from an SMB share. I had no problems at all with streaming from within iTunes though. Hopefully this has been fixed in later versions.

      I think you are confusing what Rendezvous is, by the way. It's an implementation of the ZeroConf service discovery protocol, and a really slick one at that. I've used two Apps which make use of Rendezvous. The fist is iTunes. When I plug my PowerBook into any network, I can instantly see any music that's shared by others, and play it. You could do this using SMB browse requests, but it would be a hack. The second is iChat, which I recently used in a very dull meeting. I had set up an ad-hoc WiFi network for the meeting (three mouse clicks, by the way) to copy a presentation from someone else's laptop to mine and I thought I'd have a look at iChat. As soon as it was launched, it populated the contact list with other people in the room and let me chat to them. Again, you could do this with some combination of SMB broadcasts and NET SENDS, but it's not a good solution.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Windows iTunes a different story? by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      I would rather not take the risk. Purchasing a solid state player for a an active session at the gym or riding a ridge doesn't require me to have every single audio file I have, since the activity will probably not last more than the amount of music I can drop into those players, not to mention solid states are not very expensive. Perhaps you are willing to move up and down repeatedly for an hour or more while running with the ipod strapped to your arm every day and wonder if it's cutting its lifespan short? Do you think dropping an ipod is good for it as well? It's fairly common sense that a lot of active movement with a hard drive is not a good idea. While it may not break it, it can't do much to lengthen its lifespan.

      No one said I used rendezvous. In fact, I'm also using smb, with samba, on a 3ware raid array (I even tested it over nfs). It doesn't matter if I'm using one of the two powerbooks I own *or* the athlon 2600, iTunes does not navigate well for huge music repositories, and I'm not just talking to response speed (iTunes will cache a lot of information off the network). I'm talking actual GUI navigation. The finder field is good for locating one track, or something by an artist, but a tree would add so much more... sometimes I want to look at files by the albums they're from, and it's very natural to look down a tree, locating artist, then perusing albums. With iTunes, everything is just lumped together in the main screen, depending on which item you've checked on the sidebar, or the term you've grepped for in the find field. Honestly? There is no good music library program for something that big. I am stuck using Media Center from J Center on the windows boxes. It has a mediocre interface for most operations, but the organization features it brings to the table really makes iTunes look like a second rate program (and for the record, I really liked iTunes when it first came out).

      Once you add the fact that iTunes cannot play any lossless compression codecs, it pretty much seals the deal for me. Keep in mind that I realize that most people like iTunes, and that's fine; it's just not tuned (no pun intended) to my needs. I think it's just a bit disappointing because (I think I mentioned this in a completely seperate post) that Apple stuff usually caters to very novice users, as well as highly proficient, advanced ones, and it's part of the reason I like a lot of their products. iTunes only seems to get part of that right.

    6. Re:Windows iTunes a different story? by nitehorse · · Score: 1

      You do realize that iTunes can browse your music and sort it by artist and then album, right?

      IIRC, the shortcut on Mac systems is Cmd-B, and on Windows I would bet it's Ctrl+B.

      Try it out.

    7. Re:Windows iTunes a different story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that iTunes has no problem with AIFF...

    8. Re:Windows iTunes a different story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I don't know about the lifespan of the HD being reduced by movement, but I can tell you that I've had my Ipod for 1.5 years and have never had a problem with the hard drive. I use it a lot in the gym (about 2 hrs a day) doing a lot of cardiovascular exercise and probably could be said to abuse the hell out of that thing. The hard drive doesn't spin much unless a song is being accessed and it seems to cache the next song or two. Mine han't broken yet and I haven't heard of one breaking due to head crashing, but it is a valid concern.
      Try, Edit>Show browser. You can sort by artist, genre, or album. I think SoundJam MP could do something like that too. I just wish that Soundjam was still being developed. I liked how Multiprocessor aware it was. i could rip and convert wit one processor and use the other for full-screen visuals without any slowdown. Itunes visualizer is crap. Apple should license G-Force as their default visualizer, IMO.
      Itunes plays AIFF. I actually load all my songs in aiff and then convert them for the iPod. I run the optical out from my computer to a Headphone amp/DAC and Sennheiser HD 600's. The Optical connect on the G5's is as good as any other I've seen and the headphone jack is as bad as any I've seen. Even playing uncompressed AIFFs through the factory jack sound like doo-doo. If you're interested in quality, 256kbps aac is basically identical to AIFF when played through the headphone jack on a mac. If you want lossless audio though, get a good Transport and DAC or go with a turntable, because even "good" soundcards usually have terrible output stages.

    9. Re:Windows iTunes a different story? by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      The problem is that I don't have a music library for me to play on crappy portables (if I did, you're right, I'd just use some sort of compression scheme); the lossless tracks are for my listening room where I have (among other things including a Rotel transport and respectable Denon turntable) a rack mounted a small audio box running Linux that uses its optical out and pulls files off the house file server. By convenience, I like being able to bring some of those on a portable. The either involves mirroring the entire 75 gigs to a compressed format (of course it would be smaller, but what a kludged solution) or having a portable that understands the lossless codec.

      Anyway, you can see the problems this poses for me doing a lot music managing with iTunes. It doesn't understand FLACs, and once you get used to the insanely nice way the J River / Media Center app can update whole slews of tags in really complicated, pseudo-script ways to dragging and dropping selected files onto other existing tags, as well as physically sorting them on the drive. it's hard to use iTunes. The one thing I haven't checked into very deeply is AIFFs. The possibility to convert from FLACs to AIFFs would enable more iTunes compatibility, but it would also roughly doubly the space from 75 gigs... not a big problem, but something to keep in mind. Also, is there an AIFF encoder for Linux? (Most of my ripping / file sorting is done by the server, then tagged by the Windows box along with some file positioning correction).

      So there it is. Like I said previously, I like Apple and I used to like iTunes, but I ran into a lot of small things that just made it 'not for me'. As I have no blind loyalty to any particular software set (I'm more about finding what fits the best for what I need), I'd be more than willing to head back to it if they supported FLACs. Or do AIFFs compress losslessly?

  87. Re: almost-as-small-as-iPod laptop by pwarf · · Score: 1

    Actually, a new product like this will be released soon.
    See the picture and specifications.

    Key points:
    * 4" by 6" by 1"
    * runs XP (a real computer)
    * 30 GB hard drive
    * only 5.6" screen, but 1024 by 600 pixels
    * integrated wireless
    * USB 2.0 port
    * docking station for optical drives, more ports, wired ethernet
    * integrated 1.3 MP camera

    Price is rumored to be about $1500.

    Full disclosure: I don't have any affiliation with the company other than a friend who might work there.

    Seems like a great option for a second computer in adition to a normal desktop. What do you other slashdotters think?

  88. Ummmm... by PasteEater · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How to legally obtain music for your iPod.
    Step Five: Sell all those CDs you just bought to another used CD shop.

    See, the whole idea of making a backup is that only one copy will be in use at a time. As soon as you sell that CD, someone else could listen to at the same time as you, which now makes your copy illegal (since you no longer own the original).
    Nice try though.

    --
    There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    1. Re:Ummmm... by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Intereting point.

      I'd be interested in hearing what a (Non-pimping for the RIAA) lawyer would have to say on the subject.

      As long as there's no EULA included with a CD that specifically states that you can't do this, I suspect that it's legal.

      Oh, hell! I've just given the RIAA an idea they could use!

      Bugger!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    2. Re:Ummmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on. It's common sense.

      You own the music on the disc by purchasing the disc. Used or new. When you sell the disc, you sell the music, along with your right to listen to it.

      It's no different than if you buy a piece of software, install it on your HD, copy the CD, then sell the software. That's software piracy.

      Just because the copy exists on your HD in a compressed format as opposed to a physical format doesn't magically change the fact that you kept property after selling it.

      I half agree with buying used CDs, though, in that you should do something to put money in the artists pockets (as opposed to putting 95%+ in faceless corporation pockets, as occurs with new CD purchases).

  89. Yep, got to hold it to understand by zerocircle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've used an iPod mini a fair bit, and from the first moment I picked it up, I knew it was a superior design.

    Now, my purpose in owning an iPod is not to carry around a handy collection of music; it's to carry around all the music I might want to hear at any time, so I got a regular iPod (10GB, US$209 at Target) and I've loaded it (so far) to nearly twice the capacity of a mini.

    I deeply wish my iPod had the mini's click wheel instead of the touch buttons, because the tactile feedback on the mini is worlds better -- try pausing or skipping just by feel when you're driving, and you'll really appreciate the click wheel. I don't like having to hover my finger over a button in order to touch it at the right moment -- I prefer to be able to lightly rest on the button and click it when needed. (Yes, I'm a touch typist.) I hope Apple incorporates a larger click wheel into the 4G standard-size iPods. I'll be first in line for one of those.

    Wouldn't mind if they used the brushed-aluminum finish on all the iPods, since it has better grip and isn't hyper-fingerprinty like the plastic/polished-steel case. But hey, the click wheel's the most important improvement, and the 3G iPod does look undeniably cool if you keep it reasonably clean in some sort of case or bag (mine's in a dice bag, works great), so...whatever. Just give me a click wheel and a good-sized hard drive, and I'll be happy.

    1. Re:Yep, got to hold it to understand by grioghar · · Score: 1

      No one can tell you about the iPod Mini; you have to see it for yourself...

      --
      Can you ping me now? Gooood! | Manhappenin.Net - Things to do
  90. Not true - Fat16 works with larger cluster sizes by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You can format the 4GB drive using Fat16, BUT you need to increase the cluster size (I think doubling to 64k). You can use this trick to format one of these cards for use in the (many) devices that only understand Fat16.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  91. 199$ Neuros, 20gb HD, FM, FM transmitter Open src by Stonent1 · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Neuros Has more capacity than an Ipod mini, cheaper, plays OggVorbis, MP3, can record from the internal FM radio and even go out on the net and figure out which song it recorded. You can transmit your music over FM to a radio, the HD is removable and upgradable, the software is open source, it has a built in Mic that can record at full cd quality (helpful for sneaking into concerts) The iPod doesn't look that hot any more. You can also get a 99$ version that has a 128mb flash module which can be upgraded to the 20gb version for $129.

  92. Most interesting bit on page 28... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    I did a document search for "altitude" to find the environmental specs, they are better than I thought:

    -300 to 12,192 m -- Altitude
    5C/Minutes -- Maximum temperature gradient
    40C, non condensing -- Maximum wet bulb temperature
    5-95%, non condensing -- Relative humidity
    -40 to 70C -- (See note)Temperature Nonoperating conditions -300 to 12,192m -- Altitude

    So the altitude is not a problem like I had thought (40k feet!). Only the temperature range and temperature gradient (and perhaps humidity for someplace like a rainforest) might be of concern still.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  93. As Freud once said... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    ... sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

    We are all so conditioned to be cynical of any advertising or media, sometimes it's hard to tell if a device is popular because of itself or a push. But then devices that are popular over a long time (as the iPod has been) usually have something of substance to drive continuing popularity.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:As Freud once said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freud knew Monica Lewisnki?

  94. Microsoft will release Beatles tunes later... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As you say the Beatles are holdouts for new technology...

    But I am pretty convinced that the first online sales of Beatles music will be the launch of an official Microsoft Music Store (around the end of the year I think, possibly hastened by the popularity of the ipod mini). They will pay the $1billion an album or whatever it takes to be "the first".

    About a year after that the Beatles will arrive at ITMS.

    The funny thing is that I'm not sure the Beatles would be a giant driver for sales online, as most people that care would already have the CD's (and thus ripped them already). A few exclusive tracks (are there any left? Probably a few) might fare well, but not be a convincing argument to drive people to one store over another for the long term.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  95. I applaud your ability to follow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot says OGG and you follow.

    But seriously, after the neato factor is over, you really should keep your music in a format that is most useful to you.

    Despite using Macs almost to the exclusion of all others, I use mp3, because it's the standard. You can play them anywhere.

    1. Re:I applaud your ability to follow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I use mp3, because it's the standard.
      It's also crap.
    2. Re:I applaud your ability to follow.. by tieke · · Score: 1

      I know I shouldn't feed the troll, but really - blindly advocating ogg and blanket-denigrating mp3s isn't really the way to go. Maybe if you were talking about the mp3s speed-encoded a couple of years ago with the Xing encoder at 128K CBR you might have a point, but there really isn't any excuse to settle for below-average audio quality no matter what the format. I use the latest version of lame with the "extreme" preset, and the quality of my hi-fi system is more limiting than the encoding system used. In return I get usability across a wide range of consumer devices. If your stand was on philosophical grounds of course, that woiuld be a different matter.

  96. the Nitrus doesn't sound better than the iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even the mini. I've listened to them.

    4dB? Not that I can tell.

    There is no detectable difference between the two that I can tell.

    Also note that audio components in neither the iPod nor the Nitrus were designed by PortalPlayer. The iPod uses a Wolfson sound chip and the Nitrus likely does also. But beyond that, the circuitry around the Wolfson chip matters. For example, the Samsung Napster uses a Woflson chip too, but uses it poorly and has distortion problems.

    They both sound great, but I like the iPod better. I furthermore would have to say that I think any objective person would have to say that it is difficult to make a case that either of these is markedly inferior to the other in performance.

    1. Re:the Nitrus doesn't sound better than the iPod by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Also note that audio components in neither the iPod nor the Nitrus were designed by PortalPlayer.

      Right, but PortalPlayer picked the components and decided how to put them together, which seems like it'd count for a lot.

      Anyway. I'm glad to hear from someone who sounds like they know what they're talking about.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  97. Re:Not true - Fat16 works with larger cluster size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he's talking about what works in the camera. Do your 32k or 64k FAT16 thing and put it in a real-world camera that is known not to be FAT32-capable. Anyway, there's plenty of stuff that falls over when it sees a FAT16 cluster size above 32k. Try older scandisks, for example.

  98. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet you get all the ladies.

  99. Almost deja vous by t0ny · · Score: 1

    Wow, when I saw the headline of the post (Apple: iPod Mini Sells Out), I had flashbacks of Bill Gates giving Steve Jobs a hot cash injection.

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  100. larger cluster Fat16 works in real life - links by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    At least in the Sigma SD9/SD10, I know you can in fact format a 4GB card using Fat16 with 64k clusters and the camera can read it. In real life, on a real camera - and I think many other devices that know Fat16. I had also talked to a technical person at Foveon at PMA that said the only reason they did not add support for formatting larger cards using this technique into the camera firmware was that the Mac would not be able to read them (OS X at the moment cannot read the 64k cluster formatted disks, supposedly - looking into working around that).

    Here, read this and this.

    If I did not have a number of CF cards already and a portable storage device I'd probably get one myself. I'll bet this is > 50% of the MuVo player sales.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  101. The difference is Style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The main thing is that the iPod has got style. Its hip. Its cool. Like the original iMac. People love it for that. When Apple has 70% of the revenues in the HD based player market, then they are doing something extremely right. They do not have to compete on price, and that is a good thing. They can spend more to make it cooler, and people will buy it even more. Once in a while, people break the bank to get something they really want, and in this case, the iPod is one of those things.

  102. Re:Apple by mlk · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it dont have an RFC, it dont exist!

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  103. Re:199$ Neuros, 20gb HD, FM, FM transmitter Open s by Moofie · · Score: 0

    Yes. You like the Neuros. Good for you. Go buy one. They haven't sold out yet.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  104. Re:The real problem is simple... by rtilghman · · Score: 0


    I have a Karma, so WTF would I need with a player that has 1/5th the space.

    I stated that if you MUST get a miniature player then I'd go with the Nitrus 2 before the mini-iPod. Hell, I'd go with the Nitrus 2 just to avoid being another lamea55 dip5hit carrying a lilly white toaster around with me.

    However, I wouldn't BUY a mini player ot begin with anyway. I just don't see the sense in it. If I want all my music I want all my music, and I'll tow a big player with me. If I want just some of my music to work out I'll get a solid state player with no drive to be shocked and damaged when I drop it while running stairs.

    Go to the trouble of actually READING my post before you post a reply so obviously in error, I don't enjoy making you look stupid.

    -rt

  105. Apple rips off UK customers by Danj2k · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Apple does not yet sell the iPod Mini in the United Kingdom, but once it does I expect it to be just as much of a rip-off as the regular iPod is. To show you what I mean, here's an example: in the UK, Apple charges GBP248.99 including tax for the 15Gb iPod. Take the tax off and it comes to GBP211.91, which is equivalent to $390.55. The same device is sold for $299.00 in their US store.

    Maybe if I was some trendy yuppie with a high paying job who has his car changed every 6 months just so he can get the new numberplate, I would consider buying an iPod, but for those of us in this country who are not earning 6 figures or winning the lottery, value for money is a far higher priority than how "cool" it is. You can get a Creative Labs player with 5Gb more storage for GBP69.00 less than the iPod.

    (On a completely unrelated note, why doesn't Slashdot reproduce the "pound" symbol, even when I use an HTML entity for it?)

    1. Re:Apple rips off UK customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid its not just Apple, look at the prices of other stuff (I recently bought some Adobe software). That said, Apple UK did say they would review the price when it became available in the UK.

      I was in London yesterday and it is quite noticable how many iPods are around, looks like opening an Apple store in London is a smart move.

    2. Re:Apple rips off UK customers by patrikr · · Score: 1

      > why doesn't Slashdot reproduce the "pound" symbol, even when I use an HTML entity for it?

      Because slashdot is run by morons who think 7-bit ASCII should be enough for everyone, apparently...

      --
      All Glory To The Hypnotoad!
    3. Re:Apple rips off UK customers by Ian.Waring · · Score: 1

      Next time you're in the USA, buy one. I queued at the Apple Store in Palo Alto the day it started shipping, and the whole works (with arm band and dock) cost me less than GBP180. And it works fine, charging itself off my PC's firewire port. I only wish the iTunes Music Store would open up so we this side of the pond could get at it. I reckon there are no more than 2-3 decent tracks on most of my CD's I rate, am tired of feeding CDs into my PC, and could use listening to some audio books :-) Most people who see it are impressed to bits. Good work, Apple.

    4. Re:Apple rips off UK customers by noeamaral · · Score: 1

      Try buying an iPod in Brazil. The 15GB model costs us R$1999,00. Using the conversion rate 1US$=3R$, it turns to almost 700 dollars.

      That's what I call a rip off. Brazilian Apple is the world's worst for sure.

    5. Re:Apple rips off UK customers by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      This is only a reflection of the strong pound / weak dollar. In more "normal" times, the margin of difference wouldn't be this outrageous. European consumers always get screwed with high prices for electronics and computer equipment.

  106. reEAAAAALLLy? What are these then? by rtilghman · · Score: 0


    I can tell you must have spend a great deal of time studying the specifications of both products. However, let me see if I can find some information you may have missed.

    1. Gapless playback
    - Nitrus has it, iPod doesn't
    - What is it? The ability to play ALBUMS without a pause, like a Floyd album with no break between songs the way it was intended to be heard.

    2. 5 Band Parametric Equalizer
    - Nitrus has it, iPod doesn't
    - What is it? The ability to actually fully manipulate and manage the player's audio signal beyond stupid cheapo options like "Jazz" and "Hall"

    3. Longer Battery Life
    - 16 hours battery life (continuous playback)
    - the iPod, ALL iPods (at least the ones that don't die) have 8 hours.

    4. Weight
    - The Nitrus comes in at 2.75oz vs. the iPod mini's 3.6oz.
    - True, there both still pretty light, but note that the difference is about 25% of the weight.

    5. SD or MMC Expansion Slot
    - I've seen no mention of support for memory on the iPod mini.

    6. Open Source Codec Support
    - Ogg, Flac, etc. on the Nitrus
    - iPod: closed codecs ONLY.
    - Welcome to Slashdot, home of the OS movement!

    -rt

  107. Re:The real problem is simple... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    I think the only zealot here is the Rio fan.

    Here's some troll chow:

    I haven't used a Mac since 1998. Split between various flavors of of Windows and Linux

    Both my laptop and desktop have FireWire. Neither were top of the line.

    Ogg matters not, since almost nothing supports it.

    AAC vs. WMA matters only because one of these two formats will ultimately win the online sales war. At least in the near term.

    Speaking of sales war, you choose to mention Mac's 4% market share, but you hold market share of the iPod and iTMS in disdain. Nice consistency to your logic.

    Yeah, I read the specs. 4GB player. One is $249, one will be $209. One plays AAC, the other plays WMA and some weird bullshit format that almost nobody knows about.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  108. Re:199$ Neuros, 20gb HD, FM, FM transmitter Open s by Chucker23N · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Butt-ugly, web site is confusing to navigate, cites dimensions and weight that go far beyond the iPod, hard drive seems to be 2.5 inches which makes the whole thing clunky. Button arrangement is needlessly complicated; software said not to work on any Unix on the web site (the iPod works flawlessly even on various free Unixes out there). Doesn't play official successor to MP3, AAC.

    The one interesting positive point is that it plays Ogg Vorbis, but I only see such files every few months...

  109. selling out is no prize by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Apple's biggest problem is that their products sell out. While amateurs (including all of Apple's inventory managers since at latest the 1980s) might think selling out is the highest achievement, no stock means no sales. And unless you think Apple has projected exactly one unit for each customer with demand in their market, that means unsatisfied demand. If that weren't bad enough, in missed profits on a single release, that kind of poor planning leaves giant bubbles in the supply chain. What corporate IT buyer wants to face their boss when 300 new people are hired, but Apple runs out of Macs after 25? And 250 people have no computers on their desks? Unless they buy a commodity PC, of course running Windows (or perhaps Linux, etc). While Dell, Gateway, and Mom & Pop Chopshop don't perfectly project demand either, at least the option of choosing a different source from among mostly compatible PCs keeps the pipeline full. Until Apple gets Supply Chain Management for its products under control, it will be a hobbyist computer. And if it hasn't happened by now, even during the tenure of (ex- National Semiconductor chief) Gilbert Amelio, it never will. Of all the reasons for Apple eventually perish, SCM failure is the most pernicious, and the most inevitable.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:selling out is no prize by MacDaffy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple is still cautious about over-production because it still doesn't have the confidence of the public yet vis-a-vis survival. They produce too much, and flagging sales give rise to "Apple is dying" rumors. Produce too little (e.g. "sell through") and they get criticisms like yours. There is no middle ground. Apple gets no "slack." Every misstep is trumpeted as their last. It's still better to sell out than to have an over-hyped "flop" on its hands.

      Not to put too fine a point on it, but Gil Amelio couldn't market pussy in a prison. He doesn't know anything about the computer business to this day and, despite taking several measures that improved Apple's fiscal health (and I wouldn't ignore Fred Andersen's role in all that), he led the company into a death-spiral with a cluelessness that was maddening. Consumers weren't being given a reason to buy Macs. The machines then were utter crap (Performa series, anyone?) There were too many of them and they weren't innovative. Loyal customers and smart people within the company like Andersen were what got the company through that period. (Oh, and Amelio did buy NeXt and bring back the True Believers. Thanks, Gil).

      Fortunately, Steve Jobs wrestled the wheel away from him and resumed level flight. Survival of the company is no longer an issue. Recent articles have intimated that the growth phase of the company's resuscitation has begun. And the timing is excellent; Microsoft is dead in the water, period. I'm a consultant for home and small business users; XP is the company's most exploitable system to-date (but it's still not ME, thank God). Next Generation/"Trusted" Computing is a non-starter. Apple is beginning to get mindshare in a lot of quarters solely on the basis of the "no virus/malware/spyware" issue. The "Slashdot Constituency" isn't deriding Apple about performance, stability, lack of software (except games, d00d) or "modern" operating system issues any more--as was the case during Amelio's tenure--and, frankly, Steve Jobs now has a product he can be proud to offer to business.

      The point for Apple now is not to bite off more than it can chew. That's why you don't see the competitive ads challenging Microsoft on a heads-up basis--it's not time yet. A premature ramp-up in anticipation of the kind of demand you think they should have could be disastrous. And if Virginia Tech can get 1100 G5's on-demand, I wouldn't worry about three-hundred new hires at Podunk Insurance; Apple will take care of them.

    2. Re:selling out is no prize by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0

      "Until Apple gets Supply Chain Management for its products under control, it will be a hobbyist computer."

      Oh, dazzle us with your wisdom Great and Powerful Oz! What a load of shit! I don't think that the recording or movie or publishing industries would think of the Mac as a hobbyist computer. What the fuck is the definition of a hobbyist computer anyway, Einstein?

      --
      Karma Schmarma
    3. Re:selling out is no prize by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Hobbyist computers are for computer hobbyists: people whose buying criteria are that computer itself, rather than primarily the job it does. Like a Marinoni hobbyist bicycle, it might even be the best platform, but its cost/benefit is for specialists, enthusiasts. If you understood the SCM issues in my post, you'd be mad at Apple, not me. I first learned why Apple isn't a corporate supplier while working for Apple, waiting on hardware for a project they commissioned for Apple Developer University. Their internal SCM messed with their own software production schedules.

      Later, Apple hooked me up with possibly the first PowerPC sold outside of California, a "beta" 6100 purchased by Northern Telecom (then their biggest customer in the world), as a patch to yet another SCM problem that was holding back NorTel from a "next generation payphone" multimedia Internet kiosk project. It didn't help the NorTel debate in favor of jettisoning Apple in favor of WinTel when I, a vocal supporter of keeping the technologically superior Macs, had to miss a meeting because I couldn't get third-party RAM to work in my (probably the first sold) 9500, bringing it forever to its knees (certainly the first publicly fried 9500). NorTel dropped Apple, and they were right to do so. I gave my 6100 beta to a graphic artist, and she was right to keep it - it still runs. But notice that Adobe has switched (antistrategically, for other reasons) away from Apple, and Linux is starting to eat Apple's lunch. SCM is the way companies do business. Hobbyists don't care, the waiting for releases and resupplies is part of the fetish, keeping the objects exotic. I wish Apple would get with the program. But that would probably mean licensing the platform, or compiling OSX for x86, and even though Jobs has entered new territory with his HP iPod license, I don't expect to see that until it no longer matters for Macs, or its fans, like me.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:selling out is no prize by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Jobs is the biggest hero in personal computing, after Gilbert Hyatt. He has rehabilitated Apple to its strongest condition since 1979, although mostly thanks to the failure of others (Microsoft) to compete on merit. But his success is *despite* his company's SCM mismanagement. Instead, he's focused on niche markets, where SCM isn't as much a factor as the corporate market. Probably a good strategy, if he won't tackle SCM. And I hope he wins. SCM can be a straitjacket, if it defines future strategy, when the market moves faster than the supply chain can support. I hope the successor to the mini iPod is a phone, with iPod and "Newton" functions built in. And the HP iPod license indicates willingness to "commoditize" these consumer electronics. Maybe Jobs will lead us all through his visionary hoops once again, emerging post-PC on top, just where he debuted post-mainframe.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  110. Re:Apple by identity0 · · Score: 1

    ...and the sad part is, if they had priced it wrong, everyone here would be complaining about how overpriced Apple products are. If they had misjudged the market and sold only to a small niche, people here would be complainig about how elitist Apple are...

    Instead, we get to hear about how clueless Apple customers are for knowing what they like, and liking based on 'feel' instead of numbers... *sigh*

  111. Re:199$ Neuros, 20gb HD, FM, FM transmitter Open s by hattig · · Score: 1

    These are completely different products!

    Size:
    Neuros: Go anywhere size: 5.3" x 3.1" x 1.3", 9.4 oz.
    iPodMini: 3.6 by 2.0 by 0.5 inches

    So 21.4 cubic inches vs 3.6 cubic inches ... Why are you even bothering to compare the two products? Even the normal iPod is only 6.1 cubic inches!

    Weight:
    N: 9.4oz.
    i: 3.6 ounces

    Just over 1/3rd the weight. One of these is portable. The other one should be remade into a car stereo format and a home stereo component format.

    Data Transmission:
    N: Full speed USB 1.1
    i: Firewire or USB2

    Enjoy waiting 30x longer per MB to fill up the Neuros

    Battery life is similar (10hrs vs 8 hrs), charge time is horrible on Neuros (8 hours, vs 3hours for iPod).

    Looks: Neuros is butt ugly, a Vogon or a geek must have designed it.

    I'd happily pay for an iPod mini if I could spare the money, but I wouldn't touch the Neuros. The orange screen looks kinda cool though.

  112. Re:199$ Neuros, 20gb HD, FM, FM transmitter Open s by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

    Butt-ugly,

    Wow, two separate independent comments used the phrase "butt ugly" in different contexts to describe two different facets of Neuros' device and web site. Methinks this is rather telling of their [Neruros'] priorities and style.

    This is not good.

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  113. iPods, are they audio devices? are they jewelry? by rtphokie · · Score: 1

    Apple seems to have correctly identified the price point and the market they were going after

    Perhaps, but this is Apple we are talking about. The popuplarity of the mini ipod is probably better explained by hype and fad. Actually I think they could have priced these things a little higher and still sell them out.

    iPods are part useful music playing device, and part jewelry. Why would someone give up 80% of the capacity to save only 15%? The hype, and most importantly the "cute" factor is driving sales on this unit.

    Apple should have priced these at $275 and stuck at that price. Better yet, strike up a deal with the NCAA, NFL, MLB, and NBA to put team logos and colors on the mini iPods for an extra $25 and they'd have to back a dumptruck up carry the money away.

  114. You're both wrong by pslam · · Score: 1
    Dude, RIo and Apple both get their device platform from PortalPlayer. There isn't any arguing that point. I don't see how either can be a rip off of the other when they both paid for the concept and design of their internals.

    I take exception to both your posts because it's pretty clear neither of you know what you're talking about. You're both mixing up the Nitrus and Karma for a start. The Rio Karma uses a PortalPlayer CPU, but that's as far as PortalPlayer's contribution goes because none of their software is used, and they had no part in hardware design. There is absolutely nothing shared in the design of the Karma and the iPod except the CPU existing on a board.

    There is even less (none in fact) design shared between them and the Rio Nitrus because it uses a Sigmatel 3410 CPU. It's far less capable than you're making it out to be mostly because the CPU is far less powerful. But using the 3410 is why it's at 16 hours of battery and not 8.

    As for time scale, out of the iPod, Nitrus, Karma and Mini: the iPod was first, then the Rio Nitrus, Karma, and finally (much later) the iPod Mini. The iPod Mini isn't first or original by any stretch of the imagination, though Apple would have you think otherwise. See the keynote speech where Jobs somehow ignores the existence of many 1.5GB MP3 players and compares the iPod Mini to a $250 (hard to find them that expensive) Rio 256MB flash player. He'd earlier announced in that keynote how they'd just invented midi synthesis, sequencing, and moving through photo collections quickly, so I guess that strategy nothing new to them.

    1. Re:You're both wrong by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  115. Re:The silver one has problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you know what anodization is, right? It's oxidation! Rust! The iPod Minis are coming from the factory rusted! For $250? No thanks!

  116. Re:iPods, are they audio devices? are they jewelry by BinxBolling · · Score: 1
    iPods are part useful music playing device, and part jewelry. Why would someone give up 80% of the capacity to save only 15%?

    Look at this from the perspective of someone with a music collection small enough to fit comfortably in 4 GB, or who doesn't feel the need to carry their entire collection with them: Why pay 20% more and carry around something 66% larger, just to get a greater capacity for which you have no use? For such a person, the value of the extra 11 GB is close to zero, and thus easily outweighed by the $50 price difference and space/weight savings.

  117. Explotation? by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 2, Funny

    exploitation of a tech-illiterate market.

    Right. Apple has totally hidden from customers the fact that they make a 15 gig iPod that sells for $300. I mean, it's not like it's in their stores or anything. And you have to be a genius to figure out that 4 gigs is less than 15 gigs , so nobody without a masters in CS can figure that out.

    Some people value size and style over amount of memory, and they've chosen to buy one. Apple didn't make them buy it.

  118. Surprise surprise, Gomer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not one to gloat, but I would like to say that I totally called this one. In spite of /.'s vast collection of brilliant loose cannons, Apple seems to know what they're fu(C)king doing after all. Who'd a thunk it!!

    jaz.

    P.S., apparently I am indeed one to gloat. Damn!

  119. 4GB Compact Flash by swgs · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to say that the iPod Mini's hard drive is the same compact flash situation as Creative's MuVo2.

    As was documented by Christopher Breen of Macworld, the iPod Mini's hard drive is "encased in compact flash form". Some cameras support using this 4GB compact flash card, but not Mr. Breen's. He does note that it works in his USB Media Reader attached to a PowerBook G4, shows up on the desktop as a 3.6GB volume.

    1. Re:4GB Compact Flash by k4v1 · · Score: 1

      It is the same, but it doesn;t work well even in the iPod Mini. Mine freezes all of the time as do others, and Apple has no answers.

  120. Re:4GB Compact Flash for $200? Not Anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI! In case people haven't noticed and decides to buy the muvo for the Hitachi Microdrive. Let me warn you ahead of time, after Creative found people used it for digital cameras, they revised the design and soldered the drive onto the player, so it's considerably more difficult to extract. So far I seen any confirmation that people are able to use the drives from the new batch of muvo.

  121. Exchange rates by Aexia · · Score: 1

    Half of the difference is because the dollar sucks right now. 1.83 USD = 1 GBP! IIRC, It's usually been closer to 1.60 USD.

    And EVERYTHING is expensive in the UK. It's not just Apple. it's food, movies, lodging, etc.

  122. Re:The real problem is simple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (scratching head) What exactly is a top-of-the-line laptop these days anyway? I have to ask because all the laptops I've req'd for work and friends have purchased in the past 6 months have had firewire on the motherboard. The most expensive was $1500.

    Seeing how top-of-the-line in dollar amounts comes out to around $3300 by my informal search, I don't think any of those laptops count. If $1500 is a top-of-the-line laptop in your world, may I suggest finding a new job? I know McJobs don't pay well, but you should've known that going in.

    Couple this with the fact that Firewire consistently transfers data at a faster rate than USB 2.0 (USB 2.0 being massively CPU bound, one hiccup and the transfer rate drops), and this isn't just a piddling little feature.

    As for Ogg - okay, great, so you save your music in Ogg. Glad to meet you. I'm sure you'll find some friends at Slashdot. Too bad none of the people you'll come in contact with on any given day will even know what Ogg Vorbis is, much less have stored their music in that format. Given this, a company investing millions in order to have their hardware play that format is a dubious business plan at best. Very reminicent of a DotBomb business plan.

    The point is that whatever sales Rio ends up with is more likely to be from geeks gutting it for the memory card than because it plays Ogg. And, hey, who knows, there might be a few wacky people running around with one who don't even stick a single Ogg or WMA on there - MP3 is here to stay, it's about time that you remove your head from your rectum and get used to the fact.

  123. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect Slashdot curmudgeons are still reeling from the DotBomb.

    Sales? What's that?

  124. Re:In other news.... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1

    My ass it is.

    It's Apple's best selling MP3 player.

    You'll notice Apple only sells one kind of MP3 player.

    Dumbass.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  125. Re:To Do What? by pyite · · Score: 1
    And as a plus, you've thumbed your nose at the RIAA by buying used CDs.

    This is a common misconception that is blatantly false. By buying used CDs, you're decreasing supply of the product. The end result of this is that another new CD is going to be sold somewhere down the line, thus allowing the RIAA to profit. And as others have pointed out, once you sell a CD, you no longer have the right to possess its contents.

    --

    "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  126. Good luck!! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I don't mean that sarcastically or anything, that sounds like a great trip and I hope it all works out for you.

    One thing you might consider is a portable storage device if you are going to takea lot of picture (and I sure would!!).

    Good to know it worked oK in Death Valley, I was there a year or two ago and that's one of the places I was more worried about taking a Microdrive into. In particular, I was really concerned about getting in and out of an AC car with a microdrive. Most of the time though we just left the windows of the car open with a bit of Ac blowing on us for comfort.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  127. Re:The silver one has problems by raoulotoole · · Score: 1

    The color ones are anodized. The silver one is probably coated with some clear finish to keep the aluminum from oxidizing (rusting).

  128. Re:199$ Neuros, 20gb HD, FM, FM transmitter Open s by Chucker23N · · Score: 1

    Heh, that's funny. I had no idea someone else was going to call it that.

  129. Re:The silver one has problems by sribe · · Score: 1

    The color ones are anodized. The silver one is probably coated with some clear finish to keep the aluminum from oxidizing (rusting).

    Bzzzt! Sorry, the silver one is anodized.

  130. G4 cube by Oh-es-eX · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know what is a reasonable price for a second hand cube? I would love to have one for a good price? The size and weight is what the ipodmini makes a success. When I have my ipod 40GB in my pocket I must wear a belt otherwise my pants are on my knees all the time...

  131. Re: almost-as-small-as-iPod laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's great, almost the price of a full laptop with less than half the screen! AND it's got XP on it? Talk about pee-your-pants excitement, count me in!

    And yes, I hope you notice the sarcasm here, because I'm laying it on pretty thick.

  132. Re:199$ Neuros, 20gb HD, FM, FM transmitter Open s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Neuros is also somewhat immature. For example, if you pop up the menu while playing, the music will stop.

    It's too bad, really, that they could not make a better product. They seem to embrace the open source community.

    If you care about features a lot more than size, the neuros seems to be good player, but for most people, different players will work better.

    If you need vorbis support, a Karma or iRiver will be better.

  133. Re:199$ Neuros, 20gb HD, FM, FM transmitter Open s by pknoll · · Score: 1
    You forgot "Won't sync with iTunes". To me, this is a big deal, since iTunes is my preferred music player.

    The iPod works with iTunes. No other player will, so no other player is pknoll-compatible.

  134. Too high! by CyberdogOSX · · Score: 1
    selling well or not, the price is too high.

    for 50.00 more, i got a 15gb. i can hold three times the music. not too mention the peripherals like the iTrip antenna which i am not sure works on the mini(could be wrong about that).


    it needs to be around 200.00 to make it significantly less than the 15gb model. and the regular iPod is really small anyway, so the size thing is definitely not enough to make it worth giving up 11gb of storage just to have a tinier one.


    my $.02

  135. I'm a Mac fanatic. I like Linux. Obviously not as much as I like OSX, but if I had to I could live on Linux.
    In fact, most of the Macheads I know would be interested in using Linux if OS X wasn't an option. Especially if the alternative was Windoze.