"Sorry, this program has unexpectedly quit because of a programming error"
Maps to, among other things:
SIGSEGV "Segmentation fault" ENOMEM "Out of memory" ENOSYS "No such system call"
As far as I am concerned, working programs are more important to the user than knowledge that the program has failed, and to have more working programs, the error messages have to be more informative.
Though, it would be more convenient to have a Mozilla TrackBack or GNOME Bug Buddy type program to collect this debugging information...
#./buggy-program SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) recieved. The program has been terminated. File a bug report? (Y/n) _
Windows Server 2003 (or Longhorn) purportedly has a command-line and shell-scripting system that comes close to the power of bash.
Mostly because the admins demand batch jobs that can do more. (And, being a batch job, means that none of the programs should require interactive use... Unfortunately, even most system programs require interactive use)
Virtually all current 32-bit protected mode i386 OS kernels do not use segmentation.
There are a number of reasons, including the monstrosity known as a far pointer. Pointers that don't fit in one register, nor load into one.
When you are returned a far pointer, you cannot just use it... You must first load a segment selector register, and there are only 4 for use with data: DS, ES, FS, GS. Then, you can indirect through a far pointer.
Slashdot Mirror
H_2SO_4 is Sulphuric acid not Hydrosulphuric acid, nor Hydrosulphate acid nor Hydrosulphuric oxide acid.
It probably has to do with the fact that H_2O + SO_2 => Sulphuric acid; and H_2 + Cl_2 => Hydrochloric acid.
Introducing...
The Hydrogen Hydroxide Alkali!
Chemical composition: H(OH)
Strength remains constant when mixed with water!
Introducing...
The Hydroxyl Acid!
Chemical composition: H(OH)
Is not diluted by water!
Introducing...
The Hydrogen Hydroxide Salt!
Chemical composition: H(OH)
Dissolves perfectly in water!
There are several JVM-in-(micro/nano)kernel with purely Java drivers and in some cases, purely Java services usually implemented in-kernel.
http://jos.sourceforge.net/ is one of them. There was another one that I looked at before, but I don't remember its name or address.
OS X isn't a rewrite of OS 9. It is a whole new system. OS 9 may have been partially rewritten for use with the OS X Classic environment.
In any case, OS X was not a complete rewrite either. It was based heavily on OPENSTEP and NeXTSTEP before that.
UNIX was the major OS of the 70s.
Why don't they use UNIX then?
It is called the True-believer syndrome.
Do you not want your hard disk to be formatted? [Yes] [No]
"Sorry, this program has unexpectedly quit because of a programming error"
./buggy-program
Maps to, among other things:
SIGSEGV "Segmentation fault"
ENOMEM "Out of memory"
ENOSYS "No such system call"
As far as I am concerned, working programs are more important to the user than knowledge that the program has failed, and to have more working programs, the error messages have to be more informative.
Though, it would be more convenient to have a Mozilla TrackBack or GNOME Bug Buddy type program to collect this debugging information...
#
SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) recieved.
The program has been terminated.
File a bug report? (Y/n) _
Windows Server 2003 (or Longhorn) purportedly has a command-line and shell-scripting system that comes close to the power of bash.
Mostly because the admins demand batch jobs that can do more. (And, being a batch job, means that none of the programs should require interactive use... Unfortunately, even most system programs require interactive use)
So... would it be an abjad or abugida ?
Sounds more like abjad.
Czech tongue twister:
Str prst skrz krk.
(Stick a finger through your throat.)
Hm. W... Ligature for UU... is it pronounced as such in Welsh?
From NeXTSTEP and OPENSTEP.
Also known as a bundle.
The SCO that bought Xenix from Microsoft is not the SCO that currently owns Xenix.
That is to say, the SCO that bought Xenix is now Tarantella and the SCO that currently owns Xenix was Caldera.
There is this encryption scheme called one-time pad.
This disposable paper^H^H^H^H^H^H computer sounds perfect for the job.
Mod parent down, the link is mislinked.
The article
Chapter ZZZZZ9999: Credits.
.... ....
We'd like to thank the following people for their contributions to Wikipedia, in ASCIIbetical order:
11.0.0.1
11.0.0.2
11.0.0.3
11.0.0.4
222.254.254.254
a = b.
aa = ab.
aa - bb = ab - bb.
(a + b)(a - b) = b(a - b).
a + b = b.
a + a = a.
2a = a.
2 = 1.
From there, you can prove that 2 + 2 = 5.
The rich get richer, the poor get richer: who's paying for all this?
Enron accountants?
Right. Like GPL compatibility.
This is like 4-clause BSD, which was also incompatible with the GPL.
The GPL does not require this crediting -- therefore, any licence that does is not compatible.
Exploding phones? Or exploding batteries?
I've heard of self-destructing circuitry too.
Blue Box became Classic.
Yellow Box became Cocoa.
I believe Red Box was the Windows(/x86?) emulation.
PowerPC machine != Mac.
ARM machine != PocketPC || Palm.
Would you like to be imposed the One True Theology, the One True Philosophy, the One True Government and the One True Leader? Thought so.
Choice requires thinking. If you rather not think, well... Do you deserve choice?
Anyway. The BSDs adhere closer to that model you think of. There is only One True {Free|Net|Open}BSD.
Most of C's quirks are derived from assembly.
Assembly is a do-it-yourself kind of language. Bounds checking is strictly optional.
After all, how can we be certain this is a pointer into an array, or a pointer to an array element?
Virtually all current 32-bit protected mode i386 OS kernels do not use segmentation.
There are a number of reasons, including the monstrosity known as a far pointer. Pointers that don't fit in one register, nor load into one.
When you are returned a far pointer, you cannot just use it... You must first load a segment selector register, and there are only 4 for use with data: DS, ES, FS, GS. Then, you can indirect through a far pointer.