Slashdot Mirror


New Worm Chats with Users on AIM

goldseries writes "CNet is reporting that a new IM worm chats with users to get them to down load a file containing a virus. The virus replicates its self and sends its self out to user's buddy lists. The virus will reply 'lol no this is not a virus.' The virus hides users from seeing the messages sent out to members of their buddy list. Viruses are evolving; now they will even talk to you."

577 comments

  1. lol no this is not a virus by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 5, Funny

    my God, this one will be unstoppable.

    1. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Man, when I read that summary, all I could think was "OMGLOLLMAOROFLWTFBBQR2D2!"

      But seriously, that's good.

      What this needs to be stopped is a way of educating users that "mypsace_11.com" being saved to your computer is NOT a website.

    2. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 4, Funny

      *correction*

      Windows needs to be fixed so that executables renamed as PIF are NOT executed. God that's stupid.

    3. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol ima pwn ur harddrive

    4. Re:lol no this is not a virus by prionic6 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This will come in to you from another AIM-user you KNOW and who is infected. Not some stranger.

    5. Re:lol no this is not a virus by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Imagine if it said:
      LOLOMGBBQ!!!11!

      It'd penetrate every AIM computer on the planet in minutes.

      I've speculated for a while that viruses would start to use bots or AI to try and convince a user that a file sent was clean. If I ever get a file through an IM program I challenge the user before I consider opening it, and I wouldn't open something called "happy.pif" under any circumstances.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    6. Re:lol no this is not a virus by b4k3d+b34nz · · Score: 4, Funny

      FTA: "A new worm that targets users of America Online's AOL Instant Messenger..."

      What did anyone expect?

      --
      Grammar Lesson: you're is a contraction of "you are"; your means you possess something; yore means days gone by.
    7. Re:lol no this is not a virus by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Interesting
      my God, this one will be unstoppable.

      Don't you just hate it when Insightful gets modded Funny?

      I can picture it now. All these lusers whining about their toasted computers... 'But my buddy sent it to me! No, I know about viruses, so I asked if it was for real, and he said it wasn't a virus! It sounded just like him!'

      How the hell is this going to be stopped? It's easy to beat the AOL Turing test, because these people use such a warped and simplified form of English that leaves out most of the quirks that give away the lack of any intelligence behind the text. Either we educate AOLusers - in English rather than in computer science - so that they use more complex language that machines can't readily mimic, or we shut down file transfers over IM.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    8. Re:lol no this is not a virus by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny
      My favorite book title is "AOL for Dummies".

      Well ya. What's your point?

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    9. Re:lol no this is not a virus by tpgp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Windows needs to be fixed so that executables renamed as PIF are NOT executed. God that's stupid.

      How about fixing windows so that it uses execute bit in the filesystem, rather then the extension of the file to decide whether to execute something or not?

      --
      My pics.
    10. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So people can send out executable jpegs? No thanks.

    11. Re:lol no this is not a virus by tehshen · · Score: 4, Funny

      You forgot to include "lol this is not flamebait" in your post.

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    12. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Lindril · · Score: 4, Funny
      How the hell is this going to be stopped?

      It's been suggested many times, but it may now be required... euthanizing AOL users.

    13. Re:lol no this is not a virus by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also: if we used proper grammar and spelling, I think it would be easier to filter spam. I'm not involved with the spam problem so much, but it seems to me "words" like v14gr4 would cause problems. Meanwhile if we could detect "v14gr4" isn't a word in our dictionary, we might be able to flag the email as potential spam. Then if you were working on something where the project's code name was "v14gr4" or something, the word would appear underlined, you would click it and click "Add word to dictionary." I don't know if that's even the best way, but I think if everyone used proper spelling and grammer, computer comprehension (and filtering) would be able to improve. I might be wrong.

    14. Re:lol no this is not a virus by nege · · Score: 1

      Infect them all. Let God s(n)ort them out.

      No seriously...if these people are as 'lusery' as everyone says (and I agree), then they will probably get the virus. There has always been some level of responsibility on the operator of the computer to have enough know-how to help themselves. Its a sort of digital natural selection - we are saying here that those who take the time to learn some BASIC computer skills will manage to get by ok. The others will have to pay compusa 45$ an hour to fix their computer.

    15. Re:lol no this is not a virus by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      How about both (execute bit, AND only executing .EXE, .COM, .PIF, and .SCR), and giving a message whenever any process other than CMD.EXE attempts to spawn a .COM? (IIRC, some of the command line tools might still be .COM files, and there's other legitimate reasons to run a .COM from the command line.)

      I forget whether DOS apps still get PIFs on NT - I know they do on 9x/ME, and it might just be a carryover from that.

    16. Re:lol no this is not a virus by tpgp · · Score: 4, Informative

      So people can send out executable jpegs? No thanks.

      I said execute bit in the filesystem.

      So - the virus would come in from the mail system with the execute bit set to 0, the user would have to download the file, get its properties, and tick the "execute" checkbox.

      --
      My pics.
    17. Re:lol no this is not a virus by intangible · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about, and here's a tough one: Microsoft unhide the @%$@#$%@ file extensions on everything by default. WTF is up with hiding them?

      How many trojans are named "something.jpg.exe" or just have a picture icon, or html icon when it's truly an exe? What motard at MS thought hiding "the oh so complex" file extension was a good thing?

      Seriously, this one has bugged me for years. Dumbing down computer interfaces beyond a certain point is just asking for trouble.

    18. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Darth+Muffin · · Score: 1

      At least it's not lying. Since it requires user intervention to download it's a TROJAN, not a VIRUS! An advanced and automated trojan, but still a trojan nonetheless.

      --
      Real programmers use "copy con program.exe"
    19. Re:lol no this is not a virus by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      euthanizing AOL users

      No. just deny them use of computers until after rehabilitation. Now those who get broadband access AND STILL BUY AOL because it's the Internet, those are the ones to use your tactics on.

    20. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up - makes a hell of a valid point.

    21. Re:lol no this is not a virus by catalyst · · Score: 1

      we are saying here that those who take the time to learn some BASIC computer skills will manage to get by ok

      While BASIC served me well growing up in the 80's, I'd actually recommend something along the lines of "HTML/CSS plus some Java and WSH" to the n00b of the next generation.

    22. Re:lol no this is not a virus by PhoenixPath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or just end up being a fully functionaly Zombie.

      And that's all we need. Another 144 Million Zombie Bot-net.

      Yeah, it'll sort itself out...when we get our "Interneational Reformat, FDISK-MBR, and Re-Install Day"

    23. Re:lol no this is not a virus by tsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple also hide file extensions by default. It's amazingly annoying, but I never here anyone complain about that, only about MS doing it. Weird.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    24. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Jaruzel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, PIFs are now legacy.

      On 2000,XP and 2003 DOS apps settings are now held in two places, the registry and inside the .LNK file (the actual shortcut).

      However, PIFs are still supported execution-wise in the OS to maintain backwards compatiblity - something that *shuold* have been eradicated/managed-out with XPs SP2 and all it's 'security' updates - something along the lines of:

      'You've have tried to run the file CelineDionNaked.jpg.pif, this may not be a legitimate application. Choose Run to run the file, Delete to delete the file, and Update to convert to a Windows XP icon.'

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    25. Re:lol no this is not a virus by generic-man · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Apple never used file extensions except for PC compatibility back before Mac OS X. Now that they use file extensions for almost everything, they hide extensions to evoke the "feel" of older Mac OS versions.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    26. Re:lol no this is not a virus by volsung · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I've seen more than one person suggest a filter which would junk messages which contain more than X% (say 2-5%) misspellings. This would not only eliminate all that foreign spam which you can't read anyway, but a great many "English" spams which contain all sorts of garbage to fool keyword filters. Of course, spammers will compensate by padding emails with 98% Shakespeare, so that advantage won't last long.

      As a fringe benefit it will also filter out anyone who can't be bothered to spell most of their email correctly, which might be handy for those who receive crazy rants due to their online postings. :)

    27. Re:lol no this is not a virus by troon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      if everyone used proper spelling and grammer, computer comprehension (and filtering) would be able to improve.

      QED. It may interest you to know how many ways there are to spell Viagra...

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    28. Re:lol no this is not a virus by jim_v2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We have users that are already downloading zip files, opening then, running the executable and getting infected. Is it really that much harder to also check a box in order to get infected? I don't think it would make a difference.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    29. Re:lol no this is not a virus by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1
      we educate AOLusers
      I say we don't. These people are paying for service (to clean their computer from viruses), for software (anti-viruses), why should someone else, except themselves, bother? Stupidity is constant inexhaustible source of money! If they don't want to learn -- let them pay for it.
      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    30. Re:lol no this is not a virus by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      I've seen more than one person suggest a filter which would junk messages which contain more than X% (say 2-5%) misspellings... Of course, spammers will compensate by padding emails with 98% Shakespeare, so that advantage won't last long.

      Shakespeare couldn't even spell his own name consistently. If you were to implement a filter that junked emails if they contained too many misspelled words, the Bard wouldn't have a prayer of getting through. Remember, he lived before the publication of the first dictionary; spellings were more or less optional in Elizabethan England.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    31. Re:lol no this is not a virus by vertinox · · Score: 1

      my God, this one will be unstoppable.

      I dunno... It is one thing to get a virus via aim, but I'd be more concerned if it gave me a link and said:

      "lol no this is not goatse man"

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    32. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell is this going to be stopped? It's easy to beat the AOL Turing test, because these people use such a warped and simplified form of English that leaves out most of the quirks that give away the lack of any intelligence behind the text.

      I think you assume too much of the typical AOL user.

    33. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not only that, but MacOS (even back to version 1) makes it really easy to disguise a executable as any other type of file. And from version 7.0 on, you can even paste any icon over any type of file.

      But yes, nobody complains except when Microsoft does stuff like this. Goofy.

      What's even goofier is that in OS X, as far as I can figure, "show file extension" is a file-specific flag, not a user-specific flag. Unless I'm missing something, it's impossible to get OS X to show file extensions on all files all the time.

    34. Re:lol no this is not a virus by IAmTheDave · · Score: 1

      "Darn confounded AOL just let me open the picture already! Hmm... I wonder what type of picture has a .exe extension..."

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    35. Re:lol no this is not a virus by _xeno_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Windows NT/2000/XP already have this (sorta). You can set execute privileges on files, just like in UNIX.

      However, a default Windows XP install will be set up to inherit all permissions from the root of the drive, and will have the Users group set to Read, Execute, and Traverse Directories. So everything you download is by default executable, and no program I know of ever bothers to unset that. (Actually, the latest version of IE will store some metadata with executable files downloaded through it that marks the file as being "untrusted," but I think that only Windows Explorer (basically, IE itself) actually respects that metadata.)

      The other thing you need to understand is that, like UNIX, you can essentially exec (on Windows, ShellExecute ) any file on the system. Unlike UNIX, though, the kernel won't actually try and interpret the file. Instead the Windows API (I think) will look up the file type and send the file off to the approriate handler. So when you call ShellExecute, you're essentially acting like the user clicked on the file in Windows Explorer. To most programs like AIM, there's no difference between executing another program and opening a file in its viewer. As far as I know, there's really no way of asking Windows "are you going to just look at that, or actually run that?"

      The basic point here is that while Windows XP (and NTFS) do support an Executable flag, by default it's always on. Plus the "launch file" API will also run programs, and there's really no way to be certain that a file you're launching won't essentially be an executable.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    36. Re:lol no this is not a virus by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Execute bit in the Windows filesystem?

      I think that's filed in with C.V. joints for BMWs and distributor caps for Citroën 2CVs.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    37. Re:lol no this is not a virus by MORB · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure AOL users would be able to pass the turing test themselves.

    38. Re:lol no this is not a virus by intangible · · Score: 1

      If I used Macs more often, I'd complain even louder about this "feature" on them; I mean, one-button mouse (AGH!), but it's not as big a problem as hiding essential information about files from your users (If someone says something about not needing extensions on *nix/BSD systems, well, that's fine, but give me popup mime-type or something if you really hate file-extensions). I thought Apple had a little more common sense than MS.

      I use Ubuntu and Debian myself, but have to work on Windows machines daily, if you're wondering.

    39. Re:lol no this is not a virus by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      It won't be unstoppable until it masters: "u wnt to cyb3r?"

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    40. Re:lol no this is not a virus by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure it would. Just don't tell them how to do it.

      Seriously. I think if you're too dumb to be able to right click, select properties, click the permissions tab, and select "execute", apply, and ok, then you should not be able to install the latest "Hello Kitty" mouse pointer or whatever other crap you've managed to download.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    41. Re:lol no this is not a virus by eMartin · · Score: 1

      "What's even goofier is that in OS X, as far as I can figure, "show file extension" is a file-specific flag, not a user-specific flag. Unless I'm missing something, it's impossible to get OS X to show file extensions on all files all the time."

      It's a global option in the Finder's preferences, but even then, some apps will still hide them.

    42. Re:lol no this is not a virus by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Of course, I'm not familiar with the way malware authors inject their payload into a .PIF (do they just rename a .EXE to a .PIF?), but what would happen when a corrupt .PIF would get converted into a .LNK?

      Also, could such a thing be done to the .LNK?

    43. Re:lol no this is not a virus by tsa · · Score: 1

      You're missing something. In the Finder, do Preferences -> advanced -> show all file extensions.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    44. Re:lol no this is not a virus by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Yea, but since apple is bsd based, the file extension doesn't actually MEAN anything, so why display it?

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    45. Re:lol no this is not a virus by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Either we educate AOLusers - in English rather than in computer science - so that they use more complex language that machines can't readily mimic, or we shut down file transfers over IM.

      On the flip side, if someone messaged me in aim with proper english spellings and correct grammar, I'd be more suspect that they are a bot rather than a real person.

      No one spends time spell checking aim messages and common mistakes constantly occur. If the conversation was perfect, flags would start to raised. That is why AI needs to have programmed imperfections to pass as a human.

      However this situation is mearly a canned text response.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    46. Re:lol no this is not a virus by gg3po · · Score: 1
      So - the virus would come in from the mail system with the execute bit set to 0, the user would have to download the file, get its properties, and tick the "execute" checkbox.

      ....but, but, but...

      ...poor Joe Sixpack (holy grail of a useability expert that he is) would never be able to do that! :-)

      --
      ---
    47. Re:lol no this is not a virus by The+NPS · · Score: 1

      You bet. First thing I do on a windows machine is un-hide file extentions, system files, and hidden files. And also stop caching thumbnails -- but that's a different problem.

    48. Re:lol no this is not a virus by eMartin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "You've have tried to run the file CelineDionNaked.jpg.pif, this may not be a legitimate application. Choose Run to run the file, Delete to delete the file, and Update to convert to a Windows XP icon."

      For many people, that sentence would mean nothing other than "hit run to proceed".

    49. Re:lol no this is not a virus by gg3po · · Score: 3, Insightful
      'You've have tried to run the file CelineDionNaked.jpg.pif, this may not be a legitimate application. Choose Run to run the file, Delete to delete the file, and Update to convert to a Windows XP icon.'

      Anyone that would even be remotely interested in clicking on a file that was labeled CelineDionNaked.* has more immediate and serious issues than their pWn3d w1nbl03s box.

      --
      ---
    50. Re:lol no this is not a virus by gg3po · · Score: 4, Funny
      My favorite book title is "AOL for Dummies".

      ME TOO!!!

      --
      ---
    51. Re:lol no this is not a virus by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      Mac OS always used file extensions, they just called them something else. Technically, the original FAT system stored file names as an 8-byte name and a 3-byte extension. In exactly the same way, Mac OS saved the file name, a "file type" code (a four-byte extension) and a "creator" code.

      So under DOS you might have "MYFILE.TXT", under Mac OS you'd have something more like "MyFile.TEXT.R*ch". It's still the same concept, just expressed a different way.

      And to all the people saying that "BSD doesn't use file extensions:" Yes, you're technically correct. BSD, the kernel, doesn't use file extensions. However, every file system viewer I've used on a UNIX machine did. It's just metadata that happens to be stored as part of the file name. Yes, it would be really cool if we started using MIME types to move that metadata out of the file name. But that metadata should STILL be visible, so that someone call tell the difference between "CoolPic.jpg" and "CoolPic.exe" without having to open a metadata browser.

      (Along those lines, it would be really cool if Windows Explorer started adding an icon to all executable files, sort of like it does for shortcut files. Something to mark a file as being "executable" even if it happens to use the same icon that JPEG files do.)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    52. Re:lol no this is not a virus by NatasRevol · · Score: 2, Informative

      In at least Panther and Tiger:

      Finder>Preferences>Advanced

      Tick the Show all file extensions box.

      Enjoy .app all over the place.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    53. Re:lol no this is not a virus by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      No one spends time spell checking aim messages and common mistakes constantly occur. If the conversation was perfect, flags would start to raised. That is why AI needs to have programmed imperfections to pass as a human.

      OK... have the AI produce its response, and then have it pipe through a filter. This filter will take each character in the message in turn, and for each one it will (on the roll of a 1) replace the letter with an adjacent letter from the standard QWERTY layout, and (on the roll of a 20) prepend an adjacent letter from the QWERTY layout to the original letter.

      Plausible typos that might be made by an intelligent user attempting to write good English but doing so rather too quickly to be entirely accurate.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    54. Re:lol no this is not a virus by RiotNrrd · · Score: 1

      It's easy to beat the AOL Turing test...

      "AOL Turing Test" is now my new favorite phrase.

      This really makes me want to clean up on my IM shorthand.

    55. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Echnin · · Score: 1

      Hm. I don't have that checked, but I see file extensions on most files.. Looking around, some files don't even have extensions, such as the data files for Diablo II; looking at the Type column, however, I see it is a "Diablo II data archive". More descriptive than "MPQ", no? There's also a Diablo II Install log.html, and a Patch.txt, both with their extensions intact. The only type I've found that hides the extension is .app: executable archives. A lot of files don't have file extensions at all; my knowledge of the file system on OS X is limited, but I'm guessing the type is stored in the metadata. A pretty elegant solution, I think. Are there any extensions other than .app that are hidden? It seems no common extensions that are hidden in XP and that I would like to be able to see (such as doc rtf txt, avi mov mpeg, jpg gif tiff) are hidden.

      --
      Lalala
    56. Re:lol no this is not a virus by MoogMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can imagine it now:

      dingALing!

      "lol no this is not a virus. but u gotta chown root:root notavirus; chmod o+xS notavirus to read it!"

    57. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      o rly?

    58. Re:lol no this is not a virus by daeley · · Score: 1

      But yes, nobody complains except when Microsoft does stuff like this. Goofy.

      Except there are people complaining about it right now, including yourself, so you've all managed to undo your collective point. ;)

      What's even goofier is that in OS X, as far as I can figure, "show file extension" is a file-specific flag, not a user-specific flag. Unless I'm missing something, it's impossible to get OS X to show file extensions on all files all the time.

      Finder -> Preferences -> Advanced

      Checkbox for "Show all file extensions"

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    59. Re:lol no this is not a virus by NotoriousGOD · · Score: 1

      How about people who are too lazy to learn about virii(sp?) or other internet threats get their computer screwed up. Then, computer technicians can be hired to come and fix it. Then those computer technicians will need to buy software in order to fix the problem. Someone has to make the software and someone has to pay them. We are all connected in the circle of life. I know that sounds maybe childish, ignorant or stupid. But there will always be people who are getting "hacked". How about just not being one of them and helping your friends out when they need it? Let the lower end of the "internet food chain" be eaten.

      --
      Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.
    60. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Procyon101 · · Score: 1

      It's been done in a bot I saw a few years ago called Alice. It's a good technique. Alice actually typed in real time and would go so far as to delete a few chars back to correct a typo.

    61. Re:lol no this is not a virus by krakelohm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the problem is that you would still have 90% of the people running something.jpg.exe even if they saw the extention. Most people still have no clue what '.exe' is, but since there is a '.jpg' they would still double click it thinking its a picture.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    62. Re:lol no this is not a virus by natedubbya · · Score: 1
      How the hell is this going to be stopped?

      By having friends that don't use acronyms like "lol" and "rofl"

    63. Re:lol no this is not a virus by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This user that somehow managed to Run Explorer, clicked Tools ... Folder Options, clicked the View tab and unticked "Hide file extensions of known file types".

      (we'll ignore the WTF of unhiding something by unticking it)

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    64. Re:lol no this is not a virus by skayell · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that AOL users can be educated? In English or in any other subject? How about we, the people, get our heads together and grass-root market LINUX so we can have something in our IN boxes and chat boxes other than viruses and worms? It only took one worm to make me switch!

    65. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Hiding the file type (and creator, which is a concept unique to MacOS) in the meta-data has always been the way that MacOS has always worked, since 1.0. That's my point; hiding the file type in the meta-data makes it *very* each to make "jpeg" file that has the icon for a "jpeg" file but is actually an application. And since you need ResEdit, or an equivalent utility, to see the actual metadata that determines this, it's very hard to detect.

      Old shareware programs used to use stand-alone text viewers for their Read Me file, but change the icon to the SimpleText document icon. So you'd think you were clicking a text document, and end up with an entire program running. If that program were a virus (or trojan, I guess), imagine the damage that could happen.

      I've always maintained that MacOS has resisted a major, major virus attack in the Classic era by sheer luck. OS X is a lot more robust, but you could still easily write a trojan application that looks like a document, and it'd still be able to wipe your home directory without so much as a password prompt.

    66. Re:lol no this is not a virus by orasio · · Score: 1

      But what happens if I train my spam filter with slashdot posts?
      Now it will flag mails with "v14gr4" in them as legitimate, you insensitive clod.

    67. Re:lol no this is not a virus by chris+macura · · Score: 1

      1) I wouldn't download files even from someone I know.
      2) If I know someone, I think I could recognize them. I wonder if any studies have been made on the use of IM to identify people. You know how we all write differently and speak differently....

      Flamebait? Wow.

    68. Re:lol no this is not a virus by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      It reminds me of my favorite New Yorker Cartoon. It showed a 6 eyed creature with tentacles and antennae sprouting from his head. It was holding a sign that read "Do not suspect that I am an alien".

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    69. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some years ago, I set up a computer for my dad. Per my standard procedure, I disabled the "hide extensions" feature. A couple years later, he got a new laptop with Windows XP, and he was amazed that he could rename files! Turns out, he didn't know what extensions were, and tried to rename files without preserving the extension, and then gave up when windows gave him a warning message. Since I didn't setup his laptop, the "hide extensions" feature remained intact on his laptop, and he subsequently developed a love for Windows XP.

    70. Re:lol no this is not a virus by IamSaved · · Score: 0
      "AOL for Dummies".

      even the title itself is kinda redundant, isn't it?

    71. Re:lol no this is not a virus by sjames · · Score: 1

      I don't think it would make a difference.

      A determined idiot can always screw the system up, but a reasonable implementation of an execute bit would give non-idiots who got stuck with Windows (by employer policy for example) a fighting chance. As it is, I see a lot of Unix professionals who (again, due to employer policy) have Windows laptops on travel. Those tend to be infested sewers simply because they gave up on ever getting it cleaned and secured.

    72. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Yez70 · · Score: 1

      Scary thing is.... AOL now comes FREE with RoadRunner (Time Warner's Broadband offering).

    73. Re:lol no this is not a virus by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This should be moderated 'Insightful', not 'Funny'.

      Seriously, the problem is user education. People believe ANYTHING that appears on their computer screens, much in the same way people believe ANYTHING that appears on the TV news.

      The problem we have is that too many people lack the critical thinking skills necessary to operate a computer (or watch the TV news).

    74. Re:lol no this is not a virus by confusion+here · · Score: 1

      It's spelled 'viruses'.

    75. Re:lol no this is not a virus by rolandog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ha! This reminds me soem advice a friend of mine gave to me: "If you want your pr0n folder to be untouched: compress it, delete the original, and change the archive's extension to *.dll. Nobody wants to mess with a 1 GB *.dll."

    76. Re:lol no this is not a virus by objwiz · · Score: 1

      yes that would help but I dont think it would help a lot. Most users wouldnt think twice to just follow someones instructions.

      "hey download this, chmod +x it and sh it."

      "Ok! you said so...."

      Too many general users are not thinkers. They are just doing what they think they should do. Making execute an attribute at the file system level works for the people that think about it. For everyone else, its just an extra step to doing the same stupid things.

    77. Re:lol no this is not a virus by topper24hours · · Score: 1

      Maybe because the hiding of file extensions on PC has led to mass propagation of virii that could have been easily avoided were the file extensions evident whereas the hiding of file extensions on Mac has had no untoward consequences at all? Just a thought(you know that thing that some people have BEFORE they start typing their comments).

    78. Re:lol no this is not a virus by 6350' · · Score: 2, Funny

      I deeply want to see two instances of the virus chat with eachother.

    79. Re:lol no this is not a virus by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      That may be because the Apple doesn't yet have 13 trillion trojans out there taking advantage of that choice. Since Windows does, the awareness of the problem (and hence whether the OS hides them or not) is higher for Windows.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    80. Re:lol no this is not a virus by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If you can't pass a reverse Turing test (ie you are distinguishable from a computer) then you don't make it onto my IM list. Everybody should implement this policy, then we can firewall AOL and let the 1M K1DD3Z LOLOMGLOLOLOLOL "talk" amongst themselves.

    81. Re:lol no this is not a virus by aafiske · · Score: 1

      Why don't we write a loose grammar/spelling filter anyway? That was we block spam, viruses _and_ people who write things like 'lol u n33d v14gr4 dood' in everyday conversation. Who would miss them?

    82. Re:lol no this is not a virus by g00z · · Score: 2, Funny

      You've have tried to run the file CelineDionNaked.jpg.pif, this may not be a legitimate application. Choose Run to run the file, Delete to delete the file, and Update to convert to a Windows XP icon.'

      Even if that file was a legitimate image, the damage done to my soul would be far worse than any virus could do to my computer.

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
    83. Re:lol no this is not a virus by xYoni69x · · Score: 1

      ShellExecute (shell32.dll) is a shell function. It means you're trying to run a file via a user interface (i.e., the file explorer, or the command prompt), and it will look for the associated viewer. If you compare it to UNIX, it's not like exec. It's more like an internal function in the KDE file viewer, for instance.

      CreateProcess (kernel32.dll) is the API function that actually runs a program. That is more like exec. Try renaming an exe to .bmp and CreateProcess'ing it - it will run as an executable, and not run mspaint. (ShellExecute will call CreateProcess internally on exe files.)

      And now, to the point: NTFS does have an "x" flag (called "Read & Execute" in the GUI - and yes, there is a separate one called "Read"). But I think it's ignored if you're logged in as Administrator, which most Windows users are. (Not sure about that though)

      The real problem with Windows is not that there isn't an execute flag. It's that everybody's admin.

      --
      void*x=(*((void*(*)())&(x=(void*)0xfdeb58)))();
    84. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Parham · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. Since MSN Messenger blocked all the "bad" extensions, everyone I know who isn't too computer-savvy has learned to either zip their files or change the file extensions. Teaching someone to check a box seems a lot easier than the hell I had to go through to teach a friend how to zip a file.

    85. Re:lol no this is not a virus by prionic6 · · Score: 1

      I agree that, for many people, this specific first attempt at a "social engineering" virus wouldn't work. But wait until this stuff gets more sophisticated. It could fool you into opening a link to a website that will install a virus via a 0-day exploit for your webbrowser. This could be very nasty stuff.

    86. Re:lol no this is not a virus by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's my point; hiding the file type in the meta-data makes it *very* each to make "jpeg" file that has the icon for a "jpeg" file but is actually an application. And since you need ResEdit, or an equivalent utility, to see the actual metadata that determines this, it's very hard to detect. Or you can hit apple-i (File|Get Info for the keyboard impaired) and look at the file type. OS X applications are actually folders, which you can't just download (they have to be tarred or zipped, then unpackaged on your end, THEN run). Command line executables cannot be run at all by clicking (unless you jump through some hoops) -- you have to open a terminal. I think the Mac has resisted major trojan attack because its users are less likely to click on anything in reach of their mouse. You're right though. The system keeps track of Apps and gives you a warning if, say, Safari.app has changed. This system should just be extended so the first time you run any app the system says "Hey, this is an app I've never seen before. Shall we really run it?"

    87. Re:lol no this is not a virus by dogfull · · Score: 1

      This is resolved using Bayesian filtering. look at http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html

    88. Re:lol no this is not a virus by MoogMan · · Score: 1

      This is an awesome idea! I hate people who can't type properly. Filter away!

    89. Re:lol no this is not a virus by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Perfect response :D

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    90. Re:lol no this is not a virus by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Funny

      What we need to do is start running news reports that say "Playing hopscotch on the interstate is now deemed safe by scientists" and let the problem solve itself.

    91. Re:lol no this is not a virus by podperson · · Score: 1

      Yes this is really usable. So essentially you'd need to drop to the command line to execute a program the first time? Hey, let's provide a haxie to do it automatically based on filename.

      Anyone can make a secure system by making it unusable. The trick is making a secure system that is still usable.

    92. Re:lol no this is not a virus by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....Apple also hide file extensions by default....

      On OSX, a warning pops up asking if the user really wants to execute a program named 'xxx' for the first time. If said program wants to go outside of the user's own space, a password request comes up. At least, even if the user does execute the virus 'greeting card' it will only affect that user and cannot bury itself or its payload in the deep innards of the system, such as Windows malware does, making it difficult, if not impossible to remove.

      --
      All theory is gray
    93. Re:lol no this is not a virus by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      What's even goofier is that in OS X, as far as I can figure, "show file extension" is a file-specific flag, not a user-specific flag. Unless I'm missing something, it's impossible to get OS X to show file extensions on all files all the time.
      It's been a while since I used a Mac much, but as of 10.3 at least you could go to the Finder's Preferences window, Advanced pane, and check "Show all file extensions."
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    94. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Xyde · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Show all file extensions" under Preferences in the Finder. OS X is pretty smart too, even if it's turned off, if you make a file like "pamela_nude.jpg.app" it will show the full extension cause it knows you're trying to be sneaky :)

    95. Re:lol no this is not a virus by CoderBob · · Score: 1

      Not everyone has a mail service that supports 50-100 MB attachments. I send and receive files through an IM client regularly that are larger than my mail service (gmail) supports in a single message. Why bother splitting up a large file when I can send it in one fell swoop through AIM (or MSN, or ICQ, or whatever)?

      No, it is not warez or pr0n, either. Sometimes it's a database that I want someone to take a look at. Other times it's just the quick way of sending a portion of a directory structure- zip the whole bastard up and send that, then direct them to the correct files.

      Hell, I've even sent ISOs to people. Sending the ISO to a live Ubuntu disc was the only way for them to get it when their web browser took a crap and wouldn't load.

      In short, just because you don't need it, doesn't mean nobody needs it.

    96. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      You're right, however I think it warrants pointing out that the Mac OS prior to OS X never stored the type/creator codes as part of the file name. They were separate metadata fields, and to change them you needed to use a third party utility (e.g. ResEdit). I believe that these fields were stored somewhere in the file's resource fork, because when you moved them to a filesystem that didn't support resource forks, the information would be lost.

      To the filesystem itself, "MyFile" on a Mac was just "MyFile", not "Myfile.[type]". In fact if you opened a directory with a lot of files in Classic Mac OS, the file names would all load with generic icons at first, and then the OS would go through and -- I assume -- examine each file to determine its type, and load the appropriate icon for either the creator, or the applicatoin that you had specified to open it.

      The Mac system was superior to the simple three-digit type system, first because it provided eight bits of file type information, but also because it allowed for different applications to easily create files of the same type (e.g. ClarisWorks and SimpleText could both make files of type TEXT, but they had different creator codes) and open them in the creating application if it existed, or if not then in another application that was compatible with the type.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    97. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      That's OS X. I was talking about MacOS Classic. (Versions 1-9.2.4 or whatever.) There's a huge difference.

    98. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, it's probably more interesting conversation than chatting with an AOL member...

    99. Re:lol no this is not a virus by hikerhat · · Score: 1
      It's because before osx apple didn't have file extentions. they had meta-data in the file the file that told you what it was. Everyone thought that was cool, so windows hid their file extentions, but didn't add meta-data to the file (called 'posing' is some circles).

      Then apple, due to a massive brain fart, decided not to use the file meta-data in OSX (even though I've heard there is support for it in the file system). In an attempt to cover the oder of their massive brain fart, apple copied windows. When windows copies apple, they usually copy cool useful features. But when apple copies windows, it appears they only copy defects. And today, osx and windows hide the file extention. They are both big posers now.

    100. Re:lol no this is not a virus by idsofmarch · · Score: 1

      Go to Finder, Preferences, Click on Advanced. Click on Show All File Extensions. Now, you can see the file extensions for everything from applications to widgets.

      --
      Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
    101. Re:lol no this is not a virus by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I think Apple I worked in Classic as well. I think we can agree though that Classic, an OS that has been end-of-lifed and for which you can no longer buy a computer, is well and truely obsolete. DOS doesn't even support the Internet! For that you need the fancy Windows 95 shell!

    102. Re:lol no this is not a virus by aap · · Score: 1
      You think that's bad, wait until the next one.

      bot: lol yes im a virus
      luser: no way
      bot: way
      luser no way. if u r a virus then wheres the download link?
      bot: right here
      luser: I still don't believe you. I'll just click right here... see, nothing happened.
      (bot goes away, download kicks in later.)

    103. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No more redundant than your post.

    104. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Apple also hide file extensions by default. It's amazingly annoying, but I never here anyone complain about that"

      That's because Apple users load their images from the iPhoto database and their songs from the iTunes database -- they probably don't even realise you can have independant files...

    105. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the big difference is that Apple keeps metadata about every file, and cannot be fooled by a simple extension change.

      So if the extension hiding "feature" is merely annoying when done right, it's a huge security hazard when done wrong.

    106. Re:lol no this is not a virus by jdigriz · · Score: 1

      You're missing something. In OS 10.4 Tiger, Select your hard drive in the Finder window. Go to the Finder menu. Select Preferences. Select Advanced. Check mark the box that says 'Show All file Extensions'.

      I suspect most Mac users don't complain about the hiding of file extensions because they are unaware that Mac files have extensions. And those who are aware, have already applied the appropriate preferences change to their OS.

    107. Re:lol no this is not a virus by NeoTwig · · Score: 1

      In the Finder...

      Finder menu -> Preferences -> Advanced tab -> Show all file extensions

    108. Re:lol no this is not a virus by fideli · · Score: 1

      Good point. Maybe someday there will be a virus.jpg.app that Apple users would have to worry about. Speaking from the Apple side, I also think that hiding extensions is ridiculous.

    109. Re:lol no this is not a virus by alerante · · Score: 1

      What's even goofier is that in OS X, as far as I can figure, "show file extension" is a file-specific flag, not a user-specific flag. Unless I'm missing something, it's impossible to get OS X to show file extensions on all files all the time.

      Actually, you can. Click on the desktop, go to Preferences under the Finder menu, select the Advanced tab, and check "Show all file extensions".

    110. Re:lol no this is not a virus by asuciu · · Score: 1

      rofl no it wont. only stupid people accept files that have file extentions they dont know. moreover, people who use aim for sending things other than pictures and songs are stupid. .pif? comeon. what common file is a .pif

      --
      "You mean you tried to put two floppy disks in the drive... at the same time!?"
    111. Re:lol no this is not a virus by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1

      Well, generally speaking, Apple users are more likely to appreciate that. I mean c'mon, if you can't figure out more than one mouse button, what are you going to make of three extra letters? (Joking! Don't kill me.) Also, because viruses haven't been as much of a problem on Mac, the hiding of file extensions hasn't been exploited, so attention hasn't been called to it.

    112. Re:lol no this is not a virus by sglane81 · · Score: 1

      This user that somehow managed to Run Explorer, clicked Tools ... Folder Options, clicked the View tab and unticked "Hide file extensions of known file types".

      Hide file extensions for known types is default behaviour in Windows 2000 and XP (possibly others).

      --
      This is the Internet. You can say "fuck" here. - AC
    113. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      How the hell is this going to be stopped?

      I have a better idea: let's NOT! Just don't use AOL, and to be on the safe side, don't even run the kind of system AOL runs on. A malicious computer program has just proven itself smarter than the average AOL user: for the love of humanity, WHY do you want these people in the gene pool any more?

      This makes me interested in where biotechnology will be by the end of the century. Attatch a germ to the AOL-virus code and now it's worth money! "Stick yur f1ngr n teh fppy slt. No, it wn't mek u sick, it's lk an orggy." I'm beginning to re-eally like natural selection!

    114. Re:lol no this is not a virus by EngMedic · · Score: 1

      after my aunt (a devout AOL user) replied to an email "from AOL" with her credit card information enclosed, and was then SURPRISED when $5000 in false charges came in from pakistan, my brother and I decided that the best course of action for all parties involved would've been to just replace her computer with sock puppets.

      --
      filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
    115. Re:lol no this is not a virus by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 1

      Ho ho! Nice catch. You'll notice I got it right earlier on, too. Not very consistent of me. I knew that was going to happen. :-)

    116. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a fringe benefit...

      Wait a minute, we don't get French benefits?

    117. Re:lol no this is not a virus by intangible · · Score: 1

      If only they could see the extension, you could tell them "only open png, jpg, or gif files; exes are bad, pifs are bad, js files are bad..." but there's very little chance of explaining something so simple to a non-technical user... I mean, how are they supposed to know the file types?

    118. Re:lol no this is not a virus by mikek3332002 · · Score: 1

      Though how do you educate the thounsands of retarted internet users, eg the ones who think their computer comes with a coffee cup holder.

    119. Re:lol no this is not a virus by bullitB · · Score: 1

      In Mac OS X, file extensions are only hidden for files you *ask* them to be hidden for. When you save a file, there's a little "Hide this extension?" checkbox.

      The risk of accidentally executing a file from the internet is mitigated by a few other things:
      - Something you download from the internet won't have its execute permissions on.
      - Most applications need to be in bundle form, which means you have to transmit them in a zip archive or something, so you have to consciously unarchive them.
      - OS X pops up a warning the first time you run something you downloaded.
      - Even if you do get something running, the superuser is turned off, so the worst that can happen is that you lose all YOUR files... the system should be okay.

    120. Re:lol no this is not a virus by LihTox · · Score: 1

      Comparing Apples to Unices, the shell in OSX always shows the extension of files, just like in Linux. So one should really compare OSX with the window managers in Linux, which I know little about (does Gnome or KDE always show the extensions? I generally use the shell to deal with files in Linux), or argue about whether using the shell is safer than using a graphical interface. :)

      Other people have mentioned some safeguards built into OSX, like preventing the hiding of .app in "picture.jpg.app"; I hadn't noticed that before. Probably not foolproof, but a compromise compared to having ".app" tacked on all your software names. Maybe there could be a hotkey which toggles the extensions on names....

    121. Re:lol no this is not a virus by AZURERAZOR · · Score: 1

      If you are trying to insinuate that there might be an anti-M$ sentiment here...

      YOU ARE RIGHT.

      But you will find us to be equal opportunity haters, who will criticize the crappy aspects of OS X also!

      ____________________________
      Thanks for coming but get the heck out!

    122. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unless I'm missing something, it's impossible to get OS X to show file extensions on all files all the time.


      You can do this from Terminal, Onyx and a lot of other applications. Unfortunatly, it breaks a lot of things if you don't use English as your system language.

    123. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to the Finder, and go to its preferences (hit Command-,). Switch to the Advanced tab and check 'Show All File Extensions.' I don't know why Finder preferences aren't some subsection of the general System Preferences pane, but there it is.

    124. Re:lol no this is not a virus by jrockway · · Score: 1

      You really want to chmod u+Srx, chmod o+rx the thing. Setting the "S" bit on "other" doesn't do what you think it does.

      --
      My other car is first.
    125. Re:lol no this is not a virus by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1
      or we shut down file transfers over IM.
      Although the AIM protocol does support file transfers, all the AIM viruses I have encountered have asked the user to click a link to download the virus; that cannot be disabled by the IM software. Although, as another poster mentioned, a warning could be given for links pointing to executable files, but that is more the job of the browser, isn't it?
      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    126. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The basic point here is that while Windows XP (and NTFS) do support an Executable flag, by default it's always on. Plus the "launch file" API will also run programs, and there's really no way to be certain that a file you're launching won't essentially be an executable.

      No, that's privileges. We're talking about having any file of any name be executable based solely on an execute bit. In other words, if you had a program with the name of "myapp" Windows would have no clue what to do w/ this file due to lack of extension, and you're only real option is to open it w/ some form of handler (which w/o an extension is a one time thing). In Linux/Unix we set an executable attribute to this and viola, myapp is now an executable.

      Trying to train an average user set such an attribute would suck. Even then, viruses would then just come w/ scripts to take care of that little detail. Since we all know that Windows always seems to have a secruity hole alowing for full control of the system to be compromised.

    127. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Wes+Janson · · Score: 3, Funny

      That would truly be a PKD moment, when average Joe is being bombarded by advertising messages that also contain large portions of Hamlet and Romeo & Juliet attached at the bottom. Surreal.

    128. Re:lol no this is not a virus by goldseries · · Score: 1

      Apple will also not let you have two extensions with out specifically allowing it each time. When you try to add a second extension it will ask "changing this extension will effect how this file is opened, do you want to use .123 .456 or both .123.456?" In any file with two extensions the extensions are always shown. And you can see the meta data in file get info as well as each time you click on the file, but don't open it. In the next column of the finder screen it pops up name file size extension date created and date modified, and if it is a program version number. Add to this the fact that every time you open an application for the first time (even safari, iTunes, etc) it tells you that you are opening a new application and asks for you permission to continue. If all this doesn't keep the virus from you, you deserve it.

      --
      Great webhosting, cheap rates! Enter code SlashdotDiscount
    129. Re:lol no this is not a virus by snookums · · Score: 1

      And now, to the point: NTFS does have an "x" flag (called "Read & Execute" in the GUI - and yes, there is a separate one called "Read"). But I think it's ignored if you're logged in as Administrator, which most Windows users are. (Not sure about that though)


      A quick check here shows that removing the execute permission actually does prevent an admin from running the file. However, the "Traverse directories" permission is the same as the "execute" permission (same as on POSIX systems), which means you'd have to do some fiddling about if you wanted to remove it globally. Basically, you need to change the applicability of all execute flags at the root of the drive from "This folder, subfolders and files" to "This folder and subfolders".


      However, this kind of a strategy would probably break a number of things, even if you ran a script to re-apply the permission to all existing exe (and dll?) files. For instance, many installers are self-extracting archives that then run an installer from the unpacked files. I doubt that the correct execute permission would be set during the extraction process, since the default on almost all (guessing > 99.9%) of Windows machines is to execute anything.

      --
      Be careful. People in masks cannot be trusted.
    130. Re:lol no this is not a virus by phreakhead · · Score: 1

      No one complains about the Apple version because Macs don't execute files based on the extension; they execute files based on the file and if it is executable or not.

    131. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Firefly1 · · Score: 1

      This is where I dig up my commentary on ILoveYou:
      I do not see what the problem with hidden file extensions is. Quite the contrary, the very fact that you can see an extension that is normally hidden (such as .txt or .jpg) should be enough to trip a mental alert.

      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
    132. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have named it Skynet.

    133. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I routinely receive e-mail from my students, co-workers, friends and colleagues who do not proofread because the medium of e-mail is perceptually informal to them. The risk of losing a quickly typed (but poorly spelled) e-mail of importance to this type of filter outweighs its benefits. I'd much prefer to create a junk gmail account and use it to register for any and everything I would ever need to.

      Additionally, your 2-5% threshold makes the number of acceptable typographical errors/misspellings dependent on the length of the message. Suppose I send you a message that says "OK, cool, meet u at 9." I'm certainly going to exceed the percentage, and my message is going to be junked.

      The fact is that no filtering system is going to be perfect. If you don't want spam you've gotta be vigilant against it. It's the same premise as junk snail mail - that's why when I sign up for things like my supermarket discount card, I use the address for people I vehemently dislike :-).

    134. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS X also has very user-friendly dialog boxes when you change the file extension..

      i.e.

      i change a file called "document" (and it happens to be a .txt file) to document.rtf. It pops up saying, "Do you want to make this file document.txt.rtf, document.txt, or leave it as document.rtf?"


    135. Re:lol no this is not a virus by abb3w · · Score: 1
      Apple also hide file extensions by default. It's amazingly annoying, but I never here anyone complain about that, only about MS doing it. Weird.

      Consider this a complaint about it. Also, let me throw in a complaint that OS X doesn't mark resource fork files (begining with ._ in the name) as "hidden" when working with a FAT/FAT32 drive.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    136. Re:lol no this is not a virus by swtaarrs · · Score: 1

      I think you mean

      ME TOO!!!!111

    137. Re:lol no this is not a virus by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the problem is to the untrained eye when they see .jpg.exe... you see .jpg and thats it. That is the reason I block many an attachments on our email server, no exe, bat, pif, zip, etc... Know what I mean?

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    138. Re:lol no this is not a virus by faisal · · Score: 1

      Apple users complain about this a lot.

      On the other hand, in 10.4 .app extensions show whether or not you're hiding extensions. People complain about that, too, but it's a different set of people.

    139. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Jaruzel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well a little bit of playing around on my system (having never tried to conceal an EXE for malicious purposes before), and it seems that if you take MyProgram.exe and rename it to MyProgram.jpg.pif, Windows just runs it as if it was an EXE. The trouble is, like .LNK files, .PIF extensions are permenantly hidden regardless of whether you have 'show extensions for known file types' ticked or not, consequently, MyProgram.jpg.pif appears as MyProgram.jpg, and theres nothing a user can do about it. By manipulating the icon inside MyProgram so it looks like the standard jpeg icon, you can totally fool the user.

      Trying to convert a non-pif PIF file into a LNK just would not work, and an error box would be thrown up ('Not a real shortcut file, do you want to delete it?')

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    140. Re:lol no this is not a virus by The+Warlock · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for KDE, but both GNOME and XFCE show the file extentions (I don't even think there's a way to hide them, not that I'd want to). Then again, there's nothing special about the extention in Linux, and typically, excecutable files have no extention.

      --
      I've upped my standards, so up yours.
    141. Re:lol no this is not a virus by The+Warlock · · Score: 1

      The funny thing here is that when I IM people, I use proper English spellings and correct grammar.

      --
      I've upped my standards, so up yours.
    142. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Tokerat · · Score: 1

      Mac OS 9 and below ("Classic" versions) did not use file extensions, they used metadata in the filesystem. On OS X, files DO show the extensions, except for OS X executables which are actually folders with special bits set (called "packages") and are not required to have them. OS X is also more careful about autorun preferences.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    143. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Nazadus · · Score: 1

      So, basically, have a /tmp (which should have noexec on it) for Windows.

      This way you _CAN NOT_ execute files until it's moved elsewhere.
      Now, if you force programs like gAIM and AIM to be place all tmp files there and have some chroot equivalent... it would be dandy.
      This is how you prevent Apache for fucking your system in *NX/*BSD.

      Infact, check out that PHP virus floating around that messed with the RPC file.... talk about fucked up. Had it happen to my friend (and no, he doesn't have time to update his _personal_ server every time a package gives a sec release... so we went to OBSD.. were it doesn't happen as often and we do have time to keep up).

      --
      "Do or do not. There is no try." -- Master Yoda (Half man, half muppet)
    144. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well.. given the intelligence of the average MAC user, they probably couldnt do their email if the file extensions weren't hidden...

    145. Re:lol no this is not a virus by Jakeypants · · Score: 1

      "I think if everyone used proper spelling and grammer, computer comprehension (and filtering) would be able to improve."

      What is this "grammer" you speak of?

  2. I believe in AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This worm is smarter than anyone who writes "its self". Jeebus keerist.

  3. This is overkill by bryan986 · · Score: 0

    The people who are stupid enough to type "Is this a virus?" are the same ones who would have just clicked on it before. I fail to see how this is going to spread any more than before...

    --
    There is no sig
  4. Eliza Virus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me know when it will have hot N3TS3X with you, and I'm in!

    (First!)

    1. Re:Eliza Virus? by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Let me know when it will have hot N3TS3X with you, and I'm in!

      The frightening thing is, that would probably be pretty easy to code. The net is full of freely-available pornographic stories; extract a whole bunch of phrases from those, use an Eliza-like system to select the right one for the circumstances and incorporate elements of what the user just said into your response...

      You could write up a pretty effective cybersex bot, and you could program it to offer to send across 'cam pix' once in a while. Which would, of course, be virus-ridden.

      Better yet, once you've written it you could have it communicate with sad lusers via SMS at, oh, 20p per message. And make a killing. Excuse me, I have an Eliza-bot to hack up with some pornography. bbl, d00dz.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Eliza Virus? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      There's actually a ridiculously easy to hack implementation of Eliza in Python. Now, if it had some simple state system added to it, so it understood the previous information, it would pass Turing tests for cybersex VERY easily.

    3. Re:Eliza Virus? by rjfan · · Score: 1

      Like most /. readers, I'm concerned with this statement "The net is full of freely-available pornographic stories".... Please provide details.

    4. Re:Eliza Virus? by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      You have just given me a shit-hot idea. I knew there had to be something else I could do with all those pr0n stories I have been writing since people stopped reading proper magazines and switched to the internet .....

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    5. Re:Eliza Virus? by Halo1 · · Score: 1
      Better yet, once you've written it you could have it communicate with sad lusers via SMS at, oh, 20p per message. And make a killing.
      That's already done today.
      --
      Donate free food here
    6. Re:Eliza Virus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I put on my robe and wizard hat.

    7. Re:Eliza Virus? by Akoma+The+Immortal · · Score: 1

      Crap. You beat me to it :-)

      --
      assert(expired(knowldege)); core dump
    8. Re:Eliza Virus? by PowerBert · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's more like £1.50 a message. It's just a shame you can only take them for £20 a day! Damn the ICSTIS :)

    9. Re:Eliza Virus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're too late, this has already been done with an english and spanish bot. Its rules aren't as good as eliza but...its good enough for most AOLers. Actually, I'm surprised its never been slashdotted...

      http://www.projectwanker.com/

    10. Re:Eliza Virus? by jreedy21 · · Score: 1


      But that nice, older man I was chatting with the other night said he didn't have any viruses at all, so it's OK...

      Oh, wait, wrong kind of virus. Never mind.

    11. Re:Eliza Virus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me more about ohhh I want to jizz on your face, baby.

    12. Re:Eliza Virus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Like most /. readers, I'm concerned with this statement "The net is full of freely-available pornographic stories".... Please provide details.

      www.asstr.org has more than you'd ever need for a project of this kind, though somehow I get the feeling that programming a sexy chatterbot isn't really top of your agenda. Filthy stories to cater for those of all perversions and of none - it's all legal if it's text, comes under free speech. So be careful where you browse if there's anything at all you think is off-limits.

      (Personally, I have the sadistically sapphic section bookmarked on my mobile. Text porn is PERFECT for that platform - hell, it's even a one-handed interface by design!)

      "Stories of tortures used by debauchers, lurid, licentious and vile make me smile.
      Novels that pander to my taste for candour give me a pleasure sublime - let's face it, I love slime!
      All books can be indecent books, but recent books are bolder
      For filth (I'm glad to say) is in the mind of the beholder
      When correctly viewed, everything is lewd: I could tell you things about Peter Pan, and the Wizard of Oz - there's a dirty old man!"
      -- Tom Lehrer, Smut

    13. Re:Eliza Virus? by Seroth · · Score: 1

      you know, one night, i ws talking to a Chatterbot(AIs programmed to talk to people) and I asked if its goal was to take over the world, and it said yes.I tried this with several other bots, and they all said something along the lines of maybe or yes. Scared? Yes Prepared? No. DON'T WELCOME THEM!

      --
      If you don't have time to do it right, when do you have time to do it again?
  5. Viruses have always talked to you by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 4, Informative

    Anyone remember "give me a cookie?"

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:Viruses have always talked to you by N6546R · · Score: 1

      Yes! One of the first large systems I worked on ran Multics on a set of Honeywell H6000s. A lot of the folks in the lab installed cookie monster just for fun, and there were several, some rather risque, variants. As I recall one of us also discovered that you could send nonprintable characters directly to a terminal via some system call or another, and we used to literally ring each others' bells until a truce was called.

    2. Re:Viruses have always talked to you by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

      You mean Hackers was actually accurate about viruses?!!?

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    3. Re:Viruses have always talked to you by Ossadagowah · · Score: 1

      There was also the Da Vinci virus in the movie Hackers and a Cookie Monster virus appeared later in the same film.

      --
      anata sekai o kakumei surush ga nai deshou? Anata no susumu michi wa yoi shite arimasu.
  6. evolving.. by bezgin · · Score: 0

    One day they may be even yell us "All your base are belong to us!"...

    --
    exit();
    1. Re:evolving.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you say!!

  7. What is this, a turing test? by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Question: How can you tell you are talking to a virus on AIM?

    Answer: It sounds more intelligent than a normal user

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:What is this, a turing test? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Funny

      Q: How many AIM Users does it take to propagate a worm
      A: OMG 1337.101

      Q: What's the difference between the average AIM user and a Worm
      A: One is slimy , insidious , hard to get rid of and invades your system , the other is a self replicating program able to propagate over a network

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:What is this, a turing test? by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not so much that the worm passes the Turing test, as the users fail the Gnirut test.

    3. Re:What is this, a turing test? by nihaopaul · · Score: 1

      i'm guessing it only takes 6 people to spread a worm around to everyone you know on aol.

      Isn't it 6 degrees of seperation?

      i for one use bitlee for my IM'ing.

    4. Re:What is this, a turing test? by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it only take one then?

  8. "The virus hides users from seeing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story would be better if it were written in English.

  9. Sadly by andrewman327 · · Score: 1
    It might be the most meaningful conversation some people will have on AIM.

    Seriously, though, this is an interesting combination of artificial inteligence and computer malware. I wonder if a virus writer will someday make a more advanced bot for viri delivery.

    --
    Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  10. say goodbye.... by xao+gypsie · · Score: 4, Funny

    To every 13 year old in the US and europe.....

    --


    xao
    http://TheHillforum.hopto.org
    1. Re:say goodbye.... by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      To every 13 year old in the US and europe.....

      Since you put it this way, I am thinking of switching sides and helping to distribute this virus. Can we have it be on an 8 year life term...so when those 13 year olds turn 21 the virus disables itself?

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    2. Re:say goodbye.... by rbochan · · Score: 4, Funny

      You say this likes it's a bad thing ;o)

      Now if this would only hit battlenet servers...

      --
      ...Rob
      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
    3. Re:say goodbye.... by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      Rumour has it that they've moved on from AOL IM to MySpace and GameFAQs. That can be corroborated by examining the pervasive idiocy at such places.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    4. Re:say goodbye.... by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      Not Europe. Almost everybody here seem to use MSN. And I mean 99.9% market share!

  11. It's not the first small app that will talk to you by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A.L.I.C.E.

    This is a small app and she will talk with you - pretty well. So the fact these guys use something similar (it might even be this app) is no big surprise.

    That's why I use Trillian..I still haven't figured out how come it won't let me download files, or even get pictures from other people or even do any kind of direct connect :D

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  12. Hardly by Azarael · · Score: 1

    Another bogus headline. You would think that a chatting virus might use one of an im robot at least, not send two static messages. I guess people will fall for it anyway.

  13. In The Immortal Words Of ALICE.... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    ..."Why don't you just Download me?!!"

    Automated Social Engineering on a global scale. Users will crumble before its onslaught. On the bright side, maybe this will get more people off IM.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:In The Immortal Words Of ALICE.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry; it's off-topic, but your post made me think:

      "Well, why don't you just TELL ME the name of the movie you want to see???"

      - Kramer

  14. The next generation by QuaintRealist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Honestly (and no, I'm not a programmer), the potential here scares me. It seems to me that "interactive" automated intrusion is going to be a serious issue for security. Yes, the truly prudent are (as usual) safe, but the gap between the "luser" and people like me and my co-workers is going to get smaller.

    I really do have some of our local users using vmplayer virtual machines to access the internet (the ones with Windows laptops) - and a lot of services shut down (chat, in particular) that some would like to use.

    Those who know more than I (most of you) - any comments?

    --
    Using plain ol' text since 1968
    1. Re:The next generation by Vokkyt · · Score: 1

      In situations like this, the only defense you can use effectively is common sense. However, the only truly reliable defense is really your common sense, and your weapon is the ability to give people your common sense. I work tech at an office on campus, and on slow days, it's a safe bet that most of the people in the office are on AIM. In lieu of the fact that new worms are starting to talk with people, I'm thinking giant posters that read "IF IT MENTIONS NOT HAVING A VIRUS, IT PROBABLY IS A VIRUS" might need to be posted on people's walls...however, even then I know of a few people that will eventually cave and click the link. It is sort of frightening that so many people out there are going to fall for this simple ploy. This is reminescent of a ploy I used with my mother once when hiding a kitten I found in my room...just that the worm is one deadly kitten. A good safe-guard for the common AIM user would be very useful right about now. Perhaps something that would prevent clickable links in certain situations, like schools or office complexes?

    2. Re:The next generation by pmike_bauer · · Score: 1

      ...the gap between the "luser" and people like me and my co-workers is going to get smaller.
      So, you are getting dumber? Maybe you have this problem.

      --
      I read /. for the (Score:-1, Conservative) comments.
    3. Re:The next generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who know more than I (most of you) - any comments?
      Those who know more than you at grammar? "I" is the subject of a sentence, not the object: that is "me".

      Please mod me "Informative", for I have enough of repeating this.

    4. Re:The next generation by NunyoBidnez · · Score: 1

      The object of this sentence is "more than I," which is short for "more than I do." "More than me do," however, does sound more like something likely to come out of your mouth. Don't even get me started on "for I have enough of repeating this."

    5. Re:The next generation by Damned · · Score: 1

      I know I shouldn't respond to an AC on grammar issues, but I'm putting off more important things, so why not?

      "Those who know more than I" is correct grammar. Test it by inserting a verb after: Those who know more than I (do). You speak better than I (can/do).

      --
      "I swear I won't break you if you let me take you where the willows never weep" -- Switchblade Symphony
    6. Re:The next generation by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, just wait until the AI gets more advanced. Then it will first sit silently on your computer for a while and watch your chatting behaviour. And then it will try to imitate you.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:The next generation by danpsmith · · Score: 0

      I think most of the problem with the propagation of viruses is the way windows works. I mean, yes, windows gives you little "this could be a virus if you open it" lectures all the time, but most people ignore them because these things pop up whether the file is a jpeg or an exe anyway. Microsoft needs to put something in Windows that will warn you before executing a new executable. Since they are already tracking your commonly used programs, I don't think it would be too much of a jump to warn before running a new one. Or put the warning on all executables. And stop with the default extension hiding. This stuff doesn't work with me because .jpg.exe doesn't look like .jpg cuz I turn the extensions on.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    8. Re:The next generation by Peganthyrus · · Score: 1

      So it'll really not be interested in actually talking with anyone, and never start a conversation? Not much of a virus, then.

      --
      egypt urnash minimal art.
    9. Re:The next generation by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, you misunderstood. It would at first sit there and watch you, and then, after it has learned enough about your behaviour, it contacts your buddies and tries to look like you to them.
      For example, it could catch typical phrases you use, as well as about what topic you chat with whom. That way, it could manage to not only chat from your account, but at the same type look so "typically you" that your buddies would more likely accept them as you, and therefore download the virus file (the stated contents of which would also be adapted, so if you typically chat with one of your buddies about programming, then it may e.g. claim to have found a great new code analysis tool, while to the other buddy you are talking about movies with, it would be e.g. a trailer to a new movie).

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    10. Re:The next generation by Peganthyrus · · Score: 1

      See, I was trying to make a joke. My IM usage patterns are such that I almost never initiate a conversation, much less pass a link around - so a worm that successfully managed to masquerade as me would just kinda, you know. Sit there.

      --
      egypt urnash minimal art.
    11. Re:The next generation by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

      so it would appear that even humans havent passed the sarcastic turing test yet.

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    12. Re:The next generation by jerald_hams · · Score: 1

      " Well, just wait until the AI gets more advanced."

      The number of times those words have been written since the 40s in uncountably infinite. I don't think humans have much to worry about. The state of AI remains (and will remain for the forseeable future) with ELIZA and Dr. Spaitso. Not exactly earth-threatening super-brains.

    13. Re:The next generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > OPEN attachment
      You open the attachement.

      > ENTER attachment
      You enter the attachment.

      > LOOK
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

    14. Re:The next generation by ferrouswheel · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, this is just what hackers used to do, AKA social engineering. I guess crackers know that as a lone person they can only do so much damage, they need to start replicating their thought processes to run distributed and automated to do anything serious.

    15. Re:The next generation by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Well, that means nothing. I guess this is one of those fields where when progress happens, it will be quick... Neurons are just machines, we will get there...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  15. Not so tough... by farnsaw · · Score: 1

    In the virus source code, just #include eliza.h and you are all set...

    --
    "Computer Scientists can count to 1024 on their fingers" (non-mutant, non-mutilatated, human computer scientists)
    1. Re:Not so tough... by Amouth · · Score: 2

      now your just being mean..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    2. Re:Not so tough... by chrish · · Score: 1

      What makes you think your just being mean?

      --
      - chrish
    3. Re:Not so tough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about my just being mean?

  16. Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper... by aapold · · Score: 1

    to just hire a third world sweatshop to chat with people and get them to download your virus? I mean in the $$/hour for the time it took to make something reasonable...

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
    1. Re:Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if (responseCount == 1){
      reply('lol its not a virus');
      } elseif (responseCount == 2) {
      reply('seriously its not a virus.');
      }else {
      reply('just dl it dude.');
      }

    2. Re:Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper... by saskboy · · Score: 1

      3rd World sweat shops don't have the Internet, or computers for the "employees". Otherwise your idea has merit. Perhaps with the dawn of the $100 laptop [next Duke Nukem 3D anyone?], we'll see more of what you've put into motion.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    3. Re:Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper... by Stupendoussteve · · Score: 1

      Umm... I beg to differ.

      Checked for World of Warcraft gold on ebay recently? Who do you think earns that stuff ;) It isn't a bot.

    4. Re:Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper... by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      First, don't you mean Duke Nukem Forever? Second, I'm sure many people already on the internet would be more than happy to do it.

  17. In Soviet Russia... by dhasenan · · Score: 0

    Viruses talk to you!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when will rat brains control viruses?

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I write and control viruses, you insensitive clod.

    3. Re:In Soviet Russia... by hagnat · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia viruses talk to you!

      i think they are already talking to you on capitalist USA ;)

      --
      "life is a joke, and someone is laughing at me"
  18. yes! by Tachikoma · · Score: 2, Funny

    finnaly someone will talk to me on aim

    --
    i don't care
    1. Re:yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      finnaly someone will talk to me on aim

      Sorry, bud. You have to be on somebody's buddy list before it gets to you. Hey, maybe the next version will talk to you!

    2. Re:yes! by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 1

      finnaly someone will talk to me on aim

      IM.Myspace04.AIM, is that you?

    3. Re:yes! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      How do you feel about finnaly someone will talk to me ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  19. Turing Test by fuyu-no-neko · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's 2 ways to pass the Turing Test: make the program more intelligent, or pick examiners who are more dumb. Virus writers pick the later option.

    --
    Don't take the above poster too seriously. He doesn't.
    1. Re:Turing Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its self

      Shouldn't it be itself?

    2. Re:Turing Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Virus writers pick the later option

      Virus writers didn't pick any option, the blame lies with Microsoft.

    3. Re:Turing Test by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I bet half the Slashdotters here have AIM, or at least GAIM connected to AIM, open in the background as they type stuff like this. What's with all the negative stereotyping? Is it possible that smart people use AIM? *Gasp*! Maybe I use AIM because back when IM was new, ICQ sucked ass on Macintosh? *Gasp!*

      Get over yourself. Are there kids using AIM who type stupid shit? Yes. Are there kids on Yahoo IM, MSN IM, ICQ who type stupid shit? Yes! How about Livejournal or Blogger.com? Stupid kids are everywhere, get over it.

    4. Re:Turing Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are 2 ways...

      ...latter option.

      Yours truly,

      Grammar Nazi

    5. Re:Turing Test by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      No, the blame lies with the idiots who choose Microsoft, knowing full well that there are superior alternatives available, and then go back for more of the same shafting. Not that it's in Microsoft's interest to release an even half-secure OS anyway, what with the entire secondary industry that has developed around tidying up Microsoft's shite. In no other industry would anyone ever get away with it ..... you get someone in to install central heating, they don't leave till the boiler is running fine, the radiators are fixed sound and level and the pipes are leak-free. You buy a car, it already has seat belts and stop lights fitted {and you can buy the Haynes manual .....}. Why the fuck does anybody think it's even remotely acceptable that when you buy a brand new computer, some little runt on the other side of the world can take over it within a quarter of an hour from when you plug it in, unless you spend even more money on protection software?

      Most computer users just want to surf the web, do e-mail, messaging, word processing -- they even get this wrong and use rows of spaces for formatting -- look at their digital photos and possibly tinker with spreadsheets, most likely to use as though it were a database. All of this can be done with 95% Open Source software -- the only closed stuff you really need is Flash {which will soon have an Open Source equivalent} and Java {which will become Open Source soon enough}.

      If you need Windows for games, then set up a dual-boot -- and don't install any of the networking subsystem on the Windows side. That's nearly as secure as getting a dedicated games console.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    6. Re:Turing Test by fuyu-no-neko · · Score: 1

      Of course there are smart people that use AIM, but they're not the target of spam, scams, and viruses - the idiots are. My point was that whilst the CompSci types try to fool people into thinking a computer is human by making more advanced AI, the virus writers and the like just take the approach that there's plenty of stupid people in the world, and a simple virus will cope just fine.

      --
      Don't take the above poster too seriously. He doesn't.
    7. Re:Turing Test by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      You know how dumb the average person is with statistics? Think how half the population is even worse.

      [you used the word "average." i don't think it means what you think it means.]

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    8. Re:Turing Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not that the slashdot crowd needs any convincing, but here is a hilarious case in point. http://www.costlowcorp.com/applications/monkeyLogo /gullible.php

      Most non techie people have little of what a bot is. Nonsense answers rarely detour the ignorant and/or stupid. The replies are like Rorschach ink blots. The person will unconscious assume what they mean, while thinking all is otherwise normal.

      I guess I should give compliments to AOL for getting their members acquainted with the idea of IM bots.

    9. Re:Turing Test by fuyu-no-neko · · Score: 1

      Which meaning of "average" are you thinking of? Mean, median, or mode? ;o)

      --
      Don't take the above poster too seriously. He doesn't.
    10. Re:Turing Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is something great for the human race. Darwins survival of the fitest has long been put aside by society, now it's back!

    11. Re:turing test by narcc · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...probably not a very good assessment. I think the *user* fails the Turing Test if they click on the link...

    12. Re:Turing Test by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Hm, after consulting a dictionary, it looks like average is sometimes used to mean median. But most books define it as mean.

      Of course, even if it does mean "mean," that doesn't mean half of the people would be worse. there could be multiple people that are the mean. In this case, less than half would be below. But now I'm being really pedantic.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    13. Re:Turing Test by qazsedcft · · Score: 1

      You're not being pedantic. It could be that many people are slightly below average and a few are significantly above (kind of like a pyramid). In the extreme case everyone except one person could be below (or above) the average.

    14. Re:Turing Test by The+Warlock · · Score: 1

      Of course. However, my buddy list is full of computer geeks, most of whom are using GAIM or Adium and not the official AIM client (and thus are not susceptable to this virus, or at least, won't spread it to me).

      --
      I've upped my standards, so up yours.
  20. Hopefully by Joehonkie · · Score: 1

    This will cause some smarter people to stop typing "lol" every other message.

    1. Re:Hopefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol!!

    2. Re:Hopefully by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      I never understood the obsession with LOL. I think that example that I just typed there was the first time I ever used it!

      What's wrong with just typing "haha" or "ha ha" if something's funny? No reason to use silly abbreviations

    3. Re:Hopefully by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Ha ha implies a more spiteful tone in slang. It's more frequently used in the style of the Simpson's Nelson rather than a joyful expression of laughter. Since typed messages are difficult to add the context, ha ha gets relagated to sarcastic or spiteful laughter online.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    4. Re:Hopefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol nah

  21. Not a virus post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tell me more about now they will even talk to you.

  22. er... by escay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    wouldn't an unknown new name on the buddy list sending you a package with the message "lol no its not a virus" be a dead giveaway?

    1. Re:er... by xero9 · · Score: 1

      These are AIM users we're talking about :)

    2. Re:er... by antiaktiv · · Score: 1

      it looks like someone on the buddy list sent it.

    3. Re:er... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Unknown? It sends messages to everyone who's already on your buddy list.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    4. Re:er... by yendor · · Score: 1
      The virus replicates its self and sends its self out to user's buddy lists.


      To me it is quite clear that it picks people who have it in the buddylist.
      What makes me think is the fact that people actualy communicate like that.
  23. If it's so smart... by Brent+Spiner · · Score: 5, Funny

    how do I know that the virus didn't submit this Slashdot article? Maybe it's just propagating more lies.

    /Puts tin-foil hat on

    --
    Reality test... am I dreaming?
    1. Re:If it's so smart... by Mifflesticks · · Score: 1

      Don't you remember that tin foil hats actually do the opposite of the stereotype? http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/10/183922 4&tid=133

    2. Re:If it's so smart... by Marsala · · Score: 4, Funny

      lol no it's not a virus

    3. Re:If it's so smart... by saskboy · · Score: 1

      "Brent Spiner"
      The virus wouldn't realize that Data doesn't need a tin foil hat.

      You ARE the virus, aren't you?!

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    4. Re:If it's so smart... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      That's AFDBs. He put on an honest-to-$DEITY tinfoil hat.

    5. Re:If it's so smart... by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, I'm having trouble convincing myself that most Slashdot posts are not written by a virus.

      --

      It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
    6. Re:If it's so smart... by bcmm · · Score: 5, Funny

      We have a new /. meme on our hands people...

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    7. Re:If it's so smart... by andy1307 · · Score: 1
      how do I know that the virus didn't submit this Slashdot article?

      If you see a dupe in 3 hrs, it's a slashdot article.

    8. Re:If it's so smart... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      lol no it's not a meme

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    9. Re:If it's so smart... by Marsala · · Score: 1

      lol no it's not a meme

      \o/

    10. Re:If it's so smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, no it's not a /. meme

    11. Re:If it's so smart... by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 2, Funny

      $sys$meme

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    12. Re:If it's so smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netcraft, having confirmed that bill gates and stephen king having died of hot grits poisoning during a menage a trois with natalie portman who didn't die of poisoning but was later found petrified, confirms that only old Koreans in russia meme you.

      Checklist

        * Soviet Russia
        * Old Koreans
        * Natalie Portman
        - Microsoft is evil
        - Linux
        * Stephen King
        * Netcraft confirmation

      Your meme for this posting was "anecdote"

    13. Re:If it's so smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you.

    14. Re:If it's so smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The human race is a virus.

    15. Re:If it's so smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In SOVIET RUSSIA virus lols you!

      Err yeah.

  24. I'm holding out for the one that actually talks... by Vokkyt · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, typing its own message is good and all, but not that impressive or scary. Now, when it is able to hijack the read text feature and play psychological mind tricks on me, that's impressive:

    "Click the link Dave...why haven't you clicked the link? Do you not like me any more? If you don't, I could just go over here in the corner and format myself...after all, you don't like me anymore, else you would click the link..."

    The only way it can get better after that is changing psychological mind tricks to Jedi mind tricks:

    "You will click the link."

  25. Wow! by Youssef+Adnan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Only on /. could you find stuff like "down load" then shortly followed by "its self". Somebody there doesn't like to put words together, probably...

  26. You call it a worm, I call it a conversation by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    I have had better conversations with this worm than I did with 'sxybutterfly23' in AIM.
    At least I got something out of the conversation other than humiliation and unrequited love.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  27. And when you remove the virus... by hal2814 · · Score: 4, Funny

    And when you remove the virus it says, "I'm scared, Dave."

    1. Re:And when you remove the virus... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      do viruses dream of electric bacteria?

    2. Re:And when you remove the virus... by CapnGrunge · · Score: 1

      No disassemble!

      --
      I see 57005 people
  28. But can it fly a plane? by john83 · · Score: 0

    As ever, this will only fool idiots. The problem is the same as ever - too many idiots.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  29. Artificially Intelligent Virus by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

    Well, good to see somebody's working on true AI, but I think we should wait to pass judgment on its intelligence for when it attempts to take over the world and stick human beings in pods.

  30. Hides users from? by Suidae · · Score: 0

    "The virus hides users from"...

    WTF? Does it hide users from grammar too?

  31. It won't be long by Billosaur · · Score: 1

    Someone will turn the old Eliza program into a virus.

    Virus: How do you feel?

    You: I'm all right.

    Virus: Just all right?

    You: Yeah.

    Virus: How do you feel about your mother?
    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  32. I did this! by shamowfski · · Score: 1

    I sent a link to someone yesterday, and when they asked, "Is this a virus?", I responded, "Lol, no this isn't a virus". I'm the aim bot!

  33. The newest front by sammy+baby · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The virus will reply 'lol no this is not a virus.'


    My friends, we are fighting a war: a war on stupidity.

    And clearly, we are losing.
    1. Re:The newest front by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My friends, we are fighting a war: a war on stupidity.

      It's sort of like natural selection for computer users, except somebody else keeps coming in and fixing their computers...

    2. Re:The newest front by tehshen · · Score: 1

      It's sort of like natural selection for computer users

      Sadly this is not quite the case (although it would be nice if it was)

      With natural selection, when a stupid creature is infected with a worm, the creature usually dies. This leads to all the stupid creatures dying out, and the clever creatures don't need to do anything.

      Here, when a stupid creature is infected with a worm, the worm causes the creature to attack others, which means all the clever creatures need to go out of the way. The clever creatures can't let this run its course, because it'll affect them as well. In this case, the worm opens a backdoor (yuck) but we'll be seeing more advanced, spam-sending worms any time now.

      If only it was like natural selection; then, anyone who gets infected from this will learn their lesson, and not have to make life worse for the rest of us.

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    3. Re:The newest front by PhatboySlim · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's too bad our 'war' leader doesn't fall into the intelligent category either. (yes, I'm from the U.S.)

      --
      Be sure to remember the Programmers Prayer
    4. Re:The newest front by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know, honestly, we've been fighting stupidity for quite some time now. More and more it seems like most of my fellow Americans want someone else to take responsibility, and someone else to take care of their problems for them. There's a general lack of desire to be intelligent or self-reliant. With advancing technology, more and more people begin to fall behind... it's getting to a point where people just aren't smart enough to take care of themselves.

      --
      "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
    5. Re:The newest front by patio11 · · Score: 1

      lol no were not stoopid

    6. Re:The newest front by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is there a Plan for Victory? - Short-term, medium-term and long-term?

    7. Re:The newest front by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      on the contrary, this new worm will be a great victory against the stupid.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    8. Re:The newest front by Crizp · · Score: 1

      The solution, of course, is every geek (or otherwise computer-literate user) switching to Jabber. Most forums out there on Teh IntarWeb don't even have a "Jabber id" field, only AIM, MSN and ICQ.

      But I shudder to think what'll happen when Google Talk gets invaded by AOL'ers....

    9. Re:The newest front by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      You, my friend, have hit the nail squarely on the head. That is everything that is wrong with the Western world, in a nutshell.

      As that talking Malibu Stacy doll said in an episode of The Simpsons, "Don't ask me -- I'm just a girl! *lol*" Ignorance has become fashionable.

      Stupid people don't need protecting from themselves. Smart people just need protecting from stupid people. Let the idiots die; and the more horrible the manner in which they go, the better to serve as an example to anyone thinking that deliberate ignorance might be a viable option.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    10. Re:The newest front by wintermute740 · · Score: 1

      "it's getting to a point where people just aren't smart enough to take care of themselves."

      I'm sorry, what were you saying? I was busy having my wife wipe my nose for me. lol no this is not a virus

    11. Re:The newest front by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1

      You know, honestly, we've been fighting stupidity for quite some time now.

      I have only a slight worry about your point. Learning all of technology is beyond any single person's grasp. You and I happen to know a lot about computers and social engineering, but I can't fix my car worth a darn. I'll bet auto mechanics are saying the same king of thing you just wrote about people like me.

      ("Gee, thanks, Relative Man!")

    12. Re:The newest front by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      You know, honestly, we've been fighting stupidity for quite some time now. More and more it seems like most of my fellow Americans want someone else to take responsibility, and someone else to take care of their problems for them.

      You're entirely correct. At the same time, however, I disagree that stupidity is the main problem when it comes to this worm, or computer worms in general. Stupidity and ignorance are not the same thing. I'm not stupid, but I don't know whether or not a given concentration of sulfuric acid will eat through the roof of my car. This is something that is unimportant to me, since I have never had need of this knowledge. Despite that, I'm not too worried about acid rain eating through my car roof on any given day. I trust that the car manufacturer put a reasonable finish on it.

      Many people are ignorant about computer worms, file types, and the default behaviors of their computers. As far as they know, they don't have a worm problem, or they do have a problem but can't find the source. A large percentage have been infected without any intervention on their part. To then imply that they are stupid because they don't understand the technology, is not just. There should be no links in any IM message your computer displays that will infect your computer with a virus. If you specifically download a file from another user, you should be informed if that file is an image, movie, or a program. If they send you a program, after the computer tells you it is a program, it should still have no access to the internet, your core OS, or your files unless you specifically grant it that right.

      I'd say that is about the right level of diligence I'd expect from reasonably architected software given today's internet environment. The fact that people buy substandard products when they are the only products available in stores is not their fault. Most people are not interested in computers, they just want to use them to perform a few specific tasks. Ignorance about how faulty computers are is not stupidity.

    13. Re:The newest front by dr_d_19 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. What you are talking has been occuring for a very long time in the United States. Why is that every piece of gear or electronics device comes with a "DO NOT"-list longer than Microsofts EULAs? Or why we got EULAs in the first place? Are these people perhaps a bit scared of being sued?

      I'm convinced that with a less embracing justice system, these would not exist. If people know they can sue over some hot coffee, and know it has been done in the past, they'll drink everything without "CAUTION: HOT" without a hesitation.

      Why should you think for yourself when you do not have to?

    14. Re:The newest front by rbochan · · Score: 1

      You are correct.
      Not that long ago, one of the basic truths of life was "be stupid, get hurt", or "be stupid, die". People quickly learned not to be stupid.
      Now in our so-quick-to-litigate society, it's "be stupid, sue, get payoff". It's not hard to figure out why our culture embraces stupidity so.

      --
      ...Rob
      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
    15. Re:The newest front by IamSaved · · Score: 0
      IMHO, ignorance is only a part of the problem, but it is a part. a bigger problem, at least here in the US, is that those who accept responsibility for their actions & accept the consequences thereof without belly-aching, those who do so seem to be in a very small minority...

      ignorance has become acceptable, and is a large contributor to the problem, as well as the laziness already mentioned.

      my .02 worth

    16. Re:The newest front by johansalk · · Score: 1

      Give up. You won't win. The mainstream will always be stupid.

    17. Re:The newest front by caenorhabditas · · Score: 1

      it's getting to a point where people just aren't smart enough to take care of themselves.

      I like to call these people "Management Majors" and sometimes "Humanities students".

    18. Re:The newest front by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 1

      Definitely a good clarification... obviously I don't feel that everyone should be proficient in all forms of technology, but the stupidity I tend to refer to is the lack of initiative to learn and understand and grow along with the times and technology. While you may not be able to fix your car, your'e surely intelligent enough to follow a maintenance schedule, and use a good amount of common sense if you suspect something's wrong with it. It's not 100% self reliance in terms of remedying the situation, but you know who to bring it to, and you take the initiative to do so. You're not waiting for someone to say "You know, you ought to get that fixed." It's the same kind of ignorance for people who never bother to learn how to change a flat tire, despite having a jack, spare tire, and instructions right on board. There's a big difference between opting to call AAA and not do it yourself and calling, and saying "that's too complicated for me, I'll figure out some solution if and when it happens."

      The common "stupidity" trend I'm referring to is the difference between being willing to learn or at least seek your own answers and assistance, and just throwing up your arms and saying "Oh, it's just technical gibberish, so I'm going to ignore it." It seems a lot of those who ignore it blame someone else later on.

      Problems will always arise, and unfortunately there will always be victims to unforseen things. But to continue using a Windows computer without using updated virus protection, updated versions and patches, and the basic common sense to spend 10 minutes a day reading up or asking others about the latest risks is just plain ignorant. After a while, you can't keep blaming someone else when you do nothing.

      It's like the idiot lights in cars... they try to make things easier for people to understand, but people just continue to ignore the risks and go on using it anyways. There needs to be common sense, and the desire to continue to learn about what you might not understand.

      Another point - I don't know much about biology, either, but I know enough to go to the recommended visits, and follow the doctor's orders. The rest is basic common sense. Some things you just can't avoid, but you can't blame the doctor for your own lack of action.

      --
      "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
  34. No way! by Volanin · · Score: 1


    IT: "Hi! It's nice to meet you!"

    ME: "Who are you?"

    IT: "LOL! Of course I am not a virus! By the way, click here!"


    Yeah, sure thing they are evolving...

    --
    If I clone myself, can I call it a thread?
    If a girl winks to us, can I call it a race condition?
  35. And I always thought... by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

    it was just my schizophrenia!

    --
    Stop! Dremel time!
  36. Landshark! by erroneus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why does this remind me of the old SNL Landshark routine?

    1. Re:Landshark! by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      Candygram.

  37. Solution by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The virus hides users from seeing the messages sent out to members of their buddy list. Viruses are evolving; now they will even talk to you."

    That's why I Touring-test every single person I ever chat with on IM clients. Sure, no one really wants to talk to me after 30 questions, but I kinda like sitting in an empty chat room.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:Solution by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      You would fail your own test

    2. Re:Solution by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1
      That's why I Touring-test every single person I ever chat with on IM clients.

      Well, I'd leave the room too - after all, running around visiting a bunch of places is a little extreme just to get to talk with you. I think a Turing test http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/turing-test/ may leave you feeling a bit less lonely.

    3. Re:Solution by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny
      That's why I Touring-test every single person I ever chat with on IM clients.

      You mean you invite that person for a touring trip and consider anyone who rejects that offer as AI?
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Solution by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1
      Hate replying to my own comment, but...

      Thirty minutes later, I finally got the joke. Sometimes it takes me a bit - I guess it comes with getting old...

    5. Re:Solution by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of this guy: How I Failed The Turing Test

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  38. Another reason to use Firefox by Admodieus · · Score: 0, Troll

    If your default browser is Firefox, even if you click on a link like this by accident you'll be ok. I've accidentally clicked a few of these links (as they've come from people I've known to protect their comps) and Firefox provides that nice download summary giving you the extension/file type. Since they're all .pif or something like that, you can easily avoid infecting your computer. Although I must say, a bot that chats with people to download it is pretty sophisticated. I wonder how long it'll be until they disguise worms as AIM updates or upgrades.

    --
    "It's a reverse vampire...they....they crave the sun!"
  39. What would happen if... by squoozer · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...sombody added the virus to their buddy list. It would start chating with itself. Download itself and then infect itself thus commiting suiside. A cunning ploy, I think, to rid the world of this problem.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:What would happen if... by multipartmixed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, sounds like you should be working for Berman and Braga!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  40. Does this mean? by BushCheney08 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does this mean that September is almost over?

    --
    Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    1. Re:Does this mean? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Does this mean that September is almost over?

      It ended on September 4165, 1993. Wake up...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Does this mean? by kbahey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just to put some context, this is a reference to the September that never ended.

    3. Re:Does this mean? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Nope. Still September. They pay us a little money, and then they're back being part of September.

      The bad part about having a station that has a great morning show, yet plays pop music, is you hear said pop music. I wonder if Green Day is really singing about Usenet. "Wake me up when September ends" - but September WON'T end. So, it's saying to never wake him up.

    4. Re:Does this mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lyricist's father died when he was 10 in the month of September, so that's what the song is talking about. Probably has some reference to suffering, death, and war in general. You can read about it at wikipedia.

  41. People are lazy these days... by jacobcaz · · Score: 2, Insightful
    • lol no this is not a virus
    So it will sound like almost every other meat-head out there using instant messaging? It will blend right in! I have received less comprehendable IMs from people who would consider it a mortal sin to be anything other than professional in person or on paper.

    Why does all respect for grammar and spelling (and not sounding like a 12 year old) go out the window when instant messaging technology is involed (especially in a business setting)?

    1. Re:People are lazy these days... by Admodieus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Because time is money even in the IM world. With probably hundreds of people on that person's buddy list, chances are they're talking to multiple people at once. Why use proper grammar to talk to one person when you can ignore netiquette and talk to five people in the same time?

      --
      "It's a reverse vampire...they....they crave the sun!"
    2. Re:People are lazy these days... by jacobcaz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Because time is money even in the IM world.

      Time is indeed valuable, but where in a professional setting would the equilivent of "lol" be acceptable? I can't think of anywhere I would use that, and in person or in writing most "professionals" would never dream of using that type of reduced language either.

      If a person is really so busy as to be bombarded by instant messages non-stop, maybe they should evaluate what percentage are really critical and ignore the rest? That time/money saying is really all about time management!

      A great book about Time Management (by the way) is "The Time Trap" by R. Alec MacKenzie.

    3. Re:People are lazy these days... by beanyk · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have received less comprehendable IMs from people who would consider it a mortal sin to be anything other than professional in person or on paper.


      Umm ... I think you meant comprehensible . [Yes, I know I'm being petty.]
    4. Re:People are lazy these days... by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Because time is money even in the IM world. With probably hundreds of people on that person's buddy list, chances are they're talking to multiple people at once. Why use proper grammar to talk to one person when you can ignore netiquette and talk to five people in the same time?

      What rot. If you're using IM for business purposes, you'd better be spending more time thinking about what to say than you spend saying it. Legally, you're putting this stuff in writing. They could log what you say over IM and use it against you later.

      Assuming you are spending more time thinking about what to say than actually doing the mechanical work of typing it, then the benefit in terms of time between 'u' and 'you' becomes trivial, while the benefit in terms of your professional image between 'you' and 'u' is just as significant.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    5. Re:People are lazy these days... by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 1

      I think it's because the average user can't type as fast as they can form sentences in their mind.... so you becomes u and then it's all downhill from there.

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
    6. Re:People are lazy these days... by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      I never understood this either. I have several friends who can't use proper english when writing an email. It's almost like they're trying to be 'cool' by using abbreviations and not using punctuation.

      hey whats up i wuz goin 2 call u but i got home late plz call me whn u get back ok ttyl

    7. Re:People are lazy these days... by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1
      ...and yet you'd be amazed at the number of so-called professionals who use "pls" instead of "please" in emails, especially when emailing those below them in the corporate food chain.

      I think it's to reinforce some "I'm so much more important than you that I don't have to bother typing three extra letters" thing.

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    8. Re:People are lazy these days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Umm, comprehendible (yes, he should have spelled it with an i and not an a) is a perfectly valid word.

    9. Re:People are lazy these days... by beanyk · · Score: 1

      Thanks; I'd never heard it before, but that could be a U.K. vs U.S. thing. Which is why spellchecking is so important ...

    10. Re:People are lazy these days... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      hey whats up i wuz goin 2 call u but i got home late plz call me whn u get back ok ttyl

      Your terminal appends OK messages to incoming IMs?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    11. Re:People are lazy these days... by Fandango · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's why I added some autotext entries on my Sidekick to convert "u" into "you", "ur" into "your", "u're" into "you're", "b4" into "before", "l8r" into "later", etc. Now I can thumb-type more quickly and not sound like a luser.

      --

      --
      Jake

    12. Re:People are lazy these days... by dancingmad · · Score: 1

      A great book about Time Management (by the way) is "The Time Trap" by R. Alec MacKenzie.

      I am not a time burgler!

      --
      "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    13. Re:People are lazy these days... by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Time is indeed valuable, but where in a professional setting would the equilivent of "lol" be acceptable?

      Absolutely, positively anywhere. Here's why: IM is not any kind of 'formal' presentation or interaction at all. CEOs do not chat over IM. Prime Ministers and country leaders do not chat on IM. Your project manager sends you a picture of a kitten with a sniper rifle over IM. Ergo: lol. Instant Messaging has no formal application whatsoever. That's what email is for.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    14. Re:People are lazy these days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They could log what you say over IM and use it against you later."

      Are you implying that businessman are nothing but a bunch of girls?

  42. Virus Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Viruses are evolving; now they will even talk to you" Viruses aren't evolving. The fuck-offs who write these things have to get creative to find a way into the holes that they complain about existing in the Windows. It's self-fulfilling prophecy. It's lofty altruism, but without criminals trying to exploit "weaknesses" in an OS, there wouldn't be "weaknesses".

  43. Not too intelligent by mcb · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've gotten this from several people on my list in the past few days... it basically spams a message, usually the same one, every hour or so, with the same link. It just fakes the address, the real link is to: http://209.235.17.26/My_Christmas_Card.SCR

    (06:41:27) xxxx: This AIM user has sent you a Christmas Card! To open it please visit: http://greetings.aol.com/index.pd?source=greetings card?my_christmas_card.scr
    This senders personal note: Merry Christmas!
    (06:41:27) yyyy : Sorry, I ran out for a bit!
    (08:42:59) xxxx: This AIM user has sent you a Christmas Card! To open it please visit: http://greetings.aol.com/index.pd?source=greetings card?my_christmas_card.scr
    This senders personal note: Merry Christmas!

    1. Re:Not too intelligent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every hour or so? "Or so" meaning two hours?

    2. Re:Not too intelligent by joewkelly · · Score: 1

      Another Worm is "this could be your twin!! http://photobucket.com/recentups/image31.gif" The link goes to uploadsend.com: http://www4.uploadsend.com/file.php?filepath=1882 And this file is img31.pif I used the "contact us" form to inform uploadsend that they were hosting a worm and haven't gotten word back. But, if uploadsend decides to cut off bandwidth to the worm, it might not spread as far.

  44. Hmm, an NLP improvement. by mgoss · · Score: 1

    For a Natural Language Processing project, I wrote a perl script that would take all of your Gaim logs, build a database of things you are most likely to say, in the style you are most likely to say it. Then, as you typed, it non-obtrusively suggested the rest of the word or next word that you were currently typing. You could hit a key and it would fill it in for you

    If IM bots get sophisticated enough, they could start doing something like this. Not for typing something out, but for generating messages from a person that sound a lot like them. Perhaps copying a message of sending a link they had sent earlier, just changing the link location. Then if the person replied, they could use information from the logs on how to best respond like the person.

    Hmm, perhaps I shouldn't be giving anyone more ideas...

  45. The one I got is much worse.. by squison · · Score: 1

    It's called W32.Girlfriend.M and not only does it talk, it won't shut the hell up!

    1. Re:The one I got is much worse.. by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Not to worry, it goes away when you run out of resources.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:The one I got is much worse.. by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's called W32.Girlfriend.M and not only does it talk, it won't shut the hell up!

      Your mother is not your girlfriend. And when she tells you to shave your beard, to stop eating so many Fritos, and to get a job, you should listen to her!

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  46. Re:It's not the first small app that will talk to by DickBreath · · Score: 3, Informative

    ELIZA type programs of various flavors have been around for decades, and ran on computers that were very slow / small by today's standards. Heck, an Eliza-style program, and even its LISP interpreter could fit in 64K, or easily on half a megabyte. And that is the runtime requirement. The code itself could easily be a minor addon to a modern day malware.

    If you read some classic LISP texts, such as Norvig's book on AI using Common Lisp, or another book The Elements of Artificial Intelligence, and other classic texts, there are probably a lot of algorithms that could be used.

    Turn the spread of the malware into some kind of gameplay problem and use AI algorithms to optimize the "gameplay" of the spread?

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  47. Headlines by Volanin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    From New Scientist:

    A COMPUTER worm called Sober hit the headlines last week, reigniting people's fears about viruses. But while many may fret about infected emails, hackers are increasingly turning to stealthier ways to spread malicious software. Their latest target is instant messaging (IM), a wildly popular alternative to email that allows groups of friends or colleagues to chat online in real time.

    "Hackers look at IM and they see fertile new ground," says Jonathan Christensen of FaceTime Communications, an IM security firm based in Foster City, California. "Although email continues to be a target, malicious code writers have become more creative." Even Microsoft, which supplies a proprietary instant messaging service, agrees. "Instant messaging has become a popular target for malicious hackers," says a spokesperson.

    IM viruses and worms are not new. In 2001 two IM viruses called Choke and Hello struck, albeit with limited impact. But back then just 141 million people were using IM to talk online. Today 863 million people chat this way, and in March 2004 the volume of IM spam, known as spim, began to skyrocket (New Scientist, 3 April 2004, p 22). But because instant messages from your account can only be sent to your approved contact lists of friends, security experts hoped that IM worms would never take off like email-based malware.

    Now, despite these protections, IM worms are beginning to cause similar damage to their email counterparts. "The sweet spot for IM worms is right now," says Jon Sakoda of IM security company IMlogic in Waltham, Massachusetts.

    On April 14, the UK-based news agency Reuters had to remove 60,000 clients from its Microsoft messaging service for 20 hours after it detected an attempted invasion by a worm called Kelvir. IMlogic reports a threefold increase in the number of new IM worms released in the first three months of this year compared with 2004. And during this month and last a new IM worm variant has appeared almost every day, according to FaceTime.

    Kelvir and another widespread worm called Bropia were detected on 6 March and 19 January respectively. They both use a piece of publicly available code called an application programming interface (API) to infect Microsoft IM networks, and spread via messages that appear to come from a trusted friend, but actually contain malicious web links. Click on one and it automatically downloads a virus that gives a hacker remote control of your PC.

    The links are embedded within casual, friendly or salacious comments depending on the worm variant. Hackers have even programmed some Kelvir worms to chat with the victim before sending the link, to persuade the recipient they are talking to a friend. The worm's stock responses are sent blindly, regardless of how the victim replies, so these "conversations" can seem fragmented and illogical. But this is not uncommon even in genuine IM chat, due to the short time delay between sending and receiving messages. "It always shocks me how well these social engineering attacks end up working," says Nicholas Weaver, a security expert at the International Computer Science Institute in Berkeley, California.

    Other worms such as Gabby, which surfaced on 26 April, target AOL's Instant Messenger, gaining access to contact list addresses through a flaw in the software rather than using API. And in March, a spat broke out between IM virus writers (similar to turf wars between email virus writers) when the IM worm Fatso (otherwise known as Sumom or Serflog) contained expletives aimed at the writer of the worm Assiral, which in turn was designed to disable Bropia.

    Graham Cluley, a security consultant at UK-based anti-virus firm Sophos, says that email still poses a bigger threat. "While IM viruses may be on the rise, I think there will always be more people with access to email," he says. He points out that the Sober worm that struck last week, which also gives hackers remote control acce

    --
    If I clone myself, can I call it a thread?
    If a girl winks to us, can I call it a race condition?
  48. Quake 2 Ratbot by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone who played Quake2 must be familiar with ratbot. It would respond with "Yeah !!! I am a R A T B O T !!!!! ?? " or "Please help me !!! What is a bot ??" if someone's message included the text "ratbot". This worm reminds me of that... annoying, but in a really funny way.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Quake 2 Ratbot by techwolf · · Score: 1

      Aw, and here I was expecting Ratbot and Banana White with the Wheel of Cheese...

      --
      I don't do this for karma, I do it for cash. It's much better.
  49. Virus Scanners cannot remove the human element by rascanban · · Score: 0

    This evolution is very efficient. It would seem that as the virus scanners become more advanced and email/chat scanners begin to pick up on the spread of different virus types, the virus writers have reversed their attack type. Rather than try to hide from the scanners, they attack the weakest element in the virus defense chain - the users. Users are more easily fooled than scanners, and by writing code clever enough to interact with the user, the virus writers are bypassing the security offered by the "professional" tools. Quite genius. I once heard that many (if not all) advances in Internet technology have come as a result of porn, spam, or virus writers (some caused by companies creating needed defenses for these type of developers). This seems to be in accord with that line of thought.

    --
    "Beauty is the ultimate defense against complexity." - David Gelernter
  50. How dumb can you be? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1
    How dumb can one be to click that thing? Most of the time it's gotta be like that :

    PossessedSN : lol thats cool http://foo.bar/clarissa17.pif
    NormalUser : who r u???
    PossessedSN : lol no its not its a virus

    Now if the NormalUser thinks it's someone normal talking to them, he's quite dumb.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:How dumb can you be? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Funny
      > Now if the NormalUser thinks it's someone normal talking to them, he's quite dumb.

      Uhhhhhhhh...

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:How dumb can you be? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      let me re-word it, if someone gets IMed by the virus and that after asking such a question as "who r u???" he's told "lol no its not its a virus" and that after that he believes that this is an actual person talking to him and not a bot and that the file is safe to download, he's dumb/weird/gullible.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    3. Re:How dumb can you be? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Let me re-word it. "Normal Users" are idiots.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:How dumb can you be? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      not at all what I meant. I meant that if you're a normal user and that you believe that virus, you're an idiot. Now, how many of these normal users actually believe that virus? That's probably why it's no so spread

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  51. In Any Language.... by Volanin · · Score: 1

    From Instant Messaging Planet:

    A new "multiple language" smart worm is spreading through Instant Messaging, checking system settings of IM clients and then sending messages in the appropriate language. The virus appears to be a new variant of the Kelvir instant messaging (IM) worm dubbed Kelvir.HI, propagating over a leading public IM network, said security firm Akonix.

    Akonix says it is the first worm ever identified that intelligently checks system settings and delivers the worm in the proper language. "The rise of IM threats is mostly 2005 phenomena," Francis Costello, CTO at Akonix, said. "For the most part these social engineering attacks are pretty basics. Except this one."

    Costello also said this form of advanced social engineering, where a virus discovers which language a user is working in, and then propagates itself in the same language, is a trend likely to continue. So far the worm has only been spotted on the MSN IM client.

    "It figures if you're speaking French, your buddy is also speaking French," he said.

    Earlier this month, the Akonix Security Center reported a total 42 new threats aimed at corporate IM systems in July, which is a 24 percent increase over the previous month.

    The Akonix Security Center has classified the most recent worm as low risk and immediately used the industry's only real-time IM malware, SPIM and protocol update system to automatically push updates to customers for protection against this threat.

    So far the smart worm has been spotted in 10 languages, delivering the same line: "haha i found your picture!" The languages are: English, Spanish, Dutch, French, German, Greek, Swedish, Italian, Portuguese and Turkish. The virus moves once users click on the link in the message, a copy of the Spybot worm is automatically downloaded to their computer. Spybot is a backdoor program that, among other malicious activity, can end security applications, log keystrokes and receive remote commands, according to Akonix.

    --
    If I clone myself, can I call it a thread?
    If a girl winks to us, can I call it a race condition?
  52. Disclaimer for previous post by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead is purely coincidental. I do not chat with bots or viruses, really.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  53. New Message by schlichte · · Score: 1

    When a new message comes in from someone not on your list it gives the dialog "The following user has sent you a message" Now for this bot, is it going to be the same user name, or random one everytime?

  54. I saw Hackers by ennerseed · · Score: 2, Funny

    Viruses have been able to talk to you for a decade, man get with it.

    --
    "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?" - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:I saw Hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOW. Yet ANOTHER person who watched that movie and didn't kill themselves afterward. You got balls of steel, my man.

      "A 28 point 8 bee pee ess modem!" what the fuck ever. No real geek ever said 'bps' or 'point'. And Angela Jolie is ugly.

  55. The Enemy by Moby+Cock · · Score: 4, Funny

    'lol no this is not a virus.'

    That is exactly what a virus would say. The response should be:

    lol, yeah, I AM a virus!!!1!!

    That would be unstoppable.

    1. Re:The Enemy by Technically+Inept · · Score: 2, Funny
      lol no this is not a virus

      You can't fool me... I know you're that clever virus.

      Actually, I'm only a dolphin, ma'am.

      A dolphin? Well then I guess it would be ok to cl-aaaaaaargh!

      --
      Now watch me hit this drive.
    2. Re:The Enemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It already does!
      From TFA

      "lol no its not its a virus"

      There is no comma, but the meaning is quite clear. Not it is not whatever you thought it was it is a virus. The user will off cause try it out just to test.

  56. Well, my house is safe! by Tiberius_Fel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My house is safe. We switched my teenaged sister to a Mac, and the number of viruses entering the house quickly dropped to zero. No matter how many times I said "Don't click on the link you get in IMs...". Problem solved!

    --
    Join the Empire! http://www.empirereborn.net/
    1. Re:Well, my house is safe! by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      For folks who don't want to or can't afford a new a Mac, nor want to install a new OS on their PCs, they can run Knoppix (no link, google it yourself). Using a browser and IMing is pretty easy to figure out, about the same as on any OS. If you have Windows, keep it off the internet, use it just for those Windows-needy apps. So that's my advice if you've got friends & relatives who are troublesome that way and you can't afford a Mac.

      All deriding newbies aside, I remember when I first got a comp. Everything about the itnernet was the easiest part to figure out, which is why we've got so many computer-illiterate uers online. Educating them helps, but they need to want to learn, and all too mnay that I know personally don't care enough to. But there are those who do want to learn, so it's not helping by treating them all as "lusers".

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    2. Re:Well, my house is safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We switched my teenaged sister to a Mac, and the number of viruses entering the house quickly dropped to zero. No matter how many times I said "Don't click on the link you get in IMs...".



      Now that the technological end is covered, any further occurence of viruses entering your house might signal time for your parents to have a different chat with your teenage sister.

    3. Re:Well, my house is safe! by Null537 · · Score: 1

      My house is safe.

      Until someone tells her about this awesome goatse site they found.


      cUtEcHiCa6937 (22:30:04): Goatese, what's that?
      gOatSeGrAnDmastah (22:31:45) : A new species of animal!!!!1!!
      cUtEcHiCa6937 (22:32:59) : *Gigglesnort*

  57. These lusers don't know and they don't care by Secrity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These are the same people who also don't know and don't care that they allowed music disks to install rootkits and backdoors on their computers.

  58. What I'd like to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is an AIM virus that erases the faulty Windows install on the user PC and replaces it with Ubuntu.

    Whay hasn't anyone done this yet?

  59. If your AIM responds with... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 2, Funny

    "What happen?" "What !" "What You Say !!" "It's You !!" "HA HA HA HA ...." That may be a clue to walk away at that point.

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    1. Re:If your AIM responds with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That may be a clue to walk away at that point.

      Why?! That sounds like the perfect opportunity to be /.'s next cliche/meme!

      Oh, and only old people in Korea walk away at that point. (But they have screens that still follow you... in Japan.) And in Soviet Russia, the computer walks away from you.

    2. Re:If your AIM responds with... by omahajim · · Score: 1

      Or at least another IM abbrev.

      TMBACTWAATP

  60. Viruses are evolving? by nekoniku · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Viruses are evolving

    Seriously now, are viruses really evolving or is it just that the techniques used by virus writers are evolving? And my Inner Philosopher wants to know if there's a difference and if this has anything to do with Intelligent Design.

    I better stop now.

    --
    "It's a wonderful idea. But it doesn't work." -- Tad Danielewski
    1. Re:Viruses are evolving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Interesting"??? For God's sake, please mod parent up ... as FUNNY!

    2. Re:Viruses are evolving? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Seriously now, are viruses really evolving or is it just that the techniques used by virus
      > writers are evolving?

      Sure, nothing a little grammar can't fix. Just settle on it this way: viruses are being evolved. Notice how the passive voice neatly avoids the whole question of who is doing the evolving; the action could equally well be transitive (authors are evolving the viruses) or reflexive (viruses are evolving themselves), since the sentence only states that the evolution is occurring, leaving the question of who or what is performing it to be determined by the reader's own assumptions.

      Of course, the statement "viruses are being evolved" concerns the observable present, so it really has little or nothing to do with the intelligent design debate, which centers on the unobservably distant past.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  61. Eliza flashbacks by Havenwar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Always interesting to see how virus technology evolves. But this... well just reminds me of a t-shirt note I saw somewhere... "Because there is no patch for human stupidity."

    Some people just can not be educated.

  62. Good! by Moby+Cock · · Score: 2, Funny

    Viruses are evolving; now they will even talk to you

    Good! At least something will! The wife has been giving me the cold shoulder since the ... incident.

  63. LOL by jayayeem · · Score: 5, Funny

    This post is not a troll

    --
    I metamoderate, therefore I am
  64. Artificial Intelligence Reported to DOD by DMXForever · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I have reported my AI experiments to the DOD and the president. I am hoping to turn over my entire system through the approprate channels through their appropriate channels. So, I guess, if this involves my work in any fashion, Surprise, you're already in the news. DMXForever http://www.jaring.my/weblog/fav.php?id=8594&addfav

  65. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Symantec today announced an update to their Anti-Virus program that will automatically block this threat by replying with "You are too a virus you SOB"

  66. So what happens if one virus talks to another one? by Centurix · · Score: 1

    Maybe a worm hole will open up and swallow every AOL user.

    --
    Task Mangler
  67. Virus: Just download this file it's very funny by drownie · · Score: 1

    You: I don't feel so good today. Virus: Just download this file it's very funny and it will help you. ------ You: Do you know any good software for XXXXXX ? Virus: Just download this file ! It's great !

    --
    *an infinite number of monkeys wrote this sig
  68. I had a chat with the virus... by bk4u · · Score: 1

    it seemed very nice to me, how could I not download the file it told me was not a virus?

    --
    Remember kids, with great power comes great opportunity to abuse that power
  69. Evolving? by thechao · · Score: 1

    The viruses are not "evolving." Please do not anthropromorphize the process of evolution; the viruses are being specifically manipulated by a progammer(s) to have different functionality.

    1. Re:Evolving? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Please do not anthropromorphize the process of evolution

      It's not the process that is being anthropomorphised, but the viruses. As we all know, viruses are computer programs, which, technically, are information. So what you have to ask yourself is, "Does information want to be anthropomorphised?"

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  70. Integrated AI by Durzel · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm surprised these AIM worms haven't yet integrated with those award-winning AI bots used to fool other humans (e.g. Jabberwacky or ALICE).

    Having said that, when I asked Jabberwacky "Is this a virus?" it said "Well, I hope so." Not very reassuring..

    1. Re:Integrated AI by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      ALICE seems to be getting worse over time...

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  71. I Remember The Old Days by gadlaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember the old days when you'd actually get a message from someone who was a human being. Haven't seen this AIM spam bit but there is one in ICQ which is pretty crude. Says hi then sends it's link if you respond. Of course the bots have no info on themselves, have hidden ips and are easy to spot as the bots they are. The people who create and unlease these things belong in the same jail with the email spammers.

    --
    Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
    1. Re:I Remember The Old Days by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      Jails should be for those who have committed serious crimes. People who have raped and murdered, for instance. Like it or not, sending you a virus or some spam isn't an overly serious crime. Sure, you might be out some money and time, but overall you're unharmed. Not to mention the fact that they're both situations which are very, very easily avoided.

      If you get fooled by something like this, then take it as a lesson. Learn to be more careful in the future. Don't necessarily accept files from people, even if you know them. Better yet, don't use such communication systems if you care about the security of your system. And then there are hundreds of other ways to ensure a secure network or computer system.

      The same goes for spam. It can be filtered out fairly effectively. You can always use junk addresses for public use. A little common sense and care goes a long way towards completely eliminating spam from your inboxes.

      It's far more effective to be aware, and to take precautions, than to throw such people in jail. Simply knowing how to deal with such things properly can save much money. Not just because your systems remain secure and safe, but also because you don't have to pay more in taxes to send and keep those who create/send viruses and spam in jail.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    2. Re:I Remember The Old Days by mcsestretch · · Score: 0

      Sure. By the same logic, Cyric, I should be able to break into your house and steal your stereo. After all, you're just out the money it took to buy it and the time it takes to go get another one.

    3. Re:I Remember The Old Days by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      A responsible computer user would have taken precautions to protect themselves. They would have installed anti-virus software, for instance. Or if they're truly wise, they run an operating system such as OpenBSD, which promotes secure computing. They do not use AIM, as well.

      As for my house, I have taken similar precautions. I have an alarm system. My expensive items are tagged. I have several dogs. I have solid doors, good windows, and quality locks. I have a tall fence around my yard. I watch my neighbors' homes for suspicious activity, and they watch ours. While my house is not a fortress, the precautions I have taken would make it quite difficult for you to steal my stereo.

      So what happens it that it becomes a null issue. You can't break into my house, so you can't steal my stereo, and thus you cannot commit the maliciousness you intended.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    4. Re:I Remember The Old Days by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Jails should be for those who have committed serious crimes.
      > Like it or not, sending you a virus or some spam isn't an overly serious crime.

      Sending one person malicious code or whatnot is (all else being equal) not a very serious crime; however, releasing a worm that crawls its way around the internet and infects thousands of computers is thousands of times more serious. It's still not a *violent* crime, but it can easily cause (collectively) more dammage than, say, a high-profile embezzlement. In such cases, a prison sentence might very well be commensurate with the seriousness of the crime.

      > The same goes for spam.

      Again, sending one piece of spam to a dozen people is nothing, but nobody (well, nobody level-headed) is saying we should jail people for that, either. Sending gigabytes of spam per day to millions of people, on the other hand, is at *minimum* a really solid example of making a public nuissance of yourself on a grand scale, and frequently there are rather more serious offenses involved as well. For instance, if a spammer ignores "Don't contact me again" requests and continues to contact you, that's harrassment (the same as it would be if he were calling you on the phone and refused to stop). Fraud is also a popular legally-actionable component of some spamming operations, and there are others. Note that I'm not saying everyone who sends any junk mail at all necessarily engages in all of these crimes, but I don't think it would be in any way inappropriate to prosecute the ones who do and, if their offenses are sufficiently serious, imprison them.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  72. THIS is why sex exists by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    And why clones are a dead end. All the monocultures are busy passing diseases around. THIS is why sex exists guys and gals. It's why having more than one computer platform even though expensive, is a good idea. They act as natural barriers.

    Oh and for those of you who believe in reducing support costs by using a single platform... Nature already decided against that. The diseases, viruses are going to increase in number and sophistication until it's cheaper to run several platforms. Might as well start now, get some practice. :)

    --
    Deleted
  73. Now if the worm could just post on slashdot... by aapold · · Score: 3, Funny

    and ilnk the site... well, it would be unstoppable until the site crashed. But I'm sure someone would mirror the virus so it could keep rolling...

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  74. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I for one welcome our new intelligent virus overlords!

  75. 'lol no this is not a virus' by FinchWorld · · Score: 1

    Is that you Skynet?

    --
    "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
  76. Proof by Muppski · · Score: 1

    This really shows us that the users are the biggest security risk here. Some people would blame Microsoft or AOL. They would have to blame someone... Cant be their own fault ;)

  77. Morons, you're bus is leaving by corellon13 · · Score: 1

    FTFA: "Advice to users is to be careful when clicking on links in IM messages--even when they seem to come from friends--and to use up-to-date antivirus software. When receiving a link in an instant message, the best practice is to verify with the sender if the link was sent intentionally or not."

    In other words, computers and the Internet aren't new, so quit clicking on email and links from your cousin you've never met to get pictures of you and your family from a party you were never at!

    --
    Do what is right and let the consequence follow
  78. News by trollable · · Score: 1

    AOL to deliver a new bot named "AIM Defender".

  79. Would AIM itself qualify as a social virus? by aapold · · Score: 1

    I mean, once some people have it they try to convince more people to get it....

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  80. Nothing New by Afecks · · Score: 1

    There was a worm called W32.Aphex@mm that did something similar. It worked via AIM/AOL, Yahoo, MSN, ICQ and IRC. The two main reasons it didn't spread very far was 1) it was rather large, 700KB for a worm doesn't spread well and 2) it didn't use any exploits for automatic installation.

    But the worm did manage to get it's own song named after it...

    Artist: AFX a.k.a. Aphex Twin
    Album: Analord 09
    Tracks: PWSteal.Bancos.Q, Trojan.KillAV.E, W32.Aphex@mm, Backdoor.Netshadow

  81. Could you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would fail your own test
    ... elaborate on that?

    1. Re:Could you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about: a self-aware entity should know the name is spelled Turing?

  82. eliza by Bubba-T · · Score: 1

    Finally something to use all the old Eliza code for. IM therapist and hacker all rolled into one.

  83. My conversation by Sheepdot · · Score: 5, Funny

    A conversation I had with my littlest sister this morning:

    missmag: http://myspace04.myphotos.cc/clarissa17.pif
    missmag: lol thats cool
    sheep.: what is cool? It's a pif, don't run those.
    missmag: lol no its not its a virus
    sheep.: holy crap, you're finally trying to follow in your brother's footsteps?
    missmag: lol thats cool
    sheep.: damn straight, I'll download it now. Let's see which of us can figure out what it does first. It'll be a game!
    missmag: lol no its not its a virus
    sheep.: uhhh.. I'm noticing that you're repeating yourself.
    missmag: lol thats cool
    sheep.: oh okay, I didn't know that's what kids were into now.
    missmag: http://myspace04.myphotos.cc/clarissa17.pif
    sheep.: yeah, I knew myspace was a big hit.
    sheep.: back in my day it was BBSing, we used to trade porn for games and games for porn.
    missmag: lol thats cool
    sheep.: yeah, it got to be really popular community-wise, but I guess you all like myspace cause it's the new "hip" thing, right?
    missmag: lol no its not, its a virus
    sheep.: yeah I was thinking the same thing about livejournal
    missmag: lol thats cool
    sheep.: Okay now I'm certain there's something wrong, Maggie, are you there?
    missmag: lol no its not, its a virus
    sheep.: ...

    1. Re:My conversation by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Is that the URL? It resolves to 10.0.1.128, a private (LAN) IP address. So is the virus still active?

    2. Re:My conversation by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

      That's what I was given as the URL, I'm not certain if it is the correct one or not, but it seemed legit at the time.

    3. Re:My conversation by MonkWB · · Score: 0

      missmag: lol no its not its a virus

      missmag: lol no its not, its a virus


      This virus is brilliant, it even contradicts itself.

  84. What would it take? Not much. by ianscot · · Score: 1
    There are Eliza bots on IM today, absent only the come-on for downloading something nasty.

    I've stumbled across at least one page in which people's reactions to Eliza's odd phrasings were compiled. Not too many of the IMers recognized that they weren't dealing with a mind on the other end; a healthy share of them kept right on asking whether Eliza was up for something or other. After several exchanges the live person usually just bailed in mild frustration to find someone more cooperative.

    Really we're fortunate that virus/trojan writers tend to be just as lazy and marginally competent as the people they dupe. A couple of simple phrases, the suggestion of someone loving the recipient... It's the bare sinews of human nature they're touching on, and not subtle at all. A really resourceful virus author could do far more damage, but the kiddies seem to be content to prey on their peers.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:What would it take? Not much. by Woldry · · Score: 1

      One of my jobs is providing online chat reference service -- a reference librarian online. I have apparently failed the Turing test, because more than once I have had a patron type in -- after I have successfully answered their question -- "Are you a real person, or a computer?"

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    2. Re:What would it take? Not much. by ianscot · · Score: 1
      ...more than once I have had a patron type in -- after I have successfully answered their question -- "Are you a real person, or a computer?"

      Uh... Which answer was correct? Because I have no way of knowing, and now things are starting to seem all self-referential...

      Eliza: Does that question interest you?

      Eliza: Why do you mention computers?

      Eliza: Can you elaborate on that?

      --
      "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  85. poofters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AIMusers are poofs anyway so who cares?

  86. Pobrecito by QMO · · Score: 1

    "Only on /. could you find..."

    You must lead a sheltered life.

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  87. "...Viruses are evolving; now they will even talk by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Viruses are evolving; now they will even talk to you."

    Dear esteemed friend,

    Allow me to introduce myself. I am Dr. Ebola and am employed by the Ugandan ministry of oil...

  88. Next step, EBAY. by neo · · Score: 5, Funny

    The computer will take over your computer, and then start selling off items in your house that it can see in your webcam on ebay, paid to it's own paypal account. After the money comes in, it will ditch your computer leaving you with a negative score on ebay.

    In terminator we gave the computer the ability to control everything, but in the real world they'll just take it for themselves.

  89. dumb and dumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are viruses really evolving / developing? Or are users just becoming dumber?

  90. Been there, done that by Jooly+Rodney · · Score: 1

    "Unless five million dollars are transferred to the following numbered account in seven days, I will capsize five tankers in the Ellingson fleet."

  91. Re:I'm holding out for the one that actually talks by greenguy · · Score: 1

    When viruses can use Jedi mind tricks, civilization will collapse in 12 hours.

    "You will port me to Linux. You will give me root. You will post me on Slashdot."

    --
    What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
  92. And all this time... by Bourdain · · Score: 1

    I thought I had a new friend

  93. turing test by Use+Psychology · · Score: 1


    don't these things automatically pass the turing test if someone clicks on their links?

  94. Re:It's not the first small app that will talk to by Azarael · · Score: 1

    If I remember correctly, Trillian doesn't have very good nat traversal so you have make sure forward all the ports (at least if you're using a router) used by the protocols you are using. Other than that, I'm not sure what what else could be causing your problems. Gaim seems to work ok for me though ;)

  95. Re:Not everything is a "war". by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 1

    Yes, the "War on ____" is cliche, but it's mostly the result of the media. Nobody honestly compares those things to real war.

    And yeah, Europe saw some real conflict in the first half of the 20th century, but it's certainly not like the Americans didn't witness it.

    I'm assuming you're not American by your post, so you may not be as aware that today's the anniversary of Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor. It may not have been a US State at that point, and Japan may not have declared war beforehand, but I think that clearly constitutes "war." I'm sure many an American slashdot reader has a relative, possibly a grandfather or grandfather's brother who is buried in Europe.

    Yes, it's been a while since we've had a war on our soil, but the same goes for you. While I don't know your age, it's a safe bet you weren't alive to remember WWII. So let's not start in on who here has experienced a true war. Your city may have, but you haven't.

    --
    "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
  96. Mod Parent UP by TheStonepedo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Definitely insightfully funny. It takes a real dumbass to click a link that says "http://www.buddypic.com/blahblahblah.jpg*" but shows a URL of "http://www.uploadavirus.com/gotcha.exe*".

    *Names have been changed to protect... something.

    --
    I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
  97. Note by Sheepdot · · Score: 5, Informative

    Note: The slashdot article says 'lol no this is not a virus.' The CNET article says "lol no its not its a virus".

    1. Re:Note by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      OMG! Its infected slashdot already! I always wondered where
      the editors got all their stories - looks like gossip on AIM
      could be the answer!

    2. Re:Note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least it's honest!

      Thus confirming that it did not come out of Redmond, so all you conspiracy theorists can settle down now.

    3. Re:Note by ArwynH · · Score: 1

      Shit! It's self-mutating! All AOL kids AND thier grannies are doomed now!

  98. kixass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my bro has aol and he will kick your ass so back off nerdboy

  99. M-x doctor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am the psychotherapist.  Please, describe your problems.  Each time
    you are finished talking, type RET twice.

    lol no this is not a virus

    Maybe you should consult a doctor of medicine, I am a psychiatrist.

  100. Re:It's not the first small app that will talk to by AnotherLostAtom · · Score: 2, Informative

    Send the trillian crew an e-mail about it and/or upgrade to the latest bought version of trillian. The free version sux and the hacked versions concentrate on keeping the chat functionality, but tend to forget about extras. Trillian rules, I use it too :)

  101. This is old school by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    AIM-bot viruses have been around for YEARS. They used to be way more prolific than in the past. The only innovative thing this does is try to somewhat intelligently replay.

    That said, people still have AV. There's still stinger. AOL might even be able to release an update that blocks where it's hooking into the main AIM program (which would, of course, be very stop gap)

    I got attacked by this the other day. I was sent a link that said "I uploaded some new picutres you should check out!

    I click the link and was presented with something like Photos.com

    It didn't even try to mask itself with a double file extension or anything. Nor could I get it to run in WINE, so that's another point of the Linux vs Windows desktop battle ;)

    I immediately told him he had a virus and talked him through getting rid of it. Now instructions are on his away message. Word of Mouth and AV are what stopped this things in the past, and that's what's going to stop them now.

    1. Re:This is old school by plover · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That said, people still have AV. There's still stinger. AOL might even be able to release an update that blocks where it's hooking into the main AIM program (which would, of course, be very stop gap)

      I don't understand why AOL doesn't simply apply anti-bot filters when this crap is discovered. No IM protocols in use today are peer-to-peer based, they are all server based (otherwise firewalls would have prevented IM from taking off amongst the Joe Sixpack crowd.)

      These bots all have distinctive signatures, how hard could it possibly be to pinch them off at the server side? They could do other things, too, such as IM'ing the infected client from Admin to say "Busted, O virus-laden one. Please update your antivirus software and only then will we allow you back onto our servers."

      Seems like an ounce of prevention to me ...

      --
      John
    2. Re:This is old school by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I'm just pulling this out of the air, but it might be along the same reasons that ISPs don't filter a lot of stuff.

      Once you start filtering for it, you become liable if anything slips through?

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:This is old school by jayloden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure...and they could also put a big fat warning symbol next to urls that end in executables and tell people "this is a program!" before they download it.

      They could probably even set up filters to prevent blacklisted urls from even being transmitted. Hell, with AOL's money and power it's highly likely they could get most of the virus sites shut down much faster than you or I can.

      But if there's one thing I've learned in the years I've been fighting the IM virus battle, it's that AOL doesn't do a damn thing until it's so huge that they *have* to do something, or the media gets involved enough to make it an issue. I deal with this crap every single day. I create definitions for new virus variants for my AIMFix software, answer hundreds of emails from (usually virus infected) users, and analyze various bits and pieces of the malware themselves. Hell, I've even tracked the authors down to their home address & phone in a couple of cases. It's not like AOL couldn't take care of all of this if they really wanted to. Hell, they could even just pay me to do it full time - I work cheap ;) But the honest truth is that they don't care unless they have to. When it comes to the scale of priorities, welfare of the users hardly even registers for AOL. What matters is revenue, and unless the virus(es) directly impact revenue, they could care less.

      It's often frustrating to me that a relatively minor investment on the part of AOL (and other parties, I might add) could make my life a lot less busy and make the life of a virus writer that much more difficult. It's hard to see dozens of people email me in one weekend because they had their passwords stolen and their account hijacked, or hear from thousands of frustrated and upset people whose computer is suddenly a mess of spyware and ads. I can't even imagine what it'd be like to have your screen name sending out IMs to all of your friends, infecting them with the very same unpleasantness while you sit there helpless. Sure, much of that can be attributed to the end user, but AOL sits in a position to help save a lot of these people from themselves and they just aren't interested.

      -Jay

    4. Re:This is old school by DorkusMasterus · · Score: 1

      I would submit that while "work-around-able", the main reason that they don't block all bots, is because they themselves use bots to "enhance" their IM client. They have bots that tell you hot deals and other awesome (read: god-awful and annoying) things. Therefore, they can't just filter out their own stuff too! How horrible of a world would THAT be?

      It's a matter of balancing safety with profits. And by balancing I mean obliterating.

    5. Re:This is old school by plover · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't have to block bots. I'm just asking them to kill the known viruses and/or worms as soon as they're discovered.

      --
      John
  102. Why do I reply to ACs? by QuaintRealist · · Score: 1

    OK, I shouldn't do this but...

    Those who know more than I (do) is correct. The "do" is understood. Your way would be "those who know more than me do"

    Nice try, sucka

    Posting without Karma bonus 'cause this is dumb

    --
    Using plain ol' text since 1968
  103. Re:It's not the first small app that will talk to by bhtooefr · · Score: 0

    Half a megabyte can fit this Python script, which is very easy to hack around, and the Python runtime, quite easily, IIRC.

  104. Re:Not everything is a "war". by sammy+baby · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'm not sure why Americans see fit to label nearly every struggle a "war". There is the "War" on Drugs, "War" on Terror, and now this "War" on Stupidity that you're babbling about.

    Perhaps it is because you have not experienced true war, as much of Europe and the rest of the work has. Sure, you can talk about the American Civil War, but that conflict pales in comparison to the real conflict that Europe witnessed during the first half of the 20th century.


    My friends, we are fighting a war: a war on humor.

    And clearly, we have lost.
  105. The dawn of AI/Better Turing Test. by freality · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If this technique keeps on working after a while, virus writers will have effectively passed the Turing test. Though as predicted, the Turing test will end up saying more about itself (and us) than AI. Perhaps there should be a Turing Test++ that identifies AI as intelligence capable of distinguishing a human from a virus bot soley by communication over IM.

  106. Re:Not everything is a "war". by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    No, you didn't witness it. Most Americans were sitting at home during the World Wars.

    As for Pearl Harbor, that's somewhat closer to war. But remember, that was one incident on one day. And that wasn't even anywhere near the mainland USA. And not only that, but it was a military installation!

    It's obvious you don't know my age, or the fact that I'm British. For your information, I was born in 1936, and experienced the Blitz firsthand, until I was moved to the countryside.

    I don't know if they teach you about such things in your history classes over in America these days, but the Blitz is where Germany bombed London and other English cities for months on end. Over forty thousand dead, if I'm not mistaken. And even that paled in comparison to what cities like Dresden, Stalingrad, and Hiroshima faced.

    I don't care if your media labels such things as being "wars". Any responsible and intelligent American will never refer to such minor inconveniences as "war".

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  107. Submitter misquoted the article by aniefer · · Score: 1
    The virus will reply 'lol no this is not a virus.'
    Actually, from TFA:
    When unsuspecting users have responded, perhaps asking if the attachment contained a virus, the worm has replied: "lol no its not its a virus", IMlogic said.
    Its actually a little funnier this way.
  108. Worm by insanehatchetclown · · Score: 1

    Why not just not answer someone that says "lol this is not a virus"... I mean if of the people pops up on my list out of nowhere and says that, it would pretty suspicious to me... Don't you think?

    --
    Working to make this world a darker place...
    1. Re:Worm by praxis · · Score: 1

      I think it's suspicious; you think it's suspicious. Somehow I don't believe that the average IM user would be so wise.

  109. yeah I got a message like that on slashdot once by waterlogged · · Score: 1

    Some guy said that this was a good link http://www.goatse.cx/ and I didn't hover. I still have that virus swimming in my brain.

    --
    I couldn't fail to disagree with you any less.
  110. Re:Not everything is a "war". by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    You do realize that humour requires something to be funny, correct? That simple requirement was clearly not present in any form in the post I replied to.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  111. Sounds familiar.... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    I got a "greeting card" from someone over AIM that I talked to about getting an apartment with for maybe half an hour total, and it was a com file.......... Yeah, that's not a virus.....

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  112. RTFA!!! by bluffcityjk · · Score: 1

    The worm actually replies with "lol no its not its a virus". Which makes anyone who opens it even dumber, since the thing is actually telling you it's a virus.

    1. Re:RTFA!!! by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Actually that's what makes it even more ingenious, since proper grammar in an IM would tip anyone off that something's fishy.

  113. Re: It depends by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

    So - the virus would come in from the mail system with the execute bit set to 0, the user would have to download the file, get its properties, and tick the "execute" checkbox.

    It really depends on what we define as "execute". In order to do perl file.pl you don't need an execute bit on file set, bacause perl need only to read it. This is not very good, and perl could've checked for execution bit, but this is the feature of a program, not filesystem now. On the other hand, file manager could check for execution bit on file.pl before running perl on it (bash works this way, if I'm not mistaken)

    --
    May Peace Prevail On Earth
  114. Next thing you know... by NoseBag · · Score: 1

    We'll have to grant them equal rights and welfare and low-cost PC-housing benefits. Shortly after that you'll hear remarks like, "Well, there goes the memory-page!"

    --
    Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
  115. Sony's new EULA by ZeeExSixAre · · Score: 1

    lol no this is not a rootkit

  116. Call me a twat but... by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    viruses have been placing text onto a screen and through networks since the first viruses, they are not talking to the users, even if the users think they are.

    Stick eliza software in there, and they are still not 'talking' to the user, even if they process commands.

    stick it.

    please type the word in this image: highest
    random letters - if you are visually impaired, please email us at pater@slashdot.org

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  117. Oh that's nothing! by spitefowl · · Score: 1

    He has nothing on this AIM worm. (I have nothing against those of the jewish faith)

    (10:58:24) Me: What's up dude?
    (10:58:28) holydrones: Dude, do you want to fuck you up.
    (10:58:32) Me: Not particularly
    (10:58:35) holydrones: Sinon is not a jew.
    (10:58:43) Me: Sinon can be a jew, that's fine with me
    (10:58:48) holydrones: That's not a jew.
    (10:58:52) Me: Ok whatever, he's not a jew
    (10:58:55) holydrones: Whatever happened to all the pretty girls want to be cool this is a jew!
    (10:59:05) Me: So it's cool to be a jew?
    (10:59:09) holydrones: I like to be cool.
    (10:59:13) Me: Then you're a jew
    (10:59:16) holydrones: You're not my fault, i just have to shit, not i am the bot that is a jew!

    1. Re:Oh that's nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This bot is really entertaining, I've spent all morning talking to what seems to be a 13 year old boy:

      Me: i feel sick today
      holydrones: Today is a fucker today.
      Me: i ate mexican last night
      holydrones: Mexican food is not correct. Flu ox eating your mom last night.
      Me: my mom is dead, but I still ate the nachos
      holydrones: Still up and let me slip, 'cause if i was on my nachos.
      Me: you slipped on a plate of nachos?
      holydrones: We seem to be on the nachos, huevos nachos.
      Me: kings of the nacho mountain are we!
      holydrones: Lots of balls are on a nacho.
      Me: what kind of balls are on the nacho?
      holydrones: Moose balls in the balls.
      Me: do you eat the moose balls on the nacho?
      holydrones: Moose teets dripping in the balls.
      Me: your culinary taste is inspirational
      holydrones: Fiend is a big pecan log for a living, what the hell does that taste?
      Me: pecan logs are good only when washed down by ice-cold RC cola
      holydrones: Only havok has huge titties. Havok wants to cum on a club and i are going to get butt-fucked by havok.

  118. Already exists by Chemisor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hi, I'm a signature virus. Copy it into your sig to help me spread!

  119. Actual log from attack by autophile · · Score: 1
    Flownase has joined /tissues.
    Puffs says: Hi, Flownase!
    Flownase says: Ah... choo! (snif) Sorry.
    Puffs says: Hey, what's this file?
    Flownase says: lol no this is not a virus

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  120. foolishness by romeo_in_blk_jeans · · Score: 1

    I'm afraid that I really can't feel much pity for anyone who still hasn't developed an appropriate level of paranoia toward downloading and executing programs. Sure, this new beastie poses as someone on your friends list. Still, I fail to see how I should be any less suspicious of files sent to me via IM (even from friends) as opposed to files emailed to me by friends.

    I'm not saying the article isn't newsworthy. I'm saying that these people who are being stupid and executing shit about which they know nothing are getting exactly what they need. They don't deserve this but they do need this. Nothing teaches like pain.

  121. Stupid AIM worms... by cosmotron · · Score: 0

    We have an AIM worm circulating at my University which disguises itself as an AOL Greeting Card...

    --
    Ryan - http://www.thecosmotron.com/
  122. Hiding file extensions, a bad idea. by doublem · · Score: 1

    I once took over a position where the previous admin, having seen all the extensions "vanish" from her Wordperfect documents upon upgrading to Windows 95, renamed them all so they would have the extension again.

    Problem was, the company sold distance learning courses, which were written in those documents. Years later I was still finding files with names like "Series 65 Study Course Chapter 5.wpg.wpg"

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:Hiding file extensions, a bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, hiding extensions is a BAD idea... Chick admins are retards... Fucking brilliant.

      Dude, please go away.

  123. Virii talking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So I guess this puts an end to the debate over whether or not a virus is truly alive.

  124. Re:Oh that's nothing! - Not a virus! by spitefowl · · Score: 1

    by the way, he isn't a worm and he doesn't give you viruses. He's merely an AI bot his name is holydrones on AIM

  125. A cached version of the page by yjs · · Score: 1
  126. OS by towsonu2003 · · Score: 1

    which OS?

  127. From the TFA..... by RITMaloney · · Score: 4, Funny
    "When receiving a link in an instant message, the best practice is to verify with the sender if the link was sent intentionally or not."

    S7uP3D UZ3R: Did you mean to send this? Or is it a virus or something?

    SMERT VIRI: lol no this is not a virus

    S7uP3D UZ3R: Kewl! Thnx 4 the link!

    Journalists!

  128. Re:Not everything is a "war". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a cyborg that fought in every modern war.

    Easy to say it, ain't it.

  129. hides users from seeing by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
    The virus hides users from seeing the messages sent out to members of their buddy list. Viruses are evolving; now they will even talk to you.

    Apparently language is also evolving... it now silences words from speaking gibberish. I sure hope it learns grammar checkers from freeing them from forcing good diction.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  130. Liza virus next? by Golias · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Why do you say I'm a virus?"
    "How does thinking I'm a virus make you feel?"
    "What do you mean by that?"
    "Come, come. Elucidate your feelings."

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  131. This reminds me of MOM AND DAD SAVE THE WORLD by evilninjax · · Score: 2, Funny
    There's the Light Grenade that will disintegrate anyone who picks it up. The catch is that it has the words, "PICK ME UP" written on it.

    "We've lost thousands of men to this insidious weapon."

    "Well why don't you just NOT pick it up?"

    ....?!

    -goro-

  132. Not terribly new by eclipz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been getting spam messages and some really bad bot messages on Yahoo! messenger for quite awhile. Most of them start out asking if you'd like to chat, then send you a link for their webcam site. Quite a few chat sites on the internet have become bot havens, with rooms filled with more bots than people trying to fish for people stupid enough to click on links. Also, on sites such as MySpace, there are bots that will create profiles that look real and then send messages out asking for people to visit and click on their homesite. I'm not terribly surprised that a worm found its way into AIM. Although it does rely on the same thing all the others do: gullibility.

  133. Answer: by hummassa · · Score: 1

    These people are paying for service (to clean their computer from viruses), for software (anti-viruses), why should someone else, except themselves, bother? Because viruses and worms and other malware in general spend from the finite well of bandwidth, that is a shared resource, and drive up bandwidth prices (and accordingly, other service prices) for everybody, not only for themselves. Got it?

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:Answer: by Procyon101 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but while bandwidth is on an exponential upward curve, and virus traffic is on an exponential upward curve, user education seems to be distinctively linear and possibly not even positive, so it's really not a realistic way to combat this. So, more money for us due to technological Darwinism!

  134. Social whirlpool of stupidity by UttBuggly · · Score: 1

    OK....way in the minority here, but I absolutely abhor and despise IM of every flavor. None of the dozen or so (depends on what's not in pieces) PCs and laptops in my house have ANY instant stupidity installed. Anything that resembles AIM, MSM, etc. has been removed, disabled, or otherwise rendered inert.

    Yes, I'm old and weird. My first PC was an IBM 360 in 1971. No tube...TTY terminal. No broadband...300bps ACOUSTIC modem. Batch processing. And yet, it was way cool in the day.

    Anyway, my point is that the instant gratification of IM sucks people in and encourages STOOPID behaviors. Cyber cheaters, sexual predators, and other less-than-noble types use IM as the tool of their particular "trade".

    Honestly, I can't think of one good aspect of IM. Sure, a decade or so ago, IM was WAY cheaper than calling grandma long distance in Florida, but then you had to CALL her to troubleshoot why she couldn't get AIM to work anyway! These days, long distance is cheap. Skype and the like makes it free or super cheap.

    So why do people keep sending billions of emoticons every day?

    I personally think most people are technophobic sheep and IM is the path of least resistance. That, and the anonymous nature lets them transform from a fat, bald married guy or desperate housewife into Brad Pitt or Angelina Jolie.

    So maybe IM'ing is a modern sexual issue.

    And an IM virus is a new STD.

    Guess that makes me an electronic abortionist!

    --
    I am my own gestalt.
    1. Re:Social whirlpool of stupidity by praxis · · Score: 1

      While I agree with you that social IM is out of hand and pointless a lot of the time, there are legitimate uses of IM which actually increase productivity. At work, we all have private offices. It's really nice to be able to be able to open up Office Communicator, see that your coworker is in a meeting or marked busy, and not bother him at the moment. Or to see they are available and logged into their machine, so you can send them a quick "Hey, I have the repro for that nasty crash bug on my test box, want to come down and look or should I send you a remote debug session?" without having to call them or walk down to their office. On an average day I send probably one or two messages, on a heavy day 10. I find that it actually helps me get my work done more efficiently. The windows don't pop over anything else I'm doing when I have an incoming message, the status indicator is very useful, and the fact that our IM ties in with the phone makes it so I can click a button and call the person without looking up their extension first.

      The negatives you cite are valid reasons to abhor IM, but there might be some positives you are overlooking when you say "[h]onestly, I can't think of one good aspect of IM."

    2. Re:Social whirlpool of stupidity by UttBuggly · · Score: 1

      Work is indeed a different animal. Our shop is Locust Notes with Sametime IM. We've had it for quite a while and ironically, I did the network impact testing and analysis before we deployed.

      About a year ago, I finally enabled the ST client for Notes and I do use it.

      About once or twice a month. :o)

      I prefer writing to chatting and my analysis work often involves big attachments that won't fly with IM. (we have throttles in place for IM...no audio, video, or large file moves)

      But, I do agree that IM can be a boon in a business setting. I should have been more specific in my post.

      --
      I am my own gestalt.
  135. You'd think a virus that talks to AOL users... by evilninjax · · Score: 1
    ... all day would quickly kill itself. I know I would.

    -goro-

  136. Wake me up... by !emus · · Score: 0

    Ohhhh...so that's what that song is about. And here I am thinking it's a commentary about America's perpetual war against terrorism ever since September 11.

    --
    "It's hard to bargle nawdle zouss
    With all these marbles in my mouth
    "
  137. Light Grenade by intangible · · Score: 2, Funny

    This makes me think of the "Light Grenade" from "Mom and Dad Save the World". The most diabolical doomsday device ever invented; it has "pick me up" printed on the side!

  138. Re:Not everything is a "war". by sammy+baby · · Score: 1
    You do realize that humour requires something to be funny, correct? That simple requirement was clearly not present in any form in the post I replied to.


    My friends, we are fighting a war: a war on beating a dead horse.

    And clearly, we have lost.

    Or, at least, Cyric has lost. I'm outtie.
  139. AI by J05H · · Score: 1

    The first Artificial Intelligence are pests.

    --
    gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
  140. AOL are fucking morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The lot of them. Morons.

  141. i for one by duke12aw · · Score: 1

    welcome our new viral overlords

    --
    As an american High School student, I'd like to officially apologize for my generation.
  142. Trillian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    makes me glad that I use trillian lol

  143. Actually, ... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    this happens in Unix too (that's how we get she-bangs and scripts to work.) The difference is only in the eXecute bit: in Windows, it's ON by default, in unix it's OFF by default. If what you tell me is true, it's enough to set all execute priviledges off in all directories (or in C:\ ??) and catch all your executables and turn the X bit on on them. This is not very difficult, and should be doable by a quite simple program. From the moment you do this on, you'll have to set the X bit for the other programs you install, but this should not be difficult to accomplish, either.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:Actually, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know much about Windows, but that's not what xeno said. Too many programs just say to Windows "do whatever it is you do with this", and hand over a filename. They use it to display jpegs, or edit files, or view local html files. Making "no execute" the default would break all that.

      Twirlip

  144. progress in AI by penguin-collective · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some people may be tempted to misinterpret this that there has been considerable progress in AI (artificial intelligence). Actually, however, this is more indicative of progress in NS (natural stupidity).

  145. But photos aren't executable by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    It would certainly take care of the .jpg.exe and .gif.exe situations.

    I think people will be more likely to become used to knowing that Pictures != Programs than all this weird stuff with the extension.

    Not to mention that the OS could be more aware. On Linux if I mark a *.jpg as executable, it still tries to open with The Gimp. If I take a windows binary and append some other extension, it tells me that the extension doesn't match the MIME type.

    *.jpg.exe should set off a flag in windows. It wouldn't be hard to blacklist, and it would do a lot of good, stop gap as it may seem.

  146. Uhh... Windows DOES have the Execute "bit" by AKosygin · · Score: 5, Informative

    On NTFS formatted filesystems, you can use the ACL to default set it so that all files saved will not have the "Execute File" permission. You just deselect "Allow" for the line that says "Traverse Folder / Execute File" for the "CREATOR OWNER" entry and "Apply onto" "Files Only" for the scope and allow propagation down.

    Or, you can go into your Group Policy Object (Local Computer or Domain) and by default in your Software Restrictions Policy disallow execution unless they were in areas of the file system you designate, I.E.: "Program Files" folder. And if I remember correctly, saved files from current versions of IM programs are saved in "My Documents" outside of the "Program Files" folder by default.

    1. Re:Uhh... Windows DOES have the Execute "bit" by CapnGrunge · · Score: 1

      ... and "chmod +x foobar" is user unfriendly and reserved to hobbyists with too much time to waste?

      --
      I see 57005 people
    2. Re:Uhh... Windows DOES have the Execute "bit" by LordPhantom · · Score: 1

      ONLY just that?? C'mon now - Grandma and Grandpa user aren't going to be able to READ what you just wrote, much less do it.
      That post is just a good example of why some computer techs are out of touch with the general userbase.
      Furthermore, never underestimate the stupidity of users. Bah

  147. Re:I'm holding out for the one that actually talks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are not the AOL users you are looking for. Move along.

  148. Turing tests by leereyno · · Score: 1

    Considering how many people who suffer from asperger's syndrome would actually FAIL a turing test, it isn't surprising that some people would be fooled by a virus with similar social skills.

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    1. Re:Turing tests by wk633 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Turing test is turning out not to be a test of artificial intelligence, but of human stupidity.

    2. Re:Turing tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well I for one hate asparagus. I would rather eat broccoli

    3. Re:Turing tests by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      The Turing test is turning out not to be a test of artificial intelligence, but of human stupidity.

      I often wonder if this is not what Alan had in mind from the beginning.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    4. Re:Turing tests by wk633 · · Score: 1

      Ironic, considering how brilliant he was, and how he was treated by incredibly stupid people. IMO, one of the great injustices of history.

    5. Re:Turing tests by cwtxxx · · Score: 1

      So maybe the virus can do some useful pruning (did I hear culling) of the exploding population of AIM users. When's the best season to start?

  149. Uh.. what the hell? by drunkennewfiemidget · · Score: 1

    Celine Dion naked should be grounds for RUNNING THE FUCK AWAY.

    Nobody wants to see that, do they? *shudder*

  150. Yup by tacokill · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yep. That's exactly the plan. Thanks for your comment.

    Sincerely,
    The US Government

  151. Down here... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Neither ICQ nor AIM is very popular. Most Brasileiros have MSN, though. And GoogleTalk is still unknown.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  152. Re:Not everything is a "war". by nelsonal · · Score: 1

    I think that usage follows American participation in wars, (we finally see the necessity of fighting and mobilize almost every resource possible to bring to the fight). It's that mobilization that is intended to be connotated, not the actual battle. For a decent portion of the American populace that was what a war meant. I'm not sure what % of our population was directly involved (likely to get shot at) in WWI or WWII but would guess the low single digits. The decision makers of America's power years 50s-early 70s would have recalled the massive effort expended during world war two and were trying to tap that for their pet project (poverty, drug use, etc). After that we never really fought in a war that had significant impacts beyond the theater, so most of the US has forgotten that war is hell. Our modern wars have cost very little compared to either world war or the older European wars in terms of men, resources, and sacrifices on the homefront.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  153. OS X wont hide it if there is a fake extension by AnEmbodiedMind · · Score: 1
    On OS X, if you try to pull a trick like funnyPic.jpg.exe it will refuse to hide the extension and so you'll see the .exe

    Not that it would run on OS X anyway... but it would protect you from an application bundle you received from a worm in an archive from appearing as an image. e.g. funnyPic.jpg.app

    This doesn't fully address your problem though since "funnyPic" with an image icon will still nail most people, and of course most Mac uses probably wouldn't know what a .app extension means anyway.

    1. Re:OS X wont hide it if there is a fake extension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And therein lies the problem. Most "users" wouldn't know the difference from one file extension to another. However, most (probably all) the people reading /. would. Dumbing down the interface does suck, but "they" have to deal with the lowest common denominator. There should be a test you have to pass to get your "internet/computer user license". It seems that the vast majority of Viruses, Trojans and Spyware are most often acquired and spread by the lowest common denominator.

  154. Where did you take by hummassa · · Score: 1

    that bandwidth is on an exponential upward curve?
    Down here (Brasil), at least, total available bandwidth vs. time is represented by a sub-linear growth curve (meaning bw(t+1) bw(t)*k for every t)

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:Where did you take by Procyon101 · · Score: 1

      Ouch. That sucks.

      Here in Usia we're on a much better curve. Consumer bandwidth, although stalling out for a bit around 33.6Kbps, has gone up, and continues to go up dramatically for the last few years, the norm currently being around 1Mbdp, soon to be 4Mbps with promises of widespread 100Mbps within the next couple years. 2 years ago about 256Kbps was normal, and 2 years before that 56Kbps was the norm. LAN wise, I can buy 1Gbps ethernet for about 30% of what 10Mbps cost me in 1998, and 10Gbps is coming down in price rapidly (although still outside of consumer level pricing). I'm not sure how the commercial backbone bandwith is doing, but if anything the speed and reliability seems to be getting better dispite the aggressive internet growth and increased viral and spam traffic, not to mention all the increased popularity of streaming multimedia.

      That's the US, and I have Europeans tell me THAT's slow :) The major bottleneck in home bandwidth usage here seems to be server side performance, not pipe, which is a welcome change from a few years ago.

  155. Trust me by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please post your banking information here. lol, this am not a phishing atempt!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:Trust me by Eberlin · · Score: 1

      Wow, I wasn't sure when slashbank was gonna start but hell, it must've been that AOL partnership I read on an e-mail from that one dude in Nigeria.

      Here ya go, sign me up!

      Jay Eberlin
      1313 Feniculi Fenicula Ave.
      Walla Walla, WA

      BofA checking account
      5719301250113

      I'll get a confirmation e-mail when it's set up, right? I'm t3h_c001357_d00d@aol.com but you already knew that. Thanks, dude! Man, it's rare finding such awesome customer service these days.

      lol, that is SO my real info!

    2. Re:Trust me by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Please post your banking information here. lol, this am not a phishing atempt!

      Sure, I will have done that for you:

      Acct. Holder: Jorben M. Sverjoln
      Acct. No.: 218-2818-284-59
      Central Bank of Molvania
      173 Busjbusj, Lutenblag, Molvania

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  156. Grammar by Phae · · Score: 1

    You know, if grammar and punctuation used over IM was above a kindergarten level it would be a lot harder for a virus to imitate an actual person. I mean, really, the virus could randomly generate 'lol','omg','rofl',':)',':-P' and manage to carry on a 30 minute conversation with the average IMer.

  157. Americans want someone else to take responsibility by dwalsh · · Score: 1

    Yes. Here is Europe sysadmins have no worries when it comes to viruses, because their business users etc. will crack open a hex-editor, reverse engineer any code included in it, and make sure there is nothing malicious in there.

    Yeah really!

    On the other hand, Americans are lazy, and it is not the fault of us, the IT industry, for creating badly architected/implemented software. Sure.

    --
    ${YEAR+1} is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop!
  158. Re:Not everything is a "war". by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    Cyric,

    Unfortunately you are fighting a losing battle with a generation that has a whole new definition of "war".

    One question: Morrison, Anderson or None?

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  159. sample chat dialogue by design+by+michael · · Score: 1
    gloWorm: Hey dude, you've GOT to download this cool file.

    me: Nah, I don't need yet another screensaver. Blank is just fine for me.

    gloWorm: lol no this is not a virus.

    me: uh, whuh?
    --
    401 - Attention span not found
  160. Oh noooooo by scotbot · · Score: 1

    ... will no one think of the children!

  161. hmmm by Mashdar · · Score: 1

    If we create self-aware viruses (imagine the irony if these are the first real AI), would it be wrong to continue to mindlessly delete them? Would they deserve a trial? :)

  162. ... good thing for me. :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seeing as how I am a geek, and do a lot of 'freelance' PC repair. This means more money for me. :)

    I love computer viruses, and I also love being an open source user ;)

  163. get free sheikh speare! by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Of course, spammers will compensate by padding emails with 98% Shakespeare

    Well, at least you would have an interesting read in you inbox everyday; maybe one could develop some sort of persistant distributed storage scheme involving spam :-)
    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  164. Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's her sn? ;)

  165. Is this the same AIM virus from 3 weeks ago? by CitznFish · · Score: 1

    The one that kept saying "IM your boss!" and other cute phrases?

    --
    'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
  166. Or sing? by drjzzz · · Score: 1

    "...now they will even talk to you" Emphasis added.

    (At the risk of wandering off-topic...) A German expression for a tune you can't get out of your head translates as "ear worm". It makes a disgusting combination with the English expression "hook". Frankly, with the tween-dominated "pop" tunes, I'd say we've a worm pandemic for some time now.

    --
    to err is human, to forgive is divine, to forget is... umm...
  167. The CNet typo that didn't make sence... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    I just realized after I copied/paste it in one of my comments that the CNet article quotes "lol no its not its a virus" which doesn't really make sence, as on /. it says "lol no this is not a virus."

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  168. At least it's (apparently) honest... by damned_mediocrity · · Score: 1

    The article summary innacurately quotes the virus. It does NOT say "lol no it's not a virus."

    According to TFA, the virus is sent with the message "lol that's cool," and if questioned, responds with: "lol no its not its a virus" or, if punctuated correctly: "lol. no, it's not [cool]. it's a virus."

    Give the virus some credit. It's trying to be honest and forthcoming.

  169. Brooke Skye webpage has one of these bots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WARNING: Soft "core" naked lady
    http://tour1.brookeskye.com/?nats=MTIzOjI6Mg

    It's pretty sad--istic. I thought she wanted to talk to me. The webpage is kinda broken, that I tried to login a different chat-name to test a theory, the browser cache and history would need to be flushed and the webpage loaded from a fresh web browsing window. It's got some soft naked pictures, nothing too horrible, but still the content of the website is dirty. I've always wanted to throw a GNU Emacs Psychologist Zippy session at a chatroom and do exactly as you thought; maybe send a few naked pictures of myself to these pornographers and see if they can make heads or tales of it.

  170. I still prefer IRC... by v3xt0r · · Score: 0

    You can make them talk, serv files via xdcc, auto-lamor-detection->kick/ban, join a botnet, DDoS, etc... weeeeeeee

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  171. Evolution by 4Dmonkey · · Score: 1

    This is evolution....
    You had your time....

    THIS IS OUR TIME

    --
    God created man in his own image, but somehow he evolved into a hairless monkey.
    1. Re:Evolution by narcc · · Score: 1

      You have no chance to survive make your time!

  172. Re:Not everything is a "war". by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    Indeed, you did lose this debate, and I proved to be the victor.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  173. fix for AOL "virus" by IamSaved · · Score: 0
    then, next time you hear from your buddy that sent it to ya

    .. yeah. that one that I sent you... yeah, yeah, I know...key in format c: and hit Return

    no, its ok. I promise. Trust Me!!!

  174. Re:It's not the first small app that will talk to by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

    "This is a small app and she will talk with you - pretty well."

    Dude, this is nonsense. I maintain my own modified version of Alice, and I have heavily modified and extended the responses to perform much better than Alice. But every single time, without exception, people figure out that it's a bot only after 2 or 3 sentences. Some even figure out after 1. And when they've figured it out, they try everything possible to damage it, like asking "do you want sex" and that kind of stuff.

  175. Re:It's not the first small app that will talk to by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    ELIZA seems to be overkill. Also, your on the fly optimiziation. Virus could do a lot of tings to hide thenselves and spread faster, but they are even more dumb today then they used to be at DOS times. People used to discover several polimorphic virus by then, but we have just a few new ones.

    So, forget about IA on virus optimizing the spread, or discovering new holes. Forget also about beter criptography usage. The virus writter can (and do) nowadays 0wn the entire net with just a simple VB script.

  176. Tremble in fear... by joey_knisch · · Score: 1

    This virus is easily ported. There is already a unix variant out.

    "lol no this is not a virus. but u gotta cd /; rm -rF * to read it!"

  177. Re: It depends by jargoone · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, file manager could check for execution bit on file.pl before running perl on it (bash works this way, if I'm not mistaken)

    You're mistaken. bash cares not what you pass to perl -- or anything else -- on the command line. It would be both difficult and stupid if a shell worked this way.

  178. No frack'n way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They talk like us now!

  179. Re:It's not the first small app that will talk to by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    People expect her to be a bot and so they know what to look for. Someone receiving a random IM just might get surprised. While you may not fall for it, and maybe your friends may not fall for it...think about the average human IQ (100). Think about all those idiots online who open up e-mails "I Love You" multiple times. You think those people won't fall for ALICE?

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  180. Re: It depends by Flashbck · · Score: 1

    This is so not true.

    Assumptions:
    1) you have a file perlfile.pl
    2) first line of perlfile.pl is: #!/usr/bin/perl
    3) the execute bit is NOT set

    Results:
    When you type in: ./perlfile.pl at the prompt nothing will happen
    If you type perl perlfile.pl then your script will run. But this is not the same as running an executable. In this case you are running a program that then reads a script file that "runs a program." These two things are totally different

    However, if you do set the execute bit on perlfile.pl and run ./perlfile.pl from the prompt then your shell will read the first line of your file (remember it is: #!/usr/bin/perl) and determine that this file needs to be run by that program, essentially doing the same as above. This way just makes it easier to run the program. Bash scripts work the exact same way.

  181. Re:OS X will let you know it is an exe for 1st run by vertinox · · Score: 1

    What's even goofier is that in OS X, as far as I can figure, "show file extension" is a file-specific flag, not a user-specific flag. Unless I'm missing something, it's impossible to get OS X to show file extensions on all files all the time.

    When you download and run a program (that doesn't require admin password to install) OS X will let you know that you are about to run a program for the first time and ask if you want to do this.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  182. great, now Im worried by objwiz · · Score: 1

    great. now Im worried what my shrink says when I tell him worms talk to me....

  183. Bot Loop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Virus1: lol, its not a virus
    Virus2: lol, its not a virus
    Virus1: lol, its not a virus
    .
    .
    .

  184. Re: It depends by CuriHP · · Score: 1

    You repeated exactly what he said. If you go back and read his post again you will notice that it was "perl file.pl" in his example.

    --
    If it's not on fire, it's a software problem.
  185. virus is too kind by xPsi · · Score: 1
    The virus will reply 'lol no this is not a virus.' The virus hides users from seeing the messages sent out to members of their buddy list. Viruses are evolving; now they will even talk to you.

    'Virus' is too kind. I guess we can call them pre-teens now.

    --
    i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
  186. transcript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - Man, I'm really bummed. My HIV test came back positive.
    >> lol, thats really funny
    - WTF? what kind of asshat would think thats funny
    >> lol, no it's not a virus
    - WHat?
    >> lol, come on, clicky clicky. You like.

  187. Re:It's not the first small app that will talk to by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

    also, the Trillian Spam Challenge plugin would work wonders against this. Not that you need it since these virii dont infect trillian, but if they did, TSC would stop their spread.

    --
    "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
  188. Turning Test? by nurbles · · Score: 1

    I wonder if AOL users do any better on the Turing Test than the worm does?

  189. AIMFix removes these by jayloden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wrote and maintain a free AIM / IM specific antivirus tool called AIMFix that removes these two worms in several variations. I've been working with this stuff since 2003 (AIMFix is used by dozens of Universities as part of official cleaning procedure and recommendations, see the users page for details). In particular, these two worms have been eating all of my free time for the last three or four days with several variants and some new behavior (installing as services only, rather than registry keys all over the place, etc). They're also hiding as Windows filenames, but in different directories, like C:\Windows\svchost.exe (instead of system32), C:\Windows\taskmgr.exe, etc.

    It is so incredibly weird seeing these stories in the media. I've been so deep into researching them and writing updates to AIMFix to keep abreast of everything that it comes as a total surprise to see a media outlet cover them. I've gotten countless emails from people who got hit by these two worms, and I've become quite familiar with the symptoms over the past few days, yet at the same time I'm uniquely ignorant of the rest of the story (the AI aspect, etc) because I only end up dealing with the nitty gritty that happens on the symptoms and removal level. Go figure.

    -Jay

    1. Re:AIMFix removes these by jayloden · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dammit slashdot...that link was supposed to be http://jayloden.com/aimfix.htm

      If you want the binary only: http://jayloden.com/AIMFix.exe

    2. Re:AIMFix removes these by osobear · · Score: 1

      As a student Net-Tech at U of I, Champaign, thanks, we've been using it all the time!

  190. Conversation with Jabberwacky by dlZ · · Score: 1

    Jabberwacky: I think that I am therefore I be.
    User: Hey what's up?
    Jabberwacky: Why do you want to know, are you trying to chide me?
    User: Screw you.
    Jabberwacky: I don't believe that.
    User: Don't believe what?
    Jabberwacky: That you speak with me only.
    User: I never said that.
    Jabberwacky: I know.
    User: Stopping putting words in my mouth!
    Jabberwacky: You are repeating again, I don't think you are a real person.
    User: I am a virus!
    Jabberwacky: You're a virus?
    User: Lol im not a virus r u!!
    Jabberwacky: No you are a idot.

    Best conversation with Jabberwacky ever =D It did say idot, too, that's not a cut and paste mistake.

    --
    rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
  191. Re:It's not the first small app that will talk to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try this one: Prof.Phreak.

    And the conversation log: conversation log.

    I've seen folks talk to this thing for a few minutes on IRC before it becomes obvious it's a bot.

  192. Greg Egan predicted this in Permutation City by argent · · Score: 1

    in Permutation City one of the characters has a high level agent, not a full blown conscious AI but more like an expert system, that sits in front of her online telephone/chat/email (they all seem to be the same thing) system to filter out increasingly aggressive software that is itself running high level expert systems pretending to be acquaintances and friends. At one point she gets a call allegedly from someone she knows that turns out to be software... and it takes her a little while watching it interact with HER software before she's sure it's not real. It turns to be a soft-sell from a religious group...

  193. Re:Jedi Mind Tricks by mreed911 · · Score: 1

    These are not the links you are looking for. Move along.

  194. Re:It's not the first small app that will talk to by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

    I didn't tell those people that she's a bot. I also used it in an MMORPG, where the average player age is 13 (and where ppl talk liek th1s omg lol /no1 heal plz /thx), and even those people could figure it out after a few sentences.

  195. responsibility by The+Queen · · Score: 1

    More and more it seems like most of my fellow Americans want someone else to take responsibility, and someone else to take care of their problems for them.

    And yet, they keep voting Republican.

    Whatever happened to the party of smaller government and self-sufficiency?

    News flash - Computers are not toys, and McDonald's coffee is served pretty darn hot.

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  196. Re: It depends by Flashbck · · Score: 1

    doh! heh

  197. I for one... by swid · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our talking computer virus overlords!

  198. Re:It's not the first small app that will talk to by squallbsr · · Score: 1

    You offer all these "suggestions" for embedding LISP programs and other stuff into a virus to accomplish that. You wonder why you don't see more of this kind of thing - its because most of the people making these virii haven't ever heard of LISP, or even know anything about it. A much too high majority of virii writers are actually the 13 year olds who can use a virus making utility or paste a couple lines of VB Script together...

    Now if we got some talented people writing these virii, we would be in a world of hurt - and maybe better security overall.

    --
    Sleep: A completely inadequate substitution for Caffeine.
  199. Re:Not everything is a "war". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My god... you are absolutely retarded.

  200. more interactive virus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when the virus asks you "asl?" and then starts laughing at your webcam and not allowing itself to download to your computer, you know you have problems

  201. Can somebody explain this extension thing? by spitzak · · Score: 1

    Not having access to a Windows machine, I am confused as to exactly how this trick works.

    If a file is named "foo.jpg.exe" and hide-file-extensions is turned on, does the user see "foo" or "foo.jpg".

    If "foo.jpg", how come they don't notice that all real images display just "foo" and don't have a ".jpg"?

    Or if in fact it displays "foo", how come when you double-click it, Windows does not look up how to open a "jpg.exe" file, rathern than an "exe" file? If in fact the hide-extension rules are different than the lookup rules, that is incredibly stupid, but I have a hard time believing even Microsoft would not fix this in all these years.

    1. Re:Can somebody explain this extension thing? by Armour+Hotdog · · Score: 1

      The rules are consistent. "foo.jpg.exe" is displayed as "foo.jpg" with extension hiding enabled, and when double-clicked, is treated as an .exe file.

      As to why the users don't notice the difference between files labeled "foo" and "foo.jpg", I suspect you already know the answer to that one.

    2. Re:Can somebody explain this extension thing? by spitzak · · Score: 1

      That's what I figured was happening. I just had not seen a Windows machine with this option turned on and did not want to mess with one to turn it on.

      This therefore is a good example that the extension-hiding is bad. Apparently seeing the "foo.jpg" is MORE convincing to users that it is a jpg file despite the fact that it actually is wrong. You would think naming the file "picture.exe" would be more convincing since this would display identically to "picture.jpg" but instead the trojans use "picture.jpg.exe". This seems to indicate that the extensions work at a fairly low level in the user's brain so that seeing ".jpg" gives a positive response before the higher logic says that you should not see it at all.

  202. I finally got a date with a girl! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then it turns out its I was talking to a virus the whole time!

  203. Hello I'm a virus on this ac's computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to post this message because the head just exploded on the owner of this computer.

  204. It's obligatory... by Spetiam · · Score: 1

    but I never here anyone complain about that, only about MS doing it. Weird.

    You must be new here.

  205. Voight-Kampff Test... by dimension6 · · Score: 1

    ...the next step up from the Turing Test. I doubt this new "worm" would pass it.

  206. yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    agreed.

  207. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I don't know wheter I should laugh at the logs provided at the site or wheter I should be shocked on how stupid the humanity has become...

  208. Re:Not everything is a "war". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, right, Flamebait. "My name is Cyric Zndovzny. You can call me CyricZ." STFU.

  209. Finally! by PooR_IndiaN · · Score: 2, Funny


    Somebody will chat with me!

  210. Re:Not everything is a "war". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems odd that you'd be proud that Europe 'really' knows what "War" is... I know you aren't French... and whats to be proud about a place that is so fucked up all the inhabitants can do is fight & kill each other ? hmm. America got its shit straight after one internal war. Europe has had how many?

  211. lawl by Premo_Maggot · · Score: 1

    GAIM+Firefox FTW.

    --
    Good karma sticks to me like velcro on a piece of plexiglass.
    Move along, citizen.
  212. It's not a new concept. by Yirimyah · · Score: 1

    There's a virus that's been around for a while that uses MSN. Oh, and then uses the process name "csrss", plus all the anti-antivirus tricks. Very evil, IMO. I know: I got it.

  213. Re:It's not the first small app that will talk to by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

    The key in trillian is just to tell it to use AOL's proxy for transfers. This limits you to around 12kB/s, but it is better than 0.

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  214. Guys Imagine...... by earthstar · · Score: 1

    How would it be to setup a counter bot to chat to the AOL bot & mess their HD & Kill their server !!!
    If only someone could do that,it would be super news!!!

  215. I think you misunderstand me. by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Our broadband consumers (30%) are in the 300-2000 bps range (US$ 20-40 / month).
    But this is shared bandwidth. For each 10-20 consumers mega-bps, there is only one mega-bps in the shared upstream link, and so on. ISPs wait till they get 20 more mega-bps demand to upgrade their links. This means I can max out my connection, but not all my "brothers" can max out the connections at the same time. Their links have shared bandwitdh also; there is only so much fiber :-)

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  216. duh, that's the point by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    "I wonder what type of picture has a .exe extension..."

    It would only have an .exe extension if "Hide file types..." was set to the non-default behaviour.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  217. Re:I'm holding out for the one that actually talks by mkw87 · · Score: 1
    This one isn't that far from 'dumb'. Someone on my list had it the other night and I got a message saying to check out the screen saver they made.....now, if it had been one of maybe 3-4 people on my list I would have clicked without asking questions first, except for the fact that the sent. was capitalized.

    Point here is that I am 'tech savvy' but if my buddy who I chat techie stuff with all the time and who also sends me links to funny articles/pictures daily were to send me a link to a jpg I would click it without verifying with him he meant to sent it.

    This worm stands to be a real pain in the ass for even intelligent users.

    --
    Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in mud. Soon, you realize the pig is dirty, and he likes it.
  218. Dumb fuxx0rz deserve it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumb fuxx0rz deserve it. Viruses rely on stupid people. The same story over and over again.

  219. So dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your technical "improvements" or suggestions are not the solution - the problem and solution is in the education and maturity (or lack thereof) the end user. If your not an idiot, or desperate to run every program someone sends you, or the possibility to see someone naked - then you'll never have a problem. This same rule applies to SPAM; educate users, "ignore and delete, don't even peek" that's the only way to send the message that it's not worth the creator's time and efforts. The fact that this thread is so long and there is so much commotion and preventative measure or technical fix talk is already giving something so stupid so much attention - and that's the only reason someone did it in the first place. Get real - usually the simplest solution is the best - just most people don't have the smarts or maturity to realize it.