Slashdot Mirror


Gigantic Spiral of Light Observed Over Norway; Rocket To Blame?

Ch_Omega writes "A mysterious light display appearing over Norway last night (more pictures) has left thousands of residents in the north of the country baffled. Witnesses from Trøndelag to Finnmark compared the amazing display to anything from a Russian rocket to a meteor to a shock wave — although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yet. The phenomenon began when what appeared to be a blue light seemed to soar up from behind a mountain. It stopped mid-air, then began to circulate. Within seconds a giant spiral had covered the entire sky. Then a green-blue beam of light shot out from its center — lasting for ten to twelve minutes before disappearing completely. The Norwegian Meteorological Institute was flooded with telephone calls after the light storm — which astronomers have said did not appear to have been connected to the aurora, or Northern Lights, so common in that area of the world." The Bad Astronomer makes the case that a malfunctioning rocket spewing fuel is a parsimonious explanation, backed up by witnesses to similar events and a cool simulation (on video). An anonymous reader suggests that this Proton-M Carrier Rocket might be responsible for the display.

418 comments

  1. The Norse Were Right! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Odin's back. And he's pissed. The spiral is his wide brimmed hat. And he's finally got his favorite blue laser back from Loki. Unfortunately he can only use it on one person per night. Huginn and Muninn are doing surveillance right now so it's time to get those shrines up in the backyard, people! Raise your cups of mead and abandon Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc. The Norse were right, repent before it's too late! Finally, a reason to worship a deity I can identify with--Loki!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:The Norse Were Right! by yincrash · · Score: 2, Interesting

      are you sure it wasn't the asgard vs the goauld over scandinavia?

    2. Re:The Norse Were Right! by dzelenka · · Score: 5, Funny

      Has anyone considered that this is just an NVidia ad for their new Blu-Ray 3D format?

      Am I posting to the correct story?

      --
      Bah!
    3. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nazis are coming back from outer space... ha ha ha

    4. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Talderas · · Score: 1

      I think that was John Crichton opening a wormhole.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    5. Re:The Norse Were Right! by uuddlrlrab · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bullshit. That was the invaders' mothership. Everyone will regret not scrambling their military forces when giant saucers appear over every major city. Quick, someone ready a Powerbook with a virus we'll upload to their computers!

      --
      Odi profanum vulgus et arceo
    6. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He's right you know. After all, it is Wednesday (Odinsday), the 9th day of the 12th month of the 9th year of the 3rd millenium. That's pretty incontrovertible evidence, right there. Certainly more incontrovertible than the evidence for any other religion, such as Judaism, Christianity, Islam or Obamaism.

    7. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I prefer to believe that the screensaver on the computer running the matrix just kicked in accidentally. Apparently "God" hadn't moved the mouse for too long.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    8. Re:The Norse Were Right! by raddan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Somewhere, some nerd in the basement of a "computer history museum" desperately wants this to happen. He keeps his trackball extra clean for just such an occasion.

    9. Re:The Norse Were Right! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apparently "God" hadn't moved the mouse for too long.

      That would explain a number of things.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:The Norse Were Right! by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Funny

      Careful with your Linux screensavers or you will have some moving your mouse with god like powers.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    11. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly more incontrovertible than the evidence for any other religion, such as Judaism, Christianity, Islam or Obamaism.

      You know, one of those things is not quite like the others.

    12. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe not giant saucers, but giant red V over every major city might suffice.

    13. Re:The Norse Were Right! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      or even AssGaurd vs goatse~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:The Norse Were Right! by NCG_Mike · · Score: 1

      Just in time for the solstice too. Coincidence... I think not.

    15. Re:The Norse Were Right! by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      nah, it's a coincidence for the next 3 years, 0 months, and um.... 12 days.....

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    16. Re:The Norse Were Right! by sznupi · · Score: 1

      You can't prove it.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    17. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just give them a copy of Vista - that will do the job.

    18. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, what kind of fundamentalist modded me down? Was it a Jewish fundamentalist, a Christian fundamentalist, a Muslim fundamentalist, or a Obamaist fundamentalist? By demonstrating that you have trouble tolerating dissenting opinions, you are only strenghtening my point. Oh well, maybe a Norse fundamentalist will mod me up.

    19. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      The nazis are coming back from outer space... ha ha ha

      I thought they were in Antartica?

    20. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Whiteox · · Score: 3, Funny

      Personally, I'm blaming it on the LHC

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    21. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly more incontrovertible than the evidence for any other religion, such as Judaism, Christianity, Islam or Obamaism.

      You know, one of those things is not quite like the others.

      That's what you think.

    22. Re:The Norse Were Right! by selven · · Score: 1

      Just "leak" Windows XP into space and hopefully they'll have a malware-compatible infrastructure in no time!

    23. Re:The Norse Were Right! by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apparently "God" hadn't moved the mouse for too long.

      Wait a minute, I thought the mice were running this simulation ? Now I'm confused.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    24. Re:The Norse Were Right! by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't have a Power book, will an iPhone with a picture of Rick Astley do?

    25. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Celebrity astronomer Knut Jørgen Røed Ødegaard

      Wait.. He's a what?

    26. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's always a script for that

      http://xkcd.com/196/

    27. Re:The Norse Were Right! by JuzzFunky · · Score: 5, Funny

      Meanwhile, at the LHC a small group of physicists are shitting their pants asking each other? "What the fuck did we just do?"

      --
      Unexpect the expected!
    28. Re:The Norse Were Right! by JohnRoss1968 · · Score: 0

      Nope they moved here to the good ol' USA......
      Who did you think was running things....The people of the US.... HAHAHA I laugh in your general direction

    29. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Brickwall · · Score: 1

      Actually, I called Jeff Goldblum, but he's busy attending Tiger's seminar on marital relations.

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    30. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Brickwall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did no one watch the second X-Files movie?

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    31. Re:The Norse Were Right! by hoffmanbike · · Score: 1

      The storm had now definitely abated and what thunder there was now rumbled over more distant hills, like a man saying "and another thing" twenty minutes after admitting he's lost the argument. - Douglas Adams sorry your references were too similar to the continuation of THGTTG... Odin and Loki.. I choose Thor dammit!

    32. Re:The Norse Were Right! by imhennessy · · Score: 1
      Gods, aliens, who cares?

      Let's get back to the mead. I've some in the bottle, and some in the works.

      ivan

      --
      Like to brew? Want to talk about it? Brattlebrew: groups.yahoo.com/group/brattlebrew
    33. Re:The Norse Were Right! by pnevin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Mod redundant

    34. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, norse nonsense... it's clearly His Noodly Appendage...

    35. Re:The Norse Were Right! by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. That was the invaders' mothership. Everyone will regret not scrambling their military forces when giant saucers appear over every major city. Quick, someone ready a Powerbook with a virus we'll upload to their computers!

      Now that's just stupid. Only in Hollywood would that work. Everyone knows that viruses don't run on Powerbooks! Just ask Justin Long.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    36. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      My mind has been mystified.

    37. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Finally, all you fake monotheists admit that you never really believed in God in the first place. Return to the barbarism of your roots, that we may finally destroy you with all your idol-worship!

      Am Yisrael chai! Od avinu chai! Mavet la'paganim!

    38. Re:The Norse Were Right! by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Stephen Hawking is a celebrity astrophysicist, don't you agree?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    39. Re:The Norse Were Right! by MakinBacon · · Score: 1

      or root-like powers.

    40. Re:The Norse Were Right! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      The basement -of- a computer history museum? I thought all such museums were basements.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    41. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vista was developed by the dark spawn from the stars.

      Did you really ever think it was the product of a human mind ?

    42. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Celebrity astronomer. Nerdy, enthusiastic and endearing. Dunno if you can say he's popular, but pretty much everybody who watches TV knows who he is.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    43. Re:The Norse Were Right! by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      That can happen with bad IRC behaviour as well: http://bash.org/?117002

    44. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, they probably are figuring out how to repeat the experiment.

      I remember a xkcd strip about this... something about the difference between normal people and scientists.

    45. Re:The Norse Were Right! by your_neighbor · · Score: 1

      Odin got a copy of Black&White

    46. Re:The Norse Were Right! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      So if someone mods down some of those posts about black people being lazy, that often appear on slashdot, they're somehow proving that black people are lazy? Just because someone calls you out on your bullshit doesn't mean your bullshit is the truth.

    47. Re:The Norse Were Right! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      They do happen - Sir Patrick Moore is one. Every Brit knows who he is. He's been hosting the same TV show for 52 years, "The Sky at Night".

    48. Re:The Norse Were Right! by guruevi · · Score: 1

      It is said that the comet always precedes them - these world enders. The Coalsack planets are gone. Eight million settlers missing. The entire Aquilan system is gone too.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    49. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Obama in Norway at the time for the Nobel reception?

      He was communicating with our Galactic Overlord. There's more to believe in now than change, baby.

    50. Re:The Norse Were Right! by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Alan Kaufman, is that you?

    51. Re:The Norse Were Right! by zymano · · Score: 1

      Its' hoax. you morons.

      it's a laser light show.

      dumbasses.

    52. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odin's back. And he's pissed. The spiral is his wide brimmed hat. And he's finally got his favorite blue laser back from Loki. Unfortunately he can only use it on one person per night. Huginn and Muninn are doing surveillance right now so it's time to get those shrines up in the backyard, people! Raise your cups of mead and abandon Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc. The Norse were right, repent before it's too late! Finally, a reason to worship a deity I can identify with--Loki!

      Odin's back. And he's pissed. The spiral is his wide brimmed hat. And he's finally got his favorite blue laser back from Loki. Unfortunately he can only use it on one person per night. Huginn and Muninn are doing surveillance right now so it's time to get those shrines up in the backyard, people! Raise your cups of mead and abandon Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc. The Norse were right, repent before it's too late! Finally, a reason to worship a deity I can identify with--Loki!

      Have any of you every thought about Albert Einstein and his theories today?

    53. Re:The Norse Were Right! by rdnetto · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    54. Re:The Norse Were Right! by alantus · · Score: 1

      I hope this is a joke.

    55. Re:The Norse Were Right! by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      No duh? You know, in the same vein as the post suggesting we return to the worship of pagan gods?

  2. LCD Projector FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember a light display for a "grand opening" of a restaurant here. They used huge floodlights to "beam" an image on to the clouds above (originally intended for a large white screen in the parking lot).
    While those images were stagnant, I see no reason why the phenomenon couldn't be repeated 10+ years later with a more advanced tool.

    1. Re:LCD Projector FTW by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 5, Funny

      Except that multiple images from multiple angles show a circular phenomenon, which means that the source must be roughly spherical.

      Also, there are no clouds in any of the images.

      Also, you're an idiot.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    2. Re:LCD Projector FTW by Ian+Alexander · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see no reason why the phenomenon couldn't be repeated 10+ years later with a more advanced tool.

      Then you haven't seen the pictures of this thing, because there are no clouds on which to project an image.

      My vote's on the rocket hypothesis. It's simpler than supposing somebody managed to project an image of spirals onto an invisible screen in the sky for no discernible reason.

    3. Re:LCD Projector FTW by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My vote's on the rocket hypothesis.

      While I consider myself a skeptic, the "it's a rocket" explanation sounds really dubious to me - it's like hearing loud creaking noises and banging and saying "oh, it's just wind" - disregarding the fact that wind isn't capable of producing such noise.

      IANARS, but I haven't ever seen anything even close to what the photos look like IRL, nor on any real photos, including those of various rocket launches, etc. Nor can I think of any sound reason as to why a flying or even exploding rocket may produce an effect such as this, especially the beam (keep in mind that it appeared after the rotating sphere, not before it).

      If anyone who has a deeper understanding of the subject can come up with a sufficiently detailed and plausible explanation of how exactly a rocket may have caused this, I'm all ears.

      Oh, as a side note (and to keep the conspiracy theory going), the "someone [Russians?] testing a new secret rocket" and "aliens!" theories are not mutually exclusive. If we see Poland invaded tomorrow from the east by hovertanks on antigravs with huge red stars painted of them, we'll know for sure.

    4. Re:LCD Projector FTW by tjstork · · Score: 3, Funny

      it's like hearing loud creaking noises and banging and saying "oh, it's just wind" - disregarding the fact that wind isn't capable of producing such noise.

      I think the people in New Orleans and Galveston might feel a bit differently!

      --
      This is my sig.
    5. Re:LCD Projector FTW by Bakkster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If anyone who has a deeper understanding of the subject can come up with a sufficiently detailed and plausible explanation of how exactly a rocket may have caused this, I'm all ears.

      Bad Astronomer has a good write-up, and he certainly knows his stuff. It's corroborated by a comment on the blog there as well:

      That reminds me of something we saw waaay back in the late 1980’s during a public night at our observatory. All of a sudden there was a gasp from the crowd, and we looked out the dome to see this bright glowing ball traveling south to north (mostly). When we moved the telescope over to it, we could see in the eyepiece a small object from which the stuff was jetting out from. Later we found out it was a booster stage venting unused propellant.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    6. Re:LCD Projector FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it's like hearing loud creaking noises and banging and saying "oh, it's just wind" - disregarding the fact that wind isn't capable of producing such noise.

      Wind is perfectly capable of manipulating items that make that noise. Not only is it capable, it's quite common. I have an old screen door that doesn't always latch properly. When the wind picks up it will sometimes be blown open with a bang and creaking as it swings.

      Nor can I think of any sound reason as to why a flying or even exploding rocket may produce an effect such as this, especially the beam (keep in mind that it appeared after the rotating sphere, not before it).

      Did you not read the BA link? There is a video simulation (produced at some point in the past) of ejecta from a spinning rocket. It looks identical to this phenomena.

    7. Re:LCD Projector FTW by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "While I consider myself a skeptic, the "it's a rocket" explanation sounds really dubious to m""
      Because you are a skeptic is why you question it.

      The linked photos are of a long exposure time. Actual videos of the event make it pretty clear it's a rocket spinning out of control and spews something out while it spins. Probably propellant. It's altitude is high enough to be in the Sun light.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:LCD Projector FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Though I disagree with you on your points, if I had mod points, I would have modded you awesome for the "Also, you're an idiot." There is a point to that.

    9. Re:LCD Projector FTW by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      If we see Poland invaded tomorrow from the east by hovertanks on antigravs with huge red stars painted of them, we'll know for sure.

      You insensitive CLOD!

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    10. Re:LCD Projector FTW by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "must be roughly spherical. "
      Or spinning.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:LCD Projector FTW by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Though I don't really care if I agree, if I had mod points, I would have modded you insightful because throwaway insults don't get me screaming like a little girl. What was my point again?

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    12. Re:LCD Projector FTW by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I love this game. :)

          Wind can make creaking and banging sounds. The wind can move doors, windows, or depending on the construction of the structure, it can shift the walls enough to make the wall, pieces in the wall, or even the roof or floor creak.

          I was in a newer construction 2 story house on a hill, and strong winds would make the whole house move. I was glad I was only renting. :) The earthquakes would make it shift too, so it wasn't an ideal place to stay.

          The stills were timelaps photos, that do look totally computer generated. There are videos that are clearly rockets with guidance problems.

          It's already been identified to be a Bulava missile from the Typhoon submarine "Dmitri Donskoy" in the White Sea area. They had already announced their missile test, and had exclusive use of the area for launch. Nothing like hitting a fishing boat from the bottom with an ICBM to mess up your morning. :) Apparently it wasn't that surprising, most of their test have had rather dramatic failures.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    13. Re:LCD Projector FTW by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Informative

      "must be roughly spherical. "
      Or spinning.

      Or high enough in the atmosphere that the "different angles" weren't actually that different.

      Since it also would have to be that high to catch the light of the sun, this seems likely.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    14. Re:LCD Projector FTW by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      "While I consider myself a skeptic, the "it's a rocket" explanation sounds really dubious to me - it's like hearing loud creaking noises and banging and saying "oh, it's just wind" - disregarding the fact that wind isn't capable of producing such noise."

      As you point out, you're not a rocket scientist. Actual rocket scientists and others who have seen a lot of rocket launches have seen similar things before. If that's not enough for you, the Bad Astronomer has posted a simulation of the exhaust from a rocket tumbling out of control - the simulation looks just like the pictures.

    15. Re:LCD Projector FTW by Kagura · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is neither the first time nor the second time this has happened. These videos show the exact same phenomenon exhibited in TFA. It's a rocket spinning mostly out of control, as reported here.

    16. Re:LCD Projector FTW by pz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "While I consider myself a skeptic, the "it's a rocket" explanation sounds really dubious to m""
      Because you are a skeptic is why you question it.

      The linked photos are of a long exposure time. Actual videos of the event make it pretty clear it's a rocket spinning out of control and spews something out while it spins. Probably propellant. It's altitude is high enough to be in the Sun light.

      Also, images 3 and 5 from the second linked site in the summary show a cloud near the horizon that seems highly reminiscent of what a rocket would leave as it leaves the launch pad and heads skyward, illuminated by the setting sun. The cloud does not obviously link up with the other phenomena, but it isn't much of a stretch to connect a line between the two.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  3. Did we by haderytn · · Score: 1

    kill an alien?

  4. Where is my kaboom? by Tofino · · Score: 4, Funny

    There was supposed to be an earth-shattering kaboom!

    1. Re:Where is my kaboom? by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

      There was. Huge boom. Allegedly hears across hundreds of miles. I bet the operator hit the "self destruct" button.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    2. Re:Where is my kaboom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No boom today, boom tomorrow, there's always a boom tomorrow

  5. it's the LHC i say! j/k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    lol, maybe it was the LHC.

  6. Atlast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are here!!!

  7. It's the LHC by wiredog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sending Bogons back from the Future.

    1. Re:It's the LHC by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      What the hell is a Bogon?

      Is it resistant to Vogon poetry?

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    2. Re:It's the LHC by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      Great; it's not like we don't have more than enough bogons as is.

  8. no ufos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yet.

    The reason nobody's mentioned UFOs yet is because whatever it was originated from the Earth. Unless I'm seriously mistaken, UFOs tend to come from space, not the ground.

    1. Re:no ufos by ls671 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > UFOs tend to come from space, not the ground.

      How do they take off to get back home then ?

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    2. Re:no ufos by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reason nobody's mentioned UFOs yet is because whatever it was originated from the Earth.

      No, the reason nobody's mentioned UFOs yet is because this phenomenon was spotted over Norway, not Arkansas.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    3. Re:no ufos by Neil+Watson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      UFO's are unidentified. Everything about a UFO is unknown. Space is one, albeit very unlikely, UFO hypothesis.

    4. Re:no ufos by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 4, Informative

      U.F.O. stands for Unidentified Flying Object. Those are the only conditions for being a U.F.O.

    5. Re:no ufos by Trace+Bullet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isn't UFO simply an acronym for "Unidentified flying object"? I'm pretty sure this phenomenon counts as one.

    6. Re:no ufos by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2, Informative

      In fact, the vast majority of UFOs have been proven to originate from earth. That is, all that have been identified and thus are no longer unidentified. We cannot from the observations rule out extraterrestrial visitors, but it appears to be pretty unlikely.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    7. Re:no ufos by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Informative

      UFO-Norway Arkansas, on the other hand, has no organization devoted to UFOs and ranks far behind California and New York in number of reports.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    8. Re:no ufos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point, this one was a weather balloon. It can't be an UFO if it was identified.

    9. Re:no ufos by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Informative

      What's this then? http://arkansasmufon.org/

    10. Re:no ufos by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      You are technically correct, but for practical purposes, the acronym UFO refers to alien craft for non-scientists and non-technical people.

    11. Re:no ufos by buback · · Score: 4, Informative

      New York and California also have many many more people than Arkansas. This could either make these places more attractive to aliens, or maybe the ratio of alien sighters is the same but there are more of them because of population density.

      Some numbers from Wolfram alpha (for what they are worth):
      Arkansas-
      population- 2.85 mil
      density- 51.3 people/mi^2
      Norway-
      population- 4.7 mil
      density- 39.6 people/mi^2
      New York-
      population- 8.36 mil
      density- 401.9 people/mi^2
      California-
      population- 36.7 mil
      density- 217.2 people/mi^2

    12. Re:no ufos by SeeSp0tRun · · Score: 2, Informative

      A UFO, or unidentified flying object, can originate anywhere. It just must conform to the following:
      Unidentified: unknown origin
      Flying: not in/on the water/land
      Object: another word for noun
      To recap, it could be something that is in the air, and you have no idea wtf it is. It may have come from the Earth, Mars, or the Russians.

      --
      Something witty.
    13. Re:no ufos by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Not per Capita.

      Considering the number, and level of crazy, the reports that come out of Arkansas, I'm surprised there isn't a UFO group for the local whack-a-doodles.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:no ufos by Hork_Monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      But once you call it a UFO, isn't now "identified"?

    15. Re:no ufos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude New York state has roughly 19 million people. New York City is not a state. You can't compare a whole state (California) to a single City (NYC) no matter how many people are in it. Of course you get a much significantly higher density.

    16. Re:no ufos by tinker_taylor · · Score: 1

      Er...that's because it was an UGO (Unconfirmed Ground Orifice)

    17. Re:no ufos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They don't go home, idiot. They stay to colonize earth.

    18. Re:no ufos by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      UFO-Norway Arkansas, on the other hand, has no organization devoted to UFOs and ranks far behind California and New York in number of reports.

      The difference lies in what the common man/woman thinks, not nutcases with tinfoil hats. (Except, or course, where the nutcases with tinfoil hats are the common man/woman) Norway has the lowest proportion of religious people in Europe and that should be a pretty good indicator of how much of a propensity we have for believing 'stuff'.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    19. Re:no ufos by princessproton · · Score: 1

      You are seriously mistaken. UFO stands for "unidentified flying object" -- with the most salient characteristic being "unidentified". Although UFO sightings are often associated with (assumed) extraterrestrial phenomena, this is not necessary for the label. An unidentified object in the sky is still a UFO regardless of origin (and typically will no longer be considered a UFO when identified, even if alien/extraterrestrial).

      --
      I'm always positive; it's my nature.
    20. Re:no ufos by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      In fact, the vast majority of UFOs have been proven to originate from earth. That is, all that have been identified and thus are no longer unidentified. We cannot from the observations rule out extraterrestrial visitors, but it appears to be pretty unlikely.

      So what you're saying is that there are currently no UFO cases where it has been proven that the UFO was from Earth, right? ;)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    21. Re:no ufos by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Well, not exactly...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism#Europe

      Your place is very decent, but there are still countries that most likely beat you...most notably Czech Republic and Estonia, perhaps Germany too, in a way (the stats are a bit misleading, former East Germany regions are close to Czech Republic & Estonia); maybe also Sweden, for example. ;p

      Granted, it's a bit muddled because of the "Belief in a spirit or life force" category. Which still is much better than living in, say, Poland (just look at the stats...if you, hopefully, don't hear in your media about ridiculous stuff that's happening here). Certainly good enough that I'm seriously considering moving to one of places where people aren't detached from reality in a considerable way. I'm determined to put up with "my" (I can hardly call it like that) place at most short few more years... (getting education & finances to adequate levels, so I won't come with nothing; while being careful not to "tie" myself here)

      BTW, how is it Norway regarding situation that I mentioned in case of Germany? How do regions differ?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    22. Re:no ufos by burne · · Score: 1

      Nobody mentioned UFO's because a gobo with exactly the same image is available in Rosco's online shop. Find it yourself at http://www.rosco.com/us/gobos/index.cfm

    23. Re:no ufos by selven · · Score: 1

      Actually, no the vast majority of objects that are in the air and have not yet been identified originated from the ground, not space.

    24. Re:no ufos by Oyjord · · Score: 1

      The reason nobody's mentioned UFOs yet is because whatever it was originated from the Earth.

      No, the reason nobody's mentioned UFOs yet is because this phenomenon was spotted over Norway, not Arkansas.

      Bazinga!

    25. Re:no ufos by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Unless I'm seriously mistaken, UFOs tend to come from space, not the ground."

      You are both seriously mistaken and too young to know. Back in the seventies (the big days of the UFO scene) we all "knew" that places like Canary Islands or the Bermuda Triangle were submarine secret UFO bases (well, not so secret since everybody knew about them).

    26. Re:no ufos by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am sure someone can identify it, but won't.

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    27. Re:no ufos by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "U.F.O. stands for Unidentified Flying Object. Those are the only conditions for being a U.F.O."

      That's what people like *you* try to make us believe... /me goes for his tinfoil hat with a clever glint on his eyes.

    28. Re:no ufos by StreetStealth · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was attacked by a UFO once.

      Then I identified the flying object. It was a stuffed animal thrown by my brother.

      --
      Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
    29. Re:no ufos by belthize · · Score: 1

      I have nothing to add other than that my view of humanity went up 3 points when I saw this comment marked +5 insightful.

    30. Re:no ufos by meowhous · · Score: 0

      They were certainly mentioned very early on in the comment stream, but most of those early ones seem to have been moderated into invisibility.

    31. Re:no ufos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, then it has been labeled. Not identified.

    32. Re:no ufos by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      No, UFS have to be flying (It's in the name), which still leaves an open question of if this was a UFO.

      It looks like some sort of projected effect to me, hence not a UFO, although I'll be damned if I can figure out how you do that in the open sky like that.

      Everyone seems to be going with 'rocket', but that's one damn weird spinning rocket. Usually, they get blown up when they start going like that, and I've never heard of one that loops perfectly. (I mean, gravity should be making the loop an oval, even if the flight path is perfectly curved.)

      And that totally ignores the blue light in the middle.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    33. Re:no ufos by Exception+Duck · · Score: 4, Funny

      In order to understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.

    34. Re:no ufos by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Lights, either projected onto the sky or naturally occurring, are not 'flying'.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    35. Re:no ufos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh they use the stargate.

    36. Re:no ufos by stjobe · · Score: 1

      Interesting link there, thanks.

      A 2006 study by researchers at the University of Minnesota involving a poll of 2,000 households in the United States found atheists to be the most distrusted of minorities, more so than Muslims, recent immigrants, gays and lesbians, and other groups. Many of the respondents associated atheism with immorality, including criminal behaviour, extreme materialism, and elitism.

      The most recent ARIS report, released March 9, 2009, found in 2008, 34.2 million Americans (15.0%) claim no religion. Of which, 1.6% explicitly describe themselves as atheist or agnostic

      Guess I'm going to keep quiet about my atheist ways next time I'm in the U.S.

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    37. Re:no ufos by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      If you are going to be pedantic: light cannot be projected onto the sky. It can be projected onto clouds of course, but the sky is otherwise transparent to visible light.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    38. Re:no ufos by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Swamp gas.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    39. Re:no ufos by ct1972 · · Score: 1

      No, a UFO is just an Unidentified flying object. If it's a "flying saucer" or known to be some space object, then it's an identified flying object :-).

  9. BA by Yert · · Score: 4, Funny

    BadAsstronomer seems to have picked up on a TV station's assertion that it was a russian ICBM test launch - it's certainly pretty, but unfortunately, not the black hole the LHC was supposed to bring us. Bastards.

    --
    Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
    1. Re:BA by jimbobborg · · Score: 1

      And yet, the Soviets, er, Russians deny that they were testing anything there. Personally, I think it's a prelude to an alien attack. Their agents on Earth are beaming a signal to indicate that we here on Earth are too primitive to fight back. Well, it was nice knowing you.

    2. Re:BA by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The third picture on the second link clearly shows a vapour trail lit by the fading sunset. However I think physicists are going to have a hard time explaining a rotating spiral and a blue beam of light with ice crystals.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    3. Re:BA by Narpak · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to this article (in Norwegian); John Espen Lien (senior spokesperson for the Norwegian Defence Operations Headquarters; loosely translated) has confirmed that they had been informed about a Russian missile launch in the Barents Sea at the time of the light phenomena. Lien said this was most likely caused by the missile launch; though he couldn't confirm that at this time; but investigations are under way.

    4. Re:BA by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I agree it's probably a rocket, the vapour trail indicates this. As others have pointed out the spiral could be caused by leaking fuel from a rocket spinning out of control and headed either away or toward the viewer, I'm at a loss to explain the blue beam.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    5. Re:BA by dominious · · Score: 5, Informative

      It was a rocket indeed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56_Bulava#2009
      Read the third paragraph...

    6. Re:BA by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For the record, the Russians announced there would be a launch there, then this happened, then they deny ever doing a launch.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:BA by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Exhaust contaminated by something?

    8. Re:BA by josquin00 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unless someone was testing a laser weapon to knock out missles/rockets. I blame the sharks.

    9. Re:BA by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      This supposedly points to the launch warning as well as just crappy winter weather, but it's fairly vague.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:BA by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First, weather control. Now, this. The Soviets are up to something, and you know Putin is behind all this. He's been playing "World in Conflict" and getting ideas...

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    11. Re:BA by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should re-phrase the question: "Russia, did you inadvertently put on a weird fireworks show the other night?" After all, "launch" implies putting something into space. Going up a mile or two, spiralling around and around for a several minutes until the whole thing is obliterated, hardly qualifies.

    12. Re:BA by Narpak · · Score: 1

      Apparently there was a case reported about a month ago about another light phenomena in the barents sea which was apparently also because of a Russian missile test.

    13. Re:BA by who+knows+my+name · · Score: 3, Insightful

      bah, it's unconfirmed [citation needed]. Russians aren't going to confirm or deny it yet...

      --
      Nothing to see here.
    14. Re:BA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Cause, ya know, wikipedia's never wrong.

    15. Re:BA by ChienAndalu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Have a look at this video explanation.

    16. Re:BA by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The spiral doesn't rotate. It behaved exactly as you'd expect something being spewed out of a spinning source to behave. Just like one of those spinning lawn sprinklers. The blue "beam" is actually a smaller diameter spiral, which is also consistent with a spinning source venting something.

    17. Re:BA by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I suspect this is actually the case, a link to a recently written paragraph with no citation on Wikipedia is hardly evidence.

      Did you write that third paragraph yourself?

    18. Re:BA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this means that the missile worked as expected in its defensive capabilities.

      Video related: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN1WxSITwWw&feature=related

    19. Re:BA by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1

      If it really was the LHC, I'd say the damn thing is worth the money.

      --
      Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
    20. Re:BA by scumfuker · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

    21. Re:BA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, weather control. Now, this. The Soviets are up to something, and you know Putin is behind all this. He's been playing "World in Conflict" and getting ideas...

      Putin is rearing his head....

    22. Re:BA by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

      From what I understand its fairly common to put a missile into a spiraling trajectory then blow it up. Its a standard test before you try making go strait.

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    23. Re:BA by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      "was probably caused by a failed missile launch from the White Sea, several Norwegian space and defense experts believe."

      "an anonymous Russian military source says"

      "the Norwegian Defense does not know for sure what the light was, but that it probably was a Russian missile"

      It's certainly the leading theory, but your link also doesn't contain any evidence that would justify the Wikipedia statement. It's just speculation and an anonymous source.

    24. Re:BA by opposabledumbs · · Score: 1

      Ah, but could it be seen from Alaska?

    25. Re:BA by StickANeedleInMyEye · · Score: 1

      ...it's certainly pretty, but unfortunately, not the black hole the LHC was supposed to bring us. Bastards.

      Yeah *that* black hole looks like my empty pocketbook that paid for the LHC.

    26. Re:BA by psithurism · · Score: 1

      From article: A Moscow news outlet quoted the Russian Navy as denying any rocket launches from the White Sea area.

      Now can we get past all these boring Occam's razor mandated responses about it looking exactly like a rocket spiraling out of control and get back to the excitement of preparing for an alien invasion?

    27. Re:BA by psithurism · · Score: 1

      From article: A Moscow news outlet quoted the Russian Navy as denying any rocket launches from the White Sea area.

      Now can we get past all these boring Occam's razor mandated responses about it looking exactly like a rocket spiraling out of control and get back to the excitement of preparing for an alien invasion?

    28. Re:BA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the Wiki article on the RSM-56 Russian ICBM

      "The Russian military developed Bulava to possess advanced defense capabilities making it nearly impervious to existing and future missile-defense systems. Among its claimed abilities are evasive maneuvering, mid-course countermeasures and decoys and a warhead fully shielded against both physical and Electromagnetic pulse damage. The Bulava is designed to be capable of surviving a nuclear blast at a minimum distance of 500 meters.[3] Prime minister Putin has claimed that Bulava could penetrate any potential anti-missile defence system."

      That could explain the light, they could be testing its defensive capabilities against a newer missile defense system.

    29. Re:BA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a Norwegian site with lots of pictures. Some verify that it was a rocket as you can see the trail of smoke leaving the ground. Picture 3 is a good one.

      http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/distrikt/troms_og_finnmark/1.6902392?index=2#image-gallery-content

    30. Re:BA by Yert · · Score: 1

      You forgot the obligatory goatse link...

      --
      Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
    31. Re:BA by bcmm · · Score: 1

      The third picture on the second link clearly shows a vapour trail lit by the fading sunset. However I think physicists are going to have a hard time explaining a rotating spiral and a blue beam of light with ice crystals.

      Dawn, not sunset. And the spirals (the blue thing is also a bit spiraly) could be two different leaks (or a leak and the exhaust) from a rocket which is spinning due to some failure of its guidance systems.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    32. Re:BA by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      So basically the story is the Russians were testing a missile designed to hit multiple targets on the eastern seaboard of the US with nuclear warheads (google MIRV), withstand being hit (indirectly) by an atomic bomb while in flight, and penetrate missile bunkers. Launched from northern Norway, days before Obama is scheduled to recieve the Nobel peace prize, also in Norway. The US has been reulctant to pull out of Poland as part of our Missile Defense Shield (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_missile_defense_complex_in_Poland) but did so recently. If this was an intentional failure by Russia, it's an odd way of showing affection. Either way the timing couldn't possibly be worse on the Russian's part. Putin was probably throwing chairs Balmer style as soon as he got wind of this.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    33. Re:BA by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      First, weather control. Now, this. The Soviets are up to something, and you know Putin is behind all this. He's been playing "World in Conflict" and getting ideas..

      You do know that the USSR broke up almost twenty years ago?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    34. Re:BA by xupere · · Score: 1

      Of course. Obviously they had to postpone their launch after this totally-not-a-misfiring-rocket thing turned up!

  10. Swirly Thing Alert! by Tofino · · Score: 4, Funny

    All hands on deck: Swirly thing alert!

    1. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by oldspewey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Attention travellers: The Department of Homeland Security Threat Level is currently set to Swirly.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it a wibbly thing or a swirly thing, sir?

    3. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
      Shit wat was that?! Command, I've got a problem here. Some cowboy clipped me on the way in and thrusters just say 50% and dropping...

      I have no flight contro-.........oooooooooo-ooooooooooo-........OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!!!

      --
      Here be signatures
    4. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Kryten: "Are you sure, Sir? It does mean changing the bulb."

    5. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      And Kiff, issue a flashing light thingie!

      Uhh...a red alert, sir?

      No time for details man, just do it!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by uuddlrlrab · · Score: 1

      This should be simple enough to resolve. We just use Photoshop to swirl the opposite direction...

      --
      Odi profanum vulgus et arceo
    7. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You will be joining a society where you will be compelled to have sex with beautiful, brilliant women twice daily, on demand. Now, am I the only one here who finds that just a little bit tacky?"

    8. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Step up to red alert!

      Sir, are you absolutely sure? It does mean changing the bulb.

    9. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Finally! I was getting a headache from the Everything's Fine Klaxon.

      - T

    10. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by yahwotqa · · Score: 1

      Wow, is that Quake 2? That intro was very cool for its time.

    11. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omg, a red dwarf reference

    12. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cat, is that you?

    13. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by piphil · · Score: 1

      I would go to red alert, but that would mean changing the bulb...

    14. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by Sumbius · · Score: 1

      Cat: Forget Red — let's go all the way up to Brown Alert! Kryten: There's no such thing as a Brown Alert, sir. Cat: You won't be saying that in a minute! And don't say I didn't alert you!

    15. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like Van Gogh's Starry Night to me. Maybe he got the idea from a Russin Rocket.

    16. Re:Swirly Thing Alert! by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It's still the best intro ever created.

      Nostalgia: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SVVKQlwTUk

      --
      Here be signatures
  11. Relax people by Daimanta · · Score: 1

    Its simply the aurora borealis caused by some escaped gasses from the planet Venus.

    Now go back to sleep.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:Relax people by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Aurora Borealis? At this time of the year, in this part of the country, located entirely in your internets?

      Yes.

      May I see it?

      No.

    2. Re:Relax people by Smelly+Jeffrey · · Score: 1

      Agnes: "Seymour! The house is on fire!"
      Skinner: "No, mother. It's just the Northern Lights."
      Chalmers: "Well, Seymour, you are an odd fellow, but I must say you steam a good ham."
      Agnes: "Help! Help!"

    3. Re:Relax people by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      "Its simply the aurora borealis..."

      [Carla says to Cliff]: You're a roaring borealis.

    4. Re:Relax people by Ragzouken · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No other object has been misidentified as a flying saucer more often than the planet Venus.

      Even the former leader of your United States of America, James Earl Carter Jr., thought he saw a UFO once, but it's been proven he only saw the planet Venus.

      Venus was at its peak brilliance last night. You probably thought you saw something up in the sky other than Venus, but I assure you, it was Venus.

      Your scientists have yet to discover how neural networks create self-consciousness, let alone how the human brain processes two-dimensional retinal images into the three-dimensional phenomenon known as perception. Yet you somehow brazenly declare seeing is believing?

      Your scientific illiteracy makes me shudder, and I wouldn't flaunt your ignorance by telling anyone that you saw anything last night other than the planet Venus, because if you do, you're a dead man.

    5. Re:Relax people by gtall · · Score: 1

      James Earl Carter, Jr., while canoeing, claimed to also have been attacked by a rabbit. Coincidence? I think not. Our scientists have done extensive work on Carter's brain and have discovered that it isn't up to creating self-consciousness except for a slightly disturbing tendency to wander the globe somewhat like Jacob Marley (Bob's uncle), rattling his chains, in search of another Nobel Peace Prize. And Obama was recently awarded one. Coincidence?? Hah! Seeing is believing, that rabbit hunts Carter to this day.

  12. Well.... by s0litaire · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...I for one...
    Welcome our now very dizzy alien overlords...

    --
    Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
    1. Re:Well.... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      But I'm too dizzy to bow to the overlords.

    2. Re:Well.... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I personally enjoyed your particular twist to that meme.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, it is just the messiah...

      And odin, loki and nazi of course...

    4. Re:Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats ok, Obama has that covered.

    5. Re:Well.... by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      I blame it on Vodka.

    6. Re:Well.... by mathx314 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was a good spin on a classic.

  13. Oh My... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this happens on the day the new LHC has hit record voltage????

    I for one welcome our new borealis-like leaders.

  14. Other explanations by HangingChad · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Another possible explanation is that the original rocket was a target drone with rocket assisted take off. The light could have been a ground laser engaging the drone. If you've ever seen a test of a large scale laser, you can't really tell if the beam originates on the ground or from the target, if you can see it at all.

    Although a 10 minute kill time challenges that theory. A laser anti-aircraft weapon for engaging targets that conveniently linger over the target area for an extended period of time. Not exactly a Death Star, is it?

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Other explanations by BaronHethorSamedi · · Score: 1

      A laser anti-aircraft weapon for engaging targets that conveniently linger over the target area for an extended period of time. Not exactly a Death Star, is it?

      Actually, on a planetary scale, that's exactly what the Death Star was for.

    2. Re:Other explanations by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Take a look at the video, or even the pictures. The blue "beam" is just a smaller diameter spiral. Definitely not a laser beam.

  15. Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket! by dtolman · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got this from the BA forum:

    Blogs / Bad Astronomy
    Terra spots a volcanic plume
    Awesomely bizarre light show freaks out Norway
    submit to reddit

    [UPDATE: See bottom of post; I knew it!]

    Earlier in the morning today (around 8:00 a.m. local time) this weird thing was seen over the skies of Norway:

    norway_spiral

    My first reaction when I saw that was, "What the FRAK is THAT?!" My second thought was, "Photoshop". But then I saw lots of pictures of this on a bunch of different Norwegian media, so I don't think it's a digital hoax. Then videos started surfacing, like this one, which clearly show the spiral spinning. It's not just a static picture, whatever this thing was; it was really in the sky.

    However, after a moment, I realized this must be a rocket, most likely spiraling out of control. I don't understand all the details -- I don't have all the info yet -- but a rocket fits what we're seeing here. First, this was seen all over Norway, so it must have been at a high altitude to be so visible. Second, the blue spiral angling down to the right is clearly due to perspective. A rocket spiraling around, and coming up from the lower right, would appear to make tight spirals when it was far away and bigger ones as it got closer.

    Third, you can actually see the bright white spiral spinning in the videos. That threw me for a second, to be honest, but after a moment I figured that it makes sense if the rocket is headed more or less straight toward the camera. Whatever it is being lit up (exhaust, or a leaking payload?) would appear to expand in a spiral like water from a spinning sprinklerhead. The spiral itself is not spinning any more than water from the sprinkler is; that's an illusion of motion.

    norway_spiral2Fourth, after a few moments, a black disk appears to expand in the center of the white spiral, as seen in this picture (it's a little fuzzy; you can see the person taking it must have used a long exposure because foreground lights are jittery, but you get the idea). That's exactly what I would expect if whatever is being ejected by the rocket ran out; the arms of the spiral would expand away from the center, leaving black emptiness in the middle.

    So that's my hypothesis. A rocket got out of control, perhaps losing a stabilizer, and started to spiral. The two spirals, different in shape, size, and color, indicate something happened in the middle of all this (the rocket second stage fired while still spinning, or something else started leaking out), changing the rocket's direction. Then, when the fuel or whatever ran out, the white spiral began to disappear from the inside out as the material expanded in space.

    So who launched it? The Russians are a likely guess, but -shocker -- they're denying it. I'd love to know and find out what the details are, but whoever shot it up and whatever the purpose, I'm pretty sure what we're seeing here is a rocket launch that didn't go exactly according to plan.

    Note: there are a lot of stories online about this with more very cool pictures: The Sun and The Daily Mail have it in English, while Norwegian media include VG Nett, Altaposten.no, NRK.no, Framtidinord.no, Nordlis.no, and amazing videos can be seen here and here.

    UPDATE: From Doctor Atlantis I heard of this video which simulates particles being spewed out from a spinning rocket booster. Look familiar?

    Photos: Jan Petter Jørgensen and Morten Kristiansen. Tip o' the payload bay to the many folks who alerted me to this story!

    December 9th, 2009 10:47 AM Tags: Norway, rocket
    by Phil Plait in Antiscience, Cool stuff, Pretty pictures, Skepticism | 58 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >
    58 Responses to "Awesomely bizarre light show freaks out Norway"

    1. 1. Kevin Says:
    December 9th, 2009 at 10:53 am

    That reminds me of something we saw waaay back in the late 1980's during a public night at our observatory.

    1. Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      perhaps losing a stabilizer, and started to spiral.

      Ouch! That sounds painful. -Tablizer

    2. Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket! by BobMcD · · Score: 3, Funny

      If it was an ICBM, wouldn't that ruffle some feathers?

      I mean, I thought we all agreed that unless you're a very short Korean deity that you're not allowed to test these kinds of devices.

      I distinctly missed the beginning of WWIII this morning, though to be fair it could have happened before my first cup of coffee.

    3. Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket! by aminorex · · Score: 1

      I wonder how the rocket managed to become headed "straight for" at least 3 different cameras distributed over hundreds of miles of subarctic islands.

      BA is shoveling it high and deep.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    4. Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket! by arthurh3535 · · Score: 1

      More importantly, if it was an ICBM, why the hell didn't our different RADAR systems catch it at any point? We're supposed to have had this technology down to detect these sort of launches a long, long time ago.

      --
      No! It's a *SIG*. Keep the Special Interest Groups away! (Con joke!)
    5. Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket! by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Admit it. How long have you been waiting to make that joke?

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    6. Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket! by Matheus · · Score: 1

      First of all: Thanks

      Second: Really.. do you need to include the entire contents in your post?

      Third: Is Russia getting sloppy in their old age? If you are going to deny that something has occurred you may want to not have posted a NAVTEX preparing people for it!

    7. Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket! by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      ...why the hell didn't our different RADAR systems catch it at any point?

      What makes you think they didn't?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    8. Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket! by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

      ICBMs can be tested. It's just generally polite and wise to inform those who might otherwise decide to shoot back.

    9. Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket! by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      What if you're leading a government in south Asia bent on destroying another government in south Asia?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    10. Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket! by dtolman · · Score: 1

      I meant to only include the last entry... frigging copy and paste in FF failed me... my fault - should have previewed.

    11. Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      ICBMs can be tested.

      Provided you leave off the warhead!

    12. Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket! by Splab · · Score: 1

      And what exactly would Norway be shooting with? Dried fish? Norway, like Denmark and Sweden, has a military plan in case of nuclear attack that is pretty much summed up with "play dead".

    13. Re:Cool... but mundane - It was a Rocket! by jinxed_one · · Score: 1

      Recent article on BBC seems to confirm rocket hypothesis. Why do people go to the UFO hypothesis so fast?

      The surest sign that there is intelligent life in the universe is that they haven't come here.

  16. WoW's new raid instance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally, we've found the entrance...

    1. Re:WoW's new raid instance... by SlipperHat · · Score: 1

      The fact that the entrance is in Norway would explain the latency.

    2. Re:WoW's new raid instance... by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Crap. There are no flight points near by. WTB summons to Norway.

    3. Re:WoW's new raid instance... by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      I dunno how you are supposed to get there from your basement though :/

    4. Re:WoW's new raid instance... by NIN1385 · · Score: 1

      That was great, I laughed for 10 minutes about that one. gj

      --

      If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up. - Comedian Mitch Hedberg R.I.P. 03/30/68-2/24/05
    5. Re:WoW's new raid instance... by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Dude, what patch are you playing on. 3.3 = teleport to instance. Unfortunately it's also full.

  17. This is what the other end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of a laser pointer looks like every time you shine it on a star. Damn alien kids.

  18. Aliens....? by ikefox · · Score: 1

    These images are bizarre. In some of them, the light seems to be coming over the mountains in the background, almost as if it were being projected from on the ground. But this doesn't make sense, as a projected image would not ordinarily coalesce in one place in the sky, as it appears to have done. The Archimedean spiral formation that appeared seems too perfect to be the result of a weather formation. This does not look like any aurora that meteorologists have documented, so far as I'm aware. However, nature always has surprises for us uncomprehending humans. The stipulation that it was a rocket that had gone out of control also seems unlikely. Again, the image seems too perfect. I'm honestly stumped, but too skeptical to want to believe that this is alien contact.

    1. Re:Aliens....? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      IT's a spinning object spewing something, like propellant.

      It's pretty obvious in the video.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  19. Oh, come on... by wjsteele · · Score: 1

    The light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus. Everybody knows that!

    Bill

    --
    It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    1. Re:Oh, come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Worst men in black reference ever.

    2. Re:Oh, come on... by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Kay, how many times have you flashy-thinged me??

    3. Re:Oh, come on... by 0racle · · Score: 1

      That weak ass story is the best you can come up with?

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    4. Re:Oh, come on... by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      You're gonna give somebody brain cancer with that thing!

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  20. So weird. by bmearns · · Score: 0

    Definitely the weirdest damn thing I've ever seen. Maybe I just haven't spent enough time around rockets...could that really be cause by one? The spiral looks too perfect for an out of control rocket.

    --
    Slashdot is not a game, Slashdot is not a game. Crap, I just lost points.
    1. Re:So weird. by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Out of control doesn't not imply erratic, it simply means it cannot be controlled. A car going 90 mph in cruise control with a locked steering wheel and no breaks is 'out of control' in a 90 mph line assuming a flat course.

      If the rocket was in a steady roll it could easily make a nigh perfect spiral if other conditions warrant. (Leaking/venting fuel is the current odds favorite?)

    2. Re:So weird. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A car going 90 mph in cruise control with a locked steering wheel and no breaks is 'out of control'

      Isn't the point of cruise control to give people a break frome the accelerator? You can still use the brake to shut off cruise control.

    3. Re:So weird. by Volante3192 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I suppose I could've left the cruise control bit out, but my thought process at the time was "I don't want friction to kick in so soon..."

      The rest are necessary to remove any controlling aspect from the car. I could've said driverless, but someone would've chirped in "remote control!" for example, so I've found trying to rigidly define conditions a necessity for /.

    4. Re:So weird. by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      Because we all pay attention to a person who can't even spell brakes correctly. Attention to detail is the first sign of a bullshitter.

    5. Re:So weird. by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      If I paid as much attention to detail as you claim, I guess I would've double checked my homonyms.

      Nice rebuttle though.

    6. Re:So weird. by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      Way to not assume someone's on the roof with a paddle using friction to steer the car.

    7. Re:So weird. by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      ...I also would've caught the double negative I left in early on. (doesn't not.)

      The remnant of a rewording that wasn't entirely highlighted and deleted.

    8. Re:So weird. by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      If the rocket was in a steady roll it could easily make a nigh perfect spiral

      It still seems like a remarkably symmetrical and near perfect circular pattern, for something that would have non-symmetric forces (ie, gravity) acting on it. Weird.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    9. Re:So weird. by db10 · · Score: 1

      No butts about it

    10. Re:So weird. by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      SEE?! SEE?!!

      (Although now that I saw that I knew I should've forseen someone attaching a sail to it...paddle I likely never would've guessed though.)

    11. Re:So weird. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 Whoooosh: so how come "rigidly defining conditions" doesn't include knowing the difference between 'break' and 'brake', you rigidly defined moron?

    12. Re:So weird. by bmearns · · Score: 0

      There's something wrong here. You're the one paying attention to the details in his post, so either you're the bullshitter, or you meant to say that "not paying attention to detail is the first sign of a bullshitter," in which case you weren't paying attention to your own post and are once again...the bullshitter.

      --
      Slashdot is not a game, Slashdot is not a game. Crap, I just lost points.
    13. Re:So weird. by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

      (I'm not assuming that you are American, this is just one thing that bugs me). And what's with Americans saying "I could care less.". Well that's great that you could, over here in Australia we say couldn't care less, because that makes sense. /headdesk. /endrant.

    14. Re:So weird. by Burpmaster · · Score: 1

      It still seems like a remarkably symmetrical and near perfect circular pattern, for something that would have non-symmetric forces (ie, gravity) acting on it. Weird.

      Oh, so you subscribe to Nonsymmetric gravitational theory? I look forward to hearing your enlightened theories on advanced physics, professor!

      Snarkiness aside, I must congratulate you for only saying it seems odd rather than insisting it can't be true because it defies your expectations like so many other people do. This is a great example of how our expectations can deceive us: objects in free fall behave the same way they'd behave in deep space, but since humans have virtually no experience with what free fall is like, their intuitions about it are wrong.

    15. Re:So weird. by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      What the heck does some theory about galaxy shape have to do with this?

      On earth (ie according to our local reference frame), gravity exerts force in one direction; down. So, if the rocket was simply firing a specific thrust causing circular motion in a vertical plane, one would expect the downward part of each arc to be accelerated by gravity, and the upward part to be resisted, breaking the symmetry of the circle.

      That particle simulation is all well and good, but it seems to be an idealized simulation... it's what I would expect to see in zero g, for example, I don't see how that simulation takes gravity into account.

      Of course, assuming the rocket is providing constant thrust is pure conjecture, it's entirely possible the flight control system (while clearly malfunctioning) is perfectly compensating for the effects of gravity, adjusting thrust according to orientation.

      I must congratulate you for only saying it seems odd rather than insisting it can't be true because it defies your expectations

      That would be an argument from incredulity; I don't do fallacies. I would never take my casual layman's observation as anything remotely conclusive, I just thought it might make an interesting point for discussion.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  21. It's comcast testing there rocket to take out D-12 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's comcast testing there rocket to take out D-12.

    As when that goes live they are in big trouble and the FCC will not let pull a VS.

  22. Spinning beach ball of death by Vicegrip · · Score: 4, Funny

    Damnit, apparently the earth is running OSX and somebody has tried to "undo" the last ten years; this has resulted in the spinning beach ball of death.

    --
    Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
    1. Re:Spinning beach ball of death by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      earth is running OSX and somebody has tried to "undo" the last ten years...spinning beach ball of death

      The LHC is uninstalling the future.
           

    2. Re:Spinning beach ball of death by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Or they were successful. How would we know?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Spinning beach ball of death by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Looks more like the "time machine" effect. Anyone notice something back that wasn't there before ? Dinosaurs, Atlantis, .. ?

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  23. My bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do show some lenience, I didn't know how powerful I am, I will use caution from now on releasing my vastly destructive mental capacity.

  24. Ob. Men In Black: by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ob. Men In Black:

    "The flash of light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus."

  25. Protons are launched out of Baikonur by Protonk · · Score: 1

    Protonks (AFAIK) are launched out of Baikonur Cosmodrome, thousands of miles southwest of Norway. I'm unsure how a launch in Kazakhstan would cause a light show in Norway, especially since the insertion into orbit proceeds east of the launch site.

    1. Re:Protons are launched out of Baikonur by exel0n · · Score: 1

      To correct you, Baikonur is South-east of Norway... the phenomenon was seen at a 120 degree perendendicular view from Finnmark (North Norway) ... check google maps. The rocket crashed in Zhezkazgan, Kazakhstan.

    2. Re:Protons are launched out of Baikonur by chebucto · · Score: 1

      Troll?

      The rocket crash you linked to to happened in 2007, kind of like the rocket mentioned in the summary, which launched in 2005.

      Also, Baikonur is very, very far from Norway. Correction: very, very, very far. Like 4,000 km far. Central Asia to Northern Europe far.

      The Plesetsk cosmodrome is the one that borders the Nordic states, and is far more likely to be the source of the rocket, if it wasn't a sub testing the new Russkie SLBMs or someting.

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    3. Re:Protons are launched out of Baikonur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Further to the SLBM theory, note this tidbit from wikipedia:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56_Bulava

      In the last days of October 2009 another launch reportedly failed when the missile did not leave the launch tube, according to an anonymous source[who?] quoted by AFP.[citation needed] However, according to other sources, "the launch was tentatively scheduled for November 24 but has been postponed... to the end of 2009."[23]

    4. Re:Protons are launched out of Baikonur by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

      This was most likely a test of Russia's new ICBM, designed to sneak past the US missile defense net. A failed test, that is. And they're not exactly going to admit that to the public.

    5. Re:Protons are launched out of Baikonur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the launch orbital inclination is above 90 degrees they would launch west. This orbital profile is great for weather or spy satellites that require a curtain angle of the sun in relation to the ground, or if a space telescope wants to spend more time behind the shadow of the earth.
      Proton and Delta rockets launch these profile satellites quite often.

    6. Re:Protons are launched out of Baikonur by damburger · · Score: 1

      Aside from the direction fail, I was going to point this out. Whoever suggested that needs to buy a globe, find Norway, and then find Kazakhstan. The 'Russian rocket' theory is very much plausible, but at least do some fucking background research. For gods sake, thinking a Proton might be launched from northern Russia is not even a wikipedia level of knowledge.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    7. Re:Protons are launched out of Baikonur by damburger · · Score: 1

      Good find. If it is a Russian rocket, then it will have to be a military one; the Russian civilian space program is quite open and cooperative with the west now, and civilian rockets launched in that region, by any nations, are warned about well in advance so people watching for ICBM's don't get jittery.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    8. Re:Protons are launched out of Baikonur by Protonk · · Score: 1

      To correct you, Baikonur is South-east of Norway... the phenomenon was seen at a 120 degree perendendicular view from Finnmark (North Norway) ... check google maps. The rocket crashed in Zhezkazgan, Kazakhstan.

      Thanks for the correction. You are correct about the orientation of the site vis Norway. Also, I wrote "protonks" (a pluralization of the old version of the proton rocket) because I'm so used to writing my nick, protonk. Was too hasty.

    9. Re:Protons are launched out of Baikonur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that Kazakhstan lies to the southwest of Norway, then you either don't know where Norway lies, where Kazakhstan lies, or both.

  26. Zoomba by Speare · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's just an experiment that the iRobot corp was conducting, where they cross a Roomba with one of their military devices. Apparently this is related to Bill Gates' theories that hurricanes can be controlled with the proper application of technology. Dean Kamen was not not available for comment on speculation that it was related to a Death Star marketing tie-in for his Luke "Skywalker" prosthetic hand project.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:Zoomba by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      It's just an experiment that the iRobot corp was conducting, where they cross a Roomba with one of their military devices

      Running around in spirals and zooming at random's certainly been an effective combat strategy for the troops and manned aircraft, no reason it wouldn't work with robots.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  27. I think it was NASA. by dhudson0001 · · Score: 1

    Obviously this is a result of what happened AFTER the helicopter hit the airbag.

  28. LHC by Zebra_X · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I blame the LHC...

    1. Re:LHC by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      I did too, in the earlier thread. I was hoping that it was an escaping magnetic monopole that caused auroral havoc.

      But the destabilized rocket simulation has convinced me; it was a rocket.

      At this point I'm wondering whether some US company can reproduce the effect, and sell rockets like that as fourth-of-july fireworks.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
  29. The ol "half trick" trick by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I suspect people are mixing in Photoshopped hoaxes with real photos and/or real eye-witness accounts. The first thing do for an investigation is to verify which photos are real and which are bogus.

    1. Re:The ol "half trick" trick by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      On VG, in the morning, they apparently just let people upload anything. There was one picture of a bat-signal, an another obviously drawn in paint... but the ones making the rounds now appear completely genuine.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    2. Re:The ol "half trick" trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're all real. Well that was easy!

  30. HIlary Clinton Was Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    North Korea is attacking Hawaii via Norway !

    Yours In Yasnogorsk,
    Kilgore Trout

    1. Re:HIlary Clinton Was Correct by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      North Korea is attacking Hawaii via Norway !

      And Kim Jong's glasses fell off on the way. (He didn't watch enough Scooby Doo to learn that lesson.)

  31. Pierce the Heavens With Your Drill! - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't believe in yourself, believe in me who believes in you!

    1. Re:Pierce the Heavens With Your Drill! - by Icegryphon · · Score: 1

      Touch the untouchable,
      Break the unbreakable
      Row Row Fight The Powah!

  32. Not caused from the Large Hadron Collider? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assumed it was the start of the destruction of earth caused by the Large Hadron Collider creating a black hole which I assumed was brought to full power earlier than expected.

  33. Spiral warning by hammarlund · · Score: 1

    Since it's sabotage of the CERN collider has not been especially effective in preventing the restart of the collider, I believe that these spirals are a warning from a future Higgs boson. I urge CERN to immediately halt all testing until we receive more information from H b.

  34. light show by jn0149 · · Score: 1

    or maybe its a light show with artistic and strong projectors

  35. It's a buggy rocket missile from a Submarine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On New Years Eve we all see what happens to the New Year fireworks when the rockets loose their steering pin. And a missilie from a Sub will do the same with broken steering fins.

    Yes I have an account here, but I prefer to be the Anon Coward today.

  36. Norway's First Open Air Laser Light Show by biskit · · Score: 1

    I saw some pictures and some shaky video - it kinda reminds me of a laser light show. The blue haze cone of light points back to the source - but what do I know - I live in the cold in Idaho...

    --
    what? me worry?
    1. Re:Norway's First Open Air Laser Light Show by Matheus · · Score: 1

      It can't be a laser light show... Pink Floyd was nowhere near Norway when this went down!

  37. Texter Hypothesis by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Theory #3: A sky-writer pilot was making an "@" for an email address, but passed out.
       

  38. The Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe no one has said the obvious ... it's very clear that someone has finally turned the Bat Signal into a functioning worm hole.

  39. Reflected Sunlight by capn_planet · · Score: 0

    ...The spiral, he claimed, was the result of light reflecting on the leaking fuel. He was quoted as saying the light was sunlight, despite the strange lights showing up at night.

    I don't see why this is so far-fetched - it would make sense that a missile at high altitude just before sunrise would shine, since "sunrise" has already occurred at high elevation where earth's shadow no longer obscures the sun. (The event happened around 8:00am) Compare it to a view of a shuttle launch just after sunset:

  40. It wasn't _that_ proton-m by chebucto · · Score: 1

    The dateline for the proton-m article is 2005 (which mentions satellite AMC-23), giving a launch date of Dec. 6, 2005. It even successfully launched!. I'm pretty sure that particular rocket wasn't responsible for the light show.

    --
    The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
  41. Don't Worry by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    if you missed it, I'll sell you a pair of these.

  42. Let's see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Unidentified? Check
    Flying? Check
    Object? Check

    It's a UFO alright. Of course after it's identified, it will no longer be a UFO.

  43. Clearly a rocket launch by starglider29a · · Score: 1

    http://gfx.nrk.no/YOYD2X1CgNBSeaPse9LjVwT6ymkkphv7Q7x0aibAWJwg.jpg

    If you've ever seen a rocket launch around sunrise or sunset, this is pretty obviously one of them. It should be a piece of cake to figure out the azimuth of this picture and deduce from where it was launched.

    Case closed. Next...

  44. Even if it's just a rocket by Target+Practice · · Score: 1

    I have to say 'thanks for the light show'. That's the most unusual thing I've seen in the sky!

    --
    There's a 68.71% chance you're right.
    1. Re:Even if it's just a rocket by iamapizza · · Score: 5, Funny

      I live in England. We once saw the Sun. That was unusual.

      --
      Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.
    2. Re:Even if it's just a rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bloody southerners boasting about their tropical climate again, I see.

    3. Re:Even if it's just a rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was once in England. There I saw The Sun (specially page 3). That was unusual.

    4. Re:Even if it's just a rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The English are all slashdotters? That I didn't know!

  45. Putin shows some muscles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Obama is soon in Oslo for the Nobel Peace Price Ceremony. Did you think Russia could just sit and watch?

    Russia is well-known for creating such distress to their non-allies.

    Frightened? Mission completed. End of story.

  46. LHC...... by Wazz · · Score: 1

    This is obviously the result of the Large Hadron Corridor.....Enter the Twilight Zone Peeps!!!

  47. Close Encounter of The Third Kind! by kai_hiwatari · · Score: 1

    Close Encounter of The Third Kind! They are here!!

  48. Hey Norway by r00tw00t · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ubisoft called it wants its logo back!

    1. Re:Hey Norway by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Give that man an Internets!

  49. ... just a laser light-show, friends! ... by ninjagin · · Score: 1

    It was some kids at the local polytechnic having some fun with a laser light-show projector. I saw the video.

    --
    .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
    1. Re:... just a laser light-show, friends! ... by mea37 · · Score: 1

      ...and it was seen all over Norway? I don't think so.

    2. Re:... just a laser light-show, friends! ... by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

      Thanks ever-so-much much for that piece of doggerel verse :)

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    3. Re:... just a laser light-show, friends! ... by ninjagin · · Score: 1

      You mean the sig? That's an oldie but goodie, sung to "Frere Jaques". Taught to me by Dr. Kelly, my math teacher, who also taught us physics limericks like:

      There once was a fencer named Fiske

      Whose swordplay was exceedingly brisk

      So fast was his action, by the Fitzgerald contraction

      that his rapier turned into a disk

      Deep. Fried. Bacon. Wrapped. Awesome.

      Cheers!

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
    4. Re:... just a laser light-show, friends! ... by ninjagin · · Score: 1

      Okay, if you're at a polytech, and you have access to any number of continuous-beam lasers, some of much absurdly-high power that they cannot be use for performance, and you have an oscillating mirror, you can put something in the sky that can be seen for hundreds of miles. It's cold up there, lots of icy water vapor in the air, and the video I saw showed bright circles being drawn. I may be wrong, but that's what it looked like to me. Missiles have been launched in the north sea for testing over years, and I don't recall any kind of visual phenomena ever recorded like this. Also note that the "glowing cone" seems to point to a place on the ground, and was distinctly linear, and the angle into the sky was too low for a rocket test, which would be an arc, and not a line. I stand by my hypothesis. Thanks for your skepticism.

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
    5. Re:... just a laser light-show, friends! ... by mea37 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you haven't put much thought into the conditions necessary for a laser on the ground at the point of that cone to draw a spiral along the surface of the cone.

      Anyway, not every rocket test would look like that. That is what a particular type of rocket failure looks like. (And yes, whether or not this event is a rocket failure, that is what such a failure looks like, as you can discover by looking through the material linked in TFS.)

      But whatever; if you somehow you think these images give you a good enough angle to say that a rocket failure couldn't look like that even though witnesses to previous events and simulations say you're wrong, that's fine.

  50. Endgame Cinema by W.+Justice+Black · · Score: 1

    The explanation is simple. The plucky young upstart warrior (and perhaps the rest of his party) just defeated the final boss using his strongest-ever attack. One involving, say, exploding materia*.

    What everyone saw was just the endgame cutscene for that (at a safe distance, of course).

    * Materia is a Final Fantasy VII term. Substitute your favorite mystical RPG energy thingy here if you like.

    --
    "Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." --Groucho Marx
  51. It's the SGC blowing up a space ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the SGC blowing up a space ship

  52. Check the garden for triffids ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enough said.

  53. Uh oh... by scubamage · · Score: 1

    someone better call Gordon Freeman!!!

  54. God installed the 60's wallpaper/screensaver by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I told you he was a liberal.

    1. Re:God installed the 60's wallpaper/screensaver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait... someone tried to say God wasn't a liberal?! Goddamn! That pot must be gettin' to my head or something--I was starting to think people, such as myself, that believe in God were actually starting to get an open mind for a change of pace. Well, fuck it. I guess that's why I stick out of organized religion.

  55. A copper chloride based propellant? by pkarlos_76 · · Score: 1

    Im curious to know whether they are experimenting with a new copper chloride based propellant that gives off a blue flame, or another chemical that gives off a blue flame?

    1. Re:A copper chloride based propellant? by damburger · · Score: 1

      If its an SLBM (likely) or any other kind of military rocket, it will burn nitrogen tetroxide with hydrazine (+1 or 2 methyl groups in some cases). In daylight the flame from that is pretty transparent, don't know what colour it would show at night.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  56. Looks like a lot like Russia, 2006 by mrjb · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    1. Re:Looks like a lot like Russia, 2006 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, the Norwegian phenomenon would require a rocket to be spinning in place to generate the spiral, then to bail and dump to generate the almost perfect conical beam which is a different colour. The youtube link looks like a rocket fucking out.

  57. Happened in china some time ago also. by voodoowizard · · Score: 2, Informative

    This was posted a few months ago but I have no idea when it happened. Look similar... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixLE3iuszbU Just skip to 35 seconds unless you can speak Chinese.

  58. Hadron Colliders first black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe, just maybe, those paranoid freaks that said black holes from the Hadron Collider might be reality could be right and this is the result of their testing??? Makes you wonder unless some credible source can tell us what that phenomenon was.

  59. Re:Please "dumb it down" by pavon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So what you are saying is that the editors should be more parsimonious in their use of the English language?

  60. looking close by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Looking close, you can see a dish shaped object flanked by two cigar shped ones.

    In other news, there was reports of a strange russion looking for nulcear wessels.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  61. Re: "akustimeportal" tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awesome.

  62. precursor to 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (to all conspiracy theorist) it is the early sign of 2012 :P

    1. Re:precursor to 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, even Christians are pointing out the verses about signs in the sky, etc. Shit. Is even Christianity going to join in on 2012 now? Not that it wouldn't be fitting--Christianity as many of us see i
      t is nothing more than any of the other prophecies for 2012 (like a guy going out in the desert, tripping on drugs, and devising some method of predicting the end of the world in 2012 by using some ancient Chinese stuff)...

      PS Drinking and slashdot can be a bad mix... don't seek my sympathy when you ruin your keyboard and lose your beer at the same time... there's a reason I have this "virtually indestructible" keyboard (alcoholic's necessity)

  63. Simple Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Nothing to worry about, this is a typical time-mass interfence pattern caused by a trans-galactic class rift engine reaching its firing potential while the host craft skims the atmosphere of a planet with its anti-graviton containment field slightly out of phase alignment.

    Considering that Sol33087-3 (Earth) is also on the blue-list ('keep your distance') due to the operation of your Hadron collider (whose output can cause short-duration dimensional microfractures in rift engine stern waves), as regional observer I have reported the incident to the appropriate authorities together with readings from the unique anti-graviton signature of the engine and you can rest assured that the pilot/primary officer of the craft will be identified and interviewed, with appropriate action taken.

    Erm - posting AC for obvious reasons.

  64. Geez, Earth is no fun any more by david.emery · · Score: 2, Funny

    > - although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yet

    It's no fun buzzing Earth if there's no panic calling to authorities and calls for investigation of the subsequent coverup.

    Bleezarp (from Alpha Centauri...)

    1. Re:Geez, Earth is no fun any more by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Damn, I knew I forgot to check the Sub-Etha Sens-o-matic today.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  65. UFOs by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    Witnesses from Trøndelag to Finnmark compared the amazing display to anything from a Russian rocket to a meteor to a shock wave -- although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yet.

    That's because a UFO isn't an explanation -- a UFO is an "unidentified flying object". You could compare it to specific instances of unexplained aerial phenomena -- though that's unlikely to help explain it unless the conditions surrounding this occurrence help explain some whole class of previously-unexplained aerial phenomena -- but to compare it to UFOs in general is somewhat pointless since the only thing that that class shares in common is that they appear above the ground and are not explained.

    1. Re:UFOs by Monolith1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Witnesses from Trøndelag to Finnmark compared the amazing display to anything from a Russian rocket to a meteor to a shock wave -- although no one appears to have mentioned UFOs yet.

      That's because a UFO isn't an explanation -- a UFO is an "unidentified flying object". You could compare it to specific instances of unexplained aerial phenomena -- though that's unlikely to help explain it unless the conditions surrounding this occurrence help explain some whole class of previously-unexplained aerial phenomena -- but to compare it to UFOs in general is somewhat pointless since the only thing that that class shares in common is that they appear above the ground and are not explained.

      pedantic

  66. Russian rocket by MortenMW · · Score: 1

    Russian rocket fired from a submarine. The russians of course denies this because the rocked failed. Case closed, next!

  67. Clearly, it's the Higgs by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 1

    This is just a stunt being pulled by the Higgs Boson to distract us away from the LHC, so we won't find it.

    1. Re:Clearly, it's the Higgs by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Hold on, the Higgs Boson wants to prevent us from finding the LHC? Isn't that thing, like, pretty damn huge? Needs more than 1 country to fit under kinda huge?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  68. Tagged: akustimeportal by TyIzaeL · · Score: 2, Funny

    I love you guys.

    1. Re:Tagged: akustimeportal by mwsw · · Score: 1

      Curious (and ignorant) as I am, I'm wondering what on earth an akustimeportal might be? Strangely enough, Google can't help me out here.

  69. E.T. + 12 foot tall lizards are REAL by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    I feel sorry for that school superintendent who got fired for running SETI@home on his school computer.

  70. UFO over Ontario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah I saw a pulsating light in the sky over Northern Ontario last night at about 3 AM. At first I thought it was a star but when I looked around I could see the moon dimly shining through a full-sky cloud cover. I watched it for about 5 minutes before moving on. It was quite high but beneath the clouds: it never moved, but just slowly pulsated yellowish-red irregularly.

  71. Blue-green beam by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    I agree, this looks like a rocket out of control, especially when you look at the videos.

    But here's the one remaining question: what's the glowing blue-green "beam" shooting out from the center? It's not the launch trajectory of the rocket, because according to this site (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1234430/Mystery-spiral-blue-light-display-hovers-Norway.html) the green beam formed *after* the spiral was visible.

    My guess: the rocket fuel gradually became ionized, and the glowing charged ions moved away from the rocket following along magnetic field lines.

    Anybody know what cardinal direction these photos are taken in?

    1. Re:Blue-green beam by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

      This was a launch at dawn. The upper part of the plume was illuminated first, since it was the first part to leave earth's shadow. The blue portion of the plume wasn't illuminated until later, and is blue because of compton scattering. There's a better photo out there which shows the low altitude white puffy plume turning into the ghostly blue plume as it gets higher.

    2. Re:Blue-green beam by damburger · · Score: 1

      Seems unlikely that natural magnetic fields would be strong enough to create such a trajectory. More likely, the rocket aerodynamically disintegrated and that was some part that was venting, or perhaps an engine puffing out a last bit of thrust. That or a booster; recall how the two SRBs flew out of the fireball during the Challenger disaster.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  72. Similar sightseeing in RUSSIA in 2006 by chriz74 · · Score: 1
  73. Failed ICBM test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is failed Bulava(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56_Bulava) ICBM test.

  74. /flash/ by SterlingX · · Score: 1

    It's Venus flying through a weather balloon full of swamp gas. Move along folks, nothing to see here.

  75. But how do you explain the scale? by Xaedalus · · Score: 1

    I don't think this was a rocket of any kind. Consider the scale of the explosion if it was seen all over Norway on a given night. How big exactly was that burst of light, and how far away was it? Unless that was a honkin' big missile able to withstand who knows how many Gs of pressure from spinning tightly and then blowing up with a nuclear warhead, I don't believe that was a missile. Of course, I reserve the right to be completely wrong.

    --
    Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    1. Re:But how do you explain the scale? by damburger · · Score: 1

      Good job you reserved that right, because you are wrong. There is no indication of a nuclear explosion. The only thing required for it to be seen over much of Norway (it wasn't seen over the entire country) is altitude, which rockets have. And rockets/missiles tend to be very big and have a lot of highly energetic fuels on board.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  76. clearly it's a weather balloon by BetterSense · · Score: 1

    http://bleen.ro/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/us-air-force-aircraft-identification-chart1.jpg

    1. Re:clearly it's a weather balloon by stjobe · · Score: 1

      +1 funny

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
  77. Keep one eye closed--Day of the Triffids! by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    Those who remember the very good John Wyndham novel "The Day of the Triffids" (later made into a very bad movie) will recall that the population of most of the civilized world is transfixed by a spectacular show of mysterious lights in the sky. The first-person narrator is stuck in a hospital recovering from eye surgery with patches over his eyes and feels frustrated at being left out.

    A few days later it turns out that everyone who saw the lights has gone blind, leaving the narrator one of the few people in the world who can still see.

    The story suggests but never says that it is some space-based weapons system that was accidentally deployed.

    So, when viewing mysterious and spectacular unexplained lighting phenomena in the sky, perhaps it would be prudent to keep one eye closed.

    1. Re:Keep one eye closed--Day of the Triffids! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      I have only one eye, you insensitive clod!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  78. Energy required to create a worm hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I say the Large Hadron Collider at CERN never did it's claimed tests... the energy was diverted to Norway to make this worm hole!

    Now back to hiding under my tin foil hat.

  79. We are all doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully this has nothing to do with the LHC tests recently.
    Maybe a mini black hole?

  80. Cern's fault. by Rawrsterman · · Score: 1

    Looks like CERN's particle collider is creating a blackhole!

  81. It's a sign! Repent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh ye all who use Ubuntu:
    Repent!
    I've seen the shape of things to come...
    And it's Debian.

  82. Anyone notice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article about the Russian Proton-M Carrier Rocket is from Dec 7th of....2005?

    1. Re:Anyone notice... by dunng808 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The article did say the launch had been delayed.

      --

      Gary Dunn
      Open Slate Project

  83. The sky is buffering.... by e-scetic · · Score: 1

    ...a la Youtube. Weren't the Russians experimenting with a type of wobbly missile with an unpredictable trajectory? And wouldn't a perfect spherical explosion like that mean it took place in zero gravity? Otherwise, must be nice living next to the wormhole. Your pagh is strong, my son.

  84. Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was the furious venting of the planet in its anger over Global warming. This venting will cause a radical shift in global temperatures and rapid cooling which will cover the planet in ice. I'm sure I can whip up a study, some anecdotal evidence, and some impressive statistics in a few more hours to prove my conclusion. After all, that's how all the best science is done these days.

  85. MOD PARENT UP by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

    I wish I had mod points to give you dude!

    --


    "Lame" - Galaxar
  86. Debian by Geheimagent · · Score: 1
  87. Russians have power back on by AHuxley · · Score: 0, Troll

    Found some cash and fired up haarp?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvr9ieFf-Fw
    Few months it was over Moscow.
    USA tires to hit 1 rocket with another.
    Russia melts the sky.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  88. No UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I find interesting is how different this phenomena is from UFO sightings. Also how few, if any, reporting of "UFO", but rather og a "light phenomenon".

    It doesn't prove anything, but it's interesting to note most people don't jump to the UFO conclusion, just because there is some unexplained lights in the sky.
    Of course, the die hards, hardcore UFOians, will always claim whatever they want to believe. But who listens to that anyways?

  89. Goatse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, we've found the entrance...

    ... to Uranus?

  90. Nice special effects... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I think that thing could be easily made with one heck of a big projector. That would explain the blue cone leading to the ground.

  91. Shameful waste of a swirly thing ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    .. when there are no crops to flatten out.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  92. duH! It's obviously by KiwiCanuck · · Score: 1

    a dimensional portal. Don't you watch scifi?

  93. Re:Please "dumb it down" by grcumb · · Score: 1

    So what you are saying is that the editors should be more parsimonious in their use of the English language?

    I'm proposing that promulgating such preposterous pronouncements precedes persiflage and paltry, even parsimonious praise.

    --
    Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
  94. Good for the Doctor... by Daswolfen · · Score: 3, Funny

    It seems he has gotten the aliens to crash on another country besides the UK this holiday season...

    --
    Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
    1. Re:Good for the Doctor... by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

      Awwww... Dr. Who Goes To Norway... you know, I can see that happening... I'm staying tuned. :)

  95. This is why UFO observations are always so suspect by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

    You haven't got any mod points so no one will read yours or my post, but this is, in hindsight, a perfect example of why UFO related observations get such an incredibly bad rap. I'm not attacking you personally per se, but yours is a near perfect example.

    With obviously no knowledge of rocketry at all you're happy to put forward that

    The stipulation that it was a rocket that had gone out of control also seems unlikely.

    yet now that it's all been and gone this is exactly what it actually was. And this is why that lone observations from people that have seen 'something' carry virtually no weight. Without, or even with, experience in all relevant airborne related fields it's near impossible to be sure that what the majority of people have seen is anything other than the mundane that appears incredible to the untrained eye. Sufficently indistinguishable from magic, if you will.

    And you weren't even there. Get a report from someone at the scene and you're suddenly including in hysteria, panic, adrenaline, and a whole other list of things that someone seeing something unfamilar will have affect their judgement. Put on top of all that a bias towards assigning anything unknown to an alien race and right there you have the perfect receipe for a completely mis-identified flying object.

  96. I see trouble on the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see earthquakes and lightning
    I see bad times today

    Just sayin.

  97. OMG THE DREAMCAST IS BACK by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

    I knew that never giving up on the GREATEST CONSOLE OF ALL TIME would reward me in the end.

    THE DREAMCAST IS BACK PEOPLE, BOW BEFORE YOUR NEW GAMING GOD.

    I love Sega.

  98. Mother Plucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chicken Little was right!

  99. Just a spaceship carrying some damn alien baby... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    One more dang illegal. Spewing green glowing stuff everywhere. Those dang Kryptonian rockets. They're *so* messy. Well, there goes the neighborhood....

    Excuse me, I must go back to my secret lair now and shine my hairless head.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  100. Google twitter viral feed test ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is testing their twitter realtime search feed.
    This was accomplished with a highpowered light projector.

  101. What Proton-M launch? by Animats · · Score: 1

    There wasn't a known Proton-M launch this week. There was one on November 25, 2009. The article cited by the "anonymous poster" is from a 2006 launch.

    Proton-M rockets are huge, and are launched from Baikonur in Kazakhstan. When one of those things is launched, it gets noticed.

    Somebody local may have launched something, but it probably wasn't launched 1000 km away from Kazakhstan. There are pictures from multiple locations, and many show ground details. So get those pictures geo-located and aligned, and figure out where it came from.

  102. God's Biometrics by abbynormal+brain · · Score: 1

    He's back! He just got a retina scan. Hurry up and look busy.

    --
    L'esperienza de questa dolce vita (The experience of this sweet life) - Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy
  103. I blame the Techno Viking by nalidog · · Score: 1

    No need to be alarmed. It's just the "Bat Signal" for Techno Viking.

  104. Please, its SO obvious by alexborges · · Score: 1

    Its a higgs bosson traveling back to its time (to the future!), to get reinforcements to finally kill the evil LHC.

    --
    NO SIG
  105. Clearly it was caused by... by zkiwi34 · · Score: 1

    Either global warming, or one of the CRU unit paying the price in a flashy manner for their apparent misdeeds. Who knew...

  106. Roswell That Ends Well -like vortex?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine...

  107. Not convinced about the rocket story by mtemmerm · · Score: 1
    Several things contribute to me not going for the rocket explanation:
    • - Highly symmetrical pattern. Most if not all rocket explosions you can find footage of, show erratic patterns instead.
    • - Same thing happened in 2006 in Russia and another poster linked to a Chinese video of this phenomenon. These look exactly the same though different occasions.
    • - Why would Russia fire a missile from their (and the) largest submarine this close to Norway? It would be too dangerous this close to population especially if it's a test launch.
    • - On these pictures as well as the older footage, the larger spiral seems to be radiating light (not just the center or one point which could be an exhaust - the whole spiral emits light).

    It's probably just me, but I smell a cover up in the guise of a failed Russian missile launch ;)

    1. Re:Not convinced about the rocket story by Knara · · Score: 2, Informative

      - If its spinning the pattern would probably be roughly symmetrical. the dude from Bad Astronomy noted that he's seen rockets do that sort of thing before

      - Which makes it more likely that its something mundane like a rocket

      - Russia apparently routinely uses the Baltic Sea for testing, and notifies Norway so that no one freaks out (it's not like it's only a few feet from Russia to Norway across the Baltic)

      - It's (intelligently) noted that the altitude of the cloud makes it quite likely the light is sunlight (in spite of the dismissal by the non-scientific article).

    2. Re:Not convinced about the rocket story by mtemmerm · · Score: 1

      Good arguments all of them - one but though: I know Norway isn't *that* close to Russia, which makes it exactly this weird... either that's a freaking large missile or it faulted pretty close to Norway. From the footage it looks like the spiral is forming over the next hill...

  108. It's the Gobblers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've finally worked out how to get our souls!

  109. I saw things very similar to these by 21mhz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... about 20 years ago, over Syktyvkar, Russia.
    That was clearly a rocket (I saw rocket launches before, living downrange of Plesetsk), but at some point the thing has "stopped" in the sky and started rolling out a spiral. The rotating object and the spiral quickly faded away, but the gaseous afterglow along the ascent trajectory remained, as it usually does.

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    1. Re:I saw things very similar to these by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      To think of it, a display like this could be normal for some upper stages (unpublicized ICBM test launches?), if the engine is still burning after the stage has been ejected from the payload, which is invisible at this distance.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  110. Re:Please "dumb it down" by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    Isn't it a fruit?

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  111. Confirmed - it was a Russian Missile test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  112. Rocket gone wild. by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is a well documented launch of an Minotaur rocket from Vandenberg AFB in 2005 which has some similarities:
    http://www.spacearchive.info/minotaur-streak.htm
    As for the spiral in I my opinion, depending on the perspective of the viewer relative to rocket you can see this pattern if you are looking at the exhaust end of the rocket and the rocket started to spin so that exhaust plume started to create a spiral. As the rocket lost total directional control, the rocket controller ordered a self-destruct so the sudden "hole" in the middle of the spiral as the rocket exhaust stops at the end of the event.
    Here is another link about rocket trails with an expert description http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap020926.html

  113. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet that somebody modified a carbon arc searchlight and played with it. Like crop circles, this is art.

  114. You haven't followed the recent events by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I distinctly missed the beginning of WWIII this morning, though to be fair it could have happened before my first cup of coffee.

    I hope this picture helps you understand what is happening over here. (From Scandinavia and the World)

  115. SO obvious -- LHC black hole by Nicky+G · · Score: 1

    DUH... The LHC gets fired up, and suddenly this kind of thing just randomly starts to happen? Suuuuuure.

    Clearly, this was a mini black hole spawned by the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, and indeed they ARE harmless and just disappear after a few moments, or else we wouldn't have this little thread going on here, now would we?

  116. Final Countdown by falken0905 · · Score: 1

    Apparently no one here (or in Norway) has seen The Final Countdown. Has anyone reported recently returning from 1941? Is it a coincidence that this happened on Pearl Harbor Day? Ha, I think not!

  117. Refraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The helical part was likely the rocket vapor trail. The giant spiral part could have been sun light refracting through rocket vapor trail and illuminating an ice crystal layer in the atomosphere or something like that. Anyone know what direction the sun was in? From where the rocket was launched?

  118. Side effect of CERN's Black holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a higgs boson.

  119. Re:Please "dumb it down" by adamrut · · Score: 0

    I know now that "parsimonious" is actually a word. I've learned enough for today... I'll move on to the next article now.

    Well I looked up "parsimonious" in the dictionary and I think I understand what it means, but in that sentence it has me stumped. Are they saying that they think the explanation is bullsh*t?

  120. Russian RS-24 ABM-laser countermeasures 'demo' by Chromal · · Score: 1

    Russian officials stated as recently as Oct 22nd they would be deploying their new RS-24 ICBM “in 2009.” Why wait? It technically violated the START-I nonproliferation treaty, to which they were party. The ‘good’ news? The START-I treaty expired on Saturday, Dec 5th, 2009.

    What makes the RS-24 special? Its widely-boasted ability to penetrate the US’s anti-ballistic-missile shield technology (e.g.: Tactical High Energy Lasers). There are a variety of theoretical ICBM laser countermeasures, and it looks like the Russians are trying at least two: 1) Oscillating Trajectory 2) Ablative gas shield. They may be coming from the same system, e.g.: the shield also causes the oscillations with a carefully vectored output.

    Doesn’t hurt for leverage in the literally ongoing as I type renegotiation of a treaty to replace START-I. Also, doesn’t hurt that Obama’s scheduled to be in Oslo, Norway, for the Nobel Prize acceptance ceremony tomorrow.

  121. Someone Call Ray Stanz! by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    "SUBCREATURES! Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, The Traveller has come! CHOOSE! CHOOSE AND PERISH...

    --
    [End Of Line]
  122. It is an aurora alright by amightywind · · Score: 1

    It is an Aurora alright, like in the not so secret U.S. spyplane. Take that Ruskies!

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  123. Russian missle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Norwegian astronomer Knut Jørgen Røed Ødegaard says it's 99.9% safe to say that it's a rocket out of control, while some newspapers and TV channels are quoting Russian military sources, confirming that this is a failed Bulava missile launched from a nuclear submarine in the White Sea.

  124. Golden Eye by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there a James Bond movie of the Russians having this device?

  125. failure of a SLBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rumor in Russian circles is that it is a failed test of a very failing Bulava Submarine Launched ballistic missile that has been having a lot of trouble over the last ten years. with a 70% test failure thus far.

  126. OMG! A Wormhole! ;-) by Knoman · · Score: 1

    John Crichton COME HOME!!!

    --
    "It's an imperfect world,screws fall out..."
  127. What's the big deal? by SlothDead · · Score: 1

    Looks like a normal weather balloon to me...

  128. A rocket, or a GIANT TREBUCHET??? by RonTheHurler · · Score: 1

    The same effect, via trebuchet.

    Somewhere deep in the California desert, at a super secret test site.....

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sMIO15gCQI

  129. Re:Please "dumb it down" by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

    I think they're saying it's one of the least fanciful explanations. A bizarre use of the word parsimonious though; looks as if it was used by someone who wasn't at all familiar with it's common use. (Yeah, I know, it's not really commonly used, but generally it is used to mean stingy, cheap, frugal, thrifty, extremely unwilling/unlikely to spend money.)

    This is what happens when someone breaks out their favorite five-dollar word so they don't have to say "likely" or "realistic".

    Of course, I may be over-analyzing; there's always the possiblity that timothy had no freakin' idea what parsimonious meant.

  130. Re:This is why UFO observations are always so susp by ikefox · · Score: 1

    Get a report from someone at the scene and you're suddenly including in hysteria, panic, adrenaline, and a whole other list of things that someone seeing something unfamilar will have affect their judgement.

    You insult me as though I'm making assumptions when you're the one who is assuming. Hysteria? Panic? I specifically said I'm a skeptic to the idea that aliens put that in our sky, mainly because I'm skeptical of intelligent life being anywhere near our solar system. I didn't even reference the other people who had seen it specifically - I did address a few of the "theories" that I saw several people mention in various articles and comments - but I drew no strong conclusion in any direction. I'm well aware that things that a complete stranger says are subjective / subject to bias, since that's a fairly basic social concept.

    The entire leading point of my post was that I had no good idea of what the object was. I didn't claim that my post was verifiable, nor did I claim I have any intensive knowledge of meteorology, rocketry, or physics even.

    It wouldn't matter if I had claimed those things though, because I take no shame in being incorrect over something like this. As somebody reading a news article in my spare time, I don't have any responsibility to anyone beyond myself to make a completely informed comment.

  131. The Nowegian BatSignal. by OgGreeb · · Score: 1

    There's villainy afoot!

    --
    -- Gary Goldberg KA3ZYW 301/249-6501 AIM:OgGreeb Digital Marketing Inc., Bowie, MD //www.digimark.net/
  132. Hrmf... by a_nonamiss · · Score: 3, Funny

    I stared at that spinning little ball of light for like 3 minutes before I realized it was just waiting for the video to load.

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
  133. FPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like a rail gun corkscrew trail.

  134. It was a fucking strategic weapon being tested! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After reviewing the wikipedia page I would say this is a bit scary. It was a state of the art submarine launched ICBM, capable of holding 4 - 10 MIRVs (warheads). The Russian doctrine is to hide their subs rather than park them off the coast of the target, but SLBM missiles can have a very short flight time relative to land based missiles. It appears Russia has not yet tested or deployed the submarine that can launch this missile.

  135. Day of the triffids by adityamalik · · Score: 1

    In an unrelated development, mysterious walking trees were found wandering the norwegian woods.
    Experts predict they are an evolutionary response by the earth to substitute petroleum, just in time for copenhagen.

  136. Putin call home... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Politicians. So they finally decided to return where they came from

  137. Flush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God just flushed his toilet. No biggy...

  138. Most definately a rocket by denebeim · · Score: 1

    A few years ago I saw this: http://members.cox.net/starscopes/space_sky/20050922_vandenberg_rocket_launch.html while driving home from work. It looks more or less identical to the photographs from Norway. I can attest that it's an amazing site.

  139. Now that we all know that it was a Russki rocket.. by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 1

    I meant to post this last night and never got around to it, but I was going to say, "Nah, it's the Nobel Peace Prize committee spinning out of control with regret!"

    --
    In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
  140. It was a Russian ICBM test. by Animats · · Score: 1

    The Russians have admitted it was an ICBM test. They were trying a launch from a nuclear submarine from a submerged position in the White Sea. The third stage of the ICBM failed.

  141. Interplanetary convention by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Just give them a copy of Vista

    Ok, do you really want that the first thing ever for which human are going to be known for on the intergalactic scene is something as deeply disturbing and vicious as this ? and probably violating several of their interplanetary equivalents of the Geneva conventions ?!?

    No, let's capture them and do medical experiments on them : it's much more kind and humane.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  142. Hypnotic by cheezitmike · · Score: 1

    Or, maybe someone was trying to hypnotize Norway... http://www.reallifecomics.com/archive/091210.html ...or failed trying to blow it up.

  143. Just Physics by Jeprey · · Score: 1
    Looks like a rocket plume to be sure. Seem pretty obvious but I was once a real rocket scientist so obvious is relative.

    Remember this is in Norway. As in, a country close to the north magnetic pole of the Earth. What geometric pattern do ions follow in a magnetic field gradient like at the poles? A spiral or helix. Voila! But why two? Two different chemical species in the exhaust with two distinct masses and two distinct ionization recombination emission colors.

  144. The same week as the RAF closes it's UFO division by evilandi · · Score: 1

    As a Brit, I was dissapointed that our Royal Air Force closed their UFO analysis division last week. I wittered in social media about how the RAF UFO division was an excellent team who investigated unidentified incursions into UK airspace, assessed them for threats, and passed on reports of possible enemy action to the rest of the UK military. The RAF UFO division was never about finding aliens, it was about assessing unidentified airborne threats.

    I'm now beginning to think I should have been a lot more vocal, writing to my MP instead. What if that had been a missile launch over Scotland instead of Norway?

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
  145. ShareAndSaveTheWorld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On 12 December 2008 Share International Foundation announced that a large, bright star would soon be seen worldwide. It is a sign heralding the imminent appearance of Maitreya, the World Teacher, on US television.
    The 'star' is really one of four enormous spacecraft placed around the world to allow people everywhere to witness this extraordinary phenomenon. Sightings are increasingly being reported.
    "In the very near future, people everywhere will have the opportunity to witness an extraordinary and significant sign, the like of which has been manifested only once before, at the birth of Jesus. Then, according to Christian teaching, a star appeared in the heavens and led three wise men from the East to the birthplace of Jesus. Soon, once again, a star-like luminary of brilliant power will be seen around the world." (Benjamin Creme's Master, Share International magazine, Jan/Feb 2009)
    See "The 'star' sign" video on YouTube or visit Share International website.

  146. Norway Spiral announcing Maitreya's emergence by magicstar · · Score: 1

    This phenomenon is a sign that today we live in a most extraordinary time in history.

    Some will know that a year has passed since Share International released a news release, where they predicted that very soon a bright star-like sign would appear in our skies, visible day and night. This 'star' was to be similar in its nature to the biblical Star of Bethlehem - announcing that a great teacher for our time is among us and is ready to step forward into the public, having his first public interview on one of the major american television networks.
    Many will also know that such a 'star' has indeed appeared not a month after the prediction, and that Share International magazine has every month since then published a number of photos and reports of the 'star', coming from all parts of the world. Likewise many people uploaded their own videos and reports to and talked about it on forums and blogs.
    The latest information from Share International is that this spiral over Norway was yet another instance of the 'star', this time showing itself in such a spectacular way. Further such manifestations are to be expected in the near future.
    See "The 'Star' Sign" on.