Slashdot Mirror


Mexican Attorney General Gets Microchip in Arm

novakreo writes "Rafael Macedo de la Concha, Mexico's Attorney-General, now has a non-removable microchip in his arm, to track his movements and to give him access to a new crime database, according to Bloomberg. The article says that eventually around 160 Mexican officials will have a chip implanted." (Wired and CNN are both running the very similar Reuters report, too.)

410 comments

  1. Great... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, when someone REALLY wants access to the system, all they'll need is a saw.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    1. Re:Great... by peragrin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most Saws don't work well on humans and would cause scars. You need a fine tooth long blade in a Sawzall, in order to quickly producea clean wound.

      Oh wait did yo want him to live afterwards???

      In that case never mind. An axe will work just as well.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Great... by Scorchio · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry. They've gone to great lengths to let the whole world know it's implanted in his arm, when actually it's in his left leg.

    3. Re:Great... by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I don't think any gang with the nerve to kidnap the Attorney General would worry too much about gouging his arm a little.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      This will really come in handy when they pick him up at the pound.

    5. Re:Great... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Security by obscurity?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    6. re: great... by ed.han · · Score: 1

      cuz, as everyone knows, if the gangs can't find it there, they won't go on a very thorough, massively uncomfortable treasure hunt for it in the rest of him? and really, isn't this providing a motive for getting to him? unless he's decided to take the suicide route and kitted out w/ a bomb that he can trigger upon being abducted by the bad guys, i don't understand the reason for this press release at all.

      ed

    7. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      what i want to know is these mexicans that are getting micro chips, will they be receiving some micro salsa to go with that?

      bada boom crash!

    8. Re:Great... by StuckInSyrup · · Score: 2, Funny

      There must be some security issue, in case his arm is severed. I think the acces to the chip is granted when he licks his own elbow.

      --
      Ni.
    9. Re:Great... by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      Don't get yourself tired.. use a chainsaw!

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    10. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i lolled.

    11. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think one of those water cutter things would be most suitable for the task, though pricy.

    12. Re:Great... by bfg9000 · · Score: 1

      4 out of 5 professional assassins choose a Hattori Hanzo blade. If you have the means, I highly recommend it.

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    13. Re:Great... by Directrix1 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Boy I wish Osama and crew put a system like this into place. It would've been a lot easier to fire a guided cruise missile up his ass, being able to track him no matter where he went and all. I mean, hooray for technology this can only possibly make the world better. Nothing bad can possibly come of this type of action.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    14. Re:Great... by bfg9000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's not his leg.

      *NOW* how's his security?

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    15. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...all they'll need is a saw.

      Nah I think it's like those collars in The Running Man...
      //BOOM

    16. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And think his wife thought it was a ribbed condom this whole time......

    17. Re:Great... by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 1

      So then all the micro-chipped terrorist has to do is ride the New York City subway until you fire the cruise missile, and there goes the subway and a nice sized chunk of New York City. Yep, "nothing bad can possibly come of this type of action".

      How about we *not* help the terrorists blow up things, huh?

      That's as bad as Godzilla, Mothra, Rodan, and Manda basically standing around in bemusement as the Japanese destroyed Tokyo with their artillery in "Destroy All Monsters". What a tragedy that was! ;)

      "Once we wake Godzilla, he'll take care of those guys."
      Ichiro on disposing of the Red Bamboo terrorists.
      "Godzilla, Ebira, Mothra: Big Duel in the South Sea" (Japanese version)

    18. Re:Great... by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 2, Funny

      I likes to use a Sling Blade. Some people call it a Kaiser Blade, but I likes to call it a Sling Blade. Mmm Hmm. You got any of them French Fried Pertaters? Mmm Hmm.

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    19. Re:Great... by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Interesting
      being able to track him no matter where he went

      Does someone think that this chip can be read from further than two meters away?

    20. Re:Great... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Does someone think that this chip can be read from further than two meters away?

      I bet you could read it from way more than two meters if you put him inside a big fat faraday cage and used a superconducting quantum interference device to sense the signal :)

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    21. Re: great... by orpx · · Score: 1

      possibly to encourage the acceptace of getting chips implanted?

    22. Re:Great... by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      Whaddya mean "non removable"?
      NOTHING is "non removable"!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    23. Re:Great... by drtomaso · · Score: 1

      I dont know what you people find so funny about all this. This is a truely great development. Many a time have I been out someplace, when I got a hankerin' for some Mexican Attorney General, only to have to go without because I could find any. Problem solved.

    24. Re:Great... by cylcyl · · Score: 1

      He's Mexican, the salsa is in his blood.

    25. Re:Great... by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      First glue an entangled photon on him.

    26. Re:Great... by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      What I want to know is why this is in the your rights online section. Shouldn't this article be under magro.slashdot.org/storynumber?

      Magro, of course, meaning "Mexican Attorney General's Rights Online."

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    27. Re:Great... by NarrMaster · · Score: 0

      With what, Gluons?
      /ducks....

      --
      That's right. All your base.
    28. Re:Great... by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      Exactamente.

      My first thought: great, they'll rip off his arm. That'll be so much better than merely being tossed in a car's trunk and spirited away for a weekend with a blindfold, won't it?

      Poor guy; they probably told him, "Jeffe, to combat kidnapping we're going to, uh, ARM you." (And to use a pun like that in English, how rude!)

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  2. Yeah well... by nametaken · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...EVERYTHING is removeable. The question is what happens when you do.

    1. Re:Yeah well... by danknight · · Score: 1

      Hmm, reminds me of a star trek TNG episode...

      --
      wanted: one clever sig,apply within
    2. Re:Yeah well... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      It is manufactured out of aethereal adamantium. They then phase shifted it's quantum harmonic oscillation to trans-bond it to his soul.

      I guess it's *possible* to remove it, but it would require a conjugate phase-polarized negentropy singlarity, 42 pounds of cyan peanut butter, a bi-sexual midget, and Wesley Crusher. I'm getting nauseous just imagining the process.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  3. How to cause panic (evil and slightly offtopic) by CdBee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Record his transponder signal, and throw a copy of his chip over the border fence into the USA...

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:How to cause panic (evil and slightly offtopic) by dr_dank · · Score: 0

      I expect to see a better job on these hedges or its back to Hidalgo with you, Mr. Attorney-General.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:How to cause panic (evil and slightly offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet... attach the copied chip to a goose.

    3. Re:How to cause panic (evil and slightly offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This should be MANDATORY.

      This way Mexicans can use the EZ Pass lane at the Southern California Border Checkpoints and don't tie up the rest of us who have to wait in line to have our cars searched for illegal Mexicans.....

      Hey wait a minute!

  4. His is a beautiful mind? by YetAnotherName · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. Re:His is a beautiful mind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BWHAHAHA. This is by far the funniest thing I have read in MONTHS. This is just hillarious!

  5. Thoughts... by mirko · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. If he gets kidnapped, I guess I know what will be sent as a proof of his detention... I just hope he didn't have it implanted in his writing (and pizza^Wtortilla-eating) arm.
    2. Is this the same chip that the Okinawese scholards are supposed to get ?
    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:Thoughts... by Azrael+Newtype · · Score: 1
      1. It's Okinawan if anything, not that it matters too much.
      2. The kids getting RFID are from Osaka, not Okinawa. This is still mostly irrelevant.
      3. No. RFID is much less intricate than what they're talking about.
      --
      I'm always right and I can prove it, because to the best of my knowledge, I've never been wrong.
  6. Not necessarily by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The technology exists such that they could in theory make this thing only operate when pysically attached to the body ( say, powered off of blood or bloodflow ), and only operate when in contact with his specific blood type.

    So to use it, a perpetraitor would have to a) Kidnap him, b ) cut off his arm, c) surgically graft the thing into someone else with the same blood type.

    Hopefully by that point they'd have de-activated his chip.

    I imagine in a few years we'd even be able to make these things DNA specific.

    1. Re:Not necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      So to use it, a perpetraitor would have to a) Kidnap him, b ) cut off his arm, c) surgically graft the thing into someone else with the same blood type.

      How about just giving him an icepick lobotomy?

    2. Re:Not necessarily by nametaken · · Score: 1

      I'm more interested in the HOW part, myself. I'd like to know if they managed to strap or adhere it to a bone. I'd also like to know what kind of technology they use to make that thing strong enough to be locateable "anywhere". I guess it can't be passive, right?

    3. Re:Not necessarily by fubar1971 · · Score: 1

      Check out this article Here

      If I was a gambling man, I bet it can't be much different.

    4. Re:Not necessarily by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      So to use it, a perpetraitor would have to a) Kidnap him, b ) cut off his arm, c) surgically graft the thing into someone else with the same blood type.

      Well, it's good to see that Mexico is encourgaing creative usage of new technologies, anyway.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    5. Re:Not necessarily by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      Why not just take a pint of blood with you when you grab the arm? Hell, you only need a little vial of it, like those urine sample containers doctors use.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    6. Re:Not necessarily by kabocox · · Score: 1

      The technology exists such that they could in theory make this thing only operate when pysically attached to the body ( say, powered off of blood or bloodflow ), and only operate when in contact with his specific blood type.

      So to use it, a perpetraitor would have to a) Kidnap him, b ) cut off his arm, c) surgically graft the thing into someone else with the same blood type.

      Hopefully by that point they'd have de-activated his chip.

      I imagine in a few years we'd even be able to make these things DNA specific.


      Just wait till we start doing human genetic tinkering. I bet one of the first ideas would an internal organ that's sole purpose is to broadcast out a small DNA finger print. All you'd have to do is develop one really good version then you put it into all the people that you want tracked. Then you never have to worry about tracking them or their offspring. To be really evil, you'd make death or extreme illness happen if this organ were removed.

    7. Re:Not necessarily by haluness · · Score: 1

      > Just wait till we start doing human genetic
      > tinkering. I bet one of the first ideas would an
      > internal organ that's sole purpose is to broadcast
      > out a small DNA finger print

      Woah! Been reading a lot of SF lately I take it? :)

    8. Re:Not necessarily by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      Didn't you see the movie minority report. The guy was a wanted criminal and he still had access with his removed eye.

    9. Re:Not necessarily by kabocox · · Score: 1, Funny

      Woah! Been reading a lot of SF lately I take it? :)

      Yeah, this would be "do able." All we really need to figure out is how to get an organ to transmit radio waves. Then we refine that from barely tranmiting RF to tranmitting RF out to about a mile. Every cell in our body has a copy of our DNA. It should be that difficult to pick enough markers for the individual to be unquie. Then you have the organ just operate 24x7 similar to the heart. Then we'd just have it passed down to all the offspring. Actually, all the really hard parts could be tested out in other organisms before field testing it in humans.

      Of course you could be evil and design cockroaches that broadcast out random RFID tags or copied useful RFID tags. Could you imagine tring to find your RFID keys in the morning when your house says that you have 10 copies of them moving around in different rooms?

      Remember SF is good for thinking about things that may or may not be that far in the future.

    10. Re:Not necessarily by nametaken · · Score: 1


      That's a good article, but the article for this says that the guy can be located "anywhere". That gives me the impression that you don't need to be in close proximity.

    11. Re:Not necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All we really need to figure out is how to get an organ to transmit radio waves.

      Great! We could also tie them into the 802.11Z networks and have "always on, always connected" internet!

    12. Re:Not necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, two things:

      1) You could probably put it in a bag of blood of the same type and circulate it mechanically.

      2) It's probably a hell of a lot easier just to hold a gun to the poor guy's head.

      I really don't think this makes things more secure. It just makes things a LOT more unpleasant when someone decides to steal them...

    13. Re:Not necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The tech exists to do lots of things, much of it not mass producible or reliable. We have close loop diabetes type 1 solutions that are not in use to do, we can transplant islet of langerhan cells to do the same (NEJM article covered this sometime last year), and the like. We can build nano devices today.

      You seeing them? No, because either there is no market, they are not economical, or the risk is too high.

      Look, if it's possible to build, it's possible to work around. The *only* things I've seen that are near impossible to work around is crypto and certain quantum effects. Whatever they are doing biologically, it's possible to disable, but may simply not be *easy* to do. The story is just spin to make it sound impossible or very difficult.

      If the thing is embedded, it likely has a pressure sensor on it in case someone tries to remove it with surgery. They *think* it can't be beat. Blood type is ridiculously easy to compensate for. Direct immunological matching would be better, but also possible to work around.

      This is security through obscurity with a mean technical hill to covercome, nothing more. The worse thing is that they think it's impossible to overcome, meaning they're more likely to slip up. This is evident since their claims are more for sure; I'm not exactly sure why anyone would do this compared to typical excellent security practices and procedures today, e.g. id card with password with rotating password.

    14. Re:Not necessarily by uberdood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if it was tied to his DNA for operation, I still don't see how the chip is non-removable. If it can be inserted INTO the body, it can be removed.

      --
      "Population 1,656"
    15. Re:Not necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No thank you, DoS attacks would be too brutal...

    16. Re:Not necessarily by eblum · · Score: 1

      It isn't that new. This kind of technologies have years. The only thing novel about it: Now they're being used on humans. Pedigree dogs use these kind of chips to prevent their robbery since 5 years or more.

    17. Re:Not necessarily by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      I imagine in a few years we'd even be able to make these things DNA specific. no need for that, have a electrical sensor that detects and SD'd when it detects no heartbeat for %TIME

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  7. Can't be removed? by jerith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "can't be removed" -- I doubt that. *Anything* can be removed from the human body if the remover the required skill and doesn't really care about collateral damage.

    I suddenly have a mental image of a Mexican criminal trying to get into a government installation carrying an arm...

    1. Re:Can't be removed? by slart42 · · Score: 0

      >*Anything* can be removed from the human body if the
      >remover the required skill and doesn't really care about
      >collateral damage.

      shouldn't that read "*or* doesn't really care about
      collateral damage." ?

    2. Re:Can't be removed? by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Funny

      I suddenly have a mental image of a Mexican criminal trying to get into a government installation carrying an arm...

      If he doesn't get in there, he can just go to a convenience store to commit an "armed" robbery.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    3. Re:Can't be removed? by jerith · · Score: 0

      He's already committed "arm" robbery...

    4. Re:Can't be removed? by jerith · · Score: 1

      not necessarily -- removing certain objects (such as the central nervous system) from the human body pretty much guarantee that the patient won't survive...

    5. Re:Can't be removed? by boaworm · · Score: 1

      What happens if he gets fired ? I'd be interested in seing that debate :-)

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    6. Re:Can't be removed? by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      Well if he gets fired, they revoke his clearance like everyone else. He'll just be some guy in Mexico with a RFID chip in him.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    7. Re:Can't be removed? by kyknos.org · · Score: 4, Funny

      "In the case of Mexico, where the vast majority of its citizens have sub-average intelligence" you are an American and Bush voter, aren't you?

      --

      SHE does throw dice.
    8. Re:Can't be removed? by yarisbandit · · Score: 1

      Aaaaarrrggghhhhm, what a bad pun ;)

    9. Re:Can't be removed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently dry sarcasm is a bit beyond your menal capabilities to comprehend, and apparently those of some mods too.

    10. Re:Can't be removed? by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, he is a racist or an idiot. After that, it doesn't matter what he is or who he votes for.

      You, on the other hand, smear both Americans and Bush voters as being like this racist idiot guy. Pot Kettle Black.

    11. Re:Can't be removed? by philbert26 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "In the case of Mexico, where the vast majority of its citizens have sub-average intelligence" you are an American and Bush voter, aren't you?

      Yes, I'm sure that someone with a phobia of Mexicans will vote for Bush. The right wing are really happy with his policies on immigration.

    12. Re:Can't be removed? by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 4, Funny

      You, on the other hand, smear both Americans and Bush voters as being like this racist idiot guy. Pot Kettle Black.

      *ahem* That's "Pot Kettle African-American," you insensitive clod.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    13. Re:Can't be removed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't live with the must stupid human race, blacks, that fuck your women!!

    14. Re:Can't be removed? by ganhawk · · Score: 1

      "smear both Americans and Bush voters"

      Bush voters are no longer Americans ? :)

      --
      Python script to convert photos into "artsy" portraits: http://p2pbridge.sf.net/pyPortrait/
    15. Re:Can't be removed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That comment didn't seem to make much sense.

    16. Re:Can't be removed? by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      Query: In Mexico is it legal to keep and bear arms?

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    17. Re:Can't be removed? by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Yes...and no.... anything past a 38 special has to be registered at the secretary of defense

      --
      NO SIG
    18. Re:Can't be removed? by rooijan · · Score: 1

      Would that not make the Mexican criminal a one-armed bandit?

      --
      Daar is nie 'n lepel nie
    19. Re:Can't be removed? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Hey, we murrikins have a message for your kind.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    20. Re:Can't be removed? by karniv0re · · Score: 1

      I think, rather, they meant "can't be easily removed." That makes more sense anyway.

    21. Re:Can't be removed? by NarrMaster · · Score: 0

      Not in my book. Course, Kerry voters aren't either. I guess I'm just cynical like that....

      --
      That's right. All your base.
    22. Re:Can't be removed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it... "moran"? Is that a word? Or are you just too much of a moron to be able to spell "moron"?

    23. Re:Can't be removed? by paul-h-squared · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I think the author must be insane.

  8. Exagerated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can a chip (or anything else) be non-removable?

    Given that it's some kind of RFID, the range is probably quite limited. The chip can be traced only when it is quite close to a detector. I think he can be tracked as long as he doesn't leave his office building.

  9. Welcome to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why is it sci-fi movies of years past tend to predict the future

    terminator/2, cafe flesh etc etc :)

    Anyways im still waiting for the flying cars..

    1. Re:Welcome to the Future by ThePilgrim · · Score: 1

      I was thinking mor on the lines of Nuromancer.

      Doidn't the mega corps chip their science personall.

      --
      Wouldn't it be nice if schools got all the money they wanted and the army had to hold jumble sales for guns
    2. Re:Welcome to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps it's because the children watching these shows today are the ones guiding developement of technology tomorrow?

      self fufilling prophecy, the lot of it. not the only way we could have done technology.

      And if movies are a predicter.. oh shite

    3. Re:Welcome to the Future by kjeldor · · Score: 1

      What are you waiting for?

    4. Re:Welcome to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not really like that, the future tends to emulate the past writings of the future, we get inspired by someone's ideas and try to make them happen... though of course in most cases it's only the stuff that the writer wants to make sure we don't do that get the most money thrown at them in R&D ... must mean that those who want it made forgot to finish the book/movie to realize the full implications of their invention.

      oh, well. I guess those that do finish the book, know how it ends so there's no surprise.

    5. Re:Welcome to the Future by Rostin · · Score: 1

      Well, when enough of them are made, one or two are bound to get a few details correct.

    6. Re:Welcome to the Future by JofCoRe · · Score: 1

      Anyways im still waiting for the flying cars..

      I got your flying car right here, buddy :)

      --

      Place sig here.
  10. Homeland Security masterplan by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1, Funny

    Homeland security soons hopes, through coersion, fear, FUD, false warnings and money, to install trackable microchips in every Mexican by the year 2020.

    Upon so doing it will be able to monitor all immigrants crossing the border, and those without chips will obviously be terrorists.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Homeland security soons [sic] hopes, through coersion [sic], fear, FUD, false warnings and money, to install trackable microchips in every Mexican by the year 2020.

      I suppose you intended this a humor, but I fear you're right. I suspect Homeland Security -- or actually, the U.S. Treasury, may even be behind this.



      From the article: The chip can't be removed, but will be deactivated after Macedo's term as attorney general expires, he said.

      Now, did Mexico implant 160 government employees with non-removable chips at the behest of the Bush Administration?

      According to Fox News (emphasis orthogonal's):

      WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration announced Tuesday [6 July 2004] that it has resumed sharing a wide range of financial information with Mexico with the aim of trying to catch money launderers (search), drug dealers and terrorist financiers.

      In April, the United States had suspended sharing such information with Mexico, dealing a blow to cross-border crime fighting, which had resulted in the arrests of several high-profile drug lords.

      The U.S. government did so after sensitive information provided by the [U.S.] Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network was leaked by Mexican officials. After the suspension, the network outlined a set of steps that Mexico should take before the United States would agree to resume information-sharing.

      The Treasury Department said Tuesday that Mexico has since taken steps to safeguard sensitive financial information it receives from the United States and other countries.


      Were employees told to get the chip or to find another job? Especially bad is that the chip can be "deactivated" but not removed. Even deactivated, can it be detected? Conversely, if it can't be detected after detection because it has its, for instance, own power source which is turned off by deactivation -- unlike RFID chips which reflect the powered signal of a detector --, what do you do when the power runs out? Stick in yet another chip?

      I realize the price of dealing with a superpower can be high, but I never imagined that it would be as high as treating your country's citizens like livestock.

      This is terribly dehumanizing. Employees no longer just have an employee number, then have serial number like any animal on a feedlot, like any other cog in a machine -- and they don't just have it, they have it inside them. This is dystopian science fiction reified.

      The chip is reminiscent of the terrible and also un-removable serial number tattoos that Nazis forced on Jews and other concentration camp inmates.

      And I'm sure certain Christians will recall the "Number of the Beast" in the Christian Book of Revelation.

      Regardless of the recollections that spring to mind, this is a horrible defeat for humans and for humanity, and a great victory for the omnipresent, omnipotent "Big Brother" State.

      Shout out against this now -- shout to the roof tops -- or in ten years you'll have to decide between getting a chip of your own or losing your job -- and in twenty years, some bland man from Homeland Security will tell you that for "security reasons, you understand" you have no choice at all to refuse a chip.
    2. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Offtopic I know, but;

      Terrorist, Terrorist... Is it just me or has "Terrorist" simply replaced the decades old and now obsolete buzzword "Communist". Never have two words caused so much fear, the USA needs to get a grip.

    3. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by JustDisGuy · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Shout out against this now -- shout to the roof tops -- or in ten years you'll have to decide between getting a chip of your own or losing your job

      First - it isn't going to take ten years. Five at the outside.
      Second - this is not going to be just about jobs. This is going to be about whether you can buy groceries or not.
      Third - refuse at all costs, even unto (mortal) death. There's no disputing that RFID tags (at the very least - MIGHT!) represent the Mark of the Beast from the Book of Revelations. If so, the payoff for your faithfulness will be far greater than the immediate gains you make in this life, and they will last longer.

      Speak out against this by all means, and do so LOUDLY but don't be surprised when all this comes to pass anyway. Be prepared.
      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." - Hanlon's Razor
    4. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by Dachannien · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How does tin-foil crap like this get modded upwards?

      A simple application of Occam's Razor will tell you that a much simpler explanation - and likely the correct explanation - is that the Mexican AG realizes that in a country with significant government corruption and organized crime, he needs all the protection he can get. That includes discouraging people from kidnapping or killing him by making his whereabouts known at all times to the lawful and uncorrupted segments of the government.

    5. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by xSauronx · · Score: 1

      So does that mean that part of the Bible was somehow right, or is it entirely a coincidence that this is beginning to happen?

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    6. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by LtOcelot · · Score: 1

      A span of 2000 years includes plenty of room for coincidental fulfillment of prophecy.

    7. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dear. If you're going to argue against RFID, for goodness' sakes do it on fact, not on some hocu-pocus religious crap invented by some fruitcake who lived 2000 years ago. All you are doing is giving amunition to the proponents of the technology who will shout gleefully that the only people who resist are those who are clearly irrational.

    8. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by Paulrothrock · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      There's no disputing that RFID tags (at the very least - MIGHT!) represent the Mark of the Beast from the Book of Revelations. If so, the payoff for your faithfulness will be far greater than the immediate gains you make in this life, and they will last longer.

      Stow the Xian Fundie crap. It doesn't work here. The fear of having a chip implanted is plenty for people to not do it. There are many benefits "in this life" for not having a chip implanted than to offer people another life that may or may not exist.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    9. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by aero6dof · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What? Mexico has a problem with "significant government corruption and organized crime" (including BTW judges and other officials being assasinated) and the solution is to put a location tracking device on the officials? Am I missing something here?

    10. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Still, if you're only given the choices right limb or forehead when you are chipped, I'd probably be worried...

    11. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by forgetmenot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't fight it. Join it. Yup... when they start forcing RFID chips into my body, I'll add another 1,000,000 or so of my own all so the whitenoise will drown out the signal of the original.
      I should make sure that would work first though, shouldn't I.

    12. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are missing the supposition that ALL officals and agents of a given government are not corrupt or in bed with organized crime. However, given the anti-government slant of most slashdoters, it is understandable.

      More to the point, even though things are improving, it can be awfully hard to tell who's side the various mexican authorities are on. I was assigned to give a paper on sea turtles. In the course of this research I found an article that refered to an incident in 1998. The rangers of a natural preserve busted a ring of sea turtle egg poachers ("poaching" not in the cooking sense, obviously). However, the poachers had members of the local federales as guards. Now, try to imagine a running gun battle between two dozen Yellow Stone Park rangers and FBI agents.

    13. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FOX News only refers to FINANCIAL information. There is an agreement between both countries to share financial information when transactions are suspected of being part of money laundering or drug operations. The US suspended sharing information after left-wing Mexico City mayor released bank transaction information from a corrupt official that was in the middle of a fraud scandal, thus violating the agreement between the US and Mexico concerning public disclosure.

      Rafael Macedo implanted the chip because Mexico is currently experiencing a high wave of crime and is re-defining its justice system. This includes the creation of a new high-tech national security center which only people at the highest levels of authority will be able to access. Note that there has never ever been mention of US participating in this center and I would doubt any foreign diplomat would be allowed in this center. Mexico is a sovereign country, it is absurd to think that the US Treasury department is behind every decision the government makes.

    14. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      God. You people are all idiots.

      This thing would have to be the size of a Sharpee in order to even remotely be used as a 'tracking device', especially in a country with such poor communications facilities as Mexico.

      More likely, this probably was the doing of the US, but there's probably no more intent than limiting access to said sensitive information to responsible members of government.

      We can't go trusting Mexicans with a smartcard they can say they 'lost'. If they 'lose' their arm, on the other hand, then there's a bit more cause for a friendly little visit from 'Mr. CIA'.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    15. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by aero6dof · · Score: 1

      "You are missing the supposition that ALL officals and agents of a given government are not corrupt or in bed with organized crime. However, given the anti-government slant of most slashdoters, it is understandable."

      I wasn't implying that any gov't officials are corrupt - Just trying to figure out how putting on a location tracker helps keep officials safe?

  11. Mod Parent Up by mfh · · Score: 1

    > Does he really have one?
    Great reference!!! I think if he doesn't really have one, then maybe he's not really the Attourney General, either. Maybe he's just a plantation worker who fell in the Coke vats? IEEEEEEEEEEYIEIEIEIEIE!!!

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  12. Mark of the devil!!! by mystereys · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm just waiting for the conspiracy theorists on this one:

    It's the sign on the devil! Apocalypse is upon us! Major League Baseball really is tracking our movements!

    --
    "Righteous speed demon and trust fund party darling of justice"
    1. Re:Mark of the devil!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'Conspiracy theorists' have been going about this for ages saying we'll have them in our cloths, shops and arms within no time at all...

      Doesnt a conspiracy require some kind of secrecy?

    2. Re:Mark of the devil!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've had two articles on how RFID is a good thing (first Japanese kids, then Mexican officials). Is this an attempt to soften public opinion for a new front on the war against terrorism? If everyone has a tag, we'll soon know the terrorists from the general population.

    3. Re:Mark of the devil!!! by JustDisGuy · · Score: 1
      Doesnt a conspiracy require some kind of secrecy

      "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmumnd Burke

      People can whine, bitch and complain as much as they like - that's democracy. It's the lack of anyone actually doing anything about it that will allow it to happen.
      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." - Hanlon's Razor
    4. Re:Mark of the devil!!! by Gorath99 · · Score: 1
      "Righteous speed demon and trust fund party darling of justice" (If you know where that quote is from, I'm your fan!)
      I could never resist a challenge. Description of Blitzen in The Tick vs. Europe (Episode 33).
    5. Re:Mark of the devil!!! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting for the conspiracy theorists on this one:
      It's the sign on the devil!


      What I want to know is why the religious right isn't all up in arms about that one.

      The goverment is actually moving forward with apocalyptic prophecies, doing the beast's work no less, and the religious groups are not on this? Why?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:Mark of the devil!!! by mystereys · · Score: 1

      Gorath99, you just made my day. =D I'm still waiting for the official animated Tick DVDs to come out. Maybe someday... *sigh*

      Sorry to get so incredibly off-topic.

      --
      "Righteous speed demon and trust fund party darling of justice"
    7. Re:Mark of the devil!!! by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      The religious right probably isn't up in arms abou this because, it has been prophesied. Therefore it must happen. And in their prophesy, the end result is ultimately good. They are sitting in anticipation of the rapture -- they probably want the RFID tagging to happen faster so the rapture comes sooner.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    8. Re:Mark of the devil!!! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The religious right probably isn't up in arms abou this because, it has been prophesied. Therefore it must happen. And in their prophesy, the end result is ultimately good. They are sitting in anticipation of the rapture -- they probably want the RFID tagging to happen faster so the rapture comes sooner.

      I guess I should expect logic from people like that, but it seems to me that supporting the devils work because it has been prophetised shouldn't be a good excuse when you get to heaven's gates...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    9. Re:Mark of the devil!!! by Gorath99 · · Score: 1
      Heh, easiest good deed I've done in a while.

      The Tick does indeed rock, but I have to admit that I wouldn't have recognized the quote if I hadn't had the help of my good friend google :-)

    10. Re:Mark of the devil!!! by karniv0re · · Score: 1
      What I want to know is why the religious right isn't all up in arms about that one.
      Because, no doubt, John Ashcroft will be behind it 100%.
  13. tracking? by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    anyone else doubt the tracking ability of this thing? it would need both a fairly decent rx/antenna, and also a fairly good transmitter to get that info back out. since mexico isn't known for the incredible cell coverage, the incoming part would at least have to be gps. outgoing could be cell, but would be better served by satellite also. So they fit two satellite radio devices into this guy, complete with high gain antennas?

    1. Re:tracking? by DosBubba · · Score: 0

      He himself can become the antenna. Makes you wonder if he just went on a high fiber diet...

    2. Re:tracking? by JJahn · · Score: 1

      Yep, now he's broadcasting pirated TV through his satellite receivers and transmitters!

      Seriously, its probably just a passive type device like most RFID tags. Its powered by the electromagnetic energy of the reader (the thing that would be installed at say, the government offices). I could be wrong though.

    3. Re:tracking? by pappin · · Score: 1

      It'll be an RFID chip. See: This example RFID chip from Microchip Inc.

    4. Re:tracking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean fibre? :-)

    5. Re:tracking? by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, the article says as he goes about the city. I imagine the chip readers are installed at the doors to various governmental buildings. Between that and tracking his official car, they can follow his whereabouts pretty effectively.

      As to range, I keep reading people saying it's only a very short distance, yet I have heard they have some good rfid now they can place on goods inside of steel locked containers and read them effectively outside the container. That's decent range and power, and I am sure they probably have much better ones that aren't common public knowledge yet. And yes, using the skin as the antenna and part of the transmitting power source would be effective, you would imagine.

    6. Re:tracking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the article says as he goes about the city. I imagine the chip readers are installed at the doors to various governmental buildings. Between that and tracking his official car, they can follow his whereabouts pretty effectively.

      Wow, talk about doing your enemy's scut-work for them.

      Now, instead of a kidnapper having to tail his quarry for a few days to find out habits and schedule, they just have to break into a computer system and download his itinary history. Unlike physical tailing, which is very likely to be noticed unless you're really good, breaking into a database is pretty easy and untraceable.

      This fellow is going to be kidnapped for ransom sooner or later. Hope he thinks it was worth the convenience factor to hand the kidnappers the tools needed to do the deed.

    7. Re:tracking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      breaking into a database is pretty easy and untraceable.

      Why do you think that? I think you've watched too many movies.

    8. Re:tracking? by locr1an · · Score: 1

      Does this mean he's on a Mexican Radio?? No comprende :-/

    9. Re:tracking? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      I agree. I read the article yesterday on CNN and thought that the "tracking" claim was bogus. I think it is aimed at discouraging kidnappers who have seen too many Tom Clancy movies. I doubt that they did more than put in a small RFID chip that has a range of 10 cm at most. They could track his presence at a doorway, but they wouldn't know where he is if he isn't passing very close to a reader.

      What this is really going to do is cause the kidnappers to cut both his arms off to make sure they aren't tracked.

    10. Re:tracking? by alexborges · · Score: 1

      since mexico isn't known for the incredible cell coverage

      Well... actually it is known for that:

      Damn, cant find a link. ... Ok, we have 95% cellular coverage in the same GPS network (by telmex, the only large telecom in the world actually making money) and two other separate urban cell networks (a large GPS by telefonica de españa - owned by the third largest financial group in the world. And one by iusa, a smaller mexican owned, non GPS, network).

      --
      NO SIG
    11. Re:tracking? by Anne.O.Neimaus · · Score: 1

      Getting signal through a Faraday Cage (grounded, full-surround steel container) sounds like a pretty good trick, to me. Do you have a reference I could read?

    12. Re:tracking? by zogger · · Score: 1

      I know I read about one before, but can't find a reference fast for that. I did find a seal rfid tag reference though for containers, which I know isn't the same thing. perhaps the inside rfid uses the container shell as the antenna, to beat the farady cage deal.
      shipping container seals and tracking
      scroll down, little article in there on tracking using rfid and gps in tandem.

    13. Re:tracking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not Radio Frequency -- if they were smart they would use something with a unique radioactive signature. Nothing that would hurt the guy, but something that could easily and passively track by sattelite.

      Of course, wrapping his arm in lead would stop that., but the criminals would have to know this.

      This wouldn't work for the average Joe, but I sure could see it for heads of state.

    14. Re:tracking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need much to track this thing. Lets say that sensitive information is leaked, a search goes out to find the person responsible- obviously they have one of these things that has a unique identifier. So a sensor in goverment buildings, police buildings, airports, train stations, marinas, maybe even randomly scattered around a city if they have the funding picks up one of these devices passing by. Bingo, you know where your man is.

  14. Hmm by mukund · · Score: 1

    Remember what Boris the Blade did to Frankie Four-Fingers cause he attached the suitcase to his arm?

    --
    Banu
    1. Re:Hmm by bhsurfer · · Score: 0
      That sneaky f'in russian.

      [movie switch]

      You want an arm? I can get you an arm by 3:00 this afternoon...WITH a chip!

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
      Groucho Marx
    2. Re:Hmm by Angry_Admin · · Score: 1

      "Well' you're plenty fucking stupid, I'll give you that. Do you have any idea why they call him Franky Four Fingers, Doug?"
      "Well, because he makes stupid bets with dangerous people. And when he doesn't pay up, they give him the chop, Doug. And I'm not talking about his fucking foreskin either."

      --
      Wait a minute. I got it. You could play with your magic nose goblins.
  15. Re:I for one... by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 2, Informative

    Federali wouldn't be a word in Spanish. Maybe Italian or Latin, but not Spanish. I think the Spanish word would be Federales.

  16. Reboot? by FuzzyShrimp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, do you kick hin in the ass to reboot the thing?

    1. Re:Reboot? by SpinyManiac · · Score: 1
      --
      It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
    2. Re:Reboot? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Crap, are you saying the chip is running Windows?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  17. A chip to "give him access" ? by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Funny

    What, with an internal heads-up-display, a la the Terminator
    I am Attorney Sancho Panza of Borg, prepare to be indicted!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:A chip to "give him access" ? by eluusive · · Score: 1

      .....Hello my name is Attorney Sancho Panza of Borg, you killed my father! Prepare to be indicted!

    2. Re:A chip to "give him access" ? by Adrian+De+Leon · · Score: 1

      The character (from Don Quijote) Sancho Panza was from Spain not Mexico.

      Yes, I am nitpicking :-)

      --
      adl

      My boring ramblings
  18. And Just Think! by HBPiper · · Score: 1

    He'll be buying all those drinks "on the arm"...
    Remember this?

    --
    "I went on a diet, swore off drinking and heavy eating. And in fourteen days, I had lost exactly two weeks. Joe E. Lewis
  19. RFID? by howman · · Score: 0

    And his parents can track him on his way to work...
    All he needs now is the school girl uniform and a red knapsack.

    --
    flinging poop since 1969
    1. Re:RFID? by ThePilgrim · · Score: 1

      Please leve your fantisies out off ...

      Oh, sorry this IS Slashdot :)

      --
      Wouldn't it be nice if schools got all the money they wanted and the army had to hold jumble sales for guns
  20. Wow! Another "cyborg"! by djkitsch · · Score: 2, Informative

    It looks like he's giving Professor Kevin Warwick a run for his money...

    Next step: interfacing with computers using mind control!

    --
    sig:- (wit >= sarcasm)
  21. Microchip in arm by Avada+Kedavra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Civilian contractors in Iraq need this technology
    not Mexican Attorney Generals.

    1. Re:Microchip in arm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Terrorists will look for the scar, and cut the limb (arm,leg,head) before even saying they have him hostage.

      Also, since this is Mexico we're talking about, the possibility of kidnapping is also very high.

      A question why do you think you have the right to say to Mexicans (or any other country for that matter) they don't need this technology but we USians do? Because Mexico it's just the whore house of the US? Because they have less money than we do? It's THEIR prerrogative. It's THEIR choice, like it or not. If you want the chips implanted on civilians in Iraq, tell Ashcroft/Rumsfeld/Dubya, not Mexicans.

    2. Re:Microchip in arm by OlafW · · Score: 1

      If I were a contractor in Iraq, I'd pay my own good money for this kind of insurance (assuming, of course that it actually works).

    3. Re:Microchip in arm by sanctimonius+hypocrt · · Score: 1

      Okay, real-time tracking of politicians. Maybe RFID isn't so bad after all.


    4. Re:Microchip in arm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't implant it in their heads.

    5. Re:Microchip in arm by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      From the articles, it is unclear why anyone would need this technology, nationalism (racism?) aside.

      There are a million different ways this chip could have been implemented, and very few of them would actually increase the security of whatever database they're talking about. I hope we get more details.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  22. I can tell you one thing by adeyadey · · Score: 2, Funny

    This guy really does have a chip on his shoulder..

    (ok ok arm, its close..)

    Seriously though, is there really any justification for this? Is this not something that can be achieved by other, less obtrusive methods?

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    1. Re:I can tell you one thing by CaptainCheese · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe they're just really sick of him forgetting his pass.

      --
      -- .sigs are a waste of data...turn them off...
    2. Re:I can tell you one thing by imkonen · · Score: 1
      Is there a mod +1 "groan"?

      Yeah, I don't know if I'm blurring the line between sci-fi and reality, but aren't there already working biometrics systems that could serve as a unique identifier without requiring implantation? Retinal scanners, fingerprint scanners, etc?

      I suspect part of the answer is the tracking capability..the article didn't mention it, but Mexico is suffering a crime wave of kidnappings for ransoms. Perhaps his job makes him a particularly vulnerable/valuable target. I imagine he and his family are at least upper middle class if not downright rich, but that doesn't really explain why this is a requirement of his job and not just a suggested preventative measure for all wealthy residents of Mexico.

    3. Re:I can tell you one thing by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I'm blurring the line between sci-fi and reality..
      Isnt that why slashdot exists?

      For id purposes such as system access, yes one of the new biometric systems would suffice. Even a chipped card & password probably would too. Interesting point about kidnaps - I had forgotton about that - although I have visited mexico & columbia.. But would an ID chip be a lot of help? they only work at close range, and surely all the kidnapper would have to do is wrap the arm in tin foil. (like his hat).

      If he was chipping himself as a precursor to saying "Ive done it, so this is ok to do on criminals too", that is the start of a very slippery slope..

      Oh, and I think you mean "-1 groan"..

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  23. Upgrades by iCharles · · Score: 3, Informative
    I've always had a problem with implantable technologies for non-medical purposes (i.e. not pacemakers, replacement valves, etc.). Basically, you wind up with
    • Having to make all sorts of backward compatibility on a single standard.
    • Competing standards requiring multiple implants. (and you thought browser wars were bad!)
    • Surgery every few years to upgrade (would Best Buy take an old implant back?)
    • A lot of old chips collecting in your arm, leg, neck, etc.
    1. Re:Upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've always had a problem with implantable technologies for non-medical purposes

      Oh you have not, you pretentious twit.

  24. yes but.. by Mr.+Smokey+Mcpot · · Score: 5, Funny

    can you run linux on Him? Now that's what I call an Embedded solution.

    1. Re:yes but.. by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      Give Bush a chip and I'll run Windows on him...

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    2. Re:yes but.. by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2, Funny

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of attorney generals!

      Sorry.

    3. Re:yes but.. by Mr.+Smokey+Mcpot · · Score: 1

      if my first cliche wasn't bad enough... Now if only someone could come up with a way to hook all them together. They could have a 160 node beowolf cluster of Mexican officials.

    4. Re:yes but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No does the chip support OGG?

    5. Re:yes but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, since they're human, they have a plug in front that can connect to the port in the back... granted, that'd be a serial connection, so you don't want to have one in the middle fail...

    6. Re:yes but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cluster of Mexicans

      And I bet they can replace roofs and pick tomatoes at (3/4)n the speed too!

    7. Re:yes but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The correct plural is "attorneys general", not "attorney generals". If you're going to use a tired joke, at least have the decency to employ correct grammar.

    8. Re:yes but.. by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1
      can you run linux on Him?

      That would require a mod chip.

    9. Re:yes but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than Windows. Brings a whole new meaning to a virus carrier.

  25. The REAL reason he did it... by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    ...was to it easier for him to booze at the Baja Beach Club in Barcelona.

  26. Next election by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1, Insightful
    This guy seems to be assuming that he will never be our of office. An unremovable microchip giving access to a crime database seems a bit out of place for a private citizen.

    On the other hand, if *I* can get access to the Crime database at the price of being tracked everywhere, where do I sign up? I'm sure I can find a way to profit from such access.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re:Next election by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you consider the US senate has a retention rate of about 90%, most high level polititians wont really leave the shadow of power.

    2. Re:Next election by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      He's not a Senator - he's the Attorney General. Soon as El Presidente loses an election, there'll be a new AG.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re:Next election by godglike · · Score: 2

      Well he is Mexico where they have changed party once in 70+ years, IIRC.

      When Ashcroft getting one? We REALLY want to know where he is all the time...

    4. Re:Next election by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless elections are cancelled because of 'terrorist threat' ...

    5. Re:Next election by huge · · Score: 2, Informative
      This guy seems to be assuming that he will never be our of office. An unremovable microchip giving access to a crime database seems a bit out of place for a private citizen.
      The article clearly states that it can be deactivated once he leaves the office.
      --
      -- Reality checks don't bounce.
  27. not only useless but dangerous by koan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How hard is it to block the signal? kidnap them throw them in a foil lined body bag then scan later in a basement to remove.
    I guess in one sense you could mail them the chip to prove you have the official.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:not only useless but dangerous by lovecult · · Score: 1

      hmm...

      Is that a Mexican Attorney General in your tinfoil lined bag?

      Or are you just pleased to see me?

    2. Re:not only useless but dangerous by koan · · Score: 1

      kidnap shake n bake =)

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  28. Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by Theovon · · Score: 0, Troll

    I can't wait for all the Christians to start wailing about 666 and the antichrist and stuff.

    What they don't know is that the number was originally 616 and that these numbers were the result of a popular mental exercise of the ancient world where you would add up the numerical values of the letters of some famous person's name and then have others try to guess what name corresponds to the sum. I think 666 corresponded to Calligula, and 616 was some other Caesar.

    1. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by rooijan · · Score: 1

      Do you happen to have any URL's with more on this? You've piqued my curiosity...

      Yes, I am aware that google will yield many should I just take a look, but I thought someone that wrote about might have more relevant links than the tons of dross google would probably serve up.

      --
      Daar is nie 'n lepel nie
    2. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by aborchers · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Citation?

      Funny, BTW, that you misspelled Caligula with an extra L, which would add 30 to the number of his name (696?) by the numerological scheme I'm familiar with. I don't know how it would match with that used of first century Christians.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    3. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by vidarh · · Score: 2, Insightful
    4. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by bmj · · Score: 1

      This site has most of the relevant passages from the Bible. Keep in mind, dispensationalists spend every waking moment of the day looking for the end times. Most of your conservative Christian politicians in the U.S. are dispensationalists, hence their undying support for Israel (the end times won't come unless the Jewish people have full control of the lands around Jerusalem -- the Promised Land). I don't think the link about has anything specific about it, but credit cards have long been a source of distress for end times folks as well, as the same "mark of the beast" passage says you can't buy or sell without the mark.

      --
      Whereof we cannot speak, thereof we must be silent. --Ludwig Wittgenstein
    5. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 0

      I can't wait for all the Christians to start wailing about 666 and the antichrist and stuff.

      Yeah--what a bunch of superstitious, paranoid fools. That's probably what they thought 1950 years ago when one of these wackos came up with the idea that there would ever be a technology that would make it possible that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark (Rev 17). Huh, everyone knows that will never happen!

    6. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 0

      Finally, some people that understand that Revelation isn't telling the future.

      Well, you're partially correct anyway. It does indeed reference the Roman Empire, but--being apocalyptic literature--it *clearly* also deals with what is referred to as end-times. What did you think all of that stuff about Jesus returning, the New Jerusalem, the new heaven and the new earth was about?

      You're free to believe it or pass it off as the superstitious ramblings of a wacked-out zealot, but don't try to change what the author meant so that you can be comfortable with it.

    7. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, nonsense.

    8. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct on that. I should have rephrased some of what I said to include that there are references to the "end times".

    9. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me preface this statement by mentioning that i'm an atheist. However, as useless as most of the bible is, I think that the whole concern about universal numbering has some merit as a bad thing that COULD happen. Lots of speculative fiction/nonfiction performs the same function today,
      (1984,brave new world, vinges singularity concept), they all perform predictive modeling of bad/good things that could happen. For that reason they are useful.

    10. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, "ALL US Christians" probably won't be worried until

      "all those who bear this mark on their heads or hands" as the verse says

      not

      "arms"

    11. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by aborchers · · Score: 1

      Interesting material, though I found little new in it and, if it was there, I missed the answer to my question.

      I wanted a citation for the 1st c numeroligical methods mentioned in the first email that led to Caligula, Nero, etc being interpreted as 616 or 666. In other words, I wanted this assertion put in the chronological context of The Revelation with a non-Biblical source. Clearly, the Bible leaves it as a mystery, and does not explicitly say that Ceasar == 666. I wanted a (non-revisionist) historical reference that made that association.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    12. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by bmj · · Score: 1

      How about this? The Hebrew Qabala system is often applied to the Bible by non-Jews to get end times information.

      --
      Whereof we cannot speak, thereof we must be silent. --Ludwig Wittgenstein
    13. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by shadwwulf · · Score: 1

      Might I point out that the hand is in very close proximity to the arm. Given that biblical text have been translated multiple times, from one language to another, throughout the time subsequent to it's original authoring. It logically follows that the generalization of "appendage that encompasses everything below the shoulder" became the meaning and "hand" was the word selected when the most recent translation was created.

    14. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by hump_ · · Score: 1

      I think far too many modern "Spirit" filled "Christians" are mislead in an absurd emotional interpretation of the scriptures. Especially those pertaining to estachology. Worrying too much about future events will cause you to forget your purpose in the present and make you ineffective in the command to Love God and other people.

      This may be an interesting read for you: http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/666.htm

    15. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by bbobjoe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Incorrect. The NT with exception of very early Bibles has been translated ONCE. I have a copy of the Critical Greek NT. That flags Manuscripts and their age. Most modern Bibles NIV, NASB, etc... Are heavily based on Codex Siniaticus (4th Century), Codex Vaticanus, and Codex A (5th Century) from Egypt. And various fragments from ealier. Translators do NOT keeping copying other works. The NIV was not a KJV copy. In fact the KJV is based on late Greek Manuscripts from the 11 - 15th Centuries. Although they agree about 99% statisically They NIV translators went back the said Manuscripts and translated. And it does mean right hand and forehead. Only 1-1.5% of the text of OT or NT is disputed and none of it affects any doctrine.

    16. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by laura20 · · Score: 1

      Except, of course, at that point they believed that Jesus was coming back any day now; there's a number of bible verses where it is prophesied that Christ will return within the lifetime of someone still living.

      That's one of the reasons for the Wandering Jew hack; they made up a legend to explain why the bible wasn't actually wrong on that, because someone was still alive from that era. Modern fundamentalists are more sophisticated and use sophistry instead to explain that's not *really* what the prophesies meant.

    17. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 0

      there's a number of bible verses where it is prophesied that Christ will return within the lifetime of someone still living

      Help me out--which ones?

      Thanx

    18. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're wrong you know, completely.

      Revelation is about the apocalypse, the revelation of Jesus Christ to ALL the world. I'd say it hasn't happened yet and when it happens the world will change.

      The book is about the years from Christ's resurrection to His return in Glory at the end-times. You can note that there is a parallellism between the liturgy of the church on earth and that of the church in heaven as portrayed in the book. Dr Scott Hahn mentioned this by the way.

    19. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the reference and whether it's symbolic.

      Guess what, the bible uses pointers too!
      Symbols are pointers and just as difficult to understand sometimes.

    20. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 0

      Hey dude (or dudette) while I appreciate the sentiment, I gotta ask--why the AC?

    21. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to add the

      "of course someone will use the old hip bone is connected to the knee bone is connected to the.....line to say that the arm is connected to the hand."

      to my post, But I didn't think I needed to. I guess I should be more descriptive in the future.

    22. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by aborchers · · Score: 1

      Thanks. That's a lot closer. Should have known that wikipedia would come through...

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    23. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by aborchers · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. That was pretty much the kind of info I was looking for, particularly the business of the Dead Sea Scrolls, etc.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    24. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by bbobjoe · · Score: 1

      Two Corrections. Codex Vaticanus is 4th Cent. I meant early English Bibles. Pre-KJV in 1611,

    25. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by binkzz · · Score: 1
      I do agree with bbobjoe, but it's only a small step to move the chip from the arm to the hand (or forehead), perhaps because those chips will be removable and therefore easier to fix/update as I'm sure they won't last a lifetime. These chips could then be used instead of a credit card to purchase stuff directly from your bank account. Perhaps you could even swipe your hand across your iPod to buy a song you just heard on the subway.

      And I personally believe this is a sign of the second coming of Jesus; if you add the number of the beast to the chip and start using it as a means to buy stuff, that's another sign fulfilled. Many people will think that's ridiculous, but even if you do, I would advise you to still educate yourself on why so many Christians think the end-time is nearing; it will be more and more discussed all over the world in the not so distant future.

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
  29. El hermano mayor le está mirando. by pragma_x · · Score: 3, Funny

    En Rusia soviética, el microchip le programa!

    1. Re:El hermano mayor le está mirando. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Greetings from the spanish grammar troll.

      Nice try... Score: 8.5/10

      s/le/te ... and we're almost done.

      "El hermano mayor te está mirando!"
      "En Rusia soviética, el microchip te programa a TÍ!"

      (the inverted excl marks are missing, sigh)

    2. Re:El hermano mayor le está mirando. by gglaze · · Score: 1

      greetings grammar troll de español,

      just curious...

      Isn't formal "le" (usted) also correct, and probably actually more appropriate in this case? I'm not a native spanish speaker, so not sure... also, talking mexican spanish here, not spanish spanish or whatever - perhaps in those regions some kind of vosotros rule applies for formalities...

      i.e. ...

      "El hermano mayor le está mirando a usted!"
      "En Rusia soviética, el microchip le programa a USTED!"

      anyways, props to the grandparent - too funny.

    3. Re:El hermano mayor le está mirando. by seth_stabilizer · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to be annoying or anything, but just for information purposes, the sentences are grammatically correct if we consider that this is Spanish used in Spain, not Latin America. In Spain, "le" is the same as "te". In Latin America it is also used sometimes, but to imply politeness, and is less common :D

    4. Re:El hermano mayor le está mirando. by pragma_x · · Score: 1

      anyways, props to the grandparent - too funny.

      Thanks!

      And the translation is courtesy of babelfish [original english -> to spanish], in case anyone (grammar troll de español?) wondered. :)

    5. Re:El hermano mayor le está mirando. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      My experience was the opposite - in Spain, "tu" was quite common, while in Guatemala, "Usted" was used almost exclusively when dealing with people you either didn't know, or had any kind of professional relationship with. I don't think you can group all of "Latin America" together; the culture varies a lot between countries, or even within countries.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    6. Re:El hermano mayor le está mirando. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "El hermano mayor te está mirando!"

      It would be more correct to use the official translation of 1984's "Big Brother" ("gran hermano"). Also, you forgot the opening exclamation mark. Plus "te está mirando" isn't the best translation for "is watching you". "Te vigila" is much better. So, the final result:

      "El Gran Hermano te vigila!" (it's just as in the spanish translation of 1984).

      "En Rusia soviética, el microchip te programa a TÍ!"

      "En Rusia soviética" is like "En Alemania nazi". Since you aren't talking about the country per se, but one historical period or faction in that country, an article is necessary. Like this:

      "En la Rusia soviética".

      Now, "el microchip". That means there is only one microchip that programs you. The "El" article means there is only one subject. Since we are talking about all the microchips in Soviet Russia, we need to use the plural form: "los microchips". The verb also changes to plural form.

      The accentuation mark in "TÍ" is wrong. Words with a single syllabe aren't accentuated as a rule, except for some exceptions (like distinguising "tú" as a pronoun, from "tu" as a posessive).

      Another opening exclamation mark was skipped.

      Final result:

      "En la Rusia soviética, los microchips te programan a TI!"

      And now misters, everyone reading to this point owes me 15 for a Spanish class worth of 30 minutes.

    7. Re:El hermano mayor le está mirando. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, it's true the opening exclamation marks (and euro sign) aren't shown in responses. Sucky. :/

  30. My tin-foil hat by grunt107 · · Score: 1, Funny

    is now embedded UNDER my skull

  31. If your gonna.... by millahtime · · Score: 1

    If your gonna cut it out odds are you don't really cares what happens to him. I say use an ax. It'll be more fun that way.

  32. New warning labels on RFID implants... by stienman · · Score: 1

    I hope he read the warning label:

    Caution: do not microwave person with RFID tag. Tag may vent with flame causing serious and possibly fatal wounds.

    But don't worry. Microwave safe RFID tags are surely just around the corner.

    -Adam

  33. So, where are the Watches TV's & Focus Groups by EvilBastard · · Score: 1

    On the bright side, I guess we'll have the first Black Female Mexican president soon, after a dramatic election day fiasco.

    WUBBAwubbaWUBBAwubbaWUBBAwubbaWUBBAwubba

  34. Neal Stephenson by DJTequila · · Score: 1

    Reminds of "Interface" by N. Stephenson.

    When will he run for presidential election?

  35. If he ever goes bad... by millahtime · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If he ever goes bad we won't have to worry about finding him. The US can target a couple missles at him and sit back. No searching like for Saddam.

    If he pisses us off, an arm chair soldier could take him out. Just like a vid game.

  36. It's worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Harris Miller says he can program C++ like a madman plus he's got Cisco certs.

  37. Oblig Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new Cybernetic Mexican Overlords...

  38. Re:So, where are the Watches TV's & Focus Grou by DJTequila · · Score: 0

    Wow, two post about the same book in the same minute :) Kewl.

  39. A fine assasination tool by mrmeval · · Score: 3, Insightful



    ``The system is already in place and I already have it,'' he said. ``It's only for access, for security and so that I can also be located at any moment anywhere I am.''

    If I have the key I can drop an NLOS on you ass baby!

    http://www.raytheon.com/products/nlos/

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    1. Re:A fine assasination tool by NarrMaster · · Score: 0

      Better yet, let's find his IP address and /. him!

      --
      That's right. All your base.
  40. Shopping with the Attorney General by chiph · · Score: 1

    So, if he walks through the scanner at one of those "supermarkets of the future", how much does it ring up for him?

    And, does it know to use Pesos?

    Chip H.

  41. sounds like the mark of the antichrist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    im a god fearing christian and when i heard about this it made me sick! this is definitely the mark of the devil! 666! the bible prophecises the mark will appear on the skin! hello! this chip goes under the skin and makes a mark ON THE SKIN! dear heavens, protect us from satan himself!

  42. I knew this was gonna happen... by white+russian · · Score: 1
    Also in the news:

    After hearing about Mexican Attourney-General California officials quickly started work on a bionic eye for their governor. It will feature night vision, and will integrate into a secret electronic defense system.

    Rumours have it, the eye will also have complete plug and play support.

  43. Chips by dj245 · · Score: 1

    Fu*bZZZTTT enchiritos I cannot remove this godd*vBZZT Vchip from my arm, compadre!

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  44. I want a MOD CHIP too!!! by erroneus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Then I can play all the cool games! Right now I can't play worth a flip.. ...this is about the new playstation right? Maybe I should go back and read the article...

  45. This is Old News by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    THIS has been done before.

    We can rebuild him. We have the technology.

    We have the capability to make the world's first Bionic man.

    Rafael Macedo de la Concha will be that man.

    Better than he was before.

    Better . . . stronger . . . faster.

    duh nah nah nah nahhhh...

  46. This will stop.... by mseeger · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Hi,

    this will stop as soon as terrorist use RFID sensors to "trigger personalised" bombs.

    A few months ago i was consultant for a goverment agency. They were plannng to install RFID chips into the cars of VIPs to save them from stopping at the parkhouse entrance of that agency. The goal was to avoid stops and deny snipers a shot. We were able to convince them that this was "not a good idea" ®SMALL>TM.

    Regards, Martin

    1. Re:This will stop.... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      The goal was to avoid stops and deny snipers a shot.

      Surely the simplest solution would be to ensure that the entrance 'gate' is simply obstructed from any distant line of fire?

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    2. Re:This will stop.... by mseeger · · Score: 1
      Surely the simplest solution would be to ensure that the entrance 'gate' is simply obstructed from any distant line of fire?

      Sounds simple, may be difficult. This may require a major reconstruction of the site. As the involved buildings are 130 years old and the area public (really public, not as "Times Square" but not far away either), this ain't easy and the costs would be even worse.

      Security is never easy. And sometimes there isn't even one as high as you would like. In that cases you have to take the risk.

      Regards, Martin

    3. Re:This will stop.... by blackest_k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      so thinking about this if an rfid is implanted in a tyre or other car part or maybe an item of clothing it would be possible to design a smart bomb that would only blow when a particular Rf tag (person) came into range.

      or how about an rftag smart minefield.
      say each us serviceman has an rf tag on his dog tag then a mine field could be laid which would be inhibited by the presence of the rf tag and totally lethal to the enemy whoever that might be.
      or conversely triggered. of course the mines could be rf tagged as well so you can collect them up later.

    4. Re:This will stop.... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      I for one wouldn't rely on it. You only really need one scanner to fail to read properly out of 1000 to kill or maim you.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  47. Revelations and RFID by yazan · · Score: 0

    and so it begins... 13:16 He causes all, the small and the great, the rich and the poor, and the free and the slave, to be given marks on their right hands, or on their foreheads; 13:17 and that no one would be able to buy or to sell, unless he has that mark, the name of the beast or the number of his name. 13:18 Here is wisdom. He who has understanding, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is six hundred sixty-six.

  48. Is this an american product?? by xot · · Score: 1

    ..If it is.. have the americans used the mexicans as guinea pigs to test out chip implants in humans? There is no mention about the medical safety of any such device.
    I mean id never let any such implant come near me.Besides the idea of someone tracking me all the time is SPOOOKY! :-P

    --
    Lord of the Binges.
  49. Hmm... by chendo · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... Upgrades.

    *cue martial arts fighting scenes*

    --
    Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
  50. He has a chip in his arm? by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    (go on... make the joke!)

    What joke? I don't know what you're talking about!

    (don't act all coy with me. it's sitting right there waiting for you. take your shot!)

    Shut up! I don't hear you!!

    (oh, come on. think of the adoration. think of the +5 Funny!)

    NO! NO!NO!NO!

    (just one little joke. it's easy. mexican attorney general? chip in his arm? do it.)

    Do WHAT?!

    (quit playing games. mexican? chip? tortilla chip? do it now before someone else takes your precious karma away!)

    I WON'T!

    (you know you will...)

    NO!

    (+5 Funny, baby. just this once. do it for me. for old times sake.)

    I HATE YOU!

    (you know you want it...)

    [sigh]

    Fine.

    "Hey, guys! Is it a *tortilla* chip?!"

    (aah... i can feel the sweet, lovely "Funny" mods already. can you feel it yet?)

    Leave me alone.

    (aah... the sweet burn of cheap /. humor. next best thing to china white.)

  51. Just wondering... by carou · · Score: 1

    A microchip in the Arm...

    Is there an ARM in the microchip?

  52. Some people by slushbat · · Score: 1

    would give their right arm to get access to that data.

    --

    Don't put off until tomorrow what you can leave until the day after.

    1. Re:Some people by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Or give his right arm, more likely :)

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    2. Re:Some people by Osgyth · · Score: 1

      It was his right arm? Aw, shit. No wonder why the stupid reader wasn't working......

  53. ST:TOS describes what to do... by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

    In the ST:TOS episode "Patterns of Force", Spock and Kirk are sent down to the planet to undo the mess that historian John Gill created when he indoctrinated the Ekosian people with the idea that the Nazi society would work. Before leaving the ship, both Spock and Kirk were injected with a crystal that had similar properties to an RFID chip.

    Now, this Mexican official is set! All he needs now is to rip up the bed springs, slit his arm and remove the crystal, and he can burn his way out of his jail cell with a homemade laser!! How cool is that shit?

  54. Messup by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

    Chip readout: 'delivery boy'.

    Nooooooooooooooo!

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  55. "Non-removable" by alex_tibbles · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article does not specify how it is made non-removable. Perhaps it reacts to air (but not blood etc!). Any ideas? Perhaps they just claim that to dissuade people chopping him up to get his security access...

    1. Re:"Non-removable" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that by "non-removable", they mean something like "it's under the skin, and removing it would hurt". Duh. Anything is removable from a body if you have the will to remove it.

  56. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel much more confortable tagging my government officals with RFID tags then I do with being tagged by the government. This is almost like a reverse 1984 thing. Or like:

    In Soviate Russia YOU watch government.

    Wait no thats not right. Head spins.

  57. Re:Imagine... by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    didn't Beowulf the arm off of Grendl?

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  58. Windows Updates by mfisher · · Score: 0

    He should have waited for SP2 - now how the hell can he update!

  59. I wonder... by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it would be better using the ARM processor?
    (or maybe the Strong ARM)... ...nyuck nyuck nyuck

    .

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  60. well, the plan is for.... by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... everyone to get the chip obviously. They know in advance it would be resisted, so to mitigate that, they have to first chip the ones who will be enforcing the mass chipping. That means the paramilitary the overt military and the police, and they have to start at the top in those orgs so that the orders will be followed. Every step of the mass chipping has to be taken precisely. They scare the parents into chipping the youngest. They force the highest levels in government to get the chip. The police and military get it, so that they can say "what citizen, you rdfuse the chip? WE got the chip, so if we can do it, you can do it", along those lines. We've seen the plans coming soon to chip cops hands so that that chip will activate their "smart" guns, so only the cop can use them. Special forces in the military are the first to be getting the chip. Criminals will be getting the chip soon, to track them inside the jail, then outside forever. As they enforce the chips in these unique areas, eventually enough of the population will have them so that the rest may be mandated to get them, perhaps to tie in with a universal ID system.

    One step at a time, how they do most things.

    This topcop down there being chipped might be related to corruption in mexico, no idea, seems reasonable enough though. It is obvious that we are seeing an outright complete merging of the countries, any sort of "border" now is becoming moot, so perhaps they will be trying out the more extreme measures down in mexico first, to work out the bugs, see what sort of techniques are more efficient.

    1. Re:well, the plan is for.... by Anne.O.Neimaus · · Score: 1

      Of course, once it's nigh-universal, the chip becomes your identity (at least, to a first-approximation check). We then get chip-forging, freaking, etc., so people can pretend to be other (or elsewhere) in an automatically-credited manner. The crypto-ID database only has to be compromised once to make the entire system suspect - and thus, useless.

    2. Re:well, the plan is for.... by zogger · · Score: 1

      the point is moot for me. Forced chipping is an automatic second amendment activation. Just *ain't* gonna go there.

      And speaking of second amendment,just coincidently, last night right after I went to bed, we had a drive by shooting incident here. I don't see what they hit looking around today, so I have no idea what the target really was, maybe they were jacking deer, but it was RIGHT out front of our house, and that just don't fly to my way of thinking. I heard a car slow down, then three shots, then they split. I hit the deck out of the bed, rolled, grabbed a handy equalizer and hung out in the dark, but I heard the car drive away quickly. I most definetly would have shot back. I purposely stayed low and away from the windows though for a minute, so I didn't see the car. If they had continued I would have retaliated with lotsa force. Lots.

      Sucks though, haven't had any words with anyone around here or no enemeies I can think of.

    3. Re:well, the plan is for.... by kace · · Score: 1

      Yet, you point out several instances where the chip could be life saving: police and "smart" guns, various military personnel (who often, I promise you, get lost in bad places), officials and others at risk of kidnapping.

      Given this, I'd say the best protection we can have is for the chips to be removeable. That way people in special jobs can have them while their life may depend on it and get rid of them later.

      And all of this talk about future coercion is over blown. I'm afraid that the chips will be made so useful that people will be standing in line to get them. This isn't the only technology that is going to require us to have a more open and honest government. (Yeah, we're screwed.)

      p.s. Don't tell my wife about this!! I'll never get within a mile of another computer store.

      K.C.

    4. Re:well, the plan is for.... by zogger · · Score: 1

      well, just so far in the past two decades we've gone to hardly any forced drugging in the schools to in some areas it's approaching 1/4th to 1/3rd of the children deemed so unstable they need to be drugged. And we have the ability to have implantable drug delivery systems now. and we have the ability to implant radio controlled chips.

      Add up the tech, think a decade or so down the road, throw in a few more phony terror attacks, and what do you see as most probable for the general population, given the speed of tech advances and governmental command/control/surveillance interests now?

      It's the same as any other tech, they will always abuse it. I can not think of a single aspect of technology that ISN'T being abused by government now, speaking in general terms. Just now they have the ability to create a society of 99% complacent drones, and to enforce it by law. The tech is here *now* it requires nothing more, and it will just get easier and more sophisticated. We have accepted big brother cameras all over, random stasi like "paperz pleez" checkpoints. We accept governmental lies and nothing happens to the liars except they profit. We accept the mass media being a propoganda arm of corporgovernment, and nothing much happens.

      When they have enough people faked out into it, being tagged and chipped and commanded and controlled and surveilled routinely, and doing it "voluntarily" even though they have been literally brainwashed into it over two generations, then they will switch to *mandatory* and we truly will have a complete big brother society. I do not give it more than about 10 to 15 more years to get there, either. It might even start well in earnest after this year, given the high probability of another reichstagg fire terror event that they assure us is coming soon.

      I hate to be a pessimist about it, but frankly, you watch society for a long enough time and see 10 instances of de-evolution for every instance of e-volution, for the better, and it gets hard to be an optimist.

  61. In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...sales of lead armbands in Mexico City are skyrocketing.

  62. Red Dawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say next time some terrorists threaten to behead someone if we do not release some prisoners I say we release the prisoners . . . . Just implant one of these chips and let them return to their group and in a few weeks track them.

  63. ...carrying an arm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...do they have the right to bear arms down there?

  64. Just a PR stunt by James+Lewis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this is obviously just a PR stunt by the Mexico officials to make it look like they are "doing something" about the crime in their country, when in fact this doesn't really help at all.

  65. Sounds like a bluff by color+of+static · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Think about it. You want to threaten the bad guys, who are a little less educated and a whole lot more guilable then you are. In that light you concoct a story that makes it sound like this database is being watched with "superhuman" effeciency by the head in each district. Throw in the part about tracking and non removable to make kidnapping seem dangerous, and you keep the officials safe on top of it.

    This sounds like it is the high tech version of the "This is protected by an alarm system." sticker. Instead of just buying them and sticking them on your windows, you do a press conference.

    1. Re:Sounds like a bluff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the sticker is a little tatoo that is provided at the time of the surgery

  66. Hostage protection? by TrentL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, this could be a good idea for people who are afraid they are going to be taken hostage. If I had to go to Iraq, I wouldn't mind having a chip in me so I could get rescued if I were taken hostage.

    1. Re:Hostage protection? by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Exactly - and in much of Central and South America, kidnapping for ransom is a large and growing problem. I sometimes travel internationally on business, and there's no way I'd head down there these days. Fortunately for me, I usually head to Scandanavia. I'll let the Swedish Bikini Team take me hostage anytime...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:Hostage protection? by carlos_benj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I had to go to Iraq, I wouldn't mind having a chip in me so I could get rescued if I were taken hostage.

      I thought there needed to be proximity before they could be detected and they didn't work well through barriers like walls.

      If that's the case, you should get two chips so they can find your head as well as your body once they're tossed out into the open....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    3. Re:Hostage protection? by SEWilco · · Score: 3, Informative

      The chip can only be detected at a distance of a few meters. It would help you in getting rescued only if the rescuers are waving a detector over everyone in the room.

    4. Re:Hostage protection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mexico isn't in Central nor South America. It's located in North America.

    5. Re:Hostage protection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While his geographic knowledge is lacking, he right about the current kidnapping epidemic in Mexico.

    6. Re:Hostage protection? by stevejsmith · · Score: 1, Informative

      Uh...Mexico is definitely in Central America. Central America is just everything below the United States in North America.

    7. Re:Hostage protection? by Kevin+Mitnick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mexico is definitely in North America. You, know that trade deal you guys signed ~10 years ago, the one with the giant sucking sound? Canada-US-Mexico? NAFTA? North American Free Trade Agreement? ok, you got it now!

    8. Re:Hostage protection? by stevejsmith · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Uhhhh... North America is a continent. Central America is a region in a continent. The continent of North America. Are we all in agreement now? (And maybe some parts are in South America...I don't think so, but I'm not totally sure.)

    9. Re:Hostage protection? by Kevin+Mitnick · · Score: 2, Informative

      alright, just don't try calling any Mexicans Central Americans, trust me.

  67. Scary. by bfg9000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the Article: Mexico's Attorney General Rafael Macedo de la Concha said he had a non-removable microchip implanted in his arm as a security measure to track him throughout Mexico and to give him access to a crime data bank.

    They say they'll have access to the network, but apparently, in Soviet Mexico, THE NETWORK WILL HAVE ACCESS TO *THEM*.

    Just say NO to the Mark of the Beast, kids. Especially if it's running Microsoft.

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    1. Re:Scary. by bbobjoe · · Score: 1

      If it is running MS we nothing to worry about it will crash too much.

  68. implantable batteries by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting
    using that as a search term, you get 18,800 hits on google. And here is a New Scientist reference about rechargeable implantable batteries, that are recharged from inside the body using your body heat. This is a small copy/paste from that article: "The "biothermal battery" under development by Biophan Technologies of West Henrietta, will generate electricity using arrays of thousands of thermoelectric generators built into an implantable chip. These generators exploit the well-known thermocouple effect, in which a small voltage is generated when two of the junctions between two dissimilar materials are kept at different temperatures."

    Seems like the "limitations" of range and power to RFID tags that people kept saying would make them impractical for mass universal chipping are being overcome at a fast rate.

  69. Now THAT'S a Switch by Rob+Carr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The article says that eventually around 160 Mexican officials will have a chip implanted."

    The usual FUD is that the politicians would get all the citizens implanted with chips, and that they would be able to spy on our every movement.

    Mexico has come up with the concept of implanting the politicians so that the citizens can spy on their every movement.

    This is a definite improvement, if you ask me.

    --
    This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
  70. Anyone else read it as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Microchip in ARM"... and say "DUH"

  71. Bush & Mexico by Giggle+Stick · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    You are aware that Bush has actually bothered to learn Spanish. Do you think he did so to speak to the Prime Minister of Spain? Also his sister-in-law is of Mexican descent. And he supports NAFTA, which most people would agree benefits Mexico at least slightly more than the U.S.

    Most presidents pay lip-service to Mexico, while it would appear to me that Bush has actually tried to build a relationship with Mexico.

    If one was to hate Mexicans, I would think there were better candidates to support than Bush.

    So let me guess that you are a frightened panty-waist whose heritage comes from a country that can't defend itself, and a Communist Party supporter.

    1. Re:Bush & Mexico by kyknos.org · · Score: 0

      i was not commenting usa - mexico relationship. i was commenting racism and fashism. and bush is known supporter of these ideologies

      --

      SHE does throw dice.
    2. Re:Bush & Mexico by Abreu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...And he supports NAFTA, which most people would agree benefits Mexico at least slightly more than the U.S.

      Absolutely not! NAFTA benefits the US far more than it benefits Mexico. The US has been blocking a lot of mexican products and services from entering the country because of protectionist lobbying.

      Just one example: USian truck drivers can enter Mexico without any trouble since day one of NAFTA, Mexican truck drivers are being blocked from entering the US because of lobbying from the teamsters union. Therefore, both US and Mexican producers trying to sell products to either side have to hire USian transports...

      Of course nobody has recourse on the WTO against the US, since the WTO is US-based and has never decided against the US in a trade dispute... Combined with the fact that mexican politicians would never do anything to upset Uncle Sam...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    3. Re:Bush & Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so full of dick-sucking bullshit that it is spilling out through your keyboard. The WTO has ruled against the USA, just recently in fact. See the case of steel tarrifs in which the EU won and the USA lost.

      Furthermore, the existence of a few restrictive policies like the blocking of Mexican commercial truckers does not mean that NAFTA is not favorable for Mexico. Here's the way it works, NAFTA sucks for poor Americans because jobs for unskilled labor goes south, NAFTA is reasonably good for upper-middle to upper class Americans because they can buy goods cheaper and think they are immune to their jobs going south. NAFTA is pretty good for rich industrial Mexicans because they get to sell their product to the US market with relative ease. NAFTA is somewhat good for the poor Mexicans who can now get jobs that pay very well compared to other jos in the local economy but the cost for them is sweat-shop like conditions.

    4. Re:Bush & Mexico by philbert26 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Of course nobody has recourse on the WTO against the US, since the WTO is US-based and has never decided against the US in a trade dispute...

      The WTO has never ruled against the US? Maybe they favour the USA over Mexico, but they sure don't give the USA a free pass in disputes with Europe.

      Combined with the fact that mexican politicians would never do anything to upset Uncle Sam...

      Are you sure?

      Has cynicism become the new naivety?

    5. Re:Bush & Mexico by robogun · · Score: 0, Troll
      Just one example: USian truck drivers can enter Mexico without any trouble since day one of NAFTA, Mexican truck drivers are being blocked from entering the US because of lobbying from the teamsters union.


      Don't be so disingenuous. If you lived near the border and had to share the road with those unmaintained, smoking, oil-dripping, rolling-environmental-disasters, you'd probably revise that opinion. Anyway, I thought the Teamsters were all Democrats -- what do you have against them?


      It won't be a problem AFTER they fix their trucks. As it is, we are being far more accomodating accepting their unsmogged, uninspected passenger cars hauling ass up and down our local roads. The cops won't ticket Mexican plates and so they drive like bats out of hell.

    6. Re:Bush & Mexico by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      "...bush is known supporter of these ideologies"?

      Really?

      Do you think that if you keeps saying it, people will believe it? It evidently worked on you! Why don't you do something you've never done before and actually think about what you hear and say. You should also try to back up your dribble with some kind of evidence. You should actually look up the "facts" that are spewed out in a McMoore movie and get the real truth. Don't be such a sheep.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    7. Re:Bush & Mexico by ksheff · · Score: 1

      The cops won't ticket Mexican plates and so they drive like bats out of hell.

      What? Why not?

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    8. Re:Bush & Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know the truth. My friends was actually killed by US troops. I lost my girlfriend in US army attack. Well, it happenned when Clinton was in Maison blanche. But we are off topic and it is to bitter to think about it. Sorry I do not want to continue.

    9. Re:Bush & Mexico by Metapsyborg · · Score: 0
      I believe a law was recently passed that allows the U.S. to drop off Illegal immigrants in central Mexico rather than on the border of Mexico. Bush surely had something to do with this law.

      What if they live by the border?

      And Bush likes Mexicans 'cause his friends that own huge corporations can outsource manual labor to Mexico (among other places) and save massive amounts of money.

      --
      (\(\
      (^.^) INFECTED
      (")")
    10. Re:Bush & Mexico by beta21 · · Score: 1

      WIN: Winton Australia
      LNX: Smolensk Russia
      BSD: Baoshan China
      OSX: Kosciusko MS USA


      One more to add to your collection:
      SCO Aktau Airport KZ Kazakhstan 738

    11. Re:Bush & Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHO needs to look up facts? Read the below. I would take Benny as an authoritative source on defining this word, and if you can't see how this describes Bush you haven't read a newspaper in years...

      "Fascism should more properly be called 'corporatism,' since it is the marriage of government and corporate power"

      -- Benito Mussolini

    12. Re:Bush & Mexico by ArcherB · · Score: 0

      Figures you'd quote Mussolini to try and prove your point.

      Actually, isn't that the definition of Communism?

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    13. Re:Bush & Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, who is this Mussolini guy, some kind of expert on Fascism or something? I've never heard of him either. Way to stand up for America, ArcherB! We can't have none of these Communist Baath party members flying any more airplanes into any more buildings. I just don't think some people understand the hard work Bush does in spreading martial law and fomenting terrorism abroad--but he's up to the challenge and deserves to get elected--assuming we hold elections this year.

    14. Re:Bush & Mexico by eblum · · Score: 1

      You're right. We mexicans didn't do our homework about this truck issue. This already have 2 or 3 years. (may be more)

  72. beowulf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "nice beowulf cluster you have there" ... "Oh wait, its just the Mexican government, nevermind..."

  73. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You talking about the Bush that proposed amnesty for illeagles currently in the US because they are important to our economy? I'm not sure how you get from kyknos hatefull comment to Bush, or are you Michael Moore simply taking the opportunity to bash Bush regardless of reality?

  74. Tracking by missing_hed · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm not totally up to date on this technology, but there's a few things I don't understand.

    1. What exactly does "non removeable" mean? Grafted to the bone? Will he die if it is removed? It will be deactivated after he retires, which is understandable, but why couldn't they remove it if it's not going to functioning anymore anyway?

    2. The chip gives him access to a crime bank... how? Does he have a USB port in his finger now? Bar code? Magnetic strip?

    3. The chip also allows him to be tracked throughout the country. This would imply he is a target, in danger of being kidnapped, held for ransom, murdered, etc etc... was it really such a wise idea to tell the world that he has such a tracking devise on him, and where it is? If he was to be kidnapped, the arm could be removed to throw authorities off the trail. Or maybe the secret is WHICH arm it's in?

    Maybe I'm getting paranoid, but I don't find this technolocy very desirable or even very useful. What's next? Explosive implants (ala The Fortress) on inmates to prevent jailbreak? Trackers implanted on registered sex offenders? How long before implants are mandatory?

    ~hed~

    1. Re:Tracking by GPLDAN · · Score: 3, Insightful

      hedless man:

      1. My take on it is that they mean "not trivially removeable", like a wristwatch. It's under the skin, I doubt it's grafted to the bone.

      2. His RFID code can be read to allow him access to the bank. It's a heck of a lot better than a driver's license as ID.

      3. Kidnapping is a HUGE problem in Mexico. huge. Hollywood put Denzel Washington in a movie, "Man on Fire" - about the kidnapping rings in Mexico. Vincente Fox has been asked to crack down on the issue. Mexican police are shot at about as often as U.S. forces in Baghdad, i.e. just about daily. You just don't read about it unless you read Spanish newspapers, like La Raza or others. At this point, RFID might be a minor deterrent to kidnapping. But it might just persuade potential enemies to just kill him outright in the street. In fact, they may put a hit on the guy JUST TO SEND A MESSAGE.

      I see a world like the one in Minority Report within my lifetime, and I'm 35. The Gap has a electronic voice that greets you as you walk in. Every subway car you board goes into a database. Every transaction your credit card makes goes through a heuristic filter for abnormal pattern matching, and certain kinds of deviations get you reported automatically to the government. RFID is just the means to make it happen.

  75. The Barcelona Method by replicant108 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As somebody on another forum astutely observed, the way that this will be sold at first is by "chip = vip" method.

    Expect non-removable chips to become a chic accessory in the next few years.

  76. Not for the rest of us. by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

    It's fine to have a chip implanted to get access to a crime database.

    It's not fine to have to have a chip implanted when you're added to a crime database.

  77. Re:I for one... by gglaze · · Score: 1

    actually, i'm guessing it's a reference to martin lawrence in the movie blue streak. and i think the point of the original joke is that it's not even spanish.

  78. But how many US officials have the chip?.. by Chineseyes · · Score: 1, Interesting

    But how many US officials have the chip? My guess is many of them probably do and its simply not public knowledge. I would be shocked if The Dubya himself did not have something even more powerful implanted in him in the event of one of many worst case scenerio's where he could be be kidnapped.

    Although I agree that implanting people with chips is pretty dehumanizing, if you agree to a particular job you have to agree with the particular terms of employment, no matter how absurd, if you don't like it then find a new line of work its that simple. Those gov't employess have an option to do this so comparing their situation to the serial number tatoos on jews in concentration camps is almost laughable.

    And before anyone can even think to say "Well then the US gov't wouldn't cooperate with them" and "The US gov't is forcing them to do this". I will once again say everyone has a choice, The Mexican government can choose not to work with the US in sharing intelligence but there are consequences to every choice. I am sure the Mexican government and the Mexican officials themselves weighed the consequences of every particular course of action carefully so if they choose to implant their officials with chips the consequences of those decisions fall upon the Mexican government itself and no one else.

    --
    I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

    --A wise old fart named SC0RN
    1. Re:But how many US officials have the chip?.. by Rich0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Although I agree that implanting people with chips is pretty dehumanizing, if you agree to a particular job you have to agree with the particular terms of employment, no matter how absurd, if you don't like it then find a new line of work its that simple.

      I dunno. Suppose your kids are starving and the only job in town has an indentured servitude clause in their contract. Should that be legally permissible?

      You might suggest that the slave employer is at least taking care of his slaves instead of letting them die. However, I'd argue that it is immoral to allow somebody to die of starvation at your doorstep if you have the ability to render immediate aid to prevent this. Sure, I can't be the savior of the world, but if I see a man bleeding to death on the sidewalk of my house and don't even call an ambulence, what does that say of my character?

      Some employment conditions should be illegal simply becuase they are inhuman. Employers have a tremendous amount of power - particularly over those without highly in-demand talents or skills. You or I may be able to design computer software or something of high value. Some people are working hard just to be a Walmart greeter. Most normal people are somewhere in-between.

      Workplaces are something to be regualted for certain. That doesn't mean that we need expensive regulation that doesn't serve any benefit. However, to just say that an employer-employee relationship isn't anybody's business but their own is very naieve...

  79. he cannot speak English! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bush has trouble stringing enough words together to complete a simple, declarative sentence and would have trouble talking a whore into bed even if he paid in advance.

  80. Sweet by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Its time to start tracking the government, why should leaders be allowed to sit behind closed doors giving favours to big corporations, and dont tell me that doesnt happen. On the other arm, i think any technology like this - biometrics and implants is a very bad idea. It now means that in order to get mugged, someone could go to the length of cutting your arm off or gouging out your eyes, or going the opposite way and stopping you having access to something by burning your finger-prints off. I don't think we even need to debate that it should be a basic human right for someone to choose not be forced to identify themselves with certain biometrics or implants, where do we draw the line though?

    Definately 24/7 recording of all politicians though or atleast sand-boxing them so they cant talk to un-authorised people, you don't see a jury having a little chat with the murderer do you?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  81. No it IS 666 by bbobjoe · · Score: 1

    Incorrect the Greek says 666. Rev. 13:18 has 666 not 616. Has Hexakosioi 600 (strongs 1812) and Hexekonta (strongs 1835) means sixty and Hex (strongs 1803) means 6. So 666 not 616.

  82. Right tool for the right problem! by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
    > If you['re] gonna cut it out odds are you don't really cares what happens to him. I say use an ax. It'll be more fun that way.

    When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

    When the only tool you have is a shotgun, every problem looks for the nearest exit.

    But when the only tool you have is an axe, every problem looks like hours of gleeful, giddy, glorious fun!

    1. Re:Right tool for the right problem! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      Invoice:
      For the replacement of
      1 keyboard belonging to Lehk228
      1 mouthful of tea
      assorted papers behind keyboard

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  83. It was actually because of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just type in "choicepoint foreign" into google and you see why Mexico wants to protect their data. By the way, it was a 4 man team in a Sarasota division of Choicepoint that created the atxi.com system before it was shut down on Sept. 30, 2003. It's a really interesting story why the voting blunder in 2000 made headlines but nothing really hit mainstream about the "borrowing" of foreign data from Latin American countries and then supplying it to our own government for a super huge price tag.

  84. Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a Beowulf cluster of this guy.

    1. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But can he run Linux?

  85. reminds me of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Badges?! We don't need no stinking BADGES!!

  86. I have just two words for you.... by fallen1 · · Score: 1

    Cortex Bomb

    Simple, effective, near-absolute control.

    Welcome to the future, cyberpunks.

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

  87. I was thinking Minority Report.... by Xhad · · Score: 1

    "Greetings, Mr. Kawasaki."

  88. Imagine... by joshmathis · · Score: 1

    A Burrowulf cluster of Mexican officials!

  89. More like... by Xhad · · Score: 4, Funny
    Yo para una doy la bienvenida a nuestros overlords mejicanos del cyborg.

    (Apologies in advnance for my terrible Spanish)

    1. Re:More like... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Our cybernetic translator overlord would like to say:

      I para una recepción nuestros overlords mexicanos cibernéticos nuevos.

      Or, back in English:
      I for a reception new ours overlords Mexican cybernetic.

      Further more:
      I para una recepción nueva el nuestros cibernético mexicano de los overlords.
      I for a cybernetic new reception our the Mexican of overlords.
      I para una nueva recepción cibernética nuestra el mexicano de overlords.
      I for a new reception cybernetics ours the Mexican of overlords.
      I para una nueva cibernética de la recepción el nuestros el mexicano de overlords.
      I for a new cybernetics of the reception ours the Mexican of overlords.

      Or, through Korean Russian Portuguese Japanese to Spanish:
      La alucinación 1 del iego del peligro de la cosa la semana cuando la tropa mexicana aspectual es nueva somos el control automático que es grande.

      For you ignorant non-overlord mono-lingual Americans:
      The hallucination the 1 of iego of the danger of the thing week when the aspectual Mexican troops are new we are the automatic control that is great.

      In conclusion,
      Hallucinate every iego! For great justice!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  90. Incentive by Jahf · · Score: 1

    This gives a very big incentive for terrorist groups (and others) to steal or clone the reading mechanism. Heck, imagine a world in the future where it were common for leaders to do something like this and the U.S. government decided to take them out ... like we tried and failed so many times with Saddam Hussein and others. We would simply need to hack into the database and see who authenticated via their chip where, and all of a sudden a surgical strike is QUITE possible.

    Maybe this needs to happen a few times for said leaders to understand the privacy issues behind such systems, no way to tell.

    I do find it pretty amazing though. At the least I hope there is technology to allow the embedee to say, slap a small piece of tinfoil (ok, so it would probably need to be something else, just giving a nod to some folks ;) over the area to keep it inert.

    Is this an active chip or a passive one like an RFID chip? I wonder if it is safe for the human body to take a dose of radiation large enough to fry such a device (if passive, even if it had a destruct sequence, it would need extra radiation to perform such a sequence).

    Anyway, off to find the Reynolds ... oh wait, that's ALUMINUM?

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  91. Or, he could just memorize a password by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...a non-removable microchip in his arm, to ... give him access to a new crime database...

    Somewhere in Mexico, an IT guy is laughing his ass off.

    1. Re:Or, he could just memorize a password by makeyourself · · Score: 1

      we are, really :D oh wait.. their using our taxes for that damn...

  92. aaah the irony by riflemann · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia^W^W Mexico, the spooks get tracked by YOU!

  93. I'd give my right... by slowhand · · Score: 0

    ... no, Left arm for one of those chips. And one for my wife, Morgan Fairchild. and another for my robot, my GIRL robot!

    --
    Busy aligning my non-linear thoughts.
  94. holy frijoles! solution to what? by cabazorro · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Let's get this straight:
    Mexico it's suffering the highest crimes rates
    ever.
    Assaults and kidnaps galore in Mexico City.
    Solution?
    Insert some chips to law enforcement!!!???
    I think this guys are more afraid of the Mafia in
    Mexico and that's why they want to be tracked.
    They are afraid of every "citizen" out there coming after them.. to get even(ajustar cuentas).

    But like the Molotov song goes:
    Si le das mas poder al poder...mas duro
    te van a venir a joder!

    --
    - these are not the droids you are looking for -
  95. To give him access? by booch · · Score: 1

    Is that a non-sequitor, or what? Why does he need a tracking chip in his arm to be able to access the crime database? He's the Attorney General -- if anyone should have access to the crime database, it would be him. Who could possibly make a rule forcing him to do anything in order to access the database? RFIDs might be good for physical identification, but it seems silly to use it for access to an online database.

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  96. Good Idea! by headqtrs · · Score: 1

    Let's bug all the politicians, police men, secret services people etc. in the world! That way, we know instantly who not to trust, where they are and what they do.

  97. Contractors in Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What they really need are weapons, armed guards and bulletproof cabs. The media typically doesn't give any details about _how_ the truck drivers are captured by the insurgents; I'm picturing some trucker just sitting in a standard cab, unarmed.

    I recall hearing that the Iraqis that have been hired as security guards only make a hundred or so American dollards per month. With hired help costing little more than chicken scratch, why aren't the truck drivers hiring their own personal guards? My impression is that these guys are sitting ducks.

    1. Re:Contractors in Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't hire their own guards. Nor are they allowed to carry weapons (at least legally). This situation happens not only in Iraq but also Saudi Arabia. The Saudi incidents are much worse, but kept hushed because of the puplic backlash. Get a subscription to Stratfor and read about all kinds of fun things that you never hear about in the normal news.

  98. Here's one for you... by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    who put up the 26 million?

    Mexico, or USA?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Here's one for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good work captitalizing the countries, but you forgot the first sentence. Fuckwit.

  99. Regarding Mark of the Beast by Landaras · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Everytime a topic like this comes up, a lot of people mention the Mark of the Beast or other references to Revelation.

    Many are jokes, a few feign seriousness, and there are sometimes one or two that appear to be truly righteously indigant (on Christian grounds) in regards to the technology.

    I personally don't touch eschatology, as I have better things to do with my time, but I thought I would repeat (or rather, paraphrase) the insight of a non-Christian poster of several months ago.


    Why do you fundamentalists get up in arms about this supposed 'Mark of the Beast' or that intepreted 'Sign of the End Times?'

    You say that you want Jesus to come back, but your messiah said himself that he won't return until these things come to pass.

    Stupid Christians. No End Times = No Return of Christ. You shouldn't be fighting this technology.

    You should be cheering this on.


    Not making any judgment calls (as a Christian myself), but thought I would repeat the insight for the benefit of all.

    - Neil Wehneman
    1. Re:Regarding Mark of the Beast by el_gregorio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Basically, the fundamentalists oppose the "mark of the beast" because they believe those who allow themselves to be branded with it will go to Hell. the Bible claims this mark will be mandatory in order to participate in commerce. so, the fundamentalists believe there will come a time when you must accept the mark and a fate in hell, or reject it and be persecuted and unable to live in society.

      --
      "You want a toe? I can get you a toe by three o'clock... with nail polish."
    2. Re:Regarding Mark of the Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adding to what the poster before me responded with...

      There's supposed to be 7 years of incredible misery between the start of this and when Jesus comes back. From a pragmatic standpoint, wouldn't you prefer to live out a long peaceful life than endure that to get into heaven?

    3. Re:Regarding Mark of the Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So then in other words they fear the days they will not be able to drive SUV's and drink double latte's. Doesnt sound very christian too me.

    4. Re:Regarding Mark of the Beast by pavon · · Score: 1

      That depends. Like Paul said (paraphased), to die is gain because he gets to go to heaven, but to live is also to gain because he can save more people, so he is divided on which is best. This is pretty much the same thing - if the end times come soon then it is good for the saved but not the unsaved. Who is more important? Also, depending on whether you belive pre-trib or post-trib, and concidering how difficult the end times will supposedly be, there is good reason for a christian to want to die before the tribulations come.

      Then again for those fundamentalists who would like to see everyone go to hell, but think that they will be whisked up into heaven in time for tea, then yeah, they should probably be cheering this stuff on.

    5. Re:Regarding Mark of the Beast by macemoneta · · Score: 1

      Not that I follow any particular religion, or claim to be even passably knowledgeable on any, but let's not forget the great crime of Satan: providing man with knowledge (at the cost of leaving the blissful ignorance of the garden of Eden).

      I don't even remember him being responsible for any deaths in the bible (though the "other guy" sure racked them up).

      Doesn't sound like such a bad sort after all. :-)

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    6. Re:Regarding Mark of the Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a Christian and would like to offer an alternative view on this. But I believe my view is correct. I'm sorry for the long post, but I knew someone would compare this to the mark of the beast. I feel I should offer my thoughts.

      In the Bible, it is stated that the only sin that cannot be forgiven is the sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. One who is unaware of the mark of the beast, through ignorance or lacking a calling from God, cannot commit the sin by accepting the mark, should it turn out to be a physical object or mark. One, instead, must be aware of what they are pledging to before they can have truly accepted the mark of the beast. It is a spiritual thing, committing the sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, that is equivalent to accepting the mark of the beast.

      Furthermore, it is in the interests of any Christian to oppose the mark of the beast and delay the so-called "end-times." The reason for wishing to delay the events from happening is for the purpose of allowing anyone who may be saved to have more of a chance to turn to God.

      Keep in mind, God is a loving God. He's not looking to condemn people but to give them eternal life. Merely accepting a chip out of ignorance cannot possibly be equivalent to accepting the mark of the beast. Furthermore, if God doesn't intend it to be the time of a person's conversion, merely telling them of the mark of the beast does not condemn them to Hell. One cannot be accidentally condemned to Hell; instead, one must openly choose Hell and to reject God.

      Lastly, I don't believe that an implant constitutes the mark of the beast. The mark of the beast will be on the hand and forehead, but I believe that is part of the symbolism of Revelation. Instead of being a physical object, it will be that your mind (forehead) and actions (hands) are committed to evil. While the implications of chips being implanted are scary, I don't believe for a moment that this is the mark of the beast. There are many signs in Revelation that must happen before the mark of the beast will be an issue. That's the problem with people who constantly talk about the so-called "end-times;" they select a few ominous passages from the Bible, relate it vaguely to the events of the day, and incite fear in people. These people are doing a dis-service to those of us who actually believe in God.

    7. Re:Regarding Mark of the Beast by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've wanted a mark on my hand and forehead so that I can buy and sell since I heard the idea in Dave Hunt and Constance Cumbey ("Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow") religious conspiracy books in the mid-80s. Even as a Christian reviled by the "Mark of the Beast" I could not help but see the advantages of ID that cannot be lost or stolen (without "disarming", I mean). Then I realized that as long as obtaining the Mark without being required to bow down and worship the Beast, it was just a damn mark. Bring it on, baby!

      Later I realized that the crooks could just break into the central servers and drain me dry without slicing or dicing and the whole idea seemed less interesting.

      Anyway, I still hear people whispering about the "German guy" at the mall who paid for his goods with a scan of his forehead, much to the shock of the salesperson. *Yawn* People who pass these stories along are better suited for bowling than serious discourse...somewhat similar to that other brainless nub of "Bowling for Columbine" fame.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    8. Re:Regarding Mark of the Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christians wish to delay it so as many people as possible will have a chance to repent and choose God. It is out of selflessness that Christians wish not to see the end time. Obviously any Christian wishes to be with God, and were it not for the important part about other people being saved, it would be in the interest of Christians to want to bring on the end times.

    9. Re:Regarding Mark of the Beast by el_gregorio · · Score: 1

      i agree wholeheartedly with your statements, which is why i tried to qualify my comments with "fundamentalists believe..." as opposed to "Christians believe..."

      --
      "You want a toe? I can get you a toe by three o'clock... with nail polish."
  100. Had to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    imagine a beowulf cluster of Mexicans

  101. Lets not forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that NAFTA's real benefit for the ruling elite of Mexico is the aforementioned population problem.

    Without NAFTA, you would have constant civil unrest. NAFTA is the simplest way to alleviate the nation of surplus population and provide sort of work to keep the rest of the masses busy.

    1. Re:Lets not forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good. that means less of them go north.

  102. In related news by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    George Bush has chip on shoulder

  103. Stolen cars by netglen · · Score: 1

    Are these the same Mexican officials that buy stolen SUV & Luxury cars from America? You should see all the US Border videotapes of car thieves that blow past the checkpoints with stolen cars. For some strange reason, a lot of these stolen vechicles find their way into the hands of government officials.

  104. That was long due by varjag · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now, if they only equipped politicians with detonation collars..

    --
    Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
  105. "I for one" in Spanish by tepples · · Score: 1

    In Spanish, doy already means "I give". Adding yo places additional emphasis on the subject, roughly in the same manner as the "I for one" of the original Simpsons quote from 1F13. The phrase dar la bienvenida a means to welcome a guest physically; the more metaphoric term connoting approval would be recibir bien. It would also seem that superseñores translates "overlords", and Google backs this up as well as cibernéticos for "cybernetic". Thus I suggest: "Yo recibo bien a los superseñores cibernéticos."

    But I may be wrong as well. Has the episode been dubbed or subbed into Spanish?

    1. Re:"I for one" in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative



      dude,
      That was a hilarious rethoric. You don't have to think too much, just say: "Permitanme dar la bienvenida a nuestros nuevos amos ciberneticos". There, that was easy.

    2. Re:"I for one" in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Yo recibo bien a los superseñores cibernéticos."

      Geez, that sounds in Spanish like "I welcome well the cybernetic supermasters" to you.

      But I may be wrong as well. Has the episode been dubbed or subbed into Spanish?

      Spanish of Spain dub was something like this:

      "Permítanme ser el primero en dar la bienvenida a nuestros nuevos amos" --> "Allow me to be the first to welcome our new lords".

      Not a direct translation (thank god) neither a perfect translation, but it works.

  106. Implant in wrong location by MagnaMark · · Score: 1

    If I were him, I would have implanted it in my appendix. Or maybe my tonsils, or my wisdom teeth, or that mole on my neck...

  107. chipped.. like a dog? by patbob · · Score: 1
    Rafael Macedo de la Concha, Mexico's Attorney-General, now has a non-removable microchip in his arm

    I get it.. so when he gets lost and someone takes him to an embassy, his government can come and get him, right?

    --
    Welcome to the net of 1000 lies. Upgrades are scheduled soon that should bring us to the 10,000 lies mark.
  108. why not just ask em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, where's the implant you talked about that can't be removed. Oh, it's in my "so and so" and it can't be removed because it'll effect my function "so and so." Ok. And. Um. What's your point?

  109. Follow the trail of crumbs..... by sponga · · Score: 1

    This is the type of technology in the Middle East we could desperately use with all the kidnappings. Use it to track people or baitem with certain weapons with Tags attached to them could certainly help in tracking movement of terrorist/rebels.

  110. non remove-able by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds like a challenge to me :)

  111. This is just plain nuts. by lasermike026 · · Score: 1

    To hell with human tagging subdermal or otherwise. Its inhuman.

  112. Not Sure the Story is True by monk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While he may have said these things in an interview for whatever reasons the claims sound a little odd to me. He claims that he, "...can also be located at any moment anywhere I am," with this system. If you think about that claim he's saying this chip somehow communicates with receivers which can track him. It can't be a passive RFID chip as their would have to be readers everywhere to power it, so we might assume it's an active chip. Where is the network of readers in place to track him all over Mexico? Maybe we can assume it uses cell towers. Does mexico have the cell location technology in place in the towers yet? Also, if you have a cell phone you have probably charged it at least every few days. With just an ID to transmit, let's assume his battery lasts longer, maybe weeks. Is he inserting a battery in his arm every few weeks? I don't think so. He might be charging the thing through a pair of coupled coils? Even so, wet tissues and skin don't make for a great environment for a transponder. That's why we don't implant tags in cattle among other reasons. The tags in small pets can only be read within a few inches.

    I think the current technology is just not up to this claim. Maybe the statement is an anti-kidnapping, psychological warfare tactic.

    --
    [-- Trust the Monkey --]
    1. Re:Not Sure the Story is True by choks · · Score: 1

      I read some AF pilots had a chip like that and that the system was used for the first time on the rescue of the pilots from the stealth bomber that was shot down in bosnia

  113. Technically possible? I don't think so. by Gray · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree. It's almost certainly 99% BS. Maybe there is an RFID-type chip in his arm for accessing that database, that's fairly moot. There are lots of exciting way to protect databases and none of them are 100%.

    The tracing Mexico wide aspect is the tip off. Although everybody wants to think otherwise, I'm fairly sure that's just not technically possible.

    Passive RFID style chips are good up to 9 meters max. Even at 100 times that, it'd be next to useless for nation wide tracking.

    You can't stick a transponder of any decent power inside a person without a power supply.

    It's a bluff trying keep him unkidnapped and privacy advocate types off his back.

  114. Much bigger plans for implantation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This may sound ludicrous, but the US Government has plans to implant chips in 30,000 American workers who currently live in Saudi Arabia. I am not joking, and I am not making this up. One can only wonder how long it is until basic privileges (Such as financial transactions) in the USA are restricted to people with such a chip. You can imagine that Bush is not going to widely publicise these plans for such reasons. Welcome to the "terrorist" state.

  115. People are overlooking the really important point by mcc · · Score: 2, Funny

    MEXICO WILL SOON BE RULED ENTIRELY BY CYBORGS. Is nobody noticing this? I mean, we can finally scratch an entry off the list of "things that we would have expected to happen in the 21st century". We may not have flying cars or meals in pill form yet, but at least Mexico is now living in the plot of a comic book.

    [Mexican mecha-attorney general] With this new microchip I have had implanted in me, I have become more powerful than ever imagined. I can track my movements, as well as access a new crime database.
    [Reporter] But Señor Macedo, aren't you worried about there being ill effects?
    [Mexican mecha-attourney general] Yes, that's why I have also had an "inhibitor chip" installed, so that I control the RFID chip-- instead of it controlling me.

  116. Actually it's not just him... by Yokoshima · · Score: 1

    According to this article on La Cronica

    En este caso, reiteró que él ya tiene colocado el chip, al igual que los subprocuradores de la Procuraduría General de la República (PGR), y explicó que también tienen este sistema, estrictamente, el personal de mando superior y personal que tiene acceso a la información.

    Roughly trasnlated it's not just him but also other high level officials already have the chip, although it doesn't state who. If you read further on he also goes to say he has had it for quite some time now but only recently with the ignauration of the Nationcal Center of Information for the Safeguard of Justice (Or something?) he revealed the chips existance.
    Just would like to point that out, first didn't believe the story since I read the local newspaper daily (fine i read the e-version of it but it still counts) and I didn't find anything about this, and then looked on a national newspaper and found nothing either...wasn't until I google'd that I found this article and tought I'd bring it up.


    Yoko out.

  117. SIN Numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FASA should sue the Mexican government, since they came up with this idea ages ago. Shadowrun has to be prior art. ;)

  118. Im a Mexican harcore /.er....And i agree to this. by alexborges · · Score: 1

    This is not so that the goverment can track citizens. Is so that Mexican citizens can track their law enforcement assholes.

    --
    NO SIG
  119. Japanese schoolchildren by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he'll be tracked down by confused Japanese parents...

  120. Mex. AG was threatened a lot of times by alexborges · · Score: 1

    By the Mexican Mafia.... which is powerfull enough to buy really tough lobby groups in the US senate (not that it takes anything else than money to do that, but it does take a lot of it).

    The AG says (im a mexican duh!) this is for his own safety. He probably thought this up himself.

    That said, i hate the fucker. Actually, those quotes about mexican officials divulgating US treasury information point directly to this guy, whose party, the same as that now in power at the federal government used this confidential info in a smear campain against the major of mexico city back in may.

    Im all for the major of Mexico City.... if you ask me, the CIA (who is not in favor of the major of mexico city) put this info in the AG hands to give the nice Fox government a 'hand' in securing power for the conservatives.

    Heh... i guess you have to be a mexican to care or understand it... but then, thats what a public forum is for!

    --
    NO SIG
  121. Hitler? by ArcherB · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ya know, I'm tired of the relentless attack on our president. He's not a fascist, he's not a racist, he's not stupid, and he's not bent on taking over the world or the world's oil. I didn't like it when Clinton was relentlessly attacked, and I certainly don't like it now that GWB is given ten times as much. No one called Clinton Hitler. I find it odd that those that stuck up for Clinton and said the attacks were wrong are the same ones that hammer Bush day in and day out. Get off it already. Bush is not Hitler. Bush has not killed 6 million Jews (or any other race for that matter... Saddam has BTW). Bush did not invade France, Belgium, Russia, Poland etc. All the countries "invaded" by the US under Bush were turned back over to local government control, not turned into states or territories. Bush is not Hitler, I don't care how hard you try to make the comparison. Example of hypocracy: Why is it peopel bitch and moan because Bush went into Iraq, (no threat to US? intelligence said otherwise... do a google for russian intelligence iraq attack US.. or just open http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2004/06/18/0 12.html) yet no one said a word when Clinton bombed the snott out of Bosnia without UN or France's approval. If you are going to be that hyporcritical, at least try to be more sly about it! Yeah, it's OT... just responding to another OT post.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  122. No. He is worse than Hitler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmm what about torture? what about killing children and innocent civilians? etc... bush is worse than hitler. i hope he will loose in the elections. if they ever happen

    1. Re:No. He is worse than Hitler by ArcherB · · Score: 0

      OK, now you are just being stupid.

      I'm sorry, but I have not seen any gas chambers here in Texas. Maybe they are hidden somewhere on the Haliburton compound. Still, I can't believe all these women and children are being trained into there without anyone noticing. For such an idiot, Bush is certainly doing a great job of riddin us of all those Jewish women and children.

      OK, seriously now... How many women and children has Bush killed? Has he killed more than a million? That would still be less that what Unicef said died in Iraq under Saddam Hussein. Did you care? No. Why? Because Saddam Hussein is not Bush. You could handle Saddam in power as long as it was not Bush. Your hatred for Bush would cause you to sacrifice countless men, women and children, not to mention American service men and women, just to see Bush get a little egg on his face. Don't act like you care about the "women and children" because you certainly didn't give a shit about any Iraqis before the invasion, why do you claim to now?

      Torture? Don't even get me started on the "torture" you claim. Show me the limbs that Bush thugs have cut off. Show me the video tapes of the raped wives sent to their husbands.

      I've been to the mideast dipshit. People like you running around screaming "Torture" and "...killed women and children" only encourages terrorist to kill more coalition forces and Iraqi civilians, not to mention American and European civilians. Again, you don't care about them. Damn the whole world as long as Bush is damned with them.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  123. Re:Easy by symbolic · · Score: 1

    Ditch plastic. Use cash.

  124. Turn him into a video game by coinreturn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tracking him with a website would be great fun (a-la the Sims). Also handy for any potential assassin.

  125. WTF!? by AmoebafromSweden · · Score: 1

    This will soon give hasta la vista, a new mening.

  126. Hello, my name Inigo Montoya... by gardyloo · · Score: 1

    "... you killed my fahthair, prepare to die."
    BEEP.
    "Um, no, sorry, you're not."
    "Que? My name Inigo Mon-"
    BEEP.
    "See, my PDA with built-in arm-scanner says you're not. You're Frank Thompson, from Akron, Ohio. Oh, and your moustache is falling off."
    "..."

  127. interface? by nazsco · · Score: 1

    ok, i can understant that the device can send some signal to point out the postition of the officer... but how the hell does the officer has the claimed access to the "huge crime data bank" as all articles suggest?

    Is it transmited to his mind? does it have a speaker?

    also, if it's unremoveable, how does the officer know if its really turned off if he gives up his carrer? will he be tracked forever?

    besides that, what about the security of those things? would the mafia came up with a device that detects policeman and avoid them?

  128. Even if you're not a "Mark of the Beast" prophet.. by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    ...oppose this. I'm a hardcore atheist and I will refuse to be implanted with any such technology. In addition to privacy concerns, I've been -- for years now -- hearing doomsay cultists say that such things are coming, that the "Mark" will be forced upon us in the form of a chip, that a computer in Switzerland called "The Beast" will keep track of us all. I absolutley refuse to be a part of a system that proves those nutcases right.

  129. That's why it's called a "movie" by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    That scene in Minority Report is wrong on so many levels.

    For one, if the eye was disconnected from his head for any period of time the retina would detach and thus it could not be used to open the door.

    And even more obvious flaw is, why the fuck would his eye still open the door anyways? The guy has is being manhunted for murder; you would think the very first thing the authorities would do is delete all his access codes to police data; otherwise why couldn't he justt log into the system and remove himself?

  130. Depends by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    It could be designed such that once activated, it needs to be constantly imp[lanted or else it triggers a self-destruct type of action. If it was being powered via a bio-mechanical type of mechanism ( ie, bloodflow ), then seconds after you removed it the device could detct it was no longer implanted and disable itself.

  131. You obviosly do not know much theology by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Even a believer has no desire to see the end times. The Bible speaks of much suffering of all, both believers and non, of such ferocity that many so-claimed believers will actually forsake their faith.

    On the other hand, a believer who dies before the end times will go to heaven without having to suffer.

  132. Leave it to the Mexicans by Teahouse · · Score: 1

    They start using new technology to thwart kidnappers and gain access to a "secret" database. Then, they announce it to all the world, so the kidnappers can locate him, kidnap him, and then rip the chip out of his arm with a bowie knife, thus gaining a "key" to the "secret" database.

    Stupid is as stupid does.

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  133. Mark of the Beast by jimmer63 · · Score: 1

    He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.
    Revelation 13:16-17

    A third angel followed them and said in a loud voice: "If anyone worships the beast and his image and receives his mark on the forehead or on the hand, he, too, will drink of the wine of God's fury, which has been poured full strength into the cup of his wrath. He will be tormented with burning sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment rises for ever and ever. There is no rest day or night for those who worship the beast and his image, or for anyone who receives the mark of his name."
    Revelation 14:9-11

    The first angel went and poured out his bowl on the land, and ugly and painful sores broke out on the people who had the mark of the beast and worshiped his image.
    Revelation 16:2

    I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
    Revelation 20:4

    I am a Christian and this stuff does concern me. We have the technology to make prophecy come true.

  134. Now that he has the micro-chip... by meme_vector · · Score: 1

    All he needs is the micro-salsa and micro-guacamole!

    Ole!

  135. an inspired guess by RaymondRuptime · · Score: 1

    Hello. It's just after 8:00, and time for the politician on top of your television set to explode.

  136. Related To US Support of Isreal? by Vagary · · Score: 1

    Similarly, doesn't the Bush Administration support an expansionist and defiant Isreal because it is a necessary condition for the Second Coming?

  137. Tracking a person would make kidnapping EASIER by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

    The chips would enable the wearer to be found anywhere inside Mexico, in the event of an assault or kidnapping, said Macedo.

    And kidnapping is a huge problem here. From 1992 to 2002, Mexico saw some 15,000 kidnappings, second only to war-torn Colombia, according to the Inter-American Development Bank.

    Crime fighting is a dangerous business in Mexico, where police are notoriously corrupt and where political figures and investigative journalists sometimes risk assassination.

    If the authorities, such as the police, are notoriously corrupt and the chips would enable the wearer to be found anywhere inside Mexico, how can this provide security against kidnapping? I'd think it would make it easier for a criminal organisation to find where the government official is through corrupt contacts, and kidnap them! They would be vulnerable to political rivals in the government as well.

    This isn't going to prevent them from being kidnapped, but would make it much easier. And all the kidnappers would need to do is stick the official in a Faraday cage to prevent them from being tracked. The kidnappers would have to lock them up in a room anyway. Couldn't a car trunk be easily converted into a Faraday cage? And what about simply using a magnet, electric shock, or dismemberment to disable the chip?

    So not only would the official be more vulnerable to kidnapping, but the kidnapping process would have to involve more confinement and torture to circumvent the chip. Brilliant. However, it would make it easier to find the body after the official is murdered.

  138. I can see it now! by sirgoran · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A sudden rash of Mexican officials having their arms cut off and the "secret" database being accessed and hacked. Nice business model folks!

    1. Implant security chip in arm, tell world about it
    2. Be found anywhere
    3. Access Secure database via chip
    4. Rebels cut off arm
    5. ???
    6. No Profit! Country in disrepair..
    Oh wait...

    -Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  139. you call those implants? by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 1

    And all these years we've been using silicon implants :(

  140. Wait! Can I be the first one on the block with an by multiplexo · · Score: 1

    "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Mexican Attorney Generals" post?

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  141. sooo... by bitterfun · · Score: 1

    ...what's stopping an inventive criminal from just cutting off his arm?

    --
    The most merciful thing in the world is the inability of the human mind to correlate its contents.
  142. We should take this research even further by multiplexo · · Score: 1
    By experimenting with implanting things into John Ashcroft. I know that many /. readers would like to implant their foot in his ass, but what else could we install in our attorney general? An ID microchip, a FastPass, a blender, a rice-cooker? We could build ourselves a really cool bionic attorney general. Sure, it would be somewhat risky for Mr. Ashcroft, but I think I speak for a lot of /. 'ers here that that's a sacrifice we would be prepared to make to advance the field of implantable AG technology and to maintain America's lead in this important field!

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  143. I don't see what all the fuss is about. by handslikesnakes · · Score: 0

    in Matthew 16:26-27, Jesus says:

    For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.
    Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.

  144. I think you're missing the point. by raehl · · Score: 1

    He's saying that it's not possible for the majority of a country to be below average intelligence; therefore the person making such an assumption must not be intelligent.

    It is, however, quite possible for the majority of people who vote for a certain candidate to be of below average intelligence. In the case of Bush, it's actually NECESSARY for the majority of his voters to be of below-average intelligence.

    In fact, from the 2000 election, we can conclude two things:

    1) Because Gore did win the popular vote, even some people of below average intelligence still voted for him.
    2) There are more people of below average intelligence in rural states, but Florida is too close to call.

  145. Non-removable? I think not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To remove the microchip, I think all you need to do is simply cut off both arms. Problem solved.

  146. In related news.. by sPaKr · · Score: 1

    The Mexican Bar association is investing in devlopment and financing of prosthetic replacement arms. "We expect to to need many, many new arms in the future."
    -- Jose Oryo Horchata Conchita Banana Pepe Don Diego Vasquese

  147. Future upgrades by forc · · Score: 1

    I hope this chip is somewhat upgradeable ? Why even bother with an implant when the technology is so young, it is bound to be obsolete in his own lifetime or much sooner.

  148. "Civilian contractors" by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1

    "Civilian contractors". I hate that term. They're mercenaries. They are being paid to do work that the military traditionally do but can't/won't.

  149. Mexico, my home. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    This country is the suxx0rz... I'm jumping the fence to the United States ASAP!

    Would the last one out of Mexico please turn off the lights.

  150. What about privacy of general, now and later by little_prince · · Score: 1

    I wonder, will authorities like to deactivate the chip even after the tenure is over? May be they want to monitor and blackmail him later, when he goes on to selling secrets.. :-) As a side thought, I was wondering if these electronic chips implanted in his body -- - can damage the tissus around? afterall chips are made of certain material foreign to body. - can the OS or other software running on these chips can be infected by electronic viruses transmitted over wireless? and then have funny/dangerous repurcussions arising out of that. what do fellow slashdotters think?

    1. Re:What about privacy of general, now and later by carn311 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps one could infect such a chip with a virus, assuming of course it is wired to recieve signals rather than simply transmit them. However, as to the chip being rejected by the tissue surrounding it this is highly unlikely assuming that the chip is engineered with the proper materials. As for a virus being able to cause physical reprocussions upon the subject by infecting the chip, the chip would have to be built with such actions in mind unless one were to somehow cause a power surge or something.

      --
      Click here to find out what true knowledge real
  151. A false sense of security by AndreyF · · Score: 1

    This has always bugged me about RFID's... are they not incredibly insecure? As far as I understand, they 'reflect' a certain signature, kind of like... license plates on a car, except with a bit of high-tech in there. This isn't private/public key encryption scheme to verify the authenticity, this is a signature that's accessible to anyone that can get near you with a relatively small reader...

    this may only give a false sense of security

  152. Mark Of The Beast: Just Add Commerce! (repost) by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    Revalations 13:16-17
    [16] And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
    [17] And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.


    King James Bible at umich.edu