Well, I think that the amazingness of the view is because it's got five planetary-type bodies in view at once.
I was just poking a little fun at how the original poster said it wasn't likely to happen again until 2036 since without any large amount of external force being applied to one of them, the probability of their orbits being affected beyond our current predictions of their orbital mechanics is effectively zero.
Ctrl-alt-+ and - (the + and - keys on the number pad), assuming your X server is configured with multiple resolutions (which it usually is, at least in all of the distributions I've ever used).
Properly written Windows programs (everything from MS that I have used) do not require the use of the mouse cursor for anything
That sounds like an application issue, not an OS issue.
OSX apps have full keyboard access by default as long as the developer uses standard widgets (and the user enables the shortcut key for activating the menu bar). Good apps also have shortcut keys for nearly everything. Additionally, as of OS X 10.3 the user can define shortcut keys for every menu item in Cocoa apps (though the interface for it is still a bit kludgy).
None of the Macintosh apps I use have 'save' in the toolbar. For file saving, you can either do file:save, or you can do cmd-S. The only app I can think of which might have a save icon in its toolbar is Acrobat Reader, which IIRC is a 3.5" floppy which hasn't been pertinent on the Mac since 1998.
Really? My experience has been just the opposite - MacOS has had better SMB access for me than Windows! Though I've only tried connecting to Samba shares.
Adding a ? doesn't do anything server-side, but it makes it so that your browser and/or proxy Must try to reload it. But then the URL with the ? will just get cached. I usually do things like ?sdjhfsdf or ?dshfakhfaiowe or whatever.
Re:Windows iTunes a different story?
on
iPod Mini Sells Out
·
· Score: 4, Informative
AIFFs can be tagged though. It's got a lot of rich metadata support, which all Apple tools make heavy use of; as a demonstration of this, take an AIFF file, then use iTunes to edit its information. YOu can remove the AIFF from the library and then load it back in, and it will still have the metadata.
WAV is a subset of RIFF, which (being another IFF derivative) shares a lot more in common with AIFF than people realize, and so it might be able to do metadata also, but I don't think any tools actually support it, and most stuff working with.wavs that I've seen just seem to assume that you only have a single WAVE chunk in the file so they'd probably break horribly if you gave it anything more complex anyway.
Wall bounces are easy to fix. Buy some cheap comforters and hang them on the walls, and maybe throw some pillows in the corners. It'll also improve the quality of the recordings since it won't have the wall bounces of whatever's being recorded, too.
It depends on how you interpret "non-commercial." I think that broadcasting it as a PSA wouldn't count as "commercial" since it's not being used for profit by the TV station; in my interpretation, "non-commercial" just means "not sold for money."
the good is that a judge's vedrict is not a law (and really, if it is, how do you cancel it?)
In America, the precedents set by judges don't create laws, but create interpretations of existing laws for new situations. Killing the law makes the precedent no longer valid for the basis of a judgement, and precedents aren't strongly-binding, they're just a guideline.
If a judge disagrees with a precedent, they don't necessarily have to follow it.
No it doesn't. Check the specs on every single phone T-Mobile offers - they use the GSM900 versions.
I was just poking a little fun at how the original poster said it wasn't likely to happen again until 2036 since without any large amount of external force being applied to one of them, the probability of their orbits being affected beyond our current predictions of their orbital mechanics is effectively zero.
I'd say it's pretty much certain that we won't see that configuration again until 2036, unless Jupiter is knocked out of orbit or something...
Ctrl-alt-+ and - (the + and - keys on the number pad), assuming your X server is configured with multiple resolutions (which it usually is, at least in all of the distributions I've ever used).
OSX apps have full keyboard access by default as long as the developer uses standard widgets (and the user enables the shortcut key for activating the menu bar). Good apps also have shortcut keys for nearly everything. Additionally, as of OS X 10.3 the user can define shortcut keys for every menu item in Cocoa apps (though the interface for it is still a bit kludgy).
'Kay. Never used Office.X, and even if I did I'd have probably just turned off the toolbar anyway. :)
None of the Macintosh apps I use have 'save' in the toolbar. For file saving, you can either do file:save, or you can do cmd-S. The only app I can think of which might have a save icon in its toolbar is Acrobat Reader, which IIRC is a 3.5" floppy which hasn't been pertinent on the Mac since 1998.
Or Bluetooth, which this printer supports as well.
In the future, you might want to consider putting static content on static HTML pages.
What's Brandon's platform, cussing out every new user who happens to ask any question about the distribution?
Really? My experience has been just the opposite - MacOS has had better SMB access for me than Windows! Though I've only tried connecting to Samba shares.
Nice theory, except that MPEG-4 (the only truly streaming MPEG) *is* Quicktime.
The second one.
Were you born with only one hand or something?
What about Custer's Revenge?
Adding a ? doesn't do anything server-side, but it makes it so that your browser and/or proxy Must try to reload it. But then the URL with the ? will just get cached. I usually do things like ?sdjhfsdf or ?dshfakhfaiowe or whatever.
WAV is a subset of RIFF, which (being another IFF derivative) shares a lot more in common with AIFF than people realize, and so it might be able to do metadata also, but I don't think any tools actually support it, and most stuff working with .wavs that I've seen just seem to assume that you only have a single WAVE chunk in the file so they'd probably break horribly if you gave it anything more complex anyway.
Why does Fraunhofer think that their "standard" is going to get any more acceptance than any of the other options?
Wall bounces are easy to fix. Buy some cheap comforters and hang them on the walls, and maybe throw some pillows in the corners. It'll also improve the quality of the recordings since it won't have the wall bounces of whatever's being recorded, too.
Look into Freecache.
It depends on how you interpret "non-commercial." I think that broadcasting it as a PSA wouldn't count as "commercial" since it's not being used for profit by the TV station; in my interpretation, "non-commercial" just means "not sold for money."
That's only if the player hasn't busted already. If the player busts, it's an automatic win for the house.
If a judge disagrees with a precedent, they don't necessarily have to follow it.