Slashdot Mirror


User: Jaruzel

Jaruzel's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
359
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 359

  1. Re:welp.... on Virgin Media UK Begins Throttling P2P Traffic · · Score: 1

    A *LOT* of work proxies and 'free wi-fi' hotspots limit HTTP/S traffic to ONLY ports 80/443. Having a link to http://myawesomefridgecam.com:81/ is just not gonna work...

  2. Re:Facebook on your phone on Facebook-Direct Phones — and Facebook Right On the SIM · · Score: 1

    What he said.

    Mod this guy up. Or at least send him a free tin foil hat.

    -Jar

  3. This needs to stop. on Xfire Purchased, Team Leaving · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I don't need to see this right at the top of the comments [1]. I thought slashdot released stories earlier to logged in users or subscribers? If so, then how are ACs getting first comment?

    -Jar

    [1] Yes I know I can change my comment browsing level, but I shouldn't have to. Besides, thanks to the useless mods on /. there's a lot of good stuff modded down into the minuses.

  4. Re:similar experience on BBC Web Slip-Up Insults Facebook Fans · · Score: 1

    I recall that a simple search for memes and swear words in Google Code can show that devs putting in incredibly stupid placeholder text is depressingly common.

    I know I'm guilty of it also, sometimes I just can't help myself.

    (Hmm, I've just tried it again, and unless I'm doing it wrong, I can't seem to search the code repository properly?)

    -Jar

  5. Re:Remember kids... on BBC Web Slip-Up Insults Facebook Fans · · Score: 1

    You pasted the Corporate Ispum link incorrectly. Here is the correct URL.

    Apple didn't invent Lorum Ipsum y'know. ;)

  6. Re:For those who don't know European slang: on BBC Web Slip-Up Insults Facebook Fans · · Score: 1

    Either way, most Masochists ARE Saddos imho, so the BBC are right however you look at it. ;)

  7. Re:All I can really say is... on BBC Web Slip-Up Insults Facebook Fans · · Score: 3, Informative

    Know your history, it's 'We'...

    http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/401800.html

  8. Re:Opera users didnt have a problem on Google Introduces, Then Scraps, Bing-Style Background Images · · Score: 1

    Try as I might, I couldnt 'see' those colours. So I had to mock up a html file with dummy text. I am pleased to report that it is a nice pale yellow text on a dark cyan (teal?) background.

    http://www.weegeeks.com/upload/foo.html

    Very pleasing on the eye.

    -Jar

  9. Re:size matters on For Automated Testing, Better Alternatives To DOS Batch Files? · · Score: 1

    VB(6) and C++ will. Java of course wont, seeing as it needs thousands of support files just to do a hello world [1].

    - Jar

    [1] I don't program Java, and have no desire to, as it is a 1990s throwback language. feel free to flame on :)

  10. Re:Limey on Facebook Calls All-Hands Meeting On Privacy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Government made the internet, and they goddamn well better get a handle on the corporate takeover of it before it turns completely into cable television.

    I totally agree with this point. I am sick and tired of following a news headline in my RSS reader only to find that the destination page is just an embedded video player of some talking head hack reading out loud the article I was fully prepared to read for myself in the first place.

    If I wanted to watch TV, I'd turn it on. Now, get off my lawn!

    -Jar.

  11. Re:The effect would be weird on How To Build a Winscape · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've done this on a 8ft projector screen with Johny Chung Lee's original Wii head tracking mod, and I can assure you, the moment you move your head and the display updates, your brain is immediately fooled into seeing 3D.

    Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd3-eiid-Uw

    -Jar

  12. Re:Unrealistic? on Virgin Promises 100Mbps Connections To UK Homes · · Score: 1

    ...you imply you have not even tried. My advice is to try and contact them letting them know you have a problem.

    You've not had to deal with Virgin Media before have you?

    Their support system is the most on-rails I've ever encountered. I've tried before when I've had previous issues, and it's simply frustrating. They won't even send out an engineer if their remote tools say nothing is wrong.

    The main point of my post was to see if anyone understands the traffic profile I'm seeing ? It seems like they are shaping me ALL the time, but I am not sure, and I want to collect as much information about whats happening before I do speak to them.

    -Jar

  13. Re:Unrealistic? on Virgin Promises 100Mbps Connections To UK Homes · · Score: 1

    It also sounds like you're more stubborn than they are.

    I probably am. :)

    Anyway, the router on my side is a pfSense box, with an unchanged config on it. I can't see how by changing nothing on my side, that the speed has dropped and it beeing something I (haven't) done.

    -Jar

  14. Re:Unrealistic? on Virgin Promises 100Mbps Connections To UK Homes · · Score: 1

    I'm on their 20mb service, and have been with them for several years now. My location has overheard phone cables, so fast ADSL is not an option leaving me with Virgin cable as my only broadband option.

    Over the past few months the speed has practically collapsed. Now I never get any more than about 6mb from sites like Microsoft.

    More alarminly, is that it's not a constant speed. If I watch the traffic graph in DownThemAll (using a single stream, single file download) it looks like a row of mountains, peaking upto to 6mbish, and then suddenly dropping to a few Kb for several seconds, then climbing back upto 6mbs over another 10-20 seconds. This pattern continues for the complete download, regardless where I am downloading from, and what size of file, and when in the day I'm doing it.

    Because of this, even low res YouTube type video streaming is out. Warcraft regularly stutters, and overall browsing is now becoming hit-and-miss with a lot of failed page loads.

    I know if I contact them, they'll argue that it's my equipment (it's not - nothing has changed on my side of the network for a couple of years now), and they'll never admit to it being their problem...

    So I'm throwing it out here, are any slashdotters who use Virgin Media suffering in the same way, and did they manage to solve it?

    -Jar

  15. Re:Terrible Hero on 1938 Superman Comic Sells For $1M · · Score: 1

    'bang regular chicks'

    Who let the pre-schoolers in here?

    *sigh*

  16. Re:Terrible Hero on 1938 Superman Comic Sells For $1M · · Score: 1

    I am SO with you on this. I've always disliked Superman for many reasons, but mainly
      a) He's WAY overspecced so that no encounter is ever dangerous.
      b) Even though I know his reasons for being created (US Depression era), his Jingoism simply gets on my nerves.
      c) Theres no inner turmoil. In short, he's a dumb Jock who would have never graduated from High School.

    This leaves us with very simplistic stories that fail to engage.

    I'm bias though, because for me, Batman is the MAN.

    -Jar

  17. Re:Excellent time to sell on 1938 Superman Comic Sells For $1M · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Once, I was at a sci-fi collectables fair. One of the most popular stands was selling Beanie babies. My 1 year old daughter, whom I was carrying, started stretching out for one of the beanie babies (a small pig I think). I picked it up and asked how much. The vendor told me £30 or there abouts. Watched by the many other collectors who were all sifting through the stand, I bought the beanie baby pig, tore off the tag, and handed it to my daughter.

    The silence around me was deafening... I quickly retreated to the Star Trek area, where at least they can take a joke.

    -Jar.

    PS. She's 12 now, and still has the beanie baby pig, without tag, and without most of it's fur.
    PPS. I bought an original lobby poster of Star Trek V at that same fair, signed by Shatner. It's one of my most valuable collectables.

  18. Re:And? on How To Play HD Video On a Netbook · · Score: 1

    I'll take my eggs, hard boiled thank-you-very-much...

    Haven't actually seen the film myself mind you.

    -Jar

  19. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream on Windows Patch Leaves Many XP Users With Blue Screens · · Score: 1

    See This Comment

    -Jar

  20. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream on Windows Patch Leaves Many XP Users With Blue Screens · · Score: 1

    Why use an illegal spyware ridden torrent copy ?

    Just use nLite for customizing an XP install, or vLite for a custom vista* install. Both tools do a very good job of creating lightweight Windows installations.

    (*although WHY anyone would still be running vista, is beyond me.)

    -Jar

  21. Re:ha ha suckers!!! on Windows Patch Leaves Many XP Users With Blue Screens · · Score: 2, Funny

    No he wouldn't. Douglas was a Mac fan.

    -Jar

  22. Re:ha ha suckers!!! on Windows Patch Leaves Many XP Users With Blue Screens · · Score: 1

    And save before printing

    So much time/stress/relationships would be saved if this was the default option on all Office type applications.

    You cannot Print until this document has been saved, click on 'Save' to continue.

    -Jar

  23. Re:Wolowitz!!! on Cool NASA Tech That Will Never See Space · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the toilet on the IIS has it.

  24. Re:FACEBOOK AND TWITTER!!!!!! on Cool NASA Tech That Will Never See Space · · Score: 1

    That'll be the missing > on the IMG tags. Sloppy html coding there.

    -Jar

  25. Re: on 2 Displays and 2 Workspaces With Linux and X? · · Score: 1

    Windows Devs: Please stop using MSI installers. I hate having to find the install files to remove programs.

    That's not MSI per-se but a badly built install table. Blame the mechanic, not the tools.

    When you install an application via MSI, the MSIEXEC process stores a cached copy of the application installation db (not the files, just their position and information) in a sub folder under windows. This cache copy SHOULD be all windows needs to uninstall the application. Ergo, in well behaved MSI installs, you do NOT need the original install files (just uninstall the app via Add/Remove Programs).

    However, because MSI allows for extensive custom scripting, a lot of devs add extra checks into their install routines, some of which would probe for the existence of the install files (even during an uninstall, which is dumb obviously).

    Hope this explanation helped.

    -Jar