of course you won't notice you're digging, since that requires a modicum of intelligence.
You forget something. It TAKES intelligence to do what they are pulling. They KNOW what they are doing, and they know that doing it is wrong. But that doesn't seem to matter to them.
The fact that they are doing the frog-boil method proves that they know it.
Whats this anti-bot string stuff I have been seeing? Maybe it only shows up for non-subscribers, for frequent posters, or those subnets that have shown signs of abuse.
Screenshot would be nice.
Re:An extra bit for their issue counter...
on
PHRACK Final
·
· Score: 1
No, only part of the system needs to be truly random: the radio noise. Randomly sorting and shifting frequencies avoids any patterns that may appear on a particular frequency.
You could avoid the sudden changes by using a simple cypher as I stated, I believe. Even so, it shouldn't matter if the end use was as a cypher key.
How about randomly sorted slices of randomly-chosen radio frequencies? I was under the impression that was the kind of thing the NSA uses.
You could then take the sliced-and-diced random radio noise and apply some kind of simple encryption to it with user entropy and use the result as the random data. That would be pretty random.
Don't bother wasting your mod points on these crapflood posts. The idea is probably to get you to spend mod points on them rather than the troll posts.
Not only are they from other stories, but parts of whole actual threads are copied around. All as AC (or a different user than the origional) of course.
Makes me wonder how boring their jobs are, to be entertaining themselves like that. Or lack of job, depending on circumstance.
Am I the only one out there that likes the hard edged right-angle style that Win95/98 used? I don't like all this smooth and/or bubbly stuff everyone is using now. Gimme dark colors and hard edges and I'm happy.
Or they all reach a consensus and decide that one master icon that they can add their company into is good. Hopefully that doesn't plant the seed of a MPAA/RIAA style group of developers.
Replying to myself, but its really for all those replies that say the same thing basically.
Yes, there is always a way to record the DVD as it plays, but there would be no -easy- way to just cripple the RFID chip and give the disk to someone. I wasn't thinking about mass distribution, actually.
This is a pretty good idea. If anything, it will help curb the script kiddies indesciminantly flinging exploits around. Unless you want that overflow you found to get patched, pick and choose your targets carefully.
At my college they used our SSNs as student numbers! What the fuck is that?
Get a glance at a student's/staff's ID (computer labs are pass controlled - so its easy. "I forgot my card, can you let me in?") and you have their SSN.
Doesn't this drain your bodies energy supply anyways? Just what we need. Fall into deep-code-mode and wake up in the hospitol after a diabetes-style blackout. Oh, yea, you just lost the use of one hand.
I see specialized uses, like in TFA like artificial hearts. Powering things from your blood supply for the fun of it will be A) dangerous and B) stupid unless you have plenty of sugar pills at hand.
It also reported that the server wouldn't accept attachments over ~20,000kb. It was actually a bit over 20,000kb. The attachment I was sending was only 18,000kb. Yet it said it was above 20,000k. WTF.
Slashdot Mirror
of course you won't notice you're digging, since that requires a modicum of intelligence.
You forget something. It TAKES intelligence to do what they are pulling. They KNOW what they are doing, and they know that doing it is wrong. But that doesn't seem to matter to them.
The fact that they are doing the frog-boil method proves that they know it.
Furthermore, since when did the Pentagon do any of the computing? I always thought that was done by the NSA at Fort Meade.
It takes 8 years of employment with UPS before you can drive the trucks. Makes you respect the deliverymen a little more, knowing that.
Oy! I'm a retard. 800mm = 80cm, but was there something I missed? Other than my stupid mistake, what else is going on?
If you didn't notice, I'm just a little bit confused now.
No, 800mm is 0.8cm
Whats this anti-bot string stuff I have been seeing? Maybe it only shows up for non-subscribers, for frequent posters, or those subnets that have shown signs of abuse.
Screenshot would be nice.
Your sig fits perfectly with your post :)
[click] NOW I get it! That does make sense.
As for a source of random EM radiation, why not aim a small/cheap radio telescope at the sun and use that? That should be random, right?
No, only part of the system needs to be truly random: the radio noise. Randomly sorting and shifting frequencies avoids any patterns that may appear on a particular frequency.
You could avoid the sudden changes by using a simple cypher as I stated, I believe. Even so, it shouldn't matter if the end use was as a cypher key.
Hate to break it to you, but last I checked AMD was onboard with the TCPA alliance.
r s/
Look at the top of this list.
https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/about/membe
The domain www.trustedcomputing.org redirects to the domain I linked to. It's official.
How about randomly sorted slices of randomly-chosen radio frequencies? I was under the impression that was the kind of thing the NSA uses.
You could then take the sliced-and-diced random radio noise and apply some kind of simple encryption to it with user entropy and use the result as the random data. That would be pretty random.
Don't bother wasting your mod points on these crapflood posts. The idea is probably to get you to spend mod points on them rather than the troll posts.
Not only are they from other stories, but parts of whole actual threads are copied around. All as AC (or a different user than the origional) of course.
Makes me wonder how boring their jobs are, to be entertaining themselves like that. Or lack of job, depending on circumstance.
I want to know what genius came up with the name Trolltech. Even outside of forum-speak trolls arn't usually looked upon as a nice creature.
Am I the only one out there that likes the hard edged right-angle style that Win95/98 used? I don't like all this smooth and/or bubbly stuff everyone is using now. Gimme dark colors and hard edges and I'm happy.
Unfortunatly places with non-broken proxy scanners kick you out. Freenode.net refuses my connection most of the time when I try to use Tor.
Annoying.
Or they all reach a consensus and decide that one master icon that they can add their company into is good. Hopefully that doesn't plant the seed of a MPAA/RIAA style group of developers.
Replying to myself, but its really for all those replies that say the same thing basically.
Yes, there is always a way to record the DVD as it plays, but there would be no -easy- way to just cripple the RFID chip and give the disk to someone. I wasn't thinking about mass distribution, actually.
Unless they use some kind of CSS like encryption, and your fingerprint decrypts the key to decrypt the movie. What then?
This is a pretty good idea. If anything, it will help curb the script kiddies indesciminantly flinging exploits around. Unless you want that overflow you found to get patched, pick and choose your targets carefully.
At my college they used our SSNs as student numbers! What the fuck is that?
Get a glance at a student's/staff's ID (computer labs are pass controlled - so its easy. "I forgot my card, can you let me in?") and you have their SSN.
Doesn't this drain your bodies energy supply anyways? Just what we need. Fall into deep-code-mode and wake up in the hospitol after a diabetes-style blackout. Oh, yea, you just lost the use of one hand.
I see specialized uses, like in TFA like artificial hearts. Powering things from your blood supply for the fun of it will be A) dangerous and B) stupid unless you have plenty of sugar pills at hand.
That sound drives me crazy. Evil sound.
Well, that makes sense of the problem.
The server reported the size limit in bytes, so I checked filesize in bytes (file was lower).
It also reported that the server wouldn't accept attachments over ~20,000kb. It was actually a bit over 20,000kb. The attachment I was sending was only 18,000kb. Yet it said it was above 20,000k. WTF.