Slashdot Mirror


Xbox Price Drop To $149 Now Official

bpitzer writes "It's official - Microsoft is cutting the price on the Xbox to $149, effective tomorrow, according to CNET News. Now, will Sony follow suit on the PS2? And how long until the next price drop? Maybe at this year's E3, making three in a row?" We previously reported on rumors to this effect, and other readers point to the official Microsoft press release, sporting a quote from noted tech analyst P.Diddy: "[I] believe that the system's cultural influence as a social entertainment brand has only just begun."

527 comments

  1. It may cost only $149, but by Can+it+run+Linux · · Score: 1, Funny

    can it run Linux(TM)?

    1. Re:It may cost only $149, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This has to be one of the best trolls I have seen recently! GLTY!

  2. Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...it starts trumpeting quotes from rappers as news.

  3. Nice but... by DaHat · · Score: 0, Interesting

    it's still more then I can afford on my meager interns wage.

  4. Obvious question to follow... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When exactly does Xbox2 come out?

    1. Re:Obvious question to follow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real question is when does Halo 2 come out.

      Probably the on the same date.

    2. Re:Obvious question to follow... by jakel2k · · Score: 1

      Forget xBox2 what about xBoxXP??? Ewww.... I feel so dirty.

    3. Re:Obvious question to follow... by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      Xbox media center perhaps?? Oh wait.. it's called a mod-chip..

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    4. Re:Obvious question to follow... by Naffer · · Score: 1

      Slightly offtopic, but still kind of relevant. If I purchased and modded an Xbox, are there any media players available that could access a WindowsXP network and stream video files to the console for play or would I have to copy them to the console prior?

    5. Re:Obvious question to follow... by SoVeryWrong · · Score: 1

      Xbox Media Center
      You can set up SMB shares and after tweaking the buffer size it streams nicely.

    6. Re:Obvious question to follow... by whittrash · · Score: 1

      When they drop the price with games it means one of three things.

      A). It sucks
      B). It has run its course, it is outdated and a newer and better version should be coming out.
      C). If it is too cheap it must not be worth buying.

    7. Re:Obvious question to follow... by Golias · · Score: 2, Interesting
      D) They have already recovered all their development costs, and everything they make now is pure gravey.
      E) The parts that go into the X-Box have steeply dropped in cost over the past three years.
      F) All of the above.
      G) D and E only.

      Answer: G

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    8. Re:Obvious question to follow... by Bilestoad · · Score: 1

      H) Time to shore up market share for X-Box 2.

      (Gonna eat Sony's lunch, or at least gnash teeth furiously in its direction while they smile.)

  5. also in canada by Coneasfast · · Score: 4, Informative

    they also dropped the price in canada to $199 CDN

    --
    Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    1. Re:also in canada by nilstar · · Score: 3, Informative

      It should also be noted, that ever since the beginning of the new year, that some companies in Canada (like Best Buy, Futureshop) have been offering the X-Box for $199 on "sale" without games and $229 with 1-3 games. So, I wonder, does this mean that I can get a "street price" of $179 Cdn? Anyone know how street pricing works?

      --
      ===> An eye for an eye makes everyone blind - MG
    2. Re:also in canada by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny
      Anyone know how street pricing works?

      After you buy from a sidewalk vendor, you notice that you bought something with slightly name, like "X-Boks". Still, I'm pretty happy with my Roleks watch.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:also in canada by rocket97 · · Score: 1

      LMFAO thanks I needed that.... and how true it is!

      --
      "The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." -Harlan Ellison
    4. Re:also in canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they also dropped the price in canada to $199 CDN

      No, that's just the U.S. dollar getting weaker.

    5. Re:also in canada by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Still, I'm pretty happy with my Roleks watch.

      I hate to break it to you, but this street vendor I bought my Rollex from told me those Rolecks watches are cheap knock-offs. That's why his was so much more expensive.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    6. Re:also in canada by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      yeah, if you walk down the street and stick your head into a shop, how much will they sell you the product for? that's the street price. being able to order it over the 'net or whatever for that price reliably makes it a "street price". Of course that actually varies from day to day, but basically when a magazine prints a street price they just put in there about what you will expect to pay for it in the average retail outlet. "Street price" on most things don't actually fluctuate daily, but I'm used to watching pricewatch and seeing everything flopping around nonsensically.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. ps2 drop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've been thinking about getting a ps2, hope this helps that price drop as well.

  7. This guy needs to lay off the marketing pills... by AssProphet · · Score: 5, Funny

    "[I] believe that the system's cultural influence as a social entertainment brand has only just begun."

    This just in: rampant usage of the xbox has increased usage of the word owned!
    ...thanks guys.

  8. Still too much by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    There's only one game I'd like to play on the Xbox, so adding the $149 to the price of the game (which I haven't priced lately) comes in well above the threshold for fiscal pain.

    Thank goodness my old Amiga 2000 still works :-)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Still too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I remember going out and spending $500 on a video card for a $2000 PC, then spending another $49 on the newest game. Basically, a $2,549 XBOX.

      So I like the new price. :)

    2. Re:Still too much by kryocore · · Score: 1

      Except that your $149 Xbox cannot fill a tenth (probably less) as many polygons as the $2549 PC.

    3. Re:Still too much by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Back when my life had less direction, I used to blow half my wages at Aladin's Castle and the rest buying games for my C64. Now I throw kind of money at my bicycles so I can go out and suffer in the sun, wind and rain. Still, you can't beat rocketing down a hill with 100 other riders for pure adrenaline rush.

      I'll just wait a couple years and pick up an XBox at a garage sale for $25.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Still too much by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Still, you can't beat rocketing down a hill with 100 other riders for pure adrenaline rush."

      Sure you can. Give the PCP and crowbars.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    5. Re:Still too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Give them PCP and crowbars."

      Oh the heartbreak of a perfectly good funny post ruinde by poor typing skills!!

    6. Re:Still too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that your $149 Xbox cannot fill a tenth (probably less) as many polygons as the $2549 PC.

      Yeah, who gives a shit about gameplay or things like that when you can just sit there and drool over how many polygons the game is filling! Ohhh I need to go get a rag! Ohhh!

    7. Re:Still too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because we all know that you can just drop in a P4 3.2GHz, 1GB DDR400 memory, and an Nvidia FX 5950 when the XBox gets a little too slow for those new games and mods. You know those games, like Desert Combat mod, Battlefield Vietnam, Counter-Strike and Day of Defeat. I especially love how game consoles allow me to download and permanently store free, full-modifications of games, especially when it's through Steam so I don't have to worry about finding a mirror.

      I mean, where else can you pay $40 for a game, and get several more new and completely different modifications for $0, and still have that upgrade flexibility -- other than on an XBox.

      /sarcasm

    8. Re:Still too much by kryocore · · Score: 1

      Yeah, who gives a shit about gameplay or things like that when you can just sit there and drool over how many polygons the game is filling! Ohhh I need to go get a rag! Ohhh!


      That's what I'm talking about!!! The drool factor is cool!

    9. Re:Still too much by Spankophile · · Score: 1

      Not true. Being dedicated hardware, with dedicated tech like Pushbuffers, you can push an assload of polygons. Plus, playing on the tv reduces the need to have that much resolution anyways.

    10. Re:Still too much by necronom426 · · Score: 1

      If someone was to PAY me to have one, it would still be too much.

      I wouldn't have an X-Box on principal. I have NEVER bought ANYTHING with Micro$oft on it and I never will.

      My Amigas also still work :-)

    11. Re:Still too much by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      He said "remember when" - I think he's talking about the days when mainstream video cards cost $500, etc.

      But to address your "troll" :) uh... don't you think it reasonable that if you spend $2500 on a PC (which is a lot in today's dollars) that OF COURSE it will outperform a $200 piece of hardware? Or are you expecting to get better performance out of something that costs less than 10% of the price? The xbox is dedicated, sure but come on what do you expect?

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    12. Re:Still too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you are so cool. Can I come over to the painkeep later when your parents go out to dinner?

    13. Re:Still too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Thanks for letting us know. Have fun "playing" with your outdated lil toy.

      Your are l33t!!!!!

    14. Re:Still too much by necronom426 · · Score: 0

      I didn't say I play on it all the time, I just mentioned it since the original post mentioned Amigas.

      I have a PS2 for games.

    15. Re:Still too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Substituting a $ for the S in Microsoft makes Baby Gates cry.

    16. Re:Still too much by tssm0n0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      you can push an assload of polygons

      Exactly how many plygons can be stored up one's ass?

    17. Re:Still too much by danielsfca2 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I don't think you're giving the Xbox enough credit. First off, I think the OP was referring to a "back in the day" time when PC's cost more money. *rereads your post* oh yeah, you noticed that too. I'll bet the Xbox does outperform the PC he bought for $2000+$500 back in those days.

      Second, it was widely rumored at the Xbox's introduction that it was being sold at a loss. So it's probably not a $149 or even $200 machine. I'm sure the loss margin is smaller now, of course, than it was at its introduction.

      Now I'm off to buy me an Xbox!

    18. Re:Still too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Sony is so much more progressive and forward thinking, right?

    19. Re:Still too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be a P$2?

    20. Re:Still too much by Golias · · Score: 1
      you can push an assload of polygons.

      That sounds like it would hurt.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    21. Re:Still too much by necronom426 · · Score: 0

      I like Sony. They have never done anything to annoy me or to make me dislike what they are doing.

      When they bring out the PS3 I will almost definitely get one.

    22. Re:Still too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except make shitty products that constantly break.

    23. Re:Still too much by Intocabile · · Score: 2, Funny

      And please use a standard unit like a Volkswagen Beetle or Library of Congress.

    24. Re:Still too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Na, skip the xbox, just snag a old NES, you can probaly find one with 50+ games for... $5 total, lots of play for the buck.

    25. Re:Still too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's only one game I'd like to play on the Xbox

      Which is???

      Let us know, and maybe we can find you a similiar game to play on your PC.

    26. Re:Still too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Price out a P3 machine 64 MB of ram and a GeForce 4 MX and you're pretty close to an Xbox MS gets a deal because they will buy several million units per year. Another part of the loss is manufacturing costs (they pay Celestica or anther EMS to make them) and any retail markup. The estimates put the cost of the box at anywhere between $350 and $450 at launch, also since introduction prices have fallen by ~1% per week for components. A good assumption for game system license fees are that MS gets about $10 per game sold for third party titles, and $15-$20 for internally developed games.

    27. Re:Still too much by necronom426 · · Score: 0

      They've never broken for me. My PS & PS2 have worked without fault since the day I got them. I even have an old Walkman from the 80's that still works although I obviously don't still use it now.

    28. Re:Still too much by quecojones · · Score: 1

      But... what about the Metric ButtLoad (TM)?

      --
      "PROFANITY is the inevitable literary crutch of the inarticulate MOTHER FUCKER." -- some PC user
    29. Re:Still too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory Sagan Quote:

      "Billions and billions!"

  9. Not buying until 99$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    It's not worth more than that. Gamecube and PS2 have all the good games these days.

    Also, having a green X in my living room is kind of creepy.

    1. Re:Not buying until 99$ by kyoko21 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Apparently you have not played ninja gaiden.

  10. Loss by DarkBlackFox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So what kind of loss is Microsoft taking now to ship these things?

    If they already sold the X-Box for below cost, wouldn't this just hurt them further?

    1. Re:Loss by Egekrusher2K · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not necessarily. As time goes on, it costs less and less to manufacture these. The video core, which is kind of a haggle between a Geforce 2 and a Geforce 3 (basically, an overpowered Geforce 2 w/ vertex and pixel shaders), was beyond what PC manufacturers had out at the time. Now, we are 2 cores BEYOND that, so manufacturing costs have dropped signifigantly. As far as the processor goes- it's a 700mhz Celeron, which costs practically nothing to manufacture now. The 8GB hard drive they are using is now TINY comparatively. In short, that's how they do it.

      --
      Listen to my experimental-industrial-techno!
    2. Re:Loss by blogboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds like the printer ink scam/strategy. Get 'em hooked on a platform and live off the game sale revenues.

    3. Re:Loss by Troed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ~$100 is the best guess as to the current loss per box, before this cut, I've heard. Microsoft obviously won't say, so you'll have to hunt down a few analystis who will. The only link I can offer is old - but Microsoft doesn't gain as much from increased factory optimisations as Sony and Nintendo do (for one thing - the Xbox hasn't had its layout optimised for over a year).

      http://www.xboxsolution.com/article154.html

    4. Re:Loss by baudilus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not necessarily - This is a standard business tactic, it is an attempt to drive the market by creating more of a demand for the product. Think of it this way: sell 10 units at $100 or 50 units at $75. Still a loss per unit, but now you have 50 potential "investors" (read: game buyers) rather than just the 10. There is significant risk involved, due to the hypothetical nature of this reasoning. (What if people don't buy it at this price?) If the trend continues, they will likely scrub the project and work on Xbox 2.

      On a side note, this is likely a very good move by Microsoft, everyone I know says Xbox > PS2; the price difference is likely to exacerbate this perception, driving those that have yet to buy either towards the Xbox. This is likely behind the hastiness of the decision.

    5. Re:Loss by Black+Mage+Balthazar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Plus the fact that the less they have to store, the less their storage costs are. I'm sure MS will suck up a few new companies to offset this loss. Really, when it comes down to it, this was their practise machine. I'm honestly wondering what will happen to my precious N5 when the next gen is out, and MS has (perhaps) caught on to the way this market works. At least there is no chance of them buying either of their compeition :).

    6. Re:Loss by Troed · · Score: 5, Informative

      No. Microsoft pays a fixed amount of money per chip to nVidia, Intel etc. They might have been able to cut something on the DVD-drives and harddrives, but manufacturing 8Gb-drives isn't cheap if you need to sustain a whole factory line just for one customer.

      The reason MS is in bed with ATI for the next system is because nVidia didn't agree to suggested price cuts by Microsoft.

      You're also wrong on the GPU. It's a Geforce 3 with an extra Vertex Shader, like the Geforce 4.

    7. Re:Loss by ooPo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There was an article a few weeks ago about how Microsoft can't find 8GB harddrives anymore and has to pack in larger drives. This is why they can't get the cost of the Xbox down over time and is also why they're looking at not including a harddrive for the Xbox 2.

      This is because the harddrive industry increases size instead of lowering prices. Quite workable for the pc industry but not very good for the console industry, especially since the Xbox is designed around 'only' having 8GB available. Larger drives are just formatted to have 8GB available.

    8. Re:Loss by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      I'll point out that the only reason I own a PS2 is for the Japanese RPGs that won't, in the forseeable future, wind up on anything which doesn't have a Sony label on it; .hack, Final Fantasy (Crystal Chronicles being the exception that proves the rule) and so on.

      Oh, and for all the PSOne Japanese RPGs; other Final Fantasys, Xenogears, Star Ocean, Valkyrie Profile, Legend of Dragoon, and so on.

      I loves my Xbox, yes I do.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    9. Re:Loss by mercuryresearch · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually it's no so clear this has to do with "price cuts" on the graphics chips per se.

      ATI negotiated the deal in a radically different way from Nvidia -- they sold IP, not chips at a specific price.

      The gamble in chip manufacturing is usually that you price the chips at a (near) loss at the start, and improvements in manufacturing result in cost reductions and profits later on in the process.

      Nvidia used this model for the original X-box deal, but the design wasn't finalized and additional complexity was added, raising manufacturing costs (this is what triggered the arbitration between Nvidia and Microsoft over the last couple years.)

      In any case, the X-box chips Nvidia sold weren't terribly profitable to them. I seriously doubt any chip manufacturer would accept a repeat of the arrangement. Obviously ATI didn't -- and had Nvidia negotiated a deal like ATI's on the original X-box the present situation would have probably been different -- the trade off being the potential profits would likely have been lower had the manufacturing cost reductions actually worked out.

    10. Re:Loss by eigerface · · Score: 1, Interesting


      I'll believe that Microsoft is losing money on every X-box sold when the balance sheets are published.

      Maybe they are selling the boxes at below Suggested Retail, but at a loss. . . I doubt it.

    11. Re:Loss by smackjer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow. Stop the presses.

      You JUST figured this out?

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    12. Re:Loss by Krondor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There was an article a few weeks ago about how Microsoft can't find 8GB harddrives anymore and has to pack in larger drives. This is why they can't get the cost of the Xbox down over time and is also why they're looking at not including a harddrive for the Xbox 2.

      The Xbox hasn't been shipping with 8GB drives for quite some time now. Most are now coming with 10 GB drives. Ask any modders about it and they'll confirm (xbox-scene.com) I know mine included a 10GB Seagate. Also, I believe the 10GB drives are actually 20 or 30 GB drives with the extra platters disabled refurbised drives are probably a good bet on this.

      As far as why the Xbox 2 will not have a hard drive, lack of 8 GB drives is definitely *NOT* the reason. Hard drives below size X become a commodity, and thus an 8 GB drive isn't necessarily more expensive then a 20 GB in 2 years etc.. so drive size is not the reason. I'm not sure but it probably has to do with the modding scene (it is harder to for any real use something without permanent storage), increases in flash storage size and speed is probably a factor as well, and/or size and heat concerns.

    13. Re:Loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on how you amortize the (billions I think I heard) money spent on R&D

    14. Re:Loss by Troed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They've always come with both 8Gb and 10Gb depending on manufacturing date. The newest I've seen (Crystal variant, made 2004-02-02) has an 8Gb WD as an example.

      I've seen no signs whatsoever of any variant larger than 10Gb but disabled.

    15. Re:Loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you're correct in shader numbers. However, the XBox graphics hardware is more like a GeForce 3.5, due to it not being as optimized as the GeForce4. If you look hard enough, you can find an interview with nVidia execs saying the same thing.

    16. Re:Loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can absolutely guarantee you if MS is making a loss on the XBOX they have some scheme cooked up to extort 10x that amount from the sorry lusers that fall for this and buy one. When are you people going to learn, THERE ARE NO DEALS COMING OUT OF REDMOND. They are the masters of the gullible.

    17. Re:Loss by Moofie · · Score: 1

      How do you figure any of these components cost significantly less to manufacture than they used to?

      It costs about the same to manufacture an 8gb hard drive as an 80 gb hard drive. That's why the computer industry keeps their prices relatively constant for given market segments, but continue to upgrade performance.

      As a fun exercise, go look at prices for new 72 pin SIMMS. They cost a LOT.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    18. Re:Loss by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      The gamble in chip manufacturing is usually that you price the chips at a (near) loss at the start

      There's no such thing as a "near" loss, there's break even and slight profit. Talk about marketing pills...

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    19. Re:Loss by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      Another anecdotal thought on this, however--My girlfriend teaches 7th grade. 13 year old boys are probably a huge demographic for consoles. They all love the ps2. I've read a few things they wrote in free writing about how much they think the xbox sucks. Sony has won the marketing war, I think the xbox is always going to be a hard sell.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    20. Re:Loss by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      Everyone I know loathes the PS2 and loves the Xbox. It seems to be determined largely by demographics. Older, more serious gamers tend to prefer the xbox, as it has excellent FPS games with quite good graphics. PS2 wins in just sheer numbers of games, however, including lots of platformers and that sort of thing, which would tend to lend itself more to younger more casual gamers.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    21. Re:Loss by unclethursday · · Score: 1
      Microsoft's SEC Filings for the Qaurter that ended December 31.

      Scroll down about halfway through the document to see the results for each division of Microsoft. The Xbox and its games are part of the Home and Entertainment Division, and accounts for most of that division's revenues, and for most of that division's losses.

      For the quarter ending Dec 31, the H&E Division brought in $1.2+ billion in revenue, but still lost $241 million dollars. Most of that money comes from the Xbox and its games, and most of that loss comes from losses on the Xbox hardware.

      Since the launch of the Xbox, the Home and Entertainment division has lost over $2 billion, most of that coming directly from losses on the Xbox hardware cost to produce vs. MSRP.

    22. Re:Loss by Jacek+Poplawski · · Score: 1

      Well, very interesting opinion.
      You were in cave for last 3 years?

    23. Re:Loss by blogboy · · Score: 1

      Taking bait...the topic of story was XBox cost cut to $149. The focus was about the pricing of XBox, as well as all comments I saw. Hence my post.

      Nice to see sarcasm gets modded so much higher than honest observation. I'm understanding what /. really values. Stop the presses.

    24. Re:Loss by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      This article implies that the xbox GPU is much more comparable to a GF 3 / 4 and the GF 4 is the first PC chip to equal or surpass its power.

    25. Re:Loss by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      The 8GB hard drive they are using is now TINY comparatively.

      It's practically impossible to find an 8 GB hard drive these days. Wouldn't it be cheaper for MS to just put in a 20 or 40 GB hard drive (because 8 GB hard drives have to be specially made for MS, instead of being off the shelf).

  11. This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They were already selling them at a loss! Let's all go out and buy one of these, that will be striking a great blow for open source!!

    Silly M$, this is an exploit for their business, not just Windoze.

    1. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by dead+sun · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Microsoft is sitting on billions of dollars. Everybody rushing out and buying an xbox will only serve to skew the results of who's leading in the console wars and make Nintendo look even worse. Besides, who's going to sink $150 into the thing and not get a game or two for it?

      I don't want to see Nintendo pull a Sega because of some silly numbers being inflated. Nintendo needs to get over the gaming is for kids only thing, but they've made and continue to make some quality games.

      Want to hurt Microsoft's interests here? Everybody rushing out and buying a cube (at $50 less than the xbox no less) and putting the big N into the number 2 spot again will have more of an effect.

      --
      If not now, when?
    2. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Cthefuture · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I believe an XBox might make a nice Mame (prefer) or MythTV box.

      Is it expensive to get the thing running Linux? I saw someone in this thread mention modchips being more expensive than $150. Do you need a modchip to run Linux? Is there a cheaper "hacker" way? I can solder.

      Can you add more RAM to it? How about hard-drives? Does it have a free PCI slot?

      I mean, $150 for a 1 Ghz (?) P3 and nVidia card sounds like a good deal to me since I need more of these cheap "weak" machines for common stuff like MythTV and arcade machines.

      In normal PC terms, $150 would only buy a 1.3 Ghz Celeron+Motherboard with GF440MX video. You'd still need to add RAM, a hard-drive, power supply, and a case.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    3. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Troed · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you can borrow 007 Agent under Fire, MechAssault or Splinter Cell (the first one) and a memorycard from someone, you can with two additional small soldering blobs hack your Xbox at no cost at all.

      http://www.xbox-scene.com

    4. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nintendo needs to get over the gaming is for kids only thing, but they've made and continue to make some quality games.

      The people that think Nintendo only promotes "kiddie" gaming are the same ones that won't play a game because they think their friends will laugh at them, playing something with bright colors and/or bouncy music is embarassing, etc.

      And yet again, this PA comic is appropriate.

      I realize you're not (directly) bashing Nintendo, but this rubbish that they only target little kids needs to stop. Just because they make games without massive blood, violence, or sex does not make them any less mature or enjoyable.

    5. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Besides, who's going to sink $150 into the thing and not get a game or two for it?

      i did... in fact I bought 2 of them.

      they both sit on my network in my bedroom and my daughter's bedroom as Mythbox playback units.

      work great and you cant build a playback box for myth for anywhere the price of an X box.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Besides, who's going to sink $150 into the
      > thing and not get a game or two for it?

      Me!!! Thats a $150 3D TETRIS APPLIANCE BABY!!! Tape the DVDROM door shut for me! Tetris 24/7!!! SWEEEEEEEEET!!!!

    7. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Can you add more RAM to it? How about hard-drives? Does it have a free PCI slot?

      The memory is soldered onto the mainboard, so unless you are an electrical engineer who has insides with the Xbox team, I doubt you'll be able to add RAM to it, nor or a PCI slot.

      The 3 most common ways to allow you to run unsigned code (such as Linux) is to either:

      1) Follow the soldering instructions, which require you to solder (IIRC) 2 seperate spots on the bottom of the mainboard. I tried this with a friend, and he fried his mainboard. I would not suggest doing this unless you have some good experience with precise soldering of electronics.

      2) Use the James Bond 007 exploit, which requires a specific saved game to be put onto a memory card, and then once you load that saved game from within James Bond, it will allow you to load unsigned code from the Xbox. The only problem, atleast when this exploit first came out, is that you have to redo the exploit everytime you want to reboot your OS (or everytime you want to load some new unsigned code).

      3) Buy a modchip. There are plenty of companies out there that sell modchips that don't require any soldering (but the chips can be a pain in the ass to line up correctly at times). There are also the chips that require soldering, sometimes up to 10 or more seperate points.

      Unless you have A) The money to burn, or B) The skills to solder, I would suggest buying a no-wire modchip such as the Matrix. I purchased a few of these from easybuy2000.com (no personal affiliation, just a happy customer) and have had no problems.

    8. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by metroid+composite · · Score: 1
      I don't want to see Nintendo pull a Sega because of some silly numbers being inflated.

      Nintendo's making profits and Sega was not. Nintendo isn't folding any time soon.

      Nintendo needs to get over the gaming is for kids only thing,

      They did that years ago with Conker's Bad Fur Day, and it's not like they stopped at all with the Cube; Eternal Darkness and Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes were both developed (in part) by Nintendo. In short, they have! Why does everyone still say they need to get over it? Because they also released Kirby's Air Ride? Heaven forbid that your system can play Kirby's Air Ride. I mean it's not like with Sony you're stuck with a system that can also play teletubbies or with Microsoft you're stuck with a system that can also play Spongebob Squarepants....

      Seriously, do you throw out your DVD player because it can also play cartoons?

    9. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by diamondsw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does anyone else find it strange that in America, games are for adults and animation is for kids, while in Japan (with Nintendo, at least) the games are for kids and the animation for adults?

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    10. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      I guess the chunk of my comment was more poorly worded than anything and I really meant that they need to get over the typical mentality of the masses that they make games only for kids. Sorry for the confusion there.

      Anyway, not one of those people here. I'm probably gonna pick up a cube soon and get some of the "kiddie" games like Super Monkey Ball and Kirby Air Grind and whatever else looks like fun to play. I'm a big fan of some of the fun and interesting games that Nintendo's made or had on the cube that aren't just rehashes of the same old thing.

      Like I said, I recommend getting a Cube rather than an Xbox. You can get games for it and have fun without supporting Microsoft.

      --
      If not now, when?
    11. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by ThosLives · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well, I hate to rain on your parade, but here's an economics lesson for you: if you buy them (even at a loss) you are offsetting their losses. Here's why (numbers are made up - let's say it costs $200 to build an X-box and MS gets the full $150 for them)

      Cost to build 10,000 X-boxes: $2,000,000

      Scenario 1:
      Revenue from selling 10,000 X-boxes: $1,500,000
      Net loss: $500,000

      Scenario 2:
      Revenue from selling 0 X-boxes: $0
      Net Loss: $2,000,000

      So, because the way businesses work is they spend money to make a product, then hope to get some back, you don't hurt them by purchasing things "at a loss" - you actually reduce their losses. It's better to not buy them at all and have them just eat their initial expenditure.

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    12. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      I realize you're not (directly) bashing Nintendo, but this rubbish that they only target little kids needs to stop. Just because they make games without massive blood, violence, or sex does not make them any less mature or enjoyable.

      Actually, it does.

      Now don't get me wrong - I do not mean to disagree with your point. I like Nintendo a lot and they make some great games. However, I disagree with your last statement.

      Any sort of creative control that Nintendo exercises over the content of the games on their system is a bad thing. They have no place meddling in someone else's art. Sure its their right, as the console manufacturer, to enforce this Disneyfied vision on their developers, but it hurts them with other markets... like people who eventually get sick of MarioKart's colour scheme.

      Sony has it right. Games are so mainstream now, they must be treated like movies - and more importantly, art, when warranted. Put a rating on the thing and stay the hell out of the creative. It stunts the available offerings.

      (Disclaimer: I also realize that Nintendo has lightened up a bit of late)

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    13. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by ThosLives · · Score: 1
      Oh, actually, you're really hurting the retailers, not MS. What happens is that retailers will buy 10,000 boxes from MS, then have to be sitting on the however much they paid to MS. If you don't buy any then the retailer just ate what they paid MS, but the retailer won't order any more. If you buy them from the retailer, the retailer gets back all that they spent and will order more.

      So, the odd thing is, buying or not buying X-boxes really will only hurt MS if they made more boxes than the retailers will purchase. I guess, then, that the original analysis still holds, but is more complicated because there is the retailer involved.

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    14. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by LinuxHam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey Lumpy, could you please post your comments about your experiences doing this? I have a link in my journal to open a discussion if you have the time.. thanks!

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    15. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Any sort of creative control that Nintendo exercises over the content of the games on their system is a bad thing. They have no place meddling in someone else's art. Sure its their right, as the console manufacturer, to enforce this Disneyfied vision on their developers, but it hurts them with other markets... like people who eventually get sick of MarioKart's colour scheme. Sony has it right. Games are so mainstream now, they must be treated like movies - and more importantly, art, when warranted. Put a rating on the thing and stay the hell out of the creative. It stunts the available offerings.
      Ironic because Sony is the one that meddle's in the affairs of third party developers.
    16. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      Not sure how exactly this or your original reply to my post relates to my post. I'm advising purchase of the cube over the xbox, as at the very least it will help move Nintendo towards the number 2 spot.

      The grandparent makes the point that buying them up would hurt MS. I agree that it would not, and for more reasons than just sunk inventory costs. Getting to point to larger sales numbers brings people to develop for them, in turn driving profits. It could scare Nintendo off because the sales gap would widen. There's a number of reasons that it could help MS without getting into money, which MS has plenty of even eating the whole console inventory it has, I'm sure.

      --
      If not now, when?
    17. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What hurt Nintendo I believe is they waited to long to come out with there bread and butter games(i.e Mario Kart, Zelda, there is still yet a old school Super Mario type game featuring mario). I would of bought a gamecube if they came out with Mario Kart earlier. Now that I played it enough times at my friends and they have other games of little interest to me, I just don't care.

      The sports games are subpar in the fact that they don't have a wide range available as compared to ps2 and xbox. I mean they freaakin discontinued nhl 2004 already..come on!!!

      Don't get me wrong I love nintendo and I still hold on to my found memories of the original 8 bit system but its the above poor business decisions along with the fact they won't carry "violent" games which is hurting the company. I respect them for that decision but lets be honest, these games seem to sell the most.

      So by delaying the games that help define nintendo and not offering a broader range of games like ps2 and xbox, well its a no brainer why they aren't doing good.

    18. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by ThosLives · · Score: 1

      whoops - I entered the wrong point in the thread... sorry about that. One of the other replies to your orig. post was about "buying all the X boxes to make MS lost money". Apologies for any confusion, folks.

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    19. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      Okay, and you've found a valid use for them without buying games. Kudos. I don't have time to be messing with the things at the moment (but will later *grin*).

      I'm still not sure that increasing their sales numbers is going to hurt them. They've already sunk costs into their inventory. MS has a huge stash of cash just lying around for further market domination. If they can post a big enough sales gap who's to say that Nintendo won't get scared and focus only on their gameboy product? The cube and gba already sell for the same amount! I don't think losing Nintendo would be good for the console wars and I like their games. It would be a win for MS though.

      Heck, any favorable market penetration number they can spew about will attract developers. We've seen developers get sucked into xbox only or even away from the PC in the past. They're selling at a loss for a reason. They're not going to be upset if they sell all of their consoles.

      --
      If not now, when?
    20. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by dead+sun · · Score: 1

      Not a problem. It's a good point I neglected to make in my original post anyway.

      --
      If not now, when?
    21. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      Sorry, I worded my comment wrong. What I meant was that Nintendo needs to get past all the people who think that it markets only to children, not that it only makes kids games. I know they have gone beyond that with games, but they're stuck with this stigma about them.

      And I want to play Kirby's Air Ride actually. I'm a 23 year old male who loves the Kirby games. Nintendo makes some very fun games that are aimed at kids and some very fun games that aren't. Nintendo makes a lot of good games, period.

      I sure as heck they don't pull a Sega. Nintendo may still be making a profit now, but what I'm hearing says they're skating pretty thin ice. I mean, their console is selling for the same price as their handheld unit. They've been selling their console for $100 to $50 less than the competition and last I heard they're still in third place. I'd like for them not to pull out of the console market and focus only on handheld games.

      Buying Nintendo over Microsoft will ultimately hurt MS far more than it would to buy an Xbox at a loss.

      --
      If not now, when?
    22. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by aixou · · Score: 0

      You can actually solder more ram on to the Xbox motherboard yourself, taking the total to 128MB (from 64MB).

      All of the xbox linux stuff is documented really nicely at http://xbox-linux.sourceforge.net

      Total, it cost me about $250 to get Linux up and running on my Xbox (including the cost of the system, USB thumb drive, USB to Xbox adapter cables etc etc). You don't need a modchip to install Linux, nor do you give up your ability to play games. The only thing you give up by doing the Mech Assault dashboard method is your ability to configure Xbox Live ("Linux" appears where Xbox Live normally is).

      My ability to play games is not hindered at all by having Linux installed.

      The only problem I have with the Xbox-linux documentation as it exists is that it's a little scattered. If you have problems in the process of a howto, often times the remedy is elsewhere. Make sure to read the documentatiion thouroughly before you decide to do an install.

      This morning for example, I turned my Xbox on (after it had been unplugged for a while) and the internal clock battery was out of juice. Normally when this happens, the Xbox will ask you for the date and you can be on your merry way. With Linux installed though, its a different story. The system goes into a process where it keeps rebooting itself over and over (and you can't do anything -- no loading linux, no playing games, no nothing). You have to wait about a half an hour for it to timeout before you can get going again. Depending though, on how you do the Linux install (Mech Assualt vs 007), this can be a small problem or a big problem (big problem = infinite loop).

      This type of small obscure problem can be a huge hindrance to getting Linux functioning smoothly on the Xbox. If one of the howtos recommends that you backup something, or take note of something, it is a very good idea to heed that warning.

      The Xbox may be $150, but it can either be a $150 Linux box, or a $150 paperweight, and you're walking that fine line when installing Linux.

    23. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we all know that the measure of blood and sex in a game is enough to gauge its "creativity," or "maturity."
      I'm not going to argue with you on "enjoyability," since that's obviously subjective, and you're obviously fourteen. I'd be so embarrassed if my friends caught me playing a kid's game like Civilization.

    24. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Octagon+Most · · Score: 1

      "They were already selling them at a loss! Let's all go out and buy one of these, that will be striking a great blow for open source!!"

      Then let's take vengeance on RFID by buying every Gillette Mach III we can get our hands on. Victory will be ours!!

    25. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by metroid+composite · · Score: 1
      What I meant was that Nintendo needs to get past all the people who think that it markets only to children, not that it only makes kids games. I know they have gone beyond that with games, but they're stuck with this stigma about them.

      Totally agree there.

      And I want to play Kirby's Air Ride actually. I'm a 23 year old male who loves the Kirby games.

      Similar situation here, though then I read some reviews of it and...seems like they droped the ball on the gameplay of that one. I certainly want Double Dash mind, and I've heard rave reviews about that both from friends online and from reviewers....

      They've been selling their console for $100 to $50 less than the competition and last I heard they're still in third place.

      They've always been second worldwide, not third. While they have sometimes been behind the XBox in North America (due in some degree to American desire to buy home-grown products) demand has been massively spiking recently, and they just got an exclusive Final Fantasy and Metal Gear Solid titles so....

      Buying Nintendo over Microsoft will ultimately hurt MS far more than it would to buy an Xbox at a loss.

      Maybe; the thing is XBox 2 won't be backward compatible, and that comes out in 2005 so it's not like a higher install base for the XBox 1 will help much in the long run. Though, I'm basing this off of speculative information, of course; it'll hurt them more to buy closer to the XB2 launch anyway (especially since price will probably drop to $99 by then, and the Europe lawsuit may be tightening screws) so might as well wait and collect more information, at the very least, before doing anything.

    26. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you believe"? Well don't just have faith brother, go find out some facts! Yes, an Xbox makes a very nice mame/mp3/streaming video box already - plenty of modchips and free software exists to do just that.

    27. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have never done any of this yourself.. PLEASE just SAY SO.

      Otherwise, lots of CLUELESS MODERATORS will +1 you without knowing your statement regarding XBOX memory is WRONG WRONG WRONG. Moderators who +1 posts that are factually wrong, should be beaten.

      128MB Xbox mods are common. The only reason you are not seeing higher memory is no one CARES to solder in $100 worth of RAM in a $150 xbox. Life is too short.

    28. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      It's definately getting blurred. I know more and more of the people I know are getting into animation. The computer rendered animation is certainly making inroads. Games are also getting more popular with all generations in the US.

      Likewise there are plenty of kids animations in Japan, like Pokemon and the others aimed for the young ones. And games have always been popular in Japan as far as I know.

      What really strikes me as strange is that geek culture is finally getting out of just geek circles. The rash of comic book movies, anime getting put on adult swim, and just general acceptance of what geeks do for hobbies is kinda amazing.

      --
      If not now, when?
    29. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by v13inc · · Score: 1

      There are other methods that will allow you to run unsigned code a lot easier then the 007 exploit.

      The first one is called the audio hack. whenever you start up your xbox, you need to go through a special procedure to take advantage of a bug in the audio track handling. This is not nearly as hard as it sounds, and takes about 15 seconds to get going.

      The second is called the font exploit. This takes advantage of a bug in the font handling of the xbox. By changing a few font files, whenever you load up your xbox, it will run linux right off the bat. Unfortunately, there are problems with this if you decide to unplug your xbox and move it.

      It is possible to add more ram to the motherboard. It _IS_ a pc motherboard, and it has an extra surface mount point where you can solder another ram chip on (read: quite difficult soldering), this can get you to 128mb of ram.

      On the topic of modchips, if you have even basic soldering experience, go for a modchip that requires soldering. They are surprisingly simple, and although they require '10 wires' to solder, 9 of them are located on a pin header which is a joke to solder. One of the points on the back (the d0 point) is a bit harder, but it it still nothing to be afraid of. Solderless modchips can be more of a problem. There can easily be problems aligning tem properly, and you will most likely spend more time aliging, then soldering another modchip.

    30. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by 110_110_110sic110_11 · · Score: 1

      You do NOT need a modchip to run linux on an Xbox. You need simply to solder two points on the mainboard, and get a copy of the Agent Under Fire savegame onto the xbox hard disk (take it out and put it in your PC). US$100 for a mod is outrageous, if anyone in NZ is interested please refer to www.xboxhacking.co.nz

    31. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      I've heard Kirby is an interesting sort of racing game which bends traditional rules. Maybe my sources are making stuff up. Haven't really checked review sites for it. Double Dash seems neat, but I'm getting really sick of cart games. They're all practically the same with one or two little twists and what I find to be poor control.

      Anyway, you're right, Nintendo is second worldwide. I keep forgetting that the Japanese seem to hate the xbox with a passion. They're behind in the US though, which isn't a good position for them. And if I recall, the race is fairly close, especially considering the gap to the PS2 sales figure. Demand has certainly shot up with the reduction in price again, which is great. The new titles coming out for the cube have it looking good as well.

      As for buying which console now I'm still going to speculate that having more cubes in geeks hands would be better. Apart from the people who pirate massively or turn the xbox into a media box of sorts, the geeks are going to want something out of their investment aside from a 10 GB drive that's a pain to unlock, a celeron, some ram, and an inperceptable dent in MS's budget. While some might sit it on a shelf, others would certainly give in to the temptation to play it.

      I'm not against buying the xbox and playing it as a console. I think it's an interesting approach and the games are generally well rendered. But I think if you're going out to hurt Microsoft then helping their enemies will be the best route. Even without backwards compatability Microsoft can lure good developers with better sales figures. Developing for the US market? Then MS might be a better option than Nintendo. Buying up Xboxes only strengthens that claim.

      Beyond that, I've never been convinced that backwards compatability sells consoles. Honestly I got a PS2 for PS2 games and the backwards compatability has been relatively unused. If I had a huge PS1 library I'd have a PS1. Now I doubt I'll get a PS3 since the PS4 will almost have to be backwards compatable, so Sony's pretty much lost a sale for being backwards compatable. If the Xbox 2 were backwards compatable I might hold off a purchase of one for the second console, again, losing a sale. But if not then no big loss because I can pick up an xbox on the cheap later if I really want it. I can then choose my next console for the next gen hardware. I never expected backwards compatability with my cartridge systems and it never mattered then. Why should it now?

      --
      If not now, when?
    32. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Any sort of creative control that Nintendo exercises over the content of the games on their system is a bad thing.

      Depends if it's for the purpose of increasing quality or, in your words, to create "Disneyfied" games. It's a case-by-case deal, not something where you just say "Hands off!" and that's it.

      Sure its their right, as the console manufacturer, to enforce this Disneyfied vision on their developers, but it hurts them with other markets... like people who eventually get sick of MarioKart's colour scheme.

      Okay, i'm trying not to get too annoyed, but you're being quite confusing here. Since you mention Mario Kart and it's color scheme for some reason, we'll go with that.

      First of all, the latest Mario Kart game (and the two before them) were all first-party Nintendo titles, meaning they didn't force a vision on anyone but themselves. You may argue that they're still stifling their in-house developers, but that's not really what we're worried about at the moment.

      Secondly, I really fail to understand how having a similar color scheme across games in a series is a problem in the first place. Even if it is/was, it's certainly not confined to Nintendo alone.

      And lastly, i'm curious who you mean, exactly, by "people who eventually get sick of MarioKart's colour scheme.". Would that include the teenaged segment of the population that worships stuff like Halo, GTA3, or DOA: Extreme Volleyball?

      Again, if your sole reason for not playing a game is embarassment over a bright, colorful color scheme or oddball premise, maybe you should think about how mature you really are.

      Sony has it right. Games are so mainstream now, they must be treated like movies - and more importantly, art, when warranted. Put a rating on the thing and stay the hell out of the creative. It stunts the available offerings.

      Oh, Sony and many of the developers for the PS2 are treating games like movies in more ways than one, especially the more high-profile RPG's.

      If you have a PS2, go rent Xenosaga, and you'll see exactly what I mean. Namco's still cool and all, but gawd...The game is best described as a series of up to 45-minute cutscenes where you occasionally get to play the game a bit inbetween. The cutscenes are skippable, but if you're going to miss huge chunks of story, what's the point of even playing?

      Anyway, when it comes down to it, if you think a game's fun, just play it. Personally, I think life's too short to miss a good gaming experience just because it might look a bit cutesy.

    33. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by josh+glaser · · Score: 1

      Interesting you should mention MAME. I don't know if anyone else has said this, but on TSS (on right now...later at 12c) they're gonna show how to put MAME on the Xbox. Cool...

    34. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux turns any computer into a paperweight, whether it "works" or not.

    35. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Depends if it's for the purpose of increasing quality or, in your words, to create "Disneyfied" games. It's a case-by-case deal, not something where you just say "Hands off!" and that's it.

      See, I would argue that it should be 'hands off and that's it'. At least in some capacity, or studio, or whatever the structure is. I'm all for being able to screen the crappier, or more violent, or more explicit games from youngsters. However when there is a kind of blanket limit on what kinds of games can be made at all - that's when I have a problem. And to finish the point I'm not even sure that Nintendo does do this, but somehow that effect seems to be in place, whether purposeful or not.

      First of all, the latest Mario Kart game (and the two before them) were all first-party Nintendo titles, meaning they didn't force a vision on anyone but themselves. You may argue that they're still stifling their in-house developers, but that's not really what we're worried about at the moment.

      Agreed. Nintendo set a style, and a rather nice style at that, totally their prerogative.

      And lastly, i'm curious who you mean, exactly, by "people who eventually get sick of MarioKart's colour scheme.". Would that include the teenaged segment of the population that worships stuff like Halo, GTA3, or DOA: Extreme Volleyball?

      Well, I'm not sure how to address that. I chose my words poorly with the MarioKart comment. Let me try and explain more clearly.

      When MarioKart (to run with that again) came out, I liked it quite a bit; what I got bored of was the look and music of the game. I would never argue that both aspects were lacking in any way. I just got tired of it because, at the end of the day, this music was nothing I would normally listen to. These graphics, while masterful for that oeuvre if you will, would have done nothing for me outside of the gameplay experience they had created. Eventually I turned to playing Wipeout for my PS2, as it had music I actually liked, and would listen to normally. It had a look that was this dire, dystopian, futuristic thing that was cool - and violent. I wanted missles instead of bloody mushrooms, you know?

      As for the Halo/GTA3/Volleyball comment... well, I do worship GTA3, I think its a brilliant freeform gameplay mechanic and a ridiculously fun game, with a cheezy 3rd-rate Sopranos storyline that just makes it funnier. Halo I'm lukewarm on, Volleyball does not bear mentioning. (no Xbox either.)

      Again, if your sole reason for not playing a game is embarassment over a bright, colorful color scheme or oddball premise, maybe you should think about how mature you really are.

      It's not the colour scheme. Really. I agree with you. I only mention this to point out that a great many Nintendo games - too many - fall into the supercute category, and the platform suffers a stigma as a result, in the common perceptions of Western gamers. It ain't necessarily right, and I'll defend to the death artworks like Metroid Prime and Pikmon, but Nintendo should have done more (earlier) to let publishers stretch out a bit.

      I mention Sony because, as far as I know, they say nothing about how you should develop the content of your game. This is better, I think. There are better ways to sort out how appropriate content is for some players than making sure that possibly objectionable content never exists in the first place.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    36. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by ElliotLee · · Score: 1

      Actually the Xbox is only 733MHz and the Nvidia chip is nonstandard.

    37. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      I've said it once I'll say it again. Resident Evil & Eternal Darkness are *not* for kids.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    38. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Thank God for MS bugs, huh?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    39. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by greggman · · Score: 1

      Eventually I turned to playing Wipeout for my PS2, as it had music I actually liked, and would listen to normally

      While I'm not going to say that MarioKart has the best music, Wipeout really pushes a button for me. Using your logic I should not like any movies that don't use popular music I like to listen to as their soundtracks. I guess Lord of the Rings would be better if it featured music I normal listen too?

      I believe most games should be scored. In other words they should use music that fits them. As in movies that is rarely if ever music I would normally listen too.

      I know I'm in the minority here but Wipeout, while having great music, has mostly inappropriate music. The game is about racing and so the music, if scored correctly, should fit racing. More than 1/2 the songs on Wipeout would never have been used in a racing sequence in a movie unless that sequence was a dream sequence. The music is great but it does not make me want to race, it makes me want to daydream and is therefore a poor match for a racing game.

    40. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      I've said it before in my replies to the people who replied and grumped about this before you did, and I guess I'm saying it again. I meant they need to get beyond what people think of them and not actually make non-kid games, since, as you've stated, they've already done that. I'm sorry I didn't word my post perfectly to avoid that bit of confusion, but this marks the third reply to my post that said this and I've already replied to the other two (quite promptly) that how it's being taken is not what I meant.

      I mean, c'mon, I actually reply to people that reply to me for a reason. It is a discussion.

      --
      If not now, when?
    41. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Amanset · · Score: 1

      Sony has it right. Games are so mainstream now, they must be treated like movies - and more importantly, art, when warranted. Put a rating on the thing and stay the hell out of the creative. It stunts the available offerings.

      But Sony do exactly the same thing. Seen many 2D games on the PS2 in the US lately? SCEA are known to be anti-2D and frankly your game will not be given the OK be released if it is 2D.

      For example:
      Metal Slug 3
      Any new 2D fighters
      2D shooters that get released in Europe and Japan (eg. Psyvariar)

    42. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      I mention Sony because, as far as I know, they say nothing about how you should develop the content of your game.

      If it helps, I think that's how all the console manufacturers are now. There are certain things they might not allow - for example, for PS1 games, it used to be an automatic failure if you had a church in your game. It didn't matter what the context or purpose was, Sony just didn't want religious imagery/buildings in PS games. I expect that rule is no longer in force (I haven't checked).

      I don't think Nintendo enforce these creative controls in the way you think they do. I've not seen any such rules when I was working on Gamecube stuff (but maybe I just missed them).

      Sony, MS and Nintendo are all the same in this respect, I think - they want good games. Certain things will give them pause for thought (pornography, repeated overly graphic and realistic violence - perhaps), and all 3 have the power to veto your title, because they publish the discs.

      But, as has been said many times, if you think Nintendo only allow games suitable for 5+ yrs, go play Eternal Darkness, Resident Evil, Burnout etc.

      They certainly have an in-house style which leans towards softer imagery and brighter palettes, but they don't enforce that on 3rd party developers. Or, sometimes, even 2nd party - look at Conker's Bad Fur Day.

      It's entirely appropriate for them to have a house style for 1st party games if they want, because [a] they're footing the bill for development, and [b] they are the games which often sell the platform (at least initially).

    43. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      But Sony do exactly the same thing. Seen many 2D games on the PS2 in the US lately? SCEA are known to be anti-2D and frankly your game will not be given the OK be released if it is 2D.

      I don't think that has anything to do with Sony; that's just the general direction of the game industry. Forget PS2 - I don't see many 2D games, period.

      To answer your question about 2D fighters however, I do believe that some of the SNK offerings are on PS2.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    44. Re:This is our chance to strike back!!!! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      If it helps, I think that's how all the console manufacturers are now. There are certain things they might not allow - for example, for PS1 games, it used to be an automatic failure if you had a church in your game. It didn't matter what the context or purpose was, Sony just didn't want religious imagery/buildings in PS games. I expect that rule is no longer in force (I haven't checked).

      While I'm sure that was probably true at some point, that policy must have changed during the PS1's heyday - I can think of one specific example off the top of my head, Medevil - made by Sony's in-house studio - that was full of Burtonesque churches, cross, skeletons, etc.

      I do agree that I don't think Nintendo is enforcing anything like this anymore, and the latest crop of Cube games certainly proves it. Do you remember when Resident Evil came out for Cube? I was a big deal, because that was the signal from Nintendo that you can now do more 'grown up' (ha!) game content. I have no idea as to the extent or nature of their original guidelines, but I would not be surprised to see a big push from Nintendo at E3 this year - not just for the new console, but for a whole new attitude in their games.

      Your point about Nintendo footing the bill for development and managing sales expectations is well taken.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  12. And so it begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if Nintendo will/can drop their price below $99. Personally... I'm a big Nintendo fan. I can't believe, in the 2+ years I've owned the console, that it took me so long to try Metroid Prime.... what a delight!

    1. Re:And so it begins... by DR+SoB · · Score: 0

      Dude you can get a nintendo for like $20 now, what are you talking about??

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    2. Re:And so it begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... I'm pro Nintendo as well. I'm all about game quality and Nintendo seems to have what I'm looking for. Plus, I don't need to watch DVD's using my game console... I have a DVD player for that. With the Xbox you need to purchase a suitcase from the luggage section of your local department store if you wanted a travel case for it (because the Xbox is soooo large).

    3. Re:And so it begins... by drewmca · · Score: 1

      God forbid they throw in DVD playback. I don't want it! No, help! It ruins my gaming experience! It's the real reason I don't like the games on playstation and xbox as much!

  13. They're already selling short... by Seoulstriker · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They're already selling their units at a loss. Now it's $50 cheaper! They must be pretty desperate to increase the user base for selling those games.

    Still, $150 for a 700mhz linux box is pretty nice. :)

    --
    I am defenseless. Use your button. Mod me down with all of your hatred.
  14. Xbox price cut coverage everywhere by securitas · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's some links from an almost-submitted post.

    Microsoft Cuts Xbox Price to $150

    Microsoft has cut the price of its Xbox game console to about $150 ($149.99), a $30 drop. The price cut was widely expected by analysts in a move to spur slowing console sales for the Xbox as the current generation approaches the end of its cycle, and gamers anticipate the next-generation of consoles in 2005. Microsoft also announced several price cuts on Xbox games and titles including 'Xbox Music Mixer, Project Gotham Racing 2 and Crimson Skies: High Road to Revenge.' More coverage at CNet, CNN Money, ZDNet UK, AP via Seattle PI and Bloomberg via Seattle Times. (Microsoft press release)

    1. Re:Xbox price cut coverage everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize the relative insignificance of a 30 dollar drop on a gaming console, right? It's not like Osama bin Laden was captured or we discovered life on another planet. I think one link would have sufficed, you really went overboard with this!

    2. Re:Xbox price cut coverage everywhere by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      "It's not like Osama bin Laden was captured or we discovered life on another planet."

      Osama's been captured?

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    3. Re:Xbox price cut coverage everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ask him to "learn to reason" at the same time you believe an unnamed source on Iran state radio. You are a whacko.

    4. Re:Xbox price cut coverage everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      com.com? What the hell is com.com?

      Oh, it's CNet. Why on earth does CNet pwn com.com?

    5. Re:Xbox price cut coverage everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Osama's been captured?

      Yes, but it'll not get announced until closer to the US presedential election date.

  15. New Milestone? by pegr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is it a significant milestone when a console becomes cheaper than the modchip for that console?

    1. Re:New Milestone? by Dr_LHA · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure why this is "insightful" rather than "funny". After all Xbox modchips can be found with installation for $45.

    2. Re:New Milestone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can any Linux Xbox hackers tell us if a mod chip is absolutely necessary? Has Microsoft patched the glitch that allowed Linux to be installed using the Mechwarrior saved game hack?

    3. Re:New Milestone? by Intocabile · · Score: 1

      It's only more expensive if you factor in the cost of human life from playing certain games.

  16. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by jared_hanson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Saying "jumped the shark" has sooo jumped the shark.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  17. "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." by idealego · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is it really?

    1. Re:"News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." by metroid+composite · · Score: 2, Informative
      Is it really?

      Absolutely!. Mmm: cheap webservers....

  18. 2005 last I heard by metroid+composite · · Score: 4, Interesting

    as previously reported on Slashdot. No specific details, though.

    1. Re:2005 last I heard by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Which, in my case, makes the price of the Xbox changing uninteresting.
      If the Xbox2 Won't play Xbox1 games (as previously reported) I'm not about to go out and buy one unless the price drops below $50.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    2. Re:2005 last I heard by pi+radians · · Score: 5, Funny

      Rumor has it you'll still be able to use your Xbox even after the Xbox2 is released, so worrying about backwards compatibility is a non-issue....

      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    3. Re:2005 last I heard by drjenk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >so worrying about backwards compatibility is a >non-issue.... The issue of backward compatibility is for people who have never owned and xbox before, and could pick from the entire xbox library as well as new xbox2 titles. So I believe it is an issue...although not a huge one.

    4. Re:2005 last I heard by ziggles · · Score: 1

      I don't know. With other consoles that's true, but I imagine Microsoft could very easily make Xbox Live incompatible with the original Xbox after Xbox 2 comes out. Obviously you could still play offline games, but xbox live is supposed to be the big selling point of the xbox.

    5. Re:2005 last I heard by cfuse · · Score: 1
      Cats land on their feet. Toast lands jellyside down. A cat glued to some jelly toast will hover in quantum indecision

      This is a common misconception.

      If you perform this experiment, the act of observing the cat/toast causes the quantum state to collapse. Only unobserved cat/toast is theorised to maintain it's quantum state in the form of lobes of probability. As we cannot observe this without collapsing the state, it remains only theory.

    6. Re:2005 last I heard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last I heard XboX2 WILL be backwards compatible. Can't remember where I heard it though so can't claim any kind of reliability.

    7. Re:2005 last I heard by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I imagine Microsoft could very easily make Xbox Live incompatible with the original Xbox

      Could? could??? You know damned well that as soon as XBox2 is out, original XBox live functionality has less than a year to live.

    8. Re:2005 last I heard by leifm · · Score: 1

      I don't know about everybody else, but I've pretty much never played any PS1 games on my PS2, even though I didn't have a PS1. So as far as I'm concerned backward compatibility is a non-issue.

      --

      "Windows Me offers tremendous reliability and stability improvements..." -- Paul Thurott
    9. Re:2005 last I heard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real issue for me is how soon n64, nes, snes, and sega emulators come out. You can't find a cheaper faster emulator system! I hope it still has intel compatibility!

  19. DUMPING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So we have an established monopoly with $50b in cash in the bank now selling their product way below cost to steal market share.

    how is this NOT dumping? if Sony or Hitachi did this with TV's they would be prosecuted.

    1. Re:DUMPING by DaHat · · Score: 1

      I suggest you do a little research, game consoles rarely make a profit on launch, even Sony and Nintendo loose money every time you buy their latest and greatest consoles, why would they do this? Because they not only want to get into your living room, but they want to stay there for years to come and have you be a loyal buyer of games for their system.

    2. Re:DUMPING by GlassHeart · · Score: 3, Insightful
      an established monopoly with $50b in cash in the bank now selling their product way below cost to steal market share.

      Microsoft does not have a monopoly in the game console market.

    3. Re:DUMPING by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      So we have an established monopoly with $50b in cash in the bank now selling their product way below cost to steal market share. how is this NOT dumping? if Sony or Hitachi did this with TV's they would be prosecuted.
      It's not dumping if you do it everywhere. If Nintendo dropped their US price and not their Japanese price, then it's dumping. So what companies do is sell it high to the Japanese and then drop the price in Japan right before releasing it elsewhere.
    4. Re:DUMPING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is only illegal if you are doing it without ever having a possibility of making a profit; if you are just doing it to eliminate a competitor so you can have monopoly power. For example, if Microsoft lowered the price to an extremely low amount just to drive out the competitor and then increased the price since they were the only game in town. They can make a profit from this since this type of product will generate more revenue for them beyond just the consoles.

    5. Re:DUMPING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, it's not illegal to have a monopoly, it's illegal to leverage that monopoly, which is what's happenning.

    6. Re:DUMPING by GlassHeart · · Score: 2, Informative
      it's illegal to leverage that monopoly, which is what's happenning.

      Again, false. The only thing Microsoft is leveraging, if it is proven that they are selling below cost, is their money. Now, if they had bundled an X-Box with every purchase of Microsoft Windows, that would be illegally leveraging their Windows monopoly.

      It's a bit counterintuitive, I know, but not every "unfair" business practice is illegal and actionable. Big companies have more money, and that's inherently unfair.

    7. Re:DUMPING by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1
      Sigh.

      1. microsoft is not a monopoly in console gaming systems. in fact, it is more or less an underdog.

      2. this is not dumping, even if microsoft had a monopoly in consoles, as dumping, as written by congress into law in 1979, is what FOREIGN companies do. You're probably thinking of the Robinson-Patman Act, I'm sure. However, even then it's not clear that this applies, as the RP Act was written with an eye on COMMODITY goods, largely to protect small stores from giant chain stores.

      In short, I'm not even sure that there is a law in the US that makes what you suggest at all wrong.

      Nb: why is there an anti-dumping law for foreign stuff? Many agree there should not be. But when there is, it is often to counter "costs not so easily seen" such as government subsidies to manufacturers or political maneuverings.

    8. Re:DUMPING by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Nah, dumping would be if they sold 'em for $1 each to students, educators, the army, etc. Kind of like their Office strategy.

    9. Re:DUMPING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony DID do this. They muscled their way into a market they were totally new in and floored the competition. Did you miss 1995-2000?

    10. Re:DUMPING by Overt+Coward · · Score: 1
      how is this NOT dumping? if Sony or Hitachi did this with TV's they would be prosecuted.

      Probably because the entire console video game industry uses the consoles as loss-leaders for selling games. If it were just Microsoft doing this, you might have a point. But Nintendo and Sony also (intentionally) lose money on their consoles, so it'd be hard to make the case that Microsoft was engaging in any nefarious activity here.

    11. Re:DUMPING by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      I think you are wrong about this. I think this could be described as dumping. Microsoft is using their resources to sell product below markt price. I don't think there will be any action because sony has plenty of resources as well and is not likely to let Microsoft price them out.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    12. Re:DUMPING by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      Microsoft does not have a monopoly in the game console market.

      Yet...(?)

  20. the next bet. by DenOfEarth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if they are gonna drop the price once again when halo 2 comes out. That would seem like a pretty reasonable way to move a whole lot of Xboxes, but that's just me. I like halo.

    1. Re:the next bet. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah, they'll just offer a bundle.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:the next bet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have a strange feeling that they'll hold Halo 2 until Xbox 2

  21. Consider the Source by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when......it starts trumpeting quotes from rappers as news.

    P.Diddy: "[I] believe that the system's cultural influence as a social entertainment brand has only just begun."
    Considering the source of this wonderful social commentary, I find nothing wrong with slashdot and everything wrong with anyone whom the quote holds true. P. Diddy, a Nobel candidate ain't.
    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Consider the Source by Vargasan · · Score: 4, Funny

      I didn't even know P.Diddy knew such a large word as "entertainment", let alone it's meaning.

      --
      Putting the romance back into necromancer.
    2. Re:Consider the Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me start by saying that I can't belive I'm defending P.Diddy.

      On the other hand, his company is called Bad Boy Entertainment, so I have to assume that he has a passing familiarity with the word - certainly more than your post indicates you have.

    3. Re:Consider the Source by wankledot · · Score: 1
      Your comment is especially funny given the name of his company....

      Bad Boy Entertainment.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    4. Re:Consider the Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when exactly did Puff Daddy start diddy-ing himself?

    5. Re:Consider the Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Donkey came around

    6. Re:Consider the Source by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I bet even someone as illiterate as you seem to think he is could learn the rules for apostrophe usage ;-)

    7. Re:Consider the Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats just stupid. Sure it's funny to make fun of P. Diddy but at least make sense. He is afterall in the entertainment industry. Not to mention rappers are notorious for their vocabulary (some more so than others). I realize it's a joke, it's just not funny.

    8. Re:Consider the Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      music industry? Small word.

      Vocabulary? Like "bling", "da", "dat", "ho", "gat", "blunt" or "booty"?

      Big words.

  22. Is this ethical, really? by Saven+Marek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I must say I don't mind a price drop of this nature. As a consumer it's a good thing, at least short term where I lay out few clams and come up with a good product for the lower price.

    However I'm sure nobody believes MS is anywhere near making a profit, indeed they're taking gigantic losses (not relative to their income of course, but in real numbers) to do so. Obviously Sony will be doing the same with the PS2 and whatever it's next box is, and Nintendo too if they release another.

    Doesn't this just end up as a war of attrition, where the company who is most able to sustain gigantic losses comes out on top? Not only coming out on top but coming out as the ONLY contender. While it's not a monopoly situation now it seems clear to me it's heading that way.

    I know nobody can prosecute a company on something they have not yet done, and there's perhaps no indication of who will win in the end out of the gigantic gaming manufacturers. Indeed, far be it for me to tell someone they CAN'T throw away their profits, but looking ahead it seems impossible to end up in any other way than someone with a massive monopoly. No new players, no competition between existing ones, and it won't end cleanly... because (forgive the cliche) in the end "there can be only one"

    Adult mac desktops & wallpapers

    1. Re:Is this ethical, really? by ooPo · · Score: 1

      Please don't assume that just because Microsoft has taken the loss-leader approach that other game companies are as well. ...at least, not without citing proof. Thanks.

    2. Re:Is this ethical, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't assume that just because Microsoft has taken the loss-leader approach that other game companies are as well. ...at least, not without citing proof. Thanks.

      Even if they don't, then the OPs monopoly situation is just going to come sooner. Still a point

    3. Re:Is this ethical, really? by faust2097 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sony and Nintendo are both profitable [or in Sony's case the game division is profitable]. Microsoft is trying to get into the console space by outspending everyone else. How long do you think it's going to take MS to recover the almost $300 million they paid for Rare? "Grabbed by Ghoulies" has been a pretty big failure so far. Or the $2 billion they've committed to spend developing XBox Live?

    4. Re:Is this ethical, really? by ooPo · · Score: 1

      If a company like say, Nintendo, isn't losing money on any systems and isn't losing money on games... Its hard to imagine how they'd be eventually forced out in a 'war of attrition'.

      Now, if/when they start losing money it becomes a point. Until then keep enjoying MS paying you to take their Xbox. :)

    5. Re:Is this ethical, really? by bobthemuse · · Score: 0

      Doesn't this just end up as a war of attrition, where the company who is most able to sustain gigantic losses comes out on top?

      1990 called, they want their business plan back...

    6. Re:Is this ethical, really? by Coneasfast · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doesn't this just end up as a war of attrition, where the company who is most able to sustain gigantic losses comes out on top?

      i'm sure once the price reaches a certain point, it will be a war of who can produce the best system, in terms of graphics, games, features, etc... people won't neccessarily buy the one with the lowest price, the market doesn't work that way

      --
      Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    7. Re:Is this ethical, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Xbox live has been underway for 2 years now, from start to now approximately. If MS spends as much continuing it (and their startup costs probably won't need to be replicated, but for arguments sake take $1billion a year). At MS's current cash reserves that's another possible fifty years.

      There was a quote from "Citizen Kane" that's relevant here, and unfortunately I forget anything but it's most basic meaning. In essence, a reporter asks Mr Kane about his businesses losing $X each year for the last few years.

      Mr Kane replies that, with the amount of money he's worth and current losses, it looks like he'll be in real trouble in oh, 100 years.

      I don't know how long it'll take MS to recover once they become profitable, but they certainly have a long time to get to the stage of becoming profitable.

      And all the more ubiquitous

    8. Re:Is this ethical, really? by southpolesammy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hmm...sounds like the end of the Cold War to me, when Reagan continually up-ed the ante in that great poker game of defense spending, knowing that either the Soviet Union is going All-In, or is going to fold.

      And the rationale behind why the US did this? America could match the Soviets' defense spending dollar for dollar (ruble for ruble?) and still have enough budget left for other goverment programs to keep the conutry sustainable, while the Soviets cut everything in order to keep up with American defense spending. So while we had like 30% of the budget going to defense, the Soviets had like 80-90%. Ultimately, the US knew they could "outbid" the Soviet Union and that the outcome would destroy the Soviet Union's ability to govern, and therefore they would defeat themselves and crumble.

      Sounds like history repeating itself again.

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    9. Re:Is this ethical, really? by Ian_Bailey · · Score: 1

      While Microsoft probably still loses some money on the console (they probably would have liked to drop the price further, but they're not cutting their wrists yet), it is possible that Microsoft is making profits in some territories (notably North America and England).

      You may be right on how it is heading, but I think we should wait untill the next generation of machines before predicting doomsday. Because a console's power is becoming a less-appreciated selling point, console are slowly beginning to compete on features, such as DVD-playback and online functionality. Despite Microsoft's near limitless cash reserves, I don't think they would continue pursuing the Xbox product line if it continues to underperform and does not generate much in profits beyond the next iteration of the brand.

      Nintendo and Sony have always made significant profits on their consoles, so as long as Microsoft does not conduct any more illegal activities (such as dumping), I don't think there will be an extremely aggressive price war as you suggest.

    10. Re:Is this ethical, really? by dead+sun · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I don't know. It seems that the game is played by selling the hardware at a loss and making up for it with good titles and collecting money from 3rd party developers who make money because your console is widespread.

      Given that, while the hardware may be taking losses, I don't know how hard the gaming unit at MS or Sony gets hit as a whole. And cripes do they make up for it with accessories. One controller and extras cost $25+. Memory cards going at $20 for 8 MB? The initial console sale is a loss for sure, but there's plenty of room for profit.

      So what's the problem with console makers dropping their price horrendously with time? If you look at initial pricing, you can now get an xbox and gamecube for less than the initial price of the xbox or the PS2. If Sony dumps the price again you can get the xbox and the PS2 for the price of either initially.

      I don't think this is heading towards a monopoly, I think it's heading towards trying to grab more customers that already have a system and aren't likely to give another a shot without incentives. I have a PS2 which I got at the $200 price point. I'm now considering an Xbox at this new point. And why not, Ninja Gaiden is sweet and there's some other games I'd like to check out as well. Will I stop buying PS2 games? No way. Well, unless they're the all platform games, in that case I'll pick whichever looks the nicest, likely the xbox's version.

      Heck, new hardware at $150 means skipping 5 new releases at $50 each and waiting until they're $20 each. I don't have to skip the games, just wait a little bit. And if I have a good selection of "Greatest Hits" or whatever for the console I just got they're as good as new games to me, right?

      --
      If not now, when?
    11. Re:Is this ethical, really? by faust2097 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's less of a "who's going to survive?" issue and more of a "how long are Microsoft's shareholders going to put up with this money pit?"

      Of course MSN is still around and that's never even come close to proftiability.

    12. Re:Is this ethical, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nice story, but remeber that the CIA was wrong about what was the Soviets were spending. They just tricked us into thinking they spent all that money of defense. They must have had a good laugh watching Regan waste all that money. They still ran out of money, but not the way you think.

    13. Re:Is this ethical, really? by hng_rval · · Score: 1
      --
      Thank you Mario! But our princess is in another castle!
    14. Re:Is this ethical, really? by faust2097 · · Score: 1

      Well I'll be damned. I wonder how long until they recoup their investment in it though.

    15. Re:Is this ethical, really? by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      Was it worth it? Are these kinds of arms races, devestating to everyone, actually desirable? The soviet union's financial collapse left the remnants in poverty. That nation is a long way from recovering from 75 years of reckless economic policy and the devestating effects of the arms race.

      To get back on topic--If the fight for the living room between sony and micrsoft escalates to a real price war that will seriously damage both companies' finances what will be the benefit? I suppose if both companies waste a lot of money on this it will benefit their competitors in other markets. Breaking microsoft's stranglehold on software and sony's domination of consumer electronics can't be bad and might be worth it. On the other hand, if the living room race gets ugly enough the cost of fighting that war could potentially drive a lot of other players out of the set top market (like tivo, rca, etc) leaving the winner of the console war with a new monopoly, which nobody wants...Hmm. Well that was rambling, but it is all worth thinking about.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    16. Re:Is this ethical, really? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      They're trying to get in by outspending everyone else? You mean like Sony? Granted there were amazing games on both PS and PS2 at or shortly after launch but the fact is that Sony threw money at the PS hand over fist.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Is this ethical, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at how the national debt has increased exponentially starting with Reagan and has been increasing faster every year. You realize that both countries lost the cold war, and we are on the verge of bankruptcy.

    18. Re:Is this ethical, really? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      I thought the soviets backing down was a big fake and they are in 'covert' soviet mode to come back later. Maybe just scare tactics.

      Maybe they are both 'allies' but the big defense contracters are laffing for making ($340 billion *30years) worth of sales, I would be too.

      I hear a new war is starting/being planned perhaps(read http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGATAIXMESD.html)

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  23. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you missed the sarcasm in the article.

    Noted tech analyst?

    Your bus is leaving.

  24. Don't you mean... by PCM2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...the phrase "jumped the shark" has officially jumped the shark once it appears on Slashdot?

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Don't you mean... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Actually, "jumped the shark" has jumped the shark because it was on national television (NBC Dateline) last night.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  25. *Sigh* Here they come... by MacOS_Rules · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's restrict the "We'll bankrupt Microsoft by buying the $150 XBox and coverting it to Linux" topics to replies to this post. This includes all cheap PC quotes from pricewatch, as well as arguments to the real cost of the XBox (better graphics, small HD, working from TV instead of monitor, monitor cost, yadda-yadda-yadda.) Not meaning to be a troll, but it seems 3/4 of the conversation revolves around these topics. [Well, there goes the Karma].

    --
    If a man's character is to be abused there's nobody like a relative to do the business. -Thackeray, William
    1. Re:*Sigh* Here they come... by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But you're not costing MS money, you're mitigating MS's loss.

      Say they pay $300 per unit, and are selling it at $150. For you to be able to buy that $150 unit MS has to be out $300 to make it. When you buy it, their loss shrinks from $300 to $150.

      And, if enough people buy it and then buy games for it(since more games are made as it penetrates further), the loss decreases. The only way purchasing an XBox hurts MS worse than not buying one is if it spurs a large amount of manufacturing of new units which then go unsold.

      You are in NO way hurting MS by buying an XBox, you're helping them. Feel free to do so, but stop saying you're costing them money. You aren't.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    2. Re:*Sigh* Here they come... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The other 1/4 of the posts revolves around discussing what the other 3/4 of the posts discuss. And lo and behold, your idiotic meta-discussion got you a +5, Insightful. IOW, instead of just talking about the subject at hand, you can get more karma by pre-emptively flaming people who just want to discuss the topic at hand.

    3. Re:*Sigh* Here they come... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the fact that if demand keeps up, they'll have to manufacture more. Given, they'll have to produce the number already in stock, in order to make the loss reach the same level. However, there will be people buying them already, so the only real hope of maximizing Microsoft's loss is to try to shoot the moon by buying a lot of them. Then again, trying to hurt Microsoft by buying or not buying the Xbox seems silly to me altogether.

    4. Re:*Sigh* Here they come... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are in NO way hurting MS by buying an XBox, you're helping them. Feel free to do so, but stop saying you're costing them money. You aren't.

      And getting MP3's off Kazaa doesn't make the artist any money, no matter how bad a deal his record label gave him. C'mon, do you believe *any* of the self-serving shit people here come up with? For chrissake, 90% of them are reading and posting on Windows.

    5. Re:*Sigh* Here they come... by AndrewHowe · · Score: 1

      If you buy a hundred Xboxen, using the suggested figures we have Microsoft down $15,000 and you down $30,000. Oh and you have a big stack of xboxen. To Microsoft this is small change but for you, well I hope you are not married. Have fun with your xboxen, Microsoft is having fun with the money of the 99.9% who are buying games for theirs.

    6. Re:*Sigh* Here they come... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops I meant $15000/$15000

    7. Re:*Sigh* Here they come... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      As long as Microsoft is making Xboxes, buying them is costing them money. When they stop, buying them will be pure profit in terms of the order of their operations.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:*Sigh* Here they come... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a severe language difficulty? I wasn't suggesting that any one person buy all those Xbox's. I was merely pointing out that if many Xbox's get bought, Microsoft will have to continue to manufacture them and eventually it would bleed them dry hypothetically. Now, I don't think that it's realistic, but I don't think the post I was replying to was all that insightful because he neglected the fact that Microsoft's losses will grow if they continue to manufacture Xbox's beyond their current stock.

      The fact that the post got modded up to 4(insightful) shows how simple minded the majority of /.'s are.

    9. Re:*Sigh* Here they come... by Serzen · · Score: 0

      Say they pay $300 per unit, and are selling it at $150.

      WHEN, O Great Minds of Slashdot, will one of these posts be made by someone who has a clue about retail? Microsoft is not selling these Xboxes to you for $150. Wal-mart, Best Buy, EB, Gamestop, and all the other retail outlets are the ones selling them to you for $150.

      Microsoft is selling the boxes to the retail outlets for as little as $75, perhaps as much as $100, and the retailers are selling them to you at a (Microsoft mandated) mark up. One that is probably between 50 and 100%. This is the way that licensed merchandise is handled, and the way that it has been handled for A Great Many Years: Corporation X creates a Widget that everyone wants to own. Storefront Y sees this demand and wants to get in on the action, so enquires with Corp X about purchasing the Widget. Meanwhile, Stores Z, A, B, etc have all also enquired; Corp X looks at all this interest and knows they stand to make a bundle, if they can get the Widget into the hands of the public. Corp X forces Stores Y, Z, etc, to sign an agreement to sell the Widget for "at or about" a given pricepoint, and to display it in a certain fashion in the store, to stand on one leg when receiving shipments and send a Bagel Basket to Corp X every fourth Tuesday. The Stores, wanting to profit, sign the agreements and receive the Widget, sell it in accordance with the agreement, and profit.

      THAT is what Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo and all the others are doing. They are not personally selling you a damn thing; moreover, the Store has to BUY the Widget/Xbox before they can SELL it. When you see an Xbox sitting on the shelf, that's not money that you can steal from MS by buying the Box, it's money that you can give to the retailer, so that they can afford to bring more schtuff for you to buy later. The only Xboxes that MS is losing any great deal of money on are the ones that are still sitting in warehouses that haven't been ordered and paid for yet.

      It's not that hard to figure out, people.

    10. Re:*Sigh* Here they come... by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1

      Actually, I stated precisely what you brought up, and I quote... me: The only way purchasing an XBox hurts MS worse than not buying one is if it spurs a large amount of manufacturing of new units which then go unsold.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    11. Re:*Sigh* Here they come... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that is likely. You make it seem like that has the same chances as the moon crashing into the earth.

    12. Re:*Sigh* Here they come... by AndrewHowe · · Score: 1

      No, my language ability is fine, thanks, but it's nice that you're concerned.
      I'm not seriously suggesting one person should buy them all either. I'm pointing out the general stupidity of this action. I'm being conservative when I say 99.9% of Xbox owners buy games for their Xboxen rather than run Linux on them to fuck with The Man.
      With Xbox and GC sales pretty much neck-and-neck, Microsoft would love your custom, anyway.

  26. yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    yes

  27. This is proof Microsoft cares about the consumer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What other company would sell a device for $149 when it costs $400 to manufacture? Only Microsoft would. Linus sure as hell wouldn't.

    Zealots are sure in a quandry here. If Microsoft raises the price to above it's manufacturing cost, they scream that Bill is being a robber baron. But yet if they make the price more palatable as the Zealots want, it's labeled as dumping. The Zealots can't pick one stance.

    But Microsoft does. It's stance is 'quality products, at a fair price'.

  28. Wake me.. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..when they're giving the Xbox away in a box of Lucky Charms.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    1. Re:Wake me.. by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

      Hope you're in a coma, because it's probably gonna a be a while. Watch out for bed sores. Or am I speaking to Walt Disney a.k.a. Frostilicus?

      --
      True story.
    2. Re:Wake me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got mine in a Cracker Jack box!

    3. Re:Wake me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh boy oh boy, Bill Gates has a special message for me on XBox live!

      REMEMBER

      TO

      DRINK

      YOUR

      OVALTINE

      WTF!? A commercial?

  29. What is that in real money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even your "quarters" don't work in vending machines.

  30. First worn out SCO joke! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    No. That will cost you an extra $699.

  31. PS2 Price Drop Coming Soon by TrentL · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article also mentions a PlayStation 2 price drop in mid-April, so don't buy an X-Box based on price just yet.

    1. Re:PS2 Price Drop Coming Soon by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      The article also mentions a PlayStation 2 price drop in mid-April, so don't buy an X-Box based on price just yet.

      Or do, just make sure you get a bunch of them and mod every single one and use them as a server farm.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  32. Let's include the games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The game prices is what's killing us the consumers. The price to manufacture 1 game disc is like pennies. If Game Cube decides on another price drop, then I'll definetly get Game Cube just for Zelda: the windwaker.

  33. Price Wars!! by MakoStorm · · Score: 1

    I hope Sony drops the price as well.

    I just bought a PS2 Yesterday to replace my fallen scph-3001 I hope they drop the price so I can get some cash back.

  34. Never will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Xbox controller will never fit!

    1. Re:Never will... by jmauro · · Score: 1

      But if you open the case of the xbox and fill it with lucky charms instead of eletronics, then I'd buy it. It'd be worth more to me that way.

  35. Re:DUMPING (Not) by Erbo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Got news for you...all console makers sell their product below cost, and have for many years. They make it up on the games, though, which actually winds up making them more money than in the days of $300 consoles and $30 games. (Keep in mind that the console makers collect license fees even on third-party game titles, because the titles have to be officially licensed to run on the consoles. This not only ensures a revenue stream, but keeps third-party publishers from flooding the market with cheap, crappy games, which is part of what caused the video game crash of 1983.)

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
  36. Lossy Business Model by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    So what kind of loss is Microsoft taking now to ship these things?

    If they already sold the X-Box for below cost, wouldn't this just hurt them further?

    Wait 10 years for when grown up kids start discovering they've got all sorts of physical maladies associated with repetitive stress from video gaming and start suing the game makers, same as with tobacco and guns.

    I think i'm losing feeling in my right thumb. Could it be all the times I hit it with a hammer or a fire button injury?

    today is the first day of the rest of your litigous life

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Lossy Business Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What games are you playing?

      Usually the 'fire button' is your right index finger. Not your thumb.

    2. Re:Lossy Business Model by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Informative
      Usually the 'fire button' is your right index finger. Not your thumb.

      Ah, but see, mine is from when you had a firebutton on the joystick base which you hit, not directly on, but with the side of the thumb. I remember times when it felt like the end of my thumb was going to fall off, the joint hurt so bad.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Lossy Business Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you meant to say is that your 'trigger finger' is your right index finger. Any finger could be a so-called 'fire finger'.

    4. Re:Lossy Business Model by Destoo · · Score: 1

      Think old.
      Atari and stuff.

      Basically, pre-ergonomical consoles.

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    5. Re:Lossy Business Model by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      Damn youngsters! Back in my day, we'd be happy to have TWO buttons, and they were always on TOP of the controller. Sure, some people tried to hold it so they could press the buttons with their fingers, but they'd just end up sucking - and looking like a mentally challenged person trying to cast a fireball spell for real, or something.

      (ok, ok, so the Intellivision had a keypad, a round pressure pad, and some buttons which were on the side of the controller. But it didn't go anywhere, and it was still like trying to play a game with a TV remote.)

  37. Maybe same loss, not greater by MooseByte · · Score: 1


    Not necessarily. They may have been able to reduce manufacturing costs. (I'd hope at *some* point Moore's Law was able to affect Xbox component prices).

    If that's the case they may simply be maintaining the same loss while hoping to pull in yet another slice of the bell curve of consumers.

    Not that I'm one of them. I'm boycotting MS best I can. Finally got Mozilla Firefox installed on my Winboxen. Slowly I purge my home of All Things Microsoft. (Still require WinOS for work projects, unfortunately, but Firefox is great!)

    1. Re:Maybe same loss, not greater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moore's Law does not apply to pricing.

      In fact, as technology gets older, it is more expensive to produce because there are fewer customers.

    2. Re:Maybe same loss, not greater by MooseByte · · Score: 1

      "Moore's Law does not apply to pricing.

      I was thinking along the lines of "cutting edge" components getting cheaper, being able to lose a few ASICs and replace with a single cheaper one as tech improved (saving a few dollars there) etc.

      That plus improved manufacturing efficiency seemed to be within the range of a US$30 price drop.

      But perhaps not.

    3. Re:Maybe same loss, not greater by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm one of them. I'm boycotting MS best I can. Finally got Mozilla Firefox installed on my Winboxen. Slowly I purge my home of All Things Microsoft.

      I used to feel this way as well, but I've got to admit, that XBox is one badass game machine, I was all about the ps2 for the longest time and couldn't justify an XBox, eventually I got one after playing multiplayer halo with my neighbors, now we've got all of our systems networked and bigger games, and I'm finding some outstanding games for that thing.. Halo (for multiplayer, not impressed by single), Mafia, The Suffering, Fuzion Frenzy (hehe), Amped, and many more, there's not as many games as the PS2, but the ones that are out there are pretty good.

      Anyhow, what your comment and my rant made me realize, well, not realize, but put into words, is that Microsoft makes some great hardware. The XBox is great, their keyboards are good, their mice are good, I'm wondering, if they didn't have to deal with so much stuff being piled on so much stuff and so many third party drivers and processors n' stuff.. If MS made their own hardware, would their OS be more stable, and would they be a 'better company'? Basically, if MS were doing the same thing as Apple, would everyone still boycot them? Would they be carrying on all of these lawsuits? Or would they be more of a socially acceptable and fair business?

      Disclaimer: This is -not- an anti-ms or pro-ms rant, it's just a rant, don't read more into it than is stated ;)

      -matt

  38. Sugar mama by millahtime · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's called a sugar mama... all you need to do is get one. I did and it changed my world. She busys me toys to keep me entertained. Sometimes I feel like a dog just playing with the toys my owner bought. But then I play with my cool toys and don't care.

  39. What game? Me it's Ninja Gaiden by kryocore · · Score: 1

    Ninja Gaiden is the only game on Xbox that I would buy the system for. Until then I am happy with my PC and GameCube titles.

  40. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    no doubt.

    most catchy lingo is a single word. "Jump the Shark"....it just sounds gay.

    I don't know anyone, firsthand, to use that phrase.

    I think I heard 3 people, on TV, use it. They were publicly beaten.

  41. Sony already does this with PS2. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And your vaunted Linus did it too. He charged not one single penny for Linux.

    You arrest Bill, you better haul in Linus as well.

  42. PS2 Already 150... sort of by samsmithnz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought that Sony dropped the price about 6 months ago, but then added in a subsidized modem and slightly increased the price to 170, so that the price effectively stayed the same, but the value of your purchase increased.

    Bunch of marketing crap really.

    1. Re:PS2 Already 150... sort of by thecoder42 · · Score: 1

      They did drop the price about 6 months ago, but the price is still 180 w/o modem and 200 with the modem; at least in California, US. Sony would be smart to drop the price to stay in line with the other consoles.

  43. P. Diddy understands Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you have no design skills yourself, you simply sample from someone who does.

    1. Re:P. Diddy understands Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He likes the finest breast milks!

  44. Cheap Entertainment PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With this new price point and the hacks for the XBox out there, is this worth purchasing as a MPEG, MP3 and PVR entertainment PC? I'm not really interested in the games for the thing, but if I can get a decent computer out of the thing for $150, I'd be game.

    Thoughts?

    1. Re:Cheap Entertainment PC? by Ubergrendle · · Score: 0

      You're better off spending a bit more money and buying a low end multimedia PC for your home. More flexibility, more storage. You can kindof play games on your TV, but TV resolution sucks anyways in comparison with an SVGA screen.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    2. Re:Cheap Entertainment PC? by BigDish · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Xbox Media Center That application alone is worth the $150 for an Xbox console.

    3. Re:Cheap Entertainment PC? by Graemee · · Score: 1

      Unless you have HDTV. Doesn't the Xbox & PS2 have HDTV compatible video adapters available.

      I believe that most games support 480P and a few support 1080i &/or 720P.

      http://www.hdtvarcade.com/xboxlist.htm
      http://w ww.hdtvarcade.com/ps2list.htm

    4. Re:Cheap Entertainment PC? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      is this worth purchasing as a MPEG, MP3 and PVR entertainment PC?

      Be aware that the cheap fan makes it sound like a lawnmower.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    5. Re:Cheap Entertainment PC? by Intocabile · · Score: 1

      An Xbox with Xbox Media Center can't do PVR by itself yet but for playing MPEG 1/2/4 and virtually any audio it's great (any codec MPlayer can do). It can stream from SMB network shares, Internet, Replay TV and modified Tivos. Plays DVDs, DVD+/-R/Ws and CDs. Can lookup and download movie/album covers and gives a short review or IMDB rating. Skinable UI and can be booted in 20 seconds. Can output HDTV resolutions (although playback is still not where people would like it to be). Perfect HTPC just replace the fan.

  45. Doom3 and HL2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Doom3 and HL2 ship for the Xbox I will buy it - till then I am happy with my Gamecube and collection of older PCs...

  46. Cluster Goodness by Ianoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    50 x $150 = $7500

    This gives me 35000MHz of processor power and 3200MB of RAM. That'd be a pretty nice setup.

    1. Re:Cluster Goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wait a minute, I didn't see the word beowu.... [Signal Lost]

    2. Re:Cluster Goodness by claar · · Score: 1

      Humor aside, it is wild how cheap a cluster can be these days..

      $7500 for 35Ghz/3.2GB is downright expensive these days. For example, a 2.16Ghz Athlon 3000+ machine w/256M ram & 40GB HD is listed on pricewatch at $229.

      That's 16 machines to get 35Ghz/4GB at a price of $3664. I know quite a few people that have spent that amount or close to it for a single machine! This is part of why I love computers, constant progress.. the next generation will laugh at us paying $3660 dollars (even with inflation) for 35Ghz/4GB.

      --
      I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous...
    3. Re:Cluster Goodness by Ianoo · · Score: 1

      It's amazing, because what seems like only a few short months ago I made this very joke (not on Slashdot) and the figures actually worked out too (i.e. the X-Box cluster was cheaper). I agree it's pretty amazing progress we've seen in the last two years... heck the last 20 years of computing. The X-Box seems positively expensive by comparison, especially when you have to go and fiddle them to boot Linux ;)

  47. Re:DUMPING (Not) by Troed · · Score: 5, Informative

    Got news for you...all console makers sell their product below cost, and have for many years

    Congratulations, you've fallen for a myth. The only consoles before the Xbox to have been sold at a loss are the Sega Saturn and the Sega Dreamcast.

    Please don't post myths - learn how to use Google.

  48. Re:This guy needs to lay off the marketing pills.. by goldspider · · Score: 1
    I believe you mean "lisenced".

    Remember, you don't own an X-Box (and therefore can't mod it, etc), you lisence it.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  49. wait. by snakattak · · Score: 1

    I think I'll wait till its $99 probably in a few months. Slashdot told me so. I already have a gamecube and a ps2, and I really only want X-box to run linux as a media player on my tv.

    --
    Ban Reality TV!
  50. You forget the coding cost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes it may only cost pennies to PRESS the disk. But you are a moron to think that's the only cost involoved. What about the cost to CODE the game? Those coders didn't do it for free. Do you you work for free at your job? Oh, I forgot, mommy and daddy still support you.

    1. Re:You forget the coding cost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding really? You didn't get the point. It cost pennies to make many duplicates of the game!

  51. many more games by millahtime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "There's only one game I'd like to play on the Xbox"

    You are missing out on the games then. I have 2 for you to try. Ninja Gaiden and Ghost Recon. Oh, and get xbox live too. You will never go do anything else again.

    1. Re:many more games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm holding out for the Xbox bundle that comes with safety goggles and a sledgehammer.

    2. Re:many more games by RailGunner · · Score: 1
      One question - I haven't played it, so I don't know - but - what do you like about Ninja Gaiden so much?
      See, to me it looks like Rygar for PS2 (which is the same publisher.. and the same engine?), or Castlevania: Lament of Innocence for PS2.

      As far as Ghost Recon, you can't swing a bat in a computer store without hitting a FPS...

    3. Re:many more games by NickF · · Score: 1

      Ghost Recon on Xbox live is by far one of the most addictive games I have ever played. Definitely one of xbox's best games.

    4. Re:many more games by mal3 · · Score: 1

      I haven't played it either but I can venture a guess.

      Viking vs. Vampire Hunter vs. Ninja.

      Ninja wins.

      --
      Non gratis rodentus anus
    5. Re:many more games by badasscat · · Score: 2, Informative

      One question - I haven't played it, so I don't know - but - what do you like about Ninja Gaiden so much?
      See, to me it looks like Rygar for PS2 (which is the same publisher.. and the same engine?), or Castlevania: Lament of Innocence for PS2.


      Both published by Tecmo but that doesn't mean anything; they were developed by different development teams. Dev teams are almost little companies within companies; they usually have their own offices (often their own buildings), and they have their own stable of games. Ninja Gaiden was developed by Team Ninja, the team best-known recently for the Dead or Alive series (both fighting and now volleyball), but also for (wait for it) Ninja Gaiden, from which the team derived its name. This same team responsible for the new Xbox game also developed the classic NES version, and possibly the arcade, Lynx, and Game Gear versions, though they were all quite different.

      Rygar was developed by a different team within Tecmo - I couldn't tell you who, but I know for a fact it was not Team Ninja, as they only work on Xbox right now and only with their little cast of Team Ninja characters (the characters in DOA and Ninja Gaiden do cross over to some extent - the little ninja core of DOA, comprised of Ryu, Kasumi and Ayane, are related and appear in both series). Team Ninja are pretty adamant about developing their own game engines as well, so Ninja Gaiden's was not borrowed from Rygar (two different platforms anyway).

      Now, I haven't played the new Ninja Gaiden and I'm not disagreeing with you that in general it and Rygar may be similar games. But as in any action game, it comes down to the execution, so it may very well be that Ninja Gaiden is that much more of a precisely timed game, with better level and enemy design, better graphics, etc. But really, it is true that it's just an updated remake of a game that came out 15 years ago (as is Rygar; Castlevania is technically a sequel, but was derived from a similar action platformer).

      Basically these are all games within the same genre, so it's natural they would be similar. I don't think it's the originality that draws people to games like this; nobody would argue that remakes of classic games about ninjas are at all original. But that doesn't mean they can't be fun.

    6. Re:many more games by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      One question - I haven't played it, so I don't know - but - what do you like about Ninja Gaiden so much?

      Off Topic, I know, but I had to butt in here... I got Gaiden when it came out and couldn't stand the way the camera follows you.. if you go around a corner you lose sight of your char until you move forward a little, more than a little bit annoying, I took it back and traded it in for The Suffering, which my g/f and neighbors will sit and watch for quite a while without getting bored.

      -matt

    7. Re:many more games by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      Oh, and get xbox live too. You will never go do anything else again.

      Because I'll be too busy trying to figure out how to connect it using my 56k modem?

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    8. Re:many more games by Talahamut · · Score: 1

      Yeah, getting Xbox live isn't the problem, getting broadband is. No DSL available at my place, so my only option is paying Adelphia's exorbitant prices for a cable modem connection...

    9. Re:many more games by Lectrik · · Score: 1
      Viking vs. Vampire Hunter vs. Ninja.

      Ninja wins.


      Ahh, but you have forgotten something, that vampire hunter is equipped with..... a whip... erm... nevermind...
      --
      --- As to make my comment seem, by comparison, more intelegent... doodie doodie doodie poop poop poop!
  52. Re:What game? Me it's Ninja Gaiden by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    You might as well not then. It's a wickedly hard game that isn't that interesting. Might as well get a NES and play the original ;-)

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  53. Translation by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

    other readers point to the official Microsoft press release, sporting a quote from noted tech analyst P.Diddy: "[I] believe that the system's cultural influence as a social entertainment brand has only just begun."

    Or for those of you who know Diddy-speak:

    "yeah, uh huh, uh, thats right, c'mon now"

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    1. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "[I] believe that the system's cultural influence as a social entertainment brand has only just begun."

      Or for those of you who know Diddy-speak:

      "yeah, uh huh, uh, thats right, c'mon now"


      If you really know P. Diddy, then I think you'll see that he's just trying to say

      "Ya know I told ya that they won't stop, ya know I told ya that they won't stop."

  54. The prices they are a-droppin' by MrPoopyPants · · Score: 1

    This is pretty cool. Maybe I'll pick one up to make a media box out of for the livingroom.

    Now, my real concern is, when will we see a pricedrop in the Gameboy Advance SP? Anybody heard any rumors about that?

  55. What are you talking about? by Iscariot_ · · Score: 4, Informative
    Is it a significant milestone when a console becomes cheaper than the modchip for that console?

    Check your facts before posting. No xbox mod-chip costs more than $100.
    1. Re:What are you talking about? by LiXY · · Score: 0

      Don't forget ConsoleSource.com for mod chips

      http://www.consolesource.com

    2. Re:What are you talking about? by j0hnfr0g · · Score: 1

      No xbox mod-chip costs more than $100.

      Logically, you can't say this. Examples of mod-chips costing less than $100 does not disprove the existence of a mod-chip > $100.

      But what I think you intended to mean is correct: mod-chips are available that are less than the reduced-price Xbox.

    3. Re:What are you talking about? by pegr · · Score: 1

      You misssed the first logic error. I made no statement. I merely posed a question. (And, yes, I intended for it to be funny. Had to alter my sig for a few minutes to say "Laugh! It's funny!" in order to get a few "funny" mods to get the ball rolling. Kinda like a sitcom laughtrack, I guess...)

      Hey Iscariot! What facts did I get wrong? ;p

  56. Re:DUMPING (Not) by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.

    Nintendo and Sony at worst always broke even, up until very recently, neither had EVER sold a console at a loss. Nintendo is(or was before resuming manufacturing) now selling at a very minimal loss at their $99 price point.

    --
    The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
  57. Re:What game? Me it's Ninja Gaiden by kryocore · · Score: 1

    The demo was tight

  58. WORD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, a little sack time with the prune every night, and I get to drive the Porsche . What's a little whoring when you've got so much time left to be responsible!

  59. xbox-linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so ppl will rush to the store, buy the xbox, and install linux on it, right ??

    Since M$ is subsidizing the box, what is a better reason to install linux on it ? *grinn
    Make an openmosix node out of it.

    Time to flash that tsop, yeah.

    well, good thing i keep my 007auf around.

  60. Re:This is proof Microsoft cares about the consume by BdosError · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nice troll. The "selling the console at a loss" state is not unique to Microsoft. Most (or possibly all) of the consoles are like that. It's like cell phones -- sell the hardware at a loss, make it up on the accessories, services, etc.

    I also recall hearing somewhere that they get the manufacturing costs ways down as the product matures, so later revs are as much of a loss, or possibly not a loss at all.

    --
    Complexity is Easy. Simplicity is Hard.
  61. Re:This is proof Microsoft cares about the consume by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, I usually don't start with an insult, but you're an idiot.

    Microsoft isn't lowering the price of their system because they "care" about consumers and want everyone to drink from their goblet... they just want everyone to drink from their goblet whether they like them or not.

    Every major video game console on the market right now is sold at a loss (analysis of hardware for the systems show that Nintendo has the lowest loss margin even at their $100 price tag as a side note. Then PS2, then X-Box.) Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft all sell these systems at a loss in order to get licensing fees out of game producing companies. They essentially do nothing, and get paid for it.

    Microsoft lowering the price is pure economics. The cost of $200 is too much for some people. They realize if they drop it $50, they can sell more consoles. By selling more consoles, more games (theoretically) will get moved off the shelf and more licensing fees are paid to Microsoft.

    Microsoft lowering the price has nothing to do with caring about people. Its about caring about profit. (How any good business is run.)

  62. Re:What game? Me it's Ninja Gaiden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you might as well get a fucking lobotomy, because summing the game up as 'wickedly hard and not that interesting' is truly deserving of one.

    Have you even played it?

  63. Re:This is proof Microsoft cares about the consume by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

    But Microsoft does. It's stance is 'quality products, at a fair price'.

    Hmmm, let's see. Get the virus of the week and Windows XP for $200, or stay relatively virus-free for FREE. Decisions, decisions.

  64. oh boy! by malus · · Score: 4, Funny

    i've been waiting for this price drop! i'm going to go out tomorrow and pick one up! it'll sit right next to my PS2 which has been idle for the last 8 months due to Lack of Playing Time(tm). But at least i can say i have one!

  65. Re:This guy needs to lay off the marketing pills.. by Have+Blue · · Score: 4, Funny

    The major contribution of the Xbox to our culture so far has been corpse humping in first person shooters. Not really something to be proud of...

  66. Linux box... by ajutla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Haven't people installed linux onto the Xbox? Does it actually work well or is it more of a novelty sort of thing? $150 is pretty good for a linux box. The Xbox has like a 733mhz processor, right? So it shouldn't be too slow...and if it really does use pretty standard PC hardware, then it might work out all right. As opposed to the PS2, I mean, which has weird hardware specifically designed for running games.

    1. Re:Linux box... by aixou · · Score: 0

      I have linux installed on my xbox and it works great. I play Snes games on it (using the xbox controller and a separate usb controller), watch movies (using linux means I don't need to buy Microsofts remote to watch dvds), am running it as web server, mail server, ftp server, ssh server (overkill I know, but I don't care). And I run seti@home on it as well.

    2. Re:Linux box... by Jonathan+Hamilton · · Score: 0

      What snes emulator do you use?

    3. Re:Linux box... by Wog · · Score: 1

      I use an XBox modded w/ GentooX linux ($30, DVD Drive didn't work) as a file server in my dorm room. It's a very nice small box, and with the 80GB hard drive I put in, it lets me backup my laptop over FTP/Samba more often than I otherwise would. I even have my roommates doing backups of their important files... Already saved one of them when his HD died.

      I recomend an XB as a linux box any day. Thing is, most of us geeks can piece together a cheap PC for cheap. I did it because I like the low noise/heat/size of the XBox.

    4. Re:Linux box... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      But don't you have to mod the XBox? And doesn't the mod involve some questionable use of ROM? And doesn't it mean it won't play xbox games anymore?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    5. Re:Linux box... by aixou · · Score: 1, Informative

      The only 'modding' you have to do is via software, and no it does not limit your ability to play games. You can do a hardware mod, but it isn't necessary. Get all the details here.

      To illustrate the point -- I have a fully functioning Linux install right now with a 2 gig root partition. If I decide I want to play an Xbox game (e.g. Splinter Cell), I restart the Xbox, put the game in the drive, and am on my way. When I want to boot back into Linux, I restart the Xbox with no game in the drive, select "Linux" from the Dashboard menu, and it boots into Xebian (Xbox version of Debian)

    6. Re:Linux box... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      Ah, I thought I remembered a snag. Installing Linux blocks you from XBox Live.

      I also wonder if the arms race has escalated since the FAQ was written -- who knows if things are the same? Will they be the same on the new, lower price models?

      If I look for MechAssault, how do I know I have the version with the hole? (I can't imagine that a *current* run of this game doesn't have the defect!)

      Don't get me wrong, I'd like to install linux on my xbox just for the hell of it. If I could make one work as a file/print server, I might even be tempted to replace my mini-itx file/print server. But I don't want to waste time and money on it unless I can be sure it'll work.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    7. Re:Linux box... by aixou · · Score: 0

      Taken from http://wiki.xbox-linux.org/ -- "5 Are all MechAssault CD's the same?

      No. You need the original version, not the "Xbox Game of the Year" version. The newer disk has been patched and can waste a lot of time. The CD labels are identical. Look at the laser etching on the back. The new one says MS02308L while the original is MS02301L."

      Notice that the only difference between the two strings is the second to last character. 8=bad, 1=good.

      My recommendation would be to go to a used game store and ask to take a look at the a used copy of mech assault. If it's the right one, then buy it. If you buy it, you aren't under the same time crunch as you are if you rent it. (not to mention that you can usually get it for a mere $15)

      There a couple other problems you can run into during the install. If your Xbox dashboard is above a certain version number, the Mech Assault install won't work. You have to downgrade your dashboard. You can view the version number of your Dashboard by getting System info in the dashboard(or something of that nature). Instructions on how to downgrade the dashboard are towards the bottom of this page.
      The file required to downgrade the dashboard is not that difficult to get, but it can be tricky to find. (I can help you get it if need be)

      Depending on what DVD drive you have, you will need to use certain brands of CD-R/RW. It is very important that the disc be compatible (for obvious reasons). In any given Xbox, there is either a Samsung, Phillips, or Thompson drive. You can identify which drive you have using this picture here. At wiki.xbox-linux.org there is a "compatibility list" that tells you what brands of CD-RW should work with your drive. The Thompson drive is the least desirable of the three, and ideally you want a Samsung drive.

      There are a bunch of people readily available to help troubleshoot any problems. I got some good help troubleshooting my install, and I don't mind helping anyone out that might need it.

      If you don't have an Xbox already and you want to install Linux, I would recommend picking up a used one (as opposed to new). Used Xboxes are less likely to be problematic during a Linux install due to the simple fact that they're likely to have older firmware and such.

  67. $99 by Labor Day??? by Viking+Coder · · Score: 4, Informative

    Didn't I read somewhere that it was going to $99 by Labor Day? Or was that just an ugly rumor, and this is the only price drop I can really expect?

    Nope, I'm not nuts - this was the rumor.

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
    1. Re:$99 by Labor Day??? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I can wait. I'm holding out until it drops down to $49.95 + 2 free bonus games.

  68. Re:This guy needs to lay off the marketing pills.. by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hate to be a spelling nazi, but you misspelled pwned.

  69. Re:This is proof Microsoft cares about the consume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe the problem is that they sell things at a loss in order to get a foothold in a new market. They could not do that without their monopoly position in the PC industry. If they had a console monopoly, I imagine that Microsoft would follow its past reputation and raise prices. They're just ruthless competitors when they need to be, and they are leveraging one industry monopoly in order to extend it into other industries.

  70. I agree with this post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Death to all Slashbots.

  71. Re:This is proof Microsoft cares about the consume by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

    should have been "... relatively virus-free with Linux or BSD for FREE." But, you all knew that.

  72. Re:DUMPING (Not) by DR+SoB · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And the Sega 32X.. Lesson learned: Do not invest in Sega, but you can certainly buy their gear!!

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
  73. Improvement. by hethatishere · · Score: 1

    Great, the XBox now has a more competitive price-point. This thrust Nintendo into what was an increasing second-place lead over the XBox.
    It's good to see Microsoft is still working to keep this generation and not abandoning it for the next round like Microsoft's CFO John Conner's seemed to be implying.
    Now, Microsoft needs to work on what was more important all along and getting the quality of games higher. Microsoft has a lot of games, but still suffers from gaping genre holes and mediocrity.

    --
    Something intelligent here.
  74. Re:This is proof Microsoft cares about the consume by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

    What's the difference between having a virus and relatively having a virus????

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
  75. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by lacrymology.com · · Score: 1

    I felt that /. jumped the shark long ago when CowboyNeal's evil twin brother started posting here.
    -m

    --

    #
    # Modus Ponens
    #
  76. Re:DUMPING (Not) by PNGrata · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Funny how immediately after blaming someone for falling for a myth, his sig proclaims that Bush already has Osama...

  77. holding out till august/september by enrico_suave · · Score: 0, Redundant

    When it's reportedly going to be $99 dollars, that's my console sweet spot...

    Till then.. hey buddy, can you spare a dreamcast?

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    1. Re:holding out till august/september by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you could just buy a Gamecube, and get superior games rather than the half-assed movie-based game of the week and a rack of FPS's.

    2. Re:holding out till august/september by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or better yet, instead of buying the gamecube why don't you send me a check for 99 dollars and I'll send you a package with some of my shit in it.

      It will be more entertaining and a better deal.

      Gamecube blows. Graphics suck ass. Games suck ass. Controller sucks ass.

      Xbox is where it is at. Prince of Persia, Halo (even years after it has been out), Ninja Gaiden, Splinter Cell, GTA, Halo 2 (soon), etc...

  78. why buy a game machine by sirinek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For a long time I wanted to play GTA3. I pondered buying a $199 PS2 and then said "Naah, I'll wait for the price to go down". That was a year and a half ago, and they are still $179. Last year I bought GTA3 for my PC and a game controller very similar to the PS2 controller. Together the pair cost me maybe $65 and the graphics blow away the PS2.

    1. Re:why buy a game machine by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

      Your PC with graphics that "blow away" the ps2 was only $65, including the game?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:why buy a game machine by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      maybe not, but assuming he alread owned the PC, and it's use was spread out over more than just games, including things a gaming console cannot do, it's probably more economically responsible to use it instead of laying down a fresh $179 that could be used on other things.

    3. Re:why buy a game machine by mr.capaneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For a long time I wanted tp play KOTOR. I pondered buying a $179 Xbox and then said "Naah, I'll wait for the price to go down". A few months ago I warezed KOTOR for my PC and just used the mouse. It cost me $0 and the graphics blew, period.
      Seriously, I never played GTA3 on the PC but the PC ports of console games that I have played have sucked royally (NFS:U, LOTR:ROTK and of course KOTOR). I even spent $100 to buy a new video card so I could run the above mentioned games at a decent frame rate. I was pretty disappointed.

    4. Re:why buy a game machine by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Informative

      'cause you're not a IQ=65 kid who with enough luck can be taught not to put the DVD disk upside down and any maintenance beyond pressing reset is beyond them. Game consoles are so dumbed down, that you just can't break them by doing something wrong from the UI. And stupidity costs. Simple.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    5. Re:why buy a game machine by JaxGator75 · · Score: 1
      I had no problems with KOTOR. I thought the graphics were just fine on my PC (never saw it on Xbox).

      To the contrary, I've never had ANY luck with a GTA title ported to PC. The controls were always screwy or it wouldn't work with any of the various gamepads I had handy (some even brand-name!)

      I gave up on ever playing a GTA game, but now it seems Prince of Persia and others don't like the PC/gamepad connection. Thank God NHL and NFL games work well...

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
    6. Re:why buy a game machine by sirinek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I didnt buy the PC for the sole purpose of gaming. :) Certainly it cost more than the $250 I'd spend on a PS2 and a game to go with it, but it does much more.

    7. Re:why buy a game machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you talking about? A Geforce 4 ALONE is $180 dollars. And how is a GeForce 4 spread out over more than just games? What other application does a typical user do that needs that much power? This isn't even going into the increased memory needs gaming requires, or the nice monitors and sound setup.

      Also, what about upgrades? An xbox is a one time $180 purchase that will play every xbox game ever made. A PC gamer upgrades components every 2 years or so.

      Also, the console uses the living room TV and stereo, the cost of which is spread out over more than just games. Your argument is really weak, man.

      PC gaming is economically responsible...please.

    8. Re:why buy a game machine by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about a GeForce 4 or buying a new graphics card at all, for that matter?

      he had the comp, he had a graphics card and monitor, had everything. he just bought a game and a controller.

      arguing with an AC who brings in all other issues to dilute reason. fun stuff.

    9. Re:why buy a game machine by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 1

      I've got a both GTA3 and Vice City for the PC, and I can no longer even look at the PS2 versions. Graphics are weak and fuzzy, the loading times take forever (they essentially don't exist on the PC), the controls are so much better (the ease and *challege* of the mouse compared to the hideous hacked-together control scheme of the PS2).

      Sure my computer cost more than a PS2/XBox, but I built it myself nearly 3 years ago for 1500 bucks, it still can play any current game (and it will still play HL2 & Doom III, although with the settings turned down), and in the mean time I've been able to use it to, I don't know, write papers, check email, surf the internet, code, watch movies, play with Linux, game online for free (well, after internet access)...

      The console has its place, and perhaps especially for the games you chose. But for other types of games, the PC is perfect.

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
  79. Re:This guy needs to lay off the marketing pills.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I hate to be a spelling nazi, but you misspelled pwned.

    You misspelled "pwn3d!!!"

  80. How many Watts? by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    You're going to need an electrician to verify you can run 50 of those things.

    1. Re:How many Watts? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The best I could do was this where a user states that the Xbox draws 55W. (Microsoft says 100W. This might be true if the DVD-ROM were to spin up at the same time as the HDD during intense computation, but I doubt it. So a nice safe margin.) 100W is .833(bar) amps @ 120V or .88A at 113V, and 55W is .49A (either way, rounded to the nearest hundredth) so... A typical household circuit can manage either 10A or 20A peak, more like 7 or 8, or 15 to 17 respectively sustained. Assuming that the Xbox will draw 100W peak and we want to exceed 15A 0% of the time so we never pop the breaker unless it is defective, we should be able to put 17 Xboxen on a single circuit. If we assume that they will peak around 75W, we can have 24 Xboxes on the same circuit. Or, 20 Xboxes, a cheap unmanaged 24 port 100Mbps switch, and a reading light. Perfect for a spare bedroom. 50 Xboxes, on the other hand, might be a miss.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  81. MOD UP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Now, why is this troll?

    It can run linux.

    1. Re:MOD UP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Because my cousin bill gates just got a login recently.

  82. Yeah by oGMo · · Score: 1

    And knowing Sony, it wouldn't be a shocker to see it dropped to $99, would it? This is pure speculation on my part, but they've liked sticking it to the competition in the past. Given they've got declining sales growth, indicating market saturation, if they cut the price to $99 they'd compete with the Cube, undercut Microsoft, and reach the population who will buy at $99. And probably still make a little profit off each box.

    I believe they still have separate bundles for the PS2 with and without network adaptor. Maybe they'll go $99/$120, or $120/$150. Either way it's a good opportunity to make the competition look bad.

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    1. Re:Yeah by TrentL · · Score: 1

      Well, I just hope they do it soon. It's a tradition of mine to use my tax rebates to buy a new console. :)

  83. Re:What game? Me it's Ninja Gaiden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For me, it's that beach vollyball thing.

  84. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhhh.. He raps. He's bad at it and his music is definitely pop. But he's still a (bad) rapper.

  85. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by JohnTheFisherman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, if you listened to the original single version, you'd note that all that P. Diddy did was take a tape recording of "I, Cringely" complaining about MS and say, "uh huh, unh HUNNNHH" over the top of it.

  86. Re:This is proof Microsoft cares about the consume by BensonLeung · · Score: 1
    Your argument is flawed. Not "only" Microsoft... Sony and Nintendo (and Sega before they quit consoles) have been selling game systems at a loss for years now. Its not Microsoft being benevolent to its loyal masses as you imply... Its the name of the game in game consoles, and Microsoft is trying their best to keep their head above water (and not really doing well in that regard) in a market they don't exercise absolute control over... how's that for a change?

    the fact of the matter is that "quality products, at a fair price" is bullshit. Everyone in this market does this, and do not kid yourself into believing that Microsoft has the consumer in mind... this is not an act of benevolence... they are simply trying to stay alive in this market.

    The fact of the matter is that the hardware is sold at a loss here, but games make up the slack. Playstation 2 has been enormously successful not because Sony makes a bunch on the console... even now at $179, it probably barely breaks even. But the money is in games. Unfortunately, Microsoft has had a few things against them... 1) slow start in attracting game developers to the platform 2) still a dearth of games altogether and 3) getting people to buy those games that are out, with the exception of Halo.

    I'm impressed that someone actually worked themselves up to be outraged that people are bashing MS on Slashdot, by the way...

  87. When does it become practical? by earthforce_1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since the Xbox is essentially a PC with a lot of anti-hack DRM crap built in, I wonder when it becomes practical simply to canibalize it for parts, stick on an "open" BIOS and turn it into a real low end PC?

    Not as a basement hacker project, but as a commercial scale re-engineering effort. If you are replacing the BIOS with a one that will turn it into a regular PC and not play any PS/2 games, they could hardly be raided for piracy.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:When does it become practical? by detritus. · · Score: 1

      While still a basement hacker project, it's alot more practical now with the price drop, being you can now get an Xbox with a modchip for about $179 ;)

    2. Re:When does it become practical? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can use the cromwell linux bios and boot linux on the Xbox without any microsoft code. The problem is the lack of video drivers for the custom nvidia graphics solution. Oh and, Xboxes don't normally play any PS/2 games, though I guess you could install DOS in a virtual machine on the Xbox under linux. In case you're wondering, they normally don't play PS2 games either.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  88. Economies of Scale... by BJZQ8 · · Score: 1

    I would have thought that MS could have dropped the price a long time ago to spread out their enormous development budgets a bit...but then again, "cutting the prices until we make a profit" hasn't worked too good as a business strategy recently.

  89. Almost got a refurbished one for $99 from Fry's by drfreak · · Score: 1

    but the mob beat me. Well, maybe next weekend..

  90. got money to throw away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS is doing a great job of throwing money at the XBox problem. hurray! if it means PS2 is cheaper due to competition, I'm all for MS pumping several billions more into XBox.

  91. i too would like to know if anyone has tried this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  92. Re:So faggots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what does this mean?

  93. Re:This guy needs to lay off the marketing pills.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's 'licensed' you dyslexic fuck.

  94. Erroneous Myths by oGMo · · Score: 3, Informative

    While the parent of your comment is pretty much a troll, most consoles are not like that. How often must this be posted before this myth is finally laid to rest?

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    1. Re:Erroneous Myths by BdosError · · Score: 1

      A ha! That's exactly where I'd read it. Thanks for pointing me to the right place.

      I stand by the cell phones part though.

      --
      Complexity is Easy. Simplicity is Hard.
    2. Re:Erroneous Myths by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      Yes, because we all know a storyteller like Gord is an authority on such topics.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    3. Re:Erroneous Myths by Jeff85 · · Score: 1

      Aren't all myths erroneous?

      --
      Fetch Text URL - Firefox Extension
    4. Re:Erroneous Myths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't all myths erroneous?

      No, that's just a myth.

    5. Re:Erroneous Myths by LordIvan · · Score: 1

      Actually, while this URL is probably quite valid, it's not really something that should be used to validate your point - The article has no references or links to solid information backing his claims - It could be just another one of a billion other webpages out there talking about things they don't really have the right to talk about.

      It's written in a light-hearted, entertaining fashion, but that does not automatically make it _correct_.

      To _really_ set this to rest, we need links to news sites, sony.com, etc, to validate the figures and claims made on the actsofgord site, or another webpage that already contains this information.

  95. How much for a PC? by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a PC. We all know it. How much would a PC with hardware of "the same class" cost now? I don't think it would be more. It's far from "state of the art" technology by now and PCs that are 2-3 years old, easily fall in the "economy class". Think something similar to HDD40GB, GForce2, P3 1GHZ, 256M RAM - where would such thing land on a shelf in a computer shop?

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:How much for a PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be an expensive PC. The hardware is customized for the consol to get maximum performance out of it.

      You can go and buy what you said, but things wouldn't run as well at the level as on the XBox...or PS2 for that matter.

    2. Re:How much for a PC? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      ~$150 will get you a 2.4 GHz Celeron or an Athlon XP 1700+ system. (The celeron has much better associated components but the Athlon is going to be a faster CPU since Celerons are a joke. YMMV.) However the cheapest prebuilt system I found on pricewatch with poosibly comparable video was $211.99 with a 1GHz Duron, 20Gb disk, and no optical drive. Make that about $230 to $250 with a decent DVD-ROM.

      On the other hand the Xbox is in a (slightly) smaller case, consumes significantly less power than most PCs, and has excellent TV out. So if you are building a cluster, you probably won't want Xboxes, although they are pretty much disposable and they're fairly small. If you're building a HTPC for output, an Xbox is an excellent choice. If you want one for input, you need a PC. Ultimately the Xbox is only going to be the right decision when you want to use a TV for output.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  96. crap by natefanaro · · Score: 1

    my g/f just got me a ps2 for my birthday.

    1. Re:crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't know that inflatible women could make purchases like that. Because if your g/f wasn't inflatible you wouldn't be on slashdot.

  97. Re:yer an idjit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WRONG, BITCH.

  98. Offtopic: Re:Still too much by nolife · · Score: 1

    You can get a preowned Dreamcast (DC) at EBGames for $15 at a physical store or $19 online. Scope out DCEmulation for tons of homebrew ports and games (Mame, other emu's, mp3 player, divx player and many others) or fire up alt.binaries.cd.image.dreamcast for some commercial rips and work released by others. It even runs Linux (although a little dated) to a VGA monitor with KB support. The DC does not require any "chips" or internal hacks to run anything and has an internal modem.

    Even further offtopic but I use my DC often, mostly for NES emulation and simply playing the games I've bought for it over the years.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  99. Re:This is proof Microsoft cares about the consume by BoyHowdyAAF · · Score: 1

    ::drinks from the goblet::


    Hey! This is Mountain Dew!

  100. Not low enough by CosmicDreams · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The price tag of ~ $150 is still not low enough for me to buy a second console. In fact, for someone like me who has already invested in "This generation" of consoles, anything over a hundred is too much. Its not a casual buy whenever you see three digits in front of the price tag's decimal point. I don't see what they intend to gain from this manuever.

    --
    Go Gusties
  101. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    I think you missed the sarcasm in the...

    I think you missed the sarcasm in the post...

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  102. Obligatory... by Frohan · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Soviet Russia, prices slash Microsoft....

    *cowers*

  103. and I just spent $99 on... by stephenisu · · Score: 1

    A harddrive for my PS2. But, GT4 will prevail...

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
  104. Good try.. by beldraen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Name the company that sells an OS and an office suite at 80% profit margin? Name the company that could significantly cut prices across the board because it has 40+ BILLION in CASH in reserve, but doesn't? Name the company that is inducing a loss-leadership so that eventually it can make large profit margins. Capitalism is the best system in the world, but it is hardly perfect nor always thinks of the consumer. Make no mistake, Microsoft has demostrated a willingness to own markets at any cost, especially as the cost of consumers. After all, how many companies with superior products have been decimated so that we have been left with a lack of innovation for a decade? The definition of a viable system is that it must work in the long term. The short term consumer gain will come at a huge long term cost. It took over five years before browser innovation started again, for instance.

    I, for one, do not welcome our attempted overlords.

    --
    Bel, the mostly sane.. "Of course I can't see anything! I'm standing on the shoulders of idiots." -- Me
  105. And in the UK... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...you can bet they won't drop it to 80!

    Am I right in thinking that you can't export the X-Box from the US because of the encryption issue? That is the offical reason given when you try to export an iPod.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:And in the UK... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      You've just discovered the real reason for encryption export laws.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  106. At a Loss?? by eigerface · · Score: 1, Interesting


    Maybe they are selling the boxes at below Suggested Retail, but at a loss. . . Doubtful.

  107. Never. Or not really soon. by SharpFang · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, it's a PC. But by nowadays standards, it's a crappy PC. The stuff is rather old. A P3 CPU, a 20-60G harddrive, some three years old gfx card, no monitor included, moderate amounts of DIMM RAM. Might be good for embedded projects like laser displays for a DJ, info booth boxes and such, but there are better and cheaper home PCs available.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  108. Decaf for you from now on, Frohike! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  109. Loss = R&D costs +promotion + manufacturing? by johnpaul191 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    i think a lot of the loss is also for the Xbox project as a whole..... so the R&D, promotion and whatever else. i don't think it's purely the physical bits in the Xbox carton cost more than $150 or $199 or whatever. So in that sense they will be reducing their costs over time.

    As for the components themselves, i would think for a time the costs would go down, but at some point they would be somewhat outdated and not worth sustaining, i dont know where that curve crosses the "time to upgrade to keep up with Sony!" curve.

    obviously with games costing $30 - $50 (right?) anyone with a system will spend much more on games, and M$ or Sony or whomever gets a cut of that, as well as M$ making their own games.

    I wonder what other companies have to pay to Sony or M$ per game sold? THAT seems to be what sustains the console makers. when you read that the average consumer only buys a few new games a year, it makes you wonder what the licensing stuff works out to be. It also explains why theyw ould be going after anyone that is bootlegging games, or trying to use the consoles to run linux and not buy their software. The console is purely a vehicle for selling more games..... kinda like the opposite of the iTunes Music store? weird........

  110. All right! by jeff13 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I just bought an Edsel with fins and white wash tires and it's SO cheap! Can't wait to show off this baby to all the chicks in town. Boy, am I cool for having something this modern and fast or what?

    Anyone want to buy a Delorian? It only has 50 'flux capacitor' years on it. ;p

  111. Ah Yes! by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny
    But if we each apply for a national foundation for the arts grant, buy 10,000 of the things, superglue them together to make giant Tux-the-Penguin statues and have them all shipped to Redmond, we can do two things:

    1) Deal a financial blow to Microsoft that will make the EU fines pale in comparason and

    2) Raise up our army of giant tux-the-penguins for the last battle against the Evil Empire (Microsoft.)

    Hmm maybe I should lay off the cough syrup...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Ah Yes! by dead+sun · · Score: 2, Informative
      Funny, but even without the consoles out there to buy games for, that's 10,000 more to the gap of sales vs. the Gamecube. Microsoft attracts more developers for the Xbox 2 with great numbers about market penetration. MS continues to dominate the market.

      Besides, figuring a $150 loss per sale, that's only a cold $1.5 million on 10,000 units. Now, if those same units never sell there'll be double the pain, because they won't recoup $150 per box and the actual number of people playing legal games on the things hasn't changed.

      To get to the $500 million the EU slaped them with you'd have to buy up over 3 million units assuming $150 loss per sale. Microsoft had sold fewer than 14 million units worldwide at the end of 2003. Do we really want to hand them 20% of their total sales to inflict losses similar to those done by the EU?

      --
      If not now, when?
    2. Re:Ah Yes! by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      But... you don't understand... It's an army of giant X-box Tuxxes! Woudln't that really be worth any price?

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    3. Re:Ah Yes! by dead+sun · · Score: 1

      Okay, you've got me there. The army of giant Xbox Tuxes is nothing short of a sweet idea. ;)

      --
      If not now, when?
  112. Re:This guy needs to lay off the marketing pills.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I believe he said "owned", not "liscensed". Obviously, you spend more time complaining about the Xbox than you do playing it.

  113. shucks by vanlandw · · Score: 1

    i just bought mine a month ago for 180...don't matter i got three free games :-P

  114. Re:DUMPING (Not) by jeffehobbs · · Score: 1


    Sega Saturn and the Sega Dreamcast.

    And the Sega 32X.. Lesson learned: Do not invest in Sega, but you can certainly buy their gear!!

    You would consider the examples of Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast and Sega 32X to be examples of what gear one should buy?

    ~jeff

  115. Re:This guy needs to lay off the marketing pills.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously, you've forgotten to take your sarcasm/humor pills today.

  116. P. Diddy didn't really say that... by Gruneun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft just sampled the press relesase of a more talented game console company.

    1. Re:P. Diddy didn't really say that... by Hassman · · Score: 1

      Do you mean Nokia? Isn't the N-Gage awesome?!?

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  117. If you really want to stick it to M$ by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

    You need to convince M$ to keep making X-boxes then buy just above the threshold where M$ might stop making them, and keep bringing the price down.

    And for you brave ones keep buying them and selling them at a loss on ebay. Don't worry that you're losing money meaning that M$ isn't losing as much in comprison to you, M$ will always have more money than you, this for the principle of not letting 800 lb gorrillas stink up the market.

    --
    The message on the other side of this sig is false.
  118. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by LilGuy · · Score: 1

    I think this is the first 10 times I've seen it used.

    I've heard of jumping the boat, but somehow that doesn't quite fit.

    --

    You're nothing; like me.
  119. Re:What game? Me it's Ninja Gaiden by 13Echo · · Score: 1

    It's just my opinion, but like most Team Ninja games over the last few years, it is simply a repetitive and unoriginal game with very pretty graphics. Essentially, it's a tech demo, like the last few Dead or Alive games. At least this time it was more of an attempt at making a lasting game.

    It's not bad by any means, but I think that other adventure games like Prince of Persia do a better job of telling a story and merging fun gameplay. Ninja Gaiden is hardly any reason to buy the system right now. The difficulty issue mostly comes down to using the right weapons at the right time. Mastering, and you'll get through the game pretty quickly. After some time, it's easy to lose interest as there really is no meat and potatoes to the game. The story and repetitive gameplay doesn't really do the game justice, in spite of its lovely graphics.

  120. If it fitted in with my HiFi or TV ... by hattig · · Score: 1

    ... then I'd get one.

    As it is, a large black brick with a large green X is not coming inside my house. Someone bring the MS XBox division into the new millennium regarding console design, please!

    Odd isn't it ... the small, professional looking GameCube plays colourful kiddie games (excellent games, don't get me wrong) in the main. The large, colourful Duplo-style console is the one with the more adult games.

  121. In other news.... by vwjeff · · Score: 1

    Microsoft today announced a price drop for their Xbox game console. Prices will be dropped to $149 in hopes to spur slumping sales.

    In other news a Sony spokesperson was quoted as saying, "Bring it on, bitch!!" after hearing of the recent Microsoft price drop.

    1. Re:In other news.... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 4, Funny

      Meanwhile at Sony headquarters, execs are releasing PS2 with a new slogan

      "Live in Microsoft world, but play in ours".

  122. I just wish....... by MrIrwin · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Somebody would make a tiny little box where I plug the TV in one side and my joystick on the other. On the top there is a little socket where I plug in my USB key full of MAME Roms.

    I reckon a MAME emulator like this would could cost something like $25 at the factory door.

    --

    And if you thought that was boring you obviously havn't read my Journal ;-)

    1. Re:I just wish....... by dspyder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're close... the processing power required to emulate anything (especially arcade games that had a lot of custom hardware built into them) is quite intensive and therefore expensive.

      What might be a better option is something along the line of what the FPGA Arcade people are doing. They're esentially replicating that custom hardware in the FPGAs. More hardware cost up front (relative to the actual chips themselves) but ultimately less cost than would be required to fully emulate everything.

      Another interesting thing I've seen is like a 10 pack of Atari games built into an original looking controller with RCA outputs. I'm not sure the hardware they're using, but I'm pretty sure it's not emulated. The code may have been rewritten for a specific low-cost chip.

      --D

    2. Re:I just wish....... by sbma44 · · Score: 1

      the original atari 2600 was constructed using off-the-shelf parts. I imagine they put one on a chip, is all.

      processing power to emulate is quickly becoming negligible. obviously newer systems will require more power, but you can comfortably run everything through PS1 on an XBox using emulators that are out there. Visit xbox-scene.com for more information.

      In fact, I can play the Gameboy Advance version of Super Mario Brothers 3 on my xbox -- that's two layers of emulation!

      (Ok, 2 I think -- I don't know exactly how nintendo implemented their gba cartridge)

    3. Re:I just wish....... by DeadMeat+(TM) · · Score: 1
      The Atari 2600 used a custom chip nicknamed Stella for graphics and sound. Needless to say it's no longer available in mass quantities.

      There's info on the Jakks 10-in-1 stick here; the short version of it is that it seems to be a port to some kind of mystery chip rather than emulation.

      The GBA version of SMB3 is a port using native ARM code instead of emulation.

    4. Re:I just wish....... by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      While it's not quite what you asked for, thinkgeek.com has the 10-in-1 Atari controller and the 5-in-1 Namco controller. Both are reasonably priced.

      If that's not to your liking, it would be fairly easy to custom build a cabinet (perhaps out of old stereo parts) with a cheap mobo with built-in video, audio, usb and game controller socket. That and an internal hard drive. I'll bet you could even approach your $25 mark if you shop carefully and scrounge thoroughly for free/discarded items.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
  123. Begun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the cultural influence has.

  124. Think of it this way.. by Jonathan+Hamilton · · Score: 0

    I always use to think it was novelty too.
    But for 150 you have a networked mp3, move, and dvd player. The dvd can play any region. I use a wireless keyboard and mouse to browse the internet on my Television while playing mp3s.

    I live @ college in an apartment with ethernet. I can mount any computer in the apartment complex via samba (or nfs) and stream mp3's from the computer to my stereo. (I'm getting optical out soon it'll be even better)

    You can also watch dvd's, the quality is awsome using s-video (I can't even imagine component).

    You can use a pc to do all this, but a pc would look really big and ugly next to a plasma tv. You could mount the xbox vertically. Not to mention the xbox is soo fucking quiet. I have a ps2 that I bought first, and it's loud. The xbox you can barely hear when it is on.

    Plus for 20 dollars get a copy of Halo used and you can use a spare computer and program called xbox connect to play people on the internet. (The program is free cause it tricks the xbox into thinking the computers are local.)

    The xbox we have now is my roomates, but I'm buying one this week (since the price dropped) cause I'm going to want one this summer (I graduate and move) and I'm afraid by then Microsoft will make it to hard to put on Linux.

    You already can't use the new mech warrior game, or Xbox newer then like September 2003.

    Hope that helps.

    1. Re:Think of it this way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But for 150 you have a networked mp3, move, and dvd player. The dvd can play any region. I use a wireless keyboard and mouse to browse the internet on my Television while playing mp3s.

      Wow movies and mp3s on a 8gig drive? How do you do that?

  125. Game prices that go UP by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    Heck, new hardware at $150 means skipping 5 new releases at $50 each and waiting until they're $20 each. I don't have to skip the games, just wait a little bit.

    Some games don't ever get re-released, and by the time you get to them, they cost upwards of $70 for one copy on eBay. Look at Chrono Trigger for Super NES, Super Puzzle Fighter II Turbo for PlayStation, or Rez for PlayStation 2.

    1. Re:Game prices that go UP by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      These games are few and far between and typically have some feature of gameplay that is so compelling that people don't want to let go of their old copies. (Or for Rez, I'd imagine you'd not want the used controller bit anyway...) Anyway, if there's some game that is absolutely being raved about, well, go get it. I don't know exactly how long the production runs on some of these games are, but I'd hope they're not so short that it's completely gone within a couple months.

      Say you decide you want a new system, to play KOTOR or Gran Turismo or some console specific game. You go hrm, I need $150 to get it now and I have $50 a month budgeted towards games. Month 1 goes by, you keep $30 in your pocket and finally beat FFX or Halo or whatever. Plus you get a greatest hits game that you've been eyeing for a while but aren't certain of. Month 2 rolls by and you do likewise with another game and buy another greatest hit. Month 3 comes around and there's Chrono Trigger Puzzle Fighter X Ultra or some such that's destined to be great and go for $70 on ebay. Well, dump this month's game money on it and wait another month for the new console. Or if you can't stand the thought of waiting 5 whole months buying only greatest hits games you've underlooked because you have to have every game first, then take $25 each month and buy a new release every other month. It'll take 6 months of that. Simple budgeting.

      As an alternate suggestion you could save everything 3 months straight and then buy a couple greatest hits games for the new console the next month, which you know you've been wanting. Then buy three in the second month. Then go back to new releases. If something big comes up after the 3 months then you can get it instead of greatest hits games, you've still got $50 a month. If it happens in the first 3 months just delay the console purchase. This isn't hard.

      And if it costs $70 on ebay what's the huge deal? They cost $50 in the stores and you'll never pay less than that. Sure, you spend $20 more on a single title while buying however many good games for the new system at $20 each and still manage to pay off the hardware system with 5 games that are guaranteed to become greatests hits games. It all gets evened out with time. What's the big deal if you don't personally rip the shrink wrap off?

      --
      If not now, when?
  126. 128MB XBOX by ferrellcat · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The xbox comes with 64MB RAM. There are open spaces on the motherboard that allow you to add another 64MB, bringing the total to 128MB. The process is not as complicated as you might think. You can even buy an xbox with the 128MB modification already done for you.

    1. Re:128MB XBOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The process is not as complicated as you might think.

      The process is also not as simple as you might think. Atleast on the 1.0 and 1.1 versions of the Xbox, there are maybe 1 or 2 spaces to solder on an additional 64MB chip, but it is not a standard type of memory module. So, if you are on your own on trying to locate a single chip for soldering in your Xbox, it might be somewhat difficult. Of course everything is relative, so an electrical engineer might have no problem with adding 64MB to their Xbox. Now you can always just go the easy route, and purchase an already-modded Xbox from companies such as the above mentioned. You can even get a 1.4GHz processor instead of the normal 733MHz. But after making enough modifications on a console, one has to wonder if they are going to effect either 1-The life of the product, or 2-The reliability of the product.

  127. xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    I picked the ps2 first years ago because I could play dvds on it, however lamely, without having to buy the remote at first (I did buy one later), and because I knew I wanted to keep playing Final Fantasy. I was also upset that Microsoft cancelled the two movie-tie-in "A.I." games, and was waiting to see other compelling titles.

    Now that I haven't used my ps2 in months for games, and the next Final Fantasy is going to be online (and a rip-off for the kit and the monthly fee), I'm looking to get another game system.

    Is gamecube is really all that compelling compared to xbox? What are the major non-sport, non-fps titles for each platform? I'm already leaning to xbox because it will play dvds so I can just unplug and pack away the ps2 for a while, but I haven't compared them otherwise.

    1. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      Well, the xbox line up is particularly strong in sports and FPS, while the GCN is stronger in adventure-like games, Zelda and Metroid style. Jost go to Gamerankings, click on Rankings and select the console you want to check from the list.

    2. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1

      If you aren't interested in Sports/FPS titles the Gamecube currently has the XBox beat for exclusives you can't get on the PS2. Only two games I can think of off the top of my head are out(or coming out shortly) for the XBox that might appeal to you as an FF Fan: Fable and KOTOR(also avail for PC). Of course, the Gamecube has Crystal Chronicles, but that's pretty much an offline MMORPG, and you need a GBA and at least 2 friends with GBAs to really, really enjoy it(it's a pretty good dungeon crawl in 1P tho).

      As the previous poster noted check Gametab/Gamerankings and look at the top rated games. Should give you a good idea.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    3. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say if you want a dvd player that bad splurge 50 bucks for a low end dvd player.

    4. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by JackAxe · · Score: 1

      Definately the GameCube, like already mentioned, Zelda and Metroid Prime are GC only. Two of the best games currently available. Mario Kart Double Dash and Mario Party are also excellent group games, the Xbox and PS2 have nothing even close to these when it comes to group fun factor. The games that are good on the XBox, are much better on the PC, IMHO.

      The GameCube also has the fastest load times. There is very little wait, unlike the Xbox and PS2, which are quite slow in comparison.

      Unless I've been out of touch, doesn't the Xbox still require an additional remote purchase to play DVDs?

      Besides, a good DVD player isn't even a $100 now days. If the Xbox breaks, one is out of a game system and DVD player.

    5. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the excellent suggestions. I'll research more carefully later.

    6. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

      Excellent link, thanks!

    7. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

      I can tell this isn't nearly the easy decision I thought it would be :)
      You telling me that xbox games are more fun on pcs is great news, because of course I have one of those :)

      And, I know, breaking a game system is more expensive than a mere cheap dvd player, but I'm looking for convenience. My tv has a vcr on its front input, a replaytv on its back svideo, and the ps2 takes the back component input. That'd be a mess to swap out often, you know? :)

      Can't have everything, though. I'm still trying to get over the fact that Nintendo deliberately crippled the gamecube so it couldn't read dvds. It makes me wonder what other design choices they've made that I don't agree with.

    8. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by GaimeGuy · · Score: 1

      Um, they didn't include a DVD player because there's no point. It's a game machine, not a DVD Player. You want a DVD player? Go and buy one for 30 dollars. It's not that hard. :/. You want a GameCube? Go and buy one for 99 dollars. Really, this is the VIDEO GAME INDUSTRY. The ability to read DVDs shouldn't matter, especially with players being so cheap, now.
      Plus, Nintendo uses a custom format, so they'd need to add more hardware into the Cube to play DVD, and piracy would be much easier. In other words, Nintendo didn't include DVD playing capability because it's not a necessary feature for a game console, and it would have just made the thing more expensive for the consumer and Nintendo. It's an obvious decision to make. I don't see why everyone is so stumped about it. :/

    9. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by artifex2004 · · Score: 1
      It's an obvious decision to make. I don't see why everyone is so stumped about it. :/


      Remember that it wasn't always $99.

      At the initial price point, it would have made a lot of sense to include the functionality for maybe a couple bucks more in parts.

    10. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by GeneralCern · · Score: 1

      Another reason is that anything with the "DVD" logo on it has to pay a fee for the trademark and technology to the companies that own the "DVD" trademark and technology. (I believe this may actually even be Sony, among others). Nintendo and even the Xbox left this out to keep the price down. The xbox doesn't have to pay this fee until you buy the remote control. (Notice the logo on the remote and not the Xbox). This is actually a good thing, as those of use who have no interest in playing DVDs do not have to pay the fee without a choice in the matter.

    11. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by JackAxe · · Score: 1

      Nintendo admitted that they should have included a DVD Player. They also, mentioned that the initial Indigo color wasn't a good choice. =) but I agree with the previous post, that it is a game machine and a great one at that. it's not missing anything.

      The one thing that I don't like about the Xbox, is that it was not initially intended to be a game machine. MS wanted a Settop TV Box, so that they could weasel their way into our living rooms. But when they found out that developers were not interested in it, they basically repackaged it and called it a game machine. It's a buggy system, that carries over some of the traits from it's Big PC brother. Before the Xbox, I had never known of a game console requiring a patch. I think that the Xbox2 that's coming out in a year or so will be a good machine though, since MS has set out to create it as a game machine from day one and now have some experience.

      The GameCube IMO, is currently the best game console. It really isn't lacking anything right now. The smaller DVDs are easy to carry, offer really fast load time. I was amazed at how slow the HD actually is on the Xbox. And like mentioned in another post, it's helping Nintendo fight piracy, something that is plaguing the XBox and PS2. From that stand point, I think it was an excellent choice on their part.

      I also like the fact, that the games available only for GameCube are of great quality. The Xbox mainly has quantity, lot's of bad PC ports that were horrible on the PC and only worse with game controler and lo-rez screen. I also appreciate the quality of the GC over the XBox, my friends first rev slows down big time during Halo, making it almost unplayable at the end, where as my other friends does not.

      The GameBoy player attachment is also a great addition. I like the fact that I can play my GB, GC and GBA games on my TV through the GC when I'm at home. Plus using the GC controller is a pleasant relief from the tiny GBA controls.

      I've rambled enough, I just have no respect for the Xbox, it's a work in progress for MS and needs to be replaced. Halo took longer to get to my PC, but the high-rez screen and keyboard/mouse controls make it 10 times better as is true for games like "Knights of the Old Repulic."

      O.O

    12. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by PaleGreen · · Score: 1

      The Cube has some good stuff coming in 2004, but if I had to choose one system, it'd be the XBOX. (Insert obligatory "I own both" disclaimer here)

      [RPG]
      KOTOR was just the start. These games look amazing:
      True Fantasy Live
      Jade Empire (from makers of KOTOR)
      Sudeki
      Fable

      [Other Good Stuff in 2004]
      Dead or Alive Ultimate
      Kameo
      B.C.
      Steel Battalion: Line of Contact (for the mech purist)
      Rallisport Challenge 2

      [FPS]
      The OP didn't express an interest in FPS, but the three most anticipated shooters of 2004 are XBOX-exclusives:
      Halo 2
      Doom 3
      Half-Life 2

      I'm sure I forgot a few, but that's enough quality material to keep you gaming through the 2004 holiday season!

    13. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm many of those aren't XBox exclusive(or won't be over time). They're coming out for the PC too.

    14. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by JackAxe · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't know why anyone that owns a PC, would want to play Doom 3, or Half-Life 2 on a Xbox with a game controller. I wonder what type of voodoo magic they're using to get OGL Doom onto a DX8 Xbox? If they released a keyboard and mouse for the XB, then I guess it would be an OK cheap lo-rez alternative to a PC.

    15. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few of those games will be released for the PC, but they're all exclusively for XBOX in the console realm.

    16. Re:xbox vs. gamecube? I already have a ps2 by GaimeGuy · · Score: 1

      Show me where Nintendo ever said that they should have gone with a different color or include a DVD player. I can imagine some NOA rep saying something about the color, maybe, but Nintendo has always stood by their decision to not incude DVD playback.

  128. Diddy-speak by cthulhubob · · Score: 1

    WHAT?!

    --

    In post-9/11 America, the CIA interrogates YOU!
  129. I accidently poured Comet into my coffee by planckscale · · Score: 1
    Instead of creamer, I'm a little out of it this morning. Sweet, might just have to get myself one of those xbox's. Can you mod the new one's that are on the shelf, or have they been hack-proofed?

    --
    Namaste
  130. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't consider P.Diddy a rapper (much less a musician). Rappers usually have a little talent.

  131. Monopoly by DrugCheese · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Now someone else may have posted about this and I may be redundant, but it just ERKS me like nothing else that Microsoft can get away with this.

    Being a monopoly Microsoft cannot use their weight and power from one market to force their way into another market. This especially involves selling products at a loss. Even though it's common to sell a console at a loss and hopefully make up for it on game sells - MICROSOFT SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO DO SO

    They're a justified monopoloy by two (terrible) justice systems. They should not be allowed to play by the same rules as everyone else.

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
    1. Re:Monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing particularly dirty about this sales technique. Odds are good that you've supported a company that does the same thing for most of your adult life.

      It's either Gillette or Schick.

      The trick with razor sales is to sell the handle at a loss and make up the difference on the blades. How is this any different?

      --AC

    2. Re:Monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like you have ANY fucking clue as to what goes on within microsoft, or how much an X-Box costs to produce.
      Slashdot is fueled by rumor, clueless speculation and semen.

      And it's spelled, irks not erks. Why are you so fucking stupid?
      You owe an answer to me and to everyone else here (the open source community).

    3. Re:Monopoly by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

      Get some balls, get a username then reply to me loser.

      As to the first Anonymous..

      I know many companies do this, but Microsoft is a Monopoly. Proven in court (like that means a lot) and Monopolies CAN NOT play by the same rules the rest play at. At least that's what our government should be protecting us from.

      --
      *DrugCheese rants*
    4. Re:Monopoly by Hassman · · Score: 1

      They cannot play by the same rules they are already in.

      MS is not a monopoly in the gaming market. They can do what they want from what I know. Now then, if Sony and Nintendo got together and dropped their prices to like 50 bucks to keep MS out of the market, then that would be a no-no...but you see, they are already well established.

      If memory serves, Sony did this with their first consol when they wanted to break into the market.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    5. Re:Monopoly by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

      Yes it's legal to sell your products at a loss to get into a market, UNLESS you're a monopoly. From what I read, a monopoly cannot take steps to use their monopoloy to infect other markets, even if they use methods that are legal for other companies.

      They could give away their consoles for 2 years untill no one bought sony or nintendo anymore. They would be out what, 5% of their bank account?

      I'm just ranting, think it's sad that they're allowed to get away with this. Sick em Sony! You've got my Mony!

      --
      *DrugCheese rants*
    6. Re:Monopoly by Hassman · · Score: 1

      You're probably right...though if that was the case, I'd expect sony or nintendo to file a lawsuit.

      Is it rumor or fact that MS loses money on every XBox sold?

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    7. Re:Monopoly by scum-e-bag · · Score: 1

      I might be off target here, but...

      MS is a US based company and Sony/Nintendo are not. It is in the interests of the US to allow this to take place.

      --
      Does it go on forever?
    8. Re:Monopoly by neko9 · · Score: 1

      MS is not a monopoly in the gaming market.

      and when they become monopoly xbox quality will start suck hard... like with all m$ products...

    9. Re:Monopoly by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

      It's in the US interest to stop having their population fucked over by money hungry corperations and the governments they control.

      Sorry

      --
      *DrugCheese rants*
  132. GAmecube is already $99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can go to Walmart and buy a game cube for $99 already. WHat are you babbling about.

    $99 gamecube

    1. Re:GAmecube is already $99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... if you read the original post you can see that the statement was "I wonder if Nintendo will/can drop their price BELOW $99." I think we're all aware that the Gamecube is already priced at $99. Learn how to read dumbass.

    2. Re:GAmecube is already $99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is your problem I said it was $99. That is what the op asked, when will the GC be $99. Maybe you should learn to read.

    3. Re:GAmecube is already $99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      troll troll troll troll troll

      123456789

  133. Re:What game? Me it's Ninja Gaiden by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    Why yes I have. Having an xbox and access to a local blockbuster I rented the game last week. It's a bunch of bounce off wall, stomp head, and cut'em'up action.

    As an example of "hard" consider the first boss [the dude with the nunchuck [sp?] action]. If you try to hit him dead on he blocks then proceeds to hit you like 9 times.

    The only way my buddy and I got past him was to flip off the wall and hit him as he turned around.

    Not only does stupid "hardness" like that prolong the game to artificially make it seem more developed [prince of persia comes to mind] but it also just makes the game frustrating to play.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  134. Re:DUMPING (Not) by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    Actually, I just recently bought a Dreamcast, and I'm *very* happy with it. It's *exceedingly* easy to dev for, since it accepts regular ol' CD-Rs (in a slightly odd format) (heck, it even takes those little 8cm discs, which is *really* nice), and thus has a very active homebrew community. It's even easier to dev for if you drop a few bucks on a Dev cable or a Broadband Adapter, which allows you to wire the machine up to a standard PC. Consequently, a ton of emulators and other software have been written for it... including a port of Linux (which I plan to use as a platform for code experimentation, once my dev cable arrives). As for tools, the standard GNU toolchain works like a charm. It really is a console hacker's dream machine... powerful, open, and easy to code for... In fact, the only console-type device that comes anywhere near the popularity of the DC, in terms of the homebrew scene, is the GBA. And if all that wasn't enough, it's cheap, too! You can get one off E-Bay for around $30-40 US!

  135. Re:This is proof Microsoft cares about the consume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you people stop perpetuating this myth.

    SEGA is the only company prior to MS's launching of the XBox to sell a console at a loss.

    Nintendo briefly did when they sold off their backstock at the $99 pricepoint, and Sony has always at WORST broke even.

  136. Re:DUMPING (Not) by microTodd · · Score: 1

    I'm Googling...and I can't find anything that definitely shows that consoles are/are not sold at a loss. All I can find is a bunch of stupid forum posts.

    --
    "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
  137. That is NOT Dumping by xswl0931 · · Score: 1

    http://www.wto.org/trade_resources/publications/go ods/ma_dumping.htm

  138. Re:DUMPING (Not) by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    I know how to use Google and I'm not finding it. Can you cite a source, perhaps, and help us out?

  139. Go Ahead by Techmaniac · · Score: 1

    Waste your money on this piece of tripe. Idiots.

  140. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you mean "bad" as in "good"?

  141. P.Diddy and Paris Hilton by x136 · · Score: 1

    The PR from Microsoft quotes P.Diddy, and has a picture of Paris Hilton sporting an Xbox-logo-emblazoned bag.

    Hmm.

    Microsoft Xbox: The official video game console of the 15:01 crowd!

    --
    SIGFEH
  142. Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is WINNING the console war!

    You idiots! why haven't you done anything to stop this?
    Isn't it enough that open source is FREE (as in Beer and Sex and Rock and Roll via Kazaa)?????!!?!?!?

    Hell, you all DESERVE to be sold out to THE MAN.

    Fuckingshit.

  143. Scweet! MythTV boxen for under 2 bills! by infochuck · · Score: 1

    Uh... that's pretty much all I got.

    Move along.

  144. Re:DUMPING (Not) by Tharian · · Score: 1

    Do you have links for all this? I know someone who recently picked up a Dreamcast and is looking to do more with it... Maybe I can convince her to let me have a go at it.

    --
    I'm not a nerd. I'm a geek. Nerds make more money.
  145. I have played it only briefly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But damn. I didn't get any of this generations consoles. Now, even though Xbox MK II is schedualed for q4 of 2005 (which means late 2007?), I'm picking this up with a new xbox next paycheck.

    I was impressed. The control isn't perfect, but it's pretty good, and there's good context sensitivity from I've experienced. You can wall jump like Strider in 3D, run up walls, or sideways on walls. The combat is pretty free-form, and brutal, sorta like soul calibur. The old move that counts is in there.

    It was no Rygar, I had a friend who bought and returned Rygar.

  146. Re:DUMPING (Not) by Troed · · Score: 0

    http://www.actsofgord.com/Proclamations/chapter02. html

    There are official statements from Nintendo regarding whether they sell at a loss as well available (Perry, recent drop to $99). The above took me 5 seconds with Google - you need to brush up on your Google-skills.

  147. Re:DUMPING (Not) by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    Try here. They've got links to a bunch of software and references to other sites on actual DC dev. Incidentally, for actually burning DC discs in Linux, just read this email that I snagged... it's really quite easy, but you need to pass the right options to cdrecord for things to work properly.

  148. Rip-off pricing in Britain by Andy_R · · Score: 2, Informative

    Over here it's 129.00, which at today's rates is 234.58 United States Dollars.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:Rip-off pricing in Britain by Da+VinMan · · Score: 1

      I'm no international trade expert, but I'm guessing that you have the British government to blame for that (because of tariffs) along with shipping costs. No?

      --
      Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
  149. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    um i think you mean jumped ship.

  150. Interesting timing on price reduction... by dhienzsch · · Score: 1

    Funny that they only dropped the price after a full weekend of sales of the new Splinter Cell 2 game, which, coincidentally, isn't available this time around on PS2 (it's original platform). I too almost went out and shelled out the bucks for it... almost.

    1. Re:Interesting timing on price reduction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Splinter Cell was Xbox exclusive for a good while killer...

    2. Re:Interesting timing on price reduction... by JackAxe · · Score: 1

      They dropped the price, since the XBox has fallen behind the GameCube during the holidays. :)

    3. Re:Interesting timing on price reduction... by GeneralCern · · Score: 1

      Since when was Ps2 the original platform for any Splinter Cell game? You need to get your facts straight before you jump to conclusions.

  151. ... speaking of which.... by Constantin · · Score: 1

    IANAL, but IIRC you can only sue for dumping as long as you can show that a US manufacturer is being hurt by said dumping. Just how many TV manufacturers are left in the US? My understanding is a big, fat zero. Units are assembled in the Far East and Mexico, AFAIK.

    It should be very interesting to note what will happen as hybrid vehicles are started to be produced by US manufacturers. My understanding is that both Honda and Toyota are selling their vehicles below cost. Now that Ford has licensed the Toyota technology, what will happen next? Did Toyota insert a "thou shalt not sue" clause in Fords licensing terms?

    Which brings us around to consoles. Once again, there are no US manufacturers. Thus, no one can sue anyone for dumping. Considering how much of the US manufacturing sector has already wandered off to greener pastures, I wonder how much longer the US will be able to sue for dumping...

  152. ps2 ? naw.. its the second hand market by sPaKr · · Score: 1

    everyone is talking about how XBOX is competing witht the PS2 on price. I suggest that the ps2 isnt hurting them, people want they want, if you want PS2 your going to get a sony, if you want an XBOX your going to get an Xbox, sure grandma might not know the differnece, but how many gandmas feel confident to change the gift from what Jr, asked for? none. They just get what you wrote down. I think the real price pressure for Xbox is the second hand market. The problem is that with only a few good games people start to get tired of the console, sell it and someone else picks it up on the second hand market. I got my xbox ( just to play KTOR) and it was like $149.. course that was second hand. So is it coidence that the new price is exactly the going rate on the second hand market? And if you dont belive me that there are only a few good xbox titles why are they still pushing HALO ? Jebus its a good game, (better on the PC) but are you still supposed to be surfing that wave years later? I mean they should be pushing HALO2.. or even HALO3.. but no.. they just have a few old tired games. The only great thing about Xbox is that its costing MS even more money to sell it now, and it will never go away. MS can affored to pump money into Xbox for eons, something atari and sega could never do. The only thing that could kill Xbox would be the MediaCenter PC, but since MS done an even worse job of selling that piece of trash Xbox2 will most likly suck in the MediaCenter features killing that basterd and pushing XboxX slight further along.

  153. Re:This is proof Microsoft cares about the consume by AvengerXP · · Score: 1

    Kind of like saying "i'm never driving so i wont get an accident" what the hell are you gonna do with a Linux box anyway?

    --
    Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
  154. why buy a game PC? by Malc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a PC that I've been slowly upgrading over the years (motherboard is 5 year old dual proc BX with 2xP3-850). It suits my needs just fine as a software engineer. The biggest cost this year was adding an 80GB hard drive - not much really. Why would I spend a couple of grand to get a machine capable of playing games? Why would even set myself up to that I would need to keep spending top dollar to keep it playing games? That's a waste of money. Not to mention that it's in my office and nowhere near my stereo nor TV nor in a position several people can sit around it. Also, who would want a large noisy PC in their living room? Nah, I bought an XBox and *no* new game will have performance problems and force me to upgrade.

    Buying a gaming PC is a constant battle against one's bank account and a foolish mistake that I've only made once. If you've got money to squander so frivolously then go ahead as there are plenty of people who you keep employed. I would rather save the money and spend it boozin' or taking my wife out to dinner or travelling to other countries, or any other number of things. Trust me, you can do a lot with the money you save.

    1. Re:why buy a game PC? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I have a PC which it sounds like I've been less slowly upgrading over the years. I haven't done a complete system replacement in one step in probably five years or more, but I don't have a single component in this PC (except possibly a jumper or a screw - though I doubt it) that I started with. I have an XP 2500+ with a gig of memory and a GF4Ti4200, also a pair of 80GB disks. But I don't just use it for gaming, I watch movies, I convert media (here I whistle innocently) and so on. I haven't bought the latest greatest PC hardware ever and I've never particularly wanted for CPU power except when I was too broke to do any upgrades. I'd like more graphics card power but the fact is that my video card has more capacity than any current console, and I can play any current game with it.

      Keeping a PC fully up to date and superbadass is expensive. I don't suggest it. But you can have a fully useful gaming rig for a reasonable price.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  155. Re:This guy needs to lay off the marketing pills.. by Spleener12 · · Score: 1

    You misspelled "pjwn3d", dumbass!

  156. I agree with P. Diddy by Darth+Daver · · Score: 1

    "[I] believe that the system's cultural influence as a social entertainment brand has only just begun."

    I agree. I also believe the system's cultural influence as a social entertainment brand has also peaked.

  157. but then they'll raise game prices by Wansu · · Score: 1



    They'll just raise game prices to offset the markdown on the console. It's like Gillette, Shick, et al. does with razors and razor blades.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  158. don't shizzzle my shazzzlse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or i'll wuzzle your zchabzzlle!

  159. Re:This is proof Microsoft cares about the consume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell no... Linus makes an operating system with hundreds of thousands of man hours put into it, the equivalent of tens or hundreds of millions of dollars of labor. Then the whole thing is given away for free. I think Linus is a communist, don't you? He leans to the left in more ways than one! [wink, wink]

  160. Not the same... by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1, Redundant
    For a long time I wanted to play GTA3. I pondered buying a $199 PS2 and then said "Naah, I'll wait for the price to go down". That was a year and a half ago, and they are still $179. Last year I bought GTA3 for my PC and a game controller very similar to the PS2 controller. Together the pair cost me maybe $65 and the graphics blow away the PS2.

    That's because you 'just had' a PC around, and you're not adding the cost to that.

    Do the calculation for the lifetime of a console (about 4 years), figure in video card upgrades and Windows licenses, etc., add any downtime and screwing around due to drivers, viruses, etc. and then come talk to me about which is cheaper. Hell man, your video card alone costs the same as a console.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  161. James Bond 007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2) Use the James Bond 007 exploit, which requires a specific saved game to be put onto a memory card, and then once you load that saved game from within James Bond, it will allow you to load unsigned code from the Xbox. The only problem, atleast when this exploit first came out, is that you have to redo the exploit everytime you want to reboot your OS (or everytime you want to load some new unsigned code).

    Assuming you flash the bios when you use the exploit you will never need the exploit again.

  162. $149? by IllogicalStudent · · Score: 1

    You mean $219; don't forget the modchip.

    --
    But Maaa! Everyone else has a .sig !
    1. Re:$149? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you flash the TSOP via software. Not that I would ever think of doing that when a modchip is only $50, but it is a FREE option.

      I still can't believe all the negative comments on such a great system. I would never think of owning a PS2 compared to a modded Xbox (Actually sold my PS2 months before Xbox was released, and that was before anyone knew what an Xbox could really do). Media/DVD Player, Emulators galore, server capabilities, Linux, and on and on the list goes for Xbox uses.. With the 320Gig HD I have in mine, it is one amazing all-in-one box.

  163. Re:DUMPING (Not) by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
    Got news for you...all console makers sell their product below cost, and have for many years

    That's not true at all. Nintendo has stated that they have always made a profit on their hardware. SEGA made a profit on all their hardware until the Saturn. Sony eventually makes a profit on their hardware because they are manufacturing it instead of having it manufactured for them.

    As stated earlier, Microsofts biggest problem with making a profit on the XBox is that they used components that do not go down in price but go up in functionality, i.e. hard drives.

    --
    Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
  164. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ah no, they don't. That's why they rap, to tell the whole world how great they are, when in their deluded little ghetto thug minds they are forced to attempt reconciliation of the paradox of believing they are great while being treated like yesterday's turd by all around them.

    The real tragedy is, lots of people are stupid enough to believe them... i.e. Sony Music.

    Don't believe me? Name one rapper who doesn't do a piece about how fucking awesome they are, and everyone better watch out. It's like pre-pubescent pencilnecks playing Unreal Tournament. You can say what you like when those you are saying it to are on the end of a CD player, or a DSL line. A phenomenon you'll see here on /. also!

  165. Yes, is the answer... by UncleRage · · Score: 3, Informative
    if you're comfortable with spending another $150-$200 or so to create the appliance.

    I picked up an XBox around Christmas, ordered my mod chip (Xecuter 2.3b), bought a 120 GB WD HD and proceeded to get busy. A couple of hours later, the Xbox was ready and I began to copy over my media. By the end of the night, I had everything stored safely on the box with a simplistic enough setup (EvoX & XBMC) so that my wife (a bright technophobe) was, suprisingly, very comfortable with. Add another $30 for a remote and it's a kick ass media system, that also houses my NES, SNES, Genesis, Mame and Apple ][ library (I am so lame). Oh yeah, it also pulls my favorite shoutcast streams so that I can listen to GrooveSalad or SecretAgent while getting pleasantly trampled in the backyard on those perfect spring saturday evenings.

    You can also get yer Xbox working happily with a samba share. I was personally thrilled just get all of that shit off of my studio box so that I can get back to recording music... not cluttering it up with 40 GB of music and DIVX movies.

    Yes, you could also do all of this with a custom built PC, but then again... a custom built PC isn't going to play the odd Xbox game that catches yer fancy.

    So, if a total of around $300 and a small amount of dirty work is worth it to you to put together a very competent Media (Mp3/Ogg/AAC,etc... DIVX, SVCD, DVD, shoutcast stream), emulation machine that also plays xbox games... yes, it's worth it.

    A couple of years back, I spent $250 on a DVD player that was fitted with NUON crap, what an effin mistake that was. Now that DVD player is a spare MP3 player for the bedroom.
    ____

    --
    #SickNotWeak
  166. Re:This guy needs to lay off the marketing pills.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget "man humping". I know it's not an offering of the games themselves, but the console does tend to attract a "certain type" of male.

    Think about it - when you see people looking through XBox titles, do you more often see a single guy on his own, or TWO guys, smiling at each other and looking like they want to hold hands? "It's good to play together" indeed.

    A kid asked me if I knew which games were best for the XBox. I said "Sorry, I'm into chicks".

  167. Re:DUMPING (Not) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And from that very article you linked: "Reports have it fall between $50 to $105 lost per console. MS has only said that they are losing money, and won't comment on how much."

    Not to mention there are comments about how the GC at first lost money, as did the first few runs of the PS2. And there's questionable logic applied about how Sony makes $175 per PS2: " It said that had Sony been able to meet demand with another 1 million PS2 units, they would have pocketed $175 million in profits. $175 million divided by one million consoles equals $175 per console profit."

    Now, that totally ignores manufacturing realities, such as scale of production, etc.

    I think it's fair to say for a portion of most console's lives, the manufacturer does lose at least a little. Maybe not a HUGE loss, but I think it's a bit rash to say it's a myth that systems lose money. If the system lives past the first few years, economies of scale come into play and they can start making money. But that initial R&D cost, combined with initial manufacturing costs, would make it fairly difficult to launch a system at an affordable price and not lose money. (*cough*3DO*cough*)

  168. Re:This guy needs to lay off the marketing pills.. by Majik+Sznak · · Score: 1

    Un-anonymously...

    I believe you mean "licensed."

    --
    Karma: Chameleon (Mostly affected by the 1980s)
  169. Oh yeah... forgot one other thing. by UncleRage · · Score: 1

    If you do decide to go with an Xbox, make sure to get your free (well, $7 for shipping) keyboard adapter from Microsoft. That, or sacrfice an Xbox controller extension cable to fit it for standard USB. Then, when yer really feeling drunk and lame, you can sit on the couch pounding down the beer doing yer thing on IRC.

    It's also handy if you decide to install Linux on yer box (GentooX 3.0c is a nice release).

    ____

    --
    #SickNotWeak
  170. Re:DUMPING (Not) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Funny how immediately after blaming someone for falling for a myth, his sig proclaims that Bush already has Osama...

    In all actuality, it's the reverse: the binLaden family owns Bush.

    Kind of an odd coincidence that September11 hysteria was parlayed into a war against Iraq... when the Bush family is SOOO invested in Saudi Arabia. What country harbored the REAL organization behind the attack? Iraq? Ha..

    I believe the attack was plotted, financed, and the bombers came from Saudi Arabia. Even the Taliban leadership all came from Wahhabist sects of Saudi Arabia. Oh yeah.

    Silly facts... quick, bring out the Fox News shiny things!!

    I'm sure we'll see some Olliver North style pardons before we ever know the full truth.

  171. (Mis)perception of a system's target user by LionMage · · Score: 1
    I realize you're not (directly) bashing Nintendo, but this rubbish that they only target little kids needs to stop.

    Indeed. I bought a Game Cube, and played Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem. Definitely a mature title! Full of Lovecraftian creepiness and a fair amount of gore and psychological manipulation. It is one of the few survival horror type games that actually scared me.

    I might also point out that the Resident Evil series was (re)released on the Game Cube, with revamped graphics and game play. I don't own those, but was impressed with what they did to beef up the titles.

    If only the Game Cube weren't manufactured with bright colors, and had controllers that looked a little more like those for the PS2 and Dreamcast, I think it would have gone over better with adult gamers. But it's a fine system, and has plenty of adult-oriented games in its repertoire.
    1. Re:(Mis)perception of a system's target user by quecojones · · Score: 1

      I was agreeing with you until that last statement.

      I had a GC, but I ended up selling it and getting an XBox to go along with my (older) PS2. The bottom line is that, aside from a few exceptions, most of the GC games out there are just platformers and derivatives (sp?).

      I loved the few games that I played on it, but I got tired of the platformers real quick. I won't say that having a lot of violent or adult-oriented games is necessarily better, but having (many of) them in addition to the rest is better. The more options/variety/competition in the market the better IMNHO.

      --
      "PROFANITY is the inevitable literary crutch of the inarticulate MOTHER FUCKER." -- some PC user
  172. Finally, affordable child care by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

    With a $149 X-box and ten of the best murder simulators for $19.99 a piece everyone can finally afford childcare.

  173. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that's "bad" as in "Avril".

  174. Re:DUMPING (Not) by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    Saturn: Really neat console, cool controller (the 3d pad anyway), some really fantastic games you won't find anywhere else like dragon force and panzer dragoon saga. Dreamcast: If you are a gamer and you do not own a Dreamcast I think you should go kick your own ass because it is a fantastic platform. The only thing wrong with it is the great expensive of acquiring a broadband adapter. It has more inventive controllers, more inventive games, and games can be cracked using only software means, no modchip necessary! It runs linux and they made a keyboard and mouse for the system. It was the first game console with VGA output. Some realy good games were first released for it, like Sega GT and Jet Set Radio, Power Stone (2)... Okay so it died but the used market is still going strong and there's lots of good games out there. This is equally true however of the Saturn which has some great arcade ports (like Virtua fighter 1 and 2, they play perfectly, also area51, and a bunch of fighters which take rom or ram carts.) You can even get a videocd player for it, but it's VCD 1.0, not very useful.

    Sega made some great games and some great hardware. Just because Nintendo's gear was better is no reason not to pick up the good Sega stuff :)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  175. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your comment is just plain fucking stupid. I hold no deep love for rap music, but to say what you just did is as ignorant as saying "all rock is about partying, name a rock band that doesn't do a piece about love/women/partying and everyone better watch out". Talking themselves up is a intrinsic part of the style of music they perform, but that does NOT mean that every song is about how tough they are. Try listening to some Brotherhood, Hilltop Hoods or KRS-1. Also try listening to rap from the rest of the world (not just your moral cesspit) where there aren't gang violence problems on the same scale and you will see the music reflects that. The fact that some dickhead moderator wasted a point modding up a AC just reinforces the fact that your drivel is all opinion, no content. Keep spinning the country and western, cowboy.

  176. Re:What game? Me it's Ninja Gaiden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've enjoyed KOTOR, Morrowind (admittedly both are availible on the PC, but I played them on the XBox), Halo, Crimson Skies, SCII (cross platform). I and got my XBox a year ago with Splinter cell and Mechassault for $179, and I've been pretty happy with the system, I'll probably mod it this fall. The other nice think about it is that I don't play a ton of games on the computer anymore and I'll finally make the switch to linux.

  177. WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Per another Anonymous Coward's post, here's how one can prove that you're mathematically wrong:

    Microsoft has x Xbox's already made (their current stock).
    Each unsold Xbox costs them 300.
    Every sold Xbox costs them 150.

    If no one buys them, they lose 300x dollars.
    If they sell all of them, they lose 150x dollars.
    If they manufacture another x units, they're out 150x + 300x.
    If they sell the second set of units, they're out 150x + 150x = 300x (the amount they originally lost).

    At this point, any further manufactured units translate into pure loss (above and beyond the original loss). Now, you may say, "well, they have enough units produced that they'd never sell 2 times the amount of stock they have now." But that's a guess and more likely because Bill is no moron, the amount of stock is kept low (as any basic business course will dictate as the ideal situation). Therefore, it is extremely likely this will happen and any sudden surge in Xbox sales at this point is likely to effect manufacturing of new units and the bigger the surge, the more stock MS is likely to maintain to be able to meet immediate demand. Now how clever do you think you are?

  178. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No you are wrong, rap is all a bunch of violent wannabe thugs singing about how they'd like to be - only they pretend it's how the already are. And that's a good thing - at least they keep each others' numbers down on the rare occasion that one of the chickenshit punks sprays a few rounds from a speeding car and manages to actually hit someone.

    If you listen to rap from New Zealand, it's still all about being better than you really are - and who can blame them, it's nice to have a fantasy. Yours is "I hold no deep love for rap music" - obviously you do, you just can't see through to what's at the bottom of it, shallow though it is.

  179. why is this trolly post modded as funny? by tsadi · · Score: 1

    ignorance is funny?

  180. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

    The expression "Jumping the shark" comes from an episode of the old tv show Happy Days, where one character litterally jumped over a shark. Many people considered that this was the worst. episode. ever. and that the show went downhill from there. Hence the expression.

  181. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

    Don't use the word, "gay" to mean bad. That's so gay.

    --
    How ya like dat?
  182. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by Tracer_Bullet82 · · Score: 1

    As in 2pac, Nas, Outkast..

    --


    Timang tinggi tinggi
    parang sudah asah
    alang alang mandi
    biar sampai basah
  183. Obligatory karma grab by Tracer_Bullet82 · · Score: 1

    You're right, I did lose a million dollars last year. I expect to lose a million dollars this year. I expect to lose a million dollars *next* year. You know, Mr. Thatcher, at the rate of a million dollars a year, I'll have to close this place in... 60 years.

    --


    Timang tinggi tinggi
    parang sudah asah
    alang alang mandi
    biar sampai basah
  184. I just picked one of these up for $120 ... by dimension6 · · Score: 1

    ... preowned and in perfect shape from Gamestop. Apparently, they reduced the preowned XBOX prices in anticipation of the Microsoft price drop. Of course, I had to add the price of the USB extension cable, a USB memory stick (my digital camera wasn't recognized by the XBOX), and another controller dongle connector in order to throw Linux on it, but the device even had a Samsung drive (the best of the 3 possible drives)!

  185. dumping by realkiwi · · Score: 1

    Isn't selling at a loss called dumping and forbidden by the WTO? Didn't the US put a tax on Korean made RAM for this very reason?

    --
    realkiwi
  186. Linux cluster, anyone? by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    I can't wait until the price comes down to $49.95, and then I'll buy 100 of them and make a wonderful Linux cluster out of it.

  187. Hedache by Kyrthira · · Score: 1

    Lord, I work at a video game store.

    Then again, I've known about this for a week. ::Nod:: How? Posters and all been sittin' in the back all this time.

    *rubs temples* I have to work tomorrow...

    --
    ~Kyrthira Phelan~
  188. Re:This guy needs to lay off the marketing pills.. by VikingBrad · · Score: 1
    There is a great song/comedy sketch by an Australian group called Tripod about a guy who is 'gonna make sweet love to his lady' just after this level. Heaps of other references, basically ends in saying he loves his Xbox more than chicks.
    Can't find an mp3 on the net. They recently played it at Melbourne International Comedy Gala.

    Cheers
    VikingBrad

  189. Re:This is proof Microsoft cares about the consume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the difference between having a virus and relatively having a virus????


    Sort of like being a little bit pregnant?????

  190. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by zonker · · Score: 0

    yeah and even more curious, news that hits the front page...

  191. Re:This guy needs to lay off the marketing pills.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and your mad PS2 skillz get you WAY more chicks than P.Diddy gets.

  192. Re:What game? Me it's Ninja Gaiden by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

    Are you referring to the combat in Prince of Persia: Sands of Time? If so, I actually quite liked that. I got kind of annoyed when you'd meet stronger enemies who could block you when you tried to run up them and so on, but it made me actually start using blocking manoeuvres and so on, and made be better at the fighting part, and enjoyed it.

    On the other hand, if you're talking about the original Prince of Persia games, then yes, I totally agree :)

  193. Excellent by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

    Its great that the Xbox has gone down. As P. Diddy knows Mo' Money, Mo' Problems.

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  194. Re:Slashdot has officially jumped the shark when.. by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > um i think you mean jumped ship.

    Um, I think YOU meant "I'm an idiot who should shut the hell up because I don't know what this conversation is about." He said it correctly.

  195. Ok. Reality check. by AzraelKans · · Score: 1

    You can buy an xbox an make a linux box with it (you would need around 50 more bucks for a modchip and you would need an extra $100 for a decent hdd), but exactly what good will that make? the beauty of linux is that it would run in a $400 pc and it would be much better than in an xbox (since the CPU could be faster and you can buy extra ram).

    But you would need a $1000 bucks pc to run Ninja Gaiden (if it existed) and/or Halo in a decent PC. it costs $200 in a xbox.

    What would you like better a half baked linux station with the illusion you "hurt" a company by using your money in buying their product? or a game station at almost 20% of its price? you do the math.

    There goes the karma

    --
    Go ahead MOD my day!
    More opinions here
  196. The network. by Jonathan+Hamilton · · Score: 0

    The network man, the network....

    I have a 40GB headless server in a closet, connected to the xbox via switched 100Mbit ethernet. The 40GB server is running freebsd and has nfs shares. My apartment complex has a 10 mbit network, my computer, my roomates computer, my friends upstaris computer can be mounted using samba.

    The xbox mounts the drives and plays everything over the network path is just(/usr/media/.) Streaming a mp3 over samba takes about 20k/s. Moves more, but quality is still good.

    If I want a DVD quality movie, well I have a DVD+-RW so I just burn the movie and take it out on the xbox.

    You can put a 120GB HD if you put in a mod chip.
    I just wanted to software mod mine for a while.

  197. Re:DUMPING (Not) by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    Uh, no.

    First of all, even if "Acts of Gord" was a reputable source of factual information (it's not, it's a humor site), it *only* mentions Nintendo machines. What about Intellivision? How about Coleco? Atari?

    The page you linked to doesn't support your argument. If your argument was "Nintendo never sells hardware for below cost," then that official statement (posted on a humor site!) might be relevant in some way.

  198. Re: Dreamcast instead? by D4C5CE · · Score: 1
    However, to connect to your network (at more than 56kbps) and play back anything from there, a Dreamcast (unlike the Xbox) will need an optional Broadband or LAN Adapter, still at several times the price of the console itself (if you can point out a cheap source, please do):
    Sega.com has discontinued Broadband Adapter distribution. You can buy used ones on eBay, or you can go to Lik-Sang and purchase one for $120.
    Moreover, the "Divx" you are referring to seems to be a "Pocket DivX", specifically transcoded to run on less powerful hardware (that could not cope with the full-featured format):
    Why does my video and audio skip and or freeze?
    A: Again play with the encoding settings... try reducing the video bitrate, decimating by 2 or reduces the audio bitrate down to 22khz mono to avoid these skips. If you have found a magical setting that works GREAT share you findings (...)
    The current decoder CORE cannot handle resolutions larger than 496x496. But a bigger issue is that anything higher then that the Dreamcast hardware can not handle (A/V skips). So do not look for any larger resolution anytime soon.
  199. Re: Dreamcast instead? by nolife · · Score: 1

    A cheap network adapter would be nice. Although I have not tried it myself, there is a modem to modem method of establishing a PPP connection to your local network with the DC. Not ethernet but it should be a reliable connection.

    For Divx I've only used dcmplay. I do not know the relationship if any between it and Pocket Divx but this one suffers from sync problems also.

    Even with the obvious negatives of the DC, it was a very capable console and there is still a decent amount of development floating around for it.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  200. Re:DUMPING (Not) by Troed · · Score: 1

    It is a reputable site, not a humor site. You also need to brush up on your reading skills, and learn a bit or two about the history of the console industry.

    Oh, and yeah. Use Google.

    Seriously. It's tiresome having people reply to you on Slashdot saying "Duh I cannot find anything to support your statement" when it takes only 5 seconds to do so.

    Now go find Perry's statement about Nintendo only losing a marginal amount of money right after the cut to $99 on the Gamecube. You'll also be able to find that they lost a marginal amount at launch - but in between these two points in time they actually made (or broke even) on the hardware.

    Claiming "everyone loses money on the hardware and makes up for it on the games" (which the parent, and several others posts in this thread did) just displays utter ignorance and no knowledge whatsover about the console industry.

  201. Re:This guy needs to lay off the marketing pills.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, chicks go nuts for Gamecube. "It's so tiny, and cute!" And by proxy, you become cute too... just don't introduce them to Animal Crossing.

  202. PRobably due to WalMart.. by rofthorax · · Score: 1

    Note that Wal Mart forces its suppliers to
    cut back on their margins.. Microsoft probably did this ina desperate attempt to get Wal Mart to drop their PS2 and Nintendo lines and to remain in the stores..

    --
    Just say no to license servers!!
  203. FYE rebate by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Not only is there the price drop of $30, but FYE has a $30 rebate on top of that, bringing it down to $119.99.

    But be careful! The rebate applies to units with a specific UPC code and does not appear to apply to the Holiday Bundle that includes Tetris Worlds, Clone Wars, and 2 months free Xbox Live. Further, my local FYE had removed the original UPC barcode on the holiday bundle and replaced it with a different one.

    But don't despair just yet. My local FYE put their stamp and a note on the rebate form that they are substituting the unit and requesting that the rebate be honored. On top of that, I got a promise that if the rebate was not honored that they would honor it in store themselves.

    On a different note, be aware that some of the stores that do price matching are themselves very nitpicky and may not honor a price match against a different bundle package. You might have make some lies of omission to get them to do it, or be very convincing.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  204. Re:This guy needs to lay off the marketing pills.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tripod are great! I wish they'd put out their songs as MP3 downloads :(

  205. I've seen these by CosmicDreams · · Score: 1

    I don't know if they were running MAME or not but I've seen small game kits sold in malls that have a lot of early generation Atari, Nintendo and Sega games (for example: Duck Hunt-->with laser gun, Super Mario Bros., Altered Beast, Joust, Hogan's Ally, etc.). I think it was selling for around $25-$30, but I'm probably wrong about that.

    The coolest thing about it was that the games were all stored in the controller. The light gun plugged into one of the controllers to work. They had a genesis-like controller and a NES looking controller.

    The light gun games were fun to play again. I never really had the chance to play Hogan's Alley when it was out. NEway, its a pretty good waste of time.

    --
    Go Gusties