Programs like quiken point of sale and many others run on Windows and use the Windows driver. Usually they require winxp or better but i know of several win95 and 98 pos still in use.
So because ISIS was attacking people, people are justified in attacking ISIS which then justifies ISIS attacking other people?
I guess the world needs to wake up and just obliterate ISIS then. I they are all dead this can end because there will no longer be people attacking people.
No, there really isn't many inconsistencies. The problem you have is that you think it is a one story manual for something like operating a toaster or something. It is more like a driving manual with different vehicles, road surfaces, climate conditions, and the history of how the best practices came about.
There are four or five separate covenants in the old testament. With each one, things are a bit different and even contradictory because the people rejected the old covenants or adhering to them, even corrupting them so generations latter god gave the people another chance. Within these historical representaions, hints or prophecies of new covenants are given and it is included with the new covenant to show the prophecies being fulfilled.
Now there are some chronology inconsistencies in the new testament and some witness accounts do not include everything the others do, but that doesn't take away from the meaning or moral of the points.
I understand what you are saying but i need to point out that man acting in the name of is not always the intent of.
In other words, i can contort words to mean something other than the obvious interpretation. Some words do not need to be contorted and the obvious interpretation can be used. So people claiming religious support doesn't necessarily mean that the religion supports their acts.
What is not repeated or reaffirmed in the new testament is generally not considered part of the new covenant. However the new testament has some words about homosexuality too. But we do not stone gays and you do not have to kill a dove as a burnt offerings of repentance if that is what you are worried about.
I'm to lazy to actually look it up - but sync should be the service that allows you to store your bookmarks remotely so you can use them across platforms and systems.
It would make sense that they would be shut down if pocket is a third party bookmarks service. Sync was a Mozilla in house thing and even though the ability was built in, it was optional and required you to create an account before anything was transferred.
Yes you do- or can. It's all about efficiency and productivity though. Paying someone who produces 1000 units an hour an extra 10 dollars per hour comes out to just 1 cent difference on the per unit costs.Of course taxes add to it and it wouldn't be that simple because there would be an additional employment tax as well as social security and so on on top of that 10 dollars but you can get the point easily.
It is a lot harder however when you are providing services of some sort or when the production is lower. At 100 units per hour, the cost difference would be roughly 10 cents per unit (not considering taxes and all). So if someone could pick your tomatoes at a rate of 100 packs an hour (lets say 2 tomatoes to a pack), paying them $20 an hour would have a cost associated with 20 cents on each pack of tomatoes purchased. Paying them a minimum wage of $7.25 per hour would be 13 some cents cheaper so it isn't a huge cost increase to pay them a little more.
Where it hurts is when you can only service or produce 10 units per hour. An extra $10 dollar per hour would be $1 per unit. A typical waitress at one of these full service chain restaurants can likely handle 4 to 6 tables an hour depending on the number of people at each table. If every table leave $2 for a tip, they are earning $8 to $12 more per hour than their base salary. But as restaurants usually have it, they are not packed enough at all times of the day to enable this type of turnover so there will be several hours which the waitress/waiter would only service 1 or 2 units per hour and you would need a tip increased quite a bit to make up the difference.
Well, you certainly sound like you know more about it than I do. The information I have is third hand from someone probably along the same level as you or maybe a little more advanced. The question is, can you do all that with software defined radio?
I decided to look to see if anyone is offering an undetectable radar detector and it appears Escort is in their redline series and claimed to have patented some "TotalShield Technology". So it is able to be done.
So basically your reasons for not using Firefox aren't because Firefox is bad, but because if people are stuck in Google's ecosystem they might as well use Google's browser,
Did you stop reading when you got to the point you knee jerked or something? I specifically stated "hird, Firefox has had some turd releases in which it ran like shit on older systems and hogged memory on newer ones".
and because you think that the Brendan Eich thing has any bearing on the quality of the browser itself
It has absolutely no bearing on the quality of the browser itself. It does however have a bearing on the company itself and the people who represent it. It's just something that if alone, would bother me but not enough to distance myself from the company, but when put together with all other reasons, weighs pretty significantly in my opinion. What he did was political speech, you do not have to agree with it but he has to have the right to have it consequence free.
And whether Eich wanted to stay with Mozilla or not is irrelevant to just about everybody except people who want to take a very hardline stance on such things, which practically no one cares about.
Everyone should take a hard line on it. Political speech is the foundation of any other freedom we consider a right in the world. Suppose people thought the same way and started hounding the opposition of prop8 out of a livelihood. Suppose companies retrieved lists of contributors to the various marijuana legalization efforts around the country and fired them in fear their company would become associated with employing pot heads. If you do not have free speech, you do not have freedom. He has never mistreated anyone and no one- including you can show otherwise outside of a donation 8 years before it became an issue.
It's fine to have an agenda, but not when you cross the line into preachy disingenuousness.
I think you are the one who is disingenuous. Hell, you even missed specific statements in my post in order to start yours. If you are not smart enough to understand the real implications of what happened, you probably should not even talk about it. It's not about gay marriage, it is about political speech free of repercussions. If he treated someone badly or discriminated against them, it would be a different story. But the fact that so many gay people were associated with the Mozilla foundations he helped start shows this didn't happened even without the lack of evidence to show it did.
That is because when processing the radar signal in order to alert you, it emits another frequency signal and there would be no real way around it without a bunch of larger equipment like antennas and amplifiers or shielding. A radar detector's receiver called a superheterodyne receiver. It emits a frequency that interferes with the radar frequency which in turn allows reception on lower frequencies that are easier amplified.
To get around this, you would need a large antenna or even a couple of them for the variations of different frequency ranges used as well as large amplifiers and large power requirements and such. It would probably make it too cumbersome and expensive to be practical (although I have never thought it through enough to say for certain)
Your car radio works similarly although I don't think it is a "super" heterodyne receiver. I remember a while back a friend experimenting with signals detection was able to use a receiver similar to a detector-detector and tell which radio channels someone was listening to in their car. He got the idea from some concept where electronic billboards would change advertisements presented based on the average of stations passing by every 30 minutes due to the demographics who typically listen to them.
The problem is that sometimes the cops get the wrong guy (person). Where this becomes a big issue is when they run their mouths to the press and taint almost everyone who would be serving on a jury. The wrong person is often presented with some deal where they get a fraction of jail time or lose the death penalty portion of punishment if they plead out to save the court time. People look and realize that their paycheck to paycheck existence already is disrupted because being locked up for a week screwed them and because the cops are bragging about how brilliant they are, you boss fires you so to not have his business associated with whatever crime they are accused of.
Hell, recently a college football player got a DUI and was punished by the team before he was even convicted of a crime. Instead of going to court and arguing the constitutionality of the stop (he was stopped for going around a police DUI checkpoint when the US supreme court has already said the only way they could be constitution is if they were publicized and an way to avoid them was available) he took a plea deal to relieve some of the possible penalties if the judge threw the book at him. And yes, the cops are the ones who said he was stopped for trying to bypass the checkpoint and no other reason (wasn't swerving or driving recklessly or showing signs of intoxication) not the player.
In the US, all being locked up proves if that you went through the system and was convicted of something. Some people are more than likely criminals, some people are not criminals and either took plea deals or had a crap defense for whatever reason.
My understanding is that felon disenfranchisement in the USA was always, from the very beginning, aimed at preventing black people from voting.
Felony disenfranchisement originated long before blacks people were issues in the US or lands that became the US. It (Atimia) originally started in Ancient Greece around 1100 bc and was known as civil death. It was a part of Rome and Most of Europe by around the end of the medieval era.
In the US, Kentucky was the first state to have it in their state constitution in 1792. It barred anyone from voting or holding office if they had been convicted of bribery, perjury, forgery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
In 1793, Vermont's constitution gave the state supreme court the ability to disenfranchise those guilty of bribery, corruption, or other crimes.
In all, before the civil war in 1861, 21 of the 34 different states (Oregon Minnesota Maryland California Wisconsin New York Iowa Texas Louisiana New Jersey Rhode Island Florida Tennessee Delaware Virginia Missouri Alabama Connecticut Mississippi Indiana Ohio) had disenfranchisement built into their state constitution for stuff other than being black before blacks were generally allowed to vote at all. And we all know that Blacks didn't get a universal right to vote until 1870 with the passage/ratification of the 15th amendment.
In 1882, the US congress even passed a law disenfranchising polygamists from voting and holding political office. After that, some of the disenfranchisement laws were abused to deny blacks the vote which prompted provisions in the civil rights acts as well as the voting rights act in the 1960s.
But felon disenfranchisement in the USA was not brought about to prevent black people from voting. It is a relic from Ancient Greece and Rome brought into the US by British rule over the colonies and maintained throughout out history for various reasons not related to black people.
It's more than being a chrome clone. I've ditched Firefox on several systems and stopped installing it on client PCs in favor of chrome for a couple reasons. I even actively recommend people pass it by if they ask what browser to use.
First, it is easier to sync book marks and crap with their android phone and other computers and a lot of them are more accustom to the layout. The second is the crap where the new CEO Brendan Eich had to resign over a political contribution that should have been anonymous to the public (it was when he made it) some 8 years before he landed that job even when absolutely no one could ever show any discrimination or detrimental treatment from him towards gays or to anyone in his entire career at Mozilla as he was a co-founder of it. Third, Firefox has had some turd releases in which it ran like shit on older systems and hogged memory on newer ones.
There are a lot of reasons to look elsewhere. I'm not sure going back to it's roots would change much of that. The new internet explorer from Microsoft seems to be worth looking at too.
Its not that difficult to understand without any malice at all. Different countries cooperate with the CIA. We seen some of the local populations rise up in protest over this when the secret prisons originally came to light. Since then, some of those countries have had to suffer terrorist attacks due to this cooperation.
Not releasing this report could be nothing more than attempting to protect that level of cooperation and perhaps those cooperating so other aspect than prison like intelligence gathering, joint opperation against terrorist, and so on that actually does keep American safe isn't lost.
No malice needs to be involved. No cover up of illegal activity needs to be involved. There are 50 senators, their staff, and various other agencies with themployees in them. If it was illegal activities behind the reasons, you would think a high level leak would have surfaced by now.
Don't really need numbers. Political posturing is everything and if you keep hearing people talk about it, you are seeing the motivation for it to become a political issue. They will call your job security waste and promise to streamline the government making it more efficient and less costly.
Numbers don't really matter. The voters will eventually demand it whether it is true or not.
I'm going to speculate that English is not your first language. I was equating the value of his post with something that should be completely unnecessary to normal people and somewhat disturbing that it happened.
You think? I bet you say that to all the guys. Of course i understand your lack of specificity. Other than general allegations, your comment is about as insightful as peaking into the bedroom while your parents are have sex after you finished college and moved back home.
I've seen more intense hate coming from supposedly educated people like you than i have from southerners as a whole. I think your worldview is skewed by hate to some degree.
It's not US duties on importing cars as much as shipping costs and tax perks.
Building in China or anywhere else is economical because so much more product will fit in the shipping container when the products are smaller and weight less where a per unit shipped cost is pennies or often less. This is on top of shipping costs within the country of destination. Larger products like cars are easier and more economical to ship in pieces than as a whole because you can pack more into the same space by avoiding air gaps and stacking in ways an assembled car couldn't be.
But more interesting might be the stigma of buying foreign made goods like this. In the 80s when the import cars were all the rage, the unions and likely US manufacturing ran campaigns describing how your purchase of that foreign car put and American out of work (despite the import being better in a lot of areas ) and it worked.
As for building in south or latin America - perhaps there is a level of infrastructure from Tesla's run enabled. Perhaps the tax credits and incentives are missing if the vehicle is shipped in. Perhaps there is a level of experience and technical skills that aren't as easily available in those areas but are in the US because of tesa.
The problem with taxis (if there actually are any running that late in your area- mine there aren't) is that if you didn't start off intending to drink, it costs double because you have to retrieve your car. Of course it could be double anyways because you have to get to the bar in the first place.
It would be so much easier to just program the destination in before having a drink (say on way home from work or something) and then just push some buttons to get home. The vast majority of my drinking away from home is spur of the moment where i got invited from somewhere else or work was such a bitch i need to unwind a bit before going home.
Slashdot Mirror
No - not really.
Programs like quiken point of sale and many others run on Windows and use the Windows driver. Usually they require winxp or better but i know of several win95 and 98 pos still in use.
Read this.
http://arstechnica.com/securit...
It is possible that they are using the same technique.
Look up badbios at arstech. It appears that the mic is not even needed and Mac is just as exposed as pc without user interaction.
So because ISIS was attacking people, people are justified in attacking ISIS which then justifies ISIS attacking other people?
I guess the world needs to wake up and just obliterate ISIS then. I they are all dead this can end because there will no longer be people attacking people.
No, there really isn't many inconsistencies. The problem you have is that you think it is a one story manual for something like operating a toaster or something. It is more like a driving manual with different vehicles, road surfaces, climate conditions, and the history of how the best practices came about.
There are four or five separate covenants in the old testament. With each one, things are a bit different and even contradictory because the people rejected the old covenants or adhering to them, even corrupting them so generations latter god gave the people another chance. Within these historical representaions, hints or prophecies of new covenants are given and it is included with the new covenant to show the prophecies being fulfilled.
Now there are some chronology inconsistencies in the new testament and some witness accounts do not include everything the others do, but that doesn't take away from the meaning or moral of the points.
Are you seriously suggesting that these attacks are justified because someone else attacked someone else in the past?
I understand what you are saying but i need to point out that man acting in the name of is not always the intent of.
In other words, i can contort words to mean something other than the obvious interpretation. Some words do not need to be contorted and the obvious interpretation can be used. So people claiming religious support doesn't necessarily mean that the religion supports their acts.
What is not repeated or reaffirmed in the new testament is generally not considered part of the new covenant. However the new testament has some words about homosexuality too. But we do not stone gays and you do not have to kill a dove as a burnt offerings of repentance if that is what you are worried about.
I'm to lazy to actually look it up - but sync should be the service that allows you to store your bookmarks remotely so you can use them across platforms and systems.
It would make sense that they would be shut down if pocket is a third party bookmarks service. Sync was a Mozilla in house thing and even though the ability was built in, it was optional and required you to create an account before anything was transferred.
Yes you do- or can. It's all about efficiency and productivity though. Paying someone who produces 1000 units an hour an extra 10 dollars per hour comes out to just 1 cent difference on the per unit costs.Of course taxes add to it and it wouldn't be that simple because there would be an additional employment tax as well as social security and so on on top of that 10 dollars but you can get the point easily.
It is a lot harder however when you are providing services of some sort or when the production is lower. At 100 units per hour, the cost difference would be roughly 10 cents per unit (not considering taxes and all). So if someone could pick your tomatoes at a rate of 100 packs an hour (lets say 2 tomatoes to a pack), paying them $20 an hour would have a cost associated with 20 cents on each pack of tomatoes purchased. Paying them a minimum wage of $7.25 per hour would be 13 some cents cheaper so it isn't a huge cost increase to pay them a little more.
Where it hurts is when you can only service or produce 10 units per hour. An extra $10 dollar per hour would be $1 per unit. A typical waitress at one of these full service chain restaurants can likely handle 4 to 6 tables an hour depending on the number of people at each table. If every table leave $2 for a tip, they are earning $8 to $12 more per hour than their base salary. But as restaurants usually have it, they are not packed enough at all times of the day to enable this type of turnover so there will be several hours which the waitress/waiter would only service 1 or 2 units per hour and you would need a tip increased quite a bit to make up the difference.
Well, you certainly sound like you know more about it than I do. The information I have is third hand from someone probably along the same level as you or maybe a little more advanced. The question is, can you do all that with software defined radio?
I decided to look to see if anyone is offering an undetectable radar detector and it appears Escort is in their redline series and claimed to have patented some "TotalShield Technology". So it is able to be done.
Did you stop reading when you got to the point you knee jerked or something? I specifically stated "hird, Firefox has had some turd releases in which it ran like shit on older systems and hogged memory on newer ones".
It has absolutely no bearing on the quality of the browser itself. It does however have a bearing on the company itself and the people who represent it. It's just something that if alone, would bother me but not enough to distance myself from the company, but when put together with all other reasons, weighs pretty significantly in my opinion. What he did was political speech, you do not have to agree with it but he has to have the right to have it consequence free.
Everyone should take a hard line on it. Political speech is the foundation of any other freedom we consider a right in the world. Suppose people thought the same way and started hounding the opposition of prop8 out of a livelihood. Suppose companies retrieved lists of contributors to the various marijuana legalization efforts around the country and fired them in fear their company would become associated with employing pot heads. If you do not have free speech, you do not have freedom. He has never mistreated anyone and no one- including you can show otherwise outside of a donation 8 years before it became an issue.
I think you are the one who is disingenuous. Hell, you even missed specific statements in my post in order to start yours. If you are not smart enough to understand the real implications of what happened, you probably should not even talk about it. It's not about gay marriage, it is about political speech free of repercussions. If he treated someone badly or discriminated against them, it would be a different story. But the fact that so many gay people were associated with the Mozilla foundations he helped start shows this didn't happened even without the lack of evidence to show it did.
For the most part, yes, it can be detected.
That is because when processing the radar signal in order to alert you, it emits another frequency signal and there would be no real way around it without a bunch of larger equipment like antennas and amplifiers or shielding. A radar detector's receiver called a superheterodyne receiver. It emits a frequency that interferes with the radar frequency which in turn allows reception on lower frequencies that are easier amplified.
To get around this, you would need a large antenna or even a couple of them for the variations of different frequency ranges used as well as large amplifiers and large power requirements and such. It would probably make it too cumbersome and expensive to be practical (although I have never thought it through enough to say for certain)
Your car radio works similarly although I don't think it is a "super" heterodyne receiver. I remember a while back a friend experimenting with signals detection was able to use a receiver similar to a detector-detector and tell which radio channels someone was listening to in their car. He got the idea from some concept where electronic billboards would change advertisements presented based on the average of stations passing by every 30 minutes due to the demographics who typically listen to them.
No, not really.
The problem is that sometimes the cops get the wrong guy (person). Where this becomes a big issue is when they run their mouths to the press and taint almost everyone who would be serving on a jury. The wrong person is often presented with some deal where they get a fraction of jail time or lose the death penalty portion of punishment if they plead out to save the court time. People look and realize that their paycheck to paycheck existence already is disrupted because being locked up for a week screwed them and because the cops are bragging about how brilliant they are, you boss fires you so to not have his business associated with whatever crime they are accused of.
Hell, recently a college football player got a DUI and was punished by the team before he was even convicted of a crime. Instead of going to court and arguing the constitutionality of the stop (he was stopped for going around a police DUI checkpoint when the US supreme court has already said the only way they could be constitution is if they were publicized and an way to avoid them was available) he took a plea deal to relieve some of the possible penalties if the judge threw the book at him. And yes, the cops are the ones who said he was stopped for trying to bypass the checkpoint and no other reason (wasn't swerving or driving recklessly or showing signs of intoxication) not the player.
In the US, all being locked up proves if that you went through the system and was convicted of something. Some people are more than likely criminals, some people are not criminals and either took plea deals or had a crap defense for whatever reason.
Felony disenfranchisement originated long before blacks people were issues in the US or lands that became the US. It (Atimia) originally started in Ancient Greece around 1100 bc and was known as civil death. It was a part of Rome and Most of Europe by around the end of the medieval era.
In the US, Kentucky was the first state to have it in their state constitution in 1792. It barred anyone from voting or holding office if they had been convicted of bribery, perjury, forgery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
In 1793, Vermont's constitution gave the state supreme court the ability to disenfranchise those guilty of bribery, corruption, or other crimes.
In all, before the civil war in 1861, 21 of the 34 different states (Oregon Minnesota Maryland California Wisconsin New York Iowa Texas Louisiana New Jersey Rhode Island Florida Tennessee Delaware Virginia Missouri Alabama Connecticut Mississippi Indiana Ohio) had disenfranchisement built into their state constitution for stuff other than being black before blacks were generally allowed to vote at all. And we all know that Blacks didn't get a universal right to vote until 1870 with the passage/ratification of the 15th amendment.
In 1882, the US congress even passed a law disenfranchising polygamists from voting and holding political office. After that, some of the disenfranchisement laws were abused to deny blacks the vote which prompted provisions in the civil rights acts as well as the voting rights act in the 1960s.
But felon disenfranchisement in the USA was not brought about to prevent black people from voting. It is a relic from Ancient Greece and Rome brought into the US by British rule over the colonies and maintained throughout out history for various reasons not related to black people.
It's more than being a chrome clone. I've ditched Firefox on several systems and stopped installing it on client PCs in favor of chrome for a couple reasons. I even actively recommend people pass it by if they ask what browser to use.
First, it is easier to sync book marks and crap with their android phone and other computers and a lot of them are more accustom to the layout. The second is the crap where the new CEO Brendan Eich had to resign over a political contribution that should have been anonymous to the public (it was when he made it) some 8 years before he landed that job even when absolutely no one could ever show any discrimination or detrimental treatment from him towards gays or to anyone in his entire career at Mozilla as he was a co-founder of it. Third, Firefox has had some turd releases in which it ran like shit on older systems and hogged memory on newer ones.
There are a lot of reasons to look elsewhere. I'm not sure going back to it's roots would change much of that. The new internet explorer from Microsoft seems to be worth looking at too.
Its not that difficult to understand without any malice at all. Different countries cooperate with the CIA. We seen some of the local populations rise up in protest over this when the secret prisons originally came to light. Since then, some of those countries have had to suffer terrorist attacks due to this cooperation.
Not releasing this report could be nothing more than attempting to protect that level of cooperation and perhaps those cooperating so other aspect than prison like intelligence gathering, joint opperation against terrorist, and so on that actually does keep American safe isn't lost.
No malice needs to be involved. No cover up of illegal activity needs to be involved. There are 50 senators, their staff, and various other agencies with themployees in them. If it was illegal activities behind the reasons, you would think a high level leak would have surfaced by now.
I'm criticizing him for grouping every person of a class (invented or not) together as if there is guilt by association no matter what reality shows.
Yes, his openness and honesty deserves to be attacked by everyone.
Don't really need numbers. Political posturing is everything and if you keep hearing people talk about it, you are seeing the motivation for it to become a political issue. They will call your job security waste and promise to streamline the government making it more efficient and less costly.
Numbers don't really matter. The voters will eventually demand it whether it is true or not.
I'm going to speculate that English is not your first language. I was equating the value of his post with something that should be completely unnecessary to normal people and somewhat disturbing that it happened.
You think? I bet you say that to all the guys. Of course i understand your lack of specificity. Other than general allegations, your comment is about as insightful as peaking into the bedroom while your parents are have sex after you finished college and moved back home.
I've seen more intense hate coming from supposedly educated people like you than i have from southerners as a whole. I think your worldview is skewed by hate to some degree.
It's not US duties on importing cars as much as shipping costs and tax perks.
Building in China or anywhere else is economical because so much more product will fit in the shipping container when the products are smaller and weight less where a per unit shipped cost is pennies or often less. This is on top of shipping costs within the country of destination. Larger products like cars are easier and more economical to ship in pieces than as a whole because you can pack more into the same space by avoiding air gaps and stacking in ways an assembled car couldn't be.
But more interesting might be the stigma of buying foreign made goods like this. In the 80s when the import cars were all the rage, the unions and likely US manufacturing ran campaigns describing how your purchase of that foreign car put and American out of work (despite the import being better in a lot of areas ) and it worked.
As for building in south or latin America - perhaps there is a level of infrastructure from Tesla's run enabled. Perhaps the tax credits and incentives are missing if the vehicle is shipped in. Perhaps there is a level of experience and technical skills that aren't as easily available in those areas but are in the US because of tesa.
What? Are you seriously trying to say let logic and reality, the history of most of the world take a back seat to the feelings of those who lost?
The problem with taxis (if there actually are any running that late in your area- mine there aren't) is that if you didn't start off intending to drink, it costs double because you have to retrieve your car. Of course it could be double anyways because you have to get to the bar in the first place.
It would be so much easier to just program the destination in before having a drink (say on way home from work or something) and then just push some buttons to get home. The vast majority of my drinking away from home is spur of the moment where i got invited from somewhere else or work was such a bitch i need to unwind a bit before going home.