>if they use many servers sharing a common queue, the actual host trying to sending a particular piece of mail might change for each attempt!
postgrey at least gives the option of looking at the/24 network address of the sender instead of the full ip, seems to help with server farms. It also has a whitelist.
We are talking about Darwin's Theory vs. a whole slew of other ideas including intelligent design.
Only one of which is a testable scientific theory. The rest are, at best, wild-ass guesses with no evidence and no way to prove them true or false and have no place in a classroom. As far as science is concerned, evolution is it.
Before Outlook, there was a joke email that made the rounds. It warned of an email that, if you so much as viewed it in your email client, would infect your computer and do all kinds of nasty things.
Of course, the very thought was ridiculous. Merely viewing an email could never infect a computer with a virus. We spent months educating customers that no such thing could happen.
Then Microsoft created Outlook. Not only could you now catch a virus by merely opening an email, you could sometimes catch one by having some small part of it show up in a preview plane.
Microsoft turned that joke into reality. Bravo.
I truly wish I could understand how people can continue to apologize for the crap this company produces.
It's an even worse scam. It isn't even illegal to download copyrighted material in Canada, so even the people supposedly doing something wrong, aren't.
If you bring it in under your personal limit you don't have to tell them what it is. I buy CDR's and blank DVD's in Bellingham whenever I go down to the US for the weekend and I've never paid any duty on them.
Not that I think you're wrong, but seriously, the government worker couldn't possibly be worse than the energetic unionized support staff at my telco, which also feels free to add service charges and increase fees regularly without asking me.
lmao peer1.net is one of the biggest spam sewers around. Check out their SpamHaus listings someday. They currently have 10 ROKSO-listed spammers hooked up and spamming away - some of whom they have had connected for almost a year.
Peer1 is as bad as it gets.
Re:Ignore the list, they'll render themselves usel
on
Should You Trust MAPS?
·
· Score: 1
blacklists are extremely useful against all kinds of things:
- hard-core spammers
- trojanned windows machines
- virus-infected machines
- spam-sewers run by idiots, like MCI or Wanadoo
You don't like them, don't use them. What do I care. I have better things to do than read the 400+ spam messages a day (or even scan the spamassassin-tagged subjects) I'd get if I didn't liberally use blacklists.
No, they're arguing about it because no one cares if men get into a female-dominated field or not. If women aren't in a male-dominated field, then obviously it's because they're somehow being discriminated against or pushed away or something. If men aren't getting into a female-dominated field, well, it's because the men don't want to. How sexist is that?
Slashdot Mirror
>if they use many servers sharing a common queue, the actual host trying to sending a particular piece of mail might change for each attempt!
/24 network address of the sender instead of the full ip, seems to help with server farms. It also has a whitelist.
postgrey at least gives the option of looking at the
Fuck em. Tear up the treaties. What are they going to do, anyway?
Notice that you never hear about a company or university having a significant percentage of their machines taken over, especially not for a long time
Universites have the same end-luser problem that ISP's do. Many have started blocking port 25 outbound for the same reasons.
How come that we have never seen them in Belgium?
Because they tend to stop in France.
We are talking about Darwin's Theory vs. a whole slew of other ideas including intelligent design.
Only one of which is a testable scientific theory. The rest are, at best, wild-ass guesses with no evidence and no way to prove them true or false and have no place in a classroom. As far as science is concerned, evolution is it.
Not only is it invisible, but if you question the existence of the dragon, it will condemn you to an eternity of suffering.
So be quiet and do what the dragon tells you.
Uh huh.
Before Outlook, there was a joke email that made the rounds. It warned of an email that, if you so much as viewed it in your email client, would infect your computer and do all kinds of nasty things.
Of course, the very thought was ridiculous. Merely viewing an email could never infect a computer with a virus. We spent months educating customers that no such thing could happen.
Then Microsoft created Outlook. Not only could you now catch a virus by merely opening an email, you could sometimes catch one by having some small part of it show up in a preview plane.
Microsoft turned that joke into reality. Bravo.
I truly wish I could understand how people can continue to apologize for the crap this company produces.
You've clearly never seen "Cannibal Women in the Avocado Jungle of Death". Or any given 2 minute sequence from it.
Not that I've seen BFE, but it can't be any worse.
Yep, love that Outlook. Nothing else spread viruses faster.
Most of the time, it's up to you to stumbled into bugs and then figure out the best solution
Name one bug you were the first to find in either MySQL or PostGreSQL.
I have never ever found a problem that a minute with Google didn't explain and show a workaround or solution.
The RBL lists have been around for a long time, yet there has been zero impact on spam. I'm frankly shocked that anyone still uses them at all.
Really? Q: How many legitimate companies spam? A: very few. Why? Because they can't afford to get blacklisted.
Spam would be _so_ much worse without people doing what they can to fight back.
It's an even worse scam. It isn't even illegal to download copyrighted material in Canada, so even the people supposedly doing something wrong, aren't.
Because ridiculous taxes hurt sales? Because many people are buying their media in the US instead of from them? Could be a lot of good reasons.
If you bring it in under your personal limit you don't have to tell them what it is. I buy CDR's and blank DVD's in Bellingham whenever I go down to the US for the weekend and I've never paid any duty on them.
Not that I think you're wrong, but seriously, the government worker couldn't possibly be worse than the energetic unionized support staff at my telco, which also feels free to add service charges and increase fees regularly without asking me.
I think most of China and Korea should just be stripped at the backbone level. This would cut spam and hacking activity in half
Yep. Throw the US in there and that should go up to about 90%.
Of course everyone wants it, or nearly everyone, anyway. Where do you think religions come from?
lmao peer1.net is one of the biggest spam sewers around. Check out their SpamHaus listings someday. They currently have 10 ROKSO-listed spammers hooked up and spamming away - some of whom they have had connected for almost a year.
Peer1 is as bad as it gets.
blacklists are extremely useful against all kinds of things:
- hard-core spammers
- trojanned windows machines
- virus-infected machines
- spam-sewers run by idiots, like MCI or Wanadoo
You don't like them, don't use them. What do I care. I have better things to do than read the 400+ spam messages a day (or even scan the spamassassin-tagged subjects) I'd get if I didn't liberally use blacklists.
They fixed that somewhere in the 7.x series.
No, you still need to vacuum Pg 8.0. It includes an auto-vacuum daemon that does a decent job, though.
That's basically ALL the state does, is take money from one party to give to another. That and shoot people it disagrees with.
Less. I've seen it for $.80 CDN. But not in a monopoly broadband market.
sshh, don't tell the French that. Their language police will start removing all those nasty imported Latin words.
No, they're arguing about it because no one cares if men get into a female-dominated field or not. If women aren't in a male-dominated field, then obviously it's because they're somehow being discriminated against or pushed away or something. If men aren't getting into a female-dominated field, well, it's because the men don't want to. How sexist is that?