And it _somehow_ helps "reliability" (relax, nothing ridiculous, I'll explain). Someytimes it happens that one badly written/buggy thread/app decided to take practically 100% CPU under Windows. You could theoretically kill it...but explorer and such isn't exactly responsive. However, on my dual cpu machine this never had happened.
Hmmm...from their explanation it seems like overall it's quite capable running NetBSD...but its CPU isn't supported, and they're waiting for other port (RS/6000) to add support. Not exactly trying...
"Their" clame? Are YOU on drugs? Just some "qa'lth" said it...
BTW, not only is the appearance skin-deep (and apparently now they want to be faitfull to NextStep), but judging useability of programming tools by screenshot...I've lost my words here.
And soon (via converter) it will be compatible with.nib files, meaning very easy poerting of Cocoa apps (or you could save to XML in Interface Builder...)
Uhmm...IMHO it's the issue of misunderstanding the roots of the dillema - on BOTH sides. It's not that it's impossible to attach keyboard or mouse to console (PS2 accepts normal USB ones... and PS1 had it's own mouse) or that it's impossible to do good FPS or RTS on a console (I think one of the most enjoyable FPS experiences for me was Quake2 on PS1 - mouse in right hand, dual shock (force feedback, ANALOGUE movement, 3 keys accesible without movinf fingers + 5 more) in the left; also there was fun RTS, Warzone 2100, that actually played better with Dual Shock than with mouse - developers must only think and create completelly new interface instead of "joypad emulates mouse by moving the pointer"). And it works in the other way too - there are few typically arcade games for PC, a great games I should add.
But that doesn't really matter...it's al about pattern and place of usage. PC sits at the desk - you have monitor, keyboard and mouse right in front of you. Console place is in the living room, and nobody will feel comfortable sitting in the couch and trying to operate keyboard/mouse. That's it, nothing more, no ideology behind it. (but of course we all now that in the real world fanboys will be most vocal..)
Prokaryotes simply couldn't have such amount of DNA even if they "wanted" to - simply because of it's form (one, loosely packed, loop - not only such amount of genetic material as in humans couldn't possibly fit inside their cells, the process of reproduction would be too long, because of different mechanisms they use, for them to be succesfull in ways they are)
Not much float around...if some mutation gave birth to proteins not doing anything...than that simply didn't do anything to organism and wasn't promoted/denounced in any way by natural selection. And comparison with bacteria isn't fair...we reproduce at their level all the time, constantly. Your cells that is. Sure, there's perhaps some "waste" given for example simply the amount of nuclear material...but it gives us so much. There are things in which bacteria aren't very effective. Sense of sight, for example, is first out of many things I could mention here...
The thing is - it doesn;t matter if you, internally, thought as a whole that this was joking. It didn't appear like that from the outside, and that's all that matters.
And France did won on several occasions...for example in 1781 there was some important naval battle that you should know about...
Let us see...what about CIA jeopardasing weapons inspectors job? Really, don't pretend you're in the sole position to have moral stand in this world, that's what turns people/countries away.
(not to metnion that I'd like to know on what good crack you're on - since you're saying EU nations said US "deserved it". And don't you dare pretending hat France didn't help - actaully, France was one of your most active allies in Afghanistan campaign. But in case of Iraq, they've seen you're wrong, they warned you how it can end and look at the mess now that they've envisioned then. That's what freinds do. That's what allies do.
But of course you would like them to just be puppet states...
Of course what I've said is a gross generalisation, even worse: I'd assume it really doesn't even include over half of Americans, just the most vocal ones. But...you really don't remember waaay overblown bashing of France?
Slashdot Mirror
And it _somehow_ helps "reliability" (relax, nothing ridiculous, I'll explain). Someytimes it happens that one badly written/buggy thread/app decided to take practically 100% CPU under Windows. You could theoretically kill it...but explorer and such isn't exactly responsive. However, on my dual cpu machine this never had happened.
Nerds != Gamers
Hmmm...from their explanation it seems like overall it's quite capable running NetBSD...but its CPU isn't supported, and they're waiting for other port (RS/6000) to add support. Not exactly trying...
I dig up a bit wanting to put it on one of my spare computers...and it doesn't support it. I'm shocked O_o
(Powermac 7200)
Obvious reason - much more expensive (you can't get as good yields at manufacturing fab)
"Their" clame? Are YOU on drugs? Just some "qa'lth" said it... BTW, not only is the appearance skin-deep (and apparently now they want to be faitfull to NextStep), but judging useability of programming tools by screenshot...I've lost my words here.
"These"? Just some "qa'lth" said it...
And soon (via converter) it will be compatible with .nib files, meaning very easy poerting of Cocoa apps (or you could save to XML in Interface Builder...)
I haven't noticed that GnuStep guys said it. Just some individual named "qa'lth" did it...
What advantege does it give for lasers?
It definetelly wouldn't be English teacher in times when the joke would be true :P
You know, thsi reminds me of old joke...
:P
School teachear giving homework: "children, please write who's your idol, and why Lenin"
Luckily the background isn't the same
Uhmm...IMHO it's the issue of misunderstanding the roots of the dillema - on BOTH sides.
It's not that it's impossible to attach keyboard or mouse to console (PS2 accepts normal USB ones... and PS1 had it's own mouse) or that it's impossible to do good FPS or RTS on a console (I think one of the most enjoyable FPS experiences for me was Quake2 on PS1 - mouse in right hand, dual shock (force feedback, ANALOGUE movement, 3 keys accesible without movinf fingers + 5 more) in the left; also there was fun RTS, Warzone 2100, that actually played better with Dual Shock than with mouse - developers must only think and create completelly new interface instead of "joypad emulates mouse by moving the pointer"). And it works in the other way too - there are few typically arcade games for PC, a great games I should add.
But that doesn't really matter...it's al about pattern and place of usage. PC sits at the desk - you have monitor, keyboard and mouse right in front of you. Console place is in the living room, and nobody will feel comfortable sitting in the couch and trying to operate keyboard/mouse.
That's it, nothing more, no ideology behind it. (but of course we all now that in the real world fanboys will be most vocal..)
Prokaryotes simply couldn't have such amount of DNA even if they "wanted" to - simply because of it's form (one, loosely packed, loop - not only such amount of genetic material as in humans couldn't possibly fit inside their cells, the process of reproduction would be too long, because of different mechanisms they use, for them to be succesfull in ways they are)
Not much float around...if some mutation gave birth to proteins not doing anything...than that simply didn't do anything to organism and wasn't promoted/denounced in any way by natural selection.
And comparison with bacteria isn't fair...we reproduce at their level all the time, constantly. Your cells that is.
Sure, there's perhaps some "waste" given for example simply the amount of nuclear material...but it gives us so much.
There are things in which bacteria aren't very effective. Sense of sight, for example, is first out of many things I could mention here...
Apart from mentioned video editing: usable voice recognition and whole process of dooing usefull things with it...
And more important, where are Semprons?
On the second thought...perhaps it would be better to use something like http://hugeurl.wiggy.net/ for this kind of proof-of-concept...
Sooo...you don't have Audi in US?
TinyURL might become not so tiny anymore...
Bleh, you know which meaning of "risky" was used there...
The one with areospike engines and composite fuel tanks? Too risky, too many new technologies = too many problems along the way = project shelved.
The thing is - it doesn;t matter if you, internally, thought as a whole that this was joking. It didn't appear like that from the outside, and that's all that matters.
And France did won on several occasions...for example in 1781 there was some important naval battle that you should know about...
Let us see...what about CIA jeopardasing weapons inspectors job? Really, don't pretend you're in the sole position to have moral stand in this world, that's what turns people/countries away.
(not to metnion that I'd like to know on what good crack you're on - since you're saying EU nations said US "deserved it". And don't you dare pretending hat France didn't help - actaully, France was one of your most active allies in Afghanistan campaign. But in case of Iraq, they've seen you're wrong, they warned you how it can end and look at the mess now that they've envisioned then. That's what freinds do. That's what allies do.
But of course you would like them to just be puppet states...
Of course what I've said is a gross generalisation, even worse: I'd assume it really doesn't even include over half of Americans, just the most vocal ones. But...you really don't remember waaay overblown bashing of France?