The same thing happened to me once when I was eight yrs old with respect to an idea i had involving magnets and trains. Don't let them tell you that you are insane...your simply ahead of your time! Now, get out there and raise some capital! hehe...
It's newsworthy as it demonstrates how the "absurd" ideas that Drexler proposed more than 20 yrs ago, while still in many areas theoretical, continues to gain in relevance when discussing real science. To call it idle speculation ignores the billions of dollars in research and development that is happening now...obviously, right under your nose.
If it makes you feel more comfortable go back to Sci-Am articles about 10 years ago when Gary Stix published several stories arguing about the impossibilities of self-reproducing molecular nanotechnologies...sounds like your right in line with where his opinions where at that time, so I'd say you have some catching up to do!
Re:The UN has outlived its usefulness.
on
UN Attacks Free Speech
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Time to send them home.
-jcr
I'm always surprised how few seem to share my idea that we need the U.N. more than ever.
If humanity is to thrive, at some point we will need a world order. Not...the frightening overseeing insidious world order we always hear about, but a governing world body that is based on Secular Humanism, Rational Thought, Reason based thinking & Transparancy.
The U.N. in it's current form proves only that one can have a great idea, and execute it poorly.
Now that we have the tools to spread rational thought and ideas and concepts to the far flung corners of the world, we should easily recognize the need to consolidate into one voice of reason. The United Nations could potentially do this while still representing our unique differences.
I believe this is the way governments are moving whether we like it or not-we simply cannot afford to ignore that fact that we live on the same planet, and it must be protected...almost as if we still need to prove to ourselves the VALUE of these things. We say to the contrary, but it's blatantly clear that we really doesn't know quite what to do with the insurmountable questions that religions present. This makes sense as we keep searching for answers to impossible questions just as after thousands of years, we continue to struggle with concepts like economics, nationalism, freedom,democracy & privacy, ecology, PEACE.
Sorry for ranting, really! But we need to stop being afraid. When that happens, all of the religious tomes will claim their rightful place on the bookshelf of humanity, right next to Mother Goose, and we can finally start asking ourselves WHY it is so hard to admit we have much to learn. When fear of the unknown no longer grips us we will pare down our incredibly long list of absurd belief systems-IE-Creationism just one example.
A united nations could help humanity to acknowledge our differences, embrace our uniqueness and agree to live peacefully. Think about it, whats the alternative? We could continue pointing all the fingers that we want, but we really only have ourselves, as humans,to blame.
Now, had you claimed that science can demonstrate sufficiently for all practical purposes that pottery and baskets are in fact very real then you might have had a point.
Not quite, just ask Pythagoras, who was thought to have said "wisdom is an art of mischief".
Well, I had Cat's Cradle queued up as my next audiobook. Fortunately I'm currently listening to DUNE so by the time I begin Vonnegut, I will hopefully have forgotten the spoiler.
The Digitech vocalist 4 generates harmonies on the fly using input from the instrument being played. Guitar/piano is patched into the unit and it extracts the harmonies based on the chord I'm playing. IMO-It works as long as it's not overused in the performance.
I have real-time auto tune on my digitech vocalist 4. The only song I've ever used it on was Purple Rain, because it gave exactly the desired effect. It's actually quite easy to tell when someone is using it -it does sound jumpy and automated although much less so than even 5 yrs ago, the real shit-kicker will be when the algorithm is improved to the point where the average ear cannot distinguish that the machine is doing the pitch,timing, formant and dynamics.
I'm reminded of how impressed I was upon hearing Christine Peterson's talk at the 2007 Singularity Summit where she addresses the same issue on how science desperately needs a stronger voice in politics.
As this speech was given at Eliezer Yudkowsky's summit-some of you will undoubtedly want to riff on the merits of speculation that occur there. However, her suggestions during the talk are overall on firm ground and seem to apply to what has happened here.
I for one welcome our new Geeky-Politica Overlords...cough,cough...
I believe that was Bill's initial reaction to nanotechnology...what was yours? Perhaps he has settled down now that he has had a decade or so to think it over?
When comparing Crichton with Verne, please don't forget that the latter was a sci-fi pioneer who lived in the 19th century.
There was no excuse for Prey...IMO it desperately sucked..especially as the laypersons introduction to the nascent field of Nanotechnology at the turn of this century.
I agree w/ parent. It seems to me the internet is a less hostile place than it was back in the 90's. One might say the air has leaked out of the inane, pointless arguments that used to spring up seemingly everywhere- trolling seems more obvious than ever before to the general public.
Maybe it's just wishful thinking, or the fact that I don't spend much time on Digg or plowing through the noise on Utube, or maybe it's because I finally gave up on Usenet... but I simply don't see the typical butt-stupid flaming as much as I used to.
Could it be the use of the internet is forcing collective reasoning and rational thought on us?
It's a nice thought...in the end I believe that most of us have the capacity to learn how to behave- to disagree without being completely disrespectful, and to learn how to act through example. I suppose there is hope that the strongest, fittest examples that are passed on to the next generation will be the most rational ones
Nice segue from the previous "most disgusting story of the day" which in my opinion was the newly appointed committee member to the DPIAC. Excuse me while I cough up both my identity AND my lunch....
Slashdot Mirror
Apparently, it runs on both windows and mac courtesy of Gog. Definitely one of my favorite games of all time. http://www.gog.com/gamecard/sid_meiers_alpha_centauri
I almost sat through the 25 second commercial just to watch the the guy selling air cans. That is how interested I was. Was.
How do you feel about the concept that we on the whole as a species may at some point reach fundamental limits on all manner of new ideas?
It seems that you've answered the most contentious problem man has ever faced, and made a funny joke at the same time. I see what you did there.
...where two guys prance around in a cheetah costume..the big dog parody was brilliant. http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/80666772/
The same thing happened to me once when I was eight yrs old with respect to an idea i had involving magnets and trains. Don't let them tell you that you are insane...your simply ahead of your time! Now, get out there and raise some capital! hehe...
Obviously this is a result of what happened AFTER the helicopter hit the airbag.
Let's just send a giant magnet up and start over...
Well, it does say "eventually".We haven't collided with Andromeda yet...
It's newsworthy as it demonstrates how the "absurd" ideas that Drexler proposed more than 20 yrs ago, while still in many areas theoretical, continues to gain in relevance when discussing real science. To call it idle speculation ignores the billions of dollars in research and development that is happening now...obviously, right under your nose.
If it makes you feel more comfortable go back to Sci-Am articles about 10 years ago when Gary Stix published several stories arguing about the impossibilities of self-reproducing molecular nanotechnologies...sounds like your right in line with where his opinions where at that time, so I'd say you have some catching up to do!
How short-sighted of you.
Time to send them home.
-jcr
I'm always surprised how few seem to share my idea that we need the U.N. more than ever.
If humanity is to thrive, at some point we will need a world order. Not...the frightening overseeing insidious world order we always hear about, but a governing world body that is based on Secular Humanism, Rational Thought, Reason based thinking & Transparancy.
The U.N. in it's current form proves only that one can have a great idea, and execute it poorly.
Now that we have the tools to spread rational thought and ideas and concepts to the far flung corners of the world, we should easily recognize the need to consolidate into one voice of reason. The United Nations could potentially do this while still representing our unique differences.
I believe this is the way governments are moving whether we like it or not-we simply cannot afford to ignore that fact that we live on the same planet, and it must be protected...almost as if we still need to prove to ourselves the VALUE of these things. We say to the contrary, but it's blatantly clear that we really doesn't know quite what to do with the insurmountable questions that religions present. This makes sense as we keep searching for answers to impossible questions just as after thousands of years, we continue to struggle with concepts like economics, nationalism, freedom,democracy & privacy, ecology, PEACE.
Sorry for ranting, really! But we need to stop being afraid. When that happens, all of the religious tomes will claim their rightful place on the bookshelf of humanity, right next to Mother Goose, and we can finally start asking ourselves WHY it is so hard to admit we have much to learn. When fear of the unknown no longer grips us we will pare down our incredibly long list of absurd belief systems-IE-Creationism just one example.
A united nations could help humanity to acknowledge our differences, embrace our uniqueness and agree to live peacefully. Think about it, whats the alternative? We could continue pointing all the fingers that we want, but we really only have ourselves, as humans,to blame.
Now, had you claimed that science can demonstrate sufficiently for all practical purposes that pottery and baskets are in fact very real then you might have had a point.
Not quite, just ask Pythagoras, who was thought to have said "wisdom is an art of mischief".
Well, I had Cat's Cradle queued up as my next audiobook. Fortunately I'm currently listening to DUNE so by the time I begin Vonnegut, I will hopefully have forgotten the spoiler.
...my commercial is a brain fuck because even though you want to, you can't make fun of me like you did the other fat geeky guy because I'm cute.
The Digitech vocalist 4 generates harmonies on the fly using input from the instrument being played. Guitar/piano is patched into the unit and it extracts the harmonies based on the chord I'm playing. IMO-It works as long as it's not overused in the performance.
I have real-time auto tune on my digitech vocalist 4. The only song I've ever used it on was Purple Rain, because it gave exactly the desired effect. It's actually quite easy to tell when someone is using it -it does sound jumpy and automated although much less so than even 5 yrs ago, the real shit-kicker will be when the algorithm is improved to the point where the average ear cannot distinguish that the machine is doing the pitch,timing, formant and dynamics.
I knew I shouldn't have paid extra for the AdCam.
Chances are you would get a substantial discount for choosing the model with the adcam in the first place.
...for kurzweilAI.net
2007 Singularity Summit
As this speech was given at Eliezer Yudkowsky's summit-some of you will undoubtedly want to riff on the merits of speculation that occur there. However, her suggestions during the talk are overall on firm ground and seem to apply to what has happened here.
I for one welcome our new Geeky-Politica Overlords...cough,cough...
I believe that was Bill's initial reaction to nanotechnology...what was yours? Perhaps he has settled down now that he has had a decade or so to think it over?
There was no excuse for Prey...IMO it desperately sucked..especially as the laypersons introduction to the nascent field of Nanotechnology at the turn of this century.
I agree w/ parent. It seems to me the internet is a less hostile place than it was back in the 90's. One might say the air has leaked out of the inane, pointless arguments that used to spring up seemingly everywhere- trolling seems more obvious than ever before to the general public.
Maybe it's just wishful thinking, or the fact that I don't spend much time on Digg or plowing through the noise on Utube, or maybe it's because I finally gave up on Usenet... but I simply don't see the typical butt-stupid flaming as much as I used to.
Could it be the use of the internet is forcing collective reasoning and rational thought on us?
It's a nice thought...in the end I believe that most of us have the capacity to learn how to behave- to disagree without being completely disrespectful, and to learn how to act through example. I suppose there is hope that the strongest, fittest examples that are passed on to the next generation will be the most rational ones
3-chord knockoffs? The Beatles had plenty of them...doesn't mean the songs sucked, just that they tended to be somewhat redundant at times.
Nice segue from the previous "most disgusting story of the day" which in my opinion was the newly appointed committee member to the DPIAC. Excuse me while I cough up both my identity AND my lunch....