The handful of commands necessary to connect to any AP? On gentoo, you put about as much information into a config file once as you would in windows setting up the network (none if it's broadcasting an ESSID and not encrypted), and start/etc/init.d/net.wlan0 whenever you want to connect (or in my case, ngc -u net/wlan0)
The motion-sensing circuitry expects a fully resistive load, and the CFs just freak out the circuit causing flicker or total failure to light.
fully resistive wouldn't be the right term to use, as even incandescent lights aren't. They're just a big coil of wire, and the inductance of the coil outweighs the capacitance between turns. Try running an incandescent bulb on 120VDC -- it'll be noticably brighter.
(and no, there's no efficiency increase involved, all you're doing is raising the resistive voltage component by eliminating the inductive voltage drop, and susceptance doesn't consume power.)
bridge rectifier would count as supporting circuitry.
And without some sort of current limiting circuitry, an LED on AC will either be on for a very small duration at the very peak of the waveform, or will draw far too much current when the voltage rises too far above the voltage drop of the LED.
Your logic is flawed -- when one goat is revealed, you now have a 1 in 2 chance of either event. THEN you switch. Still a 1 in 2 chance in either case then, so it becomes a guessing game.
Or, look at it this way. you could go: goat1->goat2 goat2->goat1 car->goat2 car->goat1 goat1->car goat2->car when you switch. When monty reveals one of the goats, 4 of those possibilities disappear, and you're left with 1 goat->car and 1 car->goat.
okay, are they using a squirrel-cage blower with some other sort of (most likely PM) motor, or are they using an actual squirrel-cage inductive motor (which means you have to apply voltage to it and spin it faster than it wants to go on its own to get it to generate power)?
Re:ICMP flaw #1 on Linux: it's in the kernel
on
Examining ICMP Flaws
·
· Score: 1
okay, am I really confused here, or does this make no sense? Parent, if we should move ICMP to userland, what about TCP and UDP?
That sounds like complete and utter bull to me. I've never heard of such a fine -- and I work on gensets for a caterpillar dealer.
In fact, one job I worked on was a sawmill where they used an old 3406 (mechanical, ~15L, 350kW -- same base engine used in a lot of trucks) prime-rated genset for their sole source of power. No utility hookup whatsoever.
If you're really concerned about emissions, get an electronically-controlled genset and an SCR system.
And if you want to save more money, consider peak shaving (running the generator when power demand is high in order to get a lower rate from the utility company -- and no, you don't have to push power to the grid).
because after the initial setup, compile times don't matter, unless you absolutely *have* to have the new version *now*. If you need all the CPU time you have dedicated to serving, compile on one system and push the resulting packages out to the rest.
Why does everyone seem to think that gentoo is "known for its speed" because it is source-based? The whole compiling-it-yourself thing isn't worth it as far as performance gains go. However, there's also the customization aspect.
Slashdot Mirror
The handful of commands necessary to connect to any AP? On gentoo, you put about as much information into a config file once as you would in windows setting up the network (none if it's broadcasting an ESSID and not encrypted), and start /etc/init.d/net.wlan0 whenever you want to connect (or in my case, ngc -u net/wlan0)
yes, but instead of SI, it's Kari in a bikini.
funny, oxygen + burnable substance + ignition source used to be = slingshot around the moon and everyone gets back alive.
platters from old, broken hard drives work better.
I saw the word genetic manipulation in the paragraph to which you were replying, don'tcha know?
I can see PETA replacing 'selective breeding' with 'genetic manipulation', don'tcha know?
The motion-sensing circuitry expects a fully resistive load, and the CFs just freak out the circuit causing flicker or total failure to light.
fully resistive wouldn't be the right term to use, as even incandescent lights aren't. They're just a big coil of wire, and the inductance of the coil outweighs the capacitance between turns. Try running an incandescent bulb on 120VDC -- it'll be noticably brighter.
(and no, there's no efficiency increase involved, all you're doing is raising the resistive voltage component by eliminating the inductive voltage drop, and susceptance doesn't consume power.)
bridge rectifier would count as supporting circuitry.
And without some sort of current limiting circuitry, an LED on AC will either be on for a very small duration at the very peak of the waveform, or will draw far too much current when the voltage rises too far above the voltage drop of the LED.
Your logic is flawed -- when one goat is revealed, you now have a 1 in 2 chance of either event. THEN you switch. Still a 1 in 2 chance in either case then, so it becomes a guessing game.
Or, look at it this way. you could go:
goat1->goat2
goat2->goat1
car->goat2
car->goat1
goat1->car
goat2->car
when you switch. When monty reveals one of the goats, 4 of those possibilities disappear, and you're left with 1 goat->car and 1 car->goat.
I didn't look further, but perhaps their discussion forum stuff got hijacked?
nope, it's a javascript redirect in the headline in the page title.
okay, are they using a squirrel-cage blower with some other sort of (most likely PM) motor, or are they using an actual squirrel-cage inductive motor (which means you have to apply voltage to it and spin it faster than it wants to go on its own to get it to generate power)?
okay, am I really confused here, or does this make no sense? Parent, if we should move ICMP to userland, what about TCP and UDP?
now, honest question here, is this the same exploit that has had gentoo hard-masking wordpress for some time now?
That sounds like complete and utter bull to me. I've never heard of such a fine -- and I work on gensets for a caterpillar dealer.
In fact, one job I worked on was a sawmill where they used an old 3406 (mechanical, ~15L, 350kW -- same base engine used in a lot of trucks) prime-rated genset for their sole source of power. No utility hookup whatsoever.
If you're really concerned about emissions, get an electronically-controlled genset and an SCR system.
And if you want to save more money, consider peak shaving (running the generator when power demand is high in order to get a lower rate from the utility company -- and no, you don't have to push power to the grid).
not true, a good portion of that is converted to kinetic energy (moving the air)
I'd like to know what they're smoking making a 2hp DC motor, though
wait a minute, since when is porn a bad thing?
because after the initial setup, compile times don't matter, unless you absolutely *have* to have the new version *now*. If you need all the CPU time you have dedicated to serving, compile on one system and push the resulting packages out to the rest.
kinki = 6969
yeah, I'd say a double 69 is a bit kinky.
I've gotten neither the virii or the SMS spam. but that might be because I still use a clunky old analog phone that doesn't support such things...
why? because I don't have any better use for it at this time. it's going to be used as a server as well at some point.
even my router has 512 megs of PC133! get with it, people!
that's what I was wondering.
Am I the only one
who finds it
incredibly hard to
read Geist's blog
when the text wraps
every three or four
words?
actually, a MITM would be easy enough -- just retransmit. same way you'd put a bridge between an ethernet cable and its switch to snoop on it.
Why does everyone seem to think that gentoo is "known for its speed" because it is source-based? The whole compiling-it-yourself thing isn't worth it as far as performance gains go. However, there's also the customization aspect.
And yes, I am a gentoo user.