I don't believe DIGG ever cam back from changing its site has it? Maybe that's what they want a different audience that they have control over. We are not an audience "we Are Slashdot".
Honestly I resent being called an audience. WE the USERS are the content and what drives this site not anything they do. Lets see if they make the very same mistake Microsoft made They ignored its users and wouldn't up with a Windows 8. So MS is happy and the USERS are not.
Don't ya think they are taking advantage of loopholes made by our government? I don't know im shit poor they live in a whole different tax level then I do lol.
Yes same here I don't trust yahoo, Google with my phone number somewhere down the line they will change there TOS so they can call us or there 3rd party can call us or god knows what else so no ya cant have my Phone number ever......had my yahoo account for 15 years so far.
There are no scuff marks that would suggest that rock came from it. It would have been a lot more then a skuff it would have been a hole. There is no confusion of images either 1 has a rock the other CADPP2385R1M1.JPG "Before" doesn't have a rock. unless the story is about vanishing rocks?
Stitching both images together makes you claim not as obvious as you say. Alot of the image isn,t even shown in the dounut image the skuffmark is in the before image its not even in the picture in the second infamous shot. It looks like something fell from the rover doesnt even look like a rock to me. Maybe a crystal rock that was busted open but the edges are very strange unrock like. Ive seen alot of very strange images they have taken from mars this isnt even close to as strange as they were. Its a strange rock no dought about that.
"It was resolved. But it was stupid. What people can do without proof has to be fought and even lost with insurmountable evidence to the contrary."
But you complain they wouldn't believe you unless you had physical proof, something more then a phone call wouldn't do? Do you see the irony here? Cant have it both ways buddy whats makes you so special they should just....believe you... Glad it got all worked out though..
Ya ask me this is only the beginning. the gap between those who have and those who have not is going to fuel hate as you've haven't seen in well over 10,000 years. IMO
And then the industry will cry because legislation will have to be made. They will say Regulations are hampering our ability to provide a low cost, high profit product too many regulations. We will need top bring in foreign workers and move our production offshore.
You can dream all ya want but there is no way in hell space tourism will NOT be regulated in the USA. That said They will do what all corporations do to get out of regulations..take it off us soil.
I disagree. Because why should YOU have the only choice? Why should YOU decide for parents what their children can and cant view?Or maybe the parent dont want to view say... pornography sites. Isn't forcing ones view on another Censorship? Because thats why YOU are suggesting. False positives can be fixed so you have no argument there as well.
Nothing is stopping you..except visions of getting ass raped in prison for the next 10 or so years.Loosing family and friends,wife, GF, kids, car, house, money, Respect for oneself last but not least freedom.And our prisons are full of people who said they couldnt get caught.
I disagree auto update got a bad rap because MS and others pushed updates that had nothing to do with security or system fixs. So MS and others created this problem with non tech people, now we all live with it because..ya just cant trust anyone to do the right thing, use auto update for security and OS bug fixs ONLY.
My main reason for blocking ads...flashing brother some ads Its like trying to read with some jack-off flashing a flashlight in my eyes so all flash ads are blocked. 2 malware/viruses they cant guarantee a malware/Virus free ad network and wont take responsibility for MY computers if they get infected. And 3rd i don,t free bad for blocking ads/malware/viruses because Ive already paid in over inflated prices for products to pay for the advertising so no thanks Ive already donated.
The real problem this patent should never have been granted.Thats the process that MUST be looked at with a microscope i have no proff but im betting someone getting paid off.
I don't believe DIGG ever cam back from changing its site has it? Maybe that's what they want a different audience that they have control over. We are not an audience "we Are Slashdot".
I disagree its definitely had an effect on my following story's all the comment say Fuck the beta....
Honestly I resent being called an audience. WE the USERS are the content and what drives this site not anything they do. Lets see if they make the very same mistake Microsoft made They ignored its users and wouldn't up with a Windows 8. So MS is happy and the USERS are not.
Don't ya think they are taking advantage of loopholes made by our government? I don't know im shit poor they live in a whole different tax level then I do lol.
I wasn't serious. hence the lol at the end.
I'm looking at Google Earth right now, just give me a few minutes ill find the impact lol
Its the fantasy of innocent until proven guilty theory. Sounds nice but not very pratical lol
Yes same here I don't trust yahoo, Google with my phone number somewhere down the line they will change there TOS so they can call us or there 3rd party can call us or god knows what else so no ya cant have my Phone number ever......had my yahoo account for 15 years so far.
Or bough there collage degrees through a spam email? That's scam was very long running spam scam.
There are no scuff marks that would suggest that rock came from it. It would have been a lot more then a skuff it would have been a hole. There is no confusion of images either 1 has a rock the other CADPP2385R1M1.JPG "Before" doesn't have a rock. unless the story is about vanishing rocks?
Stitching both images together makes you claim not as obvious as you say. Alot of the image isn,t even shown in the dounut image the skuffmark is in the before image its not even in the picture in the second infamous shot. It looks like something fell from the rover doesnt even look like a rock to me. Maybe a crystal rock that was busted open but the edges are very strange unrock like. Ive seen alot of very strange images they have taken from mars this isnt even close to as strange as they were. Its a strange rock no dought about that.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/115425315@N06/12210951073/lightbox/
If Nixon was pardoned for the better of the USA then so should Snowden.
How do you know hes unjustified? He was pretty blunt for sure but i don,t see any proof its unjustified. How is it you know?
"It was resolved. But it was stupid. What people can do without proof has to be fought and even lost with insurmountable evidence to the contrary."
....believe you... Glad it got all worked out though..
But you complain they wouldn't believe you unless you had physical proof, something more then a phone call wouldn't do? Do you see the irony here? Cant have it both ways buddy whats makes you so special they should just
Ya ask me this is only the beginning. the gap between those who have and those who have not is going to fuel hate as you've haven't seen in well over 10,000 years. IMO
I'm betting its a little more in detail then just images of genitalia as you would have us believe.
And then the industry will cry because legislation will have to be made. They will say Regulations are hampering our ability to provide a low cost, high profit product too many regulations. We will need top bring in foreign workers and move our production offshore.
You can dream all ya want but there is no way in hell space tourism will NOT be regulated in the USA. That said They will do what all corporations do to get out of regulations..take it off us soil.
I disagree. Because why should YOU have the only choice? Why should YOU decide for parents what their children can and cant view?Or maybe the parent dont want to view say... pornography sites. Isn't forcing ones view on another Censorship? Because thats why YOU are suggesting. False positives can be fixed so you have no argument there as well.
and the Supreme Court rules that student speech can be limited by the school admin already.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/features/jan-june07/scotus_speech_3-19.html
One word....Lawyers.
Nothing is stopping you..except visions of getting ass raped in prison for the next 10 or so years.Loosing family and friends,wife, GF, kids, car, house, money, Respect for oneself last but not least freedom.And our prisons are full of people who said they couldnt get caught.
I disagree auto update got a bad rap because MS and others pushed updates that had nothing to do with security or system fixs. So MS and others created this problem with non tech people, now we all live with it because ..ya just cant trust anyone to do the right thing, use auto update for security and OS bug fixs ONLY.
My main reason for blocking ads...flashing brother some ads Its like trying to read with some jack-off flashing a flashlight in my eyes so all flash ads are blocked. 2 malware/viruses they cant guarantee a malware/Virus free ad network and wont take responsibility for MY computers if they get infected. And 3rd i don,t free bad for blocking ads/malware/viruses because Ive already paid in over inflated prices for products to pay for the advertising so no thanks Ive already donated.
The real problem this patent should never have been granted.Thats the process that MUST be looked at with a microscope i have no proff but im betting someone getting paid off.