Adding www or removing www is both equaly stupid and unwanted. Yopu are potentially pointing to a different server that does not what Google thinks it does.
The reason as to why they do that is irrelevant and non of Googles business. A browser points to a server with a DNS entry and also a protocol and some subdomains and what not. So I want to see: http://www.example.com/dir/file.php?X=1 and not example.com/dir/file.php?X=1 or example.com or "Ranked number 17 on twitter" or a "your momma" joke , or an ad or anything else for whatever reason, except for the URL.
That is as a browser user. As a domain holder, I would expect the same and on top of that I should not need to defend or even explain myself why I do whatever it is I do.
If the messenger fucks up, you are allowed to shoot him.
Hey, I still have that gif of a guy walking up to the an IE banner and pissing on it. Here is it without the IE logo: http://houghi.org/shots/peeing... Use as if copyright does not exist, as I did not make it.
Hey ANY combination of letters is a perfectly valid sub domain name, including www.
I often see that www.example.org does exist where example.org does not exist. www. does not mean it is pot 80 (or 443). If I desite to only run ssh on www.example.com on port 80, it might be a stupid thing to do, but it is MY stupid server, so I decide what I run on it.
Do not confuse subdomains, portnumers and protocols.
Well, neither is the AA in Europe. 1) Europe is not a country. There is no Euroean AA. There isn't even a "Belgian AA". 2) From the AA pages Flanders In AA leer je dus niet hoe je minder kan drinken of hoe je een sociale drinker kan worden die tijdig kan stoppen met drinken. At the AA you do not learn how to drink less or how to become a social drinker that can stop with drinking. Wat we wel doen is je leren hoe je kan stoppen met drinken, door het eerste glas te laten staan, door vandaag nuchter te zijn,.. What we do is to learn you how to stop drinking, by not taking the first glass, by being sober today,...
The person also compared Alcoholism to his wife cutting down on smoking and then not smoking anymore, in a followup post. Thast obviously is unrelated to alcoholism.
Yet I agree. It is said that the USofA is not able to take care of the people. I really wonder howso many believe they live in the bestest country in teh world, while they never have seen another one and live in way worse situations than a lot of other countries.
Do you know why the people have these neckties? Because what they do is illegal. Make that legal and a lot less people get killed over it. It is directly related with the illegal part.
An iceberg, by definition, is not part of Antarctica in any way, shape, or form.
International law says that a country will go out to sea for a while. It does not end at the waterline. There are the teritorial water. That is only 12 nautical miles (22.2 km; 13.8 mi). But there also is the ecxonomic zone of 200 nautical miles (370.4 km; 230.2 mi).
In case of Antartica, we could perhaps even talk about the continental shelf and the rights to it. "A coastal nation has control of all resources on or under its continental shelf, living or not, but no control over any living organisms above the shelf that are beyond its exclusive economic zone. This gives it the right to conduct hydrocarbon exploration and drilling works. " Water or ice could be seen as such,
Look at Wikipedia for some info and ask a maritime and international lawer for details.
So it will depend very much where they get the Iceberg from.
So an iceberg can very well be a part of Antartica, even if it didn't hit the ground.
And Antartica has some other issues concerning rights that are not standard.
If a society thinks it is funny and normal to be raped in prison, you have an issue. It means you have not yet understood the difference between revenge and punishment (let alone rehabilitation)
1) Several years ago I worked at a company that did hosting for the police. Think Windows NT. They frequently asked to do a reset of our servers. To do this, they send a fax. One day the fax was not readable, so I called for verification.
The person that had signed the fax was not working at that department for a few years. So I asked them from then on they need to have the fax signed AND dated by the person sending the fax, otherwise it would be seen as fraude and falsification of forms. So yeah, I treatend the police.
2) A different department always tried to get data from us about customers without a warrent. Well, fuck you. No warrent, no info.
If they are doing this automatic, you can bet that the logins will be floating around and that they WILL find a way to get data. It also means that others will be able to get that data.
So to make this possible, the judge needs to make the warrent somehow available for Apple over a secure connection. Technically this could be done. I see this done for financial information in Belgium all the time. No issues.
However this should NOT be done for Apple or any company. This should be done for every company and accessible to every company that wants it AND it should be free or cheap with the absolutely needed chacks in place that no company can read the one from others. Also that no other police department will have access to the data.
It would also mean that this is a nation wide system. That means that all judges and policedepartments and companies need to be connected to the same system.
Technically I see no issues. Bit of SSL and XML and you are done. To make it, I would forsee a failed system after 10 years of building and a few rich consultants.
And even then it will encourage rubberstamping and it will not be secure due to the fact that 90% of hacking is social enineering.
That is not how GPRS works at all. What differs is that. 1) They need to have reasonable protection in place. 2) They need to inform people and instances where hacked. 3) They need to have a person responsible
Just because they where hacked, does not mean they need to pay. That would be very stupid as this will happen. It will depend on each individual situation.
Not talking about what or why you WANT it to change. Why SHOULD they change. No accountabiliy, no reason.
If I would steal cookies as a kid and all my mom would do was moan about ot, I would eat them all and demand more. A light punishment after the first cookie was enough.
Slashdot Mirror
One thing does not exclude the other.
Adding www or removing www is both equaly stupid and unwanted.
Yopu are potentially pointing to a different server that does not what Google thinks it does.
The reason as to why they do that is irrelevant and non of Googles business. A browser points to a server with a DNS entry and also a protocol and some subdomains and what not. So I want to see:
http://www.example.com/dir/file.php?X=1 and not
example.com/dir/file.php?X=1 or example.com or "Ranked number 17 on twitter" or a "your momma" joke , or an ad or anything else for whatever reason, except for the URL.
That is as a browser user. As a domain holder, I would expect the same and on top of that I should not need to defend or even explain myself why I do whatever it is I do.
If the messenger fucks up, you are allowed to shoot him.
The fact that Google does not care was clear since they bought and raped DejaNews.
Hey, I still have that gif of a guy walking up to the an IE banner and pissing on it. Here is it without the IE logo:
http://houghi.org/shots/peeing...
Use as if copyright does not exist, as I did not make it.
Hey ANY combination of letters is a perfectly valid sub domain name, including www.
I often see that www.example.org does exist where example.org does not exist.
www. does not mean it is pot 80 (or 443). If I desite to only run ssh on www.example.com on port 80, it might be a stupid thing to do, but it is MY stupid server, so I decide what I run on it.
Do not confuse subdomains, portnumers and protocols.
Oh, and you think the Chinese governement cares more for their people than the US one does?
The Chinese have always looked more at long term goals. They do not need to be worried if they are elected in 4 years or not.
They easily take decissions where suddenly millions of people nmeed to move. And you think they care if a few thousand people will have a hard time?
OTOH prices in the rest of the world would fall.
Hey, he brought some steel jobs back with the taxes. Many more where lost because of it, but still.
OTOH we get a Harley Davidson factory in Europe, so that is nice.
Well, neither is the AA in Europe. .. ...
1) Europe is not a country. There is no Euroean AA. There isn't even a "Belgian AA".
2) From the AA pages Flanders
In AA leer je dus niet hoe je minder kan drinken of hoe je een sociale drinker kan worden die tijdig kan stoppen met drinken.
At the AA you do not learn how to drink less or how to become a social drinker that can stop with drinking.
Wat we wel doen is je leren hoe je kan stoppen met drinken, door het eerste glas te laten staan, door vandaag nuchter te zijn,
What we do is to learn you how to stop drinking, by not taking the first glass, by being sober today,
The person also compared Alcoholism to his wife cutting down on smoking and then not smoking anymore, in a followup post. Thast obviously is unrelated to alcoholism.
So it is contrary to the "Europan AA" as well.
AA is about Alcohol. The dependencies on Alcohol are completely different than those to smoking.
Bring out your dead!
Yet I agree. It is said that the USofA is not able to take care of the people. I really wonder howso many believe they live in the bestest country in teh world, while they never have seen another one and live in way worse situations than a lot of other countries.
Do you know why the people have these neckties? Because what they do is illegal. Make that legal and a lot less people get killed over it.
It is directly related with the illegal part.
International law says that a country will go out to sea for a while. It does not end at the waterline. There are the teritorial water. That is only 12 nautical miles (22.2 km; 13.8 mi). But there also is the ecxonomic zone of 200 nautical miles (370.4 km; 230.2 mi).
In case of Antartica, we could perhaps even talk about the continental shelf and the rights to it.
"A coastal nation has control of all resources on or under its continental shelf, living or not, but no control over any living organisms above the shelf that are beyond its exclusive economic zone. This gives it the right to conduct hydrocarbon exploration and drilling works. "
Water or ice could be seen as such,
Look at Wikipedia for some info and ask a maritime and international lawer for details.
So it will depend very much where they get the Iceberg from.
So an iceberg can very well be a part of Antartica, even if it didn't hit the ground.
And Antartica has some other issues concerning rights that are not standard.
Proof of concept. Bit like people hacking computers and telling that such and such is vulnerable.
Or are you going to say that that vulnerability does not exists, because it was not yet abused?
(Disclaimer, I do not like Greenpeace, as they do not give a good enough solution to the perceived problem.)
This has been done for a Very Long Time
Well, sort of. How many others are there for you to select from?
If a society thinks it is funny and normal to be raped in prison, you have an issue.
It means you have not yet understood the difference between revenge and punishment (let alone rehabilitation)
1) Several years ago I worked at a company that did hosting for the police. Think Windows NT. They frequently asked to do a reset of our servers. To do this, they send a fax. One day the fax was not readable, so I called for verification.
The person that had signed the fax was not working at that department for a few years. So I asked them from then on they need to have the fax signed AND dated by the person sending the fax, otherwise it would be seen as fraude and falsification of forms. So yeah, I treatend the police.
2) A different department always tried to get data from us about customers without a warrent. Well, fuck you. No warrent, no info.
If they are doing this automatic, you can bet that the logins will be floating around and that they WILL find a way to get data. It also means that others will be able to get that data.
So to make this possible, the judge needs to make the warrent somehow available for Apple over a secure connection. Technically this could be done. I see this done for financial information in Belgium all the time. No issues.
However this should NOT be done for Apple or any company. This should be done for every company and accessible to every company that wants it AND it should be free or cheap with the absolutely needed chacks in place that no company can read the one from others.
Also that no other police department will have access to the data.
It would also mean that this is a nation wide system. That means that all judges and policedepartments and companies need to be connected to the same system.
Technically I see no issues. Bit of SSL and XML and you are done. To make it, I would forsee a failed system after 10 years of building and a few rich consultants.
And even then it will encourage rubberstamping and it will not be secure due to the fact that 90% of hacking is social enineering.
http://hackme.houghi.org/ Use it and abuse it (After you have done the DNS lookup)
Oh, like the US funds corn. I get ot now. So is funding good or bad?
So he is gambling that the Chinese care for short term issues.
That is not how GPRS works at all. What differs is that.
1) They need to have reasonable protection in place.
2) They need to inform people and instances where hacked.
3) They need to have a person responsible
Just because they where hacked, does not mean they need to pay. That would be very stupid as this will happen. It will depend on each individual situation.
Since evar, the current generation was worse than the previous one.
The hammer is an inate object, just like an atom bomb. It has no concience, so blaming anything on it to s irrelevant.
The bkaming is more a lingiustic issue. We 'blame' tsunamis for the death of people,
Not talking about what or why you WANT it to change. Why SHOULD they change. No accountabiliy, no reason.
If I would steal cookies as a kid and all my mom would do was moan about ot, I would eat them all and demand more.
A light punishment after the first cookie was enough.
Accountability: it somehow matters.
This is NYPD, so: *Youse. (Like in "Youse all")