Slashdot Mirror


Color Laser Printers Tracking Everything You Print

It's not new, but it's getting noticed: Jordan writes "Yahoo! News is reporting that several printer manufacturers are now and have been for some time embedding (nearly) invisible serial numbers in every document you print with their color laser printers, allowing law enforcement to track any such document back to the printer which printed it. The technology, ostensibly created to track down money counterfeiters, was created by Xerox about 20 years ago. A Xerox researcher says that the number-embedding chip lies 'way in the machine, right near the laser' and that 'standard mischief won't get you around it.'"

795 comments

  1. Those rat b--- by BlackMagi · · Score: 0

    That just has to break some kind of privacy law ... just has to! fp?

    --
    http://melbournephilosophy.com/
    1. Re:Those rat b--- by coachvince · · Score: 0

      Yet another reason to hold onto old tech- I've got an Apple StyleWriter 1200 just a few feet form me, hooked up to a working PowerBook 540c, with PhotShop, etc.

      --
    2. Re:Those rat b--- by BlackMagi · · Score: 1

      I wonder how this deals with issues of international law. I can actually see a kind of usefulness when proving copyright etc which might go beyond simple fascism, and be genuinely useful. It would be nice if it were optional though!

      --
      http://melbournephilosophy.com/
    3. Re:Those rat b--- by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny
      "That just has to break some kind of privacy law"

      What makes you think we still have such archaic things as privacy laws anymore? Dont you know that if you have a private life the terrorists win?

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:Those rat b--- by powerspike · · Score: 2, Interesting

      not realy, your the one who keeps that infomation, they only way (we'll you'd hope) they'd get there hands on that serial if you done something with the document that was "legaly challanged" =) but this does remind me of the story a few years ago about the printer manafactors having to recall there green inks because it was the same color as dollar bills.

    5. Re:Those rat b--- by Kohath · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here's a worse one:

      Did you know that every time you touch something, you leave an invisible mark that's unique to you and can be used to track where you've been?

      It's a privacy nightmare.

    6. Re:Those rat b--- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is this mean i can no longer cut the letters out from the print out to send them to the ex-girl friend?

    7. Re:Those rat b--- by Reducer2001 · · Score: 0

      Um, gloves?

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    8. Re:Those rat b--- by BlackMagi · · Score: 4, Funny

      All your prints are belong to us

      --
      http://melbournephilosophy.com/
    9. Re:Those rat b--- by bersl2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nobody prints with green ink. That's a primary color in RGB, and surely nobody prints in RGB. The printing primary colors are CYMK: Cyan, Yellow, Magenta, and blacK. No green.

    10. Re:Those rat b--- by cabjf · · Score: 1

      Ah, but this is Slashdot! Where a right to privacy is always read as equivilent to a right to be an anonymous coward in everything you do!

    11. Re:Those rat b--- by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      I don't suppose you leave flaked off skin cells with your DNA like the rest of the population?

    12. Re:Those rat b--- by cei · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just curious, but when was the last time someone sold a printer with green ink? Color printers have been CMYK (or more) for as long as I can remember. (Maybe the 7 color ribbon for the ImageWriter II???)

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    13. Re:Those rat b--- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just hope they don't have to check my wang as evidence.

    14. Re:Those rat b--- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I collect other people's skin cells and hairs from the shower drain and leave those around wherever I go.

    15. Re:Those rat b--- by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 1

      Two words:
      Full Bodysuit.

      --
      Sig
    16. Re:Those rat b--- by Secret+Agent+X23 · · Score: 1
      What makes you think we still have such archaic things as privacy laws anymore? Dont you know that if you have a private life the terrorists win?

      "These days it's all secrecy and no privacy."
      --Fingerprint File, Jagger/Richards (1974)

    17. Re:Those rat b--- by hameluck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "we'll you'd hope" is the key.

      Say you print some literature that the government doesn't like. There's all sorts of things the government doesn't like. It doesn't (at least the current republican government) like abortion, marajuana legalization, protests against the war in iraq. You print these up and post them around, pass them out. Laws don't change themselves, it takes action. Disagreeing with a current law is perfectly legal but in the current climate in America might be considered subversive. So if you print them on these printers the FBI can track you down, build a file on you, and perhaps bring Joseph McCarthy back from the dead you commie, tree hugging, pot smoking hippe. That's just an example. Of course you could print money and then the secret service would track you down.

    18. Re:Those rat b--- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to Gattaca!

    19. Re:Those rat b--- by Julia+Cameron · · Score: 0, Troll
      • Did you know that every time you touch something, you leave an invisible mark that's unique to you and can be used to track where you've been?

      Yahbut, what do you expect? You knew God was a neocon... right?

      --
      Julia Cameron
      Oich ù agus hiùraibh éile
    20. Re:Those rat b--- by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Ah, so the stylists of the 70s were on to something!

      I see only one problem with full body suits. Here, you can see it too:
      http://www.latex-ronni.de/blue-latex-suit-111.jpg

    21. Re:Those rat b--- by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      I don't on one hand, a run in with my right hand and a belt sander took care of those fingerprints nearly 15 years ago (freshman in high school, worst shop accident the school had ever had). Though I would not suggest you go through what I did (and still have trouble from) to loose your fingerprints. Though I may leave some DNA traces I guess, I don't know how much they can get from simply touching it.

      Interesting note, I live in Tennessee and we have pretty easy to obtain handgun carry permits. One of the requirements is fingerprinting and then those fingerprints being run through the TBI and FBI. When they took my right hands fingerprints they circled the whole print (one large solid smudge for each finger) and wrote "scar tissue". The local police thought I may never be able to get one without going to court to press for my rights. A few months later my permit arrived and nothing was ever said. My mother had cut herself a few years before and had a small scar that could not be seen visably but showed up when fingerprinted (very clear and very obvious what it was). It was circled and "scar tissue" was written - she had to redo the prints *five* times because of it.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    22. Re:Those rat b--- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, the ImageWriter II was still CMYK. It produced the other colors by mixing the colors on the ribbon. For example, green was cyan + yellow.

    23. Re:Those rat b--- by Fortran+IV · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nobody prints with green ink.

      Nobody at home, maybe. Commercial printers print with all kinds of ink. If a pamphlet, coupon, or package only needs a few colors in block graphics (no complex shadings), it's more practical to use exactly the colors of ink needed than to uce CYM. Color alignment is simpler, and you use less ink.

      Q&D example off my shelves: Dove soap. The package is has only four colors, two for text, one for solid graphics, and one shaded. The printer used four colors: black, deep bluish-green, light bluish-green, and gold.

      The hardback editions of The Neverending Story were also printed with a bluish-green ink.

      Or think of green-lined ledger pages; you think a printer is going to go to the trouble to line up a cyan and a yellow run when he can do one green run and be done with it?

      So it's entirely plausible that an ink manufacturer or a commercial printer had to abandon a particular variety of green ink as being too close to one of the government's protected shades.

      --
      I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
    24. Re:Those rat b--- by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 1

      Well, you know the solution to that, don'tcha? You just merely put on enough bodysuits, so that any recognizable bodily crevice has disapeard. ;)

      --
      Sig
    25. Re:Those rat b--- by starman97 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Canon BCi9900 Photo printer uses Red and Green
      inks..

      http://www.dealtime.com/xPC-Canon_Canon_BCI_6_Bl ac k_and_Color_Ink_Tanks_8_Pack_i9900_Photo_Printer

      Basically any inkjet could be refilled with whatever color you like as long as the properties were compatable with the printhead nozzles.

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
    26. Re:Those rat b--- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the K in CMYK stands for Key. The black is used for keying the image.

    27. Re:Those rat b--- by sahonen · · Score: 1

      Ouch! Why couldn't they fingerprint your left hand, though? Because you would actually be holding the gun with your right?

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    28. Re:Those rat b--- by dickens · · Score: 1

      It's called "spot color". Using Cyan, Magenta, Yellow and Black ink (or some other combination) to make up other shades is called "process color".

    29. Re:Those rat b--- by Kevin+Mitnick · · Score: 1

      brilliant!

    30. Re:Those rat b--- by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Dont you know that if you have a private life the terrorists win?

      And if you dont They've already won

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    31. Re:Those rat b--- by Gar0s · · Score: 1

      "Nobody prints with green ink"

      Not strictly true - CMYK is used for four colour process printing. but you can also have spot colours (Pantone etc...) especially handy for corporate ID - where you want a specific colour(corporate ID, for example) which'll look much bolder because it's printed with a single INK rather than a composite of four. Stuff printed in colour with gold or silver ink is another example of spot pigments.

      --
      I'll wager 400 quatloos on the newcomer
    32. Re:Those rat b--- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new canon i9600? has both RED and GREEN in addition to yellow, cyan, magenta, light cyan, light magenta, and black. So I suppose that you could print in RGB in necessary.

    33. Re:Those rat b--- by rleibman · · Score: 1

      What makes you think we still have such archaic things as privacy laws anymore? Dont you know that if you have a private life the terrorists win?

      The ninth: the forgotten ammendment.

    34. Re:Those rat b--- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This shows an incredible abount of ignorance on your part. You're so stupid, I won't even try to explain, but here's a hint: Paint is not equal to light.

  2. Countermeasures? by fdiv(1,0) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone know any methods of getting around this short of physically ripping apart the printer and soldering a few wires together?

    --
    --- "...And everybody died!!! Except for me, of course...you know why? Because I had my tray table up...and my seat ba
    1. Re:Countermeasures? by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Interesting
      why- do you want to counterfeit cash?

      my suggestion? find another same model printer that does this, then DUPLICATE PRECISELY these yellow dots in your final image... two sets, should--- well, supply reasonable doubt at least...

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    2. Re:Countermeasures? by arose · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe he just wants to print anonymous, is that a crime nowdays?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    3. Re:Countermeasures? by Zen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just disconnect the yellow. Who needs all three (or four in some cases) colors anyway?

    4. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Steal your printer. Run the page through multiple printers. Encode fake serial numbers in the page along with the real ones.

    5. Re:Countermeasures? by fireduck · · Score: 2, Informative

      tinfoil hat time: go to a different city, buy your printer with cash and never send in the warranty card. since it'll never be registered under your name; any documents you print, at best can be traced back to the original store.

    6. Re:Countermeasures? by ccharles · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suspect that if this technology has actually been around for 20 years, it has gotten good enough to be nearly impossible to bypass.

      Think about it: if counterfeiters wanted to pay some less-than-moral geek to fix this, wouldn't they be doing it already?

      And (to the tinfoil hat club), why is this so bad?

    7. Re:Countermeasures? by Phillup · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One word: Kinkos

      Two more words: Pay cash

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    8. Re:Countermeasures? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "at worst" (not "at best"), unless you're a Secret Service agent. : )

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Countermeasures? by mgv · · Score: 4, Interesting

      my suggestion? find another same model printer that does this, then DUPLICATE PRECISELY these yellow dots in your final image... two sets, should--- well, supply reasonable doubt at least...


      Thinking about it, adding in a speckled yellow pattern as part of your printing algorithm would work - it would just take a little knowledge of what they print.

      Does anyone know if the pattern gets printed even on white space? Printing a "blank" page should reveal the pattern and allow a suitable overlay that would stuff up the recognition algorithms.

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    10. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, rewrite your printer drivers to insert randomly spaced yellow dots in every page you print. Wash out the serial number in random noise.

    11. Re:Countermeasures? by sosume · · Score: 1

      Or, how to detect it? That would be cool :D

    12. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, that's a good idea. Better yet, find all possible positions, so they get the equivalent of 888888888 for the serial.

    13. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not to mention parking far away from the store and taking the bus (including transferring a couple of times) and walking some distance between. Otherwise the camera at the store may pick up your liscense plate!!!!

    14. Re:Countermeasures? by temojen · · Score: 1

      I guess printing a background of faint yellow dots might work.

    15. Re:Countermeasures? by scribblej · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hahah, that'll work.

      "Hello Kinko's Employee. I'd like you to print 500 copies of this here One-hundred dollar bill. You can just keep one of them to cover the cost."

    16. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you really think that serious counterfeiters use consumer printers?

    17. Re:Countermeasures? by kesuki · · Score: 4, Funny

      Printers are cheap, every time you run out of ink, place old printer inside ion cannon* and turn it into a ball of molten obsidian.. and also never send in warrenty registration etc etc... and even though they can trace documents to a certain printer, since said printer is no longer identifiable.

      *= if you don't Own an ion cannon yet, you can build one care of these DIY directions (a cyclotron is the key component to an ion cannon...)

    18. Re:Countermeasures? by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Interesting
      > I suspect that if this technology has actually been around for 20 years, it has gotten good enough to be nearly impossible to bypass.

      This technology has been around a lot more than 20 years.

      In Soviet Romania, a sample page from every typewriter had to be registered with the police, so that any samizdat produced could be quickly traced back to the typewriter's owner. Use your imagination as to what happened to the owner, or Google for it.

      In Romania every typewriter had to be registered with a local magistrate. Samples of letters typed on these machines had to be produced under the observation of the secret police so they could trace underground publishing activity.

      - G. Davey, Christian Publishing: Before and After the Communist Collapse

      In Soviet Russia, all photocopiers were registered with the KGB and kept in secure rooms, to which physical access was restricted.

      Some samizdat works, mostly magazines, were typed on typewriter. The copies were indistinct and hard to read. I realized that the movement against violating human rights was doomed to be an eternal amusement of the few intellectuals without proper copyprinters. But where could one find a copyprinting machine in the country, where all the copiers were affixed with seals at night and placed in the special rooms where only proved KGB members could work on it. There was the only decision - to make the machine ourselves. It had to be easy to make and quite efficient.

      - A. A. Bolonkin, Memoirs of Soviet Political Prisoner

      The West is probably still playing catch-up.

    19. Re:Countermeasures? by rjelks · · Score: 1

      Two more: Think cameras!

    20. Re:Countermeasures? by arose · · Score: 1

      Then you need to buy two printers (you want to sign your non-anonymous prints) just because the goverment is a PITA and companies do things behind your back.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    21. Re:Countermeasures? by libra-dragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yellow and Blue(Cyan) make Green(cash)

    22. Re:Countermeasures? by plover · · Score: 1
      TFA says "The millimeter-sized dots appear about every inch on a page, nestled within the printed words and margins." So according to my reading of this, it wouldn't appear in whitespace.

      I'm not buying it for a second. Millimetre-sized dots are much larger than the resolution of the printer. Perhaps the author meant "millimetre-sized font." Or perhaps the author was only thinking of the so-called Eurion constellation, discovered by Markus Kuhn. The circles (dots?) making up the constellation are exactly one millimetre in diameter.

      --
      John
    23. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, but it probably should be. How many terrorists would LOVE to get their hands on a printer capable of printing documents without being traceable? Sounds like it is time to write another letter to my congressman to get this potential loophole fixed.

    24. Re:Countermeasures? by Lusa · · Score: 1

      Assuming its somewhere near the edge so that it doesn't get affected by the print would mean it can be cropped easily. Which sort of helps the counterfeiters unless some country started making full page sized bank notes?

    25. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hypothetical: Let's say I wanted to print up a flyer protesting the actions of the KKK.

      Suppose I wanted to do it in Vidor, TX.

      Do I really want that document traceable to me?

      Imagine what would have happened to Swift if such a technology were available then.

      And moreso, the document is only traceable to a printer, not an individual. Do you really want to explain that to a jury?

      Not to mention to possibility of framing someone else.

      Inasmuch as the gov. doesn't have transparency in their dealings, I think I should be accorded the same.

      And huge, Godzilla sized disgusting that printer manufacturers weren't upfront about this from the get go. If they can't be forthcoming, why should I?

    26. Re:Countermeasures? by dshaw858 · · Score: 1

      The idea is that they already know who you are, but when normally you could say "I didn't print that! I swear under oath!", they can now go into your house and say "you damn well did".

      - dshaw

    27. Re:Countermeasures? by jonom · · Score: 1

      It prints everywhere across the page.

      The thing I've never been able to figure out is how they would be able to read the codes with lots of colour laying down on the page.

      Someone mentioned millimetre sized dots, but they're much smaller than that. You really need a magnifying glass to see them.

    28. Re:Countermeasures? by beaverbrother · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know if the pattern gets printed even on white space?
      It appears that the pattern gets printed only on whitespace, as it uses yellow colors so the dots aren't easily detectable.
      Yellow on black = easy to see and we would have known about this a while ago.

    29. Re:Countermeasures? by fataugie · · Score: 4, Funny
      Good God, has there finally been a "In Soviet Russia" post that was ON TOPIC?

      I guess I can eat a gun barrel now, I have seen everything.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    30. Re:Countermeasures? by RWerp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To add more spice to it, in Poland even for legitimate (in state's eyes) use of xerox machine one had to obtain a special permission.

      Comparisons of laser printers' chips with Soviet Russia are, however, exaggerating. There are probably lots of possibilities to distinguish two copies printed by two laser machines. While giving the state the possibility not just to compare the output of two known laser printers (which I'm sure comes very handy when tracking false money, extortions or some con-man tricks) but to find the printer which printed any possible text is surely disturbing, there is no comparison with Soviet-style secret police. Soviets didn't have to bother with chips, they had people spying on other people, on their neighbours and spouses --- it always works better than technology. The best defence before Soviet-style supervision is assuring your country isn't run by such kind of people.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    31. Re:Countermeasures? by Idealius · · Score: 1

      It would stand to reason that people who fear government or law enforcement's knowledge of their printer serial number would have to first suffer the loss of their printed material to one of these institutions.

      Knowing that, one obvious example is shown:

      Counterfeiting money.

      Now, tell me, what kind of person wants to go to Kinko's to counterfeit money?

    32. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kinkos uses xerox color machines that use this system...

    33. Re:Countermeasures? by Sime208 · · Score: 1

      What will we do when all cash transactions are tracked with RFID?

    34. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Yellow on black = easy to see and we would have known about this a while ago.

      So print on black paper.

    35. Re:Countermeasures? by quarkscat · · Score: 0

      Win32 OS (esp XP) -- you're SOL.

      For linux/unix box, perhaps the following:

      (1) make certain to use a postscript
      color laser printer
      (2) print to file instead of printer
      (3) run sed on resultant output file
      (4) copy new file to the color laser
      printer
      (5) profit

      And for a Mac OS X computer, perhaps:

      (1) make certain to use a postscript
      color laser printer
      (2) select output to native PDF format
      (3) run sed on resultant output file
      (4) copy new file to the color laser
      printer
      (5) profit

    36. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol!!

      really, thanks for this post. i really liked it.

      thank you!

      regards.

    37. Re:Countermeasures? by maggeth · · Score: 1
      A Xerox researcher says that the number-embedding chip lies 'way in the machine, right near the laser' and that 'standard mischief won't get you around it.'

      I find your lack of faith disturbing.

    38. Re:Countermeasures? by mesach · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I used to work at a Kinkos in Southern California, We would get Regular visits from the SS looking to track down our Security tapes of the Self Serve color copiers, we got so that we could tell when people were doing illegal things and would point out that they were doing illegal things, and when they scoffed at us we would just point up, and they would "Stupidly" look up and give the cameras a good look at thier face so then when the SS would come in they had a good picture of the suspect.

      BTW it better be REAL cash, cause people at kinkos (the average employee) has already played around with copying money, and knows what thier copiers can and cannot do and most likely will spot the fake... as I am sure you know, the copiers at kinkos arent in the best maintenance condition and the colors arent calibrated that well.

      --
      moo.
    39. Re:Countermeasures? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
      'standard mischief won't get you around it.'

      How about more creative mischief? Where does it print? Can you turn your 8.5x11 sheet into 8x10 sans id code?

      Of course very creative mischief would just have you pay cash and not register your printer. Sure you don't get warrenty coverage, however if you're that worried about discovery it would be a small price to pay.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    40. Re:Countermeasures? by mi · · Score: 1

      When printing anti-Government pamphlets, be sure to use a black-and-white printer...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    41. Re:Countermeasures? by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Try a black and white printer. If you want to spread fliers rather than print $100 bills, that is.

    42. Re:Countermeasures? by Balaurul · · Score: 1

      Mod parent down! Romania was never soviet. Comunist at best, but not soviet.
      The comment is quite offensive, considering the fact that the red army "elibered" (as in "to conquer, to pillage and burn") Romania following the second world war: http://countrystudies.us/romania/23.htm
      Registering typewriters and printers was a common practice in some countries in the 70s~80s.

    43. Re:Countermeasures? by Idealius · · Score: 1

      "I suspect that if this technology has actually been around for 20 years, it has gotten good enough to be nearly impossible to bypass."

      Stupid assumption. The method the government is using here is actually more like a measure. Just because it doesn't stamp out all counterfeiting on comercial printers in all cases doesn't mean it fails to stamp it out for a certain age group. Realistically, the technology has probably improved slightly, but ultimately it's still in the owner's possession so it can never truly be secure.

      Also:

      "Think about it: if counterfeiters wanted to pay some less-than-moral geek to fix this, wouldn't they be doing it already?"

      Translation: foobar question.

      You're saying the less-than-moral geeks are actually counterfeiters themselves. Counterfeiter first, geek second, please. Either way a counterfeiter is counterfeiting so what was the question again??

      Please try not to post high on /. Thank you.

    44. Re:Countermeasures? by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      Don't think that'll work.. it's probably something that's not part of the actual print driver but part of the logic in the print head itself, meaning you can't actually get the output any way but actual physical print.

    45. Re:Countermeasures? by iocat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I find it hard to think of a situation in which I would print anonymously. Usually I print so that I can distribute information to others(if it's just for me, I tend to leave it on my computer). Maybe anonymous political flyers? I'm not trying to be a troll here, but seriously trying to come up with a good scenario where you'd ever want to print anonymously.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    46. Re:Countermeasures? by cyanman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First, this technology has been in use since the very beginning of color laser devices, even before you could use them as a printer. Meaning this started when a color laser printer retailed for close to $100k. It was there (along with other technology) to mark everything that came out of the machine. On the Canon CLC line there is a bar code imbedded on a plate next to the copier glass. Every time you hit the start button, it reads the bar code and compares it to the value stored on the controller board to make sure you had not monkeyed with it, then it prints that bar code all over the page with single yellow pixels. How did they track it? Easy, the thing cost over $75,000. Every one that left the factory was tracked by the manufacturer. They knew where every serial number went. The feds would call up those manufacturers a few times a year asking who a machine with such and such a serial number was sold to. Fast forward to todays commercial equipment and that same thing still applies. I can't vouch for whether you can run down to Best Buy and walk out with a color laser without Best Buy recording the serial number and tying it to your name, but it will dang sure still print identifying info on every page that comes out. It would not suprise me if most of the stuff you drag home marks its territory too, including ink jets. Even if the authorities can't look you up in a database and knock on your door, if they happen to raid your place and grab your printer, try to make new friends in prison.

    47. Re:Countermeasures? by Tanktalus · · Score: 1
      1. Actually, yes I do. I've seen stories on the news as recently as one year ago "showing" this to be the case.
      2. Do you really think that these identifying features are only embedded in consumer (as opposed to what, business?) printers?
    48. Re:Countermeasures? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Soviets didn't have to bother with chips, they had people spying on other people, on their neighbours and spouses

      Heard of TIPS?

      The best defence before Soviet-style supervision is assuring your country isn't run by such kind of people.

      Uh-oh....

    49. Re:Countermeasures? by mscalora · · Score: 1

      No, they go to professional counterfeiter's printer stores. You have to have a tax id to even get in!

      -Mike

    50. Re:Countermeasures? by arose · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Political flyers would be the prime example. Also a call to boycot abusive printer producers. :-D

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    51. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most if not all mechanical devices have a unique "signature", be it the "rhytm" of the pistons, the spacing between characters, and/or the vertical shifting of the lletters relative to a horizontal normal. Anyway, your post brings back first hand memories when the Securitate turned my father's house upside down (7 times in 3 years), and among the things they took were the typewriter's indigo rollers for evidence, rollers which were reused 20-30 times.

    52. Re:Countermeasures? by mikael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Consider the number of bits required to store a serial number.

      Assuming 8 digits of hexadecimal, that would give you 32 bits. So a little box 6 x 6 pixels would be enough. A laser printer has resolutions ranging from 600 to 2400 dpi. So you would need far less than one square millimetre to store such information. Even if you double the size of the box in order to have some sort of redundancy, that would still be far less than 1 square millimetre.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    53. Re:Countermeasures? by RWerp · · Score: 1
      The best defence before Soviet-style supervision is assuring your country isn't run by such kind of people.


      Uh-oh....

      It usually isn't hard to tell a dictator from a democrat (small 'd').
      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    54. Re:Countermeasures? by EvanED · · Score: 2

      Okay, you're a dumbass. RTFA.

      If the practice disturbs you, don't bother trying to disable the encoding mechanism--you'll probably just break your printer.

      Crean describes the device as a chip located "way in the machine, right near the laser" that embeds the dots when the document "is about 20 billionths of a second" from printing.


      It's a hardware thing, not a software problem.

      Nice, accurate, sensible dig at Windows though. </sarcasm>

    55. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't forget the bleached hair, cosmetic surgery, and sex change!

    56. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All cash transactions are tracked by serial numbers on dollar bills anyway. Don't think for a moment that when you get bills out of an ATM those serial numbers aren't recorded and associated with your ATM card.

    57. Re:Countermeasures? by nyekulturniy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point is that Romania had a Communist government from 1948 to the moment they lined Ceaucescu and Mrs. C. up against the wall.

      Dictatorships, like any other monopolist, want to limit the free flow of information.

      --
      Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
    58. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With what? White ink?

    59. Re:Countermeasures? by yorkpaddy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I once printed up fake backstage passes at a kinko's. They weren't counterfeit or copied. I designed a logo that looked somewhat like that of a local radio station and put the concert's name on it. The employee said we don't let people print up IDs or counterfeit money, but this is just funny, so he let me. The passes were good enough for me to walk to the backstage area and act like I was supposed to be there. I ended up finding a box full of event staff tags and was able to go whererever I wanted to for the whole concert.

      --
      "brxref .k.p ,.by xprt. gbe.p.oycmaycbi yd. cby.nci.bj. ru yd. am.pcjab lgxlcj" don'
    60. Re:Countermeasures? by lightknight · · Score: 2, Funny

      Disable the alarm system, break in at night. Be sure to replace all used ink cartridges and paper. Then steal something stupid, like a stack of AOL discs. The police and employees will forget about it (no one will pursue a criminal who steals AOL discs, Kinkos has a dozen more boxes and the police don't like being laughed at).

      Wait several months, then start buying stuff. But under no circumstances should you live above your means. The IRS, unlike the police, do not assume innocence, and are pure evil.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    61. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, what have you got hide, comrade?

    62. Re:Countermeasures? by yorkpaddy · · Score: 1

      not only that, but you could switch the yellow with another color ink in your toner cartridge. Then run the image through a graphics preprocessor.

      --
      "brxref .k.p ,.by xprt. gbe.p.oycmaycbi yd. cby.nci.bj. ru yd. am.pcjab lgxlcj" don'
    63. Re:Countermeasures? by azpenguin · · Score: 2, Informative

      In CMYK, printing a color on top of another color makes things darker. Yellow dots would not show up on the black ink - they would actually darken things up. If you knew exactly what you were looking for, where you were looking for it at, and what a yellow/black overprint looks like, you *might* see it. Obviously, if it is printing on the black, the agencies in question know whee to look and what they're looking for.

    64. Re:Countermeasures? by Gibouille · · Score: 1

      Once I did a fake and phoney NSA card for a friend, the idea was to scare the s... out of a friend who likes to "work around" computer security by paying him a late night visit... just when you looked at the NSA logo it said No Such Agency... you can counterfeit for fun.

    65. Re:Countermeasures? by muonman · · Score: 1

      But it *IS* a lot harder to tell a dictator from a Republican (Large 'R').

      --
      Anything NOT worth doing is NOT worth doing well...
    66. Re:Countermeasures? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      Sure. Exactly _how_ will "they" be able to trace a printer to you/me? For example. I walk into a store and pay cash for a color laser printer. I take it home and do not register it (as I never register any product I buy). Now I do something stupid like try to print fake money and the Feds find the money and see this "secret" serial number on it. Exactly how again will they track it to me?

      My firewall blocks apps that try to connect to the Internet and are denied access unless I give them the OK, so this color laser printer would not be allowed to connect back to any home server.

      I think the only people that would be able to be tracked are those who have no intentions of using these color lasers in an illegal way or _very_ dumb criminals that deserve to get burnt. Seriously, any "smart" criminal would know to either pay cash or get it "hot". I hope thise criminals would not be dumb enough to register these printers and give their real location nor allow the laser printers to get on the Internet and "phone home".

      I personally do not condone illegal activities, however most of the "solutions" that the industry and the governemt come up with are just silly.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    67. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1, scam in signature.

    68. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Comparisons of laser printers' chips with Soviet Russia are, however, exaggerating."

      Give it a bit of time. Today the government puts a tracking chip into printers, tomorrow you are cheerfully shoveling snow somewhere in a labor camp in Alaska.

      Gradual change is the key to turning a democratic country into a "Big Brother" society.

    69. Re:Countermeasures? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Disable the alarm system, break in at night

      Uh, you do realize that Kinko's is open 24 hrs, right?

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    70. Re:Countermeasures? by damiam · · Score: 1
      Really, all they can say is "your printer did". That doesn't tie it to the person.

      Actually, I dunno if they could tie it to the printer either. It's probably possible to use a non-compromised color laser to reproduce one of these serial numbers, so I don't know if they establish enough proof for a court of law.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    71. Re:Countermeasures? by nolife · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I suspect that if this technology has actually been around for 20 years, it has gotten good enough to be nearly impossible to bypass.

      Good enough? I doubt it. This is one time where security through obscurity worked. Considering there is not a live market and a real desire to remove these codes, it has not passed the test of many hands. A bunch of hackers can work collectively to get around an Xbox and a Playstation because there is the incentive of more functionality and thrill of experimentation that you can share with others. Printing money is not something there is a big following for and not something you advertise that you are interested in. I would assume many big time money printers people have got around this serial number issue but it can still be used to catch the other 99% that thgouht they knew what they were doing.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    72. Re:Countermeasures? by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...you don't get warranty coverage...

      Yes you do. Warranties cannot be denied just because you did not register the product. If you claim warranty however, you must have dated proof of your purchase. Therefore big brother will not know who owns the printer until the owner needs to have warranty work done.

      --
      All theory is gray
    73. Re:Countermeasures? by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      It should be pretty easy for them to know which stores get which printers. It should also be possible to query a database to find out at exactly what date and time a particular model of printer was sold. It might even be possible to query to find out when a specific printer was sold. Then it's a simple matter of looking up the security video from the store, or a neighboring store, or a camera in the parking lot, or whatever. They won't have your address, but they'll have a picture of you carrying the printer, possibly your face, and maybe a vehicle.

    74. Re:Countermeasures? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Are you serious? Being able to express free speech in an anonymous way is the most important part of free speak. For example, while I am pro-life, there are many pro-choice people who may want to voice their opinions anonymously because there are many pro-life freaks (not me) out there. Also think in a political way. There are people who may want to speak out against the current government or a even worse, a local government and do not want to suffer any repercussions.

      Many of the people who spoke out and signed the original Declaration of Independence were wealthy, and lost everything after they signed! Freedom of speech doesn't always come with no price tag. Sometimes people pay dearly for expressing their opinions, even in the "Land of the Free".

      I am a Conservative Christian Libertarian (I know it sounds messed up). The sad thing is that there are many in our nation that have no problems with _more_ government control. These "conservatives" offer excuses like if you have nothing to hide, then why would you care? _I_ personally care because A) I have nothing to hide and B) if I did have something to hide it is none of your @##$@# business! Our government was never set up to be "big brother". Sadly we are almost there. Many of my fellow Christians are more then willing to give up their rights/liberties because they _think_ it will make them more "safe". They think that only "bad" people would want privacy and not want "big brother" to know your every move.

      I am sorry but I will not give up my rights, liberty or privacy to make it easier for the government to catch a "bad" guy. As a "good" citizen, I am willing to help the government, police (I give them money every year), etc to stop crime, but my help stops when they try to encroach my rights. Yes, being able to print on a stinking piece of paper without the government tracking me is what I consider a right.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    75. Re:Countermeasures? by b!arg · · Score: 0, Redundant

      How about buying your color laser printer second hand...you know...almost like the gun shows loophole.

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    76. Re:Countermeasures? by Phleg · · Score: 1

      my suggestion? find another same model printer that does this, then DUPLICATE PRECISELY these yellow dots in your final image... two sets, should--- well, supply reasonable doubt at least...

      Yeah, reasonable doubt will be an abslute breeze when you have not one, but two printer serial numbers pointing towards you as the culprit. Isn't this a bit like swapping your license plate with one from an older car of yours, in order to rob a convenience store?

      --
      No comment.
    77. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of like it was back in the day of typewriters then, isn't it?

    78. Re:Countermeasures? by _defiant_ · · Score: 1

      I doubt the printer would let you do that. They're pretty damn smart nowadays, and can probably tell when you switch a yellow and a magenta cartridge.

    79. Re:Countermeasures? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      That could be possible. Though that doesn't take into accout a stolen printer or the very poor quality of most store cameras.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    80. Re:Countermeasures? by ZB+Mowrey · · Score: 1

      I think the problem comes when they already suspect you are printing illegal shit. Then they can raid you, take your gear, and say: "Your honor, we can prove that this subversive communo-anarchist hate tract was printed on this printer...which we found in the !!guilty!! defendant's house. The state rests."

      --

      Self-referential sigs are rarely entertaining.

    81. Re:Countermeasures? by snkline · · Score: 1

      Well, this is just a shot in the dark, but I'm pretty sure they would at least be able to track the printer to the point-of-sale. Based on the unique serial they could find out which distributer a company had sold the printer to, and which store the distributor had sold the printer to. Now it is just a matter of time, if the authorities come knockin' before the security tapes for the store have been recycled, wiped, or otherwise destroyed, they will at least have a good idea of what you look like.

    82. Re:Countermeasures? by sentientbeing · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ive never had a problem. When I need to make first contact with my associates in the form of anonymous letters, I usually use cut out pieces of lettering from recent newspapers and magazines then haphazardly glue them onto copier paper with egg white or floured water.

      I think most old school kidnappers use the same technique.
      the younger ones obviously use email.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    83. Re:Countermeasures? by yorkpaddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      people recharge or refill cartridges right? refill them with opposite colors

      --
      "brxref .k.p ,.by xprt. gbe.p.oycmaycbi yd. cby.nci.bj. ru yd. am.pcjab lgxlcj" don'
    84. Re:Countermeasures? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's more like trying to do that, but forgetting to take the first plate off, and having both readable.

    85. Re:Countermeasures? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      Yes, someone else posted something like this already. However, have you ever seen most store camera videos? Thay are horrid. I recently seen some footage of an armed robbery of a major convience store chain and it was pretty much impossible to tell who the guy was.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    86. Re:Countermeasures? by nolife · · Score: 2, Funny


      It would not suprise me if most of the stuff you drag home marks its territory too, including ink jets.

      I do not use my ink jet often but when I do, the ink is always dried, has bands and looks like crap. If these tracking ink dots came out fine and traceable, I'd be pissed.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    87. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on!!! It's not a computer. It is a paper. How you disctinct color #ECECEC from #EBECEC ?? I would think that there is something more.

    88. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What incentive do printer manufacturers have to do this? It seems unlikely that the government would be able to pass legislation REQUIRING them to implement this technology, and surely implementing this technology adds cost to the printer.

      Also when word of this got out, they had to know it could look bad for them and ruin their reputation.

      So where's the incentive?

    89. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay cash for your printer and don't tell anyone you bought it.

    90. Re:Countermeasures? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      Oh, one other point I just thought of. If I had a bought or stolen color laser, I could very easily make photo copies of it and that would most likely wash out any watermark/serial number. There is just too many ways to beat this weak system to make it worth the privacy that is lost.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    91. Re:Countermeasures? by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      It's pretty obvious: buy your printer at a computer show using cash or on Ebay using a postal service money order, never send in the registration card, and don't tell anyone you have it.

      Serial numbers are only as good as the database that tracks them. If you aren't in it... Well...

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    92. Re:Countermeasures? by Zarquon · · Score: 1

      Not all of them.. 1 out of 4 in my area.

      --
      "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
    93. Re:Countermeasures? by Alien54 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Many of my fellow Christians are more then willing to give up their rights/liberties because they _think_ it will make them more "safe". They think that only "bad" people would want privacy and not want "big brother" to know your every move.

      And of course, they all know that they are the only truly good people out there. This comes with a certain naive child-like trust of certain government officials that really should be reserved for certain religious figures found in rather thick traditional texts.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    94. Re:Countermeasures? by websaber · · Score: 1

      basically sombody who is really determined can see your number, change theirs, and frame you with out you ever knowing what happened until your front door comes flying off it's hinges.

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
    95. Re:Countermeasures? by cos(0) · · Score: 1

      It might even be possible to query to find out when a specific printer was sold.

      That part is not feasible for now. The barcode, although unique to the product, is not unique to each instance of it. So, they'd initially have to suspect everyone who bought that type of printer.

    96. Re:Countermeasures? by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Kevin Mitnick who almost got arrested at a Kinko's before he went underground?

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    97. Re:Countermeasures? by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      While I freely and unconditionally grant the right to free speech, I'm curious to know how you arrived at a universal human right of anonymity...

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    98. Re:Countermeasures? by MeNeXT · · Score: 1
      Just steal it!

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    99. Re:Countermeasures? by Macgrrl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Print the document - then go get multiple copies done at Kinkos, or some other copy centre.

      This serves two purposes - firstly you will have two sets of dots overlaid on each other - presumably this will 'confuse' anything trying to read the dots. Secondly, the dominate signature will be the public access device - if the dots are hard to see by the naked eye, they will be very difficult to copy.

      For the tracking to work they need to match a serial number to a user - i.e. the device has to be registered. For small consumer devices (e.g. the HP CLJ 2500) it is simple for the user to simply not register the purchase with the manufacturer, however these sort of devices are unlikely to be capable of producing anything which could be remotely be considered a good forgery.

      Large colour devices often come with maintenance contracts attached, so if you knew the serial number and had a cooperative manufacturer, tracking the owner would probably be relatively simple, however you would also find that these devices are typically in a shared user environment (offices, copy centres, student resource centres, etc...).

      Having said that, I work for Xerox and conduct audits for large corporate clients regarding what equipment they have and how it's used - even with access to the sales records, client asset registers and physical identifcation of units we frequently have problems identifying every device on a site back to original point of sale. Errors in how SN's have been entered into billing systems or asset registers is not uncommon, chassis or logic boards get changed during maintenance changing the actual or apparent SNs (very common with HP or Lexmark equipment). This would only work with seriously large hardware with fully tracked service histories.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    100. Re:Countermeasures? by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      Kinko's has wierd rules, though. One time, I ripped an image off of an online encyclopedia and took it into kinko's to make a transparency out of it (for a lecture I was giving). Just to cover my ass, I photoshopped it and put on it, in bold 12 point letters, "COPYRIGHT 2002 Encyclopedia Britanica".

      The guy at kinkos' said he couldn't copy it because it was copyrighted. And he knew, because in the interest of fair use, I had added the notice, denoting the graphic as not my work. And then, he said that it was just that HE couldn't do it, but he stood there and instructed me while I did it on one of the copiers in the customer area.

      Wierd.

      --
      sig?
    101. Re:Countermeasures? by Frogbert · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually in keeping with the theme, everything has, in fact, seen you

    102. Re:Countermeasures? by badasscat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh, am I the only one that noticed that this article only refers to color laser printers? And only from a few manufacturers at that.

      Obvious solution: use an inkjet or a dye-sub. Both inkjets and dye-sub printers are better for printing in color anyway, unless what you need is top speed at the expense of color accuracy and resolution (which is not likely even for a counterfeiter).

      If you're talking copiers, I don't know. Are most copiers laser these days? Still, it seems implausible that any counterfeiter would be using a consumer copying machine to commit his or her crime (simply because the results would be pretty obviously awful), so I'm not sure why this technology would even be necessary.

      But the obvious solution for yourself in that case is to do what I do to make my copies - buy a flatbed scanner that has a "copy" button on it and use your inkjet printer for the output. I get much better quality that way than using any copy machine I've ever tried anyway, and it's really not much more inconvenient either. My scanner, PC, and printer all have to be on and running, but it's literally a one-button process just like it is on a regular copy machine. If my PC is off, the time it takes to boot is not really much longer (if any) than the time it takes a standard copy machine to "warm up" from a cold start anyway.

      For the moment, this seems pretty easy to get around, if what the article says is really accurate. Because what it says is that certain brands of color laser printers use this technology. So, the solution is to not use those brands, or to not use a color laser printer. Seems pretty simple. May not stay that way forever, but it doesn't seem like it's time quite yet to start hoarding pro-level inkjets before they're outlawed.

    103. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called stegenography (sorry two martini dinner and I'm not sure how its spelled). THe FBI's spending all that money to detect bad people (you knwo, terrorists and libertarians and such) using steganogreaphy and here we have the corporatations helping the evildoers. It the Management of Lexmark and Xerox aren't standing naked on a wooden crate with electrodes taped to their balls by this time tomorrow, then I'll knw there is a double standard in the war against terrorism.

    104. Re:Countermeasures? by Lost+Race · · Score: 2, Funny
      It would not suprise me if most of the stuff you drag home marks its territory too, including ink jets.
      Lucky for me I have a Lexmark. The print quality is so wildly erratic you can barely read the text, let alone some hidden 1mm yellow bar code. Yellow only works about 10% of the time anyway.
    105. Re:Countermeasures? by haxley · · Score: 1

      Would that we had a mind so acutely full of vision and truth that it were necessary to publish them anonymously. Our "intelligencia" are for the most part dull and docile. In the former Soviet Union their fear was not counterfeiters but people whose ideas were contrary and or threatning to the established order. In Russia on occasion, there appeared men who understood Conrads dictum about wanting to win an argument. "Put your faith not in the right argument but the right Word for the power of sound has always been greater than the power of sense" sic. Sadly that remains the condition here today, witness our last election.

    106. Re:Countermeasures? by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the rest of the /. crowd, but when I think of someone trying to create a large quantity of documents for distribution, and trying to remain anonymous in doing so, I don't picture that person doing so at a public kiosk with pimple-faced employees and lots of security cameras.

      Call me crazy. :P

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
    107. Re:Countermeasures? by Lihtan · · Score: 1

      Think of yellow as a "malfunctioning" color channel on your printer. When you need to cleanly print yellow, put the yellow toner in to one of the cyan, magenta or black cartridges and make the appropriate adjustments to the CMYK layers in Photoshop.

      Also to make detection easier, couldn't you just print a blank test page on black paper?

      --
      Divide by zero hurts my brain.
    108. Re:Countermeasures? by EnormousTooth · · Score: 1

      The parent isn't talking about colors, just positions.

      --
      I don't use Emacs; it uses me.
    109. Re:Countermeasures? by jxs2151 · · Score: 1

      The CIA knew how to deal with copiers in Soviet Russia.

    110. Re:Countermeasures? by keraneuology · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'm curious to know how you arrived at a universal human right of anonymity

      Please refer to:

      TALLEY v. CALIFORNIA, 362 U.S. 60 (1960)

      McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm'n (93-986), 514 U.S. 334 (1995)

      Very relevant is the quote from McIntyre:

      "The decision in favor of anonymity may be motivated by fear of economic or official retaliation, by concern about social ostracism, or merely by a desire to preserve as much of one's privacy as possible. ... Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. It thus exemplifies the purpose behind the Bill of Rights, and of the First Amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation -- and their ideas from suppression -- at the hand of an intolerant society."

      While one can reasonably question anonymity as a "universal" right applicable in all times under all conditions, these times should be the exception rather than the rule with the burden falling on those who say that the restriction should apply rather than on those who say not.

      --
      If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
    111. Re:Countermeasures? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I find it hard to think of a situation in which I would print anonymously. Usually I print so that I can distribute information to others(if it's just for me, I tend to leave it on my computer). Maybe anonymous political flyers?

      In the FA the Xerox guy says "We developed the first (encoding mechanism) in house because several countries had expressed concern about allowing us to sell the printers in their country," Crean says. In some countries printing a political flier could get you sent to a re-education camp for 20 years, or just disappeared. And Xerox and other printer companies have sold them out, like IBM cheerfully made punch card systems to computerise the Final Solution.

    112. Re:Countermeasures? by DrCash · · Score: 0
      Wrap the printer in tinfoil when printing out your pages. For best results, the operator should wear a tinfoil hat in case the printer also has mind-reading properties.


    113. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think someone is going to take the time to try and track something you printed with a few dots? How are they going to know it was *you*, as these printers print thousands of pages by many many different employees. These aren't your home printers you know.

      What are you doing that requires such secrecy anyways? Lighten up man, no one cares what you do in your life except those who love you, and if they need to track you by using dots in a print, you have much more serious issues in your life.

    114. Re:Countermeasures? by wtansill · · Score: 1
      Anyone know any methods of getting around this short of physically ripping apart the printer and soldering a few wires together?
      How about walking down to Kinkos and running your printout through a color copier? I doubt the copier would be able to pick up the printer's dot code, and unless someone was watching you duplicate your document, I doubt they'd be able to tie it back to you specifically unless they did fingerprint checks.

      One thing though -- even if the code is embedded in your document, no one can trace it to you unless you've somehow sent info to the manufacturer tying your serial number to you...

      --
      The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster
    115. Re:Countermeasures? by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      Fsck that! Printers are expensive! Send in the warranty card, just fudge the serial number on it. Send them back the lump of molten goo and demand your money back (which you then use to buy the next printer). With the printer duly melted, they won't know that the warranty card was a fake!

      Now... Where did I put my ion cannon?

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
    116. Re:Countermeasures? by iocat · · Score: 1
      Part of what was so hardcore about the Declaration of Independence was that they did sign their names; they knew they were basically signing their death warrents if the whole Independence thing didn't work out. That's what also made John Hancock such a badass, because he signed his name so big and so clearly.

      I guess I support the right to anonymous political flyers, but I also think there's something to be said for having the courage of your convictions and using your name. A child poster below mentions countries with out the freedoms we enjoy here in the USA, and I admit my opinions are biased by knowing that "they" can never really come after you unless you're advocating sedition...

      Defeating the measures would probably be as simple as photocopying with a slight change in brightness / contrast, or using a traditional printing press. The dot gain would probably screw up any really slight digital signaturing.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    117. Re:Countermeasures? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, maybe you should look at this post.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    118. Re:Countermeasures? by B.D.Mills · · Score: 1

      An example with Microsoft Word: set an image as the background of every page of the document. Said image consists of a few overlaid random patterns of little yellow dots.

      Print the document. Now the background is *covered* in little yellow dots. Good luck trying to find the real dots....

      This method reminds me of a cover of Mad Magazine from c. 1978 (#198) when they were required to print a UPC barcode on the cover for the first time. They blew up the barcode and used it as the cover (with the small UPC barcode in the corner).

      http://ksacomics.com/mad/17.htm

      --

      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
    119. Re:Countermeasures? by Talez · · Score: 1

      Yahoo news reports that Kinkos has stopped accepting cash as ordered by the Department of Homeland Security.

      Also, all printers are to be registered before being sold.

    120. Re:Countermeasures? by sloth+jr · · Score: 1
      What incentive do printer manufacturers have to do this? It seems unlikely that the government would be able to pass legislation REQUIRING them to implement this technology, and surely implementing this technology adds cost to the printer.


      Oh, I think it'd be pretty easy to the get any government to require measures that would protect the stability of their currency. Keep in mind that there's nothing backing the dollar other than user belief that that piece of paper actually has inherent worth (and by user, here I mean The World That Takes Dollars And Converts Them To $50 DVD Players And Hondas). Seriously bad things would happen to a lot of economies should the dollar freefall into worthlessness.

      Remember, the dollar buys a soda because people believe it can.
    121. Re:Countermeasures? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Incentive? Nothing - until one day when a very friendly and nice man in black wanders into your offices and kindly asks you to please change the design of the printer/PBX/camera/telephone/whatever gizmo according to these simple, voluntary government specifications...

      Well, then you do it of course, since maybe the next guy will not be so nice and maybe you won't get that next order and maybe you may get a tax audit and maybe your credit rating may go to hell and maybe the bank may foreclose on your mortgage...

      That's why...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    122. Re:Countermeasures? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Dude, the most serious counterfeiters that we need to worry about are hostile foreign governments which produce billions of dollars in fake greenbacks each year, and our own central bank should it be convinced to go down the road of hyperinflation that our current deficit and trade imbalance are leading us towards. Btw the grandparent was talking about using real offset presses identical (or nearly so) to the ones the US mint uses to produce authentic currency. That is the method used by anyone serious about counterfeiting. The idiots that would use a color laser to counterfeit are probably also too stupid to use the right paper which will of course lead to these advanced countermeasures being wholy unncessary. The only generally available paper that even comes close to matching US currency is Crane's #21477 Fluorescent White 24lb. Wove which runs about $1 per 8.5"x11" page. Btw if you want to really get your resume noticed use this paper as it feels like money =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    123. Re:Countermeasures? by afidel · · Score: 1

      With UPC codes invidual items can't be tracked. Most retailers break lots up at a regional warehouse and have no way to know to which store a particular item went. Surveilance video is usually kept for a week or two unless it is specifically pulled for evidence reasons. This can of course can change with the addition of RFID chips to individual items and cheap digital cameras and storage space making archiving of video a trivial expense. Besides, if you're a smart criminal you pay some lowlife to buy the printer for you and offer him several time what the printer cost if he returns with it so that he doesn't just run off with the $.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    124. Re:Countermeasures? by freedom_india · · Score: 1
      Why go all the trouble? Pay your ex-GF money to buy it and change towns imm'ly.

      That way you can have your cake and eat it too !!!

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    125. Re:Countermeasures? by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      very good points -- and yes, this is only with Colour Laser Printers. Typically, only businesses can afford these types of products, as they generally range from 15,000 to 500,000Cdn. (cheaper ones)

      Also, as the article states (and having worked at *the major market player for many years) it has been happening for years. It really is no big deal, its not like someone is actually trying to track your prints on a regular basis. Think of the work involved in doing this. Not to mention that the Database of Serial numbers is adhoc at best, because machines are refurbished after some use, resold, then refurbished again (and yes, they still work like new if fixed properly -- much like a car)

      Sorry to douse the flames of the Privacy War we wage on Slashdot, but this is only for those counterfeiting money, copying passports, etc. Which, as law abiding citizens, we should not be doing anyway. Copying money is not the same as downloading Mp3's ....

      The quality that comes from these high end devices is similar to the quality that comes from the Mint in any country, because the technology is based on the same thing.

      So, to wrap this up, if anyone really feels paranoid, and Bush is checking every piece of paper and tracing it back to huge CorpX - then use an inkjet.

      And drop the hubub about privacy. (for all posters)

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    126. Re:Countermeasures? by ryanmfw · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the woman from Walmart who wanted change for her $1000000 bill(wouldn't that be a treasury security?). You've got to be stupid. Stupid, and, uh, just stupid really.

      --
      Hurricane Ivan: A 17th century prison collapsed. All of the inmates escaped.
    127. Re:Countermeasures? by Webmoth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure, the resolution may be 2400 dpi, but what is the minimum dot size?

      Resolution describes only the level of precision as to where the center of the dot can be placed, but the dot size might be much larger than 1/2400 inch.

      It's like saying that an elephant can crap on a teacup.

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    128. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "Stupidly" look up and give the cameras a good look at thier face so then when the SS would come in they had a good picture of the suspect.

      Sorry to be a little off-topic, but I noticed that several ./'ers use thier (pronounced 'theer'?) instead of their. Is thier somehing that I'm missing? Is this like a secret handshake?

    129. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once went backstage without anything resembling a pass. Just walked straight past the guard and acted like I knew exactly what I was doing. No hassles.

    130. Re:Countermeasures? by macdaddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a HP 8550N at my house (soon to be DN). I noticed, thanks to ZoneAlarm, that my HP printer software phones home to some IP address via port 80 every so often. Next time it happens I'll write down the IP. My thought is that perhaps it's checking in for me, thus I don't have to register my S/N. If they log my S/N, IP and timestamp then that's all a entity would need in theory to identify me via the courts (or via an "In the Fight Against Terrorism" letter) that bypasses the Judicial branch.

    131. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      insightful? lol this was a joke idiot mods

    132. Re:Countermeasures? by Technician · · Score: 1

      when they were required to print a UPC barcode on the cover for the first time. They blew up the barcode and used it as the cover (with the small UPC barcode in the corner).


      I don't remember the issue, but the one I remember is the one with Alfred on the cover pushing a lawnmower over the barcode cutting it to half height.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    133. Re:Countermeasures? by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      ...like IBM cheerfully made punch card systems to computerise the Final Solution.

      I believe that there is a mistake in the statement above. "The Final Solution" was a code term used by the German Nazis to refer to their policy of the systematic murder for all European Jews which they implemented between 1941 and 1945.

      The punch cards made by IBM (I believe) were developed after the end of World War Two for data storage and input to early large computer systems.
      IBM did however work very closely with the Apartheit South African government to register and monitor all non-European South Africans. But they did not engage in systematic genocide of these people in the way that the German Nazis did against the Jewish people.
      These matters even after many years are still quite sensitive. It is important to be very accurate and not simply metaphorical in statements such as this.
      Questions concerning the exact involvement of IBM in the holocast could be referred to the Simon Wiesenthal centers in Vienna and Los Angeles, or the Holocast museums in Israel and Washington DC.

      Thank you,
      Simonetta

    134. Re:Countermeasures? by obender · · Score: 3, Funny

      We would get Regular visits from the SS

      Could you please explain why the Schutz Staffel would pay you visits at all? I thought I shot them all down in Castle Wolfenstein years ago.
    135. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't be long before there are some clever EEPROM hacks out there.

      I would like to see one that spells out SETEC ASTRONOMY in binary or other random data using the number of pages, toner level, etc as the seed.

      It's all in the code, someone just needs to hack it.

      c'mon ya nerds, you can do it

    136. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It prolly calls home the second the printer driver finds an internet connection.

      Good enough for government work.

    137. Re:Countermeasures? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      >>...like IBM cheerfully made punch card systems to computerise the Final Solution.
      > I believe that there is a mistake in the statement above. "The Final Solution" was a code term used by the German Nazis to refer to their policy of the systematic murder for all European Jews which they implemented between 1941 and 1945.

      I'm aware of what the "Final Solution" was.

      This is from a review of IBM and the Holocaust.

      As early as 1933, IBM's German subsidiary, Dehomag, contracted with the Hitler regime to conduct a census of Prussia, Germany's largest state. Jews could not escape the whirring "clickety-clack" of IBM's punch cards, cards that recorded and collated names from one generation to the next, address changes from one town to another, baptisms and religious conversions, and all manner of personal data. Hollerith cards inventoried slave labor resources to assure their most efficient deployment. Box cars and locomotives, scheduled through IBM technology, transported millions to their final destination.
      It is important to be very accurate..

      Accurate enough?

    138. Re:Countermeasures? by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      PS
      The punch cards made by IBM (I believe) were developed after the end of World War Two for data storage and input to early large computer systems

      Inventors: Herman Hollerith - Punch Cards

      In 1881, Herman Hollerith began designing a machine to tabulate census data more efficiently than by traditional hand methods. The U.S. Census Bureau had taken eight years to complete the 1880 census, and it was feared that the 1890 census would take even longer. Herman Hollerith invented and used a punched card device to help analyze the 1890 US census data. Herman Hollerith's great breakthrough was his use of electricity to read, count, and sort punched cards whose holes represented data gathered by the census-takers. His machines were used for the 1890 census and accomplished in one year what would have taken nearly ten years of hand tabulating. In 1896, Herman Hollerith founded the Tabulating Machine Company to sell his invention, the Company became part of IBM in 1924.

      it is important to be very accurate

      OK?

    139. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off-topic but interesting: Did you know this is exactly how (non-US) Governments pay the companies that print their actual cash bills? They just ask them to keep a bit of the bills that they printed!

    140. Re:Countermeasures? by slart42 · · Score: 0

      >Just disconnect the yellow. Who needs all three (or four in some cases) colors anyway?

      or, smarter, swap tha color cartridges around, and adjust your image accordingly..

    141. Re:Countermeasures? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Buy an old printer from E-Bay

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    142. Re:Countermeasures? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Hostile governments? I'd worry more about "friendly" ones. In particular, the U.S. government. Oh, I forgot, they don't have authority to print money.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    143. Re:Countermeasures? by deimtee · · Score: 2, Informative

      I sometimes use some of these printers (xerox's 2060, 5252, 6060's) at work. The dots are straight yellow toner, much smaller than 1 mm, but are large enough to see in bright light if you have excellent eyesight. They are easily visible under a printer's glass, or a decent magnifying glass.
      The pattern repeats itself across the entire page, whitespace and all. As yellow is the last colour laid on the paper I would expect that they can easily detect the pattern in any area that doesn't have solid yellow.
      Interesting - I just checked a couple of prints and it is all across the colour one, but not on the one run in black and white mode even though it uses the same print engine.

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    144. Re:Countermeasures? by deimtee · · Score: 1

      There have sensors in them that measure the actual quality of the print on the page. No way would they work if you put the wrong toner cartriges in.
      And even if they did, then you'd just be making the pattern easier to see - printing it in magenta or cyan.

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    145. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Western intellegence agencies often suplied eastern block dissidents with typewriters and copying machines for the puposes of printing samazdats. The CIA still suplies Cuban dissident authors today. Recently Castro jailed 14 of the recipricants for some very long times. Seems the US gov think Cubans are more in need of privacy than US citizens.

    146. Re:Countermeasures? by DB'C · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Read this: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Think about it: "... no law... abridging the freedom of speech." To have a law requiring speakers be identified is _a_ law, and Congress shall make no such law.

    147. Re:Countermeasures? by AndyCap · · Score: 1

      Well, only in the US, other countries have Blue and Red currency as well. ;-)

    148. Re:Countermeasures? by inflex · · Score: 1

      I just checked with some colour laser printer outputs I have here. The dots are arranged in a square grid formation with a resolution of 1 pixel, that is, 1/300" or less.

      The are furthermore spread across the entire page, irrespective of if it's whitespace or colour.

      It takes a while to pick up the dots but they are there, it's rather amazing.

    149. Re:Countermeasures? by elgaard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >but I also think there's something to be said for having the courage of
      >your convictions and using your name.

      yes, but it is only courage if you have the choice.

    150. Re:Countermeasures? by ars · · Score: 1

      Figure out the pattern of dots.

      Then add in artificial dots in somewhat the same pattern.

      Now you can't tell which dots are the real ones from the printer and which are the ones you added.

      --
      -Ariel
    151. Re:Countermeasures? by Skizac · · Score: 1

      I am a Conservative Christian Libertarian

      And I thought I was the only one!

    152. Re:Countermeasures? by Caseyscrib · · Score: 1
      go to a different city, buy your printer with cash and never send in the warranty card. since it'll never be registered under your name; any documents you print, at best can be traced back to the original store.

      You're failing to kill two birds with one stone here. Fill out the warranty card with information of a local politican you dislike, a celebrity, hell even a Xerox executive. Go crazy printing out racist, sexist, or ageist remarks. Be creative. Hilarity (and possibly Jailarity) will ensue.

    153. Re:Countermeasures? by jpop32 · · Score: 1

      Assuming 8 digits of hexadecimal, that would give you 32 bits. So a little box 6 x 6 pixels would be enough.

      I seriously doubt that would be the system used. More likely would be some sort of spread spectrum encoding, where you spread a small amount of information over a large number of carrier bits. Systems like that are much more resiliant to defects (copying, scanning, cropping and such) and much much harder to discover (practically impossible unless you know exactly where to look and what to look for).

      Basically, a magnifying glass and patience would get you nowhere. :-)

    154. Re:Countermeasures? by Arcturax · · Score: 1

      And what about the security cameras in the Kinkos to protect against theft or robberies? You'll show up on those easy enough.

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    155. Re:Countermeasures? by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "Do you really think that serious counterfeiters use consumer printers?"

      Do you really think that this is an anti-counterfeiting measure?

    156. Re:Countermeasures? by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      here is one I found real quick, with a price tag of 449 USD. Color laser printers are not limited to big businesses anymore, they are only double the price of a cheap b/w-laser printer. Dunno about their quality, though. But I'm sure they embed their serial numbers, too.

    157. Re:Countermeasures? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      Sounds like you need to go into photoshop (gimp, whatever) and draw a bunch of tiny random yellow dots on a page and print it out 200 times.

      And then put that paper back into the input tray. Rotated 180 degrees. Not only will it have some nonsensical dots on it, the real pattern will also be there. And when you print the page again, the real pattern will be superimposed again over the two existing ones!

    158. Re:Countermeasures? by hashwolf · · Score: 1

      "I find it hard to think of a situation in which I would print anonymously."

      Love letter to a government official?

      --
      - "They misunderestimated me."
    159. Re:Countermeasures? by RedBear · · Score: 3, Interesting

      this is only with Colour Laser Printers. Typically, only businesses can afford these types of products, as they generally range from 15,000 to 500,000Cdn. (cheaper ones)

      Um, where I work we just bought a pretty hefty color laser printer for around $1,600. I think the cheapest ones are just a few hundred. That's color, not monochrome. I don't know where you get your prices. The Canadian dollar isn't quite that far below the US dollar.

      It really is no big deal, its not like someone is actually trying to track your prints on a regular basis.

      I will never understand this reasoning. Hey, I just tracked you down through your IP address and installed a remote keylogger on your computer. But that's OK with you, right, because you're not doing anything illegal, right? Oh don't worry, I'll only be checking it once a week or so. Not on a regular basis. That makes it OK, right? Remember that anonymous letter you're writing to expose your employer's illegal money laundering activities? I'm sure you won't mind if I insert a unique serial number in that file so that document can be traced back to you. Right? I won't be telling you about this serial number, naturally, and that's OK too. You'll find out about it when Vinny the Wrench comes to see you this Thursday evening. He'll know exactly where you are because the police installed a tracking device in your car without your knowledge, for no particular reason, despite the amazing fact that you've always been an honest, law abiding citizen, and your employer is given access to this tracking information. But that's OK, right, because you aren't doing anything illegal with your car either, and you have no reason not to let your employer know where you are at all times. Right?

      Bah.

      Is all that pretty unlikely? Yeah, but it's not like it's never happened to anyone. It has and it will.

      So, to wrap this up, if anyone really feels paranoid, and Bush is checking every piece of paper and tracing it back to huge CorpX - then use an inkjet.

      If you aren't paranoid about things like this, you don't understand how government works, or human nature, or history. Power corrupts, information is abused. That's the way the world works. You have to fight tooth and nail just to maintain the status quo, to keep the few freedoms you do have. Sure, use an inkjet, if you're aware of the fact that your hardware is allowing you to be tracked. What about those situations where you don't have a choice to use some other type of device? And who's to say that inkjets don't also have a similar chip that prints a unique serial number on everything you print? Up until today, most of us didn't think our color laser printers had anything like that inside. Inkjet printers already have either hardware or software to detect counterfitting. How easy it would be to print the printer's serial number in a nearly invisible microscopic pattern of dots.

      NOBODY is trying to support counterfitting by opposing this sort of thing. Get over yourself, Mr. Law Abiding Citizen. Guess what? The rest of the world doesn't necessarily obey the law. That includes your employer, your local government, and even law enforcement personnel. I know, shocking.

      drop the hubub about privacy.

      We'll drop it when we think it's not important anymore. Thanks.

    160. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is, my ex-GF knows my name, so when her door flies off the hinges ...

      Moving to another town will only delay, not prevent.

    161. Re:Countermeasures? by milo_Gwalthny · · Score: 1

      The dollar has inherent worth. That worth is: you can pay your taxes with it. If there were no taxes the dollar would be questionable as a currency.

      --
      Milo
    162. Re:Countermeasures? by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      ...and Congress shall make no such law.

      Perhpas they'll just set up a regulatory body, then. See, that's not making a law to abridge free speech, it's making a law to set up a regulatory commision which will abridge free speech. Apparently, there's enough of a difference there for our oily leaders to squirm through. Next we'll have a Federal Document Authentification Commission. Better not write the word 'fuck' on any document ever, or you'll get a nasty fine from the FDAC!

    163. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why go to the expense and trouble to make the printers use these identifying marks? I mean if, as you assert, they don't do anything, why do they exist?

    164. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious? Being able to express free speech in an anonymous way is the most important part of free speak.

      Perhaps the printers should allow people to print anonymous documents, say, 10 times per 24 hours. To prevent abuse!

    165. Re:Countermeasures? by milo_Gwalthny · · Score: 1

      But many of those people also wrote anonymously/psuedonymously, as did other "fathers" of our country: Hamilton and Madison writing the Federalist Papers, Paine writing Common Sense, and many many newspaper editorials and assorted broadsides. Note that the Federalist Papers were written after the revolution, so the fear of being hanged was less.

      The Declaration of Independence was more the exception than the rule.

      --
      Milo
    166. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why? The answer is obvious. Counterfeit money. The police can track the paper to the source and narrow the investigation, since they know where it came from. There they can rely on security cameras (ie, at Kinkos), or start interviewing people in the company.

      Any normal law-abiding citizen has absolutely nothing to fear by using these printers, they don't care where you printed your ads for your lost kitty. What is it with you people?

      Remove your tinfoil hat guys ...

    167. Re:Countermeasures? by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am a Conservative Christian Libertarian (I know it sounds messed up).

      It doesn't sound messed up to me. Traditional Conservatives are (supposed to be) very much in favor of personal liberty. Traditional Christians have that whole Golden Rule thing going, and are (supposed to be) very tolerant. Put it together, and a Conservative Christian should, in my eyes, be a Libertarian almost by default. Sadly, it rarely works out that way.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    168. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Use a black and white copier. They don't have tracking data on them, as they cannot be used to conterfeit money.

      2. Do the printing out of state if you're that worried about revenge. Or use an offset printer, or ink printer.

      3. Normal people can't locate the origin of the documents (however I do realize corrupt police do exist).

      The manufacturers didn't collaborate with the government to track it's citizens. This was one of the ways the colour copiers could sold and still satisfy the FBI.

    169. Re:Countermeasures? by Random_Goblin · · Score: 1

      find another same model printer that does this, then DUPLICATE PRECISELY these yellow dots in your final image... two sets, should--- well, supply reasonable doubt at least...

      I would have thought the easiest way to do this is to print a set of blank sheets through a couple of other laser printers, in fact I wonnder what the spacing and distribution rules on the chip are, because you could very easily get those dots overprinting each other, making identification much harder.

    170. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      plus you'll need to wait for the surveillance camera footage from the store you bought the printer from to get erased before you release any documents.

    171. Re:Countermeasures? by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      Sorry but, "Freedom of Speech" != "Freedom of Responsibility"

    172. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.47 million people in US prisons + millions on probation/parole and you don't think people are spying on other people? you're living in a fantasy land.

    173. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The best defence before Soviet-style supervision is assuring your country isn't run by such kind of people.

      Yeah, but we already failed at that one.

    174. Re:Countermeasures? by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      That part is not feasible for now. The barcode, although unique to the product, is not unique to each instance of it.

      While this is true many products (playstation2s for one) require the store to scan the serial at purchase. I would expect that, if they are so concerned about security, they might do the same thing with these printers.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    175. Re:Countermeasures? by Darth23 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Everything will be fine once the chips are implanted directly into all our brains.

      --

      -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

    176. Re:Countermeasures? by excaliber19 · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA, it said that the printing of the yellow dots happened *BEFORE* the laser, presumably not using the traditional method at all to mark it down. I'm betting it is a totally seperate mechanism to lay down the dots.

    177. Re:Countermeasures? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      "firstly you will have two sets of dots overlaid on each other"

      Won't work if the dots print in a rectangle based matrix of some kind (which I am sure tha they do). A tiny shift of phase will just lead to a connect the dots type investigation. Then it will not only show that it was you who made the document but that it was also you standing at the copier at Kinkos trying to obscure the tracing.

      In other words you are leaving a trail of breadcrumbs from your ass to federal prison.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    178. Re:Countermeasures? by rleibman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I freely and unconditionally grant the right to free speech, I'm curious to know how you arrived at a universal human right of anonymity...

      I plead the ninth. Read the constitution sometime, wonderful document.

    179. Re:Countermeasures? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      Did you mean "Freedom _from_ Responsibility"? If so, where in my post did I condone not holding people accountable for their actions? I believe people _should_ be accountable for their actions. However, that still doesn't mean I think people should give up privacy for some temporary "safety".

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    180. Re:Countermeasures? by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      certain naive child-like trust of certain government officials

      which confounds me to no end.

      No matter what people tell you about their piety, any Christian knows that humans are all corrupt, corruptible, fallible.

      This should include, yes, even religious figures that are, yes, people. It's only "In God We Trust". Nobody else, even if they claim to speaking for Him, doing His will, etc. deserves anywhere near the same loyalty and respect.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    181. Re:Countermeasures? by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

      Well, that'd work ok with $100 bills too, assuming you only pass them to people who are color-blind...

      --


      This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
    182. Re:Countermeasures? by nicolas.e · · Score: 1

      I've heard this argument many times and it is ridiculous. Photocopiers you find at Kinko's cannot make counterfeit money that looks real. Nor can color lasers.

      Maybe some of the more recent hi-res inkjets could do something good-looking, but reproducing the paper, the watermarks... is really more work than printing.

    183. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be a republican. The devil's greatest trick was convincing the world he didn't exist...or pointing at someone else.

    184. Re:Countermeasures? by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Other arguments in this thread have already swayed me, but yours has not.

      "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech." So far, so good.

      But where's your argument that laws about anonymity would abridge free speech?

      You can't just flail the Constitution around like a kid with a toy lightsaber, and then claim you've made an argument.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    185. Re:Countermeasures? by susano_otter · · Score: 1
      Oh, I'm familiar with the 9th Amendment, that "[t]he enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

      My actual question had nothing to do with what rights the Constitution may or may not enumerate. Please re-read my original post, and see if you get it this time around.

      (Hint: The Declaration of Independence makes refrence to certain universal truths that the Declaration's authors believed to be objectively, absolutely true, independent of the Declaration or any other temporal law or custom. My actual question had to do with elements in that absolute class. Good luck!)

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    186. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, Mr. government agent. It's nice to know you read slashdot. It's for counterfeit money...that's fucking hilarious. I suppose you honestly believe that normal laser printers can produce fakes so good that the government not only needs to get actively involved, but the printer manufacturers must go to the expense of putting this chip into every laser printer they sell? I know I hear all the time about people successfully counterfeiting money on laser printers with available paper stock. Er wait, no I don't. Without special rag bond, you're not making bills that feel real. Without better equipment than even a quite expensive color laser printer, you're not making bills that look real. I'm certain that a fair number of idiots have tried this scheme, but I am equally certain that they have not passed enough monopoly money to harm our economy, and we've had laser printers for years. Does it make more sense for the government to want 1) a ridiculously complex and expensive way to track down incredibly inept forgers; or 2) a way to keep tabs on people without their having any idea it's going on? Yes, I loaded that question. I just find it odd when some minor thing becomes such a 'problem' that incredibly broad powers need be granted to the government to solve it. I don't think that in this case, there is a lot of use to this system. It would take an extremely strong central government, weak state governments, and a very strong secret police/domestic intelligence agency in order to really make use of this method of marking 1) counterfeit bills printed on laser printers (.00000000000001% of documents printed on them) and
      2) everything else printed (99.99999999999999%)

      Any normal, law-abiding citizen should have no fears. However, were it against the law to criticize the government, then a person doing so would no longer be a law-abiding citizen. Be careful of using that phrase, because laws can change. Legal != ethical/moral. For example, are there any laws requiring a court order to trace someone in this manner? What is the oversight on it? Can private citizens access this information as well? If I put out a 'zine, say, that was anarchist or revolutionary, which is my right under the Constitution, will I be targetted by the FBI as a subversive? Should I be, in your mind?

    187. Re:Countermeasures? by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 1

      The word 'privacy' may not appear in the Constitution, but the intent is clear in Amendment IV:

      The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..

      --
      There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
    188. Re:Countermeasures? by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Really?

      I see little clarity in this passage, only a vague reference to "unreasonable" activities. This is wide open to interpretation, and indeed might be interpreted differently by different societies, or even by the same society at different points in its history.

      Hardly a definitive right to privacy, assuming such a thing even exists in nature in the first place.

      Actually, I suspect that privacy isn't in fact a natural human right.

      But if privacy isn't a human right, then the Constitution can only grant it as a convenience, as a useful rule for maintaining order and justice in society. But if the Constitution doesn't spell out such a right anywhere, explicitly or implicitly, then such a "right" can't properly be applied as a law in this land.

      And while the Constitution does explicitly leave all un-enumrated rights firmly in the hands of the citizenry, we still haven't even touched the question of whether or not privacy is a right at all.

      At best, a good argument could convince me that protection of personal privacy is a good rule for a society to have, but you have yet to advance such an argument.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    189. Re:Countermeasures? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      I can't tell you if we have a right to privacy, but if I want to keep something private, then I WILL find the way. The law be damned. We live in a world of might makes right. The powerful have privacy, among other things. The others don't. I claim the right to ANYTHING that does not cause harm to others. And once I am able to neutralize your weapons, I will be able to enforce my rights. You have the same rights. Rules of society that don't apply to everybody are invalid. So, I'm not going to try to convince you that privacy is good or bad, but I will keep it when necessary...and possible. I certainly won't let a bunch of old, bald, white bastards tell me what my rights are. As a human(as much as I hate to admit it), I know my rights.

      --
      What?
    190. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tried it on my machine and what do you know. I have a serious case of the spots (dots).

      My printer is a Minolta 2300DL

    191. Re:Countermeasures? by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      I wish all conservatives, Christians, and conservative Christians were as well-reasoned and concerned about large, over-powerful government as you are... but you're right, most seem willing to throw their freedoms away in the name of security.

      Sadly, the only real "conservatives" remaining as far as government bureaucracy and preservation of individual rights are concerned are the libertarians and hard-right Republicans (excluding the neocons). :( Seriously, WTF happened to the "party of Reagan"...

    192. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...For example, while I am pro-life,...
      ...
      B) if I did have something to hide it is none of your @##$@# business!

      Just like what a woman does with her body is
      NONE of you little-p*** f**** business.

    193. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but, "Freedom of Speech" != "Freedom of Responsibility"

      Assuming you meant "freedom from responsibility" this implies that people can/should be held accountable for their speech. In which case, the operator you used is exactly wrong; in matters of speech, "Freedom of Speech" == "Freedom from Responsibility".

      Unless you buy Justice Holmes' argument that yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theater is beyond your rights and is not encompassed by free speech. If you believe that, though, then you've bought into the principle that a "right" can be relative to the interests of public policy. In which case, you have no freedoms or rights; you only get responsibility, under threat of jail.

      Freedom of speech is not a natural right, anyway. You don't have the right or freedom to invade someone else's property and speak your opinions. (For instance, only a few elite have "Freedom of speech" in the context of Slashdot.) There is a right to property, including self-ownership, and that's about it.

    194. Re:Countermeasures? by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      If you're unwilling to convince me that privacy is a good thing, then you cannot expect me to take your side when The Man oppresses you.

      Also, unless the community as a whole reaches a consensus on what our rights are, then your own personal definition of human rights is meaningless.

      Well, maybe it means something to you. A bit of fantasy to comfort you as you hide under your blankets from The Man. But until you're both willing and able to convince your friends and neighbors that your personal view of the world is accurate and worthwhile, you're not going to get very far.

      Obviously, many people actually do agree with you--more or less, at least. And yet you cannot explain why you agree on this thing, what its value is and why I should also agree with you. Hardly an impressive example of deep thought, there.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    195. Re:Countermeasures? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      I'm not attempting to express any deep thought on the matter. It doesn't require any. I am simply stating that with or without the community's consensus on my "right" to privacy, I will keep my coomunications(or any other part of my life) private when necessary. I will use whatever means to that end, short of causing harm to others. The only fantasy I engage in is the part about neutralizing your weapons, but that won't stop me from trying. Besides, I think it's a nice fantasy to maintain. An individual being able to protect himself from any and all other individuals or groups is a good thing. If I were able to do that, I woudln't need to use a weapon(cause harm) to protect my rights. Ultimately the weapons are the only tools we have to defend one's rights or to take them away. In this world the guy with the most powerful weapons has all the rights he could want. Due to my survival instincts(something we all posess, and when it comes to brass tax, we probably cannot control), I would probably use a weapon to protect my rights, but I would know in my heart that it's not right. After the event anyway. So we can agree to disagree and leave it at that, but when I want my privacy, neither you or anybody else is going to stop me from having it.

      --
      What?
    196. Re:Countermeasures? by Sime208 · · Score: 1

      Possibly, but once they're back in circulation and have passed through a few tills (cash registers in the US ;), cash is about as anonymous as it gets.

    197. Re:Countermeasures? by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      a little late on the response -- but here goes:

      when you buy your crappy 1100$ printer, do you think that Business Depot wrote down the serial number, and who it was sold to? How would anyone find that printer from the millions that are sold?

      my point lies in the machines that *are counted. That governments *do know where they are. And those, which may print serial numbers on them, also have millions of copies running through them over the course of a few months. How will they ever track down a person who printed a page on it? It would take some serious detective work. Multiply the man hours to do this task, and you will see lost hope. It really is futile.

      And as I said before, previous experience has shown that only in extreme cases would anyone actually pursue this costly tracking.

      Just imagine the sheer amounts of paper printed in North America -- needle in a haystack I call it. But, definately do *not get me wrong. I am the first to stand to defend my freedom against any abuse. Obviously Americans do not, as we have seen with the Patriot Act.

      To conclude -- we should be trying to focus our energy on the tracking devices put into American money, or the pulling of sensitive information from ISP's. This paper thing is not necessarily an issue. So, put on your tin foil hat, the red coats are coming.

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    198. Re:Countermeasures? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Uh, you do realize that Kinko's is open 24 hrs, right?

      Well ok. Break in after that, then.

    199. Re:Countermeasures? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      I noticed that several ./'ers use thier (pronounced 'theer'?) instead of their

      And two posts above you the guy wrote wierd instead of weird. There's something goin' on, I'm telling ya!

    200. Re:Countermeasures? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      I thought I shot them all down in Castle Wolfenstein years ago.

      Did you save? That might explain it.

    201. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But don't pay with cash you have printed out with your color laser printer.

  3. I was right! by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is why I always print my ransom letters using an old daisy wheel printer.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:I was right! by colinemckay · · Score: 2, Funny

      So that's why I keep running out of yellow ink!

    2. Re:I was right! by DanteBlack · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course a daisy wheel printer can be tracked forensicly anyway since they suffer the same "signature" issues that a typewriter does. Hammer based printers, manual and electric typewriters, leave distinct, identifiable, characteristics in the copy that they produce. For example, wear on the hammer, a tendancy to "drop" a letter etc.

      --
      I am invisble, and you can't see me.
    3. Re:I was right! by Drakonite · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You overlooked a vital problem in your plan.. The prints created by a daisy wheel are as unique to the printer used as fingerprints to a person, if not more so.

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    4. Re:I was right! by jemenake · · Score: 1

      Well, you can always pee on the ransom note before you send it.... or just spray it with some other yellowing agent.

      This brings up another idea I had. CSI's use luminol to find invisible blood traces. The chemical in the luminol spray reacts with the iron in the remaining blood and glows. Anyway, I'm waiting for the day when some smart-ass murder suspect sprays his entire house with some iron-containing substance so that, when the CSI's show up with their luminol, everything glows.

    5. Re:I was right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kind of doubt that those old Diablo 630s can be traced to their original purchasers, much less to their current owners.

    6. Re:I was right! by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yes, but the feds can't go the the daisey wheel printer manufacturer and say "which printer of yours makes this unique pattern?", whereas with the vendor embedded watermarks, they can.

      Well, they can still ask the daisey wheel vendor, but they will get an "I don't know" answer.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    7. Re:I was right! by wankledot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At least with a daisy wheel it requires "the feds" to have possession of the wheel in order to determine which one it came from. With the dots, they will already know where and when the printer was sold as soon as the have the document.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    8. Re:I was right! by marksilverman · · Score: 1

      This is why I always print my ransom letters using an old daisy wheel printer.

      Don't forget, each typewriter has a unique fingerprint of it's own based on the make and model plus the wear on each key and the horizontal and vertical alignment (this was a lot more pronounced with manual typewriters). Back in the day, forensic scientists used to spend a lot of time matching ransom letters to particular typewriters. So if they raid your house and they can match your typewriter, they have an easy conviction.

      Don't forget about that ribbon either, it's got a trail of every key you pressed!

    9. Re:I was right! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Thats why I always use the office laser printer to write my ransom notes.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    10. Re:I was right! by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Ferric chloride, as long as you don't mind the smell and brown stain on everything(which is fine if you're ruining forensic evidence).
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    11. Re:I was right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot step two of print a ransom letter: destroy the daisy wheel and replace it with another one.

    12. Re:I was right! by cly · · Score: 1

      But presumably for a color laser the embedded serial number in a doc can be linked to the sales record and thus leaves a paper trail.

      God knows which daisy wheel printer would generate a particular head signature.

    13. Re:I was right! by shepd · · Score: 1

      Anyway, I'm waiting for the day when some smart-ass murder suspect sprays his entire house with some iron-containing substance so that, when the CSI's show up with their luminol, everything glows.

      Better yet, just write "Try Harder, Morons!" with it on the mirror. :-D

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    14. Re:I was right! by Bilestoad · · Score: 1

      chelated iron from a garden store (and it won't corrode non-ferrous metals)

    15. Re:I was right! by Epistax · · Score: 4, Funny

      My soldering iron says that fingerprints might be unique, but they aren't permanent.

    16. Re:I was right! by UranusReallyHertz · · Score: 1

      But doing that would be awful incriminating itself now wouldn't it? You might as well just sream "I am trying to hide that fact that there is blood in this house!".

      --
      Smoking is an expensive, slow, and unreliable method of suicide.
    17. Re:I was right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the trick is just to go to local garage sales, thrift store and the like an purchase old, used printers. Get an equally old computer that can actually use that technology and print said documents. Once you have sent off one or two, then destroy the printer and use a different one. Tracking by marks on a printer will be tough when it changes often.

    18. Re:I was right! by Jahf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which can still be tracked to your employer.

      That's why I always use Kinko's, paying cash, while wearing a Santa suit (everyone loves Santa, doesn't matter what time of year).

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    19. Re:I was right! by Jahf · · Score: 1

      But to verify it was -your- printer they have to figure out it was you first (or at least have enough suspicion to think of you). Far different from being able to look at the code and trace you down with it.

      And heck, for the truly paranoid, you could go out to one of any number of government auctions held throughout the country and buy up all of the auctioned off daisywheels in cash, using them once and very doubtfully tracked.

      Although this does lead to some interesting "joke" opportunities for all of those places I visit while working that have open-to-all network printers ...

      And for a last way around this, buy a laser printer from office depot ... take out all the guts. Buy a second one at another office depot (always with cash), swap the guts, and return one of them. When they come looking for the printer registered to that code, they'll find some schmoe that bought your returned (or if you are lucky, refurb'ed from some other part of the country) printer with their plastic.

      Or simply DON'T PRINT SOMETHING that requires the fuzz to come after you.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    20. Re:I was right! by pentalive · · Score: 1

      Having a sample of the output will not help if the investigator can not find the printer itself.

      Moral: buy a single use printer with cash and destroy it afterwards.

      Do they put the serial numbers on ink jet printers?

      Should I have posted anonymously?

    21. Re:I was right! by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      You overlooked a vital problem in your plan.. The prints created by a daisy wheel are as unique to the printer used as fingerprints to a person, if not more so.

      Yes, but they aren't registered with the manufacturer before the printer leaves the factory.

      Who cares if the daisywheel was "unique" when no one can link that unique pattern to you?
      Just buy a daisywheel, print your letter and then grind all the letters off the wheel.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    22. Re:I was right! by Hatta · · Score: 1

      You forgot step two of print a ransom letter: destroy the daisy wheel and replace it with another one.

      Ahhh, so that's the infamous

      2) ???

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    23. Re:I was right! by cheekyboy · · Score: 0, Troll

      And how usefull is that if its made in 1991 and you bought it of someone in 1997.

      Especially if its so 4th hand it could have come from a church/police depot.

      Print, then destroy your printer like in office space.

      But real criminals OWN banks, ie the federal reserve and INFLATE (i mean COUNTERFEIT 500billion) every year in 'fake' money.

      Note, the USD isnt real, its been fake since 1913 when federal reserve was setup privately, its just paper only worth the trust of the govt in getting income taxes to pay for it.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    24. Re:I was right! by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      You think the print from a Dasiywheel is distinct? try finding an XP DRIVER!!!

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    25. Re:I was right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You overlooked a vital point of the comment to which you are responding. It was a joke.

    26. Re:I was right! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Not after I've filed off all the ... oh.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    27. Re:I was right! by amorsen · · Score: 1
      Anyway, I'm waiting for the day when some smart-ass murder suspect sprays his entire house with some iron-containing substance so that, when the CSI's show up with their luminol, everything glows.

      Sure, that sounds like a great way to prove your innocense. Can you come up with a legitimate reason for doing something like that?

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    28. Re:I was right! by TheAntiCrust · · Score: 1

      Even if the investigators KNOW you did it, unless they can prove it in court you wont go to jail. You are technically free to spray your house with almost anything you want as long as it's not dangerous.

    29. Re:I was right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a hair line thin scar on a finger from a soldering iron, it has been there for about 20 years. It is unique and permanent.

    30. Re:I was right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You overlooked a vital point in the comment. It was a joke.

      Yes, believe it or not, it is entirely possible to organize information in a way that both appears informative and yet remains at least marginally humorous at the same time.

      I do admit "marginally humorous" is being generous at best.

    31. Re:I was right! by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      That reminds me of an idea that I had once in high school

      Purchase a very small amount of, say, cocaine. Possibly you can purchase a 'line', that would be the right amount, not that I'm a cocaine expert or anything. Be sure to get rid of the container by fire or something.

      Have an envelope that's not tracable to you, make sure to leave no fingerprints. Put the cocaine, about a teaspoon, in it. Don't seal it.

      When you get to school, wet a cotton swab. Stick it in the envelope, and spread the cocaine everywhere. On lockers, in classrooms, in the restrooms, everywhere.

      Or, if you want to be really clever you can just put it in a few places, like on certain lockers. You can go with the asshole's lockers, to annoy them, or you can hit your own to claim the administration is harrassing you. (Obviously, you want just hit the outside.)

      Seal the envelope, not by licking it. Leave it on someone's desk. (Nowadays, of course, you'd want to write 'cocaine' on it, but this idea was thought of when 'Anthrax' was a band we'd vaguely heard of. It's no good if they evacuate the school, you couldn't see the fun.)

      Wait for them to discover it. Wait an hour while it's tested. Watch the drug dogs arrive.

      Enjoy the fun. The dogs will smell it on you, so hopefully you also marked some other people. Complain strongly when they try to search you. Have a poppy seed bagel on you.

      The next day, tell everyone your theory: That the administration spread cocaine all over the place so they'd have an excuse to bring in the drug dogs.

      God, I hated those fascists. And I got out before Columbine, it got a lot worse afterwards according to my brothers.

      Anyone who's required to watch though metal detectors has my utmost sympathy, and I suggest you start carrying different large lumps of metal, like car tires and boxes of paper clips, through it each day and act surprised when it goes off. (Nothing they could even possibly claim was a weapon, though.) Emptying your pockets while you're obviously holding onto a sink faucet or a clip-on desk lamp will just piss them off, but there obviously are no rules against bringing those to school.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    32. Re:I was right! by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      But presumably for a color laser the embedded serial number in a doc can be linked to the sales record and thus leaves a paper trail.
      Only for a stupid criminal that buys a color laser with a credit card registered in his/her name. For the criminal with a few more brain cells, they use cash; end of paper trail.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    33. Re:I was right! by MisterMoney · · Score: 1

      and this is why my ransom notes are always hand made from letters cut out of magazines and newspapers.

      remember to wear those latex gloves.

    34. Re:I was right! by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Note, the USD isnt real, its been fake since 1913 when federal reserve was setup privately, its just paper only worth the trust of the govt in getting income taxes to pay for it.

      This has been covered on other tangential Slashdot segues, but it looks like time to dust it off again.

      The total amount of gold mined in the world--ever, in all of human history--is estimated at about 3.4 billion troy ounces. At current prices around 450 US dollars per ounce, that's about 1.7 trillion worth of gold.

      The total number of U.S. dollars in circulation, as banknotes, is about seven hundred billion dollars' worth. Fully backing the U.S. dollar would require nearly half of all the extracted gold in the world today. Similar problems arise if you look at other precious metals, or commodities, or very nearly anything else.

      The United States economy is so large, and so many people inside and outside the country find the U.S. dollar a convenient currency to use, that you can't fully back it--there just isn't enough free stuff available to tie up for the purpose.

      You're always welcome, of course, to not use U.S. dollars.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    35. Re:I was right! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1

      Yes, but he's using YOUR printer!

    36. Re:I was right! by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      Since when do you need "ligitemate" reasons for your actions? Honestly, for big cases, you really only need small proof that you _didn't do it.

      Seriously, I am able to spray my whole house with iron-coating substance. I do not need to _prove_ a reason to any judge or jury. It is up to a prosecutor to _prove_ that I used x, y, z to do x, y and z.

      Don't get me wrong. I hope the cops/feds get _all_ the help and luck they can get to stop crime. Just don't ask me to give up rights to make their jobs easier.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    37. Re:I was right! by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      No you don't destroy it, they will reconstruct it. What you do is sell it on e-bay!

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    38. Re:I was right! by Technician · · Score: 1

      The prints created by a daisy wheel are as unique to the printer used as fingerprints to a person, if not more so.


      And I have a box of daisywheels for it. Sometimes it breaks one. So, it's one printer that is easy to change fingerprints as needed. If the heat is on, keep the printer. Change the printwheel. Put the old one in the disposal. It no longer matches the ransom note.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  4. Money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People try and print money with regular laser printers? WTF?

    1. Re:Money? by Sein · · Score: 1

      Oh yes.

      Every few months there's cases around here of some kids running their cash through a scanner and running off a few copies using Dad's laser printer. Fairly easy to detect, but they still do it.

  5. But can it track slashdot dupes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if each story were printed as hardcopy in color?

  6. It's the new model... by LilMikey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get dazzling colors, the blackest blacks, and the highest resolution from your new HP Ashcroft.

    --
    LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    1. Re:It's the new model... by thomasdelbert · · Score: 1

      Comes equipped with fuzzy logic...

      - Thomas;

      --
      ___ This sig is in boldface to emphasize its importance!
    2. Re:It's the new model... by codegen · · Score: 1

      I decoded the dots on mine. It said "DEADBEEF"

      --
      Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
  7. fascists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    fascists!

  8. Just another reason... by MrDyrden · · Score: 5, Interesting
    To be lazy and NOT send in your product registration card!

    I mean, seriously. How else would they know who bought it and how to get a name from that serial number? I guess maybe if the store kept your credit card info on file or something and associated it with the serial number, but how often would that happen?

    Lesson learned, if you want to print hundreds of forged checks or counterfeit bills, pay for the printer in cash!

    1. Re:Just another reason... by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right.. However, the Serial number will tell the feds right where the printer was sold, then they check the cash register computer to find out exactly when it was sold.

      After a quick check of the surveillance camera's, they've got your face (or the person who bought it, if its you) and are coming to raid your house.

      --
      | - | - |
    2. Re:Just another reason... by 6Yankee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lesson learned, if you want to print hundreds of forged checks or counterfeit bills, pay for the printer in cash!

      But not cash that you printed yourself on a printer that wasn't paid for with cash you didn't print yourself. Or something.

    3. Re:Just another reason... by bunyip · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be lazy and NOT send in your product registration card!

      I mean, seriously. How else would they know who bought it and how to get a name from that serial number? I guess maybe if the store kept your credit card info on file or something and associated it with the serial number, but how often would that happen?

      Lesson learned, if you want to print hundreds of forged checks or counterfeit bills, pay for the printer in cash!



      Actually, if you're going to do anything illegal, cash is king. Just print some up and, well, ....

      Anyway, police officer friend of mine once who said that if you're going to do something illegal, do it big, do it once and don't tell anybody.

      That "once" part of it is key, you could print up a bunch of cash one afternoon, enough to pay for the next printer (with cash, of course), then dispose of the printer.

      Greed will get you in the end.

      Alan.

    4. Re:Just another reason... by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

      No, no, no!

      Cash that you printed yourself on a printer that someone else paid for in whatever way they felt like it.

      Just don't let 'em know you're using their printer.

      Or something.

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    5. Re:Just another reason... by Zen · · Score: 1

      Fry's associates actual serial numbers with customers (they're listed on the receipts). But I dunno if they do that with all their products, or just the easy to walk off ones (harddrives in particular are done this way). Can any employee verify?

    6. Re:Just another reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I noticed that on the last high-dollar purchase I made the retail store (best buy) scanned the serial number of the product. (It was on a barcode on the outside of the box.) I would recommend buying it in cash at a store far away from where you live. That way the trail will dead-end at the store. I don't imagine most stores keep their surveilance tapes for longer then a week or so.

    7. Re:Just another reason... by over_exposed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the reasoning behind this isn't necessarily that they need you to register the product (but they'd still love you to I'm sure). All this really does is give the police something to compare against when they do a raid on a suspected counterfeiting location.They bust your door down and check the forged bills printed serial number against the serial number your printer embeds in every image. If it matches, say goodbye to your anal virginity and ability to vote for the rest of your life (if you're an American). If it doesn't match, you get a half-assed apology, a really messy apartment and splinters in your carpet in the entry way for weeks.

      --
      "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
    8. Re:Just another reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You give law enforcement far too much credit.

      Assuming the store you bought it at hadn't already recorded over the security tape (which happens more than you would think) it would still be rather difficult for the police to find you with just your face (for large cities at least, obviously a small town situation would be different)

    9. Re:Just another reason... by CokeJunky · · Score: 1

      I suspect that they use it to identify when multiple counterfeits from disparate sources came from the same forger, and when they can track them by following the money trail, owning the printer in question would be an awefully nice bit of hard evidence. Not damning necessarily, but it would help the prosecution.

      --
      More Caffeine. NOW
    10. Re:Just another reason... by cei · · Score: 1

      Easy, just print the cash on the store's demo printer...

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    11. Re:Just another reason... by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 1
      ability to vote for the rest of your life (if you're an American)
      I believe that is just Florida.
    12. Re:Just another reason... by ADRA · · Score: 1

      You can safely assume that those video camera tapes get wiped on a weekly basis or two. They're only really meant to stop internal theft and known events, like some guy robbing the till, or someone breaking into the store after-hours.

      --
      Bye!
    13. Re:Just another reason... by d-rock · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. I wonder if it prints these dots on a blank pages, and if it's smart enough to handle multiple sets of dots from different printers on the same page...

      Derek

      --
      Don't Panic...
    14. Re:Just another reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Worked for Fry's for one hellish year.

      Yes, you can come to return an item without a reciept and as long as you have a picture ID you can get your money back if you know someone/fight with them/are really cute.

      But this assumes that you gave them the proper information in the first place. You don't have to provide them any of that information, but you do forfit your ability to return junk without a reciept and get cash back.

    15. Re:Just another reason... by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      I mean, seriously. How else would they know who bought it and how to get a name from that serial number?

      Standard police methods would find the person(s) involved. The serial number would be used for evidentury purposed to show in court that the bills retreived come ffrom that printer.

      Yaz.

    16. Re:Just another reason... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Remember that story a few days ago about Lexmark printer drivers installing spyware that phones home with your printer details?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    17. Re:Just another reason... by mzungu · · Score: 1


      "How else would they know who bought it and how to get a name from that serial number?"


      Two words: extended warranty

      So, if you want to avoid this, pay cash and don't take the warranty, don't use your member card (no costco for you), and heck, don't buy from a primary source - buy used.

      --
      Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
      -- John Kenneth Galbraith

    18. Re:Just another reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "say goodbye to your anal virginity"

      I said that on Nov 3.

    19. Re:Just another reason... by igoryonya · · Score: 1

      I guess, the driver could transmit the number over the net to the company.

    20. Re:Just another reason... by kaustik · · Score: 1

      Some resellers do keep very good track of this. CDW, for example. Anyone who offers an extended warranty on a product will most likely be tracking serial numbers to avoid someone buying 20 printers and milking them all off of one warranty. But, I agree, if you are making phoney bills you should have the wits to cover your trail.

    21. Re:Just another reason... by ReverendRyan · · Score: 1

      When I worked for Walgreens, we kept our tapes for over a year. And we used them for everything from catching kids stealing pipe tobacco to IDing hit-and-runs in our parking lot.

    22. Re:Just another reason... by Cylix · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sweet...

      Now I just have to buy a printer at a yard sale and commit some heinous crime with it.

      Later on...

      "Yep, looks like he was murdered with this printer, but don't worry we will track it right back to the owner."

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    23. Re:Just another reason... by macklin01 · · Score: 1

      Except if they already suspect you, they can get a warrant and check for the printer (and its chip) themselves. -- Paul

      --
      OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
    24. Re:Just another reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. In Vermont, you can vote while in prison.

    25. Re:Just another reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that story a few days ago about Lexmark printer drivers installing spyware that phones home with your printer details?

      Please mod parent up and pass me another sheet of tinfoil.

    26. Re:Just another reason... by smchris · · Score: 1


      Good points but I agree with the others that this will generally catch the low-hanging fruit. Guys who print out their money at the office. But they are out there -- like the high school teacher I read about who had his kiddy porn delivered to his school mailbox.

    27. Re:Just another reason... by JVert · · Score: 1

      Well I almost wanted to take my buisness there.

      But i'm getting old now and would rather just avoid the gun battles.

    28. Re:Just another reason... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      HOWEVER, in Oregon and Colorado that I know about, certain non-violent felonies get purged after a given number of years IF you've served your time. I think breaking out is not one of the felonies that gets purged however....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    29. Re:Just another reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well now that printers send information back to the company via the web (see this) printer manufactueres may be able to get the serial number and your IP address by the printer sending it to them. Also this is a bigger deal than before because in the past companies would inform consumers about this practice (from the article - "Although the technology has existed for a long time, printer companies have not been required to notify customers of the feature.")

    30. Re:Just another reason... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Convicted felons cannot vote in any US election in any state.

      Wrong. Only seven states (Alabama, Florid, Iowa, Kentucky, MIssissippi, Nebraska and Virginia) permanently deprive felons of the right to vote, and even these allow felons to petition to regain that right. Such petitions are often granted. Most other states deny felons the right to vote only while they are imprisoned, or on parole. Maine, Utah and Vermont allow felons to vote even while they're still in prison.

      Chris Mattern

    31. Re:Just another reason... by atcurtis · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Here in the UK, IIRC, a senior detective of one of the police forces wrote and had published a book which described how to commit a perfect crime. Detailed in the book was what the detective decided was the "Golden Rules"

      1. Do it once,
      2. Do it big,
      3. Don't get greedy, never forget rule 1.

      A few years later, he was caught for fraud and was jailed... How did he get caught? He forgot rule 1.

      (I should google and find the specific case and post the link here... but I am too lazy right now)

      --
      -- The universe began. Life started on a billion worlds...
      -- Except on one where stupidity was there first.
    32. Re:Just another reason... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Here it is. Oh, and wasn't there something a few weeks ago about micro-engraved serial numbers on aluminium foil?

      (Just kidding)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    33. Re:Just another reason... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      I guess maybe if the store kept your credit card info on file or something and associated it with the serial number, but how often would that happen?

      Did you know hurricanes increase strawberry Pop Tarts sales 7-fold?

      If anybody has the power to link serial numbers with credit cards it's Wal-Mart. They have the technology, they just need the incentive.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    34. Re:Just another reason... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      The tapes they use are used over and over and the quality of the recording gets worse and worse.

      If the camera is even on. I worked at a gas station for a few months and the home class VCR used for "recording" was hooked up to a television in the manager's office for watching movies while on break.

      You're assuming that they haven't re-recorded over the tape with your face on it.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    35. Re:Just another reason... by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      3. Don't get greedy, never forget rule 1.

      Suggesting to criminals not to get gready is like suggesting to fish not to live in water. I guess there's no law against giving advice you know can't be followed.

      TW

    36. Re:Just another reason... by amorsen · · Score: 1
      I wonder if it prints these dots on a blank pages

      A decent colour printer will detect a black-and-white page and switch to black-and-white mode to save time.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    37. Re:Just another reason... by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That "once" part of it is key...

      Sniping is a good metaphor for this. A good sniper fires exactly one shot before moving on. It's not obvious to many people, but it's quite difficult to pinpoint gunfire if only one shot is fired. Second and third shots let your potential victims zero in on you and return fire.

      TW

    38. Re:Just another reason... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      You know, I've been thinking about this for a while. Greed isn't what gets you in the end. It's stupidity. Think about it.

      Main Entry: greed
      Pronunciation: 'grEd
      Function: noun
      Etymology: back-formation from greedy
      : excessive or reprehensible acquisitiveness : AVARICE

      Main Entry: 1stupid
      Pronunciation: 'stü-p&d, 'styü-
      Function: adjective
      Etymology: Middle French stupide, from Latin stupidus, from stupEre to be numb, be astonished -- more at TYPE
      1 a : slow of mind : OBTUSE b : given to unintelligent decisions or acts : acting in an unintelligent or careless manner c : lacking intelligence or reason : BRUTISH
      2 : dulled in feeling or sensation : TORPID
      3 : marked by or resulting from unreasoned thinking or acting : SENSELESS
      4 a : lacking interest or point b : VEXATIOUS, EXASPERATING

      Main Entry: intelligence
      Pronunciation: in-'te-l&-j&n(t)s
      Function: noun
      Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French, from Latin intelligentia, from intelligent-, intelligens intelligent
      1 a (1) : the ability to learn or understand or to deal with new or trying situations : REASON; also : the skilled use of reason (2) : the ability to apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think abstractly as measured by objective criteria (as tests) b Christian Science : the basic eternal quality of divine Mind c : mental acuteness : SHREWDNESS
      2 a : an intelligent entity; especially : ANGEL b : intelligent minds or mind
      3 : the act of understanding : COMPREHENSION
      4 a : INFORMATION, NEWS b : information concerning an enemy or possible enemy or an area; also : an agency engaged in obtaining such information
      5 : the ability to perform computer functions

      Greed + Intelligence = Money, and lots of it. Ask Bill Gates. Hell, any number of people who work at MS. Not everyone can walk away from the DoJ with the equivalent of a wrist-slap.

      Greed + Stupidity = No Money (or money, but you lose it). Ask anyone at Enron.

      The funny part is, if you compare Enron and MS, is that at the end of the day, MS has a lot of money in the bank, and can pay out for any mistake. Enron did not have any money in the bank, and paid out their company for their mistakes.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    39. Re:Just another reason... by dmaxwell · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll add a fourth rule:

      KEEP YOUR YAP SHUT!

      I'll assume we're talking about legal jurisdictions that at least pretend to be civilized. A lawyer once told me that most people who are in jail talked themselves in. It turns out that it is usually pretty difficult to get good witness testimony and enough evidence to convict. Most cops don't lose any sleep over it because it is also fairly easy to get most people to incriminate themselves with any number of techniques. You most especially don't go along when they say, "You better start co-operating or we'll really get mean." There is a reason why many law enforcement types don't like Miranda. Remaining silent is your right; never let them tell you any different. They sure as hell will use anything you say against you.

    40. Re:Just another reason... by dmaxwell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hate to reply to myself but I just remembered something else. Keeping your mouth shut doesn't just apply to the cops should you have been sloppy enough to merit being questioned. You don't tell your mom, best friend, girlfriend, or even your priest anything. You don't even want to smile real big if other people are in the room when Perfect Crimes? comes on.

      I'll add a fifth rule that directly follows from the fourth rule. Work alone if you can. If the hijinks you have in mind need helpers then fewer is better. Most people aren't very good at keeping secrets and the cops know how to exploit that as well.

    41. Re:Just another reason... by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Yeah, it's people getting greedy that get caught. Like morons who rob six banks in the same area.

      Hello, idiots. They tend to get on guard after the fifth one.

      If you're going to commit a crime twice, make sure it's areas that do not have the same law enforcement entity covering them. That's the entire US for counterfeiting.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    42. Re:Just another reason... by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      You know what they call a Faraday cage open at one end, right?

      They call it an antenna. You can't block RF by wrapping your head halfway in tin foil. Unless your entire body is covered in tinfoil, you've made it worse for yourself!

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    43. Re:Just another reason... by Frogbert · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know this casual copying of money could easily be avoided if America used plastic money. Australia does and its heaps harder to copy money.

    44. Re:Just another reason... by chriso11 · · Score: 1

      Go a decent distance from home. Wear non-descript clothing. Pay cash. Buy an extended warranty with a made up name and address. Don't register the purchase. Don't use the printer for a year. Those steps should at least slow down any investigation.

      Of course, don't do anything else stupid...

      --
      No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
    45. Re:Just another reason... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      "Yep, looks like he was murdered with this printer, but don't worry we will track it right back to the owner."

      How do you murder someone with a printer?

      "Excuse me--can you stand on the big X there? No need to be looking up. Now a little to the left? Perfect...."

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    46. Re:Just another reason... by fossa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We have stories of people who *almost* did it, but we'll never hear stories of people who actually have done it. They may be living among you now, someone you know and trust...

      What a letdown.

    47. Re:Just another reason... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      According to rumor the guy who murdered my great-grandfather confessed on his deathbed. Perfect crime (if the rumors are true) from the stand point of getting away with it. Nobody knew who did it until it was too late to do something about it. Thats about the only time you will hear about it though, and then the story is 50 years old.

    48. Re:Just another reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As any number of very wealthy people will not tell you, one way to set up your family for generations is to steal a substantial sum of money (preferably through 'white collar' crime, as armed robbery yields only small amounts), cover your tracks and take the secret to the grave with you. Your children will then live wealthily ever after.

    49. Re:Just another reason... by BlueBat · · Score: 0
      How do you murder someone with a printer?
      Ummm....

      Hit them over the head with the printer until they are dead?
    50. Re:Just another reason... by dourk · · Score: 1

      If it doesn't match, you get a half-assed apology

      No, they just find some other route to fucking you.

      --
      Wake up.
    51. Re:Just another reason... by dasunt · · Score: 1

      You know, I've been thinking about this for a while. Greed isn't what gets you in the end. It's stupidity.

      According to a story going around my hometown, someone decided to run drugs in their auto. Instead of going a reasonable 60 or even 55 mph[1], they went 80.

      Needless to say, as soon as they hit a certain town known for its speed-zealous cops, they were pulled over. Their suspicious behavior clenched the deal, and the drugs were found.

      Not only were they being stupid in committing their crime (speeding, suspicious behavior, etc), the crime itself was stupid -- drug laws in the US tend to be severe, and the profit wasn't that great, say, roughly, a few weeks of honest work. While other crimes may not be as risky, dealing drugs requires commiting an illegal act (selling drugs) to many people, most of which are likely to roll over on you if they are caught.

      Many crimes have that problem -- few gains for the risks taken. With the risk/reward ratio, honest work is pretty attractive. But perhaps that is the problem with many criminals -- poor risk/reward assessment, laziness, and general stupidity.

      And remember, you never hear about the criminals who did get away with it.

      [1] Where I'm from, going 55 mph on a 55 mph road is not suspicious behavior. Other places may vary.

    52. Re:Just another reason... by aminorex · · Score: 1

      ...anal virginity and ability to vote...

      There are some states where felons are not allowed to vote, but not many. Florida is one. As for anal virginity, anyone who committed a homosexual rape in a prison would be a dead man. I don't believe in the bogey man either.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    53. Re:Just another reason... by CharlesF · · Score: 1

      They may even be [snicker] posting on these forums now.

      One second, someone's at the door...

      --
      Do not read this sig!
    54. Re:Just another reason... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      You know this casual copying of money could easily be avoided if America used plastic money. Australia does and its heaps harder to copy money.

      There are a lot of problems with the current US currency. All of the bills are the same size and colour, which not only makes life impossible for the visibly impared, but also means that turning a 1 into a 100 isn't all that hard.

      Also, with Bush at the helm, US currency is devaluing daily! ;-)

    55. Re:Just another reason... by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      I work for a security and access control company, and we have a ton of clients who are moving to DVRs for their cameras. This means that they can store (reasonably) decent quality video forever. Our typical system controls 16 cameras, has two 140GB hard drives, network connectivity (we only set them up on intranets) and a DVD burner. Some sites have 5 or more of these systems. That's a ton of data, but they only burn about 1 DVD per system per month or two. While the DVDs will degrade eventually, they're not losing any fidelity to rewriting. Of course, the video quality isn't nearly as good as you see on CSI/Law&Order/etc, but then cameras work best when you already have good idea who did something, you just want to be sure. They also work to deter employee mischief.

    56. Re:Just another reason... by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      So when asking how you're going to pay the say plastic or that other kind of plastic?

    57. Re:Just another reason... by chiefnerd · · Score: 1

      And probably another reason why so many products (esp. consumer electronics) come with mail-in rebates that *require* you to submit the UPC, serial number, and your personal information.

      --
      SYS64738
    58. Re:Just another reason... by furchin · · Score: 1

      And remember to never, ever post a "how you did it" comment on slashdot.

    59. Re:Just another reason... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Doing 80 on a 55 MPH road isn't the smartest thing (at least, when you're trying not to attract attention). The general rule is that you can go up to 15 MPH over the speed limit without getting pulled over, 20 MPH if the cops aren't assholes, but 25 MPH over you will, unless the cop is the one doing the speeding (in front of you, with his lights off).

      I think I have a new rule: lightknights #2 law: one illegal thing at a time (called pacing yourself). Speed or smuggle drugs, not both. If you are going to speed, do 35 PMH over. If you are going to smuggle drugs across town, do 10MPH over (like everyone else).

      It's like the bank robber, who on his way to the bank, shoplifts a pack of gum from a 7-11. He gets to the bank, and the police are waiting for him.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
  9. Although... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "A Xerox researcher says that the number-embedding chip lies 'way in the machine, right near the laser' and that 'standard mischief won't get you around it.'"

    Although I hear not buying a Xerox printer will.

    1. Re:Although... by jonom · · Score: 1

      It's not just Xerox printers. Every colour laser printer prints these codes.

  10. Color Laser? by Luigi30 · · Score: 0

    I use a Canon Bubblejet, you insensitive clod!

    --
    503 Sig Unavailable

    The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    1. Re:Color Laser? by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      I very much doubt my nice old BJ-10ex does this.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    2. Re:Color Laser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe not but I'm pretty happy with the BJs I get from you ex.

    3. Re:Color Laser? by mikael · · Score: 1

      I use a Canon Bubblejet, you insensitive clod!

      Ahh yes, but it is a little known fact that the ink cartridges contain serial numbers stored as microbeads which end up being embedded in the paper. Why else do you the printer manufacturers are opposed to people refilling ink cartridges with non-approved inks?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:Color Laser? by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      Could be because they make a fortune off of selling new cartridges.

  11. Privacy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely this is a huge infringment on my privacy, if i want to send an "Anonymous" letter to someone, for whatever reason, i don't then want somebody else, even with legitimate access to the serial number listings, to be able to track it back to me.

    1. Re:Privacy... by Babbster · · Score: 1

      I expect that if the police have a serious interest in discovering who wrote an "anonymous" [color laser-printed] letter, that letter was probably either in violation of the law or part of a violation of the law. I doubt that they care about your letter to President Bush telling him that "he sucks" using a fancy rainbow effect.

    2. Re:Privacy... by arose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Laws are easy to make. Getting rid of tracking technology once it's there is hard.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    3. Re:Privacy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well of course not. Only a paranoid fool would think that the police care about my letter to Bush.

      It's the NSA I'm worried about.

  12. Who didn't know this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Printer manufacturers have been doing this for a long time.

    Epson inkjet printers, for example, supposedly embed serial codes using droplets of yellow ink in black regions. The serial numbers can't be seen by the human eye, but they apparently can be detected somehow.

  13. And all this time I thought I wanted one... by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

    and just as they were getting cheap enough. Okay, you talked me out of buying a $500+ machine. I'll just stick with my years-old inkie.

    --

    The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    1. Re:And all this time I thought I wanted one... by thomasa · · Score: 1

      And I will stick with my old Panasonic 24 Pin
      printer. I just re-ink the cartridge every
      once in while. I even have an older Citizen
      GSX 140. Columbus brought it over on the
      Santa Maria.

  14. Engadget by Linuxthess · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well I'm glad someone else here is reading Engadget and followed the subsequent link to the PC World article.

    --

    I sig, therefore I was.
  15. I'm sorry dave, im afraid i cant do that by Breity · · Score: 0

    While we have known about this for a long time, this dosent diminish the fact that I for one dont care! i use a color dot matrix for my counterfiting ;)

    --
    Blame it on ElGeeko De Generico [generic geek]
  16. LEXMARK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG LEXMARK...

  17. Easy to bypass (sort of) by harrkev · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The quality of inkjet printers is actually better than that of lasers. And if you want to commit some dastardly deed, go to your local office outlet or electronics superstore. Pay cash (well under $100), and dispose of the printer in a dumpster in a different part of town when done. Easy!

    --
    "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    1. Re:Easy to bypass (sort of) by Fortran+IV · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the inkjet's day is coming as well. Remember this story on printer forensics? Quote: "The technique currently focuses on laser printers but eventually will be expanded to inkjet printers."

      --
      I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
  18. Is it 1998? by Kohath · · Score: 1

    Didn't everyone already know this? It's not like it's a big secret.

    This is news from at least 5 years ago.

    1. Re:Is it 1998? by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Links, please.

      I have heard of retrictions in scanners, but I have not heard of this before.

      The next thing will be to put serial numbers in manure to make tracking a fertilizer bomb easier... Oh. Never mind...

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    2. Re:Is it 1998? by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      Just don't use your own fecal matter and you'll be fine.

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    3. Re:Is it 1998? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew of this as early as 1993. I worked at a print shop and we got the very first Canon color copier in the area. It was a really big deal. So all of the technicians were quite excited to share the ins and outs of the box, including the anti-counterfeit measures. Secret Service, helical drum scanners, and you.

      The things you're now seeing in Photoshop and desktop devices have been in the professional machines for a decade. Pattern recognition and serial numbers are essential to prevent asshats from trying to make $100 bills on walk-up copiers at Kinkos.

      I've had people ask me to copy just about everything that's been printed, from handicap parking permits to the renewal stickers you put on your license plate, currency and stamps, driver's license and other IDs, etc.

      It's a good thing.

    4. Re:Is it 1998? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2004 - 1998 != 5

      Hmmm...

    5. Re:Is it 1998? by blingbing · · Score: 1

      actually it's in 1984.

  19. Sketchy by comwiz56 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is very sketchy in privacy laws, but it probably doesn't violate anything. Also, it sounds like the printer companies are volunteering the information to the authorities.

    Any known way to easily disable this? (Or is it only known by the main-stream counterfeiters, and they don't want to share, for fear of it getting made harded to do?)

    1. Re:Sketchy by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      "Main-stream" counterfeiters wouldn't be using laser printers. Instead, they actually have engraved printing plates and actual banknote paper and such (see this search).

      Aside: What dumbass modded the parent offtopic?!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  20. Countermeasure by uberjoe · · Score: 1

    Well now I guess I'll have to go back to making my counterfeit 20's on my kid's magna-doodle.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  21. How effective is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How hard would this be to get around? If you knew where it was on the paper, wouldn't white-out kill it?

    1. Re:How effective is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I somehow think that applying whiteout isn't an acceptable way around the problem for the types of task that this technology is an issue!

      "Yeah, it's a hundred dollar bill!"
      "What's with the massive amount of tippex on it?" :S

  22. And then what? by OpenSourced · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You find some counterfeits, you track the printer, and then what? It's been sold over the counter somewhere to who-knows-whom. That's just a publicity stunt to avoid being ever held responsible for anything done with their printers.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    1. Re:And then what? by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      Well, I remember stories from the first Gulf war claiming laser printers sold to Iraq were capable of emitting some sort of a trackable frequency with which to pinpoint their location.

      There are laser printers, then there are currency-grade laser printers. I would be curious whether the secret tracking feature includes some sort of a GIS component.

      M

    2. Re:And then what? by harrkev · · Score: 1

      I would chalk this up to an urban legend. Any signal loud enough to be detected from a mile away would NOT pass FCC testing, and hence cannot be sold. Besides, it would suck to have an jumbo jet landing on your house because your printer squeaked at the wrong frequency.

      It is also possible to put all of your eqipment in a faraday cage. This is actually pretty standard procedure for HEMP/Tempest shielding. I bet that even the Iraquis know this trick. It is hard to get it right, but not too difficult to do a halfway job which would at least help a bit.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    3. Re:And then what? by Grakun · · Score: 1

      Did the FCC have any control over Iraq during the gulf war?

  23. CSI by The_Rippa · · Score: 5, Funny

    And as we all know very well, CSI has a machine that will read the code and bring up a 3d map with your current location, a recent photo of you, and a list of every cash purchase you've made in the last six months.

    1. Re:CSI by foxhound01 · · Score: 0

      and their computer will make a lot of annoying beeping sounds when it figures out who the paper belonged to.

      --


      Linux is to the internet as Duct Tape is to the Universe.
    2. Re:CSI by chill · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are confusing CSI with WalMart. You also forgot the computer that tracks every RFID-tagged item you ever bought from there or Sam's Club.

      Wait a minute...I think the last box of tin foil I bought was from WalMart! That means it probably has an RFID tag...

      IS NOTHING SACRED?!

      =Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:CSI by robyannetta · · Score: 1
      You are confusing CSI with WalMart. You also forgot the computer that tracks every RFID-tagged item you ever bought from there or Sam's Club.

      Does that mean WalMart has an RFID tag on every box of Trojan rubbers, or are they so "anal" that they tagged every individual condom?

      *ducks* *runs like hell*

      --
      - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
  24. In the old Soviet Union by pherris · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The early photocopiers in the USSR had a state issued serial number eched on the glass so copies could tracked to that machine and possible the user(s). And the tracking wasn't about counterfeiting either.

    It seems they were ahead of the US by 30+ years. Another sign of a dying empire.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
    1. Re:In the old Soviet Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, finally an on-topic Soviet Russia post, and you wasted it!

      In Soviet Russia, printers track you.

    2. Re:In the old Soviet Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the etched glass technique was used in the US military for years. It is helpful for tracking what machines were used to copy classified documents, and accounting issues. I wouldn't call this a sign of a dying empire.

    3. Re:In the old Soviet Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When every machine has the tracking, even personal ones, it is a sign of a dying empire.

    4. Re:In the old Soviet Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The early photocopiers in the USSR had a state issued serial number eched on the glass so copies could tracked to that machine and possible the user(s). And the tracking wasn't about counterfeiting either.

      So in Soviet Russia... the glass tracks you?

    5. Re:In the old Soviet Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems they were ahead of the US by 30+ years. Another sign of a dying empire.

      Does this means that the american empire will go extinct too in 30+ years from now?

    6. Re:In the old Soviet Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it's on photocopiers sold to the public, it sure is.

    7. Re:In the old Soviet Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does this means that the american empire will go extinct too in 30+ years from now?

      Thanks to Bush and the neo-cons, we are well ahead of that schedule.

    8. Re:In the old Soviet Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does this means that the american empire will go extinct too in 30+ years from now?

      I don't know if this will happen or not, but we sure took a solid step in that direction on November 2nd.

      The first consequences are already being felt: the US dollar is devaluing faster than a 3rd world currency thanks due to Bush and his-tax-cut-supported record deficits. Even Greespan says so:

      particularly after Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan highlighted the unsustainable widening in the U.S. current account deficit on Friday.


      http://cnn.com/2004/BUSINESS/11/22/dollar.high.r eu t/index.html

    9. Re:In the old Soviet Union by mdielmann · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No.

      The USSR was doing this 30+ years ago. They collapsed 13 years ago (1991). Total span of 17+ years.

      The U.S started doing this 20 years ago. We only found out now. So, by the USSR model, it should be collapsing anytime now. Now take a look around and ask yourself, "Is this the America I grew up reading about?"

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    10. Re:In the old Soviet Union by amorsen · · Score: 1
      We only found out now.

      I'm not part of that "we".

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    11. Re:In the old Soviet Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about your knee-jerk reactions. Here again is the invalid argument of correllation != causation. The US is hardly anything close to Orwell's 1984 either. Sheesh, get a grip.

    12. Re:In the old Soviet Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you telling us that is supposed to make it better? I wonder if you'd call yourself a conservative. The whole party seems to have forgotten that most of the world operates on the "looks like a duck, quacks like a duck" principle.

      This certainly looks and sounds like big brother to me. To top it all off, I bet that the government would refuse to tell me about any of the cases that this secret code was used.

    13. Re:In the old Soviet Union by Citizen+Gold · · Score: 1

      The U.S started doing this 20 years ago. We only found out now. So, by the USSR model, it should be collapsing anytime now.

      Well... Just over half of you did vote for the wrong guy...

  25. odd by name773 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The technology... was created by Xerox about 20 years ago.
    It was 1984 twenty years ago.

    1. Re:odd by sepluv · · Score: 1

      As well as seeing the irony in *that* year, I also find it slightly ironic that /. are now readily admitting in their stories that their stories are 20 years old.

      I've known about this for years--not 20 years--but then I wasn't even born then.

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    2. Re:odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I'm scared...

    3. Re:odd by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      And?

      It never said that a computer was a requirement. Copiers could do this with very limited processing power even in the 1980s

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    4. Re:odd by John+Pliskin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At least I'm not the only one who noticed.

      John Galt where the hell are you?
      $

    5. Re:odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a XEROX employee and am already in hiding

      I did not post this.

      I am not here.

    6. Re:odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And?

      Bloody hell -- don't kids read anything nowadays???
      Read 1984. It is the most frightening book in the world. And the most prophetic.

    7. Re:odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not irony. Rather, it's quite apropos.

    8. Re:odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You SUCK.

    9. Re:odd by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      *beats head against the wall*

      In a twist from the norm, it's the end of the day and I'm running down from caffeine.

      Apologies for missing that one, my bad.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    10. Re:odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is John Galt?

    11. Re:odd by KingEomer · · Score: 1

      http://www.michaelcarloneil.com/MCO%20-%20John%20G alt's%20Living%20Statue%20for%20Guelph%20ON.html

    12. Re:odd by sepluv · · Score: 1

      Why can't something be ironic and apropos. (In fact off-topic irony wouldn't work unless the irony were in the fact it were off-topic).

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    13. Re:odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orwell is probably stirring in his grave! Poor guy.

    14. Re:odd by John+Pliskin · · Score: 1

      Go pick up a copy of Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged.

      $

    15. Re:odd by wastingtape · · Score: 1

      The same year 2600 was first published!

    16. Re:odd by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

      Uh, I hate to be the one to break this to you, but 1984 is even, not odd.

      --


      This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  26. yeah by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    print in black and white.

  27. aha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this doesn't surprise me. michael moore is right. our government watches everything we do. praise allah.

  28. FEAR by Commander+Trollco · · Score: 1

    "According to experts, several printer companies quietly encode the serial number and the manufacturing code of their color laser printers and color copiers on every document those machines produce. Governments, including the United States, already use the hidden markings to track counterfeiters."

    Wow. Anyone else thinking about the massive potential for abuse? I don't mean my NGO criminals, I mean by law enforcement

    --
    http://persianews.on.nimp.org/?u=Tar_Baby
    1. Re:FEAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Code is used to see who printed handbills which were (or had been, anyway) anonymously altered by a sitting politiican. SLAPP suit is issued against the handbiller. Legal anonymous political speech is silenced. Happy?

  29. That was a close one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just used real bills to buy my new counterfitting laser printer. My slashdot addiction saved me, for once!

  30. all your posts to this are being monitored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your negative posts about this are being monitored. Even you AC's are being tracked by
    hidden technology embedded in that subversive
    browser Mozilla.

    1. Re:all your posts to this are being monitored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whew!!! It's a good thing I'm safely and smartly using I.E. then. Wouldn't want anyone slipping unknown software to my computar!!11

  31. standard mischief? by po_boy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Time for some non-standard mischief!

    http://www.google.com/search?q=non-standard%20misc hief&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

    well, I'm out of ideas. Maybe sub-standard mischief?

    1. Re:standard mischief? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *giggles helplessly*

      And you humourless moderating bastards! DIE! :D

  32. Ah, those brave reporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yahoo! News is reporting....

    I admire those brave and relentless reporters that Yahoo hires. They are always usually the first with the news and manage to cover the events in some podunk countries of this world.

  33. We can turn this to our advantage... by LegendOfLink · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...by printing tons of encoded, "dots", so when police read them, they will read, "All Your Base Are Belong to Us!"

    The Geek revolution has begun.

    1. Re:We can turn this to our advantage... by nek · · Score: 1

      That's a GREAT idea! Someone write a Photoshop plugin which scatters the same dots randomly across the print so the true serial number is obfuscated....

    2. Re:We can turn this to our advantage... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Actually this has mileage... just upload fonts (assuming these are postscript printers) that have little yellow dots scattered around them. It'll scramble the data so much as to be useless.

  34. "Standard Mischief" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does that include a Louisville Slugger?

    1. Re:"Standard Mischief" by La+Camiseta · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of a scene from Office Space ... "I stole something..."

    2. Re:"Standard Mischief" by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, but I have a whole labfull of "enhanced mischief".

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    3. Re:"Standard Mischief" by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Yes. Once the Louisville Slugger mod is used, neither Xerox nor the Secret Service is interested in the printer's output.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    4. Re:"Standard Mischief" by back_pages · · Score: 1
      hehe

      +1 mischief

  35. Standard Mischief by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ha, they don't know who they're dealing with if they think that they only need to protect their devices against standard mischief.

  36. An easy way to circumvent this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is to remove the need to have color laser printers encode this is by putting RFID chips in all denominations of currency.

    Then we'd just need tin foi hats for our wallets.

    1. Re:An easy way to circumvent this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and hope that you don't walk through any shop door alarms when you go to buy the tinfoil to coat your wallet in.

  37. That's not a daisy wheel printer by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny
    It's Microsoft Word. There was no printer available in 1972 that could have printed those....

    Oh, sorry. Wrong discussion.

    1. Re:That's not a daisy wheel printer by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      The US government recovered that font from the crash at Roswell NM in the 1940s.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:That's not a daisy wheel printer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS Word crashed in Roswell, NM in 1940s?

    3. Re:That's not a daisy wheel printer by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure. You didn't Clippy was invented by a human being, did you?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:That's not a daisy wheel printer by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Where *hasn't* MS Word crashed?

  38. Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, who is that surprised by this?

  39. warranty registration card by morcheeba · · Score: 1

    It's fine until they link the printer serial number to a actual person...

    I guess I shouldn't have printed out a copy of the warranty registration card to send in.

  40. Software control by hey · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the "security" dots are placed under software control. If so, it can be hacked.

    1. Re:Software control by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      According tho TFA, the dots are controlled by a chip (which must be programmed), thus indirectly it's under SW control. I would think that it would be an OTP chip though, so hacking it may be difficult. I'd go with buying broken models of printer that match yours, and rotate the chips through, smashing them with a hammer when done. (retaining the origional chip to re-install when the "activities" have been completed)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  41. yay! by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

    time for some non-standard mischief! To hell with ISO mischief!

  42. not quite by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

    go to your local "procurer" and get one that fell off the back of a truck. go to a store and they might remem your face or have cameras. Oh, and dont forget to wear your tinfoil hat while you're buying and using the printer :-P

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    1. Re:not quite by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Get one second hand from ebay. Preferably from another country.

      There are a thousand ways around this...

    2. Re:not quite by Hobadee · · Score: 1

      ...Don't forget to re-Ebay it once your done!

      --
      ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
    3. Re:not quite by Cryogenes · · Score: 1

      So, when they want to trace a document you printed they end up at the person who sold it to you. Who probably still has your address.

      You better not use it to print money then.

  43. I believe that... by Kjuib · · Score: 0

    "standard mischief" ends when you turn 12.
    After that it is deliquency. Then it is called being rich...

    --
    - Your stupidity got you into this mess, why can't it get you out? -Will Rogers
  44. standard mischief? by dfn5 · · Score: 1
    ...and that 'standard mischief won't get you around it.

    OK, let me break out my de-soldering iron.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  45. They never learn. . . by physicsphairy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    A Xerox researcher says that the number-embedding chip lies 'way in the machine, right near the laser' and that 'standard mischief won't get you around it.'

    So use substandard mischief. :p

    I'm quite serious really. Unless the serial number is tiled, just print a full border and keep whatever stuff you want to cut out away from the serial.

    If it is tiled, you have a number of options. You could script a program to 'split' the image so that you print unmarked bands in multiple runthroughs which eventually add up to a full image. You could offset some unknown amount and then surround the serial number with other sequences to disguise the actual serial (would take some knowledge of how serials are assigned to do a good diguise). Both of those would require a little hardware modification. But if you're printing $100 bills. . . .

    Anyway, those are just some ideas off the top of my head. The point is that if people know what they're up against, they can find a workaround. Ideally, these kinds of tricks would be kept secret. In the case, the point is trip up ignorant cons who don't account for something they don't realize exists.

    Oh well. This will still nail the 16 year old delingquents who decide to pull a fast one on the clerk at their local grocery store.

    1. Re:They never learn. . . by FFFish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seems to me you could swap the yellow and red or blue toner cartridges and easily identify exactly where the dots are being placed. Then... I dunno, make a printer driver that prints black dots at exactly those locations?

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    2. Re:They never learn. . . by bwy · · Score: 1

      Anyway, those are just some ideas off the top of my head. The point is that if people know what they're up against, they can find a workaround. Ideally, these kinds of tricks would be kept secret. In the case, the point is trip up ignorant cons who don't account for something they don't realize exists.

      Shit, and I was thinking... "just buy a different printer..." The article does say "several" printer companies which doesn't mean "all."

    3. Re:They never learn. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Unless the serial number is tiled, just print a full border and keep whatever stuff you want to cut out away from the serial."

      It's not a "number", it's a bunch of light yellow dots all over the page, in some unknown but unique arrangement. None of what you suggest would work.

    4. Re:They never learn. . . by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      What about if I swap the serial number chip in my printer with the data recorder one in my car? That'll fsck them up!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:They never learn. . . by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      " make a printer driver that prints black dots at exactly those locations?"

      you're joking right?
      that would just scream HERE I AM!! I'M AN ENCODED S/N.

      No, the driver would need to put random "noise" dots of the same intensity yellow into the printed image.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    6. Re:They never learn. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you could just print everything out in yellow.

    7. Re:They never learn. . . by cly · · Score: 1

      What if there are a large number of serials on random locations?

      Or they are tiled with random offset?

    8. Re:They never learn. . . by mrbuttboy · · Score: 1

      It is not just what you know about,it is what you don't.

      As many other people here suggested, there are many ways that a document can be water marked that you are not going to be able to detect. The true challenge is to find a method of obscuring any hidden marks that you DONT know about. Thats alot harder.

      --
      What do you say to the man that has nothing? Cast it away!!
    9. Re:They never learn. . . by karmatic · · Score: 1

      So what does it take to register at that site?

    10. Re:They never learn. . . by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      what site?

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    11. Re:They never learn. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THAT site. Duh.

    12. Re:They never learn. . . by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      The site says what is needed to register in wonderful highlight right at teh top.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  46. Nonstandard mischief? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

    If the practice disturbs you, don't bother trying to disable the encoding mechanism--you'll probably just break your printer.

    Crean describes the device as a chip located "way in the machine, right near the laser" that embeds the dots when the document "is about 20 billionths of a second" from printing.

    "Standard mischief won't get you around it," Crean adds.


    "About" 20 billionths of a second from printing, a chip "right near" the laser. Yeah, I don't suppose "standard mischief" will get you around it.

    Does a soldering iron and de-soldering wick now count as non-standard mischief?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Nonstandard mischief? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      What if its part of the rasterization engine pasing the PS or PCL input?
      Use your soldering iron to disconnect a few thousand transistors on a asic?

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  47. Back to the old methods by MagicDude · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, looks like it's back to cutting out newspaper headlines to make my blackmail notes.

    1. Re:Back to the old methods by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 1

      How does that help? When I print out my morning newspaper, it will have the little yellow dots just like everything else.

    2. Re:Back to the old methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, just be careful with your DNA and fingerprints .

      What you really need is to build a robot to go buy newspapers and cut them up for you. Maybe it could pitch in with the kidnapping too...

    3. Re:Back to the old methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer the infinite monkeys with infinite crayons. At some point one of them is bound to write the ransom note I'm looking for...

  48. This has been going on for centuries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the Declaration of Independence. It gave the ID's of everyone involved so the darned redcoats could round them all up.

  49. They don't keep those tapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The total amount of data being fed from all the surveillance cameras around is completely unstorable right now. It's just too vast. They keep the tapes for a certain period, then wipe the ones they don't know to have evidence on them.

    1. Re:They don't keep those tapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you think. 20 years from now, you'll find out the feds have secretly equipped all surveillance cameras with wireless transmitters that send all images to a centralized storage facility in North Dakota, where they are kept forever.

  50. Um, But Engadget Pays Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like Roland Piquepaille does.

    What, you didn't know?

    Here, read this...

    Journalistic Standards in Web News Sites: Are They Adequate?

    "...Additionally, there is a valid concern about ego-based censorship at Slashdot. Generally, Rob, Jeff, and most of the other editors are above this sort of thing. Allegations of it crop up from time to time, though, especially in connection with editor Michael Sims, who has been accused of misusing his administrative powers to down-moderate even high-scoring comments to -1 if he didn't like them. Even away from Slashdot, he attracts allegations of misconduct. One recent striking example is Seth Finkelstein's article on the apparent death of the censorware.org site, which Mr. Finkelstein attributes directly to Mr. Sims' out-of-control ego. (Read the article for yourself for details.) This particular example has nothing to do with Slashdot, but it bears on Slashdot to the extent that we may wonder about the integrity of a site that allows such a person on its editorial staff..."

    http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2001/3/5/44551/245 22

    1. Re:Um, But Engadget Pays Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should link to something more relevent next time, such as the comments in this thread:

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/10/02/193221

      Ever since Timothy and Michael Sims came aboard, this practise has become far more noticable. Sims has been heavily active in promoting Roland's blog.

      I don't know whether they've personally have instigated what appears to be a new commercially-oriented policy at /. or whether they're just far less subtle or discreet about it than Malda et al.

      Perhaps they were hired to take the heat for it. I can think of no other reason for a once-reputable outfit like /. to employ somebody with Michael Sims' appalling record.

  51. Maybe maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldnt swallow on the word of some guys on internet. While it is plausible, some of the details are a little odd. For example, he says the chip is "20 billionths" of a second away from printing, and that its way hard to defeat. Um..how about removing the yellow ink from the cartridge? Also, how would they track back to the purchaser even if it was bought with a credit card, do they somehow access the totally reliable database at Staples? You might in theory be able to affirm the printer matches if you already are in possession of the printer I suppose, but its seems pretty shaky.

    I have heard that dynamite and gunpowder has a signature trace chemical in it, so I guess this sort of thing is not unheard of. But, just because its possible doesnt mean its true in general.

  52. Cash by scowling · · Score: 1

    No problem. Buy your printer with cash. They'll trace it back to where it was purchased, with no record of who purchased it.

    Cameras in the store? Don't shop there, then. Buy from some little hole-in-the-wall.

    Until they outlaw using cash, of course.

    --
    www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    1. Re:Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and THEN we can print cash!

      Woo!

    2. Re:Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have to outlaw cash. The systems haven't been put in place yet, but soon it will be mandatory for retailers to use special registers that read the built-in electronic id from newly issued bills and associate it with the product purchased. This information will be sent in bulk on a daily basis to a centralized system that will allow law enforcement agencies to track a specific bill from printing right through to shredding.

  53. Bullshit alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to take a study out of context. Original Purdue article: http://news.uns.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/2004/0410 11.Delp.forensics.html

    All it says is that it's easy to figure out what sort of machine is used to create a counterfeit. There is no "secret chip" tracking you. It's just that the types of defects on the printed page can point to a specific machine type/model.

    Eh, Kemosabe... You step in something? Me smell ullshit.

  54. Well of course.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just the non-classified access to the DHS computer network. You should see what classified access will bring up.

  55. Mod parent up (I'm not the OP) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh come on - it's funny! Laugh! We don't always need to be so anally partisan.

  56. Which CSI is that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that on CSI: Seatac, WA, or CSI: LaPlace, LA?

  57. My evil plan will never come to fruition! by Sloppyjoes7 · · Score: 0

    Is anyone else curious what evil, horrible things Slashdotters do, that causes them to freak out like this? If I make a copy of a newsletter, I really couldn't care less that someone knows I printed it.

    Now, if I was printing kiddy porn, counterfeiting, or stealing identities, then I'd be worried about this technology.

    Makes you wonder what the average Slashdotter does in their spare time, (when they're not pirating evil copyrighted software).

    1. Re:My evil plan will never come to fruition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So as long as you're not doing anything wrong you don't mind being tracked? Where do you draw the line?

      Let's put a camera in every room of your house (including the bathrooms and bedrooms). If you object to that, clearly you're molesting children in your house.

      We also need to get a sample of your DNA on file. If you oject to that, you're clearly guilty of every rape that's occured within 500 miles of your home in the last 20 years.

      Do you see the point yet?

    2. Re:My evil plan will never come to fruition! by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      Is anyone else curious what evil, horrible things Slashdotters do, that causes them to freak out like this? If I make a copy of a newsletter, I really couldn't care less that someone knows I printed it.

      Really?

      I remember reading a court case, from a political science class, where a person was sent to prision in the 1920's because he was distributing communist literature. The question is, do we want free information, or do we want to track information? Both sides have pro's and con's. In many cases, it comes down to how much to trust government. In my case, I have some trust for government, but who knows what future administrations will bring. Did anyone expect Ashcroft to become attorney general? Could it get worse?

      I think information is harmelss. If someone wants to take information and do something dumb, then there are other ways to track their actions.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    3. Re:My evil plan will never come to fruition! by bwy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they'd probably be pissed as hell to know how many things already leave behind a unique identifier.

      Fingerprints. Every damn thing you touch leaves a fingerprint! Now, you can wear gloves but you'll always ask yourself, did you touch the kiddle porn BEFORE putting on the gloves w/o thinking about it?

      Shooting a gun. The damn bullets can be matched up to the gun barrel. You can shoot some bastard in a robbery and the cops can trace the bullet to YOUR gun barrel. This has the makings of Soviet Russia if I've ever heard it.

      Cameras, EVERYWHERE! You can't buy a slurpee w/o giving someone your mug shot. Shit. Just buying a lottery ticket and slurpee leaves proof.

      Dental records. I recently discovered that my dentist keeps RECORDS of my teeth and if I'm found belly up, the cops can use the records to identify me. Now I'd be dead and you might be asking, "why would I care." Well this is slashdot- so if they use dental records that means Ashcroft wins.

      I recently discovered my car in a satellite photo when evaluating keyhole. Now damnit, the problem comes in with the fact that I drove to Vegas to hire a hooker based on their claim that what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. Those fuckers. Not exactly the case when you can get 3 inch resolution sat images for 30 bucks a year, now is it?

      And now, they can track my printouts. That just does it. I'm so THROUGH with this country. I'm moving to Canada. I refuse to live under communism- so socialism will have to do. Only problem I see is that iTMS isn't available in Canada but I secretly think iPods are part of a grander communist plot anyway (have you see the U2 model? awful lot of RED on the damn thing.)

    4. Re:My evil plan will never come to fruition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember reading a court case, from a political science class, where a person was sent to prision in the 1920's because he was distributing communist literature.

      This is why I have the saying, "Innocent people have nothing to hide from an innocent government." If you can trust the government, then by all means don't get your panties in a bind over this. I, however, am an American, and it is my patriotic duty to be distrustful of government, dang it. I think history fully justifies that distrust too.

    5. Re:My evil plan will never come to fruition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey moron, what you're ranting about is called Facism, not Communism. You are so pathetic, there are no words to describe it.

      Maybe you should try shooting yourself in the teeth with that gun. The teeth can distort the bullet enough to prevent a ballistic match and you can destroy your teeth beyond the ability of dental records.

      BTW, I'm from Canada and we don't want a lunatic right-wing nut-job like you. go back to painting your neck red and stringing up anyone who's a little different from you.

  58. Stolen Printer by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Even better, that way it IS traced back.. Just not to me!

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  59. Re:Bullshit alert! - link fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  60. Old News by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Insightful


    This is old news.

    There have been news stories about serial numbers being embedded in printing for years. The first I read of it, at least 7 or 8 years ago was the same yellow microprint from color inkjet printers, which was mandated by the U.S. Gov't, to prevent counterfit bills from being printed.

    All I've ever done myself is scan in bills at the highest resolution, to show people the microprint (note the double lines around the portrait, one is really text).

    It actually doesn't stop anything, people still print them. I remember back in high school there was a story in the local paper about some kids getting dragged away by the Secret Service for photocopying $1 bills and putting them in soda machines. They only had to do one side, and it didn't care about the color, so easy drinks. Our school had a better 'hack'. If you took a water pistol and sprayed water into the bill slot, it'd short out the electronics of it, and you could push buttons all day to get free drinks. I saw it done a few times. :)

    But hey, just assume that anything you print is being tracked. Chances are pretty good that nothing you print is going to be all that interesting.

    Extremely paranoid? Pay cash for your printer, and get someone else to actually purchase it. Or don't leave home, because 'they' may be watching. Ha!

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    1. Re:Old News by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There have been news stories about serial numbers being embedded in printing for years. The first I read of it, at least 7 or 8 years ago was the same yellow microprint from color inkjet printers, which was mandated by the U.S. Gov't, to prevent counterfit bills from being printed

      What is this serial number like? Is it like a MAC address? Is there any way to print the secret serial number out without printing any text or is the serial number embedded in the text?

      I wonder if counterfitting is that much of a problem? Stores now use pens to make bills to see if they are counterfit. I wonder how many people are out there printing their own money. Heck, I think it would be impossible to even find paper that feels enough like real money.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    2. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is old news then why is it only in the press now?

    3. Re:Old news by Detritus · · Score: 1
      The difference is that as technology improves and becomes cheaper, high-end products become mass-market products. Something that once only affected a select few may affect nearly everyone.

      How is this any better than the KGB's requirement that every owner of a typewriter supply them with a sample page?

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    4. Re:Old News by merdaccia · · Score: 2, Informative
      note the double lines around the portrait, one is really text

      Neat. I'm holding an old $5 from 1995 next to a new $5 from 2003. The old $5 has text as the entire outer line, but the newer one only has it for about 1cm of the middle line (there are now three lines) near the name Lincoln.

      I learn something every day.

      --

      *blinking cursor*

    5. Re:Old News by tonywestonuk · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you took a water pistol and sprayed water into the bill slot, it'd short out the electronics of it, and you could push buttons all day to get free drinks. I saw it done a few times. :)
      Could this be taken as armed robbery?

    6. Re:Old News by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      Dragged away for one side copies? Here it's perfectly legal to print one-side copies, if the other side is blank. Its the fault of the company producing those machines that they didnt verify the stuff...

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    7. Re:Old News by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      I would guess it's the serial number of your printer. I've never bothered to actually look at that.

      As for the feel of paper, people really don't pay attention to it. I've received fake bills from convinence stores before, but there's no way in hell I'd turn it in. The person that reports it loses the money.

      I did a test one day to see how well people pay attention. I actually printed one side of a $10 bill. I wrote "fake" on the other side, just to make it clear that it wasn't a real bill. I crumpled it up, and flattened it out a few times, and put it with my other money. It looked pretty good, except for the fact that one side was white.

      I then laid it on my desk, and let people examine it in passing conversation. Stuff like "You wanna make $10?" "Sure", and they'd grab the bill and stuff it in their pocket. Then I'd have to tell them, "Look at the back of that bill", and then they realized it wasn't real.

      When I was done playing, I tore it up, and threw it away. I'm not a counterfitter, I'm just a little bit of a prankster. :)

      They have the pens to check the paper, but people don't use them on anything smaller than a $20. Is it worth pennies to print up a sheet of $10 bills? Sure, especially in the fact that $10 bills won't get a second look. If you try to pass $100 bills, they usually make like you're trying to rob them. I sometimes get $100's from the bank, and even then, knowing it just came from the bank, it's sometimes hard to spend.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    8. Re:Old News by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Well, they did admit that it was technology from 1984. I'd say it's a slow news day. Bush didn't declare war on anyone new. The elections are over. They're just searching for something to fill the space. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    9. Re:Old News by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      It may be legal to print it, but it's illegal to pass it as real money, regardless if it's a vending machine or a real human.

      There was a news story not too long ago about a lady trying to pass novelty $200 bills. Here is the arrest report. If I remember the full story correctly, she had actually passed a few of them, and got real change from them. :)

      It's all in what you present something to be. You can go to jail for armed robbery, if you had a hotdog in your hand during the commission of a robbery, as long as someone believed it was really a gun. Just the idea of the gun is enough in most states.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    10. Re:Old News by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Our school had a better 'hack'. If you took a water pistol and sprayed water into the bill slot, it'd short out the electronics of it, and you could push buttons all day to get free drinks.

      That's usually called salting, as it works best with salt water. Most modern machines are immune to it apparently.

    11. Re:Old News by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      Ahhhhh.. :)

      I wasn't ever in on the plans, I just saw them do it. But that does make a lot of sense. I know water by itself isn't conductive, but salt in it is.

      Errrr, I mean "No, I didn't see anything, Mr. Principal". :)

      Bah, it's been over 15 years, he can't suspend me now.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  61. OT: your sig by mrchaotica · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You misquoted it a bit. There's no "of course" and it's not "Because;" just "'Cause." I don't have a problem with it or anything, it's just that correcting it would help you fit more of the quote in.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  62. It's to confirm, not to track by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This technology isn't used to track you down based on some fake $20s you printed. It's so that if they find you with fake $20s they can confirm that it matches your printer.

    1. Re:It's to confirm, not to track by aero2600-5 · · Score: 1

      "It's so that if they find you with fake $20s they can confirm that it matches your printer."

      I was wondering when someone was going to bring this up. Just because they can read a serial number off of something you printed doesn't mean they know who you are. It means that they can confirm it was you that printed it if they find you and your printer. Even if they find the printer, as long as it's not in your possession when they find it, and without anything to connect it to you, the serial number will do them no good.

      But why are we so worried about this? Are we sending anonymous threats on a regular basis? If you really are concerned about this, go to a cybercafe, public library, kinko's, friend's house, etc. Anywhere that's anonymous and won't see what you're printing will do. Or how about taking the color image you just printed, bringing it to a color copier, and photocopying it? I haven't read the article at all, but I doubt the color photocopier would rransfer something that's invisible to the naked eye. But then you run into the problem of whether or not color photocopiers have serials built into them as well..

      As for the comment about people already leaving fingerprints everywhere they go, that's not entirely true. Fingerprints are not as unique as people believe. Try this article about it. Also, you don't have to leave fingerprints everywhere you go. Gloves? Also, fingerprints are residue from the oil on your fingers. The oil on your fingers is from your face and hair. If you extensively clean your hands with something like a bleach solution, then refrain from touching your hair and face entirely, you'll leave no fingerprints. Then again, how long do you think you could actually go without touching your face or hair without realizing it?

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
  63. Water proof ink by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    Being that some of epson's latest printers don't smear and you can literally run them under water immediately after printing. I bet if there is an identifier on the page it stays put for the long haul.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  64. fingerprint by morcheeba · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's more like a fingerprint... find a suspect through the usual methods, and the get a search warrant for his printer. If the two samples match, you can build a case on some strong evidence.

    It's not a magic bullet, just another tool for law enforcement.

  65. HSD by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    While you meant it as a joke, dont be surpised if the HSD can do something like this..

    They have access to enough data...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:HSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Realize you're also just half-joking, but parent was on the ball enough to mention the 'current location' (With no technology supporting it's being collected) and 'all your cash purchases' (How do you tell WHO did which cash purchases). CSI's magic technology trumps even the NSA and James Bond.

      I got over my most paranoid phase back in my teen years, when I realized the manhours and expense it'd take to track everyone (I used a basic defensible metric of at least 5 people needed to track each person-- and that's a lot of secret-keepers that have to be trusted to maintain the conspiracy).

      While I hate the sound of this (and now plan to inject odd colors into a couple spent ink cartridges to test my home printers), I also have some direct exposure into monolitic-government incompetence. At this point, the keystone kops look more Orwellian.

  66. Zerox Execs by pvt_medic · · Score: 1

    are probably reading these posting right now to be able to make the next generation of printing security. Which will of course result in new ways to circumvent their security. And it just creates a viscious circle.

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
  67. Re:Countermeasures? Add Another Number by G4from128k · · Score: 1

    If one can discover how the printer ID number is encrypted and added into the image, then one could add a second, third, fourth, etc. number to each image sent to the printer. It might make the image look slightly noisier, but it will make it hard to recover or disambiguate the printer's actual number. At worst, it increases the labor of the authorities who don;t know which number is the "real" number. At best, it obscures the printer's ID and makes it hard to recover any ID number from the image.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  68. Full Disclosure by UpLateDrinkingCoffee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't have so much a problem with the technology in this case, but the lack of disclosure by the companies that produce this stuff (or the agencies that "suggest" they do so). I have no idea whether HP discloses this feature in their manuel, but I know when it was revealed that photoshop now has "anti counterfit technology" embedded in it that no one was told about, people were more than a little irate.

  69. Dunno 'bout Xerox... by Wapiti-eater · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But as many HP color lasers I've seen that have all 'Xs' for their serial nos (XXXXXXXXXXXXX) - this wouldn't do much of any one any good for anything.

    And yes - it's possible to re-set the serial numbers via the front panel, on quite a few of the HP colors.

    Now, to just verify that this *is* the serail no that's being 'microprinted' on each page.....

    --
    Senior NCO in the fight against entropy. I've seen things, man. Things no one should have to see.....
  70. I hate to break your party by the_unknown_soldier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hate to break your "They can't stop me i pay cash" party, but i think the idea of these serial numbers is so that if the police suspect someone and have evidence to get a warrant tehy can use printer data to secure a conviction.

    1. Re:I hate to break your party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to announce the formation of the "They can't prove it was me cause I protect my incriminating electronics with thermite" party.

      Step 1: Anonymously publish politically critical literature which frequently mentions aliens and grand conspiracies.

      Step 2: ???

      Step 3: During the trial maintain that it was never aobut the counterfitting, which you know nothing about, but rather is about the grand conspiracy you've uncovered, and "they" don't want the jury to know about.

  71. HAHAHA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    And if all the tape shows is the back of your head then they can pull out the special software that zooms in on the eyeball of the clerk making the sale to get your reflection!

    Then they'll just run it through the special face recognition software!

    You've been watching a little too much CSI.

  72. Which Manufacturers Don't Do This ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article says "several" manufacturers do this; so which don't ?

  73. Old news by jonom · · Score: 1

    Move along, nothing to see here. This is old news to anyone in the printing industry who has been using high end colour laser printers. It's been happening for at least 10 years that I know of.

  74. Software Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't you just hack the printer driver to print a bunch of those "nearly invisible" yellow dots at random, so that the serial number could not be picked out from the noise?

    1. Re:Software Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, no...
      that hasn't been suggested already in this thread...

  75. Re:But by 320mb · · Score: 0

    hey......get a life, loser!!

    --
    === 'Kernel Panic' no sig found:
  76. Defeating Tracking Is Dual-Use Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If we can defeat the tracking, then we will stumble upon an important dual-use technology. The Chinese are morally bankrupt and have tortured thousands of Tibetans. These Chinese use the latest technology to track Tibetans and other "troublemakers".

    We could apply this dual-use technology to prevent the Chinese government from tracking "troublemakers". If anyone is successful in defeating tracking in the color printer, please keep the technology to yourself so that the Chinese do not learn how it works. Please do share the technology with the American government, the Japanese government, the Tibetan movement, etc.

  77. The naked truth is... by xv4n · · Score: 3, Funny

    The printer has a hidden GPS receiver (yes it works indoors even inside a cave, it's very sophisticated you know), every time you print something, the current location of the printer is also imprinted in yellow using a secret code impossible to detect by human eye. So, there you have it.

    1. Re:The naked truth is... by Verrou · · Score: 1

      Oh great now you've tiped Osamma we'll never catch him!

      --
      If changing our world is playing God, it is just one more way in which God made us in His image. -Aubrey de Grey
    2. Re:The naked truth is... by Quill345 · · Score: 1

      You know, the way this country is going, I wouldn't be surprised....

    3. Re:The naked truth is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That I'm reading this naked.

  78. One More Word: Stamps by FatSean · · Score: 0

    I mean seriously...how often do you print something that you are worried about being tracked back to you? When you need to send such a message, go buy a set of alphabet stamps and stamp the message out. Then burn 'em.

    Personally, my inkjet printer only prints out homework and projects for class.

    --
    Blar.
  79. He wasn't talking about personal computers... by Grakun · · Score: 1

    1984 has come and gone, but George Orwell's prophetic nightmare of the not so distant future holds as much power now as it did fifty years ago. The book shows what a government placed in complete control would do to maintain its power. The story is based on one man's struggle against himself and the vast web of deception spread over most of the world.

    The novel 1984 is centered on Winston Smith, an average, middle-aged man who is living his life in the city of London. London is a part of Oceania, a vast superpower controlling a third of the world. The Party, an oppressive, totalitarian government, governs Oceania and promotes itself through propaganda, censorship, and thought control. The population is controlled by Big Brother, an immense network of cameras covering all of Oceania. The cameras are fixed in the walls of every room, of every house, on every road, in every city of the whole country. All of the cameras are monitored, every minute of every day. Every gesture, twitch, or involuntary movement is intently scrutinized for signs of criminal activities, possible rebelliousness, or internal conflict. It is not uncommon for people to simply disappear without a trace, never to be seen again. As Winston goes through his day-to-day life, the reader becomes increasingly aware of the horrors of his current society and of the terrible atrocities of the government.

    * Thanks to guyknight123 on amazon.com

    1. Re:He wasn't talking about personal computers... by gilroy · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:

      It is not uncommon for people to simply disappear without a trace, never to be seen again.

      No, no one ever disappeared. They were simply retroactively not born...
  80. Do people actually register? by kuzb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I never worry about this stuff because unlike some people, I don't race to fill in that warranty/registration card in the box with all my personal information.

    The local retailers I deal with will warranty these items with nothing more than a reciept, which doesn't have any kind of personal information on it. On top of that, if you pay cash (not with a CC/Bank card) how is this serial number useful to them?

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    1. Re:Do people actually register? by wankledot · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Because they know the date and time the product was sold, and almost any store that sells a color laser printer will have a video camera.

      Sure, that's hyper-paranoid, but when you're printing counterfeit bills you kinda have to be.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    2. Re:Do people actually register? by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      So buy a used one. Be sure not to leave your name or phone number with whoever you buy it from.

    3. Re:Do people actually register? by GeoGreg · · Score: 1

      As others have pointed out, they can still match the serial number on your printer when, through some other means (e.g., Slashdot post), you have been identified as the counterfeiting/forgery/sedition suspect.

    4. Re:Do people actually register? by Sique · · Score: 1

      It is useful if they find other things you print (maybe with your sender address imprinted on it), and can compare them. Often they have already a suspicion, and all they need is a confirmation. So why not trying to get hold of something innocent you just printed which can be easily tracked back to you?

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    5. Re:Do people actually register? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and almost any store that sells a color laser printer will have a video camera."

      But really, how long do they hold onto those video tapes?

    6. Re:Do people actually register? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
      I don't think I have ever in my life sent in a warranty/registration card.

      I have never needed to either.

      To my knowlege, failure to turn in the warranty card in no way lessens any warranty coverage you might be entitled to, should you need it.

      Of course companies will not notify you personally should your anonymous product turn out to be a deathtrap, so keep an eye out for product recalls.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    7. Re:Do people actually register? by Tassach · · Score: 1

      Only if you were stupid enough not to get rid of the printer!

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    8. Re:Do people actually register? by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1

      Ah, but do you use the provided Windows drivers on a PC connected to the internet? The ones we recently learned phone home? I hope you have a firewall that prevents this.

    9. Re:Do people actually register? by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Yes, they'd have to find you first.

      (And FYI 1. I dont even own a color printer - I have a trusty old monochrome HP Laserjet II - and if a copy of a dollar bill I could print on that fooled someone, I could just as easily fool them with a blank peice of paper, and 2. If I *did* have the means and will to counterfeit money, I sure as hell wouldnt be posting advice on it to slashdot. Heck, I probably wouldnt be wasting my time reading slashdot at all)

    10. Re:Do people actually register? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ever think that maybe the serial numbers of the copiers are tracked? The police can track the copier to a certain retailer, who in turn might be able to identify you. There are very few people who pay cash for a $10k machine, if you did, I would expect the retailer to remember you ...

  81. In the old Soviet Union... by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The Party finds YOU!!!

    Oh wait...

    --

    The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
  82. Too technical by Himring · · Score: 2, Funny

    A Xerox researcher says that the number-embedding chip lies 'way in the machine, right near the laser...'

    ...just past this little doohicky, but to the right of the thingamuhwhachit, but if you get as far as the whatchamacallit you've passed it....

    Darn engineers and their technical mumbo-jumbo....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  83. bad idea by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I were doing something that I wouldn't want traced back to me, I would assume that any printer would leave unique markings on the paper, on purpose or not. Bullets have rifling marks, tires have unique markings, etc. Those aren't intentional. Also, the paper might be traceable in the same way.

    You can bet there's tricks they don't advertise on the discovery channel, particularly the intelligence agencies.

    You can't be paranoid enough. :)

    --
    I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    1. Re:bad idea by darkewolf · · Score: 1

      You are quite right. A few anti-spook articles I read a while ago talked about pen-ink companies doping each batch slightly differently so they can be traced to certain end-sellers. Also older printers (whether laser, inkjet, dotmatrix, even daisy wheel) tend to age and leave artifacts on the page. Infact I remember seeing a how-they-solved-this-crime type television show that explained that the artifacts left by older printers could be easily used to identify which printer was used.

      Of course, the real solution, is to print something out, xerox it a few times at different sites, changing the contrast / brightness each time to something random. Yes the image degrades, but artefacts vanish ;) Maybe...

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
    2. Re:bad idea by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      That assumes the photocopier won't leave artifacts or watermarks.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    3. Re:bad idea by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the solution is to use a cheap $30 lexmark printer for your illegal acts, then throw it out.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    4. Re:bad idea by darkewolf · · Score: 1

      I suspect it would too, but with a bit of care and paranoia its a lot harder to track a person down to the usage of such things.

      But I guess ultimately, if you are going to do something illegal these days there is enough technology around that can 'eventually' track you down.

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
    5. Re:bad idea by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "But I guess ultimately, if you are going to do something illegal these days there is enough technology around that can 'eventually' track you down."

      I don't know about that.

      I'd dumpster dive for it. People turf those cheap printers without a second thought, and it's probably possible to restore many of them to working order with a bit of care. You can probably get paper and ink that way too.

      Assuming "they" can trace the paper, ink, and printer to the people that bought them, "they"'d still be unable to connect it to you if you don't leave clues on the dumpster or on the paper.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    6. Re:bad idea by darkewolf · · Score: 1

      True true.

      But I think the proviso comes to mind "most criminals are stupid". The amount of people that want to act criminal don't think about what of their actions may lead to their capture and the sort of folk that would think about each piece of action would most likely tend towards realising there is little likely gain for a lot of effort. Well one would hope so (of course, now and again there are criminals that get away with their actions, either due to luck, lack of too much greed or intelligence).

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
    7. Re:bad idea by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      Of course... it's the smart ones you have to worry about.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    8. Re:bad idea by ndg123 · · Score: 1

      Or return it to the shop. At least wait until the ransom comes before you waste $30.

    9. Re:bad idea by jiggity · · Score: 2, Informative

      the solution is to use a cheap $30 lexmark printer for your illegal acts, then throw it out

      You might want to go offline before Lexmark phones home.

      --
      - jiggity
    10. Re:bad idea by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

      ["You can't be paranoid enough"]

      Hey, it ain't paranoia if they really are out to get you!

      --


      This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
    11. Re:bad idea by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      The assumption should be that things are compromised. In my case, I don't care because I put my name on the stuff I print. You just shouldn't assume that things are anonymous.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
  84. Now I know that THIS is what they want to prevent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.bitoffun.com/weirds-bush200bill.htm

  85. Duplicate... by jea6 · · Score: 1
    --

    sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
  86. What about CD-R and DVD+/-R by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've heard that they burn the drive's serial number into every copy they make. Any truth to that?

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  87. 1984 is upon us by scenestar · · Score: 1

    for cryin out loud when can we finally accept that as long as we keep buying all these "bigbrother products" were gonna get tracked. im still waiting for the day my toaster will send "anominous reords" of my toasting habits untill that day i dont wanna hear another thing about all this privacy nonsense

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
  88. or donate!!! by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

    dispose of the printer in a dumpster in a different part of town when done

    Or donate it to a Good Will/Salvation Army!

    --
    Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
  89. Those rat b---IAAPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What makes you think we still have such archaic things as privacy laws anymore? "

    The fact that I'm a paralegal and you're not.

    1. Re:Those rat b---IAAPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow, I guess in paralegal school they don't have any courses on sarcasm.

    2. Re:Those rat b---IAAPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Paralegal school?" I'll thank you not to refer to Clown College in that way.

      *honk honk*

  90. Funny by hawkbug · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is hilarious for several reasons.

    1) I never register a printer with the manufacturer after I purchase it. I also don't know anybody else who did either. It's a waste of time and an invasion of privacy.

    2) Let's say a printer was never registered - and it was paid for with cash at a store like Best Buy. Good luck tracking down the buyer.

    3) Even if both the above were not true and the manfucturer knew who originally bought it, one word foils their plans: Ebay. If you buy a printer on ebay, who knows how many hands it's been through before yours. While it is still possible to track it after a sale on ebay, it just got a whole hell of a lot harder.

    1. Re:Funny by Flavius+Stilicho · · Score: 1

      You don't buy many $10,000 printers with service contracts, do you?

    2. Re:Funny by dubious9 · · Score: 1

      It's not a be-all-end-all tracking device. Say that they have enough evidence through traditional methods to obtain a search warrant. They test your printer and *bang* it's a match. They from having little evidence to having strong evidence that the illicit came from your premises.

      Hardly hilarious.

      --
      Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    3. Re:Funny by AsmordeanX · · Score: 1

      You missed the point of the idea.

      It is ment to prosecute you in the event you pass fake money. Police suspect you and have counterfeits in hand which they have extracted a serial number from. They get a warrent and check your printer if the number matches they know that that printer printed the money. At this point you can bend over and kiss your ass goodbye.

    4. Re:Funny by The-Bus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Blockquote the poster:
      "Ebay"


      I was thinking of that as well, and realized it's easier with ebay. You've got a shipping address at least. However, if you bought it at something like a farmer's market or flea market then you're safe. However, they usually won't have counterfeit-strength machinery.

      I remember reading an article a long time ago in Esquire, I believe. Basically the author owned up to counterfeiting in the mid-80s using nothing more than a regular color printer and some paper dyed in tea. He said it worked best to make copies of $20s and use them at stores where you bought a single cheap item and the clerk was usually a bored teen. For example, flower shops. He said convenience stores and such usually were wise to the whole game.

      He said his friend and him made about $1500 in fake money that summer and spent it all that way. They had a close brush near the end and gave up but said that it was pretty easy.

      Like they say, do it big, do it once, disappear. Otherwise you'll get caught.
      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    5. Re:Funny by entrigant · · Score: 1

      You seem to be ignoring the possibility that if you are suspected of commiting the crime it probably would not be a problem to get a warrent to take your printer. So now they have the printed document and your printer, and if you are guilty then you are screwed.

    6. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every write on here who has suggested that you don't need to worry if you haven't registered the machine seems to have forgotten the story, still in the news, that Lexmark printers have been phoning home.

    7. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to send in for the famous Best Buy rebates!

    8. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ebay is probably the worst thing that you could do, as they would be able to get your information from Ebay, and then take all of your computers. See if you ever get them back.

      It's not like they care if you actually printed them, just investigate everybody and take all of their computers. Sort through the evidence later. Maybe.

      Your cash solution is much better, or a yard sale, or any other anonymous transaction. Ebay is not the answer.

    9. Re:Funny by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Want to make a lot of money? Start showing up at farmer's markets with color laser printers for sale by cash for twice their retail value.

      Don't forget to advertise "cash only sale on color untraceable laser printers" ;-)

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    10. Re:Funny by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      You don't need a $10,000 to print realistic looking money for your information. A $150 apparently does just fine, not that I would know.... but many, many others in this country have gotten by just fine using the latest HP and some resume paper from Best Buy.

    11. Re:Funny by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and if you're dumb enough to actually print money in your home, and then go use it, then yes you deserve to go to jail. However, I doubt many counterfitters leave their illicit gear in their own home....

  91. Big Brother is watching you by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

    In so many ways, the government is watching you. They say it is to protect you and they really believe that. The truth is that they have limited resources and probably never will actually use these methods unless they have developed other evidence the old fashioned way first. In some ways, this is just an extenstion of forensics. But the thinking person has to wonder just where will it stop?

    I'm not about to live in fear of this stuff, I have enough other things to fear already, this will never make it far enough up my list to make me parinoid.

    Still, when companies cooperate with the federal government, I think that they should disclose this kind of thing so an individual can make an informed decision. That would be fair and proper.

    1. Re:Big Brother is watching you by Breity · · Score: 0

      Its called a EULA!! dont you read all of your eulas any more???? I believe there is a EULA repository of all nature of EULAS. i love that word. soooooo evil

      --
      Blame it on ElGeeko De Generico [generic geek]
  92. Non free and why it's important by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The point is that if people know what they're up against, they can find a workaround. Ideally, these kinds of tricks would be kept secret.

    You don't know what you are up against and I question your ideals. That's the problem with non free software and this crap is definitely non free. This trick is 20 years old, how do you know what other patterns they put in? Subtle changes in letter spacing, and other color manipulation can do the same thing. This kind of thing is very disturbing.

    This is an area where software freedom directly affects real freedom. Speech without anonymity is not free. "Big deal," you might say, "they know a printed page came from a particular printer. So what?" So, if you are using a non free operating system, your print driver might have a back door that responds to requests for information and your ISP can be forced to reveal what IP the correct response came from. Zip, zip, just like that, without any help from retailers, you can be tied to what you thought you were publishing anonymously. You think you are going to get around it with an old typewriter? You might as well be the only person in your city making woodblock prints because everyone will know you are the nutcase with antique printing equipment. The Xerox down at the corner copy shop can put it's mark on every copy you make, and it won't take much doing after that to uniquely identify you.

    The free software foundation and RMS' comparison of non free software to the old Soviet Union, where copy machines were numbered and guarded are right on target.

    You could script a program to 'split' the image so that you print unmarked bands in multiple runthroughs which eventually add up to a full image.

    I suppose you could simply shred your work, but that's what an oppressive government would want anyway. Tell on yourself, throw you work away and wait for the trip to Minilove, the place where there is no darkness.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Non free and why it's important by boodaman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good points, but it is fairly trivial to be 100% anonymous.

      Don't buy new printers, buy used. Don't buy used from eBay or similar, buy used from swap meets, garage sales, etc. Pay cash. Use a firewall. Use open source software instead of the proprietary drivers to print.

      When you install your OS, use all bogus information when filling things out like your user name, host name, etc. Don't use anything that could be traced back to you, like naming your computers after your kids or your dog or whatever. Best case, name your computers "host1" or "cpu1" or something similar.

      Don't use retail gear to do your work...buy used, just like the printer. A Pentium 300 laptop is essentially free on the open market. Do a secure wipe on the hard drive, install OpenBSD, hook up your printer and use a generic driver (no fancy fonts, etc) and you are good to go.

      Buy a 802.11 card on the open market, also with cash. Use a free WiFi hotspot to publish...never go into the place with the hotspot, sit outside (less chance of cameras, etc). Use privacy services, anonymizers, Publius servers, etc to publish your work.

      If you need to make copies, go to any college campus or big city, pick someone off the street, and pay 10 or 20 dollars for them to go in and make the copies for you.

      100% anonymity can be done without too much trouble, as long as you pay attention and stay organized. It never ceases to amaze me that they find people who write worms and other malware...in this day and age, releasing malware with 100% anonymity is trivial.

    2. Re:Non free and why it's important by amorsen · · Score: 1
      You think you are going to get around it with an old typewriter?

      No, I think I can get around it by selecting "black and white" instead of "colour" when printing or copying. Perhaps my anti-government rantings will lack a certain pizzazz, but I will just have to make up for it with more colourful writing.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    3. Re:Non free and why it's important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously doubt the "Speech without anonymity is not free" line, but let's play along... How did they have free speech before computers and printers? Have old methods of anonymity disappeared somehow? Or is free speech a recent innovation?

    4. Re:Non free and why it's important by twitter · · Score: 1
      No, I think I can get around it by selecting "black and white" instead of "colour" when printing or copying. Perhaps my anti-government rantings will lack a certain pizzazz, but I will just have to make up for it with more colourful writing.

      OK, that's funny. Despite your best attempts to obfuscate your writing, a pattern of missing black pixels or line spacing variations can make your printer easy to identify. I'm afraid the only people confused will be your readers.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    5. Re:Non free and why it's important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a joke you idiot.

    6. Re:Non free and why it's important by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Sure, my printer is easy to identify even in black-and-white mode if the evil government gets its hands on it. This has been the case ever since the typewriter. However, I am convinced that my printer doesn't encode a serial number into the pages when writing in black-and-white mode. This is hard to prove though.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  93. LOL!! by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
    Yellow and Blue(Cyan) make Green(cash)

    Zomeone iz very zmart. Too zmart. We must take you away, for your own protection, for the people. Zeee how good it izz for you here? Yezzz, you must like it.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:LOL!! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > Zomeone iz very zmart. Too zmart. We must take you away, for your own protection, for the people. Zeee
      > how good it izz for you here? Yezzz, you must like it.

      I don't care *what* you do, I'm not drinking any of that Zima crap. It's just plain nasty.

      Chris Mattern

  94. HP by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    Well, cups has a watermarking on/off option along with several other "goodies" for my 4500n

    1. Re:HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The watermarking in CUPS is not the same thing as the one mentioned in the article. The one we're talking about cannot be bypassed in software, the CUPS version is for putting human-readable text on every printed page (that's why the font/font size selections etc. are there). Different pair o' shoes.

  95. How about altering the numbers? by teeloo · · Score: 1

    If one could detect exactly how the numbers looked like, I wonder if it would be possible to make a custom printer driver to add-on/alter to the existing numbers so that they would read differently?

  96. Welcome to GWB's PATRIOT-ACT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come see in 4 years when we can return to a free country.

  97. wE kNow WHo YoU are by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 1

    anD We WiLl kilL yOuR dOg UnLESs yoU pAy thE RAnSoM, KeNJA akA Dr. DaISy WhEEl

  98. Can't believe no-one's thought of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use up all the yellow......

  99. They don't need your product registration by Dammital · · Score: 1

    ... 'cause they likely have your IP address and your printer serial anyway.

  100. mod parent up : RFID tin foil hat reference! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG LAFF!!! Can't wear a tin foil hat because it has RFID in it... LOL!

  101. Yellow paper by n2rjt · · Score: 1

    One could perhaps hide the dots by printing on the proper color of yellow paper.
    But then again, yellow money might be suspicious.
    D'oh!

    1. Re:Yellow paper by tbmaddux · · Score: 1
      But then again, yellow money might be suspicious.
      Not at all! Why, I've been doing it for years, and nobody has caug -- oh, just a minute, someone's at the door. I'll be right back to finish this post!
      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  102. This is clearly a rip-off !! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    This is clearly a rip-off...

    ...to use extra toner and force you to buy additional extra expensive yellow toner cartridges.

    It's consumer fraud, and should be proscuted as such.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  103. Please excuse me, by Corellon+Larethian · · Score: 1, Troll

    but could y'all come up with some other books than just "1984" and "A Brave New World", once in a while. Christ. I will pay you to to reference the monitors in "Ender's Game". Or the poison snoopers in "Dune". Or the Chief of Naval Operations in "Rogue Warrior". Even the alien guy in L. Ron Hubbard's sci-fi would be a step up. Just anything other than 1984. Not forever. Not forever. Just a week. Maybe a tenday. Anything is better than nothing at this point. Please visit your local Barnes and Noble's or public library. Read a Harry Potter book or something.

  104. one shot solution, usless. by twitter · · Score: 1
    One word: Kinkos. Two more words: Pay cash

    That's tree words, but who's counting anyway?

    Do you realize how difficult that would make operations for a legitimate organization, such as an unpopular political movement? You get one shot anonymous publication if the equipment you used, such as M$ Word, does not rat you out. Sure, criminals can get around this kind of monkey business, but anonymous publication will be a thing of the past if companies like Xerox, HP and M$ keep co-operating with this.

    see here for my thoughts on how this can end free speech.

    From the article:

    Crean says Xerox and the government have a good relationship. "The U.S. government had been on board all along--they would actually come out to our labs," Crean says.

    That's really creepy and leaves little room for Xerox to do any differently. Now that the story is out in the open, I can only hope that they will take a stand against this practice.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:one shot solution, usless. by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      I guess the only thing we can do is use older machines.

      It's been a while since I fired up a dot matrix printer.

      But I look forward to the smell of ditto ink next time I want to distribute unpopular speech.

  105. Anyone able to see these Yellow dots on a Xerox? by jonharrell · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anybody able to see them yet? - I printed a page on a xerox 7700 and scanned it into PShop - Checked the blue channel and it looks like a set of verticle alligned alternating columns (apx 20-30 pix apart) of dots apx 3-6 pixals each of a yellow value...

    -jh

  106. Encoded in black and white text by brunos · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember that black and white printers somehow encoded the serial number and other information that they had available to them by shifting the individual characters slightly up or down relative to the baseline, and this could be detected with a special scanner. I also heard that the system was used to prove that certain politicians only went to work once in a while and printed post-dated letters to make it look like they worked every day. They were found out and resigned. This must have been a long time ago ...

    1. Re:Encoded in black and white text by Whumpsnatz · · Score: 1

      "They were found out and resigned. This must have been a long time ago ..."

      Ain't that the truth. It seems that corruption, theft, contempt for democracy, jingoism, incompetence, etc., are not reasons for resignation any more. Only irrelevant trivia is considered reasons for being purged from the power elite, which really means that you angered the wrong person.

  107. Stollen Goods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will sell much higher in the black market and crime communities. No?

  108. You will never know. by twitter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Thinking about it, adding in a speckled yellow pattern as part of your printing algorithm would work - it would just take a little knowledge of what they print.

    That knowledge would take lots of study to learn and you could never be sure. Printers with enough sophistication to detect currency and refuse to print can pull lots of tricks on you if it detects pattern prints and other investigations. A blank page needs no identification marks at all and the printer may refuse to print any. Subtle variation in letter spacing or shape can have the same effect. Do you know exactly where each pixel in each character you print are supposed to go? Missing pixels can encode a serial number as well as those that are not supposed to be there.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:You will never know. by quinkin · · Score: 1
      What immediately sprang to mind was a small ferrite coil on the yellow laser control trace. Filter out the highest frequency signals and viola... sure you lose a bit of detail in the yellow, but it would certainly make the dot patterns harder if not impossible to decode.

      Q.

      --
      Insert Signature Here
    2. Re:You will never know. by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      What I was thinking is simply print without any yellow ink at all. I mean, if you're going to do without a color, yellow is probably the least important for printing untraceable political rants or whatever you're trying to do. (It would suck trying to print landscapes without yellow, though, as you'd lose green.)

      You'd have to rig the yellow sensor, but that would be trivial.

      If you really needed yellow, you could always go back to the days of multi-pass printing, by rigging up special setup with the yellow ink in a different ink well, and running the document through again.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    3. Re:You will never know. by lew3004 · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess it's just back to the "Live and Die in LA" era then. Damn, they always make us WORK.

      --
      I still can't get the screen shots of Castle Wolfenstein for the Apple IIe out of my head.
    4. Re:You will never know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep ... the really disturbing part of this is that apparently none of the major printer or copier manufacturers had the guts to stand up and say no. I know for a fact that a certain, much reviled on /., software magnate once said no to a certain TLA.

    5. Re:You will never know. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Filter out the highest frequency signals and viola...

      How, exactly, are you going to get a stringed instrument slightly larger than a violin out of this?

    6. Re:You will never know. by jpop32 · · Score: 1

      Filter out the highest frequency signals and viola...

      Yeah, sure. If the government and the printer manufacturers were idiots who failed to notice the last 20 years of research in steganography.

      Modern steganography systems can make their payload survive cropping out 50% of the picture, scanning it, enhancing contrast and printing it out again. In black and white. To put it another way - if you can visually recognise the picture, you can probably retrieve the payload.

  109. For Sale - Cheap by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1, Funny
    http://www.ebay.com

    FOR SALE - CHEAP

    Almost new Xerox[tm] color printer.

    Only $200,000, er, 2000 double-sided pages printed.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  110. AAGGLL Re:odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod +5 insightful.
    Mod +5 funny.
    Mod +5 really fucking creepy.

  111. And then there was no anonymous speech. by twitter · · Score: 1
    you track the printer, and then what? It's been sold over the counter somewhere to who-knows-whom.

    Then you know what city it was in. Then you take advantage of backdoors in the printer driver that Xerox, HP, etc, were nice enough to put in there for you to find out what IP that printer is sitting behind. That routine would be easy to implement. Then you ask the ISP who exactly that IP was leased to. Then you know exactly where the document was printed if not when and by who.

    This won't get criminals, it's going to make it easy to track and eradicate political opposition. It's evil.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:And then there was no anonymous speech. by dmaxwell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would be yet another argument against closed source software. If it can tattle to the cops then it can tattle to others. No such backdoor should be present, period. If the shenanigans are implemented on the printer itself then a few simple packet filter rules will damn well keep its traffic contained.

  112. This was at the end of an Oct RTFA by michaelmalak · · Score: 1
    I noticed this at the end of TFA attached to an October Slashdot story. That CNN story has scrolled off but charleston.net has a copy (bugmenot.com is a registration-sharing service):
    One document obtained by the AP, a 1998 U.S. government business solicitation, mandated that "any color printer must include a tracing system that encodes system identification in any output. This will tie the output to the originating equipment so that forensic identification of the equipment is possible in the event of illegal printing of currency images due to failure or circumvention of the recognition system(s) ..."
    I've been meaning to report this on my blog (which I've been neglecting), but now I don't have to :-)

    What really surprises me is that this didn't break into the blogosphere back in October. It didn't even make it into the Slashdot thread! But at least there's some resiliency in the system of Internet democracy -- at least the story made it out anyway in under two months.

    But it does show that we live in a soundbite/headline world. This information was hidden in plain sight on a front-page CNN story. Nobody who cares about privacy saw it (and reported it, mea culpa), or everyone who saw it didn't care about privacy.

  113. They don't use this to find you... by GeoGreg · · Score: 1

    ...they use it to convict you AFTER they find you. Of course, the interesting thing is that it would be trivial to hook up your confiscated printer and print out some incriminating evidence after the search itself. Then backdate the evidence tag, and voila. Of course, not that police ever tamper with forensic evidence.

  114. Too damn easy to bypass by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just print on yellow paper when you don't want to be traced and the whole problem goes away. Doesn't work for counterfieting currency- but should work for the odd ransom/extortion note.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Too damn easy to bypass by DaHat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bah! You still rely on a piece of potentially traceable technology... with my hate letters (give me money or else ____), I make it a point to cut my letters from various magazines with a straight razor and then glue them to the intended paper (which often too is another magazine page), all while wearing gloves.

      Of course... I would have gotten away with it all too if it wasn't for those pesky kids... and the tracking chips in the glue.

    2. Re:Too damn easy to bypass by Fortran+IV · · Score: 1

      It wasn't the glue; government statisticians have identified the bits most likely to be cut from magazines by freaks like you, and have convinced magazine publishers to embed RFID tags in the pages.

      The glue's only effect was to kill off enough of your brain cells that you fell for the trick.

      --
      I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
    3. Re:Too damn easy to bypass by JohnPerkins · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yellow paper, what? Just because you print in yellow ink on yellow paper doesn't mean it won't show up at some other wavelength. I don't think printing on yellow paper would help you at all.

    4. Re:Too damn easy to bypass by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Preprint a full yellow page?

  115. Famous last words. by theparanoidcynic · · Score: 2, Funny

    'standard mischief won't get you around it.'

    Now that every hacker on the internet knows about it that chip has a life expectancy of . . . maybe friday.

    --
    Only in a Slashdot fantasy can a Slackware install turn into several hours of sex . . . . .
  116. My zerox.. by Nomeko · · Score: 1

    My zerox freaked out about a year ago, and started printing yellow signs amidst the normal images. The image would for example be split in three, with bands of yellow (weak) print amidst the part..

    Now I know what happened..

  117. Print quality? by supersat · · Score: 1

    Anything that intentionally degrades the quality of something (be it audio or printed matter) is bad.

  118. PROM??? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Interesting
    a chip located "way in the machine, right near the laser" that embeds the dots when the document "is about 20 billionths of a second" from printing.

    What are the chances that this is in PROM that is burned internally once the serial number is assigned? If so, overwrite it with a new code, perhaps through an undocumented command to the printer controller. After all, you don't think each of these chips is uniquely made, or that they don't have to do something like this to keep them all properly matched to the corresponding external serial numbers.

    Or is it RAM, loaded by the firmware on each power-up? Then change your internal printer serial number. Those things are set during manufacture somehow.

    Or look up Xerox's patent on the process.

    Or swap your yellow, cyan, and magenta toners around, and make the corrections in Photoshop to get the desired image with the transposed colors. They'll be looking for the wrong color dots.

    Or add lots of dots of your own.

    Ever notice that this isn't the only anti-counterfeiting technology that likes to use yellow. Why is that?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:PROM??? by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      Or swap your yellow, cyan, and magenta toners around, and make the corrections in Photoshop to get the desired image with the transposed colors. They'll be looking for the wrong color dots

      Hey, now that's a good idea. I have an HP 4500n, it has four carts that appear to be identical except for the toner color.

      I may swap yellow and black around and run a few test pages through it, just for sh*ts, grins and giggles. However, I sort of doubt much will come of it, I examined some old printouts from a few days ago with a loupe and a blue LED like they suggested and saw nothing. I think my printer is about 5 years old, it's new enough to do this.

      Really though, who would care? I'm definitely a tin foil hatter but unless you are going to send nasty letters to politicians or make fake money, who cares? If you're more paranoid than I am, buy one used with cash.
      But you're best bet, don't do stuff you shouldn't do... Duh...

    2. Re:PROM??? by IO+ERROR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The yellow dots are extremely difficult to see under normal lighting conditions, even with a magnifying glass. You basically have to put the paper under a blacklight or some sort of strong blue light (LED?) to get enough contrast to see them. Essentially it's so that people can't see the tracking dots. If people COULD see them, they'd be throwing these printers at the salespeople.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    3. Re:PROM??? by Phanatic1a · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing because yellow is a primary in both additive (transparencies) and subtractive (regular printing) color schemes.

    4. Re:PROM??? by thomasdelbert · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yellow is only a primary colour in subractive schemes. In additive, yellow is the combination of red and green.

      - Thomas;

      --
      ___ This sig is in boldface to emphasize its importance!
    5. Re:PROM??? by thomasdelbert · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Swapping the yellow with another colour won't work. The whole point of using yellow is that it is very difficult to see a tiny speck of yellow printed on white paper (RTFA!). Magenta, black and cyan will stand out on a white background, even when less than 1/300th on an inch, but yellow will not. The only way you can do it is by printing on a similarly coloured paper, like using cyan ink on blue paper.

      - Thomas;

      --
      ___ This sig is in boldface to emphasize its importance!
    6. Re:PROM??? by VCAGuy · · Score: 1

      On the 4500/4500, the black cartridge will have to stay in its slot, but you can interchange the other three. The developer bias on the black cartridge is different than on the color cartridges since the black carts use ferrous toner while the color ones use a "chemically grown" toner. And, yes, I'm a laser printer tech...

      --
      Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
      A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
    7. Re:PROM??? by lahvak · · Score: 1

      Using a CMYK printer, you could put yellow ink in the black cartridge and write a driver that would print in CMY mode with black instead of yellow. Just leave the yellow cartridge completely empty.

      --
      AccountKiller
    8. Re:PROM??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty hard to print fake money (green) without yellow ink...

    9. Re:PROM??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scan a printed page that contains only one (black) character, for example a dot, at a very high resolution. In your favorite image processing software, change every occurrence of yellow to black for interesting results.

    10. Re:PROM??? by lahvak · · Score: 1

      Please read before replying. I was never suggesting to print without yellow.

      --
      AccountKiller
  119. I love Big Brother. by twitter · · Score: 1
    It's fine until they link the printer serial number to a actual person...

    That's what the printer driver is for. It's probably part of the shrink wrap EULA they think you opened to use your printer. They might as well stamp the outside, "Use of this printer voids your right to anonymous speech. By opening this box, you consent to anything you print being uniquely traced to you, you dirty little, counterfitting, pirating, pinko scumbag. Big brother IS watching YOU."

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  120. "Mischief," he says... by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "standard mischief won't get you around it."

    It's nice to know that tinkering with a machine I bought and paid for is now referred to as "mischief." I didn't realize they started "licensing" hardware the way some people do software.

    1. Re:"Mischief," he says... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize they started "licensing" hardware...

      I kinda think one's car might be licensed, and messing with the smog devices is illegal in some places. Elevators are licensed, I think. Who knows? Someday you may have to show ID to buy computers and peripherals. They become quite deadly if thrown with sufficient force.

      --
      What?
  121. Don't forget that feedback path back to the vendor by Dark+Coder · · Score: 2, Informative

    When you install the driver, significant information is sent back to the printer vendor's website.

    What kind of information do you think is sent back to them?

    Unless you can print this using Linux CUPS driver at 4800x4800 (which I've yet to see one).

  122. Fool proof cash generator. by wjsteele · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok... how's this look?

    1). Make your money in your favorite photo editing software.

    2.) Take it to CompUSA/MicroCenter/Frys on a USB Thumb Drive.

    3.) Pop the thumb drive into one of those new printers with the ability to print from there.

    4.) Print Cash in one of their demo printers.

    5.) Use Cash to buy printer.

    6.) Return Printer.

    7.) Get Real Cash.

    8.) Profit.

    Seems complex, but... I have to run... I'm off to CompUSA.

    Bill

    --
    It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    1. Re:Fool proof cash generator. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't you have to get that down to 3 steps??

    2. Re:Fool proof cash generator. by cpghost · · Score: 1

      4.) Print Cash in one of their demo printers.

      4a.) Hack into their video system, and remove every evidence that you used the demo printer.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  123. Thank god for dumpster diving by yorkpaddy · · Score: 1

    I'm glad i'm a dumpster diver.

    --
    "brxref .k.p ,.by xprt. gbe.p.oycmaycbi yd. cby.nci.bj. ru yd. am.pcjab lgxlcj" don'
  124. FUD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There you go, /., speading FUD again. You think we're a bunch of laser-printing kiddies? All of us EXPERIENCED arch-criminals have our own printing plants, deep in our Impenetrable Mountain Fastnesses. Sheesh!

  125. You must think people who work in encryption... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    ...are really dumb. There are plenty of ways to store messages in such a way that if its cut up into little itty bitty pieces that are rearranged and half lost to the wind it is still readable. Hell, spread spectrum radio transmissions more or less do this already.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  126. Hash code anyone? by yorkpaddy · · Score: 1

    I would imagine that it isn't a simple pattern that is printed over the document. Its probably a hash of the document, based on the document content and the serial number. That would be harder to figure out. Even if it was a simple hash, and the algorithm was computationally easy to figure out, you would still have to print off multiple pages (your known variable) and then scan those documents. You might also have to try printing the same documents in multiple printers of the same model. Next, you could have the problem of the "Latest drivers" changing the hash algorithm and your back to square one. I wonder if digital cameras and scanners will start imprinting watermarks on pictures (they probably already do).

    --
    "brxref .k.p ,.by xprt. gbe.p.oycmaycbi yd. cby.nci.bj. ru yd. am.pcjab lgxlcj" don'
  127. IP protection by yorkpaddy · · Score: 1

    This would probably be a feature most companies would want. That way if someone copies secret, proprietery IP, they could more easily track it. A company with the proper security system could require users to only print using their login, which could also be watermarked onto anything printed. This is all for naught if the employee takes the document home and copies it.

    --
    "brxref .k.p ,.by xprt. gbe.p.oycmaycbi yd. cby.nci.bj. ru yd. am.pcjab lgxlcj" don'
  128. what? by AC-x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Crean describes the device as a chip located "way in the machine, right near the laser" that embeds the dots when the document "is about 20 billionths of a second" from printing.

    what is this gibberish? Why can't the say it's on a chip built into the printer rather then spouting off about the time it takes the electrons to go from the printers CPU to the laser driver.

  129. cumulative effect is overwhelming. by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    100% anonymity can be done without too much trouble, as long as you pay attention and stay organized. It never ceases to amaze me that they find people who write worms and other malware...in this day and age, releasing malware with 100% anonymity is trivial.

    The aggravating part is that an upright citizen should not have to go to such great lengths. It seems that 20 years ago, Uncle Sam decided that there should be no more anonymous publications or did not take steps to prevent that from happening.

    Free software helps, but electronic publication is just about impossible and everything you do will have to be checked with a hexeditor. How can anyone effectively communicate without the benefit of digital cameras, for instance? Every little gadget with a serial number is a potential give away. OpenBSD might be good for this, but most free software is built with openness in mind. I used to think OpenBSD was paranoid, now I'm thinking they were right all along.

    You might find some comfort in the fact that your software is not ratting you out, but you have still lost a considerable fraction of your privacy and ability to publish anonymously. When you buy that printer at the swap meet, you can be sure the previous owner was not as careful as you. It will still be linked to a particular city, and further "terrorist" investigation will lead the domestic spys to the swap meet. That's way more information than a government agency would have for an analog printing press. You won't be able to use that printer for anything but your anonymous printing and you will have to keep that on the QT. Analog printing, of course, will stand out like a sore thumb.

    I don't even want to think about how bad things will get with widespread RFID tag use.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  130. Common knowledge for those who work on them by p51d007 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anyone in the business of repairing any full color laser printer, photo copier etc, is usually told of this in certification class. At least it is when I go to school on these. On our full color copiers & printers, they specifically tell us that if you attempt to make a color copy of any "money" it will lock up, requiring a phone call to unlock it, and a visit from someone in a black suit and dark glasses LOL. We make a blank copy, and get out a high power loop, and you can see the faint yellow microdots that contain the information. A few years ago, some idiot bought a full color copier, and started on one end of the country, driving to the other end passing off phony money. When the treasury agents got the copies, they looked up the serial number and traced it back to the dealer who was more than happy to supply the information, and they got the guys vehicle info (he wasn't smart enough to fudge his name, etc when he bought it) and they caught up with him, with the machine in his van, and loads of fake bills. Personally, I don't care if they put serial numbers on this, you can't see them anyway, plus, if you are STUPID enough to forge documents, you deserve what you get!

    1. Re:Common knowledge for those who work on them by CharlesF · · Score: 1

      If these printers lockup whenever anyone tries to print money, what's to stop someone from inserting a dollar bill into a school/library copier, hitting start, and then walking away? Other than the fear of getting caught, that is.

      --
      Do not read this sig!
  131. Pay Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Pay Cash and don't register the printer if you are that concerned about this.

    1. Re:Pay Cash by Mongo222 · · Score: 1

      Or install the driver either, since that will log your IP , and serial number, and send it too the vendor.

  132. it can't be done by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying it would be completely IMPOSSIBLE, but, at least on our machines, any attempt to defeat the "black box" renders the machine unusable. We have two types of color copiers. photo type, and business type. The photo types are 8 and 16 bit color, the business types are 2 bit color (good enough for spreadsheets, line art etc.... The full "photo" color machines will LOCK OUT if you copy money etc..., the business types will print blank prints. There was one story where a church copied something that used a close color of money green on the original and it locked up, requiring the manufacturer to show up to unlock it. We don't have the code, only a few do.

  133. I don't think that will work. by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Filter out the highest frequency signals and viola..

    You have to do that with every color and it will probably make it impossible to print. If they designed the print so every pixel is a single bang, there are no lower frequency signals.

    Worse, this would have no effect on something subtle like line or character spacing, which could encode a serial number the same way a bar code does. Proper equipment can be set up to detect line spacing serial numbers despite scale and rotation distortion.

    If you don't know what the signal is, your noise might not be helping you.

    What you know is that the US government and every major printing company have conspired to make it impossible to print a document that can not be tied back to the printer. That's creepy and it lends weight to stories that once you might have dismissed as paranoid delusions.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:I don't think that will work. by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Worse, this would have no effect on something subtle like line or character spacing, which could encode a serial number the same way a bar code does. Proper equipment can be set up to detect line spacing serial numbers despite scale and rotation distortion.

      They are possibly using a varient on DataGlyphs, it uses a small line which is orientated in one of 4 directions \ / | - to express a piece of information. Xerox use DataGlyphs to intelligently route scanned documents in a number of their workflow solutions.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  134. There is a question remaining... by laughingcoyote · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have seen several arguments here that this is a perfectly harmless technology, and some of those arguments have been logical and valid. However, it still begs one question: If it is such a useful, valuable technology, why are the manufacturers not informing the customers of this "feature" in their instruction manuals or on their packaging? I checked the websites of Canon, HP, and Xerox, including the specifications of several laser printers. In none of the feature or specification listings is it said "Prints unique serial number to easily identify printer of every document!"

    If this technology is so useful, wonderful, and defensible, please feel free to inform those who pay money for your products. They might have a different view to give you. There are legitimate reasons to remain anonymous. (Even if that's just that you want to.) A desire for anonymity doesn't mean that you're doing something illegal, and that mindset is extremely dangerous, getting into the "Well if you don't want cameras in your living room, what do you have to hide?" territory.

    --
    To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
    1. Re:There is a question remaining... by BobaFett · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it is such a useful, valuable technology, why are the manufacturers not informing the customers of this "feature" in their instruction manuals or on their packaging?

      I'm sure there are other reasons as well, but how about this one: this way, law-enforcement can quickly weed out stupid counterfeiters and forgers, the "script-kiddies" of fake money. They get arrested and convicted before they get a chance to graduate to more advanced fakes. If the box had a warning, the bar of stupidity would be raised somewhat, instead of just stupid they'd be catching only the extra stupid ones :)

    2. Re:There is a question remaining... by slamden · · Score: 1

      Even more importantly, and sofar unaddressed... what, exactly, are the specs? Does anyone have a link on exactly how to translate dot-patterns to serial numbers, or do we need to start getting some data together to figure this out ourselves? Couldn't this same technology be used to discover collusion/fraud in government/corporate environments? Can the pattern be easily detected in a scanned document, so that massive data maining could be performed? Which exact companies and models are affected? Anyone have links to actual documents and proof?

    3. Re:There is a question remaining... by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 1
      If this stealth tracking technology is troubling people in the more-or-less democratic countries, it can be used to really devastating effects in countries where authoritarian regimes oppress their own people, or their invaded neighbors. Especially if the people are totally unaware that their printed media may, for practical purposes, be as good as RFID-tagged. Picture some Chinese peasant, whose lands have been stolen by corrupt official, writing an "anonymous" complaint to the corrupt police and the next thing he knows he's being introduced to another imported gadget: an electric cattle-prod. Any Tibetan found with a printed picture of their exiled spiritual leader may now also lead the Chinese military police to the place where the image was printed, causing others to be cattle-prodded as well.

      Is the US and their allies in the "war of terror" providing this kind of written-expression-tracking technology to countries where human rights are routinely and systematically violated? Or are all the worst human rights violators now part of America's inner circle of best buddies and therefore free to oppress and invade anyone they wish, as long as they refrain from criticizing or opposing the "pre-emptive" neo-con wars?

      And why aren't there any companies offering alternative products that do not intrude customers' privacy and using that as a sales argument? If there were four different models on a store shelf and one had a sign saying "Unlike most or all printer models by Hewlett-Packard, Xerox, Canon etc., our products will not print any stealthy tracking code on our customers' printed material", people might well give some business to that privacy-friendly brand. Most of us will never print anything even remotely sensitive, but do sympathize with the right and freedom of expressing oneself without government tagging (potentially leading to gagging, implicitly or explicitly).

      --

      Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

    4. Re:There is a question remaining... by TCaM · · Score: 1

      If the pattern were to be decoded, couldnt you then insert "noise" using the same color and a random layout in order to obscure the coded serial number? I would think that would be an interesting experiment to start with.

  135. Great... by Trikenstein · · Score: 1
    Now my paper moons are numbered.

    Get your Limited Edition, First Edition, Limited Run, Scans of my butt here!

    For an additional fee I'll attache someone elses name...

  136. very dangerous for all of us by Britz · · Score: 1

    Like we all have those color laser printers at home for personal stuff. It's not like they are freakin' expensive.

    1. Re:very dangerous for all of us by jonfelder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends on your definition of freakin' expensive.

      A froogle search for color laser printer pulls up hits under $500. That's roughly a two days wages for me, certainly not freakin' expensive by my definition.

      I imagine most people could afford one if they really wanted it. A few months of saving up (hell if you're a smoker, quitting would get you the cash pretty quick), or a simple credit card purchase with making the minimum payments would easily do it for most I think.

    2. Re:very dangerous for all of us by a24061 · · Score: 1

      But the prices are going down and they will eventually become reasonable things to have at home. And then traceability will be built in, so governments and corporations will be able to identify the source of anonymous printouts.

  137. Sorry. by Duhavid · · Score: 1

    You were not informed, but each letter in every newspaper is tagged such that they know where the paper was printed and when.

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
  138. Then it's a good thing... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    Well I'm glad I get my printers out of someone else's trash and take parts from two or three to make units that work! That should slow anyone down just a bit...

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  139. Bad headline by El · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not "tracking everything I print". It's tracking everything printed on my printer that winds up in the hands of law enforcement. It isn't tracking everything I burned or shredded. As a non-criminal, why should I have a problem with paper documents I am distributing being traced back to me? Allowing people to anonymously print documents like Thomas Paine's Common Sense would just get people all riled up and start revolutions anyway...

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  140. In the Old USA by Wildkat · · Score: 1

    I was stationed in Germany in the 80s and we had the same thing on our photocopies for two reasons:

    Prevent copiers being used/abused for personal reasons or jobs that should go to the print plant.

    Track copies of classified documents (who to blame when they were found in the trash or in the hands of the Russians)

    My copier was SP30! It was actually a sticker on the "back side" of the glass.

    We had a limit of 10K copies per month on the machine (Xerox 10??) and one of the first "hacks" I ever achieved was figureing out how to reset the counter so my boss wouldn't get into trouble for making more than the allotment. In return he managed to find indoor duties for me when the snow was the worst. We got around the mark for party flyers by putting solid black graphic right were the SP30 was. Ahh the memories!

  141. OK, so where's a program to read the code? by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Where are programs that read these serial numbers? This could be helpful in many ways, such as tracing phony mail-in campaigns aimed at influencing legislation.

    And is there a page on the web with the "uncopyable" pattern of little circles that identifies European money and prevents printing? That would make a useful background image for web sites.

  142. Ask this guy about Kinko's by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
    Kinkos has employees. Employees have eyes. The FBI can and does go around with pictures.

    Clayton Lee Waagner probably wishes he'd used somewhere else besides Kinkos.

  143. Canon Color machines. by TalkingToes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Print a Windows Test Page with the color logo in the corner. Use a 10x jewelers scope and a bright flashlight (LED works. Where there is NO print, focus on the paper fibers. You can see the many very tiny yellow dots. 1/600 dpi is really tiny.

    Also, the 'chip' recognises USA and foreign currency, and will discolor any duplication slightly off (ie. greens will be dark or too light). Btw, SS contacts Canon who said to who they shipped the machine. Dealer had better know who they shipped it too.

    Read: http://www.sgrm.com/art20.htm

    --
    5'16" is easy math, so why do so many miss it?
  144. Ha ha ha ha by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    That's the funniest thing I've seen here in weeks. Don't forget your Lexmark Tenet.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  145. Re:They never learn. . .to read the article. by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

    "The millimeter-sized dots appear about every inch on a page, nestled within the printed words and margins."
    "The dots' minuscule size, covering less than one-thousandth of the page"

    You just have to be paranoid enough.
    Assume the paper and printer can be tracked.
    Assume any purchases of this equipment whether cash or not is being tracked.
    Assume that store cameras are being used to monitor the purchases.
    Assume traffic cameras and satellites are being used to track the purchaser and everyone that contacts them.

    Keep up with this train of thought.
    If you do get caught, hope they're corrupt and you can buy them off.

  146. The revolution with not be color-printed by dgmckay · · Score: 3, Funny

    Technology like this is what forces American criminal organizations to outsource their counterfeting and ransom operations overseas. You're putting American criminals out of work!

  147. Was I seeing these yellow dots, or others? by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Speaking of Kinko's, I worked there for about a year and a half. A lot of the time I'd see yellow dots on color-laser customer originals that was being scanned for enlargement to poster size. I'd always remove them during cleanup, because it was easy if you knew Photoshop. They were really obvious when you blew the image up 450% on the screen to get rid of dust (a dust speck on an 8.5 x 11 will look like a big drop of ink at 36 x 48).

    Up till now I've always assumed the dots I saw (usually in empty areas, and always in a regular, widely-spaced square grid pattern) were the scanner picking up the paper tone as a very light yellow and trying to dither to match. But was I actually seeing these anti-counterfeiting dots? And if so, was I committing a felony by removing them? :)

    I never noticed our Tektronix color lasers (780/7700) putting them on its output, nor the Xerox DocuColor four-color xerographic copiers (DC12/DC2045/DC6060), although the only ones I really gave the eagle-eye inspection to a lot were the DC output since the Teks were in the customer area and we usually only heard about those when they were out of toner or paper. You could see them on the customer originals if you really looked and turned the paper so the light shone off the toner, but you wouldn't notice them if you weren't looking for them.

    And if any of you out there in Kinko-land have a grid chart in your store that gives you enlargement and reduction proportions so you don't have to play with the damned wheel, yeah, I made up that chart.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
    1. Re:Was I seeing these yellow dots, or others? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      And if any of you out there in Kinko-land have a grid chart in your store that gives you enlargement and reduction proportions so you don't have to play with the damned wheel, yeah, I made up that chart.

      Wonderful claim to fame you've got there. hahahah.

    2. Re:Was I seeing these yellow dots, or others? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wonderful claim to fame you've got there.

      Better than a first post.

    3. Re:Was I seeing these yellow dots, or others? by aminorex · · Score: 0

      ...was I committing a felony...

      Probably. And if you commit a crime (or are deemed by the president to have committed a crime), you can be designated a terrorist, and have your citizenship stripped. Then you can be shipped to Syria (for torture) or Egypt (for disappearance). Ain't it great to be an American, where at least you know you're free?

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    4. Re:Was I seeing these yellow dots, or others? by Llanfairpwllgwyngyll · · Score: 1

      Maybe you were seeing Eurions?

      http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/eurion.pdf

      The Europeans got their act together over prevention of photocopying cash a LONG time ago. All European notes (including the ones phased out when the Euro came in) contain Eurions ;-)

    5. Re:Was I seeing these yellow dots, or others? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a sign of the times that I made a nearly identical post a year and a half ago and was modded down + flamed.

  148. IN SOVIET ROMANIA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Photo copiers trace YOU.

  149. Discovering the Number by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to work at a check printing company. My gut feeling is that this smacks of a manipulative urban legend rather than a real technology.

    Yes, I'm sure that it is feasible with today's technology, but the expense of doing this on all color printers in the low profit margin color printer market makes me dubious. It will take a law to get all the suppliers to comply and create an "even-playing field" of expense for everyone. The patriotism Xerox demostrates may be commendable that their products are more trackable but it isn't profitable.

    Looking at the problems with the coordination of the ISBN book publishing numbers or the social security numbers makes coordiantion of a secret serial number system that's shared between international suppliers even more absurd. "Oops, we accidentally re-used the secret id numbers for the Xerox printers with these knock-off Zerox printers for Tiger Direct."

    Finding the serial number is a good first step. Refill an empty toner cartridge with black toner. This will not tell you the serial number (you'll have to do comparisons between printers of the same model to get that), but the presence of the serial number should be easier to find. If it's not there with the black toner then it's either a more subtle technology (modulating the laser itself?) or it's not going to be found.

    The great thing about color laser is its comparative cheapness. Dye Sublimation printers were what the check people would use for very impressive mock-ups, but the dye refills were very, very expensive compared to the laser printer refills. Still, when someone in the art department wanted to make a fake United Federation of Planets Passport, they'd go for the dye sub printer when the boss wasn't looking.

    1. Re:Discovering the Number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work for Xerox, and hell, they couldnt even track how many printers their salesmen had sold! Why do you think their shares collapsed?

  150. Re: Gold-backed currency by flimflam · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Note, the USD isnt real, its been fake since 1913 when federal reserve was setup privately, its just paper only worth the trust of the govt in getting income taxes to pay for it.

    Um, I hate to tell you this, but while the US$ may not be "real" in the sense that it directly represents an actual commodity, there is no less trust involved in a gold-backed currency. First of all, how do you actually verify that the apparently gold-backed dollars in your wallet are actually backed by gold? You'd have to turn them in and trust that you'd actually get some amount of gold in exchange. And how do you know that the gold you own is actually worth something? While gold is actually useful, it certainly doesn't have enough intrinsic value to justify its market price. It's value is primarily derived from the speculation of others like you who trust that it will have some enduring value and is therefor a safe investment.

    An interesting story: a friend and co-worker of mine is from Bosnia, and lived with his family in Sarajevo during the war. His mother had saved her gold and jewels believing that they would help them during (or after) the siege. Before the end, however, she ended up trading most of them (they'd be worth a couple thousand dollars, now) for a dozen eggs. It just goes to show the extent to which the relative value of anything can change based on the current situation.

    --
    -- It only takes 20 minutes for a liberal to become a conservative thanks to our new outpatient surgical procedure!
  151. Email headers too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recall reading (although I can't find a single link right now after about 15 minutes of googling) that OS X's email headers include the unique serial number of the computer that sent it. A quick examination of my "message-id" header does show that the last part is consistant across all the emails, but how to link that to my machine, I'm not sure..

    Anyone with more info on this?

  152. Print the same blank sheet thru lost of printers? by Tangential · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if running the same sheet of paper, printed as a blank page, thru 10-20 printers if it would garble this registration info to the point of uselessness?

    --
    Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But then I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain
  153. HS soda hacks by r00t · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's two:

    1. Just grab a drink. This works on some machines,
    with some choices of drink, if you have long and
    skinny arms.

    2. Put two pieces of 2-inch clear packing tape
    together, so that the sticky side is in. On one
    edge, include 1/8 inch of a bill. So about 98% of
    the bill is not taped. Give yourself about two
    feet of tape hanging off the bill. Soon after the
    bill goes in, yank it out.

    Note: only do this if you have permission from
    the machine's owner. :-)

  154. Can't use yellow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pssht. You know they'll just start printing up quarters.

  155. I removed it from my printer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I was browsing porn with IE and I recieved a Windows dialog warning that stated:
    "Your printer may be secretly printing a hidden serial number. Click here to remove it." So I did. I am safe now. Lucky thing my IP address was not being transmitted.

  156. Break into kinkos? by goneutt · · Score: 1

    When? They're all 24 hour in this area.

    Better bet is to ransack a professionals office and use their printer. Lawyer, architect, or graphic designer. They're less likely to have police roll by, often located in office buildings with thier own security flaws, and that graphic designer is probably already on a FBI/Secret service short list for having skills and printers.

    Your basic modus isn't bad, but your choice of target is poor. Case the joint, figure out what drivers you'll need on your laptop and bring the right cables. Also, don't kill anybody. Assualt gets WAY less attention than murder.

    --
    Bacardi + slashdot = negative karma.
  157. Countermeasures?-1 if by laser? 2 if by dot matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pfft! Get yourself one of those old printing machines schools use to use with the blue ink, and the intoxicating smell. Then you can play Ben Franklin to your hearts content. You revolutionist you.

  158. Low-tech solution by JediTrainer · · Score: 1

    I have an idea that *might* work. At least make it a little more difficult, though it wouldn't get rid of the problem entirely. Well, ok, a COUPLE of ideas:

    1 - put the toners into the printer in a different order. Put yellow in the blue slot, the red in the yellow slot and the blue in the yellow slot. Now your serial number will be in a different colour - could that mess things up?

    2 - buy two printers. Print the same image twice - one with red and yellow, the second with blue and yellow. Some adjustments might be needed to account for the fact that yellow is being printed twice.

    3 - buy used printers off eBay. Use a PO box to receive printer.

    4 - use an old printer. My crappy DeskJet 500 probably doesn't have this 'feature'

    5 - make your *own* printer with Lego MindStorms!

    6 - print in B&W only

    Yeah, I'm a little drunk so my ideas are probably not the best, but at least a few of these sound decent.

    --

    You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
  159. OT: True Kinko's story by Will_Malverson · · Score: 1
    "Hello Kinko's Employee. I'd like you to print 500 copies of this here One-hundred dollar bill. You can just keep one of them to cover the cost."

    They might do it. Shortly after the original GTA1 came out for the PC, I had made copies for friends. They were having trouble because they didn't have the maps. We agreed that we'd go down to Kinko's and get some nice 11x17 color copies made -- it'd cost them a couple of bucks, but cheaper than the game.

    Turns out the maps were printed on 12x16 (A3?) or something weird like that. When I tried to use the self-serve copier, it was broken, so the helpful Kinko's guy offered to do it for me. When he questioned the propriety of copying these maps, I said it was OK because the game was designed to play multiplayer with only one copy (true!), and that's what we were planning to do. He had my friend sign the "I'm making a copy of copyrighted material" disclaimer and took the maps.

    He came back a minute later and said that because they were 12x16 instead of 11x17, he wouldn't be able to make a complete copy of them. I said it was OK, that if he had to chop a bit off the edge, that would be fine. He walked back to make the copies.

    I wasn't really paying attention to what he was doing, so it wasn't until it was already done that I realized that he had walked over to the paper cutter and literally chopped off a half inch on each side (of the original!) of the maps to make them fit into the copier.
  160. Have you ever? by das_katz_socrates · · Score: 0

    What your describing would be right for screen printing, but comercial printing todays is now done for the most part is done on cmyk presses.

    --
    This sig has no nutritional value...
    1. Re:Have you ever? by Enahs · · Score: 1

      Yes, but spot color doesn't use CMYK, and it's a simple matter of economics. Black + mixed green = setup and running of two presses. CMYK = setup and running of four presses. Setup and running costs money, pure and simple.

      You might think that spot color is dead, but you'd be wrong.

      --
      Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
  161. They never learn. . .Neither do we. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *sigh*

    "But if you're printing $100 bills. . . ."

    You people are something else.

    A professional (that excludes slashdot) aren't using laser printers. Or inkjets, or any of that stuff.

    Only two groups are going to be affected.

    Amateur counterfiters who should be caught (and if you can't imaging why, then you know didly squat about economics).

    And political propoganda being put out (the only defensable argument present, and just how many slashdotters fit that description?).

    Anyway the last group already know how to disguise their activities (read your history. we've been doing this kind of stuff since the country was formed). Just because you all suck at it, doesn't mean the rest of us do.

    1. Re:They never learn. . .Neither do we. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And political propoganda being put out (the only defensable argument present, and just how many slashdotters fit that description?).

      In 80's I had a small role in a group distributing an underground newspaper in an east European country. Basically my job was to get packages with the stuff from somebody, and keep them at home until somebody else came to pick them up. Anyway, the stuff was printed on bw laser printers and copied using cheap copy machines. If the government had a way to trace these to particular people, the whole operation would get busted very quickly. The way it was, the only thing they could do was search houses of people who they suspected, and when they found a printer, compare marks. Since the stuff was printed in other locations, by low profile people that did not have any obvious connection to the group, that strategy didn't work.

  162. Can anyone see the dots? by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Surely someone here has a recent vintage color laser printer and a magnifying glass. Can you actually see the dots? Are there a lot on the page, any discernible pattern?

  163. Driver is spyware as well... by sadomikeyism · · Score: 2, Informative
    HP's installation software for the 4 in 1 laserjet 3015 demands you shut down your fire wall and anti-virus software to install the driver. Can anyone say "SPYWARE!"???
    When I took HP's indian tech support weenie to task for this, he tried to insist that there was no spyware (acting all nervous and flustered that I'd make such an insinuation).
    I said, "Dude, I can see the packets flowing out my ethernet port as the driver is installing, don't try to lie to me."
    He replies (in that oh so Indian way of speaking), "Fine, go ahead, jou won't be able to use dee scanner, but jou ken install just dee driver files." (huffing in exasperation)....

    And you thought Dale Gribble was paranoid, I'll show you paranoid....

    --
    "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    1. Re:Driver is spyware as well... by mhollis · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight:

      HP printer drivers require that you be hooked up to the Internet.

      Since when was that a requirement for printing?

      --
      Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
  164. In the old Soviet Union-History Class. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It seems they were ahead of the US by 30+ years. Another sign of a dying empire."

    Uh huh. I'm siting here in ye old, "dying empire" typing this post on a computer produced by a successfull capitalistic system. The communications going out over a network that was ment to connect educational institutions together, and is now supposedly the tool for the "Geek Revolution" and the "New Paradigm" that will set the music, movie, and gaming industry on their ears.

    Canaries in a coal mine are more useful than you guys with your "I passed history with a C-" alarmist tripe. Get back with me when you actually have something that's more accurate than the Psychic Friends could deliver.

  165. DMCA violation? by Lihtan · · Score: 1

    Did you ever consider that the use of a 12" x 16" paper may have been to deter reproduction of the maps?

    --
    Divide by zero hurts my brain.
    1. Re:DMCA violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12" x 16" sounds roughly (not exactly) like A3 size, an ISO standard paper size used in the UK, where Rockstar North are based.

  166. Off Topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, the gun barrel eats YOU!

  167. about 20 billionth's of a second..... by commo1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    OK, let me get this straight..... 20 billionths of a second..... In order to fit 4 bits (assuming 4 bit words as laser commands, best-case scenario, and assuming serial) in as the laser is firing..... you would need 160GHz bandwidth, plus the overhead of the actual "data" to get through. I don't think ribbon cable is quite capable of this inside a printer.

    Combined with the "millimeter sized" dots, I think we have an extreme exaggeration of the facts.... I don't think we can trust the "about every inch" on the page either. More investigation is required.

    1. Re:about 20 billionth's of a second..... by multimed · · Score: 1

      Here's more investigation...I couldn't help but have to check this out. We actually have 2 color lasers--a Tektronix Phaser 780 and a Xerox/Tektronix Phaser 790. The 780 came out before Xerox bought out Tektronix. The 780 does not have this device while the 790 does. The dots are in patterns and at least on ours, about every inch would be fairly accurate. Vertically, the dots are nealy continuous--and spaced so there's about 15-20 per inch. Horizontally, they're a little more spread out--maybe every inch and a half to two inches. Oh and rough estimate, I'd say that the dots are between 1/10 and 1/20 a milimeter. But I have to stop now--the combination of squiting through a loop and the brightness of the blue tinted LED have given me a headache.

      --
      Vote Quimby.
  168. Dye Sublimation printers by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    Dye sub printers also require that you use specialty papers - ones that will sublimate the dye into the coated surface.

    Colour laser will print onto 'plain' paper.

    While you may get more acurate colour on a due sub initially, the dyes are not colourfast and will fade - sometimes quite quickly. Colour laser pigments will hold their colour for much longer. Dye sub printers were traditionally used to emulate a chemical proof before getting plates made for offset printing. While more expensive than a laser printer print they are a fraction of the cost and turnaround time for getting a chem proof.

    If I was mocking up a neat United Federation of Planets PAssport, I would use a GOOD quality colour laser engine with the correct colour profile loaded in my DTP software on quality paper. You'd get a much better artifact that way, and it will last longer.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  169. Re: Gold-backed currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My friend, gold has no value? I have a cap, and a bunch of electronics and audio equipment that says otherwise. But that is besides the point. With no hard currency (read: international) backing our dollars, if the Euro catches on real big around the globe (or any other form of currency) and our dollars shrink to say, the comparison of a peso to a dollar, we ain't got jack. At least when our government was backing it with gold, we could just go down to the local bank/reserve and get some currency that would have value no matter where we went.

  170. One upmanship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Print on yellow paper.

  171. for a workaround, at $5000, reply to this ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (eom)

  172. Another method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.) Work

    2.) Get paid.

    Easy!

  173. ah, but you won't know. by twitter · · Score: 1
    If the shenanigans are implemented on the printer itself then a few simple packet filter rules will damn well keep its traffic contained.

    You won't know till data is sent requested, and even then only the sharpest of network traffic watchers will catch such a thing.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:ah, but you won't know. by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

      The thing will have an IP address, a MAC, and a physical port that it has been plugged into. For sure, the last cannot be spoofed and the firewall can be instructed to disallow ANY traffic from that port to the outside.

  174. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ask and ye shall recieve ;-)

    1. Re:mod parent up by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 1

      It would be terrible if our president was some kind of a religious zealot who imposed his stone-age views on everyone, attacked other countries because he disagreed with their governmental style, took away our freedoms and civil rights, arrested people without charges or legal representation, tortured prisoners, all with God's blessing because the ends justify the means....Whew! I sure am glad we never have to worry about that happening in the US!

      --
      There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
  175. Crossing the line by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    I'm more or less okay with it if they simply embed the printed material so it can be traced to a specific printer.

    But if they involve any more information than it came from such and such printer, that's crossing the line. Crossing the line would be embedding any personal information, computer information, etc.

    1. Re:Crossing the line by a24061 · · Score: 1

      Tracing a printout to a specific printer is in many circumstances almost the same as tracing it to an individual.

  176. Workaround??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about this? Take a regular printout. Then make a color photocopy of that sheet. That should take care of any serial codes that are hidden in the printout. Of course, you better cross your fingers and hope that your photocopier does not attach a serial number of it's own. Vivek

  177. or... by Fuzzums · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... or that it just might give the FBI 10-20 times more clues on where to find the used printers.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  178. Good thing I bought a Lexmark! by GPez · · Score: 1

    Who is laughing now? :)

  179. Re:Can you say "Patriot Act"? by symbolic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've heard numerous times that the Christian right was a leading force in getting this legislation passed- on Christian TV no less- almost like they're proud of it.

  180. yeah, so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the news in this. 20 year old idea, implemented for a long time now. Big whoop, and cars have steal belts in there tires. If you want to get around this just use a bubble jet printer. You can make more realistic copies that way anyway. Most laser printers are not good at reproducing things like money or pictures.

  181. News at 11 by protovirus · · Score: 1

    Today, color laser printer thefts have increased a thousandfold over previous levels...

  182. Anyone have a picture of this? by qualico · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see a picture of this.
    Does anyone have a link?

    Could it be possible to write a software filter that also prints yellow dots scrambling the dots that exist?

  183. Re:Countermeasures?--open source mischief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously since ordinary mischief wont work, we will need to use open source mischief....

  184. Man, making you my friend... ;-) by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    No, really, it did not sound messed up at all. And thanks for providing an insightful point of view which I happen to agree with... ;-)

    Paul B.

  185. Re:MFP Violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about My Fucking Property violation.

    I really don't care what the company thinks, and at no point will I stop to think of them before performing a given action.

    Companies are not people.

  186. Collect calling by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1

    My friends and I used to have people (from a long distance area) call a pay phone collect at a certain time. We would answer, accept the charges and talk for free.

  187. Toner/ink different enough from paper.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Except a close forensic study can tell the difference between the toner/ink and the paper.
    The chemicals give off visual cues that are different than the material that the paper is made
    of, not to mention changing the *texture* in that spot.

  188. Re:I will never use Kinko's again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinko's works with the man. Good to know. I will never go to Kinko's again. Fucking facists.

  189. Re: Gold-backed currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is, when we had a hard currency, other nations could come and trade in their favorable trade surplus for gleaming hunks of heavy metal.

    Once people started getting moving to fiat money, it really was a race to move everyone to fiat money... the slow lost their real assets.

  190. Buying a printer with cash? by Lihtan · · Score: 1

    Prepare to don your tinfoil hats people: Even cash now has serial numbers on them! There is no escape!

    --
    Divide by zero hurts my brain.
  191. Re: Gold-backed currency by sloth+jr · · Score: 1
    Um, I hate to tell you this, but while the US$ may not be "real" in the sense that it directly represents an actual commodity, there is no less trust involved in a gold-backed currency.
    ...which was surely the reasoning behind switching from the gold standard in the first place.

    sloth jr
  192. Everything? by Joe+Random · · Score: 1
    I have seen everything
    Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
    1. Re:Everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?

      Yes. It was disgusting. Then he went the rest of the way down the shaft. I couldn't believe it; at one point he was all the way to his balls. It was amazing.

  193. Rebates! by MDMurphy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I guess all this rebate crap really is a government conspiricy.

    Hardly any of us bother to send in any product registration crap. If you have the receipt you've covered for warranty issues.

    But, entice you with a bogus $50 rebate ( which you may or may not get 6-8 weeks later ) and many will gladly give their home address, email address, phone number. Cash the rebate check and you give up your banking info too ( all that stuff they print on the back of the check when you deposit it.)

    If you plan on doing naughty things with your laser printer you'll have to pay cash (not at Costco ) and blow off the rebate.

    Didn't they ID the first World Trade Center bombers when they tried to get the deposit back on the van? Doesnt pay to be greedy.

  194. Toner is expensive. by Stopher2475 · · Score: 1

    They need to reimburse me for the toner used on these serial numbers I didn't print.over the If it's only a buck or even a penny over the life of the printer, it's my money and I want it back. I smell class action lawsuit.

  195. Re: Gold-backed currency by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    There is some relation between the price of gold and its cost of production. Large increases in the price of gold result in less productive mines being (re)opened, more miners being used in active mines, etc..

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  196. Paranoid delusions by eyeb1 · · Score: 1


    me thinks your starting to see the light ..

    welcome to 1984 & the Brave New World ..

    that's the beauty of the opposing party democracy system .. it provides the ruling class with the perfect system for disenfranchising and isolating the serfs .. it provides the illusion of some kind of control and freeDUMB where there is none ..

    if one thinks it through .. all that a conspiracy is .. at it's most basic level .. is a preconceived plan by an given group of people ..

    which in this case is that 2-5% of the worlds population that controls 95-98% of the wealth .. and who are not going to give up that wealth and it's accompanying power .. or share it with anyone they don't have to .. if there is any conceivable way of not doing so ..

    historically all that "they" have had to do is start a war .. which takes the focus of "them" and puts the focus on the "enemy" .. which by the way .. historically has also provided the greatest amount of wealth for "them".. although some of the intervening resource booms and the modern .com boom have done very well for "them" as well ..

    it is most easily achieved with the poorly educated .. young .. nieve and idealistic serfs who don't have the benefit of generational experience .. in most cases all that has been required is to "make" an enemy .. then encourage a sense of fear .. indignation .. moral outrage .. mix in a little self-righteousness and patriotism .. and "they" have been able to get just about anyone to die defending "their" right .. to "their" wealth and "their" freedom ..

    "they" have done enough study and profiling on the general population (with them paying the bill no less) .. such as Stanley Milgram work .. mentioned in another posting on /. a few days ago .. to know that the very idea of someone conspiring behind one's back to manipulate and control one's reality is so disheartening and frightening that the average person will simple take the path of least resistance .. and deny that is even possible .. let a lone happening ..

    and as Stanley Milgram demonstrated .. the majority of any given population will simply fallow the figures of authority even in peaceful times .. let a lone in a time of war .. as did the majority of the population in germany under Hitler ..

    by the time they come to take you away .. for demonstrating some ability to think for yourself and thus being a threat to "their" control .. or to conscript you to go off and die in some foreign land to plunder another countries resources .. because "they" .. your past "leaders" have mismanaged and squandered "your" countries resources ..

    it is in all most all cases .. way to late to do anything about it ..

    if you are of a mind do a search for a document called "Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars" .. although it seems to be harder to find a working link these days .. this being one of the better ones that i have found because it contain actual formulas .. http://land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/sw4qw/index.shtm l .. many claim that it is not a real historical document

    1. Re:Paranoid delusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      such as Stanley Milgram work .. mentioned in another posting on /. a few days ago Do you have a link to this post or the story?

      Thanks for your good post.

    2. Re:Paranoid delusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      it was mentioned in a post on RFID tags to be used to track the arrival and departure from school in Texas of students .. as well as to inform the local police ..

      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/17/04 36214&tid=158&tid=193&tid=126&tid=146&tid= 17

      there was a link to the Milgram experiment .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment ..

      though the pecentage in Milgrams experiment was around 60% ..it has been higher in other countries .. where the experiment has also been carried out .. and i suspect that the percentage would be in the 80-90% range in cases .. such as just after 9/11 .. when emotions and fear are extreme .. and in the state of Singapore .. which seem to me .. to be nothing but a large scale modern experiment to see just how much people are willing to accept ..

      it is one of the main reasons that i find the opposing party democracy system so useless for giving the people what they deserve .. and what i believe to be the true purpose and meaning of democracy .. which is to give "the people" control over their own lives ..

      there was an small sidebar article that was printed in my local news paper .. some 10 or 15 years ago .. about a study that the CIA had done ..

      to determine what percentage of the American population was capable of and demonstrated the ability for free associative thought ie. able to think and act for them selves .. which in the study was identified as 3% .. with a second category of 30% who believed themselves to be capable of free associative thought .. but who did not demonstrate the ability .. interestingly almost 100% of that group were graduates of some post secondary education .. (because they believe they know something??).. and the remaining 67% percent of the people .. being identified as not caring to think for themselves ..

      and although the CIA will tell you that Muammar Qadhafi is the dictator of Libya http://www.qadhafi.org/index.html .. you will most likely find what's actually happened in Lybia after 1969 .. and why the western for profit media has refused to cover what has been happening there since 1977 .. quite interesting ..

      i think that he is right on the money .. so to speak ..

      when he say that in a real and true democracy there can be no representation in lieu of the people .. ie. no parties no parliaments etc. .. only direct democracy .. and that all that western democracies are is in fact .. limited dictatorships .. which is becoming all to clear .. to those who have eyes to see it ..

      while i don't believe that things are perfect in Libya .. i have actually talk to some people who have been there in the last 10-15 years and all have confirmed that indeed that is what is happening there ..

      i would also add that being under attack from the US's most favored WMD "economic sanctions" and or greenback invasion .. (though depleted Uranium Weapons seems to be running a close second these days) makes maintaining and spreading the revolution very dif

  197. Print a white page by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    Print a white page to the printer and see what gets printed 'extra'.

  198. Let them disclose it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I may take my trackable printer and print a bunch of labels to stick on printers in the store. Something like "Additional Feature!!! Unabomber Proofing!! This printer prints codes so any page printed by this printer can be traced back to this specific printer!"

  199. HP's planning it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP's had ideas of printing the serial numbers of the printer with yellow ink on every page just to track down the counterfiters. But who knows what else that data will be used for.....

  200. Labelling is not Tracking by serutan · · Score: 1

    This is about labelling printouts, so that an individual document can be traced back to a printer, if necessary. There's a big difference between that and "tracking everything you print," which would imply spying on your printing activities.

    In the old days police could often trace documents to individual typewriters because of small defects like nicked or misaligned characters. I have read that a similar technique even worked with some dot matrix printers. What modern printer manufacturers have done is to artificially create this same level of individuality. Nobody is "tracking everything you print." So how about we put away the foil hats and get upset about the truly bad stuff.

    1. Re:Labelling is not Tracking by a24061 · · Score: 1
      It's not "tracking everything you print", but it is artificially and unnecessarily building that traceability into hardware.

      Tracing a printout to a specific printer (e.g. yours at home) can often be practically the same as tracing it to an individual.

  201. Damn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have yet to see Natalie Portman, naked and petrified.

    1. Re:Damn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you wanna at least get halfway there, send her your photo and you'll see petrified.

    2. Re:Damn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How? Are photos magic video transmision devices in your fucked-up empty head? Dumbass. Actually, you're just a puling, moronic, dead-cow-cocksucking piece of shit. AND I'm being generous to you.

  202. Re: Gold-backed currency by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


    Kind of reminds me of a funny story regarding tulips that happened a few hundred years ago...

  203. That is so... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    ...but there's a distinct difference between being able to do it that way "Was this bullet fired by this gun?" as opposed to "This is the bullet, tell me which gun (of all in existance) fired it."

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:That is so... by McSnarf · · Score: 1

      And we need the ability to do precisely that. If you find your family shot, you will PRAY for the possibility. (BTW: Color copier protection is something my employer used since we had them on the market. There are other ways to find out which machine was used, this is just the easiest. And yes, the pro's outweight the con's. Unbelievable, though, that something as obvious as this wasn't public knowledge...)

  204. Why now? by stewwy · · Score: 1

    Anyone wonder why the story has come out now? ... could it be that the technology is now redundant? and as for not sending in the registration card.... have you ever checked what info your printer driver is sending out?

  205. Privacy law? Nifty feature! by raehl · · Score: 1

    I've misplaced several of the documents I printed. So how does this work? do I put the tracking number in the printer and it tells me where my lost documents are? Do I press a button on the printer and my documents beep so I can find them? Or do I have to do something else?

  206. Depends by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Anyway, police officer friend of mine once who said that if you're going to do something illegal, do it big, do it once and don't tell anybody. ...and that's why the Nigeria scam works so well. You do it a) big, b) once and c) don't tell anybody (you don't want to, since you made a complete ass of yourself and lost all your money).

    From what I've observed, the "do it big" is a mistake. People throw reason completely out the window because this is the big score(tm). Most important thing is to STFU.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  207. Counterfeiters don't use laser printers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They use genuine paper and plates, stolen, smuggled and bribed from the treasury department, and duplicate the processes used for the real thing.

  208. Jamming by m_frankie_h · · Score: 1

    Could you bypass this by adding your own little yellow dots to the document? Or are the dots added by the printer somehow different (size, color, maybe even shape, though it should not be possible) from anything you can tell the printer to print?

  209. terrorists!!! by hany · · Score: 1

    <irony>

    Terrorists!!! Terrorists!!!

    Quickly, we have to outlaw Santas and Kinkos!

    </irony>

    --
    hany
  210. Not all Manufacturers Do This by yrte · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just happened to be shopping for color laser printers today. After going to some stores to play with them, check the web, we made up a test PDF and loaded drivers on our laptop for all the printers in the running and went to the store and printed our own test pages.

    We had mostly settled on the low-end Minolta 2300DL because it does a better job with photos than the other sub-1K devices. We were also considering the Oki c5150n that has shinier and noisier color output, but surprisingly better text printing. I then ran across this story tonight. How irritating.

    I whipped out my Photon black-light LED and a magnifying glass and there they were. Little yellow dots everywhere on the Minolta output. They are visible with the naked eye in white/unprinted areas because the dots are a slightly different reflectivity than the rest of the paper. A magnifier and black light and it stands out.

    The Oki c5150n printer did not appear to print the spray of yellow dots, for whatever that is worth.

    We are likely to use the printer with our letter head on it in nearly all cases, so that would make 99% of the documents more directly trackable, but it sure is a big put-off to have to add this into the equation of what to buy. More a principle than it is a practical concern.

    But how much is this going to cost me, for this extra feature? The toner for these things is NOT cheap.

    So is there a list of what printers and manufacturers do this? Anyone else have any hardware they can check output from?

  211. Re:Countermeasures?: No prob by .+visplek+. · · Score: 1

    The fingerprint made by the yellow colour only. Just deactivate it and print only in CM an K. It's easy!

    --
    - Save a tree, eat more woodpeckers
  212. Cash kinda guy by Donny+Smith · · Score: 2, Funny

    > police (I give them money every year)

    Ouch!

    Hopefuly you favor cash so there's no need to worry - unless you use a laser printer to print their names and amounts on the evenlope! ;-)

  213. mod parent up by tobyvoss · · Score: 1

    it's all too true: how much worse could it get if osama was president of the us of a?

  214. Just say no - buy a litho by Casino+Robot · · Score: 1

    Designed for tracking counterfeiters? Don't make me laugh. Professional counterfeiters will simply purchase an offset litho printing press (for not much more than a quality colour laser) and amateur counterfeiting attempts are just too easy to spot. Just say no, buy a litho.

  215. Not just to track by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    While the technology could be used to track where a document came from, in it's most simplest form it identifies the document AS A COPY. That is actually enough, as it makes 'funny money' created on a laser printer unusable as the real thing, if you know where to look. That is probably a GOOD thing.

  216. So that stops the ink? by Teechur007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you print on yellow, and yellow ink is used, it does not stop those that have the means from seeing the ink...it just makes it harder. Yellow ink on yellow paper is unreadable by the human eye perhaps, not impossible to read through chemical analysis.

  217. Poor Laserjet Understanding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the article they mention "Unlike ink jet printers, laser printers, fax machines, and copiers fire a laser through a mirror and series of lenses to embed the document or image on a page" I didn't know you could make red green and blue burn marks on paper! Oversimplification wins again... And I guess the toner is just there to get all over your clothes...

  218. Not funny when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the police, having identified you by other means such as witness statements or surveillance camera tapes, use a test print from the printer they find on your desk to confirm you as a suspect.

    Doesn't matter where you buy or how you pay, if you are still in posession of the machine used in a crime, its still corroborating evidence.

    1. Re:Not funny when... by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      "use a test print from the printer they find on your desk"

      You obviously didn't read my comments above to other posts saying the same as you - I highly doubt any criminal is going to print money and leave the damn printer on his desk, or even in their own homes. Those who do deserve jail time, and probably would have been caught long before police start comparing printers.

  219. A list of printers that don't do this by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    Just ask CBS. I am sure they have figured out which printers don't do this...

  220. Analog haxor for conspiracy theorist activists by cfpresley · · Score: 1

    Just like the recent Sony debacle with the sharpie, here is another work around involving indelible ink.
    For your protest signs and flyers, go to a store and buy posterboard, then draw your own graphics. Unfortunatly, with out the use of periphirals like stencils, your choice of fonts will be limited.

    For the overly paranoid (this is slashdot after all) you could make your own paper http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie =UTF-8&q=make+paper and your own ink http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=make+ink.
    For mass producing protest flyers, you could make a silk screen http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=make+silk +screen+printer.

  221. Re: Gold-backed currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    An interesting story: a friend and co-worker of mine is from Bosnia, and lived with his family in Sarajevo during the war. His mother had saved her gold and jewels believing that they would help them during (or after) the siege. Before the end, however, she ended up trading most of them (they'd be worth a couple thousand dollars, now) for a dozen eggs. It just goes to show the extent to which the relative value of anything can change based on the current situation.

    Yeah, so? You've missed the point -- her straegy worked. If she hadn't saved that gold, she wouldn't have gotten those dozen eggs. Your story only shows how rare and precious eggs had become in that situation. Thing is, you can't store things like eggs forever, while gold will store forever.

  222. More simple countermeasure. by hummassa · · Score: 1

    1. print something in your printer
    2. scan with a higher-resolution scanner.
    3. find the dots.
    4. slurp the exact color of the dots
    5. make a background/watermark/whatever with some (eight times more) dots of the same color determined in (4), randomly scattered in the paper.
    6. use said background to print your monies.
    7. Profit!!!

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  223. Re:Groupies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But then you had to sleep with the band.

  224. The simplest solution of them all.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys look at things way too technical. If the shade of yellow is not noticed by the naked eye. Then just make the whole background of your image the exact same color of yellow (or purchase paper of the same color).

  225. Better yet... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    Use your new laser printer to create a registration card with a bogus serial number and send THAT one in. You just know that the serial numbers will be scanned or typed by a minimum wage employee into a database anyway. When the feds ask the manufacturer about the serial number, it's not yours!

    Use greater technology against itself!

  226. That'll do it. by PeanutGallery · · Score: 1

    Oh, this is definately an utterly secure and definitive way from keeping people from ever printing anything illegal.

    BTW, I need to run to Kinko's a minuite... Anybody want anything?

    --
    -- Just another unsolicited opinion... from the Peanut Gallery.
  227. Re:Can you say "Patriot Act"? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

    Christian TV is to Christianity as the WWF is to Olympic Greco-Roman wrestling.

    --
    When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  228. Be afraid be very afraid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i uSED TO think I was pAranOid BuT THen I reaLized I wasn't parANoid enough.

  229. The Inside Scoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, so I work at Xerox and I almost ended up being involved in implementing this for one of our newer printers. I know Peter Crean quite well (the guy mentioned in the article), and although this tracking capability has been an "open secret" for some time, we were all very shocked to see this public disclosure. Anyway, since I'm posting this anonymously, I might as well give the inside scoop ;) First, this is not unique to Xerox printers. We may have pioneered the technique, but pretty much any printer that has good enough quality to be used in counterfeiting has this capability. Second, it is true that *right now* the gov't is totally uninterested in using this for anything other than tracking counterfeiters. Furthermore, as others have said, it is nigh impossible to tie this to an individual user of a home office-style printer. This is mainly targetted for the big machines that turn out lots of pages per minute in super-high quality. Still, as a civil libertarian, I am somewhat concerned about future potential for abuse. It would be very difficult to track down an individual author of a document using this technology, but if you could seize the author's printer it could be used to verify identity. That's a little disturbing.... (Though I'll still help implement the tech if they pay me!) Lastly, the technical details and how it could potentially be beaten... Yes, it covers the entire page, both white space and content. And no, you cannot directly disable it. Even superimposing your own data into the Y channel to confuse the signal may not be entirely fullproof. The easiest solution? If you really don't want the gov't being able to track you, go to Kinko's or use a black-and-white printer or something. Note that even in printers that use this technology, if you print in black-only mode then it won't have the tracing data. It is only ever present in the Y channel.

  230. Saw something like this yesterday by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    Two cars parked on the side of Mitchell Freeway northbound lane in Osnborne Park, one having obviously shunted the other... but with the detached front bumper and number plate of a third absent vehicle embedded in the rear-most car's back bumper.

    Oops.

    And me without my camera.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  231. Re: Gold-backed currency by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    ...while gold will store forever.

    What happens after that?

    --
    What?
  232. Re:Can you say "Patriot Act"? by symbolic · · Score: 1


    Agreed...but what about the ACLJ?

  233. 2.0 × 10-08 seconds. How do I look? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    20 billionths of a second from the laser... so thats 400,000 clocks away(assuming only a single trigger)... with a 125Mhz clock rate..... how many clocks would each chip eat up.. to transmit that.. blah if you(i) knew enuf you know would where he was talking about and thank him very much.

    All this paranoid thinking has reminded me of my other paranoid thoughts. Sorry if im offtopic. Something I've been thinking about is that area around LCD's (TV Monitors etc) what's that for is that a camera? (Maybe even embedded in the middle) I know their watching me! (how they xmit it back I cant tell) So I returned all my LCD' TV's and monitors for good ol' CRT.

  234. Skepticism, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm curious about this story. Most of the replies seem to be taking the Crean guy from Xerox's claims at face value, but I'm wondering if it isn't a red herring. The yellow dots, I mean. Not that I don't think printer tracking would be useful to the secret service or that manufacturers aren't doing it, but does the yellow dot approach seem plausible? Or is it a misdirection that has nothing to do with the techniques that are really used?

    A few observations:

    Except for some newer 'one-pass' color lasers, the color image is usually built up in four passes of an imaging belt. In sequence, each of the four toner cartridges is pushed against the belt by a small motor and then retracted; you can hear this happen four times for every color page.

    Now print a b&w page on your color laser. If it's like mine, you only hear one cartridge move. That'd be the black one. So, no sneaky yellow dots on b&w pages. Maybe they only do the marking on color pages, figuring that's where the counterfeiting risk is.

    Now throw together a page where the only colors are, say, mixtures of pure magenta and cyan, and print that. (If your printer or driver offers several color-matching/color-correction options, do this with the setting for direct/uncorrected, so it isn't using some algorithm to tweak your specified colors.) Again, count the cartridge engagements. Did you hear the yellow cartridge move?

    So maybe it only does the marking on pages that include a nonempty yellow component. For that I'll probably print something out and see if I can make out anything like the patterns described in the article. But I'm sure I've never noticed anything like it, and whatever the article says, my naked eyes are pretty good at noticing stray toner, and I've looked really closely, especially when I first got my (used) color laser and it'd had toner shaken up in transport and I had to make a lot of test prints while I was getting it cleaned up. (It's a Phaser, which is /now/ a Xerox brand, but was originally Tektronix.)

    How many people can actually confirm systematic yellow marks added to their pages?