of course in order to do so with similar performace you need a machine weighing at 7lbs veruses the 15" power book at 5.6
Thinkpad T42p OK, it is 5.9 lbs instead of 5.6, but the powerbook doesn't come to its foot.
You need to carry a spare battery to last roughly the same amout of time on the battery.
I can't find the spec, but it is about 4 hours. With the extra battery (which stays in the ultradock bay (and you don't have to "carry")), the battery life is 12 hours.
And unless you are running Windows your Driver support is flaky at best.
And unless you are running OS X your Driver support is flaky at best. By the way, check this out.
I totally agree with the parent poster. Stow is the solution to the problem.
Here's how it works : every piece of software is installed in/usr/local/stow/package-name. (with, for example./configure;make;make install prefix=/usr/local/stow/package-name.
Then, you run stow, and it maintains symlinks in/usr/local/bin... and everything works seamlessly. No problems with statically linked libraries or whatever.
If you want to delete a package, just delete it, and rerun stow to clean the symlinks.
And why would they want to port some legacy software to a new plaftorm ? (move stuff, test...) If NT4 works well enough, no need to change. And if it does not, moving to something more recent would ease maintainability.
I've heard this argument many times and it is ridiculous. Photocopiers you find at Kinko's cannot make counterfeit money that looks real. Nor can color lasers.
Maybe some of the more recent hi-res inkjets could do something good-looking, but reproducing the paper, the watermarks... is really more work than printing.
It would violate the GPL for Red Hat to require a binary license fee of end users. Red Hat charges for its products of course, but has neither the right nor the motivation to stop people from using it for free. The Red Hat license is the GPL, but the services connected with that software -- Red Hat Network -- are only available to paying customers.
In this particular case, I dont't think that they don't get the GPL. They deliberately violate it : they removed the strings from the GPLed code... They also appear to illegaly distribute a file which came from Windows, after having altered the strings.
Slashdot Mirror
Here's for you :
GMail invite
of course in order to do so with similar performace you need a machine weighing at 7lbs veruses the 15" power book at 5.6
Thinkpad T42p
OK, it is 5.9 lbs instead of 5.6, but the powerbook doesn't come to its foot.
You need to carry a spare battery to last roughly the same amout of time on the battery.
I can't find the spec, but it is about 4 hours. With the extra battery (which stays in the ultradock bay (and you don't have to "carry")), the battery life is 12 hours.
And unless you are running Windows your Driver support is flaky at best.
And unless you are running OS X your Driver support is flaky at best.
By the way, check this out.
In fact, in France, we use the term "CV" and not résumé.
I totally agree with the parent poster.
/usr/local/stow/package-name. (with, for example ./configure;make;make install prefix=/usr/local/stow/package-name.
/usr/local/bin... and everything works seamlessly. No problems with statically linked libraries or whatever.
Stow is the solution to the problem.
Here's how it works : every piece of software is installed in
Then, you run stow, and it maintains symlinks in
If you want to delete a package, just delete it, and rerun stow to clean the symlinks.
And why would they want to port some legacy software to a new plaftorm ? (move stuff, test...) If NT4 works well enough, no need to change. And if it does not, moving to something more recent would ease maintainability.
I guess that the parent poster means that you cannot find an analytic form of some integrals, and only approximate them.
As one trivial example, it takes a LOT less time to understand the concept of "100!" than it does to compute it!
;) However for 1000! you could wait a bit...
My 48gx with its powerful 3mhz proc computes this instantly
Thanks a lot to snipes420 and Joe Pestro for the invites.
;) :f 2ca 938-6d1f1297e8
Posting this one back since I only need one
http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-c587d89248-6e8
512 nodes SSI system. Made by IBM. Running Linux. z/Series.
Unfortunately I cannot see the page. Would anyone care sending me a gmail invite ?
Maybe would you wish to tell us where you have found them ?
we'll give you a legit copy if you tell us where you bought this knock-off
allofmp3.com
I've heard this argument many times and it is ridiculous. Photocopiers you find at Kinko's cannot make counterfeit money that looks real. Nor can color lasers.
Maybe some of the more recent hi-res inkjets could do something good-looking, but reproducing the paper, the watermarks... is really more work than printing.
It would violate the GPL for Red Hat to require a binary license fee of end users. Red Hat charges for its products of course, but has neither the right nor the motivation to stop people from using it for free. The Red Hat license is the GPL, but the services connected with that software -- Red Hat Network -- are only available to paying customers.
Hah. Where are the RHEL isos ?
No, no, no. Stupid mods. The grandparent might be a troll. The parent is definitely not.
They migrated from Apache to IIS (at least for their website) ?
I'm sure you can understand the parent poster's first language as well as he understands english.
Pinnacle PCTV. The last time I checked, their bttv drivers had no support for MT2050.
From the MIT license :
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
I was wondering, what does this mean, in legal terms ? i.e. where should it be included ? In the online docs ? Printed if it is shelfware ?...
IANAL, but modifying the LGPL, and stating exactly which changes you made should be, IMHO, the solution.
A replacement for the sound system tray icon.
...
Too generic to give an answer...
A muliiple desktop,
fvwm and many other WMs. Or do you mean Xinerama ?
scrolling desktop,
X.Org supports this.
, desktop in desktop program.
Xnest
Retrofitting XP features to older versions of Windows.
Oh, do you mean on windows ?
In this particular case, I dont't think that they don't get the GPL. They deliberately violate it : they removed the strings from the GPLed code... They also appear to illegaly distribute a file which came from Windows, after having altered the strings.
Or even without a decent compiler, he could declare the functions "inline".
Here is the original announcement of the sale
sudo ksh looks easier...