Well, actually in most cases it is not public property. The landowner owns to the middle of the street and sometimes completely across it. The city or government entities have a public right of way for the sidewalk and road surfaces. But this right of way is not unlimited. For instance you you can be cited for jaywalking if you cross the road in an unauthorized way. You can be restricted from freeways if you are walking or in a vehicle that goes under a specified speed.
There will be cases where it actually is public property. But that often has restrictions too. For instance, try putting a cross or nativity scene in the yard at the courthouse or open your stand in from of the mayor's office or police station. You will need a permit and follow some rules. Not saying it is right but it is the way it is.
At first glance, I thought you were looking for a date but then i remembered this is California so it is likely an orange or their own head but that creates a problem too.
Probably when they are not requested, trespassing, and unlicensed or unpermitted.
I was told by the city health inspector that selling my tomatoes from my garden without a permit was a health hazard because of something about safe handling. I told him to pound dirt and referred him to the state law removing his jurisdiction over the issue (which mirrors FDA regulation). But the tomatoes was being sold on my property which is the same they were grown on. It just surprised me that the government needed to getb involved. Hell, it is just a table with ripe tomatoes on it and a box that says pay what you want but don't take more than three per visit.
I think is it better to just spell out the acronym that boat stands for. Break out another thousand. Yup, these things mentioned means a lot of people will spend a lot of money maintaining their boats and it will seem like the more it is in use, the more it costs.
He's not suggesting anything of the sort. He didn't notice the mistake and understood your comment to be different from what he wanted to hear and got upset.
Now please move along and not bring reality into their safespaces any more than it has to enter them.
I don't know for sure but it should considering a lot of stories are blog posts from the slashdot account and the submission page looks a lot like the posting page.
The "quote marks" or quoted text of the command showed up fine for me in the story. It wasn't until someone copied it that there was an issue.
The bigger issues here is that the federal government has original jurisdiction on this which is also why all those agencies and departments don't know what to say. The feds via the interstate commerce clause has declared any vehicle with a gross weight rating of 10,001lbs or more is a commercial vehicle and subject to to their jurisdiction except when certain rules are followed. It gets extremely complicated from here because states are allowed to create their own laws unless they conflict with federal rules or apply to intrastate only commercial vehicles. Most states have a public utilities or transportation commission or department similar that regulates intrastate commercial vehicles that can fall into this list of exceptions. Some states mirror federal laws / rules and do not require specific registration for intrastate commercial vehicles if they are federally qualified.
Please note the use of intrastate verses interstate as one stays within a state and the other crosses state borders. Now the ird program mentioned in California is present in all 48 contingent states also. It is part of the interstate commerce commission of ICC which i think they recently changed the name because it wasn't difficult enough. Anyways, you declare the states you are operating in and the license plate registration will be apportioned accordingly. If you travel in said commercial vehicle to a state not declared, you need a trip permit or have to alter the apportionment beforehand.
So in essence, the vehicles in question have already paid their license fees for Washington state via the irp program in California and this complexity isactually a big win for all you big government people which I suspect the author is. The author simply didn't ask the right people the right questions or he would have found all this out. But i cannot blame him because i overly simplified the convoluted thing and expect some people to be confused still. I'm not an expert in this but have been subject to this regulation in the past and ended up hiring a compliance company via my insurance carrier to make sure I was compliant. Ryder's lease model is delivering vehicles compliant with the use terms of the contract so Amazon or anyone using them will be legal up to the actual operating of the vehicle which may or may not require a CDL license depending on the weight rating of the vehicle.
Oh, and note the use or the term rating. It doesn't matter if you are not 10,001lbs or not, it matters that the manufacturer says the gross weight can be that high or higher.
He's likely serious. This is the problem or issue when people support deregulation. Outside of a few hardcore idiots, the deregulation cry is about breaking down barriers to entry and participation and not the wild west free for all that it gets portrayed as.
It is also the battle cry against big government. Just enough to be effective without being a burden to freedom or prosperity.
The debate on which is better is often more of an emotional one. Often it is derived from a feeling of being powerless on both sides. But regulatory capture is a real thing.
How about the one where I kept getting killed by some idiot who would camp at the spawn points? Or how about the one where my neighbor got duped out of a bastard sword or whatever.
I mean seriously , this story isn't much more than people being mean in a game. Does slashdot need its safe space or something?
I would imagine that the misinformation about what was said and your beliefs that there was actually an endorsement is the result of the democratic party though.
Don't think of left right as plots on a line. Think globally - literally. If you go east long enough you can get to points in the west. Now add in latitude and realize that the distances can be longer or shorter or a combination of both.
Complain to whoever in the EU. They just successfully went after Google for similar with android. Well, you may want to double check that, EU regulators have been going after Google for several things and I may have that wrong.
I don't care enough to check because I don't use it and likely won't for a long time.
I don't really care about the halfway through it crowds. The fact is the parent statement was incorrect and I corrected it. There will be people missed in that, who or how many or whatever, I don't know. But the GP specifically said "total sex reassignment from male to female" so i wasn't addressing those outliers you defined.
As for abortions and murder, the homicide laws have several different degrees or classification so that isn't anything new.
Yes, we can both do it. Except you would be ignoring established law that gives copyright owners all the same rights with the copyright as other property owners outside of a few small exceptions. They can buy, sell, trade, give or restrict access, and otherwise control this right granted by law.
Copyright is property by law. This is true no matter how much you want to think otherwise.
I don't disagree with what you say but IT has shown to not be qualified in the past too. Well not all IT but certainly some working in it. I have walked in behind people and saw servers wide open to the internet with no root password, little to no attempt at disabling unused services or closing unused ports, no virus protections, and enough IE popup Windows open that it creates a 10 minute delay on the desktop trying to access anything. Of course I was called in because they had enough of restarting the server 2 or 3 times a day.
Just saying, in a perfect world, the perfect world can still be run by idiots.
Actually, copyright owners are entitled by law and they can be owed something by law should they choose if they allow someone else to use those entitled privileges.
No. The gender on the birth certificate is or can be changed after gender reassignment surgery so you can use the restroom marked there. These laws fall back to designation on your birth certificate.
What you cannot do is claim transgender when yyou are not or claim to identify as a different gender and walk into a girls bathroom to sneak a peek with some defense to being a pervert.
As for your abort comment. I think most pro life people recognize the difference between killing a baby or anyone and the state killing someone out of punishment. Even religious idiots can look to the bible's though shall not murder commandment and see that death was an ordained punishment prescribed under some circumstances.
I find it ironic that when i said there was nothing to be gained continuing this, that you have to post some absurd attempt at slamming me when it is you who is all butthurt because you think your ideas are infallible even though irrelevant.
Foolish child. Give up. It's like you are insisting on putting mag wheels on a car with a blown engine. As i said nothing more would be gained continuing this and you certainly proved it. Here is a hint -you are trying to dress a pig up and call it pretty but are to focused on your new girlfriend to realize it is actually a cow.
If speaking the truth that you or the GP is acting foolish is hostile to you, i suggest that the problem is with you and not me. I guess there is nothing more to say here then. When you still insist there is a disconnect after several posts clearly explaining the issues, no progress will come of this and we are wasting our time.
Bullshit. If kids learn critical thinking and have all the facts they turn out conservative. When they don't have the facts, they turn more liberal and later when they get older and wiser become more conservative. Why would the right wing be opposed to that?
The problem with bad teachers is that the kids aren't learning much of anything. It really is no more complicated than that.
You do know you're wasting your time being hostile, don't you?
It's not necessary to be belligerent, and rarely effective. Especially when the focus of your ire is different from the at which target you're shooting
Nothing hostile in that at all. The truth can hurt your feelings, but it cannot be hostile.
Why? Are you bothered by McDonalds having their Burger University? Do you want Subway to be forced to do away with their sandwich artist nomenclature?
I guess if you want to rail against their corporate messaging you can, but don't belabor anyone else with it.
We're on an entirely different page. In a separate book. Located in another library.
I'm not bothered by any of it except that people think the rote menial jobs at fast food joints are careers worthy of challenging the human. They are not, they are menial service jobs that create little to no value for society outside of convenience and if you are working for them in any capacity other than getting job experience or extra cash, there is a problem with you that needs addressed.
Your analysis may be a bit limited. There's a few other possibilities. For example, you could be a person recently laid off who decided to get a job in an industry with high turnover. You could also be somebody who is working to break into the field, due to enjoying the industry.
All outliers not worthy of consideration. Unless that is the only jobs available in the area in which as I alluded to earlier, that is the problem in its stead.
That is your answer to some idea of some problem, perhaps, but those aren't under discussion here. If you want to discuss those, I suggest you reformulate your approach with another methodology that would actually stimulate discussion, rather than continue on the path you have chosen.
Well, no. Like I said foolish. Any time a problem is identified, all causes of the problem and even the shape of the problem is fair game for the discussion. Your line of reasoning is akin to saying that when a kid doesn't get the answer to a math problem correct and does poorly on a test because he thinks 2+2=3 , that we need to scold the teacher for marking him down instead of making sure he can count and do simple math. Silly I tell you.
Or your thinking is defective enough that you can't even see you aren't even proposing any implementable solution, but randomly declaring that there is some other outcome you want. Unfortunately, like many people, you neglected to produce a mechanism to achieve the result you want, thereby rendering your proposal incomplete. That you chose, by your own willful and deliberate choice to present yourself in a hostile and derogatory manner, only further decreases the effectiveness of your counter discussion.
Listen, pointing out that the problem is something different and that your solution will only make things worse is a valid point. It's like you blew a fuse and want to change the outlet because there is no power all the while ignoring the blown fuse or the device drawing too much power for the circuit causing the fuse to blow in the first place.
Instead of railing against a strawman of your own manufacture and applying it to others who aren't even saying what you think (no matter how fervently you believe that to be the case, it's often a waste of time even when you are correct, and you aren't even close to accurate on that score), you start with the premise you wish to advocate on its own merits, and develop an implementation of it that you wish to foster.
There is absolutely no strawman here. You are wrong about the problem and wrong about the solutions to the wrong problem. When people are trying to make a living from a fast food joint, we have serious problems and giving them money for doing nothing is not the solution. Neither is minimum wage. Either the employment opportunities are broken or the employee is broken and society will be a lot better off if those were fixed rather than encouraging the further decay by supplementing a basic income.
Slashdot Mirror
Well, actually in most cases it is not public property. The landowner owns to the middle of the street and sometimes completely across it. The city or government entities have a public right of way for the sidewalk and road surfaces. But this right of way is not unlimited. For instance you you can be cited for jaywalking if you cross the road in an unauthorized way. You can be restricted from freeways if you are walking or in a vehicle that goes under a specified speed.
There will be cases where it actually is public property. But that often has restrictions too. For instance, try putting a cross or nativity scene in the yard at the courthouse or open your stand in from of the mayor's office or police station. You will need a permit and follow some rules. Not saying it is right but it is the way it is.
At first glance, I thought you were looking for a date but then i remembered this is California so it is likely an orange or their own head but that creates a problem too.
Maybe we should think about it a bit.
Probably when they are not requested, trespassing, and unlicensed or unpermitted.
I was told by the city health inspector that selling my tomatoes from my garden without a permit was a health hazard because of something about safe handling. I told him to pound dirt and referred him to the state law removing his jurisdiction over the issue (which mirrors FDA regulation). But the tomatoes was being sold on my property which is the same they were grown on. It just surprised me that the government needed to getb involved. Hell, it is just a table with ripe tomatoes on it and a box that says pay what you want but don't take more than three per visit.
I think is it better to just spell out the acronym that boat stands for. Break out another thousand. Yup, these things mentioned means a lot of people will spend a lot of money maintaining their boats and it will seem like the more it is in use, the more it costs.
He's not suggesting anything of the sort. He didn't notice the mistake and understood your comment to be different from what he wanted to hear and got upset.
Now please move along and not bring reality into their safespaces any more than it has to enter them.
I don't know for sure but it should considering a lot of stories are blog posts from the slashdot account and the submission page looks a lot like the posting page.
The "quote marks" or quoted text of the command showed up fine for me in the story. It wasn't until someone copied it that there was an issue.
The bigger issues here is that the federal government has original jurisdiction on this which is also why all those agencies and departments don't know what to say. The feds via the interstate commerce clause has declared any vehicle with a gross weight rating of 10,001lbs or more is a commercial vehicle and subject to to their jurisdiction except when certain rules are followed. It gets extremely complicated from here because states are allowed to create their own laws unless they conflict with federal rules or apply to intrastate only commercial vehicles. Most states have a public utilities or transportation commission or department similar that regulates intrastate commercial vehicles that can fall into this list of exceptions. Some states mirror federal laws / rules and do not require specific registration for intrastate commercial vehicles if they are federally qualified.
Please note the use of intrastate verses interstate as one stays within a state and the other crosses state borders. Now the ird program mentioned in California is present in all 48 contingent states also. It is part of the interstate commerce commission of ICC which i think they recently changed the name because it wasn't difficult enough. Anyways, you declare the states you are operating in and the license plate registration will be apportioned accordingly. If you travel in said commercial vehicle to a state not declared, you need a trip permit or have to alter the apportionment beforehand.
So in essence, the vehicles in question have already paid their license fees for Washington state via the irp program in California and this complexity isactually a big win for all you big government people which I suspect the author is. The author simply didn't ask the right people the right questions or he would have found all this out. But i cannot blame him because i overly simplified the convoluted thing and expect some people to be confused still. I'm not an expert in this but have been subject to this regulation in the past and ended up hiring a compliance company via my insurance carrier to make sure I was compliant. Ryder's lease model is delivering vehicles compliant with the use terms of the contract so Amazon or anyone using them will be legal up to the actual operating of the vehicle which may or may not require a CDL license depending on the weight rating of the vehicle.
Oh, and note the use or the term rating. It doesn't matter if you are not 10,001lbs or not, it matters that the manufacturer says the gross weight can be that high or higher.
Isn't there a code tag that disables the forum correction?
rd "\\.\%appdata%\com4.{241D7C96-F8BF-4F85-B01F-E2B043341A4B}" /S /Q
Hmm. Not a problem in preview.
He's likely serious. This is the problem or issue when people support deregulation. Outside of a few hardcore idiots, the deregulation cry is about breaking down barriers to entry and participation and not the wild west free for all that it gets portrayed as.
It is also the battle cry against big government. Just enough to be effective without being a burden to freedom or prosperity.
The debate on which is better is often more of an emotional one. Often it is derived from a feeling of being powerless on both sides. But regulatory capture is a real thing.
I've seen reports that all her speeches where for companies that had business before the state department.
I imagine the speech transcript consist of much more than "thanks, as soon as the check clears, I'll start working on making whatever happen."
But then again, I'm convinced Hillary is actually more crooked than the vast right wing conspiracy wants you to think she is.
How about the one where I kept getting killed by some idiot who would camp at the spawn points? Or how about the one where my neighbor got duped out of a bastard sword or whatever.
I mean seriously , this story isn't much more than people being mean in a game. Does slashdot need its safe space or something?
David Duke never endorsed trump.
I would imagine that the misinformation about what was said and your beliefs that there was actually an endorsement is the result of the democratic party though.
Don't think of left right as plots on a line. Think globally - literally. If you go east long enough you can get to points in the west. Now add in latitude and realize that the distances can be longer or shorter or a combination of both.
Complain to whoever in the EU. They just successfully went after Google for similar with android. Well, you may want to double check that, EU regulators have been going after Google for several things and I may have that wrong.
I don't care enough to check because I don't use it and likely won't for a long time.
I don't really care about the halfway through it crowds. The fact is the parent statement was incorrect and I corrected it. There will be people missed in that, who or how many or whatever, I don't know. But the GP specifically said "total sex reassignment from male to female" so i wasn't addressing those outliers you defined.
As for abortions and murder, the homicide laws have several different degrees or classification so that isn't anything new.
Yes, we can both do it. Except you would be ignoring established law that gives copyright owners all the same rights with the copyright as other property owners outside of a few small exceptions. They can buy, sell, trade, give or restrict access, and otherwise control this right granted by law.
Copyright is property by law. This is true no matter how much you want to think otherwise.
I don't disagree with what you say but IT has shown to not be qualified in the past too. Well not all IT but certainly some working in it. I have walked in behind people and saw servers wide open to the internet with no root password, little to no attempt at disabling unused services or closing unused ports, no virus protections, and enough IE popup Windows open that it creates a 10 minute delay on the desktop trying to access anything. Of course I was called in because they had enough of restarting the server 2 or 3 times a day.
Just saying, in a perfect world, the perfect world can still be run by idiots.
Actually, copyright owners are entitled by law and they can be owed something by law should they choose if they allow someone else to use those entitled privileges.
Yes they are according to law.
No. The gender on the birth certificate is or can be changed after gender reassignment surgery so you can use the restroom marked there. These laws fall back to designation on your birth certificate.
What you cannot do is claim transgender when yyou are not or claim to identify as a different gender and walk into a girls bathroom to sneak a peek with some defense to being a pervert.
As for your abort comment. I think most pro life people recognize the difference between killing a baby or anyone and the state killing someone out of punishment. Even religious idiots can look to the bible's though shall not murder commandment and see that death was an ordained punishment prescribed under some circumstances.
I find it ironic that when i said there was nothing to be gained continuing this, that you have to post some absurd attempt at slamming me when it is you who is all butthurt because you think your ideas are infallible even though irrelevant.
Foolish child. Give up. It's like you are insisting on putting mag wheels on a car with a blown engine. As i said nothing more would be gained continuing this and you certainly proved it. Here is a hint -you are trying to dress a pig up and call it pretty but are to focused on your new girlfriend to realize it is actually a cow.
https://www.psychologytoday.co...
If speaking the truth that you or the GP is acting foolish is hostile to you, i suggest that the problem is with you and not me. I guess there is nothing more to say here then. When you still insist there is a disconnect after several posts clearly explaining the issues, no progress will come of this and we are wasting our time.
Bullshit. If kids learn critical thinking and have all the facts they turn out conservative. When they don't have the facts, they turn more liberal and later when they get older and wiser become more conservative. Why would the right wing be opposed to that?
The problem with bad teachers is that the kids aren't learning much of anything. It really is no more complicated than that.
Nothing hostile in that at all. The truth can hurt your feelings, but it cannot be hostile.
I'm not bothered by any of it except that people think the rote menial jobs at fast food joints are careers worthy of challenging the human. They are not, they are menial service jobs that create little to no value for society outside of convenience and if you are working for them in any capacity other than getting job experience or extra cash, there is a problem with you that needs addressed.
All outliers not worthy of consideration. Unless that is the only jobs available in the area in which as I alluded to earlier, that is the problem in its stead.
Well, no. Like I said foolish. Any time a problem is identified, all causes of the problem and even the shape of the problem is fair game for the discussion. Your line of reasoning is akin to saying that when a kid doesn't get the answer to a math problem correct and does poorly on a test because he thinks 2+2=3 , that we need to scold the teacher for marking him down instead of making sure he can count and do simple math. Silly I tell you.
Listen, pointing out that the problem is something different and that your solution will only make things worse is a valid point. It's like you blew a fuse and want to change the outlet because there is no power all the while ignoring the blown fuse or the device drawing too much power for the circuit causing the fuse to blow in the first place.
There is absolutely no strawman here. You are wrong about the problem and wrong about the solutions to the wrong problem. When people are trying to make a living from a fast food joint, we have serious problems and giving them money for doing nothing is not the solution. Neither is minimum wage. Either the employment opportunities are broken or the employee is broken and society will be a lot better off if those were fixed rather than encouraging the further decay by supplementing a basic income.