Slashdot Mirror


Dell Closes Ireland Plant; 2nd Largest Employer

Wide Angle writes in with a PBS report on tough economic news from Ireland: Dell announced that it will relocate its manufacturing plant in Limerick, Ireland to Lodz, Poland. "Dell's announcement... is a severe blow to the Irish economy, which has been hit hard and fast by the global economic crisis. Dell is Ireland's second-largest corporate employer and the country's largest exporter. Nineteen hundred shift workers will lose their jobs. ...Dell's closing is not a result of the economic downturn, but of a pattern all too familiar in the United States — corporations' perennial search for cheaper labor. Since 2000 several companies, such as Procter & Gamble, Intel, Gateway, and NEC Electronics, have moved manufacturing jobs from Ireland to China, Eastern Europe, and elsewhere. When Poland joined the European Union in 2004, it became an attractive place for companies to set up manufacturing plants. ... However, Ireland has managed to maintain and attract... 'knowledge-intensive jobs.' Google's European headquarters are based in Dublin, and Facebook announced late last year that they would locate their international headquarters there. But the overall economic picture for Ireland is bleak."

494 comments

  1. There once was... by Foldarn · · Score: 3, Funny

    There once was a man from Nantucket...

    1. Re:There once was... by lymond01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Being from Nantucket, I don't get the joke. I even read the article (imagine that) to see if there was some reference. In fact, being a native of Nantucket allows me to charge you 50 cents for each use of the word "Nantucket" (it's actually $3000, but we divide the royalties up amongst the entire population -- 50 cents is just my cut). However, if you can pull some strings to get us our own statehood (which we've tried for before) or our own nuclear missile base (from "Boston Legal"), I'll let my 50 cents slide.

    2. Re:There once was... by Foldarn · · Score: 3, Informative

      Originally it was an innocent joke. Now it's just a really vulgar limerick! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_once_was_a_man_from_Nantucket

    3. Re:There once was... by gnick · · Score: 5, Funny

      There once was a company called Dell,
      Who saw their costs starting to swell,
      Labor in Lodz
      Attracted their jobs,
      So they told the Irish, "Go to hell".

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    4. Re:There once was... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      In fact, being a native of Nantucket allows me to charge you 50 cents for each use of the word "Nantucket" (it's actually $3000, but we divide the royalties up amongst the entire population -- 50 cents is just my cut). However, if you can pull some strings to get us our own statehood (which we've tried for before) or our own nuclear missile base (from "Boston Legal"), I'll let my 50 cents slide.

      Hey, you might not have your own state but you did have your own TV show. That's more than my hometown (which has 20 times your population) has ever gotten ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:There once was... by mark72005 · · Score: 1, Troll

      almost-rhymes are funnier than actual rhymes! mod parent funny!

    6. Re:There once was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just for the record, the correct pronunciation of Lodz in Polish is something like Woodge.
      Cheers!

    7. Re:There once was... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I was such a fan of the show I ended up visiting Nantucket. I spent a lot of time at the Brotherhood.

    8. Re:There once was... by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      Yah, the Brotherhood has good atmosphere. They've changed the bar area around too for a little more of a pub feel. Just avoid the french fries.

      "These taste like not-quite-defrosted potatoes."

      "That's how they are," says the server.

      If you remember the show Wings, then you probably remember the two quarreling brothers, the cute little female shop owner (Crystal Bernhardt), and Lowell the mechanic. Most residents of Nantucket most closely resemble Lowell. The rest of the cast seemed like tourists to me. :-)

    9. Re:There once was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ak, that doesn't help me at all. I've never even heard of the word Woodge. Are you British or something?

      Is it pronounced more like muds or mods or moods or modes?

    10. Re:There once was... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I've never had the courage to publicly admit to being a "Wings" fan before. But you sir have inspired me to admit my love for that much-maligned and admittedly cheesy TV show.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    11. Re:There once was... by gnick · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe I can help.

      The correct pronunciation of the word "Woodge" is something like the Polish pronunciation of "Lodz".

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    12. Re:There once was... by UNKN · · Score: 0

      Wings was a pretty good show, gotta love the cab driver too.

    13. Re:There once was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There once was a company called Dell,
      Who saw their costs starting to swell,
      Labor in Lodz
      Attracted their jobs,
      So they told the Irish, "Go to hell".

      Dear Mr. Dell,

      Your poetry skills suck even worse than your computers do.

      Regards
      The Irish

    14. Re:There once was... by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dell, as they moved away, laughed,
      "To pay your wages we'd be daft."
      On pink slips they wrote
      A rude little note
      "Dude, you're getting the shaft!"

    15. Re:There once was... by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 5, Funny

      And when the Lodzians wanted their pay,
      Dell ran numbers and told them 'no way'.
      They moved to Myanmar --
      like all industry stars --
      where the workers get eight cents a day.

      But labor still cost too much wealth.
      (For some workers were older than twelve!)
      Dell's great business plan,
      could not involve man:
      They were modeled on magical elves.

      So Dell finally settled in Congo.
      Every PC they now make, as you know,
      is constructed on skimp
      by two apes and a chimp.
      (And the chimp's job security is low.)

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    16. Re:There once was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have pink slips in Ireland.

    17. Re:There once was... by Trapick · · Score: 4, Informative

      The town's name is "Limerick". Most common limerick? You guessed it, man from Nantucket. It wasn't all that funny, but that's the joke.

    18. Re:There once was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I can help.

      The correct pronunciation of the word "Woodge" is something like the Polish pronunciation of "Lodz".

      Yeah, that's because they're polocks. They can't help it. No need to rub it in.

    19. Re:There once was... by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      "loods"

    20. Re:There once was... by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Maybe I can help.

      The correct pronunciation of the word "Woodge" is something like the Polish pronunciation of "Lodz".

      This should be modded "Insightful" but certainly not "Funny". gnick is quite right. I studied Russian and I know just a little about Polish. The proper spelling of the town uses an "L" with a slashed line through the middle of it, an "o" with an acute accent, a "d" and a "z" with an acute accent on it. I tried to put it in my post but Slashdot turned it to garbage. If you search for "Lodz" on Wikipedia, you can see the proper spelling in Polish.

      Note the slashed line right in the middle of the "L". That means it's pronounced like a "W" in English. Leave it to those crazy Poles to spell "W" with an "L" :-)

    21. Re:There once was... by bytethese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Must be green slips then huh?

    22. Re:There once was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The correct pronunciation of the word "Woodge" is something like the Polish pronunciation of "Lodz".

      But it looks like LULZ.

      kthksbi

    23. Re:There once was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe your sarcasm detector is malfunctioning.

    24. Re:There once was... by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      See...now that's worth a +1 informative. Thanks!

      -- A Man from Nantucket

    25. Re:There once was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up and let those of us with a sense of humor enjoy the post.

    26. Re:There once was... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Who learned to shit in a small bucket?

      The closure's an UNLUCKY charm,
      It will do great financial harm...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    27. Re:There once was... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      And your sense of humor must have received it's pink slip long ago...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    28. Re:There once was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, your copy of the "P45" form that you get when you are laid off in ireland is often pink, especially if it's one of the handwritten carbon-paper ones which consist of 3 colored layers - one layer for the revenue (tax office), one for your ex-employer, and one for you.

    29. Re:There once was... by UseTheSource · · Score: 1

      The town's name is "Limerick".

      Tá sé Luimneach, fuarchroíoch duine!

      (Roughly translated, that's: "It is Luimneach, cold-hearted person!" "Luimneach" is the Irish name for Limerick.

      --
      "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer." -Adolf Hitler
      "We are one Nation, we are one People." -The One 'leader'
    30. Re:There once was... by UseTheSource · · Score: 1

      Ooops, I think this should actually be:

      "Tá sé Luimneach, duine fuarchroíoch!"

      Still getting the hang of the grammar. ;)

      --
      "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer." -Adolf Hitler
      "We are one Nation, we are one People." -The One 'leader'
    31. Re:There once was... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Redheads look better in cerise.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    32. Re:There once was... by Kyrka · · Score: 1

      So 1900 jobs constitutes the second largest employer in Ireland? That would make their population, what, 12,000? Whatever.

    33. Re:There once was... by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      An Éireannach tú?

    34. Re:There once was... by pacinpm · · Score: 1

      You can hear for correct (well, as close as machines can get it for now) pronounciation of Lodz here: http://www.expressivo.com/pl/say/OTExhSTl

  2. willingness to relocate by bugs2squash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps Eire should have factored in that companies agile and willing enough to relocate once to Ireland would likely be sufficiently agile and willing to move to follow the sun again.

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Everyone in Eire with half a brain knew this was coming anyway...
      Those relatively low tech manufacturing jobs were only ever going to be useful as a means of bootstrapping ourselves into a properly high tech economy.
      Not sure the government knew this, but everyone smart working in tech did.

    2. Re:willingness to relocate by spun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is what happens when capital and goods can freely cross borders but people can't. Capital will simply chase poverty in a never ending circle around the globe. When one poor, desperate country starts to get wealthy, corporations will simply move to the next one, and let the first slip back into poverty.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:willingness to relocate by ritesonline · · Score: 1

      Somehow I can't imagine that re-locating an entire factory right across Europe makes economic sense if lower wage bills are the only attraction.

      The more likely reasons are significant tax breaks and other government inducements.

      And no, this is nothing new, more a case of 'Back to the Future' (although at least DeLorean had the decency to go bust rather than look for bigger 'incentives' elsewhere).

    4. Re:willingness to relocate by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      Ireland's primary draw is that they have the world's lowest rate of corporate income taxes that I know of - something like 8%.

      Unfortunately, this illustrates that while tax breaks are nice, the cost of labor is still king.

    5. Re:willingness to relocate by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is what happens when capital and goods can freely cross borders but people can't. Capital will simply chase poverty in a never ending circle around the globe. When one poor, desperate country starts to get wealthy, corporations will simply move to the next one, and let the first slip back into poverty.

      So what's the solution? If you get rid of the restrictions on people moving you destroy national sovereignty and identity. If you get rid of free trade/adopt protectionism you drag the economy down a few pegs and probably destroy at least as many jobs as you save.

      I hate what we've become but I'm at a loss for how to fix it. Ideas?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:willingness to relocate by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      So perhaps in addition to the low pay, the Polish government bought the business.

      Perhaps they thought that a few thousand jobs created was a good return on dropping their tax rate instead of other forms of government handout like those being enacted right now in the USA.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    7. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You say "destroy national sovereignty" (and all of the restrictions therein) like it's a bad thing.

    8. Re:willingness to relocate by spun · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't see how dropping restrictions on people moving will necessarily destroy national sovereignty or identity. If a country has a strong and vital government and cultural identity, they can certainly retain control and identity even with an influx of new citizens.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    9. Re:willingness to relocate by bugs2squash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that Irish citizens could move to Poland if they wanted to.

      Besides, what you say is to be applauded, eventually the corporations will move around to even the poorest contries. Then the only way they will be able to make themselves poor again is by waging war or grossly mismanaging their governments (per the US model).

      --
      Nullius in verba
    10. Re:willingness to relocate by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The one thing that made Ireland attractive over alternatives to American companies like Intel and Dell was the low corporate taxes. Something else was an educated workforce that spoke English. Although it had varying degrees of accents, it was English. Another was Ireland is in the EU and all the advantages that brought.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    11. Re:willingness to relocate by Eunuchswear · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is what happens when capital and goods can freely cross borders but people can't.

      Both Eire and Poland are in the EU, free movement of people is guaranteed. If the Dell workers want to keep their jobs they can just move to Lodz.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    12. Re:willingness to relocate by DSmith1974 · · Score: 1

      Don't Panic! Once all the work has gone to the East, our salaries will in turn become lower than those in the East and the factories will return. I wonder if a global economy will ever stabilize where most regions are broadly similar?

      --
      It is not immoral to create the human species - with or without ceremony, Samuel Clemens.
    13. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're speaking in English, call it Ireland.
      If you're speaking in Irish, call it Eire.

      Don't mix and match in what was probably an attempt to sound intelligent and learned.

    14. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens when capital and goods can freely cross borders but people can't.

      So what's the solution? I hate what we've become but I'm at a loss for how to fix it. Ideas?

      Put a tax on capital leaving the country. Make it a 1% or a 10% tax on funds leaving the country that have not been in the country for a few years or so.

      For a long term committed partner, it's not an issue, the tax is zero after 5-10 years. For short term ones - like the industrial equivalent of currency speculators - the hell with them. If there's profit enough, they'll suck it up, if not, they would just have imbalanced your economy anyway. Slightly lower growth, but much stabler over all. You get enough time to shift job training before a long term partner can draw down its capital tax free.

      Economics is easy. Politics is hard, because economics is math (and assumptions) and politics is people (and assholes).

    15. Re:willingness to relocate by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see how dropping restrictions on people moving will necessarily destroy national sovereignty or identity.

      If you tell a Government that they can't control how many people cross their border is that not by it's very definition a restriction on national sovereignty?

      How would it help anyway? How many Americans would really want to move to India when their job gets outsourced? How many Irish would want to move to Poland? Leaving aside the lower standard of living (compared to the US) in most places where jobs are outsourced what about language and cultural barriers?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    16. Re:willingness to relocate by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      I don't know which is cheaper but what about: more shiping via truck and less shipping via boat? Even if the boat is cheaper (save in bulk) you have to divide the boat cargo up once it's across the water. Eastern Europe can cover more areas from trucks.

    17. Re:willingness to relocate by ritesonline · · Score: 1

      I'm still not convinced.

      This reminds me of an HP seminar when they boasted that labour costs for their printers was less than 2% or 3% (don't remember exact figure).

      I guess that you'll say this was because of low wages but it's still a very small part of the equation.

      The sort of breaks I was thinking of are on capital investments and match funding etc.

    18. Re:willingness to relocate by D4MO · · Score: 1

      Opinion was that we weren't going to accept loosing a commissioner and requiring specific statement on neutrality (which I don't personally believe actually makes any difference). Also, people like to make the government look like idiots, a bloody nose, if you will. If the have a referendum again, it may not pass because people are pissed off with the economy. I don't agree with that line of thinking.

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    19. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So Ireland should just do whatever EU leaders want? If the rest of us in europe were given a vote, I doubt Ireland would have been the only one to reject it.

    20. Re:willingness to relocate by Skrynesaver · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not to spawn a pointless off-topic flame war or anything, but at least we have a constitution and so the population gets to vote on it. If the Lisbon treaty, which isn't a constitution, were put to a plebiscite throughout Europe Ireland wouldn't be the only ones rejecting it, in fact support for the European project is probably higher in Ireland than anywhere else in Europe.

      Anyway, back on topic, it's a shame for the people in Limerick where the plant was sited, however the jobs going are the assembly line jobs, Dells European planning and management structures remain in Ireland for now.

      --
      "Linux is for noobs"-The new MS fud strategy
    21. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is what happens when capital and goods can freely cross borders but people can't.

      Erm, in the EU they can. We've got over ten thousand Polish people working here (Netherlands) and if you had walked in a temp agency office last year, you could have gotten a job in Ireland as well (IBM was seeking a lot of people for their customer support back then).

      Chasing jobs to Poland doesn't make sense, that's all. Poor pay, poor work environment, insane hours, etc. I've spoken to a few people who quit working in polish factories of large Western corporations because even for Polish standards, it sucked.

    22. Re:willingness to relocate by lee1026 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Problem is, the number of poor countries that are stable enough to invest in is not large, and once a country becomes a wealthy, it rarely slides downwards very far. Thus, this should end relatively soon, as soon as corporations run out of countries.

    23. Re:willingness to relocate by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      People have been free to move within the United States since its inception, and yet we still have definite regional and local identities. Each state is still able to make decisions that are best for it.

      Europe is a bit different of course, and always will be. The point being that identity is inherent in a region and isn't destroyed just because people can move.

      I'm also not sure that "free trade" and "protectionism" are absolutes that you either have, or don't have. For instance, I wouldn't call stopping food with Melamine in it a restriction on free trade.

      --
      AccountKiller
    24. Re:willingness to relocate by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You say "destroy national sovereignty" (and all of the restrictions therein) like it's a bad thing.

      You see restrictions where I see freedoms. Globalization has already created a race to the bottom for labor and environmental standards. Will our freedoms and rights be next in line? Will the United States be forced to adopt European restrictions on free speech? Will Europe be forced to adopt Islamic restrictions on free speech? Will the United States, Finland, Switzerland and Norway be forced to adopt stricter gun control laws?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    25. Re:willingness to relocate by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      On the downside, they had to interact with the Irish.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    26. Re:willingness to relocate by thrillseeker · · Score: 0

      The solution is to encourage people to earn and save money by reducing and simplifying tax structures (a single sales tax from an easily measured source, such as energy, etc.), which also allows people to easily see how much of their money is spent, eliminating taxes on capital gains to encourage savings, eliminating corporate taxes, etc. - IOW grant as much freedom to the individual to do with his efforts (and not simply his existence) as he can. But such efforts at simplification and liberty reduce the need for government ... so government does not desire them.

    27. Re:willingness to relocate by D4MO · · Score: 1

      12.5%. Yep, lowest in Europe, and yep, our wage bills and inflation got out of control.

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    28. Re:willingness to relocate by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      in most places where jobs are outsourced what about language and cultural barriers?

      How about language and cultural barriers when you call tech support?

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    29. Re:willingness to relocate by jmoen · · Score: 1

      Dubai has no income taxes at all, at least in the free zones.

    30. Re:willingness to relocate by Klaus_1250 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Agreed. The Dutch voted against the constitution the first time (which was a surprise to the government, especially since they invested million in a semi-propaganda campaign) and weren't given a vote for the revised treaty because the government feared a rejection again.

      Democracy 2.0. Give people a vote if you think they'll agree with you, take the vote away when you fear disagreement.

      --
      It only takes one man to change the Wisdom of the Crowd to Tyranny of the Masses.
    31. Re:willingness to relocate by Jeoh · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'll just call it Eireland to satisfy both sides.

    32. Re:willingness to relocate by philspear · · Score: 1

      If you get rid of free trade/adopt protectionism you drag the economy down a few pegs and probably destroy at least as many jobs as you save.

      I don't know squat about economics; how does that work? Seems like by preventing jobs from leaving the country, the company itself may not earn as much, but you've saved jobs within your own country. That's in my eyes, and anyone who is not a shareholder in said company and selfish, more important. Assuming that the company is going to use the money it saves to reinvest in your home country is not a sure thing to me.

    33. Re:willingness to relocate by Idiomatick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well they are both part of the EU so gp is wrong you can move from ireland->poland for free.
      Secondly, It is a GOOD thing that business' chase poverty! Something shitty happens to a country and big countries move in which will act to save their asses. Ireland will not become poorer than Poland because of this, as the summary says they are retaining higher paying post-secondary jobs. This could be rewritten to show how ireland is moving up in the world. Now they don't NEED the Dell jobs (atleast not as much as Poland does). This if left unfettered causes an equalization of wealth. Which is a fair thing, a good thing unless you happen to currently live at the top.
       
      We on /. like to bitch about India stealing our jobs but really they need them more than we do. Think of it like global charity except they have to earn the money.... and it is involuntary. Try to see some of the good :/

    34. Re:willingness to relocate by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the EU constitution the size of a telephone directory ?

      Hardly the few elegant pages of the original US constitution. How anyone could approve it is beyond me.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    35. Re:willingness to relocate by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that the people would willingly follow the job and take a big paycut? Dell wouldn't move if it didn't mean a lot of money saved, so it's not going to be a little paycut.

      If the people are so willing to work for less, why didn't they just work for less where they were at and save themselves the trouble of moving to another country?

      Or perhaps, it just wouldn't matter whether people were free to move or not.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    36. Re:willingness to relocate by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      Depends on what's being assembled. I would bet that printer assembly is automated to a much greater degree than PC assembly is.

    37. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Ireland won't be slipping back into poverty. Also, in the EU, people can cross borders and work freely. There are plenty of Poles working in Ireland now.

    38. Re:willingness to relocate by Eil · · Score: 1

      When one poor, desperate country starts to get wealthy, corporations will simply move to the next one, and let the first slip back into poverty.

      Okay. So what you're saying is that since England, the United States, and Canada were the first developed industrialized countries on the globe, they'll be the first to get thrown back into the third world.

      Excuse me if I'm just a little skeptical of that scenario.

    39. Re:willingness to relocate by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 1

      When one poor, desperate country starts to get wealthy, corporations will simply move to the next one, and let the first slip back into poverty.

      Or as the country starts to get wealthy, it invests in higher learning and job specialization. Then once all of the manufacturing jobs go overseas, the country is ready to reinvent themselves as a country of skilled labor. The article mentions that Google and Facebook just recently opened offices there, so there will surely be a lot of higher level positions. This has already happened to countries like Japan and Korea* as factories continually moved west toward China.

      This is comparable to the loss of manufacturing here in the United States. Don't bank on your career as an auto worker, but if you go to college for a few years you could relatively easily get a job as a system administrator, accountant, programmer, registered nurse, the list goes on.

      * Granted Korea and Japan don't have the best economies in the world, but I wouldn't describe their situation as "slipping back into poverty".

    40. Re:willingness to relocate by ionix5891 · · Score: 1

      It was that size because the Dutch (or was it French) rejected the simpler shorter version and politics between EU states are very complicated

      Hell there probably chapter on various concessions and reassurances for ireland alone with respects to Neutrality, Abortion, Workers rights so on and so for

    41. Re:willingness to relocate by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Nothing whatsoever stopping the people in Limerick following their jobs to Lodz. It's all within the EU, if you can work in one country, you can work in any.

      In fact, it would be kind of interesting to see the boot on the other foot, with Ireland having seen a massive influx of Poles since their accession to the EU (who are now increasingly going back because it's not so worth their while any more).

      This is exactly how it's supposed to work - rich countries bringing the poorer ones up so they can trade and compete on an equal footing. Ireland benefited from it, now it's Poland's turn, and people in Ireland or anywhere else within the EU are free to go there and seek work.

    42. Re:willingness to relocate by rgviza · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh like citigroup buying a spanish highway construction company with 7bn euros in bailout money from our taxes?

      http://www.thestreet.com/story/10450514/1/citi-to-buy-spanish-highway-operator.html?puc=_tscrss

      Here's the day they got our bailout check. Note the dates:

      http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN2636427520081126

      Yeap we paid for it. Be pissed, very pissed.

      I can't believe regulators aren't all over them for this. What are we paying them for? What good is all this bailout money doing if they are just using it to buy foriegn companies instead of saving the jobs of the people that effing paid for the bailout? Talk about biting the hand that feeds you. That bailout money did NOT come from Europe.

      Here's the layoff announcement of the US employees:
      http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/154130/citigroup_layoff_could_decimate_it_jobs.html

      grrr

      -Viz

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    43. Re:willingness to relocate by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Eire and Poland"?

      Why half pedantic?

      You mean Eire and Polska I guess. Or as most of us know then, Ireland and Poland.

      --
      http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    44. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, never trust on bitches like Dell. If she jumped from Uncle Sam's bed to yours so easily, you should be aware that she will jump into the next guys' bed as easily...

    45. Re:willingness to relocate by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Correct, except that this will not cause Ireland to slip into poverty. It isn't a cycle of never ending poverty, it is a cycle that is trying to reach equilibrium.

      Of course, equilibrium won't happen until we eliminate war and human rights extends globally. (I won't disagree if you assert that will never happen)

    46. Re:willingness to relocate by Bertie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually Limerick's at least as much of a poverty-stricken dump as many places in Poland, and stuff like this will only make it worse.

      Ireland has seen a lot of development and increased prosperity over the last while, but things like this show how transient that can be if you're too dependent on outside sugardaddies providing that prosperity. It's easy come, easy go for the organisations providing the jobs - if somebody else turns up with a bigger development grant and a workforce with lower wages, moving won't cost them a thought.

      The trick is to take the inward investment and use it to build up your skills base so that ultimately you can stand on your own two feet, but that's a whole lot easier said than done. Places like Taiwan have done it rather beautifully, and Estonia, financial troubles apart, seems to be on the right track, but it's tough.

    47. Re:willingness to relocate by renoX · · Score: 1

      >>So what's the solution? If you get rid of the restrictions on people moving>I'm at a loss for how to fix it. Ideas?
      Sorry, I don't have the solution.. It's probably comes with restrictions on capital investment, but the countries which don't 'play the game' will attract capital investment (much like Ireland does with its tax laws which is why Microsoft declare his benefits here) if the country is a big consumer, protectionism laws may help..

    48. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If you get rid of free trade/adopt protectionism you drag the economy down a few pegs and probably destroy at least as many jobs as you save.

      Would you care to prove that bold statement? Especially in the case of limited, case-by-case protectionism on a regional scale (Europe/North America/SEA/etc.)?

    49. Re:willingness to relocate by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      "I hate what we've become but I'm at a loss for how to fix it. Ideas?"

      No employment terms change without all company executives being present at an all hands company meeting. Employees are allowed to ( without any legal repercussions ) kill or maim any and all company executives at said meeting ( and at any other time of their choosing ).

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    50. Re:willingness to relocate by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Then all that would do is keep companies from coming into the country in the first place.

    51. Re:willingness to relocate by Bertie · · Score: 1

      And what's more, about 400 of the workforce ARE Polish...

    52. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember reading in the Daily Hate about callcenter workers that were given the option of being made redundant or relocating with the company to the south of Spain. For quite a few of them spanish wasn't so hard to learn after all.

    53. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's the solution? If you get rid of the restrictions on people moving you destroy national sovereignty and identity.

      Removing restrictions enables *free will*, and if folks choose to move, and if that is in detriment to a national identity or that nation's sovereignty, then that is how it should be, no?

    54. Re:willingness to relocate by pla · · Score: 1

      If you get rid of the restrictions on people moving you destroy national sovereignty and identity

      You say that like you consider it a bad thing...

      The sooner we get rid of the petty tribal "us vs them" mentality we get from all the imaginary lines we've drawn on our globe, the better.

    55. Re:willingness to relocate by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      The phenomenon he is referecing is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_advantage

      The reasoning is that there are different levels of efficiency.

      But simple example is that if one country can make a component cheaper than another country who is better at making finished product from that component, closing up the trade means that the component company now has to inefficiently spawn an industry to finish it themselves, and the finished goods company has to inefficiently manufacture their own components. In the end, if they both work together and focus on what they're most efficient at, they'll produce more than if they try to do it all themselves.

      This is just a very general example. Restricting trade definitely has advantages, for example, a poor country might not be able to produce a corn industry because the USA already sells corn so cheap that the corn farmers can't make any money to invest and compete. So that country may want to forego cheap US corn in order to allow itself to grow its own corn industry and perhaps grow other corn-related industries as well.

    56. Re:willingness to relocate by qbast · · Score: 1

      Will Europa be forced to adopt American self-imposed restrictions on free speech ( AKA political correctness) ?

    57. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To a "recruiter" in Bangalore, the United States looks like one homogenous entity with few cultural distinctions among locations. I tried to explain to a recruiter why I would not be interested in Salt Lake City Utah (e.g., relocating there from San Diego California where I already had a mid-career level job), but she could not understand the basic issue (Salt Lake City being a place where a person of my ethnicity, social idiom, and core beliefs will be less comfortable.)

      Would the story be different if Dell were an Irish, or even a UK company? Why can't HP compete?

    58. Re:willingness to relocate by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of Poles working in Ireland now.

      So maybe Dell thought that if there are so many Poles working in their Irish factory, they can as well relocate that to Poland anyway ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    59. Re:willingness to relocate by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      But can they afford to do so?

      And what about economic conditions at the new location? Sudden influx of new people, new jobs filled with relocating workers, prices go up ( more people chasing same goods ( excepting the Dell products, but you cant eat or live in those ), wages go down ( more people seeking the jobs ).

      Is Dell required to keep them if they want to relocate? What happens to their wages if they do?

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    60. Re:willingness to relocate by citizenr · · Score: 1

      This is what happens when capital and goods can freely cross borders but people can't.

      except ~half the workforce in that Factory was Polish ... and now they will simply return to Poland.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    61. Re:willingness to relocate by sumdumass · · Score: 0

      The problem is that the jobs don't pay enough to keep them in your country. By doing so, your inflating the prices of products which means the people need to pay more to get them. In a closed loop like this, you will lose a lot of the wealth we have now (purchasing power) because 15 to 30 percent of every dollar is siphoned off for governmental serviced that do nothing to replenish the wealth in the country.

      What we do now is offset this drain on the economy (overall inefficiency) by outsourcing a lot of the production which allows you to actually purchase the products you want and need.

      Now you also have to look at the foreign markets. A lot of these companies who are outsourcing also are doing business in those countries. You say selfish when talking about outsourcing but that exactly how it can be looked at in reverse, "you sell your product here but do nothing to support the economy like provide jobs and pay taxes and so on." "What do you mean all the jobs have to stay in America, we won't buy your product then" and all the sudden, jobs are still lost in your country anyways.

    62. Re:willingness to relocate by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Both Eire and Poland are in the EU, free movement of people is guaranteed.

      Free movement of goods, money and companies is guaranteed. Free movement of people is certainly not.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    63. Re:willingness to relocate by jwietelmann · · Score: 1

      Questions from the devil's advocate:

      What happens to all the unskilled laborers of a nation when all of its unskilled labor moves to another, more impoverished nation? Assuming that not all people are capable of performing highly-skilled labor, how do they survive in the midst of a cost of living that is largely dictated by the wealth of the upper-class who are profiting from the relocated labor?

      Much like the GP, my views on globalization are still very much conflicted, and this is one of the issues that conflicts me.

      P.S. Yes I do realize that just because a person has an "upper class job" does not mean his/her job requires immense skill or that he/she is skilled at said job. We've all seen it in action at one point or another, but I think it's safe to say that these jobs are significantly more difficult to attain for an equally incompetent person who comes from a lower class background.

    64. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It was that size because the Dutch (or was it French) rejected the simpler shorter version and politics between EU states are very complicated

      You obviously don't know what you're talking about.
      The shorter (but just as obfuscated) version came later.

    65. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And earn 200â per month instead of 2000â

    66. Re:willingness to relocate by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      You're just prolonging the effect. Without government constantly pumping new money into the market, you eventually run out. That's WHY we're off the gold standard and are stuck with this dysfuctional fiat currency.

    67. Re:willingness to relocate by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, local governments usually give huge tax breaks to corps looking to set up shop - so you lose that ability to bank "found" money and foster local industry growth.

    68. Re:willingness to relocate by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The sooner we get rid of the petty tribal "us vs them" mentality we get from all the imaginary lines we've drawn on our globe, the better.

      Those imaginary lines are a lot more important than you think. My country guarantees me several freedoms that other countries (or even the UN Declaration of Human Rights) don't provide for. You'll have a hard time convincing me of the wisdom of getting rid of those "imaginary" lines.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    69. Re:willingness to relocate by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Funny

          [in a heavy Indian accent]

          CSR: Thank you for calling [company] technical support, my name is "Bob", and how may I service you this fine morning.

          Customer: What?

          CSR: Good morning, and how can I be helping you.

          Customer: Morning? It's 9pm. Where the hell are you?

          CSR: We are in ... uhhh ... New Jersey.

          Customer: I'm in New York, and it's 9pm here.

          CSR: Oh, I am begging of your forgiveness for my incorrectness in that statement, we are in the other New Jersey.

          Customer: What?

          CSR: We are in New Jersey, India.

          Customer: {sigh} Ok, I'm having a problem with my some-computer 5100.

          CSR: I am very sorry that you are having discomfort with your "some-computer 500", how may I help you resolve this issue.

          Customer: No, a some-computer 5100, not a 500.

          CSR: Oh, I am begging your forgiveness [balls up some paper by the handset] there must be line noise. So you have 50 some-computer 100 that are not working. I will have to transfer you to large business support, please hold [hold music]

          Customer: WAIT!!

          Ok, that sounds funny and all, but I swear I've had so many variations of that call, ONLY with off-shore call centers. It's not a matter that they're in India, it's that the people I always end up get have poor training, terrible phone skills, and an equal American in the position should be fired. Since the companies farm out the work to the cheapest places, they're hiring the cheapest employees too. Now, the American call centers seem to be reserved for the highest level technical folks, who have years of experience, and know what they're doing. It's just a nice added advantage that they speak English well. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    70. Re:willingness to relocate by Manchot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Both Eire and Poland are in the EU, free movement of people is guaranteed.

      That's easy to say, but not so easy to do. Consider the following:
      1. Moving usually incurs a huge cost, both in terms of time and money. When you're moving out of the country, those costs are multiplied.
      2. Moving is stressful, and most people don't like forcing that on their family.
      3. The social costs are high. You'd be leaving your friends, most of your family, and basically everyone you know behind. There's a reason that most people live within driving distance of where they grew up.
      4. You'd have to learn Polish.

      So yeah, while you're "free" to move, you're only free to do so if you're willing to accept all of the above. I think that point #3 is the most salient one, simply because humans are social beings and while the social costs aren't easily quantified, they're easily the dominant factor for most people.

    71. Re:willingness to relocate by Roxton · · Score: 1

      Easy (well, not easy to implement, but...), trade unions. Trade unions have open membership for people who meet their standards. People within a trade union can trade freely. Trade unions can set terms of trade with other trade unions.

      Trade unions don't have to be 1 union : 1 person. Unions can be multinational. They can include things like labor and pay standards, or even go as far as being miniature opt-in governments with income taxes. Switching unions needs to be easy. Fractioning into new unions (taking a large percentage of the body) needs to be easy.

    72. Re:willingness to relocate by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      CSR: We are in ... uhhh ... New Jersey.

      Ugh! They always claim that too. Are they not aware of any other part of the United States or is there actually a neighborhood somewhere in India called "New Jersey"?

      Now, the American call centers seem to be reserved for the highest level technical folks, who have years of experience, and know what they're doing.

      You must never have had to call Verizon Wireless support ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    73. Re:willingness to relocate by Time_Warped · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When my hi tech job was out sourced I eventually found work as a store clerk at about 55% of my previous wages. So I basically stopped buying everything but food. In a typical year at my old salary I might have spent $8000 or more on Computers, TV's, Clothes, DVD's Etc. In 2008 I spent under $500 on consumer goods. A few DVD's 2 Computer Games, some underwear. I only eat out at places with a dollar menu, and when I do I almost always spend $4 or less. So by reducing my salary by 50% I now by 80-90% less "Stuff". Sounds like a great plan for economic meltdown to me. If you want to get Golden Eggs, you have to buy the goose some corn. You cheap twit!

    74. Re:willingness to relocate by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's called Global Economic Equilibrium. I agree that this migration should end (eventually), but I wouldn't say soon. The main factor will be if a nation losing jobs will still retain enough capitol to create new ones in their place.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    75. Re:willingness to relocate by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Yes, because unions have never been corrupted. Unions have never grown into entities more concerned with their own survival than looking out for the wellbeing of their membership.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    76. Re:willingness to relocate by timeOday · · Score: 1

      People have been free to move within the United States since its inception, and yet we still have definite regional and local identities.

      I disagree, regional culture in the US has declined steeply in proportion with economic development and the growth of federal govt. WalMart, TGI Friday's, and ClearChannel radio are the same everywhere. There are a few places with some local culture simply because they have strict ordinances to enforce it, such as San Francisco, Portland, and Santa Fe. Then there is New York, which I will admit, is one of a kind.

    77. Re:willingness to relocate by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What we do now is offset this drain on the economy (overall inefficiency) by outsourcing a lot of the production which allows you to actually purchase the products you want and need.

      And when you outsource all of that production and gut the middle class whom is going to be left to buy your products? Playing devils advocate here but I've lived in an economically depressed region my whole life and I have yet to see any benefits come to my region from free trade. What I have seen is a lot of jobs shipped to Mexico (thank you NAFTA) and very few jobs coming into town to replace them.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    78. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > between EU states are very complicated

      In my life I have known people who remember both WWI and WWII.

      It is amazing to me that the very notion of a unified government of Europe is even possible.

    79. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, I don't know what you guys thought the bailout money would be used for, but isn't it obvious it will be used for foreign investment [... so they can make a profit on it later and pay employees and interest on your savings]? Or were you thinking some eat-your-own-hand-to-feed-yourself scheme?

      I'm not really in the loop, but I don't get all the ado.

      Giving them the bailout money in the first place, on the other hand, I don't understand. I mean I like people, but I can't just run around hand them money in exchange for no service to me.

    80. Re:willingness to relocate by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting cost of living. I don't know about the exact specifics of Ireland and Poland, but he cost of living somewhere is one of the main drivers of salary. We have some large differences among states in the US. It's hard to imagine how large a differences between the US and other countries might be.

      Anyways, I work in a smallish town now. If someone wanted me to move and work in NYC I would expect $current+COLA. I don't see why it also wouldn't be expected in the opposite direction.

    81. Re:willingness to relocate by causality · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You say "destroy national sovereignty" (and all of the restrictions therein) like it's a bad thing.

      You see restrictions where I see freedoms. Globalization has already created a race to the bottom for labor and environmental standards. Will our freedoms and rights be next in line? Will the United States be forced to adopt European restrictions on free speech? Will Europe be forced to adopt Islamic restrictions on free speech? Will the United States, Finland, Switzerland and Norway be forced to adopt stricter gun control laws?

      What really bothers me about governments and large organizations in general is that they fail to understand the saying, "no matter how far down the wrong path you have travelled, turn back." Governments almost never say "this sounded like a good idea at the time but it's just not working, things are getting worse, time to abandon this idea and try something else." If they do say that, it's over the course of decades or sometimes centuries even though the knowledge of better solutions (or at least that this solution isn't working) has been around for a long time.

      I wish there were some type of initiative/referendum that citizens could use to challenge laws, not because they are unconstitutional or otherwise legally invalid, but because they have failed to deliver the results that were promised. If there were a way to get rid of otherwise legally valid laws that can be objectively proven to be counterproductive, not because enough voters put enough pressure on the legislators to repeal the law, but because at least one citizen can rigorously prove that it has failed, this would represent real progress.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    82. Re:willingness to relocate by przemekklosowski · · Score: 1

      This is what happens when capital and goods can freely cross borders but people can't. Capital will simply chase poverty in a never ending circle around the globe.

      Except that it is not as simple as that: a lot of Poles used to work in Ireland, which was one of the first EU countries that allowed labor migration from new Eastern EU members. Recently however, due to ecomomy tightening in Ireland, and relative economic boom in Poland, many Polish expatriates are returning eastward.

      Labor cost is still important but not as much as it used to be: capital situation, tax incentives, closeness to large markets, etc., are gaining importance as a result of the current crisis.

    83. Re:willingness to relocate by MooUK · · Score: 1

      People can move freely within the EU. Just for clarity.

      That doesn't stop moving being impractical. The cost and hassle and uncertainty of moving to an unknown area put a lot of people off, even if there's no authority preventing them.

    84. Re:willingness to relocate by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      The dial turns away from urban idealism and back toward agrarian subsistence. If environmental or political factors are such that subsistence becomes impossible, then some segment of the population literally starves. My great-great grandparents saw this happen in Ireland, so it doesn't seem so far in the distant past to me.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    85. Re:willingness to relocate by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      eems like by preventing jobs from leaving the country, the company itself may not earn as much, but you've saved jobs within your own country. That's in my eyes, and anyone who is not a shareholder in said company and selfish, more important. Assuming that the company is going to use the money it saves to reinvest in your home country is not a sure thing to me.

      Here's the problem. Assume a company employes 50 people making widget X. It costs the company Y$ so they sell it for Y$ + % profit. Widget X is used by the whole country.

      Now, it's suddenly cheaper to make widget X in another country, so the company moves its operations. By doing this the 50 people lose their jobs, but now the entire country gains the use of widget X for a lower price than before. For a short time it sucks for those 50 people, but in aggregate society is paying less for an item which frees up more money for investing that one hopes would lead to jobs that would hire back those 50 people + more.

      If you don't let the making of widget X move (or tax it so it's like it didn't move) you continue to support an inefficiency. The entire economy now supports this inefficiency for the perceived benefit of 50 people, when in the long run it's better for the whole economy and probably for those 50 people to lower the price of widget X.

      It can be argued that this cycle is not one that can go on indefinitely, but it's a cycle that has risen the standard of living around the world for quite a long time.

    86. Re:willingness to relocate by copponex · · Score: 1

      So what's the solution? If you get rid of the restrictions on people moving you destroy national sovereignty and identity. If you get rid of free trade/adopt protectionism you drag the economy down a few pegs and probably destroy at least as many jobs as you save.

      No. Protectionism protects economies. Free trade is designed to destroy small companies through market fluctuation, and to protect investor rights at the expense of worker rights.

      If Free Trade worked, Mexico, America, and Canada would be doing better today then they were in the early 1990s. But they have all experienced a decline in real wages, increases in cost for basic needs, and suffered from market bubbles that have wiped out small companies. If you're IBM, you can afford to lose a few million dollars a day. If you're Bob's Computer Repair, you're sunk after six months of reduced income.

      I hate what we've become but I'm at a loss for how to fix it. Ideas?

      Restore bilateral trade. Allow countries to decide what they want to produce, not international corporations to dictate their desires. Penalize companies severely for moving jobs out of the United States, and flat, non-negotiable taxes for moving capital - ANY capital - out of the country.

      Greedy international corporations would be shut out, and companies that wanted to invest in America, not just make money here, would benefit. None if this is a popular idea because a well paid middle class means there's less money for the top half percent that writes policy and owns the majority of the wealth.

      Yes, it's class warfare. But the war is over, and the middle class has lost.

    87. Re:willingness to relocate by Shakrai · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I wish there were some type of initiative/referendum that citizens could use to challenge laws, not because they are unconstitutional or otherwise legally invalid, but because they have failed to deliver the results that were promised

      Well there is one way but people seem too stupid to utilize it. They'd rather keep voting in the incumbent because "he's done good things and has experience" or just blindly vote for the guy who shares the same party affiliation as them. Those of who are smart enough not to do this have our votes buried by those who aren't or by rigged electoral processes (gerrymandering in the US, I'm sure other countries have their own version).

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    88. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And limit the workers to five whiskey breaks per day.

    89. Re:willingness to relocate by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Slip back into poverty?? Like which country? I can't think of any. Outsourcing has evils, but it's probably the fastest (and dirtiest) way to make poor countries rise and level the playing field a bit.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    90. Re:willingness to relocate by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      and flat, non-negotiable taxes for moving capital - ANY capital - out of the country.

      What happens when other countries impose similar taxes to keep their capital from leaving the country? Imported capital is the only thing keeping us afloat at the current moment.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    91. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the French. They were the only other country given a vote on the Constitution.

      And if you want to argue about economics and how much Eire was given by the EEC/EU, how about comparing that to the amount given back to it by opening up Irish waters from 200 nautical miles around the coast to fishing from other EEC/EU countries? From having the exclusive rights to 18% of the waters of the EEC/EU being reduced to 4% of the fishing catch quotas. I remember reading years ago that the value of the stocks opened up to the EU was somewhere in the region of £200 billion. That'd be about â300 billion (adjusted for inflation).

      According to Sinn Fein: "EU fleets have taken â120 billion in fish out of Irish waters since 1973. That amounts to more than all the direct payments and structural funds to the island."

      I could go on but that'd be off topic. By the way, Slashdot doesn't like fadas - accents over Irish letters: à = E, é = e, and £ = pounds (punts).

    92. Re:willingness to relocate by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      And the bottom line is that is where Globalization breaks. If the only difference between two countries was the price of labor, I'd say have at it (and be prepared to move myself).

      But it's not. How is this obvious? Well Dell is based in Austin, Texas. One common theme in Texas is complaining about the "illegal's"...the mexican's jumping the border and living illegally in the US. They want the opportunities, freedoms and protections our government gives us. Why then, does Mr. Dell not talk to his friend Mr. G. W. Bush and say "let them in, they can work in my factory"?

      Easy answer, once you let them in legally, they become protected by our labor laws, and become part of our society. By becoming citizens (or resident aliens), their price went up. It has nothing to do with them being brown skinned, it has to do with the fact that in order to create a fair, unexploited labor market, we have to raise the price of our labor. Mr. Dell (and many others, not to single him out), do not wish to pay the cost of the country that created him. It seems treasonous, but we justify it in economic terms as "inevitable".

    93. Re:willingness to relocate by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Why should labor be able to chase jobs around the globe and displace locals?

      [quote] When one poor, desperate country starts to get wealthy, corporations will simply move to the next one, and let the first slip back into poverty. [/quote]

      If that country wants business it can CHOOSE to compete. If it did not so choose, a competing country will seize the opportunity.

      Instead of feeling sorry for Ireland (who should have chosen to remain competitive) I cheer Poland. The rise of a strong Polish economy is good for both Poland and the EU. The further successful democracies push toward Russia the more secure the EU will be.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    94. Re:willingness to relocate by bnenning · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Free Trade worked, Mexico, America, and Canada would be doing better today then they were in the early 1990s

      Citation needed. If protectionism worked, North Korea would be the wealthiest nation on earth.

      Yes, it's class warfare. But the war is over, and the middle class has lost.

      Yeah, just look at all those homeless people huddling in Apple Stores.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    95. Re:willingness to relocate by servognome · · Score: 1

      When one poor, desperate country starts to get wealthy, corporations will simply move to the next one, and let the first slip back into poverty.

      You're making the mistake of thinking it's a zero-sum. The first country may not necessarily slip back into poverty, in fact if you look at the US and Europe, they've actually improved by utilizing cheap foreign made products to grow their internal economies.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    96. Re:willingness to relocate by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Mr. Dell (and many others, not to single him out), do not wish to pay the cost of the country that created him. It seems treasonous

      It certainly seems like a bit of a change from some of the CEOs of yesteryear that would provide benefits like subsidized housing, medical care, vacation time, pensions, higher wages, etc, etc, etc that were innovative for the times. The CEOs didn't do it for purely altruistic motives (stopping unions was a motivation -- of course if you aren't screwing your workers why do they need to unionize?) but they did it nonetheless.

      Compared to some of them Mr. Dell certainly does seem like a traitor. I'm going to remember your quote for future discussions.... "does not wish to pay the cost of the country that created him".... I think that sums it up quite nicely.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    97. Re:willingness to relocate by ardle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not sure the government knew this, but everyone smart working in tech did.

      I'd say that the government put it on their "let's not think about that" list and concentrated on making money before the bubble burst.

    98. Re:willingness to relocate by causality · · Score: 1

      I wish there were some type of initiative/referendum that citizens could use to challenge laws, not because they are unconstitutional or otherwise legally invalid, but because they have failed to deliver the results that were promised

      Well there is one way but people seem too stupid to utilize it. They'd rather keep voting in the incumbent because "he's done good things and has experience" or just blindly vote for the guy who shares the same party affiliation as them. Those of who are smart enough not to do this have our votes buried by those who aren't or by rigged electoral processes (gerrymandering in the US, I'm sure other countries have their own version).

      I know what you mean. That's actually why I don't vote. I want to see a smaller, less powerful federal government. No one who is running for national office wants to do that, so none of them get my vote. This, for me, amounts to disenfranchisement, not de jure but de facto. The "debates" in the media are not real debate and do not include real dissent because the only controversy is concerning the purpose for which government is to be expanded (health care, for example). That's an outright propaganda tactic known as debate-framing and it's a shame it is not universally recognized as such.

      What you mention is all too common. In addition to it, there is often also the mentality that "MY Congressman is great, it's all the others that need to go!" which fails when everyone else feels the same way.

      I see two solutions to this that are actually doable. My idea from my previous post, which is that if even one citizen can objectively rigorously prove that a law has failed, that should cause the repeal of the law. I like this idea because it makes it possible to remove the politics from the equation. If the facts are clearly and demonstrably on your side, it should not matter whether or not there is enough political support to go wherever the facts may lead. Let the politics be reserved for situations that are not so clear-cut and cannot be objectively proven. This is the basic "use the right tool for the job" idea.

      My other solution is that no one should be allowed to vote unless they can pass an extremely tough civics test. The idea is that you should demonstrate that you understand how the system works before you can be trusted to have a say in who should run it. I think this would eliminate a great deal of the excesses and abuses that we see today. Make this civics test comprehensive and very hard. If only a fraction of the population can pass it, then only a fraction is eligible to vote. If this is a bad thing, educate the rest of the voters and remove some of the unsound ideas on which their political views are based. The problem with implementing a system like this is that similar-sounding yet completely different systems were used as a form of institutionalized racism in the past, typically referred to as "literacy tests", which had the sole purpose of preventing black people from voting. This kind of abuse is radically different from what I am advocating, but it would make my idea very easy to demagogue in the media.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    99. Re:willingness to relocate by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

      If the Dell workers want to keep their jobs they can just move to Lodz.

      Really? So, how perchance does someone in a bad economy with no job find the money to buy or rent a new place, move their belongings, etc?

    100. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opinion was that we weren't going to accept loosing a commissioner

      losing

      If the have a referendum again,

      they

    101. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you're speaking in English, call it Ireland.
      If you're speaking in Irish, call it Eire.

      Don't mix and match in what was probably an attempt to sound intelligent and learned.

      Actually, call it Eire to distinguish that you mean the republic as it states in its constitution as opposed to the entire island.

    102. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because you are willing to leave your friends, uproot your family and move to a country you know relatively little about and can't speak a word of the local language for your JOB?

      Get your priorities right.

    103. Re:willingness to relocate by ardle · · Score: 1

      Here's the Irish Constitution online: it has only been in force since 1937 and is very readable.

    104. Re:willingness to relocate by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      To be fair, what sort of empathy do you expect from some guy who makes less in 5 years than the product he's supporting costs? If that were me, I'd be saying "Hello, how can I help you?" but I'd be thinking "Fuck you, I live in a hut and YOU'RE throwing a fit because your TV that's bigger than my bed has a tinge of red in the picture. I'm going to do everything I possibly can to avoid telling you to press MENU, Picture, Tint, then scroll the slider bar to the left, you stupid fuck. I hope you try to open the TV yourself and get electrocuted." "Yes, yes, I am understanding that you are having a problem with the red button. Is this correct?"

      But that's why many companies are moving their call centers back to the US (or at least to Canada). The kid working at McDonalds may hate his job and his life, but at least he has the knowledge that this isn't the pinnacle of his career, and even if he develops no other skills, at least he can actually work his way up the corporate ladder there. I'm sure the people working at call centers are smart enough to know that even if they're the best goddamned phone support person this side of Shanghai, the most they can hope for is not to get fired for being late one day because the only road out of their village washed away in the last monsoon and they had to build a makeshift bridge out of bamboo and dead babies.

    105. Re:willingness to relocate by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Informative
      You mean Eire and Polska I guess. Or as most of us know then, Ireland and Poland.

      There is actually a good reason to use the Irish name here: it makes it clear that you refer specifically to the Republic of Ireland, not to the island of Ireland as a whole.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    106. Re:willingness to relocate by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Somehow I can't imagine that re-locating an entire factory right across Europe makes economic sense if lower wage bills are the only attraction.

      If you're engaged in high-tech manufacturing, often it is entirely wages. A manufacturer like Dell has probably already wrung every nickel they can out of the manufacturing processes, from just-in-time manufacturing to pressuring suppliers to energy efficiencies and on it goes. What's left to cut so they can compete with Lenovo, HP and all the rest? Wages.

    107. Re:willingness to relocate by ardle · · Score: 1

      Flamebait

    108. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's the solution? If you get rid of the restrictions on people moving you destroy national sovereignty and identity.

      OK, let's do that. The sooner we toss the concept of national identity out the window, the better.

    109. Re:willingness to relocate by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those imaginary lines are a lot more important than you think. My country guarantees me several freedoms that other countries (or even the UN Declaration of Human Rights) don't provide for.

      No. YOU (and I, and any Slashdot reader from a modern Western democracy) have granted certain rights to our governments in exchange for them making certain aspects of our lives easier and safer. The governments of the world have no actual rights they can ever grant us, only rights they can (try to) take away.

      Now, I will agree with you that many cultures do not hold dear many of the freedoms we normally take for granted... But that has more to do with fear and ignorance than the position of any given line on a map... Simple example, radical Islam and Evangelical Christianity. Both want scarily similar restrictions on personal freedom, but only one (the last eight years in the US aside) uses the mask of national sovereignty to lend itself some pretense of legitimacy.

    110. Re:willingness to relocate by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

      Oh like citigroup buying a spanish highway construction company with 7bn euros in bailout money from our taxes?

      Well, you can't fix a Citi without heavy construction equipment! Sheesh! </sarcasm>

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    111. Re:willingness to relocate by dryeo · · Score: 1

      For instance, I wouldn't call stopping food with Melamine in it a restriction on free trade.
      The Americans would. If a Melamine laced food has been sold once in Canada, the Canadian government can not stop it from being sold. This was played out when MMT ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methylcyclopentadienyl_Manganese_Tricarbonyl ) was banned in the States, Canada attempted to ban the importation of MMT. We were sued by an American company under chapter 11 of NAFTA and forced to settle and allow importation.
      While whether MMT is hazardous to health is still in dispute, at the time it was considered to be hazardous.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement#Canadian_disputes

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    112. Re:willingness to relocate by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree with this.

      You're not describing cultural entities. You're describing a social framework.

      Just because the same entities are close to ubiquitous doesn't mean that they transfer culture. People who eat at T.G.I.Fridays in the south gravitate towards different menu items than those in the north. If this weren't true, they wouldn't have to bother with localized demographic data when planning product roll outs.

      This discussion can quickly degrade into a bickering over semantics, so I will lay out the definitions I use for terms such as culture, social, etc.

      My interpretations of these concepts closely corresponds to the Ken wilbur's take on the holon. In somewhat blunt terms, Culture is what the collective feels internally, and their Social aspects are what you can observe about a collective.

      Some places do create strict ordinances to maintain their culture, but those ordinances are a social manifest which never would have come to fruition without the collective sharing the same culture.

    113. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't forget the French. They were the only other country given a vote on the Constitution."

      No, it wasn't. At the very least Spain did vote too.

    114. Re:willingness to relocate by contrapunctus · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought Europe was more restrictive than the US in terms of free speech (didn't some guy in Austria go to jail for denying the Holocaust?)

    115. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm Irish and I never refer to the country as "Eire", regardless of whether I am trying to distinguish the republic from the island. Please, just call it Ireland, and if you really must distinguish (which usually isn't necessary), use "the Republic of Ireland". It just looks really goofy to use Eire all over, and strictly speaking it should be "in Eireann", you can't say "in Eire".

    116. Re:willingness to relocate by beanyk · · Score: 1

      True, but the legal English name of the republic of Ireland is "Ireland", despite the fact that it doesn't cover the whole island.

    117. Re:willingness to relocate by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Before NAFTA chronic homelessness was unheard of here in Canada. Now at night the Apple Store's entrance way is packed with homeless people.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    118. Re:willingness to relocate by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "My idea from my previous post, which is that if even one citizen can objectively rigorously prove that a law has failed, that should cause the repeal of the law. I like this idea because it makes it possible to remove the politics from the equation. If the facts are clearly and demonstrably on your side..."

      Well, good luck with it. Who will be the one that will tell when "the facts are clearly and demonstrably on someone's side"? Even for non-political somehow "clearcut" issues like penal justice (is this guy a murderer or is he not?) "the system" needs for a complex hierarchy of people that even on its top (the Supreme Court) can't be reduced to a single man. And even those "seven just men" opinions' manage usually to diverge.

      "My other solution is that no one should be allowed to vote unless they can pass an extremely tough civics test."

      So your other idea is abolishing universal sufrage so only "good citizens" can vote. You already stated why you don't vote: who do you think will be the ones to say who the good citizens are? You failed twice -with unexcusable naivety, the "first mandament for a civic society": never ever think about a law based on the good that could be achieved from it but based on how it can be abused, for certainly it will be.

      Luckily your ideas are far from even being far of being deployed but if they were to, by your own account, you would never be allowed to vote in my book and that's the very problem of any society not based on universal sufrage: the valuable ones of somebody are always the morons of another. Would you really accept your incompetence and would renounce your right to vote based on my opinion or would you say that I'm no one to tell who has the right to vote, specially when I put you in the list of those who have it not?

    119. Re:willingness to relocate by KovaaK · · Score: 1

      I wish there were some type of initiative/referendum that citizens could use to challenge laws, not because they are unconstitutional or otherwise legally invalid, but because they have failed to deliver the results that were promised. If there were a way to get rid of otherwise legally valid laws that can be objectively proven to be counterproductive, not because enough voters put enough pressure on the legislators to repeal the law, but because at least one citizen can rigorously prove that it has failed, this would represent real progress.

      I think this is one of those "Seems like a good idea in theory, bad idea in practice" things. Imagine the politics behind groups working to prove that the regulations placed on certain industries have been harmful in certain cases while they ignore the fact that it helps keep the environment clean.

      Perhaps religious groups would try to prove without a doubt that abortion is a bad thing. Anti-gun groups would try to prove that gun ownership is a bad thing.

      If one person has the power to remove a law, then groups of large people with tons of money at their disposal will have even more power to remove said laws.

    120. Re:willingness to relocate by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Relatively soon? The planet has 4 billion people and growing. How many people belong to the global middle class? Corporations are not interested in making the whole globe wealthy; they only want profit. Have pools of poor to draw from around the world is in the interest of corporations.

      I say it's far more likely that multinational corporations keep jumping from poor nation to poor nation, making a global class of elites in business and government, and leaving the rest of the population as peasants waiting for the next investment in their locality. When the divestment happens, the population becomes poor again. It would be a global middle ages of worker serfdom. The only way to break this cycle of worker poverty is to organize. Otherwise, we'd still have 16 hour days, 7 days a week, no benefits, lousy pay.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    121. Re:willingness to relocate by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      So what's the solution? If you get rid of the restrictions on people moving you destroy national sovereignty and identity. If you get rid of free trade/adopt protectionism you drag the economy down a few pegs and probably destroy at least as many jobs as you save.

      I beg to disagree. Protectionism and tariffs create jobs and protect the economy and nation. Economics haven't changed since the late 1700s; check out Alexander Hamilton's Advice To The Obama Administration

      The solution is tariffs and protection for national industries. They work, and have worked for two centuries. It's only recently been repealed (since the 1980s) and now we are starting to witness the long-term ramifications of it.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    122. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Both Eire and Poland are in the EU, free movement of people is guaranteed

      Actually no it is not. It just happens to be so in this case, because Ireland is one of the few countries in the EU to allow new accession members of the EU (like Poland) to have free movement.

      Other states who were berating Ireland for their lack of European spirit after rejecting the Lisbon treaty didn't feel sufficient European spirit themselves to allow Polish workers free movement.

    123. Re:willingness to relocate by lee1026 · · Score: 1

      Divestment rarely causes an area to become impovished again. Historically, every nation that got out of absolute poverty remained out of absolute poverty. Thus, the number of poor nations goes down, never up.

    124. Re:willingness to relocate by downhole · · Score: 1

      Sounds nice in theory, but in reality, both types of ideas are very troublesome.

      If we want to repeal laws that "fail to deliver the results that were promised", we first have to decide what the goal/promised results actually are, which is a political question in and of itself, and figure out some sort of objective metric for measuring what the results are, which is often somewhere between difficult and impossible. For example, should taxes go up or down right now? Say we pass a bill to cut taxes across the board. What is the goal? Is it to stimulate the economy? Is it a ideological goal to see people keep more of what they earn? Is it to increase the deficit in hopes of forcing the Government to cut spending? What if all of the above arguments must be put forth to get such a bill passed? Do we have to disprove all of them? How about the stimulating the economy part? Obviously, a tax cut will tend to stimulate the economy somewhat, but how do you prove the objective results of that - was there going to be a boom or a recession anyways? And should you prove that it is the best possible economic stimulation for that amount of money? Would it stimulate the economy more or less to keep taxes the same or higher and use any extra money to pay down the national debt or to undertake large infrastructure projects or do something else altogether? Then there's ideological goals. How can you prove that an ideological goal failed? What if someone else's ideological goal is to reduce the gap between rich people and poor people as much as possible? How can you objectively prove that one is right and the other wrong? What if forcing the Government to cut spending failed? Should getting them to cut spending be abandoned as an essentially ideological goal, or should we cut taxes more to try harder?

      That's just as many issues as I could think of in 10 minutes or so. I'm sure that any significant law will have just as many or more problems with trying to determine whether they have "failed to deliver the results that were promised".

      A civics test sounds nice in theory, but who gets to write it? Me? You? The DNC? The RNC? Libertarians? Socialists? What kind of politically loaded questions are going to end up on it? "True or false: The Constitution forbids the Federal Government from regulating education", "True or false: The Federal Government has no legal authority to regulate the individual use of drugs", "True or false: Abortion is a constitutional right", "True or false: The Government has the right to legally restrict CO2 emissions to prevent Global Warming". And on and on and on. Sure, you want a strict letter-of-the-law basic civics, but it'll take about 10 seconds for all of the driven ideologues out there to get into the process and start twisting it around. And what about all of the poor people out there who have a lousy education - are they just screwed until they can find the time/money to get a Government book from somewhere? It may not be the goal to disenfranchise black people, say, but AFAIK black people are still disproportionately poor and uneducated so your proposal would in practice do exactly that.

      The political process as we have it now may be screwed up in a variety of ways, but it is the best that we have been able to come up with (and convince people to adopt) over several hundred years, and it really isn't all that bad compared to the alternatives. The real goal is to represent the will of the people as well as possible, so it can be frustrating when the people do not agree with you or don't care about your pet issue much. There no basically democratic system that I can think of where you don't need to convince lots and lots of people to support your position enthusiastically to get anything done about it.

      --
      I don't reply to ACs
    125. Re:willingness to relocate by DeepZenPill · · Score: 1

      Well you're only partially right, that bailout money came mostly from China, but some did come from Europe too. Don't go yelling about how taxpayers funded the bailout because we were in a deficit long before a bailout was even 'needed.' All that bailout money and upcoming stimulus money is borrowed money. None of which came from the US taxpayer.

      But we will be paying for eventually through 'quantitative easing' which is going to hit us with one of the largest inflation taxes this country has ever experienced.

    126. Re:willingness to relocate by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Actually, using "Eire" typically means that you are referring to the entire island, as you're more than likely a staunch Irish nationalist. "Ireland" really does refer to the Republic, both in Ireland itself and internationally. "Northern Ireland" is used for the Six counties both in that state, and internationally.

      In fact only people in Northern Ireland ever really need to make a distinction between Ireland and Northern Ireland. They will use "The Republic" or "The South", when referring to the Republic. I have never heard anyone from there use "Eire" to refer to the Republic. Unionists simply wouldn't use Irish and Nationalists simply wouldn't make a distinction between parts of the island.

      So in short, nobody calls The Republic of Ireland, "Eire" unless they are speaking or writing in Irish. If you're speaking or writing in English, Ireland is the correct name for the country.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    127. Re:willingness to relocate by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      I had 'Eire' down as somewhat archaic - a usage you tend to see in old atlases in libraries and so on - but not strictly wrong. As it turns out, as with so many things in Ireland, it's been a bit political over the years.

      Excessive adherence to the officially correct rules seems to lead to some awful sentences, though:

      Lord Rooker, a Government minister, said that the Regulations would: "acknowledge the special place that the island of Ireland and the Republic of Ireland occupy in the political life of Northern Ireland". Responding, Lord Glentoran suggested that Lord Rooker in fact "meant to say that [the draft Regulations recognise] the special place that Ireland occupies in the political life of Northern Ireland." Agreeing with Lord Glentoran's observation, Lord Rooker responded:

      'I still cannot get used to the fact that we do not refer to the Republic of Ireland. I stumbled over that part of my brief because I saw "Ireland". Yes, I did mean the special role that Ireland plays in the political life of Northern Ireland.'

      'The special role that Ireland plays in the political life of Northern Ireland'? That's just awful. Technically correct, but... ugh.

      And at any rate, if using 'Eire' in English is so terribly wrong, what's it still doing in the Constitution? 'We, the people of Éire', it says.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    128. Re:willingness to relocate by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cut him some slack man, we may be slashdotters, but we're still mainly american. And you know how well that bodes for our expertise in geography.
      Hell, I myself thought he was talking about the lake, not the country.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    129. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why not just call it The Republic of Ireland, its official name? I am from Dublin and no Irish person that I know calls it Eire, normally we just say "the Republic" amongst ourselves.

    130. Re:willingness to relocate by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Problem is, the number of poor countries that are stable enough to invest in is not large, and once a country becomes a wealthy, it rarely slides downwards very far. Thus, this should end relatively soon, as soon as corporations run out of countries.

      Er, yeah, except there's a big difference between "wealthy" and "more expensive than some other country the corps could move jobs to". When you've only had your poverty level reduced a little, then what stops you from sliding back down when the corporation moves shop to an even poorer place?

      I mean, Dell is pulling out of Ireland (for manufacturing at least), but all indications are that Ireland is not now "wealthy". In fact, it sounds like they're seriously concerned that this move combined with the global financial crisis are going to severely hurt their economy. They could end up poorer than when Dell came in the first place. Maybe after Dell et al bump up the standard of living in some other place a tiny bit, they'll find it economical to come back to Ireland and the cycle can continue.

      Basically, what I'm saying is that there is no guarantee of a ratchet effect, and you should be watching the economy of Ireland in coming years to see if your theory has any validity.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    131. Re:willingness to relocate by Darby · · Score: 1

      My country guarantees me several freedoms that other countries (or even the UN Declaration of Human Rights) don't provide for.

      Not strictly true. The constitution of our country guarantees such. Said constitution is regularly slid back and forth between the ass cheeks of our rulers, meaning that our country guarantees no such thing. It's not as dead as it will be soon, but the very existence of the "patriot act" and "free speech zones" as well as drug laws and the massive collateral constitutional damage therefrom make your statement pretty naive, even approaching laughable :-(

    132. Re:willingness to relocate by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, local governments usually give huge tax breaks to corps looking to set up shop - so you lose that ability to bank "found" money and foster local industry growth.

      Employees still pay local taxes, right? Plus the new savings (hopefully) generated... and I'd rather see private investment than government-fostered local industry growth (which they can still foster the same way - by giving tax breaks)

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    133. Re:willingness to relocate by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Given that the two things you mentioned could have led to it, I would say third time lucky. But I remember some midget in a silly hat trying it before, and before that some guy in a ludicrous wig. Then there was those guys in frocks...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    134. Re:willingness to relocate by Logic+and+Reason · · Score: 1

      When one poor, desperate country starts to get wealthy, corporations will simply move to the next one, and let the first stay wealthy.

      Fixed that for you. Yes, the rate of growth will slow, but the economic growth that has already taken place is not going to magically disappear when those jobs move elsewhere. Were that the case, what would have happened to the United States by now, given all the jobs that have already been outsourced from it?

      Businesses seek out the cheapest labor, which is usually found in places with the lowest standard of living. This induces economic growth, which raises the standard of living. In this way, outsourcing enriches the poorest places in the world, while at the same time providing cheaper goods and services for first-world economies. Remind me again how this is a bad thing?

    135. Re:willingness to relocate by Logic+and+Reason · · Score: 1

      So that country may want to forego cheap US corn in order to allow itself to grow its own corn industry and perhaps grow other corn-related industries as well.

      But why should they, when they can get the corn cheaper elsewhere? Should they waste resources just so they can have an inefficient corn industry?

      And it's not as though relying on foreign-grown food is particularly risky. The world market is large, and if one seller goes away or raises its prices, another will just step in to fill its place. It's the same reason I don't feel particularly worried about not growing my own food.

    136. Re:willingness to relocate by Logic+and+Reason · · Score: 1

      Wow, your anecdotal evidence about an Apple Store in Canada has totally convinced me!

    137. Re:willingness to relocate by value_added · · Score: 1

      On the downside, they had to interact with the Irish.

      I wouldn't touch that joke with a ten foot Pole.

    138. Re:willingness to relocate by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      WalMart, TGI Friday's, and ClearChannel radio are the same everywhere.

      So are Chinese restaurants. Corporate America is about as part of regional culture as a foreign restaurant is. There's PLENTY of culture that exists outside of chains. If you can't see that, I'm afraid you must be blind.

      --
      AccountKiller
    139. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the Dell workers want to keep their jobs they can just move to Lodz.

      You must be joking, right? Either that, or you are completely clueless.

    140. Re:willingness to relocate by Xmastrspy · · Score: 0

      New Jersey... Have you ever received customer support from a person in New Jersey or any urban area in the US? Last time I called Sprint, the CS rep Ebonics-talk was so heavy I would have preferred to speak with someone from India.

      I know if fun to pick on the CS reps from India, but most of the time it's the person in calling that does not take a second to stop and listen. Yes, they are in India. Yes, they speak 10 different languages. Yes, they are hard to understand. Yes, you are going to have to slow down, take a deep breath, speak clearly, and listen carefully. It will really help you out on the long run.

      Oh any pray to god you don't get that ghetto chick I spoke with at Sprint! If you do tell her I said "WHaatttzzz up home girl! Howz it hanin yo fo show"

    141. Re:willingness to relocate by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Well, sort of but not really. It has a lot to do with how efficiently the other country can produce the products and what they are willing to charge as well as their pool of resources. When the resource pool is greater, then obviously they can charge less then a country who is subject to other countries costs. For instance, extracting coal in the US is about twice as expensive as extracting coal in India. This costs go up when we lock a significant portion of it out of the market by mandating low sulfur coal to be used. India's coal is already low sulfur but the majority of America's needs to be processed to remove the sulfur. Of course India and China don't have the low sulfur requirements so they aren't at as large of a disadvantage.

      I don't think the Fiat Currency is dysfunctional or that it is a negetive. It can be tied to the amount of wealth which makes it as much as effective as a gold or silvar standard. The big problem is the varying justifications for the worth that we see all around the world. China has purposely manipulated their currency and Japan has ties it directly to ours with some strange caveats. The best way to tie the currency to wealth is by allowing the banks to control the elasticity of it by loans. The dysfunction your probably noting is where the banks forgot the idea of transparency and pretty much shifted to a private banking market in recent years to evade the securities regulations that was supposed to keep them viable. I don't think that is problem of the system as much as it is a problem of the abuses of the system which should have been stopped a long time ago. I understand the geopolitical pressures that were put on them but the problems should have surfaced a long time ago when they would be less of an issue to deal with.

      I think I'm getting a bit far off topic so I will leave it at that.

    142. Re:willingness to relocate by keeboo · · Score: 1

      To a "recruiter" in Bangalore, the United States looks like one homogenous entity with few cultural distinctions among locations.

      Well, are you able to identify different cultural/social/whatever aspects from a region to another in Russia?

    143. Re:willingness to relocate by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      And when you outsource all of that production and gut the middle class whom is going to be left to buy your products? Playing devils advocate here but I've lived in an economically depressed region my whole life and I have yet to see any benefits come to my region from free trade. What I have seen is a lot of jobs shipped to Mexico (thank you NAFTA) and very few jobs coming into town to replace them.

      Well, it doesn't exactly work that way. New industry pops up and those employees are eventually retrained and working there. Sometimes they make less money, sometimes they make more money. Sometimes it take a short amount of time and sometimes it takes a longer time. There will always be jobs in the service industry, even of those are outsourced too.

      The thing about it is, and the Auto industry is a leading example of this, is that the price of the product gets so high that people can't afford it. When GM and Ford started pushing plants to Europe and Mexico, their sales in those areas increased which helped justify the wages in the US. Without those sales, the jobs would still be gone, probably more so then without them. Mexican and European people have the patriotic ideals of buying home made products just like the US does. This is how Japan started kicking our asses in the Auto industry back in the 80's. Their cheaper running cars were matched by the big three and the Unions started the buy American campaigns that were pretty effective. So the foreign car makers started putting assembly plants in the US and you could buy the foreign car that was made in America.

      I remember driving a friends Honda back in the late 80's because he broke his foot and couldn't work the peddles that well. We went into a construction zone on the highway and someone holding a slow/stop sign to direct traffic stopped me and said I took an americans job when I bought that car. I said I could replace him with a bucket of sand then the real owner chimed in with "this car was assembled in Marrysville Ohio".

      Anyways, the very inefficiency structure like taxes and government services that places the drain on the economy is probably the same reasons why the industry wasn't really replaced with manufacturing again. It makes it worse when people have to move or retrain just to face the very real aspect of it happening again. I'm not against all government services but for the most part, 15 to 30 percent of every dollar is pulled away from the economy and wasted in this way. I say wasted not because I don't think some of the services are worth it, but because it forces the money to be removed from the economic cycle that makes an employee capable of buying the products they make as well as living comfortable.

      Let it be known that I am not attempting to explain this as thorough as an economist could. The principle is there and hopefully I have conveyed it well enough to be seen. Michigan has been devestate by what we are talking about. Ohio went from a flourishing state who's tax burden was something like 20th to now a economical stricken state (with a higher minimum wage then the national) in the top 5 for tax burdens. California has recently taken a 1 to 2 percent lead over the national unemployment rates. when the economical burdens and wasts are the same, we don't see things like this. I think they call that a perfect market. We don't even see that with trade from within the US let alone outside it. Jobs from some of those states I just mentioned have actually went to other states and didn't even leave the country in some situations. In Ohio, we just had several large manufacturers close shop and increase production of services in KY, Indiana, WV, and so on.

    144. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your argument fails by assuming that cheaper product cost = cheaper sale price.

      By moving the production of Widget X to another country, they are simply increasing their profit margin. There is absolutely no guarantee that the price will be lowered to reflect the actual production costs, or even be lowered at all.

      Companies drive down costs to increase profits, not to "save people money."

    145. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all the EU had done for them, the Irish rejected the EU "constitution".

      they probably like the EU the way it is right now.

    146. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate what we've become but I'm at a loss for how to fix it. Ideas?

      the world needs to band together, either to save the environment or stave off alien invasion/insert random space disaster

      Also I would recommend everyone develop a worldcentric perspective. Its a little better than ethnocentric.

    147. Re:willingness to relocate by drsquare · · Score: 1

      If Free Trade worked, Mexico, America, and Canada would be doing better today then they were in the early 1990s.

      If free trade worked, Europe would be doing better today than they were before the Common Market.

      Oh wait...

    148. Re:willingness to relocate by mahadiga · · Score: 1

      Free Trade will only succeed when Wage Slavery (in Agriculture, Manufacturing & Services) is prevented in the developing nations.

      --
      I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
    149. Re:willingness to relocate by mahadiga · · Score: 1

      If you get rid of the restrictions on people moving you destroy national sovereignty and identity. Patriotism is Oxymoron in Globalization.

      --
      I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
    150. Re:willingness to relocate by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      I hate what we've become but I'm at a loss for how to fix it. Ideas?

      Sure. Get the US to stop targeting labor organizers through covert/overt support of dictators and right-wing death squads. When there's a Universal living wage, as a "floor" from which to proceed, many of these issues will dry right up. It isn't "solely" Big Business looking for poorer and poorer (i.e., less "organized") labor pools, it's the machinations and interventions that promote low wages, no worker safety rules, unrestricted abuse of labor, etc.

      It's an American Protestant thing. They had a lot of fun in the Reagan years, killing and raping Catholic socially-conscious Church people, and murdering and "disappearing" labor rights activists, all over Latin and South America. These people are operating with no sense of basic human decency whatsoever, and they need to be stopped, every last one of them, permanently. Until then? plus ca change, plus c'est la meme choses.

    151. Re:willingness to relocate by mahadiga · · Score: 1

      Globalization has already created a race to the bottom for labor and environmental standards. Will our freedoms and rights be next in line?

      Government = Welfare of their Citizens
      Businesses = Profit from the Citizens

      --
      I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
    152. Re:willingness to relocate by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      For a short time it sucks for those 50 people, but in aggregate society is paying less for an item which frees up more money for investing that one hopes would lead to jobs that would hire back those 50 people + more.

      I think I see the problem with your argument.

    153. Re:willingness to relocate by warsql · · Score: 1

      Your right to vote has been revoked for failing the civics test. There are NINE supreme court justices.

      --
      878659 - yep its prime.
    154. Re:willingness to relocate by mahadiga · · Score: 1

      The trick is to take the inward investment and use it to build up your skills base so that ultimately you can stand on your own two feet, but that's a whole lot easier said than done.

      China, Japan, and Korea have prospered following this strategy.

      --
      I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
    155. Re:willingness to relocate by warsql · · Score: 1

      So a country full of poor people refuses cheap food just so a few people can make a little money. Brilliant!

      --
      878659 - yep its prime.
    156. Re:willingness to relocate by copponex · · Score: 1

      Citation needed. If protectionism worked, North Korea would be the wealthiest nation on earth.

      You can pick the source - any source. Wage disparity has grown, average wages have declined, especially when benefits are all but disappearing.

      North Korea is in bad shape for many reasons, least of all protectionism. A more accurate comparison to the United States would be Britain, where protectionism, social medicine, and things like the "token" tax on stock trades have resulted in a much more equitable society.

      Yeah, just look at all those homeless people huddling in Apple Stores.

      That'd be like looking for homeless people in a Cadillac dealership during the Great Depression. And remember, it's still 1929, not 1933.

    157. Re:willingness to relocate by copponex · · Score: 1

      Hey, let's compare modern economies, where the euro is far more valuable than the dollar!

      Oh wait...

    158. Re:willingness to relocate by jamesswift · · Score: 1

      "Actually Limerick's at least as much of a poverty-stricken dump as many places in Poland"

      I think you are mistaken there. Sure there are parts of Limerick that aren't so nice (what city doesn't have that?) but on the whole it's a long way from being a dump or for that matter "poverty-stricken". Irish GNP per captia is about US$35000 where Poland is about half that.

      The old stereotypes of Limerick are well out of step with reality.

      --
      i wish i could stop
    159. Re:willingness to relocate by bnenning · · Score: 1

      Wage disparity has grown

      Probably true, and completely irrelevant. Why should I care whether Bill Gates makes $100 million or $200 million? If an economic metric can be improved by simply destroying someone's wealth or income, that metric sucks. Envy is a poor basis for policy.

      average wages have declined, especially when benefits are all but disappearing.

      Here's a report from the left-leaning EPI. They toss a lot of numbers around and have some screwy math (somehow a 0.1% median change for men and -0.2% change for women combines to a -1.1 median change for everyone?), and the worst they can come up with is that median compensation has been stagnant from 2003-2007, after growing from 2000-2003. If true that's not great, but it's a far cry from the doom and gloom that the left has been continuously preaching. It also fails to account for continued technological progress making things common today that were luxuries or completely unavailable 10 or 20 years ago. (Exhibit A: the Internet).

      A more accurate comparison to the United States would be Britain, where protectionism, social medicine, and things like the "token" tax on stock trades have resulted in a much more equitable society.

      The UK doesn't seem to do too well compared to the US here. Or is it good if everyone loses wealth, as long as the rich lose the most? At that point envy turns into spite.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    160. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This if left unfettered causes an equalization of wealth. Which is a fair thing, a good thing unless you happen to currently live at the top."

      It seems to me that it is a good thing if you are at the top. You get more profits from paying lower wages and not having to worry about environmental regulations. It seems to me that the people at the middle and the bottom are hurt the most. The people in the middle become poor and the people at the bottom starve.

      I have no problems with people from another country/region getting a chance to increase their living standards. I am all for it. But if the choice is between myself earning a decent living and someone else earning a decent living, I am always going to choose myself. I want it to not be an either/or choice but rather an and choice. That is all.

    161. Re:willingness to relocate by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      "I have no problems with people from another country/region getting a chance to increase their living standards. I am all for it. But if the choice is between myself earning a decent living and someone else earning a decent living, I am always going to choose myself. I want it to not be an either/or choice but rather an and choice. That is all."
       
      The options given are:
        a) You make 30$/hr coding, 2 indians starves to death
        b) you make 20$ an hour doing admin, 2 indians make 5$ an hour each and live

    162. Re:willingness to relocate by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      When one poor, desperate country starts to get wealthy, corporations will simply move to the next one, and let the first slip back into poverty.

      Except that, barring local instability, that's not what happens. What happens instead is that the infrastructure and capital from the [nameless] corporation is used to continue to develop the local economy, and the global pool of wealth continues to grow.

      It's been happening (in fits and starts) for 500 years, and it's happening today. Do you think today's bad economy is bad?

      Yeah, in the short term, it's bad, when you look at the percentages, especially over the past decade or two.

      But when you look at the absolute scale, real terms, the average sq footage of the average household, the services available to the poor, the actual net worth of infrastructure available, you'll find that you would only have to look back about 10-20 years before you find that our current economic situation is the best that mankind has ever experienced.

      It will be a while before we have a true growth economy again. Businesses that consolidate, that save money, that integrate previously separate products will do well. Businesses based on luxury will suffer immeasurably over the next few years.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    163. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Secondly, It is a GOOD thing that business' chase poverty! Something shitty happens to a country and big countries move in which will act to save their asses.

      Businesses chase poverty, but also seek to keep it a permanent fact, so it's not all good. The redistribution of wealth in the world from the "lesser" to the "better" is constantly improving. I mean, really mate, let's be honest here: I had to listen ad nauseam about how great Ireland was during the election here in the US, weeks afer it had officially gone into a recession. The reason Ireland was so great was the corporate tax rate.

      Guess that hasn't saved these jobs either.

      The only thing to remember is that no western country is more than 2 weeks away from a revolution, and personally, we need one. When money becomes rather worthless, people learn something important. This, for a short time, stops the redistribution of wealth.

    164. Re:willingness to relocate by boteeka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now, it's suddenly cheaper to make widget X in another country, so the company moves its operations. By doing this the 50 people lose their jobs, but now the entire country gains the use of widget X for a lower price than before.

      Wouldn't it be nice if it were true? Sadly, the truth is that probably the price would stay where it was, and the profit % would increase. Everybody in the company's management happy.

    165. Re:willingness to relocate by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Your right to vote has been revoked for failing the civics test. There are NINE supreme court justices."

      Your right to vote has been revoked for failing the minimal cultural test: "the seven just men" is an idiom not the number of judges on USA Supreme Court (did you notice I put it in quotes?). Search on Google for further information.

    166. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh...yeah, that works for the first, second, and third company of 50 people...but start talking about a hundred, a thousand, companies, and thousands upon thousands of people. Now, not only does it suck for those thousands of people, but we've got to figure out a way to support those people (since we've made the decision as a society that we're not okay with thousands of people dying in the streets), which is helluva hard since your tax base has decreased significantly and, what's more, all those now-unemployed people are not spending as much money in such a way as to keep the rest of the population employed.

      Which leads to ultra-low-wage jobs (Wal-Mart being the perennial example), the disappearance of the middle class, and suddenly things start to look a lot like pre-20th century times...a very few at the top and everyone else poor.

      So yeah, it raises the standard of living for a while, but shifts like this can't happen in a vacuum. Just as no single raindrop believes it is responsible for the flood, so do these companies believe that they can each get away with shipping their jobs out of the country. The problem is that now EVERYONE has done it, and the effects are catching up with us.

    167. Re:willingness to relocate by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I looked at Google and didn't get anything blindingly obvious. What are you referring to?

    168. Re:willingness to relocate by Raenex · · Score: 1

      No one who is running for national office wants to do that, so none of them get my vote.

      Ron Paul or a Libertarian candidate. Even a protest vote makes more sense than not voting at all. Ron Paul even made it into the national debates.

      My other solution is that no one should be allowed to vote unless they can pass an extremely tough civics test.

      Too prone to abuse and politically charged. The point of voting is you are allowed your own opinion, even if it doesn't meet somebody else's. I'd rather see something like Borda voting so that 3rd party candidates stood more of a chance, instead of this "throwing your vote away" by not picking one of the two parties.

    169. Re:willingness to relocate by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "I looked at Google and didn't get anything blindingly obvious. What are you referring to?"

      One of the mid east cosmologies (see Zohar) estates that the world is sustained upon seven pillars (you know the number seven holds a mistic meaning); Jews took this and expanded it stating that at any given moment there will be at least seven (hidden) just men alive that will "sustain the world" at the eyes of God in that He won't destroy it because of their mere existance (they alone compensate for all the rest of us, greedy bastards). That way, "the seven just men" becomes an idiom about an "entity" of honesty beyond doubt... if only we could recognice them.

      But I must admit I probably overstated how easy is to find is the original reference. I did a search on Google and while there are some entries about "seven just men" they implicitly expect you already know what this does mean.

      Somehow this still makes for my original point in that it's impossible to reach a consensus about what's needed in order to consider somebody "good enough" to vote and who is the one to tell it: you are not cult enough in my account since you didn't know about "the seven just men" (and it's a relevant knowledge since the fact they are hidden is what makes them useless for any practical meaning -it's, of course, a poetic license, I don't literally mean we should look for them, but that there's no way we can be sure beyond doubt about the honesty and good sense of anybody to allow him to become our benevolent tirant, even if such a person exists to begin with -Ancient Greece and Rome tried this with less than perfect results). On the other hand, it's me the one unfitted on your regard... who is to judge who is right and who is wrong? The only solution it's admitting there's no one, so the "one person one vote" should stand.

    170. Re:willingness to relocate by ultranova · · Score: 1

      The problem with implementing a system like this is that similar-sounding yet completely different systems were used as a form of institutionalized racism in the past, typically referred to as "literacy tests", which had the sole purpose of preventing black people from voting. This kind of abuse is radically different from what I am advocating, but it would make my idea very easy to demagogue in the media.

      No, your idea is not at all different from the abuse you described. You simply use a different function to decide who is similar enough to you to vote.

      If I advocate centrally planned economy and toll barriers, will you conclude that I don't know enough about economy to be allowed to vote ? If I say that I'm for gun control, is that grounds to take my vote away ? Or if I'm against your plan because I consider any limitation in the ability to vote a step towards a dictatorship - and yes, that means felons in prison should be allowed to vote - does that mean that I'm clearly too idealistic to have a say in the government ?

      Move to China if you want rule by elite, but please leave the remaining democracies alone; they are crumbling fast enough without you helping them along with your condescending "people shouldn't have a say in matters which concern them unless they can prove they're smart enough to satisfy me" bullshit.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    171. Re:willingness to relocate by ultranova · · Score: 1

      But why should they, when they can get the corn cheaper elsewhere? Should they waste resources just so they can have an inefficient corn industry?

      Because if they grow their own corn, other countries can't threaten to cut off supplies as a blackmail tool, nor do market fluctuations nor speculation threaten it.

      It's stupid to rely on anyone else for vital supplies. The way Russia cut off natural gas to Europe is a good example of why.

      And it's not as though relying on foreign-grown food is particularly risky. The world market is large, and if one seller goes away or raises its prices, another will just step in to fill its place. It's the same reason I don't feel particularly worried about not growing my own food.

      Wasn't there a huge shortage/price spike for food just a while ago ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    172. Re:willingness to relocate by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Yes, because unions have never been corrupted. Unions have never grown into entities more concerned with their own survival than looking out for the wellbeing of their membership.

      If switching unions was easy, as the grandparent said is a necessary condition, then any corruption would be rewarded by the members fleeing.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    173. Re:willingness to relocate by causality · · Score: 1

      The problem with implementing a system like this is that similar-sounding yet completely different systems were used as a form of institutionalized racism in the past, typically referred to as "literacy tests", which had the sole purpose of preventing black people from voting. This kind of abuse is radically different from what I am advocating, but it would make my idea very easy to demagogue in the media.

      No, your idea is not at all different from the abuse you described. You simply use a different function to decide who is similar enough to you to vote.

      If I advocate centrally planned economy and toll barriers, will you conclude that I don't know enough about economy to be allowed to vote ? If I say that I'm for gun control, is that grounds to take my vote away ? Or if I'm against your plan because I consider any limitation in the ability to vote a step towards a dictatorship - and yes, that means felons in prison should be allowed to vote - does that mean that I'm clearly too idealistic to have a say in the government ?

      Move to China if you want rule by elite, but please leave the remaining democracies alone; they are crumbling fast enough without you helping them along with your condescending "people shouldn't have a say in matters which concern them unless they can prove they're smart enough to satisfy me" bullshit.

      You are responding to me as though I advocated a test of political viewpoints. What I pictured, and in fact what I said, was a civics test and not a political alignment test. There is a significant difference between the two. In the USA a civics test would include things like knowledge of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the purpose and original intent behind the Amendments including the powers that government does and does not possess under the Constitution, the concept of separation of powers and the purpose and role of the three branches of federal government, the concept of checks and balances and how the three branches of government are intended to accomplish this, things of that nature.

      This is most definitely not an assessment of political views. You can be liberal or you can be conservative or anything in-between and a thorough understanding of the Constitution should not change that. If you are worried that it would, then I don't know what else to call that except to say that I sincerely question why you are insecure in your beliefs (I would compare it to how the Church felt about Galileo's telescope). If what "got you" was me saying that this may eliminate certain views that are based on faulty beliefs, I simply meant that if you seriously study i.e. the Constitution and find out that you were misinformed about what it says and does not say, and if this results in a change to your political views, then they needed to change anyway. There is nothing wrong with that unless you believe that acquiring new knowledge and evaluating your beliefs in light of the new knowledge is somehow a bad thing.

      I don't mean this as a personal attack, but many times I post ideas to Slashdot and I choose my words carefully, making sure I do not say anything I did not intend to say. I do this and then someone runs with that and assumes implications that I never intended and never said. I think benefit of doubt and assumption of good faith are valuable things, so I will assume that's what happened here and that this is not a deliberate straw man on your part. In that spirit, I ask you how anything I have said constitutes "rule by elite" or how this is condescending. It might be condescending and elitist if only the rich, or only a certain religion or a certain color were allowed to take such a civics test, but that is not what I am advocating and never was. What I am suggesting is something in which anyone could participate. Everyone would have their fair chance to pass this test. There could even be free, state-sponsored books and classes, available to everyone, so that anyone who cares en

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    174. Re:willingness to relocate by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Yes, the rate of growth will slow, but the economic growth that has already taken place is not going to magically disappear when those jobs move elsewhere. Were that the case, what would have happened to the United States by now, given all the jobs that have already been outsourced from it?

      It would run up a tremendous debt, invade various countries around the world in a panicked attempt to try to keep up the flow of goods, and finally have its economy crash.

      I guess you just proved the grandparent's theory.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    175. Re:willingness to relocate by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reference. I agree, I don't like the civics test for voting.

    176. Re:willingness to relocate by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      They might find it fairly hard to get work.

    177. Re:willingness to relocate by ultranova · · Score: 1

      You are responding to me as though I advocated a test of political viewpoints. What I pictured, and in fact what I said, was a civics test and not a political alignment test. There is a significant difference between the two.

      Actually, no there isn't. Not when you start including questions about the role of government; at that point it has become a purely political test.

      In the USA a civics test would include things like knowledge of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the purpose and original intent behind the Amendments including the powers that government does and does not possess under the Constitution, the concept of separation of powers and the purpose and role of the three branches of federal government, the concept of checks and balances and how the three branches of government are intended to accomplish this, things of that nature.

      All of these things are open to interpretation, and in fact are often used in political arguments. For example: does the Constitution give the Government right of taxation ? A libertarian would argue no. Does it give the Government right to institute social security ? Well that depends entirely on how you interpret the "general welfare" clause. And so on.

      Your test will find the ones whose views on these things coincide with the test-maker. It's a political alignment test. It's even worse when you start talking about the intentions of people long dead; at that point it slips into outright propaganda: "Admit that the founders really meant this or we don't let you vote".

      This is most definitely not an assessment of political views. You can be liberal or you can be conservative or anything in-between and a thorough understanding of the Constitution should not change that.

      A liberal and a conservative often differ in their interpretation of the Constitution. As soon as you ask what it means, you've branched into politics.

      Furthermore, one could ask: what the heck does it matter ? The voter isn't the one making the law. He is choosing someone to represent him. He doesn't need to know the Constitution to decide who he trusts to look after his interests; he isn't sitting in the Government, after all. Why would he be declined representation because he doesn't know every law which has to do with the job of actually doing that representation ?

      If you are worried that it would, then I don't know what else to call that except to say that I sincerely question why you are insecure in your beliefs (I would compare it to how the Church felt about Galileo's telescope).

      I'm more worried about being Galileo, actually.

      If what "got you" was me saying that this may eliminate certain views that are based on faulty beliefs, I simply meant that if you seriously study i.e. the Constitution and find out that you were misinformed about what it says and does not say, and if this results in a change to your political views, then they needed to change anyway. There is nothing wrong with that unless you believe that acquiring new knowledge and evaluating your beliefs in light of the new knowledge is somehow a bad thing.

      No, what "gets me" is that it would decline a waste number of people representation, thus being a move towards a dictatorship.

      I fail to see how my political views should have anything to do with the Constitution. The Founders were not gods, and the Constitution is not an unchanging word of one. It even includes an amendment mechanism for changing it. Or did you perhaps mean that any political view contradictory to the Constitution needs to be silenced ? In that case you have proven my fears correct.

      I don't mean this as a personal attack, but many times I post ideas to Slashdot and I choose my words carefully, making sure I do not say anything I did not intend to say. I do this and

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    178. Re:willingness to relocate by gkai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, I do not believe this is true, even if it is the standard economic explication of relocalisation.
      What I believe is that relocating jobs to to cheaper places is akin to thermodynamics: there is no global increase, but a leveling...and as long as a non-equilibrium exist, it can be exploited to produce work, i.e. enrich the ones that have the decision power and are not trapped in one legal system - i.e. large supra-national conglomerates.

      So what we have now is middle class of western countries getting slowly poorer, a slow creation of a new middle class in some non western countries, and a very few world "elite" getting richer quite fast. Income ratio between the most and less wealthy in western nation is spreading steadily since the 70ties...

      Imho, the standard of living around the globe (for western world) has been increasing mostly because of 2 things:
      - technical progress and cheap energy: one average man hour can produce much more goods that it used to...but this is leveling lately (energy less cheap because it is no longer in infinite supply, technical progress lacking a new revolution, electronic is maturing, and biotech/nanotech not yet), and it is a potential source of unemployment.
      - using the demographic growth for a global credit: the debt of today will be paid by the people of tomorrow...which will be more thus will have to pay less...
      There is no more demographic growth in western countries, and it is levelling up fast globally - fortunately because here too we are getting closer to hard limits. In fact, demographic decrease and/or population aging means that people of tomorrow will be less for sharing the debt created by more people today - oups.

      The pyramidal scheme is collapsing...and, as always in those case, I fear that the end result will not look pretty...

    179. Re:willingness to relocate by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Actually, something happened to my username on my VZW blackberry. I can retrieve my password, but I can't log into the Blackberry web interface to make changes.

          They're confused by email. I've given up on phone calls, because I want to keep at least some of my hair.

          But from what I understand from some ex-Verizon employees, all departments are pretty rough.

          I have a Verizon FiOS line right now, that's experiencing CRC errors. I've gone around for hours with them so far, and the only thing even half way intelligent (that was still wrong) blamed a routing issue in the midwest. {sigh}

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    180. Re:willingness to relocate by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      I've been on those calls too, but really if I had to break out my support calls, they'd look like:

          90% India
                90% difficult to impossible to work with
                10% satisfactory
          9% USA
                98% satisfactory (with some southern accents, but still good help)
                  2% difficult to work with
          1% Europe
                50% satisfactory
                50% difficult to impossible to work with

               

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    181. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I say that I'm for gun control, is that grounds to take my vote away ?

      Yes, unless the form of gun control that you are in favor of is an effort to repeal the 2nd amendment. Anything else is an end run around the Constitution, IMHO.

    182. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then all that would do is keep companies from coming into the country in the first place.

      Wow, really insightful leap from Economics 100 "The stuff I think I heard and didn't critically analyze". Take an intermediate course or just spend 20 minutes thinking about it as an if-then-else chain and you'll see that point was already addressed (hint, hedge-fund/currency speculators - if that's too esoteric, look up locational advantage).

      The only goal of a company is to make a profit, not to aid the host country. If it is still profitable after the tax, they'll still come in. You may lose a few edge cases, but the resulting stability in the host market will encourage long term investment.

      The US has (officially, loop holes aside) high taxes as far as the Republican "pro business" (ha!) party is concerned - yet BMW, Toyota and others have all invested millions to billions on doing business and making goods here, complete with US subsidiaries. Maybe you know more than they do - give them a call, I'm sure they'd be glad to subscribe to your newsletter.

      Vitriol aside, take a good look at somethign like Freakonomics, chapter 3:
      http://www.wikisummaries.org/Freakonomics:_A_Rogue_Economist_Explores_the_Hidden_Side_of_Everything
      Or any (note I didn't say other) real economics book that isn't presented in partisan terms. The argument you are giving seems good at first glance, but then so did using nuclear bombs to blow holes in mountains to build highways, at first. It's a deeply and completely flawed premise, because if all else were already equal, every company in the US would be based in Delaware instead of just most of them :p

    183. Re:willingness to relocate by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      yet BMW, Toyota and others have all invested millions to billions on doing business and making goods here, complete with US subsidiaries.

      Doesn't the federal (and state) governments lure those companies here with tax credits? They basically don't pay taxes on property or other things for the first few years of operation in some cases.

      We effectively have to bribe them because our tax law makes it not worth it to have a large company like Toyota here.

    184. Re:willingness to relocate by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      It's just an example of how protectionism can grow a country's competitive ability by shielding a domestic industry that is still in its infant stages.

      One of the major questions in economic development is why the third world countries that do have lots of natural resources have so much difficulty catching up with modern countries who had industrialized their economies centuries ago. The technology advances since the industrial revolution have crossed all over the globe so why can't they take advantage of it like other nations have?

      There are a multitude of significant reasons, but one of the possible reasons is that the first countries to industrialize have crowded the market with their cheaper manufacturing processes. A poor third world country might be able to afford a motorized tractor to farm far more efficiently than a pre-industrial farm, however, the modern countries have high-tech equipment, factories, and even genetically manipulated crops to yield huge crops at far lower costs. Opening up trade does allow that countries to buy food from other countries but that's giving them fish instead of teaching them how to fish, they need to export to get money and investment capital to grow.

      The farmer who can't compete will need to find another industry to try to compete in, but the country's infrastucture may not be able to move him into another profession( how easily can he get a loan for a new business? Can he get the education or re-education needed for a new career?).

    185. Re:willingness to relocate by pacinpm · · Score: 1

      Will our freedoms and rights be next in line? Will the United States be forced to adopt European restrictions on free speech? Will Europe be forced to adopt Islamic restrictions on free speech? Will the United States, Finland, Switzerland and Norway be forced to adopt stricter gun control laws?

      You can allow free movement for people and still keep your rights and laws. Allowing free pass at borders for anyone doesn't take any freedom from you.

  3. Despicable tags! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Frankly, i'm a little worried about all the typecasting in the tags for this article.

    You guys are just asking to get bombed by the IRA!

    1. Re:Despicable tags! by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Frankly, i'm a little worried about all the typecasting in the tags for this article. You guys are just asking to get bombed by the IRA!

      Ah you must be a leprechaun you pesky little fellu'.

    2. Re:Despicable tags! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      and we haven't even yet discussed "how many Polacks it takes to build a Dell"

    3. Re: despicable tags! by rs232 · · Score: 1

      "You guys are just asking to get bombed by the IRA!"

      That isn't going to happen since it has since become knowledge that the IRA was being run by the a branch of British security, the Force Research Unit ..

      --
      davecb5620@gmail.com
    4. Re:Despicable tags! by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      Easy: 1 to install Linux, 10 to try to make it just work.

      Oh shit, forgot to post anonymously again!

    5. Re:Despicable tags! by hierophanta · · Score: 1

      i have more of a problem with using the tag 'story' - i mean could we have a less useful tag? are there any articles that couldn't get that tag?

    6. Re:Despicable tags! by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Slashvertisements, press releases, product reviews?

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    7. Re: despicable tags! by Dupple · · Score: 1

      The IRA are not loyalist

      --
      Watch those corners
    8. Re:Despicable tags! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Oh, please! The correct answer is 3. 1 to install Vista, 1 to protect the machine from being kicked by the first guy when it BSODs during install, and one to sacrifice under the full moon to the Ballmer monkey while doing the "developers developers developers!" dance in the hopes that the driver gods will smile down upon them and allow their peripherals to work.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    9. Re:Despicable tags! by compro01 · · Score: 1

      I believe it's to differentiate between posted stories and unposted ones in the firehose.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  4. I don't care who slaps together my inspiron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as it is cheap.

    I have no problem with them finding the cheapest labor they can find, or building robots for all I care.

    1. Re:I don't care who slaps together my inspiron by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Having spent over an hour and a half on the phone with Dell Canada on Monday just to get a quote (and a quote for twenty computers I might add), I'd say there is such a thing as "too cheap".

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:I don't care who slaps together my inspiron by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      I can't wait to see what happens when our economy takes such a nosedive, and unemployment becomes rampant that companies start moving jobs here since our labor is so much cheaper than china, india, taiwain, etc...

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    3. Re:I don't care who slaps together my inspiron by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't wait to see what happens when our economy takes such a nosedive, and unemployment becomes rampant that companies start moving jobs here since our labor is so much cheaper than china, india, taiwain, etc...

      Actually our economy won't get that bad but a lot of economists were talking about what $200-$300/bbl oil would do to free trade. At a certain point it will become more expensive to ship goods than to just produce them here at home. The various economists and talking heads all disagreed as to what that point was but all agreed that it would happen sooner or later if oil prices had kept skyrocketing.

      Of course the economic meltdown has dragged oil down but how long is that really going to last?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:I don't care who slaps together my inspiron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's called rural-sourcing, and it's why "import" cars are now made in places like Ohio and Alabama instead of Japan and Germany.

      dom

    5. Re:I don't care who slaps together my inspiron by snowraver1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      RAmen to that! I RAGE when I have to call 1 800 India support. I hate the scripts they use, I hate the thick accent, and I hate having to be somewhat civil when all I really want to say is "get someone that can actually speak english on the phone". It's terrible when you call with a pretty good idea of what you want, but due to the communication barrier, you can't be sure what you are asking for, is what you will get.

      How many times have you had to clarify something, three times, to the person on the other end, and after that, are still unsure if they have a clue what you want?

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    6. Re:I don't care who slaps together my inspiron by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Why the hell didn't you hang up after 15 minutes?

      Or is this one of those company policy things that states you have to buy everything from Dell because it's "good value for our money" or some crap like that?

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    7. Re:I don't care who slaps together my inspiron by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Why the hell didn't you hang up after 15 minutes?

      Or is this one of those company policy things that states you have to buy everything from Dell because it's "good value for our money" or some crap like that?

      Pretty much. It's a sucky policy, but I'm required to get quotes from two "big name" outfits, which means my HP reseller (who isn't bad, actually) and Dell.

      The phone hell thing was just nuts, and for all my trouble, I got an email address of a guy who turned out wasn't even working for Dell any more (odd, as he still had a Dell address) who then referred me on to a guy who referred me on to another guy who is apparently my new rep. I mean, if they're going to shuffle people around, shouldn't the new guy taking over the spot make it his business to contact the companies he represents and say "Hi, I'm Bob, you're new rep".

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:I don't care who slaps together my inspiron by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      That's what you get when you don't opt for Gold Tech Support. You buy cheap, you get cheap.

      Get used to those phone calls to India using a cell phone tunnled through a VOIP connection.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9fIjYnPazc

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    9. Re:I don't care who slaps together my inspiron by Darby · · Score: 1

      shouldn't the new guy taking over the spot make it his business to contact the companies he represents and say "Hi, I'm Bob, you're new rep".

      I'd expect it, while hoping to use it as an excuse to management to fire them; all the while knowing they wouldn't understand.

    10. Re:I don't care who slaps together my inspiron by doomser · · Score: 1

      Actually, this seems to be a reason for corporations drive towards cheaper and cheaper manufacturing costs nobody ever mentions. Working in sales in Ireland for a competing IT organization, I know first hand the drive for ever more efficient supplychains and cheaper labor. Nobody is ever willing to pay for goods, and government departments are actually the worst in that regards. I can't even begin to list the amount of times where tenders are issued, asking for the best possible price and stating that at the end, an online 'auction' will be held between the 3 best vendors. This often ends up with massive contracts being sold at deeply negative margins, and somehow these losses need to be made up. The same goes for large multinationals and Joe public, whom firmly believes in the adagio that 'computers become cheaper year after year'. This contnuous pricing pressure forces IT manufacturers to follow the sun and exploit the low-wage countries in order to stay in business. People have no problem shelling out â50K for a Merc which they'll drive one hour a day, but balk at having to spend â700 for a decent computer they will be operating eight hours a day and is their primary worktool. Basically, it's a self-fulfilling profecy. In a country like Ireland, the largest market for IT is the governmental sector, which in turns puts the most pricing pressure on manufacturers, causing the move towards low-wage countries and these massive redundancies. And then that same government comes crying about job losses?!?! In regards to support, the same goes. Keeping these jobs in industrialized countries costs money, even if tech support agents get paid a pittance it would be reflected in the pricing of the machine. While for most /. readers basic tech support would be done by themselves because of their intimate knowledge of the hard and software involved, I get the impression that many still forget they at best represent a mere 2-3% of the computer buying public; and that most average users are still quite computer illiterate. It's these users and their calls on the most basic of issues that cost a corporation money hand over fist with the volume of calls they generate.

  5. Shorter commute by motek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I suppose it is only reasonable. Now all these Poles who already work there will have much a much shorter commute. Good for them.

    --
    I would like to die like my grandfather did - sleeping. And not screaming in terror, like his passengers.
    1. Re:Shorter commute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming that the Poles are getting a salary that's at least the current one minus accomodation expenses/higher cost of living in Ireland... if they aren't, it's also bad for them.

      For Ireland, there's no doubt that losing another 1.9k of tax payers is not good (emphasis on "another").

  6. Not the first time .. won't be the last by bossanovalithium · · Score: 2, Interesting

    AOL was in Dublin for a long time, and they moved to Waterford, and then Waterford lost out. Soon the only tech place in Dublin will be eBay - if they count?

    1. Re:Not the first time .. won't be the last by D4MO · · Score: 2, Informative

      Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Symantec, Oracle, Yahoo, Havok... I'm sure there's more...

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    2. Re:Not the first time .. won't be the last by Klaus_1250 · · Score: 2, Informative

      IBM is in Ireland too.

      --
      It only takes one man to change the Wisdom of the Crowd to Tyranny of the Masses.
    3. Re:Not the first time .. won't be the last by twohorse · · Score: 1

      No, the UK AOL broadband service was sold to Carphone Warehouse, the Waterford call center is actually being expanded.

    4. Re:Not the first time .. won't be the last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about all the ancillary roles that were held at Waterford?

      And does the ceiling still sound like a cattle shed there when it rains?

  7. The Race to the Bottom by HockeyPuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We the consumer, demand cheaper priced products, why should we be surprised when manufacturers look for methods of reducing their costs? You don't exactly see them firing up manufacturing plants in Tokyo or Manhattan.

    It's a Global Economy, get used to it.

    1. Re:The Race to the Bottom by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We the consumer, demand cheaper priced products, why should we be surprised when manufacturers look for methods of reducing their costs? You don't exactly see them firing up manufacturing plants in Tokyo or Manhattan.

      Corporations also demand more profit. Reducing costs helps that bottom line. Whether moving manufactoring locations ends up positive on that bottom line or not isn't always clear at the outset.

      It's a Global Economy, get used to it.

      It's been a global economy for decades. That's not the change.

    2. Re:The Race to the Bottom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been a global economy for decades. That's not the change.

      no it hasn't. protectionism and subsidies world wide especially in countries like the US and UK have ensured it is not a global economy in anything but name. some of the walls are slowly coming down, but there is a long way to go.

  8. That's fine by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's fine as long as you have a job to pay for it. If all the manufacturing and knowledge based jobs end up in the cheaper locations then can the Western Economies keep going. I know that many economists say that it is the beginning of the service economy, and we can all be rich in the west by buying and providing services for each other but I am rather skeptical. If a whole country consists of PR teams, lawyers, restaurant owners and so on can they really "generate" enough money to be able to buy their "real" things from cheap overseas sources?

    1. Re:That's fine by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The distinction between "manufacturing" and "service" jobs is somewhat artificial. Every step in the manufacturing process is a service. Finding raw materials is a service. Getting them out of the ground is a service. Refining them is a service. Transporting them from place to place is a service. Assembling them together into a finished product is a service. Making the machines to do so is a service. All of these are services; "manufacturing" is simply a convenient shorthand to describe those services whose end result is an assembled physical product, as opposed to the many other services whose end result is not.

      Thus, the fact that we have a service-based economy is not in and of itself a problem, provided that our services are sufficiently valued in world markets to purchase the manufactured goods we need as well as the other necessities and wants of life. It is a problem ONLY if our skills, or the products that are created using those skills, are no longer sufficiently valuable to earn us the kind of living we want, in which case, the obvious remedy (which scales up) is to learn new skills.

    2. Re:That's fine by mark72005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's fine as long as you have a job to pay for it. If all the manufacturing and knowledge based jobs end up in the cheaper locations then can the Western Economies keep going.

      I hope the textile industry never moves out of the united states.

      I don't see how the US economy can keep going if all the woolen mills and shirtwaist factories shut down and take their jobs overseas.

    3. Re:That's fine by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Don't forget hairdressers and telephone sanitizers.

      Shit. DON'T GET ON THE SHIP!

      -Peter

    4. Re:That's fine by bugs2squash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I guess one of the criticisms leveled at geeks is that they think they know everything...

      So in that spirit, here's my "expert" analysis of world economic matters !

      Isn't manufacturing computers just a service ? If you were Martha Stuart, you'd just get up early and grind-up the sand from the beach yourself to make your own CPU.

      To my mind there's scant economic difference between a janatorial service and a manufacturing "service".

      Furthermore; a janitor's job has to remain local and the janitor must be retained to keep the place sparkly, as opposed to a one-time manufacturing process for a durable item.

      Janitors are an extremely high-value service, that's why so many of us have a personal computer built for us but don't have our houses cleaned for us.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    5. Re:That's fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This whole thing should balance it's self out when energy prices rise to such an extent that you really need to shorten the distance things need to travel..

    6. Re:That's fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm certainly no expert, but I think the usual division into "manufacturing" and "service" is useful and not as arbitrary as you say. For instance, when you're talking about a physical object, it doesn't matter to the buyer where the object originated (or how it was made, etc.): all they are about is the price and quality of the object. Whereas a "service" is where the buyer is interacting with someone else. In that case they care about how the person is behaving, about the price and quality of the interaction.

      When you go to a restaurant, the food you eat is "manufactured" (grown and shipped), but the waiter is providing the service of actually taking your order, answering questions, bringing you the food, etc.

      In this sense, many services are inherently local: a waiter or consultant or physiotherapist are going to be right in front of you. Their jobs can't be outsourced. (Of course there are many services that can indeed be outsourced; e.g. if they are done over the telephone...)

    7. Re:That's fine by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Every step in the manufacturing process is a service. Finding raw materials is a service. Getting them out of the ground is a service.

      I think when they are talking about a "service economy" that isn't what they mean. I don't think those would be "services" for the purpose of that discussion.

      When they say "service" they specifically mean providing customer support to already made products. For example, suppose China designs and manufactures all cars. The US will still have car repairman. But those people only recycle money that is in the economy. No money comes from overseas. No raw material is obtained. Services are only valuable if they are sold overseas, or contribute to manufacturing something.

      Restaurants, lawyers, and PR teams won't help the economy unless they are selling their services to overseas companies.

    8. Re:That's fine by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      "...learn new skills"

      That only works as long as there are enough new skills to learn ( or invent ) to keep sufficient people employed. There is no guarantee of this, nor is there a guarantee that the new skill will command "good" wages.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    9. Re:That's fine by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is (to quote a certain big eared Texan) that "giant sucking sound" which is of course all your money going out while almost none of it ever comes back. Those countries in the third world like India and China simply aren't going to buy enough of your "services" to come anywhere close to balancing out. And frankly basing so much of our future on things that can be copied for almost nothing like that "IP" crap is a recipe for disaster. From what my friends who are from there or who have gone their for business tell me NOBODY buys actual movies, software, games, etc. It is pretty much ALL bootlegs.

      Hell we don't really make anything here anymore. Our electronics, our durable goods, hell even the clothes on our backs are from overseas. Do we even make the bullets for our military anymore? What are we going to do when the world doesn't want any more dollars because the fed cranks them out by the truckload? Frankly all this globe hopping helps no one but the giant multinational corporations, who can simply walk away when your country hits the skids. And as for learning new skills? How are you going to compete with someone in India who can get a masters degree for 20K when yours costs 150k+?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    10. Re:That's fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Restaurants, lawyers, and PR teams won't help the economy unless they are selling their services to overseas companies.

      Naw, we aren't on the gold standard anymore. Money get's its value from the whole economy and total demand for dollars. Americans demand dollars and compete with foreigners for them. Foreigners have to pay more for them so the real value of them increases.

      Even totally local services contribute meaningfully to the economy.

    11. Re:That's fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure I see how that helps. If all the dollars flow out of the country, and none ever flow in, then we run out of money except for what we print. What good is that?

      I'll have to think about this some more...

    12. Re:That's fine by dwarg · · Score: 1

      It's less an artificial distinction than a misnomer. The words manufacturing and/or service should never be follower by the word "jobs." You're right that all jobs are services, but the distinction over what is produced is an important one.

      Manufacturing creates capital, which is something of quantifiable and transferable value. Services are of subjective value and are nontransferable.

      The value of a pair of pants can be calculated and tracked, from the value of it's resources say $1.00 worth of cotton then sold for anything from $15.00 to $200.00 depending on the brand. The cost of labor, transportation, retail markup, etc. is a distribution of the wealth generated by the creation of that product and the profit remainder goes to the shareholders.

      On the other hand, the value of a service, such as education, cannot be quantified. We know education has great value and we can estimate the earning power of individuals with varying levels of education in different disciplines, but it still has no resale value once completed.

      The problem with the service based economy is no quantifiable wealth is generated. Salaries paid represent the circulation of money already within the system. The money you paid came from your employer, who got their money from their customers who got it from their employer etc. But all money in a healthy system should be traceable back to wealth created by the manufacture of some durable good (there is an offshoot here for food (farming) but that's more complicated).

      The loss of manufacturing jobs, and capabilities, is a problem in the United States but the real problem is that the source of money has long ceased to come from the production of goods but instead arises from debt. Wages (labor costs) have not kept up with productivity and demand has been artificially inflated by leveraging debt. Anyone that has 47 minutes really should watch this video Money as Debt.

      It's a little over dramatic and the creator has some pretty crazy ideas at the end, but it is a good presentation explaining the current system.

    13. Re:That's fine by Pinback · · Score: 1

      Dell only assembles computers. They don't make any components.

    14. Re:That's fine by mahadiga · · Score: 1

      the obvious remedy (which scales up) is to learn new skills.
      I believe companies giving stock options to all its employees is the solution.

      --
      I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
    15. Re:That's fine by Atario · · Score: 1

      Janitors are an extremely high-value service, that's why so many of us have a personal computer built for us but don't have our houses cleaned for us.

      Uh...I thought that was because everyone can clean their houses, but not many can build their own computers.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    16. Re:That's fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that a service is much more difficult to export than a manufactured product.

  9. Numbers seem odd by One+Louder · · Score: 1

    Is it really the case that a company that hires only 4300 people is the *second* largest corporate employer in Ireland? That 1900 people losing their jobs is a "severe blow" to the economy of an entire country? The population of Ireland is somewhere around 6 million - what does every *else* do there?

    1. Re:Numbers seem odd by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

      The population of Ireland is somewhere around 6 million - what does every *else* do there?

      Farm potatoes and brew Guinness.

    2. Re:Numbers seem odd by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Farm potatoes and drink Guinness.

      There. Fixed it for ya.

    3. Re:Numbers seem odd by Deag · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well the Republic of Ireland is closer to 4 million (the north is part of the UK). There is about 2 million working I believe. 4 million - children - old people easily gives you that.
      It says corporate employer so that rules out all public jobs. And in Ireland that means most education and health.

      Most major companies would only have one major location in Ireland, so even the big ones are a few thousand. So it is easily believed. You'd only need a 1000 companies employing 2000 people to employ the whole country including the public workers.

      Ireland would be the equivalent of a medium metro area in the US. Not many of those have many corporate employers employing more than 5k people I would guess, maybe Detroit?

    4. Re:Numbers seem odd by D4MO · · Score: 1

      The population of the republic is nearer 4.5 mil. Most other "corporate" employers are smaller, high knowledge type jobs. The jobs that are lost are put-screw-in-hole assembly line work. Nobody thinks we can keep those kind of jobs. The problem is that the numbers are dramatic. Honestly I'd be much more upset if 50 scientists lost their jobs. In any case, Ireland had a 17 year run with that. I'd be surprised if Poland get half that with their plant. Manufacturing in 1st world is dying. Look at the US car industry....

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    5. Re:Numbers seem odd by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      Not many of those have many corporate employers employing more than 5k people I would guess, maybe Detroit?

      Not for long, Detroit won't.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    6. Re:Numbers seem odd by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually they're not the second-largest corporate employer. That seems to be an incorrect inference on the part of the Washington Post, because the Dell Ireland website claims they're the second-largest *corporation*.. and the metric for that could easily be something other than employees, i.e. revenue. Of course, 1900 people isn't their entire Irish workforce either.

      There are _definitely_ larger employers in Ireland. 1900 people at a single factory is enough to sustain a mid sized factory town of about 30,000 people (1/3 of Limerick). I know because I've lived in one. And I'm certain Ireland has a handful of towns that size and larger.

      But just to grab some random Irish companies out of a hat and look them up: Eircom has 6,500 employees. Bank of Ireland has 16,026.

    7. Re:Numbers seem odd by ionix5891 · · Score: 1

      ESB has about 11,000 employees

      there are many large companies

    8. Re:Numbers seem odd by tmosley · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the rest of you, but I could live with that.

    9. Re:Numbers seem odd by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      The population of Ireland is somewhere around 6 million - what does every *else* do there?

      The population is actually closer to 4 million, and what we mostly do is build and sell houses to each other with other peoples money. Or at least, that used to be the idea.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    10. Re:Numbers seem odd by pi_rules · · Score: 1

      There are currently about 16, maybe 17, people in Detroit with jobs.

    11. Re:Numbers seem odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you're American as this is a retarded comment. America wouldn't exist if it wasn't for the Irish. Have some respect you cretin.

      Anonymous "Leprechaun"

    12. Re:Numbers seem odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The population of Ireland is somewhere around 6 million - what does every *else* do there?

      Farm potatoes and brew Guinness.

      Actually, the population of Ireland is only a little over 4 million, according to this source. That's a lot smaller than I thought.

    13. Re:Numbers seem odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm on with the drinking Guiness part...

    14. Re:Numbers seem odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commie b%sta%ds censoring my reply! I have to the right to defend this slur against the Irish people!

      Anonymous "Leprechaun"

    15. Re:Numbers seem odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commmies

    16. Re:Numbers seem odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it really the case that a company that hires only 4300 people is the *second* largest corporate employer in Ireland? That 1900 people losing their jobs is a "severe blow" to the economy of an entire country?

      The population of Ireland is somewhere around 6 million - what does every *else* do there?

      The population of Ireland is 4.2million (Northern Ireland is a separate entity), the workforce is just over 2million. To put this in the context of America this would be the equivalent of losing 142,000 jobs and 5% of your GDP.

  10. customer service in Poland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow that will increase the customer experience....
    Hable Poland?

  11. Good for Poland by exhilaration · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Poland has very high unemployment rate, one of the highest in Europe, and is also one of the poorest countries in Europe.

    I realize that this sucks for Ireland but Poland is in far worse shape and needs the jobs just as badly if not more.

    1. Re:Good for Poland by Improv · · Score: 1

      It sucks to give Poland a feather for its cap while it's under the thumb of such a pair of opportunistic bastards though.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    2. Re:Good for Poland by cathector · · Score: 1

      > Poland .. is also one of the poorest countries in Europe

      slight clarification:
      that link says that Poland is one of the poorest countries in the EU.
      i think Moldava and other European countries not in the EU may be poorer.

    3. Re:Good for Poland by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 1
      Poland does have high unemployment, and could certainly use the jobs more than Ireland. But it isn't one of the poorest nations in Europe.
      The linked article doesn't state that either, it says that Poland has some of the poorest regions in Europe. That doesn't necessarily say anything about the country as a whole - The average Polish person (nationally) is better off than the average inhabitant of the USA's poorest counties.

      Albania is the poorest in Europe, much poorer than Poland. All East-European countries (Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova) are poorer. Most ex-Yugoslav countries (Slovenia and Croatia are about on-par), as are Bulgaria and Romania.

      The common market will tend to smooth things out eventually. That's the point of it. Eventually it shouldn't matter if a factory is in Poland or Ireland, since Poles are free to work in Ireland and vice-versa.

    4. Re:Good for Poland by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      They have to put the plant in the EU to avoid import duties.

      Here's a chart of GDP per capita in 'PPS', not sure if that is the same as PPP

      http://europa.eu/abc/keyfigures/qualityoflife/wealthy/index_en.htm

      Bulgaria and Romania are poorer but they have more shall we say issues than Poland.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    5. Re:Good for Poland by irae · · Score: 1

      The 11.5% from the link is too high. According to the wiki, the unemployment isn't that bad (7.5% in March 2008, 6.7% in August), even compared to other EU countries.

      I guess some part of this percentage is working illegally, so the real number is even lower.

      But it's true that Polish GDP per capita is one of the lowest in EU (not in Europe), and prices are relatively high, so it sucks.

    6. Re:Good for Poland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to polish standards of statistics it's ~9%, according to EU's standards it's ~6.5 (methodology is kinda different) and average for EU is 7.5% AFAIR.

      Yes, Poland is one of the poorests countries in EU - in terms of GDP it's "ritcher" only than Romania and Bulgaria and on the same level as Slovakia, Lithuania, Latvia, a little behind Estonia, Czech Republic, Portugal and Greece. When we consider the whole Europe there much poorer countries, like all balkans states, Albania, Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, Turkey, Moldova

    7. Re:Good for Poland by rzyjontko · · Score: 1

      You are completely mistaken. The unemployment rate in Poland is lower than in the Ireland. According to Eurostat, the unemployment rate in Poland was 6.5% (and steadily declining), whereas it was 6.6% in Ireland (with an opposite trend). See http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/PGP_PRD_CAT_PREREL/PGE_CAT_PREREL_YEAR_2008/PGE_CAT_PREREL_YEAR_2008_MONTH_10/3-31102008-EN-BP.PDF

      --
      -- rzyjontko
    8. Re:Good for Poland by Tweenk · · Score: 1

      Well, not anymore... The president is still in office, but politically marginalized, and the second guy lost his grip on the Parliament in pre-term elections. It was a very big suddenoutbreakofcommonsense. The current prime minister is much more sensible.

      --
      Those who would give up liberty to obtain working drivers, deserve neither liberty nor working drivers.
    9. Re:Good for Poland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poland has very high unemployment rate, one of the highest in Europe, and is also one of the poorest countries in Europe

      It's actually not that true anymore... Unemployment dropped here to about 8% (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/PGP_PRD_CAT_PREREL/PGE_CAT_PREREL_YEAR_2008/PGE_CAT_PREREL_YEAR_2008_MONTH_04/3-01042008-EN-AP.PDF) and is comparable to Germany. However, it's true that GDP is still quite low, and wages suck compared to West Europe.

      I work for UK company, and it was very attractive job year ago, and 2 years ago it was 30% more attractive. That's because of exchange rates changing, and Poles are coming back to seek job in home country. I'm getting less and less money because of that, but I think it's a sign of our good economy - and will be good to my country in long term.

    10. Re:Good for Poland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/PGP_PRD_CAT_PREREL/PGE_CAT_PREREL_YEAR_2009/PGE_CAT_PREREL_YEAR_2009_MONTH_01/3-08012009-EN-AP.PDF

      According to Eurostat in November the unemployment rate in Poland was 6,5%, in Ireland 7,9%.

      http://www.cso.ie/statistics/sasunemprates.htm

      According to Central Statistics Office of Ireland the unemployment rate in Ireland in November increased to 8,3%.

  12. This is a tough one! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    What rhymes with Limerick?

    ...
    he had such a limp dick
    he sold plants in Limerick
    and sales went right straight to Hell.

    1. Re:This is a tough one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emmerich. Don't forget to rhyme Roland with Poland.

    2. Re:This is a tough one! by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      What rhymes with Limerick?

      "Dimmer wick."

      Not that that holds a candle to yours...

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  13. Real reason they moved to Poland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Irish lost their recipe for ice.

  14. Make 'em pay by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The fact is, since China has the unfair advantage of near-slave labor, the rest of the world as a whole needs to have stiff import tariffs to equalize this imbalance.

    This really shouldn't be completely about the "world economy" and if it can be done cheaper in China, "why not"? It is completely fair to take into account other factors such as China's complete disregard for workers rights and environmental issues, not to mention truth in labeling with regards to all the poisons they put in food products.

    Make 'em pay, it's the only way to get their attention.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Make 'em pay by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's just as completely "fair" to say "the hell with the rest of the world, we'll just make them locally".

    2. Re:Make 'em pay by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The fact is, since China has the unfair advantage of near-slave labor, the rest of the world as a whole needs to have stiff import tariffs to equalize this imbalance.

      Yeah! Because stiff tariffs worked out so well in the past.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    3. Re:Make 'em pay by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      "Near slave labor?"

      China has major human rights problems, but coerced labor in its manufacturing sector isn't one of them. They do seem to be responding well on environmental issues recently, and they took the consumer health / quality errors very seriously.

      I see the trade imbalance driven by a deceptive ideology in the West that said that manufacturing was passe, that we could thrive with a "value-added" economy in which the West managed brands, did high-end conceptual work, produced "experiences", etc., while borrowing money to buy physical goods made elsewhere. Of course, it was nonsense, and the bill has come due. But this ideology was pushed hard by the people who benefited from it: the professional and managerial classes doing this supposedly "post-industrial" work, and the people who were funding them.

    4. Re:Make 'em pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and they took the consumer health / quality errors very seriously.

      Bullshit. They only address a *specific* issue when it is discovered by the victims. If no one complains, they just keep on pumping out the poison.

      Have a look at this: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/specials/honey/

      Do you think China has come clean on this because of their own will?

    5. Re:Make 'em pay by IanHurst · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "China has major human rights problems, but coerced labor in its manufacturing sector isn't one of them. They do seem to be responding well on environmental issues recently, and they took the consumer health / quality errors very seriously."

      Thank you. Waving your hands at "Chinese slave labor" as a way to dismiss competition really grates at this point. Xenophobes: would you at least get your anti-China biases into the 21st century? Ain't slave labor at all. Employment in China is overwhelmingly voluntary, with wages set by more or less the same market forces as ours in the West.

      Chinese WANT manufacturing jobs because they're EASIER and pay BETTER than the farm alternatives. Time to step out of the 1980s, guys. If you want to complain about Chinese, the current fashion is to rail against "Mercantilism". Read up on it and get back to us after that. Christ.

    6. Re:Make 'em pay by tmosley · · Score: 1

      As they develop, they will start to pay more attention to such issues. We pay attention to such things in America because we have the time to. China is about where we were 1880-1910 in terms of economic development. Lots of industrial laborers in the cities starting to make a living, lots more poor subsistence farmers in the countryside. They'll get to where we are soon enough, then we can start talking about making things fair.

      If we "make 'em pay", they'll never be able to develop, and they will always be a nation dominated by poverty. Industrialization is always good in the long run.

    7. Re:Make 'em pay by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Or, the rest of the world as a whole needs to lower their standard of living... :(

    8. Re:Make 'em pay by bnenning · · Score: 1

      It's just as completely "fair" to say "the hell with the rest of the world, we'll just make them locally".

      Sure. Except it screws over everyone else in your country who has to pay higher prices for more inefficient production.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    9. Re:Make 'em pay by u38cg · · Score: 1
      Yup. We often hear historians and others tell us about the evil Victorian factories, the cruelties of the Industrial Revolution, how hateful industrial employment was. This is a couple of verses from a Scots song, which is actually from the Industrial Revolution, and not anyone else's varnished interpretation:

      As I gaed [went] by the weaver's yetts [gates]
      Ma heart began tae beat
      Watchin aa the factory lasses
      Stottin [striding] doon the street

      Wi[th] their flashy-dashy petticoats,
      Their flashy-dashy shawls,
      Five and a tanner [sixpence] gutty boots,
      They're aa wee gallus molls

      Gallus molls has no simple translation, but streetwise sexy young women on the prowl would be close.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    10. Re:Make 'em pay by IanHurst · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that's pretty interesting ;)

    11. Re:Make 'em pay by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. They only address a *specific* issue when it is discovered by the victims. If no one complains, they just keep on pumping out the poison.

      If no one complains, then is there a poison?

      Yes, they came clean because there was an outrage. Exactly like everywhere else (read: BSE in the USA.) Interestingly enough, the outrage about contaminated milk products was a domestic issue. China has been devoting a lot of its resources to improved product safety - both for political and economic reasons. There's nothing particularly altruistic or noble about that, but then neither is there elsewhere.

  15. Second largest employer? by Thyamine · · Score: 1

    1900 doesn't sound like a lot in respect to being the second largest employer. I suppose not knowing the population of Ireland off the top of my head, I can't say for certain (I just looked, 6 Million). So I guess I'm still a little surprised that 1900 is the second largest employer. Am I wrong that that seems surprising?

    On the side of people out of a job/paycheck, 1900 is terrible.

    --
    I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
    1. Re:Second largest employer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, 3 million work for the government, and the other 3 million are unemployed.

    2. Re:Second largest employer? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      1900 doesn't sound like a lot in respect to being the second largest employer.

      s/Ireland/America/g
      s/Dell/GM/g

      I suppose not knowing the population of Ireland off the top of my head, I can't say for certain (I just looked, 6 Million)

      Wrong page. Look again.
      Note that you are not the first person in this thread to make this mistake.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
  16. Re:Can we call it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm Flamebait whilst the Nantucket guy is funny? Riight

  17. POTATO FAMIN! by 0racle · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scares them, doesn't it. But they didn't learn; you don't put all your potatoes in one basket.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    1. Re:POTATO FAMIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      (Score:-5 Offensive)

    2. Re:POTATO FAMIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward

      Looks like no one is willing to mod you down as you requested. Please take a moment to review our FAQ

  18. Will they actually save money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was my first thought. It costs money to build a new plant and move the equipment over there.

    This could work well for Dell. The average wage is $850 a week in Ireland versus $157 a week in Poland. For two thousand employees, that's a $million a week saved in labour alone. Whatever the costs are for building a new plant and training new workers, they should be made back in a year or two.

    Sources on wage figures:
    http://www.cso.ie/statistics/indearnings.htm
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3442329.stm

    1. Re:Will they actually save money? by Skrynesaver · · Score: 1

      I believe the Polish government is offering them a €55M grant to help offset the costs of building the plant

      --
      "Linux is for noobs"-The new MS fud strategy
    2. Re:Will they actually save money? by hierophanta · · Score: 1

      dont forget potential tax breaks - also most countries would give Dell numerous other incentives just to get their business onshore (think environment regulations or tax write offs)

  19. Less taxes. by diskis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The 10 year discount is up. That's why they are moving, and Dell isn't the only corporation doing this. Ireland has a low corporate tax, and discounts it even further for the first 10 years a corporation operates there.

    1. Re:Less taxes. by SuseLover · · Score: 1

      Maybe Ireland should have added the stipulation that they would stay X years longer than 10. What enticement does a corp have to stay longer than 10 years otherwise?

    2. Re:Less taxes. by bjourne · · Score: 1

      And that was the sole reason why they moved there in the first place. Ireland was something of a role-model for neo-liberals all over Europe because of their lowest corporate taxes in Europe. Just lower the taxes and all companies will move here. But now they found an even cheaper place to do business in. Lowering taxes never is the solution because there is always some place even cheaper they will relocate to.

    3. Re:Less taxes. by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Informative

      The enticement at that point is that it's probably cheaper to stay there than move the entire operation, which means either disrupting shipments for a while or paying for 2 locations for a while. You have to be able to save a significant amount of money elsewhere to justify it. And you have to do either guarantee that savings, or do it in the short run to have it make sense.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:Less taxes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia did the same in Germany.
      http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/nokia-to-close-german-plant-and-move-production-elsewhere/

    5. Re:Less taxes. by tmosley · · Score: 2, Informative

      So lower taxes don't work because they are moving to avoid paying higher taxes?

      Great logic there, comrade.

    6. Re:Less taxes. by Surt · · Score: 1

      The cost overhead of training a new workforce in a new location, buying up property and leasing new office space, etc. The 10 year rule is essentially a bet that a corporation, once they have a decade-long investment in a specific location, will get stuck (or stuck enough that shifting their operations will cost more than the increased tax load).

      Obviously, these were either highly untrained jobs, or the difference in tax load was way too big. Bad bet by the Irish.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    7. Re:Less taxes. by 5KVGhost · · Score: 1

      So Ireland apparently gambled that it'd be too much trouble for a company to move after being there for 10 years. I guess they were wrong.

      Perhaps they should extend the 10-year tax discount into a permanent tax reduction, since the practical alternative seems to be a larger percentage of zero.

    8. Re:Less taxes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The enticement at that point is that it's probably cheaper to stay there than move the entire operation, which means either disrupting shipments for a while or paying for 2 locations for a while.

      Not really. The factory in Lodz has been operating for almost 2 years now. Most, if not all, Dell laptops made for the EMEA market are manufactured there. Dell is already paying for the mostly-unused factory space (out of 10-15 possible assembly lines only 3 or 4 are used). If anything, this should help save money.

    9. Re:Less taxes. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      The logic is that it's a race to the bottom. If you're competing on cost, there will always be somewhere in the world that is even cheaper. Then the only way to compete is to cut taxes again and again until your country falls apart.

    10. Re:Less taxes. by tmosley · · Score: 1

      That's wrong on several levels. First, there are many variables other than the tax rate, although the tax rate is VERY important to most companies when choosing a location. These include the level of education of the populace, the amount of local corruption, the ability to overcome language barriers, etc.

      Secondly, there is generally a pretty large cost associated with moving operations between nations (as I believe was mentioned somewhere above). All other things being equal, there must have been a pretty damn big jump in the tax rate to drive them out of the country.

      This is one of the big failings of contemporary liberalism. They think that productive enterprises should be forced to do what the government thinks is right, spending whatever amount of money is required to meet all of the rules and regulations they impose. When those burdens become too large, companies rightly pack up shop and leave. Classical liberalism calls for less government involvement, and allows for more wealth creation. Free markets are the most efficient form of regulation. The recent so called failure of the "free market" was actually a failure of planned economics, by the way. I only say that because modern liberals love to say that the free market has failed when in fact it is the controlled economy under the Federal Reserve regime of money manipulation and regulatory game-playing by the government that has failed.

    11. Re:Less taxes. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      None of your post refutes anything I've said, in fact you actually back me up in the existence of the race to the bottom. Of course, if companies all move to run-down low-tax economies, there won't be any customers left for them at all.

      Another flaw in your post is that there is no correlation between low taxation and wealth creation.

    12. Re:Less taxes. by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Actually, it does. Why don't all corporations move to Somalia, where there is no tax (due to there being no central government)? They don't because the cumulative cost of doing business is too high when you factor in things like security and lack of infrastructure. There is a happy medium, which will be necessarily different for different for different industries.

      Having lower taxes is good, because it attracts companies, which pay taxes (at an admittedly lower rate). When more companies come, you will often see an overall increase in your tax revenue, despite the much lower tax rate. This is not the only benefit, however. You have to remember that these corporations are also paying wages, which will often be higher than most other jobs in the area. Indeed, as more corporations move in, the demand for workers becomes higher, and so the wages rise, again creating more tax revenue for the state. Due to that effect, you could easily have a 0% corporate tax rate while still increasing your revenue. If the companies that move in are high tech or require skilled labor of some sort (especially if it is in a field where the workers are highly mobile), then you will often see that the wages paid will go WAY up, to about the same level as they are internationally.

      As to the possibility of all companies moving to the one place with the lowest taxes, then the tax rates in ALL the other nations would have to be through the roof, as with fewer companies around, wages in those countries would fall as there are more workers chasing fewer jobs.

      Your last statement is just silly. If low taxes didn't attract the people creating wealth, then no-one would ever lower taxes. We'd all be living in a worker's "paradise".

  20. This calls for an Irish Limerick by GPLDAN · · Score: 4, Funny

    There once was an old man of Esser,
    Whose employment prospects grew lesser and lesser,
    It at last grew so small
    He had no job skills at all,
    And now he's a college professor.

    1. Re:This calls for an Irish Limerick by Manchot · · Score: 1

      I really don't understand the sentiment that "those who can't do, teach." At least in math, science, and engineering, academia is by far the most competitive job market, and where the bulk of research is done.

    2. Re:This calls for an Irish Limerick by sootman · · Score: 1

      Limerick writing
      Really depends on meter
      Just stick with haiku

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  21. That's just economic development by superskippy · · Score: 1

    This is economic development, and is good news, although I appreciate that it won't seem like that if you are one of the people laid off.

    The reason Dell were in Ireland in the first place is because Ireland was the cheap labour centre of Europe. As they've developed, it's no longer true and their economy has been replaced by a knowledge economy. In many ways, cheap-ass manufacturing leaving your country because the labour is too cheap is a complement. Next, the same cycle gets to happen to Poland. Everyone moves low-skill factories there, the place develops, and then the staff get expensive so Dell will go somewhere cheaper again.

    1. Re:That's just economic development by Microlith · · Score: 1

      How is it economic development if the economy suffers a setback every time one of these companies moves on?

    2. Re:That's just economic development by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      I think folks are concerned about the cyclic nature of said economic development---like Dell relocating to US for cheap manufacturing labor after Poland, etc.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    3. Re:That's just economic development by theredshoes · · Score: 1

      I agree with you partially about economic development, but honestly it is about greed, corporate greed. And I have nothing against Dell. I use bought a new Inspiron. I have had great luck with Dell, so I stuck with those laptops. The only two computers that I ever bought that didn't go to shit after two years were Dell and Apple products.

      And it isn't even that much of a savings or profit for Dell, what a couple percentage points to move their operations and exploit Polish workers instead of Irish workers? Honest hard working people will give what three to five to seven years of their lives and scrape by on a 30K max out? Yeah!!!!

      When I read stories like this, all I think is, I better hold onto the potatoes I have, meh.

      -It is easy to halve the potato where there is love.- Irish saying

    4. Re:That's just economic development by Skrynesaver · · Score: 1

      Because local businesses gained skills providing services to the Dell plant and while they won't initially employ the laid off workers indigenous firms will grow out of the wreckage with skills and products that weren't previously present in the local economy.

      --
      "Linux is for noobs"-The new MS fud strategy
    5. Re:That's just economic development by theredshoes · · Score: 1

      A 30K max out on salary for an assembly job is not what I would call living in luxury. Especially if you have a wife and two kids and rely on a steady income. If you are single, it is hard to live on that kind of salary also.

      There are some "great" assembly jobs here in the US. The Sony plant near here (Pittsburgh) I think hires people in at $9.75 an hour, yuppers that is some high living. You can definitely cover everything on that salary, pfft.

      I doubt they will pay the Polish workers a "living wage" either.

    6. Re:That's just economic development by drsquare · · Score: 1

      What sort of salary do you expect for unskilled labour that anyone could do?

    7. Re:That's just economic development by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      There is no knowledge economy. if you become heavily dependent on third world countries for your heavy lifting, you will ultimately end up being owned by them, as their people are no less intelligent than yours, and they also have the industrial base. Foolish concept tbh.

  22. Re: second largest corporate employer? by rs232 · · Score: 1

    They mean DELL is the second largest external company to employ people in Ireland ..

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  23. Where are all the free market whiners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Ireland has been the strong argument lately as to why the US needs to stop taxing business so much. How's this crow taste?

    This is just more evidence to the idea that companies will always game the system because there will always be some country out there that provides them the opportunity. Should the US really restructure its tax base to compete with the ever expanding global market, or should we just admit that we've got more priorities to take care of than some smaller nations that can make these deals and just go about our usual routine?

    1. Re:Where are all the free market whiners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting on their knees for the biggest corporatist porkfest in US history.

    2. Re:Where are all the free market whiners? by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      Should the US really restructure its tax base to compete with the ever expanding global market?

      You betcha.

  24. A good first start by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    I think Obama mentioned that he wants to yank tax breaks away from companies that export jobs, and give breaks to companies that create jobs here in the U.S.

    That's a good first start. But how about we start putting huge tarrifs on shit that should be made in the U.S. but is coming from Poland? Send a clear message that cheap labor isn't the best way to make money.

    1. Re:A good first start by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      But how about we start putting huge tarrifs on shit that should be made in the U.S. but is coming from Poland?

      Please leave the thinking to people who known how to do it.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    2. Re:A good first start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again the consumer gets screwed.

    3. Re:A good first start by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      How on earth is that a good start - these companies will reform outside the US and the US will gain nothing from them if they move. We need to encourage companies to remain - telling them that we're going to beat them up unless they give us theior lunch money doesn't work once they grow up enough to do something about it.

    4. Re:A good first start by Surt · · Score: 1

      That's known as protectionism, and indeed, the developed world was much better off before we gave it up.

      Protectionism essentially bars corporations from shifting jobs to countries where human rights abuses allow them to manufacture more cheaply at the cost of human lives.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:A good first start by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      Not if you organize the law as such to prevent their moving across the border. You know what, we supposedly have open trade but until other nations remove their protectionist policies, we too should have them.

    6. Re:A good first start by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I think Obama mentioned that he wants to yank tax breaks away from companies that export jobs, and give breaks to companies that create jobs here in the U.S.

      The thing is, that some countries such as Ireland provide more jobs in the US than the US provides to Ireland. It's all very well to draw jobs back, but its not so smart if end up in a negative situation, and risk pissing off the EU at the same time.

    7. Re:A good first start by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Please leave the thinking to people who known how to do it.

      Apparently that excludes you too. ;)

    8. Re:A good first start by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      No, I know how to think, just not how to write.

      Fucking spell checkers - let you down every time.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  25. witcher fan? by hort_wort · · Score: 0

    Do you think the Dell execs are fans of the Witcher series? That is just now making it to the US in translated form. Coincidence? I think not.

    Oops, I forgot folks on here are probably all Tolkien loyalists. *sways hand* This is not the flamebait you're looking for...

  26. Re:There once was...here are the funny bits: by hierophanta · · Score: 5, Funny

    There once was a man from Nantucket
    Whose dick was so long he could suck it.
    While wiping his chin,
    He said with a grin,
    "If my ear were a cunt, I could fuck it."


    --- and here is the extended version of the original ---

    There once was a man from Nantucket
    Who kept all his cash in a bucket.
    But his daughter, named Nan,
    Ran away with a man
    And as for the bucket, Nantucket.


    part 2:

    But he followed the pair to Pawtucket,
    The man and the girl with the bucket;
    And he said to the man,
    He was welcome to Nan,
    But as for the bucket, Pawtucket.


    part 3:

    Then the pair followed Pa to Manhasset,
    Where he still held the cash as an asset,
    But Nan and the man
    Stole the money and ran,
    And as for the bucket, Manhasset.

  27. Like the demotivational poster says... by gillbates · · Score: 1

    Those companies willing to go to the ends of the Earth for their employees usually find they can pay them a tenth of the salary.

    I can't help but wonder how Dell would react if Ireland banned Dell computers. You know, this kind of game works both ways.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Like the demotivational poster says... by qbast · · Score: 1

      Some bored guy at Dell marketing would wonder for a 5 minutes if this 0.001% dip in sales is real or maybe a rounding error.

    2. Re:Like the demotivational poster says... by u38cg · · Score: 1

      I wonder how the Irish economy would react if prices for all computers went up by 5-10% because of the lack of competition from Dell?

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    3. Re:Like the demotivational poster says... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Then no company ever starts up or relocates to Ireland again, ever.

  28. second largest by wwwillem · · Score: 1

    RTA for once. What shocked me most is the fact that a company with only 4300 (local) employees is the second largest corporate employer. Wow ..... even my local ISP here employs already more people.

    So, either that was a Washington Post journalist missing out one way or another (has happened before :), otherwise you start wondering.

    --
    Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    1. Re:second largest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you need to take into account the fact that ireland only has 4.5million people where as the USA as 306million, so of course the 2nd biggest corporate employer is going to have less employees in Ireland.

    2. Re:second largest by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      I wasn't comparing with the US. I live in Canada and I'm originally from Holland. Which are both still larger than Ireland, but not that much.

      And don't get me wrong, I'm the last one to say "bigger is better", on the contrary. I was just surprised. And still wondering if it is correct. What about the banks in Ireland, or the telco's. How many people do they employ?

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
  29. Leeching? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell's closing is not a result of the economic downturn, but of a pattern all too familiar in the United States -- corporations' perennial search for cheaper labor.

    Sure, I guess, but if this keeps happening, who will have enough money to buy what corporations are making? Maybe every employee should be paid in stock instead of cash, that way they are on the same footing as the investor?

  30. banks to US; 'we've had a difficult season'....., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so, the only hope for survival is if you give us more than we had to start with before we 'lost' it, & let us spend it like we did before, except more.

  31. Dood, You'll Be Gettin' A Pink Slip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now fook off, ya gobshite!

  32. Oncein Ireland, there was Dell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once in Ireland there was Dell
    Where many once worked, but that's all gone to hell.
    For Dell is moving,
    and thus proving,
    You can screw everyone and still do well.

  33. Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A number of years ago I read an essay about countries and states offering concessions to multi-national corporations in order to get manufacturing jobs.

    The executive is this:

    Companies will take what they can, exploit all the benefits, and when it makes financial sense to move they will. This "cut throat" capitalism will lead to utter destruction because all it does is drive down wages world wide.

    Over time, some people in 3rd world nations seem to get less poor because they have "jobs." The previously better off economies, however, deteriorate because the working class income deteriorates. As the economic powerhouses like U.S.A, Europe, and Japan start to falter, the world wide market starts to falter, and companies start to close factories. As the factories close, the working class has even less money causing more factories to fail. Eventually, even the 3rd world factories don't make sense and the previously "less poor" return to their original poverty level, except that the world wide economy has been destroyed. All the capital ends up in the hands of a very very small number of people.

    I'm kinda worried that it wasn't just an over imaginative worst case scenario.

    1. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're kind of assuming that:

      1. People in the West won't find new jobs to replace the ones that left
      2. People in developing countries somehow are only capable of making things for export

    2. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      People in the West won't find new jobs to replace the ones that left

      You assume an infinite number of jobs. Look at the current and climbing unemployment rates in the U.S.

      People in developing countries somehow are only capable of making things for export

      Yes, because if they had the capital in the economy to producing products for themselves, they already would be doing that.

    3. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      "the world wide market starts to falter"

      Or starts to equalize, really. We've currently got a situation where some countries have high-priced labor and other have very low-priced because it used to be difficult to travel and communicate long-distance. As those things change, all countries have better ability to do jobs from other countries.

      In other words, the world was previously out of balance and now it's correcting itself.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by Surt · · Score: 1

      People in developing countries are the only ones capable of being enslaved or killed to make things for export. That's really the key to their market competitiveness.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by tgd · · Score: 1

      You say drive down wages worldwide like thats a bad thing.

      There's not productivity and resources worldwide to cover the wages world-wide as it is. For people to live at even a fraction of the wealth the average American has, someone else has to be living in absolute poverty *and still be productive*. Every bit of resources any of us consume above this hypothetical level has to be made up for by someone who isn't getting the full benefits of their labor.

      Now, living vastly above my share, I'm okay with that. But talking about wage fairness out of one side of your mouth while talking about wages staying up on the other is being unrealistic. You'll get fair wages globally when people in the US and the rest of the "1st world" are living on 10% of what they do now. Then everyone can share equally.

    6. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      except that the world wide economy has been destroyed. All the capital ends up in the hands of a very very small number of people.

      If the world wide economy has been destroyed, that capital will be worth exacly nothing.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      If the world wide economy has been destroyed, that capital will be worth exacly nothing.

      You need to read some history of the world BEFORE the Magna Carta

    8. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by bnenning · · Score: 1

      Look at the current and climbing unemployment rates in the U.S.

      Well, there is that recession thingy. We've had people whining about all the jobs going overseas for at least 30 years, yet the unemployment rate has been largely steady. Automation eliminates more jobs than offshoring, should we get rid of computers and robots? Think of all the accounting and assembly line jobs that would be created...

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    9. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      Well, there is that recession thingy. We've had people whining about all the jobs going overseas for at least 30 years, yet the unemployment rate has been largely steady.

      That is a myth. People who are no longer eligible for unemployment or who's benefits have expired are not counted.

      Secondly, a person who is layed off from a $75,000 and regains employment at $50,000 is also not counted as "unemployed," BUT, he's making 1/3 less.

      Automation eliminates more jobs than offshoring, should we get rid of computers and robots? Think of all the accounting and assembly line jobs that would be created...

      It is a fact that automation creates jobs. It may create a loss in jobs in one sector, but it creates jobs in other sectors.

      Off shoring does more than move jobs from one economy to another, it decreases their value in the process.

    10. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      alking about wage fairness out of one side of your mouth while talking about wages staying up on the other is being unrealistic. You'll get fair wages globally when people in the US and the rest of the "1st world" are living on 10% of what they do now. Then everyone can share equally.

      There are a couple misconceptions:

      (1) That wealth is a static number that neither increases not decreases. It is not true, wealth can be created and destroyed.

      (2) The the working class in the U.S.A. is rich. The working class in the U.S.A. is one of the more impoverished in the western world. It has a higher level of disease, death, and illiteracy. The bottom 80% of the country hold about 8% of the wealth. The top 1% holds about 40% of the wealth. the remaining 19% holds about 52% The working class in this country holds less than 10% of the wealth, yet make up 80% of the population.

      A healthy economy comes from commerce. Commerce comes from trade. To have trade you need (1) produces and (2) buyers. As wealth is consolidated, you have fewer and fewer buyers, thus you will have fewer and fewer produces.

      The consolidation of wealth hurts virtually everyone on the planet.

    11. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by bnenning · · Score: 1

      People who are no longer eligible for unemployment or who's benefits have expired are not counted.

      "Discouraged workers" who aren't actively looking for work aren't counted, but if your unemployment benefits have expired and you're still looking, you are counted. Here is what the Bureau of Labor Statistics has to say.

      Secondly, a person who is layed off from a $75,000 and regains employment at $50,000 is also not counted as "unemployed," BUT, he's making 1/3 less.

      Yes, and that will show up in income statistics. It would be silly to consider him unemployed in any way.

      It is a fact that automation creates jobs. It may create a loss in jobs in one sector, but it creates jobs in other sectors.

      Automation does create jobs, but probably not in the way you're thinking. It is not true that if computers replace 10,000 telephone operators, that more than 10,000 jobs are created to manage those computers; if that were the case, then there would be no cost savings and no reason for phone companies to switch. Instead, the same service that used to be provided by the operators can now be provided by fewer computer technicians. This leaves the former phone operators temporarily unemployed, but they will eventually find jobs producing other things. The end result is that we produce more with the same amount of labor, and the same thing happens with offshoring. Think of China as a black box where companies send money (less than they would pay for domestic labor) and get products back. The effect is the same as if they had saved money due to automation.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    12. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by tgd · · Score: 1

      If you think there is a single person in the US, in an inner city, in rural Kentucky, in the middle of nowhere Alaska... an single one who is living in any sort of poverty, you need to visit the rest of the world.

      There's no true poverty in the US. There is manufactured poverty (I can't feed my kids, but I just bought this new XBox), there's no real lack of healthcare. Not like the truly poor parts of the world.

      Its not even remotely close.

    13. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      If you think there is a single person in the US, in an inner city, in rural Kentucky, in the middle of nowhere Alaska... an single one who is living in any sort of poverty, you need to visit the rest of the world.

      If you think this, you NEED to go to rural Kentucky, Alabama, or an indian reservation.

    14. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by tgd · · Score: 1

      Feel free to believe what you want, clearly I'm not going to open your eyes.

    15. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      Feel free to believe what you want, clearly I'm not going to open your eyes.

      The whole passive aggressive "I'm right, but you won't listen" argument is that of a coward.

      You don't actually define what poverty is. Are there people WORSE off than the very poor in this country? Of course there are. Are there poor poorer than our poor? In most cases, I'd agree with that statement.

      It is a futile argument to say that because there are people worse off there is no problem. "We have no poor because, geez, THOSE people are REALLY poor." Is not a reasonable argument as it is not a comparative problem. Also, don't confuse the living conditions of war zones with poverty. That is a different issue altogether.

      If you've never been to some of the poorest places in this country, then you'll never really know the problem. Just saying that some other country's poor are worse off than our poor does not address the issue nor provides any factual basis for argument.

    16. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by tgd · · Score: 1

      Poor means you can't choose to change a behavior to alleviate the problems you have.

      The poor in the US is not poor. They have access to food. They have access to shelter. They choose to buy Nikes. They choose to have an XBox. They choose to buy an iPod or a cell phone while on welfare.

      Poor is having *nothing*. No chance, no opportunity, no choice you can change. Its *not* "I don't have as much as the people around me".

      No one in the US is poor. Period. If you believe otherwise, you should do some travel in parts of the world that are truly poor. I have.

  34. Unemployment in Poland lower than in Ireland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    According to Eurostat unemployment in Poland in November (6.5%) was lower than in Ireland (7.9%).

    http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

    Polish economy has been booming in recent years.

  35. I Give You, the EU by indytx · · Score: 1

    To anyone who jumps on the sensational bandwagon that this is just like Western countries relocating their manufacturing facilities to China, you obviously know nothing about European politics or its economy.

    Okay, sure this stinks for the local Irish economy, but citizens in EU countries have freedom of movement. So, big deal. This is no different from a manufacturer relocating from the Northeast U.S. to the South for the lower labor costs. Workers in the EU have the right to move to where the work is. Also, companies in the EU have the freedom to move their operations or "capital."

    --
    Make love, not reality television.
    1. Re:I Give You, the EU by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      We have free movement but we certainly do not have a common language. It's not as easy to move from Ireland to Poland as it is to move from New York to California.(Having said this, many hundreds of thousands of Poles did in fact do just that in the opposite direction over the last few years, working in both Ireland and the UK.)

      By contrast, movement from Ireland to England, because of a common language and to a large extent culture, is extremely common and is in fact a staple aspect of traditional, and probably now contemporary Irish life.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
  36. This shouldn't come as a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fruit of the Loom gave Ireland the shaft years ago, and that was when the economy was booming.

    Of course, there's plenty of young Irish workers who have no idea what a recession is really like.

  37. Bloody Poles.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Staying at home, taking our jobs.

  38. Europeans, be happy by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Dell shut down all their plants in America and shipped them to China. Your plant is remaining in Europe. Personally, I have quit buying Dell.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Europeans, be happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually not true. There are still Dell manufacturing plants in the U.S.

  39. workers are stupid by Surt · · Score: 1

    If there is one lesson to be learned from this economic downturn: it is just stupid to be a worker in the modern economy. Instead, you should be in ownership or upper management. Kids, adjust your career plans now.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  40. Hey guys I am from Poland by rewter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hey guys I am from Poland and guess what? I can more or less speak english and even know how to post on Slashdot.

    And there's more. We do embedded software and hardware here, we know Linux and it's been that way for years already.

    So it's not different compared to where you live. And as for dell, easy come easy go. They won't stay here longer than 3-4 years and eventualy will continue moving east.

    1. Re:Hey guys I am from Poland by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      They won't stay here longer than 3-4 years and eventualy will continue moving east.

      Until they'll be so far east that they'll be back in California.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:Hey guys I am from Poland by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      Relax... It will not be because it's east, it will be because it will have the cheapest labor. At least, looking at the economic forecasts and unemployment.

  41. ...the obvious remedy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thus, the fact that we have a service-based economy is not in and of itself a problem, provided that our services are sufficiently valued in world markets to purchase the manufactured goods we need as well as the other necessities and wants of life. It is a problem ONLY if our skills, or the products that are created using those skills, are no longer sufficiently valuable to earn us the kind of living we want, in which case, the obvious remedy (which scales up) is to learn new skills.

    You make it sound so simple, as if every time the creation of products and the required skills/services is exported three new skills/services which are highly valued on world markets spring up in place of the ones you just lost to a country where it is easier to mistreat your employees. The valuable skills/services that are being exported from Europe and the US to places where they will be performed for less money are being replaced by new skills/services at lower rate than they are being lost. While there will always be a certain number of people here in the west that will be able to acquire/create new skills/services as the old ones are exported and they will always be able to use these new skills/services to produce products highly valued in world markets, a large segment of the population won't be able to do that. The inevitable consequence of this is that these people will have to drastically lower their standard of living, that last phenomenon is also known as poverty.

  42. Not just manufacturing by jjrff · · Score: 1

    Proctor and Gamble did not just move manufacturing over. They completely outsourced their IT (allegedly 100% of it) and demanded that at least 60% of IT work should be cheaper offshore support. Ironically the last I checked this was going incredibly well for them. Not so great for the people who were canned over the years of course.

  43. as soon as corporations run out of countries. by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Right. They've hardly touched Africa yet.

    1. Re:as soon as corporations run out of countries. by lee1026 · · Score: 1

      Africa is not exactly what I would call stable. In any case, Africa have got less people then either China or India. If outsourcing can push living standards in both countries up considerably in just 20 years, there is no reason to think that any country would remain both poor and stable in another say... 50 years.

    2. Re:as soon as corporations run out of countries. by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some areas of Africa are currently stable. If I'm not mistaken Kenya is relatively stable, hence why Google seems to be interested in it. Also in France when we call a hotline it doesn't go to India but Tunisia or Morocco, French-speaking countries that have been fairly stable over the last few decades (Tunisia has nothing to envy regarding stability these days). So it's not all that bleak for Africa, mind you there's more to Africa than starving kids, guerilla wars and genocides, but there's many reasons why most of it will be the last to experience what Poland or China have just experienced, one reason being you can't really just put a big computer chip factory in the middle of Mali.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  44. Who cares? by PinkyDead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, maybe that's a little blase, but there are two points that have to be considered here:

    1. Ireland is not nor never has been a manufacturing country. Sure there have be some manufacturing companies such as Dell, but essentially Ireland is a combination of a strong agricultural and tourism in rural areas with technological and financial bias in the urban areas. Dell is nice to have, and I feel sorry for those that have lost their jobs in Limerick - but it is not a core industry, even if it is a core employer.

    2. Ireland has been growing at an incredible rate over the past 10 years, far faster than anyone could possibly hope to adapt to. Looking at the government's actions over this period, they have acted like lottery winners, squandering the growth to create an ever-burgeoning public sector. Coincidentally, the National Competitiveness Council in Ireland established that our competitiveness has deteriorated by 32% over this period. This loss as well as others is a good wake up call - and an opportunity to regroup and establish a firmer foundation for the future.

    It is also important to note that Dell is not leaving Ireland - they are closing their manufacturing plant. Ireland's corporate tax rate is still extremely attractive to US companies.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    1. Re:Who cares? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Is it fairly easy to open up shop in Ireland if you're already a US corporation?

    2. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) The urban areas are mostly employed by either the state or some sort of service or retail. The %age of people in real export industries is relatively tiny.

      2) Ireland has been running up a large private debt at an incredible rate for the last 10 years. Most of it squandered on houses. It has also been running up an obscenely expensive public sector. This was not growth, it was inflating your cost of living, and your cost of doing business. It's one of the reasons that it no longer makes sense for companies like Dell to operate here.

      Yep, thank heavens for special low corporate tax. Extracting a levy for doing no work. It's an immoral scheme, barely one step above the caymans. The taxes should be paid where the work is actually done (you know, to pay to look after the welfare of the workers who actually worked to produce the goods).

    3. Re:Who cares? by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

      It's a disaster for Limerick though - particularly as there are thousands more jobs likely to be lost in companies relying on business from Dell. Not to mention the effect of the jobless not having money to spend locally.

      I guess it's just going to be another event cementing the emigration in Ireland to Dublin. It's bad news even for Dublin to have a quarter of the State's population living there, pushing infrastructure to the limits. Also the depopulated rural areas still have to have services - services which benefit fewer and fewer people. A more even regional distribution of jobs and population would ensure better value-for-money for all taxpayers in the State.

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
  45. Rhyme it, at least! by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    Does Michael Dell play dirty tricks
    When he's handing out jobs to the Micks?
    "No," he says with a laugh,
    "We just fuck 'em all daft
    "Then we close up the plant in Limerick."

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  46. Basic climatology explains this by macraig · · Score: 1

    Have you heard of high and low pressure systems? Nature abhors even a partial vacuum; systems like to equalize. Water, air, and even money will flow to where the low spots are. India was once a "low spot" not so long ago, but now it's equalized a bit and so the flow has shifted. Closer to home, Ireland was a low spot, too, but apparently now not low enough. Outsourcing is a natural descriptive phenomenon.

    I'm rather surprised that Dell chose Poland rather than, say, Moldova, though.

    1. Re:Basic climatology explains this by theredshoes · · Score: 1

      What a Zen approach to money. I definitely agree with you though, it is an interesting observation. I wish some money would flow over here in the low spots of the Eastern U.S.

    2. Re:Basic climatology explains this by macraig · · Score: 1

      Your implication is that your "low spot" is somehow the aberration, but you have it kinda backwards: it's the economic high spots that are the aberration, and the rest of the system wants its share back!

    3. Re:Basic climatology explains this by Tweenk · · Score: 1

      I'm rather surprised that Dell chose Poland rather than, say, Moldova, though.

      Many skilled CS graduates?
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/06/code_jam_europe/
      Though I expect there will be mainly manual jobs created, so maybe this isn't very relevant.

      --
      Those who would give up liberty to obtain working drivers, deserve neither liberty nor working drivers.
    4. Re:Basic climatology explains this by macraig · · Score: 1

      Yeah, skilled CS graduates generally demand wages that would sorta defeat the goal of maximizing the "human resource" at minimum cost. That's why India is increasingly less in demand for outsourcing now. A decade or two from now, India will be doing its own outsourcing.

    5. Re:Basic climatology explains this by o'reor · · Score: 1

      it's the economic high spots that are the aberration, and the rest of the system wants its share back!

      Isn't that a Marxist approach ?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    6. Re:Basic climatology explains this by macraig · · Score: 1

      No, it's not; I've never read any writing of Karl Marx; I don't know anything about his "socialism" beyond the paragraph or two I read in a school textbook. I've simply observed, analyzed, noted problems, and made conclusions. If those conclusions just happen to be the same ones that some famous dead person made, well then that's just fine by me.

      You really didn't fully read and comprehend what I wrote, did you? The system wants to equalize the pressure. Ergo, roughly same standard of living throughout the closed system (global economy). No behavior makes this more apparent than outsourcing, and outsourcing is a capitalist behavior, no?

  47. read some of the comments from the irish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  48. Re:POTATO FAMINE! by sholsinger · · Score: 1

    ^^ There, fixed it for you.

  49. Honey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Have a look at this: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/specials/honey/

    Do you think China has come clean on this because of their own will?

    I'm surprised the Chinese are still making honey. They have managed to wipe out several species of pollinators over vast sections of their country by grossly overusing pesticides. Uncontrolled industrial pollution didn't help either. There are places in China where farmers have to pollinate fruit trees with paint brushes. To be fair to the Chinese the USA is fast on it's way to suffering the same fate for a lot of the same reasons. Neither government seems to care.

  50. Pumping Gas by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    In New Jersey and Oregon it's illegal (with some exceptions) to pump your own gas, an attendant does it for you.

    I have never seen the point of creating jobs like this, and I suspect that despite the local job creation, it is probably bad for the economy. but it is truly hard to create 100s of millions of high-end jobs.

    If we are successful in continuing to promote the USA as a global leader, worthy of "management class" wages compared to other nationalities; WTF are the rest of the population going to do that lack these high-end skills ?

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:Pumping Gas by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      A short list:

      Police our towns.
      Carry our mail.
      Fix our roofs (well, I do that myself, along with most of home repairs, but most techies don't).
      Mow our lawns.
      Sell us food.
      Deliver our packages.
      Install our furnaces.
      Paint our houses.
      Fix our cars.
      Deliever our babies.
      Sue our neighbors.
      Grow our food.
      Pick up our trash.
      Sell us beer.
      Insulate our attics.
      Varnish our hardwood floors.
      Sell us hardwood floors.
      Chop down the trees for our hardwood floors.
      Teach our children.

      Can you perhaps think of some more?

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    2. Re:Pumping Gas by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      I've heard that the drop in pump insurance is actually proportional to the wage of the attendant.

  51. Parallels by g8oz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like Bush, Micheal Dell did not forget Poland.

    Thank you I'll be here all week.

  52. The basic problem by Moryath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The basic problem is that "free trade" never is.

    "Free trade" concerning commodities that are easily made (or grown) in an area, like tropical fruit towards northern climates, is one thing.

    "Free trade" based on paying workers shit wages, or based on the fact that one country (*coughmexshitcocough*) has absolutely crappy evironmental protection laws while their neighbors don't, doesn't - it temporarily drives down "costs" while ensuring that the environment gets ruined and poverty is taken advantage of.

    The solution is "fair trade" instead - place tariffs on any and all imported goods from countries whose labor protection and environmental laws are inferior to our own, such that the cost to produce them there and them import is the same (or better yet, slightly more expensive) as doing the production either here, or in a country with proper worker and environmental protection standards. If the USA/Canada/European countries would do that, then the countries with shit worker protection and environmental laws will have to fall in line and we can actually get things addressed.

    1. Re:The basic problem by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      And in your scenario who exactly sets the cost of living adjustment? I agree that countries with lax environmental and labor protection laws should be brought up to par, but paying people the same wage as here in the US is dumb.

      For the most part companies in these poor countries pay competitive wages for the area. I don't have a problem with the wages, only with the labor abuse (working 20 hour days) and environmental wrecking they do.

    2. Re:The basic problem by u38cg · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The funny thing is, none of these people have to work for low wages or as sweated labour; they are quite free to spend their days scavenging rubbish dumps for scraps of food. It's hardly taking advantage of someone to pay them the going rate as opposed to letting them starve in the streets.

      Your proposal is to take us back to the 1930s, which, if I might remind you, didn't work out so well. It took a long time to unwind the economic impact of protectionism. Imposing these standards on trading partners removes any point in trading with them - so all your manufacturing jobs will come back onshore. In turn, wages will go through the roof, as will inflation in general. In turn, your trading partners have to match the new, higher wages, which is even harder for them to do. Problem.

      On worker protection: the country with the least worker protection laws in the world is the United States. Yet bizarrely, you also have some of the highest standards, because you are held to them by the free market. Countries with notional but unenforced safety regimes, such as China, don't do so well at actually protecting their workers.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    3. Re:The basic problem by Mex · · Score: 1

      "Mexshitco"? Really?

      Let me guess... Republican?

    4. Re:The basic problem by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Your proposal is to take us back to the 1930s, which, if I might remind you, didn't work out so well.

      The propsal would take us back to the 1780s, when tariffs and protectionism fostered the US's nacent industries, and built it into the industrial powerhouse that it became. What didn't work out so well was the housing bubble, stock market speculation, and banking deregulation that happened in the 1920s.

      Read Alexander Hamilton's Advice To The Obama Administration . This article is about the report Hamilton delivered to the first congress, about how to grow the economy and industry in the newly created United States, and its relevance to the modern day. It's past time to get back to basics.

      On worker protection: the country with the least worker protection laws in the world is the United States

      This is patently false. The US has the least laws in the whole world? Can you cite a reference for this? It has less laws, than say, Zimbabwe?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    5. Re:The basic problem by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Did I say "pay the same wage as here in the US"?

      No, I said worker protection laws. Unemployment safety nets, safety/health regulations, worker compensation for on-the-job accidents, maximum working days (goes into "health" again), overtime pay past the 40-hour workweek, etc.

      I never said the countries had to pay precisely the same dollar wage. But they should have to have the same environmental standards (so that the "lower cost" doesn't come at the expense of shitting up the planet) and worker protections (so that the "lower cost" doesn't come at the cost of maiming or killing thousands of people in unsafe "factories").

      Was that so hard to understand, or were you deliberately being obtuse?

      One other point: lawpoop below points to this, which is absolutely brilliant and spot-on. And I know precisely why so many of the "globalist" "open borders" "free trade" people hate the points brought up in it - they're not taught history in school any more, not taught math and economics anymore, and know sod-all about the world.

    6. Re:The basic problem by drsquare · · Score: 1

      The solution is "fair trade" instead - place tariffs on any and all imported goods from countries whose labor protection and environmental laws are inferior to our own, such that the cost to produce them there and them import is the same (or better yet, slightly more expensive) as doing the production either here, or in a country with proper worker and environmental protection standards.

      American labour conditions and environmental regulations are worse than in Europe. Does this mean Europe can place tariffs on American exports due to your low minimum wage, high oil consumption, lack of vacation time or health care, weak labour laws that allow business to completely shaft employees, low levels of recycling, weak consumer protection, a broken legal and penal system etc?

      When you suggest things like that, you should work out if you're in a glass house.

  53. The USA is not much different by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Informative
    The individual states are really countries in their own right since they can make their own laws, taxes etc. USA is very much equivalent to Europe in that both are federations. US federal law can override state laws and destroy the sovereignty of states so it is very hard to say that we don't already have a picture as to how things might pan out.

    As for Globalization, well USA is the current global top-dog expecting many other parts of the world to behave as it sees fit. We're probably a long way down this track already.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  54. Why are the Irish always getting a raw deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are the Irish always getting a raw deal?

  55. But...where so you get the workers by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    If everyone is in ownership or upper management, how do you get any work done? We need people to do the grunt work, or the owners and management will have nothing to live off of, as they don't actually produce anything - they simply guide the real workforce. You need to stop discouraging people from rising above their lot as proels, or you'll have to go get a real job.

    Disclaimer: I am owner and management, but since it's a small business I spend about 80% of my time doing actual work (engineering) as well...when I'm not surfing slashdot.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  56. Unskilled laborers act as a warning to the young. by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bad examples serve a purpose.

    Let the 'unskilled laborers' fight over the shit jobs that are uneconomical to move overseas.

    The wage for those jobs will naturally be low.

    Life's a bitch. Thanks for playing...better luck next reincarnation.

    The fair consequence of never developing skills is subsistence living.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  57. "The Economist" on Polish Labor in Ireland by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    "The Economist" had an interesting article relative to this a while back: http://www.economist.com/world/europe/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12676787

    Some interesting tidbits:

    "BY THE best guesses of Polish diplomats, a couple of thousand Poles lived in Ireland at the start of 2004, including 200 emigres left from the second world war. Three years later Ireland was home to more than a quarter of a million Poles, according to consular estimates."

    "A torrent of EU regional aid is about to hit the ex-communist countries: across eastern and central Europe there are plans for new airports, fast trains and motorways. Poland has stadiums to build for the European football championship in 2012. The Polish and Lithuanian governments are actively trawling for workers in Ireland."

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  58. Made in China? No Thanks by Marin3 · · Score: 0

    I always check where stuff is made before i buy, and Made in China products are always ruled out

  59. Re:Can we call it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Potatoe, dummy! If your going to use it, atleast spell it right.

  60. Re:Can we call it by Cobaltqube · · Score: 1

    Well basically.... YES !

    --
    I'm not lazy on the weekends... I'm just Energy Efficent !!
  61. Its actually simpler than you think... by yttrstein · · Score: 1

    I'm opening a second office in Dublin next year. My first is in New York City. It's breathtakingly easy to have a presence in Ireland, and they make it very well worth one's while to do it.

    Any company of any size and any dexterity can have an office in Ireland if they want one. I'm even familiar with a company of a single individual who has an Irish presence so that he can use it to legally wrangle EU clients from the States. (he works in cryptography, so the legalities are complicated)

    All Dell has really done is shown everyone that they're incapable of providing decent work at a decent wage.

  62. Ireland by mikeb · · Score: 1

    I think that's Éire in Irish if you want to be extra picky

  63. Waterford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Waterford, a somewhat iconic Irish brand, had also outsourced some of it's manufacturing to Poland.

  64. Evil Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes we evil Americans have this ridiculous notion that businesses are created for the purpose of making money and not providing jobs to the needy. We invest our time and money in business ventures with the belief that we should receive a return on our investment and not simply to fund social programs. When governments seek to control free enterprise with punitive regulations and confiscatory taxation and labor unions try to ensure mediocrity and job security rather than what's in the best interest of the business, then the businesses leave and find better opportunities elsewhere. This is the economic equivalent of survival of the fittest. You can not force a plant or animal to thrive in an inhospitable environment. It will either move on or die.

    1. Re:Evil Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will either move on or die.

      Then remove the laws restricting emigration and immigration, murderer.

  65. Re:Unskilled laborers act as a warning to the youn by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Correct, but keep in mind this paradigm does not just apply to unskilled labour. "Skilled" jobs such as programming, tech support, design etc. also naturally seek jurisdictions were labour costs are lower.

  66. Does it work like this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Irish government: Yes master?
    Corporation: Keep those subsidies coming.
    Irish government: Yes master.

  67. Re:Unskilled laborers act as a warning to the youn by Ornedan · · Score: 1

    On the offchance that you're really this stupid and not just a troll:
    That won't work, because it won't be fair from the "unskilled laborer's" point of view. Or, rather, too unfair to tolerate. Living in a real, imperfect society means that people have to tolerate occasional unfairness. But there is a limit to that and pushing people over the limit usually generates a violent reaction.

  68. Logistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    1900 is nothing for Lodz. Lodz's population is something like 700000 with highest unemployment rate among major Polish cities.
    Apart from cheaper labour and government grants there is one more important factor - location...

    Lodz is on the crossing of freeways (in construction) connecting Western and Eastern Europe and North and South.

    Limerick is closer to the UK/France(slightly)/Spain/Portugal - but all the rest is same distance or closer to Lodz (Russia/Germany/Ukraine/Italy(slightly)) With no need to use ships/planes...

    Polish transportation companies are much cheaper due to cheaper labor and gas.

    At last - Russian wide railtracks end in Poland - eventually Transsiberian Railway can be used to move stuff from China easily...

    Once freeways are built and railways improved post-communist Central Europe is very hard to beat on the logistics side...

  69. Please reverse this bad mod by causality · · Score: 1

    I wish there were some type of initiative/referendum that citizens could use to challenge laws, not because they are unconstitutional or otherwise legally invalid, but because they have failed to deliver the results that were promised

    Well there is one way but people seem too stupid to utilize it. They'd rather keep voting in the incumbent because "he's done good things and has experience" or just blindly vote for the guy who shares the same party affiliation as them. Those of who are smart enough not to do this have our votes buried by those who aren't or by rigged electoral processes (gerrymandering in the US, I'm sure other countries have their own version).

    This is not flamebait. This is rather obviously how he/she sincerely feels about the subject and there is nothing wrong with that. Disagreeing with it, even vehemently, still does not make it flamebait and still does not mean there is anything wrong with it. Flamebait is when the sole purpose of the post is to make people angry and upset and otherwise to get an emotional reaction. That's just not what happened here. Mods, please reverse this. I'm tired of the overall lower quality of moderation lately. Blatant examples like this used to be rare and they are increasingly common. It does not bode well for Slashdot and that's a shame because I really enjoy the site. I'm writing this betting that someone with mod points is tired of it too and willing to show it.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  70. Tax Rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The operative principle here is that Ireland's corporate tax rate is so low that it encourages companies... oh wait...

  71. Re:Can we call it by daveime · · Score: 1

    One Potato
    Many Potatoes

    Slashdot, where even the grammar nazis are illiterate !!

  72. Re:Unskilled laborers act as a warning to the youn by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    violent reaction?

    Not really a problem. 'They' are just as unskilled at aiming as everything else. The really unskilled are, in my estimation, less then 20% of the population and would not be missed if they ever did decide to take up arms.

    But more basically it's not unfair at all. No skills leading to subsistence living is totally fair. If it was impossible for them to have developed skills that would be unfair. Their are many counterexamples of people with working skills from the most disadvantaged origins so that simply won't fly.

    Granted the unskilled will whine 'unfair' but that doesn't mean anything. Those wanting free rides will always whine no matter what.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  73. Re:Unskilled laborers act as a warning to the youn by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    I don't have a problem with that.

    I charge clients extra for fixing messes created by others.

    Whenever a client tries to get a price concession out of me by 'talking India' I say go for it guys.

    It has paid off well so far (for me anyhow).

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  74. Re:Can we call it by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

    We were all wondering what happened to Dan Quayle!

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  75. Dell is dumb. by alexwcovington · · Score: 1

    Dell clearly doesn't have any clue how severe the backlash from this could be.

    Ireland is never going to approve another EU treaty.

    One can only hope that Dell execs escape the wrath of unemployed ex-IRA members.

    --
    (It's never too late to join the Renaissance)
    1. Re:Dell is dumb. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      One can only hope that Dell execs escape the wrath of unemployed ex-IRA members.

      As someone who was once fooled into becoming a Dell customer I really don't see why one would wish that.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  76. Re:Unskilled laborers act as a warning to the youn by thejynxed · · Score: 1

    Funny you should say that's not really a problem. One time in France, the unskilled did just that, and the aristocracy and royalty all met Madame Guillotine's acquaintance.

    The "unskilled" shouldn't be so ignored maybe, as much as there should be serious attempts to bring them into the ranks of the "skilled". This is a world-wide issue, not just a local/regional/national one.

    --
    @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  77. lol u go socisim :P by Orig_Club_Soda · · Score: 0

    from wikipedia "The national minimum wage is 8.65 per hour for full time staff over the age of 18 -- this is one of the highest in the world. From 2007, someone working 39 hours per week at this rate is exempt from income tax, as earned income below 17,600.00 per year is not taxed."

    also "State provided old age pensions are also relatively generous in Ireland. The maximum weekly rate for the State Pension (Contributory) is 223.30 for a single pensioner aged between 66 and 80 (423.30 for a pensioner couple in the same age range).[45] The maximum weekly rate for the State Pension (Non-Contributory) is 212.00 for a single pensioner aged between 66 and 80 (352.10 for a pensioner couple in the same age range).[46]"

    Its a simple equation: artificially high wages, benefits, and taxation equals bye bye jobs

    1. Re:lol u go socisim :P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about this equation: artificially high wages, benefits, and taxation equals SPOILT, LAZY WORKFORCE!

      OK, this is going to infuriate any Irish Slashdotters, and is almost certainly going to be modded "flamebait", which perhaps it is, but I'm telling it how I see it.

      I am an American who moved to Ireland a couple of years ago because I saw the writing on the wall for the US economy. I transferred all my assets to gold bullion, stored in Europe.

      So I've been living and working in Ireland for two years now, and let me tell you, Dell was absolutely right to leave. The "work-ethic" of the generation of Irish who grew up in the years of the so-called "Celtic Tiger" has to be seen to be believed. In fact it is more of an "anti-work ethic"! The contrast with the thousands of Poles who have moved here in the last few years couldn't be starker. Dublin is so full of Poles that walking in the city center you hear Polish almost as often as English, and there are Polish shops everywhere. The Poles are mostly young, ambitious, and quite highly educated.

      Dell's American management cannot have failed to notice the stunning cultural difference in attitudes towards work that I have seen. I did some research before I left on work attitudes in different European countries before I left America, so I know this is not merely a subjective judgement. Irish workers score lowest in Europe on "work-motivation". I don't have links, but if you are curious you can Scroogle them yourself. At the time, I just shrugged this information off, but the reality was a shock for me.

      Customer service in Ireland frequently just makes me gape in amazement. The major subject of casual conversation in this society, among all ages and classes(!) is "how drunk I got the other night". I am not kidding!

      The Poles here, and many of the other foreigners who came for a slice of Celtic Tiger, have a very poor opinion of the Irish. I wouldn't employ Irish workers if I had any choice in the matter.

      So, I agree with Dell. They made the right decision, and, happily, I will be leaving Ireland soon too.

      Too bad for the Irish. They thought that they were some kind of financial geniuses because of the the absurd property bubble here, and massive agricultural subsidies from the EU.

      Perhaps now they will understand that there's nothing "Protestant" about a work-ethic, just as Afro-Americans need to understand that it isn't "acting White" to do your homework when you're in school.

  78. more profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By doing this the 50 people lose their jobs, but now the entire country gains the use of widget X for a lower price than before.

    Most companies would keep the price the same and simply make more profit. That profit would then go to the top 2% of society which generally owns everything.

    If enough companies do this then no one has a job, and therefore no money to pay for these (theoretically) cheaper widgets.

    1. Re:more profit by warsql · · Score: 1

      Only if Widget X is made by a monopoly.

      --
      878659 - yep its prime.
    2. Re:more profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct, but don't expect a whining, anti-corporate communist troll like the GP to understand subtleties like that.

  79. corporations' perennial search for cheaper labor by oldsaint · · Score: 1

    Why do corporations never seem to search for cheaper CEOs?

  80. Poland vs Ireland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey guys I am from Poland and guess what? I can more or less speak english and even know how to post on Slashdot.

    And there's more. We do embedded software and hardware here, we know Linux and it's been that way for years already

    Great! Can you answer me a question then?

    Is it true that a typical Pole claims he can really outdrink an Irishman? If you think so, then I'm coming over there for the challenge!

    1. Re:Poland vs Ireland by rewter · · Score: 1

      I take the challenge, come over.

  81. Donald Tusk... by majorbugger · · Score: 1

    During the electoral campaign, our current prime minister promised to make Poland the second Ireland as far as the economy is concerned. I did not, however, expect him to be that literal :)

  82. Irish potatoes by Seth+Kriticos · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the story of Irish potatoes. In the 18th century the Irish people were planting exactly one kind of potato and used it as main food supply. Then one day came a disease and all the crop died. As a result thousands of Irish people starved.

    I like to bring this analogy in the same line as Microsoft software, but that the Irish people would do the same mistake twice.. Makes me wonder if humans are really able to learn out of failures?

    1. Re:Irish potatoes by ambrosen · · Score: 1

      Stick to the car analogies, dude.

  83. Sixties Documentary... by WCLPeter · · Score: 1

    I hate what we've become but I'm at a loss for how to fix it. Ideas?

    I remembered watching this amazing documentary series made back in the sixties that detailed how to run a nearly perfect Utopian Society. It was so popular they kept showing it so that, as a young man in the late Seventies, I too could see the awesomeness of it. Of course I wasn't paying too much attention to the social aspects they were trying to explain, I was just excited about it because all the women wore short skirts and the narrator spent a lot of time banging hot chicks.

    Later documentaries made in the Eighties and Nineties clarified some of the earlier concepts and really showed the awesomeness of their world management model. Although I never could figure out why the new narrator kept tugging on his shirt and yelling "Make it so!".

    Still, I always thought we'd be much better off as a people if we could model our society on that wonderful documentary series. Of course I don't think a society like the one described in those documentaries could possibly work for us until we somehow managed to figure out the weird magic they use that creates something out of nothing.

  84. The problem ... by grainofsand · · Score: 1

    "The problem is not that someone who doesn't look like you might take your job, it's that the corporation you work for will ship your job overseas for nothing more than a profit."

    --
    A dream is good. A plan is better.
  85. Re:Unskilled laborers act as a warning to the youn by drsquare · · Score: 1

    The really unskilled are, in my estimation, less then 20% of the population and would not be missed if they ever did decide to take up arms.

    First you'd need to define 'really unskilled'. Then realise that many of these people are violent and with criminal records. Denied employment or welfare, they will have no qualms in simply taking what they like.

  86. Not necessarily. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    That is only true if one assumes that today's "global economy" is established deeply enough to be a "closed" economy, in which the exchange of goods (including currency) is equitable, in the sense that it leads to further exchange of goods within the same economy, whcih eventually cycle around for the benefit of everyone. However, very often today this is not the case.

    Take the situations concerning China and Japan, for example. While we are allowed to buy Chinese and Japanese goods, in many areas we are not allowed to sell goods in China and Japan that compete with their locally-manufactured goods. Therefore the economic benefits of exchange are NOT "fair" or equitable, and are largely one-sided. Not entirely, of course, but enough to distort the situation significantly.

    Very often, it is more beneficial to your economy to keep your currency operating within your own "closed" economy, even if prices are higher, than it is to piss your currency away to someone else who does not return the economic benefits to your economy that would normally accompany the goods you receive in exchange.

    There were choices available to the United States, and to corporations here who wanted to outsource and otherwise join the "global economy". There are right ways and wrong ways to go about it. In large part, they chose the wrong ways; at least if you judge that by the effects their efforts had on their "home" country and its economy.

    If it were up to me, I would charge the officers of certain corporations with treason, for the way they treated their own people and their own economy, in pursuit of personal profit. The very people and the very economy and system that allowed them to grow so large in the first place.

  87. And next up ... IBM by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

    In a week to ten days from today, the only question remaining at Big Blue is, how many thousands? It's sad stuff. I'm not a Dell customer, but layoffs suck, it's as simple as that.

  88. Democratic Deficit by meehawl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the voters in the USA had had to vote yes in each State under plebiscite to amend the US constitution *or* to agree to accept new member States then I doubt it would have grown much.

    And the USA did not have European conservatives fronting the funding for proxy anti-Federalism parties within the USA.

    --

    Da Blog
  89. Ireland, not "Eire" by meehawl · · Score: 1

    If you're writing in English, then the name of the country is Ireland. Only if you are writing in Irish is the name of the country "Eire".

    You don't say, for example, "Well, Deutschland is a little bit west of Polska", or "Hey, I was born in the Estados Unidos de America.

    Using "Eire" where it is incorrect and Ireland is correct is just ignorance masquerading as pretension.

    There's also supposed to be a "fada", or accent over the E in Eire, but Slashdot's preview seems to screw that up because it apparently can't conceive that anyone might want such a thing. This also includes the accent over the e in America, en castellano.

    --

    Da Blog
  90. Upside by bjoahl · · Score: 1

    Now we will get cheaper hardware from Dell. This is a good thing, much more so than jobs going to people who need them more than the other guys. Also the other large part of the marketprice for labor, taxes, are way lower i Poland, so the government is f-cked. That is also a good thing.

  91. Dell came, saw, and left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, this is going to infuriate any Irish Slashdotters, and is almost certainly going to be modded "flamebait", which perhaps it is, but I'm telling it how I see it.

    I am an American who moved to Ireland a couple of years ago because I saw the writing on the wall for the US economy. I transferred all my assets to gold bullion, stored in Europe.

    So I've been living and working in Ireland for two years now, and let me tell you, Dell was absolutely right to leave. The "work-ethic" of the generation of Irish who grew up in the years of the so-called "Celtic Tiger" has to be seen to be believed. In act it is more of an "anti-work ethic"! The contrast with the thousands of Poles who have moved here in the last few years couldn't be starker. Dublin is so full of Poles that walking in the city center you hear Polish almost as often as English, and there are Polish shops everywhere. The Poles are mostly young, ambitious, and quite highly educated.

    Dell's American management cannot have failed to notice the stunning cultural difference in attitudes towards work that I have seen. I did some research before I left on work attitudes in different European countries before I left America, so I know this is not merely a subjective judgement. Irish workers score lowest in Europe on "work-motivation". I don't have links, but if you are curious you can Scroogle them yourself. At the time, I just shrugged this information off, but the reality has to be seen to be believed.

    Customer service in Ireland frequently just makes me gape in amazement. The major subject of casual conversation in this society, among all ages and classes(!) is "how drunk I got the other night". I am not kidding!

    The Poles here, and many of the other foreigners who came for a slice of Celtic Tiger, have a very poor opinion of the Irish. I wouldn't employ Irish workers if I had any choice in the matter.

    So, I agree with Dell. They made the right decision, and, happily, I will be leaving Ireland soon too.

    Too bad for the Irish. They thought that they were some kind of financial geniuses because of the the absurd property bubble here, and massive agricultural subsidies from the EU.

    Perhaps now they will understand that there's nothing "Protestant" about a work-ethic, just as Afro-Americans need to understand that it isn't "acting White" to do your homework when you're in school.

  92. Re:Unskilled laborers act as a warning to the youn by ultranova · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Life's a bitch. Thanks for playing...better luck next reincarnation.

    So let's have the government hold a gun to your head, take the fruits of your labour and distribute them to unskilled labourers. That should be okay, since life's a bitch and you might have better luck next reincarnation, right ?

    Or we could try to make the life a little less of a bitch to everyone, including those unskilled labourers.

    The fair consequence of never developing skills is subsistence living.

    The fair consequence of being an arrogant jerk is to get whatever fate you callously wished upon those you considered lesser beings.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  93. How much is 9 IQ points worth ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Polish Average IQ: 106, Irish Average IQ: 97

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article697134.ece

    Any Questions?

  94. Re:There once was...here are the funny bits: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a young man from Poole,
    Who had a red ring round his tool.
    When he went to the clinic,
    The Doctor, a cynic said :
    "It's only lipstick, you fool"

  95. Now, I hate Citigroup as much as the next guy, but by Numair · · Score: 1

    Citigroup didn't buy the highway operator - it was Citi Infrastructure Partners. This is a fund that is probably comprised of high net worth individuals, pensions, and other large investors from all over the world. This is also entirely separate from Citi as a bank; if Citigroup were to be deemed insolvent, and have its assets sold, Citi Infrastructure Partners would simply detach itself from the parent (this is currently happening with Lehman Brothers' various funds - if anyone wants a VC fund, it's currently up for grabs).

    Where'd you read this info, by the way? I'd be interested to know if there's a news source that provided you with this incorrect analysis. There are a lot of reasons to hate these banks - and Citigroup is one of the worst of them - but that isn't the case here.

  96. Unfair advantage by mahadiga · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't China have any road-map for Democracy?

    --
    I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
    1. Re:Unfair advantage by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Because ... they don't particularly value democracy?

      And, when I see the results of democracy, there are times in which I don't blame them.

  97. let's stay with the facts by rgarbacz · · Score: 1

    The message seems to be way exaggerated.
    1) 1900 out of 3000 workers would lose their job
    2) the sales and marketing department will remain in Ireland
    Please take a look at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7817487.stm

    Of course it is not a good news for Irish workers, but the polish workers can face the same fate in the future if other (poorer) countries joined EU.

    People like to buy cheap, so companies have to produce cheap. Thanks to this simple principle countries in the world can develop and the gap in wealth between different parts of the world is diminishing, which (I believe) is good.

    The only restriction should be for the working conditions and the environment impact, not for the place.

  98. Re:Unskilled laborers act as a warning to the youn by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    'really unskilled': Without the knowledge to earn a decent living. These goalposts move depending on where you live. Most skilled people would learn locally appropriate skills without outside assistance.

    Even in the criminal world the ones we need to worry about are skilled.

    The 'really unskilled' are too clueless to be a threat. Think copper thieves.

    If they tried to rebel they would simply be slaughtered.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  99. Re:Unskilled laborers act as a warning to the youn by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Good luck with training them.

    As a group they are uninterested in putting forth any effort.

    Generally if they can show up for work on time and sober they will be trained on the job and develop skills. Everybodies first job is a shit job.

    If they can't make it to work on time and sober there is nothing that can be done for them by anyone but themselves.

    This isn't 17th century France. You analogy is stupid and completely ignores income and gun ownership demographics. The unskilled depend on the good will of the at least somewhat skilled majority to keep eating.

    They make threats at their own risk.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'