The used clothing market used to be different. A collector in the United States would first sort by quality. Clean, no stains, no rips clothing would be separated for shipment to markets, almost always international. There was no market otherwise. Rejected clothes would go to US rag manufacturers. But before shipment of the good items, they would be sorted a second time by designer label, because shops in foreign countries, such as Senegal, specialized by designer. And the markets were not only poor countries. The largest market for American used clothing was once Japan, because kids wanted to make a fashion statement. And it was a very complex market even there. When grunge rock became popular worldwide, the market for used American flannel shirts in Japan shot up, with much higher prices both there and here for the American collectors who knew what they were doing. We need a return for those good old days when buying and wearing obviously used clothing was a sign of cultural equality and virtue ("His clothes are dirty but his hands are clean. And he's the best thing that you've ever seen.").
64k RAM, CPM, dual floppy drives, not bad for a start (1981), Wordstar etc., but not so good for a non-geek, and very quickly outpaced (and replaced) by IBM and Apple.
iPhones and other mobile phones have more gold per unit weight than almost any other consumer electronics, and they are much more valuable than gold ore... if, and only if, they can be collected and processed in very high volume. Apple is not in the high volume business of smelting and refining iPhones, so of course it contracts with a subcontract electronics recycling industry that has existed for decades to recover gold. And that industry puts all gold-bearing electronics, e.g. mobile phones, circuit boards, connectors, into large process-efficient batches. A batch is smelted in copper, and after the copper is removed the residue is further refined for precious metal content. After all of this no one can trace a molecule of gold back to a specific source, but It is entirely possible that $40 million in gold from that industry is fairly attributable to recycled Apple iPhones. Whether Apple receives a payment for its collection and delivery of iPhones and other electronic scrap into the electronics recycling industry, or a credit against costs, seems irrelevant to its goal of putting raw materials back into commerce, rather than disposing of them.
The FCC asserts, on the one hand, that it “is considering whether advances in technology no longer warrant – on a technological basis – the prohibition of in-flight mobile phone use. This is purely a technical decision.” (FAQ: What has the FCC proposed?) And yet in the NPRM the Commission makes a sweeping and non-technical assertion that “we find that it is in the public interest to bring the benefits of mobile communications services on aircraft to domestic consumers.” (79 FR 2616) The FCC cannot make such a finding; the public interest in this issue goes far beyond the technical considerations for which it has expertise. And indeed the Commission has not actually made a true finding of the public interest, nor even attempted to do so. The Commission has repeatedly and expressly absolved itself of the responsibility of weighing, or even considering, the costs to the traveling public of cellphone use on aircraft. And while it makes passing reference to “public safety” and “law enforcement” (79 FR 2626) its use of these terms does not include concern for the safety of passengers from emotional disruption, confrontation and potential violence on board aircraft, or of the law enforcement responsibilities of aircraft crew in such circumstances. If the FCC must remove a technical barrier to cellphone use, so be it, but it should not purport to have made a public interest value judgment upon such use.
Tarring and feathering remote manufacturers, by stories like this, ensure that they will do their utmost to avoid sourcing any minerals in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. This is the common reaction, perfectly sensible for any business, and it is actually happening. For a private manufacturing company, without government investigative powers or private armies of their own, to operate safely in that incredibly corrupt, violent country and discover which mine and which trader has not "supported" an armed group, i.e., that has not been victimized, had not its work product stolen or "taxed" and so is "DRC conflict-free," is not possible. So Central Africa, the size of the United States with 200 million people, is simply stigmatized by the Dodd-Frank Act and shunned in its entirety by those manufacturers who are capable of controlling their supply chains. Remaining DRC mineral trade goes into criminal channels. More Congolese starve. The horror, the horror, for those who never read Heart of Darkness. The circumstances are very complex and difficult, and the time has long passed to address the problems with realism on the ground, in country, and not just try to privatize larger societal obligations. The Dodd-Frank Act, and wrathful moralizing of the Slate article, only prolong the agony.
The removal of lead from automotive gasoline in 1976 brought about a very significant reduction in airborne lead, for which there was a risk of exposure by inhalation. There is little to no need for additional reduction to mitigate that risk. The only remaining serious risk of lead exposure is by ingestion of lead paint chips by children living in old houses. The FAA will need to be very careful not to increase the risk of aircraft engine failure beyond any possible mitigation of a minuscule inhalation exposure.
Oxidation of any hydrocarbon is an electrochemical reaction - an exchange of electrons between fuel and oxidizer. In an "ordinary" oxidation reaction, the electron exchange is completely internal, and the only product is heat. That heat is converted to electric power through a series of mechanical means, e.g., heating water to steam, using the expansion of stem to push a turbine, using the turbine in a magnetic field to create electricity. It wastes a lot of the energy of the original oxidation reaction. In a solid oxide fuel cell, the electron exchange is captured through an external circuit, making it significantly more efficient as a generator of electricity. This is why, for example, Google reports using half of the natural gas for the same electrical output.
The problem for DARPA is that it is trying to develop its own mosquitoes - real and mechanical - as weapons. This is a defense strategy that DARPA is likely to buy and suppress.
"Studies" that are funded or sponsored or promoted by environmental organizations should be taken as expressions of religious dogma, essentially worthless to those who endeavor to understand the underlying issue. Environmental organizations, like religious organizations, perceive themselves as above criticism, and therefore not accountable for the veracity of their proclamations. Commercial organizations might be equally and oppositely dogmatic in their desire for lucre, but tend to have a higher regard for logic, even if they reject it when they can get away with it.
The concept is called hermesis, and there are a significant number of examples, proven in rigorous tests. Toxicity starts at a threshold above zero, but there are beneficial effects at doses below that threshold.
Systems that account for physical possession of gold, whether allocated and stored under individuals' identities, or unallocated and used in other transactions (as banks do with money) do not rely upon any specific accounting or transaction system. There are many ways of keeping track of gold accounts, including purely manual records on paper. They all work, if that is the intent. A gold trader that touts its linux system of accounting and trading as somehow essential, or as giving it some sort of advantage in the world gold market, is suspicious. The key point of this article is that apparently no one is allowed to confirm that the gold actually exists. Good luck.
The fifth amendment to the constitution provides that government taking of property, including temporary taking, requires fair market compensation to the owner. The routine examination for explosives at an airport security check would not require payment, but an extended taking of an electronic device, without individual suspicion, should require a payment of fair market rental value.
The Chinese should ignore CNN and Jack Rafferty, like everyone else. Well, I suppose it is like American Idol, and has a perverse entertainment value to many, but certainly no content. Attacking the CNN website, or protesting CNN in any way, is just noise on the audience meter, and they love it.
It seems obvious. Steam is introduced to the hydrocarbon fuel, and the oxygen is stripped from the steam, combining with the carbon and leaving hydrogen. The oxygen stripping process creates the carbon dioxide. Old technology, although not for very small scale devices like cars. Capture of the newly created carbon dioxide can be done, although the scheme seems to be to compress it to a liquid. What, dry ice? The energy balance is questionable.
The identity of the blogger will lead to accusations and lawsuits, and the legal fees for the blogger will dwarf $10k. And the threat will shut down the criticism, which is the point. The identity of the blogger should be worth a lot more to Niro, say $100k. And then let the blogger win by revealing his identity.
The lawyers are the problem, not the answer. The lawyers who file these suits should be disbarred. Until they face consequences, they will file these kinds of suits forever, and their brethren will gladly file defenses, all laughing all the way to the bank.
The WTO decision has nothing to do with MP3s or IP law. It is about access to gambling over the internet. The WTO has long ago ruled that the US can not allow internet gambling within the country, while banning it from other countries. The legal principle is called national treatment. i.e., what any WTO member country allows from or for its own citizens, it must allow for the citizens of other WTO countries. This is very similar to US law that requires states to allow Indian casino gambling if they allow other forms of gambling.
The button cell in the computer was undoubtedly an elemental lithium cell, with a high level of reactivity, potentially explosive if it ruptures and leaks in the presence of water, reaction with which creates both heat and hydrogen gas. A cell phone battery, on the other hand, is lithium ion, far less reactive, and unlikely to have any explosive potential. It may be that some elemental lithium is created in recharging a lithium ion battery, if the battery is charged too rapidly or otherwise improperly, so a reaction can not be ruled out if the elemental lithium is released into contact with water. This is why device manufacturers recommend that their batteries be replaced with their own batteries. But the explosive capacity should still be small.
People should look at the reality, rather than the sci-fi fantasy of environmental spin. Take the statement: "As each CFL contains five milligrams of mercury, at the Maine "safety" standard of 300 nanograms per cubic meter, it would take 16,667 cubic meters of soil to "safely" contain all the mercury in a single CFL." 300 ng/m3 is a standard for mercury concentration in air, not soil. Mercury is an element found naturally in soil. The concern for human exposure is primarily ingestion, and perhaps inhalation, by pregnant women. There is virtually no other human health concern. No one is likely to eat from a floor. So if the window had been opened, with a fan directed out, the inhalation "safety" level would have been reached in a short time. Second, the Maine "safety" standard is set at a level to protect against exposure over a lifetime, with added orders of magnitude of intended to cover uncertainty, and still cause not even a possibility of harm. So the 300 ng/M3 level is unrealistic in any case for a temporary exposure. Third, the standard is based on the toxicity of methyl mercury, which is produced in the guts of fish, and not elemental mercury, which is used in CFLs, and is much much less toxic. So a spill of mercury from a CFL, even in the highly unlikely even that all of the mercury was released, is not a circumstance worthy of panic.
Since when did/. readers ever have reverence for dear old wonderful school days. Take a quick poll and you will find that 99.9% were disgusted with school, and would see any alternative as better.
Here's how it works.
You want to get ahead politically, so you make up a story about weapons of mass destruction. If you want to save a village, you have to destroy it. Ring any bells? Tell everybody that they are about to die, or maybe even that they are half dead already. You call them.. what.. polybrominated diphenyl ethers, because you can be certain that no one will actually read any of the real literature about it, especially that it is a family of chemicals, especially that there are differences between the members of the family according to how many bromines are attached. It doesn't matter, just yell about danger, death, etc. And the good deluded people of Washington will be willing to support a surge. When will they ever learn?
Slashdot Mirror
The idea is not new. See The President's Analyst, 1967. And think of Trump.
The used clothing market used to be different. A collector in the United States would first sort by quality. Clean, no stains, no rips clothing would be separated for shipment to markets, almost always international. There was no market otherwise. Rejected clothes would go to US rag manufacturers. But before shipment of the good items, they would be sorted a second time by designer label, because shops in foreign countries, such as Senegal, specialized by designer. And the markets were not only poor countries. The largest market for American used clothing was once Japan, because kids wanted to make a fashion statement. And it was a very complex market even there. When grunge rock became popular worldwide, the market for used American flannel shirts in Japan shot up, with much higher prices both there and here for the American collectors who knew what they were doing. We need a return for those good old days when buying and wearing obviously used clothing was a sign of cultural equality and virtue ("His clothes are dirty but his hands are clean. And he's the best thing that you've ever seen.").
64k RAM, CPM, dual floppy drives, not bad for a start (1981), Wordstar etc., but not so good for a non-geek, and very quickly outpaced (and replaced) by IBM and Apple.
iPhones and other mobile phones have more gold per unit weight than almost any other consumer electronics, and they are much more valuable than gold ore ... if, and only if, they can be collected and processed in very high volume. Apple is not in the high volume business of smelting and refining iPhones, so of course it contracts with a subcontract electronics recycling industry that has existed for decades to recover gold. And that industry puts all gold-bearing electronics, e.g. mobile phones, circuit boards, connectors, into large process-efficient batches. A batch is smelted in copper, and after the copper is removed the residue is further refined for precious metal content. After all of this no one can trace a molecule of gold back to a specific source, but It is entirely possible that $40 million in gold from that industry is fairly attributable to recycled Apple iPhones. Whether Apple receives a payment for its collection and delivery of iPhones and other electronic scrap into the electronics recycling industry, or a credit against costs, seems irrelevant to its goal of putting raw materials back into commerce, rather than disposing of them.
The FCC asserts, on the one hand, that it “is considering whether advances in technology no longer warrant – on a technological basis – the prohibition of in-flight mobile phone use. This is purely a technical decision.” (FAQ: What has the FCC proposed?) And yet in the NPRM the Commission makes a sweeping and non-technical assertion that “we find that it is in the public interest to bring the benefits of mobile communications services on aircraft to domestic consumers.” (79 FR 2616) The FCC cannot make such a finding; the public interest in this issue goes far beyond the technical considerations for which it has expertise. And indeed the Commission has not actually made a true finding of the public interest, nor even attempted to do so. The Commission has repeatedly and expressly absolved itself of the responsibility of weighing, or even considering, the costs to the traveling public of cellphone use on aircraft. And while it makes passing reference to “public safety” and “law enforcement” (79 FR 2626) its use of these terms does not include concern for the safety of passengers from emotional disruption, confrontation and potential violence on board aircraft, or of the law enforcement responsibilities of aircraft crew in such circumstances. If the FCC must remove a technical barrier to cellphone use, so be it, but it should not purport to have made a public interest value judgment upon such use.
Tarring and feathering remote manufacturers, by stories like this, ensure that they will do their utmost to avoid sourcing any minerals in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. This is the common reaction, perfectly sensible for any business, and it is actually happening. For a private manufacturing company, without government investigative powers or private armies of their own, to operate safely in that incredibly corrupt, violent country and discover which mine and which trader has not "supported" an armed group, i.e., that has not been victimized, had not its work product stolen or "taxed" and so is "DRC conflict-free," is not possible. So Central Africa, the size of the United States with 200 million people, is simply stigmatized by the Dodd-Frank Act and shunned in its entirety by those manufacturers who are capable of controlling their supply chains. Remaining DRC mineral trade goes into criminal channels. More Congolese starve. The horror, the horror, for those who never read Heart of Darkness. The circumstances are very complex and difficult, and the time has long passed to address the problems with realism on the ground, in country, and not just try to privatize larger societal obligations. The Dodd-Frank Act, and wrathful moralizing of the Slate article, only prolong the agony.
The removal of lead from automotive gasoline in 1976 brought about a very significant reduction in airborne lead, for which there was a risk of exposure by inhalation. There is little to no need for additional reduction to mitigate that risk. The only remaining serious risk of lead exposure is by ingestion of lead paint chips by children living in old houses. The FAA will need to be very careful not to increase the risk of aircraft engine failure beyond any possible mitigation of a minuscule inhalation exposure.
How many "mistakes" were made to undercharge the customer?
Oxidation of any hydrocarbon is an electrochemical reaction - an exchange of electrons between fuel and oxidizer. In an "ordinary" oxidation reaction, the electron exchange is completely internal, and the only product is heat. That heat is converted to electric power through a series of mechanical means, e.g., heating water to steam, using the expansion of stem to push a turbine, using the turbine in a magnetic field to create electricity. It wastes a lot of the energy of the original oxidation reaction. In a solid oxide fuel cell, the electron exchange is captured through an external circuit, making it significantly more efficient as a generator of electricity. This is why, for example, Google reports using half of the natural gas for the same electrical output.
The problem for DARPA is that it is trying to develop its own mosquitoes - real and mechanical - as weapons. This is a defense strategy that DARPA is likely to buy and suppress.
"Studies" that are funded or sponsored or promoted by environmental organizations should be taken as expressions of religious dogma, essentially worthless to those who endeavor to understand the underlying issue. Environmental organizations, like religious organizations, perceive themselves as above criticism, and therefore not accountable for the veracity of their proclamations. Commercial organizations might be equally and oppositely dogmatic in their desire for lucre, but tend to have a higher regard for logic, even if they reject it when they can get away with it.
The concept is called hermesis, and there are a significant number of examples, proven in rigorous tests. Toxicity starts at a threshold above zero, but there are beneficial effects at doses below that threshold.
Perhaps now, in Oregon, ignorance of the law will be a valid defense, because the AG is determined to keep Oregonians in ignorance.
Systems that account for physical possession of gold, whether allocated and stored under individuals' identities, or unallocated and used in other transactions (as banks do with money) do not rely upon any specific accounting or transaction system. There are many ways of keeping track of gold accounts, including purely manual records on paper. They all work, if that is the intent. A gold trader that touts its linux system of accounting and trading as somehow essential, or as giving it some sort of advantage in the world gold market, is suspicious. The key point of this article is that apparently no one is allowed to confirm that the gold actually exists. Good luck.
Why do corporations never seem to search for cheaper CEOs?
The fifth amendment to the constitution provides that government taking of property, including temporary taking, requires fair market compensation to the owner. The routine examination for explosives at an airport security check would not require payment, but an extended taking of an electronic device, without individual suspicion, should require a payment of fair market rental value.
The Chinese should ignore CNN and Jack Rafferty, like everyone else. Well, I suppose it is like American Idol, and has a perverse entertainment value to many, but certainly no content. Attacking the CNN website, or protesting CNN in any way, is just noise on the audience meter, and they love it.
It seems obvious. Steam is introduced to the hydrocarbon fuel, and the oxygen is stripped from the steam, combining with the carbon and leaving hydrogen. The oxygen stripping process creates the carbon dioxide. Old technology, although not for very small scale devices like cars. Capture of the newly created carbon dioxide can be done, although the scheme seems to be to compress it to a liquid. What, dry ice? The energy balance is questionable.
The identity of the blogger will lead to accusations and lawsuits, and the legal fees for the blogger will dwarf $10k. And the threat will shut down the criticism, which is the point. The identity of the blogger should be worth a lot more to Niro, say $100k. And then let the blogger win by revealing his identity.
The lawyers are the problem, not the answer. The lawyers who file these suits should be disbarred. Until they face consequences, they will file these kinds of suits forever, and their brethren will gladly file defenses, all laughing all the way to the bank.
The WTO decision has nothing to do with MP3s or IP law. It is about access to gambling over the internet. The WTO has long ago ruled that the US can not allow internet gambling within the country, while banning it from other countries. The legal principle is called national treatment. i.e., what any WTO member country allows from or for its own citizens, it must allow for the citizens of other WTO countries. This is very similar to US law that requires states to allow Indian casino gambling if they allow other forms of gambling.
The button cell in the computer was undoubtedly an elemental lithium cell, with a high level of reactivity, potentially explosive if it ruptures and leaks in the presence of water, reaction with which creates both heat and hydrogen gas. A cell phone battery, on the other hand, is lithium ion, far less reactive, and unlikely to have any explosive potential. It may be that some elemental lithium is created in recharging a lithium ion battery, if the battery is charged too rapidly or otherwise improperly, so a reaction can not be ruled out if the elemental lithium is released into contact with water. This is why device manufacturers recommend that their batteries be replaced with their own batteries. But the explosive capacity should still be small.
People should look at the reality, rather than the sci-fi fantasy of environmental spin. Take the statement: "As each CFL contains five milligrams of mercury, at the Maine "safety" standard of 300 nanograms per cubic meter, it would take 16,667 cubic meters of soil to "safely" contain all the mercury in a single CFL." 300 ng/m3 is a standard for mercury concentration in air, not soil. Mercury is an element found naturally in soil. The concern for human exposure is primarily ingestion, and perhaps inhalation, by pregnant women. There is virtually no other human health concern. No one is likely to eat from a floor. So if the window had been opened, with a fan directed out, the inhalation "safety" level would have been reached in a short time. Second, the Maine "safety" standard is set at a level to protect against exposure over a lifetime, with added orders of magnitude of intended to cover uncertainty, and still cause not even a possibility of harm. So the 300 ng/M3 level is unrealistic in any case for a temporary exposure. Third, the standard is based on the toxicity of methyl mercury, which is produced in the guts of fish, and not elemental mercury, which is used in CFLs, and is much much less toxic. So a spill of mercury from a CFL, even in the highly unlikely even that all of the mercury was released, is not a circumstance worthy of panic.
Since when did /. readers ever have reverence for dear old wonderful school days. Take a quick poll and you will find that 99.9% were disgusted with school, and would see any alternative as better.
Here's how it works. You want to get ahead politically, so you make up a story about weapons of mass destruction. If you want to save a village, you have to destroy it. Ring any bells? Tell everybody that they are about to die, or maybe even that they are half dead already. You call them .. what .. polybrominated diphenyl ethers, because you can be certain that no one will actually read any of the real literature about it, especially that it is a family of chemicals, especially that there are differences between the members of the family according to how many bromines are attached. It doesn't matter, just yell about danger, death, etc. And the good deluded people of Washington will be willing to support a surge. When will they ever learn?