Slashdot Mirror


Epson's Female Printer

zmcnulty writes "I finished translating the K-Tai Watch (Japanese) article about a new printer in the Colorio line from Epson. It's not only being marketed at women, it was completely designed by 'Team8' - an all-female project team created within Epson specifically for making a printer 'easy for women to use.' Here is the original Japanese press release." Apparently they've been reading these studies.

697 comments

  1. No damn way.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Careful, guys!

    It'll work well for the first few months then get tempermental. You'll be getting ready for work when a sheet of paper prints out saying "You're not wearing that are you?"

    It'll start being non-responsive for a few consecutive days per month and have the odd spill of red ink on your important work. Then it'll start to cost you loads of cash in consumables.

    You'll come home to printouts in the tray saying "You never take me to Best Buy anymore..." Finally, after a hard day at work, you'll get back to your abode only to find a Post-It note on the refrigerator saying "Moved out with the iPod, he understands me."

    No siree.. give me a He-Man HP LaserJet anyday.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:No damn way.. by Boing · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Moved out with the iPod, he understands me."

      I dunno, that iPod has always had a "good sense of style", if you know what I mean... :)

    2. Re:No damn way.. by kevlar · · Score: 5, Funny

      I dunno if you should have so many mod points for that one... it was just too damn easy... Its like trying to hit the ground with a dart... you'll never miss.

    3. Re:No damn way.. by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 2, Funny

      And when your printer gets old and you go looking for a new one ...

      Watch out!!!

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    4. Re:No damn way.. by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Funny

      A simple inspection of the iPod connectors is just as revealing...

      The headphones wear the pants.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    5. Re:No damn way.. by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its like trying to hit the ground with a dart... you'll never miss.

      Let me introduce you to my wife.

      KFG

    6. Re:No damn way.. by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your post reminded me of the old "wife 1.0" joke. I'm sure the printer in this case will be jealous of any other printers too.

      Tech Support

      Dear Sir,

      Last year I upgraded my system from Girlfriend 7.0 to Wife 1.0 and noticed that the new program began creating problems within the system processing and that took up a lot of space and valuable resources.

      Wife 1.0 installs itself into all other programs and launches during system initialization, where it monitors all other system activity.

      Applications such as Poker Night 2.3, Girlfriend 3.2 and Saturday Football 5.0 no longer run, crashing the entire system whenever selected.

      I cannot seem to keep Wife 1.0 in the background while running my other favorite applications. Whichever module or software I enter, only Wife 1.0 seems to run and nothing else.

      I am thinking about going back to Girlfriend 7.0, but the uninstall from Wife 1.0 to Girlfriend 7.0 does not work on this program. Can you help me, please!


      Thanks,
      Huggy


      Reply

      To: Huggy

      Dear Huggy,

      This is a very common problem, men users of the Wife 1.0 software complain about but it is mostly due to a primary misconception of the software.

      Many men upgrade from Girlfriend 7.0 to Wife 1.0 with the idea that Wife 1.0 is merely a UTILITIES & ENTERTAINMENT program.

      Wife 1.0 is an OPERATING SYSTEM and designed by its creator to run everything. It is unlikely you would be able to purge Wife 1.0 and still convert back to Girlfriend 7.0.

      Hidden operating files within your system would cause Girlfriend 7.0 to emulate Wife 1.0 so nothing is gained. It is impossible to uninstall, delete, or purge the program files from the system once installed !!

      You cannot go back to Girlfriend 7.0 because Wife 1.0 is not designed to do this. Some have tried to install Girlfriend 8.0 or Wife 2.0 but end up with more problems than the original system. Look in your manual under "Worries Invited For Ever (Wife 1.0)".

      I recommend you keep Wife 1.0 and just deal with the situation. Having Wife 1.0 installed myself, I might also suggest you read the entire section regarding general partnership faults (GPFs).

      You must assume all responsibility for faults and problems that might occur, regardless of their cause. The best course of action to solve this major IT problem of yours will be to enter the command C:\APOLOGIZE.

      In any case avoid excessive use of the Esc key because ultimately you will have to give the APOLOGIZE command before the operating system will return to normal. The system will run smoothly as long as you take the blame for all the GPFs.

      Wife 1.0 is a great program, but very high maintenance.

      Consider buying additional software to improve the performance of Wife 1.0. I recommend you to install the latest gift software like Flowers 2.1, Necklaces 3.2, and Chocolates 5.0.

      note: Do not under any circumstances, install Secretary With Skirt 3.3. This is not a supported application; in fact it is a deadly virus for Wife 1.0 and is likely to cause irreversible damage to the operating system.


      regards,

      Tech support manager.

    7. Re:No damn way.. by intertwingled · · Score: 1

      pretty good... for a GIRL. =P

      --
      -- SKYKING, SKYKING, DO NOT ANSWER.
    8. Re:No damn way.. by jobugeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      You also forget that in the store it print beautiful sample pages, but once you buy it and bring it home, it will barely ever put out anything.

      --
      I'm not drunk, I just have a speech impediment. And a stomach virus. And an inner ear infection.
    9. Re:No damn way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OK, this is really bad, but I can't help it...

      Another problem with the printer is that it drips red ink about once a month for a few days.

    10. Re:No damn way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hmm... "good sense of style"... stay cool, iPod must be gay! :)

    11. Re:No damn way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. And you don't get printouts until you politely notice that the printer has switched to a new toner color, and you have commented positively on its new look.

      When you're finally smart enough to realize you can live your life without one of these things, you're labeled a "docuphobe". But you can't kick it out the door until you relinqush 50% of your available HD space (calculated only *after* the OS has been installed, of course).

      Sigh, paraphrasing from experience.

    12. Re:No damn way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was even easier before they banned them....

    13. Re:No damn way.. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Funny

      You also forget that in the store it print beautiful sample pages, but once you buy it and bring it home, it will barely ever put out anything.

      Maaan. Where do you do YOUR printer shopping?

      All the models I see on display are invariably unresponsive. I think there's something wrong with them.

    14. Re:No damn way.. by Kelz · · Score: 1

      I would do a reformat before I upgraded to Wife 1.0!

    15. Re:No damn way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dear Tech Support,

      thanks for telling me about Secretary with Skirt 3.3, as my office uses this application to perform various essential mid-level duties and to reduce monitor burn-in. Another user of Wife 1.0 I met in a chat room recommended that Wife 1.0 could get along with Secretary class applications, the real problem arising mainly with Skirt-edition releases. A programmer coworker of mine and I altered the source and we recompiled; initial testing was a disaster. Apparently although Wife 1.0 doesn't like Secretary with Skirt 3.3, our rewrite, Secretary without Skirt 0.1, was tolerated even less. Upon entering the Dev server room, the target machine was in total disarray; the backup tape had been ejected onto the floor, the password had been changed and several nearby machines had apparently migrated over and were blocking all access to our computer.


      Someone else finish this story! :)

    16. Re:No damn way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if the top is welded shut like the car volvo made "for women"

    17. Re:No damn way.. by Moeses · · Score: 1

      Give me a dart and a lawyer and I'll prove you wrong.

    18. Re:No damn way.. by lthown · · Score: 1

      This printer was shown at the Photo Marketing Association (PMA) show in Las Vegas back in January. The printer is being targeted to scrapbookers - there's the female side of it. Epson had a display up with a bunch of monitors and women on the screens talking about scrapbooking. Pictures and more here (scroll down about one page).

    19. Re:No damn way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wife 1.0 is well known as malware.

    20. Re:No damn way.. by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "have the odd spill of red ink on your important work."

      You know, your use of this metaphor... Just where exactly do you keep your "important work" and what is it doing there?

    21. Re:No damn way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to replace "home" with "motel"

      I seem to have no problem getting a printer to work for me when I buy it and we just go to a cheap motel that charges by the page. Granted the quality of printing isn't as personal as if you were to take it home, and the per-page cost might be higher in the short term, but in the long run it can be a lot cheaper than a classier printer that insists on meeting your home computer and then ends up taking half your HD space when it leaves you with the digital camera.. stupid artsy freak.

    22. Re:No damn way.. by Whoever · · Score: 0

      No wait.... ! Are you trying to say the ipod is some kind of slut. I mean there is the headphone jack and firewire port. Pornostar maybe?

    23. Re:No damn way.. by jrockway · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course your computer can't throw darts. We already knew that :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    24. Re:No damn way.. by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      Can you put wife 1.0 and girlfriend 7.0 on different partitions and dual boot? Go to one or the other depening on your mood?

      After partitioning properly, you'd have to install Wife first, and then Girlfiriend (in their respective partitions). Else if you reverse the process, Wife will overwrite the boot partition and (Girlfriend'd bootie loader)you'll never get to see Girlfriend without a boot disk.

      Girlfriend is the more complex and stable of the programs. You can get right down to things and run whatever you want, any way you want. Simple commands like %tweak glands are possible with a huge number of satisfying options. Check the man page. She's not very big on resources, but yet the more you give her the happier she is and the more she'll put out^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hdo for you.

      Wife is a big colorful, yet moody kind of program. She has a very dumbed down interface, and doesn't do anything very well. There is a command line pack available that tries to emulate girlfirend commands but yet C:\tweak glands more often than not crashes the system. Which isn't really so bad becasue on a crash, you can reboot and get right into Girlfriend and do whatever you like.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    25. Re:No damn way.. by griffjon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its like trying to hit the ground with a dart... you'll never miss.

      Not true. Sometimes you hit your foot, and it doesn't make it all the way through to the ground beneath.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    26. Re:No damn way.. by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      When my sweetie throws things they seem to take on an almost quantum quality. They can end up anywhere in the universe, irrespective of her original aim.

      She can make SQL dance though.

      KFG

    27. Re:No damn way.. by thebes · · Score: 1

      C:\APOLOGIZE.

      That seems to indicate that it runs on MS-DOS or Windows...that might be the problem right there...

    28. Re:No damn way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >> Newton, Galileo, Kepler, Dirac, Faraday, Planck, Kelvin, Maxwell and Einstein beleived in God. So do I.

      The differences are: 1) those guys have an IQ greater than room temperature. 2) they probably know how to spell "believed".

      I don't know about the other guys, but Einstein refers to "the Old One", not exactly the typical western view of God. And Galileo spoke the scientific truth and his reward was a conviction of heresy and a lifetime sentence under house arrest. The Catholic Church apologized for this in 2000, so I guess it's all right. There are numerous revisionist websites trying to change the history of how the Church persecuted Galileo. 350 years from now, they'll probably be telling everyone that pedophilia wasn't really a problem in 2000.

      The history of science is shining light in the dark corners to illuminate great truths. The history of organized religion is blowing out the candles because of fear of the great truths that upset their status quo.

      Governments oppress. Religions oppress. Science liberates.

      Evolution is a fact, not a theory. Religion has set scientific thought back 400 years. Deal with it.

      PS - You might want to read The Demon-Haunted World by Carl Sagan

    29. Re:No damn way.. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's your technique. Try sticking your tongue in the USB port and wiggling it around. That'll warm up the ol' print head.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    30. Re:No damn way.. by yowi · · Score: 1

      note: Do not under any circumstances, install Secretary With Skirt 3.3. This is not a supported application; in fact it is a deadly virus for Wife 1.0 and is likely to cause irreversible damage to the operating system.

      I thought it just did a self uninstall and took the money.bnk file with it

      --
      Why don't the headlines ever read 'Psychic wins lottery'
    31. Re:No damn way.. by tiger99 · · Score: 1
      The catholic church do not believe in God. They are a heretical cult. The word believe comes from the greek pisteou, which means to trust in, rely on and adhere to, none of which they do. They have elevated Mary to the stauus of "Mother of God", etc. They have all the identifying signs of the Beast of Rveelation, including the number 666. They disobey His word right, left and centre, as do their offspring, most of the nominally Christian churches, who in fact are no such thing.

      Don't confuse man-made cult religion with Truth!

      See http://www.trf.org.au

  2. Completely misses the point! by dartmouth05 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This completely misses the point!

    The studies showed dissatisfaction with the way that electronics were marketed towards men. Women said that they were treated differently, and in many cases, were assumed to be stupid or unknowledgable, compared to men. Brenda Myers, quoted in the CNN article that the slashdot link in the parent links to, said, "Every time you go these places [national electronics retail stores], they think women don't know anything, and they don't you the same features as they would when my husbands goes with me."

    Creating a printer that will be marketed under the theme "printer easy for women to use" is not going to mollify complaints like Myers, instead, it seems to reinforce her argument that electronics retailers and manufacturers think women are stupid. Saying that this printer is easy for women to use is really just saying is that women aren't capable of using all the other printers.

    1. Re:Completely misses the point! by AchilleTalon · · Score: 0, Troll
      Well, are you sure they are not? After all, this printer was designed by an ALL WOMEN team...

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    2. Re:Completely misses the point! by swordboy · · Score: 1

      Women said that they were treated differently, and in many cases, were assumed to be stupid or unknowledgable, compared to men.

      I wouldn't use the term "stupid", but, as a generalization, women certainly need to be treated differently due to the difference in technical skill level.

      I realize that there are some women who are technical. However, as a percentage, that number is about the same as the guy:girl ratio here on slashdot. My wife still wastes all kinds of time with film so I am in the process of getting her a PictBridge compatible printer and camera.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    3. Re:Completely misses the point! by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. This isn't the first instance of such a campaign and it probably won't be the last time you see something like it. I've seen it take many forms from targetting women to minorities to old people. The whole thing is just rediculous.

      The only thing I want from a marketer are specs - not pictures of happy people using the product, not warm fuzzy slogans, and certainly not a message that their product was designed for me specifically... or for "the rest of us."

      Specs please. What does it do. What doesn't it do. How much does it cost. Thank you.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    4. Re:Completely misses the point! by Servo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Are all men at a higher level of technical proficiency? It has nothing to do with actual abilities, it has to do with sexism. Guys automatically assume women don't know what they are doing, but when we go to talk to another guy, we are more apt to give them the benefit of the doubt.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    5. Re:Completely misses the point! by RealityMogul · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Those marketing types are completely sexist. I for one think that men and women consumers are equally stupid when it comes to technology and treat them accordingly. I'm an EOE (equal opportunity elitist) when it comes to these matters.

      If corporations want to market products to consumers in general, they should steal a 20 year old idea from Apple and make everything only have one button. But don't make it light-up when it's pressed or someone will think it's a night light and call tech support and complain their printer only works when its dark out.

    6. Re:Completely misses the point! by Dutchmaan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have to say that some women give other women a bad name. My mother wants to get a computer but thinks she is too stupid to buy one. Now my mother is in fact not stupid at all and I actually have to argue with her that she is smart enough to learn computing..

      When she walks into a store and says "I don't know what kind of RIM or ROM it needs" I can easily see how salespeople would develop an impression that women in general are not that bright when it comes to computers. In actuality, women IMHO don't mind not knowing something and asking to be informed where as a man wouldn't be caught dead not knowing what the hell he is talking about..

    7. Re:Completely misses the point! by ctr2sprt · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Sexism is when you make a judgment based not on reason, but on a person's gender. We in agreement so far? So if you have a logical argument for a judgment, even if that judgment relates to people of a specific gender, then it's not sexism.

      The logical argument here is real simple. The first people to get involved in computers were men. They made stuff other men would want. It's a feedback loop now, and it discourages female involvement.

      And actually, as it happens, I assume that everyone I talk to knows nothing about computers. A person's age has far more to do with it than a person's sex. So when you say "we" (as in "we go to talk to another guy" and "we are more apt") I sure hope you aren't talking about all men, though that's certainly what it looks like.

    8. Re:Completely misses the point! by TenaciousPimple · · Score: 1

      Agreed. At first I thought this was a repost of the story about the Volvo designed 'by women, for women', where only a Volvo mechanic could open the hood. Just because women designed the thing, doesn't mean it can't be just as insulting towards women.

    9. Re:Completely misses the point! by hazem · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm male, which is irrelevant.

      I just go about my day assuming everyone is stupid - stupider than I am. I'm usually right, and when I'm wrong, that smarter person just assumes I'm stupid like everyone else.

    10. Re:Completely misses the point! by Inebrius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It isn't a matter of all men being one way or all women being another.

      The generalization is that men, on average, are more technically minded than women. When selling in volume, you go with what will be correct 8 out of 10 times.

      I doubt this has anything to do with biology. Women are just as capable as men, they just don't (in general) have as much interest.

      Things, however, are changing

    11. Re:Completely misses the point! by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One big thing I see everyone missing here is the part about women shopping at "[national electronics retail stores]". This is their first mistake right away. If you go buy a TV at one of these places, like Circuit City, Fry's, or worst of all, Best Buy, you're confronted with an annoying, know-it-all, moronic, pimply-faced 17-year-old kid who treats you like an idiot, no matter what sex you are. Of course, they probably treat women even worse since men are usually more assertive and less tolerant of 17-year-old kids. But the bottom line is that the salespeople these stores hire are not employed there because of their sales and customer service skills, or because of their technical knowledge. They're employed there because they're willing to work for minimum wage.

      So what makes anyone think these idiotic sales droids should be turned to for buying computer equipment, which is significantly more complex?

      If people (men or women) want to be treated better when they shop for stuff, they should stop shopping at stores that use minimum-wage employees for their front-line sales staff. Of course, this won't happen because Americans want everything as cheaply as possible, which is why the big-box stores do so well, and making products to cater to specific groups isn't going to change this situation at all.

    12. Re:Completely misses the point! by beeplet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think that Slashdot suffers from exactly the problem that the OP was pointing out... Women perceive that Slashdot is male-oriented, or that they are being viewed differently here, and find it annoying. And then they leave, perpetuating the problem.

      The solution is not to create a simplified, pink-themed version of slashot; I think the solution involves changing the assumption that women are inherently less technical, and making the technical community seem more accepting of them rather than less so.

    13. Re:Completely misses the point! by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Informative

      The first computer programmer was a woman. Look it up if you don't believe me.

    14. Re:Completely misses the point! by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Specs please. What does it do. What doesn't it do. How much does it cost. Thank you.

      Ahhh, but that's the point. The perception is that women find tech specs cold, stark and heartless. Tech specs are "male", happy people and warm fuzzies are "female". I was going to say that it's all bullshit, but there is quite a bit of evidence to the contrary. Just look at how cosmetics and shampoo are marketed. Also look at how many women there are in "hardcore" tech positions - meaning network and system admins, programmers, etc. I've seen women start those positions, and I've seen them leave. How many programs and incentives have been instituted over the last twenty years to encourage more women to get into science and technology? When do they begin to work?

      I guess that's a roundabout way of saying that (generally) men and women think and process information differently, and that's OK. Each has strengths and weaknesses, perfectly set up for a kind of symbiotic interdependance. But you are right - a female printer is kind of ridiculous.

    15. Re:Completely misses the point! by gpinzone · · Score: 1

      Specs please. What does it do. What doesn't it do. How much does it cost. Thank you.

      Specs? Ha! Pfft. Spoken like a heterosexual man in his 20s-30s. I guess you are the one that missed the point. Did you think the I-Mac's #1 selling point with women and gay men was the single mouse button? Hell no. It was purely ascetics and what Apple wanted you to believe were selling points. I'm not knocking Apple, but even Mac fan boys have got to admit the I-Mac wasn't winning any awards for specs alone.

    16. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there's two factors that lead men to be more proficient with technology...

      1) Technology is primarily designed by men. Good designers try to create a product that is intuitive to use. They can really only use their own intuition as a guide. If male and female intuitions are different, most products on the market would be more intuitive to men than women. If we had more female designers, this would be less of an issue.

      2) Men have a built-in instinct to feel that we can build stuff. On rare occasions, we actually can. So we have less fear of breaking something because we feel more comfortable repairing it afterwards. Technology, and more specifically computer technology, is best learned by breaking things and then figuring out how to fix them. Whenever I have a linux newbie ask me how to get started, I first tell them to break something (make X not work, delete the network interface, etc...basically anything but incorrectly compiling the kernel.) Then I work with them to fix it. After fixing a couple of problems on their own, most get over the fear of breaking things and can go off on their own and break/fix stuff. From my limitted experience, it takes fewer handholding examples for men to feel comfortable going off on their own than for women.

    17. Re:Completely misses the point! by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny
      ascetics
      Targeting the lucrative Creepy Hermit market?
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    18. Re:Completely misses the point! by Servo · · Score: 1

      The post I replied to before, and now this, proves my point. You are male, so you assume the world revolves men. I'm not blasted you, I'm just pointing out a nuance of life. I do it myself too sometimes.

      And when I said "we go to talk to another guy", yes I meant men in general, as a whole, not as every single man in existance. Dumbass.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    19. Re:Completely misses the point! by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Women perceive that Slashdot is male-oriented, or that they are being viewed differently here

      "perceive"? have you read the first thirty or so posts? the level downright sexist jokes that rely on stereotypes about women is insane!

      he solution is not to create a simplified, pink-themed version of slashot

      bingo. the solution is for the population here to smarten up. yes, women comprise only a small percentage of the it/programming world. but then again, so do mexicans. and yet no one seems to make jokes about mexicans and computers. why? because as a society we've finally clued in that racism is unjust and couterproductive.

      can we start working on dealing with sexism now?

    20. Re:Completely misses the point! by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      I totally agree, and will take that one farther.

      I have a couple of friends I do computer support for...all women.

      Wasn't always that way.
      I got _really_ tired of my know-it-all-but-haven't-got-a-clue male friends assuming they knew better than I what was up with their system and how to fix it...resulting in bigger problems and more time to fix. And they NEVER ask before breaking something...Gee what does _this_ do?

      In my experience, when a Woman doesn't know, she usually asks and is happy to get an answer.

      Guys rarely ask, and when they do, they even less often actually hear the response.

      --
      No Comment.
    21. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, this guy had a point! Why mod him down?

    22. Re:Completely misses the point! by swordboy · · Score: 1

      Are all men at a higher level of technical proficiency?

      Nope... I'm just pointing out the averages. Again, you'll probably find that the guy:gal ratio here on slashdot is about the same as technical proficiency ratio among guys:gals.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    23. Re:Completely misses the point! by geirhe · · Score: 1
      Are all men at a higher level of technical proficiency?

      No, but most women tend to hold back more than men do when asked if they know something. A man will say "yes" with a weaker hand.

      Now, imagine what this leads to when someone who doesn't know about this "feature" of interaction between the sexes are told by a woman that she doesn't know something - when she may know her stuff better than the person asking.

      Remember what happened to non-alpha females who spoke up in the herd when you were at school? I have never seen people treating each other as harshly as adolescent girls do without even thinking about it. Young girls tend to teach themselves that it doesn't pay to speak up. Yes, males help out, but young males usually mostly dream of interaction with young girls - males are not the ones who teach young girls to interact in groups.

      If a male tries to point something like this out - even to adult women - chances are that he will be stamped as a sexist bastard.

      It is a funny old world.

    24. Re:Completely misses the point! by Servo · · Score: 0

      We aren't talking about Slashdot, we are talking about Best Buy. The average consumer shopping at a megachain, guy or gal, is not anything like the average slashdotter. Talking down to someone because they are female is sexism, even if its unconcious.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    25. Re:Completely misses the point! by p4ul13 · · Score: 1
      Why is it rare that people buy Mexican computers?

      Because a half hour after using one, you ... Ahhhh nevermind

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    26. Re:Completely misses the point! by Servo · · Score: 1

      While I don't disagree with you on the above statement, I don't see how it fits with women being treated differently when they shop for technology items.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    27. Re:Completely misses the point! by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Oh, Apple's simple one mouse butten eh? OK, under X to copy and paste text I have to double click with the left mouse button on what I want to copy, then smash the middle button to paste. Under OSX's terminal app, I have to move my mouse button carefully over the text (why can't I configure the "cutchars" like in X????), smash command-c on the keyboard, then smash command-v on the keyboard. Or Shift-command-v to paste the selection. Try doing the latter 3 times fast. Try smashing the middle (or any mouse button) 3 times fast.

      On OSX, it takes the keyboard (control button) AND the mouse to simulate the common right click on other UNIXes and windows.

      Personally, I like the "complicated" way of using 3 mouse buttons, thank you very much.

    28. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, the first computer programmer - are you including the computers the Mayans built hundreds of years ago?

    29. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      One of my favorite things to do when I get in these stores (window-shopping or...whatever) is to find aforementioned know-it-all 17-year-old and start to ask really stupid questions about the PCs. Things like, "Does this come with a hard drive?", and "Will it run Lie-Nucks? I've heard Lie-nucks is good."

      After I have him hooked, I start to ask progressively harder questions, and love to watch the snotty attitude disappear, to soon be replaced (witnessing this is priceless) by panic as I start to ask questions about seek times, platter count, Firewire vs. USB 2.0 speeds, power supply wattage, etc.

      It's sooooo much fun to get those little fuckers in a corner and watch them squirm, after being so smarmy to me at the outset trying to show off thier "knowledge". It's so sad, too, because they were asking, "You want fries with that?" yesterday.

      Fuckers.

    30. Re:Completely misses the point! by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      In actuality, women IMHO don't mind not knowing something and asking to be informed where as a man wouldn't be caught dead not knowing what the hell he is talking about..

      True. But also look at the differences between men and womens shopping habits. I've heard it explained as if we are sill cave people. Men are hunters, women are gatherers. Look how women shop, they go hang out, get some food, try on clothes for hours, ask questions, and sometimes they buy something. All of this with usually just a general idea of what they want to buy. Men, on the other hand, get all the info upfront, compare stuff, maybe ask a salesman some informed questions, and then blam! They buy the thing like its a weakened animal!

      The more I learn about human behaviour, the more I am dissapointed in our evolution.

    31. Re:Completely misses the point! by daeley · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just a guess, but try pressing the buttons instead of smashing them.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    32. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's a female printer, does that mean that once a month it won't let you put paper in it and will simply leak ink all over the place? (I see an entirely new industry coming from this). Actually, check that, most of the month it won't let you put paper in it and it's difficult to turn on.

      On the upside, it can be plugged into another female printer and send test pages back and forth (without producing any useful output)... eventually, it'll get wireless communication between multiple female printers and will do nothing but communicate with other female printers all day! The danger is since it's constantly communicating, it's driver is more prone to crash from being distracted.

    33. Re:Completely misses the point! by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      No, I'm talking about Agusta Ada Lovelace, daughter of Lord Byron, who created the program for Charles Babbage's Analytic Engine

      As the page indicates (for the click-impared), the programming language ADA was named after her.

    34. Re:Completely misses the point! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Who still relies on salespeople for information about products?

      We have the internet for comparison shopping now. The only reason we still need the surly teens in the blue vests any more is to open up the cage where they keep the expensive things once we tell them what we want, and then carry it up to the checkout for us. And that's the same whether the buyer is male or female.

    35. Re:Completely misses the point! by AchilleTalon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Guys don't assume anything. This is a ALL WOMEN team. So, it's not like guys were saying women are lesser citizen and needs some special feature on a printer to be able to use it efficiently.

      Wait and see want this team will produce and it will show you how women perceived themselves different from men.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    36. Re:Completely misses the point! by the_ed_dawg · · Score: 1
      Brenda Myers, quoted in the CNN article that the slashdot link in the parent links to, said, "Every time you go these places [national electronics retail stores], they think women don't know anything, and they don't you the same features as they would when my husbands goes with me."
      It's more than just electronics stores. My wife and I were visiting campuses before starting graduate school and stopped at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. I met a professor in his lab for a tour, and his first question was, "Is she here to take notes for you?"

      Was he joking? Neither my wife nor I could tell, so we decided right there that the University of Illinois was not for us. It didn't help their case that they didn't even bother to respond to her requests for appointments. We found our way up the road to Purdue University where she and I are working on our doctoral degrees in Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering, respectively.

      The moral of this story: Don't be surprised if this happens to you at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

      --
      There are two types of people: those prepared for the zombie apocalypse and those who will be eaten.
    37. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man. We must know different women. Have you ever worked with a woman you know more than? It's like you pose a personal threat to the entire world or something... :/

    38. Re:Completely misses the point! by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      can we start working on dealing with sexism now?

      Yes, lets. We can start by dealing with all the misandry (hatred of men) in advertizing. Then, since women make the same amount as men for the same work, women can start asking men out 50% of the time and paying for first dates. Then women will be forced to register for the draft before they can get a school loan, just like men.

      the level downright sexist jokes that rely on stereotypes about women is insane!

      Uh huh. Course, not like guys never hear sexist jokes from women, no sir.

    39. Re:Completely misses the point! by anomalous+cohort · · Score: 1

      To assume that a printer that is marketed as easier for women to use treats women as if they are more stupid than men is an uncritical inference.

      After all, if men are willing to buy printers that are hard to use, then perhaps it is the men who are more stupid than women. When was the last time you bought something because it was hard to use?

    40. Re:Completely misses the point! by gitana · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I find this product insulting.

    41. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      they should steal a 20 year old idea from Apple and make everything only have one button

      I'm typing this on one of Apple's experimental one button keyboards.

    42. Re:Completely misses the point! by asl24 · · Score: 1

      While I appriciate the desire of tech companies to target specific groups with the intent of increasing sales I have to wonder if they are going about it in the right way. My parents' skill levels are about the same, where as mine (yes, I fall in the targeted demographic) far surpass my brother's. So, perhaps instead of marketing for "women" they should market for "old people", "techno-phobes", and "those who think that by 'printer' we mean 'typewriter'".

      --
      I signed this
    43. Re:Completely misses the point! by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also look at how many women there are in "hardcore" tech positions...

      I'm an aerospace engineer, and I do finite element analysis on jet engines for a living. It's not computers, but does it count for your purposes?

      One of the things I've had to face up to is that women really are less than one in twenty or so (wild guess based on observation) in my profession. Things like the printer for women, or the car for women with the hood welded shut that featured in a recent article, makes me want to simply scream in frustration.

      The issue I have with your point is that there's nothing about a woman's innate information processing capabilities that prevents her from looking at a list of features for two printers and picking the one that better meets her needs. The problem is learned helplessness. Being told not to worry her pretty little head, sometimes in so many words. It's rampant in sales and marketing of any kind--those horror stories you hear about women trying to buy cars or computers and being treated like 6 year-olds? They're all true. It's happened to me every time I've gone to make a big-ticket technical or mechanical purchase and it's positively disheartening. (The opposite problem exists in some men, who get talked into buying way more computer/car/grill/whatever than they actually need.)

      The political issue of women in science and technology (and the flip side of men in caregiving positions) is way offtopic, and not something I really feel like discussing, because it makes me all ranty.

      -Carolyn

      --
      Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
    44. Re:Completely misses the point! by geirhe · · Score: 1
      We shape other peoples perception of us by the way we "sell" ourselves.

      If women consistently sell themselves short compared to men when they buy printers or what have you - why shouldn't they also get different treatment in return as a response to their own interaction?

      I am not saying this is the whole problem. I do think it is part of the problem, and something that very few people seem to think about - women in particular.

    45. Re:Completely misses the point! by Boglin · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have to disagree with you. I am condescending and arrogant regardless of who I am talking to. It's just that the guys never figure out that I'm talking down to them, so they never get insulted by the whole thing.

    46. Re:Completely misses the point! by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

      As a person who is currently working for a third of minnimum wage, I am going hopefully within the week to the local Circuit City to apply for a new job. And for some reason the above post puts a chill in my spine.

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    47. Re:Completely misses the point! by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      Saying that women are stupid technologically misses the point. The point is that we are all 'stupid' when it comes to the latest and greatest technology. The only people who aren't stupid are the engineers that created it; and they are 'stupid' in other fields.

      Creating a product that is intuitive to use along with being productive, inexpensive, and profitable is an extraordinarily difficult undertaking that often requires massive engineering and state-of-the-art technology to make it look and feel easy to use.

      Women are great product testers because they are not as conditioned as men to feel that being unable to work with a poorly designed product is a personal failing.

      There are true, substantial, and measurable differences in how men and women approach and use technology. But since in the civilized world men and women are doing the same jobs with the same high tech equipment, the equipment should be designed with women in mind. If only to offset the subliminal bias that results from having design engineering teams being comprised of mostly men.

    48. Re:Completely misses the point! by Servo · · Score: 1

      The point was, I think, that Epson thought they had to throw an all women team to identify how to sell to women better. I'm not saying that these women won't come up with something completely different, but it doesn't solve how these types of items are sold to women, which appears to be the main complaint.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    49. Re:Completely misses the point! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Also, men like bragging rights.

      so even a non technical male will want to know details and pretend they know what they mean (generalization). A woman is much more likly to just want at good solution.

      This is my expierience selling computers/printers at office max. The women would want to know the best printer to buy, which tended to be a middle of the line HP. The men wanted to know the highest dpi printer that was cheap. Which was a God awful middle of the line Lexmark. The actauly image quality meant very little.

      Same thing with computers. We would often have an anomoly where an old pentium III was less or about the same cost as a celeron that was new (clearence and all that). The men just wanted the Megahertz and the women would listen. So yes they were treated differently, the women would get honest help while the men were just pointed in the direction of what they already wanted.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    50. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the technology sales manager of a Circuit City, I have a few bones to pick with you.

      a) minimum wage. Not one Circuit City in the US pays its employees anywhere near minimum wage - in my district, computer sales associates start out at almost double minimum wage. Not only that, online surveys indicate that customers feel that customer service has actually improved since Circuit City ended commision in the beginning of 2003.

      b) competence. Several of my sales associates are actually in university for Computer Engineering or Computer Science - these are guys I'd trust to work on my computer, let alone sell me one.

      Believe me, if I ever received any feedback that any of my associates treated customers like you seem to believe all Circuit City employees do, they would be invited to pursue a job somewhere else.

    51. Re:Completely misses the point! by Pandora's+Vox · · Score: 1

      i was going to go through a point-by-point deconstruction of your first argument, starting with a reference to the series of films "killing us softly", which are about not sexism, but violence against women in advertising.

      but then i remembered. comparing the suffering of one group to the suffering of another does no good. women's sufferage - remember that? one of the reasons women (and specifically white, upper-class women) wanted the vote was to counterbalance the effect that the flood of immigrants would have on the nation. this was how it was spun in canada and in the states. in other words, racism advancing the cause of women.

      your complaints about misandry are well taken - but please don't go blaming women alone for misandry. systems of oppression work together, and the "woe is me, i'm even WORSE off" attitude doesn't help.

      misandry comes from the same source as misogyny - the idea that we have certain roles and abilities based on gender. we do to some infinestimal degree - i certainly can't pee standing up without making a mess, and you can't "bleed for five days and not die" to paraphrase the Park - but we need to separate the rest of it from our chromosomes and genetalia. only then will misogyny AND misandry be relegated to the same rubbish heap as racism.

      -Leigh

    52. Re:Completely misses the point! by Ironica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Creating a printer that will be marketed under the theme "printer easy for women to use" is not going to mollify complaints like Myers, instead, it seems to reinforce her argument that electronics retailers and manufacturers think women are stupid.

      While this doesn't address a great deal of the issues raised by the article (such as marketing and salesjerks), having a printer designed entirely by women does address some of the issues with women and electronics.

      My hands tend to be smaller. It can be more awkward for me to carry things with two hands in front of me, due to anatomy. Men and women do not respond the same way to the same symbology; a UI designed by/for women will be different than one designed by/for men.

      Because this printer is developed by women, it should be easier for women to use than current offerings... which doesn't necessarily mean that it will be easier for *everyone* to use. It may be that guys will find it frustrating, because the buttons are small and the pictures make no sense to them.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    53. Re:Completely misses the point! by Ironica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't use the term "stupid", but, as a generalization, women certainly need to be treated differently due to the difference in technical skill level.

      I find the opposite to be the case.

      If I talk to another woman about computers, she'll usually ask questions about stuff she doesn't understand, and communicate back (paraphrasing, etc.) to verify what she does understand. If I talk to a man about computers, he's far more likely (than the woman is) to say "uh-huh, uh-huh" even though he has no idea what I'm talking about, so I tend to have to ask a lot more questions to find out where his skill level is and what he understands.

      The ratio of men to women among technically competent people is irrelevant, because the ratio of technically competent people to lusers is so tiny. The percentage of the male population that groks technology is not really that much higher than the percentage of the female population who does, but men are (in my experience) far more likely to attempt to hide their incompetence because of some macho idea that they *should* know this.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    54. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is hard about using a modern printer?

    55. Re:Completely misses the point! by HaloZero · · Score: 1
      • ...women certainly need to be treated differently due to the difference in technical skill level.
      I disagree completely. Having a penis does not immediately bestow upon you computeresque intellect. Many male figures familiar to me couldn't navigate themselves around an AOL interface, let alone figure out how to not break the printer. And by that same token, many females in my life have had exceptional computer knowledge.

      Although, my current environment lends me to see people as equals, male and female having the same skill level, and the rest of the world is simply uneducated with no desire to learn (see also: stupid), or inexperienced.
      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    56. Re:Completely misses the point! by CharterTerminal · · Score: 1

      Mm, I don't know. I like this idea of a "kinder, gentler Slashdot" (new and improved, with 95% fewer goatse links, and no more testosterone-fueled pissing contests!) but it's just not quite working for me.

      Can you build a handle on it? Because if so, I'd be sold!

    57. Re:Completely misses the point! by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

      It was never my intent to disparage you, or anyone else in your position. Finite element analysis on jet engines is definitely cool enough to earn my admiration and respect.

      My point is that the reason that female jet engine engineers are 'one in twenty' is that in general, most women aren't interested doing that kind of work. I did not mean to question their ability. You, obviously, are an exception to the trend, and are living proof that it's not a question of ability. It's a question of inclination.

    58. Re:Completely misses the point! by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 1

      Oh, I wasn't taking umbrage at your observation, since it's accurate.

      The question is whether the inclination comes from nature, nurture, or a combination of the two. (Of course it's the last, but what's the spread? 80/20? Vice versa?) Given equal opportunity, pay, and praise, how many women would choose to be teachers over engineers? How many men? Don't ask me; I just do math. The nature/nurture debate is far outside my area of expertise, and fraught with ugly politics.

      But we agree that the printer is insanely stupid. ;)

      -Carolyn

      --
      Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
    59. Re:Completely misses the point! by CharterTerminal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ha ha, yeah. According to the advertising industry, men are completely unable to choose their own cough syrup. That always cracks me up. Perhaps it's just that my secret feminine over-the-counter-medication-fu allows me to choose wisely when ill.

      But I feel obliged to politely point out that we're still earning (on average) only 92 cents on the dollar compared to men. And the gender-based salary discrepancy is even higher in high tech fields. And if anyone says women don't earn as much as men in high-tech fields because we're not as good, I will personally punch them in the face.

      As far as I'm concerned, registering for the draft would only be fair... as long as you're all sure you WANT us in the military. A lot of guys are still pretty pissed about that, you know.

    60. Re:Completely misses the point! by thogard · · Score: 1

      One button mouse? I'll buy a new mac as soon as it comes with an Apple [tm] 3 button mouse but not before. (and yes I know I can use a 3rd party mouse -- I do that wuth the used mac I own)

    61. Re:Completely misses the point! by loraksus · · Score: 1

      almost double minimum wage

      Oooh. Is that like $15,000 a year before taxes?
      You completely missed the point, and seem to have a sense of pride about how much your employees get paid.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    62. Re:Completely misses the point! by rynthetyn · · Score: 1

      Also look at how many women there are in "hardcore" tech positions - meaning network and system admins, programmers, etc. I've seen women start those positions, and I've seen them leave. How many programs and incentives have been instituted over the last twenty years to encourage more women to get into science and technology? When do they begin to work?

      The programs you speak of just might begin to work about the time that most male geeks stop exhibiting the sexist attitudes that show up all the time on Slashdot, and which are so clearly exemplified by many of the posts in this discussion. If you had to spend all of your time trying to prove that you were competant, and trying to fend off feeble advances by girlfriendless geeks, my guess is that you'd get sick of it and decide to go somewhere else where you're appreciated and not treated differently because you have two X chromosomes.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
    63. Re:Completely misses the point! by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, but that's the point. The perception is that women find tech specs cold, stark and heartless. Tech specs are "male", happy people and warm fuzzies are "female". I was going to say that it's all bullshit, but there is quite a bit of evidence to the contrary. Just look at how cosmetics and shampoo are marketed.

      Well, in a lot of shampoo and cosmetics ads I hear a lot of chemical names and technical claims. Obviously the have no relation to computers other than that cheesy part where they show some vitimin X entering a hair.

      Once I tried and ask people how much they actually understood of the claims and almost nobody understood anything. This was mostly due to not listening carefully though, as it should be. I was a bit worried when most people did not understand the term "dermatologically tested" though, it has been in ads for quite some time.

    64. Re:Completely misses the point! by CharterTerminal · · Score: 1

      My mistake - I should have done more research before posting. Upon further digging, the wage gap varies from one profession to another. We earn 92 cents on the dollar at best. I guess I should be glad I'm not a physician, or I'd only be earning (on average) 58 cents on the dollar compared to men.

      Here's a nice little table the AFL-CIO put together from US Department of Labor statistics, breaking down the wage gap by profession.

    65. Re:Completely misses the point! by TravisWatkins · · Score: 1

      Elitism?

      --

      "But I'm still right here, giving blood and keeping faith. And I'm still right here."
    66. Re:Completely misses the point! by Pike · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase the quote, this is a clear case where 90% of women give the other ten percent a bad name :)

    67. Re:Completely misses the point! by balubk · · Score: 1

      How many programs and incentives have been instituted over the last twenty years to encourage more women to get into science and technology?
      Why should you provide such incentives? Its like telling that all the software till date has been coded so that men have some incentive to use them (or develop them). If any woman is good at coding (or whatever the job is), she will automatically be recognized.

    68. Re:Completely misses the point! by hazem · · Score: 1

      Naw... rotten bastardism!

    69. Re:Completely misses the point! by dekashizl · · Score: 1
      Sexism is when you make a judgment based not on reason, but on a person's gender. We in agreement so far? So if you have a logical argument for a judgment, even if that judgment relates to people of a specific gender, then it's not sexism.
      Be careful with your definition of "sexism". Mischaracterizations and bad implications are at the root of much of the knee-jerk politically correct mentality crippling our society.

      Sexism is discrimination based on gender. Prejudice is forming an opinion before investigating all facts. Discrimination is the act of making distinctions and distinguishing among options. UNLOAD THESE WORDS and use them for what they mean, honestly, and we can move forward. They are not necessarily bad things.
    70. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason you're seeing a printer made by an all woman team is because the world is becoming femanised. The ideals held by woman are becoming the ideals of our society, for example, "woman are smarter than men" and everyone will nod there head. Say "men are smarter than woman", and you'll get stoned to death... This PC bull shit has got to stop. Make a printer and market it for its quality, its features, not because its made by an all woman team. Listen to Bill Mahrer for an entertaining take on this...

    71. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first people to get involved in computers were men. They made stuff other men would want. It's a feedback loop now, and it discourages female involvement.

      Hm, dunno about that. I find that, in general, women are more concerned with people and men are more concerned with toys. This is a drastic exaggeration and oversimplification, but is still somewhat useful as such.

      If I were to say that this was always the case, that would be sexist. Hell, if I were even to imply that this general rule probably applied to a specific individual without knowing them, that would probably also be sexist, despite being a valid claim.

    72. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a physician, or I'd only be earning (on average) 58 cents on the dollar compared to men.

      What fields of medicine do women doctors CHOOSE to enter, and which do they not enter (at least, in large numbers)?

      Now compare those various fields inthe areas of

      1) pay
      2) time spent training (school and internships)
      3) rewards
      4) risk

      and I think you'll find women doctors tend to become doctors in relatively safe, low paying fields. They are also the fields in which you need less education.
      Women don't go as much for 90-hour internships in Emergency Medicine and Surgery, where you lose patients on a daily basis. They go more toward Pediatrics, a 'safe' field that rewards them with seeing a child grow to adulthood.

      So, women CHOOSE safe, low paying jobs, work fewer hours at them, and bitch about earning less then men. Sheesh.

    73. Re:Completely misses the point! by thegnu · · Score: 0

      I always assume others are more stupid than I am as well. Not in any sort of malicious way, it just helps smooth out social interaction.

      I also don't necessarily think intelligent is the best thing to be. Try happy, or wise.

      My point, from which I diverged wildly, is what would happen if you and I met? Would we both walk away smugly, happy that we are each smarter than that prick who we just talked to?

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    74. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Anonymous Coward wrote: Women don't go as much for 90-hour internships in Emergency Medicine and Surgery, where you lose patients on a daily basis. They go more toward Pediatrics, a 'safe' field that rewards them with seeing a child grow to adulthood.

      Wrong. When my sister was in med school, she seriously considered emergency medicine because she wanted to have a family and being a specialist in emergency medicine means never being on call. Many women become emergency medicine doctors for just that reason. Pediatrics, with its midnight phone calls from panicked parents, can play holy heck with your own family life.

      In case you are interested, my sister wound up becoming a surgeon because she is very, very good at it. She had to put off child-bearing in order to complete her residency training, a price that male surgeons do not have to pay, and since male fertility extends until much later in life, would be less of a cost anyway. Fortunately, she thinks it was worth it.

      As for the part about women not working as many hours, maybe it's because when they get home they have to do most of the housework and child-tending. They are probably too tired to do any more work at their jobs than they already are! (My sister, incidentally, works longer hours than her husband and still does the bulk of the household chores.)

    75. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, you're completely right, all people should be paid a minimum of $50,000 per year.

      Don't get me wrong, I don't think it's an exorbitant sum, but at least in this area, it's quite a bit better than almost all other retail jobs.

      I believe the parent's post was about how all associates at Circuit City and similar stores are unqualified and underinformed, in addition to being underpaid. We can argue about wages, sure, but you obviously completely missed most of the point that I was trying to make.

    76. Re:Completely misses the point! by FLEB · · Score: 1

      -- "perceive"? have you read the first thirty or so posts? the level downright sexist jokes that rely on stereotypes about women is insane! --

      And note the lack of sexist jokes on a Slashdot post about... say... computers in Soviet Russia.

      The product and article distinguish between the sexes. Does the fact that most of the jokes distinguish between the sexes seem out of place?

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    77. Re:Completely misses the point! by FLEB · · Score: 1

      The industrial revolution happened. The specs are all the same. We need the warm fuzzy slogans!

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    78. Re:Completely misses the point! by FLEB · · Score: 1

      So you can shove factoids and obscure questions down someone's throat, who's there to be a customer assistant and sales help. This makes you fundamentally superior to them *how*?

      Without looking it up, do you know the names and relative advantages of the various layouts of Staples stores? Do they still sell those good cheap Koss headphones at Best Buy? What kind of Internet plan do you get with a computer purchase at Circuit City? How about pens? Where would I find pens... those really nice G-2 pens... who makes those? How long do I have until I can return this? I'm looking for portable speakers, but they have to be battery driven. Where are the batteries, anyhow?

      All that, ambling for hours on foot, dealing with a steady stream of customers, trying to keep that till within $5 on an all-day $1200 shift, having to deal with customers like you, and STILL they get paid a barely-livable wage.

      Simply because a job is replacable does not mean that the workers are dim. Don't be a jerk.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    79. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The solution is not to create a simplified, pink-themed version of slashot

      It's worth a try.

      Who would have thought that thousands of male geeks would spend their time writing millions of posts to /.

      Maybe it would help to add a "changed my mind" option to posting.

      Also, adding purple and turquoise to the theme might bring in the younger set.

      I think I'll post this as AC.

    80. Re:Completely misses the point! by instarx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thank you for taking the time to explain things to these people who just assume that the issue is within the women, when it is really within their perception of women. Unfortunatly you have very little chance of changing their male 20-something minds because they are convinced that their view of the world is the only valid one.

      I would like to add that the stereotype of the non-technical woman is likely perpetuated by women themselves out of shear frustration. As I get older I find that sales people have started talking down to me because as an "old guy" (50) I must not know anything about computers (or HDTV or you name it). I usually just let them insult me because it isn't worth my time to smack them between the eyes. This assumption by sales people that I am a moron is a recent pheomenon with me so I can't even imagine what it must be like for women who have been talked down to for their entire lives.

    81. Re:Completely misses the point! by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      Hmm, when I read the article summary, I also thought that this product might be based on sexism that women are less technologically proficient, but on second thought, I can see where they are actually coming from. It reminds me of bikes that were designed for women. Women have different bodies, so the bike proportions also need to be different. (The woman that started this business has made a fortune, btw.) The bikes weren't designed for stupids, it was designed for a different category of people.

      I think all technology should become easier to use no matter which gender one is selling to (without impeding on performance/ability, of course). I think this printer is designed for the living room, and the handle and the portability allows it to easily be transported and stored away when cleaning up a room. In that sense, it's designed for people who would use the product differntly. Printers usually take up too much space for something that isn't used frequently. Especially I'd assume photo printers are less frequently used. So it makes sense that it's designed to be easily stowed away like a vacuum cleaner. Especially because the team that designed it were completely by women, it's harder to claim the product would be offensive to women. I think Epson's being misunderstood in the press. It's taylored to women, but technological ease-of-use isn't the main feature that makes it so.

    82. Re:Completely misses the point! by instarx · · Score: 1

      If any woman is good at coding (or whatever the job is), she will automatically be recognized.

      Oh, but that were true. Your idea that all it takes is ability is very naive. You are clearly a white, middle-class male who has never experienced discrimination in your life. There are countless ways that people are kept in their places that have nothing to do with ability.

      Let's look at some other examples:

      Minority individuals will rise to the top of the corporate ladder - all they have to be is good at business. What your theory that ability is all that matters leaves out is: a)get enough money to go to college, b)get accepted to Harvard or Duke business schools (despite the old-boy network), and c)get accepted to the Country Club to make those all-important connections.

      Children of migrant workers should be able to be electrical engineers - all they have to do is be good at math and science. What your ability-is-all theroy leaves out is: a)they have to work in the fields, b)they don't have math and science role-models and c)they have to speak English proficiently. Then you have to add the money and education part from the first example.

      The current problem with women in technical fields is two-fold: women are discouraged from entering male-dominated fields from the first time their parents put that pink outfit on them and a blue outfit on their brother; and then, if they do go technical they are discriminated against because the paucity of women in the technical fields "shows" that women just don't have the brain structure for doing that work. It is a self-perpetuating loop.

    83. Re:Completely misses the point! by lorcha · · Score: 1
      Thank you for taking the time to explain things to these people who just assume that the issue is within the women, when it is really within their perception of women
      I'd like to believe you, but I think it's more likely that the parent poster is an anomoly. See my reply to her where I explained that when my wife bought a new car and started announcing it to the world, women would first ask "What color?" and men would ask "What kind?". Is it any wonder that car salespeople do the same? Most women care about color/style/look rather than specs/features/reliability. My wife happens to be one of those women who cares about specs/features/reliability. But most women do not, and she'll be the first to tell you that.
      As I get older I find that sales people have started talking down to me because as an "old guy" (50) I must not know anything about computers
      Dude, the people working at best buy know nothing about computers. Just start throwing around a few acronyms and that'll fix that. ("How many PCI slots does this machine have?", "How many megs of video RAM does it come with?") Anything they can look up on their spec sheet. Prolly better not to ask "hard" stuff like bandwidth of the FSB 'cuz they're not gonna know and you're gonna be stuck waiting 45 minutes while they try to call Sanjay in Mumbai for an answer.
      --
      "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
    84. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take the world revolving around men any day, when the alternative is being female and assuming the world revolves around me.

    85. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, women CHOOSE safe, low paying jobs, work fewer hours at them...

      References, please. "They like it that way" isn't going to cut it - let's work with data, okay?

    86. Re:Completely misses the point! by instarx · · Score: 1

      I must have replied to the wrong post - I thought I was replying to the female engineer... however in reply to your latest comments...

      Dude, the people working at best buy know nothing about computers. Just start throwing around a few acronyms and that'll fix that. ("How many PCI slots does...

      I am well aware of my ability to let them know I am not ignorant, it is just that I don't want to be bothered with having to do it. My point was that having that attitude after only a short time of being classified as incompetent in the eyes of salespeople, how much more frustrating it must be for women who have had to put up with it all their lives.

      See my reply to her where I explained that when my wife bought a new car and started announcing it to the world, women would first ask "What color?" and men would ask "What kind?".

      This is a great aphorism that conveniently supports the stereotype, but I don't really see any objective data on who said what. Maybe it is that you just *expected* the women to ask what color so those are the comments you remember. Even if you are right, so what? It doesn't tell us anything about women other than certain expectations of response and behavior have been pounded into them from that first pink dress.

    87. Re:Completely misses the point! by lorcha · · Score: 1
      This is a great aphorism that conveniently supports the stereotype, but I don't really see any objective data on who said what. Maybe it is that you just *expected* the women to ask what color so those are the comments you remember.
      Quit the opposite is true. If you read the short parable I wrote about the experience in this comment, you'll see that my wife was irritated that the salesperson at the dealer wouldn't quit harping on what color she wanted and she couldn't understand why he was being sexist. But then she noticed that all of her female friends, her mother, her grandmother, my mother, etc., asked first "What color was it?" when told that she had purchased a new car. The fact is the salesperson was responding to years of conditioning that women care more about color, and he was acting on that in an attempt to establish a rapport with my wife (of course it did not work, and he wound up only pissing her off, but that's neither here nor there). As for what that tells us about women, I'd say the fact that the car sales agent kept harping on the color tells the most about women. If that type of sales was a problem for the majority of women he'd have cut it out a long time ago. BTW, every dealership we visited behaved in this way, so it's not just one guy being a dick.

      That being said, how do you know that the 17-year-old computer salesperson in Best Buy treated you any differently for being 50? Perhaps he was just an asshole and treated everyone that way. Perhaps because most people do not understand computers and need a little handholding.

      --
      "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
    88. Re:Completely misses the point! by Fwonkas · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly you have very little chance of changing their male 20-something minds because they are convinced that their view of the world is the only valid one.

      Ok, I was with you on all your points except this one. This seems pretty hypocritical to me. How is saying that any different than saying that women or older men are technologically illiterate?

      As a 20-something, I'm offended by your condescension. Ok, not really. But you get the point.

      --
      COMPUTER! Whatever happened to Blueberry Muffin?
    89. Re:Completely misses the point! by instarx · · Score: 1

      Good point, I was stereotyping the entire group. It was an editorial comment I should have left out. My only excuse is that I had just finished reading something like 50 posts that explained with great certainty that women's brains were just not capable of analytical thinking on a par with men.

      The only difference in my comments and theirs is that I once was a 20-something year-old male, so I know how self-assured they can be while still being entirely wrong. :-)

    90. Re:Completely misses the point! by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 1

      My only excuse is that I had just finished reading something like 50 posts that explained with great certainty that women's brains were just not capable of analytical thinking on a par with men.

      Yeah, the level of sexism on Slashdot is depressing. Every single time there's an article even tangentially about something that might conceivably at one time have been touched by a woman, there's a string of "+5, Funny" posts about how it stops working once a month, demands expensive upgrades, and won't let you buy other equipment. Try that with a racial reference and see how long it takes you to get modded Troll. Likewise, if I posted something that boiled down to "Men are simply incapable of forming the deep and nuanced emotional bonds that women are," I'd be modded into oblivion so fast I'd think the time-stamping on the post was wrong.

      Don't get me wrong; I enjoy Slashdot and the pros far outweigh the cons. But some Slashdotters make my punchin' knuckles itch.

      -Carolyn

      --
      Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
    91. Re:Completely misses the point! by Fwonkas · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I got the same feeling reading through them. One or two were actually a little funny at first, but after that, it was quite disheartening. I'm not above a little playful humor that pokes fun at stereotypes, but there's some serious overkill here, and it's ceased to be even slightly funny.

      So I'm not entirely sure why I pointed out your "editorial comment". You're probably right. But as a know-it-all 20-something male, I guess I couldn't resist making the point. ;)

      --
      COMPUTER! Whatever happened to Blueberry Muffin?
    92. Re:Completely misses the point! by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 1

      Oh, and because I like you, and not because I am fundamentally a Grammar Nazi... *shifty eyes*

      In your sig, "it's" should be "its." The apostrophe only appears in the contracted form of "it is," not in the possessive. Ain't English great?

      -Carolyn

      --
      Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
    93. Re:Completely misses the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless statistics are explained, they are worthless. It says female lawyers get paid 76% of what male lawyers make. That's BS. A female associate at a Big Law firm makes the EXACT SAME as a male associate. Why the difference then? Several reasons: * The past. There are more male partners than female partners because of gender discrimination in the past. Although such discrimination no longer exists, the effect ripples through law firms. Such that attorneys at Big Law with 30 years experience are almost exclusively male. They make a ton of money and skew the statistics. * Families. Women are more likely to quit law to raise families. I know of two women who finished in the top 10% of their law school class and had jobs with Big Law firms who quit because they wanted to stay home and raise families. * Type of law. Women are more likely to take "help the community" type jobs. Those jobs pay less than "help the Fortune 500 companies" type jobs.

  3. Reminds me... by TwistedSpring · · Score: 4, Informative

    Of this article http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/04/133725 9&mode=thread&tid=126 - an all-female designed Volvo. It was only a few days ago. Why doesnt the article reference this?

    1. Re:Reminds me... by ducatier · · Score: 1

      will this printer be like the volvo? can only the ebson dealers change out the ink cartrige?

    2. Re:Reminds me... by TwistedSpring · · Score: 1

      who knows, friend, who knows. I'm still waiting for a printer that actually knows accurately when it's cart is empty. Epsons dont, and then they blink red lights at you when they're full of ink. Dumb buggers. Do you know how much stress and angst a red flashing light can cause. "IT WANTS SOMETHING IT CAN'T HAVE".

    3. Re:Reminds me... by eliza_effect · · Score: 1

      It's true. I was just noticing how completely stressed I had been lately was related to the fact that I had a blinking red light on my dash, and it was caused, I found, by something completely unrelated to what "The Light" was telling me. When it went away (was fixed inadvertantly), my life suddenly got a whole lot cheerier.

    4. Re:Reminds me... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Sooooo... you're saying I should replace all those blinking red lights (that don't really need to be RED) with blinking green lights and I can fire my therapist? You sir are a benefactor to humanity!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  4. Does it still say PC Load Letter? by DarkFencer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it still say PC Load Letter?

    1. Re:Does it still say PC Load Letter? by Waab · · Score: 3, Funny

      "PC Load Letter"? What the fsck does that mean?

    2. Re:Does it still say PC Load Letter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck does that mean?

    3. Re:Does it still say PC Load Letter? by DjReagan · · Score: 1

      http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=PC+ Load+Letter

      --
      "When I grow up, I want to be a weirdo"
    4. Re:Does it still say PC Load Letter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but the link comes back with
      No definitions found for "PC Load Letter."

    5. Re:Does it still say PC Load Letter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously never have tried to use US-centric software in another country...

    6. Re:Does it still say PC Load Letter? by NorthDude · · Score: 1

      Remove the space just before the word Load at the end...

      --


      I'd rather be sailing...
    7. Re:Does it still say PC Load Letter? by Gherald · · Score: 4, Informative

      you have to remove the space

    8. Re:Does it still say PC Load Letter? by log0n · · Score: 3, Funny

      *sigh*

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0151804/

    9. Re:Does it still say PC Load Letter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's spelled "fuck"

    10. Re:Does it still say PC Load Letter? by DjReagan · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. I keep forgetting that Slashdot inserts random spaces into URL's which aren't hyperlinked.

      --
      "When I grow up, I want to be a weirdo"
    11. Re:Does it still say PC Load Letter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      def: Remove the space

      Should be up in 24 hours.

    12. Re:Does it still say PC Load Letter? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      "PC Load Letter"? What the fsck does that mean?

      It means you have a green light to do this to the printer.

    13. Re:Does it still say PC Load Letter? by fernd1 · · Score: 1

      My printer used to say pc load letter, but then its faceplate got smashed in a move. Now it just has black boxes where the text is. Still works though, and I know enough to guess what the error messages are when it jams or runs out of paper. Guess I won't be needing one of these new fangled "user-friendly" models. Cause, that is how they should be marketing this thing. Marketing it towards women is sexist, and it's not like they are the only ones who don't have a clue when it comes to technology. I can easily make the sales droids at the local "Best Buy" equivalent's heads smoke. It's quite fun, especially when that start talking down to me. Tech and mainstream will only partially merge. There will always be the people who care enough to get something that isn't offered at the local "Best Buy" equivalent, and there will always be the people who could careless about the specs and cabiblities of a device as long as it performs the function they want it to do relatively well. They need to market towards the latter, and do it with care and respect. The former will care enough to do there own research.

  5. When... by gid13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...are we going to get the MAN'S printer??? Sexist bastards!

    1. Re:When... by darth_MALL · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh Dot Matrix? If that's not Monster Garage enough for ya, I'm stumped.

    2. Re:When... by keep_it_simple_stupi · · Score: 3, Funny
      Agreed. I believe that while the printer is warming up, it should sound like a Chevy Small Block running at around 5K RPM rather than a 747.

      If this were the case, I'd have the power saver function set to 3 seconds so that it'd have to warm up for every print job.
      :-D
    3. Re:When... by freeze128 · · Score: 2, Funny

      We already have one. It's the HP Laserjet II.

    4. Re:When... by nycsubway · · Score: 1

      If you want warm up noises, try the HP 4500 Color Laserjet. Its loud, and takes 4 minutes to warm up. You want a printout quickly, No Way! But it gives great color printouts at an affordable price. I recently got one used and am very happy with it. I just have plan my schedule around the warmup times.

    5. Re:When... by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      Agreed. I believe that while the printer is warming up, it should sound like a Chevy Small Block running at around 5K RPM rather than a 747.

      If my wife had been on the design team, it would sound like a Harley hog. Warming up. Printing. Ejecting paper. Wouldn't matter.

      Harley-Harley-Harley-Harley-Harley...
      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    6. Re:When... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being on-topic here, my girlfriend bought one of these. You know what she didn't ask for? A handle.

      I wonder who hurt these women designers so much that they feel they have to be treated differently. They're really furthering the problem by making this printer.

    7. Re:When... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by these, I meant the 4500. Sure wish I could edit posts. :)

    8. Re:When... by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      Lithography Now that's printing for guys.

    9. Re:When... by sharkey · · Score: 1
      it should sound like a Chevy Small Block running at around 5K RPM

      Nah. A Dodge 440 Magnum with glasspack mufflers. And it plays "Dixie" when your print job is finished.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    10. Re:When... by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 1

      Why stop there? Why not get a fscking laptop while you're at it?

  6. I need to ask... by HaloZero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...how is operating a piece of computer hardware ever gender-specific?

    Smells like somewhat of a double standard to me.

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
    1. Re:I need to ask... by TwistedSpring · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're gonna get a ton of replies to that along the lines of "Haha, have you seen most women try to operate hardware, lol!". Watch what you start, this could get nasty.

    2. Re:I need to ask... by Vann_v2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Haha, have you seen most women try to operate hardware, lol!

    3. Re:I need to ask... by tomcio.s · · Score: 1

      Yep.
      The one's I know are wicked at it.

      But I guess I am 'different' having had the continouing pleasure of working with real software engineers. (ettes?)

    4. Re:I need to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny stuff...

    5. Re:I need to ask... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's a side effect of society. When you have male architects, doctors, civil engineers, politicians, and transportation engineers, things are by *default* designed for men.

      Are countertops designed around a woman's height?

      Are doors built to accomodate pregnant women?

      Are computers designed to accomodate women's cultural thought processes?

    6. Re:I need to ask... by Le+Marteau · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are countertops designed around a woman's height?

      Kitchen countertops are.

      Are doors built to accomodate pregnant women?
      Yow! I'd like to see the pregnant woman who could not get through a door a Pittsburg Steeler's linebacker could not!

      Are computers designed to accomodate women's cultural thought processes?
      No, computers are completely logical, with no hint of neuroses.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    7. Re:I need to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, prey tell, is a women's cultural thought processes????

    8. Re:I need to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh heh...

      Good one.

    9. Re:I need to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Are countertops designed around a woman's height?
      No, but you don't need gender for that -- men can be small too.

      >Are doors built to accomodate pregnant women?
      No, but men can be fat too.

      >Are computers designed to accomodate women's cultural thought processes?
      I really don't think dividing different thought processes in genders are wise. People are different, no matter what gender they have.

      Make different printers for different users, and forget gender -- that's what I say.

    10. Re:I need to ask... by LordK2002 · · Score: 1
      It's a side effect of society. When you have male architects, doctors, civil engineers, politicians, and transportation engineers, things are by *default* designed for men.
      This presupposes that "designed for men" has any meaning outside basic physical characteristics, which is a notion I reject without strong evidence (and some overgeneralisations based on a few specific minor cognitive tendencies is not strong evidence as far as I am concerned).
      Are countertops designed around a woman's height?
      The average man/woman height difference is around 10 per cent. I would imagine that countertops can vary in height by more than this depending on manufacturer or consumer choice.
      Are doors built to accomodate pregnant women?
      Oh, do people walk sideways through doors these days? I had not noticed. I think there are probably more fat men than pregnant women so if this was a problem it would have been solved by now.
      Are computers designed to accomodate women's cultural thought processes?
      No, because there is no such thing. Computers, unlike social stereotypes, actually have a specific function to perform, and their operation does not depend on a few preconceived and mindlessly-propagated artificial social roles.

      K

    11. Re:I need to ask... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Are countertops designed around a woman's height?

      They sure as hell aren't designed for my height, so I would say "yes".

      Are doors built to accomodate pregnant women?

      What does that mean? Doors open when you push on them. Pregnant women are still capable of pushing on doors. Pregnant women are not too large to fit through a door that does not also inconvenience "normal" people. So, "yes".

      Are computers designed to accomodate women's cultural thought processes?

      What is a "cultural thought process" and how does a woman's differ from a man's? I don't understand the question so I can't answer.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    12. Re:I need to ask... by jamonterrell · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't been a a 'specialty' hardware shop lately.

      --
      I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
    13. Re:I need to ask... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Kitchen countertops are.

      Absolutely. The first thing I have to do with kitchen floor cabinets is build an additional frame under them to raise them them the 3 1/2" of a 2x4.

      And I'm only 5'9".

      I do virtually all the cooking in my household, a not entirely unusual arrangement these days. I want to to see countertops marketed at men.

      If she wants to cook, she can put on heels, just like in those movies.

      KFG

    14. Re:I need to ask... by vensonOnSlashdot · · Score: 0

      Indeed! They'll be feeding paper the wrong way ;)

    15. Re:I need to ask... by cynicalmoose · · Score: 1

      Have you never heard of male and female plugs - hell, my printer has sex every day!

      --
      Exercise your right not to vote. thinkoutside.org
    16. Re:I need to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes, and computers are deterministic / gender neutral. Maybe you were thinking about the software?

      I don't see these things as being specifically designed for men at all. Women drive cars and operate heavy machinery too.

    17. Re:I need to ask... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      My wife looked at the printer and said it was the dumbest looking thing in the world. She thought the handle was the stupidest thing in the world.

      She also had no trouble fitting thru doors when she was pregnant.

    18. Re:I need to ask... by infochuck · · Score: 1

      ...how is operating a piece of computer hardware ever gender-specific?

      In this case, I don't think it's so much the operation of the device as the labelling. I think too many women saw the "Form Feed" bit, thought it would force them to eat too much, and they'd get fat. BADABING!

      I'll be here all week, folks.

    19. Re:I need to ask... by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      Are computers designed to accomodate women's cultural thought processes?

      No problem. Just send over the specs and we'll start coding....

      Oh, wait a minute; there are no specs.

      No man has ever fully comprehended "women's cultural thought processes", nor will any man ever do so in the future, world without end, till the heat death of the universe.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    20. Re:I need to ask... by JLavezzo · · Score: 1

      > Are countertops designed around a woman's height?
      Which woman's height? As an architecture school graduate, I can tell you that counter tops are a compromise height. They did the numbers, decided 30 in. is a nice easy to build compromise. I once worked on a custom kitchen where we made 28 in. counters, because the owner was a little on the short side.

      > Are doors built to accomodate [sic] pregnant women?
      Um, if a woman is pregnant three times in her life, she'll have an awkwardly shaped body maybe a total of 15 months in an adult life of some 750 months... not really justification for changing the size of doors.

      > Are computers designed to accomodate [sic] women's cultural thought processes?
      Computers weren't designed to accommodate ANYONE's thought processes. It reflects the thought processes of people who can understand software programming logic and electrical engineering, not because they were men, but because they were nerds.

    21. Re:I need to ask... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Try putting a large, bulky, weighted apron on that Pittsburg Steeler, and see how easy it is for him to reach around to handle a door knob, a pull handle, a push handle, or a push plate ^^

      I probably should have mentioned the cabinets, rather than the countertops ^^

      I can reach all the cabinets, but my girlfriend can't

    22. Re:I need to ask... by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Funny

      No hint of neuroses? You obviously haven't used Windows lately.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    23. Re:I need to ask... by lrucker · · Score: 1
      Are computers designed to accomodate women's cultural thought processes?

      What exactly are "women's cultural thought processes"? I'm a woman, so I'd really like to know.

    24. Re:I need to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see vaudville isn't dead; it's just hiding out at /.

    25. Re:I need to ask... by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Funny, I happen to know quite a few Architects that are female, my Senator's a woman, and both my doctor and dentist are both women.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    26. Re:I need to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If she wants to cook, she can put on heels, just like in those movies.

      And when she is bad she goes to jail, but the good jail (just like in those other movies) - not the man jail.

    27. Re:I need to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pittsburgh, people... PittsburgH. WITH THE H.

      Thank you.

    28. Re:I need to ask... by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .but the good jail (just like in those other movies) - not the man jail.

      Ah yes, the good old days of Mamie Van Doren wearing prison issue angora sweaters.

      KFG

    29. Re:I need to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, doors do accomodate pregnant women.

      Doors are designed for generally over 95th percentile men [99th percentile women]. As men have broader shoulders, it tends to accomodate women as well.

      Pregnancy, while increasing depth of the torso, does not appreciable affect the width of the torso. Ergo, a door that accomodates someone who isn't pregnant will probably accomodate them when they are. Considering most doors are far wider than a woman would need -- there's no issue.

    30. Re:I need to ask... by rob_au · · Score: 1

      I guess you've never seen www.fufme.com.

    31. Re:I need to ask... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Good for you!

      Does your anecdote mean 50% of Senators, architects, doctors, and dentists are female?

    32. Re:I need to ask... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      I never said a pregnant woman wouldn't fit ^^

      I have to apologize, never being a pregnant woman, but does that mean your wife, when pregnant, found all doors equally useful?

      I know even as a man that half the doors I see are stupid.

      Push plates, handles, levers, and knobs.

      Like having handles on both sides of a door, while aesthetic, is stupid when it only swings one way. A plate or leverto push, a handle to pull, is much smarter, for example.

    33. Re:I need to ask... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      You hit it on the head. That's why we need more women doing things alongside men.

    34. Re:I need to ask... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      They are doors. I can't say that I have every really given them much thought.

    35. Re:I need to ask... by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      Ah...*sigh*

      You bring back so many good memories... or is that mammaries?

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    36. Re:I need to ask... by Tesral · · Score: 1

      I was going to say EXACTLY the same thing. You beat me to it.

      --
      Garry AKA -Phoenix- Rising Above the Flames
      Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes
    37. Re:I need to ask... by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      Yeah yeah yeah. Right at the moment I hit 'submit' I realized my 'error'.

      Let me rephrase: 'computers' are completely logical. The software they run, well, that's open to interpretation.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    38. Re:I need to ask... by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Of course not, but when you say When you have male architects, doctors, civil engineers, politicians, and transportation engineers, things are by *default* designed for men, you're implying that most are males. You're wrong, they' not.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    39. Re:I need to ask... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      So I'm wrong in implying that most are males?

      But I'm right in assuming there's no parity?

      So is 60% most?
      Is 70% most?
      Is 80% most?

      Not that I have a number, but I'm willing to believe that there are more men than women in those fields (and in politics, that's pretty evident) and that my implication of 'most' was correct.

    40. Re:I need to ask... by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      In a sense its splitting hairs, but a majority is not the same as most. I'll conceder majority, but most means more like 80% to me (and thats of course subjective).

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    41. Re:I need to ask... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      I do, every time I push or pull when it should be the other. There are a lot of poorly designed things out there; doors, faucets, handles, closures, etc.

  7. Connectors? by Jaywalk · · Score: 4, Funny

    And it connects to the computer with a DB25 female instead of a DB25 male, right?

    --
    ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
    1. Re:Connectors? by ivan1011001 · · Score: 1

      That was my first though when reading the headline. "Why on earth would they want female connectors. What possible advantage could that provide?"

      That's why you should always RTFA.

      --

      I was thinking of converting to paganism, but where the hell can you find sacrificial virgins these days?
    2. Re:Connectors? by Gherald · · Score: 4, Funny

      > That's why you should always RTFA.

      Yes, because:

      Internal Server Error

      Process limit exceeded for uid 11363.


      is sooo informative

    3. Re:Connectors? by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1

      First i read it, and then thought, who doesn't know their UID? And then i thought, people can't even remember the password "password".

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
  8. Time of the month... by Enze6997 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This thing sucks... Every 28 days it locks up and I cant use it for like a week.

    1. Re:Time of the month... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      At least it sucks! :D

    2. Re:Time of the month... by psylent · · Score: 0

      Does it swallow?

    3. Re:Time of the month... by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      "At least it sucks! :D"

      That's the man's version. The woman's version vibrates when it's turned on.

    4. Re:Time of the month... by crawdaddy · · Score: 1

      Mine goes through the 28-day lock-up cycle, but doesn't suck. Am I pushing the wrong buttons?

    5. Re:Time of the month... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know, you have to do all the jobs manually at that point.

  9. A printer for women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, is pressing a print button that difficult for fems that they need their own design?

  10. Strong enough for a man, but meant for a woman by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Avoiding all the usual stereotypes, humor and marketing concepts, try as I might, I can't objectively think of a reason why a printer for a woman should be any different than a printer for a man. As far as I can see, it's just another printer design created by an independent group of designers. It all looks reasonable to me, assuming that handle can be removed from the Colorio me: E-100 (OK, it does look like it should have Louis Vuitton printed on it somewhere, but trying if it works better than what I've got I could care less who it was designed for.)

    Couldn't help but note that that old dying technology Bluetooth is an option. ;-)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Strong enough for a man, but meant for a woman by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      I can't objectively think of a reason why a printer for a woman should be any different than a printer for a man

      Look it from the deodorant commercial perspective: This printer is l33t enough for a man but CYK balanced for a woman.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:Strong enough for a man, but meant for a woman by davidstrauss · · Score: 1
      Couldn't help but note that that old dying technology Bluetooth is an option. ;-)

      I'll have you know that I'm posting this via GPRS over Bluetooth on a bus traveling on an interstate.

      Let the flame wars begin.

    3. Re:Strong enough for a man, but meant for a woman by beeplet · · Score: 1

      Avoiding all the usual stereotypes, humor and marketing concepts, try as I might, I can't objectively think of a reason why a printer for a woman should be any different than a printer for a man.

      Well, to start, they can save money by not having to make the casing kick-proof. Then they can use the savings to add more complex features. (A double-winner, as it increases the functionality of the printer, and makes it too confusing to be used by anyone outside their target demographic!) :P

    4. Re:Strong enough for a man, but meant for a woman by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Avoiding all the usual stereotypes, humor and marketing concepts, try as I might, I can't objectively think of a reason why a printer for a woman should be any different than a printer for a man.

      This is the one thing that worries me about this discussion. Sure none of us can come up with a good reason, and that translated article did say that the printer was supposed to be "easy" for a woman to use which suggests that it's just a dumbed-down printer. But I have to wonder, is it not possible that this research team, having spent much more time on the problem than we did, might have actually come up with something?

      For example, I notice that some printers have buttons which stick out a bit, while others have buttons which are recessed (e.g. they go into the casing when you press them). Do you suppose that the latter type of button might cause a problem for someone with long fingernails? Likewise with touch screens now that I think about it. I assume, of course, that it is mostly women who have long fingernails, though I suppose some of you SlashDot geeks might not have cut your nails in a few months. ;)

      Perhaps there are other features which are not so much vital to women as more strongly preferred by women. Men might not mind having to get into an awkward position to plug in the cables, but perhaps women mind more? Put the plugs on the side in an obvious place and that problem is solved. Perhaps they did something to make jammed sheets easier and less messy to pull out, like some sort of quick-release button? Maybe the average woman places more value on that sort of thing than the average man. Who knows?

    5. Re:Strong enough for a man, but meant for a woman by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      How about the power LED which you can only see if you look directly at it, where I have my printer off to the side and can't see whether it's on or off without craning my neck. Simple change, to make, how did they get it wrong to begin with?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  11. yeah by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

    Great, to get rid of sexism let's impose more of it. Let's just hope it doesn't turn out as fugly as that "car" that was designed by women.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3528757.stm

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
    1. Re:yeah by xenoandroid · · Score: 1

      The car is ugly, but some of the ideas that went into it are pretty cool (removable seat pads, auto adjusting seats). However, not being able to access the engine without special tools (even if it's "low maintainence") is possibly a bigger offense than the look.

    2. Re:yeah by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Great, to get rid of sexism let's impose more of it.

      NEWS FLASH.

      Designing things to cater to the *differences* between the sexes is *not* sexism in any way, shape or form. No matter how much some crazy folks will try and convince you men and women are exactly the same in every way except a few physical features, it isn't so.

      Men and women are *different*. They think differently. They react differently. They have different priorities. Recognising that IS NOT SEXIST.

  12. Ink cartridges by Mateito · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is just a Scam to sell cartridges. Who needs "black, red, yellow and blue" when you can have "puce, rose, lavender and turquoise"?

    Scented inks, anybody?

    1. Re:Ink cartridges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What about
      • Cyan
      • Magenta
      • Yellow
      • Black

      ?
    2. Re:Ink cartridges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs "black, red, yellow and blue"

      ha! Another one duped by their highschool art teacher.

      magenta, yellow, and cyan are the subtractive primaries.
      red, green, and blue are the additive primaries.

      red, yellow, and blue come from the lack of a good cyan pigment, magenta-ish red, and cyan-ish blue paints. Mixing a true cyan with yellow gives you a much purer green than blue and yellow.

    3. Re:Ink cartridges by Mateito · · Score: 1

      No.

      Those colours make me look fat. :)

  13. /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Female printer from Epson
    Posted_on Mar 16, 2004 - 10:52 AM by zmcnulty

    Its a printer by women, for women.
    I first thought this was just being marketed at women, but no - it was completely designed by Team8, an all-woman project team specifically created by Epson for this project.
    More information on what makes a printer female inside.



    Seiko Epson will release the Colorio me: E-100, atransportable inkjet printer developed under the printer easy for women to use themeon April 23rd. The printer is officially Open Price, but indicators suggest it should cost around 20,000 yen.

    The Colorio me: is an inkjet printer designed by Epsons Team8, an all-woman project team formed specifically for the purpose of creating a printer easy for women to use. It has a handle on the round-style case for transporting.

    Its an inkjet style printer, and prints using one ink cartridge with 6 colors. The printer resolution is a maximum of 2880 x 1440 dpi. To confirm what is being printed, it features TV output, and connects to the PC via USB. The size is 256 x 154 x 163mm (W x D x H), and it weighs 2.7kg.

    Another feature of the Colorio me: is its ability to connect to cellular phones (with cameras)and digital cameras and print directly- and in addition to SD cards, Memory Stick, and CompactFlash, it supports miniSD cards and Memory Stick Duo when equipped with seperate adapters.

    Loaded on board is the Cell Phone with Camera Correction mode, and images are printed on glossy card-size photo paper. Pictures taken with a cellular phone can also be printed easily. Finally, infrared and Bluetooth (Ver 1.1) wireless support is available as an option, and when the size and print mode is set via the operation panel on the printer, it can print wirelessly.



    In addition, the Colorio PM-D1000 video-deck shaped inkjet printer will be released in May. The price on this one is also Open Price, but indicators suggest it should cost around 40,000 yen.

    The PM-D1000 also supports miniSD cards and Memory Stick Duo with seperate adapters, as well as the Cell Phone with Camera Correction mode. It also has wireless (infrared and Bluetooth) support as an option. The size is 430 x 420 x 109mm (W x D x H), and the printer weighs roughly 8.3kg.










    Inspired by:
    http://k-tai.impress.co.jp/cda/article/news_toppag e/18067.html

    Colorio me: Press Release:
    http://www.epson.co.jp/osirase/2004/040316_1.htm

    Colorio PM-D1000 Press Release:
    http://www.epson.co.jp/osirase/2004/040316_3.htm
    1. Re:/.ed by zmcnulty · · Score: 1

      Thanks: last time someone linked me I didn't have any problems. Oh well.

    2. Re:/.ed by ZoneGray · · Score: 1

      Loaded on board is the Cell Phone with Camera Correction mode

      Ah, that explains it... it includes imaging software to make them look slimmer.

    3. Re:/.ed by notsoclever · · Score: 1

      In the future, you might want to consider putting static content on static HTML pages.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people: ones who understand ternary, ones who don't, and ones who think this joke is about binary
    4. Re:/.ed by seann · · Score: 1

      Looks like an HP Photosmart 230.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
  14. My HP printer is female by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 4, Funny

    I called it a 'fucking bitch' more times than I can count.

    1. Re:My HP printer is female by adamgreenfield · · Score: 2, Funny

      .... I've also had thoughts that my printer might be cheating on me....

      --
      -Adam C. Greenfield
    2. Re:My HP printer is female by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should hire a P.I., a printer investigator.

    3. Re:My HP printer is female by aws4y · · Score: 1

      yeah, I get that felling too.

      --
      Did Glenn Beck rape and kill a girl in 1990? gb1990.com
    4. Re:My HP printer is female by loraksus · · Score: 1

      You bought a post carly model? Am I right?

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  15. Do I look fat... by fembots · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the printer is being used by a male (via the BO sensor), first thing it will ask is "Does the letter look fat in font size 14?".

    1. Re:Do I look fat... by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      The correct response, of course, being "No, you look ext!"

  16. Leaks? by rudib · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Hell, does this thing leak ink like crazy every 28 days?

    1. Re:Leaks? by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      Luckily only the red ink leaks. It has been known to through all your software on the lawn, change the locks, and sometimes it will load paper in the wrong tray... (ewwww!)

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
  17. Heh. by lrdviperscorpian · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just like a guys printer. Only not as smart and worse at sports.

  18. The main difference by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The main difference is its been designed to handle 2 inch Lee Press-Ons nails.

    --
    This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
  19. Is the linked server on the rag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or is it just slashdotted?

  20. Spike TV is working on it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Introducing the Spike TV Printer, the first printer for men!

  21. It sucks? by Atario · · Score: 1

    Count yourself lucky, dude.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  22. Oh god this is sexist by Knights+who+say+'INT · · Score: 1

    I hope feminists complain soon.

    1. Re:Oh god this is sexist by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      I don't see what is so sexist about a printer designed for/by females. What is sexist is just about every post on this board.

      Most /.ers here miss the point. The point isn't that the designers are all female, it's that the company realised it needed to take into account how users really use there products, and listen to them, and design things based on how the user uses them. Not on how some progmmer/engineer/designer thinks is the best way (which in terms on the over all product features and things like GUI, is quite oftern very wrong).

      I recommend reading The Inmates are Running the Asylum.

  23. carry a printer? by garcia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The "Colorio me:" is an inkjet printer designed by Epson's "Team8," an all-woman project team formed specifically for the purpose of creating a "printer easy for women to use." It has a handle on the round-style case for transporting.

    IANAW but I really don't see a need to make this thing look a) like a kitchen appliance b) have a handle and c) support tons more stuff than 99% of people use.

    Adding a handle is not going to make ANYONE more likely to carry it around nevermind ladies (the only people that get to carry computer equipment are men -- at least in my experience)

    Having 1000 options for importing data is also confusing. KISS.

    That's my opinion.

    1. Re:carry a printer? by jimbosworldorg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't support a bajillion options you're not used to seeing because it's designed for women, it sports a bajillion options you're not used to seeing because it's designed for Japanese domestic consumption. As far as I can tell, Inspector Gadget would stick out on a Tokyo city street mostly because his shoe-phone didn't have a color camera in it and play more games than a GameBoy Advance.

      --

      Coming soon to Slashdot: meta-meta-moderation!

    2. Re:carry a printer? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Inspector Gadget has no shoe phone. He has the little antenna that comes out of his thumb.

      You're thinking of Maxwell Smart. (Get Smart of course inspired Inspector Gadget, and Don Addams actually voiced the cartoon)

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:carry a printer? by clifyt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Adding a handle is not going to make ANYONE more likely to carry it around nevermind ladies"

      I don't know.

      My G4 has a handle (actually 4) and I've only moved it a few times in the last few years. *BUT* the few times I've had to move it, its been much nicer to grab and carry with my one good hand (I've got rhumatory arthritus in my dominant hand) and it wasn't a problem. My PC, on the other hand, is about the same size and to pick it up is a two handed exercise, with having to shift back and forth to open doors and otherwise.

      But of course, thats manly to struggle with something, ain't it. And its manly to have big pieces of equipment that has no aestetic flair. I could care less about the looks, but its nice when folks come into my studio and see it as it is almost proof that I am an artist -- at least to the folks that don't know me any better -- and feel if I'm willing to buy something that looks good in my office, I'm more than likely going to give them something back that has a little more style than the guy down the road...then again, in my day job -- they don't give a fuck about that and just want my program on their desk by 9AM tommorow morning. Different markets.

      As for 1000 options to import data, you might be right, but using my digital camera as well as several bluetooth products, its also nice that I can just drop the card into the sucker, it pulls up the photo and prints a nice proof without having to deal with the computer. If I had a camera phone, which I still think is an abomination (ever try to find a bluetooth phone without one...I was happy to find the T608 didn't have one), and used it, I think it would be great just to press the phones menu and get the stuff out without going through 5 extra steps.

      IMHO, that is KISS. Keeping it simple means different things to different people. The device might be complex, but the end user doesn't have to think about how to get data into it because there are a dozen routes that all work the same because technically, all the device wasn't is the data and the extra conduits do not add up to any more complexity internally.

    4. Re:carry a printer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KISS means ONE thing and ONE thing ONLY. Keep It Simple Stupid. It doesn't mean anything else.

      Make a printer print. Don't make it fucking fancy. Don't make it support 10000000 fucking media formats. Don't make it look purty so that moronic artists with arthritis in their hands can pick it up and carry it around while they Fung Blah their studio apartments.

      Get real asshole.

    5. Re:carry a printer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it fits the Japanese market well.

      First the handle. Many Japanese homes don't have enough room to set up a computer and printer all the time. Many have laptops they only bring out when they need to use the computer. For a printer this may require pulling the printer out of a closet and hooking it up every time you want to print. With the typical Japanese woman being smaller then your average american the handle would be a welcome addition.

      I'm not sure which items you were referring to that 99% of people wouldn't use. From the translated Press Release I assume you mean the connectivity and TV output.

      When I was in Japan a couple years ago I visited several households and I was surprised at the number of them that didn't have a computer, but did have digital cameras and/or camera phones. (don't ask me exactly why, but they did) I can see where they would appreciate a TV output. The huge popularity of digital cameras and camera phones I think explain the huge host of connectivity options. With the proper iterface removing the computer from the printing process could make it much easier. Getting pictures off a camera phone isn't always the most straight forward process.

      All these features probably make it attractive to Japanese teenage girls who are probably one of the biggest users of camera phones and digital cameras. With the direct printing options they could easily print pictures from their friends phones without installing software on a computer and maybe even browse them on the TV.

      I'm not sure what other printers are available in Japan, but I think this one has many features Japanese consumers would value. Americans with different usage habits may not value them much.

      The PM-D1000 in it's video-deck shaped case also addresses Japanese needs, but not American ones. With space being a tight in a typical Japanese house they prefer appliances that can have other things placed on top of them. It makes for better use of space. Nothing can be stacked on top of most printers you buy at your local computer store.

    6. Re:carry a printer? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Your post shows the exact ignorant attitude that most designers have. Maybe you don't carry your printer around much, but there are obviously plenty of people do. The designers, in this case, decided to listen to their customers rather than make assumptions.

      Kinda funny really. Most people here are making a big fuss over the handle. When a new Apple comes out, most people seem to like the handles on case. Who ever carries their case around?

    7. Re:carry a printer? by fermion · · Score: 1
      You guys are the reason geeks have such a bad reputation. Y'all would probably be the ones that go straight for the clitoris without a care about whether the women is actualy ready done there.

      So, if you get out the mode that the world revolves around the male sensibilities, you will see that it is easy for a male to move the printer form place to place, big hands and all, but smaller hands have more trouble. Therefore a handle to get the printer into position is brilliant. This is what is called industrial design. It is why MS uses Apple machines in it's ads instead of PC machines. It is why many macs have handles. It is why so much of the software designed by people with the spatial sense of A Square sucks so much.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  24. The Epson F-Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Includes 2 paper trays and a lipstick dispenser*.

    *only Epson-approved lipstick refills may be used.

  25. It looks like a purse! by IO+ERROR · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Why does a printer need a carrying handle? How often do you move a printer? All the rest of the features look really cool, though...

    It's pretty obvious this is going to sell pretty well to women, it's just the handle strikes me as useless.

    --
    How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    1. Re:It looks like a purse! by ZoneGray · · Score: 4, Funny

      it's just the handle strikes me as useless.

      Ironically, a lot of women say the same thing about men.

    2. Re:It looks like a purse! by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ironically, a lot of women say the same thing about men.

      So why is the first thing they do upon deciding that going to a store and buying just the handle?

      I'd like to see one of those fix the car or move the piano.

      KFG

    3. Re:It looks like a purse! by rjung2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because you don't move it very often doesn't mean you won't appreciate having it when you do.

    4. Re:It looks like a purse! by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      It's a photo printer. If it has a handle you can take with your laptop, bring it to work, bring it friends homes, etc.

      Photo printers, unlike regular inkjets, are small nitch devices. Portability suits them.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    5. Re:It looks like a purse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How often do you move a printer?

      Get an SO and find out. It'll be a part of decoration.

    6. Re:It looks like a purse! by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      It's pretty obvious this is going to sell pretty well to women, it's just the handle strikes me as useless. If they put the ports, power and SN# on the front, you would rarely need to move them at all. Instead they are tucked underneath or around the back to keep the unit 'neat'. The handle appears to be a robust item rather than the usual finger holds indented in the sides of cases for lifting heavy items (have a look at an HP LJ8100 series for example). I have a bigger problem with the fact that it is an inkjet. Personally I'm waiting until I can get a colour laser with duplex and postscript for less than A$2k.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    7. Re:It looks like a purse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It has a handle on which the thing balances badly. It's bulky. They stuck absolutely every feature under the sun into it. You can't actually use it until you put it down and fiddle with it for several minutes. Despite all this, women are expected to carry it around.

      I'd say it's a purse.

    8. Re:It looks like a purse! by PMuse · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's pretty obvious this is going to sell pretty well to women, . . .

      The interesting survey question will be:
      Q: Which of the following most strongly influenced your decision to purchase a Colorio me: E-100?

      A. It was designed for women.

      B. It was designed by women.

      C. Price and/or total cost of ownership.

      D. Brand name.

      E. Other.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    9. Re:It looks like a purse! by kclittle · · Score: 1
      "Hey, honey-babe, wanna grab my handle?"

      --
      Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
    10. Re:It looks like a purse! by binarybum · · Score: 4, Funny

      it's to fool them into thinking it's a purse! They know that women will pay ridiculous amounts of money for purses.

      seriously though... this is only going to be discouraging to women in the long run when they get frustrated with how terrible this thing is going to work. The common demoninator among epson inkjets is that they all get clogged heads very easily, eat ink at alarming rates, and are very non-user friendly when it comes to cartridge changing. I've been impressed by their print quality, but I've seen enough epsons to know that they are consistently a pain in the ass.

      --
      ôó
    11. Re:It looks like a purse! by upt1me · · Score: 1


      Why does a printer need a carrying handle? How often do you move a printer? All the rest of the features look really cool, though...


      Why did those old 100 lb TVs have a handle??? Women like to re-organize alot, the handle will help them I guess.

    12. Re:It looks like a purse! by jj00 · · Score: 1

      I'd think a sensible printer would just use 802.11 instead of USB. Just plug it into the wall and it's done.

    13. Re:It looks like a purse! by blueworld · · Score: 1
      Why does a printer need a carrying handle? How often do you move a printer?

      Umm, well, let's see, if you read the article you'll see you can print directly from a digital camera card or a smart phone. You could take it anywhere, and not have to have to bring a laptop or anything.

    14. Re:It looks like a purse! by geoswan · · Score: 4, Insightful
      From the original press release...
      ... and prints using one ink cartridge with 6 colors...

      So does "designed for women" mean "designed for people who won't realize that this printer is even more of a ripoff than usual when it comes to ink refills?"

    15. Re:It looks like a purse! by coyotedata · · Score: 1

      The handle is the selling points. It will give a lift to sales. Coming soon the Tee Hee line of cartiges and Tee Hee feminine paper

    16. Re:It looks like a purse! by rblum · · Score: 1

      I did the only sane thing - I asked a woman. (Yay! I am married! Now I just need a lower ./ id for perfect happiness)

      Answer - if you use it to print pictures from your camera, you might want to stow it away when you don't print. Leave it to women - putting things away. Who'd ever have thought of that?

    17. Re:It looks like a purse! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1, Troll


      Ask most women why they buy a car. Because it's pretty. The color matches her shoes, or whatever.

      I've been fighting with my girlfriend over what car to buy next. She wants "pretty", and I want it to be mechanically sound, and affordable

      She points at a Hyundai Tiburon, and I say "no".

      She points at a Porsche Boxter S, and I say "affordable? no."

      She points at a Mazda Miata, I remind her of the last one that died at like 60,000 miles. "no".

      Actually, the Hyundai dealership thought she was nuts. She drove her '98 TransAm there, and said she'd be trading it for the Hyundai. That set the whole "she's gotta be kidding" attitude.

      We're coming to some agreement on the issue, but it's going to be something both can agree on, since I'll be making the payments.

      She has an iMac, because it's cute. I can agree to it because it's OS/X . :)

      She has flowery, girlie things throughout the house, but I don't have much of a choice but to agree to those.

      She'd want that printer, because it had some frilly feature that she wants. Paint it pink, that'll sell even more of 'em.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    18. Re:It looks like a purse! by asjk · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna guess that the handle is there so the item can be lifted in order to dust underneath.

    19. Re:It looks like a purse! by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I'd want a girl too if she's pretty.

      Mechanically sound and affordable are very good factors to consider too :).

      But she doesn't have to match my shoes.

      Then again, based on what I gather, I figure my shoes will have to match her...

      --
    20. Re:It looks like a purse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's just the handle strikes me as useless.
      Ironically, a lot of women say the same thing about men.
      What's that fleshy, useless part at the end of the penis? Its owner.

    21. Re:It looks like a purse! by PMuse · · Score: 1

      She wants "pretty", and I want it to be mechanically sound, and affordable

      No "Troll" there, try "true".

      Among the many wonderful things a woman can add to the typical geekguy's life are . . . [drumroll] . . . floral prints. Left to their own devices, geekguy home decor includes far, far too much chrome, black, burgundy, and midnight blue. C'mon! We've all been there. A few flowers liven up the place.

      Form and function can be the best of partners. It's like wireless networking -- techically superior (mobility) AND esthetically pleasant.

      (Which is not to say that all geekgirls are ignorant of function or that all geekguys have zero style -- we just do better together.)

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    22. Re:It looks like a purse! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      My girlfriend put a red sheet on our futon couch, 'cause everything I owned was black. I was happy with black. The TV, Stereo (and assorted equipment) matched the couch and chairs. Well, the TiVo stands out. One fuckin' silver box with all my nice black stuff. That's form and function, right?

      She still doesn't agree with the idea that the grey candle holders were enough variety. Or the black&white photo of a rose was art.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  26. I guess you haven't used this piece of hardware... by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 1

    http://www.fu-fme.com/

    It is VERY gender-specific!

  27. Um...no. by lyssrose · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A printer that looks like a portable radio? How on earth is that revolutionary? *rolling eyes*

    And I can't imagine my mom being able to use that any better than she can use a normal printer. It doesn't matter what it LOOKS like...there's still the matter of actually figuring out how to hook the darn thing up, and THAT is what she has problems with.

    --
    "I came here to chew bubble gum & kick ass...and I'm all out of bubble gum"
    1. Re:Um...no. by TwistedGreen · · Score: 2, Informative

      And this problem has been solved by USB. The days of finnicky parallel-port printers are long gone.

    2. Re:Um...no. by notsoclever · · Score: 1

      Or Bluetooth, which this printer supports as well.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people: ones who understand ternary, ones who don't, and ones who think this joke is about binary
    3. Re:Um...no. by identity0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which is probobly why it can print without a PC... This actually sound like an interesting design from a technical point of view, not just an face lift of an ordinary printer.

      Okay, it was inevitable that people would make jokes about "pink printers" without following the links, but the translation site seems Slashdotted. I can read Japanese, so here's some of the actual features. There are 12 features listed, but I don't have time to do a full translation - Someone else can do that if they wish. Some of the most interesting features:

      From this page:

      1. Even when not connected to a PC, many digital devices can do easy 3WAY Direct Print.
      (1) 5 types of memory card slot. Simply put the memoory card in the slot, and use the buttons for easy control of speedy printing. Memory card types: SD, miniSD*, MMC, CF, Micro Drive, Memory Stick, Memory Stick Pro, Memory Stick Pro Duo*, Memory Stick Duo*, Magic Gate Memory Stick, Smart Media, xD-Picture card
      * - requires adapters.
      (2)USB Direct-Print. Using PictBridge, directly connect digital cameras with USB cable and print. You can view the pictures on the camera's LCD display while choosing pictures to print. Because it uses PictBridge, the choice of digital cameras is greater.
      (3)Optional Infra-Red card, Bluetooth(R) units allow direct wireless printout from digital cameras, camera phones, and PDAs. Choose size and settings on the printer, and transmit data to it. With Bluetooth(R), you can transmit from 10m away. Take a picture away from the printer, start printing, and it will already have started when you get to it.
      ...
      4. Connect to TV with video cable, allowing you to preview photos to print or change settings onscreen. Can show memory card contents without a PC, and do a slideshow of photos.
      ...
      7. USB interface for external perhipherals to connect, for example, MO or CD-R drives. You can print the contents of MO and CD-R drives, as well as move photos from memory card to MO, CD-R drives. Safe backup of your media.

      This actually sound like a cool printer, I don't think it's particularly feminine, but shows great industrial design. It's too bad Slashdotters are dissing it, it reminds me of the initial reception of the iPod...

    4. Re:Um...no. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      We're not dissing the printer (most of us DON'T read Japanese), we're dissing the marketing campaign. It actually does look like a functional and well-designed product. As for actual build quality -- well it IS an Epson.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  28. Can't wait for a MALE friend to get one by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

    Haha, I can see it now, some chick gets this for her bf, and I'll see it and start making fun of his "female" printer and how couragous he is to own one.

    Now if only we could compare the microcode in the printer to some other solid names and see if there coding is up to par. I'd also love to see the comments in the code!

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
  29. hmmm, Women... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    ... imagine a Beowulf cluster of women!

    (too easy)

    1. Re:hmmm, Women... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      imagine a Beowulf cluster of women!

      It's called a "harem".

    2. Re:hmmm, Women... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how do you 'hook them up'?

    3. Re:hmmm, Women... by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      (too easy)

      . . .but not cheap! [rimshot!]

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    4. Re:hmmm, Women... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hm, it might add up to 1 man....

    5. Re:hmmm, Women... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Someone already did.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  30. "Easy for women to use"? by Atario · · Score: 1

    The buttons have deep fingernail-shaped wells right next to them?

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  31. Um, try this search by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    cyberdildonics... you'll find a lot more than just a 'joystick' that's gender specific..
    warning, some mental images, you can't ever get away from..

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  32. Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    As if "PC Load Letter" wasn't bad enough. Now you have to worry about what will happen if you respond wrong.

    Put a big green button on it, labelled, "Yes, dear. I'm sorry. You were right."

  33. Way more gadgets than a ManPrinter by fembots · · Score: 1

    According to the article, it has more high-tech gadgets than a normal printer, things such as high resolution, bluetooth, cell connection etc etc.

    Don't most female just want a printer that prints, and with HelloKitty casing?

  34. And one for men? by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about one designed for men? The Epson I have seems to have been designed to be used by a robot.

    I mean a real man's printer would weigh about 100 pounds, have a titanium shell, be able to hold 1,000 sheets of paper at a time. The cables that come with it would be an inch thick with massive connectors on each end that make satisfying "clunk" sounds when plugged in and lock into place. Every component would be made of steel: form feed would be achieved by pulling some burnished lever requiring manly strength that would mechanically push the paper through. And paper jams? There'd be no paper jams, if the paper wasn't in the right place the printer would crush it into oblivion.

    Oh and the GIMP-Print people would already have a driver for it ready to go when I bring it home.

    John.

    1. Re:And one for men? by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      I have one of those in my office, John: http://www-zeuthen.desy.de/computing/services/prin t/model/HP_5_SiMX.html

    2. Re:And one for men? by Imperator · · Score: 2, Funny
      And paper jams? There'd be no paper jams, if the paper wasn't in the right place the printer would crush it into oblivion.

      I've got a better solution for paper jams: a fireproof printer. When it detects that paper is stuck, it will send a jet of flame to consume the wayward sheet.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    3. Re:And one for men? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Damn right. I concur with the other poster. Get yourself a used small-business grade HP laserjet off ebay. Those mofos weight 50 pounds and are nearly indestructible.

    4. Re:And one for men? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep your hands off my IBM Network Printer 24.

    5. Re:And one for men? by diggitzz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe that's a printer for beefy American manly-men, but...

      The men who need it to be less of a battlebot and more of a device would have it weigh next to nothing but be incredibly resistant to scratches, dents, or otherwise falling apart. In fact, the "correct" way to fix simple problems would actually be to bang/kick it a few times.

      It would have a compass, a barometer, a thermometer, an altimeter, and a scientific calculator, and it would glow different colors for different print status stuff (or at least just have lots of blinky lights).

      It would be voice activated, and possibly IR activated too, there would be like 50 buttons to push, some of them just for the sake of having buttons to push.

      It would have to be a combo-printer, with a phone, fax, scanner, copier, and hi-res camera, maybe it would sync with your Palm device, it would email/call/page/IM you when it's out of paper/ink/toner/fuel cells (or maybe it could just order the stuff itelf).

      There would be a built-in multimeter and toolkit that hide in some little compartment.

      It would be natively 64bit, have at least a 120GB hard drive, a huge print buffer, several types of card readers, I/O to ethernet (and an 802.11g card, of course), bluetooth, IR, video (sv, dvi, vga, and composite), quadraphonic audio, a few USB ports, firewire, and maybe a serial port for connecting extra "sensors".

      And to save cost, it wouldn't come with a manual (men don't read instructions) or warranty (you're going to void that by taking it apart anyway), but don't worry there would intentionally be lots of "extra pieces" for when you put it back together.

      --
      -=[You cannot consistently judge this statement to be true.]=-
    6. Re:And one for men? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "And paper jams? There'd be no paper jams, if the paper wasn't in the right place the printer would crush it into oblivion."

      Damn you for making me LOL at work.

    7. Re:And one for men? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing you're describing is commonly called a "computer".

    8. Re:And one for men? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      They're called DocuTechs they run at approximately 100-200 ppm and cost upwards of A$500,000 some of you guys may have trouble running one though, it does require that you get training (2-5 days depending on operator level) or read the manual first...

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    9. Re:And one for men? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean a real man's printer would weigh about 100 pounds, have a titanium shell, be able to hold 1,000 sheets of paper at a time.

      No, a real man's printer wouldn't hold paper. It would take in firewood and spit out paper.

    10. Re:And one for men? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      You forgot the `capability to print (bang out) on sheet metal'... yeah. That's what I want.

      `print out' car parts here we come...

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    11. Re:And one for men? by CSharpMinor · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the 55-gallon-drum ink cartridges.

      --

      Whatever it is I'm complaining about, I'm sure the Republicans did it. This is /., after all.
    12. Re:And one for men? by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      You forgot the `capability to print (bang out) on sheet metal'...

      Say, how about a laser printer that uses a CO2 laser? Don't bother with toner, just turn the power way down and char the text into the paper. Turn the power back up and cut through steel.

      Or maybe you'd need one of those cutting tools that uses little plastic beads in a high-pressure stream of water. Custom shaped birthday cakes and your resume carved out of a granite slab.

      Either way, I want one.

    13. Re:And one for men? by Tesral · · Score: 1

      HP Color LaserJet 5M. Have one.

      --
      Garry AKA -Phoenix- Rising Above the Flames
      Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes
    14. Re:And one for men? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There would be no paper jams.."

      Fucking hilarious.

    15. Re:And one for men? by laird · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I just saw one of these at TED. There's something to be said for having a peripheral with a 20 watt laser. I didn't print on paper with it, but it worked great on wood. action shot. That's a laser that's just burned my kids' names onto the wood, and is cuttig the piece out. The guys who showed it to me were James Rabideau, who works for the company that sells this beast, and Daniel Dubno - CBS News. Daniel crazy, but in a good sort of way. The laser cuts wood, marble, steel ... pretty much everything that they could fit into it.

    16. Re:And one for men? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you used to work at Kinko's too, huh?

  35. Me no speaky the japanee by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What exactly is "easier for women to use"?

    You put paper in one end, and it comes out the other end with words and pictures on it. Maybe japanese women are exceptionally stupid, I dont know. Does it come preloaded with paper and ink, and you throw it out rather than having to figure out how to put paper in?

    Besides crafting it in pink plastic, or some other aesthetic nonsense, whats different?

    The "designed for women!" thing is a great marketting gimmick. I mean, how many households buy two packs of razors, one for him, one for her. The only difference being that hers are pink.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Me no speaky the japanee by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      From what I read the only real difference is it comes with "TV Out" to preview the page. I guess they assume that women in general screw up more often, so by viewing the preview on a TV they can see it before they print it. I also assume from this that they must think women are too stoopad to use the "Print Preview" feature in 99% of printing applications..

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    2. Re:Me no speaky the japanee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the print preview is always the same as the end result on paper hm?

    3. Re:Me no speaky the japanee by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      So your saying the TV out will always be the same end result on paper? I guess it's possible... But yes, the print preview button works for me everytime I have the paper loaded properly.. Now 2 questions for you, 1. Does the print preview fail for you normally and 2. are you female?

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    4. Re:Me no speaky the japanee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and 3. will you go out with me? []yes []no

    5. Re:Me no speaky the japanee by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      sure but only if you tell me your name, and your a hot asian 20 year old female that's 135 lbs, with at least a C cup.

      So did your mom help you with that snappy insult or what?

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    6. Re:Me no speaky the japanee by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1
      I mean, how many households buy two packs of razors, one for him, one for her. The only difference being that hers are pink.

      Have you ever tried using a womens' razor to shave your face? The blade is set at a different angle.

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    7. Re:Me no speaky the japanee by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      What exactly is "easier for women to use"?

      I have a hard time understanding this sexist concept my self. I own a HP PSC 950 and I find it remarkably easy for *PEOPLE* to use.

      Printing is easy, as you described

      It accepts memory cards and will print off a proof sheet without your PC being on. Further, you can check the little box with a #2 pencil, put it on the scanner and it will print off which pictures you want independent of the PC.

      You can scan to the fax or scan to the PC just by using the buttons on the top level.

      It's not that this design is all that unusual, Dell has a printer which has most of these fuctions, I believe it's the lexmark 1100 but don't quote me on that model number. It requires the PC on to peform it's fuctions, and it's onscreen twain software has pull down menus to choose whether you want to send the image to the printer, file, e-mail, or fax.

      It would be really hard to improve on such printers where you can get the job done with only a few clicks on screen or buttons on the printer it self.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    8. Re:Me no speaky the japanee by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have. No, they aren't.

      Gilette sells the Mach 3 - for men. The exact same razor, pink, is called the Venus 3.

      Schick has the Tracer FX (for men), the Protector (for women).

      Go buy one of each, or look at them in the store, if you dont believe me.

      Different brands set angles differently, sure. But it's not a male/female thing, it's a user preferance thing.

      The big difference I've seen, which is fairly recent, is that lately the women's models have bigger rubberized grips, easier to hold on to in the shower/bathtub.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    9. Re:Me no speaky the japanee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The big difference I've seen, which is fairly recent, is that lately the women's models have bigger rubberized grips, easier to hold on to in the shower/bathtub.


      Easier to hold on to? Yeah right. And you probably believed that she wanted the handheld pulsing showerhead so she could get a ... ummm ... back massage.

    10. Re:Me no speaky the japanee by loraksus · · Score: 1

      a pen / marker will work too.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  36. they changed the connector on the back ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  37. Excellent..... by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now to make a car that women can drive, and we are all set...

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    1. Re:Excellent..... by Xaroth · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Excellent..... by Gramie2 · · Score: 1

      You mean like this?

  38. It won't stop us sysadmins... by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 4, Funny

    installing it on a high shelf.

    1. Re:It won't stop us sysadmins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. The HIGH shelf is reserved for those with mini skirts. The LOW shelf is for the thong wearers! Sheesh!

    2. Re:It won't stop us sysadmins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only guy that finds thongs ugly? Yes, please don't wear an outfit like that to work. I'd rather not have to claw my eyes out.

  39. Designed by Mothers? by ferralis · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'd go for this if the equipment were designed by mothers, not just women in general. The reason is simple: I have kids, and kids get into things, even the computer room you've worked very hard to be sure they stay OUT of. Perhapse I should say especially the room you've worked very hard to be sure they stay out of.

    I would shell out some serious bucks for a printer that had a super-easy-to-clean paper path, that was liquid resistant (ever try to get orange juice or peanut butter out of a laser printer?!!) with liquid resistant ink.

    Hrm... also maybe retractable cords, bluetooth to the computer, anything else that can keep kids from getting tangled in the wire jungle at the back of a PC.

    ...and I'm just a 30ish male geek. Imagine what a few moms could come up with! :)

    --
    Any generalization is a stupid one.
    1. Re:Designed by Mothers? by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      I would shell out some serious bucks for a printer that had a super-easy-to-clean paper path, that was liquid resistant (ever try to get orange juice or peanut butter out of a laser printer?!!) with liquid resistant ink. Hrm... also maybe retractable cords, bluetooth to the computer, anything else that can keep kids from getting tangled in the wire jungle at the back of a PC.

      First serious comment so far

      For computer electronics to become true consumer electronics, it needs to be much easier to set up:
      Unpack
      plug in
      (optional) connect it to other devices (if no Bluetooth)
      switch on

      The whole current nomenclature (install the software, initialise the device) is geared towards the people (like /.) who care about such stuff. As a previous poster said, KISS.
      Come to think about it, why should there need to be a separate disk of driver software? For a USB device, it should mount like an external drive type device, and then be able to install its own drivers (first checking which OS it found) whn first run. then maybe people might actually want to carry their printer around from machine to machine.

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    2. Re:Designed by Mothers? by Frobnicator · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I'd say 'designed by parents', instead, since I'm in the same boat.

      For example, I need to mod my computers to put a locking plexiglass cover in front of it -- to keep the little one away from the power, reset, and CD buttons.

      The printer has ONE button, and when my 1-year-old discovered it, we had a pile of blank pages and "Printer Information" sheets on the floor.

      I keep a spray-bottle of water and paper towels next to the monitor, since it will be covered with fingerprints every time I use the machine.

      I would like an optical mouse that really isn't, so my kids can just pick it up and play with the lights, while I use the real one.

      On Windows 98, I wrote a screen-saver program that put in a giant font on the screen whatever keys are hit. There was a message on the bottom saying "please type 'unlock' to unlock this computer". My (currently 4-year-old) daughter used to sit down with it, and say "look dad, I'm typing like you." I now keep it on her little computer so her little sister won't mess it up too badly. Unfortunately, I can't get WinXP to trap several key sequences, so it doesn't work there.

      There is a market for that type of thing, and it isn't being tapped.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    3. Re:Designed by Mothers? by ferralis · · Score: 1

      Damned good idea- load baseline drivers for key OS's and have 'em appear as if on an attached flash drive to compatible software. Windoze,Linux,OS/X could be set up to grab this info as long as a standard was forthcoming... Has this already been done? If so, why not? There's a gold mine here...

      --
      Any generalization is a stupid one.
    4. Re:Designed by Mothers? by ferralis · · Score: 1
      Durned right!

      I love your screen-saver idea... my 1.5 year old (can ya tell I'm a geek?) LOVES to play at the computer, wiggling the mouse and hitting keys.

      While in a screen saver there are some keystrokes that are going to have an effect regardless, maybe just run an app that hogs the screen when the api detects idle time (kind of a back-door override screensaver?). If done in DirectX I know you'd be able to override a LOT of the built-ins like alt-tab, etc.

      --
      Any generalization is a stupid one.
    5. Re:Designed by Mothers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have this cool invention called a "lock". You can upgrade it by adding a "deadbolt". You can use these inventions to keep people out of your computer room, unless they have serious tools like a drill or an axe.

      These devices are available pretty cheap at your local hardware stores. You won't have to upgrade all of your computer hardware and cabling, either.

      It's amazing!

    6. Re:Designed by Mothers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't beat your children enough. Boy, my dad would lose it if I fucked with his computer shit.

    7. Re:Designed by Mothers? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      ...and I'm just a 30ish male geek. Imagine what a few moms could come up with! :)/i.

      Why would they do any better than a dad?

    8. Re:Designed by Mothers? by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      There you go; some sensible comments. If you want to see this idea (i.e. a product designed by women for women) in a slightly saner implementation, look at what Volvo did. (There are plenty of other sites if you Google a little.)

      They made a design team comprised of women and said "design the car you want". They thought outside of traditional lines and asked themselves how they actually used the car. The result -- it's not some silly pink frilly thing, but a real car, with real horsepower, but loads of convenient attributes designed by women for women.

      I won't go into all the details, but things like a race-style gas filler cap for ease of use, more thought on placement and design of storage compartments, and no bonnet at the front for maintenance, but instead having the whole front of the car lift up. By the way, not mentioned in the linked article -- they've drastically cut down on the amount of maintenance necessary, so it only needs an oil change every 31,000 miles.

    9. Re:Designed by Mothers? by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Did that back in the DOS day... but wasn't a screen saver...

      However, it was a reg'lar console app (put the system into 40x25 mode for big letters), and it saw the mouse, too!

      The kids loved it!

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    10. Re:Designed by Mothers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep a spray-bottle of water and paper towels next to the monitor, since it will be covered with fingerprints every time I use the machine.

      There's something really wrong with that sentence! Why not go all the way and keep a bottle of ketchup instead?

    11. Re:Designed by Mothers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I keep a spray-bottle of water and paper towels next to the monitor...

      Dude, you already have all the tools at your disposal to keep the kids away from the computers. Next time little Tylar or Britnee gets near the PC, SQUIRT! Repeat about three or four times, and the kid will stay clear. Even if your kid is learning-disabled, it'll only take eight or nine tries.

      You obviously have never owned a cat. (Note: strangely, cats seem to learn faster than children with this technique.)

    12. Re:Designed by Mothers? by seann · · Score: 1

      use directx to get the key sequences.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    13. Re:Designed by Mothers? by Permission+Denied · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, I can't get WinXP to trap several key sequences, so it doesn't work there.

      Works for me:

      LRESULT CALLBACK win_proc(HWND hwnd, unsigned msg, WPARAM wparam, LPARAM lparam)
      {
      static WPARAM keybuf[5];
      const WPARAM key[5] = { 'H', 'e', 'l', 'l', 'o' };
      ...
      memset(keybuf, 0, sizeof(keybuf));
      ...
      switch (msg) {
      ...
      case WM_CHAR:
      for (i = 1; i < sizeof(keybuf) / sizeof(keybuf[0]); i++) {
      keybuf[i - 1] = keybuf[i];
      }
      keybuf[sizeof(keybuf) / sizeof(keybuf[0]) - 1] = wparam;
      if (memcmp(keybuf, key, sizeof(keybuf)) == 0) {
      PostMessage(hwnd, WM_CLOSE, 0, 0);
      }
      break;
      ...
      Indentation is screwed up, but you get the idea. Tested in win2k and XP pro, works fine.

      Perhaps the problem you're having has to do with Unicode. The "wparam" in XP is in UTF-16. Actually, it's a UCS-2 character since you cannot currently input plane1 UTF-16 characters in XP, but this doesn't make a difference unless your password is in Linear-B :) (But it does mean you can discard the high bits.) The implicit casting I'm doing in the "key" declaration (from "char" to "WPARAM") takes care of this, so it might not work if you're storing your password differently.

    14. Re:Designed by Mothers? by Permission+Denied · · Score: 1
      The implicit casting I'm doing in the "key" declaration (from "char" to "WPARAM") takes care of this

      Before any pedant points this out, I'm well aware that character constants are integers, not "chars", and that there happens to be no casting involved in this case. Consider it a thinko.

      And as I think about it, I'm not sure how Unicode would mess up your program unless you're doing some very strange stuff, but that would seem to be the most relevant difference between 98 and XP. Post your code and we'll fix it :)

    15. Re:Designed by Mothers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While in a screen saver there are some keystrokes that are going to have an effect regardless

      Not generally true. Alt-tab, Ctrl-ESC, etc. are all passed directly to the screen saver when in screen saver mode (but not when testing a screen saver out of screen saver mode). The only thing the screen saver doesn't get is CTRL-ALT-DEL, but you can't trap that anyway. You do not need to go to DirectX to get this. Screen savers run on a different "window station" than the desktop, so applications on the desktop window station (like explorer.exe) have a separate input queue. This is also the reason NT doesn't have screensavers that mess with a desktop image like win9x (melting away desktop, moving a magnifying glass over it, etc.).

      Also, correctly detecting idle time is non-trivial. You can install global input "hooks" to grab keystrokes and mouse movements, but those won't work reliably (another hook can simply override them and you have to deal differently with legacy stuff like cmd.exe). This is generally a non-issue unless your idle-time detector serves some security purpose and you do not want your users overriding it, but in that case, you have to write driver hooks, which is definitely non-trivial. Another issue is that global input hooks introduce latency which users might notice if they try to play games. You also have to be very careful writing global hooks since they run in every application's address space.

      Using a regular screen saver is probably the best idea.

    16. Re:Designed by Mothers? by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
      The problem with what you post -- and with my code, is the sequence, among others. As far as I can tell, Win2K and XP don't let you intercept them without jumping through a lot of hoops.

      The goal is to prevent *ANY* entrance to the system by the kid. The only reliable way I can seem to find for it is to write a GINA dll, and that's more work than my weekend-long project had in mind.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    17. Re:Designed by Mothers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good lord, I thought you said "GNAA drill" for a second there. Whew.

    18. Re:Designed by Mothers? by Permission+Denied · · Score: 1
      Which key sequences do you mean? The only key sequence I know of that a screen saver cannot intercept is ctrl-alt-del. If you check the "require password" checkbox, the screen saver runs on a separate desktop from explorer or anything else so alt-tab etc. won't work. Note that these continue to work if the .scr is invoked directly or via the "test" button in the control panel, but not when invoked by winlogon as a screen saver on the screen saver desktop.

      It also appears that winlogon will use the same main desktop for the screen saver unless the "password protected" checkbox is checked, which I did not know until I just experimented with it.

      Are you trying to intercept ctrl-alt-del? I can't understand why you'd want to do that.

      I've also written a GINA (a couple if you count rewrites :) and I don't think you'd be able to fake the screen saver disabling ctrl-alt-del. The GINA controls the dialog that appears when ctrl-alt-del is pressed normally, but it does not control the dialog that appears when one tries to unlock a locked workstation or return from a password-protected screen saver. That dialog is implemented by Windows which has the more serious effect that it's basically not possible to do alternative (non-Windows) authentication for locking a workstation even if alternative authentication is implemented for regular login. For this reason, I disabled Windows' workstation locking in my GINA (I have some ideas on how to create a similar feature, but there hasn't been any demand for it).

      Still, I can't understand why you'd want to intercept ctrl-alt-del. If your kids don't know your password, they can't get into the system. The sequence that allows you stop the screen saver is equivalent to a password, so you were already keeping a secret from them - might as well create a Windows password so they can't get into the system if they hit the power switch.

      Please do reply, I'm interested.

    19. Re:Designed by Mothers? by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
      Are you trying to intercept ctrl-alt-del? I can't understand why you'd want to do that.
      This is so that a one-year-old can bang on the keyboard and hit whatever keys they want, in any order they want, and not have any chance of messing up the computer. This includes intercepting and canceling any special commands and hotkeys. Since the app is also run-on-demand, it needs to intercept everything else (alt-esc, ctrl-esc, alt-tab) with a low-level keyboard hook.

      It has to protect from everything -- if a very young child can watch their parent's do it once, they'll figure out how to do it too. That includes things like ctrl-alt-del.

      As I said (and the number of replies shows) there *is* a marekt for this sort of thing, if it's comprehensive enough. Maybe I'll spend a week on my app, fix it up for 2K and XP, and charge $10 for it or something.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    20. Re:Designed by Mothers? by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      I got a PC case with a closing front cover to protect the power switch and such. Thought I was really clever.

      First, our 1.5-year-old found the UPS switch. Duct tape and plastic for that one. Then he found the rocker switch on the power supply at the back of the PC. More duct tape. Thought I was safe. But no...

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  40. Bigger Paper by tanksalot · · Score: 1

    Great.... now I'm gonna see a lot of spam for "Increase your paper size now!"

    --
    "I am not denying the existence of stupidity, or of stupid people." - phyruxus
  41. Cover sealed shut? by onyxruby · · Score: 1

    Does this mean the cover will require a special tool only given to factory certified repair shops? While it refuse to print some things that aren't color coordinated, and just go ahead and use your credit card when it wants fresh ink?

    So when will manufactures stop perpetuating myths that woman are too stupid for technology? For that matter why do I know so many woman that play at being stupid with technology? Ugh. Its a self propogating clusterfuck.

  42. This one has Edsel written all over it. by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

    Hmm, just what I need to pay for.. a handle on my printer. You know I was wondering what my current printer was missing and bingo there it is. I need a printer that looks like a handbag because I might want to carry it around as a fashion statement the next time I'm out instead of using it to print stuff.

    Reminds me of the Simpsons episode where Homer designs a new car for a company, bankrupting them.

  43. This is where little printers come from. by RealAlaskan · · Score: 4, Funny
    Now that printers are reproducing sexually, I'll get a couple of female printers to go with my stallions, and start breeding them.

    I ought to have a whole herd o' them thangs purty soon!

    1. Re:This is where little printers come from. by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Careful. They're easy to breed but a real bitch to feed. Priced inkjet cartridges lately?

  44. Gonna be a tech support nightmare.. by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 4, Funny

    We know women don't make good drivers.

    1. Re:Gonna be a tech support nightmare.. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 0

      We know women don't make good drivers.

      I know this is supposed to be funny, but women are a little bit better drivers than men. People can point to statistics and try to claim say otherwise, but if you take the "long haul" drivers (mostly men) out of the picture, men are slightly worse per mile than women.

      Truckers are generally better drivers because they have to be because of the insurance climate, and that they get such a rediculous number of miles of experience. Thus including them in a comparison skews the picture because of the different kind of driving.

    2. Re:Gonna be a tech support nightmare.. by zsz2k · · Score: 1

      Only because women take fewer chances than men. Who dares, wins.

    3. Re:Gonna be a tech support nightmare.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about per hour of operation?

      how do you rationalize taking out the long haul truckers anyways? The only way I can think of this making sense is if one had proof that the improved record was only caused by being a trucker and had nothing to do with better drivers being more likely to become truckers

      This is kind of like saying that women are in better shape than men if you take out people who play sports

    4. Re:Gonna be a tech support nightmare.. by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      "We're back to the times when men were men and wrote their own device drivers."
      -- Linus Torvalds


      These kind of drivers?

  45. Blatant sexism! by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

    Equal rights for men! No more female oppression! Say no the females pulling the strings! Rise, my brethren! Revolt against our oppressors! It is our calling! What's next? Special cars for women, too!?

  46. hey who knew? by great+om · · Score: 1

    Apparently, women really like coolers (or possibly lunchboxes)

    --
    ------- Oh damn.... the Sigfile escaped... -Great OM
  47. Product name? by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1

    ....Pocket Rocket Printer?

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  48. Form before function? by macklin01 · · Score: 1

    Hmm, it looks "cute". I'd imagine that the "form before function" people will buy this, female or male. It'll look great in that new VW bug along with the Michael Graves teapot.

    --
    OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
  49. When are people going to learn... by LordK2002 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    When are people going to learn that solving problems with attidudes towards women (for example in computer shops, car mechanics etc) are not going to be improved by having special "female" versions of things?

    You don't make equal by making different. This sort of thing does not benefit women any more than apartheid benefits ethnic minorities.

    Now here's a suggestion: why not make it easy for everyone to use? Or is that just too logical?

    K

    1. Re:When are people going to learn... by Scudsucker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "problems with attidudes towards women", eh? What about advertizers attitudes towards men? These days you'd have a hard time finding any misogyny in ads, but there's plenty of misandry to go around.

    2. Re:When are people going to learn... by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      We could just tell women they're as equal as men, and then they wouldn't feel the need to buy things "just for women."

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    3. Re:When are people going to learn... by tvh2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or perhaps the problem lies with the fact that women want everything equal as long as they still have the upper hand.

    4. Re:When are people going to learn... by BadTuna · · Score: 1

      I'm No Carl Sagin; but.... This qartic

      --
      Your sig here!
  50. You should see the one for men. by Phat_Tony · · Score: 4, Funny



    It comes in Ferrari red with black rubber grips, and a black leather "sports" dust cover. The feed trays are made of diamond pattern steel plate.

    It has curves like a lotus, and when it prints, a speaker simulates the sound of someone revving a Harley Davidson. Spoiler, drilled aluminum function keys, and a portable base with 110-spoke alloy rimmed casters are available as a special option package.

    The top of the printer also has special recesses for holding a beer and a remote control.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    1. Re:You should see the one for men. by jskiff · · Score: 1

      And it makes a "VROOOOOM" noise when it starts to print!!!

      --
      It's "no one," not "noone." Who the hell is noone anyway?
    2. Re:You should see the one for men. by spare.dave · · Score: 1

      Rob Enderle would buy one.

  51. oooooooohhh... by Spytap · · Score: 1

    It's marketed towards women; I thought there might be hope for the slashdot crowd afterall...

    1. Re:oooooooohhh... by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

      come on guys? mod parent up. I've already seen far more inane (and preposterously sexist) comments +5 Funny.

    2. Re:oooooooohhh... by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

      OOOoooohhh, I get it....nevermind.




      We wouldn't want the chick to read that comment and get the wrong idea about all of us geeks.

  52. Red ink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Designed by women.

    Does it leak red ink a few days a month?

    (I am so going to hell)

  53. OMG by codepunk · · Score: 1

    If my wife gets one of these I will not be able to bring another printer home, much less put it in the same room!

    --


    Got Code?
  54. more BS by drwho · · Score: 1

    Women and minorities this and that, yadda yadda I am sick of it. I want a printer designed and manufactured in the US by white american males, just like me....where's my affinity group? heh.

  55. They paid how much for this study? by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

    So this study, doubtless funded with some ungodly amount of money, told them this:

    Women have difficulty operating some mechanical devices.

    This is news?

    I don't mean this as a sexist jab, though I think it's kind of funny. There are just some things that women very often aren't good at. Then again, there are certain things that they are very good at that men aren't. It's all relative.

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    1. Re:They paid how much for this study? by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

      While I kinda agree with what you are saying, I don't so much agree with how you are saying it.

      As has been pointed out many times in this thread already, women seem to be brought up to be "less mechanically/technically savvy"...how many times have you been on a date with a woman who you swear couldn't possibly make it through life acting as dumb as she is to you?

      My mother taught me how to drive a manual transmission. I have yet to see a man or woman as capable at driving a 5-speed as my mother.....is she a special case example? Doubtfull.

      Blame society, blame social norms, blame your parents....but for fucks sake, don't blame the innate technical aptitude of women. That's just illogical.

  56. For those who read the article: "Open Price?" by jimbosworldorg · · Score: 1

    Can anybody tell me what "Open Price" means?

    --

    Coming soon to Slashdot: meta-meta-moderation!

    1. Re:For those who read the article: "Open Price?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means that there is no recommended retail price; stores set their own price for the product.

    2. Re:For those who read the article: "Open Price?" by njfuzzy · · Score: 1

      No MSRP. They sell it for a certain wholesale price, but let each dealer decide on the retail price. The alternative, of course, is that it means that the price was collectively worked on by a group of volunteers who knew what sort of price they want, and how to implement it, but know nothing whatsoever about the user experience.

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
  57. In other news by kilimangaro · · Score: 1

    Here's an american dream car build by a team of genuine american guy !!

    --
    "Insanity in individuals is something rare, but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule." - Nietzsche
  58. All printers are female! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They all have female connectors on the back

  59. Nyo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why wouldn't men and the family (especially) want a user-friendly printer?

  60. I would find this insulting... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

    ... I mean, a company has designed something *for* women, something which now makes all other printers a man's printer when clearly that isn't the case. Its not like a woman doesn't know what a power switch is or a ink indicator is? Whats going to be so different about a womens printer, that it is a *women* printer?

    1. Re:I would find this insulting... by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1
      Whats going to be so different about a womens printer, that it is a *women* printer?

      It has little printer-breasts and a printer-vagina

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    2. Re:I would find this insulting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.. I'm a woman and I do find it isulting.

  61. look at it this way by Fratz · · Score: 5, Insightful
    There are cars that are made for and marketed toward women. There's shampoo for women. There's hair dye for women. There are even paper towels that are aimed at women.

    All these things are also separately marketed toward men. Sure, the boxes are different, and the ads are different, but they're basically the same product. At some point a long time ago, someone figured out that gender-neutral products didn't do as well as ones that skewed toward male or female, and everyone else followed suit.

    So please only find the "printer for women" insulting if you find the notion of women's shampoo, socks, towels, cars, hair dye, and paper towels insulting.

    --
    -- Fratz, human
    1. Re:look at it this way by RoyalCheese · · Score: 1

      Not really.. women by and large have longer hair then men, so will need hair products targetted at the care of longer hair (but all you long haired dudes like to use the tangle-free conditioner), women tend to have smaller feet (and feminine fashion is different to masculine fashine) so yes socks for women is sensible too, men tend not to menstrate so I guess its reasonable for them women to have panty liners and tampons (while men don't) and women have thinner skin than women (so are more sensitive to touch than men.. so its reasonable for them to have gentler tissues than men) However paper for printing different for women than for men? Different computer systems? Different software? How is the way women use printers going to be different from the way men use printers?

    2. Re:look at it this way by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

      So please only find the "printer for women" insulting if you find the notion of women's shampoo, socks, towels, cars, hair dye, and paper towels insulting.

      In fact, I do find these ideas insulting. Just as I find the idea of rebadging a car (or any other product) insulting.

      While I understand the marketing aspect of it entirely (and for cars there is the average-corperate-fuel-economy motivation) that doesn't make it any less insulting to me that the same exact product is offered in a different color, different branding, or different packaging merely to appeal to a different market segment.

      Perception is not tantamount to reality.

      Specs should speak all truths in all scenarios...but i dare you to remove the intuitive aspect of perception from the logical aspect.....Thus explaining the drive of these companies to offer the same product as a niche marketed product.

  62. Its an handbag by defsdoor · · Score: 1

    So, deisgned for women means make it look like a handbag - surely then they will sell thousands.

    What next ? Shoe shaped power tools ?

    1. Re:Its an handbag by misery · · Score: 1

      Shoe-shaped power tools can't be too far away: http://www.barbarak.com/products.html

      --
      Adam
      "And the death of dreams will be a beautiful end..." - DIJ
  63. You mean it prints women ... Woo Hooo by markatwork · · Score: 1

    Great, this is finally what I have been looking for. I can finally put all those pr0n pictures I have to good use. I will take the best parts from all those pictures and piece them together into the ultimate woman (who will most likely look like Jennifer Love Hewitt). Then I will wear a bra on my head and press print. Wah-la I will have my very own woman. Oh how my life will change.

    Here is to hoping that the consumables aren't that expensive. I might just print me a harem.

  64. Internal Server Error by DigitalDragon · · Score: 1

    I finished translating the K-Tai Watch (Japanese) article:

    Internal Server Error

    Process limit exceeded for uid 11363.


    Well done. That makes for a good and interesting read.

    --
    http://dtum.livejournal.com
  65. Amazing! by ryanw · · Score: 1

    It's amazing that this printer "designed by women" looks like an ugly shoe box. I anticipated to see something that at least looked nice.

    1. Re:Amazing! by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      I think it looks nice by ez-bake oven standards.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  66. Is a printer the best item to start with? by ColourlessGreenIdeas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Printers aren't very personal objects. If I had gender issues with any of my electronics, I'd be more concerned about my phone, mp3 player, keyboard, mouse, monitor and computer in that order.

    --
    In soviet russia stale jokes recycle you!
  67. Girls: this is a troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason women buy more tech is they buy something, can't figure it out, toss it in a drawer and buy a different model.

  68. If women were like computers instead of printers by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Two years later:

    Well honey, it's been fun, but I just saw a smaller, younger, faster, sexier model I just have to have. Don't worry though, I know a guy who's really desperate and I told him I would let him have you.

    No, the female printer analogy is much more accurate. Cheap to begin with and always going for the Lock-in.

  69. This is ghey... by devphaeton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not only being marketed at women, it was completely designed by 'Team8' - an all-female project team created within Epson specifically for making a printer 'easy for women to use.'

    What makes it "easy for women to use" as opposed to any other printer?

    I swear.... with all the "women's rights" stuff, and women bantering on about how they want to be treated as equals, then why do we have "Lifetime, t.v. for women(tm)", or "Special K, A Cereal Designed For Women's Nutritional Needs", you know, "Strong enough for a man, made for a woman"

    And finally the one that made me literally fall out of my chair when i heard it:

    "Rogaine for women. Because women should not have to suffer from a man's problem."

    Don't get me wrong, i mean... i dig chicks, but I guess i just don't understand why women have to simultaneously prove that they're both equal and special. They're like that with a lot of other things too. I cannot rationalize that, but they refuse to see anything wrong with a lot of their logic.

    But what do i know? I'm just an insensitive male clod!!

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
    1. Re:This is ghey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've just summed up the argument against affirmative action. I totally agree, btw.

      I know I'm probably violating some sort of rule, including a paraphrased quote from an Orwell book...

      All people are equal. Women are just more equal than others.

    2. Re:This is ghey... by monique · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, i mean... i dig chicks, but I guess i just don't understand why women have to simultaneously prove that they're both equal and special. They're like that with a lot of other things too. I cannot rationalize that, but they refuse to see anything wrong with a lot of their logic.

      Is that like refusing to see anything wrong with taking the actions of a subset of a group and describing them as though they represent the actions of the entire group?

      But I'd like you to take a step back a moment. First of all, the stuff you're describing has nothing to do with right; it has to do with marketing. Secondly, women *do* have somewhat different nutritional needs. Most women are either losing iron every month or are supporting a growing life inside of them. (Me, personally, I'm on depo, so I'm not doing either, but hey, I'm special.) Women get menopause and start losing bone mass 10-15 years sooner than men start experiencing similar losses (numbers taken off the top of my head; ballpark figure). While I have no idea if the marketers of various foods are truly being helpful or just taking advantage of advertising, the idea that men and women have different nutritional needs is not that far-fetched.

      --
      -monique
    3. Re:This is ghey... by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      You're confused. The feminist movement is dominated by women who believe that men are unnecessary and counter-productive to the advancement of womyn. They do NOT believe in equality whatsoever, they feel that women are vastly superior.

      The whole "equal" thing is an excuse to further an agenda to destroy the traditional male-dominated society. These women do not represent what I believe to be the majority of women, who couldn't care less about the "gender war" and would much rather have a satisfying long-term realtionship with a real man.

      Men and women are not "equal" in every sense of the word because we are inherintly different. If the feminist movement really was about the equality of men and women, it would include men.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    4. Re:This is ghey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they refuse to see anything wrong with a lot of their logic

      Logic? Therein lies your error, young one. These are women you're talking about.

    5. Re:This is ghey... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      i just don't understand why women have to simultaneously prove that they're both equal and special.

      I guess you don't understand that your characterization doesn't apply to ALL women, either.

    6. Re:This is ghey... by hambonewilkins · · Score: 1
      Wow. You have no idea what feminism is about, do you? It is not about men hating or a feeling of superiority.

      It's about respect.

      Try respecting women, you may find they treat you better in turn.

      --

      God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
    7. Re:This is ghey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your post proves his point..

      You talk about respecting women, and ignore respecting men.

    8. Re:This is ghey... by zsz2k · · Score: 1

      In my experience, I have found the opposite to be the case. Sorry - but "treat them rough you get the muff" still applies, wake up and smell the coffee.

    9. Re:This is ghey... by mikeg22 · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, i mean... i dig chicks, but I guess i just don't understand why women have to simultaneously prove that they're both equal and special

      No woman ever claimed to be equal to a man, just as no man has ever laid claim to being equal to a woman...thats a total strawman.

      Having equal rights has nothing to do with acknowledging that there are differences. Women are different than men, but they deserve to be have the same rights as men.

    10. Re:This is ghey... by Delta+Vel · · Score: 1

      1. Spelling gay "ghey" doesn't make it any less insulting. You never know who's going to hear or see you use the word--just don't.

      2. It's been said, but just to emphasize the point: it's marketing, not feminism.

      --
      It's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye. Then it's fun and games without depth perception.
    11. Re:This is ghey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's supposed to be insulting asshat. Wait, that's probably not insulting to you because you probably like wearing other men's asses as hats.

      Go back and have the football team finish plowing your ass like a good little fag. And have your buddies call me, i need some interior decoration done.

    12. Re:This is ghey... by donscarletti · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Although I largly agree with your point, I think your examples are fairly facile. For a start these are products, marketed towards women wholly to make money rather than to solve social injustices and the like. For a start, special-K (the cereal type) tastes great despite the fact that it is not engineered for my male nutiritional needs (although it is not like my standard breakfast of froot loops is either). T.v. for "women" is a type of broadcasting that networks do because it is cheap and its pulpy sap is soaked up by the 80% of female kind who cannot destinguish bad television, this is much like the 80% of males that thought "the fast and the furious" was a good movie. I see no problem with the Rogain ad either. Pattern baldness in women is like breast cancer in men, rare, but when one has it, it is awkward.

      I agree with you, post feminist gender roles are nothing but an il-defined, inconsistant, paradoxical mess. But one cannot progress from the old ideal of giving women protection but no power to the new ideal of giving them power but no protection without an intermediate step of pure chaos where they seem to be granted whatever the hell they want. But these are just consumer products and what do you care if some corperate executypes want to cash in on the fact that women buy stuff?

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    13. Re:This is ghey... by TC+(WC) · · Score: 1

      No woman ever claimed to be equal to a man, just as no man has ever laid claim to being equal to a woman...thats a total strawman.

      I don't really care about your argument, but that's an idiotic statement. Of course people have claimed this.

    14. Re:This is ghey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you think it was women who came up with those
      stupid marketing schemes and products?? why???

      ten to one it was an idiot guy...

      see how easy it is to automatically blame the
      women?? knee jerk reactions..

    15. Re:This is ghey... by benja · · Score: 1
      At least partly because not all women think the same thing. The women who are on the streets protesting for women's rights are not necessarily the same ones that buy a product "strong enough for a man, made for a woman."

      (It's like saying, how can men at the same time rally for gay male rights and support fundamentalist preachers who saying that being gay is a sin? Hey, it's not necessarily the same men who do this!)

      The cereal "designed for [females'] nutritional needs" may be different -- I don't know the background of this and I don't know whether it's bogus or has actual scientific background (which would only be a statistical tendency, of course, the statement "this is better for all females" makes zero sense). Many things in our society are oriented towards male bodies -- look at how prostate cancer got much more research money than breast cancer. Perhaps there is some actual scientific evidence to support that this cereal can support the nutritional needs of female bodies better; if so, I don't see why marketing that would be a bad thing.

    16. Re:This is ghey... by Fwonkas · · Score: 1

      But what do i know? I'm just an insensitive male clod!!

      Yes, you are. The dead giveaway was: "I swear.... with all the 'women's rights' stuff, and women bantering on about how they want to be treated as equals, then why..." 99% of anything following that has got to be stupid.

      I can only imagine that the mods got it wrong. For example, when you said, "Don't get me wrong, i mean... i dig chicks, but I guess i just don't understand why women have to simultaneously prove that they're both equal and special.", you were trying to be ironic and funny. Right?

      Either the moderators are idiots or you are. Pretty depressing either way.

      --
      COMPUTER! Whatever happened to Blueberry Muffin?
    17. Re:This is ghey... by Delta+Vel · · Score: 1

      I'm a bisexual woman, dumbfuck.

      --
      It's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye. Then it's fun and games without depth perception.
  70. fap fap fap by legomad · · Score: 3, Funny

    Printer pr0n.

  71. accomodate women's cultural thought processes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Cultural Thought Processes?

    Does this mean when the Woman says she wants to computer to switch OFF, she really wants it to switch ON... ...depending on the day of the month and whether she has just broken a nail, and the shoe heel is coming off!

  72. I'm confused by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

    How exactly is this geared to women? Seems like every other printer on the planet, but with a useless handle.

    --

    ----
    All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
    1. Re:I'm confused by jeff13 · · Score: 1

      ^^^ LOL! That's SO funny! Reasons! :D

  73. Only women would... by kc0dxh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...design a printer with a single 6 color cartridge. It's bad enough my printer has 3 colors in one cartridge. Nothing like sucking money from the weak of mind.

    --

    --- "1.21 Jigawatts!" -Doc

  74. One word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " The studies showed dissatisfaction with the way that electronics were marketed towards men."

    HOMO!

  75. Reminds me of the "Designed by women" Volvo by HitScan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sooo... is the hood welded shut? ;)

    --
    HitScan
    1. Re:Reminds me of the "Designed by women" Volvo by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
      The paper tray and toner bay are welded shut; when the printer senses either low toner or paper, it signals the office supply department to send up either a ream or a cart.

      In the event of a paper jam, the printer signals the repair shop, who dispaches a specially-trained technician to clear the jam... so you don have to!

      --
      Yeah, right.
  76. It also comes with a free Dish Scrubber! by jamonterrell · · Score: 1

    Epson says they plan to ship it with a free gift! Your choice of either a Dish Scrubber or Laundry Soap.

    --
    I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
  77. We don't know. That's the fsck'ing point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've lived with it for years, put up with it and now we ignore it.

    Kind of like a wife.

  78. haha by doobman · · Score: 4, Funny

    female printer? i'd never buy one of those. I have a hard enough time keeping my blasted slave drives.

  79. Is PARENT really INSIGHTFUL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There must be some really dim moderators today!!!

  80. Why for women? by MythoBeast · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is why our culture (and the Japanese culture, apparently) has to design things "for women" when they want to make something easy to use? Do men really like to spend a lot of time with the useless details of making a printer work, or do they just not want to admit that features like video preview are useful, and that a lot of other "features" are just useless trappings?

    I do have to admit, however, that no male designer would have designed a printer to look like a purse. There's probably a good reason for that.

    --
    Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
    1. Re:Why for women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I do have to admit, however, that no male designer would have designed a printer to look like a purse. There's probably a good reason for that.

      Don't count on it. After all, there are lot of men who design cars to look like various strange objects (eg: Monster Garage). Just because women design a printer to look like a purse first doesn't mean men won't.

    2. Re:Why for women? by MythoBeast · · Score: 1

      Don't count on it. After all, there are lot of men who design cars to look like various strange objects (eg: Monster Garage). Just because women design a printer to look like a purse first doesn't mean men won't.

      Men obscess over their cars as an extension of their personal prowess. While there are probably some guys out there who do the same with printers, they are far less plentiful, and I haven't seen any of them yet.

      --
      Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
  81. yes but ... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
    ... yes, but - do they have it in pink :-)

    ... or coral

    ... or fuschia

    From the press release, it doesn't look like it. Actually, it just looks like every other printer coming out of the shops today - rounded "softer" edges.

  82. You people try looking at the AMERICAN Epson site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the Epson of America website, a press release about the "PictureMate"... a printer designed for the mother of the household:

    PICTUREMATE(TM) BY EPSON ELIMINATES
    THE BARRIERS TO DIGITAL PHOTO PRINTING
    First and Only Personal Photo Lab Enables Consumers to Produce Photos with Quality,
    Durability and Cost Benefits of Traditional Photo Lab Prints in the Convenience of Home
    LONG BEACH, Calif., February 9, 2004 Addressing all of the barriers that digital camera
    owners have had with printing their photos, Epson today introduces PictureMate(TM), the first and only
    personal photo lab that allows digital camera owners to easily print brilliant, long-lasting lab-quality
    4" x 6" photos at home at a cost that is comparable to some of the most affordable lab print prices.
    This breakthrough is made possible by Epson's exclusive archival print technology for photos that are
    indistinguishable from traditional lab prints and last even longer.
    With an estimated 33 million households owning digital cameras at the close of 2003, more
    people are taking digital photos to preserve their memories.1 According to the Photo Marketing
    Association International (PMA) Digital Imaging Survey, the majority of these owners would like to
    print more photos at home but feel the prints they are making don't look as good as lab prints. The
    survey also indicates that owners believe 4" x 6" printing at home is difficult, too time-consuming,
    and cost-prohibitive.
    Epson, the brand that professional photographers prefer 4-to-1 over any other printer brand,
    specifically designed PictureMate to break down the photo printing barriers for the amateur digital
    camera consumer. Now even non-technical consumers can very easily print beautiful borderless, labquality
    4" x 6" photos for only 29 cents per print on average comparable to the most affordable
    photo labs and about half the cost of prints from other 4" x 6" dedicated photo printers.2 Epson's
    innovative archival 6-color pigment printing technology ensures photos are as stunning and durable as
    professional prints so memories will last for generations.
    As a result, all digital camera owners will soon have the ideal printing solution for sharing
    their memories of everything from holidays and vacations to a baby's first birthday party, without any
    compromises and in the convenience of their own homes.
    "As with film cameras and now with digital cameras, men and women evenly share the
    picture taking responsibility, but studies indicate women generally are more interested in sharing and preserving those memories in print," said Fabia Ochoa, group product manager, Photo Imaging,
    Epson. "Women, therefore, are typically the Chief Memory Officer(TM) of the home. I happen to be
    one of them. However, digital camera owners told us they feel their home printers aren't meeting
    their basic photo printing needs. Yet they also feel that alternative solutions -- such as the photo lab,
    photo kiosks or online photo services -- are not as appealing as printing at home. Addressing the
    needs of ease, quality, durability and affordability, PictureMate becomes the Chief Memory Officer's
    ideal photo printing appliance for preserving and sharing memories."
    Convenient Print Pack
    Because saving time is a priority for the primary PictureMate customer, Epson is also
    introducing the PictureMate Print Pack. This economical and convenient combo-pack contains a
    PictureMate Photo Cartridge and PictureMate Photo Paper to print about 100 glossy 4" x 6" photos.
    "The PictureMate Print Pack eliminates the guesswork of trying to predict when to stock up
    on more paper or ink," Ochoa said.
    PictureMate Product Overview
    PictureMate was optimally designed as a printing accessory for any digital camera. No
    computer is required since it supports all popular memory cards, including SD(TM) memory
    card/MultiMediaCard(TM), Memory Stick(R), Compact Flash(TM) type I and II, SmartMedia(TM), Secure
    Digital, MMC, xD and Microdrive

  83. One Week a Month by Necromancyr · · Score: 4, Funny

    One week a month the thing prints out only in red. Total mess.

    1. Re:One Week a Month by vistic · · Score: 1

      ewwwwww... but i laughed.

    2. Re:One Week a Month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but what you seem to forget is that if you purchase the extended service plan, you are provided with pads so you can clean everything up.

  84. THAT is one by abolith · · Score: 1
    ugly-ass printer. and WTF is up with the friging Handle how often does one need to move a bloody printer??

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
  85. Re: Women and PC knowledge by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    At the risk of going out on a limb and getting labeled "sexist!", I'm going to (hesitatingly) share my own experiences.

    While it's true that, often, women complain about being treated as "unknowledgeable" or "stupid" by sales or tech. support staff - it's also true that generally, they're not very "technically inclined".

    I think what most women really want is to be able to go in and make a purchase, or ask questions, and not be made to *feel* stupid or unknowledgeable - no matter what their actual level of knowledge of the product is.

    In other words, don't talk down to them - or arbitrarily decide the woman "isn't interested" in a particular feature, when explaining a product.

    It's exceedingly rare when I run across a woman who honestly fully understands and cares about all the small, technical details of a product (such as a printer). That doesn't mean they want you to ignore having that discussion with them about the 1440DPI resolution capability of a new inkjet. It just means you're expected to explain what that really is ("DPI stands for dots per inch, and it refers to how many dots the inkjet printer can make on an inch of paper"), without acting like they're clueless for not knowing that in advance.

  86. woMAN by nick_davison · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...are we going to get the MAN'S printer??? Sexist bastards!

    OK, way too much time spent on unix today. My immediate thought was "There is no manual entry for 'printer'".

    However it does lead on to another thought - how to finally move Linux on to the average home desktop. Clearly it too needs to be more female-friendly. And I know just the way to do it...

    To go with the man command, there needs to be a woman command. It should pull the man entry, then pull google's "I'm feeling lucky" entries to replace every word in it. The end result is something that doesn't really tell you anything useful, takes way longer to get to the point than man would do, but gives the user a reassuring feeling that they've really shared with the command.

    Given all the creative types on slashdot, I'm sure we could have a script working within the afternoon, in all the main distributions by the end of the week and Microsoft finally bannished within the month.

    1. Re:woMAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your immediate thought means you are a retard.

      Did you know nobody cares?

      Did you know you're not funny?

      Just checking...

    2. Re:woMAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By all means be my guest and post your best attempt at humor here.

      (just checking...)

    3. Re:woMAN by yowi · · Score: 1

      Given all the creative types on slashdot, I'm sure we could have a script working within the afternoon, in all the main distributions by the end of the week and Microsoft finally bannished within the month.

      Team-8 should find it as easy as getting from A to 3.

      --
      Why don't the headlines ever read 'Psychic wins lottery'
  87. Try buying a serial cable... by jamonterrell · · Score: 3, Funny

    They are clearly labeled whether they are Female or Male on each end. Does it get more gender specific than that?

    --
    I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
  88. Freelancers by bsd4me · · Score: 1

    I know a bunch of short term freelancers who bring their own printers to job sites along with their laptops.

    --

    (S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))

    1. Re:Freelancers by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1
      I know a bunch of short term freelancers who bring their own printers to job sites along with their laptops.

      OK, so how many of them are women? Are they aware there are much smaller printers out there? Battery operated ones, even? This is obviously intended to be a desktop printer.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
  89. Well, I think its cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think its really cute when women try to operate machinery or electronics equipment. Its like you can see them reading off an internal script (press this button, wait for flash, press "left" until flashings stop...).

    Its gets frickin' hilarious if something doesn't work according to that script. Its like something out of an Indian call center.

  90. I think I understand by Nanite · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't think I have to mention how mental the Japanese are over cameras. Well, most (female) Japanese also like the photobooths that give you little stickers with your photo on them. I think this printer is designed for the average japanese schoolgirl who wants to take pictures with her friends and then print them out immediately, hence the handle to carry it with you. It doesn't even look like it prints on regular 8.5x11 paper, just 35mm print size photo paper. Add in the fact that it can print from a camera phone and you've got a device that would be a hit with ganguro girls everywhere.

    BTW, check out the pic of the girls of team 8, HOT! :)

    --
    God is real unless declared integer.
  91. Printer beating? by n()_cHIEFz · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that we can't beat the shit out of this printer to get it working again? Dammit, beating the crap out of my HP LJ 4 to make it work is one of the highlights of my work week, but I couldn't hit a girl printer.

    --
    -- Is it a right to remain ignorant? -- Calvin
  92. Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I can't be the only one that thought "cool, now I can print my own girlfriend"

    1. Re:Am I the only one? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      No, But I thought it looked like a "Little Playmate Cooler" by Igloo

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  93. That's not the best topology! by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's been shown that women in close confinement for long periods of time synchronize their cycles. It's best to partition your cluster into several seperate sub-clusters to better ensure fulltime availability.


    So I've been told...

    Q: "What's the penalty for bigamy?"
    A: "Having two wives."

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  94. The honest answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Are countertops designed around a woman's height?"

    Who cares?

    "Are doors built to accomodate pregnant women?"

    Who cares?

    "Are computers designed to accomodate women's cultural thought processes?"

    Who cares?

    See how easy life is when you try?

  95. Women make a printer and what do they do? by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    They make a handle, so it's easy to carry with you to to the bathroom to "freshen up". :-D

    Sorry, couldn't resist. But seriously. What is that about? I can't remember ever moving any printer of mine since the date of purchase. Only move them to the trash when they brake, or get replaced.

  96. Dont buy this printer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I made the mistake of buying one of these printers. In the store, it printed everything I asked. Now that I get it home it only prints twice a month if I'm lucky, even then it complains half the time

  97. Too many.. by djdanlib · · Score: 1

    Still too many buttons.

    I say it should just include one:

    The "Call stereotypical male computer geek" button.

    He-he-he! Okay, sorry.

  98. -1 sexist by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    and with such a stunning deluge of churlish "humour" about women it has suddenly become apparent to me why computer programmers can never get dates!

    1. Re:-1 sexist by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Troll
      Not with women that don't have a sense of humor about themselves or anything else....

      Lighten up....

      Man...seems you can't tell a joke about anyone these days without them getting all upset or PC about it.....with the possible exception of white males....they're open targets...

      Not being racist....just an observation.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:-1 sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Man...seems you can't tell a joke about anyone these days without them getting all upset or PC about it

      wow. i just went and looked at your "homepage" - which features sections like "ho' of the day" and "pimp slapped".

      that's real funny.

    3. Re:-1 sexist by Pandora's+Vox · · Score: 1

      to expand upon what an AC said about your comment, you shouldn't be the one sayng this, considering your link....

      but for serious. there's a big difference between a funny joke, and a bunch of stereotypes. learn it. frymaster is right - this is one of the reasons male nerds don't get dates.

      -Leigh

    4. Re:-1 sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that's not it, but nice try.

    5. Re:-1 sexist by Ironica · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not with women that don't have a sense of humor about themselves or anything else....

      "A sense of humor" and "offended by ridiculous stereotypes" are not mutually exclusive.

      However, "male chauvinist" and "getting the point" seem to be, in your case...

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    6. Re:-1 sexist by h00dLuM · · Score: 1

      thanks for making this point man, gotta make people aware of what is happening right now..

    7. Re:-1 sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score -1, pussy-whipped new man.

    8. Re:-1 sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it has suddenly become apparent to me why computer programmers can never get dates!

      By the way, just how slow is this printer?

    9. Re:-1 sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "A sense of humor" and "offended by ridiculous stereotypes" are not mutually exclusive.

      I would point out that while parent was a rather lame attempt at humour, anyone getting seriously offended by ridiculousness of stereotyping in case of a joke is most likely lacking in humor-sense department. That is, I can see someone getting offended by suckiness of the attempt, but not much else.

      I guess you could have said "good sense of humour" and "finding that 'joke' rather unfunny" are not mutually exclusive and I'd have agreed.

    10. Re:-1 sexist by Macgrrl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So... you guys can spout off about how 'all' women move furniture on a whim, don't understand technology, waste money on shoes and clothes, and don't 'get it' about guys and gadget (and can't follow basic instructions), but if we complain about it we have no sense of humour... Of women have a sense of humour - most of us end up dating/married to men. cheers

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    11. Re:-1 sexist by Ruliz+Galaxor · · Score: 1

      suddenly?!? when was the last time you were on /. again?

      sig(h)

    12. Re:-1 sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your comment makes me finally realize why so many men are sexist.

    13. Re:-1 sexist by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      Of women have a sense of humour - most of us end up dating/married to men.
      No offense intended and I do not want to sound patronizing but in modern western society dating is easier for women and marrying is easier for men.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    14. Re:-1 sexist by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Yeah..but, then again...stereotypes, didn't come up on their own. ALL of them are based on facts. No one just pulled them out of the clear blue sky.

      Like any other generalities..not everyone fits into them...but, many do.

      Many jokes ARE based on stereotypes...that's why everyone 'gets' them...I'm from the south, I hear jokes all the time about being uneducated..not wearing shoes..etc. I take it all in stride..I know I'm not in those categories...there are a bunch of people that do fit in that here. But, its just a joke...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re:-1 sexist by jdeking1 · · Score: 1

      But I do know a *gorgeous* female programmer. Unfortunately she's already married. Love to watch her take those walks around the parking lot while I'm on a smoke break, though. Mmmm ... long hair and nice body ... (drool)

      --
      "A generation which ignores history has no past and no future." -- Robert Heinlein
    16. Re:-1 sexist by Pandora's+Vox · · Score: 1

      i won't argue with you that stereotypes come from facts - the problem with them is that they take a few facts, without the context in which they exist, and reinforce them.

      if the stereotype is that women are bad with computers, and we continue to joke about it and make fun of women for it, we're not going to want to go into comp sci in droves very well, are we? playing on those stereotypes reinforces them, and does not consider the ways in which technology is gendered, and we're directed in subtle ways towards different things from a very early age.

      it can be "just a joke", and with the best intentions, but it's still part of the problem.

      *sighs*

      and come on. we need more geek girls. let's do the best we can to encourage more female geekyness!

      -Leigh

    17. Re:-1 sexist by Pandora's+Vox · · Score: 1

      note that i said male geeks - we of the fairer geeky sex have to beat male geeks off with sticks. ram works especially well. :-]

      -Leigh

  99. apple users should appreciate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the effeminate qualities infused in their own hardware.

  100. You know what ... by Sonic+McTails · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can remember target marketing directly at women as far back as the 70s. Lionel released it's "Lady Lionel" which had simpiler instructions, all pink and blue cars, and is now a very valuable collectors item. However, at the time, the Lady Lionel compeletely flopped and it did more harm them good to the Lionel train company.

    --
    This signature was left intentionally blank.
  101. men vs. women tech marketing by dten · · Score: 1

    In my experience, generally speaking, men are more functionally oriented, so they want to learn as much as they can about what they're buying so that they can make their own decision about what best fits their needs. Then they feel a sense of accomplishment, even more so if it's complex to operate, because they can put their knowledge to use.

    Women are more socially oriented, so they would rather have someone ask them what their needs are and then recommend the best product to them, without forcing them to learn all the details. Then they feel supported, especially if the item is very simple to use and does everything the salesperson/marketer said it would.

    Different marketing and design strategies are required to specifically target either gender.

  102. et tu?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, I'd like to see your sterotypical slashdotter fix the car or move a piano!

    1. Re:et tu?! by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      Depends, but a lot of geeks are interested in cars--it's the whole "ooh, I wonder how that works" gene that we seem to all have.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    2. Re:et tu?! by slaker · · Score: 1

      I probably couldn't fix the car, but I can tune or move a piano. So there. :P

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    3. Re:et tu?! by zaxus · · Score: 1

      But can you tuna fish?

      --
      /. zen: Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Beowulf clusters...
    4. Re:et tu?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm hungry.

  103. Oh the jokes by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Funny

    Printer for woman features

    • No error display: If you don't know what is wrong it certainly is not going to tell you.
    • When you insert a small usb plug in the usb hole it will show a gentle message informing you that size doesn't matter. Then runoff with the parallel cable.
    • A constant reminder to upgrade your lease to a purchase.

    Known problems:

    • Once a month the inkt is known to leak.
    • It will complain that you never ask it to print anything intresting anymore.
    • It will demand the finest in inks then only consume a tiny portion of it claiming it is on a diet.
    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  104. Fuck you by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    and your "women's cultural thought processes". Its because of sexist remarks like this that the myth of such gender-specific stuff continues to spread.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Fuck you by bluesangria · · Score: 1

      Although "women's cultural thought processes" sounds like typical politically correct tripe, there really DO exist gender-specific differences in the way men's and women's brains work. Here is a sample snippett from this article:

      Sex on the Brain

      Gur's discovery that females have about 15 to 20 percent more gray matter than males suddenly made sense of another major sex difference: Men, overall, have larger brains than women (their heads and bodies are larger), but the sexes score equally well on tests of intelligence.

      Gray matter, made up of the bodies of nerve cells and their connecting dendrites, is where the brain's heavy lifting is done. The female brain is more densely packed with neurons and dendrites, providing concentrated processing power--and more thought-linking capability.

      The larger male cranium is filled with more white matter and cerebrospinal fluid. "That fluid is probably helpful," says Gur, director of the Brain Behavior Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania. "It cushions the brain, and men are more likely to get their heads banged about."

      White matter, made of the long arms of neurons encased in a protective film of fat, helps distribute processing throughout the brain. It gives males superiority at spatial reasoning. White matter also carries fibers that inhibit "information spread" in the cortex. That allows a single-mindedness that spatial problems require, especially difficult ones. The harder a spatial task, Gur finds, the more circumscribed the right-sided brain activation in males, but not in females. The white matter advantage of males, he believes, suppresses activation of areas that could interfere with work.

      The white matter in women's brains is concentrated in the corpus callosum, which links the brain's hemispheres, and enables the right side of the brain to pitch in on language tasks. The more difficult the verbal task, the more global the neural participation required--a response that's stronger in females.

      Women have another heady advantage--faster blood flow to the brain, which offsets the cognitive effects of aging. Men lose more brain tissue with age, especially in the left frontal cortex, the part of the brain that thinks about consequences and provides self-control.

      "You can see the tissue loss by age 45, and that may explain why midlife crisis is harder on men," says Gur. "Men have the same impulses but they lose the ability to consider long-term consequences."


      Sexism is not the attempt to quantify actual differences in men and women. Rather, it's the inability to change your ideas when confronted with overwhelming evidence to the opposite of your ideas.

      blue

  105. About the same time when we get by melted · · Score: 1

    "White channel" on TV. Black channel is allowed, white channel would be a no-no and perceived as racist.

    1. Re:About the same time when we get by p4ul13 · · Score: 1

      It's called The Nashville Network (Or was anyway)

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    2. Re:About the same time when we get by Dever · · Score: 1


      excluding the WB, BET etc...all the other channels are white channels.
      does the sea of white on the screen somehow not magically reach your eyes? The only reason that BET and the few others exist, is because there already are a hundred or so white channels.

      they're just called AmericanTelevision instead.

      --
      - I'd prefer not to.
    3. Re:About the same time when we get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called FOX News

  106. And the cartridges are ribbed... by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

    for her pleasure

  107. Now for the guys... by Mr.+Certainly · · Score: 0

    Now we need one that looks and sounds like a Harley... But what do I know? If it sells, it sells. Great for the slagging tech industry. Can I interest any of the ladies in a pink fuzzy case for a PDA?

  108. How about by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1

    them just making easier manuals or user interfaces : So -both- sexes won't have to figure how a printer (or insert any other hardware) works properly.

  109. Re:Four days a month by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    it stops working and gives you nothing but attitude.

    Sounds like both genders of users, froma Tech Support point of view.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  110. Difference in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think a lot of you are missing the point. Obviously, marketing something like this in the US for women WOULD be a stupid idea. However, in Japan it is not actually that bad of an idea. Basically you have to consider two things:

    1) It DOES have a handle. The cell phone use in Japan is something quite out of this world. Everyone has one, everyone uses one -- especially teenage girls. The main use of these telephones is not actually for talking either. There is a lot of text messaging and picture taking going on. Not only that, but the new cell phones are basically the same quality as digital cameras. So, with a handle, I could very easily see people carrying around a printer to give photos to friends. Internet access is just not that common over there.

    2) Women are starting to be seen as a huge powerhouse in Japan. There still exists lots of gender bias, but recently (the last few years) women in Japan are starting to be looked at by businesses. With something being marketed at women, it probably has a higher chance of success compared to something just being marketed to everyone.

    If the price is kept low enough, this could very well become something a lot of girls buy, or get as presents for Christmas to use with friends. Maybe as some kind of option for the purikura style of pictures.

  111. That, ADMIRAL to you, punk! by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "The first people to get involved in computers were men."

    WHAT THE FUCK are you talking about, you young whelp?!!!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:That, ADMIRAL to you, punk! by Miriku+chan · · Score: 1

      style and finesse on that one =)

      --
      shaolin punk, activist post-industrial
    2. Re:That, ADMIRAL to you, punk! by ipxodi · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      load "windows7" ,8,1
    3. Re:That, ADMIRAL to you, punk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somewhere, someone always managed to come up with a rare exception - that typically serves to prove the rule.

    4. Re:That, ADMIRAL to you, punk! by BaronAaron · · Score: 1

      Wow, she invented the freaking COMPILER!!

      Probably while at sea, under bombardment from Nazi warships, and with one hand tied behind her back.. ;-)

      I like her.. :-)

    5. Re:That, ADMIRAL to you, punk! by n3tkUt · · Score: 1

      Cheers Thud457, glad somebody remembered her.

      Unless memory fails me; Grace Murray came up with the term "BUG" in the sense that we use it today when referring to software or systems. Except in her time it really was a "bug" in the system (moths I think). Huge systems that took up whole buildings, we could have easily ended up with: "that old win98 box has a bunch of buffalo's in it"

      ...google... a-hah! Here's a link to that info. -whew, no memory errors.

      A lot of ignorant sexism in this thread, I like to think Slashdot posters and readers are more evolved than that, heh.
      Take a trip to the local computer museum if you still underestimate the role women have played in the evolution of computers -you might be suprised how great an influence they were and still are.

    6. Re:That, ADMIRAL to you, punk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just had a second thought here... 80-90% of my clients are women!!! So's my mom! And my girlfirend (nobody will believe that part). Wow, women are cool.

    7. Re:That, ADMIRAL to you, punk! by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      There've been people doing this earlier, kids.

    8. Re:That, ADMIRAL to you, punk! by ethx1 · · Score: 1

      Good. I was going to post about Lady Lovelace. You beat me to it. ;)

    9. Re:That, ADMIRAL to you, punk! by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      and with one hand tied behind her back.. ;-)

      Kinky!

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    10. Re:That, ADMIRAL to you, punk! by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1
      "The first people to get involved in computers were men."

      You don't say!

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    11. Re:That, ADMIRAL to you, punk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ada Lovelace's depiction as a primordial computer expert is largely a myth.

      She was rich, popular and a generous patron for Babbage, who indulged her by taking whimsical chatter seriously. Historians have discovered that the majority of the writing attributed to her was actual other's speech she transcribed.

      Ada was always technically subservient to males. Just like the current stereotypes, a male did the actual creation but let a female handle the PR.

    12. Re:That, ADMIRAL to you, punk! by OldSchoolNapster · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was talking about the ~80% of CS students who are male. Or maybe he was talking about these guys.

  112. It's bad enough.... by Flavius+Stilicho · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...That we now have mice with no balls. Printers are tempermental enough, damn it! ;)

  113. Impressive, two birds with one stone by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Epson has managed to be both Sexist and Racist in a single promotion.

    A printer for women, and targetted at the Japanese?

    So first they are implying that women can't figure out their original crappy Stylus's, and especially their Japanese customers?

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  114. But if you do... by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Funny
    I dunno if you should have so many mod points for that one... it was just too damn easy... Its like trying to hit the ground with a dart... you'll never miss.

    But if you do aim at the ground and miss, you just learned how to fly. Or, I guess the dart did. Whatever.

    1. Re:But if you do... by p4ul13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The trick there is to get distracted at just the right moment.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    2. Re:But if you do... by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

      *smacks head* Grr... what movie is that from? I can't remember for the life of me...

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
    3. Re:But if you do... by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Grr... what movie is that from?

      It's not from a movie... yet.

      The answer is 42. Maybe not to your question, but to *the* question.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    4. Re:But if you do... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      If they make Book Four into a movie, the producers will be the first ones against the wall when the revolution comes.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    5. Re:But if you do... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      actually there already is a HHGttG movie out, it is old , long, and exactly how not to make a movie (4-5 hours long IIRC and it is almos line-for-line out of the books)

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    6. Re:But if you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of the BBC adaptation, I think.

    7. Re:But if you do... by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah. Hitchhiker's. Duh.

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
    8. Re:But if you do... by Ironica · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of the BBC adaptation, I think.

      Yep, pretty sure he is...

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    9. Re:But if you do... by $rtbl_this · · Score: 1

      That would be the TV series, not a film.

      --
      "Are you being weird, or sarcastic?" said Emma. I said I didn't know because I get the two feelings mixed up.
    10. Re:But if you do... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Like seeing someone throwing dart at you before you fail to miss the ground.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  115. I prefer to think.. by nathan+s · · Score: 3, Funny

    that all people lack technical proficiency. This allows me to be pleasantly surprised, rather than disappointed, when I find out that the support technician on the other end actually knows how to turn his/her _own_ computer on, and that no, it really isn't a drink holder.:-P

  116. Damn headlines by redNuht · · Score: 1

    I thought it would print females...

  117. very nicely said by abhisarda · · Score: 2, Funny

    This gender specific stuff is idiotic. Printers for women only? What are they going to do?
    Print on politically correct 6 by 8 inches paper?
    Each printout will have a pink boundary?
    It will be tuned to your biological clock and avoid printing in red for a few days?
    Photos containing photos of violence, guns etc will be left out like that currency thing?
    This printer can fit in your handbag you purchased for 1200 from prada?
    If you're ugly, will it make you look good?
    Epson's next going to come out with wood color printers that look like ammo boxes for the guys?
    I mean wtf is this?

    1. Re:very nicely said by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Epson's next going to come out with wood color printers that look like ammo boxes for the guys?

      How about a printer shaped like a pair of boobs?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  118. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPods are for fags.

  119. Re:The other punchline by BeerCat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So I've been told...
    Q: "What's the penalty for bigamy?"
    A: "Having two wives."

    Other A: "Two mothers in law"

    Still a pathetic joke, though

    --
    "She's furniture with a pulse"
  120. Finally a working printer by bowties_rule · · Score: 1

    Finally a printer that will work with having to be bribed, it will continue to work during a sporting event. No more lost print jobs (the printer will actually ask for directions). But the best feature--will automatically put the "lid" down after changing an ink cartridge

  121. It's not a printer this woman wants by eris_crow · · Score: 1

    The article doesn't really say what it is about this printer that makes it "for women", but maybe the plugs for all the external devices is the key. It doesn't work for me though. I've got no cell phone, no digital camera, and soon I'll have no TV either. The handle is hokey, the top of the printer is rounded, so you can't stack anything on it.

    I'll stick with my HP 520. It's old and it's slow, but it's a solid piece of well designed and functional equipment, and that's what this woman cares about: quality engineering. I'll give it up when it dies, which at this rate looks like about 2125.

  122. washing machine by BenJaminus · · Score: 1

    Superbly sensible concept. I think they should do the opposite to other devices that are already running on female logic such as the washing machine (what on earth is a delicates pre-wash anyway?)

  123. Re: Women and PC knowledge by beeplet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sure this does happen, but I don't think it's a reflection of women having inherently less technical ability than men. I would see it more that women are less likely to feel embarrassed about asking questions, whereas a man might research his purchase beforehand just to avoid looking clueless in the store.

  124. The laptop version already exists! by NineNine · · Score: 1
  125. Other differences to design for by wytcld · · Score: 1

    Surely there are differences between cultural cognitive style that are larger than the differences between men and women of the same culture. So we have for instance pickup trucks designed for cowboys and cowgirls - same trucks, different color schemes - which are different from the SUVs designed for suburban breeders, etc.

    So, printers designed for women. How about marketing printers designed for blacks with their special cognitive needs (and if they aren't special, why are blacks so disproportionately in special ed?*). After all, if the (woman) Secretary of Education in Georgia can take the word "evolution" out of textbooks to suit the special cognitive needs of Southerners* (although she more recently bowed to pressure and allowed the word back in) - which is kind of like welding that car's hood shut so the women won't be bothered by all those things inside - why don't we just pander to every stereotype (especially the ones supported by survey data) that correspond to cultural groups? Why limit it to sex?

    *Disclaimer: This is humor. I neither believe that blacks have special cognitive needs, nor that more than a few percent of any population should be in special ed (it's approaching 30% in my mostly-white town - ridiculous). I do however believe most Southerners need remedial education in evolution (which is borne out by surveys).

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  126. And one for men?-Tendon-cies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Those mofos weight 50 pounds and are nearly indestructible."

    Sadly my foot wasn't.

  127. Designed for women. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will actually consider buying this printer. Many scoff at the idea of a feminized product but it has a few key points. One is the ease of use. I don't want to get into a discussion about whether it is appropriate to call an intuitive interface girly. All I want to do it plug the printer in and for it to work. Screw configuring all the drivers and other features. The other reason is that I am tried of having soul-sucking equipment to look at. Cubicle decorations not withstanding, most offices have the flavor and appeal of gruel.

    Anyways, I can't say I agree with the idea of having to make a female printer to get those two things but I can say that I those two items are important to me.

    As long as the handle folds away neatly then I don't see what's the fuss. Think of it being along the same lines as the 5+ different compilers that come with a linux distro. You may not use all of them but if you do need to use them you are glad they are there.

  128. and furthermore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    geeze, I didn't realize the Navy had a destroyer named after her.

    Unfortunately, I can't find a bio from the offical US Navy site.

  129. Would that mean... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

    that a printer designed for lesbians could never be connected?

    Yeah, yeah....

    -1, stupid fscking politically incorrect post....

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    1. Re:Would that mean... by Delta+Vel · · Score: 1

      Sure it could--you'd just have to buy an extra piece: the DLD08 "cable." And when you're done printing, you put it back in the drawer.

      And I'm a bisexual woman, so I would know.

      --
      It's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye. Then it's fun and games without depth perception.
  130. A Picture's Worth a Thousand Words... by patricksevenlee · · Score: 1
  131. You forgot the accessory by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Instead of a shredder, you can get an optional attachment that takes a piece of paper, crumples it up in a ball, and flings it in the air where a FOUR FOOT HIGH JET OF FLAME SHOOTING FROM THE PRINTER consumes it.

    Now that's a printer I would pay some money for!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  132. Good, excellent by zpok · · Score: 1

    While I'm wary of stereotyping, it's a good experiment to have all-woman design teams and to have a naive targeting like this.

    If the majority of men finally will speak out and say "Hey! We don't enjoy this technical bullshit either!" then we can wrap up the experiment and target "people who don't enjoy technical bullshit".

    I like my "equipment" simple but powerful. Think women are impressed if you can only perform by waving a manual around?

    eheheheh, sexual joke, eheheheheh... *sigh* man I feel old.

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
  133. Awww!!! by gt25500 · · Score: 1

    How cute! It has a little handle for when I take it to a picnic.

    --
    _________ Help me get a PSP!
  134. I need to ask...Shakey tool usage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Haha, have you seen most women try to operate hardware, lol!"

    They never seem to have any trouble with the vibrators.

  135. bah by TechniMyoko · · Score: 0

    As a woman, I say these women are idiots. I can use a normal printer, and never once thought it was made specifically for men. If you cant use a normal printer cause its made by men, you are way to sexist

    1. Re:bah by Mongo222 · · Score: 1

      Thank you. You saved me the time of typing the same thing, and I'm a guy. How is it that I meet so many smart people in my life, but the human race as a whole is dumber than a box of rocks?

  136. First actual case of bug being found. by milsim · · Score: 2, Informative

    The article doesn't mention that Hopper was the first person to find a 'bug' - http://www.jamesshuggins.com/h/tek1/first_computer _bug.htm Also we ought to mention Ada Lovelace - Enchantress of Numbers, Founder of Scientific Computing, whoe helped Babbage with the Analytical Machine.

  137. Nothing new... by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

    Guys at the computer lab used to print females all the time, even way back in the early '90s. Especially when they got that alt.binaries feed.

    Or does this one actually print real females?

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
  138. What I would appreciate is not a handle... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    but marked "lift points". You know, portals with hand grips near the base of the unit that are clearly marked (so you don't break it by holding it in the wrong place)

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  139. Misleading article title!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn! At reading "Epson's Female Printer" I thought it would be a quantum leap like improvement of this innovation. Then I realized it is just a printer for women and not to print women.

    Damn you, slashdot!

  140. Some features seem kind of useful by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some of the features everyone seems off about strike me as kind of useful.

    To start with, the handle. I could actually see a lot of use for this myself - I am not printing often, and it would be nice to make the printer easier to tuck out of the way. Also, I have a laptop and it would be nice to sit out on the porch with a printer at times. The actual device looks about twice as big as I would like for such use though (if that's an 8x11 sheet of paper in the press photo).

    The second thing I kind of like is the video. It's nice to have a last minute visual confirmation of exactly what the printer is about to do. I didn't read the whole thing but it would be even better if it auto-detected paper sizes loaded to provide a helpful warning it was going to crop.

    The single ink cartridge is still a bad idea though, even though it's simpler... I don't know. I think more people would have a problem with the cost than figuring out which ink cart needs to go I know, you could hit a button and it would print out a slip telling you exactly what ink carts to buy so you could take it to a store and hand it to a clerk. That would be useful anyway, as even with one cart it can be tricky knowing which thing to buy when you get to the store. I always forgot which exact model of Epson Stylus Photo I had (was it the 700 or 750?) which was kin dof annoying, and I was trying to be careful.

    I do agree though that the idea of a "Womens Printer" is pretty stupid, just make a printer that's easier for everyone to use and you will have a lot of happy customers.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  141. When are people going to learn...Toiletries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "When are people going to learn that solving problems with attidudes towards women (for example in computer shops, car mechanics etc) are not going to be improved by having special "female" versions of things?"

    Well, there goes the "feminine aids" market.

    "Now here's a suggestion: why not make it easy for everyone to use? Or is that just too logical?"

    [Looks uncertainly at a box of tampons]

  142. Since you brought it up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    BUENOS DIAS!!

    Jou have yust received a mehican puter birus!!!!!

    Since we not so technologically adbanced in mehico, dis is a manual birus.

    Please delete all the files on jour hard drive jourself and send this e-mail to eberyone jou know.

    Tan jou por yelping me.

    Julio Manuel Jose Rodirguez Garcia
    MEXICAN HACKER

  143. women printer by shaark78 · · Score: 0

    it prints out blowup dolls?

  144. misleading article title... by phyruxus · · Score: 5, Funny
    rrr... with all the recent hoop-la about 3d printers and advanced robotics, I misinterpreted the title... "Epson's Female Printer"... not as a printer *for* females, but *of* females.

    Oh well, back to cryo-sleep until it all comes together. ;)

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  145. Family Guy semi-reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Female Printer? Well I guess that means it'll only print in red for a few days every month.

  146. Designed by dumb women, for dumb [wo]men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proof:
    > Its an inkjet style printer, and prints using one ink cartridge with 6 colors.

    Didn't Team8 ever take any clues from Canon!? The 3-colour cartridges + 'smart' chip are nothing but a ripoff tactic to get people to pay for overpriced cartridges!!! As if that isn't dumb enough, Team8 decides to make the cartridge 6 colours! If that's what what Epson mean by respecting fellow women, you can guess what do other Epson printers mean for them.

  147. Troubleshooting the printer by genkael · · Score: 1

    I was just reading the Troubleshooting Section of the manual and came across this error "Out of paper light is flashing". Here's the fix: "Nag your husband, boyfriend, or SO and remind him that the roll must go on the TP holder a specific way, and not on the counter until the light goes off."

    --
    GeneralKael -- Slacker Extraordinaire
  148. It's just a pretty normal kind printer ... by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

    ... Hiding in a sewing machine case.

    Ugly lump of a thing waiting to go down the annals of time.
    Nothing new, move along now.

  149. Consider the source by SpamJunkie · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen anyone mention the source of the article as being japanese, unless they've been modded down.

    Japanese culture has an entirely different structure than North American or European. This is especially true for women. I think a big part of the significance of this announcement is that there is an all-women team of engineers in Japan.

    I have doubts that this product will even be considered for any markets outside Japan.

  150. My printer is French! by supertbone · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    All it does is complain and send out white sheets.

  151. Ada Byron? by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1
    The first computer programmer was a woman. Look it up if you don't believe me.

    If you're talking about Ada Byron, Lady Lovelace, her claim to be "the first programmer" is badly exaggerated. The machine with which she was familiar with Babbage's Analytical Engine, which was never built.



    If you're talking about Admiral Grace Hopper, then all homage to her for cool, but she was hardly the first programmer.

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    1. Re:Ada Byron? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Parts of the analytic engine were built, and the whole, if completed, would have worked (and unlike the electrical-relay computer with the first "bug", any "bugs" would have been ground to dust :-)

      Just because you don't have access to the hardware doesn't mean you can't write the program. That's how I learned Fortran and COBOL. I'm sure other /.ers have similar experiences.

    2. Re:Ada Byron? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      don't have access to the hardware doesn't mean you can't write the program

      But Ada never wrote a program. Occasionally Babbage would walk her through the steps to create a hypothetical program, but she was no more a programmer than Plato's Meno was a mathematician.

  152. Please read your own comments by ExistentialFeline · · Score: 1

    Guys,
    If after reading all the comments posted here, you cannot understand why more women do not care to spend time learning about technology, you're pretty $%$%$# stupid for smart people. If someone bleeding 5/28 days out of the month means that they cannot understand technology I'm missing some correlation here.

  153. Ink Cartridge Ripoff! by Cbs228 · · Score: 1

    From The Article: It's an inkjet style printer, and prints using one ink cartridge with 6 colors (emph. added).

    Inkjet printers, due to how the printing process works, do not use the different colors of ink at the same rate. If your ink cartridges contain more than one color, the entire cartridge must be replaced when one color runs out even though there is still some useable ink left in the cartridge. This printer will most likely be even more of an ink ripoff than most of the inkjets in the market today.

    --
    At our school, we don't earn a degree when we graduate—we earn pi/180 radians
    1. Re:Ink Cartridge Ripoff! by RoyalCheese · · Score: 1

      Yes very true.. I always recommend people buy inkjets with separate colour cartridges. I also always suggest they consider the COST of the cartridges. (HP about 25 each, Canon about 10 each - UK prices at my local shop)

  154. When men design computers for women by garfield1979 · · Score: 1

    When a man designs a computer for women

    Whats next, a woman designing a computer for men ?

  155. Bluetooth is an option? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Couldn't help but note that that old dying technology Bluetooth is an option. ;-)

    Bluetooth is dying!

    Ok, you mod bastards, now you can go ahead with your "-1, off-topic". ;-)

  156. No, I was talking about a channel by melted · · Score: 1

    that SPECIFICALLY shows only white people (99%), clearly states that it only shows white people, and doesn't give a shit about national minorities.

    Or a channel that only has shows for men (no, not sex related), calls women bitches, gays - fags, and boosts macho side of male personality.

    Would something like this be protected by the 1st ammendment?

  157. But you forget by Kelz · · Score: 1

    There is no dart.

  158. Volvo violates privacy rights, anticompetitive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Volvo service staff are the only ones who ever need to access the engine, when the time comes for routine service.

    It's all baloney. Volvo isn't the only one who know cars, and nobody should buy a car that totally relies on any single manufacturer for parts and services. Having one M$ is bad enough.

    > When service is due, the car automatically notifies a service centre of your choice. The service centre then suggests an appointment time which you can confirm or reject.

    How do I know the car isn't sending what isn't suppose to, such as where I drive and how much do I drive? And for that matter, the signals are probably not encrypted, allowing such information to fall into the hands of stalkers and sexual predators!

    Given concept cars are usually nothing but a show off piece, the idea of 'car made for and by women' sounds nothing more than dumb marketing slogan that doesn't really address women needs.

    1. Re:Volvo violates privacy rights, anticompetitive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are other things the Volvo women overlooked too:

      Gull wing doors can potentially hitting other cars, causing YCC owners to bear unnecessary damages versus those with more conventional cars.

      > The car is finished in Easy-Clean paint. This behaves rather like the coating on a non-stick pan - dirt finds it very hard to cling on in the first place and, if it does, it washes off very easily. The interchangeable seat covers and carpets are also washable.

      For a high end car such as YCC, I would expect something like LINE-X as a base coat for chassis, just in case some other gulf winged car doors knock YCC from the side.

      > The YCC has a six-speed Powershift gearbox. You can either choose the fully automatic mode, or use the controls on the steering column to change gear.

      What happened to continuously variable transmission? After all, 2004 Audi A6 has it, and the CVT model rated to 220hp. BTW, YCC has 160 kiloWatt (214.563534hp) engine.

  159. Re: by Rabscuttle · · Score: 0

    Imagine...a Beowulf cluster of these!

  160. Sexist by fsterman · · Score: 1

    First of all why do "women" need "easier to use" printers, they can be just as smart as men. Secondly doesn't everyone need an easier to use printer?

    --
    Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
  161. Designed by Mothers?-Kid tested. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK. Serious ideas.

    "I would shell out some serious bucks for a printer that had a super-easy-to-clean paper path, that was liquid resistant (ever try to get orange juice or peanut butter out of a laser printer?!!) with liquid resistant ink."

    Imagine a large horizontal cylinder done in matte chrome with black endcaps mounted to a flat base. Roll paper comes in a cartridge that's installed through one of the endcaps[1]. There's only a covered slot that the paper comes out. Retractable power cord. Wireless comunications to computer. Controls locked behind a thumbprint controlled door.

    [1] The ink cartridges install through the same opening and plug in, or made part of the paper cartridge. Same if it's a laser printer.

    "Hrm... also maybe retractable cords, bluetooth to the computer, anything else that can keep kids from getting tangled in the wire jungle at the back of a PC."

    Ever seen an Apple? All people really need on the desktop is display (wireless), keyboard (same), and input/output devices (plug into either one, or anywere else).

    Client/server can apply to a home based setup too.
    High speed connection between everything and the camcorder plugs into the firewire "anywere". Same with USB. Think outside the box, people.

  162. Bad for the industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then it'll cut your nuts off while you sleep :)

    No, but seriously. This is really bad to see. There are enough gimmicks in the printer market already. Printers need to PRINT. Gimmicks just serve to distract from functionality.

  163. Developers please by ExistentialFeline · · Score: 1

    Could we have some input from the all female development staff as to why they made this product? I want to know!
    All the anti-women comments on here are neglecting the fact that there were women who knew enough to design the product.

  164. And women should learn to do this too... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    because the sales guy in the store doesn't know either (usually), so the guys are less likely to get ripped off in this respect.

    I learned this really quick. No matter what the sex, the salesperson still makes things up to sound helpful and push the sale.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  165. In the mood... by fragbait · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I'm in the mood to print something, its print mechanism aches.

    When it is in the mood, it takes forever to get warmed up. When it doesn't successfully print something, it's my fault no matter how long I spend trying to get it to print. Occasionally, it tries to fake printing.

    Watch out for a paper jam! That takes months to work its way out....

    -fragbait

  166. In Beetles by identity0 · · Score: 1

    I hate sexist jokes as much as any guy can, but DEAR GOD, I hope that's supposed to be THE GUY talking, not the girl...

    I know a guy who's really desperate and I told him I would let him have you...

    *shudder*

    1. Re:In Beetles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate sexist jokes as much as any guy can, but DEAR GOD

      Yes, homophobia is far more fun than sexism!

  167. First currency-detecting print drivers... by noidentity · · Score: 1

    ...now a printer that puts clothes on pr0n when it's printed out!

    1. Re:First currency-detecting print drivers... by RoyalCheese · · Score: 1

      Or maybe makes penises look bigger when they are printed off the internet..

  168. not the first time by kertong · · Score: 1

    If I recall correctly, the 96-ish and up Ford Taurus vehicles were designed by a team of only women.

    I mean, look at it.. it looks like a kotex pad on wheels!

  169. Why does a printer need a handle? by finelinebob · · Score: 2, Funny

    To take it to Best Buy, you insensitive clod! Didn't you read the parent post?!

  170. mobile phone link is key... by gpvillamil · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, this printer makes a great deal of sense in a Japanese context. Its mission in life is to connect to mobile phones, which are overwhelmingly used by and marketed to young women in Japan. (Girl's mobile phone culture is very strange and heavily developed - google "gyarumoji").

    Collecting photos of each other is a major social pastime for young Japanese women, there are a number of businesses specialized in this such as the print clubs. Increasingly, print shops are offering printouts from mobile phones. The Epson product seems designed as something that can be taken along on an outing to make prints immediately.

    A lot of Japanese electronics for home use are designed to be stored when not in use - so portability, compactness, etc. are important. The concept of a dedicated home office or computer desk is relatively rare.

    What Epson has done is design a product very specifically focused on the lifestyle of young keitai girls. These girls are usually *very* tech savvy. So the product is not necessarily "dumbed down", but with a feature set adapted to their needs.

  171. Completely misses the point!-Career slide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They're employed there because they're willing to work for minimum wage."

    Don't worry the outsourcing phenomenon should start improving this demographic.

    1. Re:Completely misses the point!-Career slide. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This is starting to get off-topic, but I wonder about that. I think some technical people might go into these jobs, but not a whole lot since they pay so poorly, and technical people are capable of doing other things (and aren't really good at sales anyway). I think the vast majority of them will end up going into other careers, probably including a lot of trades jobs. Most trades jobs pay better than IT and engineering jobs anyway, and are more stable too.

      Eventually, however, I think the country may be headed for economic collapse, unless we use the military to build a Nazi Germany-like war machine to keep the economy going. If we just outsource all manufacturing and engineering jobs, we'll just be left with a country full of lawyers, investors, and servicepeople. If the country doesn't actually produce anything of value that can be used to trade with other countries, then how will the economy survive? I really don't see how an economy can be viable in the long term when the whole economy consists of people shuffling money around in the stock market and in lawsuits.

  172. Colorio ...almost a great name by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Colorio ...almost a great name... but a little too close to Cholera for English speakers.

    It does remind me of the name 'Infolio'; which was a pen-tablet computer made by PI Systems of Portland Oregon in the early 1990s. This company disappeared when the entire first generation tablet computer sank in the early 1990s, taking this product name with it.

    'Infolio' is a perfect name for a tech product. It is beautiful to hear and fun to say.

    What does happen to excellent marketing ideas and strategies when the start-up that conceived them goes under? Can they be bought and reused? Do they become available for reuse after the start-up that developed them has been gone for ten years?

  173. I Wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it costs 10x more like woman's clothes do?

  174. *sigh* by JLSigman · · Score: 1

    Thanks, Epson, for promoting stereotypes. I appreciate it so much...

    --
    -jls
    Techno-pagan
  175. Let me guess..... by kidgenius · · Score: 1

    On this one, the lid is glued shut, so when you have a paper jam or run out of ink, it's time for a new printer! :-D

  176. Too bad my mom just bought a Canon i80. by Gldm · · Score: 1

    My 55 year old mother is about the most non-technical user you can find. Yet she still knows how to comparison shop and ask the right questions. She read up on the subject and learned what resolution was, and picked the printer because 1: it worked directly with her canon digital camera without software and 2: it was small, and she plans to take it when travelling to print copies of pictures for friends.

    She doesn't use her computer for much, but she's smart enough to go clicking around when she forgets how to do something like stream audio, and often she figures it out.

    My father on the other hand, is way smarter than my mother. But he's a worse computer user. He writes down step by step procedures for everything and if anything changes or he doesn't recognize something he freezes up and starts yelling at me to come help him. Even for simple things like the default save directory changing in a program. He's terrified to try and experiment with anything because he thinks he'll somehow "break" the computer in such a way that it won't be fixable.

    If this plan of Epson's works more power to them but I just don't see a need for female-specific hardware. As far as I know they're fine with buying the hardware we have now. Though I do wish some niche markets would be more thoroughly explored like highend wireless optical mice for left handed users.

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  177. Look at BET by zakezuke · · Score: 1


    "Mom, can we have some Stove Top Corn Bread?"

    Not that I would buy Stove Top products, but it seems odd that the only network who carried their corn bread comercials was BET. While corn bread is soul food... it seems to be just a popular dish all over america.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  178. You're missing something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ads for printers now (in the mainstream press) don't have much in the way of specs as it is.

    And as for shampoos and cosmetics, they DO have specs. Not the low end cheapo stuff as much, but you have the information as to what the shampoo is supposed to do, what ingredients are in it, what it was tested on (since people do care if their products were tested on animals), and so on.

    It's all a matter of what you are interested in -- because I care about photography, I could probably rattle off the specs of many cameras and the pros and cons of all of them. Some can't. I could tell you which moisturizer is best, because I've been actively researching switching brands. But ask me which distro of Linux to use? Forget it. I don't use it, I have no need for it, why bother learning about it? Save my brain cells for important things like cameras, moisturizers, power tools, produce. Things I need.

  179. I do. Are you saying that the female branded shampoos are nto insulting? You don't find the Idea that women are more concerned with their apperance more than anything else insulting? The coperate shills brainwashing of little girls into believing the most important decision of their day is the pattern on their socks doesn't bother you? I guess I just don't understand most people.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  180. I don't find this surprising at all by Polyhazard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This thing is about marketing, period.

    We have all grown up in a society where products are gender-coded from a very young age.

    Just think about children's toys with a "boy" model and the "girl" model are exactly the same, except one is pink and the other is red or blue.

    Or Gameboy vs Gamegirl.

    Seems to me that this a is just a variation on that.

  181. Like Furniture by wthynot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why does a printer need a carrying handle? How often do you move a printer?

    Believe me, make it easy to move, and women will move it. Functionality? Bah! There will come a day--and only females know which day that will be--when it has simply been in the same spot too long and must be moved immediately. Look at furniture, for instance. I don't know what great, catastrophic, disaster we are being saved from, but for some reason when a woman has the revelation that "the day" has come, it's an emergency. And it is. Because if you don't help her realize the destiny of every piece of furniture in the house--and I don't care if she wants you to move the dining table so the kids have to crawl under it to get to their seats--she's going to have a splitting headache that will last until you do.

    1. Re:Like Furniture by tedgyz · · Score: 1

      No kidding man. What is it with the need for females to move things around. It's as if the world will somehow stop turning if you don't cycle your furniture on a regular basis.

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    2. Re:Like Furniture by TheLink · · Score: 1

      How about you pretend that it's because they want to see you flex your muscles? ;)

      --
    3. Re:Like Furniture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe shes bored with the monotony that her life with you has become, and moving the funiture around (sad as this may sound) actually adds just enough spice and variety to her life to keep her from hanging herself.

      And why can't an "cute" car be a sound car? I personaly find the Toyota Camry "cute" and mine has 193K mile on it, of which half were put on it in NYC. (NYC is notorious for turning new cars into barely running rust buckets in a couple of years) I have not been anal about up keep either, yet it still runs like a champ and looks "cute".

    4. Re:Like Furniture by wthynot · · Score: 1

      Maybe shes bored with the monotony that her life with you has become, and moving the funiture around (sad as this may sound) actually adds just enough spice and variety to her life to keep her from hanging herself.

      Wow. I think you may have hit the nail on the head, depending on which week of the cycle we're talking about. But you wanna know my secret? Three words (apologies to Nike in advance): Just Do It. I don't need to understand her urge to play musical chairs with the...well....chairs any more than I need to understand why you think a Camry is "cute" (though the 193K miles does melt my icy heart somewhat). I just do it. I do what she says. At least in this situation. Ok, in most situations. Because it's not a matter understanding why, but of understanding that I cannot understand. But hey, if you're thinking it's some kind of one-way street, think again. She will return the favor when my Day comes. And just what "unreasonable" thing might I be whining for on that day? Well, I would explain, but I don't think you'd understand ;)

  182. How well will it iron my shirts? by RoyalCheese · · Score: 1

    This printer reminded me of a cartoon I saw which was titled, "Computer ergonomically designed for a woman" It consisted of a normal pc with an ironing board attachment. (okay maybe it was an elongated heat resistant mousmat, but it was designed to be used from the standing position and had an iron)

    1. Re:How well will it iron my shirts? by RoyalCheese · · Score: 1

      Oh, someone found a photo of something similar and urld it in their earlier postiing! Well done!

  183. Where do you guys shop? by blair1q · · Score: 1


    I could sell everyone here a new 4-function Winnebago with square wheels and a fahnestock clip on the ethernet port if this is how y'all perceive product marketing.

  184. How could this have even happened? by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2, Funny
  185. A port called Gen1t4ls" by Fullmetal+Edward · · Score: 1

    if it's a female printer is it going to check what gender we are? "Sorry you're not female, not removing sexual organs"

    --
    --- [Insert intresting Sig here]
  186. It's a freaking printer, okay! by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    Why does a printer need to be marketed towards women? Does no one see the inherent sexism in this? "Dense enough DPI for a man, but made for a woman..."

    Looking at the photo, it still has buttons, just like masculine printers. And it has a rounded plastic molding, just like masculine printers. And reading the blurb, it even has cartridges, just like a masculine printer. The only difference I could see was that it had a handle.

    I'm so glad I don't work for a company that divides up projects according to gender. "Oooh, better not give Holly the printer driver project, she's a woman! Put her on the team designing printer handles instead..."

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  187. No... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    ...But I did think "Oh god, here come the PMS jokes".

  188. Women Must Be Really Stupid by thelizman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    First Volvo proposes a car with the hood welded shut, and that rarely needs an oil change. Now Epson proposes a printer that is "easier for women to use". Why don't they just say "breasts lower IQ's" or "that's okay little lady, we know you can't read an owners manual".

    1. Re:Women Must Be Really Stupid by ViVeLaMe · · Score: 1

      hey thelizman!
      how are you doing?
      found those WoMD yet?
      or you're still looking?

      --
      i had a sig, once..
  189. I think you hit it on the head by serutan · · Score: 1

    The marketing, not the product, is what they are designing for women.

  190. Uneconomical by Snarfvs+Maximvs · · Score: 1

    One cartridge for 6 ink colors. Great. Now when she runs out of blue ink she just throws away the whole cartridge and buys a $new$ one.

    Actually, that's more of a male feature than a female feature. My wife's all big on conservation and recycling and stuff. I just chuck it all in the trash.

    On the other hand, I'm the cheap one.

    --
    -----------------------

    To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.

  191. Come on, be serious by wayne606 · · Score: 1

    All these dumb comments about "women's special needs" misses the point. The goal is to make something that's easy to use and not require a lot of fooling with to make it work as desired. Why not ask the opposite question: what's a "typical guy's printer"? If you make some overly broad sexist generalizations you would get: (1) doesn't connect with anything but a PC (who cares how hard it is to print photos from a camera, as long as there's some way to do it), (2) ugly (it's supposed to be functional not pretty), and (3) not ergonomic (we have big muscles for a reason - picking up awkwardly shaped boxes!).

    Now that I think about it, the printer and its basic approach reminds me of something closer to home - the iMac and all its iPeripherals. The designers of the iMac weren't afraid to make something easy to use and nice looking. Does that make it a "women's computer"? Let all the female graphic designers and interior decorators have their cute Apples with the colors and rounded edges, and give us manly hackers our plain beige boxes with Linux and Windows, or black angular laptops that weigh 10 pounds! And our hard to use and ugly printers so we can reaffirm our testosterone!

  192. Is it shaped like a cylinder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so they can dispense with reading the instructions?

  193. Heh heh heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not goin' there....

  194. I'm sorry, ... by Vincman · · Score: 1

    ...I may be looking at this from a man's perspective, but most printers are simple, non-complex machines with 1-5 buttons on average and a very straightforward manual and installation-procedure. The software to run it, however, is the one that preplexes most new and inexperienced users. That this would be a gender-issue is another ridiculous statement. It may very well be that some people prefer more style in their machinery at home, in which case the printer in question may have some appeal, but please don't tell me that it is more user-or genderfriendly.

  195. mirror? by period3 · · Score: 1

    Anyone have a mirror with a readable font?

  196. Need a lesbian adapter? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

    Of course all the printers so far have been male! The parallel port on the back of the computer is female, so it wouldn't work any other way! I guess this printer could work with a dongle, though.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  197. Female Apple? by slashdot4ever · · Score: 3, Funny

    Aparently Apple is releasing a new imac, specifically desinged for the ladies. Dont worry guys, there is one for us aswell. Here is the article

  198. uhh.. sexism? by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    looking from a male point of view on this in the defense of women.. isnt this somewhat sexist?

    even though it was done by women, isnt that very general to say?

    because they prolly got the most computer illiterate women they could find, and have them make a model that represents all women..

    this is much like volvo's car for women... that boils down to an almost useless, and even more annoying car.
    if my mom can do basic repairs on a ca, I dont think they need to block access so women dont bother their pretty heads over it.. and this.. bah.. it's another stupid marketing gimmick IMHO

  199. Re:STOP PRESSES by andy55 · · Score: 1

    WHAT THE FUCK are you talking about, you young whelp?!!!!

    STOP PRESSES: TECH ENTHSUIAST MAKES GENERAL STATEMENT OF FACT; OPPONENT OFFERS SINGLE EXCEPTION.

    Seriously, do you want to see a list of the hundred other (male) figures at this time in the field? The grandparent is right on.

  200. Re:STOP PRESSES by Jane_Dozey · · Score: 1

    There's no doubt that men are predominant in the technology field, but you really shouldn't just base your assumtions on those that got enough publicity to be remembered. There are thousends of unnamed people who have helped in the tech field (both male and female).

    --
    Silly rabbit
  201. Re:STOP PRESSES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    womyn don't do shit

  202. Don't buy pink! by BadCatRobot · · Score: 1

    I'd say stupid more than insulting. I'm female (and quite at home with equipment much more complex than a printer) and I figured out a long time ago I could get cheaper socks, shoes, etc. if I didn't buy the "pink" ones. I hate pink. (Marketers hate *me*.) I saw some idiotic "women friendly" hammers at a hardware store once. Yes, you guessed it. Pink handles. woo. That makes *all* the difference.

  203. All this hoopla and... by jwiegley · · Score: 1
    It's basically a purse.

    I mean its got a handle and looks like a purse. A printer for women = another purse.

    Actually, I can't say that I'm surprised by this.

    --
    I will never live for sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
  204. A printer being marketed at nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The printer software contains complex algorithms that use fuzzy logic to produce new original errors messages every week ...

  205. A printer being marketed at Germans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fiercely efficient, metallic exterior, won't let you cancel a job until it has completed 'zee order'

  206. Re:STOP PRESSES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, your time machine dropped you in the year 2004 not 1954!!! Calibrate your discombobulator so you don't end up in an era of evolved thinking and equality! ... or just wake the hell up bozo.

  207. A printer being marketed at Italians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks totally cool, flings out the paper at high speed in a random but creative direction, rusts pretty much straight away

  208. Maybe it has a market? by griffjon · · Score: 1

    What, is it a bit more... wobbly... than other printers?

    This could be the Rez of the printer world!

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  209. A printer being marketed at Spaniards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    doesn't print between the hours of 9am and midnight

  210. hmmm... by Palmedero · · Score: 1

    A printer designed mainly for women? I wonder how it would differ from a man printer? Maybe it only prints after you throw a hissy fit, kick the printer with a healed shoe, and yell "stupid machine!" Just a thought... Oh wait no... I know what it must do. It obviously must print documents without a user having to tell it to ahead of time. Could there be a secret compartment for tampons somewhere in this contraption? Hopefully the printer was designed to be too feminist... you might have to worry about it kneeing you in the balls everytime there is a paper jam!

  211. Stop the marketing weenies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will companies stop playing with slogans and focus on making technology products that are easy to use for all humans? And make them reliable, secure, etc. while they're at it.

    Oh, I forgot: that's too hard, takes too many resources, and costs too much money to even think about attempting. Bummer.

  212. Wet-Process Imagen Printers for Real Men by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Bah - the Laserjet II was for wimps! Give me an old Imagen printer with the liquid toner that they used before the new dry toners came out! It was based on a mid-80s Canon copier mechanism, and the toner looked like used motor oil, but was really more like kerosene with carbon black dissolved in it. If the gauge shows that you're a quart low, you fill it up, after first making sure it wasn't just gunked up and lying about how full it was (the stuff's really nasty to clean up if it overflows.) Then you get to clean your hands like a Real Mechanic if you dripped any. And you get aromatic 240-dpi fuzzy pictures out of it, after having fun negotiating with the protocols.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  213. Let me guess.. by 56ksucks · · Score: 1

    .. it has no access hatches or openings of any kind and the only person who can service, or change the toner or ink, or open it in any way is an Epson technician.

    --

    ---- "Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"

  214. Article didn't mention Ink cartridges or drivers by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Sure, it's cute that it has a handle, and it's actually useful that you can plug in various flavors of compact flash etc (assuming that that feature works well and has a clueful user interface.)

    But it didn't say whether paying 20000 yen let you avoid replacing ink cartridges every not-very-many pages, or whether the high price just means you can print more pages before you've spent more on overpriced ink than you spent on the printer, or even brag about how you can replace the cartridge without breaking a fingernail.

    And it doesn't say whether plugging the USB interface into your PC Just Works or requires installing drivers that don't get along with your version of Windows and have badly-translated instructions (We get signal! Somebody set up us the printer! It's you! How are you, lady! All your ink are belong to us!)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  215. printer for women, volvo for women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone linked to the previous /. article on the volvo designed by women. I have to say that either those teams worked in an entirely sexist environment seeking to dumb techonlogy down for the 'ideal woman' they had in mind (a helpless princess who doesn't care how things work), or else women really think of themselves as helpless princesses who don't care how things work. (Or maybe they really are helpless princesses who don't care about how things work (Or maybe they think they are helpless princesses, and don't know how things work. (or...)))

    I wonder how an ultra-feminist man-hater would react to these 'inventions?' To me, it's terribly insulting or proof in the pudding. I can't decide.

    AC

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3528757.stm

  216. YOU MISS THE POINT!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point is that the sociopolitical superstructure has been setup (by men) in such a way to keep technology out of the hands of womyn! The reason more womyn aren't in technology and science isn't because they lack the basic interest, drive, or capacity, but because MEN are controlling WOMEN in such a way that their inborn technology-loving feelings can't be expressed in this WOMYN-HATING so-called culture in which we live!

    For example, where are the interesting video games? Counter Strike is stupid and violent! If there aren't any good video games for young girls, ones they are interested in, then they won't play the computer. Clearly, this is another area where men are OPPRESSING womyn!! Why won't MEN program girl-friendly games? Barbies Fun Land doesn't count! It's just restating the PATRIARCHAL ROLES pushed onto INNOCENT little girls so they can be more easily RAPED by MEN!!!

    And why do computers have to use such boring 1s and 0s? This is part of the Male-Centric epistemological worldview that cuts womyn right out! All womyn know from experience that not everything can be put into 1s and 0s, so why are computers built this way? To OPPRESS WOMYN!!! They don't want us to find out how interesting computers are. They want us to become bored while MEN STEAL all our RIGHTS!

    Men do this to us womyn so we can't compete in the workplace. By keeping us out of science and technology, men are keeping our WAGES LOW. They are perpetuating the CYCLE OF ABUSE on all womyn kind!!!

    AHHH!!! LEAVE ME ALONE!!!! I AM BEING RAPED BY YOUR BEADY EYES AND SWEATY GEEK HANDS!!!!

    In Disgust!
    feminista

  217. Re: Women and PC knowledge by glitch23 · · Score: 1

    whereas a man might research his purchase beforehand just to avoid looking clueless in the store.

    Or, as with cars and stereo equipment, a man does research to know what he wants and/or to find the best there is so as to always outdo the neighbor, or brother, or father, or whatever. A woman just wants the thing to work.

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  218. Re:If women were like computers instead of printer by Ossadagowah · · Score: 1

    I just wish they'd make a printer that would last longer than 5 months before refusing to work entirely.

    --
    anata sekai o kakumei surush ga nai deshou? Anata no susumu michi wa yoi shite arimasu.
  219. Japanese marketing by MrWa · · Score: 1
    I'm no expert on Japan but from what I can tell the products that sell big in Japan are those that appeal to women. The woman is the one doing the shopping for the home, watching the TV, and maintaing the household in general - men are usually too busy being a salaryman and being exploited by whatever company they were lucky enough to get a job with.

    It only makes sense to design and build a product that appeals to them. Regardless of what you may think is important in a printer, what matters in the end (for Canon, anyway) is how many they can sell. Appealing to women is the quickest way to sell something in Japan.

    1. Re:Japanese marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your conclusion is correct, but your reasoning is wrong. The reason marketing to (younger) Japanese women is so lucrative is because very often they have more disposable income than just about anyone else in the world.

      Many young Japanese women work full time, live at home and pay no rent, and end up with ALOT of money left over every month. Consumer goods marketed to them have great potential.

  220. A Cut and Paste tutorial on Mac by cubal · · Score: 1

    Method 1: command-c and command-v, as available in every OS in existence.

    Method 2: Highlight text. Click and hold on highlighted area. Pause a moment. Drag and drop text. (In terminal.app, is almost identical to middle-click, except you drag a little)

    Method 3: Highlight text. Right-click->Copy. Right-click->Paste.

    Dunn't seem so difficult to me...

    1. Re:A Cut and Paste tutorial on Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait a minute! You're a woman, aren't you?

      (I keed! I keed!)

    2. Re:A Cut and Paste tutorial on Mac by cubal · · Score: 1

      uh, that would be a "no".

      wtf?

  221. ...and statistics by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    But I feel obliged to politely point out that we're still earning (on average) only 92 cents on the dollar compared to men.

    Well, would you expect to be paid more than the next employee, if you worked an average of 10 hours more per week, 400 per year, had 25% more job experience and put in 90% of the overtime hours? How about if you were over nine times as likely to be seriously hurt or injured on the job? Feminists complain about how the "glass ceiling" keeps them from the highest paying jobs (a myth), but you don't see too many demanding to be landfill divers (second one down).

    And if anyone says women don't earn as much as men in high-tech fields because we're not as good

    No, men get paid more because they work more. If women were really paid that much less for the same work, why don't companies fire all their male employees, replace them with women and drive their compeditors out of business? A couple of nice editorials on the subject, here and here.

    I will personally punch them in the face.

    Ah, another of my favorite double standards. Violence against women by men is a cultural taboo in this country right up there with priests having sex with little boys, but female violence against men is no big deal, deserved, or even funny. I'm not saying you have that attitude, I'm just talking about how gender violence is perceived today.

    Finally, one more reason why guys make more than women: because we don't have any choice if we want to date you. Money is the easiest sign of success, and women want their men to be successful. I'm not accusing the entire female gender of gold digging; its not about money. Its just that the man has to be more successful in his profession than the woman is in hers. How many senior, female bank managers marry guys who are full time bus drivers?

    1. Re:...and statistics by Helen+O'Boyle · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:
      Well, would you expect to be paid more than the next employee, if you worked an average of 10 hours more per week, 400 per year, had 25% more job experience and put in 90% of the overtime hours?....
      OK, dude. Don't make blanket generalizations. I have in fact worked at several companies who frequently specifically chose to hire women because they knew they could save 20-30% on salary by hiring a single or a family's second earner. (One mistake that does seem to be fairly common on the part of women professionally is a willingness to accept far less salary than comparable men, possibly because fewer are in the "sole family breadwinner" position that many men are, or possibly due to less confidence about what their skills are worth.) These women were putting in, in most cases, as many OR MORE hours than the men in similar positions in the company -- typical was around 55 hours a week. In general, I would say they were several years more experienced and more skilled than the guys in the company who were in comparable positions. I saw this phenomenon mostly in the southeast US; out here on the West Coast, it seems much less prevalent. So don't excuse ALL of the lower pay by saying "ya get paid what you're worth, if you're not worth as much as men, quitcherbitchin and change it if you really do care" ... because things are just not that simple in the real world.

      And to blockquote again:

      If women were really paid that much less for the same work, why don't companies fire all their male employees, replace them with women and drive their compeditors out of business?
      Because most don't dare to be that blatant due to discrimination on basis of gender being illegal. Note again, however, that I have worked in places for which there were 5 or 6 female programmers for every 1 male programmer (and hint: it wasn't because the women were any more qualified than the male applicants) for exactly that reason. So it does definitely happen.
    2. Re:...and statistics by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      OK, dude. Don't make blanket generalizations.

      Well, national averages are pretty general. :) In the US, men average 10 hours more per week at work than the average woman, 400 more hours in a year, work 90% of the overtime hours, have 25% more job experience and suffer 90-95% of serious injuries and deaths. The old feminist chestnut that "women make 76 cents for every dollar a man makes" only compares pay per hour, without taking in any of the above factors. Once you start taking in *real* equal pay for equal work (and experience), the pay difference is so small (around 3%) as to be statistically insignifigant.

      I have in fact worked at several companies who frequently specifically chose to hire women because they knew they could save 20-30% on salary by hiring a single or a family's second earner.

      I'm surprised you left out the "and they have to work twice as hard as a man to prove themselves". To which I would say: do you think that men *don't* have to prove themselves as well? Do you think that men are never unfairly denied promotions, or aren't paid what they are worth?

      Men have been putting up with asshole bosses for thousands of years. But if a woman gets one and is mistreated, she can claim sexual discrimination and/or harrassment and sue for millions of dollars. And if you think women don't get respect in IT, try being a male education major who wants to teach kindergarden.

    3. Re:...and statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on long conversations with a coworker with a masters who had been teaching college courses for a decade, the respect issue extends much further than kindergarten teachers.

      Women speakers at conferences regularly joked about how men didn't need to feel threatened by the growing percentage of female teachers (at that time roughly 75%), repeatedly, literally until a number of men walked out of the conference.

      So he switched to the IT field.

    4. Re:...and statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, men average 10 hours more per week at work than the average woman, 400 more hours in a year, work 90% of the overtime hours, have 25% more job experience and suffer 90-95% of serious injuries and deaths.

      Please post references to the source data you quote. It's a little-known fact that 98.6% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

    5. Re:...and statistics by CharterTerminal · · Score: 1

      If women were really paid that much less for the same work, why don't companies fire all their male employees, replace them with women and drive their compeditors out of business?

      I recently left a company which had been, over the past two years, doing just that. Then they went the permatemp route, because the only thing cheaper to hire than a woman is a temp.

      Needless to say, it didn't help their stock price much. Possibly because the CEO is fucking said company up the ass (financially speaking), drawing down about $33,000 net pay every two weeks, not to mention his company-sponsored penthouse apartment, to which he commutes (from out of state) via company jet, plus a six-figure annual bonus.

      But I digress.

      Violence against women by men is a cultural taboo in this country right up there with priests having sex with little boys, but female violence against men is no big deal, deserved, or even funny.

      Settle down, tiger. Rest assured, if a woman told me I couldn't be as good at computers as a man - and believe me, there are plenty of women out there who've bought into the party line - I would not hesitate to punch her in the face, as well. Is that culturally taboo, or culturally accepted? I don't know; I've lost track of my rhetoric handbook. You tell me - sounds like you've got a recent copy close at hand.

      Personally, I vote we treat each other fairly, and put all the sexist assholes and bitches up against the wall. And the greedy, ass-fucking CEOs, too!

      The world would be a much better place if I was in charge.

      ME FOR WORLD PRESIDENT!!!11

    6. Re:...and statistics by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Forget all that. It's more cost effective to outsource to India.

      --
  222. uhm.... by whoppo · · Score: 1

    this is simply the most retarded thing I've read today.... and I read a LOT of retarded things.

    --
    chown -R us /base
  223. Marketing, explained by thegnu · · Score: 0

    Marketing is about playing off stereotypes and prejudices commonly accepted in a given society. It plays off fear and descrimination. Like when when the negro/hairy hick is scared off in the home alarm commercial. Yay!

    I got a vacuum cleaner yesterday, and what I learned from the pictures on the box:

    1.- The bagless design is so simple, a middle-aged man in a dress shirt can clean it!

    2.- It's so light, a middle-aged woman can carry it down a flight of steps!

    It's a gender-role busting mega machine, my vacuum cleaner is!

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  224. Does this mean... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    Does this mean the printer is werded shut and must be taken to a genuine Epson dealership to have the toner changed?

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  225. Welded by uspsguy · · Score: 1

    One question: Is the hood welded shut ( a la Volvo)?

    --
    Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
  226. WTF? by Raven42rac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is it that when people hear "designed for/by women" they think "I will be a pussy if I use it", and immediately belittle and deride the object in question? Maybe the fairer sex can shed some new light on printers and cars, amongst other things. Women tend to look at things from a different angle. They are more practical than most men. I am a practical person, as I am sure most geeks are. I would rather have a good printer designed by/for a woman than a P.O.S.

    --
    I hate sigs.
  227. Eh? You misunderstand. by raehl · · Score: 1

    What you're seeing is that programmers are just smart enough to realize that they don't *WANT* dates.

    Yeah, that's it.

  228. Bah - typical female hypersensitivity. by raehl · · Score: 1

    The reality is, these people assume CUSTOMERS don't know anything, an assumption that is certainly valid. Women just ASSUME that their gender is responsible for this assumption, failing to realize that it's their species.

  229. YOU completely miss the point! by instarx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You want just the specs, nothing else and certainly no marketing aimed specifically at a you. That's pretty funny and self-centered because products sold that way ARE using marketing aimed at a technical sub-group. Those bullet-pointed spec sheets are written specifically for your market segment and what is more, they clearly work because you prefer them.

  230. Okay, enough... by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

    Enough about the fucking handle. Yeah, it seems like a silly idea, but so did the handle on my GambeCube...which i now find insanely useful for transport between the upstairs and downstairs (big) TV. While I can't immediately come up with an analogue to what problem this handle solves, it surely costs an insignifigant amount which is easily trumped the first time you use the goddamn handle.

  231. HOW IS THIS A TROLL?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one found it disgustingly funny! MOD: You are an idiot.

  232. Cybermen by goatan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does anyone else think it looks like a Cyberman from Dr Who.

    --
    Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

    1. Re:Cybermen by jdeking1 · · Score: 1

      Damn, I knew something looked familiar ...

      --
      "A generation which ignores history has no past and no future." -- Robert Heinlein
  233. Patronizing by goatan · · Score: 1
    TheresA Volvo all woman design team that has designed a car by woman for woman and it has come out with some classics like

    Honestly, the only time I open the bonnet on my car is when I want to fill up washer fluid," said Tatiana Butovitsch Temm. "Do we need to have a one metre square hatch for that or could we do it in another way? "So we shifted the filling station for washer fluid to the side of the car, next to where you fill up fuel, and we closed the bonnet for good."

    WTF that's a nightmare car there's an engine in there for a start how do you get the oil into the engine? Change spark plugs etc and is it really a good idea to put the filler for water next to the fuel?

    Volvo aren't going to produce the car but some features may appear on other Volvos most likely the seat covers

    Like the Volvo the printer is a marketing scheme more than anything to try and attract woman to there brand and it's a bit fake as most design projects will have woman on the team as there are very few all male design teams.

    an all-female project team created within Epson specifically for making a printer 'easy for women to use

    As my girlfriend said about the Volvo team "patronizing bitches they make us seem dumber than men"

    --
    Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

  234. Just a guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    it was completely designed by 'Team8' - an all-female project team

    Five will get you ten that when it starts printing, it keeps printing and printing and printing, sounding like "meemeemeemeemeemeemeeemee".

  235. "It's Not a Purse, It's a European Carryall!" by Enkerli · · Score: 1
    --
    Alexandre http://enkerli.wordpress.com/
  236. Comm'on!! by Pope+Raymond+Lama · · Score: 1

    Aren't "one button" printers simple enough already??

    I just an nearly UNABLE to operate the One Button stuff, because all the maintenance operations and error messages taht were once supposed to be flashed and selected through the printers' pannel are now made trough a Proprietary piece of software designed and locked to a single O.S. platform on a single kind of hardware.

    What are these now? one will be unable to open them to pick out jammed sheets, just like the Volvo car from the other day?

    --
    -><- no .sig is good sig.
  237. Don't Worry by dman123 · · Score: 1

    Don't worry... If she timed everything right you'll probably have to move the furniture in 2-3 months so you can repaint/wallpaper the entire room... with a border... or wood moulding... or arrrrrrghhhh.

    --

    --
    dman123 forever!
    Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
  238. Confused by SilkBD · · Score: 1
    Am I the only one confused here? I thought it was pretty damn straightforward... color or BW.. and inkjet or laser.

    Beyond that it's simply clicking the godamned print button in the application.

    --
    00101010
  239. Definitely needed by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Because the "You just plug it in and print" thing that current "male-oriented" printers do is TOO hard.

    Oh, and "math is hard", "let's go shopping."

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  240. Whoo, karma to burn, boys! by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    I think the US Navy in conjunction with Radio Shack should do a series comic books based on the adventures of Grace Hopper. Sort of like those "Electronics is Cool! No, Really!" comics they did in the 50's-80's. Here's some proposed titles:
    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  241. Great, that you're a counterexample by lorcha · · Score: 1
    I'm an aerospace engineer, and I do finite element analysis on jet engines for a living.
    Great. And my wife is a business analyst for a credit card company. She creates models to determine company's credit policy that take a few dozen variables and determine the credit risk vs. likely profitability. Not rocket science per se, but not your typical girly profession either.
    It's rampant in sales and marketing of any kind--those horror stories you hear about women trying to buy cars or computers and being treated like 6 year-olds? They're all true.
    A few years ago, I accompanied my wife (we weren't married at the time, tho) to some car dealerships for car buying because I had just purchased one myself and had already done a lot of the research on what's out there. All of the dealers behaved the same way, so I'll just use the Nissan dealship (why not name names, eh?) as an example. We went in, I stood in the background (she was buying the car, after all) and my wife informed the sales agent that she would be buying a car. The dealer introduced himself, shook my hand, and started talking to me about models. I responded that I already had a car and that he'd do better trying to sell to the lady standing next to me. So he turns to her and asks her, "So what color car would you like?" She informed him that she would like to discuss models/features/etc. and pick a color later. But this guy wasn't accepting of that. After asking less than 3 times my wife's color preference (before test driving even one car!), my wife informed him that if he asked that one more time she would be leaving.

    Why do car sellers behave this way? I'll tell you why. Because that is how they sell more cars. They're trying to establish a rapport with the customer, and women tend to care more about car color than features. Don't believe me? Well, buying a new car is an exciting experience, and of course my wife told everyone she knew about it. She told her parents. Grandparents. Friends. Pretty much anyone who would listen (hey, she has to have some stereotypical female traits, right?) Without fail, the conversations with the women (her mother, grandmother, female friends, coworkers) went something like:

    Wife: I bought a new car yesterday!
    Female: Oh, that's so exciting! What color is it?

    And as I'm sure you've already guessed, the men all asked "What kind" instead of "What color". So what does that tell me? That you are an anomoly. So is my wife. But most women care more about color/style/looks than they care about specs/features/durability.

    About the best you can do is inform any unskilled salespeople (the ones who, in trying to establish a rapport with you, miss the boat completely and try to give you warm fuzzies) what you consider to be important to your purchase and inform his/her manager if he/she still doesn't get it. Yes, it sucks. Yes, it shouldn't be that way. But you've got to function in society somehow.

    Or just ride the bus.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
    1. Re:Great, that you're a counterexample by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 1

      Why do car sellers behave this way? I'll tell you why. Because that is how they sell more cars. They're trying to establish a rapport with the customer, and women tend to care more about car color than features. Don't believe me? Well, buying a new car is an exciting experience, and of course my wife told everyone she knew about it. She told her parents. Grandparents. Friends. Pretty much anyone who would listen (hey, she has to have some stereotypical female traits, right?) Without fail, the conversations with the women (her mother, grandmother, female friends, coworkers) went something like:

      Wife: I bought a new car yesterday!
      Female: Oh, that's so exciting! What color is it?

      And as I'm sure you've already guessed, the men all asked "What kind" instead of "What color". So what does that tell me? That you are an anomoly. So is my wife. But most women care more about color/style/looks than they care about specs/features/durability.


      I am well aware that this is the state of things. However, the point is that men and women are socialized all their lives to fit into their gender roles. If given half a chance, would there be more overlap in the reactions? I'd hope so, but I can't say; we don't have a control group. What burns me is not women who want to be incredibly social or men who want to be extremely technical, but the immense societal disapproval of women who want to be technical and men who want to be social (which is arguably a worse pressure than on "masculine" women). And the assumption that it's simply the Way Things Are. Of which "The Printer for Women" is simply an absurd example.

      So...I blame Society. ;)

      -Carolyn

      --
      Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
  242. Female Printer? by Tellalian · · Score: 2, Funny

    The real question: How many females-per-minute can this thing print out?

  243. Printing out Females by cylcyl · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that read the headline and thought (hoped) that it would be a printer that would print out a girlfriend for me?

  244. ARGH! by beckysue74 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First off, I am a woman, and I don't really see any use for this printer as opposed to any other printer with the same features. It's definitely not much sleeker and doesn't seem to be easier to use from the description. I personally don't see a need for a "woman's" printer in the first place because most of the women I know - friends and coworkers - are techie enough to use a regular printer anyway. If some women want to buy it because it appeals to them, they're entitled.

    Second, I'm no Femi-Nazi but the woman-bashing on this story is ridiculous. Sure, /. may be dominated by male geeks, but there are few of us "geeky girls" out here reading the boards. A few of y'alls jokes made me chuckle, I'll admit, but the hostility of a few of you nerds makes me think you're a bunch of lonely, lonely boys. With such an attitude towards the opposite sex, I don't wonder why.

  245. why do we need a printer for women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it probably will sell brilliantly, but i'm willing to bet that the money they put into R&D for this product could easily have instead stretched out and paid for education so girls don't have to get a "special" printer. a little education can go a long way, and we're just as capable of applying ourselves to CS. i can name you a couple dozen men in this building alone who spend every day asking a girl (me) how to work that email/printer/blinking green/beepy thing.

  246. Some reading materials to help you... by Rectal+Prolapse · · Score: 1

    I suggest going through this reading list. I hope it will help you sort out nature/nurture:

    "Nature Via Nurture", by Matt Ridley

    "The Red Queen", by Matt Ridley

    "The Blank Slate: The Denial of Human Nature", by Steven Pinker

    "The Moral Animal", by Robert Wright

    I highly recommend "Nature via Nurture" myself - excellent and very enjoyable to read!

    Be sure, many scientists are studying these issues, and the results may surprise you...

    (Be sure to check the reviews of these books at Amazon.com)

  247. Just different by TheLink · · Score: 1

    "However, the point is that men and women are socialized all their lives to fit into their gender roles. If given half a chance, would there be more overlap in the reactions?"

    I doubt it. The differences appear from a very early age (often despite parental influence).

    If women were really interested, they'd be doing it already. They've been pretty good at what they are interested in. Women do very well in ten pin bowling for instance.

    In the US seems there are plenty of guys who get picked on because of their various nerdy interests (counterproductive culture). But they still persist.

    If women are so easily discouraged from doing something, maybe they're not interested enough and just won't cut it later. Why force them to do something they're not interested in? I mean what next? Have a quota to ensure a higher ratio of male nurses? I'm all for giving people opportunities but I'd pick someone with less knowledge/experience but a lot more interest anytime. I'm willing to be that a programmer who writes stuff like Acme::Bleach in his spare cycles for fun is more likely to be (or end up) a better programmer than someone who's very capable but just not as interested.

    CEOs, Leaders and pioneers aren't an easily discouraged bunch. Of course, the same applies for psychos, cranks and other unfortunately not easily discouraged folk (of which it seems there are more "outstanding" males than females).

    There is no significant barrier in contributing to opensource projects. Where are the females? I know of a few, but from what I see, the generalizations and stereotypes are valid.

    I sometimes joke that if a woman has a compulsion to wash her hands frequently, she'd either hide it or seek professional help (or talk about the problem to a very close friend). Whereas with a guy, there's a not insignificant chance that he'd start a special interest group for like-minded guys and there'll be endless debates on which soap is the best, and bragging about how many times they wash a day.

    I mean look at the PC overclockers or the people who buy HiFi cables that claim to be erm unidirectional...

    --
    1. Re:Just different by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 1

      This may be true. I was certainly never interested in dolls, and my brother made pretend guns out of sticks until my pacifist mother relented and bought him toy guns. But, as I said in an earlier post, there's nothing about women that keeps us from making smart consumer decisions when provided with the correct information to do so, which is why this "printer for women" thing is insulting. Look at the iPod. It's not "for men" or "for women." It just has a simple, intuitive UI, attractive styling, and rock-solid design (okay, there's that battery thing...oops), and it's beating the living daylights out of competing products because of it.

      But...the stigma of not fitting into your preordained niche is strong, as the former high-school outcasts of Slashdot ought to know. I honestly don't care if I'm a 3-sigma outlier from the rest of my gender, but I want to be taken seriously in my profession and my hobbies, and every single stupid "women don't get technology, tee hee!" product that comes out makes it that much harder, both for me and for women who want to be judged competent in any field. I don't want hand-holding and I don't need to be encouraged. I would just like to see the absence of discouragement.

      There is no significant barrier in contributing to opensource projects. Where are the females?

      I'd love to, but ya'll don't want my code. "Whaddya mean I can't write it in FORTRAN?"

      -Carolyn

      --
      Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
    2. Re:Just different by TheLink · · Score: 1

      The printer for women thing may be insulting to you (and probably many like you), but are you sure it is as insulting to the women who are the target market? You'd probably be able to handle those big printers where the "Printer is on fire" message might actually be something to worry about.

      The printer is made by women, who I'd assume didn't think it was insulting to women.

      Volvo's "car for women by women" seems to have done pretty well too.

      "I don't want hand-holding and I don't need to be encouraged. I would just like to see the absence of discouragement."

      Maybe that's why that "printer for women" is a good thing for some women, helps reduce the "carrying it around" discouragement by including a nice handle :).

      A bit too many boys/men see discouragement as a challenge. Tell them not to do stuff, and they still do it. Tell some its broken and won't work = a challenge[1].

      Oh well, it seems more girls are starting to smoke despite all warnings etc, so things are changing I suppose.

      "I'd love to, but ya'll don't want my code. "Whaddya mean I can't write it in FORTRAN?""

      If you can write in FORTRAN go ahead:

      http://sourceforge.net/search/?words=fortran

      Have fun!

      [1] I recently hexedited a program for a customer and got it to do something which the vendor has already documented it doesn't do and customers are to buy the vendor's other product to do it... I wasn't aware that that was the official position when I did the hexediting. My boss told me to go fix the customer's problems with the software and I thought that was one of the problems I was supposed to fix... Oops :).

      --
    3. Re:Just different by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 1

      The printer for women thing may be insulting to you (and probably many like you), but are you sure it is as insulting to the women who are the target market? You'd probably be able to handle those big printers where the "Printer is on fire" message might actually be something to worry about.

      But why "for women," why not "for the technologically clueless," or whatever marketspeak could sell that concept? Why encourage equating the two concepts? It should be insulting. (Or even "for people who don't want to be bothered.")

      Maybe that's why that "printer for women" is a good thing for some women, helps reduce the "carrying it around" discouragement by including a nice handle :).

      Oh, :P

      If you can write in FORTRAN go ahead:

      http://sourceforge.net/search/?words=fortran


      Cool! I don't know how much would fall under my NDA, but I'll definitely poke around. Wonder if there's a finite-element program in there...and if I'm 1337 enough to actually contribute. Most engineers who program write terrible code...I know, I just had to figure out a subroutine written back in early 80's sometime, and it caused me actual pain. I hope I don't subject whomever's reading my code to that in 20 years. ;)

      I recently hexedited a program for a customer and got it to do something which the vendor has already documented it doesn't do and customers are to buy the vendor's other product to do it... I wasn't aware that that was the official position when I did the hexediting. My boss told me to go fix the customer's problems with the software and I thought that was one of the problems I was supposed to fix... Oops :).

      Heheh. I heartily approve.

      But again, to drag this slightly back on topic, problem-solving of that sort is encouraged in men, discouraged in women. The pressure on women to be passive is pervasive, and hard to shrug off. Hence my desire for a level societal playing field.

      -Carolyn

      --
      Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
  248. Color Coordination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, the toner just does NOT match my paper, hang on, oh maybe an hour while I change to something better? Dear, does this make me look fat?