Slashdot Mirror


Nokia Exec: Young People Fed Up With iPhone and Android

jfruhlinger writes "Nokia's Windows Phones haven't hit the U.S., but at least one company executive thinks they'll be a slam dunk, since young people have soured on the iPhone and find Android baffling. Of course, much of the Internet commentariat found his remarks even more baffling. Is he right, is he delusional, or is he just trying to build buzz for his company's products the best he can?"

532 comments

  1. State Of Mind by rsmith-mac · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is he right, is he delusional, or is he just trying to build buzz for his company's products the best he can?

    It's Nokia, so I'll take delusional for $2000, Alex.

    1. Re:State Of Mind by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's paid to be delusional. What's he supposed to say? "iPhone outsells every other phone by an order of magnitude and Android devices in general are rapidly cornering the lion's share of the market and now we've made this commitment to Windows Phone 7 that we can't just drop for a number of reasons" Yeah, I'm sure the shareholders will love that.

    2. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this.
        If he thinks Windows mobile phones can uproot android he must be on something that is making him see shiny colours.

    3. Re:State Of Mind by Canazza · · Score: 2

      He's been staring at the Metro interface too long

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    4. Re:State Of Mind by jemtallon · · Score: 2
    5. Re:State Of Mind by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It would take some serious kool-aide to think that people were generally confused by any of iPhone, Android or Windows Phone 7, they are all easy to use. Each has it's pros and cons.

      However, with the serious lack of good 3rd party apps, I suspect mostly due to MS figuratively castrating their developers with insane draconian file access and network access restrictions that prevent any direct cross-app communication on the phone, or network access via anything but http/https... You would have to have gone through a few kilos of LSD before ever thinking Windows Phone 7 could catch up to those two. Nice OS, but MS royally screwed the 3rd party developers over.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    6. Re:State Of Mind by flyingsquid · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it's pretty delusional: "What we see is that youth are pretty much fed up with iPhones. Everyone has the iPhone." OK, so we see that everyone has an iPhone or an Android... and we conclude from this fact that everyone must therefore hate the iPhone and the Android. Reminds me of that Iraqi information minister who claimed that the American troops attacking Bagdad were committing suicide in droves. On the other hand, the guy quoted in the article is their director of marketing and sales, you pay marketing people to foster delusional thinking, so that's not an entirely bad thing. As long as the management isn't drinking the same kool-aid as these marketing guys. If the CEO is so disconnected from reality that he believes this, Nokia is completely hosed. But even if they do go out of business, I have the feeling that a certain Niels Munksgaard, Nokia Director of Product Marketing and Sales has a very bright future and will land on his feet.

    7. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is he right, is he delusional, or is he just trying to build buzz for his company's products the best he can?

      It's Nokia, so I'll take delusional for $2000, Alex.

      How about "half right"?

      My Android phone continually crashes like it's running Windows. The only thing missing is the BSOD.

      So yeah, there's room for another competitor in the market. But it ain't Nokia, and it ain't Windows.

    8. Re:State Of Mind by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      I haven't had windows crash as much as either android phone I had crash (two Samsungs, can't remember the models off the top of my head - transform and intrepid I think), since the 90s. Both crashed once every 3-4 weeks on average. My current HTC windows phone has yet to crash on me, and I've had it for almost a year. Mind you, 3rd party app selection sucks, and unless MS fixes their API, no amount of popularity and customer demand will fix that.

      If MS fixes their API issues, Windows Phone 7 could actually be a rather nice competitor in the arena.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    9. Re:State Of Mind by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Informative

      "iPhone outsells every other phone by an order of magnitude..."

      I hate that BS apple propaganda. iPhone outsells every other SMARTPHONE HANDSET on the market. If you look at real data, like Total phones, far far far more dumb phones are sold. And the smartphone market? If you look at a more accurate number, like the number of phones with the iPhone OS or the Android OS on them, Android has double the market share of apple. Apple is able to say they sell the most phones because they only offer one... sure if you break up android sales by model, each one gets a much smaller share... but that's stupid.

      Then Windows phones? hahahha... I dont think I've ever met someone with a windows phone.

    10. Re:State Of Mind by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      WebOS is going open source. Nokia would be smart to get in on that.

    11. Re:State Of Mind by rmstar · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you look at real data, like Total phones, far far far more dumb phones are sold.

      That's interesting. Do you have links on this? I got the impression everyone except me spends their time fingering their fondleslabs these days. Also, your claim contradicts the data I can find, e.g. http://gizmodo.com/5817082/everbodys-getting-smartphones

    12. Re:State Of Mind by crakbone · · Score: 1

      Stability of that system is probably going to be proportional to the amount of apps available. Just saying.

    13. Re:State Of Mind by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      That... is probably one of the most clueless statements I've read in a long time.

      Stability might, on a particularly poorly written OS, such as pre NT windows systems, MacOS < X, etc, or any system run with normal users having administrative access, be loosely related to the number of applications installed, but hardly related to the number available. Even with the number installed, it is only if the user is particularly incautious.

      Stability on these systems will probably be most affected by the 3rd party drivers produced by the hardware vendors.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    14. Re:State Of Mind by s73v3r · · Score: 0

      And the smartphone market? If you look at a more accurate number, like the number of phones with the iPhone OS or the Android OS on them, Android has double the market share of apple.

      If you're going to go by devices on which the OS can run, shouldn't you be adding iPod Touches and iPads (and Android tablets) into that mix?

    15. Re:State Of Mind by itsdapead · · Score: 2

      What's he supposed to say?

      Equally

      "Young people have soured on the iPhone, find Android baffling and will see anything tagged Windows as uncool and boring, so we see a huge opportunity for Symbian and MeeGo... Sorry... you say we signed a WHAT with Microsoft? Seriously? Aw shit!"

      ...would likely have been a career-limiting move.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    16. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In two years of Android Phone usage (HTC Incredible), I have not had a single "Crash". I think I've only rebooted the thing twice.

    17. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think most of the phone-buying world is not in North America nor Western Europe. So worldwide numbers would show more feature phones rather than smart phones. I pay attention to this international market as a natural contrarian. I haven't bought a phone on contract nor from my wireless provider in over ten years, nor have I spent more than about $200 on most. Several of my phones have been from other countries, either gray market imports or something I bought retail while I was traveling. I did spend a lot (3x my normal budget cap) for a gray market import of a Motorola V66 flip phone many years ago, and I might do that again if an equivalently perfect (for me) phone surfaces...

      Interestingly, yesterday's smart phones are on course to become tomorrow's feature phones, so don't be surprised when there are suddenly a lot of cheap Android phones floating around. At the same time they're pushing new multicore platforms, they are also making cheaper, smaller, more power efficient variants of the older single core chips. I'm actually hoping for a reincarnation of the V66 design ideals in an Android phone: feather weight, compact, good battery life. I hate these massive phones they are making, too awkward for most pockets.

      I'm just hoping that CyanogenMod will target these as well, so I can replace my aging feature phone with a smart phone. I want to be able to upgrade and customize the next one myself.

    18. Re:State Of Mind by number17 · · Score: 1

      And in my household it's 50/50, which is just as relevant as looking at a Nielson telephone survey of the US market. Worldwide the picture is slightly different for the smartphone/dumphone market: http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1848514

      Smartphones will outpace dumbphones in a matter of time. Interesting to see that Nokia accounts for 23.9% of the total market with Apple at 3.9% in 3Q of 2011.

    19. Re:State Of Mind by Kartu · · Score: 1

      Outsell by order of magnitude?
      More than 10 million Samsung Galaxy SII's were sold starting from mid summer. Not counting previous model (which still sells a lot).

    20. Re:State Of Mind by INeededALogin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes... Nokia needs another open-soure OS to get behind since Maemo, MeeGo and Symbian weren't enough.

    21. Re:State Of Mind by Krau+Ming · · Score: 1

      actually, the data is further skewed because we do not look at individual numbers of iphone 4s, 4, 3gs (and so forth) on the market.

    22. Re:State Of Mind by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      No, because we're talking about the phone market, not the general device market.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    23. Re:State Of Mind by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      Another story, which I submitted but has not been posted, detailed leadership changes at Microsoft around WP7, and Windows 8 vis-a-vis mobile devices.

      Where will Nokia be if Microsoft declares WP7 a failure and moves forward with trying to shoehorn Windows 8 onto mobile devices (as it pictures tablets running)?

    24. Re:State Of Mind by droidsURlooking4 · · Score: 0

      It would take some serious kool-aide...

      Don't 'drink the Kool-Aid'

    25. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This article only talks about the US market.

    26. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That Gizmodo link says that the smartphone sales are only 38% of the market. That percentage is only going to grow (because, of more recent phone purchases, over half are smartphones), but currently, "far far far" more feature phones are out there.

    27. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Microsoft already won that metric even if no one bought a Windows phone...

    28. Re:State Of Mind by Zcar · · Score: 1

      And Apple's on track for 30 million this quarter (10/1 through year's end) vs. 5 million Galaxy SIIs its first quarter, so about .8 of an order of magnitude.

    29. Re:State Of Mind by Luckster7 · · Score: 1

      I dont think I've ever met someone with a windows phone.

      I have a Windows phone. Windows sucked really bad however so I put Android on it. I'm sure I count in the statistics for Microsoft and against Android.

      --
      Deuteronomy 13:06-9
    30. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's for the US market which is pretty much crap, you don't get any of the really cool phones, only dumbed down versions mostly and very very few varieties. Mostly because the carriers decide what they let you buy.

      http://www.businessinsider.com/android-market-share-2011-11

      Check it. iPphone at 15%

      Nokia is going from delusional to desperate and back again. Years ago they were a serious brand with a lot of shares in the phone market, now they're struggling to keep the little they have, getting back to the top is near impossible.
      Their union with MS had nothing to do with building better phones, just a losers alliance pooling their patents to make a profit from their competitors.

    31. Re:State Of Mind by tgrigsby · · Score: 2

      For comparison purposes, I had an HTC Fuze. Liked it at first, although it was a bit slow. Over time I grew to hate it. Had to reboot it every one or two days due to lockups. When it got stolen, I did a little happy dance, put on my sad face, and informed my wife that maybe it was finally time for me to break down and get one of those "Android" phones that all the guys at the office had....

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    32. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know exactly one person with a Windows 7 Phone. ...

      He is a Microsoft employee, and got it for free.

    33. Re:State Of Mind by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      That's WiMo6. Totally different OS. I might was well bitch about android because of the headaches I had with Linux when attempting to use various distros in the 2000-2006 timeframe.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    34. Re:State Of Mind by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      It's anecdotal, but of the people I see daily & in passing with phones, only about 20-25% of them have smartphones.

    35. Re:State Of Mind by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 1

      Stability on these systems will probably be most affected by the 3rd party drivers produced by the hardware vendors.

      Which is really the whole problem with trying to compare their stability in the first place: The stability is going to depend on the model, and whether the hardware manufacturer provided stable drivers for the OS, not the OS itself. For every model with stability problems there is another model from a different manufacturer running the same OS without any issues.

    36. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US, World. Learn the difference.

    37. Re:State Of Mind by u38cg · · Score: 3, Informative

      Can't provide citations since the numbers I saw were internal, but the smartphones thing is very much a Western and developed Asian phenomenon. In terms of numbers, the biggest seller out there is still the Nokia something-or-other, 1112 maybe, despite being pathetic in comparison to any smartphone. In large parts of the world, the only thing that counts is price and battery life.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    38. Re:State Of Mind by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      hence my mention of model and manufacturer in my original post. Heck, there is even a fairly wide variety between models of the same manufacturer.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    39. Re:State Of Mind by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

      I used to do that. I got an HTC TouchPro2 for free (because the prev. owner didn't want it), and installed Android on it. It worked alright, but it was sluggish, had a 6h battery life, and I had to quickly activate and then deactivate the loudspeaker everytime I answered a call for the microphone to work. Since it was also the same size and mass as a brick, after around a month I bought a $120 Android phone instead (no contract).

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    40. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Space Nutters who talk about things that don't even exist and never will are perfectly rational and healthy, and deserve daily stories about their religion.

    41. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "iPhone outsells every other phone by an order of magnitude..."

      I hate that BS apple propaganda. iPhone outsells every other SMARTPHONE HANDSET on the market. If you look at real data, like Total phones, far far far more dumb phones are sold. And the smartphone market? If you look at a more accurate number, like the number of phones with the iPhone OS or the Android OS on them, Android has double the market share of apple. Apple is able to say they sell the most phones because they only offer one... sure if you break up android sales by model, each one gets a much smaller share... but that's stupid.

      Then Windows phones? hahahha... I dont think I've ever met someone with a windows phone.

      You're nuts! EVERYONE has a Windows Phone! ..... sources? I don't need any sources! Just mark me 5,Informative like the parent!

    42. Re:State Of Mind by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      sure if you break up android sales by model, each one gets a much smaller share... but that's stupid.

      Well, stupid might be putting it strongly, but it is definitely a specific measure. But here are some things to consider:

      + I think, but am not certain, that the iPhone outsells other smart phones in unit volume per manufacturer. That is to say, all of the iPhones outsell all of Samsung's smart phones. I'd need to look this up for certain.
      + I am absolutely sure that Apple makes more revenue and profit from their phones than any of its competitors do from theirs, either in the smartphone or dumbphone markets.
      + Having multiple phone products increases complexity and cost. There's an argument to be made that with a dozen major phone vendors, and with some of them offering dozens or even hundreds of different phones, these companies may be pumping out lots of competition to the iPhone, but they're not doing so in a way that is sustainable long term.

      I'd definitely recommend you check out Asymco.com for one perspective on that.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    43. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Apple's on track for 30 million this quarter (10/1 through year's end) vs. 5 million Galaxy SIIs its first quarter, so about .8 of an order of magnitude.

      And that's only looking at one phone. Take all the other Android phones and they out sell Apple. Or in the words of the original poster "Apple outsells them by a slightly negative order of magnitude".

    44. Re:State Of Mind by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      Check out Asymco. The most recent post is titled Global smartphone penetration nearing 10%. They've got lots of other interesting info on the mobile market in older posts.

      If you're not an iPhone/Apple fan, beware: this site takes a firm stance that revenue and profits are more important than pure market share. In that context, Apple appears to be walking on water. They present their analyses factually and with complete citation and disclosure of contextual biases, but regardless, I can imagine that someone who hates Apple for whatever reason might feel that it's distressingly pro-Apple.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    45. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world is bigger then the US:

      http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1764714

      and Apple is tiny compared to Nokia. They almost a match to the Symbian phones though.

    46. Re:State Of Mind by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Well, first, we're talking about the smartphone market, so we shouldn't include them. But, second, it really doesn't change things that much.

      If we look at shipments for Q3 2011, we see 60,490,400 Android phones shipped versus 17,295,300 iPhones shipped. Now, let's start with some assumptions for entertainment value.

      Let's assume 509,600 Android tablets and non-phone devices were sold in that quarter, just to round Android's numbers up to 61 million. Let's also assume that Apple didn't sell a single iPod nano or iPod shuffle in Q3--that all iPod sales are iPod touches.

      According to Apple, they sold 11.12 million iPads and 6.62 million iPods. Now, again, if we assume that all those iPods were iPod touches, we come up with 17.74 million. If we add that to the number of iPhones sold, we come come up 35,035,300. This causes Apple's market share to jump from 16.6% to 26.2% and puts Android at 45.7%. iOS is still a ways off.

    47. Re:State Of Mind by LordLucless · · Score: 2

      Um, that's pretty much what the GP said;

      • iPhone outsells every other phone by an order of magnitude (comparison of handsets)
      • Android devices in general are rapidly cornering the lion's share of the market (comparison of OS)
      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    48. Re:State Of Mind by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Those figures are just for the U.S. Globally, smartphones are only about a quarter of all mobile phone sales (i.e. 3x as many regular phones sold as smartphones).

    49. Re:State Of Mind by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 2

      Then Windows phones? hahahha... I dont think I've ever met someone with a windows phone.

      I know one person who has a Windows Phone. He's my boss.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    50. Re:State Of Mind by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      Gizmodo isn't exactly an unbiased source...

    51. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would guess GP is referring to phone sales worldwide. It may be that in the US smartphones have overtaken regular ones, but the US aint all there is...

    52. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's a little old, but Gartner Report data places Smartphones at 23.6% of total sales for Q1 of 2011:

      http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1689814

      so-called "feature phones" far outsell smartphones and Nokia sold nearly ten times as many phones as Apple, despite being a minor player in the smartphone market - one of the reasons Android has started outselling iPhone is because many manufacturers have now introduced cheap Android phones which basically sit mid-tier (and these phones have found their way into many, many hands) - they are Android-based, but they are NOT smartphones...

      you may look around your circle of friends and see lots of smartphones but unless you live in, say Mumbai, that doesn't mean much

    53. Re:State Of Mind by crakbone · · Score: 1

      From what I have seen as far as computing the more applications made available and the more a system is made to have more applications available the poorer the stability of the system. That does not mean you can't lock it down, but that the system itself is made to be more compatible as time goes down and degrades the stability. Iphone has one of the most locked down application systems (every application needs to be approved by apple) but still crashes all the time. Even linux as time goes on get more unstable as more patches are made as well as its design is changed to add more packages. All I am saying is that as your windows 7 phone gets more applications the complexity of the system will build and become more unstable. Its quite simply the KISS rule.

    54. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wish they had stayed with Maemo. I had the N900 and it was awesome; more a computer than a phone, a hackers dream. A niche product sure, but it had so much potential; they'd have a serious contender if they had treated their community better, and polished the shit out of a next gen N900 so it would appeal to the masses.

    55. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samsung (with Android OS) outsells apple on the smartphone market:
      http://www.infoworld.com/d/mobile-technology/samsung-becomes-biggest-smartphone-vendor-androids-market-share-grows-179046

      For that matter, the Windows Phones are great for companies and will probably really take of on that market because of possibilty of managing Win7 phones through the windows asset manager.
      Apple products, however, are horrible to work with in a windows environment, even linux based machines are better.

    56. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same article:
      http://www.infoworld.com/d/mobile-technology/samsung-becomes-biggest-smartphone-vendor-androids-market-share-grows-179046

      Also states that Nokia outsells apple.

    57. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ââBS on the Apple outsells, sorry.
      http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/248150/20111112/htc-market-share-apple-u-s.htm
      "HTC was able to ship a total of 5.77 million smartphones in the U.S. which accounts for 43% of the total smartphone shares in the market. Samsung placed second with 4.9 million smartphones which was led by its Galaxy-class products while Apple claimed the third spot with 4.6"

      So their the number three manufacturer.

      http://www.tgdaily.com/mobility-features/60210-android-takes-53-of-us-smartphone-market
      "The popular OS captured an impressive 53% of smartphone sales from January-October 2011, while Apple's iOS increased to a 29%" market share.

    58. Re:State Of Mind by PaladinAlpha · · Score: 1

      Samsung smartphones outsell Apple smartphones

      + Having multiple phone products increases complexity and cost. There's an argument to be made that with a dozen major phone vendors, and with some of them offering dozens or even hundreds of different phones, these companies may be pumping out lots of competition to the iPhone, but they're not doing so in a way that is sustainable long term.

      This doesn't make much sense to me. Do you have an example of a market in which alternatives are bad? Why is it unsustainable?

    59. Re:State Of Mind by jrumney · · Score: 1

      iPhone outsells every other phone by an order of magnitude

      It seems like being delusional is not the exclusive domain of Nokia execs either.

    60. Re:State Of Mind by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      That's too much phone for the masses. The N900 was never going to be a mass market device. It's for the elite.

    61. Re:State Of Mind by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I don't think Apple cares so much about being the biggest seller as long as they can make the most money. They have the coolness factor going for them as it's considered by most (feel free to disagree) to be an upscale product. I believe they like where they are at. A big advantage for Apple as well is they don't have to pay off MS for every phone they sell like so many Android platform makers do.

    62. Re:State Of Mind by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Another advantage for Apple. There's only one iOS vendor. Makes life easy at Apple. Android developers are learning about the Microsoft Windows world. Many different pieces of hardware and they all have to run android and some will obviously do better than others. This gives us two different guys going "My droid "never crashes/crashes every 5 minutes."

    63. Re:State Of Mind by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 1

      Another advantage for Apple. There's only one iOS vendor. Makes life easy at Apple.

      Certainly hasn't stopped them from having antenna and battery life problems.

    64. Re:State Of Mind by savuporo · · Score: 1

      Even further. Which iPhone is it that outsells every other phone ? Because if you take any individual model, ( 3GS, 4S etc ) they are not ORDERS of MAGNITUDE ahead of best selling android handsets. two iPhone 4 variants in 2011 go toe to toe with best android handsets, Galaxy II, Evo and Thunderbolt. Nowhere even close to an order of magnitude difference. And yeah, ofc Nokia 11xx, 5230 and the like just kill everything else in sales figures.

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    65. Re:State Of Mind by chrb · · Score: 3, Informative

      iPhone outsells every other phone by an order of magnitude

      I am no fan of Nokia's recent moves, but to claim that their phones don't sell is simply inaccurate. Nokia sold more 5230 phones in one year alone last year (2010) than Apple has sold iPhones in the whole five years from 2007-2011. Nokia has also produced the best selling phone for many of the years on record. List of best-selling mobile phones:

      Year Manufacturer Model Units sold
      1990 NEC P3 15 million
      1996 Motorola StarTAC 60 million
      1998 Nokia 6120 15 million
      1999 Nokia 3210 150 million
      2000 Nokia 3310 126 million
      2002 Nokia/Nokia/Nokia/Siemens 3510/6100/6610/A50 15 million
      2003 Nokia 1100 250 million
      2004 Nokia 2600/2610/2626/2630 135 million
      2005 Nokia 1110 150 million
      2006 Nokia 1600/1650/1661 130 million
      2007 Nokia 1200 150 million
      2008 Nokia 1680 Classic 35 million
      2009 Apple iPhone 3GS 35 million
      2010 Nokia 5230 150 Million

      If the sales comparison is restricted to smartphones and recent year, then both Samsung Galaxy S and HTC Desire have large sales (30 million and 21 million respectively). Total iPhone sales in 2010 was 40 million, so neither HTC nor Samsung is being outsold by "an order of magnitude".

    66. Re:State Of Mind by chrb · · Score: 1

      s/HTC Desire/HTC WildFire

    67. Re:State Of Mind by chrb · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_mobile_phones#Best-selling_by_year

      Yes, dumb phones are still popular. Nokia sold 150 million 5230 handsets last year. That is more than every iPhone ever sold.

    68. Re:State Of Mind by Nyder · · Score: 1

      ...... You would have to have gone through a few kilos of LSD ...

      Having trouble finding any, can you share?

      --
      Be seeing you...
    69. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, actually in some markets (West European) certain Samsungs (specifically the ACE) are outselling the iPhone easily.

      But yes, admitting that the world is being currently split up by iOS and Android is probably not a prudent thing for a Nokia flunky ;)

    70. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look at real data, like Total phones, far far far more dumb phones are sold.

      That's interesting. Do you have links on this? I got the impression everyone except me spends their time fingering their fondleslabs these days. Also, your claim contradicts the data I can find, e.g. http://gizmodo.com/5817082/everbodys-getting-smartphones

      I think you missed the definition of "Feature Phones" are what everyone else calls a "Dumb Phone". Data comes from NPD, can also be had from Gartner and additionally from others as well. Exact percentages vary but they all agree that Dumb/Feature phones still outsell their bigger cousin the Smartphone, though that gap is rapidly closing.

    71. Re:State Of Mind by cbhacking · · Score: 3, Informative

      For the record, your info is (half a year) out of date. As of the Mango SDK release, WP7 now officially includes TCP and UDP sockets. Yes, it was idiotic of them to ship without those in the beginning, but they are available.

      Unofficially, where I do most of my development, WP7 has a full WinSock stack, but you're not going to get those into the Marketplace. Apps using System.Net.Sockets will and have, though.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    72. Re:State Of Mind by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Apples to ostriches. WP7 (what everybody else is talking about) and WinMo (like your unlamented Fuze) do share *some* code, but then so do Windows ME and Windows XP (or Win7 for that matter). It's a totally different experience, though (moreso than on different PC Windows versions). WP7 does not, in parcticular, suffer the hangs and crashes so commonly reported in WinMo.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    73. Re:State Of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gizmodo is data. I thought it was where horriblly written articles go to die on some guys blogufact

    74. Re:State Of Mind by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Actually the dumb phone market is extremely fragmented as is the feature phone market. iPhone does in fact outsell every other phone on the market including dumb phones. Now if you rephrase this a bit like sales of iOS vs. JavaVM then things look different.

    75. Re:State Of Mind by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      They're certainly not perfect.

    76. Re:State Of Mind by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 1

      Nobody's perfect. The point is that having a single model doesn't save you from problems.

      In theory Apple might be able to spend more effort working out all the bugs than would someone with less volume, but there are two troubles there: The first is that the most popular Android handsets have a sales volume within an order of magnitude of the iPhone, which means they can achieve as close as makes no difference to those economies of scale. The second is that diversity has its advantages: You can choose among all the Android handsets that have come out in the last six months and pick the one that has proven to have the least problems, whereas if you only have one option and it has a problem which is a deal breaker for you, you're SOL.

  2. Obvious Troll is Obvious by Gr33nJ3ll0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And looking to promote his company.

    1. Re:Obvious Troll is Obvious by MightyYar · · Score: 3

      Or maybe he just read an iPhone or Android story on Slashdot and believed all of the frothing lunatic haters.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Obvious Troll is Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe

  3. And Another Thing ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    The kids these days, they don't like the broadband. They are fed up with the cable and the fibre. Everyone has the fibre. Also, many are not happy with the complexity of broadband and the increased risk of viruses over broadband. So we do increasingly see that the youth that wants to be on the cutting edge and try something new are turning to dial up.

    Right now, it is so confusing to the customer. Where is the softly assuring BEEEEEEP WAHUNG WAHUNG SCSSHHHHHHHHH white noise after connecting that lets you know that you are receiving 56k service?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:And Another Thing ... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I kind of miss that sound, I wonder if there's a sound that could be made to play every time I open my browser that would give that feeling. Thanks to the high latency of the DSL around here, I already get a long pause.

    2. Re:And Another Thing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make a local frame (your regular homepage as the content in the frame), but just have it play the '56kmodem.ogg' file when you first open the page, and again any time the http request takes more than 3 seconds.

    3. Re:And Another Thing ... by IANAAC · · Score: 2

      Right now, it is so confusing to the customer. Where is the softly assuring BEEEEEEP WAHUNG WAHUNG SCSSHHHHHHHHH white noise after connecting that lets you know that you are receiving 56k service?

      You just KNOW there's some hipster out there thinking "Hey! If I can find a away to recreate that, but faster, I'll be RICH!"

    4. Re:And Another Thing ... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Should be simple enough. Here's the plan:

      Register domain 56Kb.it.

      Implement a basic URL-shortner/social-media-linking-crap mechanism.

      When somebody clicks on a 56Kb.it shortened link, it redirects them to a fairly standard framed-web-proxy-page arrangement; but with an (HTML5, of course) audio widget that plays the dialup noise, and deliberate bandwidth throttling of the framed page to a bitrate chosen randomly from the historically plausible performance of a '56k' dialup line.

      It's pointless, wasteful, adds an extra point of failure, and is really a pretty stupid gimmick. Should be all over the social networks within hours.

    5. Re:And Another Thing ... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Ah, good old times... when I got pissed off every time I didn't get the full symphony, and knew I was stuck at 14 kB.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    6. Re:And Another Thing ... by sandytaru · · Score: 2

      NPR's April Fool's joke last year was exactly that - hipsters turning to dial-up modem cafes because they wanted the Internet to be slow again.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    7. Re:And Another Thing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally off-topic - sorry - but your tone noises reminded me of the recent Muppets movie. A 1980's robot used a modem (with appropriate noises) to dialup an Internet connection. Me and a couple of other nerdy Dads were chuckling. My daughter whispered "What's a modem?". Suddenly I felt *really* old.

    8. Re:And Another Thing ... by Liambp · · Score: 2

      Gosh how I loved that SSCSSHHHHHHH when it eventually did connect. In my mind I can still hear those bits pouring down the telephone line into my computer. Some modems (might have been pre 56k days) even let you keep the modem speaker on constantly so you could listen to your data all day long. The sheer nerdy joy of it.

    9. Re:And Another Thing ... by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      That is an *awesome* idea!

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    10. Re:And Another Thing ... by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows only old people use iPhones.

    11. Re:And Another Thing ... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      You forgot the part where it goes: BEEBOO BEEBOO BEE

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    12. Re:And Another Thing ... by joocemann · · Score: 1

      No.... the hipster was only pretending to think about something other than cigarettes, coffee, and clothing.

    13. Re:And Another Thing ... by linuxwolf69 · · Score: 2

      That's ok, I don't have Cable or Satellite TV for the last year and a half. Got a new TV with tuner built in, so borrowed an antennae from a friend to see if I could get some local channels. Daughter saw locals and says "YAY! We got Cable!" When we told her no, it's over the air, she says "same thing... Do we have Cartoon Network?"

      Thinking back though, she's never had over the air, only cable and satellite. It's a shame the things kids have today and don't realize how "bad" we had it as little as 15 years ago.

      now get off my lawn....

    14. Re:And Another Thing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, the domain is already taken. :(

    15. Re:And Another Thing ... by Spykk · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to add random and tags. You should also append a guestbook to the bottom of every page.

    16. Re:And Another Thing ... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      OMG, I'd so click that link. Freaking Genius.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    17. Re:And Another Thing ... by nightfell · · Score: 1

      This already exists. It's called Sprint 3G.

    18. Re:And Another Thing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also acted as a parental alarm system after 12:00 at night when your 10-year-old son is caught yahoo!ing "Pamela Anderson boobs."

  4. Nokia's Windows Phones by Toe,+The · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Yeah... young people love Windows.

    1. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by swanzilla · · Score: 2

      Maybe the young people just want to make PHONE CALLS on their cellPHONES. Now get off their lawns.

    2. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by Relayman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh, no. The young people make very few calls on their phones. It's text messages, IM, Facetime, VOIP over Xbox, facebook; everything but phone calls.

      - Living with a 20-year old in the basement.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    3. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by cshark · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. The question I have with the whole thing, is, well, how exactly is windows phone any simpler or easier to use than Android? Do they know something at Nokia that the rest of us don't?

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    4. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

      As a young person, I cannot confirm that we want to only make phone calls.

      --
      SSC
    5. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      As a middle aged guy, that is why I ended up with an iPhone. My previous 3 phones (every 2 years, broken or not) really made me made because they made using it as Just A Phone so hard. When I was shopping for my new one earlier this year, I got the iPhone 3gs because it was so easy to use as Just A Phone.

      Now get off my lawn...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    6. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Nokia thinks I'm a young person (I'm in my 30s), because they're still winning with me for just this reason. I shelved a Samsung Galaxy to go back to my ancient Nokia. The battery lasts forever, it's easy to dial numbers on, it has a good antenna, and it doesn't do anything else.

    7. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      why the fuck would they want a zunephone ?

      as a sidenote new aisha s40's are sporting 1ghz cpu's too. and they're friggin Phones.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      No, we don't. Most of us don't like actually talking on the phone.

    9. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      Maybe Windows has been long enough that it is cool again?

      Apparenlty I wouldn't know any more...

    10. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you even used a Windows Phone? Android is by far the more busier and complicated UI. Windows Phones are, by far, the most elegant UI on the market outside of the N9 which doesn't really count.

    11. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using the same Nokia phone for 6 or 7 years. Still works fine. Original battery - doesn't hold a charge for too long but as long as I charge it overnight, no problem. It can make and receive calls, send and receive txts and not much else. The microphone must be pretty sensitive on it as my ex-wife claims that I am shouting and screaming at her when I'm speaking on my phone in a normal conversational voice! Oh, maybe it is actually the crazy ass wiring in her brain causing that problem.

    12. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by swanzilla · · Score: 1

      (group whoosh)

    13. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dad! Stop posting on slashdot and bring me my sandwich! Geez, you're so lazy.

      And tell mom to come get this laundry, its been sitting here all day!

    14. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a telex for you. It reads: "The Internet eats all other networks. It has eaten CD retailers, is in the process of eating movie rental and television and is slicing up the telephone network into nice juicy chunks before eating that. And a good thing too."

    15. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Why waste money on a smart phone if all you want is a phone?

      I can get you a great "just a phone" without any fancy features, for about 20 bucks on dealextreme. Plus, you can kick your carrier to the curb if you wish, because you won't owe a cent on your 20 dollar cell phone.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    16. Re:Nokia's Windows Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that you dad?

  5. They're just upset... by pdxer · · Score: 1

    ...that Microsoft Kin was cancelled.

    --
    Looking for a job in Portland, Oregon?
    1. Re:They're just upset... by Haxagon · · Score: 1

      RTFS, this is Nokia.

    2. Re:They're just upset... by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Just because Kins were weird, 5 years behind the times, and under-powered, it doesn't necessarily mean Nokia made them :) The handsets were Samsungs.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    3. Re:They're just upset... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      No. they were made for Sharp.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  6. Out of touch by zule666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Guess that's why my teenagers wanted iPhones..

    1. Re:Out of touch by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      WOW! These Chinese Crowdturfers are mean.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  7. Hee hee ya they sure are.... by Stumbles · · Score: 2

    the only thing baffling (not really) is how stupid Nokia's shareholders have been.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
    1. Re:Hee hee ya they sure are.... by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Many of them have sold off the shares. Nokias shares are down ... alot.

      It was the board that decided to select an alliance with Microsoft.

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    2. Re:Hee hee ya they sure are.... by Haxagon · · Score: 1

      Didn't they just rise?

    3. Re:Hee hee ya they sure are.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      so glad I didn't take the job with Nokia

      so glad I didn't take the job with Nokia

      so glad I didn't take the job with Nokia

    4. Re:Hee hee ya they sure are.... by Delarth799 · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I wasn't aware that Nokia still had any shareholders left.

    5. Re:Hee hee ya they sure are.... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Rise over what time frame? NOK's stock has lost a little over half its value this year.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    6. Re:Hee hee ya they sure are.... by s73v3r · · Score: 2

      The only thing that has kept me hanging on to a small set of shares is the idea that Microsoft is simply going to buy Nokia soon.

    7. Re:Hee hee ya they sure are.... by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      I would never actively avoid an opportunity that could make some positive returns, such as holding Nokia in hopes of a buy-out, but I have nightmares about trying to explain my taxes in an IRS audit when I sell stocks that have gone through acquisitions and spin-offs. The cost basis calculations can get interesting, especially if you keep buying shares or reinvest dividends. Just imagine if you purchased shares of AT&T prior to the original break-up, re-invested dividends into all the companies along the way as they slowly re-merged into a few remaining companies. I suppose that's what CPAs live for, but not I.

    8. Re:Hee hee ya they sure are.... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      It was sort of the only direction left

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    9. Re:Hee hee ya they sure are.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      according to the Gartner Report:
      http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1689814

      Nokia outsells Apple by nearly a factor of ten and, despite being only a minor player in the smartphone market, they remain King of Phones

      dumb phones BAY FAR outsell smartphones - there is a reason why manufacturers are scrambling to get Android-based phones which are NOT smartphones to market...

    10. Re:Hee hee ya they sure are.... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I was a customer of Nokia's for years until I switched to HTC, it seems completely batshit mental to me that they'd arbitrarily cut off their options in that way. I personally would've been very interested to see a high spec Android Nokia phone. Limiting themselves to Windows 7 doesn't seem to make any business sense whatsoever.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  8. Shocking... by clonehappy · · Score: 1

    Executive at a company that gambled their existence on the success of the Windows Phone platform tries to start an astroturfing campaign against the clearly-winning competition in favor of his "also-ran" platform. Film at 11.

  9. Oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahahah by golly! I'm so tired of this world. I'll buy a Windows device. This is just PR.

  10. fedup with web sites like it.com with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    complex layout and all that glitz and scrolling animated stuff...who bothers to go to websites that are so poorly laid out??

  11. Android vs iphone vs windows phone wars 3,2,1... by youn · · Score: 1

    Hum... what could go wrong... nothing, not likely to have controversial opinions and flame wars :) ... haha

    --
    Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
  12. Not sure what he's thinking... by Scoth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think I've ever met someone who wasn't a hacker/tweaker sort who didn't like their iPhones. Regardless of your beliefs about their business practices, Walled Garden, etc, by and large the iPhone works and works well. I'm not sure exactly who he talked to about being fed up.

    I've also not met a lot of people unhappy with their Android phones, though they may not be using them to their full customization potential.

    1. Re:Not sure what he's thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a hacker of sorts, just not when it comes to my phone. I want it to just work. Maybe if I had a spare, but my phone I'd prefer not to mess with.

      With that said, I hated my iPhone. It was slow and unwieldy. It took seconds to open the text app. I had to wait through two major releases before I got copy and paste. I didn't like it.

      Maybe they fixed much of what I didn't like in future releases, but the iPhone 3G was terrible.

      I don't have single (major) complaint with my HTC Inspire.

    2. Re:Not sure what he's thinking... by Relayman · · Score: 1

      The biggest disappointment with Android is not allowing owners to keep it up to date without rooting it. We're talking about the majority of the phones being obsolete even before the two-year commitment is up. To update, you have to get a new phone and many of them do not have the latest version of Android.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    3. Re:Not sure what he's thinking... by Relayman · · Score: 0

      Oops, replied to the wrong message and can't delete and repost. Oh, well.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    4. Re:Not sure what he's thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had nothing but problems with my iPhone 3G. Typing would sometimes take 30 seconds to register a keypress when trying to write a text. It got progressively shittier as time went on. Rebooting did nothing. Left my contract early and got an Evo 4G, and I'm MUCH happier.

    5. Re:Not sure what he's thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So 4 yr old phone not as good as current phone? You're a moron.

      Complaining that 4 yr old phone didn't have cut&paste, when android didn't have cut&paste (system-wide) then either? You're a moron.

    6. Re:Not sure what he's thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think I've ever met someone who wasn't a hacker/tweaker sort who didn't like their iPhones.

      Some of us don't like being spied on by Apple.

      Some of us don't like being treated like children by Apple.

    7. Re:Not sure what he's thinking... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      By the same token, I've never met anyone (including hackers/tweakers) who didn't like their Android.

      Really, both platforms are perfectly usable. It's just that with a choice between "perfectly usable" and "perfectly usable and locked down by its manufacturer", I'll go with the former. iPhones got in first, so they got a larger share of the market, and with their users being accustomed to being locked into the app store, Android didn't have a particularly large draw.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    8. Re:Not sure what he's thinking... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      One thing that I think everyone can agree on is that having 2 great innovators in the arena, slowly stealing ideas from each other while trying to edge out each other with new ones, we're ending up with 2 phenomenal platforms, and you can't say that about decades of stagnant windows CE and stagnant Palm.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    9. Re:Not sure what he's thinking... by savuporo · · Score: 1

      I don't think I've ever met someone who wasn't a hacker/tweaker sort who didn't like their iPhones

      It's hard to find people complaining about their Lexus or Saab purchases too. Regardless if the cars are any actual value for the money.

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    10. Re:Not sure what he's thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were plenty of unhappy iPhone users who bitched about dropped calls.. they just refused to believe it was their phone.

  13. I'm not young, but... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...I've soured on the Android (performance and privacy issues) and the iPhone looks expensive (based on the iPhone tax it looks like service providers charge). But, I also had about 2 years of development experience on the inferior Windows Mobile platform when Microsoft pissed on the developer base, then shoved us out the door.

    I'd say he's right there's room for another competitor, but his ain't it.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:I'm not young, but... by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      Not sure what this "iPhone" tax you mention is. The top-end Android phones are at the same ($199/$299) price points. Sure, you can go cheaper with Android but it isn't close to the same hardware.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    2. Re:I'm not young, but... by oPless · · Score: 0

      Why not?

      Disclaimer;
      I have an iPhone 4 as my main phone. A G1 before that, and have Wildfire S, a Samsung Galaxy 2 android phones, and a random chinese android tablet. Also I'm on my second windows phone 7 device (yep, I've had a few WinCE based phones too, but they're dead and gone)

      WP7 is becoming mature, it's getting integrated with facebook and twitter better than Android and iOS (All the kids love their social networks) there's a minimum spec too which is fairly high. It's not trying to be the next iPhone/Android either. I think it's becoming a worthy competitor to both.

    3. Re:I'm not young, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Privacy is an issue for you with Android devices so your first idea is to turn to an Apple product?

      This is were a young person would post a picture of Jackie Chan looking utterly baffled.

    4. Re:I'm not young, but... by 0123456 · · Score: 0

      My phone cost $25. It makes phone calls and sends and receives text messages.

      I'm still trying to figure out why I supposedly need to be connected to Facebook 24 hours a day. Constant mobile internet connections were cool... in 1990. Today they're a sign of a lack of real life.

      If he's right, maybe kids are finally figuring that out.

    5. Re:I'm not young, but... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 4, Informative

      Privacy is an issue for you with Android devices so your first idea is to turn to an Apple product?

      This is were a young person would post a picture of Jackie Chan looking utterly baffled.

      You seem to have either a short or selective memory. Prior to the iPhone, the standard practice for cell phones were for handset makers to make phones for carriers with their carrier branding on the case and carrier specific apps permanently installed on the phone. The iPhone was sold to "consumers" and treated like a consumer device rather than something created specifically for a carrier.

      Apple has put into place restrictions to protect the privacy of users from third party apps from collecting personal information without concept.

      If you are referring to the "log" file that was in the backup file, that did not contain any personal information in it. Location information was stored "ON THE PHONE" to speed up location services acting as a "CACHE".

      All carriers are capable of tracking you through their backhaul infrastructure without any help from Apple.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    6. Re:I'm not young, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm 28 and grew up with several computers of various kinds in the house (Amigas, Linux based PCs, Windows based PCs, OS/2, and Macs), but I have been called "old" because I don't rely on computers/technology for every single thing in my life (despite being a programmer). My last phone before I switched to an iPhone was a Motorola Razr (the old flip version) and I was impressed with the iPhone, for a while. I found though that it didn't actually help me do anything, I was less connected with my friends cause we always had our noses in our smart phones, combined with the cost of owning an iPhone (between the mandatory data plan, all the apps (which is more of a self control issue) and the phone itself) and the reliability (or lack thereof in my smaller foothills "metro area" town) I switched to a Droid on Verizon, and found the only thing that had changed with the reliability and quality of the phone itself was poorer. So after a year of trying, I ditched smart phones all-together and went back to my venerable Motorola Razr. Of course with the new Android version coming out, it's going to be harder to find the $30 version of these on Amazon when I have to replace it. I'm just happier not being *totally* connected *everywhere* I go *every* second of every day. Plus, I think the quality of people you meet and the conversation that occasionally ensues over which book you're carrying/reading is higher than which phone you're squinting at.

    7. Re:I'm not young, but... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      My phone cost about a day's pay more than yours and let's me work from anywhere I want, so I can take off on what would be a normal workday and be outside instead of in a windowless office in the third basement.

      And by the way, kids consider constant connection to Facebook "a real life."

    8. Re:I'm not young, but... by wintercolby · · Score: 1

      I think he mentioned the monthly iPhone fee, but a lot of places are charging a premium "Smartphone Data Fee" that I assume is similar to this iPhone fee he's talking about. I'm starting to believe that the cell phone companies are charging differently based on street address and zip code, as well.

      --
      Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
    9. Re:I'm not young, but... by oodaloop · · Score: 2

      WebOS? I'd love to see it as a viable open-source alternative to Android.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    10. Re:I'm not young, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhones cost around US$ 700-900 in Brazil. But a Galaxy SII will also cost about that, too.

      Just a data point.

    11. Re:I'm not young, but... by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      If you want to see performance and privacy in your Android device, run Cyanogenmod on it. My Galaxy S and now my Galaxy SII are practically different phones since I replaced the factory load.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    12. Re:I'm not young, but... by revlayle · · Score: 1

      Apps/ecosystem cost you a bit more on iOS - but not sure if that is that big of a barrier for entry. However, top-end android phones and iPhones cost about the same even when unsubsidized.

    13. Re:I'm not young, but... by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm still trying to figure out why I supposedly need to be connected to Facebook 24 hours a day. Constant mobile internet connections were cool... in 1990. Today they're a sign of a lack of real life.

      Really? I can sit in a meeting at work (or anywhere, for that matter, even without wifi) and use my phone to open a Windows remote desktop connection (or SSH session) to the server and actually write code on the server right through my phone. People are amazed when they give me a bug report at the beginning of a meeting which is fixed by the end. No laptop required, my laptop stays on my desk now.

      You may only use the internet to connect to Facebook, but there are other people who get real work done even using their phones.

      I can also check Slashdot on the shitter, so I've got that going for me. Which is nice.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    14. Re:I'm not young, but... by Splab · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to believe that the cell phone companies are charging differently based on street address and zip code, as well.

      Actually that's not a bad idea, it is wastly cheaper to run networks in big cities than rural areas and the competition is so hard many places (EU at least) that charging based on location might soon be back in the game. (Here in Denmark some carries used to give you discount if you where using your mobile from your home (based on the towers closed to your home).

    15. Re:I'm not young, but... by iceaxe · · Score: 1

      Constant mobile internet connections were cool... in 1990.

      In 1990 ANY internet connection was a sure sign of a nerd. "Cool" people only used a Macintosh (no "i") for word processing or desktop publishing, and otherwise did not use computers much. The internet was something that connected University systems and government or private research facility networks, mostly. Nerds enjoyed froups and email and ftp. Some people used AOL, but it wasn't available for DOS yet, and it wasn't the internet. BBSes were popular, maybe those were "cool"?

      What a long, strange trip...

      --
      WALSTIB!
    16. Re:I'm not young, but... by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      For unlocked phones, the Apple tax is most apparent. An iPhone 3G costs over 300 bucks on amazon, and I just got a Cliq XT for about half that. Compare the hardware for yourself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iphone_3g http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola_Cliq

    17. Re:I'm not young, but... by Kartu · · Score: 2, Informative

      @ Prior to the iPhone, the standard practice for cell phones were for handset makers to make phones for carriers with their carrier branding on the case and carrier specific apps permanently installed on the phone. @

      You forgot to add "in the USA". You could get unlocked, unbranded phones in Europe before iphone and sure you can get it after.

      On Android you know which app has which permissions, but you don't with iOS.
      Having this piece of news in mind, talk about Apple's "protect the privacy" is very ironic:
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/apr/20/iphone-tracking-prompts-privacy-fears

    18. Re:I'm not young, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome, and the Cliq XT still uses Android 1.5 (currently 2.5 years old), and will never be upgraded.. I'm sure that's MUCH better than iOS4.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola_Cliq#Cliq_XT

    19. Re:I'm not young, but... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I can also check Slashdot on the shitter, so I've got that going for me.

      See, we didn't need to know that ... it's like being a Twitter Shitter; some things are best kept to yourself. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    20. Re:I'm not young, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can also check Slashdot on the shitter, so I've got that going for me. Which is nice.

      Honey? Is that you? Come on, you've been in there for an hour, and I have to go!!

    21. Re:I'm not young, but... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2

      @ Prior to the iPhone, the standard practice for cell phones were for handset makers to make phones for carriers with their carrier branding on the case and carrier specific apps permanently installed on the phone. @

      You forgot to add "in the USA". You could get unlocked, unbranded phones in Europe before iphone and sure you can get it after.

      On Android you know which app has which permissions, but you don't with iOS.
      Having this piece of news in mind, talk about Apple's "protect the privacy" is very ironic:
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/apr/20/iphone-tracking-prompts-privacy-fears

      I don't think you understand what privacy is. Privacy protects information that can identify a "person" specifically things like your name, address, phone number and government issued ID numbers. Privacy policies do not protect statistical information like what was contained in the log file. It does not identify a person. Devices do not have privacy rights and you agree to give access to your phone identifier number to your carrier when you sign up for service. The only time location because a privacy concern is if the location information is tied to your account information which was not the case for the log file.

      You are doing disservice to consumers who actually have real privacy risks from using the Android platform. Don't forget that Google is an advertising company and not a consumer technology company. They do not view consumers as they customers. There is also the real risk of downloading malware from the marketplace because google does not have proper vetting processes in place.

      iOS does not require a series of allow/deny prompts beyond location services in third party apps because Apple has a strict set of guidelines for what an application can access and they vet all of their apps in the app store. You can always go into location services in the settings app and turn location services for specific apps off and or turn off location services entirely.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    22. Re:I'm not young, but... by dwpro · · Score: 1

      What model do you have that has performance issues? My performance has been fantastic on my G2, but my old MyTouch was pretty sluggish.

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    23. Re:I'm not young, but... by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Higher monthly rates are not an "iPhone tax", they're "smartphone data fees".

      Sure there are some feature phones with a browser or Facebook applet and "unlimited" internet that might charge only $25-30 a month, but my brother had that the last two years and the user experience on those was so atrocious he never bothered with it after the first week.

    24. Re:I'm not young, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you knew what permissions CarrierIQ had? Or not?

    25. Re:I'm not young, but... by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      Well, the thing about android is that you don't have to depend on the manufacturer for upgrades.

    26. Re:I'm not young, but... by tatman · · Score: 1

      I am starting to have second thoughts about the Android platform as well. Each time I get an OS update on my phone, something changes. While some are good, its also frustrating to find functionality moved or gone. All in all, the updates are not making my experience better. In some cases, worst. For example, in the latest update, my camera settings are lost after each time I reboot the phone. The latest voice mail update now pushes deleted voice mails to a trash bin which I have to manually purge. I'm about to not update anything on my phone again for fear what will happen next I don't like....

      --
      I've always said English was my second language. Had Romeo and Juliet been written in C, I might have understood it.
    27. Re:I'm not young, but... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Yep. Absolutely none. That's why I bought a device with stock android (Nexus S), instead of letting vendors install their crap all over it.

      Blaming Google/Android for CarrierIQ is like blaming Microsoft for all the crapware your cheap Dell was pre-loaded with.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    28. Re:I'm not young, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as a point of comparison, in the UK, on O2 (the network I use), if you were to go for the cheapest monthly contract (£21.50), the cost of the iPhone 4S handset is £299. A Samsung Galaxy S2 (which is pretty comparable) on the same contract costs £179. I shopped around recently for a new smartphone (and went for an S2) and the prices are similar on other networks too. The iPhone generally costs about £100 more than the top-end Android phones on contract in the UK.

    29. Re:I'm not young, but... by wed128 · · Score: 1

      A galaxy SII with superior hardware costs about the same. that sounds like a tax to me.

    30. Re:I'm not young, but... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      I've got an LG Ally. Can't remember my GF's model, but her's is flaky too.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    31. Re:I'm not young, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPhone tax is the extra 10-20$/month that some phone companies charge for an iPhone plan over an Android plan. It used to be as high as 30$/month more, but the gap has closed somewhat (at least where I live).

    32. Re:I'm not young, but... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      I don't see how that's an iPhone fee. If you have a smart phone with anyone, that's going to cost, and having lived with mobile internet on older cell phones (basically uses the built-in phone line to dial into internet), I'm more than happy to pay that cost.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    33. Re:I'm not young, but... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      If that's your privacy concern, I think a lot of android users would consider that bug a feature.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    34. Re:I'm not young, but... by toutankh · · Score: 1

      On Android when you install an app you know what permissions this app requires. For instance if you install words with friends you know that it will access your contact data information. Through information privacy is enhanced: I have several times refused to install apps because they were requiring permissions that I thought they did not need. These apps would probably have done more than I knew with my phone, including sending private information. Now I do not own an iPhone and I'm curious, maybe you or someone can answer this: when you install words with friends on your iPhone, how are you informed that it will send your contact data information to Zynga?

    35. Re:I'm not young, but... by chrb · · Score: 1

      You seem to have either a short or selective memory. Prior to the iPhone, the standard practice for cell phones were for handset makers to make phones for carriers with their carrier branding on the case and carrier specific apps permanently installed on the phone.

      It was "standard practice" for some carriers, with some phones. It was never standard practice for all carriers on all phones. I don't recall Nokia selling many (any?) models with carrier specific apps. Maybe there were some, but Nokia sold over a billion phones, and the vast majority had no carrier apps.

  14. Kids want to differentiate themselves... by lonechicken · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... in the same way as their friends.

    1. Re:Kids want to differentiate themselves... by Apocryphos · · Score: 1

      and share their individuality with people just like them.

  15. Nobody does that because everyone does that by Toe,+The · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He employs some great logic. Here is a direct quote:

    "What we see is that youth are pretty much fed up with iPhones. Everyone has the iPhone," he said.

    If everyone wants something, then nobody could possibly want it... right?

    1. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Nobody goes there any more, it's too crowded." -Yogi Berra

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    2. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Pope · · Score: 1

      "Nobody goes there anymore, it's too crowded." - Yogi Berra.

      There is a small group of too-cool-for-school hipsters out there who disdain anything they deem mainstream and/or popular, so they're likely the ones who would complain about everyone having an iPhone. Hell, I read a few comments to that effect when the iPhone 3GS came out! As usual, they're the people to ignore IMO because they simply represent an outlier viewpoint.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is a small group of too-cool-for-school hipsters out there who disdain anything they deem mainstream and/or popular

      Of course, many on Slashdot also disdain anything deemed mainstream or popular, but we're uncool - that's the important distinction.

    4. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's right though. It's a wise point of insight. iPhone and Android are ripe for played-out cultural saturation, just like Facebook.

      Maybe if Nokia doesn't drop the ball, they can parlay this natural social rhythm into success, unlike SOME people (I'm looking at YOU BlackBerry). ...hate to imagine any Microsoft involvement though. I wish they and their shitty Windows Phone would just die.

    5. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by berzerke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Everyone has the iPhone," he said.

      And perhaps they are looking for the next bright shiny, must have item. If everyone has one, it isn't as special anymore. Fads come and go.

      Now whether or not the iphone IS a fad is another question I'll not try to answer. Personally, I've played with my wife's iphone and just can't see why people are so crazy about them. Overpriced and not very flexible IMHO. But maybe it's peer pressure. I've always been rather resistant to it, while my wife is at the other end of the spectrum.

    6. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      iPhone and Android are ripe for played-out cultural saturation, just like Facebook.

      If people are tired of smart phones, they're not going to suddenly rush to buy one that runs Windows.

    7. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 1

      Everyone has the iPhone

      We want to deliver services and phones that are different

      Nobody will have the Nokia.

      Windows Phone 7

      (Unsurprinsingly)

    8. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

      My mom has had sex. They sell Sex For Dummies books. Those two criteria right there are reason enough to never have sex.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    9. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There are people like that. Before the iPhone killed the iPod, people would buy Zunes just for the "its not popular" aspect.

      Will it be enough market to keep WMP going? Probably not. However, WMP has one advantage -- Microsoft can easily have it the only phone that works with a new "secure" protocol of Activesync. If MS also licensed it to Apple, Android would be effectively locked out of the enterprise like it was back in the 1.5 and 1.6 days. This by itself would all but kill Android as a competing phone. Exchange support makes or breaks handsets. Even Apple came to Microsoft to get support in their devices.

    10. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by poetmatt · · Score: 2

      I've never seen a stronger case for Nokia being a willing Microsoft crony than a Microsoft exec who leaves to Nokia, fosters a relationship with Nokia, and now trashtalks their competitors.

      Does he really want Nokia to fail this badly?

    11. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by somersault · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think we dislike things directly because they're popular and we want to be hipsters. IMO it's probably more to do with our experience with Microsoft and Intel over the last couple of decades. We often will root for the underdog even when there isn't much of a difference to the end user simply because we don't want any one company getting too far ahead of the rest and crushing innovation.

      Then you also have to consider that we simply are more aware of the alternatives in many situations and will choose the option that is best for us, which won't very often be the most popular choice. It's when geeks start acting like what's best for them is best for everyone when the problems start. Usually it takes the world a few years to be ready for what we are happy to use straight from the bleeding edge. Having said that, I think Android is a decent balance of customisability vs usability. You could probably say the same for the iPhone - as long as you jailbreak it first..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    12. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      My mom has had sex. They sell Sex For Dummies books. Those two criteria right there are reason enough to never have sex.

      Dude, that's a horrible mental image - it's bad enough knowing that *my* mom had sex, but your mom did too!? That's disgusting!

    13. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by The+Man · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's right though. It's a wise point of insight. iPhone and Android are ripe for played-out cultural saturation, just like Facebook.

      Maybe if Nokia doesn't drop the ball, they can parlay this natural social rhythm into success, unlike SOME people (I'm looking at YOU BlackBerry). ...hate to imagine any Microsoft involvement though. I wish they and their shitty Windows Phone would just die.

      And this for me really highlights how Microsoft especially but also its partners have really dropped the ball. If you can't be the saturation player (Apple), and you can't directly challenge the saturation player (Google and its partners), then you have to offer a compelling niche product. That approach can succeed, especially for smaller companies for whom even a niche product produces meaningful revenue. But there are two big problems here: First, neither Nokia nor Microsoft is a small company; Nokia needs to be a major challenger for its business model to work, and Microsoft is investing a lot of money in mobile and needs more than just one or two partners with niche products to generate a return. Second, the Windows brand has plenty of value, but is a handicap to anyone trying this approach in developing a new niche product. Windows is hardly the brand people associate with innovative, hip new products or being off the beaten path; many if not most people interact with it every day and for them it is background noise, the default, the standard, something that is so bland and ordinary as not to even occasion comment. Is that really the brand that Nokia, or Microsoft for that matter, thinks will excite people who are tired of iOS or Android, or people looking for a less-common status symbol?

      If Microsoft were smarter they would have recognised this and invested the time and energy into coming up with an alternative brand for their mobile products, perhaps leveraging the successful Xbox brand. But in a sense that would also have been an acknowledgement up front that their approach was unlikely to pay off big; a new brand might generate a niche following, but only the Windows brand is likely to be able to take on Apple and Google... most likely by eating RIM's lunch in the corporate space. In other words, either Microsoft has badly misjudged the cachet of Windows among ordinary individuals or its intent all along was to sell Windows Mobile into places where corporate IT makes the decisions rather than end users. That strategy looked decent a few years ago, but we have really seen a lot of changes recently in how employers handle supporting their employees' personal mobile devices. Recognising that it's cheaper to support their existing iOS and Android devices than to issue their own fleet of business-only devices, and that most people prefer to have at most only one phone and one tablet anyway, almost no one is still handing out a single device and refusing to support anything else. In the absence of products that are compelling on their own, RIM is finding that the decay of the corporate mobile device mandate is very bad for business. Microsoft, and therefore their partners as well, seem to be in the same spot.

      It looks like the niche player, whatever it ends up being, will be built around WebOS. It has open source cachet, underdog cachet ("back from the dead"), and it's not a terrible technology. With two dominant players duking it out for the mass market and a potential family of niche alternatives brewing, where does this leave Microsoft? With a lacklustre brand, tiny market share, an apparently outdated strategy, and no compelling products on the market, it's hard to imagine Windows Mobile going anywhere. Too late to market to be where Android is today, and too stodgy a brand to be what Nokia wishes it were (not that a niche business is what Microsoft wants anyway), Windows Mobile looks like a dead end. If anyone knows the value of getting in early, it should be Microsoft; the entire company exists today solely because of its first mover advantage all those years ago. Nokia was happy to get a backer, but it appears to have picked the wrong one. They could be doomed as well.

    14. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm curious why you know that Sex For Dummies exists. I was not aware of this. I'm trying to picture the person who would walk up to a bookstore counter and pay for that. I'm picturing a mix between Stallman and Buscemi.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    15. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When I tried to flex my friend's Droid X it snapped in half too. :)

      Seriously though, most users aren't looking for flexibility. I really don't want the option of being able to run Apache on my phone and being able to SSH into it so I could configure it right.

      They're looking for practical applications of their devices and Apple's doing a damn good job of attracting application developers.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    16. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by hrimhari · · Score: 1

      They must be taking Steve Ballmer as role model...

      --
      http://dilbert.com/2010-12-13
    17. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing wrong with either of them. At least that is from my recollection of last night anyway.

    18. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My mom has an iPhone. They sell iPhones for Dummies books. Those two criteria right there are reason enough to never buy an iPhone.

      What, because it works, is easy to use, and you can get documentation for it that an actual consumer can understand?

      So any technology your mom can use is bad? I take it you have eschewed all forms of technology she can operate like TVs, plumbing, and toasters? Or is it just phones?

      Oh, you can also get Linux for Dummies, Windows for Dummies, and a whole raft of things ... so if the presence of a Dummies book is your criteria, you should stop using anything listed here ... they even have your beloved SQL.

      Seriously man, I consider any technology my mother can operate to be fairly well implemented; because she's in her 70's and for her to decide she needed a GPS, laptop, scanner, digital camera, digital picture frame, a USB drive for backups, and a PVR ... well, that was quite a series of leaps for someone who isn't all that interested in that kind of stuff.

      Why should technology be something that your mother couldn't possibly use?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    19. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shakrai, you needn't mention your mom has sex, most of us here at slashdot have tried out the Sex for Dummies with her.

    20. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Splab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's been on display in many a bookstore, so anyone buying and reading a lot of books could easily have seen it for sale.

      And the reason why people would by it is the same as why people buy the book "The mole who wanted to know who pooped on it's head", it's a fun book and you just might learn something.

    21. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      So Nokia is targeting the hipster market? Only time will tell if they can actually wrest control of it from Apple.

    22. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by s73v3r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a huge difference between just choosing something that may not be popular, and bitching about something simply because it is popular. A lot of the latter is what happens here on /.

    23. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mom has had sex. They sell Sex For Dummies books. Those two criteria right there are reason enough to never have sex.

      There is not enough information to come to that determination. Pics of your mom please?

    24. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      In order of importance...

      1) Stability. This is key for me.
      2) Application availability. Windows isn't my ideal OS either, but it became the dominant OS and my everyday OS for much the same reason. You either go where the software goes, or you deal with a lack of options.
      3) Resale value, especially jailbroken and unlocked. A lower TCO means more money for more important things.

    25. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by NatasRevol · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe they had sex with each other. Back when they were hot.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    26. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 1

      My mom has an android phone. They sell Android for Dummies books. So what?

      Easy to use "appliance" things are bad? My mom can barely operate a flat screen television. It took her two years to figure out how to turn her computer one. Hint, there was literally only one button on it. She can work this phone just fine.

      That there are /. readers who like android a lot testifies that it also courts the techies.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    27. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      they can employ whatever market strategy they want but they will never go viral neither niche untile their phones starts to stand out by their merits.

    28. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but too-cool-for-school hipsters are not the kind of people who will be jumping on a windows tablet, as in
      "how cool now I can get the same utterly boring sh*t I have a school on my phone to be like "everybody"....

      But nokia will probably succeed in getting some of the corporate loosers who are starting to get scared by the state of their fleet of blackberrys....

    29. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd be perfectly comfortable bearing the embarrassment of buying that book so that I could give it to someone at Christmas :)

    30. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but you had your beer goggles on.

    31. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Sorry to insult your mother, but if it really took her too years to learn how to turn her computer on, she is retarded. My suspicion is that you are just talking smack about your mother in an attempt to make a point.

    32. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Not with your mom, anyway.

    33. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Appreciate that you've decided not to reproduce ;)

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    34. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure Stallman wouldn't use any book that was not in the public domain.

    35. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Brett+Buck · · Score: 0

      Ooh, I wish we could mod people +6/mrsmalaprop

    36. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you bitching about bitching about something simply because it is popular simply because it's popular? Because me, I'm all for bitching about things simply because they're popular. So I would support you in that 100%, unless perhaps it became an unpopular thing to do.

    37. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by tripleevenfall · · Score: 2

      Most of the hipsters / geeksters who disdain whatever is most popular or anything perceived as mainstream also parrot the same lines and maintain orthodoxy with a fairly uniform set of viewpoints, they just come from a different source.

    38. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by RManning · · Score: 1

      If using an iPhone or Android felt anything like sex, we wouldn't be having this conversation. :)

    39. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by AxemRed · · Score: 1

      It sounds like he's trying to market to hipsters.

    40. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except: 1. Microsoft doesn't want to kill Android because last I heard they were making truckloads of money from licensing agreements. 2. Exchange only matters in the enterprise sector when it comes to Exchange users. There are plenty of non-exchange enterprise users and there are plenty of non-enterprise users who don't care one bit about Exchange.

    41. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've noticed this too. People parrot the same lines and maintain orthodoxy with a fairly uniform set of viewpoints. Frickin sheep.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    42. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 1

      Sorry to insult your mother, but if it really took her too years to learn how to turn her computer on, she is retarded. My suspicion is that you are just talking smack about your mother in an attempt to make a point.

      Yes, not the full story to prove a point. No, she isn't retarded, just differently motivated.

      She isn't retarded. She is of the mindset that bragging and purposefully being ignorant of how computers work is a blessing and proof that she is "down to Earth". She feels anything implying intellectualism in a person is snobbish and a sign they have no lives. This includes doing any reading other than the newspaper.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    43. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Sebastopol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You illuminate an interesting subtext:

      I think the fact that you put "stability" at #1 means you've probably never owned an iPhone. I've had a 3GS since the week it came out and stability has never even crossed my mind: it just works. The only time I think about stability is when I'm playing Words with Friends and it crashes and vanishes.

      Stability shouldn't even be an issue. No one bought Bakelite phone in the 1960's based on stability: it was correct by construction _already_. I think iPhone nailed that. Of course, I've never owned an Android (used 'em plenty and don't mind 'em one bit), but I would expect "stability" to never enter my conscious thought with Android phones either.

      I just wish the bar was set higher so that absolutely no one would feel compelled to include "stability" on a list of important features.

      It's like saying, "I'm shopping for a car, and my #1 important feature is that it doesn't spontaneously burst into flames." We shouldn't have to even think about that.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    44. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's your loss then. You'd be losing out on applications like AirDroid or Remote Web Desktop or similar, which (probably) run an Apache server on your phone but offer a nice HTML based interface for secure remote access to your device.

    45. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by cizoozic · · Score: 1

      I think the bitching here is due to the popular choice usually being technologically inferior in some set of (rarely relevant to most users) specifications or benchmarks. Remember "No Wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame."?

    46. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Rhodri+Mawr · · Score: 1

      The only time I think about stability is when I'm playing Words with Friends and it crashes and vanishes.

      ...and gets you thrown off an American Airlines plane?

    47. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nokia needs to be a major challenger for its business model to work, and Microsoft is investing a lot of money in mobile and needs more than just one or two partners with niche products to generate a return.

      I think you've identified a very real reason why this whole partnership was a terrible idea: It requires one partner or the other (if not both) to get screwed. There is basically no chance of WP7 taking over the entire market. The best it can really hope for is to split the market three ways with Android and iOS, and even that seems extremely optimistic at this point. Windows Mobile, the discontinued product, is still outselling WP7, and those are the just-released latest numbers.

      What is Nokia supposed to do with only a small part of a small percentage of the market? Even the entire volume of WP7 sales is probably not enough to sustain them. And Microsoft can't even let them have that, because they'll never get their market share off the floor with only one vendor who, by necessity, will itself have to continue selling and marketing non-WP7 in the interim.

    48. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      iPhone and Android are ripe for played-out cultural saturation, just like Facebook.

      Right, that makes sense, I'm sure MySpace didn't fail because it was replaced by something better - surely it happened because people got tired of it. Same goes for BlackBerry. And Yahoo.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    49. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by wfolta · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the famous Yogi-ism: "No one goes there anymore. It's too crowded."

    50. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by hoggoth · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't bitch about Microsoft Windows because its popular (though it is), I bitch about it because it makes my days unending drudgery and pain.
      I know you will probably think I am drinking the Slashdot cool-aid, but I assure you 90% of the frustration in my day is caused by something Microsoft did.
      I also have Apple, Linux and Solaris machines and none of them give me the "WTF were they thinking?!" headaches that Windows does.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    51. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      While I agree somewhat, I'd also point out that "popular" does not mean good.

      Besides the whole Microsoft Windows argument, McDonald's hamburgers are the most popular. The most watched television series is still "Baywatch." And I believe the best selling beer in the world is Budweiser.

      Or, as I like to say, "Eat Shit: 10,000,000 flies can't be wrong."

    52. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mom has had sex. They sell Sex For Dummies books. Those two criteria right there are reason enough to never have sex.

      Dude, that's a horrible mental image - it's bad enough knowing that *my* mom had sex, but your mom did too!? That's disgusting!

      Your moms are lesbians? That's disgusting.

    53. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by N0Man74 · · Score: 2

      "Yes! We are all individuals!"

    54. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disagree, but then I'm not an Apple fanboi so I don't need to rationalize why people bitch about what I like.

    55. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Oh my... They've got Farmville for Dummies too...

    56. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a book store?

    57. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Zune's use Zune software and the devices were great. 120 Gb hard drive, unlike iTunes, it sees anythign you put into a watched folder. You don't need to play it once, or add the folder again.
      They didn't and still don't try to police what I have on my Zune.

      I wish you could all give your heads a shake and stop being such fanbois, technology is technology, they all use the same stuff, but they sure have you convinced their branding is better than the other guys branding.

      Find the stuff that works and support it, one thing I can say about windows is they sell you a tool to use, and don't care what you use it for. It is your device and you paid for the software.

      How much did your "upgrade" to Lion cost you? Service pack 1 for windows 7 was free.

    58. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I was explaining why I own an iPhone to someone who didn't see why people were interested in iPhones.

    59. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      I (somewhat deludedly, I admit) speak for at least two others when I say:

      I hate MS because of what they have done to me with DOS1.0 and ever since.

      I would probably hate Apple if they did the same to me, but since I can't afford their kit, they have not had a chance.

      I hate Oracle a whole lot more because they did me worse.

      My HTC Android phone seems to work fine now it has Cyanogen mod on it and not the carrier's software.

      In tests, Bing search results were quicker, but Google searches returned relevant information

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    60. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      the fact that you put "stability" at #1 means you've probably never owned an iPhone

      Id bet actual money he has never had a Windows Mobile anything either - it makes jello look stable. And no one who has ever touched a WinCE product would consider letting MS near his/her data ever angain.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    61. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Patch86 · · Score: 2

      Your Linux machine clearly does not run a recent version of Ubuntu then.

      / typed, for reason that frankly I'm somewhat unable to recall, from a machine running Unity.

    62. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Patch86 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That seems like a redundant title for a book to have...

    63. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      But maybe it's peer pressure. I've always been rather resistant to it, while my wife is at the other end of the spectrum.

      Wow, so not only are you a condescending asshole, but you're married and you think you're a whole lot better and smarter than your wife. You were quite the catch. I'm sure she's not experiencing any buyers remorse, for her iPhone, I mean.

    64. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Patch86 · · Score: 2

      Even the entire volume of WP7 sales is probably not enough to sustain them. And Microsoft can't even let them have that, because they'll never get their market share off the floor with only one vendor who, by necessity, will itself have to continue selling and marketing non-WP7 in the interim.

      Well to be fair, it is possible to have a good market share with only the one vendor. Apple is the only vendor or iOS products, and RIM the only vendor of BlackBerries. And if you had to pick a "one vendor" to bet your product's future on, you could do worse than Nokia- former title holder for #1 smartphone market share, and current title holder for #1 overall mobile phone market share.

      That said, I do actually agree with you.

    65. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the 3GS was the pinnacle of iPhone stability? From my observation, my partner's iPhone 4 is less stable than my Nexus S. Especially since getting iOS 5.

    66. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Except Zune's use Zune software and the devices were great."

      Oh, so you're the one.

    67. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Defenestrar · · Score: 1

      Marketing! They do have (or at least used to), the best commercial creators in the world.

    68. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by berzerke · · Score: 1

      It was not meant as condescending, merely as an observation. She didn't even consider one until 3 of her friends got one, then all of a sudden, she HAD to have one. There are numerous other examples.

    69. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by FrkyD · · Score: 1

      WinCe had to have been the most appropriate acronym for any product, ever.

    70. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Sounds a little like my mother, though different. She doesn't have the anti-intellectualism problem, but there's definitely some kind of different motivation going on, though I can't really explain it (I'd probably need to be a psychologist). She's in her early 70s (which has its own issues with technology, obviously), and she's bought several computers along the way, but done little to nothing with them, always having to go take some useless classes to supposedly learn how to use them, but then never actually coming home and putting that learning into practice. I think she likes buying things as it makes her feel good, but then actually using the things she buys is a totally different matter. It isn't like this for everything, though; she bought a cellphone (I don't think it's a smartphone) and uses that just fine; she also bought a GPS nav system for her car (TomTom I think), and from what I recall of our conversations, I think she's actually used it on her multi-state road trips to visit her family (I wasn't there personally to verify). But with computers, she never seems to get together the motivation to actually do much with them; she'll set up an email account, and then almost never check it, and then complain that I don't send her photos (she wants the paper kind), and when I offer to email her photos she complains she needs to wait for someone else to come help her with her email.

      Back in her working days, she was a perfectly good nurse, so she isn't retarded either, and I think I remember her saying she took a computer class once that involved making punch cards. A lot of it seems like good old-fashioned laziness to me, as when she's home she seems to like to spend all her time making quilts.

    71. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      I'm not.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    72. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by mosb1000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If this is the way you think about your wife, and talk about her, you should probably consider what effect that behavior may be having on your relationship.

      If someone does succumb easily to peer pressure, then that's a real issue that should be addressed. But buying an iPhone really doesn't qualify all on it's own, because it is actually a perfectly good phone, and iPhone users tend to make more of an effort to help their friends see all the good things an iPhone can do. I would know, I've encouraged many of my friends to buy them.

      It looks to me like rather than actually trying to understand why people would want an iPhone, you are simply saying that since you don't want one, the only reason that anyone else could want one is that they are influenced by peer pressure, while you are not. And regardless of how you think you meant it, being susceptible to peer pressure is not a good thing, so you are basically saying that you are better than iPhone users because they give in to peer pressure and you don't.

      Not only are you over-simplyfing, but you are making basically no effort to understand the alternative point of view. That's even more troubling, because the alternative point of view happens to belong to your wife.

    73. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by painandgreed · · Score: 3, Funny

      And the reason why people would by it is the same as why people buy the book "The mole who wanted to know who pooped on it's head"...

      To entertain small children?

    74. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by polymeris · · Score: 1

      If everyone wants something,...

      Don't know about "everyone" or even "the youth", but it is my impression that there is indeed a significant group of people who are fed up with the iPhone. Problem is, they don't like Android, blackberries, Meego, or W7, either. They all suffer from some subset of these severe problems: closedness, privacy/security issues, poor performance, poor build quality, poor battery life, being dead.

      All in all, I don't think any of the above systems has won the race. Even a completely new player still would have a chance in this market dominated by mediocre offerings.

    75. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a The Onion article about the latest video from bin Laden: "Where you have a dwindling number of targets to choose from, we have a wide variety!"

      --
      It's been a long time.
    76. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be self-published to include such a glaring, common grammar error in its title.

    77. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by breeze95 · · Score: 1

      If MS also licensed it to Apple, Android would be effectively locked out of the enterprise like it was back in the 1.5 and 1.6 days. This by itself would all but kill Android as a competing phone. Exchange support makes or breaks handsets. Even Apple came to Microsoft to get support in their devices.

      Does exchange support really make or break handsets? Why would Exchange support be a make or break situation for hand sets? Think about that for a moment. As far as I can tell most smart phones in use are not synch to an Exchange server. Most smart phone users didn’t get the smart phone because the phone can synch to an Exchange email server. Also, if Exchange support was so crucial and Android 1.5 and 1.6 didn’t support Exchange how do you explain the explosive growth of the Android platform under 1.5 and 1.6? No, Exchange support is not a make or break situation for 95% of consumers.

    78. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      They're looking for practical applications of their devices and Apple's doing a damn good job of attracting application developers.

      This is getting really tired. A friend and I had a face off recently Apple vs Android. He pulled out an App and I showed him the equivalent on Android, then we did the reverse, the only rules were no apps that required jailbreaking.

      Both app stores are HUGE. Both app stores have basically an app for everything. Hell both apps stores have games which are direct clones of each other with different graphics (how this isn't a legal issue I don't know).

      Although I do admit that I conceded defeat when he used Siri to send me a text message, and then I used Android voice commands to reply saying "Fuck off" and the stupid Android phone didn't recognise the swear word.

      Even when you jailbreak / root your way out of the walled garden and the .... picket fenced garden, both phones have apps that make them incredibly versatile.

    79. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      Nobody drives in New York, too much traffic...

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    80. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by amiga3D · · Score: 0

      Dude that's a great web video. Hot MILF lesbians!

    81. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      The same guys that buy the extra small trojans.

    82. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      You left out vibrators for dummies.

    83. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      You don't get it. Microsoft gets revenue for every android phone sold. I don't know why they even bother with that shitty Win7 phone. If they don't sell a damn phone they still get rich off of all the droid hardware. It's win-win-win.

    84. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      You mean the fix for that beta software that was Win7 was free? It should be, especially after they made a mint off of the Alpha version (Vista). Then sold a Beta (Win7) even MS couldn't get away with charging for a service pack to fix their fucked up code. I'll give you that lion isn't much of an upgrade, in fact I'll probably keep running SL until new stuff requires Lion or until the next version of OS X, but it's not a fix for beta software.

    85. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Oh man. That was painful. I laughed so hard I think I have a hernia now.

    86. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1

      >> youth are pretty much fed up with iPhones. Everyone
      >> [and their Grandma] has the iPhone," he said.

      *sigh* Fix it for you. In 2004/5(?) I was mobile phone browsing when the salesman rolled out the: "oooh! You want the Motorola Razor!" I laughed chidingly, and he was perplexed, I said: No way! Everybody and their Grandma has that phone, it's fad had escaped me. What do you have from Hong Kong, Taiwan?

      When you're in the midst of a fad it's hard to notice it, unless you are dispassionate. I was too busy with other things to even bother owning a cellphone, that when I was shown/used the !flat! FLAT! keypad I was left with pained nail beds, and thought, "WTF's the fuzz about?! This shiz's gotta be a fad." Within a couple of years I was proven right, the floor dropped off for "Hello Motto."

    87. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      >Windows Mobile, the discontinued product, is still outselling [reghardware.com] WP7, and those are the just-released latest numbers.

      That's the wrong way to look at the data. Those are marketshare numbers, not sales numbers.

      >What is Nokia supposed to do with only a small part of a small percentage of the market? Even the entire volume of WP7 sales is probably not enough to sustain them. And Microsoft can't even let them have that, because they'll never get their market share off the floor with only one vendor who, by necessity, will itself have to continue selling and marketing non-WP7 in the interim.

      Huh what? Nokia is betting on new smartphone buyers, not exactly other WP7 users(who are already in contracts).

      --
      This space for rent.
    88. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing about your comment is that Nokia is already selling the perfect niche player right now. It isn't built on WebOS however; I'd be astounded if anyone outside the US thinks WebOS has a future. Sadly, Meego etc only have a past.

    89. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by savuporo · · Score: 1

      I also have Apple, Linux and Solaris machines and none of them give me the "WTF were they thinking?!" headaches that Windows does.

      Seriously ? You must not be doing much with any of these machines then. The entire Unix heritage is just one big "wtf were they thinking?!". For an introductory course, and as a homage to the late mr. Ritchie himself, read unix haters handbook once, and try to understand what it is saying.

      I'm not here to praise Microsoft. I have used and programmed for probably more than 30 different operating systems in my life ( ever heard of V+ my friend ? ) . They all suck, when you get down to it. All the great OSes are the ones that never leave the labs - if they did, they would start to suck.

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    90. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      "Nobody goes there any more, it's too crowded." -Yogi Berra

      That's exactly what I was thinking!

    91. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      "Nobody goes there anymore, it's too crowded." - Yogi Berra.

      There is a small group of too-cool-for-school hipsters out there who disdain anything they deem mainstream and/or popular, so they're likely the ones who would complain about everyone having an iPhone. Hell, I read a few comments to that effect when the iPhone 3GS came out! As usual, they're the people to ignore IMO because they simply represent an outlier viewpoint.

      And these aren't exactly people who are going to then buy a Microsoft product.

    92. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      iPhone and Android are ripe for played-out cultural saturation, just like Facebook.

      Re: Facebook ... it doesn't seem like people are jumping on to the google plus wagon in huge numbers. Facebook (and I'm guessing Iphone and Android) are pretty safe for a while.

    93. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Archimboldo · · Score: 1

      I don't think, therefore I'm not. - Rene a la Carte.

    94. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by virtualonliner · · Score: 1

      I really don't want the option of being able to run Apache on my phone and being able to SSH into it so I could configure it right.

      But does it run Crysis?

    95. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by atamido · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of non-exchange enterprise users

      While there are plenty of non-Exchange mail servers, the number of non-Exchange mailbox servers in enterprise environments (>1000 users) is pretty small. The closest I can think of are universities using hosted mail solutions like Google Apps, but I still wouldn't call that "enterprise".

      The truth is that Exchange does far more than just email, and it's those USEFUL extra features that make just about every enterprise use Exchange + Outlook. I've even seen organizations split off less important users to a simple email only system, but they still run Exchange for a major chunk of the employees, and that setup is rare.

    96. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by ggeens · · Score: 2

      While there are plenty of non-Exchange mail servers, the number of non-Exchange mailbox servers in enterprise environments (>1000 users) is pretty small.

      Don't forget Lotus Notes. IBM has some very large accounts using that.

      OTOH, Groupwise is on the way out.

      --
      WWTTD?
    97. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sex for Dummies"? It's not like we don't have enough already. Why encourage them to reproduce?

    98. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by greggman · · Score: 1

      My iPhone 3GS crashed all the time. It crashed while browsing the net. It crashed while trying to answer a phone call. It locked while trying to dial a phone number while driving down the freeway requiring holding the power button for 5 seconds to force a shutdown and reboot. So much for not being distracted while driving. It would randomly disable all downloaded apps until I downloaded 1 new one again. Since that time I've had a Nexus One and a Nexus-S. They are every bit as crappy as my iPhone 3GS was. I haven't owned a smart phone that's stable.

      I too wish the bar was set higher.

    99. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by pionzypher · · Score: 1

      I've noticed this too! Parrots people the same lines and maintain orthodoxy with a fairly uniformed set of viewpoints. Frickin parrots.

      --
      I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
    100. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by atamido · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Lotus Notes. IBM has some very large accounts using that.

      OTOH, Groupwise is on the way out.

      Yeah, IBM has some legacy customers, and a few whose C-level folks got a little too tipsy with an IBM sales person. I don't think I've met a single person in the past decade forced to use it that hasn't loathed it.

      I really wish there were a real competitor to Exchange, but MS is just so far ahead of the pack on this that it's ridiculous.

    101. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      iPhone users tend to make more of an effort to help their friends see all the good things an iPhone can do

      In my experience it is more like justifying their purchase to themselves. When I show them an app or feature on my phone that they can't get it's always "but I don't want it" followed by "but it can do this!" I'm not playing smartphone Top Trumps, I'm just explaining why I didn't get an iPhone in the hope that you will shut up about it.

      It looks to me like rather than actually trying to understand why people would want an iPhone, you are simply saying that since you don't want one, the only reason that anyone else could want one is that they are influenced by peer pressure, while you are not.

      Works both ways. Some iPhone owners can't understand why anyone wouldn't want one, unless it is because they hate Apple. I don't think any other purchasing decision makes people so defensive.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    102. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It looks like the niche player, whatever it ends up being, will be built around WebOS. It has open source cachet

      That only matters to geeks, and besides, plenty of people who deride Microsoft for being proprietary have been happy to use iOS.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    103. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by t_ban · · Score: 1

      Personally, I've played with my wife's iphone

      That's the problem with you geek types. You see, all you can think of playing with is your wife's iPhone. And then you complain about not getting it enough!!!

      --
      First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win. -Gandhi
    104. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows phone seems to be 100 % compatible with your windows computer and so, this fact ADD a lot of value compare to the competition.

      The work I do, I want to share it with all my devices. My computer at home, at work and the one inside my phone.

      Unfortunately, the real integration will only be available with Windows 8, so Nokia should had only develop that beta branch and keep going with the "google"/spyware crap Android is.

    105. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      It did. I went back and reinstalled an older version. Same with the latest Linux Mint.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    106. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by guttentag · · Score: 1

      ...it's a fun book and you just might learn something.

      Telling the slashdot crowd they might learn something from a "fun" book about sex is a little like telling Charlie Bucket he should press his face against the glass window of a candy shop because he might learn something about how much fun the rest of the world has enjoying something he will probably never have have. Unless he fishes around in the gutter and gets lucky. But that's just pure fantasy... it's like something Roald Dahl would write!

    107. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by jbolden · · Score: 1

      There are a large number of people who get their phones from their enterprise. Obviously enterprise features matter to them. Further many of the higher net worth people who were buying smart phones when they were only about 10% of the market consider exchange support a must have. During those days Android not having the feature was a break feature.

      Now that isn't 95% of the market, nor is it 5% of the market. It is somewhere in between.

    108. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      It makes me wonder, who could be so mentally challenged to need an iPhone for Dummies book. I would not personally buy an iPhone, but I will admit that they are extremely easy to use...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    109. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      In my experience it is more like justifying their purchase to themselves.

      The iPhone is equivalently priced to other phones, and there is no important feature that it's missing. I makes no sense at all that they'd need to justify their purchase in such a way.

      I don't think any other purchasing decision makes people so defensive.

      And yet here you are basically claiming that many iPhone users are suffering from a form Stockholm syndrome. I think maybe you're the defensive one.

    110. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by The+Man · · Score: 1

      It looks like the niche player, whatever it ends up being, will be built around WebOS. It has open source cachet

      That only matters to geeks, and besides, plenty of people who deride Microsoft for being proprietary have been happy to use iOS.

      Please don't truncate my sentences when you quote them. If you had preserved the whole thing, it would be obvious that I offered three positives about webOS, only one of which is that it is open source. And we are talking about niche products here, so having a couple of attributes each of which is interesting to a tiny slice of the possible customer universe is EXACTLY what matters. I never claimed that webOS would take over the mobile device world because it's open source. Perhaps I need to spell it out for you since you're probably accustomed to reading wild, unsubstantiated claims in unintelligible rants written by 14-year-olds: WebOS has a few attributes that may help it occupy one or two small niches in the mobile device space that iOS and Android cannot or will not fill effectively. That gives it a very limited future that may nevertheless constitute commercial viability for a few small players. ... Based on that landscape, I do not see Windows Phone being successful for Microsoft or its partners, including Nokia, since they need WinPho to be a major competitor and it does not even seem that it would be viable as a niche offering.

      Does that help any or do I need to use shorter words?

    111. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd look less an idiot if you knew what you were talking about.
      Unlocked Nokia N9000? $650
      Unlocked iPhone 4s? $599.00
      'tard.

    112. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The iPhone is equivalently priced to other phones, and there is no important feature that it's missing. I makes no sense at all that they'd need to justify their purchase in such a way.

      You don't understand how it works. It has nothing to do with the relative cost compared to other phones, only the absolute cost to the individual.

      And yet here you are basically claiming that many iPhone users are suffering from a form Stockholm syndrome.

      No, you misunderstood. Try again.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    113. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by breeze95 · · Score: 1

      There are a large number of people who get their phones from their enterprise. Obviously enterprise features matter to them. Further many of the higher net worth people who were buying smart phones when they were only about 10% of the market consider exchange support a must have. During those days Android not having the feature was a break feature.

      Now that isn't 95% of the market, nor is it 5% of the market. It is somewhere in between.

      Yes, you may be right that enterprise market is larger than 5%. However, a phone can be successful without support from the enterprise market. Just look at the Androids phones pre 2.0.

    114. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by jbolden · · Score: 1

      No question. The iPhone as well. Prior to about 18 months ago the 80+% of the enterprise market in smartphones was Blackberry. They still probably have 40+% of the enterprise market even with their marketshare falling off a cliff. Apple and Android still lack vital enterprise features. I did an enterprise purchase about 2 years ago, and I gotta tell you they are missing stuff which I would have considered extremely important. I might have been able to get around it, but I'd love a much better Blackberry for an enterprise phone (and I use an iPhone for home).

    115. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Maritz · · Score: 1

      if it really took her too years to learn how to turn her computer on, she is retarded.

      Two easy... ;)

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    116. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Maybe she was just uninterested in the hype but was impressed when she saw them in the flesh. Seems reasonable enough to me. I wanted an iPhone initially, but was put off by the hype and by Apple's unbelievably smug marketing. Each to their own I suppose.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    117. Re:Nobody does that because everyone does that by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you got me, but I bet I can learn to spell two in less than two years. ;)

  16. If you by MemoryDragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    want your kid to be beaten up by the school bully, then give him a nokia windows mobile 7 phone.

    1. Re:If you by gorzek · · Score: 1

      Even Blackberries are cooler than Windows phones.

    2. Re:If you by toutankh · · Score: 1

      At least the school bully won't steal his phone.

    3. Re:If you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they would never get mugged.

  17. The Young People by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    Obviously want a "sick" symbian phone with built in apps for managing their "epic" cassette tape collections. This is common knowledge.

  18. LMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm crying. ='D

    Thanks for the comedy break, Slashdot.

  19. Bad headline by NadNad · · Score: 1

    It suggests that the company executive's statement about iPhone and Android consumer opinion is a known premise upon which he predicts Nokia will build. But that consumer opinion *itself* is (according to the article) the novel reported idea and this same exec's opnion too. He's not just filling a niche, but claiming the niche even exists.

    1. Re:Bad headline by symbolset · · Score: 1

      It is a distraction. "Do not look at Andy Lees".

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:Bad headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh?

      In the English-speaking world, "$PERSON: Some random statement, as though of fact" means precisely that $PERSON made some comments that can be accurately paraphrased as the random statement -- not that we should trust them. I suspect very few people inferred that rubbish you say it suggests.

  20. As a certified "young person"... by HopefulIntern · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a "young person", I do not see how anyone can claim Android is "baffling"... to begin with it was more of an engineer/dev/nerd phone but it quickly changed and now IIRC is the most popular phone OS. My facebook news feed often contains complaints or questions about "why is my iphone xxx" but not once have I seen any of them asking for help with a droid.

    1. Re:As a certified "young person"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      They would have complained but they couldn't figure out how to post using their droid ;-)

    2. Re:As a certified "young person"... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 0

      That could just as well be because no one worth mentioning has an Android phone.

    3. Re:As a certified "young person"... by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Funny

      They did try - they sent you a text message, but it went to the wrong person.

    4. Re:As a certified "young person"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did try - they sent you a text message, but it went to the wrong person.

      I haven't heard of Android having that problem...but I have heard of an iOS defect that causes text messages to go out to a larger group of your contacts rather than the intended individual.

    5. Re:As a certified "young person"... by Ex+Machina · · Score: 1

      ... because they can't figure out how to post to Facebook with a Droid, obviously!

    6. Re:As a certified "young person"... by schlachter · · Score: 1

      Your friends usually stream complains and questions to your facebook new feed? That's annoying.
      BTW...maybe it's because all your friends have iPhones?

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    7. Re:As a certified "young person"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. My 4 year old son can unlock my droid and play the games he likes without any assistance. So I'd say it's not baffling. Maybe I should make a stronger password though.

    8. Re:As a certified "young person"... by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      I don't think so, it seems pretty evenly split AFAIK. Mind, most of the iPhone complaints seem to come from one very vocal girl who has, from what I remember, worked her way through three iphones before giving up on them. I dont know if this is just from neglectful use or if they are badly built, I have never owned one.

    9. Re:As a certified "young person"... by rbraunm · · Score: 1

      That error made for some interesting conversations for quite some time. Thank god it's finally fixed (though I did have to install Cyanogen to get the newest release of Android...)

  21. I hear young people have soured on sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead they'll be spending more time with aging babyboomers to acquire their accumulated wisdom.

  22. Imma go with "delusional" by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't speak for really young people, but the 20-35 crowd with whom I work love their Androids.

    They tend to see the iPhone as a bit more "stuffy", but that distinction may have more to do with company policies regarding who gets what, than with any actual differences between the devices themselves. But "Baffling"? C'mon, you just slide through the screens to the one you want, and tap when you get there.

    Now, if you want to ask if the business world will get all hot over a device they can lock down via domain policies - I'd at least give that one a 50/50 (with the "not" 50% swearing like a sailor at the horror of having any mobile device trusted on their domain). But the actual users? Yeah, I'll have to go with the Nokia execs as "delusional" on this one.

    1. Re:Imma go with "delusional" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bingo. I've yet to meet anyone who has used Android and prefers another operating system. My technologically illiterate sister got a Droid Incredible on release, back with Android 2.1 or 2.2 (nowhere near as polished as it is now), figured it out completely on her own, and loves it.

      Nokia doesn't know what they're talking about.

    2. Re:Imma go with "delusional" by m50d · · Score: 1

      I seriously preferred windows mobile as an OS. It was much easier to port obscure windows programs I used over to it, compared to android. If a good modern phone comes out running windows mobile that has as good integration with google/facebook/et al as my android (which may well never happen, MS being MS), I'll be switching.

      --
      I am trolling
    3. Re:Imma go with "delusional" by revlayle · · Score: 1

      My wife didn't like Android, she'd rather iOS (which she has now), but if that is what she likes to use... so be it

    4. Re:Imma go with "delusional" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first truly demonstratable "malware" for iOS managed to get the security researcher banned. That being said, why is that Android is has become the target of choice for malware? Maybe ... just maybe... because it is open and there are no real controls on the market place.

      Android as an OS is taking the lion's share of the market simply because it is available to more than one phone manufacturer. Apple, however, still sells the lion's share of devices by manufacturer.

      Windows 7+ may have a shot...I like what I have seen in the OS. Will I develop for for it? Not until I see it making its way into the consumer and/or business market in a way other than a passing fad.

      I see Apple and Microsoft/Nokia making their devices suitable for the enterprise. Still, it's hard to get them added to most corporate networks. Android in the enterprise? For the time being...Not on your life...it's too danged easy to compromise.

  23. We will sell more than you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We will sell more than you,
    we know we will
    And we'll pretend our ships not sinking....
    And we will tell ourselves 'we'll take over you'
    cause WE ARE THE KINGS OF WISHFUL THINKING

    lalalallalalalalalalallalalalalalalalalalalalalalalallala

  24. WP7 sales suck everywhere. by scorp1us · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not like Nokia phones are going to be any different from other vendors' WP7 phones, despite the privileged position Nokia has. Their real chance to be different was with the N9, and by all accounts the phone is a success in the markets it was launched in. People love it -- if they can get it. Carrier subsidizing is the only "feature" that is missing. But good news Newegg now carries it! ($630) so no dealing with shady importers.

    I hate my Android, but I'll likely go back to iPhone, unless I swing the N9 for xmas. Yeah, I'm not even a year into the Atrix and I'm looking to spend another $630 because Android is crap. I prefer a "walled garden" to an open field of shit. I'm only waiting to see how the iPhone 5 changes things.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:WP7 sales suck everywhere. by hellkyng · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I'm only waiting to see how the iPhone 5 changes things."

      Then you don't have to worry, I am sure it will change everything.

    2. Re:WP7 sales suck everywhere. by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      If apple adds NFC then people will start using NFC. One thing that is making me hold on to the Android that I have is the screen size.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    3. Re:WP7 sales suck everywhere. by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      But...but...but it has square corners!

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    4. Re:WP7 sales suck everywhere. by jjsimp · · Score: 1

      That's the one negative with android. Motoblur, touchwiz, etc. Yes, you can add other launchers on the phone, but that bloat is still there. I downgraded to the Atrix when my Nexus 1 broke. Yes I can get buy with the atrix, but would gladly give it away for a pure Vanilla android experience again.

  25. I agree! by loftwyr · · Score: 5, Funny

    I showed my Android phone to my 2 year old and within minutes she was fed up. To her, all those icons and such were baffling. But then I showed her a windows 7 phone and she ate it up! It spent far more time in her mouth than any other phone in the house!

    1. Re:I agree! by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 0

      Don't know if you are being serious (my sarcasm filter not working today), I have not yet seen an infant or toddler in existence that is not amazed at something which lights up and has many buttons, physical or virtual. My niece, nephew and a all my friends children absolutely love any iDevice or phone they can get their hands on. They don't care what is going on, but if they press the screen and something happens they will be engaged for hours.

      I would probably send my child to a doctor if they grow disinterested in the visual stimulus of a phone or tablet device after only a few minutes, it is not normal.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    2. Re:I agree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, my cat plays iPad games.

    3. Re:I agree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      OMG you are the Nokia Exec FTFA and didn't understand that the youth were being sarcastic... This explains everything

    4. Re:I agree! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well said.
      His post was clearly serious.
      Obviously, he needed your guidance
      Once again, thank you.
      Sincerely,
      Herbert.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  26. HELLO NOKIA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    NOKIA cant make a QUAD BAND DUAL SIM PHONE! I am forced to buy a LG or a SAMSUNG. Wake up NOKIA

  27. Exacty wrong by obarthelemy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know why older people have this misconception that young people are more iconoclastic than older ones. Just because the Young do not have the same icons as the old I guess. Teens and young adults are gregarious and sensitive to peer pressure to an extreme, more than more mature people.
    If Nokia counts on many Young having it as an argument against the iPhone, I wish them good luck. They could try "your moms and dads have them too", but since moms and dads still mostly have Nokias, at least in Europe, that doesn't sound too smart either.
    Sounds like clutching at straws to me.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re:Exacty wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever been to Orange County? I think Audis are in style now. BMWs are so yesteryear.

  28. Wrong! by wfs2mail.com · · Score: 2

    Actually, soured by the BS from companys like Nokia and HP.

    "We're releasing this product in a few months"
    "No, wait, next year"
    "Oh, never mind. We're changing directions"
    "Oops, changed out mind again..."

    A year or two goes by and then they release a piece of garbage without half the promised features. They tease and tease with carrots, but in the end deliver an overpriced rutabega. I have my issues w/ both iphone and android, but the alternatives offered are garbage.

  29. And I can see why by Lucas123 · · Score: 1

    All that texting, hi-res photo taking, streaming video, game playing, global positioning information, realtime video chat on top of being able to have a telephone conversation from anywhere would certainly leave fed up. How much longer do I have to wait for teleportation!

  30. Oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative
    1. Re:Oh really? by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      We *know* what they are smoking.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    2. Re:Oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quoting the article so you understand why this might get a downmod:

      Of course, those numbers don't reflect actual sales numbers and it only compares Nokia's Windows Phone handset to others running the same OS, but still shows strong interest in what Nokia-made phones running Microsoft's mobile OS.

  31. Fed up with the lawsuits, not the phones. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Every other day I'm hearing about smartphone makers suing each other, that's what I'm fed up with.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:Fed up with the lawsuits, not the phones. by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 0

      Why? How does it affect you personally that one phone maker is suing another? Worry about stuff you have any stake in, not what is going on with billion dollar companies.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    2. Re:Fed up with the lawsuits, not the phones. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because if companies would stop being childish and suing each other, improving their product instead of throwing lawyers around, I might have a better phone in my pocket.
      And that does effect me personally.

      --
      What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    3. Re:Fed up with the lawsuits, not the phones. by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      1) price.
      2) product delays
      3) advancement is delayed
      4) courts are tied up for stupid bickering
      5) industrial waste as delayed devices don't end up sold
      6) stupid lawyers pocketing cash that should go toward new fabs

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Fed up with the lawsuits, not the phones. by sootman · · Score: 1

      "When elephants dance, the grass gets trampled."

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    5. Re:Fed up with the lawsuits, not the phones. by nightfell · · Score: 1

      And if everyone can just come along and copy your R&D, and companies become ever weary about spending millions upon millions knowing some cheap Chinese clone company will just produce crap copies, how do you think *that's* going to effect you?

      The lawsuits really have very little negative impact on the end user. Companies pay licenses for using the property and ideas of others. That's fair. They pay for the chips they buy and the metal and plastic, etc. What's wrong with paying for the ideas? (not that I'm saying patents don't need reformation, but the basic idea is valid)

      Samsung can make tablets, but they shouldn't look almost exactly like iPads. HTC can make phones, but they will have to license some of the features invented by others. MS can make a phone OS by making it almost completely unlike anything anyone else has on the market. Apple can make phone hardware, but they have to license the industry standard radio technology.

      If instead of looking at these lawsuits as anticompetitive war tactics, look at them as the proper means of companies resolving disputes, because that's exactly what it is. First you negotiate, but if both sides can't agree, you ask a disinterested and trustworthy third party to solve the issue.

      This sounds ideal. How would you do it differently? Somehow remove disputes and differing opinions from the world? Good luck with that!

  32. same old crap by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    seriously, was he around nokia stuff _last_ decade?

    puffing up the music portfolio. well, that's something they've been trying for almost a decade.

    and some other stuff as well.
    “We would prefer a wireless transfer than a docking station," said Munksgaard. "A docking station has limitations because the phone has to be in a certain place. We are extremely pleased with the experience you get with the device in connection with Nokia gear. We don’t have a docking station at this point, however we are confident that as the Windows Phone ecosystem grows, third party docking station makers will support us.”

    well fuck nokia, pc suite on 3650 allowed me to install packages wirelessly from the pc, installation options and all. then you started taking things away one by one.

    read my typing: wp8 will have a task history/switch view just like android, symbian and ios. because otherwise it's going to continue sucking more than series40.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  33. Re:Android vs iphone vs windows phone wars 3,2,1.. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2

    at this point, it's Android and iPhone fanboys versus stupid Nokia exec.

    I think that trying to find a consensus amongst youth is stupid and foolish. Just because a group of youth take to something doesn't mean that this is what the young do or are into.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  34. BEEEEEEP WAHUNG WAHUNG SCSSHHHHHHHHH by drainbramage · · Score: 1

    I think that was a song on The Jetsons.
    What a fine boot sound for my Android!
    Move over Communicator sound effect.

    --
    No brain, no pain.
    1. Re:BEEEEEEP WAHUNG WAHUNG SCSSHHHHHHHHH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eep opp ork AHH-ah!

  35. Don't just fish for hits. by Haxagon · · Score: 1

    This is not news, execs do this every other second. Flamewars are the last thing /. needs.

  36. I think Nokia missed the boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's really missing the marketplace is a Linux console phone. All this graphics nonsense is just slowing people down. And what could be better than the feeling of compiling a kernel in your pocket?

    1. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, they screwed up trying to follow up the N900 with the N9, while giving the promising N950 only to a few devels, and so far killing the future for those great portable computers with phone functionality.

      And all android phones have a linux console, just in case you would want to compile a kernel.

    2. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually do compile stuff on my Android phone (with Debian ARM installed on it).

      I think we really do need a native Android-like device though. Java fscking sucks, especially the performance compared to iPhone or other native phones.

    3. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by SpzToid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My N9 arrived from Switzerland and I think it is just freaking beautiful, and Microsoft really did a number on Nokia to muzzle this thing. Like:

      The main website for the N9 is http://swipe.nokia.com/ Okay, so you're saying 'swipe, yeah I've heard of that. so what?' Man, if only Microsoft wasn't paying Nokia so hard to put a muzzle on it. Check out the videos at the bottom of that page, particularly the 2nd thumbnail'd from the left, at the very bottom. Dig on the one-handed swipe GUI. So now maybe you're thinking, 'well okay, if the one-handed GUI carries over through out the rest of the OS maybe...'

      Okay, to do that, you have to wait for the Over the Air update (or use another way) to install the PR1.1, i.e. the first service pack for the OS since the phone was released. Then 'swipe' is fully installed, and you can also access control-keys, up/down arrows, etc. And it is freaking awesome! And being a linux guy of course I installed the devel extras which gets me the busybox terminal, and oh man what a gorgeous phone/client.

      Today I was playing with the calendar and daily alarms; gorgeous! The included browser is fast and I'm a web-dev and really appreciate the perspective it brings to understanding modern mobile html5/touch browsers (that pops-up .flv videos in the media player but now .swf files).

      I am certain Microsoft paid Nokia to *bury* the one-handed swipe GUI so deep as to obfuscate it completely. But I also think the Good Work of the Nokia linux team refuses to be buried so. At any rate, I give the N9 the coolest, most-positive thumbs-up review. And it does linux. (Oh, and who needs a million apps if I can bash script & ssh all over the place?)

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    4. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by Animats · · Score: 1

      What's really missing (in) the marketplace is a Linux console phone.

      That's been done for OpenMoko. Someone demonstrated that from the command line, you could send AT commands to the modem in the phone and dial the phone.

    5. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by SpzToid · · Score: 3, Informative

      To better clarify my earlier post, and what I mean about having to add the swipe keyboard yourself (thanks Microsoft!) check out this blog post: http://everythingn9.com/advanced-keyboard-functions-nokia-n9. Having done so, this OS really can be used one-handed if so desired, with minimal strain if any (once practiced).

      If only the kids were paying attention to these developments.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    6. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a kernel compiling in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

    7. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by gmuslera · · Score: 2

      The N9 is a great phone, smartphone even, with far better hardware specs than the N900 and with an impressive screen. But the N900 is more a pocket computer than a phone. That is the boat that Nokia missed.

    8. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      Absolutely! Why did they abandon their Linux/QT development ship and Go Windows? Talk about terrible, terrible management. I couldn't agree with you more, and love my N900 so much I wanted to make certain to buy the last o' the Nokia linux phones (new) while I still could. For one thing, I know a flash media trick using the N900 I dare not publicize over the slashdots, which endear it to me so. And I'm still uncertain I can replicate this particular feat using the N9, but suspect an N9 UPnP work-around may be possible given further time and effort.

      A big reason I bought the Heavy Duty (gorgeous) Solid Plastic N9 w/ Gorrila Glass is so I could keep the N900 (relatively) at home so it lasts forever as the wonderful client device that it is. I have not (yet) been able to fully encrypt the N900 as I do on all my other linux note/net-books

      I am impressed by this series of N9 documents which encourages me to go mobile with It: http://conversations.nokia.com/2011/07/21/securing-the-nokia-n9

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    9. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^]:%dial

    10. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      And what could be better than the feeling of compiling a kernel in your pocket?

      I figured you were just happy to see me.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    11. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Yes they paid Nokia, it is a well known fact that Microsoft paid Nokia 2 billion dollars for using WP7, I guess the contract also must have had a bury Meego clause in it.
      And yes the N9 is one of the best smartphones in existence, thats why pretty much everyone in europe is pissed that Nokia upfront buried that phone.

    12. Re:I think Nokia missed the boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arm... Open moko...
      I had SSH connection to it over 3 years ago for sure, prolly more.

  37. What's that? by Severus+Snape · · Score: 1

    An Exec says his company's product is better than the competitors? More on this shocking story at 11.

  38. He might not speak for everyone but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one identified with his words. I'm a software developer, but I have much more interest in a beagle board than an iPhone. I'm confident that I wouldn't be confused by Android, but that doesn't make me want to upgrade from my basic cheap phone.

  39. Remember: by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Informative

    The plural of anecdote is data.

    Now go ask a thousand other parents what their teenagers want and check back here after you do. I think you'll find iStuff to be consistently high up on the list.

    BTW your "industry insider" is more commonly known as a shill. He is selling a product. He - of course - isn't going to say "well our product isn't as good as Apple". He is going to say something positive about his product and negative about the competition. That's his job.

    Find a neutral third party with a purely objective viewpoint and you'll have an "industry insider" worth listening to.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Remember: by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The plural of anecdote is NOT data. Data implies a controlled set of information that can be plotted against a single (or at least a few known) variables. An anecdote has no control of its variance, which makes it impossible to compare to other randomly collected anecdotes.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    2. Re:Remember: by jo_ham · · Score: 1, Troll

      Of course, if he'd have said "Guess that's why my teenagers wanted Android phones" he would have been modded up to +5 insightful and lauded with praise.

      Because he said something even slightly positive about Apple, even in an obtuse and indirect manner, he's "a moron" with "nothing to say or contribute".

    3. Re:Remember: by patch5 · · Score: 1

      He had nothing to say and nothing to contribute

      Oh, what sweet irony.

    4. Re:Remember: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He may actually have a point. I stopped and looked around my office. Nobody under the age of 35 has an iphone. Not one. I could probably push it back to 30, because I'm not aware of anybody under 30 with an iphone. I look at my group of friends, out of people under 35, one of them has an iphone. Beyond that, one friend recently dropped his iphone for a droid, and another co-worker just dropped her iphone. Almost everybody who could be considered "youth" have android phones. Mostly only the older crowd has iphones in the circles I associate with. I'm not going to say my limited sample size is representative of the whole, but still, it does include several hundred people I'm not related to. And if older people are buying iphones, with the rebellious nature of teenagers, they aren't going to want the phone their parents use.

    5. Re:Remember: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, if he'd have said "Guess that's why my teenagers wanted Android phones" he would have been modded up to +5 insightful and lauded with praise.

      Because he said something even slightly positive about Apple, even in an obtuse and indirect manner, he's "a moron" with "nothing to say or contribute".

      Mod parent down - obvious iPhone user.

    6. Re:Remember: by dskzero · · Score: 1

      The plural of anecdote is data.

      Are you serious? I understand you're trying to sound edgy and using powerful words is cool, but you have to agree this is blatantly wrong.

      In another news, youngsters are actually drifting away from the iPhones towards Android. Nothing to do with quality, of course, but Android is more of a buzz word nowadays.

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
    7. Re:Remember: by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      False. Controls are only required where there is a specific subset of the population you wish to analyse. When you're trying to analyse an entire population your only control is that there are no controls. This is definitely data.

      If we asked everyone what their kid wanted for Christmas and the answer is iPhones, then that is data. If we asked everyone on slashdot, then the result is still data except rather than specifying controls we simply specify the shortcomings of the data and replace "everyone" with "slashdot users".

    8. Re:Remember: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The plural of anecdote is data.

      The plural of anecdote is anecdotes. We stole the word fair and squire, so we can use English rules to make it a plural.

    9. Re:Remember: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Data is the plural form of datum.

    10. Re:Remember: by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      And the way to analyze an entire population is in two ways: you either measure the entire population, or you create a subset of the population that is representative of the entire population - i.e., you create a controlled subgroup. And by the way, creating a well-randomized subgroup is hard work. If you don't, you have lots of anecdotes and no data.

      If we asked everyone what their kid wanted for Christmas and the answer is iPhones, then that is data.

      The only data set you have is the one of what kids want for Christmas. And you better make sure you ask either every kid known, create a sufficiently large random sample that subsequent samplings will not change the outcome much, or you create well-defined subgroup that you hope provides interesting information. If you don't, you merely have a large set of anecdotes.

      If we asked everyone on slashdot, then the result is still data except rather than specifying controls we simply specify the shortcomings of the data and replace "everyone" with "slashdot users".

      Assuming, of course, that you actually ask ALL slashdot users - or again, a nicely randomized subset thereof. Do you know why the slashdot poll comes with the caveat "if you do anything serious with it, you're crazy"? It's not just because it's trivial to game the poll. It's also because the people who created the poll understand the difference between data and anecdotes.

      TLDR: your simple examples paper over the details that are the difference between a well-crafted study that yields data, and a bunch of anecdotes that come with the warning "if you do anything serious with this, you're crazy".

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    11. Re:Remember: by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      I had a nice long post written, but Slashdot ate it. So I'll leave it with a challenge and the TLDR version.

      TLDR: your examples ignore and paper over the complexities that are the difference between a study that yields useful data and one that comes with the caveat "if you're doing anything serious with this, you're crazy".

      Challenge: take your study examples to any research group, and see what they say.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  40. Snorting fumes in the fab by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think this guy's be hanging out in a wafer fab snorting fumes.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    1. Re:Snorting fumes in the fab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guys problem is he's never even seen a wafer lab.

  41. Even *I* bought an iPhone... by tekrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And I liked my Palm Pilot so much, I bought a Treo. However, the Treo was a terrible phone, I had to spend extra and buy it on eBay because the 680 wasn't supported by t-Mobile and for years I lived with it. Then, finally I started phone shopping.

    A friend lent me his Nokia 900 and I found it to be un-useable. It interpreted *everything* as me wanting to use the device, including putting it back into a belt-holster... So it would start playing videos in my pocket, and when I wanted to really use it to make a phone call, the battery was dead.

    I didn't like the iPhone's on-screen keyboard, but, when the iPhone4 came out, it finally supported a bluetooth keyboard. So, I bought the iPhone & keyboard. When I'm away from the keyboard, I've learned to live with the onscreen keyboard.

    For the last year and 2 months now, it's been OK. I haven't wanted to run my phone over with my car, something I've wanted to do to both the Treo and the Nokia. Sure, it doesn't do everything, but, I have to admit it's better than what I was getting previously. The keyboard has made taking notes and writing emails very easy, making the phone a 60% desktop replacement.

    It's a fairly good PDA, and even with AT&T service, it's been a use-able phone. All it has to do is not suck entirely, which tends to be what the other products do.

    Considered that kids want what the other kids have, my guess is that this quote from Nokia that kids want a Windows Phone is rubbish. Kids want an iPhone. Apple is already on track to be the biggest phone-maker in the world.

    Nokia, RIM, Samsung, and Sony do not have a chance unless they undertake some serious R&D and make something equally revolutionary. And somehow "revolutionary" isn't a word *anyone* associates with Microsoft. Windows phone ain't it, any more than GEOS phone. WebOS could have been it, but Palm and the HP both screwed that pooch.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Even *I* bought an iPhone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So what you just said is this:

      I used terrible phones that weren't in any way mainstream and had operating systems in no way related to Android at all (PalmOS on a Treo and Maemo 5 on the N900). Then I got an iPhone and haven't hated it too much.

      I now make completely unjustified and unsubstantiated claims about all kids wanting Apple products and how they're on track to be the biggest phone maker in the world, which means I've been blind to Android crushing iDevices in the last year or two and any studies with numbers.

      Conclusion: All the Android manufacturers in the world "do not have a chance unless they undertake some serious R&D and make something equally revolutionary" which means I clearly haven't seen the billions of Samsung Galaxy S II ads and reviews floating around over the last half-year. Apparently I've poked at a TouchPad in a store somewhere or from a friend, and WebOS seemed of passing interest - but Android products clearly don't matter because I've decided to neglect them.

      You didn't even think to post this load of crap AC? Man I hope you never get any karma, because you have exactly no idea what you're talking about but sure love talking about it.

    2. Re:Even *I* bought an iPhone... by tekrat · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, as if I've never had any friends who also might have tried and hated Android. Yes, you're so right, I'm a completely clueless Apple Fanboi, who decided after no research whatsoever that iOS was the way to go.

      Dude seriously, I see that *you* posted as anonymous coward. I guess you don't have the Karma to Burn that I do.

      Seriously, Treo wasn't "mainstream"? Between the Treo and the Handspring they were the first "smartphones" ever! I suppose you also consider Blackberry to be a "niche" phone?

      Don't get me wrong. Android is OK. But it has to make some serious strides (and figure out how to remain open while avoiding the tons of malware that are out there already), in order to really become great. And early Android phones were terrible. Trust me on that one.

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    3. Re:Even *I* bought an iPhone... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Just to provide counterpoint, my opinion is precisely the opposite of yours. iPhones are only OK. Androids (most of the ones I've tried, anyway) are Great. That Android sucked in the beginning is irrelevant (the first iPhone sucked, too). It's now that counts.

    4. Re:Even *I* bought an iPhone... by nightfell · · Score: 1

      You didn't even think to post this load of crap AC? Man I hope you never get any karma, because you have exactly no idea what you're talking about but sure love talking about it.

      It's funny you should mention that if someone is going to post a bunch of shit, they should do so as an AC, AC...

      Anyway, all he did was gave his opinion. Why so offended?

    5. Re:Even *I* bought an iPhone... by nightfell · · Score: 1

      Just to provide counterpoint, my opinion is precisely the opposite of yours.

      That's not how it works. It's fine that you are sharing your opinion, and I'm definitely not going to say it's wrong, but opinions aren't supposed to balance each other out.

      If you look at market numbers, every metric that deals with what people like, prefer, or are satisfied with, iOS beats Android handily. And just to be clear, that in no way invalidates your opinion, plenty of people prefer Android. It's no slouch.

      But if we're going to get into an opinion pissing match, Android is not the winner. Fortunately, opinion pissing matches really don't mean anything. Other than a waste of time, unfortunately.

    6. Re:Even *I* bought an iPhone... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Nokia, RIM, Samsung, and Sony do not have a chance unless they undertake some serious R&D and make something equally revolutionary.

      Otherwise Apple wont have anything to copy for Next years Iphone.

      Seriously, if you think Iphones are ahead of Android, you haven't used both. I use a HTC Desire Z for personal use and 1 week out of every 3 I have to carry an Iphone for work. It was bought with the best of intentions, a one stop shop for the on call guy (me) in reality it's anything but. Getting Nagios to work in the browser is a pain, the SMS clients makes notifications difficult to read. Half the time I forward the SMS to my Desire Z just to make it readable. I cant tether because it doesn't work with Linux or any of my Windows Boxen (cant even use Cygwin). I cant do anything to fix problems using the phone, cant ping or telnet, cant even suppress an alert.

      All it does is SMS, a job my Nokia 6500 non-smart phone can do better. Receiving an alert on an Iphone is an indication to get up and turn my computer on.

      Now the boss has a Galaxy S II and has discovered Nagios works, tethering works with all computers, that Iphone is going when the contract is up, the USB stick we bought because the Iphone couldn't tether is going too, we are all looking forward to being able to suppress alerts and even fix minor problems from the on call phone, negating the need to rise from our comfortable beds in the wee hours of the morning, disturbing our partners in the process.

      Iphones are way behind Android. Look at IOS 5, they've implemented the same notification system Android users have enjoyed since 2008.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:Even *I* bought an iPhone... by rbraunm · · Score: 1

      Except the metric that shows that Android runs on more phones than iOS. If people hated it, that wouldn't be the case.

    8. Re:Even *I* bought an iPhone... by nightfell · · Score: 1

      Except the metric that shows that Android runs on more phones than iOS. If people hated it, that wouldn't be the case.

      That metric doesn't measure what they like, prefer, or are satisfied with. It measures what they bought, and in the cell phone market, there are significant extrinsic factors that play into handset choices.

      I'm referring to things like satisfaction surveys, return rates, future purchase surveys, etc., which all directly measure those things.

      And I never said people hate Android, just that they tend to like iOS more.

  42. Re:Android vs iphone vs windows phone wars 3,2,1.. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    at this point, it's Android and iPhone fanboys versus stupid Nokia exec.

    I'd go further wrt the smartphone wars - at this point, it's Android and iPhone, period. WinPhones aren't even on the radar (and the insiders are already saying that WinPhone7 sucks, and they're waiting for WinPhone8 to make a decision).

  43. what are these things you call by ganjadude · · Score: 2

    ......phone....calls???

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  44. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nokia Exec: I matter! I do! Please don't look at other guys, it makes me feel inadequate.

  45. The carriers. by characterZer0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are fed up with the carriers, not the phones.

    --
    Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
  46. Yes to all three. by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

    "Is he right, is he delusional, or is he just trying to build buzz for his company's products the best he can?"

    Yes, I am sure someone once told him that they didn't like the iPhone because everyone had one but Android was confusing because it didn't look like the iPhone. They probably then said "This sucks, I wish there was a phone that wasn't lame" which obviously Nokia is delivering.

    Yes, because the numbers suggest that a large number of young people still prefer Android and the iPhone.

    Yes, obviously. That is corporate speak where you can be right, wrong and a pimp at the same time. Remember, you can spin facts and statistics anyway you want.

    --

    can't sleep slashdot will eat me
  47. Yo yo, da young dawgs be down with Poochy by Rogerborg · · Score: 1
    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  48. nokia lost a moneywagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nokia had the BEST phones in terms of hardware in the past. Seriously, those phones were strong, unbreakable beasts, very durable and easy to use. If they had the vision to jump the android bandwagon three years ago, they would be making a killing right now. Instead, they fumbled around symbian, then created maemo/meego/what's-her-name and now veered into a platform that no one uses or develop for. Personally, I still own an awesome symbian phone, but if they still keep this WP7 nonsense (seems they will), I will have to find another vendor.

  49. Never knew that.... by ddd0004 · · Score: 1

    December 14th was the Finnish equivalent of April Fools day.

  50. Are you seriously suggesting... by Haxagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... that Windows phone runs Windows? Think of it like this: Android phones don't run Ubuntu.

    1. Re:Are you seriously suggesting... by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      ... that Windows phone runs Windows?

      So Windows phones aren't running Windows? Do they have Windows on the front so you can see through them? Nice curtains, maybe?

      Think of it like this: Android phones don't run Ubuntu.

      That's because they're not Ubuntu phones.

    2. Re:Are you seriously suggesting... by RDW · · Score: 5, Funny

      Think of it like this: Android phones don't run Ubuntu.

      Indeed. It's easy to tell the difference because only one of these platforms defaults to a dumbed-down smartphone GUI. And the other is sponsored by Google.

    3. Re:Are you seriously suggesting... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Not yet they don't, but I think Canonical is pushing Unity towards tablets and other touchythings.

      Slim that puppy down, slam it onto a CyanogennyModdyROM, give it some deathskull tats and a few piercings, and hey-- more gnarly waykewl phone mods, man. Screw these grannyglasses doods with their black turtleneck geeky 501 crap!

      Never underestimate the whimsy of youth.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    4. Re:Are you seriously suggesting... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2
      Nice curtains, maybe?

      Yeah, That will outsell Android, with its robots.

      I would short Nokia, but I already did.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    5. Re:Are you seriously suggesting... by md65536 · · Score: 1

      Nice curtains, maybe?

      Yeah, That will outsell Android, with its robots.

      Maybe they could make it brown?

    6. Re:Are you seriously suggesting... by savuporo · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up, i'm telling ya.

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    7. Re:Are you seriously suggesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. I hope you have enough brain power to Google the Windows CE kernel. I bet you think Ice Cream Sandwich is an actual dessert inside of a phone, just because of its name.

  51. Look at the Guy's Title by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    By "Exec" in the title the actual position of the speaker is in fact "director of Portfolio, Product Marketing & Sales at Nokia Entertainment Global", which equates to something like "manufacturer of consent via media manipulation, innuendo, and implication". No hard science or technology in that guy's department.

    --
    I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
  52. Just ditched nokia for android by colin_faber · · Score: 2

    As a long time nokia user I just recently switched to android based phone. This was due too many factors the top being the fact that Nokia does a HORRIBLE job supporting their customers. After many successful generations of upgrades for my self within their `E' series business line I finally had enough with the E52 and E72. In both cases the phones barely worked, constantly had critical failures of the business applications and were nearly impossible to sync up with external, non-windows, non-nokia systems. The second being the fact that the quality of their hardware has gone from good to horrible. The mostly high quality builds have been replaced with cheap, plastic junk that breaks very easily. On my E52 I went though 4 screens between giving up on the phone, this in contrast to the E51 which is still in near mint condition after years of abuse. All of this is in contrast to the reasonably open experience I've got with the Android based phone, and much better build quality. It's no surprise that nokia would partner up with Microsoft (FOR BILLIONS OF DOLLARS). Soon I suspect you will see them shift from a leader in the mobile phone market to another patent troll with crappy hardware and software offers.

  53. Wait for windows phone in 2013... by IYagami · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just imagine: in 2013 having a windows phone that:
    a) Can be used as a phone (of course!)
    b) Can be used as a tablet (windows 8 with the Metro UI)
    c) Can be used as a computer (windows 8 with the Classic UI)
    d) Can be used as a game console (it is rumored that the next xbox could run in ARM processors a variant of the windows 8 kernel).

    Microsoft is known for improving its products version after version... Everyone thinks that Windows Phone 7.5 is a very goog start: just read the reviews:
    - Engadget ( http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/27/windows-phone-7-5-mango-review/ )
    "While Windows Phone still needs a glass of water to get rid of a few hiccups -- and let's face it, every mobile OS has plenty of their own -- it ironed out a lot of the wrinkles from earlier versions and made it a much more feature-laden, user-friendly experience. With Mango, WP7 has caught up with Android and iOS in nearly every way, and in some areas it's even surpassed the other two in functionality. Despite a grim first year, the bright future of Windows Phone is forcing Ballmer to wear shades."
    - The Verge ( http://www.theverge.com/2011/10/24/2509332/windows-phone-75-mango-review )
    "Put simply, regardless of your preconceptions, Windows Phone finally deserves an honest look the next time you’re ready to buy a phone — particularly as we start to see new devices come to market over the next few weeks."
    - gsmarena ( http://www.gsmarena.com/windows_phone_7_5-review-655.php )
    "WP7 lacked key functionality, which deterred potential consumers. Version 7.5 however brings things that will appeal to businesspeople, social networking buffs and people who like a novel software experience. If you're using Microsoft software (chances are you're using at least Office at work), WP7.5 offers the smoothest, most well-rounded experience. The rich bundle of several social networks and IM clients and emails and texts is beautifully organized too. And let's face it, the Windows Phone interface is the only UI around that's truly different - iOS, Android, even Symbian are becoming harder and harder to tell apart. The only thing that held it back was the lack of multitasking and now that's been sorted out."

    1. Re:Wait for windows phone in 2013... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is known for improving its products version after version

      Which is another way of saying their first version generally sucks and you'd be smart to wait until the worst defects are fixed in the next version.

      And, on top of that, it isn't always true either. I've had to endure several versions of WinCE / Win Mobile and I think the general consensus is that it wasn't all that great even in the later versions.

      Still, open mind and all that, maybe Windows Phone will turn out to be great. The current version doesn't do it for me, though.

    2. Re:Wait for windows phone in 2013... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice try Balmer....

    3. Re:Wait for windows phone in 2013... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Just imagine: in 2013 having a windows phone that:
      a) Can be used as a phone (of course!)
      b) Can be used as a tablet (windows 8 with the Metro UI)
      c) Can be used as a computer (windows 8 with the Classic UI)

      That'll be either one very big phone, or one very cramped computer.

      I want a keyboard on my computer. I don't want one on my tablet. I want to be able to watch movies on a larger screen and I want to carry my phone at my waist clipped to my belt. I don't want a tablet, much less a portable computer with a large screen clipped to my belt.

      They are 3 different things that server 3 different needs. It's ridiculous to even imagine that you could combine them into one device given the consumer technology right now. Maybe in 20 years, when it's commonplace to sport a holographic projector on a phone, or screens can be unfolded and folded at a whim, then perhaps the tablet and phone can be combined into one (satisfying the needs that a personal computer satisfies would require significant advances in input technology).

      A jack of all trades does nothing well at all. That seems to describe the Windows (Mobile and Desktop) strategy right now.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    4. Re:Wait for windows phone in 2013... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just imagine: in 2013 having a windows phone that:
      a) Can be used as a phone

      Dream on.

    5. Re:Wait for windows phone in 2013... by JeremyR · · Score: 2

      Great, so in 2013, Windows Phones will be able to do what other phones already can today. And of course, the competition will be standing still in the meantime. But Windows Phone will be worth the wait, we promise!

      As for Windows Phone 7.5 being "a very good start," it's not a "start." Microsoft has been trying for years to be relevant in the mobile space. So they finally got some of it right on the seven-and-a halfth try? Good for them. (OK, I know that Windows Phone releases haven't been consecutively numbered since 1.0, but you get the idea.)

      Microsoft is in catch-up mode, and I expect that they'll stay there, as this time they're not able to leverage their existing monopolies as they were able to do when they initially missed the boat with the Internet.

    6. Re:Wait for windows phone in 2013... by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      yes wp 7.5 is very goog.
      that is, it's shit.
      honestly, I'd rather have series 60 5th edition than that pile of crap. c7 over any of the wp phones any day.

      beautifully organized? are you literally smoking crack? wp7 is different for diferences sake - and because whipping up a fucking menu and billing it up as an operating system is the oldest trick in the book. there's a reason why it's moving away from that release per release, by wp 8.5 frizzleberry it'll have a sliding notification box with a task switcher(history) - just like all other small screen os's and the big screen version will have a honeycomb style switcher- so will ios btw.

      for the record, I use a xperia play currently. it's smooth, fast and expendable without sucking cock for certs, plays music and plays all non-hd vids I can throw at it. ndk is good enough for porting emulators, I can have replacement homescreens that aren't total hacks(one of the biggest gripes on symbian, really). it even receives mms messages ok(from my mom, stfu about "nobody uses mms", because yo moma does). and I a simple homescreen widget to enable wifi-hotspot was available - because there's no bullshit favoritism on the unlocked models and no artificial monopoly on who gets to provide software to do what!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:Wait for windows phone in 2013... by IYagami · · Score: 1

      They are 3 different things that server 3 different needs. It's ridiculous to even imagine that you could combine them into one device given the consumer technology right now. Maybe in 20 years, when it's commonplace to sport a holographic projector on a phone, or screens can be unfolded and folded at a whim, then perhaps the tablet and phone can be combined into one (satisfying the needs that a personal computer satisfies would require significant advances in input technology).

      A jack of all trades does nothing well at all. That seems to describe the Windows (Mobile and Desktop) strategy right now.

      I agree with you. It's ridiculous to even imagine that you could combine them into one device given the consumer technology right now.

      However, the phone can be connected to a dock so that:
      b) Can be used as a tablet: see the Asus Pad Fone http://event.asus.com/mobile/padfone/
      c) Can be used as a computer: Motorola Atrix has a dock with HDMI port and USB port.
      d) Can be used as a game console. Let's compare the specs of an iphone s against a xbox 360:
          * RAM Memory: xbox360 512MB RAM. iphone 4s 512MB RAM
          * Triangles/sec: xbox 360 500 Million. iphone 4s 68 MPolygon/s.
          * Filtered Texture Fetch: xbox 360 8.0 Billion Texels/sec. iphone 4s 1000 MTexels/s

      iphone A5 cpu is manufactured using a 45nm process. intel is producing its Ivy Bridge processors using a 22nm process right now (see http://www.tomshardware.com/news/ivy-bridge-processor-release-22nm-3d-transistor,13753.html: "CEO Paul Otellini confirmed that Ivy Bridge 22 nm processor volume production has already begun, which is a rather significant achievement as there have been apparently no major hiccups in the implementation of its 3D transistor technology")

      Of course, the next xbox will be more powerful than any smartphone, but think about having current xbox 360 games in your smartphone in 2013 or 2014.

      sources:
      * Xbox 360 http://www.pvcmuseum.com/games/vs/ps3-vs-xbox-360-gpu-specs.htm
      * iphone 4s: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_A5

    8. Re:Wait for windows phone in 2013... by sootman · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? You lead off with "in 2013..."?!?!?
      - What should I do in the meantime? Say, the next (I'll be really generous here) 13 months?
      - What do you think Apple and Google will do in the meantime? Did they both announce that they're planning a two-year freeze on new features and no one told me? Even if MS does everything you say, their competitors will do plenty of OTHER equally-compelling things.

      As for your points c) and d) ...
      - I've used a PocketPC device to RDC into a Windows XP desktop. Desktop Windows is ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY, ***NOT*** designed to be used with a four-inch, 200dpi-plus screen. (And overall, Windows 8 "Classic" desktop == Windows 7 desktop == comparable to XP.)
      - Do you really think a device that fits into your pocket will EVER perform at the same level as a full-size console? Moore's Law is great an all that, and phones are as fast as the LAST generation of consoles, but just as with Apple and Google above, MS isn't going to sit on their hands, either. You might have read recently (as in, earlier today) about the next generation of Xbox, which should also be out by 2013...

      ALL design is compromise. There is no such thing as one device that does all things equally well, and certainly not in the form of something that fits in your pocket.

      Random note: Dear Slashdot, please implement TinyMCE or CKEditor. Sometimes I just don't feel like typing a lot of tags, and laziness leads to capital letters and asterisks.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    9. Re:Wait for windows phone in 2013... by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      Yeah, wait for 2013.

      That's TWO years from now. It's been well over a year since Elop killed MeeGo, S60, and Symbian^3 in one shot, and we're barely starting to see nokia ship windows handsets. Really guys? Is this what we've become? Does nobody remember this is exactly how NT got its foot into the door?

      And we all know how well that went. Arguably things didn't even start to work out until 2003 and 2008. Ten years. They didn't even deliver on half the promises. Where is Cairo?

      Empty promises. Son, I am disappoint.

    10. Re:Wait for windows phone in 2013... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To each his own. Some people like WP7.5 and others don't. For me WP7 works great. I have MS Office, Zune, Xbox, NES Emulator and im+sms. I also personally like the metro ui and find it very well organized. Some people don't and that's ok because we all got different tastes.

  54. Re:Android vs iphone vs windows phone wars 3,2,1.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my country nobody buys Chinese crap from Apple or Motorola.

  55. Out of Touch and Bad Impression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds as if Nokia gets it as much as Ballmer.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eywi0h_Y5_U

    I typically get tentative when Executives make ridiculous statements like this. It leaves me with the impression that they're completely out of touch, and my initial impression of the product will be soured before I even see it.

    Just give me the Positives, tell me what it does, tell me how its better. Don't tell me "Young people fed up with iPhone..." when I see firsthand that my kids love their iPhones, as well as, all their peers.

  56. So why is this news? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    In other news, Steve Ballmer says MS is better that Apple, etc.

  57. APRIL FOOLS! by Digital+G · · Score: 1

    Ohh nokia you have some of the best april fools jokes around. This is good, i mean you really got me on this one. HAHAHA Ill be talking about this one for years!!

    --

    End Transmission....
  58. lies, statistics, marketing by Tom · · Score: 1

    is he delusional, or is he just trying to build buzz for his company's products the best he can?"

    Yes, he is.

    Next question?

    Seriously? This is news? "Exec claims competitors products suck." - yeah, that never happens...

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  59. Re:Android vs iphone vs windows phone wars 3,2,1.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There can't be a flamewar involving Windows Mobile since nobody actually bothered getting one...

  60. Nokia can't even give away their product. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Om Malik commenting on the state of Nokia in Finland.

    I co-incidentally happen to be in Helsinki, a few miles away from Nokiaâ(TM)s global headquarters in Espoo, Finland. Walking around the downtown (where I am staying), I have seen many more iPhones than Nokia phones. And most of the startup people I met have some variation of the iPhone. One of them who is still in college told me that Nokia gave him one of their new phones, and he decided to use it as a way to support his nationâ(TM)s largest employer. A month later, he switched back to the iPhone. Ouch! When you canâ(TM)t give away your phones to your own âoeyouth,â it is time to stop hating on other platforms and look for ways to get people to use your product.

    Nokia can't even give away their phones!

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    1. Re:Nokia can't even give away their product. by Kharny · · Score: 1

      Bullshit, as someone who lives in finland, i would say that there is still around 80% nokia.

      Only a very low percentage uses iphones, some samsungs etc are around, but most common are the nokia "featurephones"

      --
      Make a man a fire and he will be warm for a day, set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life
    2. Re:Nokia can't even give away their product. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes these things are surprising.

      Seeing what Blackberry has to offer, I really have no idea how they're so dominant in smart phones in Canada. I mean, they gave me a free 50 dollar gift card with my Galaxy S. What are they giving away with the blackberries to make them competitive?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    3. Re:Nokia can't even give away their product. by Kharny · · Score: 1

      Don't know about canada, but over here, we have to pay for those androids and iphones.
      Either by having a overpriced 2 year contract, or around 500 euro for the top models of the androids and iphone 4's.

      A feature phone or a cheap samsung can be as little as 50 euros.

      --
      Make a man a fire and he will be warm for a day, set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life
    4. Re:Nokia can't even give away their product. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      blackberries aren't cheap.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  61. It's called denial by eclectro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the first of the five stages of grief.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:It's called denial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't.

  62. Making a mistake by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are doing it wrong. They should push it as a business friendly phone. Nice tight integration with Exchange server. add on some security tools. Enable remote wiping, and perhaps even a remote bricking.
    Sell it as an Enterprise phone. Replacement for the blackberry.

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    1. Re:Making a mistake by Spyder · · Score: 2

      The enterprise mobile email system really needs to move to an app. Fewer folks and fewer companies want to deal with a work issued phone. We need an app for all of the smartphone platforms that keeps the mail store encrypted and authentication credentials at rest. It also needs an infrastructure that supports remote wiping of the app's authentication and user data. We no longer need to run the hardware side for mobile enterprise mail and sticking to that model is just making RIM's biggest problem over again.

      There are hard parts to solving a lot of expected functions, like how do you keep the authentication information secure and do automatic email pulls or how to keep the user data secure and still do calendar reminders.

      --
      Spyder
  63. In other news, by fotoflojoe · · Score: 2

    Chrysler exec claims that young people are fed up with Ford and baffled by General Motors.

  64. Android IS crap by cdrguru · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There is no escaping the fact that the entire Google-supplied Android software suite is half-done. There are hundreds of things that need "polishing" and most of these just make life more difficult for the user.

    Is the phone a neat toy for geeks? Absolutely. I switched from a recent BlackBerry (Bold 9700) to a Galaxy S II a little over a month ago. There are probably some things that still could be done to "customize" the phone into a more usable state, but you have to contrast this with a phone that comes ready-to-use in an efficient and user-friendly form right out of the box. And in no way is any Android phone efficient or user-friendly right out of the box.

    It is hard to blame Samsung for the problems with the phone because they are just taking advantage of a free phone software environment. Rather than spending lots of money developing the phone software they just picked it up free. Can't really say that isn't a really smart thing to do.

    Google, on the other hand, supplied nearly all of the software on the phone and is clearly responsible for the ad-hoc unfinished way lots of stuff works. For example, why are there two email applications (Gmail and Exchange) and they are so completely different? One asks for confirmation for a delete, the other one does not. Probably somewhere this is a setting, but why would the shipping default settings be different? And why would the Gmail email client look so much better than the one for other transport types?

    Then there is the touch screen keyboard. Incredibly sensitive so that it takes twice as long to type anything. No, they didn't put a lot of effort into figuring out what key you meant to press, they are just taking the first thing that seemed to get poked. The result is a huge number of errors. I haven't seen anyone using the keyboard on an Android phone that isn't being incredibly precise with it - basically because they learned how to use it. Contrast this with a phone where the software works with the user.

    I am not a big Apple fan. But they actually spent some time on the software and got their phone working the way people use it. As soon as I can afford to do it, I will be replacing the Galaxy S II with an iPhone. Sadly, I have to switch carriers to do it - no iPhone with 3G on TMobile.

    1. Re:Android IS crap by SoCalChris · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your complaint about Android's keyboard is one of its best features. Sure, the stock Android keyboard is just mediocre. It works fine for most people, but for those who want something better, you can easily replace it. I found one that I like, that works really well for me (SwiftKey), so I was able to very easily replace the stock keyboard app with that one. My wife didn't care for the stock keyboard or SwiftKey, so she easily replaced hers with another (Swype, I think?). I can't stand her keyboard, but she loves it. We both can easily type using our onscreen keyboards, and we both routinely use the onscreen keyboard instead of the built in hardware keyboard.

      My son has an iPhone, after using SwiftKey, I think his keyboard is horrible. As far as I know he's stuck with it though, there's no way to change the stock keyboard on it. It may be a little better than the stock Android keyboard, but it absolutely blows compared to some of the aftermarket Android ones.

      You also made a comment about Samsung just using the free software that's available instead of developing their own. Do you remember just a few years ago, when each phone had its own OS? Those were absolutely horrible. I wouldn't even consider a phone not running Android or iOS any more. I don't think many other people would either.

    2. Re:Android IS crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ICS will be out soon and should fix all your gripes. Yes, I know it's just a poor "our next version will be awesome" excuse, but you could also install cyanogenmod to get it right now. This was typed using the android on screen keyboard with no typos, but long fingernails are not very compatible with (capacitive) touchscreens.

    3. Re:Android IS crap by LordLucless · · Score: 0

      Google, on the other hand, supplied nearly all of the software on the phone and is clearly responsible for the ad-hoc unfinished way lots of stuff works. For example, why are there two email applications (Gmail and Exchange) and they are so completely different? One asks for confirmation for a delete, the other one does not. Probably somewhere this is a setting, but why would the shipping default settings be different? And why would the Gmail email client look so much better than the one for other transport types?

      Translation: Arrgghh, choice! Save me!

      iPhone had to make all their default apps absolutely perfect, because they refuse to allow any apps that replace default functionality to be installed on their devices. Android's keyboard may suck (I certainly don't think so; I used Swype for a while, but found I could type faster on stock), but if you so desire you can replace it with any number of other keyboard apps. Ditto for mail.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:Android IS crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, the best examples you could come up with are separate applications for Gmail and Email and the touch screen is too sensitive? First of all, you can set up the Email app to get your Gmail through IMAP if you can't stand using two applications. Actually, the Email app that comes with the SG II is not the same Email app that comes with a Nexus phone since it appears that Samsung has tweaked it a bit. Second, your SG II comes with Swype pre-installed. Try typing with Swype and you won't go back. Also, even the regular keyboard comes up with a number of suggestions for what you are trying to type, just like the iPhone.

      Seriously, these are two of the silliest complaints against Android I've heard. And yes, I have owned an iPhone and I still think the SG II is a much better phone.

    5. Re:Android IS crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't use Swype??

      that is superior to every other onscreen keyboard in every way - including Apple's

    6. Re:Android IS crap by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      It is hard to blame Samsung for the problems with the phone because they are just taking advantage of a free phone software environment. Rather than spending lots of money developing the phone software they just picked it up free.

      But that's not so. A number of things you've got on your phone weren't just "picked up" from Android. That menu you see when you start the phone? That's not standard Android. The touch screen drivers that steer the keyboard you don't like? Device-specific. The Exchange app? Added by your carrier or by Samsung, it's not a Google app.

      You can have the common complaint that Google doesn't lock their system down like Apple which is so horrible and etc., but then the question arises as to whether Android would have the traction it does today if it was locked down. Would every phone manufacturer want to just make an Android phone, with no spiffy customizations or anything to differentiate themselves other than hardware specs that no one cares about?

    7. Re:Android IS crap by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Google, on the other hand, supplied nearly all of the software on the phone and is clearly responsible for the ad-hoc unfinished way lots of stuff works. For example, why are there two email applications (Gmail and Exchange) and they are so completely different? ... And why would the Gmail email client look so much better than the one for other transport types?

      Because Samsung wrote their own Email client. And you're blaming Google.

    8. Re:Android IS crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen this post nearly every time that there is an android post on slashdot.
      There is two different programs for Exchange and Gmail because there needs to be. Most people will be using their gmail for home and their exchange for work. So if you leave a company(Exchange), the Exchange admin pushes out a wipe command or you remove the account it doesn't do anything to your gmail(or the rest of your phone). It's really pretty smart, it gives people the option to BYO their own phone for work and when they leave they won't have their whole phone wiped.

    9. Re:Android IS crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I switched from iphone 3gs (running ios4) to Samsung Galaxy S2 and I love it. Both phone's keyboards are equally sensitive. So I don't think iphone will make you happy if you complain about the on screen keyboards of both phones. The best feature the android keyboard has is the Swype. It makes writing email on the Android a lot more pleasant and faster. I make a lot more mistakes when writing on the iphone sure to its smaller size.

      Before the iphone I had a windows mobile 6 phone with real keyboard. It takes a lot longer to type because each key needs pressure and key travel before the phone registers a key press.

      What like about Android is that I can write app without spending money on the development platform. I don't want to buy a Mac to write software for the Iphone. I don't want to spend arm and leg to buy the Microsoft Visual studio and the Window mobile development pack. I did try their evaluation though. Not sure if Microsoft still do that with the Window Mobile phone 7.

      I look & play with some Window Mobile 7 phones, I don't like their "tile" look at all. They look like the type of user interface or graphics that a college project would look like.

  65. Yeah, because WINDOWS will be better... ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...of all operatings systems... Windows. LOL

    OK, iOS is a golden cage. But at least it's golden. Windows for phones will be the cheap 80s car interior plastics cage.

    Sorry, Mr mobile phone maker, but if I can't quickly write up a script, log in as root, install open source software from a proper package management system, install my own OS, and replace the boot loader if I like to, then FUCK YOU!

    My next phone will be a actual computer that happens to have a conveniently placed speaker and microphone, is small, lasts long and has 4G+WiFi.. Not a toy for the masses of drooling retards.

  66. Nokia talks like MicroSoft now by peter303 · · Score: 1

    All imposiible wishes!
    Possiibly because they use MicroSoft phone OS now.

  67. bzzzzz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is "WHAT is Nokia?".

    *I* will take 2000 of Mobile Phone, Alex.

  68. paid troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    obvious paid troll is obvious.

  69. Old People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    News: Old people fed up with iPhone and Android news

    Yet another article on those makes the world feel so small and time so short and tech so clumsy.

    In the larger timeframe, there is nothing special at all about those products. They came at the expected time with the expected functionality.

    Smartphones are turning into a new religion, admittingly not much different from the -by now- classic Windows vs Linux religions. Really..

    It's just a product. Bunch of chips. With software. Buy if you like it, don't if you don't. Check a review or tech site if you have trouble choosing. And now, can we please move on to the more interesting stuff.

  70. Different to be different. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    If he said people were getting bored of the same old thing, I might be inclined to agree. But if you were happy with either Android or iOS there's no reason for that to change as both OS's have fundamentally remained the same. And the thing is that most people don't want to feel left out. So they're not willing to go with something different until it's been deemed cool and desirable.

  71. My impression as well .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    If anything, the iPhone is starting to get a reputation of being so easy to use, people's 2 and 3 year old kids are proficient with them. (I know first hand... my g/f's kid was getting around the iPhone, finding cartoons to watch on YouTube, at the age of 2. She couldn't read yet, but was able to figure it all out through trial and error, and recognizing the icons and buttons for various things.)

    Android is often considered more difficult to work with, but not so much at a basic level. I don't think anyone's saying they can't get the thing to make a phone call or receive a text message. It has more issues when you want to get more sophisticated with it. (EG. Say your workplace, like mine, uses a web proxy on their wi-fi. Android doesn't support one without some 3rd. party hacks which generally require rooting before you can even use them -- so you have to know not to attempt to connect it to the corporate wi-fi, or else you lose data connectivity.)

    I'm 40 myself, so my time spent around teens and 20-somethings is pretty limited. But just judging from babysitters we've hired in the past, or comments made by younger brothers and sisters of friends of mine (not to mention what I read online), anything Apple branded is still generally viewed as "cool" to own and use. If nothing else, just because the brand is considered "in" right now. (Lots of respect and "buzz" about the late Steve Jobs out there, plus perception that Apple is more Eco-friendly and socially conscious than most other businesses doesn't hurt, plus the general understanding they're more expensive "premium" type products.)

    Nokia, on the other hand? Wow.... only positive things I hear about them are people remembering the "good old days" when they owned a candy-bar type Nokia just like Fox Mulder used to carry on the X-Files episodes or whatnot. I don't think Nokia has earned ANY real respect, at least in the USA, ever since smartphones became popular.

  72. Kin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to remeber a M$ executive saying almost the exact same thing about the Microsoft Kin phones...

  73. Re:I (don't) agree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My 4 year old figured out my android phone in 1 minute. Navigation and all. I didn't even show her. She found an icon that looked "fun" and proceeded to want my phone every chance she can get.

  74. Talk about Dillusions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People switched to the iPhone and Android because we were sick of Microsoft Antics. Tired of the spyware, tired of EULA being forced down our throats with conditions in it that we do not accept. So Apple does that too, and Google does the same evil. But we still have more choice with Android and iPhone. The Android can still be broken. If your like me and own a Android, but do not have a Google account, you can still do all kinds of other stuff, without having to sign your rights away.

    For the record, I don't care what a EULA says anymore; I do not accept many of the tems and conditions and will not honor them, and frankly I don't care if it's legal or not.

    1. Re:Talk about Dillusions. by cheros · · Score: 1

      Yup, that is the delusion du jour. However, I have found Android to be unusable without setting up a Google account. The problem is that even without using Google, you're still spying for Google - on others. Google admitted as much, also in Canada, right after the Streetview scanning scandal (read point 47, it's nicely tucked away).

      I had to choose between Android and Apple, and I picked the latter exactly because they are so "rear end retentive" with their app admission policy. They will not catch everything that way, but it needs less checking than the Wild West of the Android market. However, I respect that others *want* that complete freedom, which is probably why *both* markets do well.

      Oh, I almost forgot. I also make calls with that phone. I know, I'm old fashioned :)

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  75. My Daughter by hondo77 · · Score: 2

    My daughter is fed up that I haven't bought her an iPhone yet. Does that count?

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    1. Re:My Daughter by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      My daughter is fed up that I haven't bought her an iPhone yet. Does that count?

      Of course not. Even though 52% of surveyed kids all wanted an iPhone, iPad, or iTouch for Christmas, the MARKETING TRUTH here is that young people are fed up with smart phones.

      Unless of course "soured" is a new code word for "Windows Mobile OS", and we aren't talking about Gummy Bears...

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  76. From a sign in a cubicle at Nokia by erroneus · · Score: 2

    "You don't have to be delusional to work here, but it helps!"

  77. Shooot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just brought my Android phone... guess since everyone's fed up with them, I should change it to a new nokia with Microsoft software.
    Probably that "the young" has he says would react like that he hopes. But naaay the young aren't that dumb anymore.
    You forgot something in your statement genius... People are much more fedup of Microsoft than anything else... so you bet on the wrong team buddy.

  78. Most Recent Sales Numbers by iONiUM · · Score: 1

    Here you go: http://www.bgr.com/2011/12/13/apple-and-google-dominate-smartphone-space-while-other-vendors-scramble/.

    WP7 went from 1% to 2% of sales. Android is at 53%, iOS at 29%. This is sales, not market share.

    1. Re:Most Recent Sales Numbers by md65536 · · Score: 1

      WP7 is killing them! They've doubled their sales, while Android and iOS are essentially stagnant (and hope for them increasing their % of sales is dim, because there's not really anywhere to go up from "all of it").

  79. Dev Tools by tthomas48 · · Score: 1

    If you want fantastic dev tools you have Apple. If you want cross-platform dev tools you have Android. I cannot come up with a reason why you'd be interested in developing for the Windows phone. If they want to overtake Android, Microsoft is going to have to port their awesome dev tools to OSX and Linux. Otherwise it's going to continue to make the most sense for mobile companies to buy an Apple and have their developers develop for Android and IOS on that and ignore Microsoft completely.

  80. What phone does he have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm willing to bet good money that he, or at least the people in his household, use the iPhone privately. I don't think I've met anyone of manager level or up in the last, year or so, who didn't have a personal or work iPhone. Used to be Blackberry.

  81. He could be right if talking about Maemo... by funky_vibes · · Score: 2

    seriously, rim, iphone, android, microsoft just offer different flavors of the same thing.
    the same walled garden with the same shitty appstores that only sell farting apps.
    the phones are in no way ergonomic to use, the only focus being quick to learn for the most basic tasks.
    I've tried each and each time still return to a good old symbian or n900 phone.

    1. Re:He could be right if talking about Maemo... by pubwvj · · Score: 0

      seriously, rim, iphone, android, microsoft just offer different flavors of the same thing.
      the same walled garden with the same shitty appstores that only sell farting apps.
      the phones are in no way ergonomic to use, the only focus being quick to learn for the most basic tasks.
      I've tried each and each time still return to a good old symbian or n900 phone.

      *snifff* *sniff* I smell jealousy.

    2. Re:He could be right if talking about Maemo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jealousy of snorting coke off an iphone?

  82. Avoid Nokia! by NikeHerc · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is he right, is he delusional, or is he just trying to build buzz for his company's products the best he can?

    I had a Nokia cellphone once. It was, by far, the worst piece of crap cellphone I ever touched. Nokia support was completely and totally worthless. Bottom line: I will never own anything from Nokia again as long as I live!

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    1. Re:Avoid Nokia! by dskzero · · Score: 1

      Erm, nope. You're wrong. Nokia were easily the best of the "dumb" phones available.

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
    2. Re:Avoid Nokia! by NikeHerc · · Score: 0

      Erm, nope. You're wrong. Nokia were easily the best of the "dumb" phones available.

      I've had several hideous cell phones supplied by my former employer. Of these monstrosities, the Nokia was, by far, the worst, the stupidest, the poorest thought out cell phone I ever touched. Worse even than the windows mobile that often hung up or generated a BSOD equivalent!

      If you want to continue to support Nokia, irrespective of how lousy their phones are, please go ahead, but I'll never, ever have another Nokia.

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  83. I hate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate them kinda but that only because I want maemo back so badly. Therefore I'll hate the windows 10x more.

  84. Its a seasonal thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Nokia exec is not being coherent. His judgement is badly off the mark. I don't think he's crazy, its just a seasonal thing. He just got into the Gløgg a bit early, thats all. If its not that, well then, you need to find a nice place for him. A quiet place, with soft walls, and a well fitted jacket where his hands and arms won't cause injury to himself or others. When Nokia took microsofts money, they became as relevant as Corel Draw after Corel took microsofts money. Ever hear of Corel lately? Hum? No? Before I go all Stewie Griffin, with the inflections, please understand: Nokia is tied to a sea anchor. Windblows phone 7 is a money-sink to microsofts revenue stream. Its in place to hide revenues, show losses and keep money from federal tax. If it makes money, great. If not, it still contributes to the overall revenue. Every minute, Nokia loses to HTC, Samsung, Motorola, LG and a string of others. Foxconn is exclusive to Apple. In most peoples worlds, Nokia=old-fashioned-cell-phone from 1990-2001. Northern Telecom shuttered, Nokia is mostly there, followed by RIM (Blackberry). I will get slammed for saying this, but in less than 18 months, Apple will follow RIM.

  85. Survey says... by lmcgeoch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some Creepy old guy walks up to a group of kids.
    Creepy old guy looks at kid using his iPhone

    Creepy old guy: Can you play xbox with your iPhone?
    Kid with iPhone: No

    Creepy old guy looks at kid using his Android.

    Creepy old guy: Can you play xbox with your Android?
    Kid with Android: I don't think so.

    Headline: Young People soured on the iPhone and find the Android baffling.

  86. So far I've been impressed with WP7 by Lifyre · · Score: 3, Informative

    My wife now has a WP7 phone (HTC Arrive) and loves it. The OS seems well put together and while it doesn't seem to be a power user phone it does many of the functions better of being a phone, text platform, and media consumption device much more smoothly than either iOS or Android. I use both an Android (Galaxy SII currently) and an iPhone 4 on a daily basis, my preference is heavily on the Android side for many usability and functionality reasons. I also run custom ROMs on my android vs. stock on the iPhone which may have much to do with my experience.

    That said the WP7 has been impressive enough that it may just be my next phone.

    --
    I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
  87. mix it up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take some words/phrases, mix 'em up, and come up with a story you want everyone to believe...

    The original information was probably something more along the lines of: Young people are impulsive and unreliable as customers. They want whatever happens to be 'cool' at any given time. Middle age and older people find Android baffling, because, well, it is unless you're a computer nerd, or a young person who just wants to "Facebook" your friends and doesn't really understand what the device is capable of doing. If we take some of this information, twist it around a bit, and market the hell out of it, we might be able to attract a few people from both groups to buy our shit. If we repeat the same nonsense long enough... people will begin to believe it as fact.

  88. He selling product with a steep uphill battle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Is he right, is he delusional, or is he just trying to build buzz for his company's products the best he can?"

    No delusional; he's just marketing.

    I wouldn't go so far to say Windows phones are doomed from their start but they definitely are fighting a steep, uphill battle to say the least.

  89. I'm even more fed up with Windows Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about flogging a dead and decomposed horse.

  90. What dreams are made of by Quila · · Score: 1

    In Finland.

  91. Nokia has become Microsoft's delivery/whipping boy by Kartu · · Score: 1

    The worst part here is that awesome hardware manufacturer, Nokia, has become Microsoft's delivery/whipping boy.
    How come Samsung sells 300+ million phones without restricting itself to particular OS? How come Nokia can't do the same?

    Incidentally, Nokia's current CEO is former MIcrosoft manager...

  92. Barking up the wrong tree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Companies sue each other because that is how the game is played -- and the rules are defined by government. Can't really blame them for doing what they were encouraged to do. The more lawsuits, the more business for the legal system, the more justification for spending, borrowing, and expanding power over the people -- but most importantly, the more money raked through government.

    Did I just imply that the entire reason we are subject to an unjust, wasteful, and oppressive system of law is simply to make the business of government more lucrative for the elite who control it?

    You're god damn right I did.

  93. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 14 and I hated my mediocre Nokia smartphone. I love my Android though.

  94. People talkin bs by AdamThor · · Score: 1

    Executives, politicians, anyone with enough clout to be gambling big has a tendency to say things that they want to be true as if those things already were true.

    It's clearly a good gamble. If your thing does happen to be true then you look like the guy in the know. If your thing doesn't come true then you and the other loosers are gonna be too busy worrying about fixing the thing to go back to all that bs you were spewing earlier.

    It's a weakness in modern communication.

    --
    -- "Oh. This guy again."
  95. You can't give a child a Nokia Prostitute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would the authorities say?

  96. Slashdot: technology hipsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mom has an iPhone. They sell iPhones for Dummies books. Those two criteria right there are reason enough to never buy an iPhone.

    I know what you're saying; the iPhone was cool and unique when it came out, but now it's gone mainstream. Old ladies use it, and books have been written about it by people trying to cash in on the trend.

    These days, I only use smartphones so obscure you've probably never heard of them.

  97. He's completely delusional.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every kid over 10 years old wants an iPhone and are constantly bugging their parents to buy them one. Trust me on this one.
    That's all I hear and all anyone with kids hears.

  98. Dumb and dumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See ? I told you young people are getting dumber !

  99. Android 2.2.1 can be non-intuitive. by hellop2 · · Score: 1

    1. You cannot forward text msgs on Android.
    2. You cannot open pics that someone MMSs to you outside of the txt app.
    3. There is no memo. I cannot take a note. Well, there is a memo app, but damned if I can figure out how to run it.
    4. If you receive a txt, you cannot click and call them. You have to exit the txt app, and find them in your contacts.
    5. It's very hard to send a txt to multiple people. You have to know how their name is stored in your phone and type in their name. You cannot browse your contacts and click a box to send to multiple people like a normal phone.

    --
    How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    1. Re:Android 2.2.1 can be non-intuitive. by kyrre · · Score: 1

      1. You cannot forward text msgs on Android.
      2. You cannot open pics that someone MMSs to you outside of the txt app.
      4. If you receive a txt, you cannot click and call them. You have to exit the txt app, and find them in your contacts.

      Hold your finger on the message and menu popup that allow you to do all these things. It works on Android 1.5 and it works on 2.3. I am sure 2.2 can do that as well. Point 3 should be fixable if you install an app. Point 5 really does not work if you have hundreds of people in you contact list. You do not remember their names?

  100. 3. Anti-trust lawsuit by alispguru · · Score: 1

    3. Taking a near-monopoly in one market (business e-mail) and trying to use it to create another near-monopoly in another market (business smartphones) is what got Microsoft in trouble during the browser wars.

    Those lawsuits went on for over a decade in the US and Europe. If Microsoft is smart, they won't subject themselves to that again if they can avoid it.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
    1. Re:3. Anti-trust lawsuit by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      It's especially dangerous if they don't have a friendly administration like President Bush's that gave them a pass on the Anti-Trust conviction. Depending on which administration they get next time around they might not fare nearly as well.

  101. There is a market... by sigmabody · · Score: 1

    I don't think the marketing is anything more than typical marketing optimism/BS, but to be fair...

    If someone could make a smartphone that:
    - Had a smooth ease-of-use of an iPhone
    - Didn't require you to root it to fully customize it
    - Didn't pack it with carrier bloatware
    - Had good battery life and talk quality without building/flashing your own custom ROM
    - Had lots of free and/or nearly free apps to cover common usage scenarios
    - Guaranteed to respect your privacy (no CarrierIQ, tracking, logging, etc.) ... you could probably sell it pretty well. There's not a snowball's chance in hell that Microsoft/Nokia will produce such a phone, but it's true to say that there is a large-ish market which is being largely under-served by the current smart-phone offerings.

  102. There's an app for that. by mosb1000 · · Score: 2

    There's an app for that.

  103. Relax, everyone. Good grief. by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    Nothing edgy about it. It's a *very* old college joke, that's all. Like how to copy from one person is plagiarism but to copy from several is called research. So relax, everyone. Kids these days. Don't know the classics.

    I was merely pointing out the fact that these individual stories do add up to make a conversant whole. And the last person you should trust to get an objective viewpoint is a salesman.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  104. Nielsen: U.S. Kids Looking Forward to “iHoli by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1
    http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/us-kids-looking-forward-to-iholiday-2011/

    Looks like the Nokia guy is right, the iPhone is only #3 on America's youths' wishlists - after iPad and iPod Touch. Non-iPhone smartphone is at #10 right after TV set (aren't they supposed to be dead too?).

    --
    Fandroids hate facts.
  105. Funeral time for iPhone! by md65536 · · Score: 1

    Time for MS to hold another goofy funeral for the iPhone.
    Last time it was pretty dead -- windows phone nearly killed it -- but this time it really looks like it's just dead. If it weren't for old people, no one would be buying iphones. WP7 has killed it with it's slam-dunk future popularity. Probably. Slam-dunk, this time.

  106. iPhone by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Personally I still can not see the reasoning behind someone paying $700 USD (apprx retail without contract for verizon 32 gig iPhone 4S). It's a freaking phone, these days you can purchase a decent desktop or laptop for that price that does far more, what it doesn't do that the iPhone does is fit in a pocket. What it does that the iPhone doesn't gaming, programming, video editing, audio editing, watching videos (yeah I know you can watch video on iPhone, but would you rather watch an hd movie on a 4 inch screen vs a monitor?).

    Seriously, I only see people with more money than sense buying iPhones, this is not meant as a direct insult to those of you with an iPhone, but honestly why have one at that price. Note if you paid significantly less like only dropped 2 or 3 hundred USD for it, I could see that.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  107. From my vantage point.... by SwedishChef · · Score: 3, Funny

    From my vantage point they're probably still hot! :D

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
    1. Re:From my vantage point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many light years away are you and how big is your telescope?

  108. AFAIK "young people" prefer Blackberry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the iPhone/Android uptake was never really there...

    so I guess he's half right?

  109. Re:Relax, everyone. Good grief. by dskzero · · Score: 1

    At least the research one made sense. Perhaps it's just that I've heard it many times before. As for TFA, well. I agree.

    --
    Oblivion Awaits
  110. In other news by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Geeks fed up with Nokia and Microsoft.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  111. TFA is completely daft by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    Translated from marketingspeak to English:

    “What we see is that youth are pretty much fed up with iPhones. Everyone has the iPhone," he said. "Also, many are not happy with the complexity of Android and the lack of security. So we do increasingly see that the youth that wants to be on the cutting edge and try something new are turning to the Windows phone platform.”

    We have a product that will sell well to parents who always buy the wrong thing for their kids. (Apologies to Seth Meyers) We're also trying to capitalize on the recent negative publicity of Carrier IQ.

    “The marketplace is extremely crowded. I refer to it as the sea of sameness," he added. "When you walk up to a retail shelf at Phones4U and see the number of black mono-blocks sitting on the shelf, it is very confusing to the consumer. We want to deliver services and phones that are different.”

    We deal in a *different* kind of confusion.

    That “different” approach, believes Munksgaard, includes offering services like Nokia Mix Radio, which gives users music out-of-the-box without having to sign up to anything or pay costly fees each month.

    We've never heard of Pandora.

    “We would prefer a wireless transfer than a docking station," said Munksgaard. "A docking station has limitations because the phone has to be in a certain place. We are extremely pleased with the experience you get with the device in connection with Nokia gear. We don’t have a docking station at this point, however we are confident that as the Windows Phone ecosystem grows, third party docking station makers will support us.”

    Fucking A2DP, how does it work!?

    Hopefully for Nokia, for those bored with the iPhone and looking for something simpler than Android, those third party manufacturers will start knocking out Nok Docks sooner rather than later.

    We don't have enough faith in our phones to design and sell our own Nokia branded accessories.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  112. N9 by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

    Of Nokia's current offerings, the only one that tempts me is the MeeGo-based N9, which has a decent Linux and 64GB of storage. It also has Nokia's Ovi Maps, which are pretty good, at no extra cost. Alas, it is destined to be an orphan. If Nokia pushed it more broadly, it would be a winner - far better than their W7 Lumia 800 (costs more for slightly fewer screen pixels, similar features, but only 16GB storage) which I also handled in one store.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:N9 by dropadrop · · Score: 1

      Of Nokia's current offerings, the only one that tempts me is the MeeGo-based N9, which has a decent Linux and 64GB of storage. It also has Nokia's Ovi Maps, which are pretty good, at no extra cost. Alas, it is destined to be an orphan. If Nokia pushed it more broadly, it would be a winner - far better than their W7 Lumia 800 (costs more for slightly fewer screen pixels, similar features, but only 16GB storage) which I also handled in one store.

      Nokia already kicked out the MeeGo development team, last ones will go out of the door in a few months time, so I don't really see them pushing that platform... Just goes to show how out of touch they are.

    2. Re:N9 by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Nokia makes some really good hardware. And they make some really nice low end phones. Their low end "not quite smart" phones are great. You can do facebook, twitter, email, text messaging. Battery lasts forever on these things, even when doing web browsing. I charge my phone every 3 or 4 days. However, I think that we have reached the point where even the cheap ($100) Android phones are really good. So there may not be much of a market left for partly crippled not-so-smart phones with not enough apps. At least not in the first world.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  113. Re:Android vs iphone vs windows phone wars 3,2,1.. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    Your country of fictionesia.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  114. Eye of the beholder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPhone: " just works" Sirious cachet
    Android: works in freemarket "Serious Geekcred"
    Windows: "works for Nokia" MS-DNA should work with your pc's, right?
    BlackBerry: serves Crypto-secure communication, keyboard works

    RIM keyboard owns me. What owns you? YMMV

  115. Fed up with Apple, not the iPhone by davesque · · Score: 1

    I think there's not really anything to what he's saying. It's probably mostly geared towards building hype. But it does coincidentally touch on the fact that I'm sick of Apple, the company, and not the iPhone. I think Apple's anti-competitive behavior or suing the crap out of everyone, or going "thermo-nuclear" as Steve Jobs put it, it getting old real fast. I'm hoping that some other people/technologies/companies will pop up that are willing to challenge and beat Apple and restore a sense of innovation and originality to the marketplace.

  116. It's True! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Young people are fed up with iPhone! I frequently hear my 2 y.o. son say, "No want this" after he's bored playing with my iPhone.

    Young people are baffled by Android! And my 5 y.o. daughter just asked me the other day, "Is that your new iPhone?" -- referring to my Galaxy Nexus.

  117. Closed source problem but better than battery life by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    Apart from the lack of openess such that I find it hard to feel I'm having a private conversation... I like the software on phones these days.

    It's the hardware that has kept me waiting with a Symbian phone.

    Battery life is well off enough to go camping with and the screens are too detailed. I would prefer black and white with a 8MP camera if it lasted a week on charge.

    Perhaps owning a SonyEriccson P800 has scarred me.

  118. Clever of Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Announce a deal with Nokia, wait for the share price to plummet, then buy at the low.

  119. WTF, Mods on crack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A person offering his own personal opinion and quoting other peoples positive opinions on products you dont like doesnt make it a troll post.

    Slashdot needs a -0, Disagree mod.

  120. Delusional is one thing, but.... by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    doesn't he realize that those same young people consider Nokia to be "The Granny Phone Company"?

  121. Apple was caught TRACKING YOUR MOVEMENT by Kartu · · Score: 2

    Apple was caught TRACKING YOUR MOVEMENT if you own an iPhone, somehow that is not a privacy concern in your books? (oh, they certainly "don't know" who the owner of iPhone is, eh?)

    Dolphin HD was cought giving out information about sites your visit on Android platform. It was doing it on both iOS and Android, yet only Android users could catch it, see the problem? Where was your mythical Apple's "strict set of guidlines"?

    As most stuff surrounding Apple, being better protected than on Android is yet another myth.

    1. Re:Apple was caught TRACKING YOUR MOVEMENT by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Apple was caught TRACKING YOUR MOVEMENT if you own an iPhone, somehow that is not a privacy concern in your books? (oh, they certainly "don't know" who the owner of iPhone is, eh?)

      Dolphin HD was cought giving out information about sites your visit on Android platform. It was doing it on both iOS and Android, yet only Android users could catch it, see the problem? Where was your mythical Apple's "strict set of guidlines"?

      As most stuff surrounding Apple, being better protected than on Android is yet another myth.

      Apple was caught "logging" your movement and storing it on "YOUR" phone. It is called a log or cache file. Do you even understand the concept?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  122. Flip That by RManning · · Score: 1

    I don't think young people are fed up with Android and iPhone. I think most young people might say: "What's Nokia?". :)

  123. He's right, but not totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kids are fed up, sure, but he doesn't get that the kids decide what is cool, not him.

  124. N900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we're fed up with both iPhone and Android, why the hell did they get rid of the N900? Smart move, Nokia! I am pretty happy with Android until they bring that back!