What about if that stuff was given to you? It really depends if the people actively attempted to get money out of it, or if they made a withdrawl and it gave them more than they asked. The latter is not theft. I would, however, return it.
I read your comment out of context, and it scared the shit out of me.:)
If observation is a form of evidence collection, and they only act when they have evidence of a crime, then by now seeing a lot more "evidence", there will be a lot more to act on. Turning otherwise normal people into criminals.
So what? Predictable patterns do not mean people are in the wrong. Don't try to twist things to fit your agenda. You can't battle the problem, so you battle the behavior. The point you're now arguing has nothing at all to do with the real topic at hand.
Ergo, shut the hell up. I believe few people care about you referring to yourself in third person, "akahige at gmail dot com".
Stereotypes would not be stereotypes if they were not true. Sure, there are exceptions to the rule, but a stereotype only takes form after multiple people make the same observations and correlations.
God I hope not. At least the simpsons had a run of good episodes at the beginning. Futurama has never been funny, imo. There's a reason it was cancelled.
Let me guess... modding me up as flamebait? Grow a pair, we all have opinions. If mine disagrees, it doesn't make me a troll.
So if someone steals your SSN and fraudulently obtains a credit card, it's the institution's fault? Who's the victim? You are.
If the bank made an error on a transaction, would you say they lost their money? Hell no... you would say they lost your money. How is this any different?
Please think before bringing a rediculous argument to the table.
And to the grandparent... thieves are thieves, indeed.
A dell with Windows ME on it came to my mind when I read "pre-pwn3d"
We already have that bullshit in Orlando. ugh.
And therein lies the corruption in a two party system. *Everybody* should have to pencil in their party on their voters registration.
Makes me wonder why someone who leaks info in favor of Bush gets a pardon...
While singing about cheeseburgers...
Yeah, because there are no 7-11s near the hamptons.
Every area has poor, middle, and upper classes*.
(*New Jersey not withstanding)
I can see the Phillip-Morris style PSA's from HP already... lol
Good to see a fellow time warner subscriber online...
What about if that stuff was given to you? It really depends if the people actively attempted to get money out of it, or if they made a withdrawl and it gave them more than they asked. The latter is not theft. I would, however, return it.
Ooh... tough one. lol
I'd take 5 steps to my car. :)
Introducing the Bass from GMSea
I read your comment out of context, and it scared the shit out of me. :)
If observation is a form of evidence collection, and they only act when they have evidence of a crime, then by now seeing a lot more "evidence", there will be a lot more to act on. Turning otherwise normal people into criminals.
So what? Predictable patterns do not mean people are in the wrong. Don't try to twist things to fit your agenda. You can't battle the problem, so you battle the behavior. The point you're now arguing has nothing at all to do with the real topic at hand.
Ergo, shut the hell up. I believe few people care about you referring to yourself in third person, "akahige at gmail dot com".
Yeah, but they promised. It's cool man, relax.
You know... the netherlands kinda resemble a pyramid...
He didn't say he didn't get the joke...
:)
It just wasn't funny.
F.
So he's spreading FUD?
Or they could have just made the fuckin thing unpluggable and called it a day. ;)
All in all, most of us are thoroughly confused, but we can't stop reading!
I hear this system sucks ass...
haha.. no but seriously, when it's phrased like that it sounds like one hell of a party.
I've said it before and I'll say it again...
Stereotypes would not be stereotypes if they were not true. Sure, there are exceptions to the rule, but a stereotype only takes form after multiple people make the same observations and correlations.
God I hope not. At least the simpsons had a run of good episodes at the beginning. Futurama has never been funny, imo. There's a reason it was cancelled.
Let me guess... modding me up as flamebait? Grow a pair, we all have opinions. If mine disagrees, it doesn't make me a troll.
So if someone steals your SSN and fraudulently obtains a credit card, it's the institution's fault? Who's the victim? You are.
If the bank made an error on a transaction, would you say they lost their money? Hell no... you would say they lost your money. How is this any different?
Please think before bringing a rediculous argument to the table.
And to the grandparent... thieves are thieves, indeed.
Kind of like how EPCOT represents the "experimental prototype community of".... 1980's future?
This place is startin to sound like a fuckin tea party with all the intelligent debate...
oh well, carry on chap!