You think the equivalent of killing mold spores/antibacterial agents is not going to have side effects? Not only on people, but on bacteria which happen to live on/in the bread? In addition, questions of what actually happens to these food products post treatment? Are they safe to eat?
Oh right, they don't get into actually studying stuff like that.
you're not going to secure borders if you prevent people from becoming legal citizens just because they got here illegally. As the phrase goes, you trap more flies with honey than with vinegar. If you think taxes is even a focus on that, it's just ignorance by definition and a 100% incorrect focus.
what makes you think the US doesn't do the same? Secret interpretations of laws and the resultant function of the government is identical to China. No transparency = no accountability.
40 million licenses. to OEMs. Not "purchased copies by users", or even "sold copies". MS doesn't use real metrics.
Somewhere less than that of actual copies, probably in the realm of 1/4 of the total. Really, please try trolling better. It's also how MS fails at accounting to the public, because they know that internally when OEMs stop buying/start asking for refunds, that profit estimate goes down.
going from a shit nominee to a remotely less shit nominee does not mean that Texas is warming up to logic. They're as anti-logic as they ever have been, with intellectuals remaining a minority.
No, most people don't. Are you fucking kidding me?
Most people buy a new PC less often than a car, unless it can be avoided. Or do you not understand technology? people hold onto the oldest shit that still works at the minimum requirements, forever. Early adopters are important but a very small group.
except that it's $200+ to buy in. so no, it's not $25 a year. Just wait until...whoops, you can't do an upgrade from 2013 version to 2014 version, you have to buy new (unless you bought the $250 version). Aka what MS does today and has done for years. Of which, there's really nothing wrong with that - they do whatever they want, but it's not $40.
I find this incredibly stupid because part of the purpose of windows is stability. If it changes every year people are just going to skip versions. They won't keep up the 5-7 year long term release support in a meaningful way if they're changing it every year, most likely.
except that Canipre's data won't hold up anywhere, so acting like any single ruling is going to impact everything means that yes, court wont' even be a concern.
Canipre's speaking of imagination if they think they can go after pirates without excessive retaliation.
they aren't. The kind of people who can handle a prediction market can afford a VPN + an offshore banking account, assuming they don't already have one.
black friday highlights uninformed consumers. They're the people who buy on that day. So exactly - not only do they not know what they have (and don't), their poor experiences on windows 8 are likely to spread even further.
except they're not talking about ARM. They're talking about *ALL* processors.
So that core extreme blah blah processor? Enjoy paying extra since now you have to buy it with a motherboard.
Oh, and if it fails? Intel sends a giant "Fuck you" personally addressed to your house in the form of the surcharge as you pay the privilege to purchase their products, on behalf of the motherboard manufacturer.
its 2012. I don't think Hasbro is going to risk boycotts or paying an assload to court over trying to imply they own all toys worldwide. That Brats vs Mattel (barbie) case pretty much put a stop to that.
Do you not understand how that works? It's called astroturfing. Microsoft also admits they track. The difference is Microsoft doesn't offer you tools to opt out or export your information.
which is why DuckDuckGo, a so called "privacy oriented browser", uses bing for it's underlying searches. Any time you hear "anticompetitive search", it's 100% microsoft/fairsearch funded. It's not even remotely about privacy or security as a result of that. Anyone who believes duckduckgo is about your privacy when bing has your information, is misinformed.
if you wanted privacy in your search, use a multi-search engine and get real results the way you want. It's that simple, and they do exist. To act like people are somehow " at a loss" when they can go to any website they want to search is to fail to acknowledge that bing is a horrible search engine.
the target is unguided doesn't even matter. It is simply not a factor of anything in this situation. The intercept methods remain the same even if it is guided. You think they just planned to fire some flak at a missile? hint: no.
The path issue is simple: missiles not in the area of the coverage are ignored. It's not like they had to say "we're ignoring unpopulated areas", it's just that it has a wide field of missile defense.
Slashdot Mirror
You think the equivalent of killing mold spores/antibacterial agents is not going to have side effects? Not only on people, but on bacteria which happen to live on/in the bread? In addition, questions of what actually happens to these food products post treatment? Are they safe to eat?
Oh right, they don't get into actually studying stuff like that.
you're not going to secure borders if you prevent people from becoming legal citizens just because they got here illegally. As the phrase goes, you trap more flies with honey than with vinegar. If you think taxes is even a focus on that, it's just ignorance by definition and a 100% incorrect focus.
Where do you see the education levels in that graphic? all I saw was birth rates by ethnicity, not education.
what makes you think the US doesn't do the same? Secret interpretations of laws and the resultant function of the government is identical to China. No transparency = no accountability.
40 million licenses. to OEMs. Not "purchased copies by users", or even "sold copies". MS doesn't use real metrics.
Somewhere less than that of actual copies, probably in the realm of 1/4 of the total. Really, please try trolling better. It's also how MS fails at accounting to the public, because they know that internally when OEMs stop buying/start asking for refunds, that profit estimate goes down.
Sadly, I do agree :)
If you don't upgrade between versions because you don't care..........
you're not going to just be paying upgrade price, to say the least.
going from a shit nominee to a remotely less shit nominee does not mean that Texas is warming up to logic. They're as anti-logic as they ever have been, with intellectuals remaining a minority.
No, most people don't. Are you fucking kidding me?
Most people buy a new PC less often than a car, unless it can be avoided. Or do you not understand technology? people hold onto the oldest shit that still works at the minimum requirements, forever. Early adopters are important but a very small group.
except that it's $200+ to buy in. so no, it's not $25 a year. Just wait until...whoops, you can't do an upgrade from 2013 version to 2014 version, you have to buy new (unless you bought the $250 version). Aka what MS does today and has done for years. Of which, there's really nothing wrong with that - they do whatever they want, but it's not $40.
I find this incredibly stupid because part of the purpose of windows is stability. If it changes every year people are just going to skip versions. They won't keep up the 5-7 year long term release support in a meaningful way if they're changing it every year, most likely.
exactly, this prevents both
a: things getting worse
and b: things getting better
given the fact that I would say things are worse overall lately, I would think this congressperson is messed up.
links are not content, fool.
there's no guarantee, if this is signed by the UK only, that he won't be arrested by the US the second he arrives here.
Chances of that + being covered widely on the internet + not being covered on faux news/mainstream media at all? extremely high.
except that Canipre's data won't hold up anywhere, so acting like any single ruling is going to impact everything means that yes, court wont' even be a concern.
Canipre's speaking of imagination if they think they can go after pirates without excessive retaliation.
they aren't. The kind of people who can handle a prediction market can afford a VPN + an offshore banking account, assuming they don't already have one.
black friday highlights uninformed consumers. They're the people who buy on that day. So exactly - not only do they not know what they have (and don't), their poor experiences on windows 8 are likely to spread even further.
the margins aren't even remotely razor thin. you're talking about buying at retail in the first place. The ads are just a double dip on the profits.
most aren't willing to sacrifice their career if there's precedent. I do say *most*
because it has nothing to do with security - and like any politician, they have to look like they're doing *something!*
and no consumer was harmed from some kind of magic counterfeit goods site that won't buy it from another counterfeit goods site.
except they're not talking about ARM. They're talking about *ALL* processors.
So that core extreme blah blah processor? Enjoy paying extra since now you have to buy it with a motherboard.
Oh, and if it fails? Intel sends a giant "Fuck you" personally addressed to your house in the form of the surcharge as you pay the privilege to purchase their products, on behalf of the motherboard manufacturer.
its 2012. I don't think Hasbro is going to risk boycotts or paying an assload to court over trying to imply they own all toys worldwide. That Brats vs Mattel (barbie) case pretty much put a stop to that.
Except they made these promises THROUGH Bing.
Do you not understand how that works? It's called astroturfing. Microsoft also admits they track. The difference is Microsoft doesn't offer you tools to opt out or export your information.
which is why DuckDuckGo, a so called "privacy oriented browser", uses bing for it's underlying searches. Any time you hear "anticompetitive search", it's 100% microsoft/fairsearch funded. It's not even remotely about privacy or security as a result of that. Anyone who believes duckduckgo is about your privacy when bing has your information, is misinformed.
if you wanted privacy in your search, use a multi-search engine and get real results the way you want. It's that simple, and they do exist. To act like people are somehow " at a loss" when they can go to any website they want to search is to fail to acknowledge that bing is a horrible search engine.
TLDR: anti-google (and pro-microsoft) article.
the target is unguided doesn't even matter. It is simply not a factor of anything in this situation. The intercept methods remain the same even if it is guided. You think they just planned to fire some flak at a missile? hint: no.
The path issue is simple: missiles not in the area of the coverage are ignored. It's not like they had to say "we're ignoring unpopulated areas", it's just that it has a wide field of missile defense.
why would they have to? if the information is damning there are ways to release it publicly via the trial without it being "Accidental".