The real problem is most manufacturers are taking the easy route with software controlled radio. The FCC is once again a stick in the mud, preventing them from releasing the required information for open source drivers.
Of course ndiswrapper works well enough, but only Managed and Ad-hoc modes function - those other modes (namely monitor and the access-point (forgot specific name)) can be very useful. Not to mention the idea of actual drivers for linux is more attractive.
The devices will still need to plug into the wireless hub itself. Why not use an adapter? the idea is you can put the hub somewhere else and only have the transmitter hooked to the computer.
Their car fucked up and they needed to stretch to pay for it, and their stuck in a shitty job for peanuts. As in my case. Of course now I'm unemployed (out of state relocation) and I'm working on never getting payed peanuts again.
If you use firefox, this extension should prevent any such PDF difficulties. I think this should be assimilated into the actual program instead of being left as an extension.
The website itself says that (slightly) older versions of the individual portable apps are in that suit. Better to just download them seperatly to make sure you get the latest.
and then watch as the 10% of the internet that actually does 90% of the work (made up the numbers...) dissapear from the "official" internet leaving the **AAs of the world with their thumbs up their asses and dumb looks on their faces.
Screw couterstrike, think Operation Flashpoint on a laaarge scale, game-in-progress joining, and no stupid "Tequila Sundown"-style CTF matches. Oh, and built-in voice chat that makes you sould like your on a transistor radio.
it's not that hard. Go outside. Talk to people. Listen (thats the important part).
Give it a few months and you will be suprised!
(Of course, get yourself in shape - not too hard. an hour 5 days out of the week on a cycle or treadmill will do the trick. lay off the sugary and fatty snacks)
That may be because the Apple doesn't yet have 13 trillion trojans out there taking advantage of that choice. Since Windows does, the awareness of the problem (and hence whether the OS hides them or not) is higher for Windows.
You would think they would try installing two identical dual-core chips. That would eliminate the problem of using two different types of chips. Also that would be a quad-core system! better than tri-core!
You're worrying about that around here? How many children under 16 do you think actually read all the way down into the comments this far (if they even go here at all, unlikely).
More than likely an i586 optimized i386 compatible binary. But what are you trying to run Q4 on non-x86 hardware for? (couldn't help it... i don't actually feel that way)
Slashdot Mirror
Er, run a packet sniffer on the world-facing interface outside your firewall and watch how often random pings from the internet pass by.
Maybe better would be a simple website with a small (5 letter) text field. Enter the right code, and it would ring.
I'm all for it. FOSS and indy games will take up the slack and hopefully become rather popular for it.
The real problem is most manufacturers are taking the easy route with software controlled radio. The FCC is once again a stick in the mud, preventing them from releasing the required information for open source drivers.
Of course ndiswrapper works well enough, but only Managed and Ad-hoc modes function - those other modes (namely monitor and the access-point (forgot specific name)) can be very useful. Not to mention the idea of actual drivers for linux is more attractive.
The devices will still need to plug into the wireless hub itself. Why not use an adapter? the idea is you can put the hub somewhere else and only have the transmitter hooked to the computer.
Or:
Their car fucked up and they needed to stretch to pay for it, and their stuck in a shitty job for peanuts. As in my case. Of course now I'm unemployed (out of state relocation) and I'm working on never getting payed peanuts again.
As per http://tinyurl.com/b6rym 3:42 EST, 01/05/2006
Google has a market value of 89,241,681,960 USD
IANAL; yes. But, for some reason this is stuck in my head: You can only do it once.
Not sure where it came from, but you may want to do some research into it before you go trying to do it.
If you use firefox, this extension should prevent any such PDF difficulties. I think this should be assimilated into the actual program instead of being left as an extension.
p ?id=636&application=firefox
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.ph
The website itself says that (slightly) older versions of the individual portable apps are in that suit. Better to just download them seperatly to make sure you get the latest.
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/portableoo/port able_openoffice_2.0.1_en-us.zip?download
Have fun.
and then watch as the 10% of the internet that actually does 90% of the work (made up the numbers...) dissapear from the "official" internet leaving the **AAs of the world with their thumbs up their asses and dumb looks on their faces.
OMG it is so obvious. The balls go in before the cops do, so the cops know where they are!
Not like you go around the corner and stick the mirror in to watch where you just came from... the mirrors go first too.
Screw couterstrike, think Operation Flashpoint on a laaarge scale, game-in-progress joining, and no stupid "Tequila Sundown"-style CTF matches. Oh, and built-in voice chat that makes you sould like your on a transistor radio.
Yes, I'm bitter.
it's not that hard. Go outside. Talk to people. Listen (thats the important part).
Give it a few months and you will be suprised!
(Of course, get yourself in shape - not too hard. an hour 5 days out of the week on a cycle or treadmill will do the trick. lay off the sugary and fatty snacks)
Ive even had propositions! THEY came to ME!
That may be because the Apple doesn't yet have 13 trillion trojans out there taking advantage of that choice. Since Windows does, the awareness of the problem (and hence whether the OS hides them or not) is higher for Windows.
You would think they would try installing two identical dual-core chips. That would eliminate the problem of using two different types of chips. Also that would be a quad-core system! better than tri-core!
I want to see someone stick an "Intel Inside" logo on the gate to an embassy.
You're worrying about that around here? How many children under 16 do you think actually read all the way down into the comments this far (if they even go here at all, unlikely).
Hehe, I would buy a dvd player just for the fact that it had a "No UPOs!" sticker on the box...
What? I can't see anything in your post.
That would be the mark of the "Overrated" mod. Not meta-modable either.
/. is hardly the place to stick bug reports...
And what ends up disabled because of turning that off?
If its nothing signifigant, than cool! But if half the program ceases to function...
Tone of voice doesn't carry over text very well. Neither does facial expressions.
More than likely an i586 optimized i386 compatible binary. But what are you trying to run Q4 on non-x86 hardware for? (couldn't help it... i don't actually feel that way)