Just read Lennart Poettering's article the other day on convergence/brtfs. After having overcome some reflexive
repugnancy, saw that it made sense, and O got interested to see how that will work out.
Now Paul Venezia makes the case for divergence, in a particular (though not unimportant) use case. Makes sense as well!
I guess all this versatility is inherent in Linux -- it's just the issue at which point the di- or con- is applied, and who does
the applying, so to speak.
Is mood a state-to-be achieved (intentional in some way), or is it some symptom of the total complex and state of brain chemistry at a certain moment.
'Mood regulation' to me smacks too much of some homunculus.
Try to bring funders' attention to the destructive element of Near-Erth Objects.
Maybe even the A-challenged NSA and their apologists then might become interested in slushing some of the NSA's allotment
to the amount of 52 billion (52,000,000,000) dollars towards this NASA program.
Indeed. But there's another question. What place do techies have in the world. 'Not many' [sic].
The ones --techies and liberral arts alike-- who do find a place are those that know to bridge the gap. It is a gap created by those that are
challenged to a degree in either one of the sides, among whom you must be counted, considering your answer.
Slashdot Mirror
Just read Lennart Poettering's article the other day on convergence/brtfs. After having overcome some reflexive
repugnancy, saw that it made sense, and O got interested to see how that will work out.
Now Paul Venezia makes the case for divergence, in a particular (though not unimportant) use case. Makes sense as well!
I guess all this versatility is inherent in Linux -- it's just the issue at which point the di- or con- is applied, and who does
the applying, so to speak.
But can you yourself be the judge -- pass the judgment, that "things seemed clearer"??
Is mood a state-to-be achieved (intentional in some way), or is it some symptom of the total complex and state of brain chemistry at a certain moment.
'Mood regulation' to me smacks too much of some homunculus.
Like "200km" (125mi for all you metrically challenged).
Who is Zuckerwit btw?
Virtual Fairy Tales!
You suffer from word diarrhea. Apple sucks.
Next!
Bye, difficult science.
to just say "F*k You!" to the U.S. Government?
In fact, you might probably be able to 3D-print a Dremel with it.
Is gonna miss boat.
Start going outside on clear nights, skip prime time and then some, look up -- and then (it's a sign of awe) start wondering like... a kid.
TL;DR
Try to bring funders' attention to the destructive element of Near-Erth Objects.
Maybe even the A-challenged NSA and their apologists then might become interested in slushing some of the NSA's allotment
to the amount of 52 billion (52,000,000,000) dollars towards this NASA program.
Stumbling from one million constitutional violations into the other.
And yet this 'look we're pathetic' plea.
Can you picture Obama bent over a petri dish?
Get even. Post anything at all that you can find on the head of the FBI (et al.) -- him in that capacity and outside of it.
Ever heard of a parrallel projection? You're all rahter pathetic as Appleogetics...
Place it between two bales of hay. It will starve.
Indeed. But there's another question. What place do techies have in the world. 'Not many' [sic].
The ones --techies and liberral arts alike-- who do find a place are those that know to bridge the gap. It is a gap created by those that are
challenged to a degree in either one of the sides, among whom you must be counted, considering your answer.
Very true. Case in point: in didn't even know about this 'language' (dialect).
as long as it's destructive. They'll do the extortion for you, you'll toast
with the 'cream of the crop', you'll be IT!
Why is it that I'm having qualms about Intel?
He took too many risks. For no good. NO GOOD! The pizza got cold. What a shame!
'Law enforcement'.