If it can possibly send you to jail then you had better be encrypting it. Best bet is with some kind of physical key that can be readily destroyed when the cops close in on you. At which point without the hardware key it is impossible for even you to open the file up.
Added bonus: properly encrypted data is indistinguishable from random noise, makes finding deleted encrypted files tricky.
Look, I'm all for business driven IT, but sometimes you have to save your managers from themselves. It's not being a BOFH to look out for the corporate network. You were hired to have the expertise to make recommendations and keep things as secure as possible. If it gets shoved through anyway then it may be time to start looking for someplace that actually values your skills.
Teleconferencing, file transfer, VPN connections, e-mail (with picture attachments and whatnot), remote desktop sessions, etc. There are tons of easy ways to go over 5GB with business uses. These were just off the top of my head.
At least Biden knew what general was in charge of what war during the VP debate. His foreign policy experience and knowledge count for something, even with the occasional verbal gaffe.
When Schwarzenegger was elected Governor of California people here (including those that usually vote for the "best looking guy") were stunned with disbelief. What? How's he a politician? Only thing he accomplished is movies. And movies are NOT taken serious around here. As much as we like celebrities, they have NO place in politics. Politics is serious matter. Movies are entertainment. They don't mix.
Just or not you don't step outside and punch an injured dog in the face when it's barking and frothing at the mouth on your doorstep. The Taliban in Afghanistan were downright ignorant to even *begin* to refuse to extradite Bin Laden.
256-bit addressing would enable you to address nearly all atoms in the observable universe. (~10^77 addresses vs. estimate 4*10^79 atoms in the universe). The great thing about exponents is that it's easy to get up to a size that should be readily sufficient for all practicably foreseeable scenarios. In all honesty, while 128-bit addressing won't quite address every atom in the earth, it should be fine until we start a galactic colonization plan and develop FTL communications and travel. Until then though, it should be plenty enough.
The best analogy I've seen (not mine) is that bleach and alcohol are like guns are to us whereas antibiotics are more like infections. Sure, people may build up resistances to certain diseases over time, but everyone is vulnerable to being shot.
It's not unauthorized. In order for you to have direct access to Exchange data on your phone, you have to agree to allow it to be remote wiped in case of loss or theft. You are explicitly giving permission to do this the moment you connect in to the system. You are in no way obligated to connect your personal device to your company's network, but if you do there are restrictions and policies in place governing it.
It doesn't work like that. AFAIK (and admittedly, my experience is with Blackberries, not Exchange) there's not a "mass kill" option, as wiping a phone is expected to be a one-off kind of task. Plus, you don't want to make it easy for a disgruntled admin to screw up everyone's phones at once on Friday at 5pm the day he's laid off.
You're thinking of Britain, not Japan. Britain outlawed guns and so the people switched to using knives in murders and mayhem. Now they're freaking out about knives.
The article seems to imply that being more social implies greater intelligence. I agree there is "social intelligence"... but let's be honest here. The smartest people I know tend to be rather asocial or even anti-social. And some of the MOST social people I know are, well, kinda stupid:-) Think nerd vs party girl.
Makes sense. More or less overall intelligence is devoted to social interaction. Those cycles are then freed up to do high level mathematics or similar non-social oriented tasks. The point is that as a species we never would have had all of those extra cycles if they hadn't been needed for complex social interactions and group survival over all these years.
Yes, that's right, being social and interacting with others is the new measure of smart!
Let's do a computer analogy for a minute. You have a computer that is built for socializing. It's big, and fancy and can maintain a whole lot of contacts all around the world. This is the pinnacle of computer evolution, the most powerful computer of any on the planet. This computer is, however, flunking math class.
Now, you take the same computing power and dedicate fully half of it to weather model simulations. You begin to get amazing results in weather predictions, though on the social side it's only able to keep up with a couple dozen social connections - still impressive though. The computer now sits quietly in the back of the room and aces every math test you throw at it, even though it doesn't have many friends.
Dogs require extra smarts to maintain social interactions necessary for forming and organizing packs. This includes such complicated processes as leader election, hunting coordination, and group oriented behavior and survival instincts. Further, complexity of interactions goes up as a square of the group size (specifically there are n*(n-1)/2 relationships in a group) so this would further necessitate a larger brain to deal effectively with all of this.
Cats on the other hand are generally solitary predators and rely on being able to do everything themselves. Social interaction is more limited (lions are a kind of exception to this, but their level of social interaction is still less than canines), but individual resiliency is increased.
Dogs are built to be in a pack, cats are built to survive on their own. Both are well suited to different individual human personalities, but dogs require more intellect to function.
that don't involve manually distributing your certificates and CRL to every workstation in the company
So automate the distribution. Logon script, group policy, OS update patch, software distribution push out, whatever. You do it once and it's done. Then put it on your standard image and never worry about it again.
I would imagine a ceramic knife laid edge on in the lining of a carry on bag would be undetectable with current methods, and while prone to shatter, ceramics are deadly sharp.
1km radius = 3.14 km^2 50,000/3.14 = ~16,000 per km^2 or nearly half that of Manhattan for the upper limit. Then 10,000 / 3.14 = ~3,000 per km^2 for the lower limit. Surface area =/= perimeter (generally).
The reason they didn't go after the Republicans is the same reason we didn't nuke Russia during the Cold War: mutually assured destruction. Start shining a flashlight into the dark corners of Washington politics and everyone is guilty. 2/3's of the administration would have ended up in jail, impeached, or at least publicly ridiculed over such an attempt. The Dems don't talk about or investigate Halliburton (except to regurgitate the talking heads' arguments ad nauseum) and the Republicans do not go after Democrats ties to labor unions (except as vague campaign promises that never lead to action).
There's similar quid pro quo deals all through Washington, unspoken but very real. The only thing that they can seem to agree on is the putting down of any upstart who won't play the game. Hence any real, honest politician is either corrupted into the system, or they cooperate to find/manufacture dirt about him and get him booted out of office. It's sickening.
I suppose it's how you define "traditionally." OO7 hasn't worn a Rolex since 1973's "Live and Let Die." In fact, aside from the early Connery films Bond has usually *not* worn a Rolex.
Hence "traditionally" all other Bonds other than Connery are pretenders to the throne.
As far as I understand the law in the U.S. (I am not a lawyer) you can only be prosecuted for conspiracy if you've taken tangible steps in preparation for a specific act. Like buying pipes and gunpowder, or putting together a robbery kit, or getting in touch with a hitman and hammering out contract details, or other things like that. Talk is cheap and still generally legal, as far as I understand.
Shall we try a 'Manned Spaceflight as MMORPG' analogy? We hit the level cap for the Astronaut class in 1969, we're getting no loot from our encounters any more, there's been no new quest content in the last two decades, the primary server has crashed twice with major data loss, and we're about to lose our our epic mount.
By 2030 the first permanent colonies begin to form on the moon. Life is harsh, and constant resupply is necessary in the early years. Advances in rocket technology leapfrog each other in the ensuing race to exploit the moons resources. By 2050 a consortium of companies begins construction of the first of many "lunar resorts". Regular rocket service between earth and the lunar spaceport become a reality by 2055. By 2080 many people are making weekend trips to the moon and back to relax on their days off. The rich often have vacation homes built on the lunar surface to "get away from it all". Somewhere along the way, along about 2083, a gardener on a riding lawn mower shakes his head at a wide eyed tourist jumping around in his rich friends' backyard as the tourist experiences lunar gravity for the first time in his life.
Slashdot Mirror
If it can possibly send you to jail then you had better be encrypting it. Best bet is with some kind of physical key that can be readily destroyed when the cops close in on you. At which point without the hardware key it is impossible for even you to open the file up.
Added bonus: properly encrypted data is indistinguishable from random noise, makes finding deleted encrypted files tricky.
Look, I'm all for business driven IT, but sometimes you have to save your managers from themselves. It's not being a BOFH to look out for the corporate network. You were hired to have the expertise to make recommendations and keep things as secure as possible. If it gets shoved through anyway then it may be time to start looking for someplace that actually values your skills.
Teleconferencing, file transfer, VPN connections, e-mail (with picture attachments and whatnot), remote desktop sessions, etc. There are tons of easy ways to go over 5GB with business uses. These were just off the top of my head.
At least Biden knew what general was in charge of what war during the VP debate. His foreign policy experience and knowledge count for something, even with the occasional verbal gaffe.
When Schwarzenegger was elected Governor of California people here (including those that usually vote for the "best looking guy") were stunned with disbelief. What? How's he a politician? Only thing he accomplished is movies. And movies are NOT taken serious around here. As much as we like celebrities, they have NO place in politics. Politics is serious matter. Movies are entertainment. They don't mix.
*cough* Ronald Reagan *cough*
Just or not you don't step outside and punch an injured dog in the face when it's barking and frothing at the mouth on your doorstep. The Taliban in Afghanistan were downright ignorant to even *begin* to refuse to extradite Bin Laden.
256-bit addressing would enable you to address nearly all atoms in the observable universe. (~10^77 addresses vs. estimate 4*10^79 atoms in the universe). The great thing about exponents is that it's easy to get up to a size that should be readily sufficient for all practicably foreseeable scenarios. In all honesty, while 128-bit addressing won't quite address every atom in the earth, it should be fine until we start a galactic colonization plan and develop FTL communications and travel. Until then though, it should be plenty enough.
The best analogy I've seen (not mine) is that bleach and alcohol are like guns are to us whereas antibiotics are more like infections. Sure, people may build up resistances to certain diseases over time, but everyone is vulnerable to being shot.
It's not unauthorized. In order for you to have direct access to Exchange data on your phone, you have to agree to allow it to be remote wiped in case of loss or theft. You are explicitly giving permission to do this the moment you connect in to the system. You are in no way obligated to connect your personal device to your company's network, but if you do there are restrictions and policies in place governing it.
It doesn't work like that. AFAIK (and admittedly, my experience is with Blackberries, not Exchange) there's not a "mass kill" option, as wiping a phone is expected to be a one-off kind of task. Plus, you don't want to make it easy for a disgruntled admin to screw up everyone's phones at once on Friday at 5pm the day he's laid off.
You're thinking of Britain, not Japan. Britain outlawed guns and so the people switched to using knives in murders and mayhem. Now they're freaking out about knives.
The article seems to imply that being more social implies greater intelligence. I agree there is "social intelligence"... but let's be honest here. The smartest people I know tend to be rather asocial or even anti-social. And some of the MOST social people I know are, well, kinda stupid :-) Think nerd vs party girl.
Makes sense. More or less overall intelligence is devoted to social interaction. Those cycles are then freed up to do high level mathematics or similar non-social oriented tasks. The point is that as a species we never would have had all of those extra cycles if they hadn't been needed for complex social interactions and group survival over all these years.
Yes, that's right, being social and interacting with others is the new measure of smart!
Let's do a computer analogy for a minute. You have a computer that is built for socializing. It's big, and fancy and can maintain a whole lot of contacts all around the world. This is the pinnacle of computer evolution, the most powerful computer of any on the planet. This computer is, however, flunking math class.
Now, you take the same computing power and dedicate fully half of it to weather model simulations. You begin to get amazing results in weather predictions, though on the social side it's only able to keep up with a couple dozen social connections - still impressive though. The computer now sits quietly in the back of the room and aces every math test you throw at it, even though it doesn't have many friends.
Dogs require extra smarts to maintain social interactions necessary for forming and organizing packs. This includes such complicated processes as leader election, hunting coordination, and group oriented behavior and survival instincts. Further, complexity of interactions goes up as a square of the group size (specifically there are n*(n-1)/2 relationships in a group) so this would further necessitate a larger brain to deal effectively with all of this.
Cats on the other hand are generally solitary predators and rely on being able to do everything themselves. Social interaction is more limited (lions are a kind of exception to this, but their level of social interaction is still less than canines), but individual resiliency is increased.
Dogs are built to be in a pack, cats are built to survive on their own. Both are well suited to different individual human personalities, but dogs require more intellect to function.
How does this all square up?
As with all controversial legal issues - with the lawyers laughing all the way to the bank.
that don't involve manually distributing your certificates and CRL to every workstation in the company
So automate the distribution. Logon script, group policy, OS update patch, software distribution push out, whatever. You do it once and it's done. Then put it on your standard image and never worry about it again.
Doesn't matter, you can just go to a restaurant after the security check point and grab a knife.
Those knives are plastic.
I would imagine a ceramic knife laid edge on in the lining of a carry on bag would be undetectable with current methods, and while prone to shatter, ceramics are deadly sharp.
1km radius = 3.14 km^2 50,000/3.14 = ~16,000 per km^2 or nearly half that of Manhattan for the upper limit. Then 10,000 / 3.14 = ~3,000 per km^2 for the lower limit. Surface area =/= perimeter (generally).
The reason they didn't go after the Republicans is the same reason we didn't nuke Russia during the Cold War: mutually assured destruction. Start shining a flashlight into the dark corners of Washington politics and everyone is guilty. 2/3's of the administration would have ended up in jail, impeached, or at least publicly ridiculed over such an attempt. The Dems don't talk about or investigate Halliburton (except to regurgitate the talking heads' arguments ad nauseum) and the Republicans do not go after Democrats ties to labor unions (except as vague campaign promises that never lead to action).
There's similar quid pro quo deals all through Washington, unspoken but very real. The only thing that they can seem to agree on is the putting down of any upstart who won't play the game. Hence any real, honest politician is either corrupted into the system, or they cooperate to find/manufacture dirt about him and get him booted out of office. It's sickening.
2) Even a thief has a conscious and doesn't want to hurt a Dog if it does react.
Ahem
And Bond wore a Rolex Submariner traditionally
I suppose it's how you define "traditionally." OO7 hasn't worn a Rolex since 1973's "Live and Let Die." In fact, aside from the early Connery films Bond has usually *not* worn a Rolex.
Hence "traditionally" all other Bonds other than Connery are pretenders to the throne.
As far as I understand the law in the U.S. (I am not a lawyer) you can only be prosecuted for conspiracy if you've taken tangible steps in preparation for a specific act. Like buying pipes and gunpowder, or putting together a robbery kit, or getting in touch with a hitman and hammering out contract details, or other things like that. Talk is cheap and still generally legal, as far as I understand.
Shall we try a 'Manned Spaceflight as MMORPG' analogy? We hit the level cap for the Astronaut class in 1969, we're getting no loot from our encounters any more, there's been no new quest content in the last two decades, the primary server has crashed twice with major data loss, and we're about to lose our our epic mount.
Ah, an Everquest player I see.
By 2030 the first permanent colonies begin to form on the moon. Life is harsh, and constant resupply is necessary in the early years. Advances in rocket technology leapfrog each other in the ensuing race to exploit the moons resources. By 2050 a consortium of companies begins construction of the first of many "lunar resorts". Regular rocket service between earth and the lunar spaceport become a reality by 2055. By 2080 many people are making weekend trips to the moon and back to relax on their days off. The rich often have vacation homes built on the lunar surface to "get away from it all". Somewhere along the way, along about 2083, a gardener on a riding lawn mower shakes his head at a wide eyed tourist jumping around in his rich friends' backyard as the tourist experiences lunar gravity for the first time in his life.