VLC Media Player 0.8.4 is out
mctk writes "This new release features many improvements including a new VLC cone, new Mac OS X wizard and extend controls dialogs, tree playlist skins2 support, HTTP interface CGI handling, linux binary codecs loader, UPnP and Bonjour service discovery, shoutcast stream forwarding, new languages... Have a look here for the full list of changes. Binary packages and the source code are available on the VLC download page." Always been one of my favorites on any platform.
I really like VLC. For the longest time, I used Winamp to play all my media files, but it is painfully slow. iTunes is okay, but still lacking. And WMP is out of the question (I try to run Windows as non-Microsoft as possible). Then, when trying to find something to run .ogm (Ogg Vorbis video files), I came across VLC, and haven't used anything since. And the fact that it's released under GNU doesn't hurt at all.
have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
I'll reserve judgment 'til I've used it a bit more, but nine times out of ten, wizards are a usability disaster that are only marginally better than the abomination of an interface that necessitated them to begin with. (Those nine times are usually in Microsoft products.) You shouldn't need a wizard to set things up, or to create things--the options should be right there in front of you, and not require elaborate explanation. Wizards are kind of alien to the whole OS X experience, even though there are a few examples of decent, helpful wizards in the OS.
Also, I notice the new VLC still doesn't have a nice way to compensate for audio desynchronization. There should be a slider or something on the controller to scrub the audio sync back and forth in realtime. Add to that the totally awkward menu to select where to play fullscreen--why not just play it on whatever display the window's in right now?--and overall I'm disappointed in this update.
That said, it's still the best "free" player out there for OS X I've seen yet. Congratulations to the developers. It could be a great product, if only they'd pay a little more attention to usability and elegance.
Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)
http://www.lawrenceperson.com/
Am I doing something wrong? The last version of VLC was completely unusable on OS X. The new version doesn't seem much better. It's already hung hard once, and crashed two times on me.
Actually, looks like it's crashing every time I open it now. Nice.
Bryan
The world cares, deeply.
As in who gives a shit? Digg sucks ass.
Just like any project, they have to prioritize. Besides the massive amount of codecs it already does, it has h.264 running very well, which I have seen a lot more than WMV, and I use it on windows... I suppose I just avoid Windows Media in general. THe simple point is, if you want this codec so badly, make a monetary donation and add a Note: please put this towards the WMV3 codec! Ask and ye shall receive, but a little motivation couldn't hurt.
"The more pity, that fools may not speak wisely what wise men do foolishly" - Touchstone,Shakespeare's "As You Like It"
Always been one of my favorites on any platform.
I agree from my own experience. In fact, I find files (or discs) that either work strange or not at all on other media players (such as Windows Media Player or WinAMP) run just (or very close to) perfect on VLC. The capability to play VCD, SVCD, DVD, DVD (with menues) was a feature that I also found make the player even more flexible.
Does anyone here have experience with VLC for running your own streaming server? Also, anyone know if they are going to add capability to play RealPlayer files? I find RealPlayer as a major bloatware and RealAlternative (no offense, just from my experience) looks too much like (and as featured limited as) the original media player in Windows 95/98. For a good reference here's a full table of all features available on all the various Operating Systems that VLC works with. Very good product and highly recommended!
A lot of people recommend this very player for anime playback. Anime tends to come in a lot of formats (avi, mpeg, mkv, ogm) with a lot of codec requirements, and this player seems to have become a favorite in the anime circles. This is one of my favorite players and it's completely replaced most of the other media players I used to use.
One of the biggest perks for using VLC is it does *not* honor the 'thou shall not fast forward through the FBI warning and any damn previews/ads we applied the same flag to' setting. Skips right on by.
+++ UGUCAUCGUAUUUCU
I believe the people working on WMV3 are either ffmpeg and/or DVD-jon. If you really want it to be supported, you might want to bug them instead. I know DVD-jon has figured out how to use the VC-1 codec (same as WMV3) in conjunction with VLC, but the VC-1 codec is not under an open-source license.
There are at least two solutions to decoding WMV3 video stream in OS X. But you know the first one is a horrible Microsoft implementation and the other one is a licensed codec package from Flip4Mac that you have to pay. Currently, neither can't do what everyone wants... WMV3 video + MP3 audio in AVI container, which is the biting deficiency, and compounded by the fact that some anime file releases use exactly THAT format thanks to the existence of WMV9 VCM in Windows. Ugh.
As for VLC, it needs an OPEN-SOURCE decoder. Specifically, it'll be adapting something that ffmpeg guys are doing. That team has been tackling WMV3, a.k.a. VC-1 / VC-3 / WMV9 stuff for about a year now. They put preliminary support in, what, February? Apparently, peeps have so far gotten the key frame to decode, but it freezes there.
So what I'm saying is, it's nice to donate to VLC guys, but help ffmpeg guys first.
Serving time in Aristotelean prison for violating laws of physics
Yup, this is the big I'm interested in! I wonder if it will also work with OGG/Theora that way.
Unfortunately I will have to compile this from source for Linux because the rpm and deb packages are so hopelessly lame. They only enable half the codecs (like Theora) or functions (like PVR support) for no good reason I know about. However, whoever looks after the Windows installer pays a lot more care and attention and the Windows version is more representative of what VLC can do. I even resort to running it under Wine sometimes.
Yes, I did re-complile the RPMs myself for my particular distro of choice and one day I might even get them accepted!
I think about 60% of my Slashdot posts over the last few months have been about how peeved I am with half-assed-compiled VLC Linux packages.
Worst volume control of all time...
Download from mirror at this location:5 8&s=171
http://www.free-codecs.com/download_soft.php?d=11
The VLC site was down earlier today when I tried downloading it. Has anyone made a torrent of this release? Mirrors?
.82, you have to specificly set a directory to save the capture to, otherwise the option on the menu would say it was capturing but never gave an error to say it had no place to save it to.
I figured out how to take a screen capture the other day in
The volume control is also less accurate than other programs' I've used. But I've had better luck playing more files with VLC than Media Player Classic.
Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
A mac os X wizard only works for people with macs. A new cone? That's a huge improvement. A new codec loader: the only *useful* improvement that's listed in the article. This is only a *minor* release.
I still use WinAmp for audio files. I can play an entire folder of music with one right-click on the folder itself, as opposed to taking all that effort into opening the player beforehand. If VLC had this function, there'd be no contest. But then again, maybe I'm just spoiled.
I hate that codec. It's not like MPEG4 derivatives are multi-platform, why do people still insist on using WMV?
From what I see on the website, VLC looks a lot like Xine. I know that Xine handles all the codecs I'm concened about just fine (wmv, mpeg, mov), so why is VLC so much better?
well vlc for me works 90% of the time, i use it as my personal tv player since tv in china sucks (output to svideo, love nvidia), so now i have VOD with pause :D all via the httpd interface, it only crashes after a week or so of deleting and adding items to the play list, so now i'm going to go over and compile this sucka for freebsd, well done guys
for a streaming server, you may want to consider a streaming server like VideoLAN's VLS. :-)
...I just tried playing a standard AVI file I got from my digital camera using the latest version of VLC. It promptly opened an oversized window that filled the screen, showed no video, and maxed out my processor until I was able to quit the thing.
Back to 0.8.3 for me, I guess....
I like VLC quite a bit as my main media (read: video) player on Fedora Core, but there's one thing missing:
I understand there is a plugin for Mozilla but where is the one for Firefox?!
In the changelog ..
..
Mac OS X port:
* New script to delete the preferences automatically
I see OSX is now getting standard Windows functionality
Robert Anton Wilson
why is the Windows version without the installer 6mb larger than the one with the installer?
Thanks, guys, for all the great work. This and Firefox are some of the ones that make all the difference.
uhuh, and I was downloading it from my debian repository before Digg had it. It's ten hours on a release notice. Who cares?
I'm using mplayer windows binaries with all the non-free DLL codecs, it plays everything I throw at it. It's fast, stable, and I can use same thing under windows I do use under linux.
You should try it too. http://www.mplayerhq.hu/
--Coder
It used to be in a monitor. http://images.google.com/images?q=vlc+mac+icon
"At all. It can't quit."
yes i can, in exactly the same one as it does on every other platform that mplayer runs on: HIT Q.
or alternatively, use the mainline build instead of the old unmaintained os x fork: i think they have created a single integrated application now, which seems to be what you desire.
I've had virtually the same experience; it loves to start skipping frames heavily and then grind to a complete stop- despite using only about 1/3rd of the available CPU power according to top. The only solution is to pause and wait a good 10-15 seconds. Also, doing things in other programs now seems to heavily influence VLC; I can load up a rather simple webpage in Firefox and VLC will drop video+audio frames all over the place.
It also stutters when playing back over anything slower than local disk; 100BaseT isn't fast enough for a 256kB/sec file to play properly, and over 802.11g (full signal yadda yadda) it's even worse. Nobody on the VLC IRC channel has been able to explain why, but it seems that the buffer is completely exhausted, then a read is performed to fill the buffer, and playback continues. Why the buffer isn't "floating" or doesn't at LEAST intelligently adjust how soon it refills the buffer is beyond me- but not being able to play a 256KB stream over 802.11G is absolutely inexcuseable.
Lengthening the buffer sort of helps- but VLC takes at least the buffer length to respond to rew/fw/pause, so a 1 second buffer means you hit pause, and one second later it actually pauses.
A more general beef I have is that unlike Xine on Linux, you can't do variable speed playback or frame-by-frame advance/rewind. I've often had times I wished I could take a screengrab of something, but after a half dozen tries I still wasn't able to pause exactly where I wanted. Mplayer has this sort of functionality (I THINK), but I haven't been able to find ANY documentation as to what the default keyboard shortcuts are for Mplayer on ANY platform.
Please help metamoderate.
I'd never even bothered with VLC, never understood all the hubris. Totem, Xine, Mplayer, Linux is absolutely brimming with media players that avoid the apparent pangs of the proprietary world.
:)
That said I'll have to check it out.
Quack, quack.
The installer compresses files.
Synergy is your friend
Apparently, the drive on the new powerbooks doesn't let VLC get by without asking for regions.
I Think it's one of the most polished player on the Linux desktop. I really don't like the way xine and MPlayer have their controls, and Totem is lacking in other departments. The only other player on Linux that has this polished look is realplayer but well... it's realplayer.
Media Player Classic is still my player of choice on windows. It has a nice interface, can step through videos, play fan subs, bookmark etc.
VLC is nice but the ui isnt so hot and it seems to do odd things sometimes.
I use many different players due to the hopeless muddle of codecs available. Basically, I can play any video file you throw at me if you give me enough time. This list shows just how bad it really is:
VLC: For use when PowerDVD gets the shakes, media player classic doesn't work, windows media player doesn't work, the Zoom player doesn't work, Quicktime doesn't work, and for streaming over a network
Media Player Classic: The awesomest player in the world due to its small size and ability to play RealMedia and Quicktime files (usually), the ability to play Windows-based codecs without dropping frames like in VLC, and for use when sites give links like in Amazon (for the audio previews, copy the location and paste it into the "Open File" dialog box).
Zoom Player: A good backup. Both this and MPClassic come with the Real Alternative pack.
Quicktime Player: Good for when all other Quicktime-playing software fails and H.264
PowerDVD: When VLC refuses to play the AVI or MPG file with issues, PowerDVD has an awesome capability - it just skips frames instead of freezing, and it ALWAYS keeps in sync.
Windows Media Player (definitely not to be confused with MPClassic): It's kind of ok, and so far has only shown its worth when playing H.264 codecs provided by the Combined Community Codecs Pack. Oh yeah, and MP3s don't sound too bad either.
DivX Player: Released by the DivX Labs, the latest version is much, much more stable and offers post-processing for ATI video cards. It can clean up your heavily compressed AVI file very nicely, but does require a noticable amount of resources to do so. PowerDVD (I'm pretty sure) can perform slightly the same job for a fraction of the processing time, though I could be wrong since I haven't tested it all that much.
Winamp: The venerable Winamp has shown itself a resource hog in its older days. When will they actually begin to optimize it instead of adding new features or security fixes that shouldn't be required in the first place? I have 2.9 for sentimental reasons, though I use version 5 for my music, coupled with HQProcsoft to milk as much from my Audigy 2 card as possible (uses software resampling - I now have audio resampled to 9600 and an output bit resolution of 32). HQProcsoft is like aural candy, and Winamp's music plugins like the Pacemaker and the visualizations are quite simply, awesome. Not for use for video files unless you want to clean the audio up. You will notice a substantial improvement using HQProcsoft in conjunction with video files though (warning: wmv is not supported by HQProcsoft)!
I use every single one of those players regularly, trying to find the one which shows the best picture and sound for any single video file I am viewing. I have actually not used Winamp all that often for video files, preferring Windows Media Player Classic for most of my needs (where else can you get such an awesome interface with instant access to subtitles, audio types,etc.?). I'm not recommending you do what I do, but hopefully what I've said above will help you choose. As a rule of thumb, you should only really need windows media player classic and VLC for most applications. Though with the rise of H.264, anything could happen.
Yes, I did re-complile the RPMs myself for my particular distro of choice and one day I might even get them accepted!
No, you won't. There's a perfectly valid reason why your distro of choice doesn't compile in all of the codecs - they would like to avoid being sued out of existence.
You see, pretty much every media format except for OGG/Theora is patented up the wazoo. So anyone that distributes binaries may as well just paint "sue me suckers" on their chest.
Now the guy that has built the Windows binaries and put them up for download obviously doesn't care about the threat of legal action. You could say that he has big balls. Positively massive in fact.
So here's a solution - you can put your homemade RPM up for download. Of course you will make yourself the target for a team of highly trained attack lawyers. But since you are a) happy to suggest that others take the risk on your behalf and b) so concerned that 60% of your posts are about this very issue, I don't see why it should be a problem for you. It can be your contribution to Open Source.
No need to thank me - just send me a postcard when you get to Guantanamo.
Jealousy hurts, doesn't it?
Digg = 1 line stories followed by 50 x 1 line comments. A lot like yours in fact.
That's why you like Digg isn't it? You feel that you are among intellectual equals. And from what I've seen you're almost certainly correct.
One question - if Digg is so good, why are you on Slashdot?
I look forward to your reply of "you suck" or "your mom smells" with baited breath.
PS. Now that you've aroused my interest I think I'm going to go and start trolling on Digg. Does Digg have the same protections against trolls that Slashdot has? No? Oh, so sad.
- New extended controls panel
Does this mean pausing and frame controls are implemented? What am I doing here - I should be downloading this!
oh I am.
#hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
VLC was originally put together by a bunch of french students. Apparently...students go out & get drunk and take odd things home with them- in this case road cones.
So there ya go...alcohol and youthful exuberance. I wonder what the British marines would have as their icon if they ever brought a multimedia player out?
The problem is, the only people who ever talk about Digg are loudmouth wanker fanboys, making Digg much like Gentoo; while it may be "teh new hotness", I wouldn't fucking touch that shit with a twenty foot barge poll. I wouldn't want to associate myself with that sort of fucking idiot.
VLC manages to embody the essential dichotomy of the OSS vs Proprietary Software debate.
Get an installer for Windows or the Mac and you get a useful multi-purpose tool that has more flexibility and fewer restrictions than the equivalent commercial software.
Try to install it on Linux and you realise the advantages of a commercial platform onto which you simply install binary application packages. There are *some* packages available for VLC, provided you happen to have the right version of the right Linux distribution, but most have some important features configured out. Try to compile it yourself and get ready for a nightmare of dependencies on specific (sometimes elderly) versions of obscure libraries, header files that your Linux distribution didn't think to provide and a number of other little glitches that have you tearing your hair out. Or, more likely, giving up.
Now if only there were an open platform onto which you could simply copy an open application and just have it run...
I use VLC for viewing movies on a PowerBook. VLC has a nice equalizer that you can amp the volume up loud enough to actually hear the movies, mplayer doesn't have that.
Which is a handy improvement, given that these are showing up a lot now.
In Winamp, use classic skin support. The "improved" GUI, while pretty and all is a major ressource hog - which is quite impressive for something that static...
Many people claim that what's so great about VLC is that it doesn't need codecs to playback video files. Yay! Well, that's just not true, in fact, that's quite impossible. All video files are encoded somehow, and in order to playback the video it must be decoded first. Hence the codec.
VLC uses the libavcodec codec to decode video. This codec handles a lot of different formats (see list) where codecs usually just handle one format. This approach has benefits and drawbacks. The obvious benefit is that the codec-hunting days of yore can be dispensed with. The less-than-obvious drawback is that a multi-purpose tool is almost never as good as a dedicated tool. The truth is that VLC very often doesn't playback video with the same quality as players using dedicated codecs.
I recommend using a player with dedicated codecs. I use BSPlayer, as it is easy on the resources, stable, with extensive, configurable features (it is ugly though, so change the skin for your own sake). Other players are probably just as good, but after having tried all the popular ones, this is my favorite. Install codecs only when necessary; use GSpot to figure out which is needed. Do not use codec packs, they are evil.
This being said, I do use VLC as a can opener for the occasional weird video file. For this use, VLC is great!
Use the source ... If that's too hard, then maybe you shouldn't be using a computer.
Excellent. You go teach all our data entry clerks C++ so that they can "use a computer". Then you can explain to the MD why this was necessary. While you're at it, better teach him C++, he even has a powerbook and wants to know how to play movies on it. Good luck on the not being fired out on your ass.
Oh, and while you're at it, change the sparkplugs and oil filters on your car. If that's too hard, you have no business driving. Leave driving to the auto mechanics, yeah!
What's this aural candy HQProcsoft? Google doesn't get me a single hit.
Most of them probably don't know of any other platform, or don't care whatsoever.
And the Stop/Pause are still for the buffer and not for the playback, meaning if you have 3 second playback buffer - it'll keep playing for 3 seconds after you push the 'Pause' button. Dumb... :(
It would be entirely legal to distribute "patented" codecs from a jurisdiction where the patents on the aforementioned codecs are legally invalid.
This is why I'm surprised that Mandriva, being a joint French-Brazilian concern {i.e. both countries that don't recognise software patents}, don't include patent-encumbered source code in their distribution by default anyway.
Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
Have they finally included some nice zoom features, like xine has?
Still pretty much equal scores. (There are some bad weeks, and some good weeks, but overall the difference is negligible.)
Too bad, this new version still stutters when playing DVDs on my Windows 2000 box.
1.7G Hz should be fast enough. Any suggestions.
In my efforts to avoid Windows Media Player and switch from Quinntessential (which is free but closed and I figured perhaps long-in-the-tooth), I recently tried VLC on my living room laptop. It did so poorly with media from network shares that I installed both WinAmp and Quinntessential to see if there was a networking problem I wasn't diagnosing. Nope. VLC simply couldn't play the files cleanly while the other two could.
This wasn't a problem with files from the internet, but those tend to be downloaded locally before playback.
Oh my! That was one mother of a typo on the parent post.
I meant to say that the codecs like Theora were missing, not included. I'm really not interested in the proprietry codecs as I am interested in using open codecs for streaming via Icecast. Yes, some distros miss out Theora and virtually all of them miss out PVR support.
i was wondering if anybody could help me out? My grandmothers computer keeps on messing up, and i don't know why. She has Firefox, not netscape or explorer. I took all instant messaging services off of her computer as well. Still the computer shuts down on me, or freezes up all of a sudden, im thinking maybe it is because she has a habit of downloading games off of the internet. please help me!
"They stole my lie"
One thing I'm puzzled that VLC doesn't do is provide a hotkey for skipping DVD chapters forwards and backwards. I went looking and found this changeset, which if I read correctly is a patch to a branched version of the 0.8.1 version of the code. I'm afraid it doesn't help me much, though, because I don't know how to obtain the branched version to patch it. It shows, though, that someone was willing to put the time in to develop this feature. I wonder why it hasn't found its way into the official code base?
If you don't have a boot cd google for something, I like bart's stuff.
If the computer acts strangely from a boot cd then it has to be a mobo/memory/cpu/ps problem.
Man, you really need that seminar!
http://hqsoftproc.go.ro/