That is because the PUBLISHER did not give you the means. If you wrote to the publisher, or copyright holder, and asked and they said "Ok, and this is how you use a copy machine", then it is legal.
. OBSD's ONLY claim to fame is that it's the most secure OUT OF THE BOX.
If this is true, and I really have no idea if it is, then I'd say that OBSD is a fairly obvious choice for superior software, at least for Joe Blow, who is the largest demographic out there. Joe doesn't want to have to install and then configure for hours on end. Hell, he'd like to not even install, but if he has to then just installing and then you're secure is going to be much better from his point of view than any other way. This is also a boon to computer construction companies like Dell. They don't want to have to spend hours configuring a secure system for their customers, and they currently don't, so if they could just get out of the box that way they'd love it. I'd say that OBSD would have a much larger commercial appeal than Linux if it was well known, but you've never had fun until you tried to explain to a CIO why a MS product is NOT always the answer, much less trying to get them to go with some OS they have never even heard of.
I've been known to leave some pretty nasty comments in the code about the state of things, such as "This function sucks and is extremely wasteful. [Insert Name here] can't code his way out a wet paper bag.", and the like but I've never left any actual instances of cursing in the comments since I got out of college. It isn't professional and depending on your company can get you fired nice and quick.
Re:I'm all for science/technology/astronomy but...
on
Back to Moon in 2015?
·
· Score: 1
Actually it would be better for radio telescopes, because you are even further away from the electronic nightmare that earth produces. Also you have all kinds of fun space trash for space telescopes to deal with (at least the ones around earth), which you wouldn't get on the moon. And it's not like dust stays off the group for a long time on the moon. No atmo and such.
Well, let's take what you just said and apply it to an industry that you don't think is filthy (not even going to go into the whole OPINION thing in your post)
So, the legislature of a state decides that
God has commanded people (Prophets) to practice Mormonism before, (read the Old Testament sometime) for certain situations. Mormonism is wrong today. Mormonism is also an evil that the whole world would be better off without. (back to the topic at hand).
it is extremely easy for its ISPs to implement an *optional* filth screen for their customers.
The society would be better off without it
So, where are the negative consequences of this action? As far as I can see, there are none. Whose rights are being violated? The Church Of Jesus Chirst and Latter Day Saints? Please
I say, you might want to visit an economics class or two before you start spouting nonsense about how the economy works
Since you make no points as to what part of his diatribe on the economy isn't true, I'd say you're just someone who doesn't like the truth.
And, since you have clearly not experienced it as a working adult, did your parents live in a run-down home with (a) dead-end job(s)?
So what if they have or haven't? This makes no difference. There is nothing noble about poverty. You can form a the same kind of world view no matter what type of background you come from.
Have you ever experienced real poverty of any sort? I'd gauge it at unlikely with the immature world-view you hold.
Once again, so what if he has or hasn't? This has no bearing on the topic. TV's and cars are not neccessary to live. It sucks to be poor, but you know, any adult has the oppurtunity to change his or her life, and has to live with the choices they have made. It may not be an easy row to hoe, but the chances are there. It is their own fault if they don't take them.
Looks like you sir are the one that needs to grow up.
You've got that wrong. What HDTV tuners let you do is view HD on an HD-ready TV. This won't help at all if you've got an old analog tv and need to convert digital signals to analog.
And if you would use YFB for a minute you'd realize that all you need to increase is the WIDTH of the printing heads. How do you do that? Put them side by side. The printer can print 847 mm/s in length, which is 33 inches. Which is 3 pages per second with a couple of head put together. Which is 180 pages per minute.
And if you had read TFA it stated that it would work for any size paper, all you have to do is keep adding heads. So to get from A6 to A4 you'd just need to have 4 heads instead of one.
I said that Brother has OSX drivers for some products. As far as Linux drivers, apparently I'm wrong, but you know, I just looked at the database that held all the information for driver support, and no where in there is there anything for Linux. Wonder how they're being supported. None of the techs here are trained to give support under Linux, so I guess it is outsourced somewhere else.
I highly doubt it. None of the Brother products have Linux drivers. At least no drivers that are from Brother. It might have an OSX driver though, there are a couple of products that are floating around that have those.
Actually, this may mean they are planning on taking out the backwards comptability. That'd be sweet. I doubt it will happen in longhorn but maybe they're planning on taking it out in the next release after that and this is to simply get people ready for it.
You can fuse any element. The trick is that it requires MUCH more energy to do fusion on anything other than plain ole H.
As far as scalabilty goes I don't think anyone really knows, or at least very few people do, and they most likely aren't on/. My gut says that you'd definatly be able to refine the process some, but since I didn't get my Ph.D in high energy I can't say for sure, although I've got a friend who might be able to.
Slashdot Mirror
Sounds more like "Universal Soldier" to me
939 pin is for their desktop chipset, 940 is for their server chipset
Unless, of course, encouraging others to commit a crime is itself a crime.
..."
It is. Generally it is called "Conspiracy to commit
That is because the PUBLISHER did not give you the means. If you wrote to the publisher, or copyright holder, and asked and they said "Ok, and this is how you use a copy machine", then it is legal.
He is, I saw him talking to the Feds. Best take care of him before he can spill all the beans.
Hey! I've never driven my giant SUV over baby ducks. I like to drive it over cats or small children.
. OBSD's ONLY claim to fame is that it's the most secure OUT OF THE BOX.
If this is true, and I really have no idea if it is, then I'd say that OBSD is a fairly obvious choice for superior software, at least for Joe Blow, who is the largest demographic out there. Joe doesn't want to have to install and then configure for hours on end. Hell, he'd like to not even install, but if he has to then just installing and then you're secure is going to be much better from his point of view than any other way. This is also a boon to computer construction companies like Dell. They don't want to have to spend hours configuring a secure system for their customers, and they currently don't, so if they could just get out of the box that way they'd love it. I'd say that OBSD would have a much larger commercial appeal than Linux if it was well known, but you've never had fun until you tried to explain to a CIO why a MS product is NOT always the answer, much less trying to get them to go with some OS they have never even heard of.
I've been known to leave some pretty nasty comments in the code about the state of things, such as "This function sucks and is extremely wasteful. [Insert Name here] can't code his way out a wet paper bag.", and the like but I've never left any actual instances of cursing in the comments since I got out of college. It isn't professional and depending on your company can get you fired nice and quick.
Actually it would be better for radio telescopes, because you are even further away from the electronic nightmare that earth produces. Also you have all kinds of fun space trash for space telescopes to deal with (at least the ones around earth), which you wouldn't get on the moon. And it's not like dust stays off the group for a long time on the moon. No atmo and such.
So, the legislature of a state decides that
God has commanded people (Prophets) to practice Mormonism before, (read the Old Testament sometime) for certain situations. Mormonism is wrong today. Mormonism is also an evil that the whole world would be better off without. (back to the topic at hand).
So, where are the negative consequences of this action? As far as I can see, there are none. Whose rights are being violated? The Church Of Jesus Chirst and Latter Day Saints? Please
Do you think your statement is valid now?
That was some of the funniest stuff I've read on here in a long time. Bravo.
I say, you might want to visit an economics class or two before you start spouting nonsense about how the economy works
Since you make no points as to what part of his diatribe on the economy isn't true, I'd say you're just someone who doesn't like the truth.
And, since you have clearly not experienced it as a working adult, did your parents live in a run-down home with (a) dead-end job(s)?
So what if they have or haven't? This makes no difference. There is nothing noble about poverty. You can form a the same kind of world view no matter what type of background you come from.
Have you ever experienced real poverty of any sort? I'd gauge it at unlikely with the immature world-view you hold.
Once again, so what if he has or hasn't? This has no bearing on the topic. TV's and cars are not neccessary to live. It sucks to be poor, but you know, any adult has the oppurtunity to change his or her life, and has to live with the choices they have made. It may not be an easy row to hoe, but the chances are there. It is their own fault if they don't take them.
Looks like you sir are the one that needs to grow up.
You've got that wrong. What HDTV tuners let you do is view HD on an HD-ready TV. This won't help at all if you've got an old analog tv and need to convert digital signals to analog.
I don't think you're going to actually get a reply, you very well might be the only female that reads /.
Assuming of course that you are female.
So if an American was to try and pick up a british chick, would the accent thing work for him too?
Since when could you put spaces in identifiers in VB?
Because you like the short, shit covered, dripping dicks?
Didn't GE buy Westinghouse?
And if you would use YFB for a minute you'd realize that all you need to increase is the WIDTH of the printing heads. How do you do that? Put them side by side. The printer can print 847 mm/s in length, which is 33 inches. Which is 3 pages per second with a couple of head put together. Which is 180 pages per minute.
And if you had read TFA it stated that it would work for any size paper, all you have to do is keep adding heads. So to get from A6 to A4 you'd just need to have 4 heads instead of one.
I said that Brother has OSX drivers for some products. As far as Linux drivers, apparently I'm wrong, but you know, I just looked at the database that held all the information for driver support, and no where in there is there anything for Linux. Wonder how they're being supported. None of the techs here are trained to give support under Linux, so I guess it is outsourced somewhere else.
As far as I know none of the Brother employee's know anything about this. I'll ask when I go smoke in about 15 minutes to make sure.
I highly doubt it. None of the Brother products have Linux drivers. At least no drivers that are from Brother. It might have an OSX driver though, there are a couple of products that are floating around that have those.
Actually, this may mean they are planning on taking out the backwards comptability. That'd be sweet. I doubt it will happen in longhorn but maybe they're planning on taking it out in the next release after that and this is to simply get people ready for it.
You can fuse any element. The trick is that it requires MUCH more energy to do fusion on anything other than plain ole H.
/. My gut says that you'd definatly be able to refine the process some, but since I didn't get my Ph.D in high energy I can't say for sure, although I've got a friend who might be able to.
As far as scalabilty goes I don't think anyone really knows, or at least very few people do, and they most likely aren't on