Slashdot Mirror


Windows Patch Leaves Many XP Users With Blue Screens

CWmike writes "Tuesday's security updates from Microsoft have crippled Windows XP PCs with the notorious Blue Screen of Death, users have reported on the company's support forum. Complaints began early yesterday, and gained momentum throughout the day. 'I updated 11 Windows XP updates today and restarted my PC like it asked me to,' said a user identified as 'tansenroy' who kicked off a growing support thread: 'From then on, Windows cannot restart again! It is stopping at the blue screen with the following message: 'A problem has been detected and Windows has been shutdown to prevent damage to your computer.' Others joined in with similar reports. Several users posted solutions, but the one laid out by 'maxyimus' was marked by a Microsoft support engineer as the way out of the perpetual blue screens."

658 comments

  1. ha ha suckers!!! by gandhi_2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    first po

    Stop OxOOOOOOFC (OxB5FD7D64, Ox76F3E963, OxB5FD7CDC, OxOOOOOOO1)

    A problem has been detected and windows has been shut down to prevent damage to your computer.

    1. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh God. WHY did you use the letter instead of the number? *shudder*

    2. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Please don't joke about this. I have been affected, and at the worst possible time, too. I have to submit my PhD dissertation tomorrow, and I don't know what the fuck I'm supposed to do now.

      I can't boot up, and I have one of those HP computers that has everything built into the screen, so I can't even take the hard drive out.

      I CAN'T GET MY FUCKING PHD DISSERTATION. I AM SO FUCKED.

    3. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 funny :D

    4. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Should have used Linux and LaTeX.

    5. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by biryokumaru · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not like the hard drive is bad. Just use knoppix or something. You're pretty dumb for someone getting a PhD. Maybe this is just the gods way of sending you a message.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    6. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What I don't get is why people don't bother backing up important things like that.

    7. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Informative

      First, take a deep breath. The most important rule is "Don't Panic".

      Next, you download a Linux distro with a LiveCD. Ubuntu's a little bloaty, but it's got a lot of drivers right out of the box. If you've got internet access, you should be able to do that. If not, then you'll have to contact a friend with access or do it from the lab. Grab a beer while you wait -- it'll be a while.

      Burn the liveCD and boot with that. You might have to edit your BIOS settings to boot from CD first. Choose the "try Ubuntu without making any changes to your computer" option. Once it boots up, you'll be able to access your hard drive, and most importantly, your dissertation. Print the fucking thing, email it to your gmail account, and while you're at it, email what you've got to your professor. Let him know that you're "having computer problems, so I'm sending what I could recover in the meantime." Remember that computers fail all the time so you have to keep copies of important papers on physically separate systems.

      You're apparently a smart enough guy to get a PhD, so you should be able to figure out how to navigate Ubuntu. It's basically the same as Windown, but with the bar on the top instead of the bottom. My daughter's six and she can use Puppy Linux.

      Actually, you could probably use Puppy. The whole OS is only 150MB, so it'll download in a much shorter time than Ubuntu. It's not quite as polished, but I've had good luck with it.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    8. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Not to brag or anything, this is for information purpose only:

      I installed the patch on Tuesday but I hadn't rebooted yet (I know, I know... ;-).

      TFA got me nervous so I figured I might as well find out right now and reboot. I was quite happy that it rebooted without any problems so far ;-)

      My windows box is a winXP SP2 running on a HP Pavillion a1450n, AMD Athlon dual core.

      As a side note, I never managed to install SP3 on that machine although I have tried 3 times with a 4-5 months interval between each try, figuring I would give MS some time to fix stuff ;-) I managed to roll back to SP2 every time by going into the windows special boot menu and choosing "Last good known configuration" or something like that.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    9. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      first po
      Stop OxOOOOOOFC (OxB5FD7D64, Ox76F3E963, OxB5FD7CDC, OxOOOOOOO1)

      A problem has been detected and windows has been shut down to prevent damage to your computer.

      Look, if he was bluescreening he wouldn't bother to type "0x0000FFFF" He'd just say it.

      "Oooooooo FFFFFFFF..."

    10. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by david_thornley · · Score: 4, Funny

      AC didn't say what his or her major was. I'd expect different computer competencies from a Computer Science major and a French Literature major. Or, given that AC is on Slashdot, perhaps an Anthropology major.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    11. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by harrkev · · Score: 5, Informative

      Agreed.

      As long as you haven't turned on file encryption (only an option with XP Pro), you can easily recover everything. Do this:

      1) Go to a friend's computer. Download and burn a copy of your favorite linux distro (I use Ubuntu).

      2) Live-boot from the CD.

      3) Mount the hard drive.

      4) Insert your favorite USB storage device (make sure it is large enough).

      5) Copy ALL important files to the USB drive (probably safest to copy your entire user directory, if your USB drive is big enough.

      6) When done, re-format your hard drive and re-install XP.

      7) Update your system completely.

      8) Re-install all applications you need (office, etc.)

      9) Copy your important files off of the USB drive.

      Really, it is time-consuming, but I have had to do this exact same process for friends a bunch of times.

      As far as the PhD goes, go up to step 5, and then use the friend's computer to print everything. Do steps 6-8 some other day.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    12. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP has a special tool for removing the hard drive.

      http://osopher.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/hammer1.jpg?w=300&h=283

    13. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop OxOOOOOOFC (OxB5FD7D64, Ox76F3E963, OxB5FD7CDC, OxOOOOOOO1) A problem has been detected and windows has been shut down to prevent damage to your computer. It is highly recommended that this system be upgraded to Windows 7.

      Fixed that for you...

    14. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by blackgod · · Score: 1

      Just slip a Linux Live CD and boot. You will find your windows partition mounted (or ready to mount) on File manager. Click.. Click.. Click.. PhD is done :-)

      --
      bits and bytes of life should serve the needy - My bits and bytes
    15. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was dictating?

    16. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      1) Go to a friend's computer. Download and burn a copy of your favorite linux distro (I use Ubuntu).

      He did say he was on windows, so he might respond with 'what is this lunix that you speak of'?

      So it's not just him, but also the horse he rode in on, thats f**ked.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    17. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't joke about this. I have been affected, and at the worst possible time, too. I have to submit my PhD dissertation tomorrow, and I don't know what the fuck I'm supposed to do now.

      I can't boot up, and I have one of those HP computers that has everything built into the screen, so I can't even take the hard drive out.

      I CAN'T GET MY FUCKING PHD DISSERTATION. I AM SO FUCKED.

      dude you are making it funnier

    18. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corrected for #6

      Install Ubuntu and live problem free

    19. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      I have the same damn problem - my work is due to be handed in TOMORROW and I lost it in the wash when the dog ate it.

      Fortunately Microsoft killed by PC so I now have a decent excuse!

    20. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let me get this straight, you have your phd dissertation on a single machine? you have no backups? dude you got what you deserve, what sort of moron are you. during my dissertation I backed every single day and then made copies at the uni itself once a week just to be doubly safe, your using a fucking computer connected to the internet and you didn't bother to take basic precautions with something so valuable.

    21. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      microsoft ate my homework - lulz

      anyway, just do as the link in the article says, i understand being in phd study doesnt actually mean you know anything about IT
      but the fix isnt THAT difficult

    22. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're pretty dumb for someone getting a PhD

      I'm not sure if I should laugh at how wrong this is, or cry because of how wrong this is.

    23. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by pdabbadabba · · Score: 1

      You're pretty dumb for someone getting a PhD.

      Perhaps the field in which GP is getting a PhD is, you know, not technical?

    24. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by blackgod · · Score: 1

      do you think that revealing that you are using windows at home will be a **decent** excuse? better tell them that your dog ate it :-)

      --
      bits and bytes of life should serve the needy - My bits and bytes
    25. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      That's certainly an interesting little background story you have. So what are you getting your PhD in anyway?

      (Assuming you can get your computer to boot Windows again, I mean.)

    26. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by gknoy · · Score: 1

      I realize the grandparent was modded funny, but thank you for the sane and well-written (and complete) response which was better than what I would have written. If I had mod points I would have modded you up.

    27. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      A French Literature major on Slashdot? HERESY!

    28. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by suso · · Score: 1

      It's not like the hard drive is bad. Just use knoppix or something. You're pretty dumb for someone getting a PhD. Maybe this is just the gods way of sending you a message.

      Don't put much faith in titles like PhD. We had a PhD candidate apply for a web development position with us once and they actually listed on their resume that they know how to use weather.com, ebay.com, etc. I mean, if you wrote them, that's one thing, but those sites are designed for the LCD, not PhD.

    29. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm sure something as important as a PhD dissertation which you have no doubt be working on for many months or years has been properly backed up? Right? You wouldn't take the risk of someone stealing your PC, spilling water on the box, having a hard drive failure for something that critical to your future career. Right?

      I have all my documents automatically copied to a secure network document store, I copy them to a thumb drive every day and to a larger usb drive every week. I'm taking about meaningless notes and information I may never even read again or need. Something like a PhD dissertation should probably be taken more seriously that leaving it on some computer waiting for one of a hundred different catastrophes to occur so I can blame anyone but myself.

    30. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Lulfas · · Score: 1

      Even those majors should be able to RTFS and see where it lists the way to fix it.

    31. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by alvieboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "The most important rule is "Don't Panic"."

      The second one: "Install Linux"

      (Douglas would be proud of this one).

    32. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by S.O.B. · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't bother with a live CD like one of the other posters recommended. Try the System Rescue CD. It's a lot faster to download and has all the tools you'll need to get your dissertation off your computer.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    33. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by rattaroaz · · Score: 1

      Uhm. How is he supposed to download a distro when his computer is down? You should not assume that he has more than one!

    34. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by rattaroaz · · Score: 1

      Never mind. I didn't read too well first time. Duh on my part.

    35. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why the fuck is he on slashdot?

    36. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by linux_geek_germany · · Score: 1

      Doesn't MS do this as well? Can't remember 100% but have some vague memories.

    37. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by EvanED · · Score: 1

      This post does not have nearly enough funny mods.

    38. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by handfullofsausage · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu by far is the easiest to use as Linux Distros go. I use many different versions of Linux and would recommend Ubuntu to anyone looking for a new OS that's very stable and easy to use. I recently installed Ubuntu 9.10 on a Lenovo, replacing Windows 7. The battery life is 5 to 5 1/2 hours with Ubuntu, compared to 3 hours using Windows. Also, the stock Windows install utilized about 60+ gigs, I have Ubuntu loaded with alot of options and am only using 6.5 gigs. Why anyone still uses windows baffles me. I am a certified MCSD, and at one time a fan boy of MS. I have totally gone to the other side, Linux. If you are still using MS Windows you really deserve what you get. The only good product MS has is MSSQL200x, and that's just another fork of SYBASE, but with some mods from MS.

    39. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by oh_bugger · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I backup the software I write with free tools provided by Microsoft (sync-toy and the built in Windows scheduler), onto a USB hard drive. It's no off-site backup, but it's fine if you're worried about your hard drive crashing.

      --
      Go home and shave your giant head of smell with your bad self
    40. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure you can differentiate between 0s and Os on BSoDs (Lucida Console 8pt non-anti-aliased, I believe).

    41. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am in no way a car expert, but even I know not to buy a 1973 Ford Pinto.

      I am not a pharmacist expert, but even I know not to take a Tylenol when the bottle I just bought looks like someone has modified the contents.

      I am not a doctor, but I know that if I shoot myself in the foot, it's going to hurt.

      Microsoft Windows is not a new product. If you don't know that it can't be counted on to work like a normal computer, that doesn't just mean you're not technical. It means you have been living under a rock for 20 years.

    42. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      AC didn't say what his or her major was. I'd expect different computer competencies from a Computer Science major and a French Literature major.

      I would expect anyone of decent intelligence and a little life experience to both know the value of keeping a backup on different media (preferably in a different location) and to have a fair idea where to turn if the lights do go out at the worst time (surely the AC knows or has access to some techie people - we aren't as rare as we once were any more). Then again, people often fail to meet expectations so maybe I've just shot down my own arguement.

    43. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by InvisibleSoul · · Score: 1

      Want backups, doc? *Meep* *Meep*

    44. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see the problem. Someone has replaced all the zeroes in your computer with the letter 'O'. Clearly, this is gumming up the CPU, which is only designed to handle ones and zeroes.

      Give the system a thorough binary flush and you should be fine.

    45. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      You're pretty dumb for someone getting a PhD.

      Maybe it's a PhD in Basket Weaving?

      NTTAWWT

    46. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by DJRumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well that and the fact that the fix is a bit easier that formatting and reinstalling. From TFA:
      I had the same problem. Since I didn't have time to identify which one of today's updates caused the problem, I removed them all and now my computer is back to normal.

      Follow these steps:

      1. Boot from your Windows XP CD or DVD and start the recovery console (see this Microsoft article for help with this step)

      Once you are in the Repair Screen..

      2. Type this command: CHDIR $NtUninstallKB978262$\spuninst

      3. Type this command: BATCH spuninst.txt

      4. Type this command: systemroot

      5. Repeat steps 2 - 4 for each of the following updates provided by FindMeFollowMe:

              * KB978262
              * KB971468
              * KB978037
              * KB975713
              * KB978251
              * KB978706
              * KB977165
              * KB975560
              * KB977914

      6. When complete, type this command: exit

      Your computer should restart and everything should be back to normal.

    47. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      "5) Copy ALL important files to the USB drive (probably safest to copy your entire user directory, if your USB drive is big enough."

      You lost me here.....windows has the equivalent of /home directories??

      I don't use windows that much, but I've not seen that on any of the few windows boxes I've used before...I do tend to set up folders for things on the directory tree for different things (downloads, recipes, projects with subfolders under them for documents, designs...etc..). I could find all my stuff as I do try to organize it...but the /home paradigm on windows I've not seen...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    48. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by element-o.p. · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sure there's a joke in there regarding LaTeX and safe computing somewhere...

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    49. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Yet he was able to post about his predicament on /.

      "WHOOSH!", perhaps?

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    50. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Scarumanga · · Score: 1

      well upgrade to a version of windows that has less blue screen, 7 perhaps. or use Linux. Why use something that no longer has support.

    51. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by deniable · · Score: 1

      Why not use a Windows live CD like Bart PE rather than Linux. It's easier for the people who've only ever used Windows and the NTFS drivers come from Microsoft.

    52. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Knoppix is great for this purpose too. Granted it's a full-sized CD iso so it will be a long download, but it's also worth the download so that you can keep a copy around for emergencies. Like the Ubuntu LiveCD it's also a fully-featured desktop suite (KDE by default unlike Ubuntu but also very similar to Windows) because it is loaded with drivers and useful utilities.

    53. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by nevillethedevil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually this is about average for a PhD. I have seen so many lose several years worth of work because their HDD dies and they never backed up.

      --
      Be gone from my sight or prepare to feel my flaming wraith!
    54. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by dasdumper · · Score: 0

      Well, he is here on /. posting so we have to assume he has another PC or access to another PC.

    55. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by snuf23 · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Windows XP the user folder is usually located in C:\Documents and Settings\username.
      In Vista and Win 7 it is usually C:\Users\username.

      Files specific to that user's accounts are stored under those directories such as Desktop, Documents etc.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    56. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by cosm · · Score: 1

      Wonderful satire! How is it that a plethora of folks take this parent seriously? Or maybe those children are perpetuating the satire, making me the dolt. Probably the latter...

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    57. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or how right...

    58. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You're pretty dumb for someone getting a PhD.

      What is it the pagans say? Oh yeah - and it harm none, don't be a douche.

    59. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Arker · · Score: 1

      It's basically the same as Windown, but with the bar on the top instead of the bottom.

      It's sort of an aside, but you do realise that you can put "that bar" on top or sides in windows? I personally always place it on a side, as this makes much more efficient use of screen space, since computer monitors are normally wider than they are tall, but most often used to display virtual-paper whose dimensions skew in the opposite direction, so placing it on the side puts it in otherwise unused space while placing it to the top or the bottom either reduces the space available for your work. Most linux systems can be tweaked to do the same, although many taskbar apps make it much harder than it should be for some reason - this is one area where Windows really is friendlier - just click on a blank section of the bar and drag. I havent used Gnome in a long time and I am guessing that is what Ubuntu is using - it would be very like Gnome to make this difficult or impossible, but in KDE it's only a little harder than in Windows.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    60. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Pentium100 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Microsoft Windows is not a new product. If you don't know that it can't be counted on to work like a normal computer, that doesn't just mean you're not technical. It means you have been living under a rock for 20 years.

      Strange, under my rock, Windows XP/2003 work well, I rarely have to restart my computers and when I do it is usually because of a hardware problem, long power outage (long enough to discharge UPS batteries) or because I am installing some software that needs a reboot. I get bluescreens very rarely.

      for example:

      Current System Uptime: 28 day(s), 3 hour(s), 27 minute(s), 48 second(s)
       
      Since 2009.03.27:
       
                System Availability: 99.9270%
                        Total Uptime: 321d 11h:16m:42s
                      Total Downtime: 0d 5h:38m:22s
                      Total Reboots: 11
          Mean Time Between Reboots: 29.25 days
                  Total Bluescreens: 0

      Those 5 hours? Most of them were spent when I added more RAM, but had either a bad module or a bad slot, so I took that long to finally give up and disable 4 modules from BIOS, leaving 3GB (instead of 5GB what I wanted and 1GB of what was before). That was ~28 days ago. Then there were a few power outages and this PC was connected to a smaller UPS. IIRC only one of those 11 reboots was because the PC froze for some reason.

      OS: 2003

    61. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until you update Ubuntu to the next version...

    62. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by BabyDuckHat · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's almost as user friendly as Linux right there.

    63. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't blame the user. This is what you get when you're in a school system that considers a class on using Microsoft Word to be "Computer Competency for Students".

    64. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by ignavus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not use a Windows live CD like Bart PE rather than Linux. It's easier for the people who've only ever used Windows and the NTFS drivers come from Microsoft.

      Given that Microsoft were the ones to issue the problematic update in the first place, I don't think saying the NTFS drivers in a Windows live CD come from Microsoft is really any sort of recommendation.

      Except maybe to scream.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    65. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by HAKdragon · · Score: 1

      On windows 2000 and XP: C:\Documents and Settings\
      On Windows Vista and 7: C:\Users\
      I think It's also C:\Users on Windows NT prior to Windows NT 4.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    66. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use the information provided by the links and be happy.

    67. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You should try Live Mesh.

      Not a troll! I am serious -- I use it all the time. I use it to sync files between several computers AND Microsoft's servers, so I have a backup of anything important "in the cloud," accessible by Web browser if I ever need it.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    68. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by tftp · · Score: 1

      How is it that a plethora of folks take this parent seriously?

      I'm sure most of the serious, insightful replies are not for the person who "lost their dissertation" but for other people, who lost access to their box but haven't posted on /. about it.

    69. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The NT line does. It even has a symbolic name %USERPROFILE% which expands to the right directory path. Too bad almost nobody (read: nobody except properly trained enterprise developers) knows about this nice feature and Windows users are still forced to work under admin-level access rights by crappy software.

    70. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by aflag · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd say he's pretty much the avarage PhD student. Anyhow, the good thing about a PhD dissertation is that nobody really cares about it anyway. When I got to college I thought I'd see science in the making if watched presentations by PhD students. What a disillusion... It felt like I was in a party watching some dude showing off, the only difference is that the PhD student will use graphs instead of drinking straight from a keg. You can almost hear the guy saying "please aprove me!"

    71. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by gemada · · Score: 1

      whoosh!

    72. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      "Go to a friend's computer"

      Dude, this is Slashdot. That should read something more like "Go to someone who isn't immediately repulsed by you" or something like that.

      But seriously though, not as big of a deal as it sounds. You are correct.

    73. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by trytoguess · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Intelligence, even extreme intelligence in something doesn't imply aptitude in all common things. I mean, what you think every person on slashdot is a well adjusted social individual?

    74. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      6) When done, re-format your hard drive and install Linux.

      Fixed.

    75. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by keeboo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm... I'll stay using Linux.
      It seems that Windows is not much user-friendly yet.

      It looks like an interesting OS, perhaps in 1 or 2 years I'll try Windows again.

    76. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      As someone who holds a degree in Anthropology I can assure you we keep backups you insensitive clod!

      --
      Get a web developer
    77. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Sanat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually it is * KB977165 only that needs to be un-installed.

       

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    78. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      Given that Microsoft were the ones to issue the problematic update in the first place, I don't think saying the NTFS drivers in a Windows live CD come from Microsoft is really any sort of recommendation.

      Well said. Excellent proof that no Windows CD can read NTFS because of a patch released years later.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    79. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you mean:

      Should have used LiNuX and LaTeX.

      ?

      Because that would have been a lot funnier.

    80. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by keeboo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Microsoft Windows is not a new product. If you don't know that it can't be counted on to work like a normal computer, that doesn't just mean you're not technical. It means you have been living under a rock for 20 years.

      Strange, under my rock, Windows XP/2003 work well, I rarely have to restart my computers and when I do it is usually because of a hardware problem, long power outage (long enough to discharge UPS batteries) or because I am installing some software that needs a reboot.

      C'mon, don't be like that. You're ruining the moment.

      Be a nice guy and let we Linux/BSD/etc users laugh at the cost of your OS, okay?

    81. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're pretty dumb for someone getting a PhD.

      Because "getting a PhD" == "being an expert in everything"

      Except for the part where it doesn't. It's more like "being an impressive expert in one field"

      Did you even bother to figure out what the AC's degree is in? How do you the AC should know how to deal with something like that happening?

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    82. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by maxume · · Score: 1

      Compared to the Nuke it and reinstall advice above it, it is a walk in the park.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    83. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Z34107 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A handy guide:

      /export/home => c:\users on Vista or c:\documents and settings on XP.

      /usr => c:\program files

      /dev => Roughly equivalent to \\.\PhysicalDriveN or \Device\blargh

      /etc => VERY roughly equivalent to c:\windows\system32

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    84. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You should try Live Mesh.

      Not a troll! I am serious -- I use it all the time. I use it to sync files between several computers AND Microsoft's servers, so I have a backup of anything important "in the cloud," accessible by Web browser if I ever need it.

      I've been doing that with dropbox on my ubuntu box

    85. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, biryokumaru, that's harsh. Would a little compassion be completely beyond your level of development? Although I'm not a PhD candidate, I'm not dumb either (have been a *very* successful software engineer for over twenty years), but I won't know wtf "knoppix" is until I look it up in a couple of minutes.

      Wait, what? *That's* your best help to a Windows user in crisis, "just use knoppix or something"?! Jackass.

    86. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by rockNme2349 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, copying to a different folder doesn't count.

      --
      Sewage Treatment Facilities - "Our duty is clear."
    87. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I don't get is how people don't understand GP was just trolling.

    88. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by groslyunderpaid · · Score: 1

      Assuming you aren't trying to be funny, what you are looking for is going to be (usually) C:\Documents and Settings\username

      It is somewhat similar to a /home directory. I won't define "somewhat" at this juncture, but suffice it to say that directory will (again, usually) contain everything on the desktop, the "my documents" folder, IE favorites, and some application settings, among other things.

      Oh, and that structure is only good for win2k and winxp. And maybe win2k3. The alternative shortcut is %userprofile%

      On vista/7/win2k8, I think it's C:\Users\username

    89. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by socceroos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've been doing that with dropbox [dropbox.com] on my ubuntu box

      I've been doing that with ubuntuone on my ubuntu box.

    90. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by dissy · · Score: 1

      Strange, under my rock, Windows XP/2003 work well, I rarely have to restart my computers and when I do it is usually because of a hardware problem, long power outage (long enough to discharge UPS batteries) or because I am installing some software that needs a reboot.

      So you mean to say, if you want a stable running system, you can't install some software?

      You also imply that you only rarely run windows update, else you would reboot monthly (or biweekly at the worst of times)

      I'll give you that 2003 is a *huge* improvement over XP with its needing to reboot for no good reason.
      Win 7 is an even larger improvement.
      Both still require a reboot to upgrade the kernel or core system files however.

      I don't think I could go back to that.
      Currently I can install ALL software for my platform, upgrade all my user space binaries (exe's to windows users), and can even patch my kernel in ram while it's running.

      Pretty much the only need for rebooting is changing non-hotswap hardware out, or having hardware fail.
      Not much any OS can do about that (Well, the ESXi hypervisor with a nice little 3 machine cluster can run a guest machine at 100% uptime, but that's a tad beyond what most home users would want to invest in I'd imagine)

    91. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't joke about this. I have been affected, and at the worst possible time, too. I have to submit my PhD dissertation tomorrow, and I don't know what the fuck I'm supposed to do now.

      I can't boot up, and I have one of those HP computers that has everything built into the screen, so I can't even take the hard drive out.

      I CAN'T GET MY FUCKING PHD DISSERTATION. I AM SO FUCKED.

      Please don't joke about this. I have been affected, and at the worst possible time, too. I have to submit my PhD dissertation tomorrow, and I don't know what the fuck I'm supposed to do now.

      I can't boot up, and I have one of those HP computers that has everything built into the screen, so I can't even take the hard drive out.

      I CAN'T GET MY FUCKING PHD DISSERTATION. I AM SO FUCKED.

      Follow these steps:

      1. Boot from your Windows XP CD or DVD and start the recovery console (see this Microsoft article for help with this step)

      Once you are in the Repair Screen..

      2. Type this command: CHDIR $NtUninstallKB978262 $\spuninst

      3. Type this command: BATCH spuninst.txt

      4. Type this command: systemroot

      5. Repeat steps 2 - 4 for each of the following updates provided by FindMeFollowMe:

      KB978262
      KB971468
      KB978037
      KB975713
      KB978251
      KB978706
      KB977165
      KB975560
      KB977914
      6. When complete, type this command: exit

      Your computer should restart and everything should be back to normal.

    92. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by westyx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course not. Same folder, different name.

    93. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by smitty97 · · Score: 1

      #10 install updates..

      #11 go to step 2

      --
      mod me funny
    94. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by kimvette · · Score: 3, Informative

      I know you meant it as a joke, but single user mode (and "recovery console" equivalents on install disks) are far more capable than Windows' recovery console.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    95. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by deniable · · Score: 1

      Given that Microsoft were the ones to issue the problematic update in the first place, I don't think saying the NTFS drivers in a Windows live CD come from Microsoft is really any sort of recommendation.

      Except maybe to scream.

      You're right, there's never been any problems with other peoples' NTFS support, especially not when it's a critical recovery. I've never seen MS do things to mess with third party systems either.

    96. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      (1) go to www.ubuntu.com
      (2) download ISO and burn to CD
      (3) boot the PC to Unbuntu CD
      (4) navigate to your Windows user folder and find your f------ dissertation
      (5) email it to yourself (if Ubuntu connects to your network) OR copy to USB drive

      Dissertation Problem solved.

    97. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by NatasRevol · · Score: 2, Funny

      Windows is cheap if your time is worth nothing!

      Depending on your install disc, amount of files & apps to install, this could take up to a whole day!

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    98. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Cool. I knew about dropbox but this one is new to me.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    99. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, no no no, he needs to download Gentoo and compile it with the --oh-fuck-i-lost-my-dissertation-to-a-buggy-windows-update flag. Gentoo is GOD!

    100. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Informative

      it would be very like Gnome to make this difficult or impossible,

      In fact, in Gnome, it works just like Windows: grab the bar (actually, Gnome calls it a "panel") and drag it to the screen edge you want it at. You can also have more than one of them, if you want; by default Gnome gives you two, on the top and bottom, but the right click menu on a panel gives you the options to add more panels or to delete the one you're right-clicking. Two works nicely since you can do more with a Gnome panel than a Windows bar; you can easily make your own quicklaunch icons, you'll generally have multiple menus on it (instead of one big Start menu) and it's where your Workspace Switcher lives (if only Windows had something that useful out of the box), in addition to doing absolutely everything the Windows bar does. It's all user-configurable, too.

    101. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      (1) go to www.ubuntu.com (2) download ISO and burn to CD (3) boot the PC to Unbuntu CD (4) navigate to your Windows user folder and find your f------ dissertation (5) email it to yourself (if Ubuntu connects to your network) OR copy to USB drive

      Dissertation Problem solved.

      Remind me, how does he get Ubuntu without a working PC? Not everyone has friends y'know.

    102. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Strange. I thought it meant "likely doomed to another half decade of slave labour."

      I've never been able to figure out how the acronym works, but it must be in there somewhere.

    103. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      My grandma is going to do this? Clearly, Windows is not ready for the desktop.

    104. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remind me, how does he get Ubuntu without a working PC? Not everyone has friends y'know.

      insert ubuntu CD, turn on computer. click on "try ubuntu without any change to your computer", which is their way of saying LIVE CD. no setup needed. how fucking hard was that? i'm sure there's a "5)profit" step i'm missing somewhere.

    105. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by xettera · · Score: 2, Funny

      Should have been writing your dissertation with Google Docs

    106. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what exactly does this box do? Mine has similar "uptimes", but it usually sits around and sleeps for a week at a time, only to wake up briefly to transfer some files, and then back to sleep.

      My mac runs a VM with 2008 R2 in it, gets constantly beat up with dual development in both OSX and Windows, with the server OS usually needing a reboot about every 4 days. The machine goes through several sleep cycles a day and never fails to wake. OSX needs a reboot about every 3-4 weeks under these loads, as something in Parallels seems to go bad after exceeding windows memory limits.

    107. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by pz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Assuming this isn't a troll --

      1. Sit. Down. Breathe.

      2. Go to the store and fill a shopping bag full of fatty snax, Doritos, Pringles, Kit-Kat bars, Coke, Red Bull, etc.

      3. Bring your computer and the bag to the university IT department and beg for help. Let them know that you don't care about the computer (because compared to N years of effort, one computer is nothing), just the contents of the hard drive.

      4. While the IT department is working on your computer, go to your departmental administrative office and talk to the secretary in charge of accepting doctoral dissertations. Beg for a one-day extension. Involve your advisor's secretary.

      5. Return to the IT department to retrieve your dissertation. Do whatever you were going to do to get it printed.

      6. Once everything works out, reward the people who saved your ass with more goodies and/or flowers.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    108. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by mysidia · · Score: 1

      One goes to the book store and buys an overpriced $50 book that includes an Ubuntu CD with it.

      Or knocks on random people's doors until he can find someone willing to download and burn a copy of Ubuntu to a provided CD blank for $10 :)

      If really desperate, ones goes to the library or other place that has working computers (hopefully with CD-R drive).

      Universities have plenty of computer labs, finding a machine that can burn a disk shouldn't be a problem, and the school might even already have Ubuntu disks that can be loaned out...

    109. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by mysidia · · Score: 1

      What about a majors attending the college of: Parties, Beer, and Women studies?

    110. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      A French Literature major on Slashdot? HERESY!

      Oh, I dunno. I would have thought majoring in French Lit would be at least as nerdy as CS. Probably more so, since the latter is more or less mainstream now. :-)

    111. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      Fooled me once... you know how it goes. Funny how people learn quickly when negative reinforcement is added in.
      Those in tech support know this one: "Hi, my computer will no longer boot-up."
      Tech: "Do you have your restore DVD? It came with the computer."
      User: "Sure"
      Tech: "Insert it the DVD drive and follow the instruction for a complete restore."
      User: "Great, thanks! You saved all my family pictures!"
      Tech: "Uhhh, well..."

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    112. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by sillybilly · · Score: 2, Informative

      PhD stands for philosophiae doctor - teacher of philosophy.

      The following assumes there is a limited, finite mental capacity for humans:

      "Philosophers are people who know less and less about more and more, until they know nothing about everything. Scientists are people who know more and more about less and less, until they know everything about nothing." (quote from somebody smart)

      Therefore PhD in science is an oxymoron. Actually, no it's not. You can both know everything about nothing, and nothing about everything, at the same time. You can have limit(x->infinity)x*1/2x+1/2x*x=1, or infinity*0+0*infinity=1, a finite number.

    113. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So a dropbox here with 2gb, another ubuntuone with 2gb, so 4gb so far + Live Mesh, you soon get 10gb free. PINA to manage, should develop a "dropbox" manager.

    114. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Actually it is * KB977165 only that needs to be un-installed.

      No, better to simply uninstall Windows. There are plenty of less dodgy alternatives. ;-)

    115. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      For the less experienced, Slax might be the better option. It boots into a GUI on almost any hardware, and it automatically mounts all available drives.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    116. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by westyvw · · Score: 1

      Goes to your local bookstore and buys 1 of the 5 or so different magazines that offer DVD's with Linux Live cd's on them.

      The real question is, does he learn NOT to use Windows for important things again, or does he go back to old habits?

    117. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by westyvw · · Score: 1

      Um no need for a book. You can get a live DVD for as little as $6 or as much as $20 with a magazine.

    118. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Gi0 · · Score: 1

      No,i just expect someone with a PhD to have common logic and at least one backup of really important stuff.

      --
      There's no patch for stupidity
    119. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by westyvw · · Score: 0, Troll

      Compared to Nuke it and take the 10 minutes to put Linux on it and not have this trouble again........

    120. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by westyvw · · Score: 0, Troll

      Corrected again:

      Install a rolling Linux distro and live problem free.

    121. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by westyvw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a linux user, the reboot because you installed something is sure strange.....
      I usually measure the uptime in months or years, but whatever works for you....

    122. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by maxume · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure, learning how to use a different system will take 10 minutes. And figuring out which apps to run to do various tasks will only take 5 more.

      The root problem was a file corrupted by malware, so calling the update broken is a bit much; certainly, the fact that malware can trample system files is a bummer.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    123. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 1
      I have a literature major in my undergrad degree.

      I'm happy to go toe to toe in a nerd-off with any CS grad.

      Trust me, we book nerds are not only the most introverted of the nerds, but also the most annoyingly verbose.

    124. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by querent23 · · Score: 1

      Mod up!

    125. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your grandma got wireless working in Linux, she can figure this out, especially since its all spelt out for her.

    126. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by natehoy · · Score: 1

      A suggestion for the future: If you are in the middle of doing work you feel is critical, hold off on loading a huge whack of Microsoft patches the day they come out. If your dissertation was due tomorrow, this weekend would have been an excellent time to celebrate Patch Tuesday. And you could have read about the issues others were experiencing and maybe held off until a patch to the patch came out.

      Seriously, if you're running a decent antivirus client and you practice minimal safe surfing, you can wait a week or two to load the latest security patches. Let the alpha-geeks who load this stuff quickly run into the patch brick walls, that's what we (*) live for.

      (*) This is my first Patch Tuesday completely Microsoft-free, so "we" no longer includes me. I read about the large set of patches, and chuckled because I don't have to load them!

      Oh, and back up your data often. And ESPECIALLY before loading a motherload Patch Tuesday set!!!!

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    127. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Or they should be able to use system restore from command prompt and go back to before the update that borked the machine. After getting the machine back up and running I prefer to give them Comodo Time Machine which allows them to press the home key if they ever end up in a "no boot" situation, and I set it for daily snapshots.

      Comodo time Machine is simple enough that anybody can use it, and having its own boot console with easy to use GUI means even if the PC won't boot they can still restore from snapshot. Much easier than all that mess you typed.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    128. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by miggyb · · Score: 1

      It's not that far-fetched, actually. Just write a greasemonkey script to replace "Anonymous Coward" with "The Stranger"

      --
      This signature serves no purpose other than to help you see which posts were made by me.
    129. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      A problem has been detected and windows has been shut down to prevent damage to your computer.

      I always wondered what damage to the computer it is preventing...

    130. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no console copy/paste for the poor bastards

    131. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Hecatonchires · · Score: 1

      No linux user has ever needed latex.

      --

      Yay me!

    132. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't step 6 be:

      6) When done, re-format your hard drive and install Ubuntu.

      Problem solved at the source.

    133. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      So you mean to say, if you want a stable running system, you can't install some software?

      No, if software wants to reboot the PC, I don't think that it makes the PC crash, however, it does reset the uptime.

      You also imply that you only rarely run windows update, else you would reboot monthly (or biweekly at the worst of times)

      In 3 cases: A patch that affects me and how I use that computer, when I am rebooting anyway and after the PC rebooted because of one or more of the reasons I stated above.

    134. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      This box is on all the time and does two things: runs uTorrent and VmWare Server with two guest OSs at the moment (that's why I needed more RAM).

      If I want I can also run it as a dedicated game server (my connection speed does not allow me to run a game server all the time - it's either games or uTorrent).

    135. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by golden+age+villain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Backup anyone?

    136. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Well only small part of software on Windows need a reboot and majority of that can actually do without. The ones that can't usually install some kernel mode drivers which (I assume) can only start during the system start.

      I haven't used a recent linux distro, so my knowledge may be outdated, but I remember restarting after installing some software (also, installing software that is not in the (yum|apt|whatever) repository is worse than a reboot).For some reason Windows got the install process right or at east better than linux.

    137. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, try the Trinity Rescue Kit. Boot CD that automatically shares all your drives over the network (password optional). 3.3 beta, 3.3 stable, or 3.2 stable are all available at http://trinityhome.org/Home/index.php?wpid=1&front_id=12

    138. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by runyonave · · Score: 1

      Especially when you're using a WIndows OS.

    139. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by runyonave · · Score: 1

      Dropbox and UBuntu One are really useful at times like this. I don't understand how people still don't keep backups of their data.

    140. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by laron · · Score: 1

      Well, he could use the PC he posted with.

      One of my earlier tech support support for fiends stuff was recovering a thesis paper. Just as the guy finished writing and hit the print button, word crashed and corrupted the file.
      Since then, I recommend everyone who writes an important paper to set up a free email account and mail daily updates to themselves. And save before printing.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    141. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by kurt555gs · · Score: 1

      Why would you use Windows for anything that really mattered? Ugh!

      --
      * Carthago Delenda Est *
    142. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      I only run Windows so I can download patches from Microsoft. It's a hobby.

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    143. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Download Ubuntu, burn it to a CD. Adjust your BIOS to boot from CD (if necessary) and grab your files using Ubuntu. A google search will quickly show you how to do this (very easy).

      You are NOT so fucked.

      Btw, BACKUPS are a GOOD idea. / just sayin'

    144. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What is this? You have to reboot 11 days within that 321 days "uptime" and still claim a total "uptime" of 321 days? Oh and only one reboot is caused by PC froze for some reason - so it doesn't count?

      Must be new method of counting system "uptime" from MS ... If I own my PC for a year and I reboot daily, can I say my "total system uptime" is 365 days? No none of the reboots were caused by "PC froze". Yeah right ...

    145. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by SittingUnderBridge · · Score: 1

      It will be at least 3-4 years if your lucky...5-6 years if its the norm.

      --
      Poop stinks and so do you=:)
    146. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by aero6dof · · Score: 1

      I can't boot up, and I have one of those HP computers that has everything built into the screen, so I can't even take the hard drive out.

      That's a start of a great joke... how many PhDs does it take to remove a hard drive? Actually try booting with some form a live CD or usb stick. Most let you access the drive. Try Linux - many like the Ubuntu flavor.

    147. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by MokuMokuRyoushi · · Score: 0

      I thought the second Rule was something about towels...

      --
      Humans are terrible replicators of Godly things.
    148. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's almost as user friendly as Linux right there.

      Wow did you spend last two week trying to compile a display driver with patches and odd forum "updates" also?

    149. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by SittingUnderBridge · · Score: 1

      When was it ever? But than again what else can you use it for?

      --
      Poop stinks and so do you=:)
    150. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by westyvw · · Score: 1

      If its not in your repository, it could be a pain, this is true, although you can easy make a Debian package for a Debian system that you can remove as needed. I long ago moved away from RPM/YUM so I can't speak to that.
      However, from my point of view, it is the well maintained repository that Linux gets right, not windows. Who knows what software will clobber other software in a windows environment?

    151. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      And that is probably why linux has a different model. I, for example, like that I can record the installs of various software to a CD or DVD and then install it on another PC which may not have internet connection (or the connection is too slow).

      Repositories are good when they work (internet connection works, the program is in the repository etc), because you do not need to look for the software, but I still like the ability to install software on a computer without internet connection (with the software I bought or downloaded using another PC).

      As for the incompatibilities, I don't remember encountering one apart from DRM. I once tried to install some program (don't remember the name) which was not in the repository and needed some special version of some lib which was incompatible with everything else in the system (at least it warned me). Windows (>=XP IIRC) solve this by keeping both versions of the .dll file and providing the one the program needs. I don't know, maybe Linux does that too nowadays, as I said, my knowledge about Linux is a bit old.

    152. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by 1s44c · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I CAN'T GET MY FUCKING PHD DISSERTATION. I AM SO FUCKED.

      You can still get your data off but it might not be easy. Your local PC shop should be able to do it.

      People like me have been telling people like you not to trust windows for -DECADES-. You thought we were ignorant bigots and ignored us. Now you are suffering from the very problems we warned you about countless times. I don't mean to sound uncaring but you brought this on yourself.

    153. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Compared to the Nuke it and reinstall advice above it, it is a walk in the park.

      Reinstalling a better OS like linux is the only sensible alternative. This or something worse is going to happen again, it's only a matter of time.

    154. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You lost me here.....windows has the equivalent of /home directories??

      Yes.

      I don't use windows that much [...]

      Clearly, since it's something that appeared in Windows around 12-13 years ago.

    155. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by CecilPL · · Score: 1

      Judging by your last sentence, it looks like you've gone the scientist route.

    156. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by zx-15 · · Score: 1

      Well, if she's got Intel or ath9k card, I don't see a problem.

    157. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by tenco · · Score: 1

      You may be surprised how many people use Windows for important things and succeed.

    158. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by tenco · · Score: 1

      Install a rolling Linux distro and live problem free.

      ROFL. YMMD.

    159. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by tenco · · Score: 1

      If its not in your repository, it could be a pain, this is true, although you can easy make a Debian package for a Debian system that you can remove as needed.

      I tried that several times, including a try at updating a package and failed utterly every time. It may be easy if you already maintain a Debian package and know the process.

    160. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by tenco · · Score: 1

      Scientists are people who know more and more about less and less

      Well, that's actually true. The more you know, the more you know what you don't know. So it feels like you know more and more about less and less.

      , until they know everything about nothing."

      I don't think you can take the limit of this process. But you may come to the conclusion that in principle you know nothing.

    161. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by vtcodger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ***Install Ubuntu and live problem free***

      Ah come on. The 9.04 Ubuntu upgrade about four months ago -- Krackpot Kingfisher or some such -- did pretty much the same damn thing to a number of people. And some of the problems weren't especially easy to fix. (You ever tried booting a Linux PC with an empty menu.lst file and no kernel? Not as easy as you probably think) The major differences would be that Ubuntu users didn't pay money for the privilege of having their PC bricked. And that repairing a Unix PC is generally less painful than repairing a Windows PC.

      The problem is that it is quite impossible to test updates against every possible hardware and software configuration that might be in use. I'm sure that Microsoft and Canonical try and try hard. But impossible means just that -- impossible.

      The lessons, of course, are don't install updates until a few days after they are released, make sure that you have bootable media for your OS (if possible), and back up frequently. I learned that in 1963. Other people have been learning it ever since.

      This incident, BTW, is a warning. It is highly likely if not inevitable that sooner or later the Windows automatic update mechanism is going to shut down much of the world's infrastructure either because the kids in Redmond have screwed up, or because some sociopaths somewhere in Eurasia have hijacked the update mechanism and used to to download something really grim, or because some country that the Western powers are trying to bully decides to retaliate.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    162. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      And the sad part is this problem most likely could have been avoided simply by running as a normal user, which Windows has had since Win2K/WinXP. With Runas there really isn't any reason to run as a full user, and if my kids and my GF can use Runas anybody can. For a good 90% of everyday tasks there really isn't any need for being admin, when they can launch Firefox, go on Facebook, check their webmail etc without hassle.

      That is why I'm glad Windows 7 is really good. I think Win 7 will finally kill the "run as admin 24/7" problem by forcing users not to run as admin constantly. They tried with Vista but they screwed the pooch with UAC and it was too "cancel/allow?" happy and irritated the hell out of folks, but even my 67 year old Luddite father has no problems with the regular user on Win7.

      But just saying "run Linux" is about as useful as telling everyone to go out and buy Macs. I would say Linux is much more like a Mac than like Windows, as they are gonna have to deal with unsupported/badly supported hardware, finding replacements for apps they have been using for years, retraining in the default way of doing things, it is a whole hell of a lot of work, especially for the non tech. Personally I gave up trying to sell Linux boxes in my shop due to the amount of CLI that is required to fix problems in Linux, which meant the non techs spent all their time bringing it back for me to fix and eating up my profits. if you have the skills, Linux is great. But a good 99.995% of the public does NOT have the skills, and Windows is easier for them, even with the rare problem such as this, which they will just bring to a guy like me to fix.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    163. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      What I don't get is why people don't bother backing up important things like that.

      Because pain is the teacher. People don't care about backups until they need one, then they never stop caring.

    164. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      As long as you haven't turned on file encryption (only an option with XP Pro), you can easily recover everything. Do this:

      1) Go to a friend's computer. Download and burn a copy of your favorite linux distro (I use Ubuntu).

      2) Live-boot from the CD.

      3) Mount the hard drive.

      4) Insert your favorite USB storage device (make sure it is large enough).

      5) Copy ALL important files to the USB drive (probably safest to copy your entire user directory, if your USB drive is big enough.

      6) When done, re-format your hard drive and re-install XP.

      You were making sense up to point 6. Then you started babbling like a mad man.

      You suffer something like this and you return like a dog to its own vomit. Isn't this enough of a wake up call for you?

    165. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Pentium100 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, you read it wrong.

      The current uptime was 28 days.

      The total up/downtime was used to calculate availability, which was ~99.92%. So, during that time(2009 03 27 - 2010 02 12), the computer was working 321 days (not continuously) and not working 5 hours (also not continuously) with a total of 11 reboots during that time which means average 29 days between reboots (even though most of those reboots were used all one after the other when fixing a hardware problem).

      I think this is pretty stable. As I said, only one reboot was because the PC froze (and as such could be blamed on Windows, I do not know the actual cause), others were because of a hardware problem, hardware addition or power failure, all of which cannot be blamed on Windows.

    166. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Windows is not a new product. If you don't know that it can't be counted on to work like a normal computer, that doesn't just mean you're not technical. It means you have been living under a rock for 20 years.

      Strange, under my rock, Windows XP/2003 work well, I rarely have to restart my computers and when I do it is usually because of a hardware problem, long power outage (long enough to discharge UPS batteries) or because I am installing some software that needs a reboot

      You are lucky, simple as that.

      You might as well be saying that smoking must be safe because you never got lung cancer.

    167. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by paganizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've been doing that with "XCOPY" on my dos 6.21 box.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    168. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > My grandma is going to do this? Clearly, Windows is not ready for the desktop.

      That's why humans and other animals die of old age.

      After a certain point it's just much easier to install a new system from scratch than to fix the old one.

      When the whole body is full of cells with subtly different (and possibly wrong) DNA/RNA/epigenetic stuff, there may be no such thing as a "good cell", and they're just "not that bad".

    169. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Reasons I have absolutely no worries about this issue:

      1) My main OS is Win2k; I triple boot Win2k, WinXP & Win2008. One of them will boot.
      2) I know, and love, Knoppix. Win2k8 treats Debian as a virus, or I would still have a Debian boot.
      3) I have other computers that I can...
              a) Back up important data to
              b) Mount the data-containing drive in
      4) I back up important things to Google Docs
      5) I back up critical things to a encrypted file on my offsite webserver.
      6) I'm not an idiot.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    170. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by chucklebutte · · Score: 0

      harrkev why is your link to a christian dildo store that sells prostrate vibrators for men? Isn't that a tad bit non christian?

    171. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...
      7) Update your system completely.

      8) See BSOD happen again.

      9) Go to step 1)

    172. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by rvw · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there's a joke in there regarding LaTeX and safe computing somewhere...

      Isn't latex used for safe sex?

    173. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when did "preparing for minor emergencies" like, say, having a backup of something that is really important with a lot of time invested become "specialist knowledge"?

      I bet you don't have a flash-light or candles in your house either since "dealing with a power outage" requires 'specialist knowledge' as well, right?

    174. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by paganizer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whoa.
      I just did a little research on this; KB977165, the apparent cause of this, is the "fix" for the recently reported "17 year old vulnerability", which (as far as I can tell) was nothing of the sort, but the NTVDM (MSA979682).
      The NTVDM is a "feature", not a bug; any exploit of it is something that was by design allowed to happen; Microsoft "patching it" is a Scary Thing.
      That we are seeing blue-screens from this is not surprising. it IS surprising that they are trying to play this off as a XP-only problem, since essentially every version of windows is reporting problems.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    175. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      1) Always keep backups of important documents on multiple media
      2) Always make sure you have means to access & use those documents on a secondary system, this could be a second computer, or the same machine booted from another medium, such a CD or USB
      3) Learn how to use recovery tools, you might like bartPE or a linux live CD

    176. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Windown

      You just had to sneak it in there, didn't you? ;-)

      Ah well. I take it you use Dvorak (the s/n typo suggests it); good on you.

      For the rest of you: you all know the value of good tools; that's why you use emacs/vim/vs/$EDITOR and linux/bsd/osx/emacs/$OS. Apply the same high standards to anything that touches your hands, and to the arrangement of letters on your keyboard---your hands will love you for it.

    177. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      The average (l)user thinks a hard drive is a magical device that'll never fail, they also assume they'll never delete the file by accident or that the software might corrupt it.

      Usually though, they'll learn once they loose an important document, the real idiots however, never learn & blame the computers/tech guy for failing to recover what was lost

    178. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      And save before printing

      So much time/stress/relationships would be saved if this was the default option on all Office type applications.

      You cannot Print until this document has been saved, click on 'Save' to continue.

      -Jar

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    179. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dropbox works on Linux.
      Ubuntuone doesn't work on Windows.

      No cross-platform support = showstopper.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    180. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      Hard drives do fail. Noise is a big indicator, and I took the opportunity to clone my 20GB drive over to a brand new 80GB drive before it had a chance to fail. (Not sure how many hours I racked up on the original.)

      Another thing is to keep an eye on the power on hours count. I have no idea how many hours is too many. Climate is another factor I'm sure, but that makes it trickier to measure. If I had to guess, somewhere between 10,000 and 15,000 hours would be the point where it might be a good idea to swap to a new drive. If you wait until it wears out, then you would lose the data between the point of wear out, and since the last clone backup.

      When it comes to papers written for school...
      Leave a copy on hard drive.
      If you have a second hard drive, keep a copy there.
      If your school provides network storage, store a copy there.
      Also, a USB flash drive or a floppy disk is another idea.

      It is also a good idea to track your computer's health. Pay attention to the SMART info. There are programs out there, but I assume it is better to go with your hard drive manufacturer's diagnostic utility. Understanding what the raw numbers means is important. I'd prefer to pay attention to the "worst values" and compare them to the "threshhold numbers".

      Now, personally, I prefer cloning software. A full clone backup, for the purpose of backing up the whole drive. While this isn't necessarily good for backing up constantly changed files, it does provide me a point where if I lose my system, or lose vital system files, it can help solve my problem.

    181. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Jaruzel · · Score: 2, Funny

      No he wouldn't. Douglas was a Mac fan.

      -Jar

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    182. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're pretty dumb for someone getting a PhD.

      Because "getting a PhD" == "being an expert in everything"

      Except for the part where it doesn't. It's more like "being an impressive expert in one field"

      Did you even bother to figure out what the AC's degree is in? How do you the AC should know how to deal with something like that happening?

      While the OP was a bit harsh, I do agree up to a point. Getting a PhD should also mean a certain level of intelligence/logic. I certainly would expect anyone able of achieving a PhD to also be smart enough to know about making backups, especially for vitally important documents. One might still not bother of course (I know I don't backup nearly often enough for example)...

    183. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry they'll recognise your talent the moment you tell them the story, you've been BORN to be a PhD...

    184. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't joke about this. I have been affected, and at the worst possible time, too. I have to submit my PhD dissertation tomorrow, and I don't know what the fuck I'm supposed to do now.

      I can't boot up, and I have one of those HP computers that has everything built into the screen, so I can't even take the hard drive out.

      I CAN'T GET MY FUCKING PHD DISSERTATION. I AM SO FUCKED.

      Simple.
      1. Download and burn a copy of your favourite nix distro
      2. Insert disk into computer
      3. Boot into live desktop and rescue your data

    185. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone explain this?

    186. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like the hard drive is bad. Just use knoppix or something. You're pretty dumb for someone getting a PhD. Maybe this is just the gods way of sending you a message.

      Pretty dumb? No I would say par for the course outside of CS.

    187. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It's surprisingly common. I committed every change to my PhD Thesis to an svn repository that was, every week, mirrored to a machine in another country (which also kept four complete dumps in separate files, in case the repository became corrupted and I didn't notice immediately). If I spend three years of my life on something, I'm not going to let a single hard drive failure destroy it.

      On the other hand, someone I know had her computer stolen a few months before she was meant to submit, and it contained the only copy of her thesis. Someone broke into her house and stole her laptop, phone, and a few other things. She called her phone to ask if they could at least leave her a copy of the files somewhere and it was answered by the parents of the thief. They reported their son to the police, and all of her stuff was returned a few hours later.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    188. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Pigskin-Referee · · Score: 1

      Be a nice guy and let we Linux/BSD/etc users laugh at the cost of your OS, okay?

      Yea, BSD is doing great. Just a few days ago, FreeBSD updated the JPG-8 port, and now 'kdebase', 'kdelibs', etc won't build without moving existing libraries around and other modifications. Then again, that is a normal occurrence on most *.nix based systems. Ease of use was never their intent.

      --
      Pigskin-Referee
      Linux: Yesterday's technology, tomorrow ...
    189. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I haven't used Windows since 2000, but I seem to recall that you can put the install CD in the drive, hit r for recover then c for console and get a command line, then you can copy all of the files to another drive. I think that this will also let you get at encrypted files if you know the password, but I never tried.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    190. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      4) I back up important things to Google Docs

      ...

      6) I'm not an idiot.

      I'm trying to work out if this was intentional irony.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    191. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      /etc => VERY roughly equivalent to c:\windows\system32

      Very roughly indeed. /etc is more equivalent to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE in the registry. C:\windows\system32 is closer to a combination of /lib and /libexec, or possibly /usr/lib (with C:\Program Files being equivalent to /usr/local/) depending on your flavour of UNIX.

      If you're on a more SysV-style UNIX then C:\Program Files is closer to /opt, where things are installed as /opt/package_name, rather than having their files scattered all over the tree.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    192. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please turn in your Slashdot account info on the way out.
      Even those all in one machines have serviceable parts. Access may be hidden but it is there and failing to use a Linux boot CD to copy your work to a thumbdrive should get your personal IPv6 blacklisted from all nerd pages.

    193. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by mangu · · Score: 1

      You cannot Print until this document has been saved, click on 'Save' to continue.

      What if your hard drive fails when you try to save and printing is the only alternative you have to keep a record of some important data?

    194. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Multiple users, each with their own home directory, have been supported since Windows NT 3.1, released in early 1993. This needed an insanely powerful computer though (486 and 16MB of RAM!) to use properly, so wasn't particularly popular. With the introduction of the Pentium Pro line, which was faster for 32-bit code than 16-bit, NT was a bit more attractive and, when I got NT 4 in 1996, the student license for NT was the same price as for '95 (I got a free copy, but I think back then the student license let you dual-boot. They changed it a few years later to make you pick only one).

      So, 12-13 years is pretty conservative. 17 for introduction and 14 for relatively widespread corporate adoption is a bit closer.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    195. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If your Linux uptime is measured in years currently, then you have at least two remotely exploitable kernel vulnerabilities that I know of, maybe more (unless you're using reboot-free kernel updates, in which case you are trusting code doing horrible binary-rewriting tricks to run in ring 0). There are relatively frequent updates to glibc, which don't technically require a reboot, but do require you to restart all of your userspace code to use the new version, so the only difference is that you can spend a lot of effort to avoid shortening the counter for your uptime. Of course, you can use an old glibc, but then things start to get painful. I recently got some bug reports from someone using CentOS, which turned out to be due to the fact that CentOS still ships an old 'stable' glibc, and a number of bugs had been fixed in newer versions that everyone else is using so he was the only one to see problems.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    196. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Arker · · Score: 1

      Last time I used gnome it would do most of that, but only by left-clicking and finding the right preferences panel. And I found when I screwed around with it enough to make it very useful the panel often died.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    197. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps its more an assumption that in PhDs are such a high level of academia, that basic analytical and problem solving skills should really be at a developed level regardless of discipline, and because the problem, although specifically within the Comp Sci field, can be solved after a google search, and following some relatively simple instructions, with a minimal requirement for domain specific knowledge.

      If an academic can attain a PhD, and yet struggle at finding and following a logical solution that is so trivial, how are we to accept that they are capable of understanding and implementing the scientific method? And if that is in doubt, how could we trust any of their resultant research?

    198. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by mangu · · Score: 1

      Since 2009.03.27:

                            System Availability: 99.9270%
                                            Total Uptime: 321d 11h:16m:42s
                                        Total Downtime: 0d 5h:38m:22s
                                        Total Reboots: 11
                Mean Time Between Reboots: 29.25 days
                                Total Bluescreens: 0

      Oh, yeah? Compare it to this:

      $ uptime
        09:46:06 up 913 days, 17:34, 6 users, load average: 0.17, 0.15, 0.07
      $ uname -a
      Linux stoeng01 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Thu Jun 7 19:00:28 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux

      Of course, this is a server that has a redundant UPS with a diesel generator. My personal computers I turn off whenever I'm not using them, it saves power and reduces my "carbon footprint".

      Those 5 hours? Most of them were spent when I added more RAM, but had either a bad module or a bad slot, so I took that long to finally give up and disable 4 modules from BIOS, leaving 3GB (instead of 5GB what I wanted and 1GB of what was before).

      Perhaps you should have googled it before wasting your time. Or blaming the hardware, which is what most MS-Windows users do when they get stumped by their OS limitations.

    199. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      We're talking about computers, they can do stuff automatically. In this case autosave before printing.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    200. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by rwiggers · · Score: 1

      You must be really good to install RAM without rebooting. That's one thing I never managed to do.

    201. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I've started backing up before I had a catastrophic failure though I did have quite a few HDDs fail gradually and having to get the data out there before the disk completely dies.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    202. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      No. Avoiding having a single point of failure is basic common sense that can be expected from everyone who can beat a monkey in an IQ test.
      Maybe on your tree, that’s what you call an “expert”. ;))

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    203. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... if you think about it, I bet Playmobil has sold “learning computers” with a more stable OS and a less childish UI in the past. ^^

      Let’s try the uptime on such a thing. I bet you can run it for decades! ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    204. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Next, you download a Linux distro with a LiveCD.

      That reminds me of a anti-protip in a German computer magazine, about a decade ago:
      “Can’t get online with your modem? Look on the Internet for tips!’

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    205. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I don't have XCOPY on my PC-DOS 3.3 system, so I had to write a BAT file to do my backups. It's got PAUSE commands each time I need to insert another blank floppy disk.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    206. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a MAC. If you can afford getting your PhD you can afford a $1000.00 mac laptop.

      P.S. WAH you big baby.

    207. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To get a PhD does not require any real I.Q. anymore, just a good credit rating and the ability to put the work into it.

      Cripes a Professor in a Physics department could not figure out how to get his car out of a frozen puddle.(puddle frozen up to the rim edge) Holy shit, that is PURE PHYSICS, and the moron cant think of "let air out of the tires" or pour boiling water on the tires to get it free.

      It's not like water is an advanced topic in physics. The tow truck driver shook his head, let the air out of the tires, and simply drove it out.

    208. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Current System Uptime: 28 day(s), 3 hour(s), 27 minute(s), 48 second(s)

          Mean Time Between Reboots: 29.25 days

      Looks like it's going down very soon...

    209. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by delinear · · Score: 1

      It's one of those situations where you only realise the value after you really need the solution - prior to that it's just a chore and people put a lot of faith in their technology (which is kind of weird considering the throwaway attitude we have towards tech now compared to, say 15, 20 years ago). Proof in point, I'll bet PHD guy (well I really shouldn't call him that now, it's just cruel) will always back up everything in triplicate from now on :)

    210. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Have you ever heard of using a Linux live boot disc or backing up your dissertation on something else?

      BTW, which university do you go to? It'd be nice to know who is handing out PhDs like cereal prizes so I can get one or two.

    211. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Did you even bother to figure out what the AC's degree is in? How do you the AC should know how to deal with something like that happening?

      You know, overconfidence generally is a problem with people who have PhDs.

      Before personal computers were around, just about everybody knew it was a good idea to make multiple copies of important papers on the library photocopier.

    212. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      course most new computers bought at a store don't come with recovery cds...

      They are extra, and you have to order them from HP, Acer and whoever.

      You do get the option to burn a backup at first boot... but it only allows you to restore to the hard drive image on the disk.

    213. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, so most computer users *don't* carry a Linux live disc everywhere they go, just in case?

    214. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suggestion:

      Free GNU/Linux distributions
      -> http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html

    215. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There might be a valid reason why you wouldn't want to autosave (imagine you had a document with lots of pretty pictures, graphs, etc and you delete these so you can print a copy off for proof-reading to save on ink, you'd be pretty annoyed to find out that your saved copy was overwritten with this version). Better to give the save prompt but allow a user to overrule it - sometimes a little annoyances isn't a bad thing if it stops people screwing up valuable data.

    216. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except when, you know..... update the kernel

    217. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      And you'll have to write it again so it won't be as good? That's kind of... a bummer.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    218. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Walter+White · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu's a little bloaty, ...

      I prefer to think of her as "full featured."

    219. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Icegryphon · · Score: 1

      No linux user has ever needed latex.

      That not what your Rootkit'd box said to me last night.

    220. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by sumdumgai123 · · Score: 1

      You don't have to be an expert in computers to back up your data. Anyone who uses a computer should be able to do that, or you are not qualified to use a computer. Also in this information age the average joe should have computer skills. If you don't have the skills to manage the foibles of your operating system you should use something more reliable, like Linux or Mac. Doesn't take a PhD in anything to know that.

    221. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Hard drives do fail. Noise is a big indicator

      Sometimes there is noise when a drive is failing. Sometimes there isn't any particular noise (beyond the sound a drive always makes whenever it's operating, which you may or may not be able to hear depending on ambient noise levels, including the computer's own fans).

      > Another thing is to keep an eye on the
      > power on hours count. I have no idea
      > how many hours is too many.

      Neither does anybody else. The mean (i.e., average) can be calculated for all hard drives, sure, but the standard deviation is so high, the mean is not a particularly useful predictor for any given drive. And the mean for your particular *model* of hard drive won't be known until you're already well past it. No help there.

      Also, sometimes there are SMART errors before an all-out drive failure, and sometimes there aren't.

      Don't wait for indicators. Make backups now.

      > When it comes to papers written for school...

      It depends. If you only spent thirty minutes writing it, one copy on your hard drive and a print copy to hand in is probably enough for now, and then when you do your next incremental backup of all your data it will of course be included.

      But if you've spent a lot of time on the thing, you should always have multiple electronic copies in separate physical locations. Don't try to guess whether your hard drive might fail. It could fail at any time. Today is the day of salvation. Make your backups now.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    222. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      No, this is slashdot, instructions shouldn't involve going outside or interacting with others.

      It should have read, "Go to your other computer".

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    223. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about joking, are you really trying to make us believe you lost your PhD diss?
      If you had really lost it, would you really have the time to sit around reading stories and commenting about the problem.

      If I had this problem, that would the last thing on my mind right now. I'd be busting my ass to get to the information.

      So who's really the joke here? If you are for real, then I find it sad there is going to be someone running around with a PhD with this attitude and lack of common sense!

    224. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Save to a separate autosave file and prompt the user to restore that if the autosave is newer than the manual save on load?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    225. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he isnt dumb, he just isn't an anal PC geek like you. Other people know fuckloads more than you do about THEIR specialist areas.
      When did you last check your smoke alarm?
      Do you watch your diet to make sure its balanced?
      Do you ensure all your doors and windows are locked and keys kept out of site every time you leave the house?
      Policemen, firemen and dieticians think you are a dumb fuck.

    226. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Ltap · · Score: 1

      I love how it's marked "Funny", personally.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    227. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      So, 12-13 years is pretty conservative. 17 for introduction and 14 for relatively widespread corporate adoption is a bit closer.

      I was quite deliberately being *very* conservative. 12-13 years is when it appeared in Windows 9x and was available across the entire Windows product line.

    228. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Company I used to work for back in 1999....We had a high end IBM server Running NT4 SP6....Was our DB server, Exchange server, file server, print server...DC...pretty much everything...Longest period for it's uptime was 473 days or something like that.

    229. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC didn't say what his or her major was. I'd expect different computer competencies from a Computer Science major and a French Literature major. Or, given that AC is on Slashdot, perhaps an Anthropology major.

      It was phys. ed. you insensitive clod! Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to my new marketing job and eventual suicide. Don't worry, I'll try to take as many of my fellow employees with me as I can

    230. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Step 0: Remove all networking/internet connections, including wireless

      ...

      Step 7: Disable automatic updates

      Step 8: Reconnect network/internet.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    231. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that hard really, they teach this kind of stuff on Blues Clues.

      -Nick, the Company Computer Guy

    232. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by xophos · · Score: 1

      4) I back up important things to Google Docs

      ...

      6) I'm not an idiot.

      I'm trying to work out if this was intentional irony.

      Look at the sig.

    233. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by xophos · · Score: 1

      I can't figure out why the parent was modded funny.

    234. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My grandma is going to do this? Clearly, Windows is not ready for the desktop.

      Clearly your grandma isnt ready for desktop either.

    235. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      "Go to a friend's computer"

      Dude, this is Slashdot. That should read something more like "Go to someone who isn't immediately repulsed by you" or something like that.

      But seriously though, not as big of a deal as it sounds. You are correct.

      Dude, this is slashdot. Go to one of your other computers. You should have 4 or 5 in your basement currently.

      or, you know, turn in that card that you've got. You know, the geek one..

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    236. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Enzo1977 · · Score: 1

      Damnit I wish I had mod points to give!

      --
      I hate all sigs, even this one.
    237. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there's a joke in there regarding LaTeX and safe computing somewhere.

      Yes, you're probably the first person ever to realise that "LaTex" looks and sound just the same as "latex". Well done.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    238. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't XP only support 3GB? I seem to remember I had a similar issue when I went to 4GB and found some workaround to display the fact that there was an extra 1GB, but I got the impression it still wasn't used.

    239. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Next, you download a Linux distro with a LiveCD.

      It's just possible he doesn't have more than one computer.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    240. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by operagost · · Score: 1

      I agree. Linux uses much friendlier commands!

      ls
      sed
      awk
      grep
      vi
      cat

      So simple!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    241. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Hope your dissertation wasn't on how awesome Windows XP is, you might have a hard time defending that.

    242. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should have googled it [tomshardware.com] before wasting your time.

      Windows 2003 32bit supports up to 64GB RAM IIRC (anyway, the PC only supports 16GB anyway). With all modules enabled, Windows did not boot. Memtest (and knoppix) only saw 4GB, but if I disabled other modules and left the suspect ones enabled, memtest froze and Windows still did not boot.

      This kinda points to a memory problem.

      For now 3GB is enough for me, when I manage to fill it, I'll try to isolate a bad RAM stick or a bad slot so I can disable it from BIOS and hope that everything works (interesting thing - if I want to add memory, I have to add 4 matched sticks, but I can disable any slot from BIOS, it does not disable the remaining slots in the "bank").

    243. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Windows 2003 does not have this limitation.

    244. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Ya ditto on that. I have done it tons of times personally. I always have several Live-Boot linux distros on hand just in case for troubleshooting.

      I can't remember, but I think XP Pro defaults to encrypt your "Personal" Folders. So as long as you didn't save it in there you should be fine.

      You can still get at them if they are encrypted, so long as you remember your old system password, its just a bit of a chore. I never had to do it, but I do remember reading up on it, and it looked like a serious pain in the ass.

    245. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by mikechant · · Score: 1

      (You ever tried booting a Linux PC with an empty menu.lst file and no kernel? Not as easy as you probably think)

      If you installed from the live CD (the most common method) you can just boot from that.

      Having said that, I think putting the grub2 bootloader in 9.10/Karmic Koala (not 9.04 as per your post)was premature and a big mistake (sounds like it would have been the cause of the problem you described).

      That decision caused a lot of grief to a significant number of people.

      I'm sticking to legacy grub for another couple of Ubuntu releases at least.

    246. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Conversely, PANIC. Panic right now. Run in circles and light your HP on fire. Best to burn down the house just in case to destroy all the evidence. No one must know! Oh wait you had roommates? Well really panic now, your a murderer. Make sure they are dead, use a shovel. Steal a car that is outside, no time to be picky, anything will do. Best take a hostage just in case the fuzz catch up with you. Now head to Mexico.

      Either that or get a LiveCD of Linux and copy it to a thumb drive. Or call a friend who is halfway not retarded to do it for you. Or god forbid pay an expert to retrieve it. I mean its not like that document is worth anything to you. Best to just ask strangers on a internet forum (you somehow frequent), or just throw your hands up in the air and give up and tell you prof your computer ate your homework. Bad computer!

    247. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Total Uptime: 321d 11h:16m:42s

                      Total Downtime: 0d 5h:38m:22s

                      Total Reboots: 11

          Mean Time Between Reboots: 29.25 days

      So you're saying there have only been 8 patches for 2003 that required a reboot in the last year?

    248. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Nope...not joking.

      I've always created multiple folders under the c:\ drive (if more than one drive, on the non-system drives) and put all of my stuff there.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    249. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Current System Uptime: 28 day(s), 3 hour(s), 27 minute(s), 48 second(s)

      Since 2009.03.27:

                System Availability: 99.9270%

                        Total Uptime: 321d 11h:16m:42s

                      Total Downtime: 0d 5h:38m:22s

                      Total Reboots: 11

          Mean Time Between Reboots: 29.25 days

                  Total Bluescreens: 0

      Ohhhh 28 days, that is definitely a production ready box!

      > uptime
        14:54:04 up 537 days

    250. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were FUCKED a long time ago, FUCKHEAD. maybe this will TEACH you to be so FUCKING LAME and use WINDOWS.

    251. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      Why update?

      If it ain't broke, it ain't.

      Want protection? Back up your hard drive. This used to be easy when an image of the boot partition only took a couple hundred megs. But now? The image is huge, and goes out of date because everyone has to update update update.

      Web browsing should be trapped in a virtual machine. So much has been done with virtual servers, but people ought to get into the hassle of virtual clients.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    252. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Fulg · · Score: 1

      That reminds me, the one time I really screwed up a Linux machine was when I failed an upgrade of glibc on a running system (I was a unix newbie and didn't know what I was doing).

      It's been more than 15 years but I still remember the overwhelming sense of panic when none of the standard utils worked anymore, so I could not undo what I just did.

      That day I learned not to mess with the glibc symlink, and how to fix an unbootable system from a boot floppy. Good times... (not!)

      --
      gcc: no input sig
    253. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      Sorry to hear that.

      Boot the computer with a Linux LiveCD and copy the files off to a usb drive or send them by email.

      I'm not looking forward to the next reboot, I can tell ya. Holding off on that. I went ahead and installed the recovery console, and put the instructions on c:\ as a preemptive measure.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    254. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by westyvw · · Score: 1

      Linux is just as easy to maintain offline, in some ways easier (lack of license restrictions, knowing dependencies before you install etc.) copy the files to a CD or DVD and install them elsewhere.

      Yes DLL hell isnt what it used to be, but there still is a nasty registry that can become corrupt, and when you install various software on windows it often thinks that it should be the one to control that filetype. That can get very annoying fast.

    255. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you've been writing up an entire PhD thessis on Windows XP?

      WTF were you thinking? You didn't see it coming???

    256. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA Mariner probes launched in the mid 1960s/early 1970s were still responding to commands in the late 1990s.

      Now THAT is uptime...

    257. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good.

      Get a Mac. :D

      LOL!

      My only other wish is that Bill Gates dies in a fiery plane crash that lands on Steve Ballmer's house because of this bug.

      Funny thing, you seemed to have computer access to post about this? Oh, and if you're not smart enough to figure out how to fix this pretty basic computer problem, you don't deserve a PhD. In anything. This type of thing is computer troubleshooting 101. I can't stand people who have degrees, make $100,000 a year, and yet can't be bothered to pull a computer hard drive. IT'S FOUR SCREWS AND TWO CABLES. IT'S NOT F'N BRAIN SURGERY. FIGURE IT OUT.

    258. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >average 29 days

      If you believe that is a large number, you are so sadly mistaken I have no idea what to tell you.

      That is almost as not funny as the Microsoft TV ads some years back that trumpeted how cool it was that their servers stayed up for weeks at a time. I laughed myself sick.

    259. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by lennier · · Score: 1

      How does infinity times zero equal one?

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    260. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At first I thought "but he might not have a background in computer science..." then I realized how right he was for calling him an idiot. Not because the guy is getting a PHD though. Rather because he is reading Slashdot and can't figure out or even knows about what GNU/Linux, LiveCDs, etc. Even my brother can figure out how to boot from a LiveCD without crying about it on Slashdot. Heck- he doesn't even know what Slashdot is.

    261. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if this helps now, but I did my dissertation on Linux because I saw so many problems with professors and other students with Windows when they were doing their papers, and I was a support guy for Windows. I learned from others' mistakes and did Linux using LaTeX, spending about a week learning LaTeX. Had no problem.

      BTW, PhD doesn't mean they are better at doing the work of Bachelor's or Master's degree holders. They just do something different, so they may not be better at it, although they can be if they tried.

    262. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like the most likely issue is a previous infection by the TRSS rootkit. According to one source, it hooks the kernel file that MS10-015 replaces. TDSS/Pakes/Alureon/TDL3/Tidserve. Symantic has a write up about it.

    263. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by the_olo · · Score: 1

      5) Copy ALL important files to the USB drive (probably safest to copy your entire user directory, if your USB drive is big enough.

      6) When done, re-format your hard drive and re-install XP.

      7) Update your system completely.

      8) Re-install all applications you need (office, etc.)

      9) Copy your important files off of the USB drive.

      I'd suggest "5a): send really-really-important files to yourself by e-mail". You know, just in case your USB drive dies somewhere between 5) and 9).

    264. Re:ha ha suckers!!! by Gaffod · · Score: 1

      Much like, say, the ability to spell, I would expect any PhD to have the common sense not to put the only copy of their half decade's hard work on one storage known to be very error prone. I think even a high school degree is dubious for the architect of such a masterful plan.

      Besides, AC is obviously joking. What is this, some kind of sweatshop ultra tough school where you lock up the students in a bunker for 5 years and either the dissertation is good or screw them? The grad students I know email theirs to the prof every few days at least.

  2. in b4 the flamewar? by isama · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    lol, 10 years and it isn't stable yet :P

    1. Re:in b4 the flamewar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, basically.

    2. Re:in b4 the flamewar? by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      No. It was stable, then they broke it.

    3. Re:in b4 the flamewar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True. Why does Linux suck so bad? Every 6 months Ubuntu breaks something.

      Heh, if we made slashdot front page stories about those forum posts then even fewer than 1% would use Linux. But ofcource we just have to publicize forum posts about XP problems to give a skewed opinion. Oh well..

    4. Re:in b4 the flamewar? by Ltap · · Score: 1

      Reading the Ubuntu forums isn't a good measure of anything. Most of the people on it are just ex-Windows users who want someone to hold their hand while they use Linux.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
  3. Did you see the solution? by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

    All I keep hearing in my head is:
    They put the update in, you take the update out!
    They put the update in, shake your laptop all about!
    "You do the hokey pokey and you uninstall the patch! That's what it's all about!"

    "ooooh... the windows bluescreen."
    "ooooh... the windows bluescreen."
    "ooooh... the windows bluescreen."
    "That's what it's all about!"

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    1. Re:Did you see the solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      there's a fix available here: http://www.ubuntu.com/

    2. Re:Did you see the solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Apple marketers are just givin' their ideas away on Slashdot these days.

    3. Re:Did you see the solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I keep hearing in my head is:
      They put the update in, you take the update out!
      They put the update in, shake your laptop all about!
      "You do the hokey pokey and you uninstall the patch! That's what it's all about!"

      "ooooh... the windows bluescreen."
      "ooooh... the windows bluescreen."
      "ooooh... the windows bluescreen."
      "That's what it's all about!"

      Did anyone else read this in Londo Mollari's voice?

    4. Re:Did you see the solution? by soporific16 · · Score: 1

      deserves an infinity of mod points, totally hilarious

    5. Re:Did you see the solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually rather fantastic and a quick Google says that no-one else has thought of it before, which is a rare thing these days. Kudos!

    6. Re:Did you see the solution? by Bovius · · Score: 1

      Thank you. You made my day.

  4. Saw this last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I saw and fixed a similar issue in January. A particular KB had patched a .dll that was in fact rootkit infected, breaking the reference to some function call. Windows BSOD'd, claiming the whole partition was unmountable. Rolled back the KB in Recovery Console, sanitized the OS, and reapplied the KB. Problem solved.

    1. Re:Saw this last month by Dorkmunder · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the comments over a DShield on this topic http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=8209 it looks like this might be the case again

    2. Re:Saw this last month by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Does the Windows update process, in fact, just naively apply patches to files that have the correct name and path, without verifying hashes or signatures, thus running a very high risk of breaking hard any file that had been slightly modified?

      Or was this some subtler and more complex situation, where the modified file itself was fine; but some tampered-with component was depending on the precise behavior of the modified file?

    3. Re:Saw this last month by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      But why would that be a problem for them? The files they are updating are in their charge so no one else should be updating them. Do you mean a conflict with their own previous releases?

      That being said signatures are a feature of security updates and any other software released by MS; They always sign their releases. Not sure about hash checking.

    4. Re:Saw this last month by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Does the Windows update process, in fact, just naively apply patches to files that have the correct name and path, without verifying hashes or signatures, thus running a very high risk of breaking hard any file that had been slightly modified?

      You didn't seem to comprehend what was written.

      The idea is not that the library which was patched was previously modified, but that another rogue process was making an inter-process call by reference to one of its procedures. A rogue process would do this if it doesnt want to have a normal reference to the library (possibly to avoid detection.. aka rootkit), instead relying on the fact that this library is always loaded (by something specific.)

      The rogue would need to be ring0 to make such an inter-process direct call, and would need to be ring0 to exhibit such a blue screen as well. The rogue authors were apparently lazy and didn't derive the relative address of the procedure at runtime, instead using just hardcoded an offset.

      Even if your theory that the library was previously modified were true, all trace of that modification would be removed when its replaced. Your logic just doesnt fit the reality of how things work. Code that used to be there but isnt now can't cause a blue-screen, since it no longer exists. Apparently you are not a (at least decent) programmer.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    5. Re:Saw this last month by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Windows has tried to protect its own files when running for years; even XP had some form of protection. (E.g. replacing uxtheme.dll I think took a little handiwork so that Windows wouldn't immediately replace it with the old version.)

      In order to get around this, malware already hides changes from the system; e.g. intercepting ReadFile calls to that file and returning incorrect (but expected) results would do the trick.

    6. Re:Saw this last month by tftp · · Score: 1

      The files they are updating are in their charge so no one else should be updating them.

      As you say, there can be a conflict with their own, earlier patches. A file can be patched several times, by different KBs. If some are skipped, a patch will be applied to a wrong file.

    7. Re:Saw this last month by Johnno74 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does the Windows update process, in fact, just naively apply patches to files that have the correct name and path, without verifying hashes or signatures, thus running a very high risk of breaking hard any file that had been slightly modified?

      Or was this some subtler and more complex situation, where the modified file itself was fine; but some tampered-with component was depending on the precise behavior of the modified file?

      Sounds like that is exactly what this is. The file being patched isn't infected, but the rootkit has some dependancy on the exact layout of this file, and when the file is updated by the patch the rootkit (accidently) causes a bluescreen. Possibly the rootkit tries to patch the in-memory image of this file, which messes things up.

      What I find really frightening about this situation is how widespread the rootkit that is causing this problem is. Most people have no idea they were infected. (and still do, they are blaming microsoft)
      MS is really gonna cop some flak for this one. Unfortunately this rootkit seems to be so stealthy that its damn hard to tell if the machine is infected until its too late and your machine won't boot.

      A machine that had been on our network has the patch yesterday and won't boot, could be some be _very_ interesting when we roll out the patch via SUS to the rest of the machines in the network and smoke out how many are really infected.

  5. Note to self: clone hard disk before rebooting . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    . . . my Windows XP updates get pushed, pulled or shoved down my throat . . . this sounds like an excellent reason to clone my hard disk before rebooting, and logging on to my company's network . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  6. Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by Antiocheian · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Here is a list of Microsoft stuff to remove from your XP slipstream:

    Automatic Updates (for reasons related to the article)
    Windows media player (including 6.4) because it downloads codecs at will.
    Accessibility Options (unless you need them)
    ClipBook Viewer (useless)
    Games
    Internet Games
    NT Backup (use a modern backup)
    Paint
    Pinball
    Screensavers
    WordPad (use openoffice for that)
    ActiveX for streaming video
    AOL ART Image Format Support
    Images and Backgrounds
    Intel Indeo codecs
    Media Center
    Mouse Cursors
    Movie Maker
    Music Samples
    Old CDPlayer and Sound Recorder
    Client for Netware Networks
    Communication tools
    Comtrol Test Terminal Program
    FrontPage Extensions
    H323 MSP
    Internet Connection Wizard
    IP Conferencing
    MSN Explorer
    Netmeeting
    Network Setup Wizard
    NWLink IPX/SPX/NetBIOS Protocol
    Peer-to-Peer
    Share Creation Wizard
    Synchronization Manager
    Vector Graphics Rendering (VML)
    Windows Messenger .NET Framework
    Blaster/Nachi removal tool (get Avira!)
    Color Schemes
    Desktop Cleanup Wizard (just have clean desktop)
    Disk Cleanup (CCleaner instead)
    Document Templates
    DR Watson
    Extensible Storage Engine (Esent97) (Ancient)
    File and Settings Wizard (Useless)
    Help and Support (Utterly useless)
    IExpress Wizard
    Manual Install and Upgrade (Just keep good system backups)
    MS Agent
    MS XML 2.0
    Out of Box Experience (OOBE)
    Search Assistant (the dog)
    Service Pack Messages
    Shell Media Handler
    Symbolic Debugger (NTSD)
    Tour
    Web View
    Zip Folders (rar instead)
    Error Reporting
    IMAPI CD-Burning COM Service (imgburn for these old devices)
    System Restore Service
    Hardware shell detection (this is one of the pieces that allow USB viruses to run in the first place)

    1. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here is a list of Microsoft stuff to remove from your XP slipstream:

      Automatic Updates (for reasons related to the article)
      Windows media player (including 6.4) because it downloads codecs at will.
      Accessibility Options (unless you need them)
      ClipBook Viewer (useless)
      Games
      Internet Games ...

      Long list, wouldn't it be simpler to just remove Windows XP in it's entirety from your PC and replace it with something else?

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    2. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by pjfontillas · · Score: 1

      This list is obviously sarcastic. You're right, though, about simply removing XP in it's entirety and replacing it with something else.

      --
      Life. Is. Good.
    3. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by pluther · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But then how will I run Mass Effect 2?

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    4. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by buswolley · · Score: 2, Funny

      Keep Pinball. I love that old game. Very well done, and might be the best Win software ever.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    5. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      But then how will I run Mass Effect 2?

      Oh, quit your WINEing...

    6. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a list of Microsoft stuff to remove from your XP slipstream:

      Automatic Updates (for reasons related to the article)
      Windows media player (including 6.4) because it downloads codecs at will.
      Accessibility Options (unless you need them)
      ClipBook Viewer (useless)
      Games
      Internet Games ...

      Long list, wouldn't it be simpler to just remove Windows XP in it's entirety from your PC and replace it with something else?

      THAT'S THE JOKE.

    7. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by jo42 · · Score: 1

      That's a long and complicated way to do a Format C: and leave the drive blank...

    8. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      Just download one of the very good stripped versions from a torrent site. There should be one available by now with the needed updates without the unneeded trash programs, files and junk MS likes to install.

    9. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by Again · · Score: 1

      Keep Pinball. I love that old game. Very well done, and might be the best Win software ever.

      This.

      A while ago I reinstalled Windows on my laptop just to play Pinball again. If someone can point out an alternative I would be very thankful.

    10. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by Plekto · · Score: 0, Troll

      Here is a list of Microsoft stuff to remove from your XP slipstream:

      (snip enormous list of junk)

      If you rip out all of that, though, you're left with essentially the same interface and options as a normal install of Linux or Mint. Ie - you have to find and download everything piece by piece and install it one at a time, which is no different at all than finding stuff from a distro server and doing it that way.

      Well, except that it's still a less stable OS with the same learning curve if you are a new user who's never used Windows before(yes, some do exist...)

      Not trolling here. Just, to make Windows stable as Linux, well, you have to strip it down almost to Linux levels anyways, so why bother with the headache?

    11. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by ls671 · · Score: 1

      > Remove automatic updates from your slipstream

      I agree with the item above, but for the rest are you crazy ?

      I wouldn't spend anytime fine tuning that much because Windows doesn't deserve so much attention ;-)

      I have to admit that I shutdown-set to manual startup-or disable a lot of services although. Apart from that, I never do any specific configuration (desktop/shortcut/task bar/etc.).

      I use Windows to play games, edit MS-Documents and watch videos since I stopped installing video support (flash etc..) on my Linux machines. I also use my Windows box to login into Xvnc sessions running on my Linux hosts and this is where the most of the real work takes place.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    12. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by zoloto · · Score: 1

      Those who are going through the trouble of slipstreaming their systems are already going through enough of a mess to get it done right. This list is small in comparison to some of the ones I've seen.

    13. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I like Pinball! That is a critical app, you jerk!

    14. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd post non-anon... but....

      I would remove NTBackup as a completely useless POS. Have you ever tried to RESTORE from shredded 0's and 1's NTBackup leaves?

      It was so entirely useless that it has been replaced with wbadmin utility in 2008 R2. Even that system sucks rocks, but appears to at least have basic functionality and does allow for some semblance of restoration.

      There's a reason real backup software for windows costs thousands. And to think you get the ability to clone your system for free with all *nix systems. (dd, or, for macs asr)

    15. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      So your saying Linux is only stable because it offers so much less functionality?

    16. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by buswolley · · Score: 1

      A lot of the alternatives are poorly done. The Win pinball game has a lot of depth, balance, and chances for strategy. Its a great game of pinball.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    17. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any program that will remove all this stuff for you? It seems like it would take a lot of time to do it by hand.

    18. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      Why use an illegal spyware ridden torrent copy ?

      Just use nLite for customizing an XP install, or vLite for a custom vista* install. Both tools do a very good job of creating lightweight Windows installations.

      (*although WHY anyone would still be running vista, is beyond me.)

      -Jar

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    19. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      See This Comment

      -Jar

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    20. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by Antiocheian · · Score: 1

      I'm using Linux (Slackware) but not as a generic-purpose OS as XP. The problem with Mint (and Ubuntu) is that it is much slower on older systems than XP and doesn't offer the same level of compatibility.

      I am considering upgrading my systems to go to a full Mint installation, but the problem is the landfill I can't justify the landfill.

    21. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      But can you still play a mean pinball with no speakers, keyboard or monitor?

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    22. Re:Remove automatic updates from your slipstream by Plekto · · Score: 1

      So your saying Linux is only stable because it offers so much less functionality?

      In a way, yes. Part of it is bad coding and adherence to the idea that it must be backwards compatible at all costs, but the majority of the reason that Windows fails is because of the bloat. The reason Linux is stable is because you have to build the OS from the ground up for each individual machine since it doesn't come with the gigabyte or two of bloat and cruft. If the first thing that you have to do is rip out half of XP and/or Windows 7 to make it clean and stable, and then build it up again to your exact needs, why not just do that with something that isn't full of DRM, stuff you can't actually remove, and of course, is free?

      XP isn't so bad, really. What worries me is that Microsoft is heading in the same direction as Google and Apple and the rest of these mega-corporations and leaving the consumer as essentially a peasant with no control and no real options. Windows 7 is almost as restrictive and anal about limiting your choices a typical gaming console. Yes, it's "better" than XP. But it also is very much like Apple in that you're forced to take it or leave it as-is. Given that XP has about a 2-3 year grace period left before you'll be required to install Windows 7 to run most games and applications, this is not merely a theoretical problem.

      Here is a comment from another person about what I said:


      I'm using Linux (Slackware) but not as a generic-purpose OS as XP. The problem with Mint (and Ubuntu) is that it is much slower on older systems than XP and doesn't offer the same level of compatibility.

      I am considering upgrading my systems to go to a full Mint installation, but the problem is the landfill I can't justify the landfill.

      And that's the rub. If you want a full-blown multimedia capable OS that can handle what most people want to use their computers for, it's going to be a bit of a bloated and unwieldy beast. On the other hand, every time I install Windows on a machine for a client, I spend another 1-2 hours cleaning, removing, and installing applications one by one to get it into a proper "clean" state. The time difference between that and configuring Mint is roughly a wash. I like Mint only because it saves me a good hour or so installing the stuff 99% of us have to install anyways.

      As for the speed issue, well, compared to Windows 7 and a the need for a full system replacement(or nearly so) if you're running "older hardware", it's a lot more livable.

  7. Liars! by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know how I know they are lying? They are posting complaints online. We designed this patch -specifically- to stop online complaints about updates. They clearly haven't actually updated.

    -Bill Gates

    1. Re:Liars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, after old Bill left his position at Microsoft, I don't think these kind of jokes are funny anymore.

      You should have signed with Ballmer's name. :]

  8. What? by dangitman · · Score: 5, Funny

    'I updated 11 Windows XP updates today...

    You updated your updates? You're doing it wrong.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:What? by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 4, Funny

      To be fair, his computer had just been pimped by Xzibit...

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    2. Re:What? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      You updated your updates?

      Its a real mark of how comitted MS is to security that they update their updates to their updates, and all require restarts.

    3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yo dawg...

    4. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it became customary for windows updates to break things and then later issue another update to fix what the previous one broke. Yes, updating your updates may be wrong, but trust me, it's happening.

    5. Re:What? by BlueParrot · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yo Dawg! We heard you like updates...

    6. Re:What? by azenpunk · · Score: 1

      Someone heard that he liked to blue-screen while he booted.

    7. Re:What? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      You wish. With MS I have more than once seen an update, that fixed a buggy update, that should have fixed a bug included in a service pack. ^^
      I distinctively remember one for MS Office, somewhere before Office XP.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    8. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo dawg, I heard you like updates so we crashed your windows...

  9. Need confirmation by dave562 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    An MVP poster in the thread claims that KB977165 causes the problem, and that the problem only occurs on computers that have been compromised by exploit code. The patch in question patches the NT kernel executable files.

    If it is true that only compromised computers blue screen then it's hard to fault Microsoft for their patch code choking when it stumbles across the exploit code.

    I wonder if they are going to push out an updated patch that at least performs some sort of sanity checking before attempting to modify the files. I doubt it. They'll just pass the buck and tell users that their computers were already hosed and that the BSOD is a "feature" and that they should have re-installed the OS anyway (because we all know that once your Windows box is pwnt, the only way to deal with it is full format and re-install).

    1. Re:Need confirmation by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If it is true that only compromised computers blue screen then it's hard to fault Microsoft for their patch code choking when it stumbles across the exploit code.

      It's pretty easy to fault them for not taking a checksum before they patch to ensure that the file isn't modified. If it is, warn the user.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Need confirmation by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      One extreme measure is to use software like Deep Freeze, coupled with an antivirus program. Maybe a good ad blocker firewall to prevent malicious ads from infecting one's machine.

    3. Re:Need confirmation by RobDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sort of.....

      You can't really blame MS for a crash that happens because the .DLLs/code on someone's machine has been modified by a malicious 3rd party.

      But, you can expect an MS (or any other OS) to take appropriate actions to avoid patching a file that isn't exactly what is expected.

      What you'd really hope for, is that when a problem is detected during the update process (IE - Crap - this .DLL isn't the .DLL we expect. Something is wrong!' - instead of modifying the .DLL it would present the user with some meaningful information like, 'Hey - this patch failed. You probably have a virus....you should get that fixed'. Or something similar.

      It's possible that the patch took some reasonable efforts to ensure the patch would only be applied as expected; but I don't know. I do know that, even if it did, it didn't work.

      There is a world of difference between an 'infected' Windows machine that has some annoying pop-ups showing up every 15 minutes, but is otherwise functional, and a Windows machine that won't boot because of a recently installed patch.

    4. Re:Need confirmation by ircmaxell · · Score: 1

      You hit the nail on the head. IF the errors are caused by "compromised" dlls that are then patched, then TRWTF is that there is no sanity checking on the file. Hashes, signature checks, signing the files, etc... And if it did find a difference, don't just overwrite the file blindly, stop the update and tell someone that a file isn't how it should be... Then again, asking for something useful out of the Event Logger is like asking an infant to read and understand Einstein's General Theory of Relativity...

      --
      If a man isn't willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he's no good
    5. Re:Need confirmation by russotto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is a world of difference between an 'infected' Windows machine that has some annoying pop-ups showing up every 15 minutes, but is otherwise functional, and a Windows machine that won't boot because of a recently installed patch.

      Yeah. The owner of the machine would rather have the former... while everyone else on the Internet would rather they had the latter, as the former is probably sending out spam and trying to infect every other machine it can find as well.

    6. Re:Need confirmation by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was thinking that perhaps mebbe they should have a backup copy of that pre-patched kernel somewhere and give you the option to boot from it as a failsafe.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wans under the impression the "patch" replaces the file and not just binary diff so it shouldn't matter what the old one was.

    8. Re:Need confirmation by dave562 · · Score: 1

      The Event Logging service is only as useful as the programmer writing the logging events. On my Proliant servers I find that it does a great job of reporting on hardware faults before they become failures. On the other hand with numerous applications I find myself having to dig through log files when I'd much rather they just wrote their errors into the Application log, so I feel your pain. A tool is only useful if it used correctly.

    9. Re:Need confirmation by ircmaxell · · Score: 1

      Well, try debugging a driver issue with the event log. Or any "core" issue with windows for that matter. Even kernel errors (Segmentation faults and the such) aren't logged... Sure, Applications themselves can log useful information, but what ever happened to the operating system logging abnormalities?

      --
      If a man isn't willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he's no good
    10. Re:Need confirmation by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      The problem is not the checksum in these cases, if you have a compromised machine it is likely the compromising code has hooks and or drivers in the system, the result of then replacing what looks like a normal kernel to any checksum is it breaks the exploit code and hence blue screen the machine, unless you know to explicitly look for the exploit code you are pretty well hosed in detecting it during patching.

    11. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... They'll just pass the buck and tell users that their computers were already hosed and that the BSOD is a "feature" and that they should have re-installed the OS anyway (because we all know that once your Windows box is pwnt, the only way to deal with it is full format and re-install).

      You mean buy a new copy of Windows and then reinstall.

    12. Re:Need confirmation by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      The patch is probably not to the same files as the exploit, but one uses the other.

    13. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One extreme measure is to use software like Deep Freeze, coupled with an antivirus program.

      It looks like this problem is actually caused by an antivirus program. Most antivirus programs use undocumented Windows functions, and change how windows works in ways that break Windows updates.
      This is the perfect example that using an antivirus program instead of fixing security holes in the operating system security model is not a practical solution.

    14. Re:Need confirmation by bertok · · Score: 4, Informative

      If it is true that only compromised computers blue screen then it's hard to fault Microsoft for their patch code choking when it stumbles across the exploit code.

      It's pretty easy to fault them for not taking a checksum before they patch to ensure that the file isn't modified. If it is, warn the user.

      Microsoft patches are file-level, not delta-patches. They always overwrite complete files, and never try to modify files in-place.

      That's why their patches are so huge, if there's a systematic error in many related files, then they all need to be replaced in their entirety.

      It's a waste of bandwidth, but it's much more reliable.

      I suspect what happened here is that Microsoft replaced one of two related files, but the other file was modified by the root-kit, and the mixed versions don't work together any more.

    15. Re:Need confirmation by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This doesnt make sense.

      Even if the file was modified, over-writing it with a valid one will not cause a problem under normal operation.

      When the file is over-written, those modifications that you are thinking of are gone. The modifications can't come back from the grave as ghosts and cause a problem.

      The only way there can be a problem is if 'something else' is making an assumption about that file incorrectly, and that does not mean that the assumption is that the file has been modified. More likely the assumption that it will NEVER be modified, which leads to the likely conclusion that it was in fact never modified. The file was exactly as expected by the updater and no matter how many times or ways you run a hash on it, equal is equal.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    16. Re:Need confirmation by initialE · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's bad news for Microsoft at so many levels -
      1. it's a 17-year-old bug
      2. The disclosure and proof-of-concept attack was done by Google, clearly not Microsoft's best friend
      3. Microsoft was forced to release a patch that is not fully tested
      4. The cure is worse than the illness
      5. Lots of windows users find out they have been compromised for how long? Nobody really knows!
      6. The only remedy now is to restore your computer to it's previous state, which means you carry on using your computer in it's compromised state

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    17. Re:Need confirmation by Erikderzweite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good idea, besides, it's not like such thing hasn't been done by others before.

    18. Re:Need confirmation by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      It's pretty easy to fault them for not taking a checksum before they patch to ensure that the file isn't modified. If it is, warn the user.

      root kits go to great lengths to hide. They could very well intercept the calls to read the infected file and return the correct version, which would result in an MD5 sum that looks perfectly valid.

    19. Re:Need confirmation by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      What are these "ads" you speak of?

    20. Re:Need confirmation by ashridah · · Score: 1

      Sanity checking in this case won't have been helpful if a separate process was making assumptions about offsets in the code in the dll, instead of looking up the appropriate symbol. you know, the kind of things that rootkits do to try and avoid detection?
      I hardly think it's reasonable for a patch to scan every single file, including ones that don't come from microsoft at all, to look for things that might, possibly, be trying to call a method by directly referencing an offset in a dll via a backdoor mechanism.
      Your TRWTF would only make sense if there were binary diffs involved, which have never been the case. The offset of a method moves, the only things that fail are things that aren't playing by the rules (read, malware, and the occasional idiotic 3rd party)

    21. Re:Need confirmation by dave562 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, admins who know what they are doing aren't having any problems. I rolled the patch out to 200+ workstations and didn't get a single blue screen. Of course "knowing what you're doing" also unfortunately equates to "spending lots of money on 'security products'". Not everyone can have an IDS and a Websense box integrated with their firewall, plus up to date AV on their desktop. Not that AV is even worth anything these days. Wasn't there just an article on here in the last day or two that mentioned only 24% of recently discovered exploit code was even detected by anti-virus software?

    22. Re:Need confirmation by hozozco · · Score: 1

      At workstation level - but I ALWAYS Ghost my c:\ drive before applying updates. Painful, but it has paid off big time on occasions. :-)

    23. Re:Need confirmation by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's pretty easy to fault them for not taking a checksum before they patch to ensure that the file isn't modified. If it is, warn the user.

      You're both missing what's actually happening here.

      1} The "patch code" doesn't choke. The patched kernel does next reboot.
      2} The patch doesn't touch the infected file.

      The problem appears to be a compromised atapi.sys driver. Is it really reasonable for Microsoft's patch to the kernel to react gracefully to whatever corruption is present in that driver? I know the obvious is that Windows should fail gracefully on any fault, but really... we don't have any clue what's present in that file.

      Summary: patch patches the kernel. Kernel tries to initialize a compromised driver. BSOD.

      Extra stuff...

      I actually encountered such a machine this morning. This was pretty much while folks were realizing what was going on, before we collectively knew WHICH patch was responsible. I backed out the offending patch and got the system back up. I then found the box was WinXP Pro SP2, so I applied SP3. The SP3 install choked while examining the environment, saying that something had a handle on ATAPI.SYS Well, being a tech, I fired up some tools, found a system process had the handle, closed it, and let SP3 continue. I then patched up everything else. Finally, I reinstalled KB977165. Lo and behold, the system worked fine. So in hindsight I can see that yeah, something was funky about that file in particular. Malware or not, something wasn't right about it. For the record, the system in question did have current AV (Norton 360) and was behind a simple NAT router but the user did have admin rights. Zero other signs of infection.

      For all we know we're going to find out that this was actually some bull-crap DRM solution.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    24. Re:Need confirmation by Myria · · Score: 1

      The fix for the KiTrap0D V86 bug was really simple and straightforward. The below explanation is for XP, but it's likely similar for all versions.

      A previously unused byte field, KTHREAD::Spare0[0], has been repurposed as a flag indicating whether a call out to the PC (or VGA) BIOS is in progress on that thread in V86 mode. V86 mode in 32-bit NT is used not just to emulate DOS programs, but also to make calls to the PC and VGA BIOS for things like setting the video mode. Of course, these calls to the BIOS are privileged while virtualized DOS programs are not. The security hole was that the general protection fault handler for V86 mode (part of KiTrap0D) did not properly distinguish between faults coming from BIOS calls and faults coming from virtual DOS programs.

      The new flag is set by Ki386SetupAndExitToV86Code, which is called by Ke386CallBios, when the kernel is attempting to do a BIOS call. KiTrap0D now only allows the BIOS return call mechanism, which led to the privileged escalation, to be called when that flag is set.

      If this change causes people's computers to crash, it probably means that there is kernel code that calls the BIOS in some way than the usual way, and Microsoft didn't account for that. Such code could be part of the kernel, supporting drivers, or third-party device drivers.

      --
      "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
    25. Re:Need confirmation by dave562 · · Score: 1

      what ever happened to the operating system logging abnormalities?

      Oh come on now, you know how this works! It isn't a bug, it's a feature. After all, if nothing is being logged, obviously there isn't anything wrong!

    26. Re:Need confirmation by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Given what you've said, it tends to lend some credence to the statement that only modified kernels are having problems. From the little I remember about writing virii code in the days of DOS, we were always looking to grab interrupts (primarily INT13 to get at the drive). If Microsoft changed the interrupt handling behavior of the kernel then any malware code that attempts to execute will probably bork the system.

    27. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Situations like this is what you get from a company that has no real need to improve. Pre-load contracts and user indoctrination assures that. I have users that can't understand that a Start menu is not imperative for a properly functioning spreadsheet. I have seen these idiots in university, losing work left and right. I can feel only so much sorrow for them, but at some point it's time to leave them there weeping in the lab and move on.

    28. Re:Need confirmation by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      If it is true that only compromised computers blue screen then it's hard to fault Microsoft for their patch code choking when it stumbles across the exploit code.

      However it is easy to blame Microsoft for not testing on real-world (i.e. exploited) systems, or to blame them for allowing it to be so easy to exploit a Windows XP system.

    29. Re:Need confirmation by dave562 · · Score: 1

      However it is easy to blame Microsoft for not testing on real-world (i.e. exploited) systems

      You're kidding me, right? What do you suggest? Should Microsoft work with malware coders to ensure that their exploit code continues to function after patching? Maybe they should code in a prompt. "Your computer is infected with a virus. Applying this patch will prevent your computer from functioning. Nothing short of a complete reinstall is going to fix your computer even if we don't BSOD it right now, but do you want to continue using it anyway?" I mean come on. I doubt they could even do such a thing if they wanted to. If they intentionally coded around exploit code so that a system would continue to function with known malicious code on it, they'd be raked over the coals not only in the press but also in the courtroom.

      Now granted, having your computer go down after an auto update because it was compromised is a pretty crappy thing to have happen. On the other hand, I'm glad that there are that many fewer compromised boxes on the net for the next couple of days.

    30. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does any update checksum a file before patching? How common is this?

    31. Re:Need confirmation by steelfood · · Score: 1

      But, you can expect an MS (or any other OS) to take appropriate actions to avoid patching a file that isn't exactly what is expected.

      Not quite. It's very possible that the bad code is in a module that uses the patched module. The patch breaks a certain call, and the bad code crashes and burns, taking the whole system with it.

      It's actually a pretty good way of getting people to clean their systems up. I say they should keep doing it.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    32. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, of course! A rootkit could never infect the backup copy!

      Once you are rooted, all bets are off.

    33. Re:Need confirmation by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      If the kernel is rooted, the checksum of the altered file from the running instance of the rooted OS would appear fine. That's the beauty of a rootkit.

      Windows XP already has a built-in checksumming system file checker. Unfortunately, the only way you'll see the rootkit is by booting from alternate media.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    34. Re:Need confirmation by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      Oh good lord! You should not trust that machine!

      I don't know how many times I need to say it, I get calls about this all day escalated from the Help Desk.

      If your system has a rootkit installed, you just plain cannot trust anything you see. You can't trust the SP3 installer. You can't trust Antivirus. You can't trust MalwareBytes. You can't trust System File Checker. You can't trust -anything- that you see from inside the rooted system. Why? Because the way rootkits work is to infect the kernel, say with a modified 'atapi.sys', then intercept when calls for 'atapi.sys' are made from the VFS, and return non-infected code back. For all you know, the write call to replace 'atapi.sys' from SP3 was intercepted and the old rooted one is still doing its business.

      The only way to be somewhat confident is to scan the machine from known-good media, like another booted instance of the OS, a boot disk, or something like that.

      The only way to be -really- confident is to format the drive from sector 0 and reinstall.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    35. Re:Need confirmation by RobDude · · Score: 1

      It's all just speculation without seeing the source code (or, if it's your thing, spending a lot of time looking at the asm).

      But, there are really only two possibilities....either

      1.) The bad code is making a call into OS code that is affected by the patch and it *used* to work but doesn't.

      In that case, you can blame MS for not enforcing backwards compatibility. Any program, malicious or not, is now broken.

      2.) The patch changed some data in OS code that would have been fine, except that the OS code was in a modified state because some malicious code changed it.

      If it's two - you can blame MS for patching something that was already invalid. You can also blame MS for allowing OS code to be modified by a 3rd party, since MS is also responsible for the OS.

      Either way, I think MS should get some blame. Yes, it would be great if people didn't let their computers get infected; but certainly, there is enough blame to go around.

    36. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that the bug 1) requires the user to execute code and 2) uses the 16-bit DOS subsystem, I suspect very few people have been compromised, and it is just idiots trolling some stupid MS forum.

    37. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A well designed rootkit means that the patcher cannot tell that the file has been modified.

    38. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For all we know we're going to find out that this was actually some bull-crap DRM solution.

      Oh please oh please oh please let Starforce or SecuROM take a hit on this one.

    39. Re:Need confirmation by bit01 · · Score: 1

      It's a waste of bandwidth, but it's much more reliable.

      With before and after checksumming there is no reason why this should be more reliable. This is just another example of M$'s lack of professionalism, that's all. Wasting enormous amounts of user bandwidth (and time!) because they can't be bothered doing it right.

      ---

      DRM'ed content breaks the copyright bargain, the first sale doctrine and fair use provisions. It should not be possible to copyright DRM'ed content.

    40. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows Update uses delta updates and delta binaries. And their updates are not huge considering files patches for each update.

    41. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't really blame MS for a crash that happens because the .DLLs/code on someone's machine has been modified by a malicious 3rd party.

      This is slashdot, yes you can!

    42. Re:Need confirmation by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      For the record, the system in question did have current AV (Norton 360)

      For the record, I wouldn't consider that AV. Consider replacing it with Avira.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    43. Re:Need confirmation by Caue · · Score: 1

      he was probably talking about the home users. "your computer" is not "the computer you use at work". for those, there's no geeky IT dude to tell them to reboot the pc every 5 minutes.

    44. Re:Need confirmation by Rogerborg · · Score: 1
      What's a kernel? Are there squirrels in my computer? Hank, there's squirrels in the computer again! Call Billy and get him to fix it.

      Hint: you're Billy. We're all Billy.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    45. Re:Need confirmation by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      Oh good lord! You should not trust that machine!

      Completely understood. For brevity I summarized my actions. My work was done in a PE environment, outside of any root-kitted OS. I compared the binary of the SP3 version of ATAPI.SYS after its install relative to a known stable environment and there were no binary diffs.

      I get it that the box in general is never going to be trustworthy again. In my opinion it never was because the end-user had and still has admin rights. Fortunately its role is not one where this is a meaningful threat. It's not on a domain and it doesn't have a business role. The owner uses it for basic web surfing at best, and printing shipping labels from a template that never changes.

      I can't justify a nuke & load on it when due to his desires he gets admin rights. The box won't be hardened so this is just going to happen again. The best I could reasonably do was update it and purge anything evident.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    46. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1546966&cid=31108534 one needs to copy atapi.dll from the windows cd to fix this issue. I believe that this is the/a cd driver. If this is case, it could be DRM that causes this issue.

    47. Re:Need confirmation by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      1.) The bad code is making a call into OS code that is affected by the patch and it *used* to work but doesn't.
      1a) the bad code is making a call into OS code but for some reason is using byte offsets rather than the files symbol table.

      If this is the case you can't really blame MS, it's normal and expected that byte offsets will change when files are modified to fix bugs etc and there is no real way for a patcher to see that bad code is relying on them.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    48. Re:Need confirmation by Ltap · · Score: 1

      "These aren't the DLLs you're looking for."

      Obi-Wan Kenobi, hacker to the stars.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    49. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You overlooked some important factors:
      1) This is the best indication that you are infected. If the update doesn't work, you definitly have an infected WinBox. Oh, and if you aren't literate enough to fix this problem yourself you are forced to proceed to step 2, the most important part.
      2) You should proceed to back-up files, format and reinstall windows.
      3) Everyone is clean again, and laziness has no factor in determining said malicious code is perpetuated.

    50. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...because exploits have never been known to intercept the file read and report back the contents of the original file which is stored elsewhere.

    51. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except doing that is an elementary procedure during software updates and I'm sure they did that. The problem is that any half decently written malware/virus is going to intercept the request and do a bit by bit replay of the original file which it backed up somewhere else.

    52. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a waste of bandwidth, but it's much more reliable.

      With before and after checksumming there is no reason why this should be more reliable. This is just another example of M$'s lack of professionalism, that's all. Wasting enormous amounts of user bandwidth (and time!) because they can't be bothered doing it right.

      Only in a world where it is absolutely impossible for an infected file to return a valid checksum value. IMHO, assuming we live in such a world is unwise and potentially unsafe.

    53. Re:Need confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could blame MS for shipping, since forever, completely insecure and broken 32-bit operating systems that are so easily pwned in the first place. If the file(s) weren't corrupted by malware the patch would work, therefore it makes sense to make file(s) more difficult to corrupt, yes? But they don't, and haven't, since at least Windows 95. If you don't have professional scars on your back from Win 95, remember how well Vista worked out?

      If we can scream at Ford/Firestone or Toyota for shipping dangerous garbage while pretending there were no problems, the same logic applies to a huge software monopoly with enough money to build it right but which repeatedly refuses to produce software that is secure and that has high quality and reliability (which are not the same things).

      In short, f*ck Microsoft. Once more they show that users are the unfortunate collateral damage of their rapacious profiteering and that MS doesn't care. If you think I'm making up how much MS doesn't care, or that I'm some sort of fanboy for another OS, I refer you to Bill Gates' testimony in federal court back in the late 1990s. His performance made MS look so bad that they hid Gates from view for months and then re-introduced him as Bill Gates V2.0: without a tie, with different glasses, and surrounded by children. They even got him married.

      http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19981116&slug=2783886

      Boies asked, "Do you remember what you were thinking when you wrote that sentence or what you mean when you wrote that sentence?"

      Gates: "No."

      Boies: "Do you remember that in January 1996, a lot of (computer makers) were bundling non-Microsoft browsers?"

      Gates: "I'm not sure."

      Boies: "What were the non-Microsoft browsers that you were concerned about in January of 1996?"

      Gates: "What's the question? You're trying to get me to recall what other browsers I was thinking about when I wrote that sentence?"

      Boies: "No, because you've told me you don't know what you were thinking about when you wrote that sentence."

      Gates: "Right."

      Boies: "What I'm trying to do is get you to tell me what non-Microsoft browsers you were concerned about in January of 1996."

      Gates: "If it had been only one, I probably would have used the name of it. Instead, I seem to be using the term non-Microsoft browsers."

      Boies: "My question is what non-Microsoft browsers were you concerned about in January of 1996?"

      Gates: "I'm sure - what's the question? Is it - are you asking me about when I wrote this e-mail or what are you asking me about?"

      Boies: "I'm asking you about January of 1996."

      Gates: "That month?"

      Boies: "Yes, sir."

      Gates: "And what about it?"

      Boies: "What non-Microsoft browsers were you concerned about in January of 1996?"

      Gates: "I don't know what you mean, `concerned.' "

      Boies: "What is it about the word `concerned' that you don't understand?"

      Gates: "I'm not sure what you mean by it."

      And so on...

      PS I'm submitting as AC because I work in a BIG Windows shop and don't need people beating me up about this anymore. In many ways it isn't helpful when everything you say comes true and all the money and time and data you said would be wasted or lost is wasted and lost: people start looking for ways to shut you up or make you disappear, and I like to eat.

  10. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And people will still be ignoring it.

  11. Re:Note to self: clone hard disk before rebooting by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Good idea. I have my updates set to ask to download and ask to install. On download I'm reminded I need a backup, so I shut down the system without installing the updates, do the backup, boot to install, reboot, cross fingers.

    Is anyone doing rsync backups (ooh, maybe even snapshots) of XP? Can rsync handle all the fs info needed to get a good backup? Right now I am indeed imaging the whole drive.

  12. Intentional? by Jawshie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well duh... How is Microsoft supposed to make any more money from you if they don't trash their old OS?

    1. Re:Intentional? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      And *THIS* is the reason why automatic updates should be disabled. We've come to the point where viruses are more benign than the same friggin' company that designed the OS.

      Yeah, viruses send SPAM. Yeah, viruses keep stealing data. But do they disable your computer completely? The last virus that did this, IIRC, was the "stoned" virus.

      And now you can't even trust Microsoft. Who knows what will break with tomorrow's automatic update?

      Thankfully, I use Linux at home now. I update what I want, when I want, and there's no greedy company spying on what I do.

    2. Re:Intentional? by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, viruses send SPAM. Yeah, viruses keep stealing data. But do they disable your computer completely?"

      In this case, apparently so. The support thread linked to has a comment from someone showing SHA checksums of infected and clean atapi.sys files; systems that are already infected are the ones getting the bluescreen after the update.

    3. Re:Intentional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was this modded "insightful"? Funny maybe, but since this issue only affects compromised systems it clearly wasn't intentional.

  13. Just close your eyes and chant by harris+s+newman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Windows costs less, is more secure, and superior to opensource OS's. And hope your boss hears you before your fired.

    1. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by Tetsujin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Windows costs less, is more secure, and superior to opensource OS's.

      And hope your boss hears you before your fired.

      Before my fired what?

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    2. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by harris+s+newman · · Score: 1

      This is not reverse polish notation.

    3. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 5, Funny

      Before my fired what?

      Don't correct me, your fired.

      Regards
      you're Boss

      --
      If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    4. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by c.r.o.c.o · · Score: 1

      You're going to need to brush up on your grammar. The OP is right.

    5. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (+ "This" "is" "the" "most" "efficient" "way" "to" "communicate" ".")

    6. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by Noren · · Score: 3, Funny

      Woo Hoo! I'm boss!

      Now why are these gentlemen escorting me out of the building?

    7. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by gnud · · Score: 1

      You don't even realise that you made a spelling error? :)
      Parent was grammar-value-oriented. I can't really get myself to call him a grammar-nazi, because your mistake was kind of unnessescary and stupid.

    8. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I'm the boss, then YOUR fired!

    9. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by Torodung · · Score: 1

      Windows costs less, is more secure, and superior to opensource OS's.

      And hope your boss hears you before your fired.

      Nobody was ever fired for choosing Microsoft. That used to be the chant about IBM back in the day. MS just inherited the object properties.

      --
      Toro

    10. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by Torodung · · Score: 1

      Before my fired what?

      Don't correct me, your fired.

      Regards

      you're Boss

      My sister was bitten by a møøse once...

    11. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't you be off promoting synergy and hitting on Debra?

    12. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regards

      you're Boss

      I'm boss? Sweet! In that case, your fired!

    13. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, you haven't yet heard my final solution to the grammar problem...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    14. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're Boss

      So, if I'm the boss, can I re-hire myself and then fire the old boss?

    15. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're Boss

      You are the boss...

    16. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      you're Boss

      Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

    17. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      He's too busy with that sewer fish.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    18. Re:Just close your eyes and chant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I weep for the many who won't get this...*sigh*

  14. I dont' HAVE a DVD or CD... it's a hard drive part by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    My machine has a hard drive partition with the "recovery" disk.

    I think I have automatic patches turned off on the XP box but I have automatic patching on the windows 7 box.

    I think I'm going to figure out how to turn it off when I get home.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  15. Re:Note to self: clone hard disk before rebooting by denobug · · Score: 1

    Running a patch server so I can personally release patches as I please.

  16. Not the solution by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    Several users posted solutions, but the one laid out by 'maxyimus' was marked by a Microsoft support engineer as the way out of the perpetual blue screens.

    I don't think this is the solution you were thinking of. The linked solution has these notes:

    # Proposed As Answer byFred_H 21 hours 11 minutes ago

    # Marked As Answer by Cody - Support Engineer Microsoft Support, Moderator 20 hours 13 minutes ago

    # Unmarked As Answer by Cody - Support Engineer Microsoft Support, Moderator 20 hours 12 minutes ago

    So it seems "Cody - Support Engineer Microsoft Support, Moderator" had second thoughts about a minute after marking this as the solution.

    [Disclaimer: I run Linux, not XP, so I don't really care either way.]

    1. Re:Not the solution by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I thought the solution was, 1:boot to cmd prompt 2: type format c: 3: press "y" when prompted 4: insert ubuntu live CD 5: follow on screen prompts for installation 6:... 7: Profit!

    2. Re:Not the solution by maxume · · Score: 1

      That solution shouldn't really cause any additional problems, I imagine it was unmarked because it is overzealous, uninstalling all of the updates instead of a single update (presumably the problem is related to a single update).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  17. How is Microsoft supposed to make any more by ticktickboom · · Score: 0

    How is Microsoft supposed to make any more money from you if they don't trash their old OS?

  18. Thanks for the scoop by texnogeekz · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm glad I did not experience this threat yet

  19. UNmarked as Answer... one minute later! by macraig · · Score: 1

    Why would TFS even highlight that post in the discussion, when the support engineer's promotion of it was retracted almost as soon as it was added?

  20. The memo making the rounds at Redmond by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    ...indicates that this *was* after all, the nostalgia patch.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  21. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL Harder!!

    • Abacus: Since 1500AD
    • HP Calculator: Since 1984
    • Dismembered head patched into the internet: Since 1990 - I was there early.
    • About to be put into alien spacecraft....2010 - ???
  22. The nut behind the wheel by westlake · · Score: 0, Troll

    'I updated 11 Windows XP updates today and restarted my PC like it asked me to

    What sort of loon patches multiple machines without first testing the patch?

    XP has about 70% or so of the client market. How many millions or tens of millions of patches have been installed successfully?

    1. Re:The nut behind the wheel by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uuuuuuuh..... A home user? Re-read that quotation that you so handily provided one more time.

      I updated 11 Windows XP updates today and restarted my PC like it asked me to

      See it?

      my PC

      It's singular. He applied updates to a single computer.

      What sort of loon thinks that expecting home users to somehow test patches from their goddamn vendor before applying them is acceptable?

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  23. I always wait for a while by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I let Windows inform me about updates, and I choose when to download them and install them. If nobody else has any problems after a week or so, then and only then will I download and install the updates. I learned a long time ago not to trust anything from Microsoft.

    I'd like to thank all of you who beta tested the updates for me!

    1. Re:I always wait for a while by blackgod · · Score: 1

      me too :-) but all these problems are applicable only at works where i have to live (??) with windows.

      --
      bits and bytes of life should serve the needy - My bits and bytes
    2. Re:I always wait for a while by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      My rule of thumb is to only install updates once per year, on a Friday before a dull weekend, so that I can spend the rest of the weekend fixing corrupted profiles, registry errors, and driver failures that the patches cause.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    3. Re:I always wait for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you don't run gentoo.
      There it's a lesser risk to update daily and suffer rare single-system-critical package-failure, than wait a year, re-compile the entire system, and then take two weeks to recover from the certain breakage.

    4. Re:I always wait for a while by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      The real fun is when you fix your friends' and relatives' computers, and you look like a miracle worker in their eyes. "Wow! How'd you do that?" :)

    5. Re:I always wait for a while by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      I let Windows inform me about updates, and I choose when to download them and install them. If nobody else has any problems after a week or so, then and only then will I download and install the updates. I learned a long time ago not to trust anything from Microsoft.

      You don't trust anything from Microsoft but you trust Microsoft with all your data?

    6. Re:I always wait for a while by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Who says I have only one computer?
      I have four.
      1. dual boots Ubuntu or XP
      2. Windows 7 64-bit
      3. Ubuntu only
      4. XP only

      My data is stored on multiple drives in multiple places; and backed up on CDs, DVDs, & online.
      (I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.)

    7. Re:I always wait for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a coincidence! I do the same with Gentoo.

    8. Re:I always wait for a while by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, we've had more problems in our office with Ubuntu and Debian-stable updates breaking stuff than Windows.

      Just sayin'

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    9. Re:I always wait for a while by mikee805 · · Score: 1

      Last weekend I installed a computer for my cousin to use that is mother had sitting in a closet for years (It was windows XP sp2). I install all of the updates and one from 3 years ago put into a continuous reboot cycle. So even waiting a while does not mean the MS will fix a broken patch. The solution turned out to be boot to the recovery console and disable this service.

      --
      B5 71 ED FB 55 D6 4E 68 07 25 E2 FA CA 93 F0 2F, is mine! All mine!
    10. Re:I always wait for a while by sheoguey · · Score: 1

      YES!! That seems to be the only SANE way to evaluate MS updates and new products... it's certainly how I prefer to do it.
      Now... off to check for Windows 7 whining :o)

  24. Yay, no problems here! by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 2, Funny

    I updated yesterday and haven't had any problems. I feel like I won the lottery!

    1. Re:Yay, no problems here! by blackgod · · Score: 0

      possibly you would have updated linux, by any chance? :-)

      --
      bits and bytes of life should serve the needy - My bits and bytes
    2. Re:Yay, no problems here! by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 1

      Nah, it was Windows XP Pro. I should have specified that in thedf;dafjlajflf A problem has been detected and Windows has been shutdown to prevent damage to your computer.

  25. Re:LOL by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    LOL! Games played since 1996:

    • Quake
    • StarCraft
    • Myst
    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  26. Re:I dont' HAVE a DVD or CD... it's a hard drive p by maxume · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can install the recovery console as a boot option:

    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/307654

    (You should have an I386 folder somewhere)

    It is more complicated for Vista and later:

    http://blogs.msdn.com/winre/archive/2007/01/12/how-to-install-winre-on-the-hard-disk.aspx

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  27. Constant BSOD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is different from.... what?

  28. A quick fix by Bloom+Berg · · Score: 5, Informative

    from ars: Users in the thread have tracked down a fix, though it requires using a copy of the Windows disc (or for netbook users without an optical drive, a bootable USB drive with Windows on it): Boot from your Windows XP CD or DVD and start the recovery console (see KB307654 for help with this step) Type this command: CHDIR $NtUninstallKB977165 $\spuninst Type this command: BATCH spuninst.txt Type this command: systemroot Good luck. When complete, type this command: exit

    1. Re:A quick fix by BountyX · · Score: 1

      Ugh, this happened to me today. I fixed it with Fedora 12, permanently.

      --
      Trying to install linux on my microwave, but keep getting a kernel panic...
    2. Re:A quick fix by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      Except you have to have the recovery console installed first... And the instructions are to install from the CD (before your OS BSOD's of course) which most users don't have, and if anything like my last 3 systems (HP, Acer, Lenovo), attempting to access the recovery partition where those files might be results in explorer.exe crashing.

      Time to boot onto a live CD, copy important files onto usb stick or nas and decide if you really want to reinstall windows so you can have the privilege of doing it all again next patch tuesday.

      You're already booted to the live CD and there's an icon right there that says "Install"...

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    3. Re:A quick fix by supremebob · · Score: 1

      You can't "permanently" fix much of anything by installing Fedora, considering that it's only supported for a year before they stop producing patches for that particular release. That that point, you can't get security updates and bug fixes unless you upgrade to a newer version. If you thought that patching Windows XP was dangerous, try updating a few hundred core OS packages to get up the latest release of Fedora!

      Fedora is a fun OS to play with, but I'd want something with more long-term support on a home PC like CentOS or the upcoming "LTS" release of Ubuntu.

    4. Re:A quick fix by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "Except you have to have the recovery console installed first"

      No, you do not have to have it installed to use it. The article you linked to is for people who want to be able to select Recovery Console from boot.ini (as if you were selecting between different OS installs) instead of rooting around for their Windows install disk.

    5. Re:A quick fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And someone has balls to say Linux is hard to use, luls

  29. Not a single person... by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    Am I the only one who thought the GPP wa a joke, along lines of "the dog ate my homework?"

    Otherwise, as you said, it's the universes way of trying to tell him something.

    1. Re:Not a single person... by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who read GPP and thought Group Policies and Preferences? :)

    2. Re:Not a single person... by treeves · · Score: 1

      No, I thought that immediately.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    3. Re:Not a single person... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      General Phlegm and Panties

  30. PHysical eDucation by poena.dare · · Score: 1

    I can't take you seriously when you AC and use caps.

    Call me tonight and I'll fix it for you.

    And wear something sexy.

  31. Resistance is futile. You will upgrade. by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Resistance is futile. You WILL upgrade to Windows 7 as instructed. We are in full control of your computer. Your computer will remain deactivated until you comply with our instructions. You have no alternative but to obey.

  32. Re:LOL by samriel · · Score: 1

    Erm... ALL of those have run on Macs since 1996.
    Citations? Sure:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StarCraft
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quake
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myst
    Look in the righthand column.

  33. gearkraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey I'm sure this news will never make it over to the geniuses at Neowin. They've got too much to make fun of with apple's new hardware.

    1. Re:gearkraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They most likely ban anyone speaking ill of their master.

  34. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because newer versions of windows suck.

  35. Lucky Me by Penguinshit · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Fortunately I didn't get bitten by this. I would be devastated. Here's why:

    I am quadriplegic with a tracheostomy to breathe. That means no keyboard or mouse and no auditory input. I control my computer with eye movement (the only muscles I still fully control) tracked via infrared camera. Almost every system built to assist communication for people like me are built on top of WinXP. There is a Mac version I have heard of but AFAIK doesn't do full control like the one I use. There is no Linux availability at all (oh how I wish).

    So I am stuck. This system is my voice and my window to the world (travel is a major production requiring a team of assistants). it controls my immediate environment (tv, lights, etc.). It represents the last bit of independence I possess. It is a Tablet so "pop in the CD isn't so easy.

    I am very careful to avoid viruses and other malware (always was when i was healthy and Win32 was only a secondary OS for me then). But to be stabbed in the back would be utterly devastating to me. It could be weeks before I could get qualified help (Nerd Herd, etc. need not apply).

    1. Re:Lucky Me by steelfood · · Score: 1

      In this case, you might want to have (someone set up) a backup camera/controller that's not connected to the internet. Or a primary one that's not networked, and use your backup for the internet. It may be expensive, but it's better than your primary and only machine dying for one of many reasons why a machine would die.

      If your life depends on the machine, you might want to go the jumbo jet route and have 4 backup machines.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    2. Re:Lucky Me by pz · · Score: 1

      I am very careful to avoid viruses and other malware (always was when i was healthy and Win32 was only a secondary OS for me then). But to be stabbed in the back would be utterly devastating to me. It could be weeks before I could get qualified help (Nerd Herd, etc. need not apply).

      I work in the field of prosthetics (although on the sensory, rather than motor side), so I am vitally aware of the importance of interfaces like the one you are using.

      That said, since things like bad patches, viruses, trojans, hardware failures, and the like do happen, no matter how careful you might be, perhaps you should think about having a spare, secondary system, in case your primary system fails for some reason. Also, it might be a good idea to implement some kind of automated backup system so that you can roll back to the previous known-good configuration if something goes wrong. Unfortunately, I'm not qualified to make suggestions for how that might work with Windows XP, but the ideas aren't new, so there must already be a solution.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    3. Re:Lucky Me by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

      Not my life but certainly my sanity. Medicare will only pay for one, the IR camera is a specialty item, and the required software is around $5k.

    4. Re:Lucky Me by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      My sympathies for your difficulties.

      Could I perhaps suggest a complete spare computer would be a good idea?

        At least not allowing updates to occur until a week after the patch release might give you some reassurance.

    5. Re:Lucky Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? If that's true you are a fool not to have a known-good system backup CD/DVD. Obviously you need to contract someone to make that for you, but it should be quite feasible to create a system restore CD that does-it-all when you stick it in the drive and reboot. And then all you need is a printed instruction sheet for the dumbest guy at Best Buy to follow. I'm sure you could even get someone to build you a simple backup/restore system so that your restore could be reasonably up to date.

      If you don't already have something like that you should get it done now. If this computer is so essential to your day-to-day life... man, I can't imagine not being able to communicate for weeks.

    6. Re:Lucky Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel for you. A few years back I visited a friend who has ALS and a really bad smoking habit. I could see him burning down everything around him with his gradual loss of motor control so I wrote a simple batch script to summon emergency help in such a scenario that if he could dial 911, and put his cell to his computer speaker, would tell a 911 operator that there was an emergency at such and such location and that the caller was an automated response message.
      Pretty simple and quick and I wrote it in just a few hours without ever writing an batch script before but it worked for what it was.
      After that, I looked for ways to do this or expand on it in Linux-land and was very disappointed.
      In this situation I'd say use what works.

    7. Re:Lucky Me by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Almost every system built to assist communication for people like me are built on top of WinXP.

      Does the hardware give you any rudimentary control over the BIOS-level startup? I'm wondering if a second install with a bootloader to chose the backup wouldn't be some cheap insurance for you.

      WinXP goes final EOL in early 2014 - so hopefully the vendors are working on some new drivers for you. It sounds like it could take a couple years to get the specialized IT out to all the users.

      How does the hardware interface with the OS? Does it emulate a keyboard and mouse or a digitizer? There are those kernel developers who are running the 'do you need a driver written?' campaign if the vendor is Open. GNOME has pretty decent assistive technologies, from what I've heard, but you're in need of the device driver.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:Lucky Me by cecom · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't need a second license for the software since you will be using only one copy at a time, right? Also, it seems you don't need a second camera for this failure mode we are discussing (although having a spare of this very important device is probably a good idea). Bottom line, I think you should get an extra hdd, make a copy of your entire os, and stash it. If you ever run into sw trouble, somebody should just swap the drives.

    9. Re:Lucky Me by Arccot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Almost every system built to assist communication for people like me are built on top of WinXP. There is a Mac version I have heard of but AFAIK doesn't do full control like the one I use. There is no Linux availability at all (oh how I wish).

      Hmmm... that's pretty interesting. What's the software you normally use, and what's the device? There's tons of OSS developers out there just looking for a worthy cause.

    10. Re:Lucky Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mate, do yourself a favour and clone your windows partition (as it is now, good and healthy) to a image file.

      When disaster strikes you can get back to your image to get it up working again.

      Clonezilla (http://clonezilla.org/) does this like here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MA5JBgwdek8

      Ghost also does the same thing..

    11. Re:Lucky Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you have a hard life.

      Anyway, I don't know all the incoveniences there may be, and maybe you've already considered this, but if you don't. I think you should think about having a redundant system.

      Your main house processor seems to be that tablet. I suppose it's wirelessly connected, so if you had another one, exactly like that (with autoupdate disabled, of course), you could just boot up that when the other one stops working. I imagine you'd still need to phone someone to boot that backup computer, but it wouldn't have to be specialized help, and you could just maybe ask a neighbor, or something.

    12. Re:Lucky Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes. Because a quadriplegic who used exclusively XP because only it runs the eye-tracking software he uses to interact with the world - as opposed to a troll - would really have the name "Penguinshit". That's some quality moderation, guys.

    13. Re:Lucky Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like if it's that important to you, you should probably have two, just as a spare. Shit happens, after all.

    14. Re:Lucky Me by Penguinshit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or I could be a longtime Linux user struck down by ALS.

      But you're probably right...

    15. Re:Lucky Me by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

      It's the ERICA system from Eye Response Technologies (now Dynavox). It is a complete environment but I unlocked it to gain full control of my computer> it is a lot more than a virtual keyboard.

      I have no control until my attendant launches the application and calibrates it.

    16. Re:Lucky Me by Penguinshit · · Score: 2, Informative

      .It's the ERICA from Eye Response Technologies (now Dynavox).

    17. Re:Lucky Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry for my brash judgment. At the same time, you can take it as evidence that you're doing great, since I couldn't find the barest hint of your condition in your post (ie thinking of the typing mistakes you must make, etc) when coming to my conclusion. I looked very carefully and it just seemed like you were some guy typing that stuff just like anyone else does. So, it may take you longer, but the result is just like anyone else's comments. :)

    18. Re:Lucky Me by Gaffod · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, shouldn't you at least have some sort of dead-man's switch type setup where a qualified 3rd party is informed in the event you setup fails? Simplest option would be to stay logged in a dummy IM account that someone monitors (reasoning that if your OS crashes, you'll go offline). Obviously much higher sophistication is possible.

      I don't know if it will be weeks before the hypothetical problem is fixed, but at least it won't be weeks before someone who knows what he's doing tries to fix it.

  36. Obviously by bangthegong · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is how they solve the problem of backwards compatibility and get everyone onto Windows.Next or Win8 or whatever. Break all OSes prior to Win7 with "patches" thereby forcing everyone to PAY UP SUCKAS....

  37. Re:LOL by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Erm... ALL of those have run on Macs since 1996.

    Didn't say otherwise. Re-read my post.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  38. Re:I dont' HAVE a DVD or CD... it's a hard drive p by BitterOak · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can install the recovery console as a boot option:

    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/307654

    (You should have an I386 folder somewhere)

    It is more complicated for Vista and later:

    http://blogs.msdn.com/winre/archive/2007/01/12/how-to-install-winre-on-the-hard-disk.aspx

    Nope. If you follow that link, you'll see you still need the Windows XP DVD to install the recovery console. Sadly, it was not uncommon for XP systems to be sold with no recovery console. My Toshiba laptop (I'll never buy another) did not come with a Windows XP DVD, merely a "product recovery disk" which wipes everything off the hard drive and does a fresh install. No recovery console available. Apparently there's a huge difference between buying a computer that comes with XP and buying a computer that comes with "XP installed."

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  39. Re:I dont' HAVE a DVD or CD... it's a hard drive p by maxume · · Score: 2, Informative

    As I alluded to in my comment, all you need is the I386 folder. It is mostly likely present at C:\I386.

    (I am typing this on a computer that did not come with an installation disc; I used the I386 folder to build one (with SP3 slip-streamed in). I have used that CD to install Windows into a VM.)

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  40. Re:LOL by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No shit Sherlock.

    He was implying that the poster has only played those games, since he hasn't been using windows and those games are pretty famous for being cross platform.

    What I don't understand is why "you can't play games" is supposed to be some sort of universal knock against people who don't use windows. I never played games even when I did use windows, it's just not my thing.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  41. Windows cannot start again. So? by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 4, Funny

    You say this like it's a *bad* thing...

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:Windows cannot start again. So? by blackgod · · Score: 1

      Can't start windows - good thing resulted in no access to his data - bad thing

      --
      bits and bytes of life should serve the needy - My bits and bytes
    2. Re:Windows cannot start again. So? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>You say this like it's a *bad* thing...

      Oddly enough, after I restarted after this patch, my *UPS* went out. High pitched shrill beeping and everything.

      Could have been just a weird coincidence, but since my linux box is also running off the same UPS, then... yeah. Windows patches can take down linux boxes.

      Fortunately my UPS has enough juice to power both machines with their monitors for at least 15 minutes, so I got everything shut down safely.

  42. Good thing Windows PCs are sooooo cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can buy a second one, which you'll eventually need to use to figure out how to fix the first one when Windows inevitably shits the bed.

  43. Who the fuck cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't touched Windows for about 10 year, and I'm not planning on getting a job that requires me to. If anything goes wrong, I suppose I only should be happy. Less Windows losers to take care of.

  44. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem with Linux is that it's inarticulate. Look at Ubuntu, which is arguably the easiest way to get someone to use Linux if they're from a Windows background.

    It works great, it's faster, and most configurations work right out of the box. if you have one of the few configurations that have been checked by the developers. (If you've got an ATI card like I do, Fuck You.) If you've got an older machine without one of the specific wireless cards detailed in document XR-122-65_rev_a_kernel26.6.1, you can with ndiswrapper and wpasupplicant. Rolling back the kernel version will also improve compatibilty on older systems. All of thse commands can be found on forums online, so there's lots of support for... ...what the FUCK are you talking about, Beardo? My machine USED to work, and now it doesn't and that's because I listened to you.

    Windows is dominant because they write and market to people who aren't technical users. Read that bolded sentence again. Apple is hauling up their maketshare for the same reason -- they are marketing to the vast majority of people that want a computer but didn't spend their childhood in the CS lab. My dad doesn't want to learn how to use a command line to set up the email. My wife, lead tech support for distance education for a College, didn't like Ubuntu because of the Flash problem.

    NOBODY GIVES A FUCK ABOUT PROPRIETARY DRIVERS. IF THE SHIT DOESN'T WORK THEN IT IS A LINUX PROBLEM. (Yes, even if it isn't.)

    Hell, MS still has their ridiculous search, when you could just drop to a shell and type "dir *foo*.ext /s | more" and be done in 10 seconds. But you see, if you weren't the kind of person who reads /., I just a) bored you and b) acted condescending and c) said something unintelligible.

    Linux is a spectacular tool, but like calipers, $30 ESD wirecutters, or my $200 soldering station, just aren't the right tool for the majority of people out there. If the developers get their heads out of their asses and learn how to market the software AND give the public what it wants, then and only then will Linux get its fair share of the market.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  45. What's up Doc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to hear you have no backups, Doc.

  46. Re:wtf by bmk67 · · Score: 2, Informative

    why are you people still using xp?

    Because -

    a) I already own a license

    b) It suits my needs

    c) It's what my employer requires me to have on my at-home on-call PC. Since they're footing the bill, I can hardly complain. See a) and b) above.

  47. Legacy by dandart · · Score: 0

    Wait a minute, I remember those from back in the day! Hah, not fun.

    It still surprises me why people still use XP - a 9 year old system. Come on, people. Upgrade. To Ubuntu. :P

    I have XP still (I'm forced by itunes) - but I'll probably chuck it out now, for I have no XP install disk and I don't want to update and have it dead, but I also don't want to not update and have it cracked. And I suggest all in my position do the same. Bye bye XP. I won't miss you.

    1. Re:Legacy by Renraku · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Okay. *upgrades to Ubuntu*

      *tries to install Modern Warfare 2*

      Hey, I can't run the installer, what's going on? *reads forums* What? Ubuntu doesn't support the latest Direct X? Fuck this, I'm going back to Windows.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    2. Re:Legacy by dandart · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What's that Mr. Wine? DX10 is supported? That's nice. See? It has a gold rating

    3. Re:Legacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=18348&iTestingId=48575

      Rated Gold in Wine ApPDB

    4. Re:Legacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wine runs Modern Warfare 2....

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdxFFAoUPXs

    5. Re:Legacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=18348
      Modern Warfare 2 is marked as gold. It both installs and runs for every tester.

    6. Re:Legacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not spend my precious time in Modern Warfare 2.
      OpenGL is superior n times that direct X.(I have not seen any big movie based in directX. However; most of the 3d animation software use openGL). Now you can benchmark scientific programs such as Slicer in both platforms using the same libraries (openGL) and you see what it is real differences in the OS .
      For you is Ok go back to Windows for other people is better to go to the best stable OS Linux.

    7. Re:Legacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know your post was sarcasm. However, my friends bring this up quite often when discussing Linux. I recommend you have a look here: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=18348&iTestingId=48575 .
      In short, if you upgrade to the latest wine, you can install and run the game pretty well. The only issue you could run into would be if you are already making use of wine. In that case, you would have to check compatibility or install two versions of wine and have two wine prefixes. Not very difficult (like most things with Linux), just time consuming.

      Have Fun :)

    8. Re:Legacy by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      He said "the latest Direct X".

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
  48. Interesting read, this link... by Erikderzweite · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From TFA: "To regain control of their PCs, users were told to boot from their Windows XP installation disc, launch the Recovery Console and enter a series of commands."

    STOP COPYING LINUX ALREADY!

    1. Re:Interesting read, this link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STOP COPYING LINUX ALREADY!

      Linux can also be repaired by booting from a Windows XP installation disc and entering a series of commands into the Recovery Console?

    2. Re:Interesting read, this link... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Depends on your definition of "fix"...

      "You dirty little... I'll fix you!" - yes

      "This is how you fix that issue" - no

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  49. clone hard disk before installing patches by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

    If you already installed the patches, your clone
    will have the bad ones too.

    BTW, the bad patch apparently is KB977165.

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  50. Why On Earth Do People Still Use Window? by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm feeling like a broken record here. I don't think you could consciously code up an OS with more holes than Windows has. Why on earth is it so damned vulnerable that any tiny code change can topple it over? Tell me again why people still use Microsoft products?

    1. Re:Why On Earth Do People Still Use Window? by Shados · · Score: 1

      XP is a 10 years old OS that was meant to be decomissioned years ago, but was forced to stay because a bunch of nerds who think they know their stuff, but really don't, convinced people the newer version sucked (when it seriously didn't. XP was one of the worse version of Windows, ever, and the one that pushed me to Linux. Vista was a dream compared to it, and of course 7 is even better...but if you aren't willing to leave your comfy turf, well...).

      It doesn't get the same kind of attention the newer versions do, so shit like that, while unacceptable (since it IS officially supported and people pay for that support), it is to be expected.

    2. Re:Why On Earth Do People Still Use Window? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Informative

      XP is a 10 years old OS that was meant to be decomissioned years ago

      Microsoft has had 10 years to introduce fixes to whatever problems Windows XP has. Systems are supposed to get MORE stable as they age, not get worse or show no improvement over time.

    3. Re:Why On Earth Do People Still Use Window? by yelvington · · Score: 1

      But ... it's so old! All the tops are worn off the 10110010, so they're now iuiiuuiu!

    4. Re:Why On Earth Do People Still Use Window? by tftp · · Score: 1

      but if you aren't willing to leave your comfy turf, well...

      At home Vista takes more resources than XP and requires custom configuration to disable superfetch and tons of other garbage services that they threw in. In business environment Vista doesn't run expensive (and no longer supported) legacy software. Why again is it a better OS?

    5. Re:Why On Earth Do People Still Use Window? by pipedwho · · Score: 1

      No, it's still around because people bought machines that were pre-installed with XP. Those same people haven't felt the need to spend money to upgrade their OS (or hardware). This is because their computer does what they need it to, and as far as they're concerned, works fine.

      The majority of people buying new computers get the latest version of Windows as part of the deal without paying any extra. Whereas those that aren't buying new machines should not be forced to pay money for an upgrade that they don't need.

    6. Re:Why On Earth Do People Still Use Window? by dave562 · · Score: 1

      People use it because it still gets the job done, and if you know what you're doing it, you can manage to use it without screwing it up.

    7. Re:Why On Earth Do People Still Use Window? by maxume · · Score: 1

      This post, a little ways below, indicates that the crash is due to malware altering a file:

      http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1546966&cid=31108534

      Certainly doesn't absolve Microsoft (they are the ones that released XP with Administrator accounts being the norm, making it easy for malware to alter system files), but it isn't that crazy that a hacked up low level driver is causing some issues.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Why On Earth Do People Still Use Window? by AntiDragon · · Score: 1

      Better yet, the bug is 17 years old - the bug existed before XP was a twinkle in lil 'ol Gates' eye....

      --
      "...So I hung back and lurked. For 18 months. Can't beat a good old-fashioned lurking."
    9. Re:Why On Earth Do People Still Use Window? by sumdumgai123 · · Score: 1

      If the job you are trying to get done is to display blue screens, you are correct.

    10. Re:Why On Earth Do People Still Use Window? by flaptrap · · Score: 1

      Systems are supposed to get MORE stable as they age, not get worse or show no improvement over time.

      No, it is basic knowledge that software becomes less maintainable as it is updated and eventually a change takes more time than a rewrite.

      The earlier code is eventually based on assumptions that the later code is inconsistent with.

      However, if the feature set is static, your statement is correct. The computer manufacturers and hence the system software developers such as Microsoft are under pressure to sell new system and therefore add to the feature sets constantly.

      Then there's the question of competence. XP handles dual processors adequately. Apparently Vista has some issues. oops. The DRM is enough reason for me to pull any disk on a Vista machine and install a fresh one to run Linux on. Windows 7 takes a fresh approach to multiple cores but to do it Microsoft had to replace much of the kernel code and then work outwards to ensure compatibility.

      There's still the DRM. I don't download music or copyrighted files but I won't pay for someone to tell me I can't even have my fair use rights. In this case, it's the functional requirements themselves that have made the system worse.

  51. One word - HIBERFIL.SYS by fibrewire · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try this before the "maxyimus" fix - boot Ubuntu or Systernals ERD and delete that pesky HIBERFIL.SYS and the $RECYCLER while your at it. Reboot to a functional computer. If this doesn't fix then "maxyimus" it is.

    1. Re:One word - HIBERFIL.SYS by fibrewire · · Score: 1

      If no linux then use XP disc to boot to recovery console. at c: use del /f hiberfil.sys

  52. Re:Note to self: clone hard disk before rebooting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use one too. Its called windowsupdate.microsoft.com

    The cool thing is, I know I can turn off automatic updates and not worry about maintaining a server. Maybe you are getting a PhD too... ?

  53. Re:LOL by bigredradio · · Score: 1

    Exactly
    Games played: None since Atari 2600. I'm fine with that.

  54. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by cetialphav · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the developers get their heads out of their asses and learn how to market the software AND give the public what it wants, then and only then will Linux get its fair share of the market.

    The question is why would developers want to expand their market share among the non-technical users? Personally, I could care less if my mom uses Linux. You know why? Because she is not a developer and will not contribute one line of code to the OSS world. I want Linux to develop a following among the technical/programmer crowd. This means a larger developer base, which means a greater pace of improvement. This has been happening consistently for the 15 years I've been using Linux and that keeps me happily on this platform. Its all about Developers! Developers! Developers! to me. Microsoft and Apple can have all the rest.

    When someone decides that there is money in getting non-techies onto Linux, they will be able to polish Linux into something really slick. Ubuntu is trying, but there really doesn't seem to be enough money in it now so they aren't able to apply a lot of resources to it. Who knows? There may never be any real money in that kind of market (for Linux, anyway).

  55. History Repeats Itself by fibrewire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    NT - http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc750081.aspx
    2000 - http://support.microsoft.com/kb/174630
    Now the same with Windows XP? Come on now, who are they fooling?
    Reminds me of that stupid stride commercial - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxBlKFxGhNk
    For those of you who feel left out with a working computer - http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897558.aspx

  56. Re:LOL by bigredradio · · Score: 1
    Things accomplished while not playing games:
    • Play guitar
    • Snowboarding
    • Breath fresh air
    • Dated
    • Have sex
    • Got married (sometimes have sex)
    • Became a father (twice)
    • Maintained a social life
    • Happy
  57. Re:LOL by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    What I don't understand is why "you can't play games" is supposed to be some sort of universal knock against people who don't use windows.

    It's not a knock, it's a small poke meant in a light-hearted way.

    I have to admit, I'm not sure why you're confused about this. There is no mystery here. Lots of energy is spent making Linux play Windows games. If that's not enough to cure your curiosity you should go to an Apple store and watch the people there orbit the games aisle hoping to find something new. Lots of people want to play games and there are a fair number of them that go about it the hard way.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  58. One copy... on a floppy! by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was in college, a friend of mine who lived down the hall from me came to my door one day frantically knocking. She had stored the only copy of her PhD dissertation on a floppy disk, and the disk had gotten corrupted, and she didn't know what to do.

    I poked around on it for a little while, trying out a disk sector editor I had to see if I could recover anything, and I couldn't. It was just lost, period.

    She ended up going dumpster-diving. She had thrown away a printed hard copy the day before, and they hadn't taken the trash away yet. She was literally in the trash dumpster, sifting through two apartment buildings' worth of trash to find it, and spent that entire night retyping it from scratch.

    I felt sorry for her, and I remember thinking, "Well, I guess that's one way to learn a lesson that you'll never forget..." I was also really glad that I wasn't her significant other, because you know who would have been sifting through that dumpster.

  59. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • Post on Slashdot to disguise envy.
  60. Finally, It's Secure! by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Maybe that was the only way Microsoft could figure out to make it completely secure.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  61. Re:Note to self: clone hard disk before rebooting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Running a patch server so I can personally release patches as I please.

    Running Linux so I don't have to worry about junk like this.

  62. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by Pentium100 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Also, while command line may be faster than GUI, GUI is easier and here's why: if I want to do some task, I can look at the toolbars and in the menus to fins an item that looks like what I need to do (for example, if I want to find a file, I'll look for a button or menu item named "Search", "Find" or something like that. I will recognize it when I see it), but on a command line, I basically need to remember the exact command for doing what I want to do, for example, I would need to remember the whole "dir *foo*.ext /s | more" command if I want to find the file, it won't work if I type ls instead of dir or if I type search instead of find or I forget to write the /s. For less used commands this gets difficult.

    Linux is great, but only when it works right after install and you do not need to install other programs. Otherwise it gets very difficult very fast.

  63. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by element-o.p. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Meh...

    If most people had to install Windows to get it to work on their PCs, they'd be in the same boat they are currently in with Linux -- they wouldn't have any more clue how to install and configure Windows than they do Ubuntu. Having installed multiple flavors of both Windows and Linux, Ubuntu currently has the easiest installer I've ever seen, bar none. And I've had all the same problems you've described with Linux when I've had to install Windows from a retail (vice OEM) CD. In fact, I've even had to boot a PC with Knoppix, just to find out what kind of hardware was inside the case so I could go download Windows drivers to make the hardware work. However, since every PC maker since Windows 95 has included Windows installed by default (at least until recently), non-techie Windows users typically don't have to worry about it. Now, Windows is what Grandma expects on her PC. And since people, as a rule, are afraid of change, that will be the default until someone gives someone a compelling enough reason to use something else. Unfortunately, at this point, I suspect the only thing that will be compelling enough is, "You can't get a PC with Windows, anymore, ma'am...".

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  64. Re:Note to self: clone hard disk before rebooting by zoloto · · Score: 1

    Same thing happened to me with a kernel update on CentOS5 last week. Now this week when updating XP. I'm terrified of the update OS X has waiting for me at home :(

  65. msft doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wondered why my brand new xp netbook gave me the old blue screen the other day. Msft, just be glad they don't make airplanes.

    1. Re:msft doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure they don't make airplanes?

      It scares the hell out of me, they're putting it in cars, that Microsoft software called "Sync."

      I'm sure it won't be long their crappy software kills someone.

  66. Re:Note to self: clone hard disk before rebooting by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    I've never tried rsync, but I've used tar and gzip/bzip2 using Samba to backup Windows admin shares (C$). Unfortunately, I have never been able to successfully restore the Windows OS based upon such a backup. I've always had to reinstall the OS, reinstall the apps, then restore the data. AFAIK, imaging the drive is the only way to completely restore the system -- OS, apps and all -- from a backup of a Windows machine.

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  67. Meanwhile at Microsoft... by BlueScreenOfTOM · · Score: 1

    Upon hearing the news of the botched update problem, Steve Ballmer pulled out his trusty Netbook while on the road to begin sending denial responses to the many complaints about the issue that had made their way to his mailbox. Naturally, his Netbook was set to the Windows XP default of "Download and install updates automatically" because his own trusted baby Microsoft told him it was best. Little did he know, before his last shutdown, the botched updated had downloaded and installed, and Mr. Ballmer was greeted with the famed Blue Screen he was just preparing to deny.

    158 men, women and children died that day. They were found scattered through the halls of Ballmer's hotel, with but a single bloody chair wedged into a corner wall.

    1. Re:Meanwhile at Microsoft... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

      His own trusted baby at MS told him to install Vista two years ago and Windows 7 this year and he did. Because of this he didn't have the problem.

      It's weird to me to see people so nonchalantly talk about running an OS that's so far out of date. You wouldn't run Ubuntu 5.04, would you?

      --
      http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    2. Re:Meanwhile at Microsoft... by Ltap · · Score: 1

      Some people do, for home servers. Admittedly these are usually on old hardware, have no external net connection, and just fulfil a single purpose with no real eason to go through the process of upgrading. This is why I prefer rolling-release as opposed to versioned systems: you upgrade what you want to and don't have to go through the same crap that is reminiscent of Windows.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
  68. Thanks MS for the stimulus! by nmos · · Score: 1

    In this economy I could use the extra $$.

  69. this is a pretty big if by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As you may have read elsewhere, MS doesn't use context or offset diffs. They just replace files. So the case you speak of is unlikely.

    The most likely case is that people who are having the problem have a foreign DLL in their system that calls directly into an offset into this DLL without version checking it. This DLL does so because it's a rootkit, and it wants to fly under the radar. When you change this DLL that other DLL is now calling into invalid code.

    But the problem here is this other DLL is bad. It isn't a problem in MS' DLL at all. And how is MS to prevent this, are they to somehow figure out every other DLL in your system that could try to call into this DLL using surreptitious means?

    MS didn't know this rootkit existed, or if they knew, they didn't test with it. That's about as far as I can blame them without any more info.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:this is a pretty big if by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      This DLL does so because it's a rootkit, and it wants to fly under the radar. When you change this DLL that other DLL is now calling into invalid code.

      But the problem here is this other DLL is bad. It isn't a problem in MS' DLL at all. And how is MS to prevent this, are they to somehow figure out every other DLL in your system that could try to call into this DLL using surreptitious means?

      I like Windows, sure, but really MS is still to blame here. If they had not made XP accounts have administrative rights by default, this situation would have a much smaller chance of success.

      But no, they had to make it "user-friendly" and now that people got trojans via a buggy Internet Explorer, MS says, "it's not our fault"? Sorry, I don't buy it.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  70. Re:LOL by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Heh. Okay, you have to admit, that door swings both ways. Watch...

    Useful skills learned while playing games:

    • Networking
    • Computer maintenance / upgrades
    • Teamwork
    • Network latency
    • Graphical tricks (texture mapping, lighting, etc. I could make a whole list on this alone.)
    • Good UI
    • Appreciation for simplicity

    ...etc.

    Ordinarily I would have let this go, but you reminded me of a programming teacher I had back in high school that thought video games offered nothing but a waste of time. Instead I have a lot to thank them for.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  71. Re:LOL by dave562 · · Score: 1

    Some people manage to play games AND do what you've done, or similar things.

  72. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by groslyunderpaid · · Score: 1

    for the love of pete, mod the man up

  73. Potential cause for the blue-screens by ThePeeWeeMan · · Score: 5, Informative

    It seems like someone's figured out what was causing the bluescreens... from the MS forum thread:

    I had an Eee PC with XP Home brought to me with this same problem. I rolled back KB977165, rebooted and the system worked fine. I reapplied KB977165 and the rest of the updates available at Microsoft Update, and the problem returned. I replaced %System32%\drivers\atapi.sys with a clean version from a XP SP3 distribution folder and rebooted... voila! Problem solved.

    For reference, the SHA1SUMs of the atapi.sys files:

    Non-working:
    bb3e36ad0c8ed6daab38653ea4a942d74b9f4ff6

    Working:
    a719156e8ad67456556a02c34e762944234e7a44

    If anyone wants to look at the non-working atapi.sys:
    https://patrickwbarnes.com/pub/atapi.sys

    I will be looking at this more in-depth. If I find anything more, it will be posted in a follow-up comment at the ISC:
    http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=8209

    UPDATE :
    I uploaded the non-working atapi.sys file to VirusTotal, and this is the result:
    http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/85aa49f587f69f30560f02151af2900f3dc71d39d1357727ab41b11ef828a7ff-1265925529

    Apparently, this update problem is the result of an infection.

    1. Re:Potential cause for the blue-screens by heneon · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the link; I checked my atapi.sys and SHA1 sum was the "working" one, a719156e8ad67456556a02c34e762944234e7a44.

      http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/b4df1d2c56a593c6b54de57395e3b51d288f547842893b32b0f59228a0cf70b9-1265974140

      However, only eSafe tells the file is infected with Win32.Rootkit, other seem to be clear. Has anyone else checked their file?

    2. Re:Potential cause for the blue-screens by cvtan · · Score: 1

      Sorry to ask a dumb question in this forum, but why look at SHA1SUMs when you just want to know if one file is different from another? Can't you just compare files bit by bit? Is there an official list of SHA1SUMs published by Microsoft so that an average user could tell if system files have been compromised? This may not always work since, on Windows machines, files with the same name are not identical from one machine to another. Thanks.

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    3. Re:Potential cause for the blue-screens by klui · · Score: 1

      It's interesting how some AV products don't recognize the rootkit--I recognize Avast, and ClamAV.

  74. It's not a crash, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That blue screen you're seeing, they call it "Windows Azure."

  75. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Boot to Knoppix!?!? That's sooo next year.

    I typically open the box, write down the random number on the card & go search for it online, then download the drivers.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  76. Check your MatroskaSplitter folder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No problem with the particular patch in question but in both W2K and XP after applying all the February patches "mkunicode.dll" in the Haali splitter folder came up missing. I suspect it was related to the DirectShow patch. Fortunately I had it backed up because without it neither my OGV or MP4s would play.

  77. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by nschubach · · Score: 1

    They say ignorance is bliss... ;)

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  78. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by steelfood · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ph.D. on a floppy? Should we get off your lawn?

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  79. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...sifting through two apartment buildings' worth of trash to find it, and spent that entire night retyping it from scratch.

    PhD "dissertation"? Normally one writes a thesis for a PhD, and a typical length is in the region of 50,000 words. I don't know about you, but that's way more than I can type in a night.

  80. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by tsajeff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Developers may want to expand their markets to non-technical users so they have a larger paying customer base to fund innovation.

  81. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by sahonen · · Score: 1

    You can do it in 8 hours if you can type 100 words/minute, which isn't a terribly rare skill.

    --
    Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
  82. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in college, a friend of mine who lived down the hall from me came to my door one day frantically knocking. She had stored the only copy of her PhD dissertation on a floppy disk, and the disk had gotten corrupted, and she didn't know what to do.

    I poked around on it for a little while, trying out a disk sector editor I had to see if I could recover anything, and I couldn't. It was just lost, period.

    She ended up going dumpster-diving. She had thrown away a printed hard copy the day before, and they hadn't taken the trash away yet. She was literally in the trash dumpster, sifting through two apartment buildings' worth of trash to find it, and spent that entire night retyping it from scratch.

    I felt sorry for her, and I remember thinking, "Well, I guess that's one way to learn a lesson that you'll never forget..." I was also really glad that I wasn't her significant other, because you know who would have been sifting through that dumpster.

    If this was Digg, I would Digg this.

  83. Another story, with many comments: by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Here's another story, with many comments: New Patches Cause BSoD for Some Windows XP Users.

  84. Re:Note to self: clone hard disk before rebooting by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    They only get shoved down your throat if you have automatic updates turned on. Change the default and you don't have to deal with these messes every week.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  85. Relax! by Rephaim · · Score: 1

    This happened on my work computer. I ran the Windows CD and pressed R at the first prompt. After logging into the installation I ran FIXBOOT and exited. After reboot Windows CHKDSK ran and fixed a few things then I was back up. Has anyone else tried this?

  86. Re:LOL by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

    What I don't understand is why "you can't play games" is supposed to be some sort of universal knock against people who don't use windows. I never played games even when I did use windows, it's just not my thing.

    Because a lot of us DO play games.

    If I didn't have other things to work on this week, I'd be playing Team Fortress 2 on my PC right now.

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  87. This one must have been fun to track down by Torodung · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There were 8 freaking OS security patches in this last patch Tuesday. It must have been a joy to track down the one update that was causing the problem (KB977165).

    I have honest pangs of sympathy for the poor sucker that had to figure out that that one update was rendering infected systems unbootable.

    This is why monoculture sucks. *Healthy* cultures are diverse. "Mono" doesn't enter into it. Pun very much intended.

    --
    Toro

  88. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by ZosX · · Score: 1

    No, but you can get off mine!

    Get off my lawn!

  89. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by ZosX · · Score: 1

    Sure, that is if you ingest lots of LSD and enter a magickal state of streamed consciousness where you can pour your whole thesis out at a rate nearly faster than you can speak it. You know? That really brings back some memories....

  90. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by sahonen · · Score: 1

    If they actually found it in the trash (the gggp never states if it was actually found) then you're just copying words off the sheet... I did data entry for a few months, you can just turn off your brain and let your fingers do the thinking.

    --
    Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
  91. One Word by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

    GNU/Linux

    1. Re:One Word by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      Sure, because you want the same people who were infected on Windows (likely by clicking on "FREE ANTIVIRUS SCAN!" banners) to be setting up linux boxes, most likely running as root while they work their way through "Linux for Dummies." That's fucking brilliant.

  92. Re:Note to self: clone hard disk before rebooting by sillybilly · · Score: 1

    This is why I never moved on past Windows 2000. You can't stop XP from phoning home, and getting your computer remotely messed up. I had a laptop that came with Vista, downgraded to XP, remembered why I used to never like XP back in the day, downgraded to Win2k, installed Lighthouse puppy 4.12c, for a taste of difference, dual boot with grub. Now lighthouse puppy is getting crappy too, as of 4.3. You can tell from the default green font color in the terminal - it burns blind spots in your eyes. And similar, as usual, retarded decidions. Look at knoppix, where it used to be at version 3.6, and where it is today. Messed up on purpose. But for now, old version of puppy Linux. Misses a whole lot of things you take for granted on unix, such as multiuser accounts. But it's superfast reinstall - just change grub's menu.lst, and start a new personal file. OS Reinstall complete by typing 3 letters into a config file - fresh system, as the personal file is layered over the OS file that does not change. I loves it. Can't say that about a Win2k reinstall, but at least Win2k doesn't need MS's approval to get reinstalled. The last one. So through better or worse, it's linux now, or something like it. And who knows what the future brings.

  93. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

    Bet she was REALLY glad that she had the printout, even if she tossed it. If she didn't...

  94. Piled Higher and Deeper by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    when you have a PHD you know enough to
    A teach others
    B get into real trouble

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  95. I am so thankful by Windcatcher · · Score: 1

    ... to still be running Windows 2000. It received patches for the same vulnerabilities as XP, but it's running just fine.

  96. I wish I'd read this a few hours earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Around the time that this popped up, I'd just finished wiping my PC and installing Win7.

    For the curious - my bluescreen wouldn't stay put, it flashed up for about 1/3 a second and then rebooted the machine. I tried a repair install with the same result. At that point, I figured it wasn't worth pursuing (I knew I had some remnants of a spyware infection left on that machine) and decided to just put Win7 on it.

    Follow these steps:

    1. Boot from your Windows XP CD or DVD and start the recovery console (see this Microsoft article for help with this step)

    Once you are in the Repair Screen..

    2. Type this command: CHDIR $NtUninstallKB977165$\spuninst

    3. Type this command: BATCH spuninst.txt

    4. Type this command: systemroot

    When complete, type this command: exit

    Your computer should restart and everything should be back to normal.

    1. Re:I wish I'd read this a few hours earlier by yuhong · · Score: 1

      There is a startup option in the bootloader for XP and later to disable automatic reboot on BSoDs. Hold down F8 during boot and you will see it.

  97. ntkrnlpa.exe by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    That one really cracked me up. in TFA it says that file gets replaced by a newer version. Guess which anti-virus couldn't make heads or tails about waht to do with it?

    Microsoft's own...

    MSE offered me to report it to MS, which I did :)

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  98. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was also really glad that I wasn't her significant other, because you know who would have been sifting through that dumpster.

    But this proves that you thought about it, right? Right!? -nudge nudge-

  99. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    That explains so much about the data I get back from the data entry people.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  100. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    When someone decides that there is money in getting non-techies onto Linux, they will be able to polish Linux into something really slick

    I have tech-illiterate friends on FB raving about their Droid phones.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  101. No problems here ... by cokegen · · Score: 1

    I know people could have many reasons for updating winxp but I found myself doing a TON of things without the need to update the machine at all for years. Just disable the automatic updates and update it manually if required. Use another browser than IE and that's it ... I don't even have an antivirus, I just have a virtual machine with xp and nod32 in case I need to test some files and that's it. I never, never, NEVER have any problems.

  102. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by carlosjii · · Score: 1

    I always email stuff to myself as an attachment as a backup - in addition to having OTHER backups also

  103. Re:Note to self: clone hard disk before rebooting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . my Windows XP updates get pushed, pulled or shoved down my throat . . ..

    No kidding, my section runs continuous long batch jobs (especially for End of Day processing). The last time the f...ing updates got pushed down and restarted our PCs, I had to tell the Windows Admin to f-off and reset my PCs to local accounts. The B-tard didn't even want to make exceptions for my PCs, and kept saying it was Company's regs, even after I explained how his Group Policies were killing our processing and forcing us to spend hours on roll back and re-running.

    And no, I can't turn it the automatic updates off, if we logon to the Company's network, the Domain Group's Policies resets the automatic updates on.

    ... and what about using the Post Windows Update Restart prompt to avoid this mess? No, the damn prompt kept appearing "Always on top" at the most inconvient moments and the default action was to restart the PC.

  104. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by nprz · · Score: 1

    Also doesn't state that the dissertation was finished that night, just that she spent the night typing it.
    Perhaps she also spend the following 10 nights typing it as well.

  105. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    For the millionth time:

    10 Do regular backups
    20 Test they work
    30 Never trust windows
    40 goto 10

    It amazes me how smart people never learn from the mistakes of others.

  106. Re:Note to self: clone hard disk before rebooting by bdo19 · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure he meant that his company network enforces a policy that instructs Windows to update - meaning he CAN'T change the setting. It also likely means he only gets updates that his company has released, so he might be spared from this one.

  107. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by CecilPL · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess she should have copied that floppy. That's what you get for listening to M.E. Hart.

  108. In case this helps anyone else by exphose · · Score: 1

    We found this to be a problem when running old ATI drivers on a FireGL card, had to uninstall the drivers and install new versions, then the patch would stop bluescreening. ati2mtag.sys was the culprit in the minidumps I looked at, FWIW.

  109. Re:I dont' HAVE a DVD or CD... it's a hard drive p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have a netbook w/ XP on it. This came with NO CD/DVD drive, let alone a disk, NO USB install, NO external recovery method whatsoever. It DOES have a recovery option on the hard drive which is only conventionally accessible from the desktop Icon -once the system boots successfully- ,so if the system gets hosed, my only options are to a) get an outside tech to salvage it, somehow b)create some sort of external backup to rebuild the OS on my own, and salvage it, somehow c)exclaim in utter contempt "F* IT!" and load some other OS onto the thing, and salvage the whole situation, somehow.

    Considering that I have a Linux distro on my desktop already and in light of this new update headache, option c is looking REALLY good to me right now. Heck, I might not even wait for the bloody BSOD as an excuse to zorch XP......neh, I'm feeling kinda lazy, I'll wait for it to self destruct first, which ought not to take all THAT long.

  110. Rarely? Surely an invitation for an uptime war. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    06:41:22 up 657 days, 19:06, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.18, 0.15

    A gentoo box.

    1. Re:Rarely? Surely an invitation for an uptime war. by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      You either have a very big UPS or your power never goes out long enough for your UPS to discharge completely.

      My main UPS (APC Smart UPS 2200I) can only sustain my computers for about 30 minutes (or so it says, load is 38% at the moment) unless I am present and can start turning off the less important ones (or faster booting ones) to keep the other ones working.

  111. actually its bigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the x86 version if 240meg vs 150meg for puppy linux.. or even smaller from some other rescue disc. or you could get the latest hiren which has a live version of windows which some might find less intimidating. (i havent used windows for years as i am doing my phd in mathematical physics and mostly use mathematica/matlab (under linux) and fortran with ifort and imkl which are highly optimized. and emacs and ifort is just nicer under linux)

  112. This is the reason,,,, by spotlight2k3 · · Score: 1

    for the need to Backup, Backup, Backup........

  113. Re:Note to self: clone hard disk before rebooting by phyrexianshaw.ca · · Score: 1

    Not true at all. it's a fairly well documented process and fairly standard to disable all user interaction with the update process using Group Policy on Windows Domains. Windows Sever Update Services(WSUS) goes out online and get's updates, your IT dept. deploys them to several test machines to ensure compatibility, and then the patch is approved in WSUS. the clients at the user level have no control over what is forced onto work machines.

  114. it's just to tell people to buy Seven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft want to be ride of XP and what is the best way to do it? Break it!

  115. Just don't update by Askmum · · Score: 1

    I knew there still is a reason why I have never run windows updates since I installed SP2. I've had infinitely less outages due to virusus and malware than others have had due to windows updates. Namely none. Give me one good reason to update my installation of XP, and especially why I would want to put automatic updates on. I see no use. Really, I don't.

  116. Whats the Fuss about? by thetsguy · · Score: 1

    BSOD is imminent with or without the patch.

  117. Ubuntu or other distros often included in magazine by ed · · Score: 1

    No need to buy a $50 book. If the place sells that book it will sell a cheaper magazine

  118. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is great, but only when it works right after install and you do not need to install other programs.

    Can we stop spouting useless generic statements. The above may be true for you but it isn't for many people. I find fixing problems on linux OSes is usually way easier (or at least possible), and I also think software installation is one the strengths of linux operating systems: Seeing "average" users find and install software on Windows is just scary.

    So could we drop the cliches?

  119. About to reboot after the update, wish me luck!!! by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    think I'll print this thread out first as there's some good recovery info... :)

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  120. Easiest way to fix for the non tech type by Bad+Ad · · Score: 0

    Find ERD commander 2005
    goto uninstall hotfixes
    uninstall offending hotfix

  121. Re:LOL by Antiocheian · · Score: 1

    Why you think you couldn't accomplish all that and play games as well ?

  122. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by Makawity · · Score: 1

    It's "should we get off your lawn, SIR"!

  123. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole thing seems fishy if you ask me. Likely a sly way to get all the non-computer-literate folks to upgrade from XP to say, Windows 7 (or Apple, if they learn their lesson the first time around).

  124. Fdisk from orbit - only way to be sure by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It astounds me utterly that people continue to use machines that they know have been compromised after they just remove the most obvious of the damage, or even without doing anything at all. Somebody else had complete control and they still type credit card numbers on the things.
    So put this down as a "me too" post - wiping the lot and starting again is the only real way to fix it.

  125. Shit happens... Updating a working system is risky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just want to make sure we keep a record of this story. We can show it to the next guy when he slams Linux for breaking his video/sound after an update.

    While security updates are important, I do believe in that old saying: "if it works, don't mess with it".

  126. Re: pc games is for windows only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too many games claim to be pc games, when they in fact is windows games only.. how is the EU commission NOT doing anything about it.

  127. Re:Note to self: clone hard disk before rebooting by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't think there's anything magical on an NTFS partition and that if you could copy all the files exactly (including metadata) you should be able to get a good, restorable backup.

    My guess, anyway.

    I think rsync using xattr and maybe acl copying is required, and then perhaps ntfs-3g's secaudit tool for the rest of the metadata.

  128. Quick Fix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a friends computer to download the latest Ubuntu and burn to a cd (slow speed), then boot from that CD on your HP computer and it will let you gain access to your hard-drive for your PhD dissertation files... it will even let you edi tthem using OpenOffice that runs straight from the CD...

  129. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

    30 should be "never trust computers", any OS can fail; any application can fail; any hardware can fail.

    Data corruption isn't reserved to windows, i've seem OSX eat it's fs too, hell, i've even witnessed data corruption on linux & big iron

  130. My speculation on your setup by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    This system is my voice and my window to the world

    My first gut reaction says I'd want to have a redundant one, so that if one gets hosed I can use the other to call out to the world and ask for help.

    There is no Linux availability at all (oh how I wish).

    Can you run control Linux running in a virtual machine? Is the IR eye tracking like a separate input device (but how would the applications know to handle it?), or is there some software translating your eye movements into mouse motion and key presses? If so, maybe you can drive a VM with it, or use Synergy (software key/vid/mouse switch) to "leap" over to a Linux machine with it?

    I must admit I don't think I can imagine very well what your situation is like. So maybe my ideas are all useless. In that case, I hope you can see past that and realise I'm doing this not just in a vain attempt at having my knowledge be useful and me being "the hero who saves the day" (although I must admit to that playing a role), but also because I genuinely hope you get more value out of your time.

  131. Another trick to promote migration to Win7 by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    /tinfoilhat

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  132. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by indiechild · · Score: 1

    Various Linux distros perked my interest as a refreshing alternative to Windows, but ever since Mac OS X came along, that has more than satisfied my needs. Ubuntu does look promising, but as you point out the money just isn't there.

    Are there any Linux distros which charge a significant amount of money (e.g. $100) for their use? I'm thinking that a Linux distro would have to be commercialised in order for it to be polished and user-friendly enough to compete with Windows and OS X.

  133. Overreacting much? by FunPika · · Score: 1

    Microsoft will probably release another patch for that exploit that doesn't cause BSODs sometime in the future. :/ And unless people you don't trust have limited access accounts on your computer, you should be fine anyways, because the offending patch fixes a local privilege escalation issue, not a remote exploit.

    --
    After years of not using a signature, I am going to make one to say the following: Fuck Beta
  134. I wasn't ready, but I was prepared! by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    Having heard about this, I didn't install any of the pending updates on my WinXP x64 machine which I was a scant couple days from installing Windows 7 on. Tonight, just as I was getting ready to do the do, the WinXP installation stopped booting... I guess the update snuck its way in. Luckily I was in a position to simply move up the install a couple hours. I had been hoping to copy the data off the original system drive while it was still operational, but instead I just took the drive out and I'll copy the stuff off later.

    God I hate Windows updates. They're always doing SOMETHING to automatically screw us good, whether by accident or not...

    Could have been worse though; if I weren't in the process of getting ready to reinstall, I would have been completely up the creek.

    Oh well. Windows 7 install is chugging along, I guess I'll go play some King of Fighters on the arcade cabinet I pissed away my tax refund on last week. :)

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  135. Linux for Anthropology majors by mangu · · Score: 1

    Of course not. Same folder, different name.

    You mean, like ln -sf thesis thesis_backup?

    That's an excellent solution, because it keeps the backup synchronized with the original automatically.

  136. yo dawg by edittard · · Score: 1

    I updated 11 Windows XP updates today

    I herd u like updating, so I updated your updates so you can update while ur updating.

    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  137. Can you see a pattern ? by jean-guy69 · · Score: 1
    Some time after Windows XP was made available, there was an critical security patch for Windows 98 SE and its siblings: KB891711.

    This patch made LOTS of Windows 98 computers become slow as being unusable and/or enjoy frequent BSODs.

    1. Re:Can you see a pattern ? by ledow · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razor

      I've had blue-screen-inducing patches at every time of year, not just near releases of their big software. They just never seem to test them before foisting them upon thousands of users. Patches which blue-screen 1-5% of the computers that you include them on are not that unusual, really. And for some reason, slipstreamed installs seem *much* more reliable than hotfix-installs over an existing installation. I find that weird.

      Seriously, a school I worked in with hundreds of desktop from major manufacturers with no "unusual" quirks on the software (basically Office on a Windows domain) had quite obvious blue-screens / hangs when we applied a round of patches. It took seconds to identify the patch, and isolate it, but it was still *blindingly* obvious and should have been caught during testing. Even fresh disk installs and slipstreamed installs produced the same problem.

      Microsoft don't test their updates adequately. I don't care if they test them on a thousand models of machine, or include however many beta-testers, whatever they are doing obviously isn't enough to make it safe to apply their testing to millions of computers worldwide. Hence auto-updates are disabled on every network that I've ever worked on (and it was hardly ever me that disabled it), and some places just block the windowsupdate domains entirely to stop that "You *WILL* install this hotfix" crap.

      Updates of anything are a risk, there's no doubt about that and I always run my networks on stable software, to which every change is tested first. But OS updates are a black-box change that can have stupidly enormous ramifications if you don't test. The users shouldn't *have* to be the people catching some of these stupid mistakes.

  138. Yup by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    This "update" ate my boss' laptop & killed at least two of the workstations at the office.

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  139. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Well, if your dissertation is below 1,474,560 characters (about 350-550 pages)... which I strongly hope for those who have to read it... ;)

    Of course with MS Word, you’d be happy to fit a single plain text page on a floppy nowadays. ;)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  140. Upgrade solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it also write, "please upgrade to Windows 7"?

  141. It depend son the exploit by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    IE - if your PC has been compromised, maybe it is doing so via a small hidden daemon that hides itself by making unauthorized calls to the kernel at specific addresses. By patching the kernel, those addresses now do something else. SO when the exploit app mucks with them in the kernel, your machine locks up.

    Just 100% theory but I have been in this industry way too long now to dismiss anything as impossible.

    1. Re:It depend son the exploit by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Well I know for sure that a certain clique of assembly language programmers liked to discuss ways of avoiding import tables and the like, and that when vista came on the scene with users defaulting to non-admin, they ran into a wall where they could no longer make direct calls into other processes that they liked (they were calling another processes kernel32.dll reference, specifically its LoadLibrary() function)

      Discussion along these lines was eventually banned from several assembly language forums. That clique of people was, it was believed, almost certainly up to no good.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  142. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    Data corruption isn't reserved to windows, i've seem OSX eat it's fs too, hell, i've even witnessed data corruption on linux & big iron

    True but missing the point. These problems are very likely on windows and very unlikely on linux or mainframes.

  143. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by jonadab · · Score: 1

    > Ph.D. on a floppy?

    Sure, no problem.

    A typical doctoral dissertation is less than a hundred pages double-spaced, so it'll fit on a 360K floppy even if you do it in XML. If you've got a high-density floppy, you could use RTF.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  144. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    They dont learn from their own mistakes. I have one friend working on her 3rd PhD.... she still loses stuff to never backing something up.

    ALL SHE HAS TO DO IS PUSH THE BUTTON ON THE HARD DRIVE... and it starts the backup software. She cant be bothered with pushing that button before bed.

    I just look at her and say," Lack of education is not your excuse... You're simply dumb."

    And it is simply being dumb. because she KNOWS that pushing that magical button will make it all better, she makes a conscious decision to NOT push that button. Which equates to stupidity.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  145. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by delinear · · Score: 1

    I'm not so sure, a girl who dumpster dives you can probably just about live with, but a girl who doesn't backup her data??

  146. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was also really glad that I wasn't her significant other, because you know who would have been sifting through that dumpster.

    Hah! Women, amirite?

  147. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

    In what way are they "very likely" on windows? Seriously, i dispise the POS just as much as the next linux user, but in all the years of (proffesional) use i've never experienced data corruption at all that wasn't related to hw failure, i've actually seen HFS+/OSX screw up more often then NTFS/Windows.

  148. The BSOD Haiku by bcf · · Score: 1

    A long while ago, a file of Windows haiku was floating around. I don't remember any but this

    Windows XP crashed
    I am the Blue Screen of Death
    No one hears you scream

  149. Fixed it for you by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

    5) Copy ALL important files to the USB drive (probably safest to copy your entire user directory, if your USB drive is big enough.

    Copy ALL important files to the USB drive (probably safest to copy your entire user directory, that command is)
    cd /C //moves to the c directory
    rm * //retrieves the media in the current directory

    --
    Knowledge = Power
    P= W/t
    t=Money
    Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
  150. Re:One copy... on a floppy! OR DRAG AND DROP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in college, a friend of mine who lived down the hall from me came to my door one day frantically knocking. She had stored the only copy of her PhD dissertation on a floppy disk, and the disk had gotten corrupted, and she didn't know what to do.

    I poked around on it for a little while, trying out a disk sector editor I had to see if I could recover anything, and I couldn't. It was just lost, period.

    She ended up going dumpster-diving. She had thrown away a printed hard copy the day before, and they hadn't taken the trash away yet. She was literally in the trash dumpster, sifting through two apartment buildings' worth of trash to find it, and spent that entire night retyping it from scratch.

    I felt sorry for her, and I remember thinking, "Well, I guess that's one way to learn a lesson that you'll never forget..." I was also really glad that I wasn't her significant other, because you know who would have been sifting through that dumpster.

    tell that idiot with the Phd disertation problem, to get another hard drive and use his original as a secondary and drag the disertation from the bad drive to the good drive...simple as that. The problem is only in the windows settings. Not in his documents. Also can use the Software: ( Powersuite Pro 2008 ) to recover data.

  151. not so bad after all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the comments I've read, it seems that it's only the Windows XP boxes that were infected with virus and other nasties that are BSODing.

    In other words, the weak systems have died. If it wasn't for cases like the PhD dude who lost his thesis, I would call it actually a good thing since those guys will be forced to refresh their Windows install and hopefully make it one less zombie on our intertubes.

    AC

  152. I already fixed this last week.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My father's computer blue screened after January's security updates. I was only able to get around to fixing it last weekened. It turned out to be a bad Nvidia video driver. Microsoft had replaced the driver from the NVidia website for his dual-head video card with some older generic NVidia driver. Went to NVidia and downloaded an even newer driver, and the system works again.

    Oddly enough I only had TEN items (not 11) to download during Tuesday's updates and all my computers have been working fine since then.

  153. On purpose to try and get you to upgrade... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I think this might be a ruse, only real techies know they can get out of it, the rest of them might think they have to upgrade to vista or 7 and do so. Nice one M$, I really hate that....I wonder if it was done on purpose...

  154. only Windows XP boxes ? by viralMeme · · Score: 1

    "From the comments I've read, it seems that it's only the Windows XP boxes that were infected with virus and other nasties that are BSODing"

    Where does it say that only infected Windows X/P boxes are BSODing ?

  155. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by jonadab · · Score: 1

    > PhD "dissertation"? Normally one writes a thesis for a PhD

    Two ways of saying the same thing. The word "thesis" in this context is short for "thesis paper", i.e., a dissertation written in support of a thesis statement.

    > I don't know about you, but that's way
    > more than I can type in a night.

    I'm guessing the story is a few years old.

    Someone who is accustomed to retyping material from extant manuscripts (not very common these days but still a widespread practice in the eighties) and thus is well-practiced at typing quickly and has a halfway decent keyboard to type on (also not real common anymore, but the Model M was very popular at one time) can generally do at least 60wpm, and a lot of people can do more. *Good* typists can do 120+. If we split the difference for the sake of estimation, 90wpm, with only short breaks, comes to about four and a half thousand words an hour, so a fifty-thousand word dissertation might take about twelve hours to type. You could only do this if you were *accustomed* to spending several hours typing every day, of course, and by the time you finished your hands would be cramping up and your arms would feel like they were going to fall off and you wouldn't want to SEE a keyboard again for a week. It would be the kind of feat you would never want to have to repeat, EVER again in your life.

    And there would be typos, and you wouldn't catch all of them, so you'd be turning in an imperfect copy.

    But it's theoretically doable.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  156. The final update! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is finally the update that will actively and effectively secure Windows once and for all!

    Thank you MS.

  157. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by aunt+edna · · Score: 1

    Too bloody right.

    Ubuntu might make it if they learn a lot more of MS's undoubted knowledge of what (the vast majority of) users know & want.

  158. Patch Blue Screen = Infection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    atapi.sys is infected on non-functioning systems. The patched files try to access it and because of the infection they trigger a crash.

    The last time there were blue screens after a patch it was also because people got infected. Not really a Microsoft issue.

  159. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by macs4all · · Score: 1

    i've actually seen HFS+/OSX screw up more often then NTFS/Windows.

    Really?

    Because in my use of HFS and HFS+ on Macs since it was released (MFS was the filesystem on the original Macs. HFS came about later, and HFS+ later still), I have never lost a file that wasn't attributed to HD failure (and that happened only once).

  160. Rootkit false positive? by bjs555 · · Score: 2, Informative

    My machines are running ok but I thought I'd look to see if KB977165 which is reported to cause the blue screens was on any of them. It was installed on one machine and not on another. So I thought I'd check a few more things that others say may be causing the problem.

    It has been suggested that atapi.sys in the system32/drivers folder might be rootkitted by the update. I compared the SHA-1 hash of atapi.sys on both machines and they were the same (A719156E8AD67456556A02C34E762944234E7A44) so, apparently, update KB977165 didn't change that file in my case.

    Some people are saying that atapi.sys is infected with a rootkit. I ran scanned the file through Jotti.com and it found nothing. I also scanned the file at VirusTotal.com and only eSafe reported a problem as follows:
    eSafe 7.0.17.0 2010.02.11 Win32.Rootkit

    I think this is a false positive since I have identical copies of atapi.sys on both machines and both show the same result on eSafe.

    It's possible, I suppose, that I was rooted by something other than the Windows updates but, so far, Sysinternals Rootkit Revealer has shown nothing suspicious.

    Do these results agree with anybody elses?

    1. Re:Rootkit false positive? by dlapine · · Score: 1

      Was working on customer's computer last night, and I did the scan of his hard drive on my clean system and it caught a hacked atapi.sys with AVG.

      "Object name";"K:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\atapi.sys"

      "Detection name";"Trojan horse Rootkit-Pakes.U"

      Swapped it out with the good one from my windows XP SP3 and then did the updates on his system. No issues.

      I was just lucky and did this without knowledge of the Blue screen issue.

      So, to sum up:

      1) yes atapi.sys can be hacked

      2) didn't see any blue screens when updating 4 XP systems with known good atapi.sys.

      That's just one data point, but it's useful.

      --
      The Internet has no garbage collection
    2. Re:Rootkit false positive? by bjs555 · · Score: 1

      I know it's bad form to reply to my own post but I just found the following VirusTotal scan result for a rooted atapi.sys file that causes the blue screen:

      http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/85aa49f587f69f30560f02151af2900f3dc71d39d1357727ab41b11ef828a7ff-1265925529

      Note that eSafe in this case finds nothing. Doesn't say much for eSafe, huh?

  161. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its that Mac ports (generally) take ages to come out, and perform awful because the rather amateur devhouses that create them are useless. See Feral Interactive, Aspyr Media, etc.

    Having said that, I haven't played computer games in a decade at least so it never mattered much to me.

  162. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've worked for 9 years in a support role for mac & windows, HFS+ and HFS aren't all that stable, however, recovery tended to be abit eaiser with HFS(+) compared to NTFS.

    I'm not going to claim however that HFS was solely to blame, it's always possible that corruption occurred due the ocasional kernel panic on OSX, or bombs in the old days or applications doing something wonky, but it happened, and more often then the (more numerous) windows installations.

    In the end though, it doesn't really matter, in most circumstances the corruption wasn't fatal and we had good backups, and there is no such thing as a perfect computer

  163. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, while command line may be faster than GUI, GUI is easier and here's why: if I want to do some task, I can look at the toolbars and in the menus to fins an item that looks like what I need to do (for example, if I want to find a file, I'll look for a button or menu item named "Search", "Find" or something like that.

    Nevermind the command line, that makes you a computer expert:
    http://xkcd.com/627/

  164. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    PhD "dissertation"? Normally one writes a thesis for a PhD, and a typical length is in the region of 50,000 words. I don't know about you, but that's way more than I can type in a night.

    Say you typed non stop at 60 words per minute, that would take you 833 minutes or about 14 hours. Just about possible - if you started at 6 in the evening you'd be done by 8 the next morning...
    Alternatively, in that situation surely you could find some friends to share the load?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  165. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did she keep the disk in her handbag together with her cell phone?

    If yes, then she is a moron. The speaker is bad for your data, but the vibrate function is worse.

  166. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by Ltap · · Score: 1

    ls | grep foo

    all anyone needs to do is read a man page. There is really no excuse for someone to be tech illiterate nowadays, it's usually just refusal to learn, and we shouldn't cater to it.

    --
    Yet Another Tech Blog
    (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
    http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
  167. Re:LOL by Ltap · · Score: 1

    This is dick-waving, plain and simple. If someone has fun playing games, then they should play games, not feel guilty because of an absurd artificial obligation to fulfil some kind of imaginary "checklist for life".

    --
    Yet Another Tech Blog
    (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
    http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
  168. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And maybe also because they get a lot of testers that help them find bugs, making a better software which can attract more users/customers...

  169. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by laurelraven · · Score: 1

    PhD "dissertation"? Normally one writes a thesis for a PhD, and a typical length is in the region of 50,000 words. I don't know about you, but that's way more than I can type in a night.

    Actually, you typically write a thesis for a Masters degree...for a PhD, you typically write a dissertation, which is a fair bit larger than a thesis.

    --
    RTFA is Known to the State of California to cause cancer.
  170. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Personally, I could care less if my mom uses Linux."

    It's "couldn't care less".

    Thanks for contributing to the nonsensical bastardization of the English language.

  171. Caused by malware-infected atapi.sys by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    You get this problem if your atapi.sys was malware-infected.

    Solution: Replace atapi.sys with a clean copy.

    More info:

    http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=8209

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  172. Nope, sorry, won't work. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    1. Boot from your Windows XP CD or DVD...

    Computers don't come with those any more.

    And, although a few vendors ship with instructions for creating a boot disk, hardly anyone actually follows those instructions.

    1. Re:Nope, sorry, won't work. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Computers don't come with those any more.

      http://thepiratebay.org/

      Problem solved!

  173. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much less could you care?

  174. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by matfud · · Score: 1

    In the UK a dissertation is the term used for a taught masters or undergrad final project. Thesis is the term used for the document resulting from a research masters or a PhD

  175. Not if you said NO to Genuine Advantage? by flaptrap · · Score: 1

    No problems here - but I declined to let Microsoft take "Advantage" of me. Three XP machines...where did that Vista sticker go - it came with this laptop running Linux.

    If accepting WIndows Genuine Advantage leads to the Blue Screen of Death...I would say it's time for another class action lawsuit!

  176. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Which equates to stupidity.

    Or self-destructive behavior. Therapy might help that. Or it might not...

  177. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    Same here in Australia.

  178. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by lennier · · Score: 1

    "The question is why would developers want to expand their market share among the non-technical users? "

    Because non-technical users are domain experts, and they can add content to your system.

    The trick is providing ways for non-technical domain experts to contribute that content without breaking the technical bits.

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  179. Re:microsoft screws users again. Why is this news? by lennier · · Score: 1

    At least one damn; that's the Planck quantum of empathy, right?

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  180. What a relief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only had one user have this issue in my office. This is mostly a result of most other users having Vista or Win7 on their computers by now. When I first saw the issue, my exact thoughts were: "what the hell?"
    I was in the process of doing my usual troubleshooting, but went home for the day.

    I happened upon this article and it hit me: "This is the exact same issue I'm having... I wonder what the chances are..."

    When I got back to the office, I tried the first of the commands listed in the fix. It worked. That meant that the updates were there, and that more than likely they were a problem. After finishing all the commands, the computer now runs like a top! I owe that "maxyimus" user a great deal of thanks for the stress relief.

    Do I blame Microsoft for this? Not entirely... I think greater testing is required before they release patches such as the one they did, but apart from that, I'm just thankful the fix was an easy one.

  181. Re:One copy... on a floppy! by laurelraven · · Score: 1

    In the US, it's the other way around, so I imagine that is what they were referring to.

    --
    RTFA is Known to the State of California to cause cancer.