Slashdot Mirror


Tux Can Even Milk Cows!

GuitarNeophyte writes "If you're a cow, you want to get milked when you want to get milked. And if you were a dairy farmer, you want to make your cow happy. So what do you do? Set up a machine that gives the cow control of its milking schedule. Oh yeah, of course, it runs on Linux. It identifies the cow, then finds the udders, milks the cow, cleans it's undercarriage, and lets it go."

313 comments

  1. Dare i ask by Fyre2012 · · Score: 0

    what else Tux can milk?

    --
    This is not the greatest .sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    1. Re:Dare i ask by gfody · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tux can milk anything with nipples really

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    2. Re:Dare i ask by toddbu · · Score: 1
      Tux can milk anything with nipples really

      So that must explain why there are no women who hang out on Slashdot.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    3. Re:Dare i ask by JrbM689 · · Score: 0

      Can Tux milk me, Greg?

    4. Re:Dare i ask by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      So that must explain why there are no women who hang out on Slashdot.

      He said women who hang out, huh huh huh.

    5. Re:Dare i ask by jsprat · · Score: 1

      I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me?

    6. Re:Dare i ask by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      and the powers vested in me by the State of Michigan

      So Michigan gives law enforcement powers to ACs? Talk about your not-particularly-stringent requirements...

    7. Re:Dare i ask by Fyre2012 · · Score: 0

      Who let Jack Thompson in here?

      --
      This is not the greatest .sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
  2. automated accident prevention? by neostorm · · Score: 3, Funny

    What happens when a bull accidently wanders in?

    1. Re:automated accident prevention? by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Funny

      What happens when a bull accidently wanders in?

      It will be a happy bull that wanders out.

    2. Re:automated accident prevention? by Xyde · · Score: 1

      I don't know but if your cheerios and milk start tasting salty perhaps this should be investigated toute suite.

    3. Re:automated accident prevention? by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      Spoken from experience, no doubt. *laugh*

    4. Re:automated accident prevention? by slashdotnickname · · Score: 1

      What happens when a bull accidently wanders in?

      This illustrates the mistake they made in not choosing a Windows platform.

      An unscheduled event such as that would of easily blue-screened a Windows milker. The robust Linux version, on the other hand, would continue milking. And with a horny bull in the stall, this might get messy... fast.

    5. Re:automated accident prevention? by lortho · · Score: 1

      Somehow, I don't think the bull ends up minding too much. ;)

    6. Re:automated accident prevention? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Actually, if it doesn't taste salty, but rather tastes sweet, then get it checked out because that's a sign of diabetes.

      *sigh* Let the piss-taking begin.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    7. Re:automated accident prevention? by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      I'll try that out tonight to find out if you're right about the taste. Night.

    8. Re:automated accident prevention? by lintux · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, actually I heard a story about this happening with a slightly different model (from a different brand). Normally, nothing would happen, because the cows all have some thing around their neck (RFID? ;-)) to identify them, and the system should know it's a bull, so it can walk through immediately.

      However, at some farm they didn't have enough ID tags, so they had the bull borrow one from another cow. The bull felt hungry, so he went to eat in the robot. The robot thought it was a female cow and started to ... errr, well, tried to milk. To make the long story short, they pretty much had to buy a completely new robot, since the bull didn't quite appreciate it. ;-)

    9. Re:automated accident prevention? by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      oh man, reminds me of that scene from Kingpin after the guy takes a big swig from the bucket "we don't have any cows, we have bulls"

    10. Re:automated accident prevention? by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      That's what SCO is for.

      --
      C|N>K
    11. Re:automated accident prevention? by MarkRose · · Score: 2, Funny

      You'd end up with Half & Half.

      --
      Be relentless!
    12. Re:automated accident prevention? by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      Well, that's very interesting, but the idea that they would pull a tag off a cow and put it on a bull for some reason seems pretty odd to me. I can see animals running around without any tags, but not switching them around like that.

    13. Re:automated accident prevention? by lintux · · Score: 1

      It was temporary. I don't know exactly why they had the bull walking between the cows in the first place, but they just needed to get this bull a tag so he could eat from the feeding units (and the milking robot is basically another feeding unit).

      These radio-tags are not the official ID's for the cows by the way, in the Netherlands all farm animals have numbers in their ears as official ID. Those obviously don't get swapped.

    14. Re:automated accident prevention? by TheSloth2001ca · · Score: 1

      mooooooooooooo!!!

      --
      Just another crappy blog
    15. Re:automated accident prevention? by cammoblammo · · Score: 1
      Apart from the odd broken fence, it's not that likely to happen, at least on the dairy farms I know. If the bull's in the same paddock as the cows, they've been dried off and they won't be milking.

      And if a bull does get into the paddock, he's going to be way too busy to check out the dairy.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    16. Re:automated accident prevention? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Wow. In my browser, you have a large ad placed in your comment, for CoreConnect. Is this a new feature of Slashdot or are you a most excellent troll?

    17. Re:automated accident prevention? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Screenshot for my above comment can be found here: http://oss-in-efl.info/~danielbo/Screenshot.png.

    18. Re:automated accident prevention? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Does that mean there are browser hijackers for Linux now? Or is that the fault of your ISP?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    19. Re:automated accident prevention? by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ehm, I'm not actually an expert on the subject. ( I have no idea how semen tastes) I heard that the taste actually varies according to what you eat and drink. No idea if it's true, but I know a girl that refuses to give you a blowjob if you drink alcohol. (Of course, I found that out *after* drinking beer... *sigh*)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    20. Re:automated accident prevention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I know a girl that refuses to give you a blowjob if you drink alcohol. (Of course, I found that out *after* drinking beer... *sigh*)"

      perhaps she refuses to give you a blowjob, and found an excuse that wouldn't hurt your feelings?
    21. Re:automated accident prevention? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Most bulls are killed before they get very big so not much would happen, even if there were *any* bulls left on the farm.

      I hear that the US is slightly different in this respect but in the UK bulls are a very rare sight and most insemination is artificial.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    22. Re:automated accident prevention? by heavy+snowfall · · Score: 1

      Probably a css float problem in the new layout. Tell the people at slashcode.

    23. Re:automated accident prevention? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Nah, she got laid by me that night anyway. Just no blowjob....

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    24. Re:automated accident prevention? by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tux, meet Longhorn.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    25. Re:automated accident prevention? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      I don't believe that I'm about to post this link... but here you go. Good luck. br

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    26. Re:automated accident prevention? by Bastian · · Score: 1

      There's a special mode for that. Haven't you ever wondered where we get non-dairy creamer?

    27. Re:automated accident prevention? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Almost certainly. My above post was sarcastic, but it doesn't read that way, I guess.

    28. Re:automated accident prevention? by heavy+snowfall · · Score: 1

      *smacks forehead*

      But the people at slashcode would probably be interested. Too bad I'm too lazy to notify them... :)

    29. Re:automated accident prevention? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Too late... I'm married now (and not with that girl).

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    30. Re:automated accident prevention? by Bega · · Score: 1
      It will be a happy bull that wanders out.
      What if it doesn't let go before a certain quota, say, a litre, has been reached? I can't think of anybody who would be happy after that kind of treatment.
      --

      THIS IS THE INTERNET. PLEASE PICK UP YOUR SERIOUS BUSINESS SUIT AT THE FRONT COUNTER.
    31. Re:automated accident prevention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The robust Linux version, on the other hand, would continue milking.

      A properly-programmed Linux version would just exit with an ENOTTY (no titty) error.

    32. Re:automated accident prevention? by bullshit+detector · · Score: 1

      It will be a happy bull that wanders out

      Trust me, it's not going to be that easy to get him out.

    33. Re:automated accident prevention? by Nate+B. · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter. The appendeges are in different places.

      Beyond the bull getting a nice nut wash, I don't foresee too much of any interest occuring assuming the bull ever gets into the stall.

      Besides, had you read TFA, you'd know that the animal is identified before being allowed into the stall--it's not a free for all. I guess that having grown up on a dairy farm I can understand how the system operates.

      On second thought, the likelyhood that a bull will even be in the herd where this technology is employed is just about nil. Dairy cows are carefully matched to various genetics these days in an effort to improve the herd over time so artificial insemination is the order of the day. The bulls are too valuable as well to allow them with a herd where there is a risk of injury. Plus AI allows many more cows to be impregnated than via natural means.

      --

      "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
    34. Re:automated accident prevention? by BreadMan · · Score: 1

      Most farmers that I know in the dairy biz (western Pennsylvania) buy cows or spingers (cows ready to give birth). Some rent a bull for a season. I haven't heard of insemination via artificial means, but that may be because I only know small-time farmers.

      A cow can get a little rowdy if not fed/milked on schedule, but a bull can be unpredictable and downright dangerous, they don't make a nice addition to your meadow. Plus, if you're doing dairy, there's no desire to feed an animal that's not making milk.

  3. Ultimate geek tool by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny

    It identifies the cow, then finds the udders

    A tool for finding udders? I really do not want to see where this story ends up...

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    1. Re:Ultimate geek tool by The+New+Andy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sure people will milk it for all it's worth.

    2. Re:Ultimate geek tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      don't you udder another word!

    3. Re:Ultimate geek tool by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Udder Finder, version 3. Has memory leaks though, and sometime it blue-screens your cow.

    4. Re:Ultimate geek tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Microsoft Udder Finder, version 3. Has memory leaks though, and sometime it blue-screens your cow.

      I thought I herd (sic) you say mammary leaks.

    5. Re:Ultimate geek tool by animale · · Score: 1


      Linux? DRM-free! Works with any moosic player !
      Do we have DVD-Jon to thank for the price of milk?

      --
      _____ Computers are so complicated... I thought I never learn how. Then I found out there was Free Pornography on them.
    6. Re:Ultimate geek tool by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Attach the program to one of these and you geeks will be happy!

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    7. Re:Ultimate geek tool by trygstad · · Score: 1

      This is just udderly rediculous.

  4. Learning Curve by TheZeusJuice · · Score: 0

    I wonder if there's alearning curve for the cows. How long would it take a cow to figure out: "If I wanna get milked, I have to go through that gate" Do they have to teain them or something?

    1. Re:Learning Curve by utnow · · Score: 0

      This whole concept hinges on the idea that cows WANT to be milked. I know that I wouldn't be thrilled about having a cold machine grabbing my nipples and draining me by force...

      I predict that this will either be abandoned or the price of milk will skyrocket as cows figure out that they no longer have to subject themselves to mechanical tit-rape. :D

    2. Re:Learning Curve by Keith+Duhaime · · Score: 5, Informative

      Cows actually like to get milked. They don't want to walk around with their udder full. They were doing research with the first generation of robotic milkers when I was doing my Masters at Guelph in the early 90s. Robotic milking is a big win-win. I wish we had these things when I was growing up on the farm. They liberate the farmer from the milking process (at least twice a day), and they provide a much more natural experience for the cow. In the wild, lactating animals don't just feed their young twice a day. The research from the early 90s showed these machines being used on average 6 times a day by each cow, which coincidentally is about the same frequency a cow will nurse her calf. Clearing the udder of milk more frequently typcally increases a cow's milk production by about 10%, a win for the farmer. Less milk in the udder also means a drop in bacterial infections in the udder. Again a win for the farmer (and the cow) who doesn't have to go through the expense and time of treating mastitis.

    3. Re:Learning Curve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both cows and bulls learn it very quickly.

    4. Re:Learning Curve by Flounder · · Score: 2, Informative
      Obviously, you've never been to a dairy farm. Milk production engorges the udder, actually causing discomfort to the cow. Milking relieves this discomfort. The more the cows are milked, the more milk is produced. Since the cows voluntarily get milked up to six times a day, this will most likely increase output, and actually driving the cost of milk down.

      Now, this only works in the theoretical world of Free Market. In the good old farm-subsidy, price-control, minimum-price-cap US of A, this will lead to the excess milk product being made into more government cheese.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    5. Re:Learning Curve by lintux · · Score: 4, Informative

      Coincidentally my parents have exactly this milking system on their farm now, for about half a year. It's really cool to see the thing boot up, see the LILO menu appear and Red Hat Linux booting up.

      Anyway, the cows don't get too much training. One day they're milked the "traditional" way, the next day there's the robot. It takes some time before they get used to that. After about a week already (especially) the younger cows get used to it already. They come 2/3 times a day by themselves, no problem. The problem is mainly with the older cows, they somehow just don't feel like going by themselves. Even now, half a year after we started milking with this robot, we still walk through the barn a couple of times a day to find those cows and make sure they go to the robot.

      And even then, they sometimes try to escape from the waiting room to go back to their resting place. Sometimes cows are really naughty. :-)

      So I think it doesn't take a long time to make the connection between "that new place" and the actual milking. It just takes an eternity for some cows to actually want to go there.

    6. Re:Learning Curve by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      The problem is mainly with the older cows, they somehow just don't feel like going by themselves. Even now, half a year after we started milking with this robot, we still walk through the barn a couple of times a day to find those cows and make sure they go to the robot.

      Sounds like what many of us go through when trying to get older relatives to use computers and e-mail. Half a year after we set it up for them, we still have to go over to make sure that they are using it.

    7. Re:Learning Curve by cammoblammo · · Score: 1
      They liberate the farmer from the milking process (at least twice a day)

      Absolutely. I spent the last four years in a dairy milking area, and it's incredible how the town has to run itself by the timetables of dairy farmers. Given the small margins made on milk here in Australia, most smaller farms (200 head, say) just can't afford extra labourers.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    8. Re:Learning Curve by hey! · · Score: 1

      Sounds like what many of us go through when trying to get older relatives to use computers and e-mail. Half a year after we set it up for them, we still have to go over to make sure that they are using it.

      Yeah, like my father in law who was in charge of key guidance components on the Apollo mission. Think of how much more productive he'd have been if he could read slashdot and if he had e-mail. We'd probably be on Mars by now.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:Learning Curve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. If /. would have been available then, no one would have been to the moon yet.

    10. Re:Learning Curve by Colz+Grigor · · Score: 1
      Good thing this system's running Linux. Otherwise, after a few month of regular cow usage it'd be loaded with malware, like your older relatives' computers. Teaching the cows healthy browsing habits might be easier...

      ::Colz Grigor

    11. Re:Learning Curve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that at one time or another, all of us have had to deal with crotchety old cows in the workplace :/

    12. Re:Learning Curve by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like my father in law who was in charge of key guidance components on the Apollo mission.

      Don't forget that he was a much younger man back when Apollo launched -- the age at which people readily embrace new technology.

  5. Nerds will love this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... who wouldn't like to be milked? (I hope I'm not logged in.)

    1. Re:Nerds will love this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Milked, not MILF'd
      I know, I am not logging in for this one!

  6. It depends by gcnaddict · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well the result of the bull walking in would either be a MOOOOOOOOOO!!!
    ...

    ...or a moOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:It depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the lamest joke I've ever seen on slashdot.

      And i've been here 8 years.

    2. Re:It depends by Haydn+Fenton · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well then, lets encourage these bulls to start the ball rolling in getting the cows programming in the COW programming language. I'm sure if we hooked up an infinite number of bovine beasts all programming in COW then we could get them to write the entire collection of William Shakesphere, or 99 bottles of beer.
      We can also power the computers using the cows. Once the cows have written a module to churn the milk into cheese, we dangle the cheese infront on them whilst they're on treadmills. Thus a perpetual system for efficiently producing the worlds electricity and dairy products, and creating the worlds software solutions is created. Us geeks can take a rest for a while, using the worlds protein surplus to gain hulk-like muscles and we can finally take over the world. This may lead to a Geek vs. Cow showdown for ultimate control of the planet, but once we lure all the pirates and ninjas in with our huge dairy stock, we'll win fo' shizzle.

  7. yeah this is rad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Saw it yesterday on a link from linuxdevices (rad site, check it out).

    Showed it to my friend who grew up on a cow farm, he was blown away, the video will get slashdotted but I recommend bookmarking and returning some time after to grab the high res video (~ 52 meg) as the accuracy of the teat suckion caps is pretty amazing, laser guided milky goodness.

    Basically, cow gets duped into walking into a little pen with tasty food, the machine cleans it's teats, attaches cups with laser guided arm in an impressive display of dexterity, cow gets milked, computer monitors and gets all the stats, suckion caps come off, door on other side of pen opens, cow goes out.

    Nothing alpha or beta about it, you could see it going into production straight away. I suspect if the cow started fucking around maybe the system would have trouble, but the back of the pen closes in a little after the cow goes in, so it can't run around. And it's pretty busy chomping on the food they give it to notice.

    The biggest decider would be maintenance/support contracts and inital cost I suppose. (anyone track down the cost?)

    Other than that, a good example of robotic automation.

    1. Re:yeah this is rad by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      I suspect if the cow started fucking around maybe the system would have trouble

      You mipselled "bull".

      But, joking aside, from what I heard, the device has several reservoirs, and is capable of doing a quick analysis of the milk (presumably, in order to put milk of slightly ill cows in a different reservoir, avoiding to spoil the milk of healthy cows).

      So then they could just file the "salty milk" in a reservoir of its own (which might even be useful to the farmer: just sell it to a neighboring farmer who doesn't have bulls!)

    2. Re:yeah this is rad by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      No, because the sperm would die fairy quickly.

      You have to do a WHOLE crapload of stuff to get the sperm frozen to keep it from dying, involving both dry and liquid nitrogen.

    3. Re:yeah this is rad by bolind · · Score: 1

      This is old news, I remember seeing a thing like this three or four years ago.

      To answer your question, no, cows generally do not get rowdy in the machine, as it is in their best interest to get milked, as they experiment the breast-equivalent of blue balls.

      Another cool feature is that if one cow is quarantined (for instance, giving antibiotics means that you cannot use the milk for a week), it will still be allowed in the machine, still milked (otherwise it will get blue balls), but the milk will just be discarded based on the ID on its collar.

      The overall result is happier, healthier cows, and greater yield, compared to standard twice-a-day milkings.

  8. I didn't read the article by 13bPower · · Score: 4, Funny

    And am a bit drunk, but I assume its running Ubuntmoo?

    1. Re:I didn't read the article by toddbu · · Score: 1

      Actually, I found it quite interesting that they chose to call this thing the Voluntary Milking System (VMS). In my day, VMS ran on a VAX.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    2. Re:I didn't read the article by salparadyse · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, some udder distro I think.

    3. Re:I didn't read the article by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Funny
    4. Re:I didn't read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And am a bit drunk, but I assume its running Ubuntmoo?

      Nope.

      (wait for it. . . . . . .)

      Genmoo!

    5. Re:I didn't read the article by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      And am a bit drunk, but I assume its running Ubuntmoo?

      No, but close. It's running Moobuntu.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    6. Re:I didn't read the article by kshade · · Score: 1
    7. Re:I didn't read the article by gmaestro · · Score: 1

      No, sheesh. There's no reason to fork ubuntu when there's already Moooovix.

    8. Re:I didn't read the article by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      I would think they would be using LambdaMOO database software.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    9. Re:I didn't read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noo, it's rolling, rolling, rolling on RedHat

      Subject: Raw Hide - development versions of Red Hat Linux
      Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 12:11:17 GMT

      Dubbed "Raw Hide," the releases will have version numbers independent of
      Red Hat Linux's version. Raw Hide 1.0 will appear on ftp.redhat.com on
      Friday, August 14 for public gnawing.

      How Raw Hide is a Team Effort

      The success of Linux and its rapid adoption by an increasing number of
      users for mission-critical applications has resulted in a growing number
      of developers. In addition to helping new users discover Linux, this
      development community continues to bring new features, tools, and utilities
      to Linux. As the Linux development community continues to push the rapid
      evolution of Linux, infrequently released Linux distributions have a difficult
      time providing the latest tools and innovations developers need.

      To solve this problem, Red Hat Software is harnassing the rapid development
      model which has proven so successful for developing individual components
      of the Linux operating system. This model helps us deliver award-winning
      OSs, and we anticpiate that Raw Hide will provide similar benefits. It's
      our hope that the feedback we receive from the Linux development community
      will range from notification of errors and omissions to valuable discussions
      of the technical benefit (or lack thereof) of new features.

      source: lwn

  9. Forget Cows by divide+overflow · · Score: 1

    Hey Tux, milk THIS!

  10. That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft has a software product which milks humans.

    1. Re:That's nothing... by Keith+Duhaime · · Score: 1

      I thought Microsoft was actually working on software for the bulls, to help them do what they do best.

    2. Re:That's nothing... by animale · · Score: 1


      You mean spooge?

      Why can't they just use the intarweb like the rest of do?

      I hear the latest Mozilla FireCow browser has an extension
      for easy one-hoof prawn-trieval...

      --
      _____ Computers are so complicated... I thought I never learn how. Then I found out there was Free Pornography on them.
    3. Re:That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Microsoft has a software product which milks humans.

      That explains the 'Moo Screen of Death'...

    4. Re:That's nothing... by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Greg: Oh, yeah, you can milk anything with nipples.
      Jack: I have nipples, Greg. Could you milk me?

    5. Re:That's nothing... by ajax142 · · Score: 1

      Actually they do! They even have a Knowledge Base Article on it. I'm still a little confused on why my modem speed matters when setting up Pregnancy...

  11. Hard drive usage by schild · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're going to use only 1% of a 40GB harddrive, why not just use a tiny bit of onboard memory and remove the entire harddrive from the equation?

    --
    schild
    editor, f13.net
    1. Re:Hard drive usage by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      memory goes away when the power goes out, and apparently flash memory is too expensive or slow.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    2. Re:Hard drive usage by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

      Who knows? They could replace the drive with a 1GB compactflash card (the board has a compactflash slot built in) and not have any moving parts and use a lot less power. Plus I sincerely doubt they're even using 1% of a 40GB drive (400 MB??) unless they did Red Hat's "minimal" installation which is around that size. A decent minimal Linux install for an embedded system is less than 32MB, if even that. The custom software probably isn't more than 20 MB. Seems like someone just didn't want to put in the effort to building a stripped-down Linux image.

    3. Re:Hard drive usage by porkThreeWays · · Score: 1

      YEP~ I found that a little sketch too. These people were sophisticated enough to come up with a laser guided titty milker but have an uneeded hard drive? I've been using IDE-CF adapters myself with 256 mb CF cards. I would have thought they would want a system like that solid state. The only reason I could think of them not wanting to use flash would be if it does constant writes (which will kill most flash memory after awhile). Many CF's and the like are rated at 1,000,000 writes before beginning to fail. I'd think if they were just careful how often they wrote to it, it wouldn't be a problem. I also found the use of Red Hat 7.3 a little suspect as well. Wouldn't you want something like uclibc buildroot, damn small linux, or even just strip down debian stable? You are wasting precious cpu cycles by running something that heavy. Maybe for development it's ok, but it just seems like a really odd choice being an old OS but still really bulky.

      --
      If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
    4. Re:Hard drive usage by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      Or simply not so relayble as would be hard disk.

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    5. Re:Hard drive usage by conJunk · · Score: 1

      well, it says it remembers historical data about each cow: average milk time, average yield, etc.... if *i* had cows going into that thing, and if *i* was trusting it to use that data to give me heads ups about potential problems, i'd want a *long* history for each animal, and i'd want that data backed up... it a couple years, that drive could easily start looking full

    6. Re:Hard drive usage by LkDotCom · · Score: 1

      Maybe thay're using 1% of the hard drive FOR THE APPLICATION, OS aside... That would mean a gig or so of RH installation (not so uncommon) and the rest for the application. If this is the case over-one-gig CF would be far more expensive than an HD, and I doubt that using motors, lasers, pumps and such theere would be a real nead for power-efficent CF instead of HD. Don't forget, in addition, that you get 39-odd GIGS for logfiles, statistics, or even coredumps ;) and that an over-one-gig CF is going to cost twice (or more) a very good 40G hd)...

      --
      Grammar Zealots: please spare a non-english writer (lastknight dot com)
    7. Re:Hard drive usage by Bazman · · Score: 4, Funny

      The rest of the drive is full of the cow's favourite MP3 files.

    8. Re:Hard drive usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the hard drive isn't a problem.

      It's cheap, it doesn't loose data with power, you can install just about any linux distribution on it without any tweaking. Why would you replace that with a solution that, although perhaps more elegant also means more work for essentially no better performance?

    9. Re:Hard drive usage by Thavius · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have to watch out for the one who has "Cows with Guns" on her playlist.

    10. Re:Hard drive usage by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Like this one:

      I am Cow - The Arrogant Worms

      I am cow, hear me moo
      I weigh twice as much as you
      And I look good on the barbecue
      Yogurt, curd, cream cheese and butter's
      Made from liquid from my udders
      I am cow, I am cow, hear me moo (moo)

      I am cow, eating grass
      Methane gas comes out my ass
      And out my muzzle when I belch
      Oh, the ozone layer is thinner
      From the outcome of my dinner
      I am cow, I am cow, I've got gas

      I am cow, here I stand
      Far and wide upon this land
      And I am living everywhere
      From B.C. to Newfoundland
      You can squeeze my teats by hand
      I am cow, I am cow, I am cow
      I am cow, I am cow, I am cow!

    11. Re:Hard drive usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That brings about an interesting legal question: how the hell will the RIAA go after a cow?

    12. Re:Hard drive usage by bfree · · Score: 1

      Your moderated Funny, and it is, but that doesn't me it may not actually be completely valid! Monitoring the cow's responses to music could let you build predictive pictures of the best music to play. It may vary by time of day or it may just be that some cows like more variety then others but I imagine given a reasonable number of inputs that over time such a system could develop a model for picking the music to play at any time. If someone out there hasn't run experiments on this yet then no doubt someone will!

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    13. Re:Hard drive usage by slazar · · Score: 1

      Flash is more reliable, but maybe hard drives were cheaper when they designed it? Compact Flash 512MB Sandisk is like $22-$35 US dollars now. 1% of 40GB is 400MB. Maybe they need to write alot, because flash drives can fail if you write too much.

    14. Re:Hard drive usage by builderbob_nz · · Score: 1

      Good idea, here in NZ there are farmers that claim that playing classical music to cows being milked actually increases the amount of milk you get from the cow.

      --

      Karma? Hey I just call it as I see it.
  12. automated accident prevention?-Got Milk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What happens when a bull accidently wanders in?"

    He'd have to fight Ms Mcdonald for the machine.

  13. Cheesy One Liners by Eberlin · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is just slashdot trying to milk Linux's popularity.

    I wonder how many anonymous COWards we'll have posting for this one.

    Does the distro have cowsay preinstalled?

    Lots of mootivated developers contributed to the project.

    To code is human -- to milk bovine

    I call bull -- this is udder nonsense!

    Alternate headline: Tux gets creamed!

    1. Re:Cheesy One Liners by raoul666 · · Score: 1

      Those were so bad, you ought to be PUNished.

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    2. Re:Cheesy One Liners by kiddailey · · Score: 1

      Caring for what cows want -- very mooving.

    3. Re:Cheesy One Liners by raoul666 · · Score: 1

      In fact, I think you deserve to be sent to the PUNitentiary.

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    4. Re:Cheesy One Liners by raoul666 · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, I'll be seeking PUNitive damages for the anguish you caused.

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    5. Re:Cheesy One Liners by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Ok, this pun cascade just soured.

    6. Re:Cheesy One Liners by thrills33ker · · Score: 1

      Yes, but can it handle two cows?

    7. Re:Cheesy One Liners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, that was unbearable.

  14. Re:Its by aussie_a · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Does being a spelling/grammar-nazi fulfill you? If so, then you're truly a sad person that such a thing could make your life fulfilling. And if not, then you're truly a sad person for doing such a useless activity on such a regular basis for no money.

  15. I saw this on TV by endlessoul · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, whilst at work, I happened to see this (not sure which channel) and was oddly intrigued by the machine. Apparently, the cows used to be milked twice a day, but when they milk themselves, it can be 6 times a day! The tech used was pretty complicated, as well. Lasers guide the "milkers" onto the nipples and it rarely misses it's target. Once connected, it auto-milks, and once done, it immediately unsucks the milkers and releases the cow. Repeat as necessary.

    This machine also provides some solace for the bovines, because they can simply walk into the "robot," and they are alone and fed for the length of their milking. Simple.

    My question after seeing the show: If the cows are milked more often, did the milk production increase? I assume it must by some level.

    1. Re:I saw this on TV by Keith+Duhaime · · Score: 1

      Yes, productivity is typically increased by about 10% because the udder is being kept clear of milk. This also basically eliminates mastitis as well. These machines are a big win all around for farmers, the cows themselves, and in the end, the consumer too.

    2. Re:I saw this on TV by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      My immediate thoughts were fairly politial, I wondered how this would fit in with the PETA crowd who thinks that cows hate what is happeneing while being milked.

      My next question was what you asked. I googled a bit, the system seemed kinda interesting.

      From looking around the web (google search on "Voluntary Milking System") it seems that overall milk production is increased, though it is not clear in the texts if that is per cow or over all because of increased effenciency and less spoilage, nor was the average increase given as a number. These systems also automatically check the milk for problems (certain bacteria and blood) and automatically divert the spoiled milk - something that is apparently a Big Thing to the farmers.

      The other large savings is that the farmer no longer has to manually set the milking devices on the cows. According to several articles the time spent can be as much as half a day of labor to milk cows but with these systems pretty much nothing unless the machines need repair.

      Not really being much of a farmer I can't seperate hype from reality too good on this, but several of the articles were from agriculture departments from universities and seemed fairly balanced. Usually the big down side was in that the systems are fairly complicated to set up and maintain and do not detect/recover from errors in the placement of the teat cups (apparently the will rarely catch one off center - but the articles claim that it isn't a problem unless it's consistently wrong, such as due to a deformation on the cow).

      Though I always thought that Linux seemed a perfect match for farmers - at least the ones I know it fits thier idealology fairly well.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    3. Re:I saw this on TV by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3, Informative

      I wondered how this would fit in with the PETA crowd who thinks that cows hate what is happeneing while being milked.

      I don't think any animal rightsists are against the act of milking. I think you do a little disservice to them to say that. You may or may not think the following is a problem, but here is the real point that PETA try to make:
      but calves born on dairy farms are taken from their mothers when they are just 1 day old and fed milk replacers (including cattle blood) so that humans can have the milk instead.(1,2)

      Female cows are artificially inseminated shortly after their first birthdays.(3) After giving birth, they lactate for 10 months, then they are re-inseminated, and the cycle starts again. Some spend their entire lives standing on concrete floors; others are crammed into massive mud lots. Cows have a lifespan of about 25 years and can produce milk for eight or nine years, but the stress caused by factory-farm conditions leads to disease, lameness, and reproductive problems that render cows worthless to the dairy industry by the time they are 4 or 5 years old, at which time they are sent to the slaughterhouse.(4,5)


      Although these animals would naturally make only enough milk to meet the needs of their calves (around 16 pounds a day), genetic manipulation, antibiotics, and hormones are used to force each cow to produce more than 18,000 pounds of milk a year (an average of 50 pounds a day).(8,9) Cows are also fed unnatural, high-protein diets, which include dead chickens, pigs, and other animals, because their natural diet of grass would not provide the nutrients necessary for them to produce the massive amounts of milk required by the industry.(10)
      Clearly if the cows natural breeding life is cut from 8-9 years to half that, then the cow is undergoing some very extraordinary stress and adverse conditions.
      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    4. Re:I saw this on TV by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Yeah, boohoo. If we could make artificial cows to make milk we would. Of course then you'd have people bitching that the milk wasn't "natural", as if any milk bought from a supermarket has ever qualified to be called such.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:I saw this on TV by bm_luethke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My experience is with my relatives and a few people my parents have as friends, but:

      "but calves born on dairy farms are taken from their mothers when they are just 1 day old and fed milk replacers (including cattle blood) so that humans can have the milk instead.(1,2)"

      None I know do this, though I am sure you can find people that do anything. Cows are VERY expensive and the above is not a real good plan. The little bit of cows milk lost is MUCH more than made up in living, breathing, healthy, cows producing milk. Common sense would tell you that.

      "Female cows are artificially inseminated shortly after their first birthdays.(3) After giving birth, they lactate for 10 months, then they are re-inseminated, and the cycle starts again. Some spend their entire lives standing on concrete floors; others are crammed into massive mud lots. Cows have a lifespan of about 25 years and can produce milk for eight or nine years, but the stress caused by factory-farm conditions leads to disease, lameness, and reproductive problems that render cows worthless to the dairy industry by the time they are 4 or 5 years old, at which time they are sent to the slaughterhouse.(4,5)"

      Again - I know of maybe 15 fairly large dairy farms - none whatsoever does this. I'm sure there are some that do, I suspect you can even find some that do even worse (you can still find meat processing facilities that beat the cows to death), but that is an exception not the rule. Dairy cattle last until they quit producing milk, then they go for dog food and other low grade products (dairy cattle generally taste bad and are tough). They are generally farly old - if you want to get up in a bunch about cattle being killed young go to the beef industry. Hell, the guy who used to work for my parents (land surveyors) kept two or three cattle, never bred them, and milked them daily. They have been bred to do this and if they are not milked they devolop infections.

      "Although these animals would naturally make only enough milk to meet the needs of their calves (around 16 pounds a day), genetic manipulation, antibiotics, and hormones are used to force each cow to produce more than 18,000 pounds of milk a year (an average of 50 pounds a day)."

      Cows were bred to do this long ago - you can purchase organic milk that is made in nearly those quantities that do not use them. Though I do not like the use of the hormones and chemicals (I ingest them also), a little bit of education instead of propaganda would be useful.

      "(8,9) Cows are also fed unnatural, high-protein diets, which include dead chickens, pigs, and other animals, because their natural diet of grass would not provide the nutrients necessary for them to produce the massive amounts of milk required by the industry.(10)"

      Not any longer, illegal in most industrialised countries since tha mad cow disease was discovered in the early to mid 90's. Hopefully PETA is a little more up to date than that...

      "Clearly if the cows natural breeding life is cut from 8-9 years to half that, then the cow is undergoing some very extraordinary stress and adverse conditions. "

      Clearly so, if it were true. However, should you simply go tour a local diary farm (many will allow it, in fact encourage it) you will see that most of what you quoted is totally incorrect for the vast majority of dairy farms. It's like accusing the entire computer industry of stuff because SGI did some crappy stuff 15 years ago.

      And, lastly, one of the points I was thinking is that the system being hawked in the post *precludes* nearly all of this type of treatment. Thus, how do they cope with it - apparently put on blinders and keep on keeping on is the answer.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    6. Re:I saw this on TV by Vellmont · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You should know that PETA are a bunch of liars that want the whole world to be vegan/vegetarian. They don't care about the truth and will distort and flat out lie at every turn. There was an episode of bullshit about these bastards, and I suggest everyone see it.

      --
      AccountKiller
    7. Re:I saw this on TV by danila · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is that PETA (like most people and organisations today) is unable to see the shades of grey in the world. According to their vision, everything that is done by the industry is eeeevil. I don't see anything wrong with feeding dead chickens to cows. Heck, I eat dead chickens myself!

      Another example: I don't see how the data (I call it data, but it sounds more like empty claims) above shows that the breeding life is cut to half of the natural. They say that cows are rendered worthless to the dairy industry. Perhaps it means that instead of making 8 tons of milk each year they only make 5 tons. At that point it would become more profitable for the farm to slaughter the cow. As long as we are not against cowslaighter per se, I don't see what's wrong with that.

      If PETA actually targeted their attacks somewhat instead of proclaiming that anyone who as much as looks at a cow the wrong way is a monster, they would get much more respect. I concede that the profit-driven (or subsudies-driven?) industry will happily spit on the well-being of cows, but why not attack their actual transgressions and not the whole concept of industrial farming? For example, why doesn't PETA attack specific farms (companies) that hold their cows in bad conditions, while co-operating with some other farms that do respect their bovine partners?

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    8. Re:I saw this on TV by poena.dare · · Score: 1
      It's like accusing the entire computer industry of stuff because SGI did some crappy stuff 15 years ago.
      That's just plain mean spirited. Besides, the cows found at SGI were above the age of consent.
    9. Re:I saw this on TV by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First off, I hate PETA, I eat meat, and I'm proud of it.

      I will say this: they're right about the whole overloading the cattle to death.

      It's not dropping from 8 tons to 5 tons. It's dropping from 8 tons to zero tons, because the cow dies.

      What a lot of farmers don't realize is that running a cow at 8 tons a year (number pulled out of my ass), it'll die in five years (again, another number pulled out of my ass, but it's fairly accurate, from what I've heard), yielding 40 tons for the whole lifetime.

      Milking 5 tons per year, with it living 10 years (not unrealistic), will give you 50 tons in the lifetime.

      Compare it to an extreme overclock - which is essentially what the Big Farms are doing to their cattle. That 2.4GHz CPU that you've got running at 3GHz might not do too well, and might quit working in five years - so, you want a cheap little web server? Sorry, your old rig is dead, and you'll have to get another one. But, at stock, it'll most likely still be around, slaving away as a little server.

      Of course, a lot of it's the breeding of the cattle - they're bred to overproduce like that. Going back to the CPU example, it'd be like a 2.4GHz-rated CPU running at 2.8GHz when it was installed - you'd just have to tweak it a little more to get it up to 3GHz.

    10. Re:I saw this on TV by danila · · Score: 1

      It's not dropping from 8 tons to 5 tons. It's dropping from 8 tons to zero tons, because the cow dies.

      What a lot of farmers don't realize is that running a cow at 8 tons a year (number pulled out of my ass)


      Since when is ignorance a valid point of view? You don't have a clue about diary farming. People have been working for centuries breeding better cows and finding out how different factors affect milk production. Hundreds of people probably get their PhDs in the field of diary farming. You look like an idiot, when you assert that everyone doesn't know what they are doing.

      PETA is lying through their teeth, they are a bunch of manipulative bastards, who are part crazy and part financed by crazies. No industry is perfect and many companies are outright unethical, but painting the whole diary industry as bad is nonsense.

      I don't really know what else to say to a person who decides that comparing cows with overclocked CPUs is a valid analogy that can provide some valuable insights to the problem we are discussing... You are not making any sense is all that I can say.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    11. Re:I saw this on TV by 2008 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I don't see anything wrong with feeding dead chickens to cows."

      They're vegetarians. Put a dead chicken in a field and the cows will eat the grass around it.

      Also consider this: Good bits of chicken get sold as recognisable cuts of meat, bad bits of chicken get made into processed meat... how bad does it have to be before it becomes animal feed?

      --
      I quit!
    12. Re:I saw this on TV by Bastian · · Score: 1

      The little bit of cows milk lost is MUCH more than made up in living, breathing, healthy, cows producing milk.

      Only girl cows produce milk. They are kept, but the boy cows go off to the veal pens.

      "Although these animals would naturally make only enough milk to meet the needs of their calves (around 16 pounds a day), genetic manipulation, antibiotics, and hormones are used to force each cow to produce more than 18,000 pounds of milk a year (an average of 50 pounds a day)."

        > Cows were bred to do this long ago

      I saw the word genetic manipulation in the paragraph to which you were replying, don'tcha know?

      > you can purchase organic milk that is made in nearly those quantities that do not use them.

      Right. I did some looking around, and this article (warning: PDF Link) says you can expect about 18,700 pounds of milk from a conventionally farmed cow, and only 15,500 pounds per cow if it's organic. (It's coming from the organic dairy industry, so I'm going to guess that these numbers, if they are exaggerated, are exagerrated in favor of higher relative production for the organic cows.) Does nearly 20% less yield really count as "nearly those quantities?"

      Not any longer, illegal in most industrialised countries since tha mad cow disease was discovered in the early to mid 90's.

      The US government still allows animal parts in feed. The original 1997 animal feed ban was weak, very very weak. So weak that they didn't ban ground up pieces of downer cow from the feed supply until early last year, after mad cow was found in the US. The recent revision to that ban is still pretty weak - no feeding cows to cows (for the most part - there are loopholes), you can put birds in there, but you can't put their poop in the feed anymore. Stuff like that.

      Maybe folks outside the US are smarter about things, but you can't blame PETA for not talking about European animal feed regulations - it's an American organisation that lobbies the US government.

      Also, you keep talking about local dairy farms, and it's true, these generally aren't quite so bad. But they are also the minority, and since they usually have less than a couple hundred head of cattle, they're producing a very small percentage of the US milk supply compared to the 2,000 cow (or more) factory farms. And it's a shrinking amount, since these factory farms are depressing milk prices and slowly forcing the farms you're talking about out of business.

    13. Re:I saw this on TV by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Is it that they can't see the shades of grey, or that their moral values are just a little bit out of tune with yours? Let me elucidate the thought process PETA (and other vegans, but I'll stick with PETA since the omnivore world seems to think that PETA is the direct representative of every vegan on the planet).

      PETA's values include the idea that mistreating an animal for the sake of your taste buds - i.e., for pleasure - is cruel. PETA, being a bunch of vegans, knows full well that eating animal products is not necessary to live a healthy life (heck, most vegans will happily go on for days about a vegan diet being healthier), so the only reason to consume them is for your taste buds - for pleasure. PETA, being mostly a bunch of animal-lovers, considers "mistreating an animal" to be anything from ghastly abuses at feedlots all the way down to simply kicking puppies.

      Now, there's not a single dairy farm out there (not counting maybe ma and pa and their pet cow on the hobby farm they set up in their retirement) that doesn't kill cows as part of their operation - either killing useless male calves or killing useless cows that aren't producing anymore. Killing a cow is definitely somewhere between ghastly abuses and puppy-kicking. So by buying milk from these farms, you are supporting animal cruelty, which is immoral.

      Considering that most of us don't think that puppy-kicking for recreation is morally defensible, we're not about to think that mistreating cows for the sake of some cheese (which you don't need - pleasure) is morally defensible.

      There really are shades of gray in the vegan moral universe - lots of them. You don't see it in the talk about dairy because the dairy industry way past the point where you're going to see any shades of gray - they only happen in the border regions between moral and immoral. To us, the dairy industry is really somewhere on the border between immoral and inhumane, a quite different place altogether.

    14. Re:I saw this on TV by deathazre · · Score: 1

      I saw the word genetic manipulation in the paragraph to which you were replying, don'tcha know?

      I can see PETA replacing 'selective breeding' with 'genetic manipulation', don'tcha know?

      --
      Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
    15. Re:I saw this on TV by c_forq · · Score: 1

      I saw the word genetic manipulation

      The breeding was done many, many years ago. At the time this was done genetic manipulation wasn't even in the science fiction books, hell at the time this was done science fiction wasn't even in existence yet. Cows have been domesticated to the point that they can no longer live in the wild, this is one of the reasons why (note I didn't say genetically modified, this isn't gene manipulation any more then the stray mutt that wanders your nieghborhood).

      Does nearly 20% less yield really count as "nearly those quantities?

      I would say it does. 20% less yield is really damn good when it comes to organic foods. In my experiance organic farming can usually count on a 40% less yeild to 60% less, and this is why organic food will always cost more.

      Also, you keep talking about local dairy farms, and it's true, these generally aren't quite so bad.

      My Uncle is a diary farmer. He has less then 100 head of cattle. Near me is a commercial plant, with over 3,000 head of cattle. The conditions for the cows are much better at the commercial plant (they allow, and even encourage, people in the community to stop by any time from 9-5 and have openhouses in the evening twice a year). The only area I don't know about is what the commercial farm does with males cows (my Uncle raises them for beef, but not veal, and ususally keeps 2-3 of the best bulls for breeding).

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    16. Re:I saw this on TV by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1
      > My experience is with my relatives and a few people my parents have as friends, but...

      I stopped reading your vile pornography at this point. Doesn't your filthy depraved mind realise that there are children reading this site?!

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    17. Re:I saw this on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a moron.

    18. Re:I saw this on TV by Bastian · · Score: 1

      A few anecdotes really don't mean much. Of course the really bad farms aren't going to let you in. Still, the overall treatment of dairy cows can't be that great - in the US, their average lifespan is only four years.

    19. Re:I saw this on TV by danila · · Score: 1

      Look, I don't have anything against vegans, they can have whatever moral outlook on life they want. I also don't really mind vegans trying to persuade others that vegetarianism is a better moral (and nutritious) choice.

      But I strongly oppose vegans lying about facts or twisting and misrepresenting them in order to mislead meat-eaters.

      Let PETA promote the vegetarian lifestyle, let them preach to other vegans about not drinking milk. But when it lies and engages in other unethical behaviour (all in the name of "greater good", I understand) it stops being a respected debate participant. Rational people now see PETA as extremist green nuts. Personally I would no longer listen to PETA and my initial reaction to anything they say is going to be dismissal. All because they don't play by the rules of a rational and honest discourse.

      P.S. Most people don't share your morals, just like you don't share hindu religious beliefs. And there is nothing unethical about killing cows.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    20. Re:I saw this on TV by Bastian · · Score: 1

      So what are these lies, specifically?

    21. Re:I saw this on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a dairy farmer I'll comment on robotic milkers. I've seen some installed locally for about half a million (C$). On our farm it takes 3 people to milk, we milk twice a day. For half a million dollars I could hire ALOT of people to milk, and not have one important peice of equipment on the farm to worry about breaking down. Although it would be nice to sleep in for once......

      Anyways in reply to the parent thread, I cant speak for American dairy farms, but in our small operation in Canada:

      - Calves recieve their mothers milk for almost a week. It contains antibodies that the calf needs and more importantly a cow that has just calved has VERY creamy or even bloody milk that should NOT be for human consumption.

      - I dont know anyone locally that artificially inseminates a "cow" (actually heifer) after their first birthday, we usually aim for 2 years just for health reasons. But even so, if a heifer comes into heat when its one year old, it would be bred if it were "in the wild", so why would AI be frowned upon?

      - another complaint is their "always pregnant". Well its kinda true. After calving they give milk for about 10 to 12 months and then production declines. But these animals go into heat cycles. ... so even if they were in a magical field that PETA made for them they would get pregnant on their own (with bulls help) in that 10-12 month span. It's freaking nature.

      - speaking for Canadian farms, our cows do NOT spend their lives "standing on concrete floors" or "crammed into massive mud lots". Cows need to be confortable to produce milk, so everything is done to try and accomplish that. On my farm cows go out half the year into fields to graze on green grass, the winter months are spent inside on rubber cushions matts with straw for bedding. Cows that are stressed do not produce much milk.

      - Our cows remain on the farm as long as they can produce milk, usually 10 to 12 years. Yes they can live longer than that, but the hard fact is we run a business. A cow that cant produce milk, costs us money. Thats life, has been that way since farming started.

      As for these other comments about what cows are fed, or injected with. Canadian producers ARE FORBIDDEN to use hormones to affect production. If a cow is given an antibiotic shot, they are marked as such and their milk is dumped as waste for about a week to ensure nothign is passed on. Canadian cows have NO ANIMAL remains in their food!!! Mad cow desease stopped that practice!!!

      The cows on our farm are pretty spoiled with the food supplied to them I think. I wont go into details but 98% of our feed is natural chopped hay, corn, barely etc. We only buy some glucose pellets to mix in with feed.

      Im just trying to defend my operation. I know there are some huge factory farms where cows are just numbers and their lives are worthless, but theres still some of us small family farms left and we have a very symbiotic relationship with the herd.

    22. Re:I saw this on TV by drwho · · Score: 1

      I am a vegetarian. I hate PETA: I think they are a bunch of lying wusses.

      First let me explain the difference between vegetarian and vegan for those of you that don't know: A vegetarian doesn't eat meat or meat products (i.e. meat fats, gravy, etc). A vegan doesn't consume any animal products, this of course includes meat and meat products, but also milk and milk products (like cheese) and eggs and egg products.

      I love cheese. I eat lots of it. My reasons for not eating meat are my own, and several. Go ahead, carnivores and omnivores, eat what you want. If you are concerned about peak oil and self sufficiency, it might be good to start cutting down on the meat consumption because the nutrition that meat gives is far less efficient in power consumption than eating vegetables and grains. Much petrochemicals are required for fertilizer. As petroleum becomes more expensive, so will fetilizer and the food that depends on that fertiziler but this will be magnified by meat, particularly beef. There are ways of not using petrochemicals (mostly natural gas) for making fertilizer, of course, but these are not currently dominant. So expect that an increase in the price of oil will have a domino effect into food, which will be magnified in meats. Milk products as well, I know, I may have to cut down on that extra sharp cheddar habit.

    23. Re:I saw this on TV by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      Lets see - where to begin? I'll keep this short, I;ve had this type of conversation many times and it doesn't really matter. You already have the facts and choose to ignore them.

      First off, veganism in general. You can't live without exploiting animals. For instance, vitamin b-12 is from an animal product - it can not be synthesized and the amounts found in some vegatables are not abosrbable by your body.

      PETA specific. PETA run kill animal shelters. If you don't like that source use google - it's simply the first link. Check out PETA's campaign to make Dogs and Cats into vegans, then look at any scientific study on the planet about it. In thier campaign against fisherman most of thier "facts" are grossly incorrect (such as catching them kills them from massive wounds in their mouths). They have been caught, prosecuted, and convicted several times being the people abusing the animals in the industry they are doing an "expose" on because they can't find people who are cruel.

      I suppose in many cases they could be so stupid or so blinded by thier idealology that they are simply wrong, but some are simply total lies. It's arguable which is worse though.

      Of course feel free to dismiss this as all right wing propaganda aimed at the loving people of PETA. Us Sheople will never notice things like that anyway (not to mention they may be fake, but they are pretty much accurate, it has to be so otherwise people wouldn't think that of them), we are just tools of the state who is soooo much worse.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    24. Re:I saw this on TV by Bastian · · Score: 1

      You can't live without exploiting animals.
      A classic argument. "I can't be perfect, so I might as well not even try to be better." I've never been a fan of it, personally.

      For instance, vitamin b-12 is from an animal product - it can not be synthesized and the amounts found in some vegatables are not abosrbable by your body.
      True - mostly. There are no plant sources of B12. Luckily, you can get it from fungi and bacteria. Beer is a pretty decent source.

      PETA runs kill animal shelters.
      True, yes. Sad, yes. I'm not aware of them lying about it. Fact of the matter is, the idea of a "no-kill" animal shelter is a bit of a myth. If an animal spends too much time at a no-kill shelter, and the shelter is running out of money or other animals are coming in and they are full, the ones that have been there the longest will be moved to a shelter that does euthanize. There's only so much you can do with limited space and limited financial resources and a seemingly unlimited stream of strays.

      Check out PETA's campaign to make Dogs and Cats into vegans, then look at any scientific study on the planet about it.
      This one I'll admit sounds fishy to me, but I've met vegan dogs that seem healthy enough, so I'm still considering the jury to be out on it. Cats, I'm not so sure. As far as the scientific studies, I don't have any access to veterinary research journals or journal indexes, so I really can't do much looking into the scientific studies, and Google has always failed to provide me with anything by anybody who quotes sources. If you could point me toward a list of some research, I'd be very interested in reading it.

      They have been caught, prosecuted, and convicted several times being the people abusing the animals in the industry they are doing an "expose" on because they can't find people who are cruel.
      I've googled for this, too, and I'll keep googling, but I'm turning up a blank.

    25. Re:I saw this on TV by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      "You can't live without exploiting animals.
      A classic argument. "I can't be perfect, so I might as well not even try to be better." I've never been a fan of it, personally."

      If something is impossible I would argue that trying to legislate and force people to do it is kinda, well, stupid since it can not be done. But I suppose to some that might be OK, though I can not see how. Nor did I ever say or imply "not try" - you are making a straw man argument at the last part. More "Since it can not be perfect do not try and force perfection".

      "True - mostly. There are no plant sources of B12. Luckily, you can get it from fungi and bacteria. Beer is a pretty decent source."

      So, if it's single celled you can kill and torture all you want, what about 10 cells, 15, 100 - where are you going to draw the line? And is it logical or just arbitrary? If arbitrary why do you want to force it on me (and, if so, do you complain about other people trying to enforce arbitrary ideas)?

      "PETA runs kill animal shelters.
      True, yes. Sad, yes. I'm not aware of them lying about it."

      They denied it for quite a while and thier shelters - especially the one in the recent lawsuit, commercialed themselfs as such. If I say "No-kill shelter" but, well, kill them in a few weeks time I would call that a lie.

      "Fact of the matter is, the idea of a "no-kill" animal shelter is a bit of a myth."

      Fact is, they exist all over the place. Several in where I live (and it is by no means a rich area) have had several for decades. A group that takes in the money PETA does can do much better than a local Podunct Tennessee shelter. But, again, you make excuses for when you (or in this case PETA - I do not know if you are a member) do things that you protest others doing.

      "I don't have any access to veterinary research journals or journal indexes,"

      Sure you do. Not only do you have the internet but I bet there is at least a junior college near you that has one. Plus it doesn't take a genious to figure out that a CARNIVORE doesn't do so well on a vegan diet. But you may even like PETA's "research" as it is "I asked my friends and they said "much more healthy than regular dogs and cats"".

      "I've googled for this, too, and I'll keep googling, but I'm turning up a blank."

      Well, I can be of help! At least one was easy to find, "peta" and "fraud" had it in the top 10 results. Since it only takes one to show they are willing and capable of doing it I'm stopping there.

      here, here is the settlement. Of course, you can claim (as they do) that the settlement doesn't prove it and they would have won, they just didn't feel like it (even they realised that winning this in a court of law would have been great and they have plenty of donations to pay for it).

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    26. Re:I saw this on TV by Bastian · · Score: 1

      If something is impossible I would argue that trying to legislate and force people to do it is kinda, well, stupid since it can not be done. But I suppose to some that might be OK, though I can not see how. Nor did I ever say or imply "not try" - you are making a straw man argument at the last part. More "Since it can not be perfect do not try and force perfection".

      You're putting words in my mouth there.

      So, if it's single celled you can kill and torture all you want, what about 10 cells, 15, 100 - where are you going to draw the line? And is it logical or just arbitrary? If arbitrary why do you want to force it on me (and, if so, do you complain about other people trying to enforce arbitrary ideas)?

      So you won't argue me eating plants, but as soon as I bring up single-celled life you jump on me? And since when is the distinction between animal and non-animal life arbitrary? Pardon my confusion but I've totally lost you here. You were putting up such a good argument before, but with these first two responses it's like you decided to smoke a bowl before drafting this particular post.

      But, again, you make excuses for when you (or in this case PETA - I do not know if you are a member) do things that you protest others doing.
      Again, putting words (or actions) into my mouth. I am not and have never been a member of PETA. Heck, I don't even like PETA - I have my own complaints about them. I'm just defending them because for whatever reason PETA directly represents every vegan and vegetarian on the planet, so the FUD you're spreading about PETA might as well be FUD you spread about vegetarianism in general. When you've said things about PETA that are true or which I also dislike (such as the less-than-savory way they handle their animal shelters), I haven't been arguing about them.

      Sure you do. Not only do you have the internet but I bet there is at least a junior college near you that has one.
      True, I could schlep myself out to a college and do some research. (last I checked, most journal indexing services aren't freely available over the internet. It would be odd if they did, considering the enormous licensing fees libraries pay for them.) But googling hasn't turned up any leads that make me think it would be worth my while. Besides, you're the one who mentioned "every major study," so I figure the burden of proof should be on you - at least give me one researcher's name so I can get started more easily.

      Plus it doesn't take a genious to figure out that a CARNIVORE doesn't do so well on a vegan diet.
      1. Humans (and all of the other great apes) are omnivores. It's different.
      2. I'm doing great on my vegan diet. Most recent blood work shows I'm getting excellent nutrition, cholesterol and blood pressure are crazy good. A bit too much iron, but a little bit less of the spinach and stuff should fix that. No vitamin deficiencies that the doctors could find. Heck, my hair (which I had been slowly losing) started growing in thicker after I went vegan. Seriously.

      here, here is the settlement.

      I gotta say, if you're going to bitch about PETA distorting the truth, you should distort the truth in the same breath by claiming that they were convicted of doing it when the case really ended in a settlement. Also, I fail to see how becoming an employee in order to infiltrate an animal testing facility constitutes faking cases of animal cruelty when none exist. Yes, I'll agree that the settlement implies that a PETA member did indeed commit fraud in order to get some inside information on Covance's research projects, but I also support the tactic. It's not like PETA did anything particularly exceptional - undercover work is a standard component of law enforcement, investigative reporting, advertising, etc.

    27. Re:I saw this on TV by Bastian · · Score: 1

      I'm just defending them because for whatever reason PETA directly represents every vegan and vegetarian on the planet

      Really, directly represents every vegan and vegetarian on the planet in the eyes of most meat eaters.

  16. Wow by Digital+Dharma · · Score: 4, Funny

    I never thought I would see an article on /. about Linux milking it's customers for everything they've got.

    --
    End of Line.
  17. Wow... by Colz+Grigor · · Score: 2, Funny
    Why don't they sell this thing on Thinkgeek?

    ::Colz Grigor

  18. Re:Its by gtoomey · · Score: 1

    Hmph, anonymous COWard.

  19. What's wrong with manual labor? by Belseth · · Score: 0, Troll
    "It identifies the cow, then finds the udders, milks the cow, cleans it's undercarriage, and lets it go."

    And in the old days we called them milk maids. Got to wonder how much of it is a true advancement and how much is simply replacing a minimum wage job with technology? At what point does replacing a ten grand a year employee with a 100 grand machine become impractical? Farm jobs actually don't fall under minimum wage laws or more to the point they have a seperate lower wage. 90% of the advances I'm quite sure are improvements but at some point I have to wonder if humans aren't more efficent than machines at certain jobs? A machine breaks down you repair it or buy another one. With minimum wage labor you hire another one. By simply creating technology to replace workers are we really improving things? You can call it survival of the fittest but that doesn't stop out of work people from breaking into your car or house to feed their families. The trick is balance and put the effort where it's really needed. Isn't food production a factory enough at this stage? We already have warehouses full of beakless tumor ridden chickens just to make sure there's a ready supply of cheap McNuggests. Personally I buy free range for a reason.

    1. Re:What's wrong with manual labor? by toddbu · · Score: 2, Informative
      At what point does replacing a ten grand a year employee with a 100 grand machine become impractical?

      For small farms, this could be a very practical idea. If the farmer spends most of his time milking then he doesn't have time to do other stuff like fix broken equipment. If you have to pay someone to fix a broken tractor rather than doing it yourself, you're going to pay something more in the $50-$100/hr range. At these rates, burning $100K doesn't take long.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    2. Re:What's wrong with manual labor? by jamesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think some of the point of this (apart from making Linux do something pretty cool :) was that by milking the cows when they are ready to be milked, they are happier and maybe (i don't think the article mentioned it) have a higher milk output. Remember that a cows milk is normally there to feed baby cows, which feed throughout the day, not once in the morning and once at night.

      This couldn't easily be done with a casual workforce - cows are normally on farms which tend to be some distance from population centers. Nobody will want to get woken up at 3 in the morning just because a cow suddenly feels like getting milked.

      Also, more technology like this means more jobs for us nerds :)

      Personally, I find the idea of an adult human drinking milk from another mammal pretty odd, but according to the size of the dairy industy, i'm in the minority.

    3. Re:What's wrong with manual labor? by prickeke · · Score: 0

      Honestly, how do you expect a so-called "beakless" chicken to ever grow? There is no such thing as a "beakless" chicken. When was the last time you went to a chicken farm? Stop believing everything you read online or see on TV. A beakless chicken would not be able to feed itself and farmers are sure not shoving tubes down chicken's throats. Technology is a wonderful thing but it IS true that we must consider all of the ethics with the creations we come up with.

    4. Re:What's wrong with manual labor? by Disposable+Rob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "At what point does replacing a ten grand a year employee with a 100 grand machine become impractical? ...By simply creating technology to replace workers are we really improving things?" You'd prefer a step above slave labor to this device?

    5. Re:What's wrong with manual labor? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      At what point does replacing a ten grand a year employee with a 100 grand machine become impractical?

      When the machine does the work of ten people, or when its expected to last more than 10 years, or some combination thereof?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    6. Re:What's wrong with manual labor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At what point does replacing a ten grand a year employee with a 100 grand machine become impractical?

      When it breaks down before ten years is up.

      By simply creating technology to replace workers are we really improving things?

      Yes. This milking job is a job that doesn't need to be done by a human now. However, they do need to build the machines. For every milk-maid job that is lost, a high-tech job opens up. As humans, we should be doing work that actually requires a brain, rather than dumb work a computer could do for us, don't you agree?

    7. Re:What's wrong with manual labor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You would prefer...human milk?

      You sick bastard. We eat/use every other body product (including man/bull-juice), why not milk?

    8. Re:What's wrong with manual labor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I find the idea of an adult human drinking milk from another mammal pretty odd

      Milk, cheese, cream, ice-cream, butter, ... Surely you understand that milk is used for many, many different things. I don't ever drink milk, but I eat milk products every day.

    9. Re:What's wrong with manual labor? by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you've checked your rural population and employment trends lately, you'd discover that in many of these places, you can't find a milk(maid/man/dude) to hire. Frankly, even amongst the underemployed, not many will work the hours a dairy farm runs at given what a farmer can afford to pay. In my parents area, northern Pennsylvania, there's actually an uptick of hispanic immigrants who come to work in the dairies, as it's otherwise almost impossible to find someone willing to get up at 4:00 a.m., milk cows, then repeat the process again at 4:00 p.m. Farmers with large enough herds to milk on the three-shift schedule have it even harder. The advantage of the machines are that they are reliable, consistent, and always on the job. If the cows are happier as a result, then that's a genuine added bonus.

      (completely off topic, but I remember one cow we had that had injured herself, so that she had to be hosed off and have antibiotic spray applied a couple of times a day. After a couple of weeks of this routine, she became tame, and would sneak up behind you, put her head under your arm, and just about demand to be scratched behind the ears. So, I've seen the difference between a merely contented cow, and a genuinely happy one.)

      Not to ruin anyone's agrarian fantasies, but my grandfather, who farmed all his life except for brief stints in the coal mines and on highway crew in the summer, said that he would have never gone into farming if it hadn't become mechanized. The work was bad enough that a summer spent shoveling (by hand) hot asphalt into holes in the highway for 8-10 hours a day was a vacation by comparison. He made sure that his kids got an education, kept their act together, and had a chance to get out.

      Frankly, mechanisation of this type is what will allow small farmers (or at least smallish) to continue to exist. The problem with the OP's idea that those jobs should be left, so that people with lower IQ's have something to do, is that unmechanized farming will require far more than just their labor. Think carefully; do you want to go back to a system where fewer sysadmins are employed, but there are great opportunities in bovine lactate extraction? We did an informal poll at one of my previous jobs, and it turned out that at least 1/2 the sysadmins had some sort of agrarian upbringing. Maybe we were just all malcontents who didn't know how good we had it when we were cowherds, but somehow I doubt it.

      Machines should Work, People should Think.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  20. YaBut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Can it squirt milk from the cow's teat into the open mouth of a barn cat up on it's hind quarters 6 feet away? I saw my great uncle do this on his farm when I was a kid. The small multipurpose farms are all but gone but they were great for holding extended families together.

    My mother's people came up the Oregon trail onto the then northwest territories, broke open the prarie sod, passed the first wintered in a hut made of mud and roots, then cultivated the prairies and built a town. Part of every summer I worked on one farm or another. I use to ride out to bring the cows in for milking from communal pasture.

    Technology is great but I'm sad family farms are gone. The latest generation we have farming in the same area barely feel a breeze on their skin moving from the house to giant, air conditioned equipment and near sterile barns.

    Ever been stupid enough to pick up a "cute" little barn kitten that's never known human touch?

    1. Re:YaBut by lintux · · Score: 1

      You bring up a nice point. Actually, in some cases the robot has a positive effect on the cow-farmer contact. In the old milking system, the farmer milks 8 (or more) cows at once. They get in, the farmer "connects" them, and goes to the next cow. And when the cow is finished, he quickly cleans up, goes to the next cow, etc.

      While with the robot, the farmer gets time to actually walk through the barn a couple of times a day to find the cows that need more attention, that don't want to go to the robot by themself. I think that's better than rushing from cow to cow, just to connect and disconnect them to/from the milking system.

  21. Re:Its by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeh stop being soh fick. wot it matta. Same goes fer codeing nasties two!!!!

    maine(voyd)[
    printg("spolling iz fer looozerz");
    retun 0;
    ]

  22. OMG!! by cybergeak · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yet one more everday thing computers can be applied to! jesus, computers can solve problems outside of the relm of computers??? thats amazing, lets put it on slashdot!

  23. automated accident prevention?-Foamy head. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It will be a happy bull that wanders out."

    Yes, but your milkshakes are going to have an awful funny taste.

    1. Re:automated accident prevention?-Foamy head. by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Ever wondered where those "Protein Shakes" in the GNC come from?

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    2. Re:automated accident prevention?-Foamy head. by sn0wflake · · Score: 1

      Wow, you must be one of those rare female ./ readers.

  24. GF by earthstar · · Score: 1

    Can it milk my Girl friend!

    1. Re:GF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try. But it would seem to be very difficult to milk a harry plam.

    2. Re:GF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Only if she's a cow...

    3. Re:GF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you really WANT it milking your girlfriend?

      I mean, provided you have one, shouldn't that be your job?

    4. Re:GF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a very strange idea of what a man should do with a woman.

    5. Re:GF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but I did.

  25. Ah, but in Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cow Milks You!

  26. OS9 Clarification by Xyde · · Score: 1

    "According to Hansson, early versions of VMS were based on an M68K CPU board, running OS9. "Later on we changed to an industrial standard PC-board," he says. "Along with that we also changed operating system. We went for Linux since some of us had worked with it and we believed that moving from OS9 to Linux would be rather easy."

    Mac OS 9 requires a PPC processor to operate, 8.1 was the last M68K compatible version. With that in mind I think they are referring to OS/9.

    1. Re:OS9 Clarification by divide+overflow · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      > With that in mind I think they are referring to OS/9.

      It was immediately obvious to me that they were talking about OS/9. They clearly weren't going to use an Apple operating system that has never been licensed for industrial use. Do you think anyone might have actually thought otherwise?

    2. Re:OS9 Clarification by Xyde · · Score: 1

      Yes, of course people might of thought otherwise, hence why I bothered writing the comment.

      OS/9 is extremely obscure, even amongst the slashdot crowd and the name similarity to Mac OS 9, recent pro-Apple trend and M68K-Apple association could account for quite a bit of confusion, don't you think? Meanwhile, is linux licensed for industrial use? Does it even matter? I've seen old ATM's running DOS, so what the fuck is your point?

    3. Re:OS9 Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean I am more nerdy than I thought I'd be?

      Besides that. Just once in a while you find job descriptions which require OS/9.

    4. Re:OS9 Clarification by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      I, for one, thought the story referred to an old Apple OS. Thanks for the clarification.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    5. Re:OS9 Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think anyone might have actually thought otherwise?

      Apple fanboys, the same who mod you down.

    6. Re:OS9 Clarification by certsoft · · Score: 1

      They meant Microware's OS9/68K operating system. Microware got bought by Radisys a number of years back. I would think at this point that OS9/68K is pretty much on life support. It is an embedded systems operating system, not a desktop system (or at least not a very good desktop system). Here's a link to the OS9 page.

  27. The man page is simple by shadowmatter · · Score: 4, Funny


    NAME
                  cowmilk - milks a cow

    SYNOPSIS
                  cowmilk [options]

    OPTIONS
                  -m
                        Specifies that the cow is male.
                        This may be the only parameter, but do not underestimate its importance.

    1. Re:The man page is simple by dagr8tim · · Score: 1
      NAME cowmilk - milks a cow

      SYNOPSIS cowmilk [options]

      OPTIONS -m
                                              Specifies that the cow is male.
                                              This may be the only parameter, but do not underestimate its importance.


      Wouldn't this be better solved with some RFID chips implanted under the skin of the cows. Then bulls could get rejected before they got near the milking station.

      --
      "Does your computer have IP on it?"
    2. Re:The man page is simple by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      It is impossible to underestimate its importance as it is completely irrelevant since there is no such thing as a male cow, just as there is no such thing as a male woman. There are cows and bulls.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:The man page is simple by Pastis · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're being way too helpful and not enough flexible. I guess you run Mandriva right?.
      Here's perhaps a program that follows more the Linux philosophy. Here's my Debian version of the script. (similar to the Gentoo one)

      NAME
      cowmilk - milks a cow

      SYNOPSIS
      cowmilk [options]

      DESCRIPTION
      cowmilk retrieves milk from a cow.

      OPTIONS

      --min-milk value
      Specifies the minimum amount of milk in milligrams to retrieve from the animal.
      Value is taken as a numeric value that can be followed by a multiplier.
      See coreutils info Block Size node.

      --max-milk value
      Specifies the maximum amount of milk in milligrams to retrieve from the animal.
      Value is taken as a numeric value that can be followed by a multiplier.
      See coreutils info Block Size node.

      -t value | --timeout value
      Specifies the maximum amount of time in milliseconds before aborting the operation.
      Value is taken as a numeric value that can be followed by a multiplier.
      See coreutils info Block Size node.

      --daemon
      Performs the operation in the background.

      --auto-detect-gender
      auto detect gender. This operation takes several tens of ms and may randomly fail, so it's not on by default.

      -v --verbose
      Be more verbose when warning messages.

      --check-sane-options
      Check options sanity.
      When in effect the option will warn the user if the specified --min-milk and --max-milk values are out of the usual
      advised range for the gender. In that case it will display a message "unsane options".
      When used in combination with -v, a more descriptive message will be displayed.
      Note: as this only works when the gender auto-detection operation worked correctly, the milk operation is not

    4. Re:The man page is simple by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      Umm, if it's not a cow what species is it?

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    5. Re:The man page is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dd if=/dev/animal/cow of=/dev/tank0

    6. Re:The man page is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Umm, if it's not a cow what species is it?

      The species is Bos Taurus.

      It's not used much today, but the English word for that species is "ox" (plural is "oxen"). A bull is a mature male ox, and a cow is a female ox. Just for completeness, a steer is a male ox that has been castrated.

    7. Re:The man page is simple by Smurf · · Score: 1
      It is impossible to underestimate its importance as it is completely irrelevant since there is no such thing as a male cow, just as there is no such thing as a male woman. There are cows and bulls.

      Oh, but you are underestimating the advances in modern surgery. I'm not sure how advanced veterinary plastic surgery is nowadays, though. ;-)
    8. Re:The man page is simple by Bemmu · · Score: 1

      Tip: "cat /dev/udder > /dev/container"

    9. Re:The man page is simple by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty certain its irrelevant, as the cows and the bulls are penned seperately, and are only put together in pairs, and only at planned times. Since the manpage was a joke anyway, it doesnt matter. (A machine to masturbate bulls may well be useful [and may even already exist], artificial insemination and all that, but I'm sure it would be entirely seperate and entirely different than the cow-milking one)

  28. Re:Its by GeoffP · · Score: 1

    speliing/grammer-nazi

    Heil Webster!

  29. I'm confused. by thomble · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wise adherents in the open source community have been using this piece of software for social networking. To my knowledge, it predates Friendster.

  30. now if only... by KillShill · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    tux could prevent the dairy farmers from injecting the cows with massive amounts of BGH (bovine growth hormone) then we'd be sittin' in butter.

    better yet, if fox news could stop sueing its reporters from bringing this story to the public's attention, that'd be even better. http://www.foxbghsuit.com/

    it's rather funny, the judge said in effect that fox doesn't have to tell the truth. and we wonder why people like Bernard Goldberg keep harping on about "bias".

    http://www.google.com/search?q=there+is+no+rule+ag ainst+distorting+or+falsifying+the+news+in+the+Uni ted+States

    follow the google link above for more info.

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    1. Re:now if only... by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      And any rule that required the news to be factual by some standard would be a violation of the first ammendment. I would be totally against any such law, much as I dislike Fox News.

      I'm also sure the first website you pointed me at has something useful to say. But it is written as a propoganda piece with bright red letters for the stuff that the author thinks is more vitally important than the rest of the vitally important stuff. It is written in a breathlessly wounded style that drains away any credibility it might have.

      I think there's probably some point underneath all that, but that website certainly isn't going to convince anybody who isn't already convinced.

  31. Ignorant Marxist Luddite -- RTFA and think by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apparently the cows actually like this because it is voluntary ("V") and they choose to get milked 6 times a day rather than just twice. I say if the cows didn't like it, they'd stay away as long as possible.

    What would you rather do, hire milk maids to sit around waiting for the cows to come home?

    And did you ever consider that maybe people would rather not spend all day milking cows? That maybe this frees humans to take up jobs which reward thinking, and maybe those downtrodden humans you despair for don't actually like dead end jobs that require no skill and no thinking?

    You remind me so much of all the Marxists I have known who never worked a day in their lives, who came from rich families and felt guilty about it, who decided they had to atone for that by helping the downtrodden masses, whether or not those downtrodden masses wanted their help, indeed in spite of the fact that many of them were told countless times to piss off and mind their own business. I am not saying you are one of them, but the feeling is the same, that is what you remind me of.

    Who the heck left you in charge of reviving Lenin and Stalin?

    Personally I hope that boring repetitive jobs become less and less available, and relish the day when no one has to do any of them to earn a living. I rejoice in progress eliminating as many of those deadend jobs as possible, so more human brains are freed for thinking work, to increase the rate of progress. I rejoice in progress itself, even tho it gives luddites like yourself more freedom to retreat into socialist realism fantasies.

    1. Re:Ignorant Marxist Luddite -- RTFA and think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, one of the main points of the Communist Manifesto was that industrialization would eventually lead to a situation where machines would essentially do all the work, and the collective society would be made equal, since noone would really want anything (though those who had the knowledge would be required to periodically service the machines).

      Your criticism isn't really directed towards Marxists, so much as toward "short-sighted bleeding-heart leftists".

      Of course, a better leftist argument would be "When we replace people's jobs with machines, wouldn't it be great if we used the cost savings to pay those people to do something other than work. Not that we're saying we should pay them to sit on their asses (though, if we did, it would be the same for society as if we paid them to do the useless job better suited to a machine), but rather, we should pay them to learn, so that they may either rejoin the workforce in a more useful capacity, or simply contribute to society as 'learned individuals', sharing knowledge with their peers."

    2. Re:Ignorant Marxist Luddite -- RTFA and think by vidarh · · Score: 1
      You show a simply amazing lack of understanding of Marxism, which isn't really that surprising given the distorted version most people get served.

      But the term "Marxist luddite" is an oxymoron.

      If anything, one of the key focuses of Marxism and derivatives has been massive industrialisation in order to reduce the need for menial jobs as a pre-requisite for the further development of humanity.

      Marx for instance, was very insistent that socialism and ultimately communism was dependent on a sufficient level of industrialisation to significantly reduce the size of the farming population to even be possible, as Marx' had very strong views on the farmers as a reactionary force in society.

      Seeing as you bring in Lenin and Stalin, I'll comment on that too though both Lenin, and to a much greater extent Stalin bastardised Marxist ideas so much that there's not much that's even recognisable.

      It was first Lenin that (in order to justify why Russia - a country that hardly met any of the criteria suggested by Marx' to be suitable for a Socialist revolution - should indeed be suitable) made the argument that landless farmers would largely share the political standpoints of the landless urban workers (the proletariat). As history has shown, he was very wrong - in fact the Bolcheviks almost exclusively built their support in the cities.

      Both Lenin and Stalin after the revolution - regardless of all the other parts of Marx' theories they blatantly ignored - put a great deal of effort into transforming farming into an industrial process in part probably because they were acutely aware that they both needed to increase the effectiveness of farming and try bring the farm workers into the fold.

      Stalin in particular forced through massive collectivisation combined with huge campaigns focusing on how new farm machinery etc. would bring factory-like effectiveness to farms.

      If you ever get a chance to see Soviet propaganda films from the 30's for instance, then a the industrialisation of farming is a frequent theme.

    3. Re:Ignorant Marxist Luddite -- RTFA and think by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 1

      When machines do all our work, robots will be plentiful. Then, the rise of Robo-Marxism will lead to a new class struggle between humans (bourgeoisie) and robots (proletariat).

  32. Agreed. by cyberwench · · Score: 1

    I'll be passing it on to my co-worker who has a small dairy farm with her husband. They keep trying to go on vacation, but can't find anyone they really trust with the cows. Getting the cows to milk themselves would be pretty amazing. There seem to be some scheduling issues that would cause problems, though. The collection and storage system would have to be running all day instead of just during two times a day.

    As far as the cow getting duped in with food, that's what happens in a standard dairy - each cow gets a grain ration while they're being milked. I can see there being some really nice benefits as far as animal comfort and production goes if they're on their own schedule instead of the farmer's.

    --
    ~ Leilah
    1. Re:Agreed. by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      I think you mean cow-orker.

  33. Re:Its by JrbM689 · · Score: 0

    Come on, guys, there's no use in crying over spilt milk!

  34. Yes, they want to be milked by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cows HAVE to be milked. They produce so much milk that it has to be removed. I am not a farmer, I don't know what makes modern cows produce so much milk, breeding? feed? fake pregancies? but they do produce a lot of milk, I understand they don't cease production once full, and it gets quite painful if they are not milked twice a day.

    1. Re:Yes, they want to be milked by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Cows HAVE to be milked. They produce so much milk that it has to be removed. I am not a farmer, I don't know what makes modern cows produce so much milk, breeding? feed? fake pregancies?

      All of these... but there is one additional cause: continued milking causes more milk production. So, if cows would be milked less and less each halfday, they would eventually stop giving milk. So the concern would not be so much that cows wouldn't visit the machine, but that they would leave it slightly early (not completely draining them, causing slightly less milk production the next time, etc...).

      but they do produce a lot of milk, I understand they don't cease production once full, and it gets quite painful if they are not milked twice a day.

  35. That question that's on everyone's mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why is it that a cow can figure out linux, yet many people can't?

    1. Re:That question that's on everyone's mind by tao · · Score: 1

      Well, the cows have never used Windows beforehand and are thusly not dumbed down...

    2. Re:That question that's on everyone's mind by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

      Debian took over the "animal usability" project a while back; human usability got hung up in committee in '02, it won't be in stable for probably 2 more versions.

      (this isn't a dig on Debian)

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
  36. Cow-computer-interaction by md2perpe · · Score: 1

    Now Linux is so simple to use that even cows can use it!

    1. Re:Cow-computer-interaction by TERdON · · Score: 1
      --
      I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
  37. wait for the bug fix by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Informative
    It identifies the cow, then finds the udders, milks the cow, cleans it's undercarriage, and lets it go.

    Perhaps we should wait for the version with the bug fix, the one that identifies the cow, then finds the udders, cleans it's undercarriage, milks the cow, and lets it go. The cleaning is for the sake of the quality of the milk, not for the cow! Feel free to add a step that does a second pass after the milking, but it needs to be done before.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:wait for the bug fix by md2perpe · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's the cows that need to be debugged, not the software.

    2. Re:wait for the bug fix by Smurf · · Score: 1

      The video shows that, as you suggest, there is a thorough cleaning step before milking, and a different one (more like a spray) after. And between cows the machine cleans itself to prevent contamination passing from cow to cow. A very well though system, indeed.

  38. Ignorant Technoworshipper -- Live in reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And did you ever consider that maybe people would rather not spend all day milking cows? That maybe this frees humans to take up jobs which reward thinking, and maybe those downtrodden humans you despair for don't actually like dead end jobs that require no skill and no thinking?"

    As opposed to those skilled, thinking jobs that are being outsourced. Leaving Mr "Downtrodden and in debt" reverting to "going somewere fast, job #3" aka Fast Food.

    At least you can't outsource a Milk Maid.

  39. OMG OMG by epiphany_man · · Score: 1

    What? That's udder madness!!!

  40. Off-topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need a special Linux distro that detects when Slashdotters post article synopses with spurious apostrophes in the word "its," then BLOWS THEIR FUCKING BRAINS OUT.

    For real, I've seen this no less than twice a day for the last week. I don't know how it is that 80% of Slashdot are twats who bitch about "it's"/"its" transposition AND ANOTHER 80% of Slashdot are twits who make the mistake every time they type the damn word, but OMFG it needs to stop.

    Yes, I DO feel better now.

  41. Mooooooooove by raoul666 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    along, nothing to see here.

    --
    When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
  42. Re:GF -- not likely by fmaxwell · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can it milk my Girl friend!

    No, but it could deflate her.

  43. In Soviet Russia... by Crouty · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... uh no, forget about that.

    --
    On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
  44. Too much information by mikeage · · Score: 3, Funny

    Posted by Zonk on Sun Oct 23, '05 10:12 AM
    from the i-don't-have-it-that-good dept.

    Thanks for sharing.

    --
    -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
  45. Data storage, and cheaper by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    TFA says the machine collects statistics on milk and production. Since you can't get disks much smaller than 40GB without spending more money for a microdrive or laptop drive, it sounds like they picked the best solution.

    1. Re:Data storage, and cheaper by lintux · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, one of their Dutch engineers told me that one of the next models will indeed have Flash. Right now they do at least use laptop disks IIRC, so slightly more shock-resistent.

      However, although you're right about the data collection, this doesn't happen on the robot. Unfortunately, the machine is directly connected by plain Ethernet to a Win2K machine with MSSQL (I guess they left out this part on LinuxDevices ;-)) and a special application for this robot. That's where all the data is collected. The robot itself doesn't really save anything.

    2. Re:Data storage, and cheaper by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      You can pick up various forms of flash for less. They have the benefit of being smaller, and potentially less likely to fail (less moving parts). You can grab a 512MB chip for about $25 retail now, so I'd imagine something integrated to the board would be cheaper, slightly both because you're buying in bulk with less middlemen, and because you wont need some of the stuff that retail package provides (software, manual, etc).

      The board they're using has both CF, IDE and USB. I suspect they'll be moving to CF unless they can get their own board designed cheaply enough to warrant moving to an integrated Flash chip. The board they've picked has video display hardware and sound hardware. Assuming they don't have future plans for those parts, they could shave off a few dollars by excluding them.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

  46. Yes, but.... by povman · · Score: 0, Funny

    ... can the cows milk TUX? mm penguin milk

  47. Linux the cash cow is now cashing in on the cow. by Druid_of_nature · · Score: 2

    DeLaval offers both linux and windows based products. Their VMS system runs free of windows but they do have their ALPRO® Windows which is a data evaluation tool for Mircosoft Windows. It appears to work with the database that the Linux VMS system creates and updates to generate it's reports and assessment. But having a system totally controlled and monitored by Linux makes me feel a little warmer inside.

  48. Now... by Quixote · · Score: 2, Funny
    if they make it opensource, will it be called OpenVMS?

    (I'm sorry...)

  49. It does clean ... by mallumax · · Score: 1
    From TFM
    "A multipurpose robotic arm then extends underneath the cow and, guided by laser and photo sensors, cleans and dries each teat before attaching vacuum milking cups."
  50. 40GB Harddrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The VMS uses 64MB of RAM, and boots from a 40GB hard drive -- only 1 percent of which is actually used

    That's 400MB - they really should have used a compact flash card. Flash based memory has come a long way since the limit of 10,000 writes esp when used with load balancing filesystems. The read time of a CF card is slightly less that a IDE harddrive, but they make up for it with zero seek time.
  51. Re:Its by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the sad thing is the person that doesn't know basic english or can't be bothered using it.
    Seeing retarded and lazy english really irritates me, so I enjoy returning the irritation.

  52. Re:GF -- not likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    probably also clean the under carage as well

  53. you mistyped.... by conJunk · · Score: 4, Funny

    whoops! i think you accidentally included the letter 'r' in the last word!

  54. Mod parent up! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As opposed to those skilled, thinking jobs that are being outsourced.

    Thank you. The right-wingers always have an answer as to why it's good to take away someone's job. But it all boils down to their blind worship of big business and a lack of empathy for those who find themselves unemployed or underemployed.

    The parent to your post wrote:

    "That maybe this frees humans to take up jobs which reward thinking, and maybe those downtrodden humans you despair for don't actually like dead end jobs that require no skill and no thinking?"

    That ignores the fact that 25% of the population have IQ scores below 89. For someone with an IQ of 75, farm work may be very fulfilling. Take that away from them and they may be unable to find other work.

    Not everyone has a high enough IQ to excel, or even function, in a job which requires intelligence, logic, and analytical skills. Not every person you meet on the street could be taught to do electronic design, software development, bio-medical research, or astrophysics. In order for our economy to thrive, we need jobs suitable for everyone in the work force -- including the mildly retarded who hold jobs as janitors, sanitation workers, laborers, assemblers, and President of the United States.

    1. Re:Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That ignores the fact that 25% of the population have IQ scores below 89. For someone with an IQ of 75, farm work may be very fulfilling. Take that away from them and they may be unable to find other work.

      So have them code in perl.
      </sarcasm>

    2. Re:Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is, people with higher IQs tend not to work towards ground-breaking ends. Farming is actually a very rewarding occupation; what is better than feeding people of the world?

    3. Re:Mod parent up! by Zoidmann · · Score: 1
      the mildly retarded who hold jobs as [...] President of the United States.

      Thank you for making me laugh - and then it made me a bit sad, that it's actually true and not funny...

      Oh well, maybe I'm a victim of anti-Bush propaganda, living here in Europe - I almost hope that, since the thought of a retard with as much power as the US President is scary.

      Doing manual labour can be very rewarding actually - normally I'm working with IT in some way or the other, but being a self proclaimed handyman, I think the job satisfaction of manual labour can be very high and sometimes more easily achieved than with more "mental" labour.

      So yes, I agree that there's no reason to try and remove all jobs involving manual labour. What should the majority of "lesser gifted" persons do if they can't get jobs? Post to ./ like the rest of us?

    4. Re:Mod parent up! by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The right-wingers always have an answer as to why it's good to take away someone's job. But it all boils down to their blind worship of big business and a lack of empathy for those who find themselves unemployed or underemployed.
      Sure, whereas the left-wingers always have an anwser why someone should be allowed to keep their job no matter what, regardless of realities. They are also remarkably hostile towards those persons who are providing those jobs.

      Probably falling in your "right winger" category, I still agree with the rest of your post. No need to turn to name calling to make your point.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Mod parent up! by dheltzel · · Score: 1
      That ignores the fact that 25% of the population have IQ scores below 89. For someone with an IQ of 75, farm work may be very fulfilling. Take that away from them and they may be unable to find other work.

      That's a very nice sentiment. And there is some value to your observations from a high level view, but my sister and her husband run a small dairy farm and getting decent help is a continual struggle. It seems like many of the "underpriviliged" youth of the area would much rather work with their friends at a fast food restaurant for $6 an hour, than get up close and personal with a bunch of large smelly bovines for $5 an hour. Raising the salary would be a nice option, if they could raise the price they sell their milk for, but they are told how much they are going to get and there are very few options if they don't like it.

      As a result, most farm families get their kids doing a lot of the work for a lot less than that child could earn off the farm, but at least they are reliable workers! What robotic milkers really do for the small farmer is to raise the quality of life for the family. Labor will inevitably price itself out of this market unless the government somehow subsidizes the wages (a bad idea for any industry), leaving the small farms to use internal labor or robotics.

      Now do you think it's such a bad idea?

    6. Re:Mod parent up! by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Sure, whereas the left-wingers always have an anwser why someone should be allowed to keep their job no matter what, regardless of realities.

      Reality: I don't need milk to be 5 cents cheaper per gallon. I could afford to pay 10% more for my McDonalds meal if it meant that someone working there could get healthcare. I don't need Walmart to open up "self-serve checkouts" and fire cashiers so that they can lower the price on my shampoo from $1.73 per bottle to $1.69. I'm damned realistic. I recognize that it's a lot better for the economy to pay someone to milk cows than to support them on unemployment.

      They are also remarkably hostile towards those persons who are providing those jobs.

      That hostility could be coming from:

      1. The ever increasing ratio between the haves and have-nots at a company. The ratio of CEO pay to worker pay has been skyrocketing. Workers are being asked to make do with less and less, with layoffs, companies seeking ways to gut pensions and medical benefits, and a constant fear of lay-offs. All the while, the CEOs are taking home ever larger bonuses, paychecks, and other perks.

      2. The fact that companies want loyalty from workers but don't give any back. How many people settle into a good job in their twenties, move up the corporate ladder, and then eventually retire from the same company, carrying out the gold watch that they got for their years of service? The reality now is that a "career" is often a series of job changes necessary to get a good pay increase interspersed with random layoffs.

      3. Workers feeling like management is out to get rid of them. If it's not automation taking away the factory jobs, it's outsourcing taking away the intellectual jobs.

      4. Ever greater demands. Companies are expecting, and getting, more hours out of workers. And the workers are having to work harder and harder just to keep their jobs. It's been borne out in many surveys.

  55. Overload... by CrimsonScythe · · Score: 0

    "If you're a cow, you want to get milked when you want to get milked. And if you were a dairy farmer, you want to make your cow happy. So what do you do? Set up a machine that gives the cow control of its milking schedule. Oh yeah, of course, it runs on Linux. It identifies the cow, then finds the udders, milks the cow, cleans it's undercarriage, and lets it go."

    Too...Many...Jokes...Can't...Compute...!&@#$%^$^NO CARRIER

    --
    The view was horrible and the smell was even worse; Julie severely regretted becoming a proctologist.
  56. Radio 4, Farming Today by Cally · · Score: 1

    I'm sure I heard a piece on this machine on the radio this week. It would probably have been the early-morning (6AM) "Farming today" proggy, essential tractor-cab listening all over the country ;).. .I've had a look at the prog's page at bbc.co.uk/radio4/news/farmingtoday/index.shtml but can't find it... anyone want to volunteer to hit "listen again" for all five progs this week? They're 30 mins long, I believe. lots of interesting stuff if you like that sort of thing...

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  57. From TFA by mrjb · · Score: 1

    A 122-year-old dairy equipment company has used embedded Linux in a robotic cow-milking system (the system is robotic, not the cows).
    Pity. This would be *so* much cooler with robotic cows!

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  58. You sir, are a hero... by krazikamikaze · · Score: 1

    ... for all the bush-haters out there. You read an article (or let's be realistic: just the headline) about an innovative machine for milking cows and immediately recognized this as an opportunity to bash Fox News.

  59. Linux Two Cow Analogy by Landshark17 · · Score: 0

    You have two cows. You get Linux, and Linus Torvalds comes to your house and milks your cows once a day. The best part is: Linux is open-source, so you don't have to pay for the milking.

    --
    This sig is false.
    1. Re:Linux Two Cow Analogy by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      I remember downloading stuff from Tucows, but I never saw a Finnish milkman...

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

  60. Re:Its by Lucractius · · Score: 1

    thats the first time i ever had that bloddy thing explained to me so for once the Grammar nazi was useful!

    --
    XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  61. Down the road by joefish_only_1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's one of these just down the road from my place. A guest lecturer spoke about this to my class. The article didn't go into specifics about how the cow "decides" when to get milked (or at least I didn't see that in my hasty skimming of the article), but the one here works like so: The center of the paddock has the only water trough fenced off, with three gates to it. The cow can only enter through one specific gate. When it does, a scanner reads a tag on the cow's ear, and the computer checks if it's time for the specific cow to be milked again. If so, the exit gate that leads to the milking machine is opened. If not, then the exit gate that leads to the paddock is opened. One of the implications of this is that better quality milk is got from the cows. (This is in Waikato, NZ - if anyone was wondering).

  62. Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if I say that my software is "free" not as in "free beer", but, for example - as in "free milk", then is this OSI approved?

  63. Mac OS 9 vs. OS/9 Lawsuit by Burning+Plastic · · Score: 1

    I remembered about this because of OS/9 trying to sue Apple over the use of OS9 in Mac OS9 - claiming that they were trying to trade on an established mark...

    I seem to remember that it was thrown out because of the obvious (to anyone not trying to sue for money) progression from Mac OS 6 to 7 to 8 to etc...

    --
    [All Your Fish Are Belong To Us]
  64. quality of the cow important too. by nietsch · · Score: 1

    It's true that you need to clean before milking. But maybe it is a good idea too, to clean the teats after milking. How healthy would it be for a cow to walk around with udders/teats with (dried-up) milk on them?

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  65. Neat, but... by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

    Can it perform cunnilingus while kneeling on a hardwood floor?

    Guess not, but maybe the opposite 'number', so to speak?

    (See the sig if you don't get the humor.)

    1. Re:Neat, but... by Monkey · · Score: 1

      While it's interesting that Linux has moved into the barnyard, it still has a way to go before it facilitates sex with a mare. Disappointing.

  66. Re:Its by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    Who are you returning the irritation to? The article was published on a news site, not slashdot. It's highly unlikely that the person who wrote the article even reads slashdot. All you're achieving is coming across as a total asshole (and I notice that you post anonymously).

  67. How does it deal with infections/health issues? by slashmojo · · Score: 1
    How does this gadget recognize if a cow has an infection? When a human is doing the job you check each udder first to make sure there is no nasty cheesy gunk in the milk.. can this machine recognize the same stuff? Wouldn't like that in my coffee..

    Also if a cow is currently being treated with antibiotics (or some other drug) does the machine know this and throw the milk after milking it? Since milk laced with antibiotics is not fit for human consumption.. I presume in this case it can since it says the cow is identified it should be easy enough.

    1. Re:How does it deal with infections/health issues? by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 2, Informative
      Cow enters milking machine. Machine reads cow's ID tag and reads her info from database ... if the cow is on antibiotics, the milk is shunted into a special tank immediately.

      A farmer's NIGHTMARE is to have an undetected case of mastitis contaminate a whole milking - the collection trucks have their own testing. Each milk collection (per cow) is in a separate tank until the automatic testing for blood and abnormal numbers of white cells is done. These scanners can pick up the signs of IMPENDING mastitis before the milk quality is affected, and way before humans spot it - wastes less milk and cows seldom develop full-blown mastitis. If the milk doesn't meet standards, it's sent to the waste tank.

      Detecting damage to udders and teats? Compare images of the cow's previous state, and signaling the farmer there is something that needs a human to look at.

    2. Re:How does it deal with infections/health issues? by spinningmud · · Score: 1

      advanced machines (such as this) would most likely use milk conductivity to detect any udder health issues. couple that with the RFID, it's easy to keep milk from cows with health issues and/or antibiotics out of the food supply.

  68. Imagine... by ArAgost · · Score: 1

    ...a Beowulf herd of these!

    1. Re:Imagine... by CaptainFork · · Score: 0

      ...and can it milk the Gnu Hurd...?

  69. How appropriate... by woodhouse · · Score: 1

    you fight like a cow

  70. Please MOOOOOD PARENT UP by spineboy · · Score: 1

    You said the funny words!

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  71. You Forgot.... by reality-bytes · · Score: 1


    Cowboy Neal
    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  72. Is this special? by Henk+Poley · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just a quick search told me that these kind of machines have been around for some time already (just as I thought it would).

    http://www.cornesag.com/eng/milking/astro.html
    (Note: you should disable CSS for this site, the 'text-decoration : blink;' is horrible..)

    1. Re:Is this special? by abxpacketloss · · Score: 1

      "text-decoration : blink" Alright who went and pissed off the designer...

  73. Re:GF - which barn is she in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and what species is she?

  74. Reverse psychology by gringer · · Score: 1

    You fight like a dairy farmer!

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
  75. VMS, ehh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice this is based on Linux but it's a shame on the creators that they haven't heard of VMS before! Even worse, they didn't do their work while inventing the name for their system! (hint: Google).
    The name is already "occupied" (since 1978) by a (quite famous) OS by DEC (Digital) -> Compaq -> HP.

  76. Yeah, but only Microsoft can automate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Mad Cow infection.

  77. obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new udder-grabbing overlords

    1. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ladies and gentlemen, I've been to Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and I can say without hyperbole that this is a million times worse than all of them put together.

      (Kent Brockman)

  78. Well, yeah... by HoldmyCauls · · Score: 1

    It makes sense... I mean, cows and penguins dress to coordinate!

    --
    Emacs: for people who just never know when to :q!
  79. Two words: by aug24 · · Score: 1

    Commodity parts.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  80. Yeah but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...can you run Windows on it?

  81. Laser-guided Teat Finder by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    I wonder where a fella could get one of those laser-guided teat finders?

  82. NOT fed "blood" by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 3, Informative
    "but calves born on dairy farms are taken from their mothers when they are just 1 day old and fed milk replacers (including cattle blood) so that humans can have the milk instead."

    No, they are NOT. They are removed from their mothers and hand-fed "colustrum" ... the antibody-rich substance that precedes milk. http://www.farmllc.org/custom3.html Cows optimized for dairy use are not optimized for nursing a calf (look at a side view of a Hereford versus a Holstein).

  83. Cripes by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    It's a robot milker. The industry has had these for 10+ years now! Hell, I met several farmers who had these installed when I was working in the livestock genetics business 6-7 years ago. Yet suddenly it's a new thing because this robot runs Linux? Yeash.

    If Slashdot wants to report about a new model of robot milker that runs Linux, then fine. But don't go making out like it's a revolutionary new concept.

    BTW, slightly off-topic, but one of the biggest reasons why robot milkers took a long time to catch on has to do with the "preferred" genetic make-up. The industry had been breeding the cows with teets very close together because it made the cow look more streamlined. Then the robot milker comes along and requires that the teets have some space between so that the milker can properly locate them and attach. No idea if they've fixed this.

    Also, robot milkers are apparently good for detecting problems with the cow. In anything but a very small herd, a farmer might not notice if a cow doesn't show up to be milked. But the robot milker keeps track and will flag any that don't show as needing to be checked for udder blockages.

    1. Re:Cripes by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      because it made the cow look more streamlined.

      I'm glad all those farm subsidies are going towards creating useful advances.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  84. OK, it runs Linux, but does it play ogg? by njchick · · Score: 1

    Cows hate listening to low-quality mp3s while being milked.

  85. Clarification, a bit by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Thanks for that. I knew most of that, but my original post was mistaken in screaming at Marxists. I meant those loonie lefties who embrace Marxism without knowing what it stands for, the ones who scream about the sanctity of the crappiest jobs, who are so eager to defend keeping the poor in crappy jobs as if that somehow washes their hands of guilt for being raised well-off. Since they are so quick to yap about Marxism, I made the mistake of using their own terminology. Sorry about that, all you true Marxists out there :-)

  86. I'm no farmer but... by mhollis · · Score: 2, Informative

    I worked with a "Down Maine" dairyman for some years. We were pretty careful around the cows. There was a whole lot of concern about infection, mastitis, quantity put out by each cow, when we needed to fertilize them again (you don't get milk from a cow that hasn't had a calf and you have to get them pregnant every so often to keep production up) and so on. We did our best to keep the cows happy and keep production up.

    We went through a lot of a sticky substance called "Bag Balm." We used it to decrease the amount of irritation cows felt when being milked by a milking machine that used air pressure. Either this device uses a different pressure or I'll bet a lot of their cows have to be taken out of the system periodically.

    I really like how well the system monitors and logs in production for each cow. The movie file indicates that it keeps track of "each quarter." That is a kind of granularity that we could never achieve with our milking system, where we would weigh the total output of each cow and keep track of that. We also kept an eye on cream and butterfat content.

    I do wonder what happens when (and if) more than one cow "wants" to be milked at the same time. Does a brawl ensue?

    For those who don't know it, cows tend to be milked twice daily at 12-hour intervals in order to ensure the highest possible output. It's kind of difficult to switch them to daylight savings time and many dairymen just don't try. Cows who are not milked experience considerable pain if they are not and may develop mastitis. The same goes for all female mammals who are producing milk. If a cow's output can be increased by varying the times of milking just a bit, dairymen could pay for the device in a few years.

    --
    Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
    1. Re:I'm no farmer but... by Nate+B. · · Score: 1

      Slight correction. Air pressure is not involved but rather vacuum. Okay, negative air pressure compared to normal atmospheric pressure.

      As for milking frequency, a increase in production has been noted by milking 3 times per day. Enough so that a lot of dairies consider it worth the extra labor expense. We never went beyond twice a day, but my uncle and cousins milked 3X until they got out of it.

      The instant analysis of the milk would prove invaluable for herd health. I was never that good at identifying problems as I was more interested in getting the milking shift over with. I guess that's partly why we're not milking out at the farm any more--too much work and not enough interest by me or my siblings to carry on. Oh well, I'm much more happy with our cow-calf beef operation.

      --

      "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
    2. Re:I'm no farmer but... by chawly · · Score: 1

      "The same goes for all female mammals who are producing milk." Is this a sexist comment or is this a sexist comment ? Notice that no consideration is given to male mammals and their difficulties if they are not milked. Shame

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  87. Damn Slashdot... by totallygeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally posting something proving that Linux sucks!

  88. But what about freedom? by Laplace · · Score: 1

    You all seem to worry about freedom of source code, but what about the freedom of the cows? Modern industrial farming keeps animals in barbaric conditions. Congratulations, you're great open source operation system now aids in the tourture of millions of animals.

    --
    The middle mind speaks!
    1. Re:But what about freedom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On slashdot, anything done with or to animals is generally considered funny.

    2. Re:But what about freedom? by Nate+B. · · Score: 1

      Really, I shouldn't feed the troll, but...sigh...

      What, exactly, is barbaric here?

      Dairy cows, with Holsteins being amongst the common, produce far more milk than their calves can consume on a daily basis. So, it is not improper to make use of their milk. The animals are being fed while milked. Once they are milked they are released back into the lot where they have plenty of room to move around plus access to more feed.

      As if it isn't obvious enough, there is no "torture" going on here. I'm sure the system is designed to avoid any undo stress on the animal. Milk production falls in direct proportion to any stress or mistreatment the cow may encounter. Thus, it is in the herdsman's best interest to avoid stressing the animals. It might surprise you to learn that dairy cows are among the most coddled of food production animals.

      If you would bother to learn the facts, you would see that this system will indeed improve the cow's comfort. Some cows need to be milked in a shorter interval than others and this system will assist the dairyman in getting them milked on time. This leads to healthier more comfortable animals which is a far cry from the "torture" you wrongly imagine. That Linux and other Free Software is useful for this technology is cause for celebration, not derision.

      --

      "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
    3. Re:But what about freedom? by Laplace · · Score: 1

      I wish that I were trolling.

      From the article: "DeLaval was started in 1883 by Swedish inventor Gustaf de Laval. It sells a variety of dairy supply and "cow comfort" products aimed at increasing dairy yields." The comfort of the cow is not the primary motivation for using this product. You can't deny that milk cows are bred for and used inhumanely as slaves.

      From goveg.com: "The 9 million cows living on dairy farms in the United States spend most of their lives in large sheds or on feces-caked mud lots, where disease is rampant. Cows raised for their milk are repeatedly impregnated. Their babies are taken away so that humans can drink the milk intended for the calves. When their exhausted bodies can no longer provide enough milk, they are sent to slaughter and ground up for hamburgers."

      Would you allow your own cat or dog to be treated in the same fashion as animals used in factory farming?

      --
      The middle mind speaks!
    4. Re:But what about freedom? by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      And I suppose you're hard at work on a catalyst for obtaining milk from grass? You're not? A microbe or something at least? (Surely microbes have fewer rights than cows) Are you planning on giving up your share of dairy products to offset the cows you want to "free"?

      Regardless, I'm more concerned with the freedom of the humans that have to milk the cows to survive than that of the cows. Face it, life sucks. It's not quite dog-eat-dog, but for now it's man-eat-cow, and it will never be less than man-eat-plant. I fail to see the ethical dilemma people like you see in living.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    5. Re:But what about freedom? by Nate+B. · · Score: 1

      goveg.com? That's an unbiased source. What exactly are you goig to do with the millions of acres of grassland, that for various reasons cannot produce anything else, that cattle, sheep, goats, bison, etc. very efficiently covert into a form of protien we humans can consume?

      Obviously, you're in no way involved in production agriculture, while I am. Perhaps if you left the concrete jungle for a while and spent some time on a real working farm you might understand the truth of the matter. Those of us involved in agriculture have a vested interest in the health and welfare of the animals, but you would rather promote your fantasy than get out and verify for yourself the truth of the matter.

      Even in "factory farming" (as you put it, since I don't know what that means), the animals are left to be themselves rather than forced to be some imitation of a human child. Trust me, there is far more animal abuse by people who keep animals as pets than on the average farm. I don't keep a dog where I live because I have more respect for the animals than to coup them up in a kennel for my own ego.

      I need to quit feeding the troll as I need to get going so we can wean some calves today.

      --

      "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
  89. The obvious next step by whitroth · · Score: 1

    So, when will we see a project to build a robot that can lead pets on a walk?

                        mark "We Also Walk Dogs"*

    * cf. Heinlein

  90. Tux can milk cows but Tux can't make movies? by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    The videos are all in windows media 9 format. Errrr..

    "Windows Media Player

        You need Windows Media Player 9 to be able to watch these movies. If you do not have that version installed, please click on the link below:

    Windows Media Player 9 - Download (Microsoft)

        Operating system requirements

        You need to have at least Windows 98 Second Edition to download Windows Media Player 9. If you have an older version of Windows 98, please visit the Windows Update page below before downloading Windows Media Player 9:

    Windows 98: Download - Windows Update (Microsoft)"

  91. Tux getting some action by aschlemm · · Score: 1

    So even Tux is getting more action now than most people on /.

  92. [OT] On your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please drop the English translation. The latin line is obvious enough, and would be funnier by itself.

    Have a nice day :)

    1. Re:[OT] On your sig by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      You think so? I hadn't thought of that.

      Hmmm.... watch this space!

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

  93. Call Me... by Ranger · · Score: 1

    ... when it can milk chickens. Then I'll be impressed.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  94. Dairy company names? by zlogic · · Score: 1

    First there was DEC (Dairy Equipment Company), with a name exactly like the Digital Equipment Company.
    Now, there's Voluntary Milking System (VMS), named after an operating system. It even runs its own copy of Linux.

  95. Does it run Gentoo? by zlogic · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Does it run Gentoo? by nerdyH · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up/hilarious! Very cool poster :-)

  96. Que? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Only girl cows produce milk. They are kept, but the boy cows go off to the veal pens."

    Last I checked, there weren't any "boy cows" outside of San Francisco and Vegas shows... ;)

    Cow = Female
    Bull = Male
    Cattle = Many Bovine, Male or Female, any Age

    I'd be afraid of the "Boy Cow" that can produce milk!

    And here's another thinking point - every grocery store carries local small-farm dairy products where possible. If you don't want the local dairy to fail, buy their products (and not Kraft Foods...). The difference in the price of a gallon of milk is trivial between corporate and private farms.

    Although I hate PETA (here's some fun - find a leftist and start unfavorably comparing PETA to GWB), I do believe that people need to start *PAYING ATTENTION* to what they buy. Complaining about corporate practices is the most idiotic thing that somebody can do. Don't like it? Don't give them your money. *TELL THEM* why you aren't giving them your money. Tell them that until they change, you, your family, your friends, and your neighbors won't give them any money, and then *FOLLOW THROUGH* on your promise. Corporations only care about getting your money, and if their current business model isn't cutting it, they will change.

    Besides, all corp foods suck anyway. Their cheese lacks flavor, their milk is inferior (watery crap, ultra-pasteurized), their breads are nothing but water and air, and their meat is about as tasteless as you can get. Buying local will (usually) improve on all of these problems - your cheese will be made from the best whole milk fats aged and hand-washed, your milk will be slow-pasteurized which helps maintain the nutrition and density of the liquid, your bread will be crusty yet fluffy inside (and damn-tasty!), and your meat will have depth of flavor to go along with the tenderness of age.

    Fuck PETA. Convince people to buy QUALITY and there won't be any corporate farms to worry about...until the corporate farms stop their current practices and start doing thing right.

    Whiney little bitches...act responsibly, and spend your money accordingly.

  97. penguin/cow jokes by lanced · · Score: 1

    I'm having difficulty creating the punchline here, but there are many out there.

    Here goes setup one:

    So this penguin walks into a barn and asks the cow, "...

    And setup two:

    Two farmers are sitting on the front stoop when one sees a penguin walking in the barn. He turns to the other farmer and asks, "...

    I can't come up with the end of those jokes, but I know that they are leading somplace that is just good clean fun.

    But I see everyone is resisting the joke that is on all of our minds, so I'm going to go ahead and do it...

    In Soviet Russia, the cow milks the penguin!

  98. Upgraded from OS9 by BiggRanger · · Score: 1

    I remember using OS9 with my TRS-80 Color Computer. It had a windows like GUI and used a mouse, all on a 8 bit processor.

  99. Selective Breeding by davegust · · Score: 3, Informative

    but calves born on dairy farms are taken from their mothers when they are just 1 day old and fed milk replacers (including cattle blood) so that humans can have the milk instead.(1,2)

    While the use of milk replacer is common practice, many farms (including our own) used "cull" milk that cannot be sold for human consumption and would otherwise be dumped. Usually this was milk from cows undergoing anti-biotic treatment.

    Female cows are artificially inseminated shortly after their first birthdays.

    Usually at 15 months, which is puberty for a cow - the same time a bull would have done it. It wouldn't work if the animal wasn't ready.

    Cows have a lifespan of about 25 years and can produce milk for eight or nine years, but the stress caused by factory-farm conditions leads to disease, lameness, and reproductive problems that render cows worthless to the dairy industry by the time they are 4 or 5 years old, at which time they are sent to the slaughterhouse.

    The reason cows are often "culled" or sent for slaughter at 4-5 years is that dairies use the cull as a tool to accelerate natural selection for milk production. If a cow is producing well, they are milked for many more years, and produce more offspring which are more likely to be high producer themselves. If they don't produce well after the second lactation, they are sold for beef. Contrary to a previous response, milk cows are used for beef - they are natually lean and well suited for low fat ground beef production.

    Although these animals would naturally make only enough milk to meet the needs of their calves (around 16 pounds a day), genetic manipulation, antibiotics, and hormones are used to force each cow to produce more than 18,000 pounds of milk a year (an average of 50 pounds a day).(8,9) Cows are also fed unnatural, high-protein diets, which include dead chickens, pigs, and other animals, because their natural diet of grass would not provide the nutrients necessary for them to produce the massive amounts of milk required by the industry.

    That has happened for 100 years. Selective breeding is hardly genetic manipulation. You simply use the breeding stock that produces offspring with the highest milk production.

    As for feeding cows "dead-chickens", cows diets are primarily alfalfa (protein), corn silage, chopped grass and legumes (protein), corn grain (protein), and sometimes high fat supplements like cotton seed or bakery waste (cookie crumbs). Most farmers cannot afford to risk feeding animal by-products to dairy cows due to the potential for disease transmission.

    Animal mistreatment is the exception, not the rule on diary farms. Most diary farmers take very good care of their cattle - it is a matter of profits. Unlike beef operations, they cannot affort to liberally use anti-biotics - most anti-biotics show up in the milk and every tank is tested - not just organic farms.

  100. Who wants milk? by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1

    I want malk (Now with vitamin R!),

  101. Future Sex Machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make these suction cups look like tentacles and it would be a great hit in japan.

  102. Milking videos are WMV. by vettemph · · Score: 1

    So this milking machine runs linux but you can't view the videos if your a linux user???
    Someone needs to contact these butt munchers and ask them to have a chat with there webmaster.
    If the vids were mpg, everyone could view without issues.

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    1. Re:Milking videos are WMV. by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      I had no problem downloading and playing them with mplayer.

  103. Re:Its by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The article was published on a news site, not slashdot. It's highly unlikely that the person who wrote the article even reads slashdot


    I'm assuming GuitarNeophyte reads his own topics, and it was he or she that made the apostrophe crime (the error was not transcribed from the article). One might hope that the editors, who should have corrected it, read the replies too... yeah, I must be new here.

  104. Sing Along with Strong Bad... Again! by Caspian · · Score: 1
    It identifies the cow, then finds the udders, milks the cow, cleans it's undercarriage, and lets it go.

    o/~ Oooooooooh... if you want it to be possessive, it's just I T S, but if you want it to be a contraction, it's I T apostrophe S... scallawag! o/~
    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
  105. apt-get moo by timothykaine · · Score: 1

             (__)
             (oo)
       /------\/
      / |    ||
    /\---/\
        ~~   ~~
    ...."Have you mooed today?"...

  106. Command Line Interface by glindsey · · Score: 1


    milker$ mount -t cattle /dev/cow
    mount: can't find /dev/cow (did someone leave the gate open?)

    milker$

    1. Re:Command Line Interface by Nate+B. · · Score: 1

      I pitched my mod points by replying in this thread. Someone mod parent Funny!

      --

      "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
  107. Trolling for trolls... by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    in the old days we called them milk maids.

    That's because you were sexist, and probably got a hard-on making women do menial work wearing stupid outfits.

    Got to wonder how much of it is a true advancement and how much is simply replacing a minimum wage job with technology?

    It's both. They're equivalent.

    At what point does replacing a ten grand a year employee with a 100 grand machine become impractical?

    This has been answered already. Had you gotten past a 3rd grade education "in the old days" you would be able to do the simple arithmetic required. Had you reached college you might even be able to correct for interest and inflation.

    Farm jobs actually don't fall under minimum wage laws or more to the point they have a seperate lower wage.

    And this is a good thing?

    I have to wonder if humans aren't more efficent than machines at certain jobs?

    Haven't found one yet. And that certainly isn't the case here.

    A machine breaks down you repair it or buy another one. With minimum wage labor you hire another one.

    It costs less to build a machine than it does a person. Much less.

    By simply creating technology to replace workers are we really improving things?

    You keep repeating this as though you actually believe you're onto something. You're not.

    You can call it survival of the fittest but that doesn't stop out of work people from breaking into your car or house to feed their families.

    No one's calling it survival of the fittest. As for out of work people, you should probably make sure they get a share of the robotic milkings so they don't have to steal your car. (PS, this is the closest you came in your entire post to making a valid point. Bravo.)

    Isn't food production a factory enough at this stage?

    Not until there's a food factory in every backyard.

    Personally I buy free range for a reason.

    I have a feeling that reason is that you're out of touch with reality.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  108. Yeah, but by Sigg3.net · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but does it run - - OH SHIT!

    I love this.
    "Milk flow, quantity, and milking time are monitored individually for each of the cow's
    four teats, and compared with historical values. Discrepancies are reported, and can be
    early indicators of illness or injury, the company says."

    ... Now all they have to do is make the cows understand the information. Otherwise, they'd be pretty much like management.

    Regarding the bull-problem, you could just write a simple script that would render 1-teated incompatible for milking.

  109. Please read the article next time. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    You should try reading the article next time. You'll be able to contribute more to the discussion that way.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.