Very true. If one were to apply the current definition of terrorism to events in the past, I suspect many would consider the US government of past to be a terrorist organisation.
I see a lot of people who ask for evidence that such things as toture kidnappings by government agencies, etc. exist. But seems to me that things like this require the question "Why not?" instead? Why wouldn't they toture a person they perceive to be the enemy or scapegoat of their own cause in a place from which information is unlikely to leave? One should ask for evidence to prove that it doesn't not exist, not vice versa.
Frankly, some of these wii jokes are really dumb. And I tend to laugh at anything. Since when did people refer to their genitals as "we" or "wee" ? "wee wee" maybe, but common guys.
I have wondered similiarly myself. But this basic thinking can be applied to much more than the war on drugs. The new "civilized" society has put away many of things (activities, customs, etc.) that may very well have catalysed the progress of society.
I would extend this to say: shouldn't the head of any employing organisation have the right to fire any employee? I mean, the company is the one giving the money.
Anyone think this would work well for Intranet/LAN use for custom company apps to lower client side requirements? Or is Java still the better way to go here?
I know that the wheel control of the Ipod makes it easy to scroll thorugh songs. But besides that, is there any special tech in an Ipod? I do not own one so I don't know. What so special that the President of a country would even try to take any credit for it?
Slashdot Mirror
Very true. If one were to apply the current definition of terrorism to events in the past, I suspect many would consider the US government of past to be a terrorist organisation.
Then I understand your point. However, I think this thinks more of US pop culture than Nintendo 's marketing department.
I see a lot of people who ask for evidence that such things as toture kidnappings by government agencies, etc. exist. But seems to me that things like this require the question "Why not?" instead? Why wouldn't they toture a person they perceive to be the enemy or scapegoat of their own cause in a place from which information is unlikely to leave? One should ask for evidence to prove that it doesn't not exist, not vice versa.
Yes they are, they have specifically said so. Check the net for said sources if you are interested.
Frankly, some of these wii jokes are really dumb. And I tend to laugh at anything. Since when did people refer to their genitals as "we" or "wee" ? "wee wee" maybe, but common guys.
I wasn't aware of this. Okay.
What's wrong with ARTs?
Change can sometimes be good. That said, I have no idea what they are doing internally.
How well did it work for you?
I think it is safe to assume that these professionals have taken such a well known form of error into consideration.
Sorry, I met "Clockwork Orange" in movie form. But where are the books and movies like "Clockwork Orange" today? Has truely creative genes been lost?
Thinking of Equilibrium are you?
I have wondered similiarly myself. But this basic thinking can be applied to much more than the war on drugs. The new "civilized" society has put away many of things (activities, customs, etc.) that may very well have catalysed the progress of society.
That's the whole point of signed packages and official mirrors...no? Plus it normally takes more than one click.
I can't agree to that. Many of us feel that Windows works best not connected to the internet. Two way traffic blocking was a good attempt at that.
Sounds like a patent to me. Go for it.
Are such vague terms as 'intelligent' really allowed in Patent Lawyer speak?
Can't we hope for both?
I would extend this to say: shouldn't the head of any employing organisation have the right to fire any employee? I mean, the company is the one giving the money.
One might consider this the infamous "Internet Addiction"
Anyone think this would work well for Intranet/LAN use for custom company apps to lower client side requirements? Or is Java still the better way to go here?
For the sake of the rest of us, could you _not_ put the Christian part in his name?
Interesting, not knowing about an Ipod == "Flaimbait" ?
I know that the wheel control of the Ipod makes it easy to scroll thorugh songs. But besides that, is there any special tech in an Ipod? I do not own one so I don't know. What so special that the President of a country would even try to take any credit for it?
Well isn't it obvious? They are trying to defend their market and mind share.