Slashdot Mirror


I'm a PC and I'm 4-1/2

theodp writes "Microsoft's new Windows ad made its debut during the Grammy Awards on Sunday. It stars a 4-year-old cutie named Kylie (Silverlight required) showing how easy it is to use Windows Live Photo Gallery to edit and share photos. And while it's impressive that little Kylie is able to transfer a snapshot of her pet fish from her camera to a PC, color-correct it, and e-mail it to her family, what's truly amazing is that the toddler was also apparently able to read, understand, and accept Windows Live's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. (But minors can't legally execute contracts, can they?)"

435 comments

  1. Dear God! by nog_lorp · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I'm a PC and I'm 4 1/2"
    They're assimilating children to make them smart enough to use their products? MONSTERS!

    1. Re:Dear God! by doyoulikegoatseeee · · Score: 0, Funny

      you must be new here

    2. Re:Dear God! by thsths · · Score: 1

      > They're assimilating children to make them smart enough to use their products?

      Maybe children are smarter than you give them credit for? :-)

      Anyway, the license is not a problem - nobody (except maybe a senior lawyer in contract law) really understands the legalese.

    3. Re:Dear God! by dhavleak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I doubt kdawson has actually ever read a complete EULA either -- he simply needed something to bitch about..

    4. Re:Dear God! by sgbett · · Score: 5, Funny

      Quite, my 4 year old has no problem browsing the net on macos, linus or windows. And is particularly takwn with the iphone and the scribble app.

      Reminds me I think I might have to change my pin number when she gets a bit older. Not that I would use the same pin for my bank card as my iphone, thats crazy talk.

      --
      Invaders must die
    5. Re:Dear God! by Kokuyo · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...browsing the net on ... linus...

      What, you got Torvalds to babysit your kid?! You ROCK!

    6. Re:Dear God! by sgbett · · Score: 0

      "I Rock" / +5 Insightful.

      Hurrah!

      --
      Invaders must die
    7. Re:Dear God! by Fred_A · · Score: 5, Funny

      Reminds me I think I might have to change my pin number when she gets a bit older.

      It is supposed to be a Personal PIN Number after all...

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    8. Re:Dear God! by wisty · · Score: 0

      Yeah, especially since it is debatable as to whether the EULER and TOS are contracts. IANAL, but a contract = terms, agreement, and consideration, all at the same time. Agreement later on is not a contract. And yes, you have probably read this rant before.

    9. Re:Dear God! by CarpetShark · · Score: 3, Funny

      What, you got Torvalds to babysit your kid?! You ROCK!

      Really? I can see it now: Torvalds: "Sure Andreas, I'll take a look." Baby: *climbs on cooker, knocks over pot of boiling water* Torvalds: *distractedly tilts head towards kitchen while battering the keyboard* "Hey kid, what you doing in there?" Baby: *screams horrifically* Torvalds: "Uhh.. sorry Andreas. What was that? Oh, OK. Yeah, no worries, I'll merge it now."

    10. Re:Dear God! by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I can second all of the above, but with a 3-1/2 year old. Kids pick up simple patterns easier than most adults do. Something about over analyzing the situation.

      I don't find it amazing that someone without preconceived notions has an easier time understanding simple things.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    11. Re:Dear God! by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      They're assimilating children to make them smart enough to use their products? MONSTERS!

      Well, I look it as another case of Microsoft copying something. In this case, it's advertising. They can't even attack Apple without copying them. I'm not saying Apple is all that original, but at least their ads don't reak of "Nah, nah, I can do the same thing too to you!" It's rather pathetic that Microsoft has to lash out like this to a competitor that has less than 10% of it's marketshare. It just gives more credibility to OS X.

      Also, I would say on the whole, the Windows is easy is a lark. How many times has a geek been called to fix his friend's computer? And it's usually just from browsing. Having to run spyware, adware, anti-virus isn't easy. But somehow security, those calls and that maintenance isn't added to the whole easy-to-use argument, sometimes deterred by the dubious market share whining rather than ascribing it to truly bad decisions.

      And before someone whines, I use Vista day in and day out. I don't get infected because it's behind a router with firewall, run Firefox with adblock and noscript, and I generally know what I'm doing (not always). It's safer than it used to be, but now Microsoft is compromising UAC in the next version for convenience, still has IE married to the core, still has the registry, and until those things are remedied it will always have to contend with those valid charges.

    12. Re:Dear God! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Not really, I started reading when I was two. If we had owned a PC back then I could have probably figured it out. My parents letting me on the thing unsupervised would have been a whole separate issue however.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    13. Re:Dear God! by VagaStorm · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actualy, I have found that an old laptop with OpenSUSE is the perfect computer for the youngest.... Many of the kid games are easier to get going in wine than on a windows computer where ther dont have admin access... Why on erth would a 7 year old need admin access on my computer? A Restricted user acount should do just fine, but alas.

    14. Re:Dear God! by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      Not that I would use the same pin for my bank card as my iphone, thats crazy talk.

      That's only because you know the bank won't let you use 1234 on your card ;)

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    15. Re:Dear God! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      I doubt kdawson has ever read a submission in its entirety.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    16. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> They're assimilating children to make them smart enough to use their products?

      >Maybe children are smarter than you give them credit for? :-)

      The original text should have been:

      They're assimilating children to make them dumb enough to use their products?

    17. Re:Dear God! by AikonMGB · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not that I would use the same pin for my bank card as my iphone, thats crazy talk.

      That's only because you know the bank won't let you use 1234 on your card ;)

      1234? That's the stupidest combination I've ever heard in my life! The kind of thing an idiot would have on his bank card!

    18. Re:Dear God! by rapiddescent · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Personal PIN Number

      what, a Personal Personal Identification Number Number?

    19. Re:Dear God! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Personal PIN Number

      what, a Personal Personal Identification Number Number?

      Hey ! You got it in one ! Congrats !

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    20. Re:Dear God! by Tuoqui · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thats ok, I doubt anyone other than Microsoft's Lawyer has read the complete EULA either.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    21. Re:Dear God! by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Maybe Hans didn't actually mean to kill his wife, he just had a shovel handy and being the FOSS geek he is saw the easiest, cheapest resolution to the problem so he could get back to writing his file system...

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    22. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt kdawson has actually ever read a complete EULA either -- he simply needed something to bitch about..

      The EULA would have provided plenty.

    23. Re:Dear God! by largoyle · · Score: 5, Funny

      1234? Hey thats the combination on my bank card!

    24. Re:Dear God! by theaceoffire · · Score: 1

      Besides, a 4.5 year old PC? No way that can use Vista.

      Might as well ditch her for a 1 year old PC,at least.

      --
      I steal signatures. This one used to be yours.
    25. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Thanks for pointing out the already incredibly obvious joke.

    26. Re:Dear God! by beadfulthings · · Score: 1

      He may have a sp-peech, imp-pediment, you insensitive clod!

      --
      "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
    27. Re:Dear God! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fortunately, Apple doesn't have any EULAs, TOUs or privacy policies. Those things are icky and Apple is far too progressive and serene to have them.

      If this ad had shown a 4 1/2 year old using an iMac, this discussion would be about how many Peabody Awards it was going to win.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    28. Re:Dear God! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      6666 is easier for me to remember.

      It came to me one day when I was shaving.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    29. Re:Dear God! by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the kind you use at the automated ATM machine.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    30. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i always thought kdawson was a chick with her constant bitching.

    31. Re:Dear God! by Rulian · · Score: 0, Troll

      U're anal ? Well, it's OK for me, bro'. Personally, I first read : "I'm into CP and I'm 4-1/2 long". Wanna meet ?

    32. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent insightful

    33. Re:Dear God! by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I think what's scarier is that they're making PC-based androids that stay looking so realistic after 4.5 years.

    34. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it really supposed to be a Personal Personal Identification Number Number?

    35. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You know, we could call it a "PI Number", but unfortunately that's just as redundant.

    36. Re:Dear God! by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Silly rabbit, /. editors can't read. They just mash at the buttons until something happens.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    37. Re:Dear God! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      silly, it's a personal information PIN number

    38. Re:Dear God! by SkyDude · · Score: 1

      Anyway, the license is not a problem - nobody (except maybe a senior lawyer in contract law) really understands the legalese.

      Oh c'mon, the senior lawyer doesn't understand it. The young wannabe lawyer fresh out of the Matchbook School of Law wrote the thing, hoping to be a senior lawyer someday.

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    39. Re:Dear God! by BHS_Turf · · Score: 1

      Maybe to install the English spell-checker?

    40. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope it's not 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 , that's the same combination I have on my luggage!

    41. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for this.

    42. Re:Dear God! by xystren · · Score: 1

      Don't you know, the identification number to identity the personal identification number? Hence PIN number..

      Bahhh, yeah, I know it's a rationalization

    43. Re:Dear God! by howlatthemoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If this had been done on a Mac it could have been made well before Kylie was born. iPhoto was released in 2002.

    44. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you're right doesn't mean you're...

      SHUT UP, I LOVE MAC!

    45. Re:Dear God! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      "smart" isn't really the problem: "interested" is.

      I can't see the average (or even above average) 4 year old being interested color correction.

      I'm not sure grandma is even aware of such a thing.

      Which brings me to another point...

      Nevermind grandkid. Howabout grandma. Get her as engaged.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    46. Re:Dear God! by initialE · · Score: 3, Funny

      Irony is when you mod a post full of redundancies... well... redundant. You win the Alanis Morisette award congratulations!

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    47. Re:Dear God! by mochan_s · · Score: 1

      Trovalds isn't the only Linus in the world.

    48. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, wait, wait, get it right! It is a personal information PIN number for one of them automated teller atm machines!

    49. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is supposed to be a Personal PIN Number after all...

      A Personal Personal Identification Number Number??

    50. Re:Dear God! by tuxgeek · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I'm a PC and I'm 4 1/2"

      So easy even a child can use it!
      Wow, now I'm impressed. But I believe I have heard that somewhere before ....

      "Build something even a fool can use, and only a fool will use it."
      Now all children can surf all the porn they can handle ... Hmm

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    51. Re:Dear God! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I can't see the average (or even above average) 4 year old being interested color correction.
      I've never used color correction. I guess I don't understand what the point is. Is her digital camera not capable of capturing the correct color? I've never had to touch any of the photos I've pulled off of my camera. I just upload them straight to Picasa and send a link to whomever might want to see them.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    52. Re:Dear God! by pub_tib · · Score: 1

      Personal PIN Numbers? Can I get one of those where they sell NIC Cards?

    53. Re:Dear God! by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      I prefer 1337

    54. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably all in the scheduling.

    55. Re:Dear God! by Tybalt_Capulet · · Score: 0

      Why not? They let me. EDIT: Maybe I shouldn't have said that.

      --
      Has the old saint in his forest not yet heard of it? That God is dead?
    56. Re:Dear God! by mad_cat_elite · · Score: 1

      What part of your body were you shaving to make you think of '6666'?

    57. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey mine is ****

    58. Re:Dear God! by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is completely believable, I have corroborate it. My 4 year old had her own PC from age of two, because she was causing too much havoc on mine, crashing Firefox regularly with the mouse before learning to walk. She would turn the mini laptop mouse around and use it backwards so she could push the buttons with the palm of her little hand. At three she was able to drag and drop the mustache icons on Mr Potato Guy, with the mouse speed suitably slowed down. At four she has mastered Tuxpaint and is moving on to Inkscape. None of this is the slightest exaggeration. Oh, and don't accept her challenge to two player Snakeball, she will frag you repeatedly.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    59. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Howabout grandma. Get her as engaged.

      Eligible bachelors aren't exactly knocking down the door.

    60. Re:Dear God! by Hottie+Parms · · Score: 1

      what's truly amazing is that the toddler was also apparently able to read, understand, and accept Windows Live's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

      Okay, a 4 1/2 year old child is not a toddler. That is a kid. A young kid, yes, but they are capable of reasoning and adaptation. Hell, my two year old is starting to learn how to use the mouse -- think what a 4.5 year old could do!

    61. Re:Dear God! by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Maybe a 4.5 year old kid can use it, but is it easy enough for her parents to use?

      I remember an ad from about 20 years ago for a video recorder that was so easy to use that "even a grown up could use it".

    62. Re:Dear God! by sorak · · Score: 1

      I doubt kdawson has actually ever read a complete EULA either -- he simply needed something to bitch about..

      Very few people have ever read a complete EULA. That is something to bitch about. That's the point. Most people agree to what is, arguably, a legally binding contract, full of unreasonable provisions, and have never even read the thing.

      That affects the rest of us, because if the people who care about their rights are in the minority, then we all get trampled.

    63. Re:Dear God! by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Go find a collection of fluorescent lights - take a photo of your wife standing under them, with a nice blue background. Go see how long it takes for her to threaten you with divorce if you post of picture of her face, sickly yellow and jaundiced, because the light and color through your camera's "AWB" setting for a loop.

      Or take a photo of someone wearing a bright jacket in a bright white snow scene.

      Hint: digital cameras can't see color. They also presume that the average scene is going to be 18% gray, if converted. While this works well enough a lot of times, and provides a reasonable starting point for color correction inside the camera, it isn't remotely close to covering all likely usage.

    64. Re:Dear God! by sglewis100 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Trovalds isn't the only Linus in the world.

      Trovalds isn't even the Linus you thought you were typing.

    65. Re:Dear God! by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      It's a Personal Identification PIN Number, jackass.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    66. Re:Dear God! by bob.appleyard · · Score: 1

      A doubly appropriate "redundant" moderation there!

      --
      How dare you be so modest!! You conceited bastard!!
    67. Re:Dear God! by TheCybernator · · Score: 1

      1234? Hey thats the combination on my bank card! you insensitive clod!!

      Fixed it for you :)

    68. Re:Dear God! by ddusza · · Score: 0

      "That's the combination on my luggage!"

      --
      Don't fear the penguins
    69. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      She was going to present an entire case study on the LHC, but she ran out of time reading the license agreements. The fish was the logical 2nd choice.

    70. Re:Dear God! by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    71. Re:Dear God! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fortunately, Apple doesn't have any EULAs, TOUs or privacy policies. Those things are icky and Apple is far too progressive and serene to have them.

      Actually, Apple EULA is so advanced that it gets uploaded directly to your brain via 25th frame technique when you first boot into OS X. So you may think there's no EULA, but when it comes to a court, and an Apple lawyer says the code word, you'll recite it from your memory entirely.

      As usual, OS X is all about convenience. Why waste time reading EULAs? Direct memory upload is so much more 21st century!

    72. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple a doodely just works a doodley perfectly a doodley!

      Everyone a doodley knows that a doodley!

    73. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah it amazes me that they were able to cast Seinfeld in their commercials while he still had all those contracts at Apple... OH WAIT--

    74. Re:Dear God! by enjerth · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of people pick on calling it a PIN number. But I think it helps to qualify a pin as a number, as opposed to a safety pin or a hair pin or whatever.

      And imagine the confusion of being asked to enter a PI number.

      "Oh god, I didn't do very well in algebra."
      - (Confused look from the teller.)
      "Lets see... there's no period on the numpad here, so that's umm... 3....1...4....1...5...."
      - "Just 4 digits, sir."
      "Oh, ok. Well then it's just 3141... right?"
      - (Confused look, again.)

    75. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just mash at the buttons until something happens.

      Hey, just like kdawson edits!

    76. Re:Dear God! by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Nice to see the MS trolls once again wasting mod points....mission accomplished!

    77. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      macos, linus, takwn - I am really out of the loop on all these technologies. Your 4 year old is truly cutting-edge.

    78. Re:Dear God! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Not to dig up an old argument, but that article you linked is ridiculous. I hadn't seen it before. To be brief, nothing in that the iPhone ads is not doable with good 3G connections, and I've duplicated the same things myself. That remains the main strength of Apple ads--they are one of the few tech ads out there that actually show the product being used as the work in real life (sure, with optimization and lots of use threads and rehearsal, but still, the device is fully capable of doing what is shown). Other products can't actually show you how well they work, because they'd have to work well to start with, and most don't work well at all--thus, they just don't show it being used and instead show Beyonce or some other celebrity pretending to use the device. Sorry, had to vent--again, the linked story you posted really peeves me.

    79. Re:Dear God! by JoCat · · Score: 1

      This isn't as far off as you might think. The iTunes EULA contains a phrase that gives Apple the right to update the EULA at any time without notifying you. Your continued use of the program is considered consent.

      Now you don't have to read the EULA!

    80. Re:Dear God! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      yes, it talks to a bank's automated ADP processor via a modulator/demodulator modem.

    81. Re:Dear God! by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Funny, I was under the impression that Microsoft's legal staff wrote the EULA the way they did to prevent people from reading it, and left enough loopholes in it for Microsoft to drive a fleet of semis through just in case...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    82. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bastard.

    83. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm a PC and I'm 4 1/2"

      So easy even a child can use it!
      Wow, now I'm impressed. But I believe I have heard that somewhere before ....

      "Build something even a fool can use, and only a fool will use it."

      Hmm, yes, it appears to be heading that way, doesn't it? In fact, I think tuxgeek's comment should be tagged informative instead of funny...

    84. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bad news about the ship, mr president.

    85. Re:Dear God! by Capt.Slant.Eye · · Score: 1

      Well I guess it is time for me to go change my PIN number then...

    86. Re:Dear God! by Capt.Slant.Eye · · Score: 1

      So easy even a child can use it! Wow, now I'm impressed. But I believe I have heard that somewhere before ....

      Yeah it's called Geico... So easy a caveman can do it... Man i hope he ain't reading this that caveman will be pis.. mad...

    87. Re:Dear God! by TheOnlyRealPerson · · Score: 1

      The part of this comment that makes it funny is the fact you were modded informative. Sometimes, I really love this site.

    88. Re:Dear God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the part of slashdot discussion that shows we're all a bit square.

    89. Re:Dear God! by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      I have a hard time believing that with good 3G connections Google Maps loads fully / reloads for zoom in sub tenth-of-a-second time.

    90. Re:Dear God! by Jurily · · Score: 1

      They're assimilating children to make them smart enough to use their products? MONSTERS!

      No, they're dumbing the poor children down.

    91. Re:Dear God! by TheStonepedo · · Score: 1

      A boy who has not yet outgrown carrying a security blanket is hardly the optimum interface for web browsing.

      --
      I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
  2. The plot thickens by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I clicked the link to install Silverlight (firefox, ubuntu, i386) and got sent to Moonlight.

    1. Re:The plot thickens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've noticed that too on my Linux boxes. I don't know if that's good or bad.

    2. Re:The plot thickens by IBBoard · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends on whether you want to view Silverlight stuff on Linux or not. Personally, I'm quite happy with no Silverlight and Gnash for Flash viewing (set to start in "pause" mode).

    3. Re:The plot thickens by noundi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Personally, I'm quite happy with no Silverlight and Gnash for Flash viewing (set to start in "pause" mode).

      So you're saying that we don't need another platform for epelepticly blinking ads that jump around your monitor and covers 90% of the page you're trying to read? This is outrageous!

      --
      I am the lawn!
    4. Re:The plot thickens by pr100 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Me too, I courageously decided to install the firefox plugin when asked. It restarted firefox... then muttered about installing some codecs, which I also permitted, it then claimed to be restarting firefox again, but apparently just closed it.

      I restarted firefox manually, tried once again to view the link, and was prompted to upgrade my version of silverlight. At this point I gave up...

    5. Re:The plot thickens by Errtu76 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I installed the Moonlight plugin, restarted FF and then it (the plugin) asked me if i wanted to download codecs. As soon as i clicked on Accept firefox crashed. This on Ubuntu 8.10 x86

    6. Re:The plot thickens by aliquis · · Score: 4, Informative

      I downloaded Silverlight in OS X, installed without restarting browser, opened the video clip, this is what happens:

      * I've taken a picture of my fish tank.
      * First I plug this thing in *plugs in USB*
      * Then I make this photo better (or something such), you don't get to see anything worth it in the application, images gets more saturated and better levels.
      * Then I share it with my friends (pre-typed family in a to-field.)
      * I'm 4.5 years old and I'm a PC.

      That's all, the whole thing is over in 15 seconds or so, so unless you enjoy seeing an USB-cable get plugged in, the result of pressing "auto"/"fix it" and how the to fields in an e-mail look you won't be missing anything.

      I've uninstalled Silverlight now ..

    7. Re:The plot thickens by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Fedora 10 64 bit, installed the addon, asks for codec install, firefox crashes. Microsoft has deployed something that doesn't work.

      Adobe can do it. Sun Java can do it. Microsoft can not [yet] do it. Keep trying. Interestingly enough, even though I have the addon installed, the main page still says I do not have the silverlight thing installed. I wonder if it is failing because I don't have mono installed? Nope. Got that installed... the 64 bit version anyway. I might get curious enough to figure out why at some point, just not now.

    8. Re:The plot thickens by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Okay, decided I was curious enough to look at it. A simple way to get some feedback from GUI programs under Linux is to start them from a terminal window. So I opened up gnome-terminal and typed "firefox" to run the program. The terminal window receives error feedback as things run. Here is what I got when I tried to install these codecs:

      (firefox:16557): Moonlight-WARNING **: Forcing client-side rendering because we detected binary drivers which are known to suffer performance problems.
      windowless mode
      Runtime destroyed, with 1 leaked EventObjects.
       
      (firefox:16557): Moonlight-WARNING **: Forcing client-side rendering because we detected binary drivers which are known to suffer performance problems.
      windowless mode
       
      (firefox:16557): Moonlight-WARNING **: Surface::CreateDownloader (): Trying to create a downloader on a zombified surface.
       
      /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.6/run-mozilla.sh: line 131: 16557 Segmentation fault "$prog" ${1+"$@"}

      Not sure what it means, but I know what "Segmentation fault" means. Zombified surface? Runtime destroyed with leaked EventObjects? Doesn't sound good.

    9. Re:The plot thickens by stonedcat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft has deployed something that doesn't work.

      Well I guess there's a first time for everything.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me.
    10. Re:The plot thickens by Lachlan+Hunt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Last time I installed Silverlight on my Mac was to stream the Beijing Olympics from NBC, and that was only because I was stuck in a foreign country where it wasn't broadcast in English. I uninstalled it pretty soon after.

      So the bar for me to install Silverlight again is pretty high, and a crappy 30 second Microsoft ad just doesn't cut it.

      Anyway, I found a copy on YouTube, so I can continue to avoid Silverlight a little longer.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtilWL4mnhI

      --
      By reading this signature, you hereby agree with the content of the above comment.
    11. Re:The plot thickens by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why did you uninstall it after the Olympics?

      Just curious, was it running in the background? Using too many resources while you were waiting for your latte to cool?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    12. Re:The plot thickens by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Damn that Microsoft for making Moonlight, which didn't run on this young man's computer.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    13. Re:The plot thickens by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I must have clicked on the wrong link. When I installed silverlight on my mac, it needed a reboot and came up in vista.

      Now how the hell do I get the Ballmer bobble head off my screen saying "NO NO NO!! you cant have OSX.... NO NO NO!!..."

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:The plot thickens by Lachlan+Hunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because Silverlight is just Microsoft's attempt to take over the web with more proprietary garbage. There's already too much Flash on the web, and I reluctantly have to have that installed. I don't want to see Silverlight become anywhere near as popular. Besides, so far, the only sites I've come across using it are either owned by or affiliated with Microsoft, which makes having it largely unnecessary.

      --
      By reading this signature, you hereby agree with the content of the above comment.
    15. Re:The plot thickens by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Why did you uninstall it after the Olympics?

      I can't speak for the OP, but Flash is evil and no Silverlight either.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    16. Re:The plot thickens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux: Ready for the desktop.

      Someday.

    17. Re:The plot thickens by pohl · · Score: 1

      You should be +5 insightful. This is clearly an attempt at using a viral ad to drive plugin installation, with cuteness overload as the bait. I won't play along with that either. See now, your bait caught some praise instead of a flame. Silly mods.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    18. Re:The plot thickens by Teun · · Score: 1

      Which brings up the question if someone is already working on an Silverlight extension to the Flashblock plug in?

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    19. Re:The plot thickens by OlySoft-Dave · · Score: 1

      Bingo guys. Novell is the vendor responsible for Moonlight, but only because Microsoft shared the related proprietary methods with Novell so they could create a client for GNU/Linux. You see, it is important for microsoft to be able to say that they are are not guilty of more monopolistic behavior by making yet another proprietary codec that you have to run windows to use...because it is available to GNU/Linux users via Novell. Microsoft will not officially make any GNU/Linux software in-house which is why their relationship with a software maker like Novell was such a necessity for them. Of course the software barely works, but that is to be expected, since actually being usable is not important just the fact that the technology is sort-of available gets them off the hook. Especially in the EU.

    20. Re:The plot thickens by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

      Moonlight is developed by Novell, not Microsoft.

    21. Re:The plot thickens by Spaseboy · · Score: 1

      As an end-user, I think Silverlight works better than Flash but that may just be because Silverlight doesn't have any compatibility baggage.

      --
      "I don't want more choice, I just want nicer things!"
      -Jennifer Saunders as Edina Monsoon
    22. Re:The plot thickens by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Last time I installed Silverlight on my Mac was to stream the Beijing Olympics from NBC, and that was only because I was stuck in a foreign country where it wasn't broadcast in English. I uninstalled it pretty soon after.

      I recall being in a foreign country for the last two olympics. At the very least the last winter olympics. I actually found it really cool to watch it in Dutch. What about the sports can I not gleam in and of my own? Do you really care that much about the "fluff" they add?

      Or, perhaps, you just prefer to watch the US-dominated sports. In the Netherlands I did tend to see more of the Netherlands-dominated sports than anything else. YAY SPEED SKATING!

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    23. Re:The plot thickens by Lachlan+Hunt · · Score: 1

      Actually, I prefer the Australian dominated sports, cause I'm Australian. But being in Norway, not being interested in most of the events they broadcast here, in a language I don't understand at an inconvenient time, I found it easier to stream the events I wanted to watch, when I wanted them from the NBC in the USA, and channel 7 in Australia. (I had to use SSH tunnelling and a VPN, respectively, to bypass the IP-based regional restrictions though).

      There was only one event I really had to watch live on TV: Grant Hackett's final Olympic 1500m freestyle, for which I had to get up at around 04:00 in the morning. For that, I put up with the Norwegian commentary.

      --
      By reading this signature, you hereby agree with the content of the above comment.
    24. Re:The plot thickens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, you ignorant fool.

    25. Re:The plot thickens by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Adobe can do it. Sun Java can do it. Microsoft can not [yet] do it.

      It's not that Microsoft can't do it, it's that they won't do it. Allowing Silverlight/Moonlight to work flawlessly on Firefox or Linux means there's one less reason to install Windows of some sort. There's a technical term for this, it's called 'vendor lockin'.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    26. Re:The plot thickens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know about the rumors but youporn.com isn't migrating to silverlight, so you can pretty much go ahead and click "Do not install".

    27. Re:The plot thickens by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      That really was the most interesting thing that I noticed when I was in the Netherlands for the Olympics. That each country kind of filters the events to show during the most likely hours to those that the country they're targeting dominates.

      I do suppose it's almost a tautological statement that they would want to do this. Who doesn't like to see their own country dominate a sport? On the other hand, I'm a weirdo because I'm pseudo-german, and so I'm essentially trapped in the US wanting to watch the German-dominated sports. :)

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
  3. OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You know, it's possible a 4 1/2 year old has parents... you know, the ones that have the laptop and the camera she's using to demo this?

    Of course, if she was using any given version of Linux, she wouldn't be able to do anything without going through an insane amount of dialogs trying to get her digital camera recognized, her pic(s) 'fixed', and finally email them to her family/friends/whatever.

    Could it be that *gasp* Windows is actually easy to use than ? Say it ain't so!

    1. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by loutr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most (All ?) of the digital cameras I've used are detected by Windows and Linux as USB mass storage devices. Both Gnome/KDE and Windows will pop up a menu asking you what you want to do with it. So it really is about the same level of difficulty under both OSes (except Ubuntu and the like have better picture managers by default).

      As for the 'fixing pic(s)' part I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

      PS : yeah, I know, I know, don't feed the trolls...

    2. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by calmofthestorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Roses are red,
      Violets are blue,
      OP is flaimbait,
      but so are you.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    3. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Flame. Stop relying on Spellcheck.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by Idou · · Score: 1, Informative

      "she wouldn't be able to do anything without going through an insane amount of dialogs trying to get her digital camera recognized, her pic(s) 'fixed', and finally email them to her family/friends/whatever."

      Hi. You obviously have not used a recent Linux distro. A lot of people recommend Ubuntu (it is my second favorite), but I prefer Mandriva.

      True story. My niece (she's 10) recently sent me a picture she had created using a program called "GIMP" that came on the netbook I bought for my sister. I was so pleasantly surprised I started sending her back versions of her picture using various GIMP filters. After commenting on how cool some of the pictures were, she finally said that people would think that I was a weirdo for being so in to pictures of ponies . . .

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    5. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both Gnome/KDE and Windows will pop up a menu asking you what you want to do with it.

      No, KDE won't anymore since KDE4 - they managed to screw that too.

    6. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using KDE 4.2 here. When I plug in my cell phone, which is seen as a mass storage device, I get a popup from the connected devices plasmoid. If I click the new icon it automounts the phone and opens the file manager. I'm not sure what more I would want to do with it when I have pictures, music, and backup Android apps on it. If I need a photo editor, one will open when I click a picture through the file manager.

    7. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by xstonedogx · · Score: 5, Funny

      As the proud parent of a Linux user I advocate throwing a bare bones slackware install on strange hardware, giving the 4-year-old the root password, and walking away.

      She's six now and she knows if she wants to be networked she has to roll her own cat 5 and figure out the appropriate network settings. She's almost there. (Boy was she mad when she finally figured out I had originally installed token ring on her box!) If she wants internet access she has to hack into the firewall and give herself that access.

      You know, you see them struggling and you really want to help them, but you have to resist the urge. Otherwise they'll never learn!

    8. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by mspohr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry to disappoint you but Linux is just as easy. On my Ubuntu machines, the camera is recognized when plugged in and f-spot downloads the images (you do have to click the download button), photo manager displays the photos (and yes you can 'fix' them) and you can email from the photo manager. No configuration required.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    9. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is all fine and great, but when she grows up she will want vengeance. And she will find it. There will be blood.

    10. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by jonnythan · · Score: 1

      Actually, Windows recognizes most digicams as digicams, not USB mass storage.

      When you plug it in, it will ask you if you want to import the photos. All you have to do is agree, then you can go through a quick auto-exposure routine. Nothing similar really exists on Linux that I'm aware of.

    11. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      "Daddy! What's a GIMP?"

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    12. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      I was shocked. I think it is totally irresponsible to use minors for advertisement in favour of a product for a company as Microsoft.

      Whoever was responsible for that at Microsoft should be fired. I am expecting her to become a furious against the company once she realises what her parents and the Redmond company abused her to do.

      It is a pervert idea.

      And if it was so easy for minors to post stuff you should better watch for pedophiles asking them to submit pictures.

      Kids and sex, this is really low school.

    13. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by loutr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well Gnome can detect the type of the device (either through HAL or by browsing its content), and change the popup menu accordingly. Furthermore if you browse the digicam content with Nautilus it will also detect the pictures and offer you the possibility to import them. The nice thing about this system is that if you plug the digicam's memory card in a reader you'll be able to browse/import the photos in exactly the same way.

      Anyway my point was that it is relatively trivial to import/manage photos under Linux ; my friends/relatives who switched to Linux have no problem doing that. There are other areas where Linux is far behind Windows (games for example), I don't understand why MS doesn't communicate more on those.

    14. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by Main+Gauche · · Score: 1

      Could it be that *gasp* Windows is actually easy to use than ?

      Freudian slips don't get any better than that.

    15. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Of course, if she was using any given version of Linux

      She would plug in the camera an F-spot would pop up automatically.

      It's 2009, not 1998. Time to update the FUD.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    16. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Nothing similar really exists on Linux that I'm aware of.

      You mean nothing like F-spot or digikam?

      Plug it in, and a nice little wizard will pop up to prompt you to copy the contents of the camera into the "Photos" folder.

      Or you can just browse the camera directly and use any app on the photos you want.

      Linux knows it's a camera and will give you the option of using camera specific protocols.
      Although that's pretty much academic either way once the OS knows what sort of data it's
      processing (IOW, an app doesn't need to care if it's a simple directory or special purpose
      protocol)

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    17. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by aralin · · Score: 1
      Could it be that *gasp* Windows is actually easy to use than ? Say it ain't so!

      Actually, photo sharing is so hard to use, most adults don't even try and just make their kids do it.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    18. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Now if I can just get it to stop displaying choppy video on my system when Compiz/desktop effects are enabled . . . ;)

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    19. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      except Ubuntu and the like have better picture managers by default

      For all it's faults, I like Windows Explorer better than Nautilus.

      Wait... you mean F-Spot et al, don't you?
      Well then I am forced to agree with you. F-Spot uninstalls much more cleanly than Photoshop Elements/Kodak EasyShare/etc.

    20. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by hrimhari · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe you're confusing Windows' ability (and Linux as well) to identify a Mass Storage Device as containing pictures and choose the appropriate program to handle it.

      Maybe you should try Linux again, or at least Ubuntu. It really does the exact same thing. When was the last time you did it?

      --
      http://dilbert.com/2010-12-13
    21. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by jonnythan · · Score: 1

      I use Ubuntu regularly. Haven't tried it with a digicam lately though.

    22. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Yea plugin in my camera and having an icon appear that takes me to my picture folder is so hard. I'm going to write those Ubuntu guys and tell them to quite being so lame and wasting my time.

    23. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      As the proud parent of a Linux user I advocate throwing a bare bones slackware install on strange hardware, giving the 4-year-old the root password, and walking away.

      She's six now and she knows if she wants to be networked she has to roll her own cat 5 and figure out the appropriate network settings. She's almost there. (Boy was she mad when she finally figured out I had originally installed token ring on her box!) If she wants internet access she has to hack into the firewall and give herself that access.

      You know, you see them struggling and you really want to help them, but you have to resist the urge. Otherwise they'll never learn!

      I think we would raise wonderful kids together. You need to make it harder by constantly using a new foreign language to get anything done. Then they have to learn each of the 10-some foreign languages that you know in order to just get a glass of milk.

      You can't make all the trouble in cyberspace, there must be meatspace conditioning as well.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    24. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by jamstar7 · · Score: 1
      Funny you should mention that.

      My roomies have a 2 year old digital camera that Vista refuses to see no matter what they do. I said, "Lemme take a look at it for a second", hooked it up to my Kubuntu system, and 5 mins later handed them a cd with all the pics on.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    25. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by Wo1ke · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention that.
      I was on my Ubuntu partition and trying to upload some photos from my camera and no matter what I did, it wouldn't recognize my camera. Eventually, I restarted and vista saw it immediately. There is no perfect system.

    26. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by mspohr · · Score: 1

      You must have a really odd computer. I haven't had any problems with video display on any of my machines with Compiz. They are a random collection of various machines... none very high end.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    27. Re:OP is a condescending asshole, and it shows... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Not just one of my computers. I've reproduced the same behavior on 4 different systems (I can actually say that I've NEVER gotten any Linux system running Compiz to playback a video a smoothly as a Mac or Windows system). It's also very commonly reported on the net. Just google for "ubuntu compiz video screen tearing".

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  4. Bill tightens his fist! by Probie · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm a PC and I'm oppressed.

    --
    Who? Who is but the form following the function of what and what I am is a man in a mask.
    1. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well I'm a Linux and I'm depressed.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by ionix5891 · · Score: 4, Funny

      its ok have hope 2009 will be the year of the linux :)

    3. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh yeah? Hmm... I'm a zip and I'm compressed.

      Sorry, had to.

    4. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm a Mac and I'm impressed! Here's some money!!

    5. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you meant the year of Linux on the desktop, that was in 2006 or 2007 when Dell started distributing Ubuntu. If you're waiting for Adobe to release Photoshop: Linux Edition before you declare it, you're going to be waiting a long time.

      Linux on the desktop is old news.

    6. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by poena.dare · · Score: 1

      I'm DOS and get OFF MY LAWN you DAMN KIDS!

    7. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by need4mospd · · Score: 1
      I'm Chinese and I've expressed that I'm suppressed, hardpressed, and repressed!

      Just figured I'd get that out of the way.

    8. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      $current_year+1 will be the year of Linux.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    9. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      I'm DOS and get OFF MY LAWN you DAMN KIDS!

      Bad command or file name.

    10. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Well I'm a Mac and I'm possessed.

      (I couldn't decide if a Mac was possessed, repressed, or impressed. I liked the first choice the best considering how a Mac seems to take over people's minds when they use them.)

    11. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im a mac and Im a snob

    12. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2009 will be the year of the linux :)

      Especially with the current economic predicament.
                            Linux is free ;)

    13. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by KDingo · · Score: 1

      Don't kid yourself. 2009 is the year of the ox.

    14. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by Cr4wford · · Score: 1

      Well I'm a mac and I'm not impressed

      --
      Freelance Web Designer - Portfolio
    15. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by spartacus_prime · · Score: 1

      I'm Dennis, and I'm being repressed.

      --
      If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
    16. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail...

      Did any of them actually ever work?

    17. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail...

      Did any of them actually ever work?

      That was what DOS would say when it had issues reading a defective floppy disk ("Error Reading Drive X, Abort, Retry, Ignore?" Later versions of DOS appended Fail, still later versions replaced Ignore with Fail). Retry never worked, but Abort would prevent DOS from appearing to lock up when trying to read an unreadable disk.

    18. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Think we'll see it before Duke Nukem Forever?

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    19. Re:Bill tightens his fist! by Wo1ke · · Score: 1

      I'm impressed.

  5. Richard Dawkins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I am a PC and I'm 4 1/2"

    What would Richard Dawkins say about that??

    1. Re:Richard Dawkins by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Something about how this particular specimen is highly unlikely to survive long enough to get its genes into the next generation.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Richard Dawkins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He'd probably kiss all the women and say something like "Let's play the Feud!" No, wait, that's Richard Dawson.

  6. Easy to share photo's, difficult to share a movie by captainpanic · · Score: 3, Informative

    Silverlight?
    In the age of Youtube, how hard can it be to share a movie? Why do I have to download a program first? Sorry, but that hasn't happened to me since Youtube was invented... oh, yeah, Youtube and google is the big competition isn't it? :D

  7. What? by zblack_eagle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    what's truly amazing is that the toddler was also apparently able to read, understand, and accept Windows Live's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. (But minors can't legally execute contracts, can they?)

    What's with this? Seriously, who the hell takes the time to read these things every time they're presented with one? What an unnecessarily snarky summary

    1. Re:What? by N1AK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm normally the one complaining about the manic MS bashing on /. but I think the summary makes an important point. Even MS advertising completely gloss over the need for users to agree to a set of extensive contracts to use the system, something that a small child certainly isn't able to do.

      It seems somehow wrong to me that it is just accepted that people ignore online contracts, and yet the consequences of breaking those can be severe like with Lori Drew. Although different, it is not altogether unlike using a child in an advert for loans secured on your property "look how easy it is to get that new car, even a kid can manage it".

    2. Re:What? by Psilax · · Score: 1

      It is microsoft and other software companies that need to be carefull with there online contracts. There contract is invalid when it's illegal according to a law. And if a parent finds i funny they can press charges against software companies because there kid (not of legal age) was able to buy or use something for which it should have it's parents permission. Let's hope nobody reads this and gets crazy idees.

    3. Re:What? by cabjf · · Score: 1

      I don't think that those contracts even matter as it would be a given that her parents set up the computer for her.

      What I do find interesting is that when they cut to show her clicking on the interface, I thought that it did not look intuitive at all. There were buttons everywhere. I doubt a 4 year old would find their way through that interface themselves without someone at least showing them how to do it the first time.

    4. Re:What? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      "Let's hope nobody reads this and gets crazy idees."

      I don't think you have to worry about that...

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is Microsoft and other software companies that need to be careful with their online contracts. Their contract is invalid when it's illegal according to a law. And if a parent finds it funny they can press charges against software companies because their kid (not of legal age) was able to buy or use something for which it should have its parents permission. Let's hope nobody reads this and gets crazy ideas.

    6. Re:What? by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      what's truly amazing is that the toddler was also apparently able to read, understand, and accept Windows Live's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. (But minors can't legally execute contracts, can they?)

      What's with this? Seriously, who the hell takes the time to read these things every time they're presented with one? What an unnecessarily snarky summary

      Plus it's stupid and wrong. A EULA isn't a contract. There is no (new) consideration and where's the "meeting of the minds"? It does not meet the standards of a contract. A EULA is a "license agreement", basically a threat and nothing more. It may be enforceable in some jurisdictions (though I haven't personally seen any evidence of that), but it isn't a contract.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    7. Re:What? by dstarfire · · Score: 1

      Seriously, who the hell takes the time to read these things every time they're presented with one?

      Ah, such innocence. You must have a lot of faith in the developers if you don't think they'll try to screw you over with the eula and ToS.

      Don't you ever read the news? Did you somehow miss the recent controversy over google's privacy policies?

      --
      Sending spam is legal, ethical, and basically a good thing ... if you're Hormel(tm).
    8. Re:What? by westlake · · Score: 1
      Even MS advertising completely gloss over the need for users to agree to a set of extensive contracts to use the system, something that a small child certainly isn't able to do.

      It isn't something the child has to do.

      It is something the owner of her system, the head of her household, the principal of her school needs to do.

      Which applies to GPL'd software as well.

      Unless the FOSS developer is prepared to allow a minor - of any age - to drive a train through the licenses that protect his own work.

    9. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The owner of the copy has to agree. Presumably, the owner of the PC and its software is not four years old. Any child with those resources would certainly have a conservator. It's not glossed over, unless you're an idiot Slashdot editor trying to make a baseless point and inspire some insipid and completely off-base pontificating from ignorant techies.

    10. Re:What? by N1AK · · Score: 1

      It isn't something the child has to do. It is something the owner of her system, the head of her household, the principal of her school needs to do. Which applies to GPL'd software as well. Unless the FOSS developer is prepared to allow a minor - of any age - to drive a train through the licenses that protect his own work.

      All good points, but they only flip the original premise around. Surely then it is irresponsible to show a child using any software under license without the person legally responsible being present to ensure they follow the terms?

    11. Re:What? by TheStonepedo · · Score: 1

      The summary doesn't address the important fact that only idiots base their decisions on the wisdom of 4-1/2 year old children who are more or less trained monkeys at their particular stage of human development.

      Children in commercials appeal to normal, sappy people. Normal people would be no more likely to buy a computer running Windows than their retailer of choice is likely to sell a computer running windows in those peoples' budget. Thinking people, a grouping that is at or beyond the fringe of the population of normal people, may look at the computer's specifications or bundled software.
      Take, for example, a recent car commercial with a football star and a kindergartener try to trick the watcher into purchasing a mid-sized ridiculous vehicle* rather than a smaller ridiculous vehicle.
      Normal, sappy people will watch the wise-beyond-her-years child to decided which vehicle is the best choice:
      The child's only reason to purchase the larger ridiculous vehicle is that it's middle seat in the back bench is wider. We're talking about a seat which will go unoccupied a majority of the time mom is driving the large, empty vehicle to and from the grocery store while chatting on her cell phone with other trophy wives about how they see no evidence of a depressed global economy.
      No worries, the kid has just sold the car to normal people and it is safe to ignore the rest of the commercial.
      If the watcher tends a little toward that thinking fringe little changes:
      The football star's only reason to purchase the vehicle is that it is more fuel efficient than the smaller ridiculous vehicle. Because he is a retired professional athlete he is infallible and has no monetary conflict of interest which would lead him to lie to the public.
      The football player has just sold the car to mostly-normal people and it is safe to ignore the rest of reality.

      I love taking the word of money-grubbing retired professional athletes at face value, but this time I checked the facts; his words were an outright lie. The smaller vehicle gets 20(city)/27(highway) miles per gallon of fuel, while the 600lb heavier, 2 foot longer, 3 inch wider, 1 foot taller vehicle gets 17/24. It's not the football star's fault he lied and the child did not. It was the choice of the marketing goons to feed the kid a truth and him a lie to regurgitate.

      *SUV designed for on-road use only

      --
      I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
  8. It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by gsasha · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Roland+Piquepaille · · Score: 1, Troll

      Wow, I went to that Youtube page, and cared to read the comments. It's "go windows", "I love windows", "Windows rocks" all the way for pages after pages!

      Not one comment pointing out the disgusting exploitation of a child's image of innocent to further a corporation's agenda. Either that or it was the deleted comments that dot the discussion.

      Does this scream "astroturfing" or what?

    2. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by KasperMeerts · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Weren't you dead?

      --
      As long as there are slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields.
    3. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've figured you'd be rolling around in your grave, but posting on Slashdot" Shouldn't you be eating brains, and moaning?

    4. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beyond the grave, dude! Beyond the grave.

    5. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm so glad that Microsoft is the only corporation on the planet to use kids in advertisements to promote a product.

    6. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      OUR ECOSYSTEM ROCKS!!

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    7. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's good no one else does so it's more obvious that Microsoft is... oh, damnit, you tricked me! DAMN YOU AC!

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    8. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I went to that Youtube page, and cared to read the comments. It's "go windows", "I love windows", "Windows rocks" all the way for pages after pages!

      welcome to the alternate reality existing outside of Slashdot ;)

    9. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's resting, pining for the fjords.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    10. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Speare · · Score: 3, Interesting
      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    11. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by should_be_linear · · Score: 2, Funny

      is it really needed to go into his private issues on public forum?

      --
      839*929
    12. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You act like this is the first time a young child has ever appeared in an advertisement before.

    13. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even in my travels in the real world doing work for Microsoft Shops I haven't seen to many people really that Gung-Ho about Windows (any more). Most of them really don't care what OS they use just as long as they know how to use it, or even know what Windows is as an OS really is or where the OS Starts and the computer ends.
      Most people take it, it is something I need to get what I want done and thats it. I guess there could be a radical subculture that are real huge Windows fans just as they are Linux Zealots on Slashdot and Mac Fanboys. I think most of them were from the Apple vs. IBM days of the 80's Who just couldn't give up their old arguments, as an Mac Owner who back in the 80's and early 90's use to be on the IBM camp, I had to break a promise to myself to never get a Mac, as I needed to realize the Ideals I have fought for have been loss. (Speed of DOS, Shipped with development tools...). Also I think a lot of my Fear of switching went away when I went with Linux back in 1994, where I learned how I could get by without MS. Then with the Mac with OS X with a Unix prompt the last thing I was hating Macs for were gone (or at least a hopeless battle)

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    14. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by onecheapgeek · · Score: 1

      As if this is somehow any different than any other commercial which exploits a "child's image of innocent [sic]"? Those damn Michelin ads worst of all, implying that it was safe to let your baby play with tires. OH THE HUMANITY!!!

    15. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He got better.

    16. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by captainpanic · · Score: 1

      The first youtube comment that I saw was: "can she download porn?" ...which seems like a totally normal youtube comment to me (sadly).

      And then the next few were quite critical and written in correct English, which is actually more worrying, considering the average quality of youtube comments. Something is going on here!

    17. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so glad that Microsoft is the only corporation on the planet to use kids in advertisements to promote a product.

      Yeah but astroturfing the youtube comments is crossing the line. That'd be like submitting your own blog entries as slashdot stories.

    18. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Oh please. Death isn't the handicap it used to be. Lots of people have died and gone on to do great things!

    19. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bah the did a way better job than G.D. Grandparents.com

    20. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here is direct link, no need for flash:
      http://mediadl.microsoft.com/mediadl/www/w/windows/videos/kylie4.wmv

      I am fed up with this obfuscation.

    21. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it doesn't.

      Your comment, however, screams either "I'm out of touch with reality!" or "I'm blinded by my hatred of Microsoft!". I don't really know which it is.

    22. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      my.experience = your.experience.clone();

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    23. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      > ...how easy it is to use...
      > ...Silverlight required...

      > It's already on youtube, no silverlight!

      I sense a disturbance in the force, as if the Lords of Microsoft were faced with hilarious irony.

    24. Re:It's already on youtube, no silverlight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even in my travels in the real world doing work for Microsoft Shops I haven't seen to many people really that Gung-Ho about Windows (any more). Most of them really don't care what OS they use just as long as they know how to use it, or even know what Windows is as an OS really is or where the OS Starts and the computer ends.

      You haven't tried to take away their crack pipe have you? Sure people don't seem to care until you take it away then they scream and froth at the mouth.

      I've tried moving into some offices and some people just really freak when they don't have their "Blue E" for the Enternet.

      I do have a 3 1/2 year old granddaughter and she uses Solaris no problem except she can't read the words. She's great a Googling "aaawksjd8782hen129p-".

  9. Troll summary by tsa · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The summary is so biased it reads as a troll. Is theodp a Twitter clone?

    --

    -- Cheers!

  10. Monkey see, monkey do.. by AlterRNow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    .. does not mean monkey understand.

    This doesn't show it is easy to use, it merely demonstrates the ability of a 4 1/2 year old to follow a set of instructions.

    --
    The disappearing pencil trick. Let me show you it.
    1. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by bluenovadesign · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My 3 year old monkey(who obviously can't read/write) uses the computer all the time and I'm amazed at what she gets up to (ok she's not posting on slashdot, but give her time). She can switch on, start up the web browser, (her home page is the BBC kids page CBeebies) and she just looks around, finds the games to play, works out what to do and plays them. When she gets bored she goes back and chooses something else - painting a picture, watching a video etc. She only ever asks for help when she gets stuck in a dead end (like when she needs to download an add-on). I imagine the Monkey v4.5 is considerably more advanced.

    2. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I can produce instructions that a 4 year old could read to do the same tasks on Ubuntu, for example. Do you honestly think it would be as easy for her?

      No. That's the point of the advertisement.
      Grow up a little, it won't hurt :)

    3. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by AlterRNow · · Score: 1

      Yes, because all she would be doing is executing the instructions you gave her.

      "Click A, Click B, Click C" is no more easier than "Click A, Click B, Click C, Click D, Click E". One instruction set is merely longer than the other.

      If she couldn't follow your instructions, the instructions would be hard to use, not the application(s).

      --
      The disappearing pencil trick. Let me show you it.
    4. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      (ok she's not posting on slashdot, but give her time).

      Why, you're subjecting her to emotional abuse right now?

      CBeebies

      Creepy name.

      I imagine the Monkey v4.5 is considerably more advanced.

      You made this whole comment just so you could say this.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least the 'PC' actually used a computer this time. A real step forward from the "I'm a PC, and I ride a snowboard" commercials.

    6. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've read it:

      My 3 year old donkey...

    7. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by sukotto · · Score: 1

      Kids are learning machines. Give a normal (no special software) computer with a net connection to bunch of kids who have no other technology of note... and not only will they teach themselves to use it, they'll also teach themselves English because most of the good stuff online is in that language.

      http://ted.org/index.php/talks/sugata_mitra_shows_how_kids_teach_themselves.html

      Here, normal means
      - Modern OS with windowing/mouse UI
      - Web browser with homepage pointing to a large portal site (like Yahoo)
      - Word processer
      - Painting/Drawing app

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    8. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by daveewart · · Score: 1

      My 3 year old monkey(who obviously can't read/write) uses the computer all the time and I'm amazed at what she gets up to (ok she's not posting on slashdot, but give her time). She can switch on, start up the web browser, (her home page is the BBC kids page CBeebies) and she just looks around, finds the games to play, works out what to do and plays them. When she gets bored she goes back and chooses something else - painting a picture, watching a video etc. She only ever asks for help when she gets stuck in a dead end (like when she needs to download an add-on). I imagine the Monkey v4.5 is considerably more advanced.

      Speaking as the parent process for an instance of Monkey v4.5, you're not wrong. She has the same setup as above, including CBeebies as the home page. The phrase "The Flash plugin has broken again, Dad" was part of her vocabulary for a while, until I sorted it out.

      --
      "If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it." --- Arthur Kasspe
    9. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by db32 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you insane?! You can't connect Monkey to the net! Are you TRYING to destroy us all?! I have Monkey 2.5 and she spends most of her time in Gcompris. She liked the little hit both shift keys to roll the ball to tux game. Then she started playing the colored ducky game where it says a color and you click on the duck... Now, a month or two of really playing with it and she knows where more of the games are than I do. Just the other day we caught here playing the letter train game and getting about 80% correct and even then half of the incorrect is done on purpose just to get a reaction out of us watching. Good lord...if I hooked that PC to the net she would be hacking SCADA systems by the end of the week just because she could make the lights flash!

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    10. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by windsurfer619 · · Score: 2, Funny

      For a second I thought you really were talking about a pet monkey, and I was very impressed!

    11. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait until MonkeyV6, it'll manage to get 5, insightful's on /.

    12. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 3 year old monkey(who obviously can't read/write) uses the computer all the time and I'm amazed at what she gets up to (ok she's not posting on slashdot, but give her time).

      Wait, what? You have a monkey? Is that legal?

    13. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by NewWorldDan · · Score: 1

      My 3 year old monkey(who obviously can't read/write)

      My little monkey has been reading and writing since she was 3. It's not that far fetched. Actually, it's damned conveniant. I can give her things and not have to explain it. She can read the onscreen instructions. But yes, to confirm your point my little monkey (now 5) is very fluent with the computer. I haven't set her up with email yet because I'm too lazy to find a good kind friendly mail program, but she's capable of running a computer. I'm going to set her up with Visual Studio soon and wait to see what she starts making.

    14. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by szyzyg · · Score: 1

      Yes you'd be surprised at how quickly kids pick up things, my 4 year old is at least as capable as the kid in the ad. And it's not just with computers, while she likes playing tunes on her mp3 player she prefers to go into the basement and play records from my extensive vinyl collection. She has her own laptop and likes to play all sorts of things on it.

    15. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations! You have just described the average computer user.

    16. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Monkeys are not Apes.
      Apes are not Monkeys.
      Humans are Apes.

      Therefore, your silly joke holds no water. :P lololololololol

      [/killjoke]

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    17. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...here I was thinking that you actually had a monkey for a pet. :(

    18. Re:Monkey see, monkey do.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this an actual monkey or a child?

      Autism strikes again :(

  11. who the hell takes the time to read these things by rs232 · · Score: 1

    "What an unnecessarily snarky summary"

    What's good about exploiting a four & a half year old child to sell product and does she realize that she just indemnified MS against getting used by her end users .. :)

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  12. Re:Nauseating by BSAtHome · · Score: 1

    More like child abuse. The perverts! Call in the Think-Of-The-Children-Police(TM).

  13. Silverlight/Moonlight by Trevelyan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have moonlight installed (what ever version Lenny has), and in Firefox add-ons->Plugins its listed as Silverlight Plug-in (1.0.30401.0).

    However when I click play to see that advert it changes to a get Silverlight button.

    I figured since I have flash 10 64bit installed (with flash block), I may as well install moonlight since there is a 64bit Debian package. I am not impressed that MS own website did not recognise it.

    I will also need to find a flashblock equivalent.

    1. Re:Silverlight/Moonlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I will also need to find a flashblock equivalent."

      Apparently it is already installed by default on all of my machines/OS combinations. :-)

    2. Re:Silverlight/Moonlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will also need to find a flashblock equivalent.

      The following works perfectly for me:
      $ dpkg -la | grep -- -cil | xargs dpkg -P

    3. Re:Silverlight/Moonlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably this video needs silverlight 2, while moonlight is compatible with silverlight 1.

  14. I'm a PC and I'm 42 & 3/4 .. by rs232 · · Score: 2, Funny

    When are they going to use endorsements from TronGuy

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  15. Re: I'm a PC and I'm 4-1/2 by worip · · Score: 1

    I'm not politically correct and I'm 6ft tall...

    --
    A picture is worth exactly 1024 words.
  16. Re:Easy to share photo's, difficult to share a mov by ketilwaa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are aware that one usually needs to download a flash player to view videos on Youtube, no? This is just a competing format. The main problem with Silverlight from where I sit is that it adds to the bloat, not that I need to download it, or that it comes from Microsoft.

  17. Re:Soo.... by PirateBlis · · Score: 0

    furthermore... I love that Microsoft is now doing what it does best by targeting a younger audience. Setting them up for a lifetime of disappointment... at least til they start using linux.

  18. Re:Soo.... by ThaReetLad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Last I checked Kylie was a girls name, so I don't think your accusation against MJ is entirely fair.

    --
    You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
  19. Another biased, hate inspired article by johnsie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No matter what MS do there is always some conspiracy theorist or Linux/Mac fanboy on the case trying to spin things in a negative way. It gets boring sometimes. Hating on MS wont do you cause any good, it will only show what a bitter personality you have. Get out there and do something postive.

    1. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hating on MS wont do you cause any good, it will only show what a bitter personality you have. Get out there and do something postive.

      Hey, good point. As a matter of fact, i just deleted Vista off my new computer. I guess that'll keep me positive for a while.

    2. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a FANBOY. I have now named and shamed you, and I feel quite happy.

    3. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by messner_007 · · Score: 1

      You can't blame those poor people. I think that their fears are totally rational ...

      How can you expect something good come of this lab :

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOPTriLG5cU

    4. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by GF678 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Agreed. There's absolutely nothing attractive about the fanboy culture existant in the Linux/Mac crowd. It's utterly annoying - they cannot see anything positive about anything Microsoft do.

      How can one listen to someone who completely lacks rational thought? Eventually it becomes apparent it's far easier to not bother listening anymore.

    5. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But...I positively hate MS....

    6. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by mgblst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We don't hate Microsoft because of just any old reason, we have really good and strong arguments for hating Microsoft. I would go over the many arguments, but if you don't know them now it is only because of your own ignorance, or you are a fanboy.

      We won't suddenly stop hating Microsoft because they paid some cute kid to advertise their products. We will mistrust them because they deserve out mistrust. We will come up with conspiracy theories because we know and admit to how Microsoft works (Halloween documents anyone? DrDos? etc...).

      So go peddle your pro-Microsoft bullshit somewhere else.

    7. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by Aphoxema · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, those Jews ought to stop remembering the holocaust because it only shows how bitter they are and hating Nazis won't do them any good.

      I know it's not the best analogy, but some people take Microsoft pretty seriously. The people who don't take them seriously are the ones who use their products.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    8. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my, nice Goodwin.

      But I don't think the intend of the GP was to convince anyone to stop hating them. I think he just wanted to point out that you get into your own way by critizising them of everything they do, no matter how irrelevant and ridiculous this point is.

    9. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by AlHunt · · Score: 1

      >It's utterly annoying ...
      >Eventually it becomes apparent it's far easier to not bother listening anymore.

      Evidently you're not at that point yet, huh?

      --
      1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
    10. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace "MS" with "Apple". See? Why is it so trendy to bash Macs but not MS?

    11. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "People think it's all about misery and desperation and death and all that shite, which is not to be ignored, but what they forget is the pleasure of it. Otherwise we wouldn't do it. After all, we're not fucking stupid. At least, we're not that fucking stupid."

      Mark Renton from Trainspotting on why we bash microsoft.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    12. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by Krokant · · Score: 1

      Yes, and then most of us grow up, leave high school and/or university and see that there is a real world out there ;).

    13. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that Jews bash the Nazis every chance they get.

    14. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by mario_grgic · · Score: 1

      Get out there and do something postive.

      I did. I bought a Mac.

      --
      As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
    15. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      For a lot of us, the issue is risk assessment. Because we have some skill, and because we do not use any application that requires MS Windows, there is no reason for us to expose ourselves to the risks and added costs of using MS Windows. In my career, such costs and risks have escalated. Ten years ago MS started sending the BSA troops to audit even small businesses, install spyware, and disrupt development for days. This continues with WGA which prevents users from conveniently accessing even critical upgrades to the OS, and increasingly complicated licensing terms that can lead to sudden lack of access to machines. Personally, the risk of my machine not working during a presentation is simply not compensated by the 'ease of use' of windows.

      So, when some one talks about the EULA as a reason not to use MS Windows, that is a valid concern, just like when the complaint is targeted at Apple. The solution in both cases is the same. If the EULA is the issue, don't use the product. In this case, the four year old can't accept the liability, so the parents do. And when the four year old does something to break the license, like when the kid is 10 installs the software on two machines, then the parents will be liable. Frankly the risk of having to pay $250 thousands dollars in fines for my kid stealing software is a good reason to use unencumbered software or if, the EULA is not too scary, pay Apple for a family pack($200 complete set of OS and applications) that can be used on up to five machines around the house. Simply risk assessment.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    16. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Linux/Mac fanboy"

        And thats not "hating on"? Give me a break! Fundie Christians and Windows users have one thing in common, they both run everything but LOVE to act like oppressed minorities.

    17. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never watched the history channel, have you?

    18. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he said positive.

    19. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It's all well and good, but if you have so many good & rational reasons for the hate, then why the daily irrational "Two Minutes' Hate" on the front page?

    20. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      johnsie my dear boy, Microsoft's EULA expressly forbids you to "get out there and do something".
      No conspiracy theorist or theory required. Just click on the "I Accept" button. I didn't. I'd prefer to get out there and do something forbidden-free (and patent-free). Pip-Pip.

    21. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boycottnovell.com

      Go there and read. Microsoft disgust me.

    22. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get out there and do something postive.

      What could be more postive than posting on slashdot?

    23. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Not all shops are Microsoft shops, thank god. You can get the chance to work on some very exciting platforms, if you look around. There is nothing worse than being locked into a Microsoft shop, who see the big M as the solution for everything.

    24. Re:Another biased, hate inspired article by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      I know, it's just the point is it's damned hard to tell someone else what's important to them. Bashing Microsoft is very important to me and my bias towards is undeniable.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  20. I always try to give him benefit of the doubt. by nawcom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess I find article about this ad on Sunday a day or so old, though I won't blame kdawson for that. I guess maybe I feel he is just always lucky to get his name linked to unneeded topics. who knows.

    Personally I am glad that Microsoft (might) get their photo camera integration/editing down for once, as it was always third party apps and utilities given to you, which you would have to punch a screen over. I never had issues with OS X or Linux at all, and I'm speaking about the 2.4 kernel days. gPhoto was what I loved using way more than the shit Olympus or whatever other brand name would give you for software. This was of course serial db9, not today's USB. Oh well, this is my little experience with this type of software, and it's nice hearing Microsoft will take care of things from now on. (I won't lie though, if I am ever in a situation where I need to use Windows AND manage a photo camera, I'll stay with a usb card reader and Google Picasa)

    1. Re:I always try to give him benefit of the doubt. by Teun · · Score: 1
      No they didn't get it sorted.
      When I connect my Canon it comes up in explorer as a camera, all I want is the mass storage device it really is.
      This camera mode has all kinds of limitations like that it'll only open the files (photo's) in this Microsoft viewer, not in the one I set as default (Irfanview).

      But then I don't do much with Windows and Kubuntu gives me the option to open either in the file manager or DigiKam.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  21. re: by tarscher · · Score: 1

    I feel sick

  22. Awwwwww by BountyX · · Score: 1

    Soooo cute ^_^, widdle girl using windows to send pics of widdle fishie Dorothy? Hmmm, her vampire like fangs at 0:26 make me a tiny bit suspicous of MS intentions...I'll stick to tux. At least they have made progress since the Gates/Seinfield ads. If Apple tries to counter this ad, they will just look like a bully. Seems like they are going to Linux route. I know it might not be spartan-warrior manly to admit it, but I'll be the first to say, tux is cute, cute builds positive and friendly image ^_^

    --
    Trying to install linux on my microwave, but keep getting a kernel panic...
    1. Re:Awwwwww by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, but Tux is generic, uninteresting, derivative, and about as cute as a million assorted random marketing devices. He's nothing special. Heck, the Windows flag icon is as cute as Tux.

    2. Re:Awwwwww by actionbastard · · Score: 2, Funny

      If Apple counters, it will be with a cuter, younger, "widdle girl" who will code an insanely great iPhone application in fifteen minutes, post it on the app store, then proceed to make enough money in an hour from sales of her app to pay for her college tuition and pay off her parent's mortgage at the same time. I'd install Silverlight to see that!

      --
      Sig this!
    3. Re:Awwwwww by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If Apple counters, it will be with a cuter, younger, "widdle girl" who will code an insanely great iPhone application in fifteen minutes, post it on the app store, then proceed to make enough money in an hour from sales of her app to pay for her college tuition and pay off her parent's mortgage at the same time. I'd install Silverlight to see that!

      Yes, but considering that it's Apple... would you install QuickTime to see that?

  23. I'm a PC and I'm 4 1/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Do we need to pay attention to everything M$ throws its advert Mega $$ to?

    Ignore them for a change. Maybe they will go away

    1. Re:I'm a PC and I'm 4 1/2 by gsslay · · Score: 1

      But then what would kdawson post on slashdot?

      Actually.. you may be on to something here. Maybe kdawson's never ending stream of pointless and snarky posts about Microsoft are actually part of the Microsoft marketing borg. Anything that draws attention or browsers has to be a good thing.

  24. So she is able to use windows to do something by antifoidulus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    that macs have been able to do out of the box since before she was born?

    1. Re:So she is able to use windows to do something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and so were windows pcs. don't make yourself look like more of a gimp.

    2. Re:So she is able to use windows to do something by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      that macs have been able to do out of the box since before she was born?

      And how exactly would that have helped her then?

  25. Oh please... by wbren · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And while it's impressive that little Kylie is able to transfer a snapshot of her pet fish from her camera to a PC, color-correct it, and e-mail it to her family, what's truly amazing is that the toddler was also apparently able to read, understand, and accept Windows Live's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. (But minors can't legally execute contracts, can they?)

    Really? Out of all the things you could have criticized Microsoft for, you chose the one thing that Microsoft has in common with every other software company (an insane EULA/TOS)?

    That would be like me saying "And while it's impressive that little Kylie is able to transfer a snapshot of her pet fish from her camera to a PC, color-correct it, and e-mail it to her family, what's truly amazing is that someone with an @aol.com email address was able to figure out how to submit a story to /."

    See what I mean? Saying something like that weakens your whole argument... Oops!

    --
    -William Brendel
    1. Re:Oh please... by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Well to be honest it is a valid (if minor) point and something that we should grill all companies for not just Microsoft.

      I think that we should be careful what we wish for. If EULAs are not treated as contracts then the GPL becomes far more weakened than any proprietary vendor's EULA ever would. If the EULAs are ruled not contracts then the GPL may end up in legal limbo as most people like Microsoft and other proprietary vendors would argue that the GPL is the same as an EULA and render it null and void which would almost be worse than EULA's as they stand because the GPL'ed software can provide a healthy and generally more safe alternative to proprietary EULAs.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    2. Re:Oh please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what do u expect. kdawson is a kunt

    3. Re:Oh please... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      The GPL is not an End User License Agreement. It is a conditional grant of redistribution rights. End users --people who merely intend to use the software, not distribute it-- need not agree to the terms of the GPL at all as copyright law itself gives them all the rights they need.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  26. Re:Nauseating by aliquis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Think-Of-The-Children

    Fuck, now you got me horny again.

  27. Re:Easy to share photo's, difficult to share a mov by aliquis · · Score: 1

    YouTube uses Flash video instead so I really don't see the problem, except flash is currently bigger. It's not weird Microsoft use their technology, just as I assume the Apple ads use Quicktime.

    Also YouTube video quality leaves much to wish for, and Microsoft probably rather host the video on their own servers.

    Obviously they could had used WMV though, but I guess they want more people to install Silverlight, and it works.

    I have no idea what sucks more of Silverlight vs Flash.

    Can I install gnash in OS X? Does it work "better" when it comes to bloat? YouTube still works? Maybe I should just uninstall the flash plugin and use Miro for YouTube. No ads! No crashing browsers! No 100% CPU load!

  28. Sounds like a good plan by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    I mean, that add was like 30 seconds long if that and now I want to find somewhere dark to go and throw up in. The stationary cupboard maybe...

    Sounds like a good plan. If you're using a cupboard, always make sure it's stationary. I tried to puke into a moving cupboard once, and... let's not get into details about the resulting mess ;)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  29. Re:Nauseating by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dude, the "Post Anonymously" checkbox is next to the "No Karma Bonus" button!

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  30. PC != Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PC = Personal Computer
    Personal Computer may contain Macintosh and Linux distros

  31. LEAVE MS ALONE!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    I agree with everyone here who is upset with the way Microsoft is being treated on Slashdot.

    How fucking dare anyone out there make fun of Microsoft after all it has been through.!

    They lost their battle with Vista, they had to resurrect XP. They gave birth to Windows fucking 7!

    Their new CEO turned out to be a chair thrower. All you people care about is... Linux and FOSS.

    Microsoft is A HUMAN! (ah! ooh!) What you don't realize is that Microsoft is making you all this money and all you do is write a bunch of crap about it.

    Microsoft hasn't performed on stage in years. Its Songsmith demo-song is called "gimme more" for a reason because all you people want is MORE! MORE-MORE, MORE: MORE!.

    LEAVE MS ALONE! You are lucky they even developed Songsmith for you BASTARDS! LEAVE MICROSOFT ALONE!....Please.

    Steve Jobs talked about professionalism and said if Microsoft was a professional they would've pulled it off with Vista no matter what.

    Speaking of professionalism, when is it professional to publicly bash a corporation who is going through a hard time????

    Leave Microsoft Alone Please. ! Leave Microsoft alone! right now! I mean it.!

    Anyone that has a problem with MS you deal with me, because MS is not well right now.

    LEAVE Microsoft ALONE!

    *sobs*

    1. Re:LEAVE MS ALONE!!!! by eat+here_get+gas · · Score: 0

      i cant remember the actress, but i remember those commercials!

      mod comment funny...

      --
      the significance of a signature is insignificant
    2. Re:LEAVE MS ALONE!!!! by Phroggy · · Score: 1
      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    3. Re:LEAVE MS ALONE!!!! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      *sobs*

      Oh, throw me a chair, will ya.

  32. More Microsoft promotion masquerading as criticism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Companies need exposure more than they need kind words - so long as those words aren't too damning. The article doesn't really criticise the software, just vaguely hints at the bad politics of the EULA. I am sure that Microsoft would rather a million people see this than nobody.

    That's how advertising works. Get the subject into the punter's thoughts so that when they are in a purchasing mood, the product will be given consideration, and maybe even purchased.

    By posting such an article on Slashdot exactly the right people are being targeted.

  33. idle much? by polle404 · · Score: 1

    Really, this should be in Idle, and labeled as flamebait.

    --

    ~men are from earth. women are from earth. deal with it.~
    1. Re:idle much? by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      Your mom should be in idle and labeled as flamebait.

      Ahhhh... I've wanted to say that all week...

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    2. Re:idle much? by polle404 · · Score: 1

      she is... well, flamebait, at least...

      --

      ~men are from earth. women are from earth. deal with it.~
  34. Re:Nauseating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but surely it's not bad to have fake representations of the real thing???

    It's just terrible... you know what I mean...

  35. Re: dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was mostly dead, but he got better.

  36. Child abuse? by rbanffy · · Score: 1

    Don't they think of the children?

  37. No Silverlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please do not post links that require Silverlight. I am not evil, and do not with to participate in evil. Thank you.

  38. Re:Nauseating by aliquis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, guess I should use the no karma bonus-button more often so my OS X bashing don't hurt my karma so bad, right? Because things can't go under -1 anyway so that way I'll lose less?

    Anyway I don't really like being anonymous, I rather post things as the person I am, though I think it was 50% flamebait 50% funny, people who see it as a flamebait don't need to answer and that problem would get solved by itself.

  39. Re:Nauseating by aliquis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... and I don't think having a girl in an ad is "child abuse" even though she may not act natural, I doubt she feel abused from doing the ad but may even think it was funny to star in a commercial. So the reason I made the joke was to tear down some of the serious edginess of "omg it's a child in a video! porn! abuse!"

  40. You are being dim, Stop it right away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody thinks there's a conspiracy. Microsoft is a huge corporation with more power than is good for them. They produce some software which is great, but then they undermine the competition by nefarious business practices - and that isn't good for us, the consumers. They are too big. They became dictators in the software world. They can't resist abusing their power and no responsible body is confronting them on it (maybe the EU is starting to).

    People like you never change anything. Dictator, monarchy, oligarchy, democracy - it's all the same to you because you are too dim-witted to see the difference between them.

    Well, I hope you're a troll because I don't like to think that anyone could really be so obtuse.

  41. Now the need the cutesys to sell products? by meist3r · · Score: 1

    When all else fails and people don't buy into your mediocrity anymore you need either boobs or something adorably cute.
    This time they went for the ethnic little girl. If this was a gaming ad she'd have to be at least 16 years older AND the cuteness would be an optional feature.

    We've asked other 4 1/2 year olds on their opinion:
    "I'm a PC, when I grow up I want to be a Mac" Stevie, Redmond, WA

    "I'm a Mac, when I grow up I want to be Photoshop" Stevie, Cupertino, CA

    "I am Linux, I passed my SATs today." The guy with the cuddle blanket, Portland, OR

    1. Re:Now the need the cutesys to sell products? by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      I asked another 4 1/2 year old girl what she thought and she said "PBSKIDS!"

      So, now I have to give up my computer for an hour for someone to play on PBSKids.org

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  42. Re:Nauseating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, Peter, here you are.
    Too bad Jen dumped you.

  43. Re:Nauseating by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

    lol! I certainly got a good reaction there.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  44. Re:Nauseating by denzacar · · Score: 0

    Doesn't this count as using child labour?

    Of course.
    Just like all those Pampers, Nivea, McDonald's, and nearly every commercial for candy ever.

    Lets crucify them all, then burn them, then boycott their products, then rape their wives and pillage their villages and sell their children to slavery.
       

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  45. (Silverlight required) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because pro windows commercials easily viewable by linux users would be bad for business?

  46. I'm a PC and i come with linux installed ... by noddyxoi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    and therefore, since i haven't payed for anything more than a Personal Computer i'm not a Windows.

    1. Re:I'm a PC and i come with linux installed ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, just the mere fact that she happens to be some ethnicity is pandering. Affirmative action strikes again!

      But in all seriousness, fuck you.

    2. Re:I'm a PC and i come with linux installed ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time some slashtard posts something about being 'forced' to buy windows with his PC, feel free to share this information.

  47. +1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1. THANK YOU! I read this and thought, "You've got to be @#$(*#$&*^@&! kidding me....?!?!"

  48. When I was your age... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was 4 1/2, there was no Windows and PC's were not kid friendly. We got a Mac. I still have it. It still works well. Any questions?

  49. Parental Responsibility by Randy+Savage · · Score: 1

    Surely her parent or guardian is responsible for agreeing to the contract?

  50. Contract law by djseomun · · Score: 1

    Minors can enter into contracts. Unlike adults, minors have the power to disaffirm contracts; they can "opt out" if they want to. They simply have to make sure that they fulfill their duty of restoration.

  51. gah! vomit. by apodyopsis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    gah, I watched the youTube version as there was no way I was installing silverlight at work as it seems like hassle and at home there is no way I am installing Mono.

    seems like a fairly nauseatingly sickening piece of tripe aimed at parents who want their children to be computer literate.

    in my mind the true path to computer literacy lies in a challenge - not locking them into a propietary interface that does all the work. but maybe that is just me. when I began programming I found it was the challenges of what was hard that kept me going back - not the easy pickings.

    1. Re:gah! vomit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in my mind the true path to computer literacy lies in a challenge - not locking them into a propietary interface that does all the work. but maybe that is just me.

      It's just you. You and many (most?) who promote FOSS. The rest of the species doesn't want computer things made harder even if it educates us. We just want the computer to fuck off out of the way so we can concentrate on things we care about, like pet fish and photos.

      I respect your position as a personal choice, but it's sad when software designers force it on everybody else. It doesn't help users and it doesn't help FOSS.

    2. Re:gah! vomit. by pavera · · Score: 1

      a little sad the the species doesn't want to be computer literate.

      I'm sure a large portion of the species wishes that they didn't have to study algebra, trig, chemistry or physics...

      yeah that's the large portion of the species that will be poor, starving, and useless in the next 100 years. I'm glad I'm not one of them.

  52. Re:Nauseating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am intrigued by your ideas and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

  53. I like this summary by ValuJet · · Score: 1

    I like this summary because windows is bad and the summary finds something bad to say about windows.

  54. Silverlight - fracturing the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silverlight is another way to fracture the market, yet again.
    During the Olympics, it was a minor issue since I won't load it.

    If it gains any traction, it will get worse for us non-believers.

    Heck, Flash, yes flash is better. Though I often say, "seems they found a little too much Flash." about many sites today.

  55. Re:More Microsoft promotion masquerading as critic by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

    Get the subject into the punter's thoughts so that when they are in a purchasing mood, the product will be given consideration, and maybe even purchased.

    Except for the fact that the product is free - as in beer.

    --
    Squirrel!
  56. Windows Vista Graphics Viewer sucks... by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 5, Funny

    The graphics viewer in Vista and Windows 7, is the most worthless peice of shit ever. It doesnt conform to ANY logical workflow for browsing, zooming, managing files quickly. Its just like its own ass backwards way of doing things.

    Microsoft could learn a lot from studying some of the other viewers out there.

    The graphics viewer doesnt even read a lot of formats used in production environments, nor does it respect embedded ICC color profiles. ITS WORTHLESS.

    Its a toy, just like the media player, the thumbnail viewing capability of explorer... etc.

    Why cant MS make some SERIOUS applications that actually get work done.

    Stop making apps for 4 year olds.

    I'm sure the online Live graphics thing is just as lame. Its another late to the game web service that others already provide and have an established user base and better integration on PCs, mobile devices, etc..

    1. Re:Windows Vista Graphics Viewer sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      buy lightroom for your professional work then.

      My god... you people want everything free?

    2. Re:Windows Vista Graphics Viewer sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good God man. It is the *image viewer that comes with the OS*. What did you expect, Photoshop?

      Not to mention the fact that, whenever they do bundle "SERIOUS applications that actually get work done" the old antitrust argument is [rightly] trotted out. Imagine the lawsuits!

    3. Re:Windows Vista Graphics Viewer sucks... by foldingstock · · Score: 1

      Why cant MS make some SERIOUS applications that actually get work done.

      You mean like...

      Microsoft Office...
      Visual Studio...
      Visual Source Safe...
      Exchange...

      Just saying, you know. They have made a little effort to help people be productive. ;)

    4. Re:Windows Vista Graphics Viewer sucks... by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      I have lightroom... but thats not a graphics viewer. Its an raw developement tool with organization and printing tools. Its very slow too.

      I'm talking about a good native graphics viewer!

      You know... like Apple has. sigh.

    5. Re:Windows Vista Graphics Viewer sucks... by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      Windows fucking Paint anyone?!

      Worthless.

      Why do they bother? What is the point of including half ass tools that arent productive for everyone?

      ATLEAST have the fucking OS create thumbnails for various common file formats like TGA etc...

      It took MS how long to add TIF support in the OS?...

      FOREVER.

    6. Re:Windows Vista Graphics Viewer sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why cant MS make some SERIOUS applications that actually get work done.

      Umm... because if they do, we all now the EU and half a dozen other jokers (and millions of fans like you) will start about monopolies and anti-trust...

    7. Re:Windows Vista Graphics Viewer sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the last time they tried that they got sued for an antitrust violation?

  57. Of course... it is not "using" - PER SE by denzacar · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...If she is not able to code the entire Windows herself on a computer she built using nothing but soldering iron and some bubble gum wrappers.

    Cause... how can we say it is "easy to use" unless she knows EXACTLY what happens with each keystroke she makes?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  58. Re:More Microsoft promotion masquerading as critic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's how advertising works. Get the subject into the punter's thoughts so that when they are in a purchasing mood, the product will be given consideration, and maybe even purchased.

    Except that most techies know perfectly well how not to pay for software. And MS going all "think of the children" on us will likely produce only ridicule (at least from my kind of people). Because we all know who will be cleaning all the crapware from that box, right?

  59. Actually, it has been working since 4.0 by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

    It might be the one thing they managed to get right with the 4.0 release, and it is working even better in 4.2.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  60. pfft, sending pictures... by boredhacker · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...my 4.5 year old can debug a friggin' kernel.

    1. Re:pfft, sending pictures... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      I had a pair of professors in college whose ~4-year-old managed to cause a kernel panic on one of the professor's office computer. I don't think her parents ever figured out how she did it.

    2. Re:pfft, sending pictures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...my 4.5 year old wrote a kernel using a only a needle, a magnet and a harddisk

  61. What kdawson doesn't know by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Is that she had already defined a P3P policy in Internet Explorer, so she didn't have to read the website documents. IE did it for her.

    --
    Deleted
  62. What is the point? by Slash.Poop · · Score: 1

    You really are stretching. What kind of story is this? There is nothing to see here...beyond slashDot's continuing and obvious bias against all things Microsoft.

  63. 4 yr old daughter does Ubuntu by knarf · · Score: 2, Informative

    My 4 yr old daughter logs in to her own account on one of the available machines (with password), starts whatever program she wants, saves the results, opens a folder on her desktop to watch one of the available video's and now wants to tag photos in the photo management app.

    This is not your old Windows. This is Gnome on top, GNU in between and Linux underneath. This is Ubuntu. Welcome to the future.

    --
    --frank[at]unternet.org
    1. Re:4 yr old daughter does Ubuntu by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      This is Gnome on top, GNU in between and Linux underneath. This is Ubuntu. Welcome to the future.

      I prefer to call it Gnome/GNU/Linux.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:4 yr old daughter does Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is GNU on top (GNOME is part of GNU project), Xorg between and Linux OS underneath.

      That is the Ubuntu...

  64. Of course she is smart enough by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Insightful

    she has not yet entered into public education.

    duh!

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Of course she is smart enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha ha ha that wuz funnee butt itz not troo i wented to public skoowl and i can rite good.

    2. Re:Of course she is smart enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its rite well dammit, WELL!

  65. Re:Soo.... by largoyle · · Score: 1

    That was Bad...

  66. Terms of Use? by airuck · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do you think that a toddler would have an easier time understanding GPL or that she is likely to violate GPL or Microsoft Terms of Use?

    --
    First entomology, then virology, and finally bioinformatics systems. Bugs follow me wherever I go.
    1. Re:Terms of Use? by slimjim8094 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't violate the GPL unless you are modifying and distributing. You can violate an EULA by looking sideways and sneezing.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    2. Re:Terms of Use? by paramour · · Score: 1

      Do you think that a toddler would have an easier time understanding GPL or that she is likely to violate GPL or Microsoft Terms of Use?

      sure. the GPL for kids:

      1. share your toys.
      2. don't make me stop this car.

  67. The rare +6 comment by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    I want to see a public service announcement with John Hodgson, that Keanu Reeves look alike, and a penguin (or Linus) all trying to read and understand their respective EULAs while a 4-1/2 year looks at a computer with a big chain and lock on it. Each time the kid tries to touch the machine, one of the three sais "don't touch that, it says here..." and spouts a particularly evil portion of their EULA.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  68. Middle name? by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

    It stars a 4-year-old cutie named Kylie (Silverlight required) showing how easy it is to use Windows Live Photo Gallery

    Poor kid. You'd think her parents could have come up with a better middle name than that.

  69. Re:Nauseating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyway I don't really like being anonymous, I rather post things as the person I am, though I think it was 50% flamebait 50% funny

    Click - Alter relationship - Foe

    Dude, you made a joke about getting horny about a 4-1/2 year old girl. Then you follow it up with "as the person I am". I really can't tell if you are just stupid or a real pedophile.

  70. MS still doesn't get Apple's commercials by dingen · · Score: 1

    I'm a PC and I'm 4-1/2

    *sigh* This quote makes it painfully clear that MS still doesn't grasp what Apple is saying in their "I'm a PC, I'm a Mac" ad campaign. It really makes me cry.

    For the love of God, dear folks at Redmond, please get your head around this: the characters in Apple's ads are the computers. They are not people using the computers, they are the computers themselves.

    MS tries to be clever by spoofing Apple's format and removing some of the stereotypes used by Apple, but in the process expose that they don't understand at all what Apple is saying in these ads. This lack of understanding renders their spoof entirely meaningless, proves nothing and makes MS look silly.

    I mean, "I'm a PC and I'm 4.5 yrs old and I can do photo's" actually means you could do some basic photo processing on a 4.5 year old PC. That's still pretty amazing, considering Vista's bloat, but I don't think that's the point MS wants to make.

    Maybe MS should try again and next time think more in the line of this commercial (no Silverlight required). This is an excellent example of a commercial which demonstrates how you should say what MS is trying to say without making your company look retarded.

    --
    Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    1. Re:MS still doesn't get Apple's commercials by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      I think Microsoft does get it; I think you don't.

      Mac says 'the computer is the most important thing; if you're not using a Mac, you're not cool.'

      Microsoft says 'the user is the most important thing; the user needs to be able to accomplish what the user wants to do.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:MS still doesn't get Apple's commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be watching those "alternate Universe" Mac commercials. The ones that play in my universe are about ease of use, lack of viruses, and pleasantly easy interfaces. Not having a TV I only see the Mac commercials when I check on the Apple site to see what the new ones are. But the ones I see say that Apple users like a serene, reliable and easy to use computer than isn't a sea of bugs, bloat and driver issues.

        Most Microsoft commercials are so free of actual INFORMATION about the product as to be scary. Ever watch a Zune Commercial? Fake film school art projects that say nothing about the product or what it does, or even the capacity most times. Just a "Zune is artsy cool" message NOBODY buys, not even Zune owners.

        And the new "I'm a PC" commercials? Even worse. Just pictures of "normal people" doing normal things. Well generally more exiting than normal things, then implying that PC is the "regular guy" choice for exiting people. Nothing about why you should use it or why its better, just a sad attempt ath the fuzzy "We are the REAL cool people" message that Microsoft keeps trying to portray and fails at so miserably.

        Microsoft Songsmith anyone?

  71. "Requires Silverlight" by Canazza · · Score: 1

    way to go Microsoft, you're trying to advertise Windows on something your target audience will have trouble viewing doesn't really sell them the idea that you're products are worth it.
    Gun.pointAt(Foot);
    Gun.Trigger.Press();

    --
    It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
  72. Re:Nauseating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a friendly pedophile, just look, I've got candy in my pocket, want some?

    This time I use the AC-button, happy?

    Idiots ..

  73. Re:Easy to share photo's, difficult to share a mov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Also YouTube video quality leaves much to wish for"

    YouTube does HD content now. If the quality of the video on youTube is lacking it's probably due to the camera the video was shot using.

  74. Tricky by John+Jamieson · · Score: 1

    See, this article _appears_ to be a troll, but, kdawson is actually paid by MS to increase the penetration of Silverlight with the tech crowd. Very tricky.

  75. Where is the news here? by fooslacker · · Score: 1

    Am I supposed to take away that /. doesn't like Microsoft and that we're so bitter and small we complain about anything even some dumb commercial about ease of use? If so then good job with this post. I mean I'm also outraged that Juan Valdez doesn't pick every coffee bean...come on where is the truth in advertising....now can we move on to some actual news?

  76. Blob drivers. by Benanov · · Score: 2, Informative

    The problem is quite simple--you're using blob drivers. Try disabling them if at all possible.

  77. This isn't right. by Benanov · · Score: 1

    GPL is not a EULA and doesn't work the same way. You do not have to *agree* to the GPL to use the software.

    If you break the GPL, then you can't use it.

    1. Re:This isn't right. by Sheafification · · Score: 1

      Just to be clear, when the OP said "If you break the GPL, then you can't use it," they meant that if you break the GPL then the GPL is no longer applies to you. And since it gives you extra rights, by breaking it you revert to standard copyright - which does not allow you to distribute. You're still free to use the software all you want, just not make any copies.

  78. Insulting by Flammon · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is implying that all the people who had trouble using their camera with Windows is less intelligent than a 4 1/2 year old child.

    1. Re:Insulting by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is implying that all the people who had trouble using their camera with Windows is less intelligent than a 4 1/2 year old child.

      That's because most people *are* less intelligent than a 4 1/2 year old child.

    2. Re:Insulting by Flammon · · Score: 1

      LOL, if I hadn't commented, I would mod you funny.

    3. Re:Insulting by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      LOL, if I hadn't commented, I would mod you funny.

      Thanks, but I was going for insightful.

    4. Re:Insulting by Flammon · · Score: 1

      Well, now you're insulting. Has Steve Ballmer ever thrown a chair at you for a typo while you worked at Microsoft?

  79. Re:OP is a condescending poopoohead, and it shows. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, it's possible a 4 1/2 year old has parents...

    not a chance. this child was born in a test tube and incubator at microsoft labs. She was raised the past 4.5 years in a crib that had every iteration of windows and microsoft products in it on flatscreens surrounding her. It's the genetic love child of Gates and Ballmer.

    Who knew those two ugly guys would make such a cute baby?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  80. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS should team up with Geico. I'm a PC and it's so easy a caveman can do it.

  81. Am I the only one... by AusIV · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who saw this and expected an article about how people aren't trading in their computers as often?

  82. What's impressive by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    What's impressive is photographing a fish in the first place. Even professional photographers have great difficulty with fish. Even with a submersible camera and lights, aquarium photography is a bitch.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:What's impressive by Locutus · · Score: 1

      don't think for a minute that this kid really did any of this originally. It's a PR stunt to get people to think Windows is so easy a 4.5 year old can use it. It's a lie as most anything coming from Microsoft is these days. IMO.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  83. C'Mon .. it is a good ad and well done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever you think of the products being promoted, it is a good ad. It is tons better at both entertaining and promoting than the Seinfeld ads were.

    The rest of the flaming and baiting here is not about the ad, it is about the positions we each hold on the company, its products and its practices in the market beyond this ad.

  84. Perhaps they should have by stimuli_ii · · Score: 1

    Shown a 4 year old installing Linux and the necessary drivers. It would have been a 10 season series.

    1. Re:Perhaps they should have by Teun · · Score: 1
      You're joking right?

      Last time (a few days ago) that I installed XP pro I had to find a USB floppy drive to make the SATA drivers available!

      With all the reboots the whole process takes around 3 hrs. for a bare assed OS against 20-30 minutes for a Kubuntu install that includes the productivity tools.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  85. Re:Easy to share photo's, difficult to share a mov by aliquis · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use to add &fmt=18 and yes, it gets better, but good would be a stretch. I've seen one video on YouTube in HD I believe, don't know if all videos uploaded in good enough resolution gets HD or not, bitrate still isn't very good, especially for the resolution, but sure it's better, googled for YouTube HD and found this:

    &fmt=6 increases the resolution from 320x240 to 448x336, Flash 7 video @ 900Kbps; audio @ 44.1KHz 96Kbps Mono CBR. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfWXRybZS4A&fmt=6

    &fmt=18 increases the resolution to 480x360, H.264 video @ 512Kbps; audio @ 44.1KHz 128Kbps Stereo. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfWXRybZS4A&fmt=18

    &fmt=22 increases the resolution to 1280x720 (720p), H.264 video @ 1024Kbps; audio @ 44.1KHz 232Kbps Stereo. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfWXRybZS4A&fmt=22

  86. Re:Easy to share photo's, difficult to share a mov by beegeegee · · Score: 1

    Ha, is to laugh. You downloaded the flash player so long ago, you forgot you had it and thought Youtube just ran on internet dust. Silverlight is currently used by Netflix for their "Watch Intantly" feature on the Mac. I've watched over twenty movies using it. The quality is way better than Youtube and it's done a much better job of streaming than Media Player on the PC. Furthermore, for those complaining about Firefox crashing with Silverlight, Firefox just plain crashes, all the time, on every platform. It's not the golden standard. Funny to find the folks who are usually complaining about Flash, now praising it in regards to Silverlight.

  87. Re:Nauseating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's ok, because apparently in Saudi Arabia and Yemen, she's not that far off from the age of marriage... what is it, 8 years old or something? Just saw something about that on cnn.com the other day about an 8 year old being married off to a 47 year old man...

  88. I'ma PC and I'm 4/12 and... by dhudson0001 · · Score: 1

    ...my commercial is a brain fuck because even though you want to, you can't make fun of me like you did the other fat geeky guy because I'm cute.

  89. Re:Easy to share photo's, difficult to share a mov by Palshife · · Score: 1

    In the age of Youtube, how hard can it be to share a movie? Why do I have to download a program first?

    You mean like when you downloaded Flash to use YouTube?

    --
    Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
  90. Karma whore! by mangu · · Score: 1

    Don't you think it's funny how lamenting some presumed anti-MS bias on /. will invariably get a +5 moderation?

    It's a simple observable fact that there exists a very strong pro-Microsoft bias on Slashdot, otherwise you would get a (-1, Flamebait) moderation instead.

    1. Re:Karma whore! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe the loud jerks are in a minority and don't have the power to do this. But they are still loud. And jerks.

  91. Vista is the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vista is the Future
    Its clearly evident that vista is the future.

    One only has to watch TV for a short period of time and see the advertising.

    WOW !!

    I personally love the part where the young man is taking a stroll in the delightful snow covered streets, and sees firsthand a young deer with a gleefull glint in its eye. It sends a shiver down my spine. WOW is all I can say.

    Vista is clearly the future of enterprise computing.

  92. Re:Easy to share photo's, difficult to share a mov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silverlight is not meant for the average persons home videos and cell phone clips to be shared. Its higher quality overall. Videos shared via embeddes in Flash will suit the average person, but Silverlights leans towards more professional applications. I.E. Streaming TV shows in higher quality.

  93. Re:Nauseating by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    Recommended listening for you sir or madam: Track 7.

  94. Bedtime reading by Jeff+Hornby · · Score: 1

    what's truly amazing is that the toddler was also apparently able to read, understand, and accept Windows Live's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. (But minors can't legally execute contracts, can they?)

    Beause the GPL is exactly the sort of bedtime reading that every 4 1/2 year old wants to hear.

    --
    Why doesn't Slashdot ever get slashdotted?
    1. Re:Bedtime reading by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Informative

      The GPL does not apply to and need not be accepted by end users.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Bedtime reading by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does.

      If it doesnt, then how can they possess source code (or binaries) that they do not have the copyright to without being illegal?

      --
    3. Re:Bedtime reading by againjj · · Score: 1

      Copyright does not restrict possession. It restricts copying. If one receives a copy of a program under the GPL, that copy is not under the condition that you accept the license. In fact, the GPL expressly states that no (additional) conditions be placed on the source code received. On the other hand, with proprietary software, the copies are made/distributed under the condition that you accept the license, and if you don't you must return the copy.

  95. Forget the kid, how about Grandma? by schnook9 · · Score: 1

    My 4 year old does all kinds of things with electronic devices. He is growing up learning about them with his fresh brain.
    The same is not true for his Grandmother, who is struggling to use any pc for more than email and a little web surfing. Open and edit pictures?? This is just not intuitive enough for someone who doesn't think in computer/digital terms.
    "Edit a picture? Why would I want to edit it? I already took the picture..."

    1. Re:Forget the kid, how about Grandma? by arikol · · Score: 1

      Aw, snap. I didn't see your comment before I made mine lower down. Basically saying the same thing..

  96. Re:Nauseating by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    The responses (modding and comments) just re-affirm that slashdotters are no more immune to the froth-at-the-mouth kneejerk reaction to politically incorrect topics than the rest of the population. Not to mention that they seem to have missed the point of the joke completely anyway. No surprise there in either case.

  97. Dept. of Redundancy Dept. by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

    Depends. Do you have a NIC card in your ATM machine that you put your Personal PIN Number into?

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  98. Windows is easy to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    compared to that unincredible crap from Cupertino.

  99. (Silverlight required) by danwesnor · · Score: 1

    (Silverlight required)

    Maybe putting it in a univerally accepted video format would help get more customers.

  100. Re:I'm a PC and I'm 42 & 3/4 .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They already do, in their online flash ads.

    "I'm a PC, and I fight for the users."

    /me envisions a Tron remake with UAC...

  101. Re:Easy to share photo's, difficult to share a mov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one usually needs to download a flash player to view videos on Youtube

    Um, ... no?

    The Flash web plug-in is pre-installed and is updated along with other system software, and has been since the first version of Safari was released. So, no, I haven't had to download a Flash player since the bad old MSIE days. That's what, six years?

  102. Are you serious? Totally lame /. by notaprguy · · Score: 1

    Perhaps her parents took care of that for her? Is that really the best you've got? Wow.

  103. Obligatory quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much for the girl? And the woman? I want to buy them. Sell them to me!

  104. Re:Easy to share photo's, difficult to share a mov by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    Well Flash came with the computer, so it's really just part of it and there's nothing wrong with /that/ ;)

  105. Minors and Contractual Capacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (But minors can't legally execute contracts, can they?)

    Actually minors can execute contracts within most states (within the US, anyways), however, minors can void a contract at any time before they reach the age of majority. (Richard Mann and Barry Roberts Business Law and the Regulation of Business, 9th Ed.) This means (for all you minors out there!) that you can get out of most contracts (there are some exclusions, largely for necessities such as food and rent for emancipated minors), even if you and the other contractee have already given consideration (an example of consideration would be paying money for a computer), you can return your consideration for whatever you gave up (you can return the computer for however much you paid). The law gets a little dicey on to what degree you have to follow through with repayment. For example, you could by a brand new car, total it, and than return the car for all of what you paid for it.

    All in all, the situation is pretty good for minors but for businesses it tends to be not so pleasant. Of course, the law varies from state to state, so googling you state's statutes is wise before attempting to take advantage of your status as a minor.

  106. Ummm, no... by JimR · · Score: 1

    it's impressive that little Kylie is able to transfer a snapshot of her pet fish from her camera to a PC, color-correct it, and e-mail it to her family

    Actually, we don't see her do any of these things. The advert is so full of jump cuts and close-ups [*], that the only thing we see the child actually do is plug in a USB cable (the fiddly end of which is already suspiciously plugged into the camera before she starts).

    Although, I'm not saying that in itself isn't impressive, given that USB was designed in such a way that the most common USB plug is symmetrical and fits in the socket (to a limited extent) the wrong way up.

    [*] At least the version on YouTube is - like I'm going to install Silverlight.

    --
    #exclude <ms/windows.h>
  107. Is that really the best you've got? by notaprguy · · Score: 1

    Questioning whether a 4 year old can enter into a contract? Really? Perhaps her parents did it for her? Who cares? Lame /. post.

  108. Minors and Contracts by Tony6785 · · Score: 1

    (But minors can't legally execute contracts, can they?)

    Actually, minors are fully capable of executing contracts, they simply have a backdoor out of them. When a minor reaches the age of majority, 18, they can renounce the contract unless the contract was for a "necessity." This should make adults wary of entering into contracts with minors, but there is nothing preventing a minor from forming a contractual agreement.

    IIAL

    1. Re:Minors and Contracts by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Since you're a lawyer, Ill float something on you...

      Isnt it true that pretty much any good lawyer can "wiggle" out of nearly any contract?

      --
    2. Re:Minors and Contracts by Tony6785 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, not if the original contract was written by a "good" lawyer. The fact is, there's nothing illegal about breaking a contract. The whole system of contracts is built on the premise that if the damages which will be awarded in breach to the other party are smaller than the cost of maintaining the contract you should feel free to breach. Breaching a contract is not breaking the law. So, if by "wiggle out of" you mean "breach", then yes. Typically the courts will attempt to hold you to the contract if at all possible or award damages for breach. It takes pretty big circumstances to actually void a contract.

    3. Re:Minors and Contracts by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      When I say "wriggle out of a contract", I mean to sign it then find a technicality in which to find the contract null and void.

      I dont mean to violate the contract, and then trigger the "breach of contract" section.

      --
    4. Re:Minors and Contracts by Tony6785 · · Score: 1

      Then in most cases, no. That's not the case. The vast majority of the time a judge won't let you get away with that. And FYI, there doesn't need to be a "breach of contract" section. If you violate a term of the contract, any term, no matter how slightly, you have breached. If you deliver 9,999.999 tonnes of steel when someone orders 10,000, you have breached. Minor breaches and major breaches are treated differently by the court and many aren't worth suing over. What you're probably thinking of is an indemnification clause - "If xyz happens, you have to cover court costs."

  109. Minors cannot be bound to contracts by tknd · · Score: 1

    In the U.S., minors may at any time void contracts they enter into. Supposedly this law exists to protect minors from things they may not understand. Fortunately for most retailers, most minors do not know this law exists, therefore they are willing to take the risk and enter into sales contracts with minors. More important things like bank accounts, however, are too risky and this law is the primary reason why every bank requires an adult to open a joint account with a minor.

    IANAL but you can certainly find more information online by Googling: minor contract law. I became aware of this law through a business law class.

  110. dominspector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I also got "install silverlight" message, but instead, I asked DomInspector what's the video URL, and fed it to totem.
    That's it. Nothing extra to install, just enjoy.
    It's GNU/Debian testing.
    Thank you very much.

    I guess somebody will release a decent greasemonkey script and/or firefox plugin to view those flash/silverlight-obfuscations.

    Common guys, it's just embedded video file, why plugins are needed when a simple object/embedded tag from standard HTML would suffice???

  111. Re:OP is a condescending poopoohead, and it shows. by Teun · · Score: 1
    And she only got out because the R&D lab is shutting down.

    Even though she's intimate with what else was released she's now making her own money in Marketing.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  112. Daughter of Microsoft Employee by rubylith · · Score: 1

    She is the daughter of an Microsoft Employee. Doesn't that explain all?

  113. Re:Easy to share photo's, difficult to share a mov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, you mean like Hulu? Wait that site is flash, isn't it?

  114. Ooooo...I'm terribly impressed by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Um, yeah, the Mac has had this capability since 2002. Once again proving that Windows is behind the times. Not to be outdone, games come out for Windows long before they do on the Mac thus suggesting that Mac owners spend the majority of their doing real work.

  115. USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the girl asked what that cable was for, the Microsoft employee answered: "I'll show you later"

  116. Re:Easy to share photo's, difficult to share a mov by hrimhari · · Score: 1

    Poor parent... nobody seems to read your entire comment... Yeah, I know, I know, it's /. : P

    --
    http://dilbert.com/2010-12-13
  117. Apple's Response by microbee · · Score: 1

    New I-m-a-Mac ad revealed: a one-year-old monkey is going to show you how he could use a Mac to do the same thing!

  118. 1 and a half year old playing with iPhone and Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And my 1 and a half year old can unlock my iPhone, go into iPod mode (exits any running program if needed), rotates it to landscape mode, finds his favourite album(s), flips that and selects his favourite songs.

    Also looks at the pictures and flicks between them.

    Uses iTunes on my Mac (although he does have a hard time starting iTunes, sometimes starts a few extra programs from the docks while getting iTunes going), does the two finger scroll through coverflow and starts the disc he wants. Sadly for him he can't read so he cannot start his favourite song from that disc.

    Kids aren't dumb and are absolute naturals at this stuff, if you let them and guide them (although he just saw me use the phone, the only thing I taught him on purpose was rotating the phone to get coverflow). I just think using a child like that proves nothing.
    Show me grandma doing that easily and I'll admit that it's easy. Kids learn fast, so if it works decently (like the Mac stuff, and obvously this new MS photo gallery) then a kid will master it in no time.

  119. Where is your next gig.... by Beat+The+Odds · · Score: 1
    ... I want to be there.

    This is the funniest thing I've ever read on ./

  120. Direct Link to WMV by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

    Like usual you can count on Microsoft to unnecessarily require some random propriety technology.

    http://mediadl.microsoft.com/mediadl/www/w/windows/videos/kylie4.wmv

  121. Confused IANAL OP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But minors can't legally execute contracts, can they?"

    There are no laws prohibiting minors from legally executing contracts... however, the minor can terminate the contract at any time. Thus, most TOCs try to exclude minors (hence the OP's very common misconception).

    IANAL, but I did take "Youth and the Law" in High School. It's amazing what a little book learnin' can do.

  122. Re:Nauseating by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

    The news crew went on location to Utah, eh?

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  123. Kids and computers in advertising? Hardly new by xixax · · Score: 1

    Though I can't find it, I remember reading about an "ease of use" challenge back in the 80's where on the day, Apple surprised the other contenders by nominating a kid as their user (where the other brand name PC people had senior engineers and the like). The Mac romped it in (from box to boot).

    I wonder if MS has subconciously recycled this promotional concept?

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  124. But is she liable for breech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of the EULA for windows?

    will YOUR house be raided because the program was used by her in violation of the EULA, which use she didn't know was forbidden because she couldn't understand the EULA?

    Not on Tux paint.

    Now what if she finds here pictures misused for commercial uses and you don't want it? Too bad because the EULA says that MS can do that. What? didn't understand the EULA provision? Too bad.

  125. My 4-1/2 year old kid runs Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because he has sufficiently developed reading comprehension and cognitive faculties to read, understand, and agree to the terms of the GPL License!

  126. Re:Dear God! Obviously, microsoft thinks that that by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    was just a .... "minor" detail, or a "minor detail"...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  127. Does not work with moonlight by drolli · · Score: 1

    At least for me (i586, FF 3.0.5)