There's already a few featured articles with non-free clips, e.g. Star Trek: First Contact and Cartman Gets an Anal Probe. The "breakthrough" has already happened; it's just that those adding the clips do so quietly and sparingly (they are non-free, after all).
Not every article will benefit from a video; sometimes a GIF or basic image will do. Even in articles where non-freeness doesn't keep video to a minimum, resources (number of editors, file size, etc.) and common sense will. Video won't reach banner-ad ubiquity on WP, but every once in a while you'll see one and say "ooh, neat".
DocVerse: "Oh Google, I want your acquisition money in my business account now! Oh! Yes! Yes!" [releases shiny products and middleware all over the place]
fix the web without breaking backwards compatibility
Using video when object with just a mime type and filename doesn't break backwards compatibility?
Given that intentional spite of IE (video is otherwise redundant and has not brought about a standard format), along with canvas and the codification of bad SGML parsing, I'm not convinced we should celebrate HTML5's failure (or FAIL, as people who can't type lowercase seven-letter words say now). I won't touch it.
I'll keep using XHTML 1.0 and pretend HTML5 and XHTML 1.1 (with its invalid DTDs and such) never existed, tyvm.
It's a Rich Self-replicating Content Distribution Network (rsCDN(tm)). It complements outdoor architectures, beautifies connected ecosystems, and synergizes with the real world. Periodic maintenance ensures minimal use of vertical resources!
Comcast only said "While we do not normally comment on [mergers and acquisitions] rumors, the report that Comcast has a deal to purchase NBC Universal is inaccurate." The inaccuracy could've been in some details of the report, or whether such a deal would actually happen, but they didn't specify which (in that quote).
PR guys love to reveal without revealing and lie without lying. A failure to do either leaves the company vulnerable.
Slashdot Mirror
There's already a few featured articles with non-free clips, e.g. Star Trek: First Contact and Cartman Gets an Anal Probe. The "breakthrough" has already happened; it's just that those adding the clips do so quietly and sparingly (they are non-free, after all).
Not every article will benefit from a video; sometimes a GIF or basic image will do. Even in articles where non-freeness doesn't keep video to a minimum, resources (number of editors, file size, etc.) and common sense will. Video won't reach banner-ad ubiquity on WP, but every once in a while you'll see one and say "ooh, neat".
Yes, but he is still vulnerable to falling gold plaques, enraged catgirl goddesses of luck, and Chuck Norris.
At least it improves on their draft slogan, "AstraZeneca: culling the unfit from the gene pool through unfortunate accidents since 1999".
Yo dawg, I herd you like side effects so we put a Viagra in your Viagra so you can go blind while you get priapism. http://www.viagra.com/
That, and the "Homepage" is a giveaway.
DocVerse: "Oh Google, I want your acquisition money in my business account now! Oh! Yes! Yes!" [releases shiny products and middleware all over the place]
I misread that as "Monitor Pirate Bay torrents of TODAY" and wondered who could've incurred the wrath of Comcast. Or Al Roker.
(Do not piss off Roker. He can control the weather and make you cry.)
*Using video when object with just a mime type and filename _would probably work too_ doesn't break backwards compatibility?
(My brain ate four words, I guess.)
Using video when object with just a mime type and filename doesn't break backwards compatibility?
Given that intentional spite of IE (video is otherwise redundant and has not brought about a standard format), along with canvas and the codification of bad SGML parsing, I'm not convinced we should celebrate HTML5's failure (or FAIL, as people who can't type lowercase seven-letter words say now). I won't touch it.
I'll keep using XHTML 1.0 and pretend HTML5 and XHTML 1.1 (with its invalid DTDs and such) never existed, tyvm.
"Lost" is what ABC is to Cablevision. :)
LOL gb2/4chan fgt
Simple. IBM no longer needed help because it invented awesome.
So you're a PC (proletariat communist) huh?
But EA already has an exclusive license on real baseball!
That's such a ninja tactic.
But, but...HTML5 will replace Flash! And it has, like, video!! It's...it's like, object, but for VIDEO!!!!!!
[/fanboy]
But you repeat yourself.
Speaking of McDonald's, I bet they'd use street-view ads to make their own fantasy version of the golden arch-less Cycle Center in Chicago. (Via WP)
They'd probably replace trees with Big Macs and bikes with Happy Meal toys.
Besides, if the ginkgo industry's scared it won't be seen as a feel-good product, they can just say it lowers cholesterol or something.
There are no roaming fees in China, only "People's Harmonious Technological Journey Dues".
Don't forget Omarosa. We need someone to misinterpret a "black body" remark as racist.
Clippy: It looks like you're getting a hard-on...
"organic carpet"? Keep up, man!
It's a Rich Self-replicating Content Distribution Network (rsCDN(tm)). It complements outdoor architectures, beautifies connected ecosystems, and synergizes with the real world. Periodic maintenance ensures minimal use of vertical resources!
Comcast only said "While we do not normally comment on [mergers and acquisitions] rumors, the report that Comcast has a deal to purchase NBC Universal is inaccurate." The inaccuracy could've been in some details of the report, or whether such a deal would actually happen, but they didn't specify which (in that quote).
PR guys love to reveal without revealing and lie without lying. A failure to do either leaves the company vulnerable.
Not until they approve that 100 Mbps Ethernet I've been waiting on!