This consists of a serious of 4 or more chemcial recombinants that arrange themselves in a ladder like pattern between two guiding rails. The pattern itself is used to encode blue print style chemcial mappings, as well as algorithmic and chemical process that can be cloned in short sequences that are then used for a piece by piece construction of a complete cellular entity.
corollary patent - multi purpose ladders
the use of such construcing map ladders to encode multipe types of cellular information, such that a series or collection of interdependent cellular entites may be self fabricated from a single encoding ladder.
(for those who haven't guessed yet, this is a really shitty description of DNA... you ALL owe me royalties because you exist!!! )
1, yes, it's 2 cd's for the documentation library only.
The full MSDN set is 20 something.
I agree with you about the merits of MFC. However, the loki man's complaints are still valid and correct. He's not writing MFC programs. He's porting them, and just as he stated, the MFC is utterly unportable.
Don't insult him when you don't appear to know what it is he's doing or why he's saying what he is.
Apparently you are relatively unfamiliar with chinese history. Does the term "Cultrual Revolution" mean much to you? Amoung many other things, it was a backlash against technology, and any other intellectual pursuit for that matter.
Granted, such an occurance is very unlikely in the "modern" china... However, it was considered equally unlikely when it happened.
perhaps the mechanical loom wasn't progressive. Positive is a word as the meaning is vague. However, the mechanical loom was undeniably a world altering piece of equipment. Carnivore, is not. Additionally, the loom was not litegated into one's home, and one was not legilated into using it. It was merely more economical. If you see the two methods of distribution as equal, then you are justified in hating both equally. After a little thought however, one should realize that they are not.
You're also making the assumption here that the carnivore box is some how progressive or positive, which is clearly not the case. It's an invasive monotring device meant to compormise you at a specific level in a specific way. It is not a world changing viewpoint altering progressive piece of technology.
No, i meant mod that down.
I fealt i had just too much karma:)
Re:Another one bites the du5t.
on
Kuro5hin Update
·
· Score: 1
What i think is truly funny, is that you proseltize about the supposed loss of virginity surrounding K5, bitch about the corporate structure of VA Linux, announe to the world that you're removing the k5 link from your long forgotten site, which incidently, has a link to ZDnet?
Yes, the ducks of your politics are well lined up. Thank you for your input, here's your tinfoil hat, please go back to your room now and take your meds.
I spent alot of time in college, but never actually finished a degree.
My goal in life was to become a history professor (after wasting lots of time thinking i wanted to teach philosophy). However, i was funding this entire venture working temporary and contract positions as a tech support specialist.
I almost accidently made my way into programming and here i sit as a developer now, having given up collegiant pursuits in favor of my High Paying Tech-Job(tm).
Whats interesting to me, is how many people i know in the industry who are officially degreed, whos degrees have very little relevence to what they do now. My project team leader has a bachlors and mastors in geology, my co-developer has a degree in psych and our little companies CTO holds a doctrate in child development.
I think a large part of this, is that the industry is surrounded by this mystique of strange techy geekdom, so that only people who are intrested in it seem to get in it and accel.
Additionally, this is a (reletively) very new industry and therefor (unlike history) demonstratable merit suddenly becomes more important to your educational certificates.
As the industry grows and matures, this _will_ change. All academic (or pseudo-academic) pursuits eventually become overrun with qualified individuals, and then who you know and where you went to school start to become more important( as in history, economics, and to a large degree, law).
Who knows how long that will take though? There are still many many companies that you walk in to and get in on the "ground floor" of their IT departments, and quickly move up in position and salary. The industry will become alot more eastablished before these types of opportunites begin to really dry up, though the market is harder now than it was perhaps 5 years ago. I don't mean that its harder to find a job, i mean that the skill sets required are higher now, as companies know more about what they actually need, rather than just looking for bright enthusiastic individuals.
I don't think that's neccissarily so... I don't think it really came about till someone at nvidia grabbed 3dfx's open source drivers and made a through study of them with the idea in mind to find patent infringement.
Which, as another poster pointed out, is "patently" bizzare. It's mostly agreed upon that nvidia makes the best graphics chipsets right now... and even if you have some argument with that, you certainly can't disagree that, at the moment, they're currently top dog.
This lawsuit, from a buisness standpoint, is silly, as it villifies the company for basically no reason.
You guys are too freely mixing terms here, expeically in regards to marxism and it's various offshoots.
Remember, the russian revolution wasn't really about russia... it was supposed to be the start, and spread through germany and the rest of europe... that uh, didn't happen though.
Russia was primarily an agrarian society at the time and lenin new that such an infrastructure wouldn't support communism. His major boon was that _everybody_ hated the czar.
At any rate, ideology was a sick joke to stalin who barily paid lip service to it personally... he considered himself a dictator, and his spin doctors then proceeded to figure out ways to propagandize him in the context of the revolution etc....
The competition between the too ideologies was required to keep communism viable... people needed something to work against... all sacrifice was for the the good of the state in this cold cold war against the capitalist pigs, it didn't matter if your government sucked, they were just trying to defeat the enemy.
If you don't think normal people will buy this stuff, go look up the shock box experiments.
What are you smoking?
McArthur was an arrogant SOB, but he was hardly a moron... Incidently, making war on china was a very sound tactical decision, but a piss poor politcal one.
Server space is a completely different matter... Most machines there are SMP there. However, Intel currently doesn't have to worry about competition there because AMD hasn't yet released a SMP capable chipset.
Microsoft Visual Studio acts in almost the exact same way... Floating dialogs with tabs that can be dragged out to create new windows or in to consolidate them.
Except the microsoft implementation also supports docking and latching those dialogs and is infact, just a little more flexable.
Additionally, ms has been using these types of windows since vb3... yet there hasn't been any noise at all between ms and adobe on the issue.
You're makeing up some vague comparison between Intel and AMD chip releases with (apparently) no knowledge of the history of the two processors.
The k6 series of chips exists in the land of laptops and embeded devices, and also in the land of low-end/low-cost machines, the k7 duron line is meant to fill that space eventually... i think, and the k7 athlon line is the hard core main machine line, so in short no k6 anything will be competeing with it is intel will be releasing pas the p4.
Intel is (perhaps) worse with their own nomenclature. There are 2 very different chips within the p3 line... the old p3's with the same cache and core as the p2's plus SSE, and the new p3's with the 256kb ondie cache... pluse all the newer chips com ein E (p3 900E)and EB versions for which bus speed they run at, etc.
Functional Programing will never reach mainstream acceptence for a number of reasons... But the most important and glaring reason, is because it's the most counter-intuitive style imaginable.
XML/XSL(T)'s popular use is not that far in the future. I work for an insurance company, and i'm one of the primary web developers working on their ecommerce innatiative the point of which, is to sell varous click and bind contracts, policies, and annuities over the web. One of the catches has been that the quote and qualifier engines must be independent of the rest of the sight so that they can be branded to partners websites in order preserve name recognition and look and feel. The method we used was to everything in xml and the various technologies relating to it. The quote and qualifiers engines deliver xml which is translated into whatever website is availabe, then posted back to the engine which converts it to xml and feeds it to a class loader which loads javaclasses on the web server based on the resulting xml, does it's thing and returns anouther stream for more translation. It's turned out to be so flexable that anybody will be able to contract with us to sell group and individual products and all they have to do is generate some xsl style sheets. We even generate the pdf apps that have to be printed and signed from the xml with xslt (digital sigs aren't respected everywhere). The project has been in development since last fall and will probably go into production this fall.
There is a catch here however. We've stayed as close to standards compliance as we found neccissary to maintian the full capabilites of the site in IE, Netscape 4, and opera... Which means all these technologies are implemented on the server side. The upshot of these technologies is, http is the only thing you're requied to speak to be a client.
Just so you know it's not _that_ cutting edge... especially if stuffy old insurance is getting into it.
Slashdot Mirror
The athlon itself and the EV6 bus can scale to 15 processors, just like the alpha it's based on.
system map.
the patent - constructing mapping ladders
This consists of a serious of 4 or more chemcial recombinants that arrange themselves in a ladder like pattern between two guiding rails. The pattern itself is used to encode blue print style chemcial mappings, as well as algorithmic and chemical process that can be cloned in short sequences that are then used for a piece by piece construction of a complete cellular entity.
corollary patent - multi purpose ladders
the use of such construcing map ladders to encode multipe types of cellular information, such that a series or collection of interdependent cellular entites may be self fabricated from a single encoding ladder.
(for those who haven't guessed yet, this is a really shitty description of DNA... you ALL owe me royalties because you exist!!! )
AMD uses DEC's EV6 protocal, same as alphas, which is why there is noise about alhp mb/ athlon compatibility.
EV6 is an insanely scalable (1000's of processors) architecture (as compared to intels apic -- like 8 procs or something )
The kernel might not need that much work as smp alpha stuff is already in place.
Great for travel out... exploration and all that
stuff but uh.... one small question...
If this were a space ship, how do you come back?
Hardly.
It is, after all, largly the democratic party that is working with these corps, pushing these patent laws, and coming up with things like the DMCA.
You can't state that any politcal party is that clearly cut. They aren't, especially the big two in the US.
One filesystem doesn't.
you fudged up.
1, yes, it's 2 cd's for the documentation library only.
The full MSDN set is 20 something.
I agree with you about the merits of MFC. However, the loki man's complaints are still valid and correct. He's not writing MFC programs. He's porting them, and just as he stated, the MFC is utterly unportable.
Don't insult him when you don't appear to know what it is he's doing or why he's saying what he is.
oh wait... I've been trolled... damn...
Apparently you are relatively unfamiliar with chinese history. Does the term "Cultrual Revolution" mean much to you? Amoung many other things, it was a backlash against technology, and any other intellectual pursuit for that matter.
Granted, such an occurance is very unlikely in the "modern" china... However, it was considered equally unlikely when it happened.
perhaps the mechanical loom wasn't progressive. Positive is a word as the meaning is vague. However, the mechanical loom was undeniably a world altering piece of equipment. Carnivore, is not. Additionally, the loom was not litegated into one's home, and one was not legilated into using it. It was merely more economical. If you see the two methods of distribution as equal, then you are justified in hating both equally. After a little thought however, one should realize that they are not.
You're also making the assumption here that the carnivore box is some how progressive or positive, which is clearly not the case. It's an invasive monotring device meant to compormise you at a specific level in a specific way. It is not a world changing viewpoint altering progressive piece of technology.
uh they won't, seeing as you know cobalt owns the whole cube thing...
No, i meant mod that down. :)
I fealt i had just too much karma
What i think is truly funny, is that you proseltize about the supposed loss of virginity surrounding K5, bitch about the corporate structure of VA Linux, announe to the world that you're removing the k5 link from your long forgotten site, which incidently, has a link to ZDnet?
Yes, the ducks of your politics are well lined up. Thank you for your input, here's your tinfoil hat, please go back to your room now and take your meds.
This is curious to me...
I spent alot of time in college, but never actually finished a degree.
My goal in life was to become a history professor (after wasting lots of time thinking i wanted to teach philosophy). However, i was funding this entire venture working temporary and contract positions as a tech support specialist.
I almost accidently made my way into programming and here i sit as a developer now, having given up collegiant pursuits in favor of my High Paying Tech-Job(tm).
Whats interesting to me, is how many people i know in the industry who are officially degreed, whos degrees have very little relevence to what they do now. My project team leader has a bachlors and mastors in geology, my co-developer has a degree in psych and our little companies CTO holds a doctrate in child development.
I think a large part of this, is that the industry is surrounded by this mystique of strange techy geekdom, so that only people who are intrested in it seem to get in it and accel.
Additionally, this is a (reletively) very new industry and therefor (unlike history) demonstratable merit suddenly becomes more important to your educational certificates.
As the industry grows and matures, this _will_ change. All academic (or pseudo-academic) pursuits eventually become overrun with qualified individuals, and then who you know and where you went to school start to become more important( as in history, economics, and to a large degree, law).
Who knows how long that will take though? There are still many many companies that you walk in to and get in on the "ground floor" of their IT departments, and quickly move up in position and salary. The industry will become alot more eastablished before these types of opportunites begin to really dry up, though the market is harder now than it was perhaps 5 years ago. I don't mean that its harder to find a job, i mean that the skill sets required are higher now, as companies know more about what they actually need, rather than just looking for bright enthusiastic individuals.
-T
I don't think that's neccissarily so... I don't think it really came about till someone at nvidia grabbed 3dfx's open source drivers and made a through study of them with the idea in mind to find patent infringement.
Which, as another poster pointed out, is "patently" bizzare. It's mostly agreed upon that nvidia makes the best graphics chipsets right now... and even if you have some argument with that, you certainly can't disagree that, at the moment, they're currently top dog.
This lawsuit, from a buisness standpoint, is silly, as it villifies the company for basically no reason.
You guys are too freely mixing terms here, expeically in regards to marxism and it's various offshoots.
Remember, the russian revolution wasn't really about russia... it was supposed to be the start, and spread through germany and the rest of europe... that uh, didn't happen though.
Russia was primarily an agrarian society at the time and lenin new that such an infrastructure wouldn't support communism. His major boon was that _everybody_ hated the czar.
At any rate, ideology was a sick joke to stalin who barily paid lip service to it personally... he considered himself a dictator, and his spin doctors then proceeded to figure out ways to propagandize him in the context of the revolution etc....
The competition between the too ideologies was required to keep communism viable... people needed something to work against... all sacrifice was for the the good of the state in this cold cold war against the capitalist pigs, it didn't matter if your government sucked, they were just trying to defeat the enemy.
If you don't think normal people will buy this stuff, go look up the shock box experiments.
I Do!!!!
Geoworks!!!!
That system was so much cleaner
than it's contemporary MS windows...
I've always wondered what happened
to the GEM system... i know it's
still out there in some wierd form.
I had a zeos 286 laptop with
Dr.DOS 4.4 or something, and
GeoWorks...
-L
What are you smoking?
McArthur was an arrogant SOB, but he was hardly a moron... Incidently, making war on china was a very sound tactical decision, but a piss poor politcal one.
Your only thinking about the desktops.
Server space is a completely different matter... Most machines there are SMP there. However, Intel currently doesn't have to worry about competition there because AMD hasn't yet released a SMP capable chipset.
Microsoft Visual Studio acts in almost the exact same way... Floating dialogs with tabs that can be dragged out to create new windows or in to consolidate them.
Except the microsoft implementation also supports docking and latching those dialogs and is infact, just a little more flexable.
Additionally, ms has been using these types of windows since vb3... yet there hasn't been any noise at all between ms and adobe on the issue.
-T
Moderate this up, the correction is neccissary.
Look at the numbers. They do make sence.
K6, k6-2, k6-3, k6-2+, k6-3+, k7 (Athlon)
You're makeing up some vague comparison between Intel and AMD chip releases with (apparently) no knowledge of the history of the two processors.
The k6 series of chips exists in the land of laptops and embeded devices, and also in the land of low-end/low-cost machines, the k7 duron line is meant to fill that space eventually... i think, and the k7 athlon line is the hard core main machine line, so in short no k6 anything will be competeing with it is intel will be releasing pas the p4.
Intel is (perhaps) worse with their own nomenclature. There are 2 very different chips within the p3 line... the old p3's with the same cache and core as the p2's plus SSE, and the new p3's with the 256kb ondie cache... pluse all the newer chips com ein E (p3 900E)and EB versions for which bus speed they run at, etc.
Functional Programing will never reach mainstream acceptence for a number of reasons... But the most important and glaring reason, is because it's the most counter-intuitive style imaginable.
XML/XSL(T)'s popular use is not that far in the future. I work for an insurance company, and i'm one of the primary web developers working on their ecommerce innatiative the point of which, is to sell varous click and bind contracts, policies, and annuities over the web. One of the catches has been that the quote and qualifier engines must be independent of the rest of the sight so that they can be branded to partners websites in order preserve name recognition and look and feel. The method we used was to everything in xml and the various technologies relating to it. The quote and qualifiers engines deliver xml which is translated into whatever website is availabe, then posted back to the engine which converts it to xml and feeds it to a class loader which loads javaclasses on the web server based on the resulting xml, does it's thing and returns anouther stream for more translation. It's turned out to be so flexable that anybody will be able to contract with us to sell group and individual products and all they have to do is generate some xsl style sheets. We even generate the pdf apps that have to be printed and signed from the xml with xslt (digital sigs aren't respected everywhere). The project has been in development since last fall and will probably go into production this fall.
There is a catch here however. We've stayed as close to standards compliance as we found neccissary to maintian the full capabilites of the site in IE, Netscape 4, and opera... Which means all these technologies are implemented on the server side. The upshot of these technologies is, http is the only thing you're requied to speak to be a client.
Just so you know it's not _that_ cutting edge... especially if stuffy old insurance is getting into it.
-T