They aren't yet required to tell everyone what all the chemicals that they're pumping down through the water table are. Yet this is the strongest law about it on record.
Really, it is. It's just that the cableco business people have to accept it. And I'm not sure anyone but Apple can force it on them, like they did to the music business.
This is fundamentally what's wrong with TV. The subscription model.
I dont want 1000 channels of random cram, repeated every 4 hours. You're going to get repeat crap when there's 1000 channels to fill.
I want about 25 channels of stuff that *I* want to watch. And I want to be able to actually chose those channels. And add or subtract channels I'm (not) interested in. I don't ever want to see a hunting/cooking/househunting show. But I do want to to watch hockey games/history/movies. You can't, the subscription model says you have to have both.
If the price is $1.99/channel/month, I'd get what I want for about the same price without having to surf the channel guide regularly.
Slashdot Mirror
Better watch out. Someone will get mad if you point that out.
http://www.theverge.com/2011/12/15/2638611/horseshit
And if the driver is only looking at the car in front of them, they're going to have a lot of accidents.
I typically look through the car in front of me to see how the next car is driving, and how the driver in front of me will react to that.
Ron Plaid?
You mean land locked Tibet?
Hence the use of the word "through".
Exaactly. Their business methods relate to them being the controlling middleman, and profiting handsomely.
Good thing individual molecules within families can't have differing properties...
Heck, identical (yet mirror image) molecules can have differing properties.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enantiomer#Enantiopure_medications
Cool fact about spearmint vs caraway seeds having the same flavoring molecule, but different enantiomeres.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chirality_(chemistry)#In_biology
Maybe they had sex with each other. Back when they were hot.
I'm pretty sure you're the one dreaming.
They aren't yet required to tell everyone what all the chemicals that they're pumping down through the water table are. Yet this is the strongest law about it on record.
http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/FoodLabelingNutrition/FoodLabelingGuide/ucm064880.htm#descend
Unless what they're pumping is a trade secret.
"The solution was a new form requiring a company to attest — under penalty of perjury — that a chemical is proprietary."
http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_19542430#ixzz1gWXCPYOi
True, the list doesn't tell you the ratio, but it does list them in order of quantity.
Too bad the chemicals aren't required to be listed if they're trade secrets.
"The solution was a new form requiring a company to attest — under penalty of perjury — that a chemical is proprietary."
http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_19542430#ixzz1gWXCPYOi
Ironic that he was on a show about stupid people doing stupid things.
So, step one in the "Becoming a Russian Candidate" process is shoot Putin before he shoots you?
You mean contributing by submitting all these source codes? Pretty sure that's not taking advantage of. But you can keep that to yourself.
From the 10.7 page, just the a* for the unix apps:
adv_cmds-147 APSL BSD
amavisd-124 GPL
apache-769 Apache
apache_mod_bonjour-15 APSL BSD
apache_mod_bw-201 Apache
apache_mod_encoding2-204 BSD
apache_mod_hfs_apple-11 APSL
apache_mod_jk-202 Apache
apache_mod_perl-105 Apache
apache_mod_php-66.1 PHP
apache_mod_python-202 Apache
apr-26 Apache
architecture-260 APSL
autofs-207 APSL CDDL
awk-18 Other
I didn't miss it. But it's not so funny when it's listing files that I'm currently hosting.
What if Apple doesn't have anything against open source projects?
In fact, they contribute a LOT to open source.
http://opensource.apple.com/
Actually, they do. Click on Some files others have loaded, click on one of those files - takes you to torrent page.
Or type in name of software, click on link, click on software - takes you to torrent page.
Fine, it had mine too.
However, it only had one file, which I had been sharing for a while. Several files which I had just leeched & turned off were not listed.
That makes for a nice meme:
Fox News journalist = libelist
So, technology is the answer?
Really, it is. It's just that the cableco business people have to accept it. And I'm not sure anyone but Apple can force it on them, like they did to the music business.
This is fundamentally what's wrong with TV. The subscription model.
I dont want 1000 channels of random cram, repeated every 4 hours. You're going to get repeat crap when there's 1000 channels to fill.
I want about 25 channels of stuff that *I* want to watch. And I want to be able to actually chose those channels. And add or subtract channels I'm (not) interested in. I don't ever want to see a hunting/cooking/househunting show. But I do want to to watch hockey games/history/movies. You can't, the subscription model says you have to have both.
If the price is $1.99/channel/month, I'd get what I want for about the same price without having to surf the channel guide regularly.
Kerio can do all those things you're asking.
The playbook would also require a blackberry phone for everyone to check their email via.