One: Marx, Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin and Stalin is years ago, not 2004. Two:Marx, Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin and Stalin is not representative of Europe. Three: Horrors of Marx?. Read his fucking works first. Read the history first.
never mind, lets use your logic.
Given that the USA idea of democracy is a nasty concept of "enforcing democracy*", this is a sensible move to assinate Bush. Coming from the same country that gave the world the horrors of hypocrisy on slavery, hypocrisy on womens rights, hypocrisy on racial equality, the ONLY country to use an atomic bomb bla bla bla..
Unable to deal with adversity? Quite funny coming from a country populated with the most obese people in the world, astounding lack of literacy, the dumbest person in the world leading them,bla bla bla. You really think the US population is able to deal with adversity?. Sure, if adversity is a 3 pound hot dog.
I'd won't be worried to bet France and German will continue to be a superpower even when USA is not.
I won't comment on the rest of ur comments. I don't know much about them. I'd wager, they are as stupid as your other comments though.
for an article comparing the strengths and weakness
of MS and Linux, there is very few MS bash modded up.
Anyways, to the posts that the guy is biased, well he is. But then again so is everyone. I consider other peoples bias(and mine) based on the rational behind it, and the lucidity.
The article, whilst I have some contention, is quite good overall.
The numbers of Linux desktops does contribute to numbers insecure systems. Given (hypothetical) probality of Linux desktop to be insecure 1/1000, a million Linux desktops will have more insecure systems than 100'000 desktops.
My view:
Security is a combination of the inherent strengths/weakness of a system, its users(admins) capabilities and numbers deployed.
posted MS will surely blame it on the drivers. I think this should been have modded insightful.
One way or another MS will spin this into users fault.
"what you can get out of the car, cause the software malfunction!!Well you should have sent it to be patched.We already roll one last month."
NO THANKS.
There was an editorial article in 2600(Summer 2003 issue) titled "Disrepecting The Law". Basiccaly it talks about goverments double standards regarding to law. They'll adopt a law as they see fit and conviniently (without due reason or process) kick out when its not. or the different intreprentation of the law for the goverment and the people.
I'm a 4th year student at my uni, and this semester I chose to stay inside the campus accomodation
Admitedly I was careless; didn't have zoneAlarm on, anti virus wasn't updated either.
Within less than 1 day the comp was attacked by sasser,welch, etc..etc..whatever their name is(didnt really bother to check)
No harm done;I know how to use the task manager, regedit,msconfig and such.
The rest of the student(almost all) though have no idea to protect much less "heal" their comp.(IT students my ass)
Something like this can be useful then. I know the potential for abuse is alot, but if the "cure" is released by a trusted source in the network then White Worms can be very effective.
'The dame was really persuasive, somehow most dames are'
Let me turn it to the real world. Suppose I break in your house (something I'm sure I could easily do, 99.999% of houses have shitty physical security) look at your things to see what I could get at, then tell you about it later. Is that ok? I mean I didn't hurt anything, and I gave you a report, so it;s ok right? Wrong, it's not ok, I broke the law.
true, true.
the diffference here though is that the university network is'nt not like a house. a better analogy is that is like the student accomodations itself.
and its the univs responsibilty to make sure that said accomodation is secure.
saying that "in order to maintain wide cheap public access to it, the security will naturally have to go down" is crap and irresponsible.
maybe its illegal, but its within the right of the 2 students to voice their concern over their own security and privacy.
juiciest of course is the cctv. combined with info from msn and stalking through the cctv, say a serial rapist could have got all the whereabout-info that he/she needs.
they should have gone through the admins first? yeah thats half true. what ensure though that the higher up will do something about it? whats the chances of a public(student) outcry forcing the higher up to actually do something?(thats rheorical)
law?bs! law doesnt come first, right should(or at least it should). cause if I remember correctly it was illegal once for blacks to sit in front of the bus.
You're right, I did lose a million dollars last year. I expect to lose a million dollars this year. I expect to lose a million dollars *next* year. You know, Mr. Thatcher, at the rate of a million dollars a year, I'll have to close this place in... 60 years.
If you want people to choose A, give them choices between A,B,C and D.
With B,C, and D being lesser "choices"
(Substitute con mans for dictator, monopolies, etc)
Slashdot Mirror
Some government employee may have it. Though I doubt the number is large.
I'm sure they are serious, but serious things doesn't always need serious message.
Someone who can manage to sent an effective message and still get a few chuckles/laughs is witty/ quite intelligent.
"Murdering innocent people in the thousands because your country blows goats in every possible way = cowardice"
I have no idea what your trying to say?
I'm not karma pumping. what makes you think I will not get modded down because of my sig.
Ironic, that your comment is also way offtopic.
People will always have the need for recognition and group ownership.
Cost not neccesarily, if hardly calculated.
cant help laughing at the way the page is made.
Well at least they have a sense of humour.
One: Its faster than a normal circuits.
Two: It consume less power.
One: Marx, Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin and Stalin is years ago, not 2004. :Marx, Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin and Stalin is not representative of Europe.
Two
Three: Horrors of Marx?. Read his fucking works first. Read the history first.
never mind, lets use your logic.
Given that the USA idea of democracy is a nasty concept of "enforcing democracy*", this is a sensible move to assinate Bush. Coming from the same country that gave the world the horrors of hypocrisy on slavery, hypocrisy on womens rights, hypocrisy on racial equality, the ONLY country to use an atomic bomb bla bla bla..
Unable to deal with adversity? Quite funny coming from a country populated with the most obese people in the world, astounding lack of literacy, the dumbest person in the world leading them,bla bla bla.
You really think the US population is able to deal with adversity?. Sure, if adversity is a 3 pound hot dog.
I'd won't be worried to bet France and German will continue to be a superpower even when USA is not.
I won't comment on the rest of ur comments. I don't know much about them. I'd wager, they are as stupid as your other comments though.
for an article comparing the strengths and weakness of MS and Linux, there is very few MS bash modded up.
Anyways, to the posts that the guy is biased, well he is.
But then again so is everyone.
I consider other peoples bias(and mine) based on the rational behind it, and the lucidity.
The article, whilst I have some contention, is quite good overall.
The numbers of Linux desktops does contribute to numbers insecure systems. Given (hypothetical) probality of Linux desktop to be insecure 1/1000, a million Linux desktops will have more insecure systems than 100'000 desktops.
My view:
Security is a combination of the inherent strengths/weakness of a system, its users(admins) capabilities and numbers deployed.
posted
MS will surely blame it on the drivers.
I think this should been have modded insightful.
One way or another MS will spin this into users fault.
"what you can get out of the car, cause the software malfunction!!Well you should have sent it to be patched.We already roll one last month."
NO THANKS.
this is a vast right wing luddite conspiracy. :)
There was an editorial article in 2600(Summer 2003 issue) titled "Disrepecting The Law".
Basiccaly it talks about goverments double standards regarding to law. They'll adopt a law as they see fit and conviniently (without due reason or process) kick out when its not. or the different intreprentation of the law for the goverment and the people.
cough**bechtel**cough cough kyoto*** halliburton**cough
Civil disobidience(breaking the law) is sometimes needed to protest agianst this.
;The law does not equal ethical; the law does not equal what is right. There is lots of friction.
variable : 25000
possible point-to-point connection : 625000000
actual date : priceless
of cananda. :)
That damn intelligence war must be really working.
I read it, I read Facts on Scientific Names of Orgasm.
Serious.
1.Promise "freebies"
2.Buy "freebies" from evil corporation.(market rate for crap=400bucks,corrupted rate=800bucks)
3.Jack up tuition
4.PROFIT!!
/bahh, too easy
I usually like to feed the trolls, but this is getting ridiculuos.
..has been a dud for past few issues. /. now.
Nice to see I can get my kick ass satire at
jokes.
"The dame was very persuasive.Somehow most dames are"
ssh
I'm a 4th year student at my uni, and this semester I chose to stay inside the campus accomodation
Admitedly I was careless; didn't have zoneAlarm on, anti virus wasn't updated either.
Within less than 1 day the comp was attacked by sasser,welch, etc..etc..whatever their name is(didnt really bother to check)
No harm done;I know how to use the task manager, regedit,msconfig and such.
The rest of the student(almost all) though have no idea to protect much less "heal" their comp.(IT students my ass)
Something like this can be useful then.
I know the potential for abuse is alot, but if the "cure" is released by a trusted source in the network then White Worms can be very effective.
'The dame was really persuasive, somehow most dames are'
Let me turn it to the real world. Suppose I break in your house (something I'm sure I could easily do, 99.999% of houses have shitty physical security) look at your things to see what I could get at, then tell you about it later. Is that ok? I mean I didn't hurt anything, and I gave you a report, so it;s ok right? Wrong, it's not ok, I broke the law.
true, true.
the diffference here though is that the university network is'nt not like a house. a better analogy is that is like the student accomodations itself.
and its the univs responsibilty to make sure that said accomodation is secure. saying that "in order to maintain wide cheap public access to it, the security will naturally have to go down" is crap and irresponsible. maybe its illegal, but its within the right of the 2 students to voice their concern over their own security and privacy.
juiciest of course is the cctv. combined with info from msn and stalking through the cctv, say a serial rapist could have got all the whereabout-info that he/she needs.
they should have gone through the admins first?
yeah thats half true. what ensure though that the higher up will do something about it? whats the chances of a public(student) outcry forcing the higher up to actually do something?(thats rheorical)
law?bs! law doesnt come first, right should(or at least it should). cause if I remember correctly it was illegal once for blacks to sit in front of the bus.
I read "revised hell of technical documentation"
I dont know much about programming.
But I'd love a CSS style implementation for open office.
You're right, I did lose a million dollars last year. I expect to lose a million dollars this year. I expect to lose a million dollars *next* year. You know, Mr. Thatcher, at the rate of a million dollars a year, I'll have to close this place in... 60 years.
As in 2pac, Nas, Outkast..
If you want people to choose A, give them choices between A,B,C and D.
With B,C, and D being lesser "choices"
(Substitute con mans for dictator, monopolies, etc)