Slashdot Mirror


User: H09N0X10U5

H09N0X10U5's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
121
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 121

  1. Re:No on Big Brother In Your Front Seat · · Score: 1
    A tax is when the government tells you to pay money.
    I bought something from a shop yesterday. That's a tax, because the government made me pay for it. Well, they made it illegal for me to steal it, which comes down to the same thing.
  2. Re:I think this is fine, in this case. on Olympics to Have Massive Surveillance Network · · Score: 1
    "If I were a resident, I would feel violated."

    -1: drama queen.

  3. Re:Some observations and questions on Olympics to Have Massive Surveillance Network · · Score: 1
    We're all about as expert as anybody in terrorism surveillance, because it's only existed for three years
    Can someone explain why terrorism surveillance has only existed for three years? I thought CCTV cameras were invented long before that, and I'm sure terrorism did too. Perhaps us dumbass Brits, Germans and Eyetalians never thought to connect the two together. Thank God for those smart Americans like the one who posted the parent comment via the interweb that their former VP invented.
  4. Re:Some observations and questions on Olympics to Have Massive Surveillance Network · · Score: 1
    That's the fucking point: Canada and New Zealand don't go around the world, rubbing other countries' noses in the dirt
    Another fucking point: if they could, they probably would.
  5. Re:Yep on Olympics to Have Massive Surveillance Network · · Score: 1

    Are you also sane enough to despise the people who constantly talk up China (or sometimes Russia) as the nation that will, as they put it, "stand up to US imperialism"? Let fatty Moore go and make a film about their governments and see how far he gets. They'll shove a cattle prod up his asshole as soon as they can find it. The big fat fuck.

  6. Re:Useless Measurement? on CPAN: $677 Million of Perl · · Score: 1
    What are usenets? Do they come on AOL discs?

    Oh, and are they good or are they whack?

  7. Re:PHP on CPAN: $677 Million of Perl · · Score: 1
    If all you want to do is serve up web pages, what PHP was primarily created for, then yes, PHP is easier to work with. But if you want to sequence DNA, Perl is the tool for the job.
    Ah right. That's what it was intended for. I did wonder.
  8. small_talk on CPAN: $677 Million of Perl · · Score: 1

    There's a second 's' missing, somewhere...

  9. Re:"Those who don't understand X . . ." on Syllable - The Little OS with a Big Future? · · Score: 1
    Those who do not understand X are condemned to reinvent it.

    Poorly.
    And the only people who do understand it are those who already implemented it. Piss-poorly.
  10. Re:I don't use em unless I have to on Stored Procedures - Good or Bad? · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with that is that it doesn't get done. Then you get divided control, which is the same as no control.

  11. Re:Is it that big a deal? on Stored Procedures - Good or Bad? · · Score: 1
    The shop I work in has two main applications which access the same database. One is a web environment written entirely in Perl where all of the DB logic has been pushed into stored procedures[...] Contrast this with a mega app written in C which has tons of queries directly in it, a minimum of stored procedures, and a constant stream of bugs because of the morass this has created. The app moves slowly, ponderously, and half the time wrongly.
    The system writtemn in C is a 'mega' app? So it's much bigger and more complicated than the other one? Seems we don't have a level playing field here.

    Even if the systems were equivalent, your anectodotal argument based on a huge sample of two proves nothing, other than some apps are easier to maintain than others. You could equally well conclude that servers with even (or odd) IP addresses are more reliable.

    This might be for nerds, and it might matter, but it sure ain't news.

  12. Re:I don't use em unless I have to on Stored Procedures - Good or Bad? · · Score: 1
    "if you abstract the data access on procedures, the schema can evolve easier."

    Only if you abstract all the data access.

  13. Re:Isn't this illegal? on Guerrilla Drive-Ins · · Score: 2, Funny

    A credit card advert?

    DVD: free
    DVD player: $50
    Generator: $300
    Projector: $800
    Not coming out of jail looking like this: Priceless.

  14. Re:Water common? on Mars Had Surface Water for Eons · · Score: 1

    Science in Farenheit is funny.

  15. Re:Arrgh.. on Alan Kay Decries the State of Computing · · Score: 1
    Small, green aliens probably don't use QWERTY keyboards, either.
    Neither do cheese eating surrender monkeys.
  16. Re:Yes, but... on Odeon Orders Takedown Of Copycat Site · · Score: 1
    Is it silly that swimming pools have to be accessible for quadriplegics?
    I used to know a quadraplegic swimmer. He was called Bob.
  17. Re:This is great because it's Google on New Google Groups in Beta · · Score: 1
    how will I know what to write?
    Something about how k3wl blogs are. If you get writer's block, just repost something from a few days ago.
  18. Re:WOOAH-THERE - READ THIS FIRST on New Google Groups in Beta · · Score: 1
    The big reason a lot of ISPs no longer 'support Usenet' is that the binary groups overwhelmed their bandwidth.
    I'm not an expert on news servers, but I suspect it is possible to configure them to carry certain groups and not others. Unless by "ISP" you mean Belgacom, who seem to lack the necessary equipment, to whit a fucking clue.
  19. Re:This is great because it's Google on New Google Groups in Beta · · Score: 1
    You're missing the whole point of threads, as have Google, unfortunately.
    Well said. Seems like the September that never ended, well, never ended.
  20. Re:This is great because it's Google on New Google Groups in Beta · · Score: 1
    Google always does things the right way without ruining the user experience or their wallets.
    I disagree. It could never follow threads properly (it assumed same title=same thread and different title=different thread) and it sucked for posting - you have to use a real e-mail address and it restricted you to about ten posts a day.
  21. Re:Gmail on New Google Groups in Beta · · Score: 1
    Using Ebay tends to generate a lot of emails. So, when you get invites, sell them on Ebay, and the email that this generates causes you to get more invites, which you then sell on Ebay, etc. etc. etc.
    What 'tards modded this funny? Now, if it had said:
    1. Get lots of emails by using Ebay
    2. Sell Gmail invites on Ebay
    3. ...
    4. PROFIT!!!!!
    it would have been hilarious.
  22. Re:So What? on Is The 6-Month Product Cycle Upon Us? · · Score: 1
    I mean, sure, the frame & certain pieces of the body could last, but that's about it. Say goodbye to any moving part, sensor, paint, etc.
    I've got a hammer that my dad gave me 30 years ago, and in all that time it's only had five new handles and one new head.
  23. Re:Six month death spiral on Is The 6-Month Product Cycle Upon Us? · · Score: 1
    I would venture to guess that with an ambient temperature near to 0 K, cooling a CPU is not a real issue.
    Since temperature depends on movement of particles, and space has no particles[1], can you actually give a menaingful temperature for space?

    [1] well, only a few.

  24. mistakes? on Spider-Man 2 Has Over 30 Mistakes · · Score: 1

    *cough* mistakes *cough*? Those are features.

  25. Re:Somewhat of a personal experience on Eye Transplant Enables Blind Boy to See · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I guess we stereoptic folks take this stuff for granted sometimes.
    I'm quite short sighted in one eye but it wasn't detected until I was in my teens. If they corrected the bad eye it made me dizzy. As for binoculars, I never saw what the point was because I always kept one eye closed to avoid getting an instant headache.

    P.S. If you ever see someone moving his head from side to side, don't assume he's crazy - he might just be a monocular(?) person like me trying to judge depth.