Slashdot Mirror


The Disposable Computer

sp00 writes "A disposable paperboard computer has been developed and is already in use in Sweden. Developed by Cypak AB, the paperboard computer can collect, process, and exchange several pages of encrypted data, the company says." Pretty impressive, given that they say it has a mere 32K of memory.

358 comments

  1. 32K?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jeez, no one would ever want to buy that underpowered machine! Give me 640k, and we will talk. ;-)

    1. Re:32K?! by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
      Jeez, no one would ever want to buy that underpowered machine! Give me 640k, and we will talk. ;-)

      Oy! Yer spoilt! I used to program in 32K and I liked it!

      Why, some of the finest programming and games I've ever seen fit in 32K. It's all slop nowdays. Widgets, buttons and things thag go Bing! and need 256 MB to do it in.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:32K?! by Arconaut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Real inovation took place in 8k.

    3. Re:32K?! by Mipsalawishus · · Score: 5, Funny

      But does it run Linux???

    4. Re:32K?! by still_sick · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A few months ago I pulled out my old TRS-80 and the classic "Dungeons of Daggorath" (you pups have no idea what you're missing). It certainly struck me hard that in the instruction manual it specifically states that your system must have AT LEAST 5K of memory to play the game. Mad respect to all the trailblazers who managed to write kick-ass games under those restrictions.

      --
      ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    5. Re:32K?! by martingunnarsson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and imagine a Beowulf cluster of these...

      --
      Martin
    6. Re:32K?! by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      32k is plenty. You just have to ditch the GUI, thats all. In the old days we had 4k Fortran and 4k Basic.

      ISTR the 8k versions were significantly better though. (And these were words, not bytes).

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    7. Re:32K?! by eric76 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      We used to run an entire company on a computer with 32K.

    8. Re:32K?! by KronicD · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, i know what your talking about, i'm in a programming principles class at uni and i was quite pissed off when he said theres no reason to use byte, short or int anymore since all machines have memory to spare we should store every variable as a long.

      I think this attitude is whats causing much of the bloat situation now days.

      --
      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty, to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"
    9. Re:32K?! by MoreBeer · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's called a Fire Hazard.

    10. Re:32K?! by toesate · · Score: 1


      But the innovation starts in punch card.

      And that is the paper, and that is the code!

      --
      Hey, that's my password you are typing
    11. Re:32K?! by rokka · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      32K!!!? We would've been happy to have 32K! We had to get up at 3 o'clock in the morning, one hour before we went to bed, have a fist full of gravel for breakfast and flash our 2K clean by licking it, byte by byte. 32K! Ha! Luxury!

      --
      I could be wrong. I'm always wrong...
    12. Re:32K?! by Herkules · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Noop! It has to do with code reuse. The code just gets more genral and bigger. But it also gets easyer to develop.

      So we get big and slow quick and cheep.

      (quick = less hours)
      (less hours = cheeper)

      --
      CIA Factbook 2002 (US):"Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households
    13. Re:32K?! by Stepping+Razor · · Score: 1

      Oooooh, we used to dream of 2k of memory. It would have been a luxury to us. We used to write code in an old water tank on a rubbish heap. We got woken up every morning to having a load of rotting fish dumped all over us. 2k? Huh!

    14. Re:32K?! by flappinbooger · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ok, im imagining it ... Looks sorta like a library?

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    15. Re:32K?! by hplasm · · Score: 1

      Caldera?

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    16. Re:32K?! by Urkki · · Score: 4, Informative
      • i was quite pissed off when he said theres no reason to use byte, short or int anymore since all machines have memory to spare we should store every variable as a long.

      Well... For most current computers, long takes as much space as int, 32 bits (or 64 bits for 64 bit CPUs). And for any individual variable, it'll take at least that amount of memory even if it's 1 bit bitfield (not sure if common x86 compilers by default pack variables to take less space if they can, though).

      So using anything else doesn't really gain you anything in space, but it may well hurt you in peformance (and code re-use).

      Bloat comes from copy-paste coding, and slowness comes from incorrectly chosen data structures and algorithms. This all arises from poor design, so for example the programmer is often faced with decision to change entire existing code to make some piece of it more generic, or copy-pasting that piece and modifying it a bit to fill the new need.
    17. Re:32K?! by zero_offset · · Score: 4, Informative

      Speaking as a programmer whose first programming experience was Z80 assembly with 4K of RAM, I had to seriously revamp my thinking in recent years, but basically 32-bit processors work significantly better with 32-bit values. Also, except when memory is statically allocated and you've forced the compiler to pack memory allocated to your variables, that carefully considered allocation of a single byte is going to take up 32 bits of actual memory anyway, because once again, the CPU can access it that way significantly faster.

      In a nutshell, if you use a byte, short, or int, you're slowing down the machine. The only good reason to optimize to that level is when you're expecting memory problems, and as your professor pointed out, that is rarely a consideration these days (especially when you add modern paging techniques to the vast amounts of available physical memory).

      The more interesting question is the chicken-and-egg angle on runtime bloat -- did RAM increase because users needed it to run steadily ballooning applications, or did applications get bloated because cheap-as-dirt RAM meant end user machines had memory to spare? (I suppose both are probably true... which would be a bizarre conclusion if we were actually talking about chickens and eggs...)

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    18. Re:32K?! by thebes · · Score: 1

      Wow that hurts man. I guess I'm thankful that my profs have really pushed (and graded) on how you choose your variable types. How long has your prof been teaching for?

    19. Re:32K?! by operagost · · Score: 1

      You could do a lot more with a Beowulf cluster of these.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    20. Re:32K?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't even matter if you're using Java. ints, shorts, chars all suck up the same amount of storage.

    21. Re:32K?! by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

      nope, not even elks, unless you do some really good stripping down.

      of course, that's to say if it even is 8086.

      pretty much not.

    22. Re:32K?! by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 3, Funny

      32K was enough to go to the moon, and it was enough for me!

    23. Re:32K?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cheap.
      cheaper.

    24. Re:32K?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...until 31K of it turned out to be SCO's intellectual property.

    25. Re:32K?! by Aidtopia · · Score: 3, Insightful
      [S]lowness comes from incorrectly chosen data structures and algorithms.

      It is certainly true that a bad algorithm can result in slow code, but most of the difficult performance problems I've had to tackle in the last several years are more closely related with bloat. In other words: virtual memory thrashing.

      Data structures are often suspect when thrashing is a problem. If nodes are scattered far and wide, then the page file can get a workout. Powerful, dynamic containers often have high-overhead per node and make little if any effort to improve locality of references. More than once I've had to replace an STL map with a hash table in order to get decent performance. (I don't intend that as a blanket condemnation of STL, it's probably just a funky implementation.)

      But it's not just data structures. Code bloat in general increases working sets. The structure of code, with long chains of hooks in message passing and method invocation, can result in skipping through dozens of pages.

      When programs were simpler, smaller and more procedural, performance problems appeared inside loops. Number crunching is still this way.

      But today we have interactive, event-driven programs implemented with deep object hierarchies that mask how much code is actually being called. A single button click to bring up a dialog can trigger tens of thousands of lines of code scattered all across virtual memory. Branch prediction doesn't help here. Level 1 caches don't help. Pipelines are stalled. The processor waits for the VM manager to deliver the next instruction to RAM. With hardly a loop in sight.

      We have few tools to fight this type of performance problem. You can get more RAM or use less memory. You can try to improve the locality of your data structures and your code, but those efforts are often at odds with a lot of modern practices such as object-orientation, enhancement by derivation, and letting the VM manager and the garbage collector worry about it.

      Hardware has gotten inconceivably faster, but software has hardly picked up the pace (in most domains). Sure, the code does more today, but the factors still don't add up. And it can't totally be explained by a bunch of bad algorithm choices. Code bloat is a big problem.

      Fight code bloat.

    26. Re:32K?! by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      More like a stack of newspapers.

      Oh crap, I gave all my computers to the Boy Scouts' paper drive!

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    27. Re:32K?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      mad respect

      Hahaha... dude, don't try to pretend.

    28. Re:32K?! by enkidu · · Score: 1
      PREACH IT BROTHER! GET OUT THE BLOAT!

      In my previous job I worked on such a system as you describe: An event driven graphical system with a large group of interrelated structures and objects being manipulated. One of the primary identifiers used to maintain the large soup of objects was called GObjectID. Each of them stored a 128bit id plus some assorted slop. By flyweighting the GObjectID's (using 32bits) we shrunk the memory footprint of a typical program run by >20%! This also had a corresponding improvement in performance of ~10%.

      The lead architects solution to performance problems was to add MORE data and MORE abstraction to cache data access and linkage, improving the performance somewhat, but also increasing the code size and the memory footprint of the application.

      --

      There is no trap so deadly as the trap you set for yourself
      -Raymond Chandler, The Long Goodbye
    29. Re:32K?! by brucmack · · Score: 1

      I think it's just a case that RAM became so cheap that people were going to stock up on it anyway. Even without bloated programs, having more RAM is an advantage, since one can just run more things at the same time.

      That said, programs certainly became more bloated with more RAM available, simply because they would not have been allowed to become bloated otherwise.

    30. Re:32K?! by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      It's funny that this came up. A friend of mine, who happens to also be a client (I built his machines and network on the side), just called me with a problem that turned out to be a dead network card. In an attempt to fix it himself before calling me (he's a good-enough friend that I help him for free), he jacked the RAM up from 128MB to 512MB.

      It would appear your first assumption is very true. :)

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    31. Re:32K?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is it made by AMD?

    32. Re:32K?! by brucmack · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I didn't consider that though, I was actually thinking about educated users as well :)

      The Windows mentality... no problem can't be solved by throwing more resources at it, and if my computer gets slower over time, it must be getting more obsolete.

  2. Obligatory BillG Reference by oldosadmin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who needs more than 32k of memory anyway?

    --
    Jay | http://oldos.org
    1. Re:Obligatory BillG Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      URBAN LEGEND. urban legend.

    2. Re:Obligatory BillG Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (who needs more than 32K memory)

      I do Dammit, where the hell did I leave my teeth now!

    3. Re:Obligatory BillG Reference by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      Dear Slashdotters,

      Either find a source for Bill Gate's "640K is more memory than anyone will ever need" or concede that it's a geek urban legend and let it go. Considering that nobody has sited a source in the 20 years since he supposedly said it, I doubt one will be found.

      http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,1484,00.h tm l

      -B

  3. a mere 32K of memory by the_other_one · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I remember when a 32K Commodore PET was a cool thing.
    If they print double sided could they emulate a Commodore 64.
    In a few more years ... Just imagine a cluster .... in a three ring binder.

    --
    134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
    1. Re:a mere 32K of memory by MotherInferior · · Score: 4, Interesting

      These guys don't need no stinking 32K. They work with only 4K.

    2. Re:a mere 32K of memory by liloconf · · Score: 0

      I am already working on a portable beowulf cluster based on this technology. Im finding that the 32 cent stamps work best...

    3. Re:a mere 32K of memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
      According to this history of ARPANET,

      The network started to become a reality on August 30, 1969, when BBN delivered the first Interface Message Processor to Leonard Kleinrock's Network Measurements Center at UCLA. The IMP was built from a Honeywell DDP 516 computer with 12K of memory.

      Makes 32k sound postively roomy!

    4. Re:a mere 32K of memory by trb · · Score: 1
      I am already working on a portable beowulf cluster based on this technology. Im finding that the 32 cent stamps work best...

      Though the Honeywell 16 series was designed as an I/O processor for he internet, they were also ganged together (not quite beowulf) and used as timesharing machines. I hacked the 1648 for a while, i think it was two 516's (one for OS and one for as many user jobs would fit in 32 K), and a 316 for I/O.

    5. Re:a mere 32K of memory by FatHogByTheAss · · Score: 1

      I've worked on machines the size of refridgerators with 32K. Versions of this were in use till the early 90s. I think they replaced them with Commodore 64s.

      --

      --
      You sure got a purty mouth...

    6. Re:a mere 32K of memory by n3k5 · · Score: 5, Funny
      In a few more years ... Just imagine a cluster .... in a three ring binder.
      Exactly, you'll be able to double the memory capacity by punching holes in the right places.
      --
      but what do i know, i'm just a model.
    7. Re:a mere 32K of memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the executable is 4k. I'm sure the use more RAM during the execution.

    8. Re:a mere 32K of memory by iamacat · · Score: 1

      "These guys" don't run their demos on bare iron. They already have a working OS that may already have some graphics calls. I have a working MacOSX web browser in less than 4K of source code. All the difference is that it uses webkit.

      As for the computer in the article, I somehow suspect the "OS" and application are stored in ROM, which is in addition to 32K of RAM. Quite reasonable, considering early Palm versions only gave programs that much heap.

    9. Re:a mere 32K of memory by k8to · · Score: 1

      Well, no. Typically 4k intros programmed the vga card directly. DOS was indeed used to get the executable into memory, but that's about it. Graphics and sound programming was done "directly".

      Now, these things generally used all 640k of lower memory (if not more with hacks) and so comparing them to 32k RAM machines is kinda misguided.

      --
      -josh
    10. Re:a mere 32K of memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes 32k sound postively roomy!

      Yeah, but back then I'm not even sure that program code was loaded into memory... basically it took all of its instructions off of tape/punch-cards, performed said instructions on every record that came through, and then wrote the results out the a new set of permanent storage.

    11. Re:a mere 32K of memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will there spring up a cottage industry of people selling punches to do just that, or will most people just take 3 whacks with a standard hole punch?

    12. Re:a mere 32K of memory by MotherInferior · · Score: 1

      Gad, are you people anal.

    13. Re:a mere 32K of memory by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 1
      Wasn't the IMP the equivelent of today's NIC, as a homogenized network interface for the PDP's, the Generals, etc. so that each location would have to figure out by themselves how to connect their computer to the IMP, but the IMPs would all have a standard interface to the network.

      How much memory does your NIC have?

  4. Only took 25 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For that to go from decent home computer to disposable.

  5. If it crashes... by Tebriel · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I get Windows running on this thing (with 32k!) and I get a BSOD, do I just throw it away and get a new one instead of a reboot? Or even better, could I mail it to MS and ask for a new one?

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
    1. Re:If it crashes... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft is saving time... their paper computers will be made out of blue construction paper.

    2. Re:If it crashes... by Mipsalawishus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Rather than send an error report to Microsoft via the internet, you have to mail these in.

    3. Re:If it crashes... by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Construction paper? Are you nuts? It wouldn't be anything like as robust as that!

  6. Nothing new... by CrashPoint · · Score: 5, Funny

    A computer you use for a few days and then throw away? Hell, Dell's like twenty years ahead in that market.

    1. Re:Nothing new... by JeremyALogan · · Score: 1

      is it sad that I'm using an E-Machine to reply to this from?

    2. Re:Nothing new... by Liora · · Score: 1

      For the average user, every computer is a disposable one... one to three years later it is deemed junk.. Joe Schmoe will find it very freeing to be able to actually toss these rather than just add them to the pile in the basement or attic!

      --
      Liora
  7. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..a computer I can actually wipe my ass with when I get pissed at it.

    1. Re:Finally... by cujo_1111 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cleaning the screen will be a real bitch then...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    2. Re:Finally... by cbiffle · · Score: 1

      Technically speaking, nothing's preventing you from doing that today.

    3. Re:Finally... by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      Good idea! It's much less unpleasant way how to make a computer full of stinking crud than installing Windows on it!

    4. Re:Finally... by maztuhblastah · · Score: 1

      As we said, Dell's already years ahead in that department.

  8. $$$ for recycling by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So what's the payout for collecting pounds of these and returning them to my local recycling center?

    The difference between disposable and classic is age. My three year old PC is disposable. My 15 year old PC is a classic and goes for $9,000 on Ebay.

    The only thing necessary for Micro$oft to triumph is for a few good programmers to do nothing". North County Computers

    1. Re:$$$ for recycling by Anonymous+User+2000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The difference between disposable and classic is age. My three year old PC is disposable. My 15 year old PC is a classic and goes for $9,000 on Ebay.

      The difference between disposable and classic isn't just age, but period. Your 15 year old computer is worth someting because it was one of the first of it's kind. If you try to sell the computer you own today 15 years from now it wont be worth crap.

    2. Re:$$$ for recycling by freshmkr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My 15 year old PC is a classic and goes for $9,000 on Ebay.

      In 1989, a top-of-the-line PC was a 386 or something. How in the world does a 386 command $9K on eBay? I guess you're exaggerating. But by way of comparison...

      A glance at my posting history reveals a more than passing interest in the Apple Lisa. The Lisa 1, an especially rare collectible computer, goes for around $10K whenever it shows up.

      --Tom

    3. Re:$$$ for recycling by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, I wasn't exagerrating for once. Rather, I didn't quote enough time. I was referring to my Radi Shack (Tandy) TRS-80 complete with every accessory ever made, all games and software, and a tape drive for disk storage. Many of the components were never used, others I have more than 1 of. Total Ebay value based on others' listings is $8000 to $10,000.

      The only thing necessary for Micro$oft to triumph is for a few good programmers to do nothing". North County Computers

    4. Re:$$$ for recycling by BTWR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      a 1980's 286 or 386 is pure junk and will get you scraps on ebay.

      But a 1984 Mac 128K, 512K, 512KE will fetch you a bundle...

    5. Re:$$$ for recycling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Classic systems are going for $9000? Geez, there are a lot of suckers I mean wistful nostalgic computer historians out there. I could probably solder together a computer out of a pic chip, a serial eprom, and serial ram that'd probably outperform any classic computer in about 30 minutes. Granted it would use a serial port of some sort instead of a TV for the display and an external keyboard, but you get the idea.

    6. Re:$$$ for recycling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just took a quick look on eBay and a Tandy TRS-80 has a "Buy it now" price of $39

    7. Re:$$$ for recycling by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

      Not the one I have... in working condition and with new-in-box accessories and software.

    8. Re:$$$ for recycling by dbenhur · · Score: 1
      The Lisa 1, an especially rare collectible computer, goes for around $10K whenever it shows up.

      Which is almost exactly what it sold for brand new in 1983. Using an average of 5% interest over 22 years, this "classic" has depreciated by roughly 65% in real dollar terms.

      Course, that's much better value retention than a random 286 AT machine from the same era.

  9. Re: Disposable Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine....a Beowulf cluster of these!
    *sigh*

  10. The point? by SoupGuru · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't get it. Why a computer that's disposable? Sure, I can understand disposable razors or diapers, but computers?

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
    1. Re:The point? by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 1

      READ THE F*ing ARTICLE ever heard of RFID?

    2. Re:The point? by Chr1s-Cr0ss · · Score: 1

      Why climb everest?
      I think you'll find the answer to both questions is "why not?"

      --

      68.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
    3. Re:The point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you must be new here"

    4. Re:The point? by khakipuce · · Score: 1
      May be disposability is not is primary purpose, only that it is so cheap that one would not mind of disposing of it after it has performed useful work.

      A lot of new inventions seemed a bit pointless until they found real world uses and then changed lives.

      One of the problems with computers today is their multi-functional nature. Most good things do one job well (washing the dishes in the washing machine isn't to great). And yet we expect one computer to hundreds of tasks - It's got to be better to have a lot of dedicated machines rather than one general purpose one.

      --
      Art is the mathematics of emotion
  11. Metal Box by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    By the time the box puts a 5 lb hard drive in, they'd upgrade to the beige metal box high end model.

  12. Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    It Had To Happen: The Disposable Computer
    March 4, 2004 (11:40 a.m. EST)
    By W. David Gardner, TechWeb News

    A disposable paperboard computer has been developed and is already in use in Sweden. Developed by Cypak AB, the paperboard computer can collect, process, and exchange several pages of encrypted data, the company says.

    "Initially, it will be used in industrial-specific applications as an enhanced and secure RFID device," said Cypak marketing director Strina Ehrensvard in an email. "Today, in pharmaceutical and courier packaging as a data-collection device; tomorrow maybe for interactive books, lotteries, passports, and voting cards."

    With just 32 Kbytes of memory, the paperboard computer's functionality is somewhat limited at present, but the firm believes its future will be broad. Cypak has entered into an agreement in the U.S. with MeadWestvaco Healthcare Packaging, which has marketing rights to the product and technology in the Americas.

    Ehrensvard said the device is currently in use in a trial sponsored by a Swedish university involving compliance monitoring of pharmaceutical packaging. The trial tracks when a medicine tablet has been taken out of a package; it is then placed on a Cypak scanner connected to a PC on which the information can be viewed and stored. Ehrensvard said the paperboard computer is being considered in another healthcare application, as well: doctors would use it to help authenticate the administration of pharmaceuticals.

    The Cypak product utilizes RFID technology that is based on printable sensors and electronic modules. The components are integrated on a variety of products, ranging from packaging and plastic cards to adhesives. In healthcare applications, Cypak says the paperboard computer time-stamps medicine dosages, which can be integrated with a patient's electronic diary. It can deliver sound reminders, too.

    Cypak has also developed a companion device--a smart card with an integrated numerical keypad. The firm expects this to be used initially in applications demanding high security. By entering a unique PIN on a card, a user can connect to the Internet and exchange data. Cypak says the card's encryption can't be copied or broken, enabling it to deliver "military-class security."

    "The paperboard computer concept and the PIN-on-Card are the same core technology--components integrated in different products," Ehrensvard said. "They exchange information to a PC with the same reader."

    Cypak offers the components on an OEM basis for about $1 each. The firm added that OEM components for its readers are available for approximately the same price in large volumes.

    The firm has developed a tamper-proof package technology with the Swedish Postal Service. Called SecurePak, the packaging technology stores sender and receiver relevant data and alerts receivers of any possible package tampering before the package is opened.

    Cypak will demo the products at the CeBIT 2004 exposition, in Hannover, Germany, later this month.

  13. Typical Swedes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unlike other cultures, they make a computer that can do what they say it can on paper!

  14. Worlds Largest Cluster by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, with this configuration the power receptacles would take up more room than the cluster nodes. So imagine 1,000,000 of these in a box the size of a filing cabinet? And along these lines, can you unplug it and store it with your other files?

    The only thing necessary for Micro$oft to triumph is for a few good programmers to do nothing". North County Computers

    1. Re:Worlds Largest Cluster by mod_critical · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, actually...

      5 Volt DC Power Supply, Jameco Part Number 112070
      1.9" x 2.2" x 1.95"

      Full height file cabinet, Office Mac Item Number 01200578
      52" x 25" x 15"

      So you could fit about 2392 of them in that file cabinet... SORRY I'M BORED!!

    2. Re:Worlds Largest Cluster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's $1,000,000 buddy... ;)

  15. On the next The Screen Savers... by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Funny

    Their mod specialist Yoshi DeHerrera will show off a cardboard case PC. (Web story is already posted here.)

    This was actually a delayed segment from last week. Yoshi cut his hand working on setting up his demo on how he did it last time he tried to do this segment. He needed to leave the studio to get stitches and missed most of the show as a result.

  16. given time they are all disposable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    even that whiz-bang new computer that you just bought that's not made of cardboard...

    the future complication may only be just where you can dispose if it given the environmental concerns.

  17. Beowoof? Bah! by tloh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Forget about clustering, I want to see someone overclock one of these without the thing smoking and going up in flames!

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  18. Re: Disposable Computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Soviet Russia...
    the computer disposes of YOU!
    *ducks*

  19. Excellent! by nmoog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can use my disposable cell phone to dial up and post my photos from my disposable digital camera and ask disney why I cant find anymore disposable dvds.

    Oops. Better get back to work. Else no disposable income.

    1. Re:Excellent! by 0racle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seems that your throwing your life away there.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    2. Re:Excellent! by kfg · · Score: 1

      Oops. Better get back to work. Else no disposable income.

      Because, of course, to your employer you are. . .

      KFG

  20. REAL Notebook computers. by Chr1s-Cr0ss · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, it seems we will finally be able to refer to something as truly a "Notebook computer"

    --

    68.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
    1. Re:REAL Notebook computers. by krusadr · · Score: 1

      God, if a notebook PC becomes a sheet of paper, I can only imagine whats going to become of the tablet PC.

      --
      while sco {
      wget -O /dev/null http://www.sco.com?sco=litigious%20bastards
      }
  21. The advantages of paper-computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look at pr0n then shred the evidence...

    1. Re:The advantages of paper-computing by glenalec · · Score: 2, Funny

      And both 'sticky keyboard' and running out of kleenex problems are solved too!

      --
      The man with no surname and a silly hat

      On the universe: It's bunk.
  22. I need this by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Somebody help me: I keep my todo/dates, todo/tasks, books/want, books/have, tidbits in a plain Unix text file and I maintain it with a text editor and print it using a2ps -2. My life fits in two columns landscape mode.

    Whenever I need it, I print it, at a cost of 17 cents on my inkjet. When I need to update it, I simply use a pen and "sync" at home later.

    I can fold it, put it in my pocket, access the data randomly instantly, and easily add graphics or test with a 0% error rate. However it gets expensive at 17 cents per sync.

    All I need is a little bit of memory (32k) and a read-only display screen, super-tiny, and cheap as hell. If America wasn't ass-backwards, I'd just SMS the stuff to my cell phone.

    As an employee at Microsoft I had TWO of the top of the line PocketPCs : I played quake on them, wrote some C programs, and put them away as toys. I need to do WORK, as a technical person, not a salesman. All I need is digital paper.

    What can I use?

    1. Re:I need this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a Newton.

    2. Re:I need this by leehwtsohg · · Score: 1

      A laser printer.

    3. Re:I need this by Moofie · · Score: 1

      A used Palm III.

      Seriously.

      Pocket PC is a toy. Palm is a tool. (in the good sense of the word.)

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:I need this by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Spend the extra US$5.00 and get a Palm IIIx.

      4MB of RAM!

      And, if you install FlashPro, you get an extra 800 K or so of storage.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    5. Re:I need this by Moofie · · Score: 1

      True, although I personally don't care for the backlight scheme. But the extra RAM is nice.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:I need this by Brianwa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you're not looking for something new or fancy, you may like a Tandy 100 or 102. They are ancient laptops, however, they do exactly what you want. They get great battery life on four AAs, however, it will not fit into your pocket. Take a look at Club 100 and see if it is what you want.
      Then again, you could get a cheap Palm and a keyboard.

    7. Re:I need this by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      Another swedish product, the Anoto pens and papers!

      --
      Martin
    8. Re:I need this by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Good suggestion. Though the Palms made in the last couple years seem to be just as much toys as the Pocket PCs. Unfortunately, since the old AAA-powered palms don't support memory cards, I use a Sony SJ33, which at least has a nice folding cover. Everything else I've seen has a completely bare screen with nothing to protect it. How the heck are you supposed to use something like that in everyday life?

    9. Re:I need this by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      Wow, those are neat. I think I remember seeing them in Radio Shack catalogues when I was a kid. Even though I wouldn't really have a use for one, it's so tempting...

      One thing I'd love to see, though, would be an updated version of this. Say, a Palm-based system in a subnotebook form factor - just big enough to fit a useable keyboard with a grayscale screen running off AA batteries. I figure something like that would be more convenient than messing around with a foldable keyboard, get insanely long battery life, and be much cheaper, lighter, and more durable than a laptop.

    10. Re:I need this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My life fits in two columns landscape mode.


      *sniff* That's the saddest thing I ever heard... *sniff* Anyone got a tissue?

    11. Re:I need this by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      You obviously are a disoragnized slob. My linear algebra professor used to come in with the notes for a 90-minute lecture on a single post-it note on his textbook.

      Very small writing.

    12. Re:I need this by TheGrayArea · · Score: 1

      Hey man, I'm an ex-ms'r as well. Just curious as to which group and site you were in.

      --

      This space for rent.
    13. Re:I need this by Idarubicin · · Score: 0
      However it gets expensive at 17 cents per sync.

      Right now, he's spending seventeen cents per day (roughly) on the paper-based method, and he considers that expensive.

      To all the posters telling him to get a Palm with keyboard, bear in mind that he could use paper for a year and a half before approaching a hundred dollars spent under the current system.

      This neglects the cost of consumables like batteries, and assumes a very low hardware cost. The time to recover his investment gets even longer if he ever discovers cheap laser printing. Paper also handles being dropped remarkably well.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    14. Re:I need this by zero_offset · · Score: 2, Informative

      If America wasn't ass-backwards, I'd just SMS the stuff to my cell phone.

      Give up your ass-backwards ways. I'm in Florida and I send text to my cell phone all day long. Some of my servers send activity reports every few hours. I also threw together a simple web page to help friends and family members send messages to my phone. Easy.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    15. Re:I need this by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      As an employee at Microsoft I had TWO of the top of the line PocketPCs : I played quake on them, wrote some C programs, and put them away as toys. I need to do WORK, as a technical person, not a salesman. All I need is digital paper.

      That's because the PocketPC is a game, or at least all flash and no substance. The PocketPC is not a PDA, it's an attempt at fitting a laptop's functionality into the size of a handheld - or maybe an attempt to become the next GameBoy.

      Try a real PDA like ones based on the PalmOS, you know, the PDA that is designed to do PDA well at the expense of having every bell-n-whistle known to man?

      Get a used Palm III, runs for 1-4 weeks on a single set of batteries.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    16. Re:I need this by helf · · Score: 1

      actually, there is more or less a palm version of the trash 80 m100 :)

      It's called the 'dana'. check it out.

      http://alphasmart.com/

      I still use a model 100 on a regular bases. Works wonderfully and does exactly what I need and its pretty darn rugged.

    17. Re:I need this by Maudib · · Score: 1

      I use my cellphone and a java text reader.

      I just keep a text file updated with whatever information I need on my pc, then synch over blue tooth when I am at the office or home. Its readonly once its in the phone, but really convenient for lists and such.

    18. Re:I need this by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Yeah. the backlight is really annoying at times.

      When the ambient light is really low, the IIIx backlight is pretty good.

      But under almost any other lighting condition, it's really useless. My Palm Pilot Pro is far superior to the IIIx in that respect.

      Sometimes, you do need that little extra contrast to view the screen clearly, and that IIIx scheme just doesn't cut it.

      Despite the funky backlight, I do like my IIIx. I've had it for years and will replace it with something newer only when it finally craps out for good.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    19. Re:I need this by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Although the modern Palms are more full-featured, the basic applications are just as well laid out. So I would still not classify them as toys.

      As for the unprotected screen, well, I always carried my Palm III in a case. There are good cases available for any Palm you might want to use.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    20. Re:I need this by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Wow, thanks! It also seems to come in a wireless version (sold out at the main site, but available at the Canadian distributor). I think it would be better if the screen were built into a folding lid like a typical laptop, since then it wouldn't need a case so badly, but very cool nonetheless.

    21. Re:I need this by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      The design of the OS and apps is much more useful, but I find many of the newer models have tiny screens and short battery life. I had a Palm IIIxe, and it was durable enough that I never bothered with a case and never got a scratch on the screen. The problem with cases is that they are more cumbersome than just snatching my SJ33 from my labcoat pocket and flipping the lid open. I'm pretty rough on it - it has small scratches all over both sides of the cover, but not on the screen.

      If it were a flimsy, coverless PDA, I'd worry about wrecking it. It would be less useful - more of a toy.

    22. Re:I need this by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Do what I do. Cut a piece of textured transparency film just a bit bigger than the visible screen (maybe half a millimeter) and slip it between the case and the screen. Gives a nice writing surface too.

      Or keep using your SJ33. I got one for my Dad, and he absolutely loves it.

      You seem to be disparaging tools that other people find handy by calling them "toys". I suggest to you that this might be sloppy thinking. The newest Palms (and Clies) are extremely well-engineered and rugged. Specifically, the plastic digitizers are far more durable than my old Palm III/Handspring Visor (each of which happen to use the same digitizer, and I replaced four of them on my personal hardware).

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    23. Re:I need this by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      Actually, I'm disparaging machines that appear to be designed solely to look cool on a display rack, with little or no thought put into durability. This is the first time I've met anybody who has found such a device handy; I suspect that these things are usually bought to be shown off and wind up in a drawer somewhere.

      Rugged? Have you tried the Tungsten C? Lovely specs, but it feels like a toy. I doubt many of the new models would survive being dropped onto carpet, let alone a hard floor. My Palm IIIxe survived a couple drops onto concrete with no damage at all. My Handera 330 was hit by a truck and merely had a crack in the screen - the machine still worked and the data was recoverable. I'm not sure what you mean about having to replace the digitizers. Did they stop recognizing graffiti or something? I never had that happen with any of my Palms.

    24. Re:I need this by Moofie · · Score: 1

      No, I mean there was a big fucking crack in the digitizer. The glass was broken. I replaced the digitizer (or, in one case, the entire screen assembly) and they worked fine.

      I don't know anything about the Tungsten C, but the Tungsten T an T3 (the two I have personally played with) seem to be doing just fine. I didn't feel the need to drop them on the ground, but they seemed to be reasonably rugged.

      If I need a lot of durability, I'll put the things in a good case.

      Look, if you don't like the new hardware, don't buy it. I don't know why I've bothered sharing my experience when you seem so determined to hate anything built after 2001.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    25. Re:I need this by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      Eh? Why so hostile? And please don't imply that you're doing me some favour by condescending to speak to me. Anyway, Sony's new PEG-TH55 looks very nice, though it's hard to tell except in person. I'd prefer to go with Palm instead of Sony and their memory sticks, but it looks like the latter's market share will continue to grow. It's just frustrating to me to see a machine that is perfect internally, but useless to me because of the exterior design.

      I'd be more willing to just get a case if I could find one that wasn't bulky, awkward, and generally annoying.

      About the digitizer thing, my Handera 330's still worked on the top half even with a crack leaking purple liquid crystal junk in the bottom half, though Handera did use a different screen type.

  23. Those swedes, whats the deal? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    People bitch at Americans for being the wasteful throwaway society, but it seems all our advances in disposable technology comes from the swedes.

    I mean theres this, and everything from Ikea, which is essentially disposable. I bought a dresser there that lasted about a month before the drawers fell apart.

    Is it just ikea and this, or is it some cultural thing?

    Oblig Futurama reference: "Enjoy yer afferdabel svedish crap"

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well done, I think that thread was aimed to be funny, yet no-one found it funny. Despite even a futurama quote. Shame the quote wasn't a good one.

      Oh about the draws, i'd get someone else to build them for you next time ;-)

    2. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by derrith · · Score: 1

      It sounds to me like you're particularly biased. I've been shopping at Ikea for several years now, and have yet to have an item there fall apart on me. I do dislike them, based on "Fight Club" and the fact that shopping there feels like walking through the intestines of a great corporate furnishing beast. However, I have no complaints with their construction.

      --
      why does the porridge bird lay his eggs in the air?
    3. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by m1kesm1th · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean drawers? I doubt he got his draws from Ikea, though you never know, those showrooms have a few props.

      Personally I like Ikea, I've never had any problem with any of their furniture. Maybe if I decked out my place in it ala Edward Norton in Fightclub some of it would fall apart, or be blown up.

    4. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      No, I seriously want to know if it's some cultural thing in sweden to make stuff with the lowest possible build quality/lifespan.

      I wasnt joking or trolling, I want some swedish dude to tell me what the deal is. Is it the lack of lumber and mining or something? Is there no wood or steel to make stuff out of?

      IIRC, laminate flooring was a swedish invention too. And despite what Pergo says, the stuff does not last. One puddle of puppy piss and the wear layer starts to peel up, I know from experience... Pay the extra 2 bucks a sq. foot for hardwood.

      I dont know if "nordic tracks" are swedish, or some other nordic country, but if they are, throw them on the pile of stuff thats built to last (a half hour).

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by dandelion_wine · · Score: 2, Funny

      I do dislike them, based on "Fight Club"

      Congratulations. You are not your khakis.

      You're a freakin fanboy instead.

    6. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by cyberworm · · Score: 1

      Heh, you're slightly wrong on the whole shopping there feeling. Shopping there is totally unnerving and irritating. but it's not the store that does it. It's the people. Don't beleive me, goto the one in Schaumberg on a weekend. It seems like people lose their mind when placed in a large scale shopping environment.
      We recently purchased a couch there, and when we went to check out, we took the tag with us thinking that they would have a couple of guys bring it up front for us.
      When told otherwise I was like "WTF? You expect me and my 100lb fiancee and our two year old son to bring a couch upfront?" Nutjobs. Purely and simply.
      I am biased however, since I had an encounter with one swede and he was totally irritating and lacked common sense (here's a taste.. he thinks Michael Moore is right and didn't put any kind of spin into his "documentaries")
      Granted he was the only swede I've ever met, but like they say "One Bad apple can spoil the bunch". :)

      Maybe it's just me.

    7. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      My wife is in love with ikea. She's bought these little end tables, the veneer has peeled off of both. The dresser, and the drawers are falling apart two months later.

      There was this one coffee table, which became a tv stand, and has actually held up. It's made of wood, not mdf and veneer. Its ugly as hell (which is why it became a tv stand in the (w)rec(k) room.)

      I did buy some track lighting there not too long ago, for about half the price of what the nearly identical product costs at Home Depot. The 12v transformer, though, just feels like a wimpy piece of crap, and I'll probably be replacing it. I wouldnt put it in an old Compaq, I sure dont want it hardwired in a position to burn down my home.

      Meh, maybe its the stupid names they tag on everything. Guugelflof and Lakwoz and all that. Its supposed to sound hipper than "fiberboard box with plastic casters on it" but doesnt. And the instructions made up of little cartoons of what you're supposed to do and what you need to do it.

      It's acceptable dormroom furniture, I suppose. Not exactly what you buy to show up the neighbours.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    8. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because if Fight Club bags on it, it must not be "cool". Anybody that sells durable furniture for low prices, that some people think is pretty cool looking, must be some sort of evil empire building exercise.

      Right.

      If you'd really understood Fight Club, you'd understand how silly basing your opinion of anything on Fight Club actually is.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually nordic track is an american product. like so many other american products its CRAP. I know the joke is "Ikea is swedish for crap" - its not for reference, but toe nordic countries actually produce a LOT higher quality in most things (take danish furniture, swedish cars etc) than what you can find 'made in the USA'

      Matt

    10. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should change your drawers more often!

    11. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The quality in Sweden is excellent. It's the stuff IKEA produces in the US that sucks. Americans just can't seem to get anything right.

    12. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by twaltari · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ikea is a Swedish company but I guess most of their stuff was manufactured in China instead of Sweden. Ikea has pretty much the same business model as H&M:
      1. Design good looking stuff
      2. Market it (e.g. printed catalog with lots of great photos)
      3. Find a Chinese subcontractor to manufacture it as cheap as possible.
      4. Profit!

      So perhaps that explains the quality issues. But on the other hand, they never promised you high quality and it was propably quite affordable.

    13. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      but it seems all our advances in disposable technology comes from the swedes.

      Yes, imagine it, disposable paper! And disposable ink! The horror! I can't think of anything more wasteful, I hope it never catches on. Whatever will we think of next... ;-)

      Seriously, this is a pretty sweet technology. They are using cheap, non-toxic conductive ink, so you will probably by able to buy printers pretty soon where you can print your own computers.

      The most immediate benefit is as the article mentioned in passing for medical use. For instance patients who need to take their medicine for, say Alzheimers. If they forget, their condition gets worse. But how will they remember to take the medicine on time if they have Alzheimers? The paper bag the medicine comes in can start to signal when its time to take the medicine. And a PDA can check up on it, if the bag is not opened in time, an alarm can be sent so someone can check up on the patient.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    14. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      About Ikea, it says on the instructions that you have to scew it together and then you have to do it again after some time, but maybe you disposed of the instructions?

      I once rented a brand new Chrysler Newport to go from Ney York to Los Angeles and that car endured barley the trip. I regularly drive Volvo the same distance in Europe with out any problems.

      I wonder what else you think is disposable and from Sweden? The steel that Mr Bush is taxing to keep away?

    15. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd really understood Fight Club, you'd understand..

      Look, the first rule of Fight Club, is that you don't talk about Fight Club, OK?

    16. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by Hyler · · Score: 1
      I wasnt joking or trolling, I want some swedish dude to tell me what the deal is. Is it the lack of lumber and mining or something? Is there no wood or steel to make stuff out of?

      I'm a swedish dude. We have plenty of lumber and iron. We don't have much semiconductor manufacturing in-country though.
      --
      It's its. They're their, there. You're your. Who's whose? A looser loser, though those two too threw through the trough.
    17. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The most immediate benefit is as the article mentioned in passing for medical use. For instance patients who need to take their medicine for, say Alzheimers.
      But, why need it be disposable? Why not something that can be worn on the body and used over and over again ..... ideally lasting several patients?

      It's time we had laws regulating disposable products. Things should be made to last forever -- or subjected to such a hefty sales tax that it would actually be cheaper to buy reusable articles.
    18. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by stefpe · · Score: 1

      Ok. I'm swedish so..

      Yeah as another poster pointed out, we do have plenty of steel and lumber. In fact, you can just go to your local HomeDepot or Lowes and check some of it out.
      Why ship lumber across the world from Sweden to North America? Well, the climate is pretty cold
      but with much less variations than in Canada and some northern states and this makes the trees grow in a nice, slow and steady pace which gives a much denser and stronger wood. (For you american readers, it can get *really* hot in parts of Canada in the summer)

      As for quality and lifespan, why don't you check out american vs. swedish cars or where the U.S. got the cameras for the apollo missions? (Though I have to admit that my wife's '97 buick has held up pretty well for a car with 175k miles on the meter)

      Anyway.. I don't think we have a culture of making throwaway crap but I will say that IKEA which another poster mentioned has historically had a pretty bad reputation in Sweden too even though they improved a *lot* in the last 10-15 years or so. When I grew up in the 70s, there was consistently parts missing, the pieces wouldn't fit together, lots of plastic crap, etc. I still don't have a problem buying their products now but if I'm looking for something special, I go somewhere else first.

      The disposable computer might in part be a result of two things: The paper industry in Sweden is *huge* - you might have seen the name SCA on paper towel holders, etc. (and they grow forests too, speaking of lumber).
      The other factor is that we have a long history of research in printing technologies such as some pioneering work in bubble jet printing in the early 70s.
      Put that together and I don't know.. maybe a computer on a piece of paper is a logic extension of that. (!?!?)

      By the way, are you sure your Pergo floor was made in Sweden?

    19. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...we're not all like that... honest :P

      / Real Swede

    20. Re:Those swedes, whats the deal? by Tassach · · Score: 1
      I bought a dresser [at Ikea] that lasted about a month before the drawers fell apart.
      Maybe you are just hard on furniture, or you didn't put it together correctly. I have a bunch of Ikea furniture (a chair & ottoman, 2 tables, and a couple of bookshelves) which are still in perfect condition after 8 years and 3 moves. The only piece of Ikea furniture I had which didn'd hold up so well was an entertaiment center -- it got banged up during one of the moves.
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  24. Slight flaw in the cunning plan by krusadr · · Score: 1

    Cypak has also developed a companion device--a smart card with an integrated numerical keypad. The firm expects this to be used initially in applications demanding high security. By entering a unique PIN on a card, a user can connect to the Internet and exchange data. Cypak says the card's encryption can't be copied or broken, enabling it to deliver "military-class security."

    Hmmm, so the password is entered directly on the card and stored in the magnetic strip along with the rest of the data - now the card has all the security info on the strip? Gee that'll make the crooks life harder!

    Wow those sellers of card readers on ebay are going to make a killing with this one.

    --
    while sco {
    wget -O /dev/null http://www.sco.com?sco=litigious%20bastards
    }
  25. it would catch fire! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    sure a beowulf cluster of them would be cool, but then they'll generate enough heat to burn themselves! ;)
    i suppose you could invest in some fancy cooling, like a liquid-based system... then your computers are soggy :(

  26. 32k is more than I dreamed of a few (25) years ago by rcpitt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    32K is a lot of RAM. It's enough to do a fairly useful voice recognition system, or word processor, or even spreadsheet.

    I know - because that's how much RAM my Radio Shack Model 1 had after I'd purchased the add-on module and populated it with the extra 16K of RAM (the main module could only handle 16K) and before I pushed the limits by moving to 48K.

    Note that the module plus 32K extra RAM (to bring the system to 48K) was about $2,000 Canadian at the time.

    This is not insignificant - at least not if you've ever used something other than Windoze ;)

    --
    Been there, done that, paid for the T-shirt
    and didn't get it
  27. New excuse for not doing homework by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "My dog ate my computer sir"

  28. OH MAN by sudotcsh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cypak says the card's encryption can't be copied or broken...

    AH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! ...

    AH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!

    *whew*! I needed that.

    1. Re:OH MAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now when you've had your laught, please show us the method of breaking AES.

  29. I only have 8k of memory! by oldosadmin · · Score: 1

    You insensitive CLOD...

    --
    Jay | http://oldos.org
  30. Is it allowed to call itself a "computer"? by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are devices marketed as calculators that have more than 32k of memory these days...

    High-end wristwatches are starting to behave like low-powered computers with a small black and white pixel-based display, the beeping speaker, and ability to accept wireless input. We're not calling those computers, just "smart watches".

    So, this really is more about "smart paper"... paper with a few chips in it and therefore the ability to beep. Only a small upgrade over the musical greeting card. :)

    1. Re:Is it allowed to call itself a "computer"? by krusadr · · Score: 1

      So, this really is more about "smart paper"... paper with a few chips in it

      If the computer is made of paper - does the word processor package consist of a pen?

      And if it's microsoft word - do you get a friendly pop-up "paper chip" to help out?

      --
      while sco {
      wget -O /dev/null http://www.sco.com?sco=litigious%20bastards
      }
    2. Re:Is it allowed to call itself a "computer"? by mlk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Its more powerfull than some of the old 8bits.

      Cool, Rogue on paper, ohh wait thats AD&D.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    3. Re:Is it allowed to call itself a "computer"? by rebelcool · · Score: 4, Interesting

      back in the 1940s, a "computer" was a young woman who sat in front of an adding machine punching in numbers. It was actually quite awhile before the electronic machines came to be known as 'computers'. I'm sure many early designers would laugh at the thought of their complicated multi-ton kilowatt consuming monstrosities being named after the job a 19 year old girl did.

      What it is called depends on its use. You don't call a PDA a computer do you? Even though it clearly is one.

      If this device is in fact used for computing, then it is in fact, a computer.

      --

      -

    4. Re:Is it allowed to call itself a "computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Is it allowed to call itself a "computer"?
      com-put-er:
      A device that computes, especially a programmable electronic machine that performs high-speed mathematical or logical operations or that assembles, stores, correlates, or otherwise processes information.
      Yes, it is a computer, as is a calculator. Though if an electronic device is calling itself something I wouldn't argue...
    5. Re:Is it allowed to call itself a "computer"? by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      How about...

      If this device is used for general purpose computing, then it is in fact, "a computer" - in today's terms. Otherwise it's just a calculator/smart-paper/parking-ticket/whatever

      BTW, can you tell us a bit about hackers, back in the '40s?

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    6. Re:Is it allowed to call itself a "computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      BTW, can you tell us a bit about hackers, back in the '40s?

      As a policeman in the 1940's, I can tell you that computer hacking was considered a very serious -- not to mention gruesome -- offence.

      Sgt. Septegenarian.

    7. Re:Is it allowed to call itself a "computer"? by buddhahat · · Score: 1

      well, if it is calling itself anything then I say it qualifies as a computer at the very least.

      --
      ------ How can making people laugh lead to bad karma?
    8. Re:Is it allowed to call itself a "computer"? by rebelcool · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Many "calculators" today run general purpose processors and can be used for general purpose computing. I believe my old 1991 TI-82 has a Z80 in it.

      It seems to me this new device has some ideas in mind for it should be used for, but is fairly general purpose. At the moment, its a computer. Though the systems it becomes embedded in might be called something else.

      Just like my calculator's processor could be used in a 'computer'. But its embedded use is for arithmetic and algebra, therefore its a 'calculator'

      --

      -

    9. Re:Is it allowed to call itself a "computer"? by qtp · · Score: 1

      back in the 1940s, a "computer" was a young woman who sat in front of an adding machine punching in numbers.

      In the 1940s, using your computer to get pr0n had a whole different meaning The quality was much better, but the availability was inconsistant and the price was much higher.

      The previous generation of geeks really had it made!

      --
      Read, L
    10. Re:Is it allowed to call itself a "computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and my TI-89 has a Motorola 68000 chip in it, the same one they used in the original Macintosh.

  31. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweden already makes disposable cars, so I guess progressing into the PC business is natural enough...

    1. Re:Hmmm by kommakazi · · Score: 1

      What're you talking about? Volvo's last forever!

  32. Re: Disposable Computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody's been playing too much Paranoia again.

  33. Spys applications by tdwebste · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This could be real handy when you need to distroy the encryption device without a trace that it ever existed.

    A spy gets caught with what looks like a fussy picture of her family stored in the spy's pda. And with no trace of a encryption device, I guess it must be just a bad picture.

  34. Oh god by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sometime within the next 20 years, if we continue this trend, we're going to have more crap IN landfills than we will actually in service.

    1. Re:Oh god by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      Disposable contacts.

      I don't know why, but that day seemed to mark the return of convenience reigning supreme. The "greens" were once again relegated to fad or fringe status.

    2. Re:Oh god by zackeller · · Score: 1

      Too late.

    3. Re:Oh god by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      If we keep packing computing power into landfill, we're going to get Stynet. (A creepy new meaning to GIGO.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  35. Chip specs by nmoog · · Score: 5, Informative
    Theres some intersting specs about its S2C chip on the Cypak website:
    8-bit microprocessor
    32kBytes non-volatile FLASH memory with >10 years of data retention.
    2kBytes Static RAM
    It also mentions using 128bit AES encryption, with RSA under development.
    1. Re:Chip specs by Kris_J · · Score: 4, Informative
      That's quite similar to the Atari 7800, if anyone wants any idea of how complicated the software can be for it.

      I wonder how many you can talk to simultaneously if they're all in a pile. What's the RAM footprint for the D.Net RSA core?

    2. Re:Chip specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I've written both AES and RC5 in Z80 assembly, AES needing about 1K of ROMable space for both encrypt/decrypt halves (significally less then 2K if both are needed), RC5 being about 30% larger (but symmetric) and magnitudes slower. RAM needs are 35/60 bytes respectively.
      Those footprints are near the lower edge of size and performance, allowing more code and data makes both algorithms a lot faster. RC5 is still too slow for 5MHz Z80. Rijndael is the way to go with low-performace processors.

  36. In Money.. by liloconf · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else think this sounds similar in aplication and design to the RFID's in the center of the new twenties? You know the story a while back about the twenties in the microwave... Or maybe I'm just a poor college student reasuring myself that it's a good thing I have no money.. eh..

  37. My wish come true by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always wanted some Windows toilet paper

  38. Cardboard Computer? by HeySailor · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    How do they read a cardboard monitor? In fact, how do they write to it?

    1. Re:Cardboard Computer? by infernow · · Score: 1

      A light pen, perhaps. Or maybe a ballpoint one...

      --

      that that is is that that is not is not

  39. disposable cellphone by ende · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm still waiting on the disposable cell-phone .....

  40. Beowulf book by NoDoZ · · Score: 5, Funny

    wouldn't a beowulf cluster of these.. be a book?

    1. Re:Beowulf book by rholliday · · Score: 4, Funny

      So then, would the book be "Beowulf?"

      I can see it now. The first virus will be called "Grendal ..."

      --
      Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
    2. Re:Beowulf book by hplasm · · Score: 1

      PowerBook....revealed!

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    3. Re:Beowulf book by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      So then, would the book be "Beowulf?"

      I can see it now. The first virus will be called "Grendal ..."


      And the AntiVirus software will be called Heorot

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    4. Re:Beowulf book by MonkeyINAbaG · · Score: 1

      wouldn't a beowulf cluster of these.. be a book?
      actually.. a notebook
      sorry, please troll me

  41. Groan by eddy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cypak says the card's encryption can't be copied or broken, enabling it to deliver "military-class security."

    sigh.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Groan by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny

      The main part of the "military-class security", is that you can eat the computer if captured.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Groan by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      sigh.

      I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here. Milspec is commonly used to mean that a system is as robust and performant as it can reasonably be made. If I'm going to be spending the night in the wilderness then I want a milspec sleeping bag, a milspec torch, etc, because I know that if it's been tested and approved by the Marines then it's something I can trust with my life - and yes, I am often in situations where your gear failing can get you killed (by freezing or falling or starving or simply getting lost).

    3. Re:Groan by paganizer · · Score: 1

      I think it was more on the line of:
      "sigh. Now every hacker, wannabe, kiddy and geek on the frikking planet is going to make breaking the encryption on this a high priority. Wonder how many days, or hours, it will take?"
      Sort of like telling harry houdini you have an escape proof cell.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    4. Re:Groan by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      [sigh.]

      I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here.

      Perhaps that anyone claiming `my whatzits encryption can't be broken' they are either idiots or crooks.

      (well, there is the one time pad, but that would make for a VERY big card or the user having to memorise an unending sequence of random one-use pins).

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    5. Re:Groan by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
      The main part of the "military-class security", is that you can eat the computer if captured.

      Ya, it's sure a great idea storing vital information in your belly.

    6. Re:Groan by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that anyone claiming `my whatzits encryption can't be broken' they are either idiots or crooks.

      No cryptosystem is perfect, but that's not what milspec crypto means. All it does mean is that the military have judged that it is sufficiently difficult to break to suit their purposes. At the moment, that's AES, you can download several implementations of it in several languages if you want to study it.

      All "impossible" has ever meant in any context is "technologically/economically unfeasable at the present time".

    7. Re:Groan by eddy · · Score: 1

      >[...] but that's not what milspec crypto means. All it does mean is that the military have judged that it is sufficiently difficult to break to suit their purposes.

      There's no such thing as 'military level encryption'. It's snakeoil peddler code for "we don't know what we're talking about".

      >All "impossible" has ever meant in any context is "technologically/economically unfeasable at the present time".

      That's not what it said, it said "encryption [that] can't be copied or broken". Broken has a specific meaning in cryptography. "Copied" I assume allures to some tamper-proofing, but that's just that "proof". Tamper-proofs are broken all the time.

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
  42. Good for distributed computing, I bet. by infernow · · Score: 5, Funny
    (I apologize in advance for this one)

    They're probably great at running Folding@Home.

    --

    that that is is that that is not is not

    1. Re:Good for distributed computing, I bet. by Kevan_moran · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The first machine, an Elliot 900, I was ever paid to work on had 8K. Not too bad tho as the bottom 4K retained it's contents when you switch off the m/c for the night

      Now that machine used paper tape and the next machine I used punched card - so what are we going to do with paper tape and punched cards that have embedded processors. Feed them to themselves?

      One machine at Uni was an 8K PDP 7(?), unfortunately some the graphite rings were broken so not all 8K actually worked. Code around broken bits was a bit tedious

  43. The Answer to All Questions by handy_vandal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why climb everest?
    I think you'll find the answer to both questions is "why not?"


    Not so. The true answer to all questions is: "to improve my chances of getting laid".

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:The Answer to All Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The true answer to all questions is: "to improve my chances of getting laid".

      Except, perhaps for the question "Why am I going to prison?"

    2. Re:The Answer to All Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it's 42.

    3. Re:The Answer to All Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are seriously so shallow that you think people risk life & limb to climb the tallest mountain in the world just go get a little action?? Stop watching American television and have an original opinion for once in your life.

    4. Re:The Answer to All Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're making the (wrong) assumption everyone is as sad as us :)

    5. Re:The Answer to All Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he was aiming for a "funny". Don't bother reading the post scores, obviously they affect your opinion.

  44. Tablet PC or yellow ledger? by mod_critical · · Score: 1

    Haha! Just imagine: Mead producing yellow paper ledgers with these to compete with tablet PCs =D

  45. Offspring by krusadr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean that a computer and a printer can reproduce?

    --
    while sco {
    wget -O /dev/null http://www.sco.com?sco=litigious%20bastards
    }
  46. It was Steve Jobs by DynaSoar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Who would ever want more than 16K?" He said it to Woz when Woz was designing the Apple II. Woz wanted to put socketing for 16, 32 or 48K on the motherboard, as opposed to the 16K limit of the Apple I. Jobs was also against the color capabilities. Woz built them in anyway.

    When Jobs hoisted the pirate flag and built the Mac, he specifically left out expandability and color on purpose. It wasn't because of technical considerations, as the Apple IIgs was in design at the same time as the Mac. It was computer design by temper tantrum.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:It was Steve Jobs by seanadams.com · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was computer design by temper tantrum.

      That may well be, but it's still perhaps one of the smartest moves apple ever made. While the rest of the computing world focused on standardized components, interchangeable io cards and memory, replaceable drives etc... Apple made an all-in-one system whose only interesting upgrade path was a new machine from Apple.

      And so, those who valued a complete, tested, supported system went with Apple, and that was the basis for (one of?) the most successful hardware companies ever.

      You can't argue with success, even if Jobs is a bit of a whack.

    2. Re:It was Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. The homosexuals didn't joing the ma[c|n] train until they put colour in the box.

    3. Re:It was Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep you can't argue with less than 3% of the market.

    4. Re:It was Steve Jobs by alistair · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "yep you can't argue with less than 3% of the market."

      Hmm, no debt at all (see recent Slashdot story), over $4 Billion in the bank, successive profitable quarters, doesn't seem like failure to me.

      There are hardware manufacturers who make have more market share but very few who make this kind of return on investment. BMW have around 3% market share but don't seem unduely worried about it, in fact it seem to please most BMW owners I know. Oh, and Apple have around 32% of the portable music player market.

    5. Re:It was Steve Jobs by rixstep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, I thought this thread was about the Swedish Cypak disposable computer? How did we get talking about Jobs's temper without getting modded as off-topic?

      And as for Jobs making a brilliant move here: I disagree anyway. Woz didn't like what Jobs did, and quit because of it, and I would hardly call a 2% market share 'successful'.

    6. Re:It was Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Jobs hoisted the pirate flag and built the Mac

      Are you trolling on purpose or just completely ignorant?

      Google up "Jef Raskin" and see who created the Mac, and who (*nudge nudge*) actually opposed the whole project and the GUI concept to the extent of trying to get the Board to kill the project altogether.

      This has been discussed on /. counless times. Oh shit is all I can say. Well, good job with the history revision, Steve.

      Sorry for my (apparent) frustration. I agree with your point about design by tantrum :-)

    7. Re:It was Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Otherwise an insightful observation about Mac, but you misspelled "Raskin" as "Jobs". Steve had bugger all to do with Mac's excellence; quite on the contrary. (You too google up "Jef Raskin" if you haven't elsewhere read the real history. To be honest, I'm tired of endlessly combating Jobs' History Distortion Field, but I'll feel the urge regardless.)

    8. Re:It was Steve Jobs by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      I call BS. Apple has, for quite a while, been given a reprieve-of-assault by MS. In order to keep the DoJ from sniffing there way, MS has been SMART ENOUGH to not crush Apple. Hell, they even make the Apple a 'viable' platform by porting Office/IE. Further, MS has (presently/in-past?) INVESTED IN APPLE. To those who will say 'it wasnt much' or 'they were nonvoting shares' thats not the point -- its a signal to the marketplace and investors "MS promises to not crush Apple'.

      It never ceases to amaze me why Apple fanatics feel that their success in such tough times isnt so obviously enabled by their virtual non-aggression pact with MS.

      MS Executive: "Were non monopolists, here, look, you can buy an Apple!"

      If MS wanted, they could bankrupt Apple in 18months by declaring their market as a target, withdrawing Office/all-other-ms software, and tweaking this and that to cease network interoperation.

      the fact that they havnt ALSO destroyed apple shouldnt be a sign that Apple is a success, just that they are a usefull foil in the marketplace.

    9. Re:It was Steve Jobs by jsebrech · · Score: 2, Informative

      You might want to read up on your history yourself. Jobs took over the mac project when he was kicked out of the lisa project, and Raskin quit over what Jobs did to it.

      The problem with Jobs is that he always wanted perfection, and perfection is too expensive. The lisa, the mac, next, all suffered from overdesign and the resulting price tag.

    10. Re:It was Steve Jobs by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      I'm warming to the idea of Macs - not for me as I hack computers around a lot and write software and like a huge variety of packages/OSS software, but for a lot of home users, a mac seems ideal.

      What are the requirements? Word Processing, websurfing, email and image manipulation. How many millions of people need little more than that? They also get major stability and less spyware and viruses.

    11. Re:It was Steve Jobs by rixstep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Incredible. I accuse the moderators of slacking, when the entire discussion gets off-topic, and they call this comment off-topic.

      I guess brown shirts are required clothing for mods at /.?

    12. Re:It was Steve Jobs by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's far more than the Cypak will ever have ;-)

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  47. 'Scratch Space' by scorp1us · · Score: 2, Funny

    When you run out of memory, just add a 'scratch pad' and malloc some more 'pages'.

    'Scratch space' wasn't meant to be taken littlerally!

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  48. Re:FucXk. by Rabscuttle · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH goatse.cx link!!!!!!!11 You're a bad man.

  49. A giant step backward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So much for the paperless office...

  50. Windows? by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Funny

    Perhaps they can get it to run Windows, sell them on rolls and I'll be able to wipe my butt with Microsoft on a daily basis.

    John.

    1. Re:Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure Bill Gates would be crying all the way to the bank with you wiping your arse with hit $1/sheet toilet paper every day.

  51. Prophetic by krusadr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Quote from flashing Adobe ad on /. front page...

    "And I need to design paper forms that are identical to the paper ones"

    --
    while sco {
    wget -O /dev/null http://www.sco.com?sco=litigious%20bastards
    }
  52. Re:32k is more than I dreamed of a few (25) years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note that the module plus 32K extra RAM (to bring the system to 48K) was about $2,000 Canadian at the time.

    This is misleading. At the time the Model 1 was released, $2000 Canadian is only equivalent to $22.40 U.S.

  53. The technology will also allow by Muhammar · · Score: 1

    tattooing computers on disposable employees
    (to better manage the workforce inventory)

    --
    I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  54. Is this really a "computer" or data storage? by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...the paperboard computer can collect, process, and exchange several pages of encrypted data, the company says.

    What do they mean by process? It sounds more like data storage. This is quite different than a computer. What kind of calculations (or computations) can it do?

    All of the examples could easily be implemented on this paper computer with nothing more than a clever encoding scheme and be decoded by a real electronic computer (PDA) with a scanner.

    In short this sound like a new type of ticker tape. The PDA and scanner would be the "Turing machine" (or processor).

    --
    What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
    1. Re:Is this really a "computer" or data storage? by pabx · · Score: 1

      By the look of the product photos on their corporate website (www.cypak.com), they have simple, integrated interfaces and feedback mechanisms (they mention a speaker and a few lights are visible). A user or signal can input commands, have them processed, and stored within the memory. This is a great deal more advanced than a visual storage mechanism A few example uses: Pharmacutical Packaging - User-specific dosage recommendations from a dateabase -Tracking/Security Distribution Tracking -have Max/Min tempurature, pressure, handling recorded and time-stamped -Tamper evidence

    2. Re:Is this really a "computer" or data storage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of calculations (or computations) can it do?

      What part of _computer_ (as in universal Turing-machine) don't you understand?

  55. Re: Disposable Computer by WwWonka · · Score: 1

    Imagine me beating you over the head with a Beouwulf drain pipe for being the first one to come up with that redundant response to a /. posting!

  56. Obligatory Robert Lucky Quote... by plainvanilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "In the future, you're going to get computers as prizes in breakfast cereals.
    You'll throw them away because your house will be littered with them."

    -Robert Lucky; c. 1984

    This might be a good time for me to start learning parallel architectures.

  57. $1 per - ouch by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 1
    At $1 per it's only likely to be used in tracking high-dollar items, if used in an inventory chain at all. I write inventory software and am looking forward to cheap rf tags to make tracking and consumption easier; however, this ain't it - not yet anyway, at least for mainstream inventory tracking.

    However, it's right up there for the applications they outline - pharmecutical inventory tracking where a vial of drugs can cost a couple of grand.

  58. I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought eMachines and Gateways were disposable machines... Perhaps these guys have exceeded that mark?

  59. Re:Oh no, the TERRORISTS will LOVE it!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So what's your point? "It might fall into the wrong hands" is a valid fear when those hands belong to the US Government, but it's a bogus fear when those hands belong to terrorists, drug dealers, pedophiles or pirates?

    Paranoid, poorly informed, easily-led leftist-wannabe asshat.

  60. Re:32k is more than I dreamed of a few (25) years by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    32K is a lot of RAM

    These days, relatively high-level CAD functions can be done with a $599 el-cheepo machine (I still wonder why some 3DLabs cards cost $1K).

    Aside from modelling the entire universe and rotating it, texturized and shaded, in real-time, why does anyone need a videocard that costs more than, say, $500? Is this why Intergraph went out of the hardware business?

    My experience has been in relatively complex models of large piping systems, and today's processors, affordable RAM and displays seem to be OK to me for design/visualization purposes when I need to do design.

    Then again, when in doubt, I use the old tried-and-true drafting table. Freaks out the new-tech morons.

  61. Origami Mods anyone? by agendi · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least it will be easy to case mod!

    --
    I just can't be bothered.
  62. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...a ream of these paper computers.

  63. Re: Disposable Computer by SkorpiXx · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of those cardboard box forts I used to build as a kid. Except this time ... er... Fuck, I'm too tired to think of something witty.

    blah.
    S

    --
    bah.
  64. Only man by luckyguesser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Only mankind would be self-centered enough to think of creating something so valuable with the intent to throw it away. I've had my qualms about other things we throw away, but this really takes the cake.

    --


    The power of Christ compiles you.
    A Random Blog
    1. Re:Only man by DoubleReed · · Score: 1

      It may not be a universal truth, but surely in this case theres no intrinsic value to a piece of cardboard. I mean, come on, these things are gonna cost $1.

    2. Re:Only man by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Only mankind would be self-centered enough to think of creating something so valuable with the intent to throw it away.

      In the camera world, some people call 'em "disposable" and some people call 'em "single use". The former people are wrong; you don't throw it away, you use it once then return it to the manufacturer (I use Ilford) who break it down into its component parts, sends the film back to you and reuses as much of the rest of it as it can. Single use cameras are great; if I'm going out with friends, I don't want to have to lug an SLR around or worry about getting it lost/stolen/broken - all I need to risk is one evening's snaps. In this case, being single-use is a positive advantage over being built to last. So it is with these - now computing power can be deployed in situations where the risk/reward calculation simply didn't permit it before. And it's built by Swedes not Americans, so it'll be environmentally friendly to manufacture and recycleable.

  65. Re:Oh no, the TERRORISTS will LOVE it!!! by coltrane679 · · Score: 1

    It's interesting that you mentioned the US government--because I didn't. Some things just kinda flow naturally, don't they, AC?

    For the record, however, let me state emphatically--the US government should be allowed to have as many disposable computers as they like. Hell, they're losing notebooks loaded with classified info all the time as it is; this would just make it more affordable.

  66. Re:32k is more than I dreamed of a few (25) years by KrispyKringle · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It really depends on what you do. Of course for Internet, word processing, etc, el Cheapo is fine. Even for Photoshop, Flash, and most coding, it's fine.

    For CAD you might get by. I've got no experience with CAD software. But for 3d modelling and rendering, the state of the art truly still isn't fast enough. A fast graphics card is necessary for showing the textured model on the fly. The better the card, the better this model, the easier it is to work on and see how it'll look compared to the real thing. The better the processor, the faster the render, the less time you have to wait to see the final product (and for a high-quality complex render, that wait is a pretty long time).

    It's good that people are catching on that they don't need the fastest machine anymore for pretty much anything. But there are still a few specialized tasks for which you do.

  67. No, it will get you $149 to $250 by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =2789658017&category=4610

  68. Finally by IronBlade · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Finally we have some real security!

    Cypak says the card's encryption can't be copied or broken, enabling it to deliver "military-class security."


    Amazing!!!

    Let's get this copy- and crack-proof encryption on everything!!

    Hmm... perhaps Cypak are a little too confident about their encryption..??

    --
    Important info:
    http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net
    http://dieoff.org/synopsis.htm
    http://www.peakoil.net
    1. Re:Finally by zhenlin · · Score: 1

      There is this encryption scheme called one-time pad.

      This disposable paper^H^H^H^H^H^H computer sounds perfect for the job.

    2. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is AES a Secure Cipher ?

      Note that if XL algorithm works, all ciphers are soon vulnerable. Not surprising, no-one has managed to get it working yet.

    3. Re:Finally by IronBlade · · Score: 1

      hehehe...

      Yep, it might be perfect for one-time pad schemes...

      --
      Important info:
      http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net
      http://dieoff.org/synopsis.htm
      http://www.peakoil.net
  69. Re:Imagine... by Shirloki · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Can I make a beowulf cluster with that? ;D

  70. New form of data loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Boss:
    Jim, where have you been and where is the data?
    Jim:
    I uh, we just had a core dump, all the data has been flushed.

  71. Re: Disposable Computer by multiplexo · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if /. can set things up so that any story related to a piece of hardware would get an automatic "imagine a beowulf cluster blah, blah blah" post from anonymous coward. Seems as if it would save a lot of valuable time for /.'ers.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  72. There must be something seriously wrong by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 5, Interesting

    with Slashdot when 95% of Score:5 comments to such an interesting article are "Funny." That having been said, I believe that our community as a whole (id est Slashdot at large) seems to completely lack any professionalism regarding cryptography by writing on the front page that "the paperboard computer can collect, process, and exchange several pages of encrypted data, the company says." which is supposedly 'Pretty impressive, given that they say it has a mere 32K of memory.' Surprise: To "collect, process, and exchange several pages of encrypted data" you don't need million times more memory than said data! Film at 11! What will be "impressive" next? The fact that strong crypto can use only few cycles per byte on general purpose processor? Wow! How impressive! Really? I don't need 4GHz Pentium 5 with 4GB of RAM to "collect, process, and exchange several pages of encrypted data"?

    Give me a break! This article is great news and really worth reading, but for much more important reasons than those that kids today think that you need ten hundred megabytes of ram to encrypt and store ten kilobytes of plain text. I, for one, feel insulted by such article summaries, because everyone who knows that I am a Slashdot user might think that I must be completely incompetent looking at the front page.

    I might only suggest for everyone who wishes to post stories about cryptography to read at least Applied Cryptography by Bruce Schneier first. This is the absolute minimum if you don't want to make an idiot out of yourself. Why cannot we talk about the serious implications of using RFID technology to build this machine instead of posting completely unintelligent jokes in the lines of "Imagine a beowulf cluster of those! It might have 640kB of RAM! Who needs more?" This is stupid at best and insulting at worst. I urge you to start posting insightful, informative or at least interesting posts before it is too late and this discussion is already archived.

    What I am personally most concerned about is how disposable are the active and passive (semi-)conductor elements which are printed on this boards. Does anyone have any experience in disposing them? It is not very clear in the article.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:There must be something seriously wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      (Lady and) Gentlemen,

      I present to you:

      Mister Grumpyface....

    2. Re:There must be something seriously wrong by bhima · · Score: 1
      The whole article is not very clear!

      I want more data!

      Insightful, informative or at least interesting posts? What are you thinking? This is Slashdot!

      The Meme of the unwashed mass of disenfranchised misanthropes.

      And we're both here as well....

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    3. Re:There must be something seriously wrong by maztuhblastah · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ironically, the entire rant aobut unproffessional conduct come from a guy with the name "Pan T. Hose." So original...


      Mod me up to +5 Funny if you want to prove him wrong...

    4. Re:There must be something seriously wrong by sipy · · Score: 1

      Cudos!

      I've been after Slashdot to give each user the ability to BLOCK all posts moderated as "Funny", as most are only sardonic, or caustic at best.

      If Slashdot would do us this one favor, we could let those that want to commiserate do so, while others discuss such topics openly and intelligently.

      While we're at it, why not have them create a mod of "BiasedToTheGills"... ;)

      - Mike S.

    5. Re:There must be something seriously wrong by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 1

      Agreeing in part - dissenting in part.

      I think the Beowolf referance and book cluster is absolutely hillarious - especially as it is not unrealistic.

      But all the jokes seem to miss the more interesting trend which is the use of ink jets to create active circuits.

      I understand oleds have been printed - here it seems some logic and memory have been created - RFID is a means of empowerment as well as communication.

      When can I start printing my own cool sh*t with my HP printer (6 unique ink wells)

      What I want is an electronic form that allows people to enter simple data and get it back.

      AIK

  73. Yes, it is. by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

    Is it allowed to call itself a "computer"?

    Yes.

    One can even build a "computer" out of tinker toys if so inclined. It wouldn't have the specs you're used to, but it's still a computer.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  74. Mad respect?! by phraktyl · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I believe the word you are looking for is "props."

    --
    Karma: Marginal (mostly due to the border around the website)
    1. Re:Mad respect?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Mad respect to all the trailblazers who managed to write kick-ass games under those props."

      Much better.

    2. Re:Mad respect?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's so much idiom nazism going on here that Shakespeare (especially famous for his mixed metaphors) would have committed suicide after but a week's Slashdot membership.

      I liked "Mad respect" -- it conveys the idea fresher than the standard-issue, semi-cliche "Mad props" could. IMO, OC.

  75. Disposal Machines...New Idea? by yintercept · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hmmm, I seem to have purchased several computers in my days that turned out to be disposable. I don't think this is a new idea. Of course, each time I bought a new machine (8088, 286, 386 ...) I thought it was the bees knees that would never be replaced. The only new thing would be pricing them at a level that didn't make buying a new machine extremely painful. Also admitting a limited lifecycle upfront is a new idea.

    Of course, on the battle front, there is a large number of computers that only get to live for a few moments before going out in a blaze of glory.

  76. I've got three words for you by highwindarea · · Score: 2, Insightful
    • One
    • Time
    • Pad
    • /
    --
    I think this internet thing sounds like a good idea
    1. Re:I've got three words for you by lxs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Very funny. With 32k on board, your one time pad can only transmit/receive say, 30k of information (well you'd need one or two K of code to actually do the work) Not to mention that you'd need a different pad for every one of these things, and the machine on the other end needs copies of all the pads for the machines it communicates with.

      30k is not much. It's a handful of /. posts. So using OTP's would e highly impractical.

    2. Re:I've got three words for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • Crowbar
      • To
      • Knee
      Messages that are encrypted with One Time Pad can be successfully retrieved 99.8% of the time using the technology described above. Cheers, and happy decrypting!
    3. Re:I've got three words for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Collectively:

      Rubber

      Hose

      Cryptanalysis

      http://www.rubberhose.org/

      PS: The rubberhose.org software approach to this issue seems like poker at the highest level: Does the interrogater believe the prisoner has divulged all the passwords/secrets to a 'rubberhosed' piece of data or are they still bluffing/witholding more?...

      Seems to me, a bloodthirsty interrogator would just keep torturing the prisoner until they died
      and use whatever secrets were revealed from a 'rubberhose' crypto'ed package of data to do whatever they have to do. The best defence to this would be to split the secret up in pieces and encrypt each piece once (or layer it like an onion via 'rubberhose'). This way the secret isn't divulged but the prisoner in this case is likely dead meat nontheless. All is lost if all the rebels are caught and compromised.

      Rebuttals welcome. Discuss please.

  77. Flushable by wrmrxxx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Very handy for when the SCO cops show up. Quick, everybody, flush the computers down the toilet!

    1. Re:Flushable by armando_wall · · Score: 1

      Maybe we'll soon get smart napkins or smart toilet paper with the ability of literally "saying" tips like:

      "Oops...seems like somebody ate too many beans! Why don't you give a try to those Gassex pills in your medicine pack?"

      Assuming they'll have wireless networking capabilities.

  78. Re:32k is more than I dreamed of a few (25) years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "32K is a lot of RAM. It's enough to do a fairly useful voice recognition system, or word processor, or even spreadsheet."

    WordStar takes 8k...

    Elite, one of the best Sci-Fi computer games ever, was developed on a 32K computer.

  79. Re:32k is more than I dreamed of a few (25) years by droyad · · Score: 1

    Ah, well, lets see. On a "normal computer" (P4, 1.8ghz, 512mb) one of our customer regularly spend 45mins rendering their CAD stuff. Now we supplied them with a new computer
    Dual Xeon 2.8ghz
    2GB RAM
    Matrox 650 Video Card

    And now thier rendering is at 7mins. They paid AUD$10000 for it (US$8000 approx). But they are more than happy with the result.

    My point is there are still applications out there that require a lot of grunt, and the video card does play a role, small it might be but it adds up.

  80. Re:32k is more than I dreamed of a few (25) years by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    Ah, well, lets see. On a "normal computer" (P4, 1.8ghz, 512mb) one of our customer regularly spend 45mins rendering their CAD stuff. Now we supplied them with a new computer Dual Xeon 2.8ghz 2GB RAM Matrox 650 Video Card And now thier rendering is at 7mins. They paid AUD$10000 for it (US$8000 approx). But they are more than happy with the result. My point is there are still applications out there that require a lot of grunt, and the video card does play a role, small it might be but it adds up.

    What kind of CAD were they doing?

    I can't think of *any* CAD work that would take 7 minutes, unless you're talking about animation rendering. What I'm talking about is computer/software response time so that the designer has an adequate view of what he's doing.

  81. Re:No, it will get you $149 to $250 by BTWR · · Score: 1

    I commend you. You are in a position where you can say that two hundred fifty dollars for a 20 year-old obsolete computer isn't "a bundle."

  82. Youngsters have it too easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The first computer I used had an architectural limit of 8192 39bit words (none of this power of two rubbish), and the fastest instruction took 576ms (2.4kips). Somebody heroically modified it to act as a timesharing system for 3 terminals.

    The first computer I built had a massive 128 bytes; never did manage to fill it up with anything useful.

  83. What? no Dilbert reference? by khcm8jw · · Score: 1

    Dilbert had to contend with this years ago... too lazy to find link in archive, use your imagination...

    --
    "They locked up a man who wanted to rule the world, the fools, they locked up the wrong man! L.Cohen
  84. I looked over cypaks site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    No new technology seems to be involved, some comments would lead one to believe that there was some inkjet printed circuitry involved and that it is a paper computer. Not so, I could see no evidence of this.

    The pin on card product looks like it has some applications.
    To order the development kit which includes a usb reader and two cards was 500 pounds(the money sort) the license to get this kit did not allow any reverse engineering or disassembly so it would not seem well suited to determining just how secure it is, they also reserved the right to take the equipment back. Postage and handling was another 100 pounds.

    I use an RSA secureID it has a keypad and numeric lcd, this does everything except the contactless is achieved by reading the correct number off the lcd.

    One of the goals of having a keypad on the card is to prevent the pin going through untrusted chanels and for achieving this I say bravo! every access card should have this feature, however combine to a wirless power and comms means you have to put it down on a reader surface.

    Ignoring cameras I still wonder how easy it would be to steal the pin by sensing the pressure through the card as it is used. Of course the card would still need to be stolen. Mind you if the reader is untrusted then how can you even be sure what your authorising?

    The package dispensing is a fancy birthday card as someone else mentioned, the pin on card is only good to tell a remote and trusted web site that yes it really is you and I'd still trust my RSA SecureID over this.

    What is truely needed is a card or cheap pda (cost similar to card) that has a keypad and a display big enough to display an incoming request.
    This can then be aurthorised (signed) and the response sent. Contactless is important for security but enough distance so that emissions and key pressure do not factor in. IR beaming is probably the best, keeping it low power and rechargable should not be insurmountable problems.

    Once something like that is built then untraceable digital cash and communications would be instantly realizable. Once you have secure comms and finance then all other freedoms are possible.

    If you wish to help build such a device or would be a potential user of it then by all means contact me.

    -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
    Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use

    mQCNA0BH2CQAAAEEAOPWa1ggC5SxV+CSOJUF0u47ZjRr7RfY XN DuXjmUV8L4csZf
    N5ks+ALXtga4GyWuEyUWFiGvik/jCdQTQu f23F4H6t48GNwxex SEvRGke8favAC0
    BMv+crgfmYF0//yAZLZnaemyTWttBvqfuV JJP5dGsm3o86FXxB kGobiHr/3FAAUR
    tCNZb3VzZWYgQWhtZWQgPHlvc2VmYWhtZW RAeWFob28uY29tPo kAlQMFEEBH2CQZ
    BqG4h6/9xQEBnJcD/1dFH+HIQouQR9VY+e MxN16fSQGNSFZ/hA eedRDP9rHMqpGX
    7siNbJ66Mecc1XQCtNnZpKiKUsGZ4Psosh Bvu4wgIk2OQzubGM LVIjHcV0kRQiqj
    xg3ZIIu04RMaROpvSYc88dygnjjxMciZtL xod4kZHCDxFizUkh bs6mudzzmN
    =iTJe
    -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

    1. Re:I looked over cypaks site by LarsWestergren · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No new technology seems to be involved, some comments would lead one to believe that there was some inkjet printed circuitry involved and that it is a paper computer. Not so, I could see no evidence of this.


      You couldn't have looked very long:

      http://www.cypak.com/index.php?a=tech&b=printable& page=tech_printable

      "Printable circuits
      Using printable, conductive ink based on non-toxic carbon powder, electronic circuits and antennas can be printed directly onto low cost substrates, such as paper, cardboard or plastic.

      By forming electronic circuit lines and monitoring if they are opened or closed, printable circuits can be used to detect events, such as a broken seal, an open lid or damaged packaging. This includes the formation of pressure sensitive areas which can be used as key switches in an electronic questionnaire. The circuits attach to Cypak Electronic Module (CEM) where events are recorded and time stamped.

      In the same production step as circuits our robust and extremely low cost antenna can be printed in the form of patches the size of a credit card.

      Our know-how in printing circuits on folded paper enables multiple form factors, such as boxes, wallets, books etc. "

      The technology is not new, they have developed it since 1996 and won a major prize in 1999 for it. What *is* new is that now apprearently it is mature and cheap enough to start using for real.

      They have started to get some license agreements from big companies.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    2. Re:I looked over cypaks site by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      This printed circuitry stuff is really cool. I did a project in school on it. Think.....disposable packaging with computers built in. Imagine a cereal box that plays back with you *cough*Minority Report*cough*. I'm sure there will be some bad implmentations, but the good ones will be worth it.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  85. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent makes a good point. What about the board elements? Are they disposable as well?

  86. Please mod this up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For it is good and informative and a fine use of the anonymous function.

  87. wooden by acceptera · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I can see it right away: We swedes have long been taunted for our wooden shoes and wooden houses. Imagine what (basically) wooden COMPUTERS would do to our image. Sigh.

  88. Which meaning of "props"? by pjt33 · · Score: 1
    Theatrical properties, supports, propellers, or a game of chance in which sea shells are used as dice?

    (Seriously, for the benefit of a non-American, what does it abbreviate in this context?)

    1. Re:Which meaning of "props"? by shyster · · Score: 3, Funny

      Proper respect...or propers...or prop. Don't look at me, I didn't make it up. Just reporting it.

  89. I've got three words for you by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    Tamper proof? Riiight.

  90. 32k|encryption by jago25_98 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    bah "32k should be enough for anybody!"

    "Cypak says the card's encryption can't be copied or broken, enabling it to deliver "military-class security.""
    ^ well fate is tempted. I'd say slashdotters will take about 3 months to crack it after being distributed commonly... :)

  91. Re:32k is more than I dreamed of a few (25) years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    word processor yes
    spreadsheet yes

    voice recognition system Not a chance

    they cant get that working decently with 2Ghz of processor speed and 512 meg of ram.

  92. Jobs was right by dmoen · · Score: 4, Insightful
    When Jobs hoisted the pirate flag and built the Mac, he specifically left out expandability and color on purpose. It wasn't because of technical considerations,

    Yes, it certainly was. The Mac was not Apple's first computer with a mouse and a graphical interface. That was the Lisa, which nobody bought, because it was too expensive. A colour Mac would have required a huge frame buffer in order to provide adequate resolution. The memory costs of this would have pushed the price too high. Also, the 7MHz CPU was not fast enough to draw text and windows on a colour graphics display (again, unless the resolution was too small to be useful).

    And keep in mind that the Lisa, despite its immense cost, was also black and white. So was the Xerox Star (another failed GUI computer that cost too much).

    The Mac was not the first personal computer with a GUI. It was the first GUI computer that was cheap enough for ordinary people to buy. The hardware limitations you mention were necessary to keep the cost down.

    Doug Moen

    --
    I have written a truly remarkable program which this sig is too small to contain.
    1. Re:Jobs was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "minor" correction:

      The Macintosh project (Jef Raskin's brainchild) introduced the GUI & mouse concept; Lisa was originally planned as a command line machine, but the team adopted the user interface from the Macintosh project (after Jobs finally understood it and approved of it).

      That is all.

    2. Re:Jobs was right by tombeard · · Score: 1

      Maybe I am mis-remembering, but wasn't the Lisa susposed to be the dev platform for the Mac? A friend wasted quite a few $$$ on one for that.

      --
      The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
    3. Re:Jobs was right by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      -1, Nitpicking Apple Zealot Uhhh... that "7MHz CPU" that was "not fast enough to draw text and windows on a colour graphics display" at decent resolution was an MC68000. Oddly enough, that's the very same CPU as was used by the Sega Genesis a scant 6 years later, which was capable of displaying 64 colors at a time out of a palette of 512 on a 512x384 display. You might want to rethink your conclusion. The reason for black & white in the original Mac was for cost reasons, true, but not having to do with the processor. A color CRT (remember, it was an all-in-one machine) jacked the price up immensely. So a black & white 9" CRT was used. Once that design decision was made, there was no use in "wasting" CPU time making color calculations, so QuickDraw was made black & white until later. Once they had time to update QD and a supplier of cheaper color CRT's, then they made the needed adjustments and made some color Macs. Lisa, on the other hand, had color capability throughout and was scheduled to put it to use right around the time they folded the whole project into the Mac.

    4. Re:Jobs was right by Harlequin · · Score: 1

      obligitory amiga zelot:

      Well, the Amiga 1000 I had seemed to do ok with color, windowing, and 4 channel audio at a reasonable resolution... all at the same time as that mac and with your slow 68000 cpu.

      I remember when my dad was buying our first computer and he asked me which one I thought we should get. Hmmmm... b&w mac or color amiga... let me think, which one will have better games :)

    5. Re:Jobs was right by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      The Lisa was supposed to be a computer for businesses users. They may have tried to sell it as the dev platform for the Mac at the time they had renamed it Mac XL.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    6. Re:Jobs was right by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      At the same time meaning 1.5 years later; using 3 custom chips.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    7. Re:Jobs was right by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      Apple was never known for their great in-house graphics chipsets. The Apple really didn't truly catch up with the PC until they started supplying PCI slots so you could buy commodity graphics cards for them.

      The Amiga, on the other hand, was designed from the ground up with video and audio in mind. The operating system came later.

    8. Re:Jobs was right by dmoen · · Score: 1
      You are correct about the cost of a colour CRT.

      The Sega Genesis had only 320 x 224 resolution, which would have been unuseably small on the Mac. It also had a custom graphics chip with sprites and scrolling playfields to take the load off the CPU, while the Mac did everything with the CPU.

      I didn't know that the Lisa had "colour capability". I do know that it had a monochrome display, just like the Mac.

      The first colour Mac was the Mac II, which had a 16Mhz 68020, significantly faster than the original 7Mhz 68000.

      --
      I have written a truly remarkable program which this sig is too small to contain.
  93. Solid design principles by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

    No doubt the design was first roughed out on the back of a notebook PC!

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  94. Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We throw away a mobile phone each every 12 months - what's the definition of disposable?

  95. Sounds like a Mission Impossible scene... by l1gunman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good morning Mr. Phelps. The documents you are viewing are... Your mission, should you decide to accept it... This computer will be recyclable in 60 seconds. Please deposit it in the nearest cardboard recycling bin.

  96. Crash and burn.. by klang · · Score: 1

    "Crash and burn" gets a whole new meaning with theese "computers"

  97. Ecology and waste by gandhiano · · Score: 1

    Do I need to add anything to the subject?

    1. Re:Ecology and waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way to get rich is to invent something that people will use and then throw away. I think Gillette said that (before he invented the disposable razor)

  98. use-once pc's? by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 1

    eMachines have already been out for years.

    --
    If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
  99. Paperless society by dargaud · · Score: 2, Funny

    So now we can become a truly paperless society, once they come out with version 1.0 of WipeMe for this system...

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  100. Book name by just+fiddling+around · · Score: 1

    No, it should be "War and Peace". Much more power to the user.

    --
    You're not old until regret takes the place of your dreams.
  101. They're called punchcards by Da_Big_G · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yup, looks like we're going back to punchcards. Now THAT's news!

  102. unfortunately it's a good answer for that question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    although I don't think one associates "getting laid" with "prison rape". Maybe that's just why the other inmates think when the new one is asking why he's going to prison...

  103. Its not a first by ZHaDoom · · Score: 0

    All the computers I have bought have been disposale. None of then have lasted over 2 years.

    --
    War isn't about who's right. It's about who's left.
  104. Re: Disposable Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They already did.

  105. The disposable computer isn't new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Timex Sinclair. Also useful as a doorstop.

  106. Zenith tried this sort of thing once.... Bad idea by Warlock7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Zenith tried using paper/cardboard circuit boards in their televisions once and it was a complete failure. It seems that many of the televisions arrived at stores and simply would not work out of the box. Turns out that the vibrations created during shipping was enough to break the circuit boards and forced them to recall the sets and replace the boards with ones that weren't as flimsy.

  107. Re:32k is more than I dreamed of a few (25) years by MrScience · · Score: 1

    Big difference between voice recognition and text-to-speach. I strongly suspect you meant the latter. :)

    --

    You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

  108. Old news... by MrScience · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wonder if this guy will be remembered? He tried to do it in the US ten years ago.

    --

    You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

  109. What happend to printable PC's? by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A year or so ago, we read about annonucement of a printable comptuer..

    Was going to be uses by the US census.. And was never heard from again...

    What ever happened to them?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  110. oh and on hackers... by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    you might be kidding, but i think of the people back then were clever enough to warrant the old style definition of hacker :)

    Computers were designed and built by engineers (directed by theorticians). But they were programmed by the same women who used to run the adding machines! Though usually they were women with a college degree, often in math.

    At that time, programming the computer was often seen as 'below' the designers who built the thing and not a particularly manly job. Given this, its little surprise that many of early advancements in programming were done by women. Grace Hopper's development of mnemonics comes to mind and the invention of the compiler.

    Though in the western world this attitude has done a complete 180 (men are much more common as programmers), there are still some places in the world where programming is often seen as a more womanly job.

    --

    -

  111. Ironically? by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    Ironically, the entire rant aobut unproffessional conduct come from a guy with the name "Pan T. Hose." So original...

    Well, Mr. Maztuhblastah (if that is your real name), there is indeed no "e" in "Hose" but "LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH ACUTE" (0xE9) but for some reason Slashdotcode don't let me use ISO-8859-1 characters, let alone Unicode. However funny that might be, I fail to find any irony here to be honest.

    Mod me up to +5 Funny if you want to prove him wrong...

    Ha! Nice try! Din't you know that Funny moderation doesn't increase your "Karma"?

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:Ironically? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod me up to +5 Funny if you want to prove him wrong...

      Ha! Nice try! Din't you know that Funny moderation doesn't increase your "Karma"?


      Maybe he did, and thus considered his post not Karma-whoring. And so he posted it non-AC.

    2. Re:Ironically? by maztuhblastah · · Score: 1

      "but for some reason Slashdotcode don't let me use"
      "Din't you know that Funny moderation doesn't increase your "Karma"?"
      For someone who is a member of Mensa, you would think that you would at least take the time to check your post for grammatical errors...

      This is not meant to be a personal attack on you, but rather a fun battle of words, mainly for my entertainment and that of others. You made an excellent point in your inital post, and I can't help but see that you hold a very strong stance on the issue of "+5 Funny" moderation.

      Respectfully Yours,
      maztuhblastah

  112. Applied Cryptography is not very practical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read Practical Cryptography. Same author, but much more real engineering insight alongside the theory.

  113. So what? by tritone · · Score: 1

    I know that this dates me, but I had my very own disposable cardboard computer way back in 1966. Sure, it only had about 100 bits memory, but it didn't require any batteries either!Here are some pics.

  114. Re:32k is more than I dreamed of a few (25) years by owlstead · · Score: 1

    It said memory. It's probably EEPROM though. This is all simple smartcard technology. The only thing interesting is the inclusion of sensors and their interface with the chip. Otherwise, nothing new.

    So the memory will be SLOW and cannot be written over continuously. So much for the software you are talking about. Oh, well, we will get there sometime.

  115. Just a smart card by owlstead · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Come on guys. This is just a smart card chip with some sensors put on it. It has a non-ISO 14443 type A or type B interface, which means you can only use the readers provided by Cypak.

    On top of that it only uses AES encryption. Great. Most smartcard processors can do any symetric cryptography and DSA and RSA as well. 156 / 1024 bit 3DES/RSA is common nowadays and higher asymetric encryption is on the horizon, if not there. 16 bit processors are quite common as well, with 32 bit processors just around the corner. You can host web servers on smart cards for some time now.

    Obviously there are some interesting things to this story. What kind of wireless protocol will they use? How do they connect the sensors? What kind of sensors are available? What kind of operating system can be used? How easy is it to integrate it into some piece of clothing (eg)?

    And 1 dollar per CPU is very good value I suppose.

  116. Re:32k is more than I dreamed of a few (25) years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Complex 3d solid modeling work, probably.

    I do electrical CAD. I could use the video card from my 286 to do the display, but when simulation time comes, I need the fastest CPU possible. And at that, my last simulation ran at a roughly 2000:1 ratio (2000 seconds runtime to simulate one second simtime).

    Other people have other needs.

  117. what happened to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.papercomputer.com? it was /.ed a few years ago, but it's gone now. pity. any info?

  118. Re: Disposable Computer by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

    and because the site always gets /.'d, they'll have to add another smart-ass AC post remarking on how "The server must be running on one of these!"...

  119. Easier way to store 32K on paper: by Atario · · Score: 1

    Use a pen. Or a pencil for rewritability.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  120. Do you even know what Mensa is? by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    "but for some reason Slashdotcode don't let me use"
    "Din't you know that Funny moderation doesn't increase your "Karma"?"
    For someone who is a member of Mensa, you would think that you would at least take the time to check your post for grammatical errors...

    Please... I am sick of everyone feeling somehow obligated to point out every single orthographical (sic, not grammatical) errour of mine just because I happen to have Philosophiae Doctor degree, intelligence quotient well above the "genius" level or Mensa membership for that matter. Now please tell me, how do you think it is all related to my orthographical, lexical, syntactical---or linguistical as a whole---skills or the lack thereof? Let me tell you how: it is in no way related, not at all. Have you ever taken a Mensa test for God's sake?! Do you know how does it look like, for the love of God?! This is just unbelievable! What is wrong with you people?! Do you feel smarter because you have found some stupid typos in my post? Do you feel better? Do you think you have succeeded in disproving my point? Please tell me, why are you doing it? I would really like to know.

    This is not meant to be a personal attack on you

    Good to know... It was not meant but it was an argumentum ad hominem, the most stupid and insulting logical fallacy since Sophistical Refutations by Aristoteles!

    but rather a fun battle of words, mainly for my entertainment and that of others.

    I hope you are having a great time!

    You made an excellent point in your inital post, and I can't help but see that you hold a very strong stance on the issue of "+5 Funny" moderation.

    As a matter of fact, yes, I do. What is your point?

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  121. Emulators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this technology can be adapted to on-the-fly production, perhaps in a supermarket or mall, imagine going to the kiosk and having a Commodore64 or Atari etc etc built for you instantly ( assuming advances in more memory) from a list of templates.Use it for a specific purpose, then into the recycler.
    I imagine creating a hardware interface by just telling the machine that makes these things: "I have a so-and-so output from this thing, and a such-and-such input here, make 'em talk to each other".
    If this has RFID capability, what's to stop it gaining two-way wireless next?
    Once you get the process started, the sky is the limit.
    It's like having interchangable motherboards instead of ISA/PCI cards.

  122. Re:No, it will get you $149 to $250 by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    It isn't. It is less than 1/2 the median rent in the United States. That makes it less than a bundle.

  123. Sartre on Philosophy, Fame, and Women by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Maybe he was aiming for a "funny". Don't bother reading the post scores, obviously they affect your opinion.

    I was, as you suggest, aiming for "funny" -- seemed like an easy karma-whore.

    What surprises me is somebody modded it "insightful". Although maybe there's an element of insight in Sartre's comment --

    "If I became a philosopher, if I have so keenly sought this fame for which I'm still waiting, it's all been to seduce women basically."
    - Jean Paul Sartre (quoted in Harpers, Jan. 1995 p. 25)

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Sartre on Philosophy, Fame, and Women by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      I thought maybe you were trying to be insightful (although I wasn't the one who modded you). After all, the only real purpose to life, from a biological standpoint, is to procreate and carry on your genes. So the most worthwhile motive for any action would be to try to increase you chance of getting sex.

  124. Re:32k is more than I dreamed of a few (25) years by rcpitt · · Score: 1

    Actually I really meant voice recognition. It had to be trained, but could recognize about 30 words fairly well once this was done.

    --
    Been there, done that, paid for the T-shirt
    and didn't get it
  125. Just what we need...more techotrash. by LordPadriac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Aren't there enough computers already stting in trash dumps (or dumped straight into the sea thank you very much China) poisoning our environment without adding computers destined to get there even quicker?

    --
    "But I don't want to go among mad people" Alice remarked. "Oh you can't help that" said the cat: "We're all mad here."
  126. Procreation and Genes by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    I thought maybe you were trying to be insightful (although I wasn't the one who modded you). After all, the only real purpose to life, from a biological standpoint, is to procreate and carry on your genes. So the most worthwhile motive for any action would be to try to increase you chance of getting sex.

    I wasn't really trying for insightful, but you make a good point about procreation and genes.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  127. Re:No, it will get you $149 to $250 by BTWR · · Score: 1

    What is throwaway money to you is groceries for a month for a family of four to others (for an item that is virtually useless). once again... congratulations on all your success in life.

  128. Re:No, it will get you $149 to $250 by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    I never said it was not a decent amount of money, I just said it wasnt a HUGE amount of money as was being implied.

    Damn, do you look for things to get pissed off about?

  129. Re:No, it will get you $149 to $250 by BTWR · · Score: 1

    My original post... "But a 1984 Mac 128K, 512K, 512KE will fetch you a bundle..."

    I am sick of responding to you. It is simple: we both have different opinions on what a bundle of cash is. Case Closed.