I don't think so. I remember there were a set of fixed memory addresses for the display - two pages for text/lowres, and two pages for hires. The idea was you could draw on the page you weren't displaying and then hit the toggle to change pages, so you could do animation. But there was some thing where if you were using it it used the same memory area as the second hires page (I think it was the disk driver but I don't know), so if you were using that you could only use the one hires graphics page.
Click implies an actual click, if someone's got a perl script sending requests to google's server with the referrer set to that page that's not a click is it? But google could be counting it as one.
AMD doesn't have the capacity to fill the whole market demand. Getting rid of Intel might well mean the smaller players like VIA became competitive.
Re:And Paramount's response?
on
P2P and TV
·
· Score: 1
Does it promote science and the useful arts to remove investment from all but the cheapest, can be done in one's spare time, types of art?
No, but nor does it to encourage targeting the lowest common denominator, going for as wide an audience as possible, which is what the current copyright system does, and don't even get me started on how ridiculous current copyright terms are. Getting rid of copyright wouldn't mean people couldn't sell movies, just that people who they sold them to would be able to sell them on. So it would become more important to appeal to devoted fans, or rich people, rather than getting as many people as possible paying $10 a pop. No copyright might get rid of the big-budget effects-only movies, and it might mean superstar actors couldn't rake in millions, but it wouldn't kill cinema. Good art will always find a buyer.
Finally, we're talking about this specific case. Regardless of whether copyright benefits progress on the whole, in this particular case it's clearly malfunctioning.
Don't you still have Jesus teaching that loving his god is more important than loving your neighbor, and getting angry with the whole money-changers-in-the-temple thing?
What's the difference between MS and their newest subsidiary? One's a bunch of scumbags who trick old ladies out of their money with a product that promises to do one thing but actually does something different and unpleasant, the other's - oh, nevermind.
I still have my Apple ][ manual boasting about how with their new enormous 16K chips you can boost your machine up to a whopping 48K of ram.
Always got a chuckle from me. (And mine had 62K because of an extra add-on card. Let you do disk I/O (? - some apple ][ geek can tell me what it was that overwrote highres page 2)without clobbering your high resolution graphics buffer)
Some police officers (fairly) recently shot a man carrying a table leg because they thought it was a shotgun. Thinking a gun is a toy isn't inability to tell fantasy from reality, it's just not being able to see what's a toy and what isn't. All the evidence is that 5 year olds certainly do know the difference between fantasy and reality.
In case you didn't notice, he's using it to point out the insanity of the proposed religious hatred bill, not seriously claiming he should have protection as a Jedi.
Seems less flawed than most popular religions. Respect for life, protecting the weak but never being aggressive, don't fear, don't be angry, don't hate. Also, crucially, no claim to be the one true faith, no claim that other gods are false. Sounds a very good religion to me.
But as a general rule, it's as a designation of ownership would make sense. John's computer, the computer's mouse, all make sense. Why not it's buttons? Using its in sentences like that is a special case that has to be memorised, because it does not make sense.
I haven't noticed any effects from anything like that, I think it's just machines getting faster. I'm still running the same machine I was 3-4 years ago, and even with the latest java (1.5.0.04) java programs are still very slow. Just opening a menu takes a good half-second, and don't get me started on startup times. When was the last time you saw a java application without a splash screen to try and disguise the horrible load time?
Look at their policies, not their traditional position. They're privatising right left and centre, being anti-immigration, cutting financial support for university students,....
The point is they *can* tell if it's a lake. If the sun-glinting method works, sure it might seem a bit goofy, but it frees up mass to use with other instruments.
No, but you'd have thought they'd have some connectivity, at least enough for a slow backup line.
Re:And Paramount's response?
on
P2P and TV
·
· Score: 1
No, we already have a perfectly good system for deciding on something of legal importance, it's called the courts. They can decide when and where copyright would benefit progress. Allowing artists to profit from their work for the sake of encouraging them, sure. Allowing artists to lock their work away from everyone who they haven't given it to personally, no.
Everything is done to give preference to IE, for example validation is often done with client-side javascript in IE but server-side in other browsers, making IE seem faster. Like when they got IE to leave its connections open so that IIS looks like it serves web pages better than Apache. MS does not play fair when it comes to network stuff.
Slashdot Mirror
I don't think so. I remember there were a set of fixed memory addresses for the display - two pages for text/lowres, and two pages for hires. The idea was you could draw on the page you weren't displaying and then hit the toggle to change pages, so you could do animation. But there was some thing where if you were using it it used the same memory area as the second hires page (I think it was the disk driver but I don't know), so if you were using that you could only use the one hires graphics page.
Yes it is. They're paying google for genuine clicks, and should only be charged for them, google shouldn't charge for the fake ones.
Click implies an actual click, if someone's got a perl script sending requests to google's server with the referrer set to that page that's not a click is it? But google could be counting it as one.
AMD doesn't have the capacity to fill the whole market demand. Getting rid of Intel might well mean the smaller players like VIA became competitive.
No, but nor does it to encourage targeting the lowest common denominator, going for as wide an audience as possible, which is what the current copyright system does, and don't even get me started on how ridiculous current copyright terms are. Getting rid of copyright wouldn't mean people couldn't sell movies, just that people who they sold them to would be able to sell them on. So it would become more important to appeal to devoted fans, or rich people, rather than getting as many people as possible paying $10 a pop. No copyright might get rid of the big-budget effects-only movies, and it might mean superstar actors couldn't rake in millions, but it wouldn't kill cinema. Good art will always find a buyer.
Finally, we're talking about this specific case. Regardless of whether copyright benefits progress on the whole, in this particular case it's clearly malfunctioning.
Those are still special cases compared to the enormous number of things for which you do use the apostrophe to show possession.
Don't you still have Jesus teaching that loving his god is more important than loving your neighbor, and getting angry with the whole money-changers-in-the-temple thing?
I'd imagine they're talking about the marginal cost rather than initial outlay, so it's a $1bn loss plus whatever they spent developing it.
What's the difference between MS and their newest subsidiary? One's a bunch of scumbags who trick old ladies out of their money with a product that promises to do one thing but actually does something different and unpleasant, the other's - oh, nevermind.
I'll be modded down for this because Roland is an asshole, but bitching about Roland is the new "I'll be modded down for this"
Always got a chuckle from me. (And mine had 62K because of an extra add-on card. Let you do disk I/O (? - some apple ][ geek can tell me what it was that overwrote highres page 2)without clobbering your high resolution graphics buffer)
C&C was very playable on the N64, I think warcraft 3 could be.
Some police officers (fairly) recently shot a man carrying a table leg because they thought it was a shotgun. Thinking a gun is a toy isn't inability to tell fantasy from reality, it's just not being able to see what's a toy and what isn't. All the evidence is that 5 year olds certainly do know the difference between fantasy and reality.
Google is charging them for all the fake clicks they got. That's why they're complaining.
In case you didn't notice, he's using it to point out the insanity of the proposed religious hatred bill, not seriously claiming he should have protection as a Jedi.
Seems less flawed than most popular religions. Respect for life, protecting the weak but never being aggressive, don't fear, don't be angry, don't hate. Also, crucially, no claim to be the one true faith, no claim that other gods are false. Sounds a very good religion to me.
But as a general rule, it's as a designation of ownership would make sense. John's computer, the computer's mouse, all make sense. Why not it's buttons? Using its in sentences like that is a special case that has to be memorised, because it does not make sense.
I haven't noticed any effects from anything like that, I think it's just machines getting faster. I'm still running the same machine I was 3-4 years ago, and even with the latest java (1.5.0.04) java programs are still very slow. Just opening a menu takes a good half-second, and don't get me started on startup times. When was the last time you saw a java application without a splash screen to try and disguise the horrible load time?
Look at their policies, not their traditional position. They're privatising right left and centre, being anti-immigration, cutting financial support for university students,....
The point is they *can* tell if it's a lake. If the sun-glinting method works, sure it might seem a bit goofy, but it frees up mass to use with other instruments.
No, but you'd have thought they'd have some connectivity, at least enough for a slow backup line.
No, we already have a perfectly good system for deciding on something of legal importance, it's called the courts. They can decide when and where copyright would benefit progress. Allowing artists to profit from their work for the sake of encouraging them, sure. Allowing artists to lock their work away from everyone who they haven't given it to personally, no.
Parent is a troll or an idiot, since he appears to have forgotten which planets the moons he mentions are orbiting
Everything is done to give preference to IE, for example validation is often done with client-side javascript in IE but server-side in other browsers, making IE seem faster. Like when they got IE to leave its connections open so that IIS looks like it serves web pages better than Apache. MS does not play fair when it comes to network stuff.
Have you actually tried running it under mono?