Slashdot Mirror


How to Build a 17-ft Wind Turbine

agentfive writes "The people over at Treehugger have found an amazing little article on how to build a 17ft - 3kW+ output Wind Turbine. Apparently this is the latest project of OtherPower.com and the site has a variety of other engergy saving/producing projects including a Homebrew Maytag Gas Battery charger."

335 comments

  1. Or... by InVinoVeritas · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Tie Rush Limbaugh to a post.

    1. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Tie Rush Limbaugh to a post.

      The best way to do that is cover it with OxyContin.

  2. Lets count... by imsabbel · · Score: 0, Troll

    until the first moron posts the usual "it will NEVER produce as much energy as it consumed during production !!!!111" propaganda...

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:Lets count... by imsabbel · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ok, point proven.
      Slashdot, home of the asshats and bigots.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  3. Beautiful! by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll take 2 please, mounted side by side, in opposite directions, my current window fan just isn't cuttin the mustard...

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
    1. Re:Beautiful! by Beau6183 · · Score: 1

      Uh, this is a passive windmill, not a fan. It does not generate wind current: it generates electrical currents from wind force.

    2. Re:Beautiful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, this was a joke, not a serious post. It should not generate personality-lacking responses which aim to make the original poster feel like any more of an ass than he allready does...

    3. Re:Beautiful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's just hope none of the jokes flying over your head get caught in the blades.

    4. Re:Beautiful! by Beau6183 · · Score: 1

      While the post was a joke, the subject was in error. I did smile when I first read it -- so my personality isn't completely lacking :-P

    5. Re:Beautiful! by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Not if you put power into it.

      Of course since this wasn't designed to put out any particular frequency power, getting a powersource that will work is hard. Particularly because it is a 3-phase alternator, so you have to have 3 of those power sources, kept in sync.

  4. Re:huh? by jandrese · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think if you replace the term windtunnel with windmill the answer will become clear.

    That or if you bothered to read the article.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  5. Slashdot is brought to you by Sears Craftsman by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    DIY stories so far today:
    Homebuilt 19" Mini-ITX Server Rack
    The Floating Powerbook
    A Practical Guide to DIY LCD Projectors
    How to Build a 17-ft Wind Turbine

    And it's only 2:45pm EST.
    Did Bob Vila donate a large sum of money to Slashdot or something?

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Slashdot is brought to you by Sears Craftsman by mkw87 · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is turning into a text version of all the showns on TLC (The Learning Channel) about home improvement.

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in mud. Soon, you realize the pig is dirty, and he likes it.
    2. Re:Slashdot is brought to you by Sears Craftsman by spac3manspiff · · Score: 1

      Nah, they realized that it's summer and they don't want anymore "Hacker sentenced to Death" stories.

      Got to keep the geeks occupied.

    3. Re:Slashdot is brought to you by Sears Craftsman by courtarro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You'd rather be reading about Google and Apple? This is truly 'news for nerds'. I for one welcome our new DIY overlords.

    4. Re:Slashdot is brought to you by Sears Craftsman by space_in_your_face · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    5. Re:Slashdot is brought to you by Sears Craftsman by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      American Computer?

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    6. Re:Slashdot is brought to you by Sears Craftsman by spun · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm, more like "Tool Time" with Tim "The Tool Man" Taylor.

      Tim: So today we're going to overclock a Pentium 3 to over 4,000 Jigahertz using this vat of liquid nitrogen. Wough, wough, wough.
      Al: Careful with that, Tim. That's minus 320 degrees you know...
      Tim: I know that, Al, now help me here, I can't quite... reach... AAAAIIIII! My balls! My balls have frozen solid!
      Al: Oh no! Let me just... (CRASH! TINKLE, TINKLE.) Sorry about that, Tim.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    7. Re:Slashdot is brought to you by Sears Craftsman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that like "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these" ?

    8. Re:Slashdot is brought to you by Sears Craftsman by budgenator · · Score: 1

      That's just too funny, I think you deserve extra karma for making a tim taylor' nutsack joke in a thread about a DIY project involving 32, 12,100 guass magnets placed only 2 sctotum skin's thickness apart!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    9. Re:Slashdot is brought to you by Sears Craftsman by kiddailey · · Score: 1


      I'd hardly call "The Floating Powerbook" a DIY story ;)

  6. Re:Amazing! by tgrimley · · Score: 1

    If you saw it on Monday, why did you submit it?

  7. Re:huh? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

    and what use might a windtunnel in my apartment be? It's not like I'm designing fighter-jets or the new Ford here.

    Wind Turbine, not Wind Tunnel. You can stick it on your roof and run a cable to your computer. Poor man's power, as it were.

    Don't feel too bad, though. I misread the headline the first time as well. :-)

  8. Something to add... by imsabbel · · Score: 1, Insightful

    After lots of real bad articles (like that beamer), this is finally some REAL DIU.
    Starting from the copper wire and magnets, there is actually some real construction involved.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  9. Local restrictions by crow · · Score: 1

    Much as I would love to generate my own electricity, a wind turbine isn't likely to be allowed by my town.

    Pretty much the only clean energy that I could generate legally is solar, and that's just not cost effective, especially in Massachusetts.

    1. Re:Local restrictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I demand that you stop this AT ONCE! It's unfair competition!

    2. Re:Local restrictions by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      Local restrictions suck.

      I'm in a prime location to put up a beast like this. Only problem is that I don't own the building.

      The rear of the building faces a highway and train tracks. They certainly wouldn't complain about it.

      But I feel for you Crow. MA is out of control these days.

    3. Re:Local restrictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In vermont we have act 250 which is an all inclusive 'fuck you' from the zoning baord as it is worded to prevent any structure that would damage the natural scenery of the property.

      natural scenery was never defined in the bill.

    4. Re:Local restrictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the lights... all went dark in Massachusetts...

    5. Re:Local restrictions by bigpat · · Score: 1

      Much as I would love to generate my own electricity, a wind turbine isn't likely to be allowed by my town.

      I just put one up once a couple years ago, didn't ask permission, apparently the building inspector got a call about it but he said that he didn't see a problem with it... I was all ready to use a "decorative" defense as I was not using it to power my house and it was just above the existing roofline just did a few experiments with it and such, but it wasn't necessary.

      However, Make sure it has wind braking or its natural rpms are low enough. The one I used started making the loudest most terrible sound I've ever heard at 4 am one morning during a rain and wind storm. Neighbors never complained, but I was up trying to stop the damn thing. Ended up wrecking the blades just to get it to stop.

      With wind turbines bigger is better, both for power generation and noise.

  10. Wind Tunnel Usage by LeoDioxide · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's obviously for your dog! Now you can simulate the head-out-the-window-of-your-car experience right in your very own studio apartment.

    1. Re:Wind Tunnel Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there was a recent "there ought to be a law" contest for kids here in good 'ole pennsylvania. the winning entry was a law banning dogs from sticking their heads out the window.

      in other news, taxes increased 16% and legislators got a 16% pay raise! i'm leaving this hole as soon as possible.

    2. Re:Wind Tunnel Usage by ifdef · · Score: 1

      Insightful???

      Now I don't feel nearly so good about when one of my posts is modded Insightful.

      The parent poster is talking about a wind TUNNEL, while TFA is talking about a wind TURBINE. Or, I assume it is, because it's slashdotted already so I couldn't read the article.

      Let's try to restrict Insightful to those posts that actually show SOME insight, okay?

    3. Re:Wind Tunnel Usage by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      You can't even fit something 17 ft through your studio apartment, let alone your landlord allowing you to install it outside your window.

  11. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turbine != Tunnel

    not sure if you were being funny or stupid...but there you go...

  12. 3 KW....pfffft by charnov · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, all I want to know is how many birds it'll kill...we have a real starling problem where I live.

    --
    [RIAA] says its concern is artists. That's true, in just the sense that a cattle rancher is concerned about its cattle.
    1. Re:3 KW....pfffft by raygundan · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't want a 17' turbine, then, I think. The bigger they are, the slower they spin-- you want a nice little 3' turbine that spins like an airplane propeller. It has to be fast enough that it blurs, and they think it's just air.

      Alternatively, you could just get a big picture window. Or a cat.

    2. Re:3 KW....pfffft by Actuator+Man · · Score: 1

      You also need an umbrella every time you go outside, to deflect all the bloody chunks of dead bird dropping out of the sky.

    3. Re:3 KW....pfffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, birds are killed by the turbines that are not spinning. They can see the spinning ones since they are moving, but they can't see the still ones because they reflect the sun (or some such thing).

    4. Re:3 KW....pfffft by myheroBobHope · · Score: 1

      an added accessory is the "delicious bird" filter. Bad tasting birds, such as pigeons, would not be able to get chopped up by the blades, but delicious birds, like eagles, would. Mmmm... eagle burger... it comes preshredded too!

      --
      http://www.pterrys.com
    5. Re:3 KW....pfffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trick is to put the bird feeder on the other side of the windmill.

    6. Re:3 KW....pfffft by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Funny

      Starling McNuggets....mmmmm....

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    7. Re:3 KW....pfffft by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Growing up on a farm we had a large (about 3 foot) ventilation fan for the milking barn. I always wondered why there always seemed to be a large amount of feathers by that fan. Since the sight of birds flying in and out of the barn was common, and the feathers not uncommon throughout the barn I thought little of the inconsistency. That is until one day I saw a bird get startled and head for the fan as it was the largest hole that seemed to lead outdoors. The fan had a wire mesh screen on it but the holes were largest near the hub where a bird in flight could barely fit through. The bird went full speed for the hole and I could see it tuck in its wings to coast through. A rattle, bang, and a poof of feathers later the bird was gone and a mystery solved.

      Birds are not smart creatures. There is a reason for the term "bird brained".

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    8. Re:3 KW....pfffft by hab136 · · Score: 1
      You also need an umbrella every time you go outside, to deflect all the bloody chunks of dead bird dropping out of the sky.

      Get a cat or dog, problem solved.

    9. Re:3 KW....pfffft by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      It has to be fast enough that it blurs, and they think it's just air.

      Why? Birds are pretty stupid - they fly into large turbines, windows, buildings, trees...

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    10. Re:3 KW....pfffft by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the person who designed the wire fan guard is even dumber than the bird...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:3 KW....pfffft by PakProtector · · Score: 2, Funny

      Doctor Lector, I presume?

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    12. Re:3 KW....pfffft by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      I love that argument. "What about the birds!?!"

      Birds have brains. Birds use those brains to stay alive, and they work remarkably well.

      Like for instance how ducks know that people that live in cities are cool and give you bread, but people that live in the country carry shotguns, and are best avoided by a margin of 100 yards or more.

      If they can figure that much out, then they can figure out that fast-moving machinery making loud noises is best avoided too.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    13. Re:3 KW....pfffft by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Pigeons not tasty? Are you mad? They're yummy. 'Course, you need about 8 of the little fuckers to get a decent feed.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    14. Re:3 KW....pfffft by buckvillian · · Score: 1

      Actually 3KW is well below the peak outputs I've seen from the machine, but 3KW does happen often. In 'average' 10mph winds we see around 400W which is really what the machine is designed for. Birds are a *none issue* with wind turbines. Noise is a *none issue* - if they are designed to run nice and slowly and furl properly you can barely hear them. Some machines are loud, but they are too fast. The loudest thing about this 17' machine is the quiet growl/hum of the alternator when current is flowing.

    15. Re:3 KW....pfffft by mink · · Score: 1

      I was thinking Starship Titanic.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  13. Links by dwight0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I like some of the sites they link to. Some useful stuff. Like how to make a rocket out of a match.
    http://www.matchrockets.com/
    Before internet, I once payed $2 out of the back of a comic book to learn that.

    1. Re:Links by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      Yeah thanks. I just wasted an hour of my work day reading that site. Now, I have all sorts of experiments to do some time. :)

    2. Re:Links by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      These days it's hard to buy matches, you get 10 butane filled pocket lighters for a buck instead. You need a more sophisticated mechanism to get your butane rocket flying.

  14. Perfect! by mogrify · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've been looking for something like this. Now I just need a death ray to use on my homeowner's association and I'll be good to go.

    --
    perl -e 'foreach(values %SIG){$_="IGNORE";}while(){}'
    1. Re:Perfect! by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

      Not only can you find one of those on the net, you can find one that also uses "green" power to do it. Now you just have to get them all to stand in the same spot long enough...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Perfect! by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      See my sig. Contact me for a quote. (Our Big Ass Lens(TM)) just came in Monday, and we're aching for a test target.

      -Peter

    3. Re:Perfect! by sharkey · · Score: 1

      mmmmmmmmmm... popcorn!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    4. Re:Perfect! by mogrify · · Score: 1

      Thank you both for your offers. I think it would be best for my neighborhood if I did not contact you directly. It is, however, nice to know that you can be the world's most menacing supervillain while using only renewable resources in the process. That way, you can feel free to destroy communications satellites and government offices without contributing to the pollution of our skies and waters. Thank you for providing a valuable public service.

      --
      perl -e 'foreach(values %SIG){$_="IGNORE";}while(){}'
  15. Re:Amazing! by a3217055 · · Score: 1

    Yeah slashdot has fallen in stories, it might be the editors are going out and meeting peope ro something :)

  16. My dad would like this by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Interesting

    he runs off the grid in Vermont, with a battery-power system, some solar cells, and a river paddlewheel turbine, and has a ridge on his 42 acre property that he could site this on.

    Which is why he uses a laptop instead of a PC - easier to wire it to trickle feed from the battery system.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:My dad would like this by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Out of curiousity, but, how hard was it to set all of this up? How much did it cost?

    2. Re:My dad would like this by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2, Informative
      ~$4000 will get you going nicely, depending on available resources. It's much easier if you still have a hookup to the grid. In many locals you can sell energy back to the grid in summer. It is limited, in that small lifestyle changes are needed to keep off the grid. No clothes dryer, for instance. A generator is useful for power tools, etc.

      There might be tax breaks available, also.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    3. Re:My dad would like this by brjndr · · Score: 1

      I know in California you can keep a running credit, so your summer solar energy can earn you credit for winter. Where I live, in the central valley, you can even get enough light in winter to keep a positive balance.

      PG&E even had a program so that you could take out a loan through them to finance your purchase of solar cells, and they will subsidize your interest.

    4. Re:My dad would like this by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Out of curiousity, but, how hard was it to set all of this up? How much did it cost?

      My father-in-law and one of my brother-in-laws built one of these. I think it was this exact design.

      I think they spent about $750 on materials.

    5. Re:My dad would like this by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Out of curiousity, but, how hard was it to set all of this up? How much did it cost?

      Not really sure, he did it over a lot of years.

      He likes to build houses, for fun.

      So first he made an outdoor solar shower and toilet, using passive solar.

      Then he bought the batteries - just car batteries, think a friend sold him a bunch cheap rather than ship them back - and got one of those panel solar cell grids and wired it up, after siting it for best elevation for his latitude and solar exposure - which I think he adjusts every month or so.

      He installed the water turbine when he rechannelled the stream to make a pond and improve drainage, and has that power up the batteries.

      It's all kind of piecemeal. So he had been talking about getting wind power, since he's just below the ridge, and owns the ridge as part of his 42 acres, so siting isn't a problem.

      Since it's a working tree farm, it's agricultural, so the permits aren't needed for what he does, as I understand it - or maybe there are permits, but I never really asked him about that. Especially since he doesn't sell the power.

      He's a bit far to be attached to the grid anyway.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  17. apparently they need another wind turbine by Ubergrendle · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... to power their websites.

    slashdot effect in... er... effect.

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    1. Re:apparently they need another wind turbine by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      All links were Coral Cache'd. Images were not.

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    2. Re:apparently they need another wind turbine by chevelleSS · · Score: 0, Troll

      they're not slashdotted.. the website link is wrong it should link to treehugger.com.

    3. Re:apparently they need another wind turbine by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      As long as you can access port 8090, the Coral Cache is still available:

      http://www.otherpower.com.nyud.net:8090/17page1.ht ml

    4. Re:apparently they need another wind turbine by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      How would that happen? I read all the pages on the 'Cache just fine.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:apparently they need another wind turbine by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      That's because they made their webserver out of old junked radio parts, 3 boxes of staplers, 2,000 vacuum tubes, 2 sheets of plywood, and a hamster.

      That, and it's not windy today.

  18. Solar Power In Wired by Omega1045 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wired had an article this month about rooftop solar power that was kinda cool. I thought that the project they highlighted (no pun intended) could be DIY with a little money and time.

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    1. Re:Solar Power In Wired by comzen · · Score: 1

      Looks cool. There sure are a lot of fluffy buzzwords in that article. I could be wrong, but I believe that even with concentrators you will only reach the maximum output of the given panel. Therefore tracking/concentrating systems are mostly good for high latitude (low solar index) places (don't really need this in Arizona). I work for a company that sells (not a pitch because I won't say which) passive trackers that work by liquid inside the mounting system heating up and moving the panel as the sun moves across the sky.

      --
      Crunch!
  19. Reminds me off... by turbofisk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    this kinda reminds me of a guy made a small powerplant for his stream... He actually got money back from the powercompany as he was now supplying instead of drawing power :) hellacool... I wonder if this will be the same case?

    1. Re:Reminds me off... by serutan · · Score: 1

      I remember a guy doing that back in the 80s, but authorities forced him to remove his equipment because the stream was listed somewhere as "navigable" and therefore it was illegal to obstruct or alter the flow in any way. It was a ridiculous claim of course, the stream being like 8 ft wide, but the bureaucrats insisted on following their rules to the letter. Wonder if it was the same guy?

    2. Re:Reminds me off... by brjndr · · Score: 1

      "Hellacool"

      Northern California in da house.

  20. Bad link by kitzilla · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bad link in the article text. It's here.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    1. Re:Bad link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, cute tree huggers! Quick, coralize!!

  21. Wind Turbine??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about Passing Wind!

    1. Re:Wind Turbine??? by milktoastman · · Score: 1

      Your Passing Wind will pass right past me and I will take you down with Heavy Fists (aka, 'the 10 dollar Fists')

  22. Yes, but can I use it as a heatsink? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Oh wait, it's been done, sort of.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Yes, but can I use it as a heatsink? by RabidJackal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just when we thought they had run out of insane cooling techniques, they tell us how to build a 17ft wind turbine. It wont just cool your computer, it will blow it down the street too!

  23. Otherpower.com Rules! by Coocha · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been following the work of the Otherpower.com folks for a while now. They're damn good DIY engineers. Not only are their wind turbines quite nice, but my interest was also piqued by their use of single-cylinder Lister engines. Coupled with a biodiesel recipe, it looks like they can run their entire shop for 8 hours on a single gallon of carbon-neutral gas.

    One of my lifelong goals is to live simply, on a large plot of undeveloped land somewhere. I'm glad there are people like the Otherpower folks who are paving the way as far as alternative energy creation, and being considerate enough to document their work as they go.

    --
    May the threads progress competently.
    1. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wasn't aware they allowed the Unabomber to post from jail.

    2. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      In my experience, living simply is hard.

      What I'd really like to see is cheaper, cleaner energy solutions that work on a large scale, so that people like me who live in HumanHives(TM) (aka, apartments) benefit from something slightly cleaner than coal.

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    3. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you are working towards that goal by wasting electricity and the environment by reading and posting to /.?

      Great...

    4. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "One of my lifelong goals is to live simply, on a large plot of undeveloped land somewhere. I'm glad there are people like the Otherpower folks who are paving the way..."

      Ah, irony.

    5. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      their use of single-cylinder Lister engines

      I much prefer Rimmer engines myself...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    6. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by TheHawke · · Score: 1

      Their shop is powered by a composite power system. They got a bank of batts being charged by several wind turbines, the Lister engine, a couple of hydrogenerators that supply a surprising amount of power considering that they were orginally squirrel cage blowers that came out of a central AC system.

      Their power plants are not state of the art, but homebrewing/improvising at it's finest.

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    7. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, irony

      it's like raiiiiiiiiiiiiin on your wedding day!

    8. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by Pionar · · Score: 1

      One of my lifelong goals is to live simply, on a large plot of undeveloped land somewhere.

      Serious reply here. On my way to Vegas last week, I saw a sign in Salina, UT that read "Undeveloped land, $500 per acre". Maybe you should check that out.

    9. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      I on the other hand, have no interest in living terribly simply, just cheaply and with little or no environmental impact. That's why I'm bookmarking them so I can read them once the /. effect is over.

      It would be incredible to be able to live on 10 acres of undeveloped land with almost no environmental footprint for about $6k/year, while still being able to enjoy many of the comforts of modern living.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    10. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      I much prefer Rimmer engines myself...

      You would, smeghead.

    11. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a free riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide when you're already there.

    12. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Yeh, there is cheap land out in the middle of nowhere. The problem is getting to it, and once you do, having stuff shipped to it to do all your homebrew engineering. Then once you decide to stop living in your vehicle, getting building supplies and crews to it is another problem. I don't know what the price threshold for that kind of land is, maybe lower than $500 per acre.

    13. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by deathazre · · Score: 1

      okay, are they using a squirrel-cage blower with some other sort of (most likely PM) motor, or are they using an actual squirrel-cage inductive motor (which means you have to apply voltage to it and spin it faster than it wants to go on its own to get it to generate power)?

      --
      Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
    14. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by TheHawke · · Score: 1

      *peers at site, keeps from drooling and having his own ideas*

      THey are using a tape drive motor, which is pretty much a DC inductive type. Those kind of motors are pretty popular with their projects.

      They have another hydro plant there that uses the 3 phase (polyphase) design that their wind generators utilize.

      I'm surprised that most aeromotors don't use polyphase generation for it is very efficient and has a very low drag coefficient in comparison to the conventional alternator/generator designs.

      The designs are very frugal on material useage (copper, magnets, supporting frame).

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    15. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      >> One of my lifelong goals is to live simply, on a large plot
      >> of undeveloped land somewhere.

      > Serious reply here. On my way to Vegas last week, I saw a sign
      > in Salina, UT that read "Undeveloped land, $500 per acre". Maybe
      > you should check that out.

      Yeah, but then you're in Utah, and that simply ain't living. *shudder*

    16. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! by arbitraryaardvark · · Score: 1

      One of my lifelong goals is to live simply, on a large plot of undeveloped land somewhere.
      You might enjoy http://raccooncreek.blogspot.com./
      We have the land, are moving a barn to it, still haven't worked out all the energy use solutions.
      www.f4.ca/text/possumliving.htm is a free online book about simple living.
      I didn't realize it was also a movie.
      http://www.newday.com/films/Possum_Living.html

      - informative, offtopic -

  24. Otherpower and Treehugger, not enough power... by VitrosChemistryAnaly · · Score: 1

    They need to beef up the power to their servers which are already crashing and burning...

    --
    "It's a tarp!" -- Dyslexic Admiral Ackbar
    1. Re:Otherpower and Treehugger, not enough power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beef up, huh?

      How about screwed up?

      (sorry, nerdy film quote there)

  25. ... those windmills will keep them cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
  26. In case of slashdotting, there is a mirror... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...of the turbine plans over at birdkiller.com.

    1. Re:In case of slashdotting, there is a mirror... by kotku · · Score: 1

      was a mirror ....

      --
      The bikini - security through obscurity since 1943
  27. I submitted this by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Informative

    with a more accurate headline.

    The website doesnt really show YOU how to build one.

    Rather, it shows you photos of the various steps taken by someone else to build one.

    Sure, you could probably look at the photos and read the descriptions and use your brain to fill in the missing details and build one yourself, but there would be additional work/calculations needed.

    It's still a pretty frickin cool project though.

    1. Re:I submitted this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still a pretty frickin cool project though.

      Yup. And if you're really interested, there was a number of very similar homebrew windpower books in the 70s. Sorry I can't remember titles and authors after thirty years, but dig around your local libraries, especially colleges.

      Skip the books by TAB. The good ones were roughly 8x11 slim paperbacks. Had some useful info on simple propane conversions for your VW van too.

    2. Re:I submitted this by bluGill · · Score: 1

      If you can't figure out how to build your own version from their story, then you should stick to professional installations anyway. Make sure you buy the maintenance contract from them.

      There is nothing wrong with being mechanically ignoreant. There is something wrong with being ignorant, and doing anyway.

  28. The Problem With Small Wind Turbines is this: by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    You put up one of these in the city and you're going to kill a lot of birds.

    Of course, that could be a bonus if we're talking about pigeons.

    --
    "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    1. Re:The Problem With Small Wind Turbines is this: by Cecil · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Where's your reference for this "fact"? It's not that I don't believe you, it's just that I don't believe you. This is mostly a myth as far as I've ever been able to figure out.

      Besides, even if they do kill birds, you'd have to build a LOT of wind turbines before you came anywhere close to the number of birds killed by trucks, deforestation, pollution or even windows (the transparent glass kind, not the OS). Should we outlaw trucks or windows to protect the poor birdies while we're at it? I ask you, How many birds would be saved by replacing coal burning powerplants with wind turbines?

    2. Re:The Problem With Small Wind Turbines is this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free energy AND food. Sounds good to me.

    3. Re:The Problem With Small Wind Turbines is this: by Nytewynd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How many birds would be saved by replacing coal burning powerplants with wind turbines?

      Most of them. In 100 years when greenhouse gasses kill everything, birds will wish they had windmills.

      --
      /. ++
    4. Re:The Problem With Small Wind Turbines is this: by gclef · · Score: 1
      This is a Google answers thread on the subject. In general, mortality is very strongly tied to the speed of the fin rotation. Given that these folks are talking about rotation speeds above 100 rpm, the speed becomes a big factor (birds can't see it & avoid it, if the fins are spinning so fast it blurs).

      In general, though, yes, windows, and (interestingly) TV/radio towers kill far more birds than wind turbines.

    5. Re:The Problem With Small Wind Turbines is this: by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > > How many birds would be saved by replacing coal burning powerplants with wind turbines?
      >
      >Most of them. In 100 years when greenhouse gasses kill everything, birds will wish they had windmills.

      All of them. In 100 years when nuclear power stations have contributed zero CO2, the birds will be doing just fine.

      Or none of them. Because the radioactive waste produced by the nuclear plants is vastly less than the radioactive waste dumped straight into the atmosphere as fly ash from the coal plants, even those birds living directly downwind of the nukes won't have mutated enough in 100 years to achieve sentience sufficient to offer us their thanks.

      (Well, with the possible exception of the parrots, who are already developing mathematics :)

    6. Re:The Problem With Small Wind Turbines is this: by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
      Where's your reference for this "fact"? It's not that I don't believe you, it's just that I don't believe you. This is mostly a myth as far as I've ever been able to figure out.

      Not at all. This article describes the situation at Altamount Pass in California. These are older, small-diameter and therefore high-RPM type turbines. As the article and countless others like it shows, they do kill birds, including hundreds of raptors. It is this very sort of turbine that one is likely to see in residential or urban applications. As you can see, the methology for determining bird mortality with any sort of turbine is simple: count the bodies. With the smaller turbines, there are many. With the larger one, there are few, because the birds can see the blades and avoid them. This is also well-documented, just look.

      How did you jump to the conclusion that I am opposed to wind power in general based upon my misgivings about wind power in built-up areas?

      And tin reply to your question: Many birds would be saved by replacing coal plant with wind turbines. Given the sundry collateral costs of coal-power, such as immense air pollution in the form of SO2, CO2, and CO, to say nothing of the radionucleides that get released from the coal, and the human and animal diseases caused by same; water pollution from mine tailings in coal-producing regions; deforestation and long-term ecological damage caused by strip-mining; mortality among coal miners, which is very, very high in the developing world; logistical costs of moving coal over long distances, all of which add up to make coal more expensive and less desirable than it appears, for avian and human beings alike.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    7. Re:The Problem With Small Wind Turbines is this: by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. We'll have run out of petroleum long before then.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    8. Re:The Problem With Small Wind Turbines is this: by dasunt · · Score: 1
      Most of them. In 100 years when greenhouse gasses kill everything, birds will wish they had windmills.

      This is currently at +5, insightful.

      The most popular models for global warming predict a change of +1.8c to +5.8c between 1990 and 2100[1].

      I doubt that this will result in the extinction of all life on earth.

      [1] Admittedly, they are models. We don't know what will happen 100 years down the road. While we hope that the models are correct, 30 years ago, our models were showing a global cooling trend.

    9. Re:The Problem With Small Wind Turbines is this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean?

      African or European swallows?

  29. Wind Power by Dracolytch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've never really gotten an answer to this question:

    What are the implications or potential problems from removing energy from Earth's weather systems? Is the energy we're removing negligible enough to be ignored? Could it potentially change weather patterns by blocking/slowing wind?

    Do we have any information about changes in weather from other man-made things such as cities? I've heard beltways can cause enough heat to slow/redirect some weather. (I know that birds of prey use updrafts caused by hot highways to help them gain altitude using less energy)

    Any reliable sources for this kind of information, or are all sides biased?

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    1. Re:Wind Power by glenmark · · Score: 4, Informative
      What are the implications or potential problems from removing energy from Earth's weather systems? Is the energy we're removing negligible enough to be ignored? Could it potentially change weather patterns by blocking/slowing wind?
      It should have no more effect than a tree does, and in windy areas where wind power is a viable source (my old stomping grounds in West Texas spring to mind), having windbreaks is generally a good thing in terms of reducing erosion.

      Of course, there has been a lot of chatter in the media lately about birds getting killed by windmill farms. Wildlife impact is a definite consideration in the design and placement of the things...
      --
      *** Quantum Mechanics: The Dreams of Which Stuff is Made ***
    2. Re:Wind Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sort of thing has always concerned me about the various ideas of putting solar power stations in orbit and beaming energy back to the surface. The earth currently receives a set amount of solar radiation (more or less). Now you're talking about grabbing some extra out in space that wouldn't have hit the planet, turning it into microwaves or whatever, and beaming it down to earth. Those microwaves get converted into electricity (and some heat during the conversion). Then that electricity gets turned into, say, compressor motor whirling (and some heat), or runs thru your CPU (and turns into heat). Seems to me we'd be adding a whole lot of extra heat to our planet...

    3. Re:Wind Power by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Informative
      To help provide some insight into your questions you could start with this BBC link which talks about microclimates.

      CNN has an article which talks about the same phenomenon.

      This link has not only a discussion of microclimates but pictures and graphs to to illustrate the effect.

      If you really want to numb your mind you could read this research paper which goes into a whole bunch of details relating to microclimates.

      The above should get you started. I didn't provide the proverbial link to a Wiki article since there are enough of other sources to provide the same information.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    4. Re:Wind Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Another problem I've read about is radar reflections from the turbine blades mucking up ari traffic control radars.

      Wind farm foe cites risk to radar

    5. Re:Wind Power by evanbd · · Score: 1, Insightful
      It should have no more effect than a tree does, and in windy areas where wind power is a viable source (my old stomping grounds in West Texas spring to mind), having windbreaks is generally a good thing in terms of reducing erosion.

      Huh? I think there's a big difference between an inert blob that the air mostly just flows around (with some turbulence and loss of energy), and a windmill carefully impedance matched to the wind to extract the maximum possible energy from it.

      Also, it's not at all clear to me that changing weather patterns is a good thing globally just because it helps locally.

      I'm not trying to say we should stop all wind power, just that the issues are more complicated than they appear at first glance. Fossil fuels are bad, so it's not a question of whether wind is harmless or not, but one of whether it's worth the costs. Sane and balanced investigation of the tradeoffs is required, as always. But in the meantime, we should start building more sources of renewable energy -- let's avoid the trap of paralysis via overly detailed studies.

      It's not even close to an easy problem, but that doesn't mean we can't try to solve it.

    6. Re:Wind Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm sorry, but you appear to be insane.

    7. Re:Wind Power by ArsonSmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even if you had a giant wind turbine that was 1/4 mile high and across your still using less than 1% of the total wind power available at that point vertically in the atmosphere.

      If they start making large fields of 1000+ foot hight turbines I might start worring about the environmental effects. For now a small forest I'm sure has far much more effect on wind resistance than a field of turbines.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    8. Re:Wind Power by danharan · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if DIY turbines were bad for birds. Smaller turbines tend to move faster and be more deadly. Modern blades spin far more slowly and result in few bird casualties.

      To put it in perspective you could look at birds getting killed running into smokestacks from your nearest coal-fired energy plant or residential/office high-rise buildings. Even cats are more deadly than turbines.

      I would choose a model carefully if it was installed near habitat for endangered birds. But most of the time, we're looking at something that is several orders of magnitude less problematic than the status quo.

      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    9. Re:Wind Power by glenmark · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Huh? I think there's a big difference between an inert blob that the air mostly just flows around (with some turbulence and loss of energy), and a windmill carefully impedance matched to the wind to extract the maximum possible energy from it.
      I think you may be underestimating how much energy transfer takes place when wind strikes a tree. Of course it will vary wildly depending upon the species of tree, as well as its size and age, but it takes quite a bit of energy to get all of those branches swaying. Just try pushing a large branch around on a calm day and keep it going. See how long it takes you to get tired. Then extrapolate that effort to all of the branches on the tree...
      Also, it's not at all clear to me that changing weather patterns is a good thing globally just because it helps locally.
      I don't disagree. Predicting the impact of manmade structures is a non-trivial feat. Just take a look at the plethora of journal articles studying the impact of suburban sprawl on temperatures with its huge expanses of concrete and asphalt. I'm simply arguing that the impact of a windmill on wind patterns would be no greater than that of a tree. In fact, I would expect that trees should have a greater impact due to the cooling effects they provice.

      Of course, these are all simply educated guesses on my part, as I am not a climate researcher (my science background is primarily in solid state physics). I could easily be mistaken.
      --
      *** Quantum Mechanics: The Dreams of Which Stuff is Made ***
    10. Re:Wind Power by Peyna · · Score: 1

      I imagine that turning all of the forests east of the Mississippi into farmland probably had a pretty drastic impact on the climate as well. Compared to that, what's one windmill, let alone thousands?

      --
      What?
    11. Re:Wind Power by Peyna · · Score: 1

      To put it in perspective you could look at birds getting killed running into smokestacks from your nearest coal-fired energy plant or residential/office high-rise buildings. Even cats are more deadly than turbines.

      About 100,000,000 or so birds die each year from collisions with buildings. Some cities, like Chicago are taking steps to turn off a number of lights on their skyscrapers during migration seasons in order to reduce problems. (The bright lights and reflections apparently are very disorienting and distracting to the birds).

      --
      What?
    12. Re:Wind Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All wind power essentially comes from the sun or outside influences than the earth "system". So no you are not removing any power as it is stemming from power already being added and "wasted" by converting it into wind.

    13. Re:Wind Power by Taevin · · Score: 1

      100 million bird deaths from buildings each year? I'm not saying you're wrong since I have no information on the statistics myself, but that seems like a rediculously high number.

      I feel sorry for the poor saps that have to clean up the mess made by all those birds splattering all over buildings though.

    14. Re:Wind Power by SlayerofGods · · Score: 1

      Well I would expect that if you put up a massive amount of wind turbines, I mean like everywhere. That it would probably get hotter where it's already is hot, and colder where it's already cold.
      Basically just remove a bit of the balance of nature.
      But then again we've cut down so many trees it would probably put the balance back in ;)

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    15. Re:Wind Power by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      It should have no more effect than a tree

      Exactly. That's why we need to save Mother Earth from the trees.

    16. Re:Wind Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you really that idiotic?

      How is replacing one source of energy with another affecting the heat generating devices you mention that use said energy (compressor, CPU, etc.)?

      You must love putting dollar bills in change machines for the free quarters...

    17. Re:Wind Power by Peyna · · Score: 1

      I just did a quick survey a few articles on the subject and that seemed to be the general consensus. The problem is that these large cities just happen to be right in the middle of some major migratory routes.

      Also, it's not like the birds explode on impact. Some of the might die instantly and fall to the ground, while others are just injured badly enough that they'll find somewhere else to die.

      --
      What?
    18. Re:Wind Power by chill · · Score: 1

      "Trees cause more pollution than automobiles do." -- Pres. Ronald Reagan, June 29, 1981

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    19. Re:Wind Power by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the tree hugging hippies just piss me off.

      Nuclear? Right out.

      Hydroelectric? Nope, the plants killed by the dam reservoir release more carbon than a coal plant releases in its lifetime (hard to believe...)

      Wind power? No! Won't someone please think of the birds!?

      To the dead bird argument:
      a. How many birds are killed by living room picture windows each year? I know my childhood house racked up a few each year, and thats only one house...
      b. Who is to say birds won't evolve to avoid big white spinning blades?

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    20. Re:Wind Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the energy held in winds is almost exclusively due to heat from the Sun, creating differences in atmospheric pressure around the world.
      If this is true, wind is as unlimited as solar power.

    21. Re:Wind Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Largest single source of CO2 is actually termites. More than all the world's industries combined! So, kill the trees, the termites are gone!

    22. Re:Wind Power by twifosp · · Score: 1
      Wind doesn't "strike" a tree. I flows around into and subsequently around it. It wouldn't affect it's velocity at all, because what is moving the wind, pressure, wouldn't be changed. You know that whole atmosphere thing? Yea... it is kinda tall.

      And even if it were to be changed, 99.9999% of the wind that has any impact on the weather is in the jet stream.

      So unless you're planning to build some 20k high tall wind turbines, I don't think we're going to cause the next ice age, be destroyed by fire and brimstone, or stop the planets rotation any time soon.

    23. Re:Wind Power by Damek · · Score: 1

      Um, I don't think these are all the same people. Most "treehuggers" I know of are quite in favor of wind power, and well aware that it poses no threat to birds.

      If there really are a bunch of media stories about the dangers to birds of wind turbines, I can't help but think the source of these stories may be attributed to either 1) creative but lazy reporters dreaming up stories to fill their quotas, and/or 2) energy industry competitors and NIMBYs who don't want wind power catching on and will dream up anything to that end.

    24. Re:Wind Power by mesach · · Score: 1

      Living in L.A. on the ocean side of the 405, I have noticed it is sort of like a heat curtain. On the ocean side its nice and cool, but as soon as you cross the 405 it starts getting drastically warmer and less windy it seems.

      Anyone else in L.A. notice this too?

      --
      moo.
    25. Re:Wind Power by Girckin · · Score: 1
      It should have no more effect than a tree does, and in windy areas where wind power is a viable source (my old stomping grounds in West Texas spring to mind), having windbreaks is generally a good thing in terms of reducing erosion.

      But trees don't just block wind. They transpire huge amounts of water, cooling the area around them. That's part of why deforestation creates deserts -- because it increases the temperature and decreases the humidity.

      I've read at least one study (can't find a link) that suggest that a large number of windmills would increase the local temperature by slowing down the wind -- wind being in part the "convection" of the atmosphere, moving hot air to high altitude and releasing the heat.

      So in the way, a "field" of windmills would have a very different effect from a forest. (Not to mention that trees provide food, shelter, and other important ecological contributions).

    26. Re:Wind Power by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if DIY turbines were bad for birds. Smaller turbines tend to move faster and be more deadly. Modern blades spin far more slowly and result in few bird casualties.

      Mmm...free range bird for dinner. "Again?!"

    27. Re:Wind Power by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Easy solution - put bore water spray booms on the windmill blades and solve rising salinity at the same time.

  30. Pre-emptive by m50d · · Score: 1

    Looks like their webserver is running from a wind turbine!

    --
    I am trolling
  31. Not exactly friendly by Nytewynd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm pretty sure most towns won't let you construct a 17 foot windmill in your yard. There are a lot of ordinances where I live, and I see this as being against at least several of them.

    Also, don't windmills produce tons of noise, to the point where they actually are a cause of noise pollution? That ought to make your neighbors thrilled.

    --
    /. ++
    1. Re:Not exactly friendly by jjeffers · · Score: 1

      Having stood below everything from 1000 watt home scale turbines, to 1 megawatt utility scale turbines I can tell you that they are not loud. A car travelling 55 MPH makes a much louder noise than any turbine I've heard.

    2. Re:Not exactly friendly by Nytewynd · · Score: 1

      Maybe I am thinking of the windmill farms in various places. Maybe if you have 200 acres of them they get loud?

      I don't know as I've never really been near a windmill. The only thing I know about them is that they are a real bitch to get through in mini golf.

      --
      /. ++
    3. Re:Not exactly friendly by evilpenguin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't know about your part of the world, but the limits in my county are that the tower must be short enough that if it fell it would land inside your property lines. I have 2 acres, the narrow part of which is about 350 ft. so I can have (in theory) a 125 ft. tower (although IIRC the FAA gets to intervene above a certain height -- you know -- the red "don't fly into me lights").

      As for noise, I don't know about this homebrew thing, but there is a commercial windmill about 10 miles from my house in minnesota. It is 250 ft high with a rotor span of 150 ft. It produces an annual average of 1.2 million kWhr (enough to power about 200 average homes). You can drive right up to it, which I did the other day. I had to turn of my radio and my carn engine to hear it AT ALL. It made a soft "whoof whoof" sound that was audible when I was right underneath it, but could not be heard from 1 block away.

    4. Re:Not exactly friendly by evilpenguin · · Score: 1

      Boy, am I a great typist or what? I had to turn "off" my radio and my "car" engine...

    5. Re:Not exactly friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to be kidding. There are not many cars running 55 MPH within 100ft of people's houses.

    6. Re:Not exactly friendly by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

      My experience is from my uncle's wind turbine (a windMILL is a similar device used to grind grain). His setup is about 50 ft diameter that cost 10k for the generator and rotors, and about 10k for the tower, foundation and install. The rotors (wings) are barely audible. The noticable noise is from the gearing stepping up the RPMs before hitting the generator. It makes about a quarter of the noise of the wind blowing through the trees, and it's a very constant hum. I found it far less irritating than the noise I get from cars driving by my house or the airplanes taking off from MCI about 15 miles away.

      What this guy has done is probably more of an eyesore than a noise problem though. It looks like he's way out in the middle of nowhere and has fairly short trees around, so he gets away with a much shorter tower. He also has lots of space to run wires to tie down his mast. Without them (if he had less space to work with) he would have to install a more expensive tower that would be mounted on a large, deep concrete foundation to suck up the lateral loads. I'm sure this contraption isn't built anywhere near his house.

      It's certainly interesting, but useless to 99.9% of /.ers.

    7. Re:Not exactly friendly by Newrad · · Score: 1

      If you get enough of them together, they get up the courage to start making large amounts of noise.

    8. Re:Not exactly friendly by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I don't know about your part of the world, but the limits in my county are that the tower must be short enough that if it fell it would land inside your property lines. I have 2 acres, the narrow part of which is about 350 ft. so I can have (in theory) a 125 ft. tower (although IIRC the FAA gets to intervene above a certain height -- you know -- the red "don't fly into me lights").

      Since my dad lives on a 42 acre working tree farm, that would be some really big turbines ....

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    9. Re:Not exactly friendly by evilpenguin · · Score: 1

      Oh, and if I can reply twice to the same post, I am in a fairly rural location (you don't get 2 acres in urban locations easily), and while my county has fairly generous rules with respect to towers, many municipalities have tighter restrictions. Also, much land is subject to covenants, which are entirely private arrangements, but are enforcable contracts. These are usually put in place by whomever sold or or bought a large block of land to subdivide for residences. Since such covenants are private, they are binding partically forever. I'm not sure what you would have to do to get around a covenant. I'm not even sure it is possible.

      Most US states, counties, and townships have a system to apply for a variance to get around legislated roadblocks. Private covenants? I don't know how you knock those down.

      Trust me. Your neighbors will be glad you have a wind turbine when you are providing power during periodic blackouts (which are coming folks, don't doubt it -- the fossil fuels party is just about over. Even those most optomistic informed opinions give us about 40 years tops.)

      We're going to need to diversify our energy bases and fast. We will need wind, solar (pv and thermal), geothermal (ground source heat pumps), coal (alas, it pollutes and is finite too, but we've got more of it), splitting atoms (face it, it is better than starving in the dark and it pollutes less than coal -- it even puts less radiation in the environment than coal, barring accident), and we are going to need both ethanol and biodiesel as transportation fuels for those things that are simply too big to power with electricity from those other sources, even if they are net energy losers (which it seems they do not have to be).

      Our energy future is pretty damned bleak *if* we continue to ramp up use at our present incredible level of inefficiency and waste.

      The good news is that we are just beginning to see the rise of oil prices. It will continue, and even accelerate. I'm not in the "doom" camp (like dieoff.org), but it is going to be a shock and a difficult adjustment. How harsh it will be will depend a great deal on how fast prices rise and availablity falls. If it happens slowly enough the the economy can allow for the transition to alternative energies and higher conservation, then it could be a soft landing. If not, the whole industrial and service economy could collapse and we'll all be standing around without money or jobs wondering what the hell we are all going to do.

      I defenitely urge people to look at sites like www.peakoil.net and yes, even dieoff.org. There are good facts amid the pessemism. I'm more optomistic because I believe with the right leadership, we can get the people of the US and the rest of the "high energy" world to join in serious conservation and habit changes that can help to shallow out that downslope side of the Hibbert curve.

      As my fellow engineers like to say, "Necessity is a mutha'" (as a riff on the cliche "Necessity is the mother of invention")

      We will change because we will have to.

      Don't fear the "windmill." It will be part of your survival in some winter probably within the next decade.

    10. Re:Not exactly friendly by toddestan · · Score: 1

      You've got to be kidding. There are not many cars running 55 MPH within 100ft of people's houses.

      Lots of people have houses that are within 100 feet of a major roadway. Some of these houses were even built after the road was put in!

    11. Re:Not exactly friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been to the Searsburg, VT wind farm and they are very loud. I'm posting anonymously because I walked in myself without a guide and you're not supposed to do that.

      I remember walking about half a mile in fog so thick I couldn't see the windmills until I was about 200' away from them, and I could hear them the whole time, so I guess you could say that it depends on the design of the windmills, the number of them, and the wind speed to determine how loud they will be.

    12. Re:Not exactly friendly by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      According to the NIMBY's, the low frequency (infrasound) noise, even though barely audible, plays havoc - eg disrupts sleep.

      I dont know if it is true or not - it's just what I've heard.

    13. Re:Not exactly friendly by Mongo222 · · Score: 1

      Sup Elk River, or Zimmerman buddy? Are there stairs in your house?

    14. Re:Not exactly friendly by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you've noticed, but this guy doesn't exactly live "in town", as they like to put it.

      Or did you actually read the article? Or look at the pictures?

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    15. Re:Not exactly friendly by evilpenguin · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm further south, in Hassan Township, just south of Rogers. But, yes, you've ID'd the correct wind turbine!

    16. Re:Not exactly friendly by evilpenguin · · Score: 1

      Oh, and yes, I do have stairs in my house.

      I'm in the most thoroughly evil sub sub-urban home you could imagine. There are no stores or other resources within 5 miles of my home, so I'm a car junkie.

      But my home is very energy-efficient, with good south exposure and passive solar gain. I'm looking into a ground-source heat pump, solar thermal water heat, and PV. I'd consider a wind turbine too, but my site is less than ideal.

    17. Re:Not exactly friendly by evilpenguin · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard this one before, but I'm sure you're right that someone makes that claim. I think the NIMBY's will change their tune when their houses go cold and dark.

  32. Full article mirror by winkydink · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here

    I keep telling myself I need to learn how to weld. I really do

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Full article mirror by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I keep telling myself I need to learn how to weld. I really do

      Make sure you're well ventilated.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  33. Misleading by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 1

    I read the site the other day when it appeared on Hack-A-Day. At that time it was a 400w turbine at 48 volts. I hate when submittors overglamorize the title of the article to get it posted.

  34. Re:huh? by dasunt · · Score: 1
    Wind Turbine, not Wind Tunnel. You can stick it on your roof and run a cable to your computer. Poor man's power, as it were.

    Considering that the article said that at ~100 rpms, there was 6 amps @ 6 volts (36 W), and that at ~1000 rpms (heavy wind?) he predicted about 400W, it seems an iffy proposition to power a desktop computer.

    Poor men use laptops, I guess.

    (Only read the first page before /. killed the site. Later pages might have had more info.)

  35. In a related story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    otherpower.com's servers are apparently powered by a 17' wind turbine

  36. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scarry that the world has such stupid people in it...not only do you misread it, but you launch an elitist attack into your misread of it. You are truely an idiot.

  37. +1 Teddy K. reference. NT by mnemonic_ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    awesome

  38. Re:Amazing! by imaginieus · · Score: 1

    Well, in their defense, Hackaday stole two of slashdot's links yesterday, so they cant be doing too bad.

  39. Dammit! by serutan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nice, but I need plans for an 18-ft turbine.

  40. Article text by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1, Funny

    In order to make your own 17' wind turbine, you will need the following items:

    1) Seventeen tubes from paper towel rolls.
    2) A roll of Duct tape
    3) Ten cans of Bush Beans

    Next week, we put it all together.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  41. They Kill Bats, Too!! by Black-Man · · Score: 1

    Environmental Disasters I tell you!! Fire up the coal burner.

  42. 1.21 Gigawatts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sweet, I just need 403333 of these for my delorian and I'm outta here!

  43. It takes a village by Foolomon · · Score: 1

    It takes a village...worth's pile of shit to completely hit this thing.

  44. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! and sells magnets by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    wicked strong magnets...well technically, wondermagnet is selling but rumage through the website and see if you can figure out their business relation ship to otherpower, I can't.

    If you are into this DIY power generation, do visit their site...they also homebrew hydroelectric systems. And the participants in their discussion groups include a few very well versed engineers with good ideas for off the grid living.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  45. Re:huh? by FrontalLobe · · Score: 1

    Windmill? You looking to make flour or something?

    --
    -FL
  46. Ezz Empossible!! by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 5, Interesting
    making your own generator with magnets and wire is just plain crazy. Designing and building an efficient generator is WAY beyond anybody's homebrew ability. You need to know electromagnetics, have a source of silicon steel laminations, the ability to stamp them out to 0.010" precision, the ability to wind interleaved 6-phase coils, and much more.


    The only wattage mentioned is "36 watts" from turning it by hand, and using not a WATTMETER, but a voltmeter. Voltmeters are notoriously inaccurate at measuring "wattage", especally of weird waveforms you're likely to get from a homebrew generator. Also if thye were turning it by hand as hard as they could, the output should have been around 250 watts, assuming an average efficiency generator. So if we use these figures, it looks like their homebrew generator is only about 12% efficient.


    This is not a great example of good DIY-ing.

    1. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      Your points against the efficiency of this approach are correct, but I think it's great DIY-ing.

      This thing was cheaper than any commercial solution, and might be even more attractive for 3rd world economies. Or what if the oil crash hits and there's a huge run on turbines while the power is failing? It's nice to know it can be done, at least.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    2. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention they're using non-pitched wood blades rather than pitched fiberglass blades. They probably considered it but, being hippies, decided that using chemicals and manmade materials went against their ideology.

      Still, I agree with the poster above me, who pointed out that any percent is better than zero percent efficiency when talking about wind power generation.

    3. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by SpecBear · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 12% is terrible. I hope he's not powering his home with this thing, cuz the fuel costs will be murder.

    4. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by blahtree · · Score: 2, Informative

      36 watts was with one coil installed. In the later pages it says they could get 2000 watts in a moderate wind and have seen as high as 3800 watts.

    5. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 4, Informative
      Hmmm, still doesnt smell right... No mention of a wattmeter. A large magnetic gap. No closed magnetic path. No design equations. It's really hard to hit all the right sweet spots when winging it.

      Plus it's really easy to be fooled when charging batteries-- the voltage may measure 48 volts, and the amps might measure 50, but that doesnt make 2400 watts. Batteries draw current only at the top of each cycle, so there's never that many amps and volts around at the same time. Your typical Radio-Shack meter is going to indicate hundreds of percent too hig-- a common stumbling-block for experimenters.

      A true RMS-reading wattmeter is likely to show much less power. Sorry to be a spoil-sport.

    6. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by llZENll · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing, for the $700 spent on making the motor couldn't they have bought a much more efficient one?

      Also why make an AC motor? Wouldn't you need to charge a DC battery to provide stable constant power?

    7. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by An+dochasac · · Score: 1

      "Plus it's really easy to be fooled when charging batteries--..."

      And if the electrolyte contains too much heavy water, cold fusion can play havoc with those wattage calcs. Kids, let's be careful out there hey? ;-)

    8. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by blahtree · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "It's producing quite a bit more power than I can really use"

      It seems that their methodology is consistent with their goals. Sure it's not as efficient as it could be, but they've achieved what they set out to do.

      Not bad, in my opinion.

    9. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
      Yep, although it's fun to build things, it's a bit iffy when you can just buy something for 10% of your cost that works 10 times better.

      For $700 on eBay you could buy SEVEN new auto alternators, or 28 used ones. They're good for about 500 watts each, are already built, tested, good for several million revolutions, have built-in rectifiers and voltage regulators for charging batteries, and have what you need for good efficiency.

    10. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      For reference, I looked at some windmills looking for the magic break-even point. A similar-sized windmill setup for $20K gets an about 12kW peak, IIRC, which is good enough to run a small house during average wind conditions.

      Net metering won't pay you back more than you use, so the payback is about 15 years, ignoring opportunity costs. Still too expensive.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    11. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should perhaps seek out some of the early issues of "The Model Engineer and Practical Electrician", a magazine which began publication about 1898. Many of the issues have information about building small generators, up to the kilowatt or so range. Mostly DC machines. Small machines are never as efficient as big ones, but 50% should be attainable using the designs given there. Back in those days, most builders had nothing more than a small lathe, and instead of modern silicon iron laminations they had to use ordinary sheet iron...which works OK

    12. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      They are putting it into a battery and extracting power from the battery with an inverter. The wave pattern of the power doesn't matter.

      Efficiency only matters with regard to space taken and cost of the raw parts compared to the electricity produced. If you had a source of magnets, wire, wood and metal that was cheap/free, then your windmill could be pretty inefficient.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    13. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

      > The wave pattern of the power doesn't matter. It does if, as the article mentions, they're using separate voltmeters and ammeters. My old Simpson 269 meter has been known to indicate 600% too high on pointy waveforms. Such as the ones you get when driving a battery with rectified AC. >Efficiency only matters with regard to space taken and cost of the raw parts compared to the electricity produced. If you had a source of magnets, wire, wood and metal that was cheap/free, then your windmill could be pretty inefficient. The choice seems to be: spend $700 and lots of time and materials to build a 12% efficient alternator, of unproven reliability, or spend $100 for a 95% efficient auto alternator, proven, and easily purchaseable and replaceable. Hmmmmm....

    14. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by bluGill · · Score: 1

      But this generator is a direct drive unit. An auto alternator generates little if any (most likely it looses energy because the coils take more power than you generate) power at 70 RPM, which is where they are testing this generator. Sure you can gear up to get an alternator to work, but then you are dealing with all those losses which can be large.

    15. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Okay. I see your point! -- It's interesting to know but not much use in the real world.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    16. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by tehdaemon · · Score: 1
      Auto alternators suck badly for windmills. They need 100's, and like 1000's of rpm's. Windmills do not provide this. Which means gears, belts etc, all of which waste energy and add complexity. Also, auto alternators use electromagnets for the magnetic fields. This allows easy voltage regulation, (lower rpm, just up the field strength) - great for a car, but hard to use for a windmill, especially when the wind isn't blowing - How do you power it for startup? And this style of voltage regulation puts max tourque at the lowest speeds. Tourque needs to match the windspeed for efficiency.

      These guys are living on this stuff. This is how they get their power. They are off-grid - due to location, not choice. If auto alternators worked better, they would be using them.

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    17. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by tehdaemon · · Score: 1
      "why make an AC motor"

      No brushes. The windmill spins the magnets, the wires are fixed. This makes it very simple mechanically. (and a rectifier is dirt simple to make, or buy)

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    18. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Designing and building an efficient generator

      There's your hubris. No one claimed that it was an efficient generator. Perfect is the enemy of good enough.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    19. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

      >Perfect is the enemy of good enough. A lot of folks wouldnt consider a design that is maybe 10% of average, 5x the weight, 10x the cost to be "good enough". You have to trap and skin a lot of muskrats to pay for that windmill, the tower, the inverters, the batteries, and enough land to hide all the above in.

    20. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Actually they used plenty of fiberglass in the generator, so it is unclear why they did not use it for the blades.

    21. Re:Ezz Empossible!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jacquesm posting from a friends house

      you are so full of shit it's just plain unbelievable...

      I just returned from DanB's house and can personally atttest to the fact that the machine performs as advertised, it's quiet and makes more power than Dan normally uses.

      I have also built my own (16') machine, which has produced peaks of a little over 2 KW in high winds (just before it's set to feather). Dan's machine is elegant, fairly cheap to construct and very reliable.

      for pictures of my own machine look at www.fieldlines.com and search for jacquesm's diary

  47. Go planet! by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    What are the implications or potential problems from removing energy from Earth's weather systems? Is the energy we're removing negligible enough to be ignored? Could it potentially change weather patterns by blocking/slowing wind?

    I doubt it, since all wind turbines operate at such low altitudes that higher tropospheric activity is not affected. Weather resides in the first 10 miles or so of the atmosphere, whereas turbines are installed within ~.3 miles of sea level (Denmark has some that are actually seaborne). It'd be like wondering whether fish swimming a couple thousand feet underwater affect the waves at the top. There's plenty of empty volume for the fluid (whether it be air or water) to bypass any obstructions (turbines, trees etc.). And there's a lot of terrain nearby with no wind turbines at all.

    I've studied wind turbine and helicopter rotor design (they have some remarkable similarities, and differences). For wind turbines, the airspeed gradient through the blade disk isn't as great as you may think.

    As for "bias," well, I've noticed that many deem any opposing opinion as "biased." So what ever.

  48. Oh good by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

    The 10 foot wind tunnel I have now was really starting to show it's age . . .

  49. Re:Wind Power spoils the view! by bubbaD · · Score: 1

    I'd think the Jet stream and other major sources of wind are largely unaffected. What impact do all the turbine jets on airplanes have on weather patterns?
    the real problem is that windturbines spoil the nice views! Just ask the people on Martha's Vineyard.

  50. PhotoVoltaic Roof Shingles by RichMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Roof Shingle power sources. There are now a number of suppliers.

    http://www.kingsolar.com/catalog/mfg/uni-solar/shr 17.html

    Uni-Solar shingles are unique and have been honored with thePopular Science Grand Award, " Best of what's new (Environmental Technology)," and Discover magazine's "Technological Innovation Award" for best innovation (Environment).

    The PV shingle permits roofs of commercial and residential buildings to evolve from mere protection from the weather to a source of electric power. The flexible, thin-film solar cell shingle blends into roofing pattern of traditional asphalt shingles or roof tile.

    1. Re:PhotoVoltaic Roof Shingles by crow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but at $157.50 per 17-Watt panel, you're looking at $9264/KW. At $.10/KWH, you would need nearly 100,000 hours to break even. If you could get 8 hours at 17W per day, you would need 32.5 years to break even.

      That's just not practical.

    2. Re:PhotoVoltaic Roof Shingles by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I look forward to a couple rooftop technologies

      * This fall: Lightweight rooftop solar concentrators will be hitting the market. They use a small amount of high efficiency solar panels, combined with heliostat mirrors controlled by a single motor. Manufactured in China, sized to a shipping pallet, and easy to install, they're projected to reduce rooftop solar costs by 30%, and an additional 20% in two years.

      * 4-5 years: Nanosolar, Nanosys, Konarka, and a few others will all be unveiling their respective high efficiency thin-plastic organic solar cell technologies. Since each company is pursuing a different production methodology, it seems likely that at least one will pay off. Thin-plastic organic cells have the potential to really revolutionize the planet, because they have the very real potential to be cheaper per kWh than fossil fuels (to the end user, at least), and are light enough to install essentially anywhere. I've read over Nanosolar's patent, and it's pretty clever - organic solar cells are normally inefficient because the densities and spacings between the electron donor and recipient often don't fall within the critical range. Their process lays down successive particles inside a nanoscale scaffolding, and then gets rid of the scaffolding.

      --
      "/etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit is a gimp plugin and must be run by the gimp in order to be used."
    3. Re:PhotoVoltaic Roof Shingles by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

      It would take longer then that. Even in areas that get alot of sun, the panels only put out their full rated wattage for about 5 hours per day in practice. Given that the panels only have an expected lifespan of about 25-30 years, you cannot ever break even at those prices.

    4. Re:PhotoVoltaic Roof Shingles by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      By the way, here's an idea that I had (it could be completely unrealistic, but I'd be interested in knowing what others thing).

      Solar water heating isn't rare, and sometimes home heating with solar-heated water is done. However, any excess heated water during the summer (especially from a home-heated system) simply goes to waste.

      Backtrack to the 1600s. A "cold drink" craze swept through major cities in Europe. The method of chilling drinks was quite simple: they added saltpeter to a water bath (an endothermic reaction), and cycled enclosed drinks through the sub-zero degree saltwater. When the saltwater had warmed, they would evaporate out the (at the time, quite valuable) saltpeter in evaporation tanks.

      Concept: Use the wasted solar water heat to help evaporate out a warm salt solution by raising it to near boiling. Warm, concentrated saltwater from a heat exchanger inside the home is piped through the solar heating ducts, raising it to boiling/near boiling. From there, it enters a chamber, possibly kept at slightly lower pressure by a low power fan, to encourage salt precipitation. Every few minutes, a scraper runs in the chamber to stir up the salt into the oversaturated solution, making a salt slurry. The evaporated water runs through an outside radiator, condensing and cooling to near ambient outside temperature. Both the condensed water and salt slurry recombine inside the house and run through the heat exchanger again.

      The obvious questions are:

      * Would it work at all?

      * Would the power requirements for circulating the water, running the scraper every few minutes, and potentially running a low power fan to maintain lower pressure be more efficient than running a compressor?

      * Would the energy savings, if present, justify the modifications to a conventional solar heating setup?

      I really don't know the answer to these. :)

      --
      "/etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit is a gimp plugin and must be run by the gimp in order to be used."
    5. Re:PhotoVoltaic Roof Shingles by Admiral+Ackbar+8 · · Score: 1

      and it's massachusets (I don't like living here enough to capitilize it); we had what, one day of sun through all of April and May.

    6. Re:PhotoVoltaic Roof Shingles by Intron · · Score: 1

      saltpeter = potassium nitrate
      salt = sodium chloride

      What energy savings? It sounds like you are making salt, not generating energy.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    7. Re:PhotoVoltaic Roof Shingles by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

      Saltpeter is *A Salt*: "A chemical compound formed by replacing all or part of the hydrogen ions of an acid with metal ions or electropositive radicals". Never did I state "table salt", although dissolving table salt is an endothermic reaction as well (just not nearly to the same degree). The reason I didn't specify which salt is that I'm not sure which salt has the best reaction. May we resume being serious, please?

      --
      "/etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit is a gimp plugin and must be run by the gimp in order to be used."
    8. Re:PhotoVoltaic Roof Shingles by cas2000 · · Score: 1

      some things are worth paying for.

      worrying obsessively about "breaking even" is like worrying that the cost of sewerage processing is too expensive - as if just crapping on the lawn is an option because it's a lot cheaper. that's not an option you have, and it's not an option you SHOULD have because it affects your neighbours as well as yourself.

      doing things the cheap and nasty way has its own costs.

      or, more precisely, not every cost is financial.

      btw, this is a general principle, not specifically in reference to these $157 shingles. i also think they're too expensive. there are, however, much cheaper ways of getting solar or other alternative power.

    9. Re:PhotoVoltaic Roof Shingles by budgenator · · Score: 1

      for even colder, check out colder. Also you could aways dump the waste heat into the ground water, and pull it back out in the winter geo-thermaly.

      Seems like you could do a small scale proof-of-concept pretty easily especialy if the desired effect is more for reducing temp peaks in mid afternoon rather than making the house an ice box

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    10. Re:PhotoVoltaic Roof Shingles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This fall

      Yeah, right - the day I can buy a power producing Sterling engine at Home Depot, NAPA Auto Parts or Targét for under $1000 - I'll shave Geraldo's moustache and dance a jig because that will mean there are (for some reason) no oil companies.

      The "war on terror" sold our energy future to Bush's boys and the middle East. We could have been over 50% renewable energy with the money he spent on Vietnam, Part Dieu.

    11. Re:PhotoVoltaic Roof Shingles by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      An achilles-heel of all organic polymers is UV radiation. While crystalline silicon can be UV-irradiated as much as you want (even so its performance degrades a few 10% over 20 years), just think of what happens to organic polymers. It will be hard to balance UV resistance AND photovoltaic efficiency at the same time. Even if you load it up with UV absorbers and only let it deal with the visible/infrared spectrum, I'm still guessing it still can't come nowhere near the longevity of raw metallic silicon. Before I put something on my rooftop, I wanna know that it will last 15 years, without performance dropping to 30% after only 5 years.
      The technology of electrodepositing into template is a very smart one, though not something radically new. This way you can get "closer" to your generated charge, and reduce the internal resistance of the "battery."

    12. Re:PhotoVoltaic Roof Shingles by vlm · · Score: 1

      It's a pain to shovel all that salt around. Why not use a nice convenient gas, like ammonia, which has different solubility in water at different temperatures.

      What you're describing is basically the classic ammonia adsorption refrigeration cycle. Any chem eng thermodynamics textbook will have this in the refrigeration chapter. Its still used in major industrial sites but the ammonia is too toxic to be used in homes. It was used in home fridges until the invention of freon. I believe it's still possible to buy ammonia adsorption refigerators for RVs, because they work great on 12V, AC, or propane (any source of heat...)

      It is not a terribly efficient cycle, would be better to use a freon or hydrocarbon based refrigerant. But it does work and has no moving parts (pumps etc). Beware that when the ammonia eventually corrodes out the pipes there will be a huge mess and asyphxiation danger.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    13. Re:PhotoVoltaic Roof Shingles by Rei · · Score: 1

      Beware that when ammonia eventually corrodes out the pipes

      That's the reason why I didn't consider it. :)

      The previous AC posted an interesting link to the Yazaki heating/cooling cycle, which is actually surprisingly similar to what I was picturing (although they don't supersaturate their solution at any point (they use evaporative cooling instead of salt cooling, but they use a salt solution to help encourage the evaporation and condensation of the vapor), they use a hard vaccum of different intensities (which is probably wise - it's enclosed, after all, so it shouldn't be too hard), and a few other differences)

      --
      "/etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit is a gimp plugin and must be run by the gimp in order to be used."
    14. Re:PhotoVoltaic Roof Shingles by Chyldes · · Score: 1

      Actually, if it is %17.50 per 17-Watt Panel you are looking at $9.26/KW. So assuming you are currently paying your $.10/KW you would need 100 hoursto break even. 8 hours at 17W per day would be 12.5 days.

      Now the initial up front cost would be rather high since you will need more than one panel. Plus installation.

  51. Very neat article and site by Hays · · Score: 1

    This is a really fascinating article. Power generation is an interesting concept but I've never really seen a detailed explanation of how a generator is built, what engineering trade-offs go into such a construction, etc. I consider myself pretty well educated by I'd be at a complete loss to do this on my own. It's really neat to see the engineering that goes into making power. Suddenly this seems so much more accessible- like something I really could do myself.

  52. So does this mean I can use my 120mm PC fans... by kuom · · Score: 1

    to power the wind turbine? And then use the wind turbine to power my PC? :P

  53. home-built wind turbines by mnemonic_ · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the alternative energy crowd it's actually very popular to build one's own wind turbine instead of purchasing one pre-built. There are kits available, but some design them from scratch.

    Often it's rather sobering looking at a wind speed map that your region isn't quite windy enough to make a turbine pay for itself. One needs Class 4 speeds at a minimum, and then you've got to deal with city ordinances about various crap with building a large structure.

    1. Re:home-built wind turbines by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      If the cost is low enough, it could still make a great addition to solar in many areas. The wind is often blowing when it's cloudy/raining.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    2. Re:home-built wind turbines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah you need zone four at wholesale energy prices. I think if you are in an area that let's you spin the meter backward at consumer prices (which some jurisdictions do) then zone 3 is probably profitable.

  54. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! and sells magnets by Hays · · Score: 1

    homebrew hydroelectric? Like daming up the creek in your back yard? That sounds like about the coolest thing ever. Do people actually do that? That would be so fun.

  55. Magnetics by gr8_phk · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been doing 3 phase permanent magnet motor controllers for many years now, and I find the amount of magnetic material in the OtherPower alternators to absolutely insane. OTOH, I think they do it that way for simplicity of construction and to get zero cogging torque. i.e. They could use only 1 ring of magnets and use metal coil forms on a steel plate. The problem then is that the magnetic poles tend to "stick" to the metal ones and you get what's known as cogging torque - you can feel these sticky spots as you turn the motor. They also use an absolutely huge air gap (the full thickness of the coils) which leads to flux going between poles instead of throught the coils - another source of inefficiency. OTOH, they sell magnets to people wanting to replicate what they've done ;-)

    1. Re:Magnetics by budgenator · · Score: 1

      We mount the stator so there's about a 3/32" gap between it and the back magnet rotor. I'm not an engineer but 6/32 of an inch in a 1.5 KW alternator don't seem outragious to me; in fact considering the construction techniques, they're probably push the tolerance limits.
      32, 12.1K Gauss magnet does seem excessive, but they probably chose them for their shape rather than their strength.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    2. Re:Magnetics by otherpower+dan · · Score: 1
      We've made machines both with laminates and with ferrous cores, and low windspeed (much more common than high winds, and the most important part of the power curve) performance suffers. So the large air gap and large amount of magnetic material is a compromise to help low wind power output.

      There's very little power available in low winds (see my recent article in the Energy Self Sufficiency Newsletter for more details), so it's critical to extract all the power possible from it.

      Fortunately NdFeB magnets have dropped so much in price since the early 1980s when they were invented, that compromise is now cost-effective....not many years ago, it would've been prohibitive. Hugh Piggott's pioneering Brake Drum Windmill used big ferrite magnet blocks, and required a very small airgap and salvaged transformer cores to make good power. Hugh has also switched to a large-airgap design with big NdFeB magnets, and no longer builds or gives classes in making that older design.

      DANF Otherpower.com IT director http://www.otherpower.com/contact_op.html

      PS and, yeah, we are in the magnet business too! ;~)

    3. Re:Magnetics by otherpower+dan · · Score: 1
      "Air Gap" actually refers to the distance between the attracting pairs of magnets. The 3/32" referred to in our page is the physical clearance between the spinning magnets and the cast stator.....the smaller the better, and bad news if it rubs.

      So basically we are eliminating the need for tight tolerances and ferrous cores (hard to build in a home shop) by throwing lots of magnets at the problem! It works. DANF

    4. Re:Magnetics by budgenator · · Score: 1

      After I post it occured to me that maybe I didn't understand what he was saying, so when I got home I looked it up in my copy of Cyclopedia of Engineering, cr 1912, boy would you love those books! Why didn't you go with a 120 VDC system, 5 more batteries would get you there, less current, less IR loses, easier to hook-up a couple light bulbs ect.?

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    5. Re:Magnetics by otherpower+dan · · Score: 1
      I know of only a couple off-grid people who use 120v battery banks, but it indeed would have many advantages. Most people are moving away from 12v systems entirely--That 17 foot turbine wouldn't be practical at 12v -- way too much resistance loss in the stator and the wiring to the house.

      The issue is cost -- batteries for off grid come in 6v or 2v, never 12v. So a dozen (or 36) more at $200 a pop would be cost prohibitive. And, there are no readily available inverters to convert this to AC. There are industrial inverters, but they are very expensive and lack the features off-grid dwellers expect from an inverter.

      The folks that DO use 120vdc systems usually scored a great deal on a truckload of surplus batteries! And 120vdc is common in industrial backup systems -- radio relay towers, etc. My battery bank of 12 2v batteries was split up from a 120vdc system like that. My 12 batteries weigh a ton -- literally! DANF

    6. Re:Magnetics by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

      The 3/32" gap is between the rotor and stator. There are other magnets on the other side of the stator, so the full stator thickness plus 2 gaps lie between the 2 sets of magnets. This allows a lot of flux to circle back to an adjacent magnet rather than go through the stator coil to the other side. You can't make an arbitrarily thin stator, but you can use a metal core material. That would eliminate one set of magnets, but would also introduce cogging torque which may cause startup problems for them. We have 7-800W motors where I work now, and they have total magnetic material of about 3 or 4 of those magnets. They are commercially designed and manufactured, and they run full power at 800-1000rpm - not at all the same as the otherpower guys. I guess my point is that their "low tech" construction does entail some inefficiency in terms of materials. They really have to move up to 48V systems too, 100Amps will burn 10Watts per miliohm of resistance and 140Watts in their rectifiers. Material inefficiency is costly when you build it, but this electrical issue burns power all the time it's in operation. Even with all that, I do give those guys a lot of credit for actually building stuff that works and makes respectable amounts of power.

    7. Re:Magnetics by buckvillian · · Score: 1

      We've built machines like you describe, with a single magnet rotor and a nice coil of silicon steel behind the coils. It does save on magnets to be sure, but we introduce some other problems... the bearings are under a much greater load, and we have iron losses. A nice slotted core would be the best way to save on magnets, but we'd introduce cogging then. In a wind turbine, it's very nice to have 0 cogging and 0 iron losses - this design with dual rotors gets us there, at the cost of more magnetic material. The other benfit is fairly easy construction. With no 'line loss' (meaning IR losses in the line between the wind turbine and the batteries) - this alternator produces very nearly 4KW @ 200 rpm. No matter what approach we take, it does take quite a lot of magnetic material to achieve this.

    8. Re:Magnetics by mink · · Score: 1

      Are we talking lead acid or some other battery tech?

      Would it be effective to creat your own?

      I'm thinking of the electroplating tanks my mother used when she was a large scale jeweler. They were about four feet long, three feet high and three feet wide. for electroplating you had an acid bath (with disolved metal salts in it)with lead plates (in some kind of bag) as one conductor and what you were plating as the other one.

      I imagine there are many more lead plates and other things (pure mixture of acid/water) involved in a battery compared to the electroplating system described above, but I know the large tubs can handle the acid, and they have lids.

      Being spoiled by having grid power and bench supplies I have not really given much thought to this, but if your looking at doing a strange power system I would think this is somewhere a custom battery might be worth the trouble.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  56. Roman windmill by msbsod · · Score: 1

    Sounds like they found the blueprint of a Roman windmill at an archeological excavation. Try http://www.metric4us.com/ 95% of the people on earth find the Ancient Imperial units just funny.

  57. Re:huh? by adam31 · · Score: 0, Troll
    Yeah, but you could power a nice wind tunnel with your 3000kW ...

    Whoa! *IDEA*

    Then you could have a never-ending supply of wind for your turbine! This is gonna be great, I'm getting goose bumps. Now where's my hammer?

  58. Re:Amazing! by loganjw · · Score: 1

    How can you "steal" links from Slashdot when all Slashdot does is link to other sites? Not that I really care who links what first or where it comes from.

  59. Maytag battery charger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have liked to have seen the pictures. But (sigh) that link has blanks where the pictures should go - is anyone else having problems viewing the pictures?

  60. Windpower is out by s_p_oneil · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hamster power is where the real future is!

  61. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laptops are too expensive for poor men.

  62. Iiiichh by chrisnewbie · · Score: 2, Funny

    My landlord had a stroke when i installed a dish, i imagine he'll implode with that 17 feet fan.

    1. Re:Iiiichh by speights_pride! · · Score: 1

      Nah, he'll be cool with it.

  63. How to weld by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1
    I keep telling myself I need to learn how to weld. I really do

    Here's where you can rent a video to learn how.

    1. Re:How to weld by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Wow, what a great link! I've always wanted to work with my hands. Gunsmithing looks interesting too. I wonder how hard it is to build a gun from scratch?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  64. ROI? by OkanGuney · · Score: 0

    Ok, it's good for areas that has no power yet and it's good on the environment but, how much does it cost? What is the ROI?
    I spend $30 on electricity every month and if it costs $2000 and saves me $10 a month that's 200 months...

    If you say no ROI at all it's just environment friendly I would rather buy Wind Energy from the local Power company.
    Here in MN, Excel energy sells wind energy for $4 a month...
    http://www.xcelenergy.com/XLWEB/CDA/0,2914,1-1-2_7 35_3857-3320-5_406_664-0,00.html/

  65. Re:huh? by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    and what use might a windtunnel in my apartment be? It's not like I'm designing fighter-jets or the new Ford here.

    You'd use a wind tunnel to carry away heat from the latest AMD and Intel chipsets as well as GPUs from nVidia and ATI.

    You'd use a wind turbine to gather up the air at the other end and turn some of that wind back into electricity at the other end.

    Or just chop local birds into salsa while you generate green energy. You can't save the environment in one way without farking it up some other way, it seems.

    Nice project btw, but a little behind the times. I thought Mother Earth News beat this dead horse into glue and snorted the entire production run when it came to alternative energy.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  66. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! and sells magnets by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    Just like that. Yes they do, even rigging up their own generators from wire and magnets...there are photos on the site. You ever wanted to tell the power company to eat your shorts? There's how its done.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  67. Re:Wind Power spoils the view! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What impact do all the turbine jets on airplanes have on weather patterns?

    A noticable effect, actually. And not due to their effect on winds but rather the contrails left behind. See here for more information.

  68. 12% is better than 0% by FirstNoel · · Score: 1

    atleast they are doing something. 12% efficiency may suck compared to what professional power producers can come up with, but it's still better that sitting on you ass not doing anything.

    I'd take 12% if it meant I was saving some money and the enviroment.

    Sean D.

    --
    "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
    1. Re:12% is better than 0% by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
      >I'd take 12% if it meant I was saving some money and the enviroment. Ah, that's the rub... Let's see how much money we're saving:

      Electricity costs around ten cents per kilowatt-hour. If you had a windmill with a 100% efficient generator, that generated a kilowatt in a good wind, you might average maybe 3 cents an hour of avoided cost, depending on your average wind speed. 3 cents an hour for a year is $262 a year of avoided electricity cost. With a 12% efficient generator you're saving about $30. You're losing $230 a year by going with your homebrew generator. And very good generators are available at car junkyards for $40.

      Also note that from the $262 per year you should subtract the interest costs of your investement in this whole rigamarole (~$10 if you steal or scrounge parts, ~$500 if you buy everything), the costs of maintaining the windmill, batteries, and inverters (~$100 year as a wild guess), plus the cost of your time spent in maintaining everything. Oh, plus maybe pay back the original cost over a period of 10 years, another $10 to $500 per year. Doesnt look like a money-maker, or even a money-saver.

    2. Re:12% is better than 0% by n17ikh · · Score: 1

      Ah, but really Otherpower and the people on there aren't about saving money - they're about living off the grid, independent of others, and I respect that. Sure, they don't have fancy machines to wind their alternators, but they do a damn sight better than I could, and they do it without help. It's nice to see a family living all by itself, growing its own food, making its own electricity, maintaining its own equipment. It's not something you see often.

      --
      Hard work pays off tomorrow, but procrastination pays off NOW!
    3. Re:12% is better than 0% by Greg@UF · · Score: 1

      I think there are a few points that you are missing.

      Firstly, you're focussing on the current price of power - and that's going up every year.

      Secondly, you include the construction price of the windmill, but not the connection price of the electricity. Where I live, if your house is more than a couple of hundred meters away from the nearest power line, the power company will charge tens of thousands to hook you up.
      It's often cheaper to install an off-grid system than to pay for the power line install.

      Thirdly, there are people out there that think getting off the grid is a good idea. They might be doing it for security of power supply, they might be doing it because they'd rather use renewable resources than support a coal-fired generating plant, or similar idealistic reasons. Some are prepared to pay a premium to live according to their ideals.

      Even assuming your calculations are correct, if someone told me I could be off-grid, clean and green by paying $500 a year more for my power than I do now, I'd jump at the chance. That's
      great !

      --
      -- You can't give it, you can't even buy it, and you just don't get it!
  69. Re:huh? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    Wow you read the first page of the article so your better than most slashdoters. but the 36W 6v 6a version was on one test coil. with all 12 coils running at normal speed it should pull the 400W.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  70. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! and sells magnets by Fishead · · Score: 1

    My buddy's dad did this. He even got a permit for re-directing the stream from fish and game that also allowed him to put pet trout in the pond. (the local birds loved that idea) Anyhow, he is an electrician for the local school district, and did this in his spare time. To keep it easier, he didn't bother with regulating the power. Instead, he just connects the unknown voltage and frequency to a heating coil embedded in his tile floor via a thermostat. It would be supercool to power his whole house off the dam, but that would be more expensive to implement. He may well do that eventualy, but for now he is happy with just having free heat. They live in the interior of British Columbia (Canada) so it gets quite cold in the winter. The stream runs almost all winter, but he occasionally has to revert to wood heat when it gets really cold.

  71. Re:huh? by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you had read the article more carefully, you would have noticed:

    So far the machine works quite well. It has such a huge swept area compared to our previous machines that it seems to start up in practically no wind, and it's making a little power by the time the anemometer says 5 mph. At 10 mph it's doing around 400 watts and at 16 mph it's up around 1.5KW. Above that I believe the blades are overpowered a bit by the alternator. I do see 2KW from it frequently and I've seen about 3800 watts from it a couple times in very high winds, but overall I believe the blades are held back a bit in higher winds by the alternator. I can improve it by adding a bit of resistance to the line - this would allow it to speed up in higher winds and the blades would run more efficiently - but as it is it seems very slow and peaceful, and it rarely goes over 200 rpm It's producing quite a bit more power than I can really use. So I'll leave it as it is, it's quite a good low wind machine I think.

    Around where I live, that'd make about 600 watts or so on average. Not bad, really. Too bad they didn't provide detailed schematics or cost estimates :P

    --
    "/etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit is a gimp plugin and must be run by the gimp in order to be used."
  72. Re:Otherpower.com Rules! and sells magnets by Cromac · · Score: 1

    They get sued and arrested by the state for damaging wetlands in Washington if they try it. You can't even build a house within several hundred feet of a creek out here anymore.

  73. Geez. No wonder I couldn't get in today. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    slashdot effect in... er... effect.

    Sure is.

    I was trying to get on over lunch to do a bit of posting and it just wouldn't serve. Guess I'll have to put it off 'til tomorrow.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  74. Re:huh? by Stupendoussteve · · Score: 0

    Why not get a generator with an electric motor plugged into a battery, and then use the generator to charge the battery and exceess for other use?

  75. Do the math by wsanders · · Score: 1

    One cu ft of air weighs .0807 lb according to http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae650 .cfm

    So the aperture of the 17 ft windmill is 227 ft^2 and a 10 mph wind is moving at 14.7 ft/sec so 3337 ft^3 of air is moving over the windmill every sec. That's 270 lb of air evey sec.

    Since E=1/2 m v^2, E = 29172 ft-lb/sec. I'm not sure if I got my mass conversion factors right but that's about 40 kW kinetic energy.

    So until turbines get way more efficient this is probably something we won't have to worry about.

    Basically, air is *heavy*.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:Do the math by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      This is a wholly misleading calculation. You're computing how much energy is being removed from the atmosphere. But the total amount of energy moved out of the atmosphere isn't an interesting quantity at all. For example if all of the Earth's atmosphere were to transfer all of its energy to a region just over your head you'd soon notice it even though there is no change in total energy.

      An improved approach might be to attempt to prove that the deviation of the atmosphere's 'trajectory' is small if you introduce a windmill into the system. But actually this is almost certainly false because of the so-called "butterfly effect". A deviation in the initial conditions of a chaotic system like the weather grows exponentially over time.

      A more useful approach would be to prove that if you introduce a small windmill to the atmosphere, even if you may change it's trajectory radically, you don't change the types of things that are statistically likely to happen. I have no idea how to prove such a result mathematically. But I know your argument doesn't even come close to this.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  76. Free Lunch is Near by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

    Seventeen feet is good, but get that baby down to ten feet and I'll be able to mount one on an electric car and tour the world!

    --
    Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
  77. Re:huh? by dasunt · · Score: 1

    The true question is what's the average windspeed (and how many watts he gets at that speed).

    I couldn't find it in the article (but again, most of the article was /.ed for me).

    As for cost, I believe 1 kW/hr 365 days a year @ $.08/kWh runs $700.80.

    Depending on the scale of what he's doing (and his location) he may increase his cost efficiency by skipping the battery array and selling excess power back to the telco.

  78. Serious bean eating! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do they expect people to eat enough beans to make wind to power a 17' turbine? Now a 1.7" one I could understand. Maybe use an extra CPU fan and some duct tape. It'd be interesting to see how much power a sack of White Castles could produce. Not as efficient as burning the methane directly, but interesting.

  79. Learning to weld by dozer · · Score: 1

    It's easy. Just buy a book, a set of oxyacetylene tanks, a torch, goggles and gloves, and a bunch of scrap steel. $500. If you get a cutting torch your rig will be able to cut steel plate.

    Or, take a course at the local community college.

    Mig is faster but Oxyacetylene is way more fun. Tig is da bomb, of course, but it's real $$$ for a good setup.

    1. Re:Learning to weld by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 1
      If he wants to just mess around, you can get an ARC buzzbox, handheld face shield & rods for $50. No need for space for storing compressed gas, monthy payments on the cylinder hire, etc.

      Gas is cool and very versatile, but ARC (MMA) is way cheaper to get started if you just want to learn.

      (and TIG is da bomb, I have a cheap inverter setup. Can't do aluminium, but is still cool)

  80. Re:Ezz Empossible!! Air core sucks. by bored · · Score: 1

    I've got a few old books from the 20's-60's at home about motor and generator design (and some modern electronics textbooks which arn't as helpful, go figure). From what I know, air core generators suck. Its quite amazing that these guys were that modivated but didn't think about designing a better generator (or for the $700 the spent on the magnets and windings just buying one). A quick google search picked this up..

    http://www.fieldlines.com/story/2003/12/27/202634/ 91

    This is not to say that I think your right about DIY generators. I think a perfectly good generator could have been built. A good lathe and mill would have been more than adequate.

  81. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  82. I love birds... by Gruneun · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's why my turbine has solid, plastic shields on the front and back.

    It generates far less energy than expected, so I'm in the process of building several more.

  83. Try Brazing First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get some sections of EMT conduit and a brazing torch. (it looks like a propane torch for plumbing) Everything should be less than $50. Brazing is reasonably strong. For example, the bronze rods have a tensile strength of 50 to 60 thousand pounds per square inch. Of course your brazes will have a much smaller cross-sectional area than 1 square inch.

  84. noise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One big question: how noisy is this sucker?
    If you are really considering the idea of planting one near your home this matters! (Or more correctly, the noise level defines what you mean by "near your home").

  85. Is it at all possible? by markass530 · · Score: 1

    For Windmills to kill people who complain about windmills killing birds? That I would LOVE (and pay) to see. As I see it, the only birds who get killed are the ones to dumb to see the giant spinning blade of death in their path, survival of the fittest, natural selection. Fucking hippies.

    1. Re:Is it at all possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking hippies?

      It's fucking hippies that are putting up windmills!

      So basically you are against anyone that cares if birds die because of windmills, but you must also be against willmills at the same time because it's all Hippie Shit. Right?

      But then in the end you just want to see people die. What a wonderful person you must be in real life!

    2. Re:Is it at all possible? by markass530 · · Score: 1

      Hippies talk all fucking day about how cool the world would be if their were Windmills instaed of nuclear power plants, blah blah blah. They never actually put one up, because they are to busy smoking weed and dropping acid. I am equally in favor of nuclear power,AND windmills so there. But your right, I am not a wonderful person, but at least I'm not a fucking hippie... fucking hippies...

  86. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The editors of Slashdot.org are still trying to figure out the right amount of time to delay a story from Hackaday.com so as to not look suspicous...

    Right now were hovering around 36 hours.

  87. Bird Strike Myth... by Lagged2Death · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...debunked here [PDF] among other places.

    Other recent research supports the idea that birds can see wind turbines perfectly well and mostly tend to keep their distance. There are a few kills, but the turbines aren't the bird-blenders they've been made out to be.

    1. Re:Bird Strike Myth... by spewey · · Score: 2, Funny

      They just need to put some of those inflatable plastic owls on the end of the rotors. Problem solved.

    2. Re:Bird Strike Myth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...debunked here [yes2wind.com] [PDF] among other places.

      Not Debunked there. Assertion is not proof, and their assertion of "one or two strikes per year" contradicts my personal experience of seeing that many in a single day.

      Don't get me wrong; I'm a big advocate of off-the-grid power and I think Wind plays a valuable part in achieving that goal, but the link you provided is nothing more than propaganda, and not even particularly good propaganda.

    3. Re:Bird Strike Myth... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Don't listen to him! We must all work together to SAVE THE PLASTIC OWLS!

    4. Re:Bird Strike Myth... by hellanacho · · Score: 1

      turbines may not kill birds, but the f#&%ing pdf format kills my poor little 1.4 ghz p4.

    5. Re:Bird Strike Myth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, my 1.42GHz G4 doesn't have any problems with PDFs.

    6. Re:Bird Strike Myth... by Lagged2Death · · Score: 1

      It's true, that link wasn't exactly a scholarly dissertation on the matter, but arguments like "assertion is not proof" and "that's just propoganda" could be applied equally well to just about any news story on the topic - what level of evidence would you require to qualify as a "debunking", realistically speaking? Not that I'm going to be able to provide it.

      I wasn't able to Google up anything about the more convincing study I read about. It seems a wind farm site was monitored for bird activity before and after the installation of the turbines. After the installation, bird traffic in the area dropped precipitously - the birds flying through the area changed their routes to avoid the turbines. The overwhelming majority of the bird traffic that remained in the area navigated the farm just fine. There were some bird kills, but they amounted to a tiny fraction of a percent of the birds that had been in the area before the wind farm. The farm was by no means a bird blender, and was probably very far from the most serious threat the birds faced in their day-to-day bird lives. I did read it on-line, so it's out there somewhere.

      Here's a story that points out that pretty much any "sticks-up-in-the-air" type structure - like a high-rise building or a radio tower - kills birds. The fact is that there are a lot of birds, and therefore there are always a lot of birds dying in one way or another, including smacking into the windows of even single-story structures or colliding with cars. Yet no one's arguing against windows and cars, at least not on those grounds.

  88. Re:huh? by budgenator · · Score: 1

    he's too far out in the boonies to get commercial electricity; what he makes is all he gets!

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  89. Water Rights? by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

    When looking at property out in the country, water rights are a common issue - who has rights to use the water from the river/stream? Because if you move in and start using water upstream of someone else that has been using the water for 100 years on a farm, then they'll get mad. Anyone have any idea if water wheels and power generation are subject to water rights?

  90. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    free electric to run a few pcs :) although you better keep a ups between there for when the wind dies down.

  91. This Is great by eadint · · Score: 1

    The problem is that i dont have the reasorces to build a thing like this, if i did i would love to, do any slashdotters know a good place to buy wind turbine kit.

    1. Re:This Is great by msbsod · · Score: 1

      Isn't that something you need for homeland security? Security as in securing money for your home?

  92. Huh? by wsanders · · Score: 1

    I don't understand your response. The original poster was asking what might happen if wind turbines extract a significant amount of energy from the atmosphere, versus trees for example. It's probably reasonable to assume that when energy is extracted from wind, the wind slows down or stops, and the numbers show turbines don't have much effect.

    The "butterfly effect" is largely a literary metaphor. Technically, its the tendency of a model to be sensitive to inital parameters. I'm don't see how that has anything to do with how much the wind slows down or changes direction as the result of one or 100 windmills placed in its path.

    Maybe, you could find a configuration of windmills that if large enough and strategically placed could result in stopping the Gulf Stream, or something like that, but that wasn't really the question.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  93. Re:huh? by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    he may increase his cost efficiency by skipping the battery array and selling excess power back to the telco.

    Somehow I don't think Ma Bell would appreciate that. Seriously, though, powerco-approved inverters cost more than batteries. And in most places, they only pay wholesale rates ($0.03/kwh) anyways. You're much better-off cutting them entirely out of the equation.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  94. a wind turbine is only a part of the system... by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    Imagine you get your wind turbine.

    Now imagine you live in a quite sunny place (Texas ? lol)
    And that you have the know-how or the money to buld a plexiglass veranda + a chimney.

    Et Voila !! you have a solar chimney for generating power...

    http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Solar-chi mney

    "A solar chimney is an apparatus for harnessing solar energy by convection of heated air. Solar power describes a number of methods of harnessing energy from the light of the sun. ... Convection is the transfer of heat by the motion of or within a fluid.
    In its simplest form, it simply consists of a black-painted chimney. During the daytime, solar energy heats the chimney and thereby heats the air within it, resulting in an updraft of air within the chimney. The suction this creates at the chimney base can be used to ventilate, and thereby cool, the building below. In most parts of the world, it is easier to harness wind power for such ventilation, but on hot windless days such a chimney can provide ventilation where there would otherwise be none. Wind power is the kinetic energy of wind, or the extraction of this energy by wind turbines. ...
    General concept of proposed solar chimney power station
    Enlarge
    General concept of proposed solar chimney power station

    This principle has been proposed for electric power generation, using a large greenhouse at the base rather than relying on heating of the chimney itself. The main problem with this approach is the relatively small difference in temperature between the highest and lowest temperatures in the system. Carnot's theorem greatly restricts the efficiency of conversion in these circumstances."

    So cheap convection veranda + cheap home made wind turbine + Batteries = Electrical power in the middle of any hot/sunny desertic place.

    Of course this particular turbine is not the best suited for this particular use, but generating wind is not that hard when you have a readily available power source...

    Then, this is slashdot, whe should know about generating wind 8)

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  95. These Terrorists Will Make You Squeal Like Pigs by Baldrson · · Score: 0, Troll
    These kinds of isolationists, who like to call their gay-islamo-neo-nazi-ecoterrorism xenophobic "self-sufficiency" are undoubtedly stockpiling food and preparing for the day when their paranoid dreams of Armageddon comes to pass. "Off-the grid"... more like "off the mud people."

    They're probably unemployed loser programmers who just have too much time on their hands and rather than spending their time doing what they should be doing -- asking their government for retrianing -- are trying to distance themselves further and further from the all-inclusive global mind.

    Stewart Brand lead a SWAT team of Homeland Security forces to shoot them before they make him squeal like a pig during his next weekend jaunt out of the city to bring light unto the inbreds.

  96. for real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf is up with ppl have to bitch and whine about something that's not coal powered.
    I guess next we'll be slowing the planet's rotation down with wind generators.
    It's your own damn fault ppl for where you live - thos city ordinances are to shelter you from having to live too close to rednecks, like the otherpower hillbillies. If otherpower lived next door your precious little house wouldn't be as valuable.
    You all /have/ the money for nuclear, so don't read about alternative energy if you can't deal with it.

  97. WTF? by Some+Random+Username · · Score: 2, Funny

    What kind of cat or dog would be good for deflecting bird chunks dropping from the sky, and isn't it going to be heavier to carry above your head anyways? I really think the umbrella is better suited to the task.

  98. Could they use a car alternator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, I'm dumb about this sort of thing but could they use a car alternator / generator instead of making their own? I suppose they might have to use more than 1 given the scale of this thing...

  99. Drying a dissolved solid by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
    Once you have the salt close to saturation, dump a thin stream into a bath of some hot liquid that is not miscible with water. (If your salt is KNO3, something non-flammable would probably be good too. Maybe silicone oil?) The remaining water boils off and you're left with salt crystals in liquid.

    This is still a handling problem, so you may be better off just concentrating the salt instead of drying it completely. This is what's done with lithium bromide chiller systems; the concentrated LiBr is used as a dessicant.

    I've read about people using CaCl2 as an absorbent for ammonia and refrigerating things that way - the absorbent is heated to drive the ammonia into a tank (which is cooled with water during this process) and when the absorbent is cooled the ammonia tank gets very cold.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  100. Liquid Nitrogen Tricks by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Tim: I know that, Al, now help me here, I can't quite... reach... AAAAIIIII! My balls! My balls have frozen solid!

    Made me laugh!

    You know what else would be funny? A trick lapel-flower that squirts liquid nitrogen. Amuse your friends! Freeze the stupid look on their faces!

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  101. For the alternative energy crowd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next wekk: Build your own Tokamak from off-the-shelf parts!

  102. Tools included? by bondjamesbond · · Score: 1

    Did anyone read the article? They show a shop that would make any professional woodworker/handyman jealous. So, did they factor in the cost of the tools, too? No. I'll just turn my A/C waaay down at night and pay for it, thank you very much.

  103. If you don't like that, you'll hate this... by benjamindees · · Score: 1
    Completely Wooden Alternator:

    It seems that there may be some argument for not worrying too much about steel laminates, or ferrite cores in the coils, and simply adding a few more magnets and wires and settling for a somewhat larger machine. One immediate benifit of having "air coils" is obviously the complete lack of cogging, which, if used in a windmill should result in a machine that starts very easily.
    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  104. MOD PARENT DOWN - Flamebait by Lihtan · · Score: 1

    Parent comments are inflammatory flamebait

    --
    Divide by zero hurts my brain.
  105. Heat-powered cooling by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    The ammonia-absorption cycle has been used for nearly 100 years in refrigerators powered by heat.

    I think the downside is that leaking ammonia is capable of catching fire. That, and ammonia is used to make everything from fertilizer to explosives to crystal meth. Widespread knowledge of its versatility is discouraged.

    Here's one you can make yourself.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  106. It's not just possible but very well done. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    No mention of a wattmeter. [...] Plus it's really easy to be fooled when charging batteries-- [details omitted]

    A true RMS-reading wattmeter is likely to show much less power.


    You don't need a wattmeter when measuring charging power into batteries. You care about watthours of charging, not watthours generated.

    Batteries charge according to the integral of the current through them. So an average-reading ammeter (combined with a voltmeter ditto) does the job just fine.

    Or just measure the state of charge of batteries of a known capacity over a known interval.

    A large magnetic gap.

    The gap is not THAT large, because the stator is thin. The use of extremely strong neodymium magnets compensates for the relatively large gap compared to a design with laminated pole pieces through the centers of the coils.

    To keep the stator thin, the three phases are laid out in a single layer around the alternator, rather than being stacked three deep, and extra magnets are used instead. This requires twice as many magnets as a stacked design with pole pieces (or four times as many as with a return path through a laminated core). But see below for compensating advantages.

    No closed magnetic path.

    Wrong. The magnetic path is closed through the rotors.

    Each rotor has alternate N and S poles, with the return path between the backside of them through the steel supporting disk. The N poles on one rotor face the S poles on the other. So the magnetic path is continuous - passing through TWO gaps and two disks.

    The disks rotate together. Thus the magnetic field is never dragged throutg the disks. This lets you make the disks out of solid metal that is magnetically "hard" rather than laminations of material that is magnetically "soft", and eliminates eddy current losses in the return path.

    While the lack of laminations in the center of the coils does increase the gap, it also elminates eddy current losses there as well. More importantly, it completely eliminates "cogging" without requiring any critical measurements or extremely accurate parts placement. Cogging could only be reduced, not eliminated, if cores were used in the coils.

    Cogging is the tendency for the mill to "stick" at particular positions (where the gap is minimal) requiring extra force to break it free and start it turning. Eliminating or reducing it is important for windgenerators, because it sets a lower limit on the wind speed that is necessary to get the mill to start after a calm. If the mill doesn't start until wind speeds above the "cutin" for generation (where the peak voltage is higher than the battery voltage), you lose generation in light wind conditions - when you need it most.

    This design can be built by hand without any fancy tools and is inherently cogging-free. So the only limit to its startup is bearing friction. It starts turning in the lightest breeze.

    No design equations.

    You only need equations if you're doing a first design and it must be right. Then you have to do lots of planning and modeling. And you'll usually find out, when you've built it, that you missed something - that the equations you used were too simple for the actual situation, and you need a correction "fudge" factor or a more complicated model.

    But when you've done a bunch of similar devices, and established rules of thumb and rules of scaling, designing one more is trivial. Or if you intend to do a bunch and play with them until you get it right you can just start hacking, using qualitative rules of thumb, then tune until you've got it down.

    Ever seen a carpenter do equations before cutting wood to build one more shed? You'll see architects do them - or use computer models - when designing a bridge or a skyscraper. But houses, pyramids, and cathedrals were built long before the invention of calculus, and even further before numerical solutions to the hard problems of material strength were even approx

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  107. Look at THESE (commercial/BIG!) wind turbines by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    Firstly, someone should make a mirror of this site and post the URL in response to this post. It's just some guy's site, and these pics are big.

    Here goes:
    http://aubrey.vima.austin.tx.us/pipestone.html

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
    1. Re:Look at THESE (commercial/BIG!) wind turbines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the exposure. However, I wish you would not copy these. I have a private counter and it will break when you do that.

      Most of the files are available in a 35K and a 700K edition. The annotation at the top of the page helps you choose which you want.

    2. Re:Look at THESE (commercial/BIG!) wind turbines by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the exposure. However, I wish you would not copy these. I have a private counter and it will break when you do that.

      My apologies, I was only thinking of preventing your server from getting slashdotted. Looks like the topic is off the front page, old and petered out by now anyway.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
  108. Break even point IS important by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Break even point is important. It's a relativly simple calculation to tell you if a modification or method is worth it. Because, let's face it, it takes energy to make those cells. It takes money and energy to get the materials for the cells. The workers to manufacture the cells use power. Sure, some things are worth paying for, and that's exactly what the break even point is good for. Even if you don't pick the most optimal, at least you know why you didn't pick it, and just how much it cost you.

    And no, it's not like crapping out in the lawn. It'd be more accurate to compare the difference between choosing whether you hook up to rural sewage, choose a septic tank system, tile field, or even an outhouse. Of course, electricity is pretty much electricity, so it's an apples -> apples comparison. Your septic waste disposal method, though, has different various issues that are harder to quantify than cost per kilowatt hour.

    Though, if you don't like the fact that they're burning coal for your power, feel free to add a suitable 'penalty' when you figure out the break even point.

    These shingles, for example, I'd probably invest in them if my other option was a gas or diesel generator in a remote enviroment. Of course, I'd also have to look at the fact that for consistant power, I'd still have to have that generator. So I'd have to be in a very sunny climate, and be needing power mostly during the day. And for what, AC? Washer? I mostly use my computer at night. Trying to use batteries is very wasteful, in that the investment in sufficient batteries, and the extra daylight(or windy, in the case of the turbine) capacity raises costs through the roof. If your power usage is the same during the night as the day, assuming 50% sun, you'd need triple the generation, and plenty of batteries(you loose about 50% of the power when charging a battery).

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Break even point IS important by cas2000 · · Score: 1

      > Break even point is important.

      i never said it wasn't.

      my point was that there are other costs and factors which need to be taken into account AS WELL AS just the purely monetary.

      pollution is a cost. waste is a cost. global warming is a cost. toxic air is a cost. and so on.

      failure to take these costs into account when calculating a "break-even" point is both short-sighted and narrow-minded. only idito economists call these things "externals" and ignore them.

      > Because, let's face it, it takes energy to make
      > those cells. It takes money and energy to get
      > the materials for the cells.

      thank you, Captain Obvious!

      > And no, it's not like crapping out in the lawn.

      using electricity from coal-fired power stations is EXACTLY like crapping on the lawn, except that a) it's not bio-degradable, b) radioactive and other toxic waster ends up in your lungs and in the water and in the ground and in the food chain, c) lawn crap is a short-term problem while coal fire pollution is a long term problem, and d) it smells worse. other than those minor details, it's exactly alike.

      most other "conventional" electricity generation methods aren't much better than coal.

      the only thing that comes close to being clean is nuclear power, and that's only because it produces such small quantities of waste that it's possible to contain it. in theory, at least. i wouldn't trust any big corporation (especially a U.S. corporation) to actually do the job properly and safely - most likely they'd just ship it to mexico and dump it in a lake because it's cheaper and easier and they can bribe people to get away with it.

      but in theory, the waste can be contained.

      > These shingles, for example, [...]

      where to start? there's so much that is just plain wrong which is revealed by your words. batteries are a small part of the cost of a solar power setup compared to the cost of PV cells....and batteries are used in pretty nearly every solar setup, except for immediate pumping and similar applications. you factor it in to the capacity planning calculations.

      apart from that, the only other thing i can say is that the best response to the situation you describe is to come up with an energy budget that sees you living within your means. some things should not be put "on credit" for the next generation to sort out....the fact is, unless WE (the currently living generations) sort it out, this will probably be the last generation with the luxury of having the time and resources and energy to be able to work it out.

  109. I'm building a copy... by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 1

    I'm building a smaller scale copy of this.

    Anyone interested in windmills should scour the used book sites for books by Hugh Piggott. His books are usable how-tos.

    Andy Out!

  110. Possible, yes. 3KW, no. by Animats · · Score: 1
    "I wired this single coil up to a big resistor (somewhere around 1 ohm I think) and cranked it hard by hand. At about 104 rpm, under load, I had 6 Volts AC and 6 Amps into the resistor (36 Watts). Im not sure if I'm figuring all this right - but I think that with 12 coils wired in 3 phase Star configuration... I should be close to 400 watts @ 100 rpm."

    Unclear what he's measuring with, but it it's a typical DVM, the voltages and currents are peak values, not average. If he's getting good sine waves out, multiply by 0.707. For worse waveforms, the value is lower. He's probably getting under 300 watts out, which seems about right for the machine he's built.

    What's making this work is rare-earth magnets. The field strengths you get today from rare-earth magnets are so high that even this simple design will sort of work. But good designs with rare-earth magnets do far better.

    What's scary is that his turbine has a wooden hub and no overspeed protection. Most wind turbines are built to feather or turn sideways ot the wind in overspeed conditions. This thing will probably throw a blade in a big storm.

    Real Goods will sell you a 3KW watt wind turbine for $5000, or a 400 watt unit for $900. So spending $700 on magnets alone to build your own is not a win. Real Goods units deliver more power from a 4' rotor than this guy gets from a 17' rotor, and they tilt to a safe position in high winds.

    It looks real enough to me, but not cost-effective.

  111. Maybe not... by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    Based on previous comments, grandparent appears to be a poor attempt at sarcasm.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  112. Re: but very well done--well not IMHO by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
    Thanks for your comments, I didnt realize there was a magnetic path through the backing plate.

    But I wouldnt call a design "very well done" if it requires $700 of copper, where a car alternator is around 1/10th the size and uses maybe 1/10th the copper.

    I'm all for wind power but IMHO this isnt an example of excellent engineeringl far from it. The good news is, it's not hard to do better than this.

  113. Thermally driven cooling machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The solar thermal industry (and not only this industry) is doing a lot of research in this field. As others have pointed out: This concept is not only known but also applied already. Larger sorption chillers are available from two Japanes companies (e.g. http://www.yazakienergy.com/waterfired.htm).

    Especially in Europe interest in this technology has increased immensely in the last couple of years with ~10 companies now working on smaller machines, which could be used in single family dwellings.

    For some of the latest research results have a look e.g. at Germany's Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (http://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/) or Google for "Solar Cooling", "Solar Assisted Cooling", "Solar Air Conditioning".

    You will be amazed how far this technology has been developed already.

  114. This is old news. by StormKrow · · Score: 1

    The homemade wind turbine has been made for several years now. This particular turbine is based from the 42v brake-drum trubines. (don't as me why 42v, I don't know either. it's a bastard child of voltage, probably just an error in the way they were winding, or maybe that's all that would fit, hence the reason for the homemade wind generator to evolve into the homebrew alternator method.)

    To be honest, I'm surprised their site has withstood being /.'ed.

    There are also several people who build these in 3rd world countries to provide small-scale power to villiages to give them light and power for radios, small tv's, and I think there's even one with a computer somewhere

    This is an interesting site and great information for someone who wanted to build their own, but it's hardly news.

    --
    Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
  115. Re: but very well done--well not IMHO by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Thanks for your comments, I didnt realize there was a magnetic path through the backing plate.

    You're welcome.

    A lot of thought and a number of design iterations went into this family of axial-flux designs. They're a very good match for the job.

    But I wouldnt call a design "very well done" if it requires $700 of copper, where a car alternator is around 1/10th the size and uses maybe 1/10th the copper.

    $700 worth of copper? What are you doing, mining your own? I doubt even the magnets cost that much.

    A car alternator is optimized for a different job:
    - keeping a battery charged and electrical systems alive when perhaps a hundred horsepower is available to bleed from - at 749 watts per horsepower so all you can eat is a drop in the bucket.
    - Keeping a tight enough regulation on voltage to keep the battery from deteriorating unacceptable for several years, despite the wildly varying shaft speed.
    - Alternators can be powered by a belt drive. So the shaft speed / crank speed ratio can be selected arbitrarily. Higher speeds -> faster flux movement -> smaller device for a given power.
    - Running for 50,000 - 150,000 miles or so between replacements or refurbishments, which comes out to no more than 1000-3000 hours at highway speeds or no more than about 10,000 hours at a typical cycle.

    This makes automotive alternators and similar designs a bad match for windpower service.

    - They consume an enormous amount of excitation power - and the most at low speeds. You can't set the wind's "idle speed". You must take what you get. In a car this is no big deal - a tenth of a horse is a drop in the bucket. In the wind this is a very big deal - a tenth of a horse is 75 watts. Stealing power to excite the alternator raises your "cutin" speed, greatly reducing the time you can charge and the amount of charge you get.

    - 1,000 - 10,000 hours between rebuilds (depending on weather conditions) corresponds to an alternator rebuild every 6 weeks to 16 months. Totally unacceptable for a mill.

    - Mill shaft speeds are limited by the aerodynamics of the blades (in particular the "tip speed ratio" in combination with the blade radius). The bigger they are the slower they turn. The slower the alternator shaft turns, the less it generates - by a square law. But gearboxes and belt drives to raise the alternator shaft speed introduce design complexity, expense, losses, maintainence requirements, and points of failure. So you're better off running at shaft speed - and getting your power by stronger magnets, more wire, and bigger radii.

    You could be slightly more efficient on copper with a radial-flux design, like a typical electric motor. But that gives you more weight on the tower and is much harder to construct.

    - Small wind power designs can't afford excitation power overhead - and using permanent magnets eliminate it (at a significant up-front cost). Unlike an automotive alternator, you don't need to regulate the voltage by adjusting the excitation: You can regulate it by letting the load slow the prop (which isn't as inefficient as it sounds - in fact you MUST do this, to get current out of the genny). You further regulate it by designing the mill to furl (typically by turning away from the wind, sometimes by designing the blades so the airflow detaches) when the alternator is maxing out and would overheat. Final control is to add a "dump load" to deliberately waste power that would otherwise overcharge the batteries. So you don't NEED variable excitation to control the mill.

    I'm all for wind power but IMHO this isnt an example of excellent engineeringl far from it. The good news is, it's not hard to do better than this.

    Most of my comments have been on the axial-flux designs in general, rather than this particular instance. I see that this one has violated some of the rules of thumb that are well-known by the denizens of the board. (And the author admitted this.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  116. what part of this is DIY? by ate50eggs · · Score: 1

    Lots of expensive, custom made parts. Dangerously powerful magnets cast in polyester resin. The dude looks like he's working in a professional level workshop. Oh yeah, I'll just get right on this. Now if only I had a local metalwork shop... or a garage... or, y'know, some tools.

    --
    not everything is a science experiment!
  117. Re: but very well done--well not IMHO by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
    >$700 worth of copper? What are you doing, mining your own?

    Thats what the fine article said. $700

    >I doubt even the magnets cost that much.

    The going price for disk drive magnets seems to be around zero or slightly lower. I got big box, about 80 large ones for $5 at a surplus place. I shudda offered less.

    > - Running for 50,000 - 150,000 miles or so between replacements or refurbishments, which comes out to no more than 1000-3000 hours at highway speeds or no more than about 10,000 hours at a typical cycle.

    So once a year you inspect and/or replace the brushes and squirt some grease into the bearings. If you're living off the grid you probably ave plenty of time on your hands.

    I get your point about the wasted excitation power. How about you open up the alternator and replace the rotor winding with some good magnets? That also eliminates the need for the brushes and their replacement.

    I didnt even mention the mismatch of rotational speeds, as used 8x 5hp gearboxes go for about $8 on ebay. And while you're pulling the alternator off a car, you can grab the serpentine belt too. A good DIY'er should be able to make a large cogged driving pulley out of plywood and popsicle sticks. Not terribly esthetic and might get iced up in a bad winter.

  118. Re: but very well done--well not IMHO by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I get your point about the wasted excitation power. How about you open up the alternator and replace the rotor winding with some good magnets? That also eliminates the need for the brushes and their replacement.

    You'll find discussions on doing exactly that on the otherpower board. (www.fieldlines.com. It has a search feature or you can use google advanced search and restrict it to that site.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  119. Re: but very well done--well not IMHO by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    So once a year you inspect and/or replace the brushes and squirt some grease into the bearings. If you're living off the grid you probably ave plenty of time on your hands. [...]

    I didnt even mention the mismatch of rotational speeds, as used 8x 5hp gearboxes go for about $8 on ebay. And while you're pulling the alternator off a car, you can grab the serpentine belt too. A good DIY'er should be able to make a large cogged driving pulley out of plywood and popsicle sticks. Not terribly esthetic and might get iced up in a bad winter.


    Why don't you build one up, join the board, and show 'em how it's done? B-)

    Then come back periodically and give them a report on how long it lasts and how much trouble it isn't to maintain it.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  120. Re: but very well done--well not IMHO by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    $700 worth of copper? What are you doing, mining your own?

    Thats what the fine article said. $700


    I looked for that but missed it. Holy cow!

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  121. 120 Volts by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    Why not use 10 car batteries? How about Motorcycle batteries? For lighting there's no need to convert to AC to use regular bulbs. Other stuff could be a problem - I don't think you can't get a 120V inverter at home depot.

    1. Re:120 Volts by otherpower+dan · · Score: 1

      Car batteries are made to put out lots of amperage for a short time, then get recharged immediately. For running an off-grid home, you need batteries that can survive being deep-cycled. Car batteries usually last under a year when used to power an off-grid home. And, you won't find many regular incandescant lights in off-grid homes, either -- we use all fluorescents and compact fluorescents to save power. DANF

    2. Re:120 Volts by mink · · Score: 1

      So "deep cycle" RV or Marine rated ones (cost much more then regular car batteries) are what you use?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    3. Re:120 Volts by otherpower+dan · · Score: 1

      Off grid folks up here use a variety of batteries, all depending on budget. RV/Marine batteries are also not that great -- maybe a year's life in a offgrid home. Going from cheapest to most expensive (and shorter life to longer life), these are the most common: 6v golf cart batteries Glass matt 6v gel cells L-16 size 6v deep cycle batteries 2v Forklift batteries (these ROCK! Absolutely the best choice, but very expensive). DAN

  122. Re: but very well done--well not IMHO by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

    That all sounds great in theory. But what you are describing would simply not stand up to use.

    Swapping out the windings on the alternator??? Good luck getting it to balance afterward.

    Use a gearbox? Again - that would be another point of failure and servicing item.

    Living off-grid you need this stuff to work. Also these guys enjoy DIYing with basic supplies. The strong magnets are a bit of a cheat in that department - but what are you going to do? At least the magnets should last a very long time.

  123. Break-even is possible. by skids · · Score: 1

    People generally make two mistakes when working with home power.

    The first is that they pay too much attention to efficiency. A system does not need to be efficient if you have a way to increase the input power. One way to do this is to stop trying to put it on your roof -- if you have a back yard, use it. Less of it to mow, that way.

    The second mistake usually made is to go right for electricity generation. I can't stress this enough: take care of heat first, deal with electricity later.

    Yes, heat is cheaper by far, but so are the systems to provide it. All you need is a couple small pumps, a storage tank, and either panels or just a really long hose to collect the solar. Reflectors for a concentrator are a very good bang-for-the buck as well. Take the money saved from heating costs and put in in your piggybank to pay for electrical generation equipment.

    What happens when you go right for electricity with a PV panel? Your conversion efficiency is lower (most of the sunlight is wasted as heat) and you have electricity some part of the day, so if you want to store the rest of it, you have to buy into an expensive battery bank with ongoing maintenance costs. What happens when you have a tank full of hot water? You get more power out of the sun, and it stays hot (if correctly insulated) during the night.

    After heat/hot water is taken care of, you can then take your sweet time looking into a thermopile, or a stirling, or a thermoacoustic, or whatever floats your boat and you can catch a bargain on. Generate electricity from the hot water, and your "storage battery" is just a big vat of water, which is not that hard to maintain.

    Of course, this market dynamic may change in several years when the new cold-assembly solar arrays hit the market, but for now, electricity generation is a bad first move.

  124. Re: but very well done--well not IMHO by pyrocasto · · Score: 1

    Well ordering them is kind of a cheat, but you can find them in many places. Dead hard drives for example have nice little Neos I believe.

    Hell, I'm building a wind genny out of microwaves.