Slashdot Mirror


User: encyclo

encyclo's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
11
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 11

  1. Obsession on How Calvin Klein's Obsession Is Helping Big Cat Conservation · · Score: 5, Funny

    BEWARE: Obsession: Attracts Cougars.

  2. Re:Proxy Servers on Quebec Government May Force ISPs To Block Gambling Websites · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure, that's a workaround, but it doesn't solve the real problem - because the problem is not connecting to blocked sites (I have absolutely no interest in online gambling). The real problem is censorship.

    So we in Quebec must fight this proposal - not because it has anything to do with gambling, but because it restricts our freedom.

  3. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... on Fake Engine Noise Is the Auto Industry's Dirty Little Secret · · Score: 2

    This actually exists (well, not the George Jetson bit) - in Europe Renault sells a car with six user-selectable engine sounds:

    See: http://www.autoblog.com/2012/0...

    Choices include a Clio V6, a Nissan GT-R or a Harley motorcycle...

  4. Customers on German Court: Google Must Stop Ignoring Customer E-mails · · Score: 1

    Google's customers (like Adsense or Adwords customers) can already contact Google. The general public can't. But that's because they aren't customers, they are the content.

  5. Re:Defaults vs. Presets on Microsoft's IE7 Search Box Bugs Google · · Score: 1

    >> Google makes no money in the sell of either. Firefox and/or Opera could change their default to MSN if they so desired.

    Sorry?! Let's get this straight: the Mozilla Corporation made over $72 million in 2005 from Google - if you search Google with the integrated search box Mozilla earn approx. 80% of the search ads revenue. Same goes for the default Firefox-branded home page.

    Opera is no different - it is no secret that they dropped the ad banners in the browser and have moved to a "free" model because they have negotiated a similar deal to Mozilla.

    Google makes plenty of money from these two browsers, Firefox in particular. It's not for nothing they pay $1 per installation of Firefox (via AdSense referrals) and advertize it heavily.

  6. Re:Maybe a software solution? on Google Propping Up Typosquatting Biz? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Google" is itself a misspelling - so should all requests for Google go to Googol?

    Another example - "slashdot" is not a real word - so should Slashdot.org go to Slashers.org? :)

  7. Re:Click here to download plugin on The Onion in 2056 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For those entirely missing the point, the problem is the old maxim that over time the usefulness of proprietary software (and also proprietary plugins) drops inexorably to zero.

    A simple example - I'm running a 64-bit version of Firefox on Linux. There is no Flash plugin available for this platform, and there is nothing I or anyone else can do about it because only Macromedia make the plugins (yes, I know you could reverse-engineer the thing...)

    So, I can't see the content, now in 2005. What will it be like in 2056? What are the chances of Macromedia still producing a plugin or supporting a 60 year-old technology? Flash content has an unknown lifespan completely out of your control.

    HTML is an open standard. There are free programs available now which can parse it. When you use HTML you can be sure that in the future there is a very good chance of it still being accessible because even if the standard falls into disuse you can still go back and read the open spec and recompile / reuse the free code out there.

    Flash in 2056? It's true irony...

  8. Re:I hope they invite the DShield guy on Hunting for Botnet Command and Controls · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't think that the security community has a unanimously high opinion of Steve Gibson: see http://www.grcsucks.com/ for a counter-point.

    Gibson is certainly a gifted self-publicist, but Ill leave others more qualified to comment on whether he is a good security consultant...

  9. Re:While on the topic of Linux... on Find Linux Torrents Quickly · · Score: 2, Informative

    You could try DeLi Linux:

    http://www.delilinux.de/

    Your machine is very high-end for that distro. Once you've got the basic system running with the IceWM window manager, you can download and install Firefox which should run OK. DeLi Linux is based on Slackware 7.1 and runs briskly even on hardware much slower than yours.

    Another option is to go with Debian stable (Woody). Like DeLi Linux, it has the old 2.2 kernel by default. The main browser in there however is Netscape 4.77 Communicator - which can be hard work as a web browser these days, although the email client is excellent (and loads better than many "lightweight" alternatives available today).

    (I have a 166MHz Pentium with 72Mb RAM running Woody with Netscape 4.77 which I use as a test web server - a good simple, old-fashioned machine.)

  10. Re:password power? on Hacking the Web with Greasemonkey · · Score: 1

    You don't specifically need Greasemonkey for that (although GM would be able to do this automatically) - there is a bookmarklet available here which will do the trick:

    http://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/forms.html# remember_password

    Very useful ;)

  11. Re:A 199 Byte static webpage.... on 32,000 "Why I'm Tired" Emails · · Score: 1
    He should try this: 175 bytes and valid HTML:
    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"><title>Are you tired?</title><center><pre>

    A re you tired?

    Tell <a href="mailto:tired@tired.com">us</a> why.</pre></center>
    Anyone still think that invalid HTML is lighter?!