Slashdot Mirror


Ginkgo Doesn't Improve Memory Or Cognitive Skills

JumperCable writes "Ginkgo biloba has failed — again — to live up to its reputation for boosting memory and brain function. Just over a year after a study showed that the herb doesn't prevent dementia and Alzheimer's disease, a new study from the same team of researchers has found no evidence that ginkgo reduces the normal cognitive decline that comes with aging. In the new study, the largest of its kind to date, DeKosky and his colleagues followed more than 3,000 people between the ages of 72 and 96 for an average of six years. Half of the participants took two 120-milligram capsules of ginkgo a day during the study period, and the other half took a placebo. The people who took ginkgo showed no differences in attention, memory, and other cognitive measures compared to those who took the placebo, according to the study, which was published in this week's Journal of the American Medical Association."

403 comments

  1. You know what else it's good for though, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's basically herbal Viagra! BOING! Not that that would interest anyone here.

    1. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by Forge · · Score: 1, Funny

      In other news Red Bull dose not actually give you wings and drinking it will not enable you to fly.

      We return to our reporter at the scene where emergency crews are cleaning up the mess left by someone who took an add for a food or drink product literally.

      Ginkgo is FOOD. Not medicine. Meaning that all the distributors need to prove is that it isn't poisonous and they can sell it with all kinds of wild claims attached. Perhaps the rules should change to require literal truth. "Our bear makes other people more beautiful to you"

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    2. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's food just like willow bark is food.

    3. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Our bear makes other people more beautiful to you"

      Is that a Care Bear, or what kind of bear, exactly?

    4. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by Forge · · Score: 1

      It's "Tipsy Bear" from the care bear family. Either that or kind of "beer" you drink.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    5. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by abigor · · Score: 1

      Same with argenine, which I'm taking for a soft-tissue injury. It acts as a vasodilator, and there's evidence the increased blood flow to normally low blood flow tissues like tendons and ligaments can help heal them faster.

      But all that blood flow has another effect as well...makes me wonder what stuff like Viagra and Cialis are actually like, given the effects of this stuff.

    6. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by game+kid · · Score: 1

      Besides, if the ginkgo industry's scared it won't be seen as a feel-good product, they can just say it lowers cholesterol or something.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    7. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      "Our bear makes other people more beautiful to you"

      I'm having a hard time figuring out if you actually intended to say, "Our beer makes other people more beautiful to you" or, "Our bear makes other people more beautiful than you."

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    8. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by Znork · · Score: 1

      Same with Icariin, which has apparently been scientifically demonstrated to be a PDE5 inhibitor.

    9. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "But all that blood flow has another effect as well...makes me wonder what stuff like Viagra and Cialis are actually like, given the effects of this stuff."

      The Chinese remedy, Sum Yung Tang, has been found to be highly effective.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    10. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by treeves · · Score: 1

      The line between food and medicine is not that sharp.

      St. John's Wort tea - food or medicine?
      Coffee - food or medicine?
      (I can't remember the name of the beans that contain a lot of 5-hydroxytrytophan, a serotonin precursor, but they make me very drowsy) - Food or medicine?
      Fish oil - food or medicine? (I have lowered my high triglycerides significantly by using omega-3 fish oil capsules.)

      But I guess that's why you got a funny mod instead of insightful or informative.

      Your sig is informative though! - a good disclaimer of sorts.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    11. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Yes, Chinese Viagra alternatives! Made with parts of soon-to-be-extinct animals, and contaminated with real pharmaceuticals of unknown type and quantity. Really tempting.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    12. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      We return to our reporter at the scene where emergency crews are cleaning up the mess left by someone who took an add for a food or drink product literally.

      What about those who took a subtract literally?

      Perhaps the rules should change to require literal truth. "Our bear makes other people more beautiful to you"

      Where may I purchase this Ursidae product?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    13. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      St Johns wort - food. coffee - food fish oil = food They are all sold as a food, rather than a medicine - regardless of potential health benefits of each. If they wanted to make claims of medicinal usage then they'd need to send the product through extensive testing for effectives and side effects, etc. It's simpler to make a vague allegation of some possible effect and watch the foolish snap them up.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    14. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by The+Blank · · Score: 1

      Gingko is food? You ever smelled a ginkgo tree fruit? It may not be medicine, but you won't see ginkgo-flavored ice cream any time soon. ....ok, maybe in Japan.

    15. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by Forge · · Score: 1

      It was meant to be funny while using logic and information. (My TNG rerun binge has made me worry that I might develop Data's personality without his power.)

      My sig is an essential disclaimer. I am dyslexic in a way that causes a great number of misspellings in everything I write.

      I depend heavily on the spell check built into the various software I use (God bless the person who added spell check to Firefox).

      Unfortunately, spell-check is no match for a real word that sounds just like the word I intended to type.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    16. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      It's "Tipsy Bear" from the care bear family.

      I remember him. No Heart didn't cause him much trouble, but No Liver could defeat him easily.

    17. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by millennial · · Score: 1

      Did you really miss the joke there?

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
    18. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by treeves · · Score: 1

      Actually St. John's Wort is not sold as a food, and while the other two are, they do have effects just like medicines do, e.g raising blood pressure, thinning the blood, etc. It could in some cases be dangerous to treat a substance (even some things you would call a food) like it can't hurt you simply because it isn't regulated by the FDA.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    19. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Why yes! I apparently am not up to date with all the slang words for genitals.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    20. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Although in my defense, when the first hit on Google for the search is urban dictionary rather than a porn site, it must be a pretty uncommon term.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    21. Re:You know what else it's good for though, right? by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      It's sold as a food here in Aus. Even water can kill you when you drink too much - but I don't see anyone trying to get that treated as a medicine.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  2. That's just Western prejudice by For+a+Free+Internet · · Score: 5, Funny

    These euro-centric "scientists" can't see pas their narrow-minded blinders to tap into the millenia of cultural experience embodied in Eastern medical and spiritual traditions. The point is, Gingko Baloba has a very potent effect when added to the labels of alternative medical products, causing them to fly off the shelves in exchange for cash. Western medicine is just jealous and probably racist and sexist against peoples like me.

    --
    UNITE with the Campaign for a Free Internet because today, our future begins with tomorrow!
    1. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sounds like they should do some tests on this "placebo" stuff to see what makes it as good as ginkgo.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:That's just Western prejudice by IdleTime · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ROFLMAO!

      Science is not centric anything, you look at the evidence and if it do not support the claims made by the manufacturer, it's clearly bullshit.

      Not that I had expected the result to be anything different than what it currently is. Just because something is used by a group of people for years does not mean it actually works. Ref religion, clearly a fantasy yet millions of people are dumb enough to accept it as reality without asking the most basic questions.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    3. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!

    4. Re:That's just Western prejudice by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Too. Damn. Funny.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Phreakiture · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know you're joking, but I actually would have thought it really cool if they had a second control group who took nothing, just to see if there is a psychosomatic element in play.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    6. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you.

      To this post I feel I should add: Gingko Biloba.

      (does it work for mod points?)

    7. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think it's funny but when I end up living for thousands of years and you croak from a toxic indused cancerous heart stroke and the western "doctors" can't do anything because your yang karma balance aura is totally waked out from flouricidated water and killer vaccines, I will have the last laugh over a cup of steaming medicinal chai. --CFAFI, going underground as an "anonymous" to evade myself from the Italian terrorists who control Slashdot

    8. Re:That's just Western prejudice by dyingtolive · · Score: 1, Insightful

      These euro-centric "scientists" can't see pas their narrow-minded blinders to tap into the millenia of cultural experience embodied in Eastern medical and spiritual traditions.

      Yup, right up there with leeching and medicinal tapeworms. Those aren't "eastern", but they were used for years too. Got a headache? We'll drill a gaping, untreated hole in your head to release the "bad spirits"! Thats African, not "eastern", but do you think it's not effective? You must clearly be racist and sexist as well.

      The point is, Gingko Baloba has a very potent effect when added to the labels of alternative medical products, causing them to fly off the shelves in exchange for cash.

      Yup, it makes yuppies in "Organic" food stores worldwide not listen to reason. I've another shipment of snake oil that's been selling so well I can hardly keep it in stock. Since that's your only proof of effect so far, this stuff must be awesome. I'll get you some dirt cheap if you want. I swear!!!

      Western medicine is just jealous and probably racist and sexist against peoples like me.

      This statement confuses me such that I'm not quite sure how to comment. I'll try anyway, after a deep breath. Ginkgo Baloba[sic] is a plant. I am sure that by pure virtue of you posting your above comment, you are not a plant, certainly not of the same species as Ginkgo is. I'm fairly certain that you can't rightfully claim any similarity between your gender, whatever it may be, and that of any type of Ginkgo. Why is it that you assume some sort of racial or even sexist slight against you, whomever or whatever you might be, when a study is done involving herbal qualities of a plant and they're found to be equivalent to a placebo?


      Oh, unless you thought the whole thing was about Ginkgo Balboa, Rocky's little known Chinese adopted sister.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    9. Re:That's just Western prejudice by anarchyboy · · Score: 1

      There is, that's why they tested it against placebo. If they had tested it against taking nothing they would have found ginkgo (or the placebo) improved memory.

    10. Re:That's just Western prejudice by lorenlal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I read this a while back, and it's been noted that placebos are becoming even more effective... so the manufacturers are making even more potent ones.

    11. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1

      Yep, the Placebo effect is well documented so there's really no need to test it in every study.

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    12. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHOOOOOSH!

    13. Re:That's just Western prejudice by natehoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, if they wanted to check psychosomatic elements, the ideal would be to have subgroups who "know" what they are taking, but lie to some of them. So you have a group that "knows" they are taking the real thing (some of them actually are, some of them are taking the placebo), and a group that "knows" they are taking the placebo (some are, some aren't). Arrange it so the people appear to have learned accidentally about their faked status, so they feel certain they know the truth.

      If a significant percentage of those who "know" they are taking a placebo get a real benefit from the drug anyway, then you've probably eliminated psychosomatic bias and have a winner.

      Especially if that exceeds the number who "know" they are taking the real drug but are actually taking a placebo, because you've demonstrated that the real benefits of the drug are better than the placebo effect can even generate. :)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    14. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you so mean, I am just a humble spirit trying to spread enlitenment and peace and you are all attacking me about stuff that you obviusly know nothing about you ignorant imperialist pigdog! --underground commando of the CFAFI

    15. Re:That's just Western prejudice by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      At first I thought so too, but then I looked at For a Free Internet's previous posts. Definitely paranoid sociopath material there.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    16. Re:That's just Western prejudice by nasch · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you should probably just get a new sarcasm detector. Yours may be beyond repair.

    17. Re:That's just Western prejudice by natehoy · · Score: 1

      The placebo effect is well-documented, but it's also not a fixed constant. In order for it to exist in quantity, the claims have to be at least somewhat credible, credible enough for people to really believe they are possible. The effects also have to be subtle enough for the placebo effect to work.

      If I came out with a pill that claimed to cure broken arms in 3 seconds, the placebo effect would be negligible. It's not a very credible claim to make, so there wouldn't be too many people taking the placebo thinking "I just know this will work!" strongly enough for their bones to knit themselves. And I couldn't fool someone who took the placebo into thinking it worked when it didn't. The results would be very easy to validate. The arm is broken or it isn't. If the drug had 50% efficacy, than 50% of the test subjects who received the real thing would have their arms fixed, and 100% of the subjects who received the placebo would not. Even if I somehow managed to fool a bunch of people into thinking it was credible, the results are too easy to test for me to get any placebo false positives.

      If I came out with something that claimed to increase blood flow to the brain and thereby enhance memory, the placebo effect would be far stronger, and could actually simulate the desired effect in the absence of the drug. The scientific language I could use to describe what's behind it sounds somewhat credible, and the results are less easy to validate and more easily created by the brain itself. For example, just exercising your memory is enough to improve it, and if you've been convinced that your memory has been improved you'll tend to exercise it more. For a study like that, I really need to compensate for the placebo effect, probably more strongly than is done in blind studies today, in order to differentiate between the placebo effect and real benefits.

      Of course, if there is an equal and measurable benefit to both placebo and real drug subjects, I suppose you could release the placebo as a new wonder drug, or just convince everyone that the government put it in their water. :)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    18. Re:That's just Western prejudice by sdpuppy · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yeah yeah.

      But the problem with Ginko (and stuff like it) is that the people who really need it

      forget to take it

      Thank you, I'll be here all day.

      Now what were we talking about? (dang)

    19. Re:That's just Western prejudice by tgatliff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tests like these are flawed from the beginning, and I am sure that these scientists know this. The trick that is always played by supplement manufactures are to set the dosages much lower than what is required to reduce side effects. Meaning, for any "drug" to work, there will always be side effects.

      For Ginko, the effective dosage is around 600mg per day, and I can tell you from years of experience that it works quite well at this dosage. There are many side effects in some people at this dosage, however. Also, it is a very powerful blood thinner as well, however, so this side effect can be quite dangerous for some people as well. None of this is a problem at 120mg, however, which is why it showed no improvement.

    20. Re:That's just Western prejudice by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Personally, I'm just waiting for them to finally come clean, and publish the studies that show that smoking, drinking, eating fatty foods and unprotected sex are exactly what IS good for you, and will lead to a long and satisfying life!!

      Hell, they're already starting to show that protein and fats ARE good for you here in the past few years.

      They're saying that alcohol (in moderation) also is good for you.

      I'm just hoping they'll find the remining behaviors I listed are just as beneficial to humans. At that point, it will be a man's world again...doing what we naturally like to do will finally once again be accepted!!

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    21. Re:That's just Western prejudice by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      You would need to follow that up with a third control group that took nothing and KNEW nothing, just to see if there is a psychosomatic element of being studied.

      Hint: Evidence has been found to support the 'placebo problem' and the 'being studied at all problem'.

    22. Re:That's just Western prejudice by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Yup, right up there with leeching

      Actually, leaching *does* have medicinal benefits. Doctors have learned that leaches can be used effectively in the reattaching of severed body parts. They've also found benefits in the use of maggots (they eat infected flesh, but don't bother the healthy flesh surrounding it)

      Got a headache? We'll drill a gaping, untreated hole in your head to release the "bad spirits"!

      Hate to break it to you, but this is used by modern medicine too in order to relieve cranial pressure caused by fluid buildup.

      So, despite your cries of "it's all bunk", "new" discoveries involving old techniques are not uncommon. That's not to say that *all* old cures and treatments work, but just because someone scoffs at something as unenlightened doesn't mean it really is.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    23. Re:That's just Western prejudice by TheCarp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another thing is, we shouldn't expect it to be able to do anything.

      If I give you a sugar pill and tell you it will cause tachycardia (and, if needed explain what that means), and give it to people, I would expect a significant number to report racing hearts. However, you can feel your heart, so there is a feedback loop, and its beat can be effected by mood, thought etc. (to some degree even consciously controlled)

      However, if I say it "increases blood flow in your calf"... I might expect you to report strange sensations in your calf... but I wouldn't really expect to see actual increased blood flow there (as opposed to anywhere else from heart rate changes).

      How needed are placebos on tests that look at physical things like, tumor size? I have yet to find any credible link between believing that your tumor will shrink and having it happen.

      On the other hand, memory and cognitive skills can be effected by mood and psychological process. So I think the placebo makes sense to rule out cognitive differences based on differences in your actions based on the belief that the pill might be helping.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    24. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, leaching *does* have medicinal benefits.

      Exactly what diseases can be cured by extracting substances with a solvent?

      FFS the GP spelled it wright, why can't you?

    25. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dare I say whoosh?

    26. Re:That's just Western prejudice by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      It would alot more useful if these memory experts would find a way to access a person's memory and back it up to some portable device. That way when my wife asks about what we're gonna do on her birthday, I can recover more gracefully. I don't think a truck load of Ginkgo will help me answer a question about what I said 3 weeks ago when my wife asks me about it at 3:00am. At least with access to a backup device, I can review, and recover more gracefully.

      The problem with reality is that I can't seem to find the [Pause] button. - Unknown

    27. Re:That's just Western prejudice by rjbeeth · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, this day and age you can find a scientist willing to write anything about 'anything', positive and negative...

      Unfortunately again, most studies restrict the tests so much (in order to see and identify results) that in most cases the very process of trying to observe and isolate an action or reaction causes the test to fail....

      That being said, having had the experience of having my mental faculties affected by intensive surgery. Causing a major issue with short term memory, I can certainly vouch for the efficacy of Ginko and so can my wife as I usually become quickly identified by her if I have not taken my Ginko for the day.

      Lastly, like everything else, not all Ginko is the same. Over the last 15 years I've tried quite a few brands and some work very well, and others not at all. For the most part one gets what one pays for... so had they cut corners and used a low end product, that by itself would have dramatically affected the outcome.

      The real funny/sad thing is, that scientists are only just now starting to move from the chemical to the energy phase of how things interact. They unfortunately think of themselves as omnipotent in their studies, but are also quickly becoming dinosaurs.... eventually we may have people who can evaluate the whole picture, but I don't think they are quite there yet.... hence these all encompassing statements of "It doesn't work" by our scientific community, on all sorts of subjects....

    28. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never read a bottle of Gingsing or any other herbal supplement. The manufacturers not only don't make any claims but they can't. If they did they would get a visit from the FDA.
      Nice rant on religion there too. You do realize that you have the exact same number of facts backing up your position as religious people do, yet that doesn't stop you from spreading your beliefs and claiming others are wrong. I really hate hypocrites. If I had to choose between having a religious person and a douche-bag athiest try and convert me I'd pick a religious person every time. They are far less angry, violent, and conceited than athiests are.

    29. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The placebo effect is the same as the occasional cancer patient that goes into remission when the best medical science said there was no way to survive. It definitely exists, and there is no good explanation for it. It's like a belief that you will recover, or in the case of placebos that some drug will improve whatever function, triggers something in your body to put out a little extra effort, and it is sometimes enough to turn the tide.

      For simple things like a memory test, just believing you have a better chance of doing well allows you to do better than you would ordinarily. If you don't think it works, then it probably won't.

      You've got to remember that even cognitive processes rely on physical bodily functions - mood depends on more of one type of chemical firing off than another, so even things like a placebo anti-depressant effect is changing the physical responses in your brain. It's quite impressive, when you think about it.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    30. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The second portion of that is unneccessary, because if the drug really works the people who take the placebo will see less of an improvement than the ones taking the drug. There isn't any need to over-complicate it.

      If the placebo and the drug both have identical effects, then the drug is actually a placebo also.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    31. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      That isn't really important when you are looking to determine if the effects of a drug are real or not. If they are real, the effects will be greater than that of the placebo. If not, they will be about the same. That's all you really want to get out of these studies, they aren't looking to study the placebo effect, just the actual effectiveness of the drug.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    32. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Actually, presented in the right way, it does! ^^

      Psychosomatic medicine is a very interesting area. Just don’t try this at home, if you don’t know what you’re doing.
      Because if you get someone to believe he can’t breathe, he will die. Even if he can breathe. The brain just shuts down anyway.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    33. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the Ginko was doing anything, it should have shown a slight improvement over the placebo even at 120mg. If the results come back essentially the same, then it is obviously not the Ginko improving memory.

      The placebo effect is powerful on its own, and had they used another control group who took nothing you probably would have seen the Ginko and placebo groups both averaging better scores than the control group. That doesn't mean the Ginko itself actually does anything.

      Even assuming you are right that Ginko will have literally no affect whatsoever until the dosage is above a certain level (which I find ridiculous, btw), if it is unsafe to use at its effective dosage, what's the point?

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    34. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      The real connundrum with psychosomatic medicine is that anybody who knows how to use it, can't.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    35. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      FFS the GP spelled it wright, why can't you?

      ROTFL!!

      I love irony.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    36. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Machtyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This sounds like an episode of House.

    37. Re:That's just Western prejudice by tuxgeek · · Score: 1

      Agreed that this test is seriously flawed although I can't say how. Perhaps being based on studying elderly, one foot in the grave men, whose brains are most likely toasted after years of ... wait for it ... alcohol consumption?
      Another flaw may be in that all ginkgo supplement brands are not equal. Some better formulated than others
      Another possibility they don't list is that maybe the men were stupid to begin with and that nothing would help them in the first place, not even Rx amphetamines?

      I know from personal experience that ginkgo definitely does work as a mental function stimulant.
      I began using it when I was in my 30s and taking college night classes after a full day's work .. day job. Long story short, It made maintaining a 4.0 gpa through Algebra, Trig & Calculus possible for me.

      Today, I'm in my early 50s and still take it daily. I certainly can tell the difference than days I don't. Actually it takes about a week without it for the fog to set in.

      The only documented bad side-effect being reduced hemostasis.
      However I find some of the many documented and proven benefits of taking ginkgo daily:
      1. My tinnitus is greatly reduced
      2. And most importantly for me, I have a genetic anomaly with my heart. Ginkgo's PAF & vasodilation properties are attributable to why I am still healthy and physically active, contrary to the opinions of some quack doctors that recently told me that I am a walking dead man and need to be on proprietary, and very expensive, beta blockers to treat what they diagnosed me as having cardio myopia.

      I see this study as just another attack on an effective and useful supplement by the pharmaceutical industry that is trying to make patients out of healthy people and addicting healthy people on toxic excrement.

      Ginkgo is a potent inhibitor of PAF function, same thing as the proprietary pharmaceutical Plavix. Who needs Plavix when you can get Ginkgo for a fraction of the cost? Along with the numerous other benefits Ginkgo provides.

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    38. Re:That's just Western prejudice by hey! · · Score: 1

      Except that Gingko wasn't used for cognitive enhancement in traditional Chinese medicine. It was used to treat respiratory ailments.

      Most of the herbal potions sold in drugstores are just as questionable from TCM standpoint as they are from a scientific one, for example "ginseng" preparations spiked with *ma huang*, whose active ingredients are ephedrine and pseudoephedrine.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    39. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Even assuming you are right that Ginko will have literally no affect whatsoever until the dosage is above a certain level (which I find ridiculous, btw)

      Really?! Do you not make a distinction between "literally no affect[sic]" and "no measurable, or statistically significant, effect"? It seems that all substances have a dosage point at which there is no "measurable effect", depending on the precision of the measurement. At least, I'm not aware of any substance that has a measurable effect (in a standard clinical setting) when one molecule of it is introduced into the human body. Alcohol requires billions of molecules to have a measurable effect (varied depending on what one is measuring - i.e. behavior, or just BAC, or the firing of synapses, etc). Water poisoning also only comes into play (has a measurable effect) with certain very high doses.

      The GP makes a good point. One could similarly perform a study that showed cyanide "is not poisonous" by limiting the dosage levels to below safe levels of ingestion. Or that alcohol "does not impair judgement" by using doses of alcohol that are significantly lower (1/5th) than the average use. I wonder what studies done with rats, etc., with various degrees of dosage of ginkgo would show...

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    40. Re:That's just Western prejudice by joocemann · · Score: 1

      Biloba (2 lobes)

    41. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you are saying is that Ginko is no better than rat poison (Warfarin), it is more expensive, and it is used without monitoring coagulation levels?

      Blood thinners may prevent strokes in certain people, but that doesn't mean you should be taking them. You may be better of with a safer medication, like Aspirin. Something that actually been shown to reduce risk of stroke and even cancer. But then these scientists and their studies with followups, they know nothing right?

    42. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      I can tell you from years of experience that it works quite well at this dosage

      No! You really very almost certainly can't tell from your own experience! That's why we have double-blinded experiments.

    43. Re:That's just Western prejudice by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      If the Ginko was doing anything, it should have shown a slight improvement over the placebo even at 120mg. If the results come back essentially the same, then it is obviously not the Ginko improving memory.

      The Ginko studies are scientifically valid, but you are incorrect in claiming that if Xmg works, then X/10 mg should work a little. Two examples:
      1) not enough antibiotics will fail completely to rid the body of a given infection. The right dose will work.
      2) Read "Awakenings" (the book by Oliver Sacks about his experiments with L-dopa). Once you get into chaos theory (aka strange attractors), you'll find basically huge differences in responses to microscopic differences in dosages.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    44. Re:That's just Western prejudice by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      If the Ginko was doing anything, it should have shown a slight improvement over the placebo even at 120mg. If the results come back essentially the same, then it is obviously not the Ginko improving memory.

      Why? What is the rational for that? That makes certain assumptions about the mechanism of action. Perhaps you could tell us what these are, then?

    45. Re:That's just Western prejudice by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      The thing is that placebos really do work. It isn't just an imaginary thing. A placebo may not heal a broken arm in three seconds, but it will certainly help to heal it quicker.

    46. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The testing really wasn't against what I've ever heard claimed about it though...

      What I've heard is that Ginko improves memory as you age, by maintaining proper blood flow... (one full dose aspirin a day would be a good test for this too for maybe a 10-30 yr period..) They tested this on old people presumably that already have had cholesterol/other age related issues reduce blood flow and do damage/harm...

      I've never heard any claim that Ginko can *reverse* this type of damage.. I've heard that *mega-doses* of Vitamin B and D *may* aid the brain in rerouting around damaged areas from lack of blood flow... Never heard any claims regarding Ginko in this regard..

      So, this test just proved that the people conducting the test don't listen/read any actual claims and test against their own beliefs.. It does nothing to prove "anti-western-medicine quakes" wrong, because they didn't test against the claims... A complete waste of money and time.. busy work, forum fodder, bullplop.. This was just someone that had grant money to burn and didn't want to lose it.. "Hey I need to spend this grant, or I won't get another! Crap! Let's test Ginko for something anyone w/ half a brain knows is IMPOSSIBLE! Step 3.. PROFIT!!!"

      Nothing to see here, move along..

    47. Re:That's just Western prejudice by flynt · · Score: 1

      Also remember, placebos aren't just for patients, they are for clinicians, too. Placebos play a central role in the pivotal concept in modern day trials, randomization. I'm sure you realize there needs to be *some* sort of control group. In double-blind trials, the doctors won't know what the patient has been given, placebo or treatment, so biases are reduced compared to if they did know (who gets into the trial, for instance?). There are many biases, including subconscious ones, that can come out when the observer (doctor) knows the assigned treatment.

    48. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Ironic example, given that alcohol does not in fact impair judgment in the way people imagine, and that it still appears to do is a consequence of the placebo effect.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    49. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      At first I thought so too, but then I looked at For a Free Internet's previous posts. Definitely paranoid sociopath material there.

      I think he's really simply a troll. A nicely talented one. Who clearly hates Italians, heh.

    50. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      From our evil jedi overlords, I respectfully request a refere*urk*

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    51. Re:That's just Western prejudice by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      That's just Western prejudice

      Actually, it is.

      I recall hearing that it had to be higher doses - as much as 3000mg/day - to see an effect.

      Of course, 3000mg/day has been labelled dangerous to your health. The amounts that have been labelled safe by the FDA and drug companies are so far below, that even if there was an effect you wouldn't see it.

      I'm tired of bullshit studies like this.

      Disclaimer: I don't believe in Ginkgo - but I'm really tired of these bullshit studies that get cited as proof until the end of time. Want to do it properly to actually dispute the claims? Try it on people aged 30-50 with doses over 2000mg.

      I bet there's a study that tiny amounts of radiation are good for you. Of course, when you up the dose, that completely flips around.

    52. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, right up there with leeching and medicinal tapeworms. Those aren't "eastern", but they were used for years too. Got a headache? We'll drill a gaping, untreated hole in your head to release the "bad spirits"! Thats African, not "eastern", but do you think it's not effective? You must clearly be racist and sexist as well.

      Trepanation has been used in many cultures, including European, African, and Native American cultures, and has been clinically shown to improve some kinds of epileptic seizures. It is still being performed clinically. Even in the West.

    53. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Grail · · Score: 1

      The ideal control group would, of course, be a group taking a "science-based medicine" drug which has been proven to have some effect on memory, attention, etc. Just to prove that the study is actually able to detect the thing it's supposed to be looking for.

    54. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      You laugh but I have a bottle of memory pills on my water cooler that I'm about 1/4 of the way through... got the bottle 3months ago... was meant to last 1 month.

    55. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      If the Ginko was doing anything, it should have shown a slight improvement over the placebo even at 120mg. If the results come back essentially the same, then it is obviously not the Ginko improving memory.

      I don't really understand your reasoning. If a substance is lethal at a certain dose, debilitating at half that dose, and has no side effects at 1/10th the lethal dose, would you say "then it is obviously not this substance that's causing the death at the higher dosage"?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    56. Re:That's just Western prejudice by joocemann · · Score: 1

      How dare you rename things with your dead language stuff like Latin this is just linguistic colonialism like when the FBI/KKK took away Malcolm King's name and changed it to "X" to be like "we can make you disappear because we have white supremacy" and shit. I will call it whaterver I like.

      ummmm... what? I seriously hope you're joking.

      If not, you should seek some help.

    57. Re:That's just Western prejudice by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>The ideal control group would, of course, be a group taking a "science-based medicine" drug which has been proven to have some effect on memory, attention, etc. Just to prove that the study is actually able to detect the thing it's supposed to be looking for.

      You mean caffeine?

      But the entire point of the study was to determine, scientifically, if ginko is effective or not.

      You can't just wave your hands and assume that all alt med drugs don't work.

    58. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so can my wife as I usually become quickly identified by her if I have not taken my Ginko for the day

      So, what you're saying is that when you *do* take it, she doesn't know who you are? Is this the secret to your marital bliss, that she thinks you're someone other than her husband?

    59. Re:That's just Western prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lololol I don't know how to logically address his argument so I'll attack his spelling instead lolololololol

  3. Ginko has a different effect on me by Green+Light · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have noticed that when I take it, I am more "motivated". I get up out of my chair and do stuff, rather than surf, say, slashdot.

    --
    "Send an Instant Karma to me" - Yes
    1. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People say the same about crystal meth

    2. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Abcd1234 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, that or you just assume that's the effect it will have on you, and so you behave accordingly.

      But, hey, who am I to argue with a placebo effect that works for you?

    3. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Exercise will have the same effect on you and improve your health.

    4. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I took gingko once, i was able to see each individual raindrop hitting the parking lot all at once. It was pretty wild stuff. I never did it again. Yes, I'm sure that's what I took.

    5. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      I get up out of my chair and do stuff

      Playing a video game while standing is hardly takes any motivation.

    6. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Vahokif · · Score: 1

      And sugar pills.

    7. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I get up out of my chair and do stuff

      Playing a video game while standing is hardly takes any motivation.

      Oh come on, he was talking about real activity, like going to the kitchen for food and soda. Sheesh.

    8. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i prefer meth

    9. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's true, but it's harder to get motivated enough to exercise. It's fairly easy to get motivated enough to take a pill.

      Maybe he should take the pill to get motivated to exercise...

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    10. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I took Ginkgo Biloba regularly for a few months and, while I think my breath was fresher, I did not note any evidence that I remembered stuff better. I quit taking it. It didn't seem worth the money.

      OTOH, I wasn't testing my memory in any standard way; my comment is purely anecdotal. Still, as an irrational human being, I am glad to read a scientific study that supports my preconception.

    11. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea but meth has an actual reason for this, besides the placebo effect

    12. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by nxtw · · Score: 1

      People say the same about crystal meth

      As does pharmaceutical methylphenidate, amphetamine, or methamphetamine.

    13. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I know I'm being silly here, but I actually read *some* of the JAMA article. In the paper I saw, they were testing to see if GB had any effect on *older* patients with cognitive degeneration.

      So, if you are 70 and you take GB because you think it'll improve your memory, you are probably SOL. If you are 30 and you take it because you want a quick boost, you are probably getting what you pay for.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    14. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      You know, the exact same thing happens to me when I take placebo!

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    15. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by notarockstar1979 · · Score: 1

      And Blackjack. And hookers.

    16. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      and about exercise!

      --
      Balderdash!
    17. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but more about crystal meth

    18. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Funny, exercise just makes me tired and sweaty and desirous of laying down (though, to be fair, a good morning bike ride before work does wonders for my energy level in the morning (though does little for the afternoon battle against involuntary nap time)).

    19. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      So do sugar pills.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    20. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Synn · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just can't get up the energy to take a pill every day. Do you think they could make a pill that makes me motivated to take pills?

    21. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by hmar · · Score: 1

      But, hey, who am I to argue with a placebo effect that works for you?

      A solid point. My morning coffee hasn't been anywhere near as useful since my wife told me that... no never mind. I don't want to ruin it for everyone else too.

    22. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by bearsinthesea · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Really? So it works for 30 year olds, probably? Are there any, say, facts you are basing this conclusion on? Any reasoning?

      Your post seems to say that drugs that work on younger people generally don't work on older people, or people with health problems. Can you give some other examples of this general rule? Maybe some other scientific studies?

    23. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "And Blackjack. And hookers."

      Hey, don't knock what works!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    24. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1

      Has your wife been slipping me decaf, too?

    25. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Aladrin · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think that your father's boot is used for that. It's an anal suppository.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    26. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Before you get too old I would exercise to the point where the same routine takes less energy at least.

    27. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you're not fairly wiped after a fairly heavy cardio workout, you didn't really work out.

    28. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Well, that or you just assume that's the effect it will have on you, and so you behave accordingly.

      What you are claiming as a possibility is not exclusive to what OP said. They did not claim that "Ginko motivates me and I follow through on it", they just said, "When I take it, I do things."

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    29. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by un1xl0ser · · Score: 2, Funny

      in fact, forget the motivation ...

      --
      v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    30. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by operagost · · Score: 1

      Did you run out today?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    31. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      That's so cruel, way to spoil your mornings huh?

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    32. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      The great thing about placebo is it works on whatever you want it to work on!

      Got a toothache? Placebo!

      Feeling a bit run down? Placebo!

      Need to study extra hard for that test? Placebo!

      It really is the wonder drug of our modern age. Too bad it doesn't work if you know it's Placebo. :/

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    33. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      So, are we supposed to moderate this Funny, or are you just out of the stuff? ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    34. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And Blackjack. And hookers."

      Hey, don't knock what works!!

      Mod parent, and grandparent as informative.

    35. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      "Works On My Machine!"

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    36. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by minion · · Score: 1

      I have noticed that when I take it, I am more "motivated". I get up out of my chair and do stuff, rather than surf, say, slashdot.

      So, today you skipped your dose?

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
    37. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Oh please, enough with the pedantic word games. His statement was *clearly* an implication of causation, as is your rewording of it. If he didn't mean to imply causation, he should've phrased his statement differently.

    38. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is not making that claim. Just because the study found that ginko doesn't work to restore memory and cognitive function for older patients does it necessarily follow that ginko has no effect whatsoever. A quick boost is much different than improved memory.

    39. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      I have noticed that when I take it, I am more "motivated". I get up out of my chair and do stuff, rather than surf, say, slashdot.

      You need to up your dosage.

    40. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Well, I see it differently; to me he seemed to be expressing his subjective experience ( if he is a he), leaving it open to interpretation, not excluding the placebo effect. If I were experiencing the placebo effect, and someone asked me about it, this is how I would respond. "I do Y and X happens".

      If was saying it works, why didn't he just say, "It works for me?"

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    41. Re:Ginko has a different effect on me by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      Obviously you didn't take your Ginko the morning you posted this.

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

  4. So what exactly then... by Suiggy · · Score: 1

    ...is ginkgo biloba good for?

    1. Re:So what exactly then... by nschubach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The same thing that the color black is good for. Selling stuff to people.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    2. Re:So what exactly then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Making money. Lots of stuff is sold because it can do "All Sorts of Wonder-full Stuff(tm): Fight aging, teach children math, make you more attractive, shed that belly fat, and make you spll gud," But all it dose is make some one some money for selling it.

      I have found that once I learned how marketing worked it that knowledge was like an inoculation against sales tactics. Spotting the over inflated clams of salesmen, and of the using public, makes it much simpler to avoid stupid trends like "OMG Ginkgo makes you SMART!"

    3. Re:So what exactly then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      ...is ginkgo biloba good for?

      Well, according to Wikipedia:

      Out of the many conflicting research results, Ginkgo extract may have three effects on the human body: improvement in blood flow (including microcirculation in small capillaries) to most tissues and organs; protection against oxidative cell damage from free radicals; and blockage of many of the effects of platelet-activating factor (platelet aggregation, blood clotting) that have been related to the development of a number of cardiovascular, renal, respiratory and central nervous system disorders. Ginkgo can be used for intermittent claudication.

      Some studies suggest a link between ginkgo and the easing of the symptoms of tinnitus.

      Preliminary studies suggest that Ginkgo may be of benefit in multiple sclerosis, showing modest improvements in cognition and fatigue without increasing rates of serious adverse events in this population.

      A study conducted in 2003 by the Department of Dermatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research in Chandigarh, India concluded that Ginkgo is an effective treatment for arresting the development of vitiligo.

      Sources:

    4. Re:So what exactly then... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ginkgo Balboa is clinically proven to improve your boxing skills...

    5. Re:So what exactly then... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      ginkgo biloba , HUH!
      What is it good for?
      Absolutely nothing!
      Say it agian.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:So what exactly then... by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2

      Made me lol @work. Wish I had mod points. :)

    7. Re:So what exactly then... by DogAlmity · · Score: 1

      ...is ginkgo biloba good for?

      Absolutely nothing!
      Say it again y'all!

    8. Re:So what exactly then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely nothing!

    9. Re:So what exactly then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As proven by slave-traders...

    10. Re:So what exactly then... by machine321 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That sounds racist to me.

    11. Re:So what exactly then... by grolaw · · Score: 1

      the infamous walletectomy - a capital depreciation device - parting fools from their money - earning income from grants to perform double-blind, placebo-controlled experiments. All proven things that ginkgo biloba is good for...

    12. Re:So what exactly then... by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm preaching to the choir, but the results of a preliminary test aren't useful for drawing any conclusion beyond whether or not a larger, more expensive, better designed test is justified.

      According to the folks at the evidence based medicine blog, this test is the first real study of the medicinal effects of Ginko.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    13. Re:So what exactly then... by schon · · Score: 1

      Ginkgo Balboa is clinically proven to improve your boxing skills.

      And Ginkgo Bilboa is clinically proven to improve your storytelling skills to other hobbits.

    14. Re:So what exactly then... by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ginkgo Balboa is clinically proven to improve your boxing skills...

      And Ginko Bilboa is clinically proven to get you there and back again.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    15. Re:So what exactly then... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Hey, modding someone down for getting you fired is bad form!

    16. Re:So what exactly then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parting fools and their money.

    17. Re:So what exactly then... by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      That's just because you're hypersensitive.

      It's the same thing the colors red, yellow, blue, and white are good for. Not purple though, purple sucks. ;)

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    18. Re:So what exactly then... by nacturation · · Score: 1

      So what effects does Ginkgo Dildoa have?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  5. Medical conspiracy! by vvaduva · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes but was it ORGANIC Kinkgo?? That is the question! This test was obviously conducted by real doctors who don't want us to know the truth about the power of eating weeds that grow in exotic jungles.

    1. Re:Medical conspiracy! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, first you need to grow the Ginko organically. Then you need to increase the potency by diluting it homeopathically. Next, you form it into an ear candle. Once you do that, the the Loch Ness monster and Bigfoot will contact the aliens from Vega 7 who will beam increased memory skills and ESP into you. But if any of this is attempted by "Western medicine", it will all fail.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Medical conspiracy! by The+Flymaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, not to speak for ginko or non-science, but it's not like eating weeds that grow in exotic jungles hasn't helped save a life or two.

    3. Re:Medical conspiracy! by cain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know you're making a joke, but ginko is far from exotic and nor is it a weed (it's a tree). It is widely grown in cities as it is very hardy. If you live in NYC, you see them all over the place and come fall can't help but smell the foul odor of the pods as they fall to the ground and are crushed underfoot.

      http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=1&taxon_id=200005235
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginkgo_Biloba
      &c, &c

    4. Re:Medical conspiracy! by gtall · · Score: 1

      ORGANIC Kinkgo supports odd and unusual sexual positions, usually requiring various pieces of external mechanical assemblages. However, if you use the inorganic kind, then you might be required to supply batteries.

    5. Re:Medical conspiracy! by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Funny

      I concur. They also need to make sure that they're using ALL NATURAL ginkgo.

      I find it comical that the "ALL NATURAL" movement has any weight behind it when countless varieties of "all natural" plants are quite poisonous, whilst tons of completely chemically derived artificial medicines will save your life.

      Heck I literally remember one stupid infomercial that was on a while back where the guy (one of those typical hyped up dorks who always appears on such shows) was proclaiming that we shouldn't eat anything that had something with a "chemical sounding name" in the ingredients list. I wonder how they'd feel about sodium chloride or dihydrogen monoxide.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    6. Re:Medical conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno about exotic jungles...but Ginko grows all over Ohio.

    7. Re:Medical conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discover magazine is just a bunch of liberal conspiracy theories!

      The rest was right on though.

    8. Re:Medical conspiracy! by Dan+Ost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This whole herbs thing doesn't make any sense to me.

      People eat "herbs" because they think some chemical in the "herb" offers some medicinal benefit. If that chemical can be extracted (or synthesized) in a more pure form and put in a pill, then why would you eat the plant instead? The plant might have the chemical you want, but it also has lots of other (possibly harmful) stuff in it that the pill is free of. Also, with the pill, you know how much of the active ingredient you're getting. There's no way to know how much you're really getting if you eat your "herb".

      If the chemical can't be extracted or isolated, that probably means that the medicinal benefit is really the placebo effect. Another possibility is that a chemical was found, but rigorous testing indicated significant side-effects.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    9. Re:Medical conspiracy! by vvaduva · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the problem with crowds listening to someone like that on TV. They will say "we only eat natural stuff." My response is: mercury occurs naturally, so why don't eat it? Or why are you opposed to smoking "natural" tobacco? There are many things that occur naturally that will kill you or harm you.

      It's madness out there. People go insane over the Bovine Growth Hormone (BVH) but they don't understand that it's produced naturally in the cow's pituitary gland. We could go on forever with ridiculous examples like this. They don't listen. In fact, they call people like you and I uninformed!

    10. Re:Medical conspiracy! by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Yes but was it ORGANIC Kinkgo?

      No, but it came with a FedEx.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    11. Re:Medical conspiracy! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      While I agree on the point you’re trying to make, actually most of the medicine we know today is stuff that grows in exotic jungles (and in the nature around us)!

      Also, doctors are normally not actually healing you. I mean, when was the last time you saw a doctor talk about the actual cause of something with you? No, I don’t mean the typical doctor’s definition of “cause”. That’s a symptom! The real cause is either something from the environment (food, nature, psychological things), or genetic. But instead, those pharmacists with further training go and call heart failure a cause of death!! That is so WTF it’s beyond belief!

      It’s like seeing a cop go “Oh, the cause of this car crash was that big dent in your hood”.

      No it’s not. Heart failure is caused by something. Headache is caused by something. Everything is caused by something... and if it’s not genetic, it always is outside the body. Full stop.

      Now I can see you thinking I want the opposite of “normal” medicine, with all that pseudo-scientific shit.
      No, I don’t. Neither nor. I want that people finally think for themselves, lay off the false social conditioning, and find out the actual causes of their diseases.
      Then, the could actually heal!

      Because getting a constant drug pump implanted in your body is not a solution, and you are not healthy afterwards.
      Just as constantly taking painkillers is not going to ever heal you.
      That stuff just makes you ignore the symptoms, and pay loads of cash to the assholes who will do everything in their power from you actually healing, and becoming independent of their shit.

      Ginko sellers and pharma companies are not opposites. The are the exact same thing. Selling shit that does not actually help you, and make money off of it, as long as possible.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    12. Re:Medical conspiracy! by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously, you have *no* idea what you're getting when you buy a "nutritional supplement".

      Let's suppose there is some clinical evidence for a supplement's effectiveness. If you buy it in "herbal" form, it might not contain the same parts of the plant that were studied. If you buy the compound, you might not get the same enantiomer studied.

      In fact, in the United States you might not be getting what the label says at all. There was a study cited in Science News a few years back which showed that "dietary supplements" often contained *none* of the headline ingredients, and often had ingredient that weren't listed. I've had this problem with herbal *tea*; I once drank a cup of chamomile tea and had an unmistakable pseudophed reaction -- probably due to contamination with ephedra.

      Next year, the FDA will put into effect rules that will require supplement labels to be accurate and for the supplement not to be contaminated with other substances. Believe it or not, this is the first time the FDA has had a policy of enforcing those things. It's no wonder that research support for supplement claims is wanting. Even if the supplement has value, if they are using commercial supplements who knows what they are giving the test subjects. In fact, I'd say it's probably ethically questionable to conduct human research with commercial supplements, until the FDA gets its act together.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    13. Re:Medical conspiracy! by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because people might not know which things they need to extract. Cannabis is a good example. Most people focus on THC, yet there are many other similar chemicals that have not been studied to the same extend THC has. In other words, the whole idea of taking plants with benefits and exacting the single chemical that makes them useful to us, then putting it into a pill, may be a waste of time in some cases. Not to mention the complex chemical processes that take place inside a plant that don't happen inside a capsules of extracted plant matter.

      As for knowing how much herb you are getting, you can take samples, then you just need some good scales and a bit of maths. This problem has more to do with personal practices and the black market than any problems with plants vs. extracted pills.

    14. Re:Medical conspiracy! by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      One thing about recreational drugs is that you can't generally separate out the placebo effect. At common doses, they give strong enough internal cues ("buzz" etc.) that you can't help knowing what you're getting, even if you get it in a tasteless and scent-less capsule, if you're familiar with it at all (If you want to study cannabis on people who don't want it and don't know what they're getting, then the ethics board will come knocking, and the police too!)

      Of all the things people stuff themselves with and believe in, I can't think of anything with more magical, far-fetched, and wildly contradictory notions attached than recreational drugs. If there's anything that has a placebo effect...

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    15. Re:Medical conspiracy! by The+Blank · · Score: 1

      That's why placebo-controlled studies exist, bro. People sign a consent form saying they know they'll either get the active drug, which they've been told about--effects, risks, etc.--or they'll get the placebo, and they won't know which one they're getting.

    16. Re:Medical conspiracy! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Heck I literally remember [...]

      Intriguing! How do you figuratively remember? ("She looked good?")

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    17. Re:Medical conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another possibility is that the isolated chemical cannot be patented.

    18. Re:Medical conspiracy! by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Didn't you read what I said? Blinding sucks for so-called recreational drugs, because people who use them are intimately familiar with them.

      It's even possible that they recognize them subconsciously. A familiar scent can make you feel a certain way, without you even being conscious of it being there at all - why should the internal cues from a drug be less potent?

      (But yes, studies CAN be blinded. Especially for alcohol, it has been done many times. But then we are talking small doses, doses far below what people take to get drunk. Plenty of more recent studies also have poor blinding.)

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    19. Re:Medical conspiracy! by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      That's why some studies are now giving drugs to both groups. One drug is the one they want to study, the other is a drug to produce some side effects. I wish I could remember where I read about it. It's not perfect, either, and it's not for this specific issue, but it's an improvement.

  6. "Americans spent $107 million on it" by sakdoctor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Holy shit, that's a lot of placebo.
    But just wait until I convince everyone to eat my lawn. I'll be rich!

    Oh wait ... http://www.hollandandbarrett.com/pages/product_detail.asp?pid=138

    1. Re:"Americans spent $107 million on it" by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, that's a lot of placebo.

      There was a study done (google it yourself, I'm feeling lazy) that showed that placebos work better when they're expensive (the target must know of the great value of the placebo).

      Mind over matter, and keep your mind on the pricetag!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:"Americans spent $107 million on it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real placebo is always better since it does not have side effects.

    3. Re:"Americans spent $107 million on it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who read that as "Cholera Tablets"?

    4. Re:"Americans spent $107 million on it" by PPH · · Score: 1

      You kids stay the hell off my lawn!

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  7. Actually works to their advantage by jarocho · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet the herbal supplements industry is hoping its customers will forget all about this report eventually... :)

    1. Re:Actually works to their advantage by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2, Informative

      They don't need to. Herbal health people are like religious extremists, any sort of logic won't get absorbed by their brain.

    2. Re:Actually works to their advantage by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Interesting

      On the other hand, St. John's Wort has been proven as effective at treating depression as Paxil. So you can't lump all the herbals together. Just because Ginko doesn't work doesn't mean no herbs work.

    3. Re:Actually works to their advantage by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Or Apple users at that.

    4. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Chris+Daniel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, St. John's Wort is effective. However, you should always consult with your doctor before taking it, as it can interfere with other drugs (specifically, I have read that it prevents or retards the mechanism of absorbing drugs into the bloodstream).

      However, do keep in mind that the effectiveness of a single herbal medicine does not change the effectiveness of other herbal medicines.

      --
      Don't blame me -- I voted for Roslin.
    5. Re:Actually works to their advantage by The+Damned+Yankee · · Score: 1

      Oh, sure. The spin will be about how "Big Pharma" is trying to suppress the "truth" about herbal remedies. So a report like this will be given roughly the same deference as the John Birch Society gives a White House press release. If it's not an out-and-out lie (to them), then it's a backhanded concession that they were right all along, because, hey, look how scared Big Pharma must be, to do this study to disprove our moonbat claims!

      --
      "Against the assault of laughter nothing can stand." - Mark Twain
    6. Re:Actually works to their advantage by fusiongyro · · Score: 1

      If they work, they eventually become medicine. Otherwise they remain snake oil.

    7. Re:Actually works to their advantage by swb · · Score: 1

      So that means that Paxil is equally ineffective?

    8. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      St. John's Wort has been proven as effective at treating depression as Paxil

      Can you cite a controlled trial that shows SJW to be effective in treating depression, as well as how you measured it against Paxil?

    9. Re:Actually works to their advantage by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No it hasn't, stop lying.

      Many medicines come from herbs, that's not an issue. The issue is 'herbal remedies' that are herbs that have not been shown to have any medicinal effect above placebo.

      You test an herb, if something shows up you testi ti in better contralloed conditions an so on. Either it is shown effective and replicate it, or you toss it away and get on to the next study.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Actually works to their advantage by geekoid · · Score: 1

      St. John Wart has no constant ingredients or ratios.

      Just so you know.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Actually works to their advantage by smidget2k4 · · Score: 1

      It is effective at treating light to light-moderate cases of depression. It has been shown no better than placebo for more severe cases. Plus, it has the added bonus of being impossible to know exactly how much of the drug you are taking, as concentrations will vary wildly by plant/time of year/soil.

      Source: NIH/NCCAM

    12. Re:Actually works to their advantage by swb · · Score: 1

      And they are conspiracists; they assume that any "scientific study" was rigged by Big Pharma or some other enemy to discredit herbals.

    13. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 2, Funny

      any sort of logic won't get absorbed by their brain.

      Prolly because they don't take enough Ginko Biloba...

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    14. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, St. John's Wort has been proven as effective at treating depression as Paxil.

      ...which is why you should stay far, far away from it. A proven psychoactive substance with no regulation or standardization? That's a recipe for disaster.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    15. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Starfleet+Command · · Score: 0

      Um, he was not bashing religion. He was commenting on how religious EXTREMISTS are unswayed by reason and logic. Not unlike /. folks who skim the responses and then comment angrily without having gotten the actual meaning of the post.

    16. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, St. John's Wort has been proven as effective at treating depression as Paxil. So you can't lump all the herbals together. Just because Ginko doesn't work doesn't mean no herbs work.

      Not according to the Journal of the American Medical Association.

    17. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 0, Troll

      It is effective at treating light to light-moderate cases of depression. It has been shown no better than placebo for more severe cases.

      You could consider this as evidence that depression is overdiagnosed and a prognosis of "light-moderate" depression is most likely bullshit.

    18. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Huh... Even the synthetic stuff that works ends up by the wayside eventually as slightly altered and currently-patentable versions are created and pushed.

      I hope folks don't get the idea that there aren't potent drugs that come from plants. Off the top of my head: Atropine, bromelain, papain, eugenol, curcumin, zingeberene, alpha linolenic acid, nicotine, hyperforin, kavalactones, tyramine, ricin, various monoamine oxidase inhibitors, fucking opium...

      Herbal supplements are not anything to rashly play with or disrespect wholesale.

    19. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      it has the added bonus of being impossible to know exactly how much of the drug you are taking, as concentrations will vary wildly by plant/time of year/soil

      I didn't see this information in your source link.

      Anyway, it seems pretty plausible that batches can be tested and normalized, no? I've seen bottles of herbal supplements with the active compounds rated in milligrams.

    20. Re:Actually works to their advantage by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So that means that Paxil is equally ineffective?

      When was it that you stopped beating your wife, again?

      Just to belabor a point, if it's more effective than a placebo, it's effective. Maybe not very effective, but the language is flexible probably for the purpose of being able to lie and tell the truth at the same time, and by jove I shall take advantage of that fact. So shall everyone else with facility.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm an advocate of herbal remedies. Well, the ones that work. Plants can be pretty potent, and to think otherwise is shockingly naive. Not every herb is going to be a cure-all, but there's a gamut of plants that effectively address an array of health problems. Or recreational desires.

      Over-reliance on synthetics created by for-profit organizations is itself basically a disease. If, say, your first choice for addressing depression is an SSRI prescription, you've been infected by advertising.

    22. Re:Actually works to their advantage by superdana · · Score: 1

      St. John's Wort has been proven as effective at treating depression as Paxil.

      Measurements of depression are based almost exclusively on self-reporting. A simple comparison between the "effectiveness" of St. John's Wort and Paxil--in which an "effect" is just a positive change in self-reported measures--can't account for a belief effect. It's not enough to do double-blind; you also have to find out whether each of the subjects thinks they've been given the substance you're testing, and include that data in your statistical analysis.

    23. Re:Actually works to their advantage by barzok · · Score: 1

      Lots of placebos have been shown to be nearly as effective at treating depression too.

    24. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention THC and other canniboids as well, but often times with newer medications developed from plant based sources, the therapeutic agent from a plant can be isolated. Then the molecular structure of the therapeutic agent can be determined as well as what about the compound makes it therapeutic. Then, similar artificial compounds can be synthesized and tested to see if an artificial compound is more effective and/or safer than the original plant based compound. Often times artificial compounds based on a naturally occurring compound are safer and more effective. Then the new medication, whether it is the original compound or not can be packaged into a medication where it is the only active ingredient and in consistent dosage sizes as well. With plant based supplements you have no guarantee that the active ingredient is not packaged with molecularly similar, but harmful compounds and no guarantee that each dose has a consistent amount of the active ingredient. You also can end up taking something like glucosamine chondroitin or ginko, which has no net benefit at all. This is even worse if you take the ineffective treatments over the scientifically tested treatments and consequently you permanently lose quality of life or shorten your lifespan significantly.

    25. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because it is hard to make big bucks selling a product anyone with a garden and a basement chemistry set can go into competition with you unlike patent medicine Paxil. Drug companies are not going to waste money taking Doctors out to for free golf games to sell them some extract any pharmacy could produce, which is something drug company marketing departments are actually doing with many patent medications in-order to beat out cheaper generics which may even be more effect/safer.

    26. Re:Actually works to their advantage by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      I bet the herbal supplements industry is hoping its customers will forget all about this report eventually... :)

      Most of them would care less. It is "organic" after all, just like hemlock. Anything organic, or herbal, just has to be good for you. Look at how many people buy homeopathic medicines, and don't know what that really means. Therapeutic touch has been disproved numerous times, yet still has a huge following. People will believe in faries if it is on a pretty enough label.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    27. Re:Actually works to their advantage by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You could consider this as evidence that depression is overdiagnosed and a prognosis of "light-moderate" depression is most likely bullshit.

      I don't see how this is insightful.
      It's like saying that since a band-aid can't staunch a bullet wound, that trauma is overdiagnosed and a prognosis of "paper-cut" is most likely bullshit. /. has a cadre of people who seem to deny/downplay the existence of mental disorders.
      They contribute nothing to the discussion other than to shit on decades of medical science.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    28. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I forgot THC. And caffeine. And theobromine. And dimethyltryptamine. And musicmol/muscarine. And mescaline. And ... the list was off the top of my head, for the purpose of showing that serious drugs can come from plants.

      This is even worse if you take the ineffective treatments over the scientifically tested treatments

      Like Vioxx?

      I highly recommend researching any drug you take, whatever the source. Just having it come out of a pharmaceutical company with attendant testing does not mean the efficacy is going to be great, that there won't be interactions, that there won't be dangerous side-effects.

      Hell, even eating grapefruit can be dangerous. Seriously. Of course there's some concern over non-primary compounds in plants, but testing can be performed on whole plant extracts about as easily as synthetic drugs. Except there's not much money for funding such studies.

      On March 11, 2009, Scott S. Reuben, former chief of acute pain at Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Mass., revealed that data for 21 studies he had authored for the efficacy of [Vioxx] (along with others such as celecoxib) had been fabricated in order to augment the analgesic effects of the drugs. Dr. Reuben was also a former paid spokesperson for the drug company Pfizer (who owns the intellectual property rights for marketing celecoxib in the United States).

      The VIGOR (Vioxx GI Outcomes Research) study, conducted by Bombardier, et al., which compared the efficacy and adverse effect profiles of rofecoxib and naproxen, had indicated a significant 4-fold increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) in rofecoxib patients when compared with naproxen patients (0.4% vs 0.1%, RR 0.25) over the 12 month span of the study.

    29. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      It's like saying that since a band-aid can't staunch a bullet wound, that trauma is overdiagnosed and a prognosis of "paper-cut" is most likely bullshit.

      That would be a valid analogy if mental states had objective, unambigious definitions.

      A bone can be proven to be broken or not. Skin can be proven to be punctured or not. There is no definitive, objective test for depression and decades of medical science have not yet produced one.

    30. Re:Actually works to their advantage by steelfood · · Score: 1

      That and people can lie about certain effects of certain herbs (not maliciously necessarily, but ignorantly). Doesn't mean the herb doesn't affect the system somehow, only that it doesn't do that particular thing.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    31. Re:Actually works to their advantage by fbjon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's two that show what St. John's Wort is about. First, not effective for major depression, but significantly better than placebo for mild depression. Comparisons seem harder to find, I can't access the ones I find on Google scholar.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    32. Re:Actually works to their advantage by psithurism · · Score: 1

      what a fucking troll why do you think its so cool to bash religion? Real good example of tolerance asshole.

      I don't think you were trolling, I think you misread him; "religious extremists" was his comparison. Extremists of any sort are not protected by political correctness. Observe: "Oh no! Watch out for the minority, power-gender, mentally-differently-abled EXTREMISTS. They're zealots!"

    33. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Dan+Ost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What herbal remedies do you recommend?

      Why do you believe that these remedies are effective?

      How do these remedies compare to the drugs that target the same complaints in both cost and effectiveness?

      What qualifies you to be making medicinal recommendations to others? Do you have relevant training?

      Over-reliance on synthetics created by for-profit organizations is itself basically a disease. If, say, your first choice for addressing depression is an SSRI prescription, you've been infected by advertising.

      What would your first choice be for treating depression? And what, exactly, is your decision based on?

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    34. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Huh... Even the synthetic stuff that works ends up by the wayside eventually as slightly altered and currently-patentable versions are created and pushed.

      Not true. If people still want them, they become generics and cost less than your herbal remedies do. The more expensive, still under patent, drugs are either clearly better in some regard (like reduced side-effects or increased potency/duration), or they fail to displace the cheaper generics in the market.

      The active ingredients in Aspirin, Tylenol, and Advil are cheap and widely available even though there's been no patent protection on them for a very long time.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    35. Re:Actually works to their advantage by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Google before calling someone a liar. Then come back and apologize.

    36. Re:Actually works to their advantage by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The study was a triple-blind study. 1/3 got Paroxitine (Paxil), 1/3 got St John;s, and 1/3 got placebo.

    37. Re:Actually works to their advantage by psithurism · · Score: 1

      They don't need to. Herbal health people are like religious extremists, any sort of logic won't get absorbed by their brain.

      I live among these people and embarrassingly have my own shelf of herbal supplements. I show these studies to my friends and family and this is generally what happens:

      1st they bring up the dozens of semi/pseudo-scientific studies which their desired conclusion was found true and somehow they can pull up ten times as many "studies" as I can bring to counter them from their alternative medicinal handbooks. I don't have subscriptions to peer reviewed journals, so I usually can't even view the complete results of the studies I want to show them, while they have full details of each and every nonscientific step that was taken in their experiments.

      Next if I still insist that pseudo-scientific studies don't discredit the results they attack the experiment: The study was handled wrong. In this case I already know the logic: "they didn't use enough of the substance, the study only shows we need to take more, much MORE!" Or they dodge the study: "dementia and memory is not what Ginkgo improves, I take it for other non-disprovable stuff."

      Finnaly they can fall back on their buying mantra which goes something like this: "Science (and logic) are not only one way to understand the world, there many other ways of understanding the world which are equally as good."

      Eventually, you give up, its their money and they going to buy whatever over hyped placebos they want. In fact I'm not going to bother forwarding this to any of my Ginko using family.The real benefit is that doctors and legitimate dietitians now know whether or not the substance is useful and can use it appropriately. Parent is correct, this will have minimal impact on the herbal supplement industry, besides inspiring hundreds of psuedo-scientific studies and faulty logic filled papers that discredit this study to those who still want to take it.

    38. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are only depressed because you don't eat meat.

    39. Re:Actually works to their advantage by jkxx · · Score: 1

      Indeed, St. John's Wort contains hyperforin, which is a serotonin reuptake inhibitor (so is Paxil et al). So watch out if you are taking it and take a SSRI or vice versa. In fact don't mix it with any "mood medicine" you are taking without consulting your doctor.

    40. Re:Actually works to their advantage by The+Blank · · Score: 1

      Hyperforin is a monoamine oxidase inhibitor. Although it's a weaker one than the synthetic versions on the market, it's still nothing benign to mess with.

    41. Re:Actually works to their advantage by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      That would be a valid analogy if mental states had objective, unambigious definitions. ... There is no definitive, objective test for depression and decades of medical science have not yet produced one.

      The gold standard for a variety of disorders is the clinical interview.
      "No definitive test" is not a valid objection to the diagnosis of a spectrum disorder.
      Hell, there's no definitive test for "light" addiction either, yet we can still diagnose it.

      Further, your assumption, that a person's mental state must be known in order to diagnose depression, is false.
      Many of the questions on a depression test are asking about changes in your behavior, not in your feelings.

      You seem to have conceded in your original post, by omission, that severe depression exists.
      But I still feel like I should be asking if you believe depression exists at all.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    42. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Raptoer · · Score: 1

      I'm an advocate of herbal remedies. Well, the ones that work. Plants can be pretty potent, and to think otherwise is shockingly naive. Not every herb is going to be a cure-all, but there's a gamut of plants that effectively address an array of health problems. Or recreational desires.

      Over-reliance on synthetics created by for-profit organizations is itself basically a disease. If, say, your first choice for addressing depression is an SSRI prescription, you've been infected by advertising.

      Said by someone who has probably never had major depression. I have, and the best way to describe it without using medical terms is to consider the brain as a chemical based state machine.

      Your brain gets stuck in this mode of being depressed, and to treat it you have to kick it hard enough for it to get out of that mode and stay out. Many ways exist to do that, SSRI based medications work very well at changing the state of your brain into a mode that either is no longer depressed, or is now able to be kicked by something else out of that mode. The best use of anti-depression medications are to get you functional long enough to address the problems in your life (if any) or to go into therapy. One thing that a lot of people don't understand about depression is that it may (and commonly does) have no external cause. Your life may be going great, but that doesn't matter because your brain has gotten stuck in depression mode.

      One of the major plusses of SSRI based medications is that they are another thing to try before going to MAOI medications, and those can be pretty nasty.

    43. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would your first choice be for treating depression? And what, exactly, is your decision based on?

      The first choice for treating depression is socializing and exercise.
      If you can afford it, the second choice is therapy + medication
      If you can't afford much, the second choice is just medication.

    44. Re:Actually works to their advantage by bartwol · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Reading now.

    45. Re:Actually works to their advantage by bartwol · · Score: 1

      A proven psychoactive substance with no regulation or standardization? That's a recipe for disaster.

      While it may not be a recipe for controlled therapy, the widespread anecdotal histories of usage of uncontrolled substances such as SJW clearly demonstrate that they are not a "recipe for disaster." You would better serve the cause of medicine if you encouraged the isolation of the active ingredient(s) in SJW and advancement of dosing/administration of said ingredient(s), rather than to attack its weakness with your own brand of FUD.

    46. Re:Actually works to their advantage by mjwx · · Score: 1

      What herbal remedies do you recommend? Why do you believe that these remedies are effective?

      Herbal medicine is medicine minus the science.

      Not to say that the science isn't important but many medicines are derived from herbal medicines, for example a lot of pain killers originated from opiates. The science is important in refining the medicine, removing impurities and determining dose. This is the worst part of herbal medicines/homoeopathy, the dosage is not regulated and effects are not monitored (the same can be said about self medicating and drinking) and more then a few herbal medicines do work or at least have an active ingredient.

      That being said many herbal remedies are bunk and more often then not these are the over hyped remedies like this Ginko or vitamin supplements. But I don't think its fair to dismiss herbal remedies out of hand although a healthy dose of scepticism is highly recommended. Sometimes a massage can fix problems as often if we wrap some science around it and quadruple the price the same procedure becomes Physiotherapy. Medicines and medical procedures are often invented by finding a traditional approach with positive benefits, studying it, learning how it works and then applying that knowledge.

      It's pretty hard to deny that many things have a positive effect on our health that aren't considered medicinal. Red Wine is known to boost the immune system when taken in moderation, ginger and green tea as part of a regular diet are also known to have positive side effects and as much as we /.er's don't like it, some time in the sun is good for you (gives you a bit of vitamin D). Most of these were discovered by empirical observation then given a bit of testing.

      I don't dismiss a herbal or alternative remedy to a niggling little problem, the kind that are not worth a trip to the GP as there may be some beneficial effect but they are no substitute for a good GP when one is actually needed.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    47. Re:Actually works to their advantage by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      This is the worst part of herbal medicines/homoeopathy, the dosage is not regulated and effects are not monitored...

      If by "not regulated" you mean "not regulated by the government", all I can say is WTF, that has nothing to do with either science or whether the product works. If you mean the dosage is not controlled by the manufacturer, then that varies: some products are mixed to achieve a standard dose of the active ingredient.

      Additionally, I noticed your dishonest attempt to conflate herbal medicines with the foolishness of homeopathy. You didn't get away with it.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    48. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      My sole criticism was that it was unregulated and unstandardized. I'm not sure why you're taking that personally.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    49. Re:Actually works to their advantage by bartwol · · Score: 1

      I agree with the "unregulated and unstandardized" part. But the "formula for disaster" part is B.S.

      And, no, I don't take your B.S. personally (i.e. as some kind of reflection on me). I simply disagree with that part. Nothing personal.

    50. Re:Actually works to their advantage by mjwx · · Score: 1

      If by "not regulated" you mean "not regulated by the government"

      I suggest you step away from Fox News and actually look up the definitions of words.

      1. To control or direct according to rule.
      2. To adjust to a particular specification or requirement.
      3. To adjust (a mechanism) for accurate and proper functioning.

      Unless you mean to tell me that you've never regulated the temperature of a room via means of a thermostat. To regulate dosage is to set a schedule for administration and dosage sizes. To the vast majority of the english speaking world, this is the first thought that comes to mind when talking about regulation.

      So all I can say is facepalm, if your first reaction is to blame the government for everything you really should think about isolating yourself from everyone.

      that has nothing to do with either science or whether the product works

      Huh? So the control of variables has absolutely nothing do with science. OK great, we've cleared that one up.

      I'm sorry but you'll have to try better then that, really. You fail at basic science and trolling.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    51. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > St. John Wart has no constant ingredients or ratios.
      > Just so you know.

      He was referring to St John's Wort.

      Just so you know, dimwit.

    52. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Let me start over. SJW is psychoactive. That's not a criticism but an observation; if it wasn't, we wouldn't be having this conversation. I don't know anything about SJW dosing, but let's say it's 100mg of active ingredient for a regular adult. Brand A has 50mg of active ingredient. Brand B's "extra stress relief" has 400mg. Brand C makes a horse pill, but it's usually mainly stems and scrap for 25mg actual active ingredient. A deal with a local farmer yields a 200mg batch this week.

      That is a recipe for disaster. Self-medicating people who are already in a bad frame of mind (or wouldn't be taking it in the first place) could be bouncing between nearly-placebo and megadosing. How that screws with their brain chemistry is anybody's guess.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    53. Re:Actually works to their advantage by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with religion. In fact there are some good things to be taken in from religion. But that doesn't mean its extremists aren't a bunch of douche bags.

      That applies to extremists of any group but I opted for religious since that's that big popular thing now what with the Muslim extremists ruining things in the Middle East and the Christian extremists ruining America.

    54. Re:Actually works to their advantage by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I think "Big Pharma" would be very interested in herbal medicines working and the finding some way to monopolise the market.

      I wouldn't say all herbal options are a joke. However it is nice to have things backed up with studies rather than the idea that it must work because people have used it for so long.

      Garlic is a very good thing for you and it's also been proven by numerous studies.

    55. Re:Actually works to their advantage by bartwol · · Score: 1

      The recipe is as you describe. But history has not delivered the disasters of which you speak. And that has not been simply a matter of luck.

      It is apparent that SJW, as with pretty much all "alternative remedies" [in the U.S.], is fairly benign as dispensed despite the extremely wide variations in dosage (intentional or otherwise). This "margin of safety" is an implicit byproduct of several factors. Manufacturers, as people and profiteers, are disinclined to make products that harm their customers. As well, the FDA does watch and wait to step in where toxicity or significant adverse reactions ensue (e.g. as with ephedra). And civil litigation is ably punitive where regulation fails.

      (Note that SJW appears to be ineffective in treatment of severe depression, and "better than placebo" in treating mild depression. Also do note that many/most controlled medications present risks of significant adverse reactions that are not predictable in individual cases, so it is incumbent upon all consumers to monitor actual effects and adjust usage as appropriate. In this regard, almost all substances can be described as being a "formula for disaster" given your rather loose standard for declaring so.)

      In my opinion, the significant problem of "alternative remedies" is their lack of demonstrated efficacy vis-a-vis the assertions under which they are explicitly or implicitly marketed. I am being kind here...there is significant informal evidence (and some formal evidence) that suggests that these substances are overwhelmingly lacking in efficacy.

      I think it is unhelpful and essentially misleading to describe "alternative remedies" as being dangerous. Such a claim is similar to describing influenza vaccines as being dangerous. The risks in both cases appear to be quite low, and attempts to focus attention on their dangers only serves to divert attention away from much more significant factors to be considered.

      Why avoid SJW? Answer #1, which is probably incorrect: because it has a significant chance of harming you. Answer #2, which is probably correct: because it is unlikely to be of significant benefit in treatment of depression.

    56. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      If, say, your first choice for addressing depression is an SSRI prescription, you've been infected by advertising.

      Said by someone who has probably never had major depression.

      Severe depression isn't the only kind out there.

      Make sure you read what I said about treating depression.

      And make sure you read the news lately on using SSRIs:

      Limits to antidepressants' effectiveness: study

      CHICAGO (Reuters) - Mild to severe depression might be better treated with alternatives to antidepressant drugs, which do not help patients much more than an inactive placebo, researchers said Tuesday.

    57. Re:Actually works to their advantage by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      You seem to have conceded in your original post, by omission, that severe depression exists.
      But I still feel like I should be asking if you believe depression exists at all.

      I believe that severe depression exists, but it is a small minority of those people currently being treated. There really is evidence that instead of taking drugs some people just need to get off their ass and stop being whiney bitches.

  8. memory no... blood flow very much so by McNihil · · Score: 3, Informative

    Aspirin or Ginko?

    http://www.umm.edu/altmed/articles/ginkgo-biloba-000247.htm

    Better concentration (some subjects thinking that that is one of the memory functions) could be a side effect of them not having headaches due to hypertension. Sample set yadi yada and so on.... statistics and damned lies.

    1. Re:memory no... blood flow very much so by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Wow, that link is full od things that have been shown false about Ginko.

      the Alt-Med* people seem to have infiltrated that school.

      *by alt med I mean idiots that will hurt and kill people.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:memory no... blood flow very much so by JumperCable · · Score: 1

      The above sample set is of 3,000 people. Link me to the study that says it has positive effects on memory functions.

    3. Re:memory no... blood flow very much so by McNihil · · Score: 1

      Sampleset of the parent post was people 72->9x. Probability that the subjects already had other types of medication that does identical things like ginko-biloba is fairly high. That they most likely used aspirin is also quite high so the study IMHO just shows that it has no different nor additional effect to synthesized pills.

      You all must have glossed over my subject line but here it is again as convenience with emphasis:

      memory NO... blood flow YES

  9. But surely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...at least it increases the size of your penis, right?

  10. Untested drug found useless... wonders never cease by jeffmeden · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or perhaps it's best put, wonders often never materialize in the first place. Is anyone really surprised that something sold with a big "these claims have not been evaluated by the FDA" on the bottle has, in fact, been found to do nothing close to the claim?

    Hopefully herbal viagra is next, and some day spammers will be emailing about things people actually can use...*

    *(warning the claims in this post have not been evaluated by the FDA)

  11. Explains things... by Bobb+Sledd · · Score: 1

    Well that explains why I can't remember where I put my Gingko.

    Seriously though, I had a suspicion 10 years ago when I took it, I couldn't see any difference either.

    --
    "They said I probly shouldn't fly with just one eye," "I am Bender. Please insert girder."
    1. Re:Explains things... by jeffshoaf · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, I had a suspicion 10 years ago when I took it, I couldn't see any difference either.

      So it affected your vision?

      --
      Putting the "anal" back into "analyst"...
    2. Re:Explains things... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Seriously though, I had a suspicion 10 years ago when I took it, I couldn't see any difference either."
      Tha';s a horrible way to evaluate something. It's the same type of thinking that gives these idiots power in the market place.

      Yes, studies show it does nothing, but using that to do bias confirmation is a bad thing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  12. Back to the real thang by oldhack · · Score: 2, Funny

    Smoke and coffee.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  13. Maybe for dementia patients... by invisik · · Score: 0

    I take it regularly throughout the day, every day, and it makes a huge difference for me in memory and calmness of thought. I get so worked up sometimes trying to multitask everything.. it really helps focus. I can definitely tell when I've taken it and when I haven't.

    Too bad it doesn't help the dementia patients. Their circulatory system may be too weak to provide the increased blood flow to the brain that ginkgo enhances.

    -m

    --
    http://www.invisik.com
    1. Re:Maybe for dementia patients... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that can't be associated with the placebo effect, how exactly? Because you're too special to fall for it? Yeah, right.

    2. Re:Maybe for dementia patients... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I have this rock here that scares away tigers. Interested?

    3. Re:Maybe for dementia patients... by natehoy · · Score: 1

      My anti-gullibility crystal isn't humming, so it must be legit.

      Just to be sure, what is its harmonic resonance, is it in concordance with the feline music of the spheres?

      If so, I'll take three, because I've got three empty chakra points that seem optimal for it. It might even keep my thetans regulated, which has been an expensive issue lately.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:Maybe for dementia patients... by LOLLinux · · Score: 1

      I take it regularly throughout the day, every day, and it makes a huge difference for me in memory and calmness of thought. I get so worked up sometimes trying to multitask everything.. it really helps focus. I can definitely tell when I've taken it and when I haven't.

      Yes, they have a term for this. It's called the placebo effect.

    5. Re:Maybe for dementia patients... by gtall · · Score: 1

      If your Thetans are not regulated, i.e., running amok, overloading your credit card with charges, then it is because you haven't yet contributed the required amount to the Church of Scientology for reaching the Next Level. You, sir, are one crystal short of Full Sparkle Consciousness. Ask Tom Cruise for pointers.

    6. Re:Maybe for dementia patients... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      /. demographics being what they are, it's unlikely that GPP is in the 72-to-96-year-old age cohort that was used in the study. What he's experiencing may be a placebo effect, or it may be that ginkgo works for younger people. More study is needed, and presenting a study which focuses exclusively on the elderly as saying "gingko doesn't work for anybody" is just as intellectually dishonest as "gingko seems to work for me, so it must be great for everybody!"

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    7. Re:Maybe for dementia patients... by LOLLinux · · Score: 1

      More study is needed, and presenting a study which focuses exclusively on the elderly as saying "gingko doesn't work for anybody" is just as intellectually dishonest as "gingko seems to work for me, so it must be great for everybody!"

      Yes, if I was doing what you say it would be dishonest, but this isn't the only study showing that the supposed benefits Ginko are hogwash. The only ones showing otherwise are funded by Ginko marketing firms.

    8. Re:Maybe for dementia patients... by invisik · · Score: 1

      I've taken similar herbals expecting the same or better results and not realized any.

      I take a 90mg gelcap and the effect lasts for about 3 hours every time.

      It's pretty predictable to be placebo.

      Again, from what I've learned it's a circulation issue. Ginkgo increases circulation to the brain and other extremities and that helps your cognitive function. I don't have any issues with my extremities so I can't comment about that.

      My wife tried some (she is typically very focused already) and she said it had no effect. So I'd agree that it doesn't work for everyone but does for some.

      -m

      --
      http://www.invisik.com
    9. Re:Maybe for dementia patients... by LOLLinux · · Score: 1

      I've taken similar herbals expecting the same or better results and not realized any.

      I take a 90mg gelcap and the effect lasts for about 3 hours every time.

      It's pretty predictable to be placebo.

      This does nothing to dispute the obvious placebo effect. In fact it does nothing but reinforce it. If you start telling patients who you are giving placebo pills that they are getting something other than what they expect the placebo effect is ruined. This is why things are done in blind manner (double-blind is best because then the people dispensing the medication don't know which is which) in drug studies. The proper way to eliminate the placebo effect is for you to not know you aren't still taking ginko pills but are given something else.

  14. No surprise because of the dosage by vlm · · Score: 0, Redundant

    average of six years. Half of the participants took two 120-milligram capsules of ginkgo a day

    No surprise because of the dosage... a peculiarity of human metabolism that theres very few (no?) raw materials you can consume at that level for years that has any effect other than life or death.

    There are vitamins and minerals that have some effect at those dosages... again, generally speaking, after six years the effect is either life or death.

    Everything else has no effect. 120 mg of red meat, no effect. Now, 4 Kg of grilled red meat every day, that'll have an effect on blood chemistry after six years. But not 120 mg.

    Although caffeine would have some effect for the first month or two, tolerance rapidly develops, resulting in no effect. And 120 mg of tea leaves would be pretty weak tea.

    There are some carefully refined prescription medicines that have an effect... but unrefined plant material, no.

    I'm struggling to think of a "raw material" that would have any effect other than life and death at that low of a dose over that time period... High yield lead ore? High yield mercury ore?

    Now you go to the Kg range, or the ug range, substances with interesting effects exist.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by vlm · · Score: 1

      I thought about it more over lunch and rephrased, what I'm getting at is:

      really small effective dose of something bad like poison, dead before the liver and kidneys even have a chance.

      really huge dose of something bad like too much carbs or too much red meat or too much booze, just too much for liver and kidneys to realistically process, and/or they die trying.

      That middle-ground, your innards have a fighting chance at saving you, and thru evolution, they seem to be pretty good at it. And that filtration that saves you from bad stuff, probably filters out similar dosages of good stuff.

      Then combine that with the duration effect. Anything required that you don't take for six years, you'll probably be dead, with the possible exception of calcium. Anything bad for you that you take for six years, you'll probably be dead.

      Combine the two effects and I'd be very surprised to find something in the mg range that you can take for half a decade that would have much positive or negative result.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      I think the lethal dosage of nutmeg is about 3 nuts. Hemlock, some mushrooms, and some berries also have low lethal doses.

    3. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by Itninja · · Score: 1

      I know there are still people that daily suck on raw coca leaves. And they don't consume the leaves, just (I imagine) a few milligrams of 'juice'. It's not killing or curing them. But is has made them coca addicts. Does that count?

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    4. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We could copy this test and use 120 mg hamburgers to prove that fast food doesn't contribute to obesity too.

    5. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You are completely wrong.

      You might want to lok into dosages of pharmaceuticals.
      Serotonin reuptake inhibitors can have a dosage between 5mg - 150mg. a day.

      It's the dose that makes the poison.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by tacarat · · Score: 1
      Actually, I was thinking something a bit different, but similar. Sometimes the fun happens in the preparation of the product rather than raw ingredient. What part of the plant was used? When the supplement standardizes specific components, are those the right ones? Do those components need other factors in a specific ratio and minimum amounts to be effective? Maybe the effects only work on Asians (given that lactose intolerance can be generalized by geographic/racial backgrounds, maybe that's not so far fetched).

      Not to say that ginkgo's hype isn't overdone tremendously, or that this report isn't spot on, but the news reports of the test aren't quite right either.

      The primary outcome analysis from the Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory (GEM) study, the largest completed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dementia prevention trial to date,1 found that G biloba, 120 mg twice daily, was not effective in reducing the incidence of Alzheimer dementia or dementia overall.

      Beyond consideration of a clinical dementia outcome, however, it is possible that G biloba may have had more subtle, therapeutic effects on the rate of cognitive change. Specifically, G biloba may have prevented or delayed age-related changes in individuals with normal cognition, or G biloba may have slowed the rate of decline in those characterized as having mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Indeed, in the United States and particularly in Europe, G biloba is perhaps the most widely used herbal treatment consumed specifically to prevent age-related cognitive decline.2 Putative mechanisms of action on brain functioning include vascular effects such as cerebral vasorelaxation and reduction of blood viscosity,3-4 reduction of oxygen free radicals,5 and neurotransmitter system effects.6-7 Moreover, some in vitro studies indicate that G biloba may inhibit amyloid aggregation, suggesting another mechanism of preventing or delaying cognitive decline associated with Alzheimer disease.

      I haven't seen any Ginkgo tablets or information saying it's supposed to be any good for Alzheimer's. The study does not cover younger people, rather just the old. And that's fine in context. Ginkgo will not help people overcome cognitive issues due to Alzheimer's or advanced age. Great. Save money. At least it's not contributing to a bad life. Again, the studies only show that's it's not effective in these cases, not that it's never effective.

      As always, science is all about how you split the hair, and there's nothing wrong with that when presented as such. "Common sense", while a potentially helpful myth, also told us the world was flat and that we couldn't fly. Picking apart the myths and truths of ginkgo will help in finding something that does what the marketers advertise, even if it leads back to just sipping ginkgo tea in a garden.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    7. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by nxtw · · Score: 1
    8. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by tacarat · · Score: 1

      You might find "In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto" by Michael Pollan interesting if you followed that line of thought.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    9. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by ITMagic · · Score: 1

      You either have not read the article, or have no concept of pharmacology (or, possibly, both).

      The quantity of 240mg per day is meaningless. What we are interested in is: 240mg *of what*? Try taking a daily dose of 240mg of Foxglove extract; or Ergot infected wheat. I think you'll find quite a profound effect!

      This particular study used "Ginko Biloba Extract". All well and good - but what, precisely, was extracted (and what was, therefore, thrown away)? From the manufacturers website:

      One ton (1,000 kg) of the dried leaves yields only 20 kg of EGb 761® Ref.

      contains approximately 24% flavone glycosides (primarily quercetin, kaempferol and isorhamnetin) and 6% terpene lactones (2.8-3.4% ginkgolides A, B and C, and 2.6-3.2% bilobalide). Ginkgolide B and bilobalide account for about 0.8% and 3% of the total extract, respectively. Ref.

      Therefore, by my maths, this study used an extract equivalent to 12 gram of dried leaf per day; a pretty reasonable dose - certainly considering that the same company sells 40mg capsules of EGb 761®. More importantly, patients received a *standardised* extract; We're not talking about Holland & Barrett bargain cheapo tea-leaves here!

      It's a rather interesting article. Rather less surprisingly, the manufacturer of the product used in the study has not updated their "latest News" section to include these results!

    10. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by jeffmeden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Never mind then that Vitamin C (arguably an 'unrefined plant material') has the odd effect of making you *not get scurvy and die* as a result of a daily dosage of around 100mg.

      Relatively small doses of simple things can affect you in lots of interesting ways. Look at medication that treats thyroid disorders; it's a simple material (although it doesn't grow on trees) dosed out in *micrograms*, the slightest variation of which (less than 15 micrograms for some people, myself included) your body WILL feel the difference of.

      Most things, sure, your body sends in one end and it comes out the other relatively unchanged. Certain things, though, are profoundly influential.

    11. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "As always, science is all about how you split the hair"

      No it's not.

      Anyways, here is a good write up on the study:

      http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=3235#more-3235

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by vlm · · Score: 1

      You are completely wrong.

      You might want to lok into dosages of pharmaceuticals.
      Serotonin reuptake inhibitors can have a dosage between 5mg - 150mg. a day.

      It's the dose that makes the poison.

      Well, yes, there are industrially refined and manufactured materials that have an effect in that dosage over half a decade, because livers and kidneys haven't had enough time to evolve to deal with that kind of stuff. If, 10000 years ago, someone licked a rock or whatever and consumed 150 mg of "something", could it have had an effect?

      Now a natural, raw, plant based, serotonin reuptake inhibitor that only weighed 150mg in raw form, that would be interesting.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    13. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by vlm · · Score: 1

      From your link:

      "It is impossible however to overdose on nicotine through smoking alone (though a person can overdose on nicotine through a combination of nicotine patches, nicotine gum, and/or tobacco smoking at the same time)."

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    14. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by gtall · · Score: 1

      The key words there were "raw materials". Meds are rarely raw materials, they are very concentrated.

    15. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      And clearance speed is a factor. I need a mathematician to help me out here, but at a certain half-life a substance begins to accumulate in your system if you're taking daily doses.

    16. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by tacarat · · Score: 1

      Mmm... Easier to understand english. I like how it mentions the blood thinning and known effects of ginkgo. I still think that the study's specificness needs to be taken into account for the effectiveness and the next test adjusted around that. To me, it's the same as saying an anti-wrinkle cream had "no discernible effect" on a one year old baby, thus was useless. Maybe try it on a different group? Again, that particular cream might be useless on 80 year olds as well, but at least then it takes age and it's characteristics into consideration.

      Still, at least they're trying. I hate it when people blindly believe or dismiss herbal remedies. Some work, some don't. Find out why :)

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    17. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by pieisgood · · Score: 1

      as an addition to the parent, LSD is administered in micro-gram doses and its cognitive effects are astronomical.

      --
      Eat sleep die
    18. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by steelfood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As somebody else above has said, plant extracts are not a concentrated source of anything. Which means you're probably better off comparing the effects of 120mg of freshly squeezed orange juice on scurvy than 100mg of vitamin C.

      No doubt, you are correct. Very small dosages of certain vitamins and minerals can affect the body greatly. But very small dosages of naturally-occurring, unpurified, untreated, otherwise minimally processed things probably don't.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    19. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Umm, two 120 mg pills is 240 mg per day. You shouldn't assume that they eat only half of each pill.

      Anyway, the dosage is within the values that the supplient makers define for usage on the labels. Should the study have ignored what the people selling it say is the correct dosage?

      Lets see, you think 4kg is the correct amount for a daily dosage, which means that they need to take (4kg / 120mg) = 33,333 pills a day. Somehow I don't think you'll see that dosage rate on the bottles. If your bottle held 100 pills, you'd be using 333 bottles a day. Even if there were 1000 pills per bottle, that would still be 33 bottles a day. Still a lot more than I'd want to try to swallow.

      That's what you get from the "suppliment" supporters. If it doesn't work, it's not the suppliments fault, it's those 3000 people in the study who all did it wrong. Not a single one used it right.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    20. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      As it doesn't seem to be sinking in, *you cannot generalize* when it comes to medical effects of various materials. You are completely wrong that "120mg of orange juice is comparable to 100mg of vitamin c" as it takes 200g of orange fruit to carry 100mg of vitamin c. Just because something is available from unrefined plant material does NOT mean it is trivial in substance. Furthermore, the term "plant extract" is completely undefined when it comes to modern medicine, so trying to base an argument on it is pretty hollow. Lastly, any statement on medical effectiveness that uses the term "probably" can go right back in your mouth. It's useless.

    21. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Never mind then that Vitamin C (arguably an 'unrefined plant material')

      Ahem.

      Vitamin C is a concentrated material, not a raw material. You still have to drink almost a cup of lemon juice to get 100mg of Vitamin C. (112.24mg to the cup, precisely.)

    22. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_sulfide

      Naturally occurring gas.

      "# 0.0047 ppm is the recognition threshold, the concentration at which 50% of humans can detect the characteristic odor of hydrogen sulfide [1], normally described as resembling "a rotten egg

      "# At 150–250 ppm the olfactory nerve is paralyzed after a few inhalations, and the sense of smell disappears, often together with awareness of danger,

      # 320–530 ppm leads to pulmonary edema with the possibility of death."

      And 1ppm is like 1mg of your 1kg steak.

      There are plenty of materials that have long term consequences. Hormone blockers are very potent and omnipresent in today's world. Effectively reducing male hormones at a 10e-12 levels (undetectable except with sophisticated equipment). That is pg (picogram) per day.

    23. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus don't forget that in addition to the vitamin C, the orange fruit (or whatever herb or natural substance we ar talking about) may have other chemicals which block the effects of the vitamin C in some pathways. So 100mg of vitamin C in an eaten orange may not be equal to 100mg of vitamin C taken in a tablet.

    24. Re:No surprise because of the dosage by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Vitamin B12 is needed only in microgram quantities and a deficiency may take years to have an effect. Small doses of meat will be adequate in almost all cases to prevent the problems caused by inadequate vitamin B12 consumption.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  15. All I know is .... by thedbp · · Score: 1

    Wait, what were we talking about?

  16. What about in populations younger than 72? by andrewagill · · Score: 1

    I seriously doubt that it would improve memory function in younger people if it fails to help the elderly, but are there any studies that involve comparatively younger populations?

    1. Re:What about in populations younger than 72? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm of a slightly different opinion, I'm inclined to doubt that a study involving the elderly would have much relevance to the younger people. Old people are already on the decline as it were, even something like regular exercise might not show results.

    2. Re:What about in populations younger than 72? by andrewagill · · Score: 1

      Wellp, it looks like that's a negative.

  17. But nothing's more powerfull than: by dschnur · · Score: 1

    "Well, I have a friend who heard from a really smart person/person on the Internet(s) that when he took it he was finally able to almost pass his GED."

    Ok, brevity aside, wikipedia "Placebo Effect" and you will see that suggestion can be a cure in it's self.

    Viral marketing gone bad?

  18. Re:Untested drug found useless... wonders never ce by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

    The "These claims have not been evaluated by the FDA" and its close friend "This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease." are generally a signal that the product is sold as a "dietary supplement" or "nutritional supplement".

    Thanks to DSHEA, the FDA legally can't do jack about it unless they have direct evidence of a given product causing serious harm(and their budget for going on epidemiological expeditions for that sort of thing isn't much to write home about).

    Whether you consider this a shining beacon of freedom, or an ignoble nest of quacks, it seems likely to remain so for the foreseeable future.

  19. How can we trust the results by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    unless the researchers were taking ginkgo to improve their memory and cognitive skills? They probably made a lot of mental mistakes...

  20. Interesting fact by static416 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know what they call alternative medicine that works?.... Medicine.

    1. Re:Interesting fact by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      It's not quite as simple as that.

      Let's say you're dealing with a fairly mild case of insomnia. You and your doctor have some options:
      1. Prescribe a sleeping pill of some kind.
      2. Recommend drinking a cup of a soporific tea such as camomile.

      Option 2 has been used for centuries, and is known to work for a lot of people, and is probably much less expensive than option 1. However, since option 2 isn't part of the doctor's training, and thanks to the patient being bombarded with TV ads, they're more likely to try option 1 first. Is option 2 a placebo that just happens to work? Possibly. But a placebo costing $0.15 a dose beats a pill costing $3 a dose if they have roughly the same effect.

      The Cuban medical system in particular makes extensive use of herbal remedies as a way to keep costs down, while maintaining similar health care stats as, say, the United States.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Interesting fact by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Medicine has effects on disease. Alternative medicine is called "dietary supplements" or "nutritional supplements" to avoid the extensive testing that real medicine must go through.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Interesting fact by static416 · · Score: 1

      That's just the thing, alternative medicine can really only be justified in situations where a placebo is considered a viable treatment option, and they bring with them a number of unique problems.

      - Poorly labeled, or undefined drug conflicts. In fact some are known to diminish the effects of cholesterol and heart medications, or birth control.
      - Cost. They are not all 15 cent teas. My mother has spent thousands on homeopathy, energy healing, acupuncture, and herbal remedies without any noticeable effect aside from a lighter wallet.

      But my personal opinion is that people don't seek out alternative medicine because it works. It clearly doesn't.

      People move to alternative health care because the practitioners tend to spend more time listening to their patients, and use that information to come up with nice-sounding theories to explain their affliction. Science-based medicine is complicated and requires a large amount of education. Alternative medicine is simple and easy to understand. It doesn’t matter that the theory has been completely refuted by numerous double-blind studies, the patient feels that they’ve been listened to and given a seemingly adequate explanation, and that’s more than they got from the hospital.

      People don’t turn to alternative health care because they want better medicine, they turn to alternative health care because they want better doctors.

    4. Re:Interesting fact by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting that "alternative medicine" cures everything. And I've know plenty of folks like your mother who completely misuse herbal remedies. In addition, I'm not someone who'd suggest a $3000 "alternative treatment" instead of a $30 pill.

      At the same time, there are a lot of very minor issues that are getting very expensive pills right now, and I'd think alternative treatments should at least be considered. In a lot of cases, there is science behind it. In a lot of other cases, there isn't a formal scientific study, but a lot of anecdotal success. I'm in agreement that you should probably go over these sorts of things with an actual doctor, though, because the doctor will at the very least need to know about it.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    5. Re:Interesting fact by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

      1. Insomnia
      2. Depression
      3. Anxiety
      4. Bowel disorders
      5. Insulin resistance (pre-diabetes)

      Those are conditions off the top of my head where alternative medicine not only has effective treatments, but the treatments are often better for you than conventional medicine. Calling anything non-pharmaceutical as "non-medicine" is disingenuous at best, and shows you have done absolutely no research on the matter.

    6. Re:Interesting fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not disingenuous. It's simple fact. This has nothing to do with "conventional" vs. "alternative". That's just conspiracy bullshit from those who try to profit off of unproven nonsense. It's all a simple matter of market forces (coupled with the fact that medicine has to be proven before it is marketed as such). If it works, it would be sold as actual medicine. If you cannot prove that it actually works, you market it as a dietary supplement and sell it to gullible people like you who do not understand the placebo effect.

    7. Re:Interesting fact by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

      In order to demonstrate what you say to be false, there only needs to be one supplement that is medically effective that isn't used by MDs. Eat a bundle of dandelion greens and tell me it isn't a diuretic. I understand placebos, you're just stubborn and ignorant if you think the only effective medicines are pharmaceutical pills.

    8. Re:Interesting fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what they call alternative medicine that works?.... Medicine.

      If... it is patentable.

      If not they pay someone to do a study to debunk it by using 70-90 yr old people who are not in my age group anyway. And... are lacking in other body chemicals as well.

  21. still a remarkable plant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ginko may not have medical value for humans, but it is still a remarkable tree. Genetically, its ancestors split off from all plants alive today something like a quarter billion years ago, and the modern tree still resembles ancestors found in fossil from 270 million years ago. No other plant has a similar leaf shape or vein structure. It is the only member of its genus, its family, order, class, and division. There may be no native population left, but you can often find this amazing form of life planted next to sidewalks.

  22. But at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can save 15% on your car insurance...

    (Oops my bad, thats Geico)

  23. Swear by ginko, swear at creationists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many believers in ginko biloba go on an utter "They're SOOO stupid!!!" rant against creationists?

    I see no difference between "faith medicine" and "faith biology".

  24. Supplements industry group replies with BS by noidentity · · Score: 5, Informative
    I love the bullshit reply from the supplements industry group:

    A supplements industry group, Council for Responsible Nutrition, said other studies suggest the herbal supplement can be effective in improving cognitive function.

    "In an area where there are few other safe, affordable options, I would hate to see this study send the wrong message to consumers," Douglas MacKay, CRN vice president said in an email. "I would continue to recommend Ginkgo biloba to older adults as a safe, effective option for supporting cognitive health."

    Cue the "but it worked in my case" replies...

    1. Re:Supplements industry group replies with BS by LOLLinux · · Score: 1

      I would hate to see this study send the wrong message to consumers

      And by "wrong message" he means that they are being told that they are buying a placebo and paying tons of money for it.

    2. Re:Supplements industry group replies with BS by radtea · · Score: 1

      I love the bullshit reply from the supplements industry group

      Translation: "Science says it has no effect, but MAGIC says that it does! Which one are you going to believe?"

      I find it more tempting every day to give up on science and sell lies to stupid people. It's so much easier and more profitable. No FDA oversight, no warranties, no consequences. There are whole industries based on this full of extremely lucrative positions for anyone who possess and brain and lacks a conscience. Financial advisor. Inspirational speaker. Various kinds of "alternative" medical practitioner. Far easier to do those things than try to build a business around something that actually works to improve people's lives.

      Of course, if Norman Borlaug had done that the world would be missing a billion-odd people with billions more living in even greater misery than they do now.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    3. Re:Supplements industry group replies with BS by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Skip that and go straight to religion. All that, and tax-exempt status too.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:Supplements industry group replies with BS by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The dishonesty, incompetence, and corruption of the FDA is established beyond any possibility of refutation. The supplement industry varies widely: there are a lot of frauds, there are a number of manufacturers who tend to be insufficiently critical of their own products, and there are a few organizations that make high quality products and sponsor research advancing the state of the art (LEF).

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  25. Ginko ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been using Ginko for years, and I must say...... wait what was i going to say.. Hmmmm hey how about those Patriots last Sunday, WOW!

  26. Good Diet, Good Test Parameters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who have a poor diet may see more improvement from any supplement than people who have a good diet. Chances are these people tested had a better than average diet than people who are in the test. Most testers set up the type of results they want, in my experience of having been in a test. When I did not answer a question like normal people, I was asked to leave. I said I only spent 20 minutes per day thinking about food. It was true, but most spend more time. I didn't fit in with the desired results, so I was put out post haste.

  27. Focusin! by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

    Bart never took ginkgo biloba for a reason!

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  28. Technical translation follows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the translation is simply put as....Ginkgo, is a Stink'oh

  29. Re:Untested drug found useless... wonders never ce by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "FDA legally can't do jack about it"
    Thanks Reagan!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  30. All I ask is truth in advertising by aarenz · · Score: 1

    I dream of a day when products can only claim to do something that has been proven by unbiased testing. If the result that is desired is known and the testers understand that fact, they can make nearly any test say anything. Herbal items are not forced to be tested for safety or effectiveness. This is a problem since there are commercials and magazine articles that tout the benefits. If all of them were created to some standard and it was proven to work, then it is fine, otherwise they should just be able to say. This product may do something for some people and no more.

    1. Re:All I ask is truth in advertising by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The republicans forced a bill that removed these items from the FDA purview.

      DId you know the Reagan made decisions based on what his wife's psychic said?

      So, why did I bring politics? for a very good reason: with the religious groups taking over the republican agenda, it has allowed all kinds of non-scientific thinking and policies to take effect.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:All I ask is truth in advertising by schwit1 · · Score: 1

      The republicans forced a bill that removed these items from the FDA purview.

      Please cite your source. 1994, Clinton was president.

      DId you know the Reagan made decisions based on what his wife's psychic said?

      Please cite your source. I was aware of claims that Nancy Reagan saw a psychic.

      So, why did I bring politics? for a very good reason: with the religious groups taking over the republican agenda, it has allowed all kinds of non-scientific thinking and policies to take effect.

      Sen. Tom Harkin, the Iowa Democrat also known as Senator Bee Pollen, could not let the Health Reform Bill go through without a provision mandating that insurers reimburse alternative medicine providers. It was Harkin, you will recall, who was responsible for creation of the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), forcing Harold Varmus to resign as head of NIH. NCCAM hasn't found any cures, but it has done a credible job of using rigorous placebo-controlled double-blind studies to demonstrate that one herbal remedy after another is totally ineffective.

  31. I recommend the book Natural Causes by noidentity · · Score: 1

    I read the book Natural Causes a while back and it opened my eyes to the sham that the supplement industry is. Note I said industry, not supplements. I'm sure some of these things have useful effects, and would love to see more experiments performed to determine what they are. Until then, I won't ever touch them again, including even multivitamins.

    1. Re:I recommend the book Natural Causes by geekoid · · Score: 1

      actually, the usual process is something is shown not o work so then it becaome alt-med.

      Since there is no dosage control, usually no way to know where the ingredients come from, and are known to be laced with heavy metals, you can't really test the shelf product.
      You can test the active item that the claim is made from.

      Import herbal medicines have been know to ahve traced of aspirin, amphetamines, caffeine.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:I recommend the book Natural Causes by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      How the hell many experiments do you need to see? I subscribe to Life Extension, and it's common to see over 100 references in one article.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  32. Re:Untested drug found useless... wonders never ce by kesuki · · Score: 1

    "Hopefully herbal viagra is next, and some day spammers will be emailing about things people actually can use..."

    that is like waiting for the world to change, spammers have plenty or subjects, porn, money scams, pyramid scams, i could go on, but it's better if i don't. charging for email would solve the scam problems by at least 75%

  33. Doesn't matter by LockeOnLogic · · Score: 1

    They will still be able to continue to sell this with the same exact claims. So long as it's a "supplement" and not a medication, nothing can be done under current regulations. The only thing that would get it removed from shelves if it was proven toxic, and even then maybe not.

  34. Competing interests by Little_Professor · · Score: 1

    Dr DeKosky reports receiving grants or research support from Elan, Myriad, Neurochem, and GlaxoSmithKline and serving on the advisory boards of or consulting for AstraZeneca, Abbott, Baxter, Daichi, Eisai, Forest, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Medivation, Merck, NeuroPharma, Neuroptix, Pfizer, Myriad, and Servier.

    Conflict of interest much?

    1. Re:Competing interests by JumperCable · · Score: 1

      If it worked, these companies would identify the active ingredient and sell it in a prescription formula. It's not in their interest to ignore potentially effective medications.

    2. Re:Competing interests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think they haven't?

  35. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...what are we talking about?

  36. So what does work? Any advice? by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    So what does improve memory or cognitive skills? I've heard of rampant use of things like Adderall at universities, any personal stories? What about things like Piracetam? I remember reading about that in Mondo 2000 and always wondered if it was bunk.

    1. Re:So what does work? Any advice? by real+gumby · · Score: 1

      A healthy diet and exercise, followed by a good night's sleep (which will be facilitated by the exercise).

      Next up after that: a good social network -- friends, family, etc.

      This has been known for thousands of years. I haven't heard of any shortcut, sorry.

    2. Re:So what does work? Any advice? by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Sure, your suggestions are good ones that I think most people interested in increased cognitive function are already doing. I'm interested in what can be done beyond that.

      According to Wikipedia, Adderall increases alertness, concentration, and cognitive capabilities. It helps you stay awake and focus for long periods of time. But is this above and beyond what you can accomplish through puritanical living?

      -ec

    3. Re:So what does work? Any advice? by rainmaestro · · Score: 1

      Honestly, it really isn't that complicated. Like most "problems", really.

      --Eat healthy. You need the right balance of chemicals in the brain.
      --Sleep more. Studies consistently show the link between sleep and memory. Doesn't have to be 8 hours. I recall hearing that sleep goes through 90-minute cycles, so a multiple of that might be optimal.
      --Exercise. Increased cardiovascular fitness means more blood travels to the brain.

      A normal body doesn't require any kind of special help to function well. Just like dieting. You lose weight by eating less and exercising, not by living off grapefruit or cutting out all carbs. Just let your body do what it was meant to do.

      Now, if you have some sort of genetic anomaly, this may not apply.

    4. Re:So what does work? Any advice? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      in general, you are correct that a VARIED diet and mild to moderate exercise, with a good sleep and less stress, plus a good social network, help a lot.

      but we were talking about drugs

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    5. Re:So what does work? Any advice? by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      That's not a very interesting answer to the question though. Assume one is already doing that stuff. That's the baseline. So, what's next? What can you ingest to tweak your brain function to move to the next level.

    6. Re:So what does work? Any advice? by rainmaestro · · Score: 1

      That's a big assumption, though. Look at the current state of health in this country. Our baseline is *waaaaaay* below that. For the average overweight, malnourished, sleep-deprived adult, any one of those boring answers would result in a very noticeable improvement.

      Assuming you already have someone who has properly cared for their body, my next step would be to train the mind. Try an assortment of methods to improve the efficiency with which you think. Play with things like mnemonics to help your memory, for example.

      Another boring answer, I know, but I see artificial solutions as a proper choice only when you have exhausted the natural solutions. Much like the focus on muscle size. I'd rather take X pounds of muscle and learn how to utilize it twice as efficiently than ingest some random magic powder to double my muscle mass while remaining at the baseline efficiency.

    7. Re:So what does work? Any advice? by real+gumby · · Score: 1

      Good point, I tend to think that most people look for a drug like this as an alternative (or "quick fix") to a healthy lifestyle. But assuming that isn't the case, I presume your question is one of chronic or long term use.

      In that regard I would be cautious about taking any pharmacological agent. Very few drugs are tested for long term effect, especially not neuro drugs. You really have no idea what effect prolonged use of Adderall might have on your neurochemistry. Plenty of studies by the military have shown deleterious effects of the use of amphetamines, and more to the point, have shown them ineffective in general for improving cognitive function (although they increase perceived cognitive performance). They aren't routinely given to pilots as they were in WWI for example.

      (The use of stimulants in treatment of what appear to be neurochemical disorders is another matter, which I don't get into here. In those cases the long term side effects, if any, may outweigh the risks of non treatment).

      If you want a long-term neurostimulant, really only one has had any serious longitudinal study: Nicotine. It is well known for its beneficial cognitive effects; its pharmacodynamics have been studied for decades. Unfortunately it has some serious side effects, but in general is believed by many to be a wonder drug for both healthy and unhealthy users.

      These long term studies are very complicated and expensive by the way, so don't expect a lot of them to be done. I say this as an former pharma guy myself, although I never worked on a drug intended to be used like Adderall. And I am not an M.D so take all this with a grain of salt.

  37. Targetting the wrong thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The double blind studies cited by GNC and the like for Ginko are for healthy adults, not 70+ year olds with dementia. It increases blood flow to the brain.

    Fail.

  38. Here is a nice write up- by geekoid · · Score: 1
    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  39. Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only given to 72+ years old subjects? ... They've already lost a significant part of their brain function at that point

  40. Re:Untested drug found useless... wonders never ce by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Reagan was a prick; but DSHEA was signed in 1994, at which point Clinton was in office, and Reagan was barely sentient.

    If you want a real villain of the piece, look no further than Orrin Hatch (R) Utah. He is a pretty lovable guy to begin with, being the guy who actually suggested, in seriousness, amending the computer fraud and abuse act to allow copyright holders to destroy the computers of suspected infringers. He is also said to be a friend of SCO Group Uberslime Ralph Yarro III's "CP80" mormon moralist pressure group.

    It was his lobbying on behalf of the nutritional supplements industry(a generous donor and big local industry) that was instrumental in getting the bill passed.

  41. regardless of its medicinal value by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the ginkgo tree itself is pretty amazing: its the coelacanth of trees

    known only from the ancient fossil record, having aspects of a missing link between major plant classifications, and with no other living relatives by a long shot (at least from the perspective of western science). until isolated specimens were located, to western expert's amazed awe, in 1690. it was cultivated in the east, and this probably led to its survival, since the only populations anyone can consider wild are only in a tiny mountain reserve in eastern china... but even this group of trees might only exist because it was tended by monks for millenia, ironically for this story, probably because of medicinal value

    in other words, the coelacanth of trees may only continue to exist in this world due to the efforts of ancient man, the inverse relationship between extinction and mankind. either way, if you've ever looked at a ginkgo leaf, you can readily appreciate how ancient and alien the plant is. its like a tiny fan, a completely unique morphology unlike any other leaf you have ever seen on any other plant

    Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba; in Chinese and Japanese , pinyin romanization: yín xìng, Hepburn romanization: ich or ginnan), also spelled gingko, also known as the Maidenhair Tree after Adiantum, is a unique species of tree with no close living relatives. The ginkgo is classified in its own division, the Ginkgophyta, comprising the single class Ginkgoopsida, order Ginkgoales, family Ginkgoaceae, genus Ginkgo and is the only extant species within this group. It is one of the best-known examples of a living fossil, because Ginkgoales other than G. biloba are not known from the fossil record after the Pliocene.[1][3]
    For centuries it was thought to be extinct in the wild, but is now known to grow in at least two small areas in Zhejiang province in Eastern China, in the Tian Mu Shan Reserve. However, recent studies indicate high genetic uniformity among ginkgo trees from these areas, arguing against a natural origin of these populations and suggesting that the ginkgo trees in these areas may have been planted and preserved by Chinese monks over a period of about 1000 years.[4] Whether native ginkgo populations still exist has not been demonstrated unequivocally.
    The relationship of Ginkgo to other plant groups remains uncertain. It has been placed loosely in the divisions Spermatophyta and Pinophyta, but no consensus has been reached. Since Ginkgo seeds are not protected by an ovary wall, it can morphologically be considered a gymnosperm. The apricot-like structures produced by female ginkgo trees are technically not fruits, but are seeds that have a shell that consists of a soft and fleshy section (the sarcotesta), and a hard section (the sclerotesta).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginkgo_biloba

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:regardless of its medicinal value by Jeeeb · · Score: 1

      Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba; in Chinese and Japanese , pinyin romanization: yín xìng, Hepburn romanization: ich or ginnan)

      The Japanese word for Ginkgo is Ichou. The article is wrong (meh no big surprise for Wikipedia). The characters it's written with could potentially be read "Gin'an". It's just that they never are.

    2. Re:regardless of its medicinal value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The name is the Japanese transliteration of the Chinese pronunciation of Ginnan. Only that some dude copying the name misread the y.

  42. Disclosures: Dr DeKosky Gets Big Pharma Money by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Financial Disclosures: ... Dr DeKosky reports receiving grants or research support from Elan, Myriad, Neurochem, and GlaxoSmithKline and serving on the advisory boards of or consulting for AstraZeneca, Abbott, Baxter, Daichi, Eisai, Forest, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Medivation, Merck, NeuroPharma, Neuroptix, Pfizer, Myriad, and Servier. No other disclosures were reported.

    Not to say the results of this particular study are necessarily bogus, but sure makes one wonder.

    Big pharma dislikes "natural", as in often unpatentable, treatments; discourages their use.

    Ron

    1. Re:Disclosures: Dr DeKosky Gets Big Pharma Money by Elokane · · Score: 1

      This is like a researcher funded by Coca Cola "finding" that high fructose corn syrup isn't that bad for you.

  43. Too old test group? by mario_grgic · · Score: 1

    Could it be that the brains of the test subjects in this study are compromised by disease beyond repair and giving them Ginko at that stage doesn't do anything for them?

    I always thought of Ginko in combination with Ginseng as a preventative measure rather than something you take to heal Alzheimer's or reverse it.

    I think everyone agrees that Ginko with Ginseng does increase blood flow to the brain, which means more nutrients and more oxygen for the brain. Now this does not mean you will be smarter or suddenly have better memory. It only means that perhaps you have a better potential for those things. If you are a lazy ass, refusing to study or exercise your brain, then no drug will help.

    On the other hand, Ginko and Ginseng do have side effects, too much stimulation to sleep and they give you jitters, and of course Ginseng is a blood thinner (just like Aspirin).

    --
    As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
    1. Re:Too old test group? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I've been taking it since I was 17 and I am now 32, I'll let you know how it goes.

  44. What's the dose again? by sdturf · · Score: 1

    I have some experience with alternative health measures and do not believe that ginkgo does much good for memory, either. However, this story does not prove it. Was this study funded, directly or indirectly, by some organization that has a stake in a poor outcome? Were the study participants provided the supplement (I would assume so since they took "two 120-milligram capsules of ginkgo a day". Most ginkgo biloba products are a 50:1 extract of guaranteed potency, although I suppose you could find capsules of the plain herb at Walmart or the drug store, but why did they conduct a study effectively using 50 times less of the active ingredients than is typically recommended? Looks to be the same as other "studies" conducted that use tiny amounts of the subject ingredient, such as studies on vitamin C which use 30mg per day and declare that it has no effect on X, and allows doctors to state authoritatively that vitamin C does no good for X.

  45. Ummm... by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    What about the placebo effect?

    1. Re:Ummm... by LOLLinux · · Score: 1

      What about it?

    2. Re:Ummm... by psithurism · · Score: 1

      Parent and GP are correct; as studies have shown, more expensive placebos are more effective than cheap placebos, therefore it is extremely important that consumers not substitute their expensive placebo with something cheaper, it will most likely be less effective.

  46. Ginkgo doesn't improve memory... by Genwil · · Score: 1

    I meant to test ginkgo myself but kept forgetting to take it!

  47. Gimmicks... by adam525 · · Score: 1

    (rant on) Some people will fall for anything. Red Bull does nothing more for you than a plain old caffinated soda (the taurine and other "supplements" have NO effect whatsoever). People hear things on the news, read articles in magazines, or hear through word of mouth that there's some new miracle herb or supplement that's gonna change their lives and they waste hundreds to thousands of dollars a year on crap.
    Want to be healthy? EAT RIGHT and EXERCISE. Period. (rant off)

    1. Re:Gimmicks... by gkuz · · Score: 1

      Want to be healthy? EAT RIGHT and EXERCISE. Period.

      Oh, but that's so much *work*. I'd rather just take a pill. You're no fun at all.

    2. Re:Gimmicks... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      But I drank Red Bull and WINGS GREW ON MY BACK. Your mileage may vary.

  48. Re:Untested drug found useless... wonders never ce by Tycho · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but at least Zicam had to withdraw its Zinc Gluconate nasal sprays and nasal swabs after enough people lost their sense of smell to it.

    --
    Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  49. surprised by solweil · · Score: 1

    I'm a little surprised at all the knee-jerk support of big pharma on slashdot.

  50. Potent placebos by TheLink · · Score: 1

    They should see which groups of people are more compatible with the placebo response/effect.

    As the article notes the placebo effect can be very powerful.

    Thus I also suspect that having certain sorts of religions or belief systems may be advantageous, since it means you don't actually need a 3rd party to actually physically administer something to you (or pretend to).

    For example, a member that believed the FSM or God has helped him, might still be able to function and be useful to his group despite injury - experiencing no incapacitating pain. Or even actually heal better than normal.

    Thus groups consisting of such members might be "evolutionarily fitter" and more likely to survive over generations.

    In contrast an atheist might not be able to access such an effect as easily - and require a device or procedure. Unless of course there's a medical tech breakthrough - which might happen if the researchers figure out more about the placebo response/effect. It is likely to still require an actual external device/treatment, but it should be better than the placebo in effect or reliability.

    --
  51. Giaia calls BS on the study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This study is BS. Gingko does work. Just that it was instructed by its Giaia Mother to play dumb when subject to stupid tests by unbelieving labcoats aka Pharma Mafia minions

  52. 120 milligrams isn't enough for any effect by foniksonik · · Score: 2, Informative

    Herbal supplement's are not concentrated like pharmaceuticals are.... 120 mg a day won't get you anything. Take 120 mg a day of most herbs that have active drug compounds and you're likely to get no more than a trace of that drug, whereas pharmaceuticals take the active compound and synthesize it - then give you 120 mg of the concentrated compound.

    As a laugh, you could take 120 mg of marijuana - even good stuff... and smoke it. That's maybe 1/4 of a joint (you'd get about 2 joints out of a gram of weed if you were conservative). How high are you going to get on 1/4 of a joint? Not very... and THC is a fairly potent compound. Gingko is not nearly as potent.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    1. Re:120 milligrams isn't enough for any effect by pretorious · · Score: 0

      Agreed. For a decent Ginko effect I'd say I steep around 2-3 /grams/ with green tea and a little lemon juice (to help the extraction). Eating 120mg of any natural non-purified substance will yeild little to no effect (some do, ie Datura). Eating 120mg of raw unroasted coffee beans would not do much, but 120mg of extracted caffeine would.

    2. Re:120 milligrams isn't enough for any effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How high are you going to get on 1/4 of a joint?

      It depends. Directly smoking it, only ~somewhat~. If you eat it, you won't feel a thing. 120mg of high quality marijuana, placed in a vaporizer, will get you "high as a kite". You should also consider that "good stuff" in most places equates "decent" in parts of the world. Especially Cali ;-)

    3. Re:120 milligrams isn't enough for any effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the pot of course. I could show you stuff that will absolutely FUCK YOU UP with one 1/4 joint.

    4. Re:120 milligrams isn't enough for any effect by lanner · · Score: 1

      I have two bottles of ginkgo products on my desk right now, which I bought from a store.

      One has 400mg of gotu kola, which has nothing do to with ginkgo, and also 60mg of ginkgo biloba dried extract.

      The other has 120mg of ginko biloba.

      Both have, per bottle instructions, one pill per day usage.

      So, the study did exactly what it should, and used "recommended" daily values of the product, which apparently failed to produce a positive result.

      Whoever figured out that 120mg of ginkgo was "enough", who knows?

      Seems like you are trying to find a reason to disregard the results of the study to meet your pre-determined opinion.

    5. Re:120 milligrams isn't enough for any effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it, what's in those pills then? Isn't it just an extract of the plant? Isn't an extract just like concentrated "stuff" that was in the plant? You can basically concentrate anything you want to whatever levels you want, right? And why do you see no effect (relative to placebo) with 120mg? Is there some threshold value for this stuff? My body doesn't typically have binary responses to things; in fact, I bet if I conducted your proposed study and smoked 120mg of marijuana, disregarding the fact that nobody has processed it and made it into a pill (which I guess doesn't concentrate it? Is that what you were saying?), it would have a measurable physiological effect.

      And in any event, manufacturers produce pills in a range of dosages*, but a quick googling reveals none over 120mg/pill, with most at 60mg/pill and a few at 30mg/pill. The instructions don't say "You need to gobble up 5-20 of these to see an effect," do they?

      *Source: http://www.google.com/products?oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=ginkgo%20biloba%20supplement%20ingredients&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wf

    6. Re:120 milligrams isn't enough for any effect by pretorious · · Score: 0

      I believe the FDA plays a part in determining dosage. As stated, eating 120mg of even strong marijuana will not cause an effect in most people. you cannot use that as evidence that marijuana has no effect on anyone!

    7. Re:120 milligrams isn't enough for any effect by msimm · · Score: 1

      How high are you going to get on 1/4 of a joint?

      High enough to measure it's effects against a placebo.

      --
      Quack, quack.
    8. Re:120 milligrams isn't enough for any effect by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      2 joints to the gram?

      You roll pin joints dude.

      120mg of the best will still be very noticeable to a low tolerance person.

      1 small hit of TrainWreck will leave a new smoker rooted in his/her chair for hours. That strain is truly narcotic.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  53. Great! by Faerunner · · Score: 1

    Aside from dosage issues, etc... has anyone considered that people taking "herbal supplements" may also show other behavioral changes which may affect memory and cognitive capacities?

    I expect if we attempted the kind of study complicated enough to trace and collect data from a dozen behavioral components (such as amount of reading/writing done, daily exercise, diet, social life, mental health/stability...) we'd find that one factor does not control memory loss or cognitive function. I'd bet money it's a lifestyle indicator, more than an indicator of taking the right herbal supplements.

  54. lef: ginkgo article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Life Extension article on previous ginkgo study (probably related to this study too):

    In this article, Life Extension reviews what the scientific literature says about ginkgo biloba extract,
      a potential flaw in the JAMA study, and why people seeking to slow brain aging are taking ginkgo.

    http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2002/nov2002_report_ginkgo_01.html

  55. Re:Untested drug found useless... wonders never ce by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Interestingly, Zicam snuck in under a different loophole. Zicam was 10% Zinc Gluconate, which turns out to be pretty bloody high for intranasal use(check out what it did in animal tests). However, since Zinc Gluconate is one of the substances included in the "Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States" (a collection of homeopathic "remedies" put together according to this procedure) and since 10% is equivalent to the "1D" homeopathic dilution, Zicam could be regulated and sold as a homeopathic drug rather than a conventional drug.

    Unlike "dietary supplements", homeopathic remedies are recognized as drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act(in Section 201(g). However, unlike ordinary drugs, they are subject only to production and labeling standards, not safety or efficacy tests, and are almost always nonprescription. Normally, this isn't a big deal, because most homeopathic drugs are so diluted that the contain(on average) 0 molecules of the active ingredient, and are prepared using harmless dilutants. Zicam was unusual in that, while it arguably fell under the definition of "homeopathic", and was sold as such, it was well within the range for biological activity.

  56. There are "alternative medicines" that work... by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

    For example, kava is a fairly strong anxiolytic, and doesn't have the addiction profile of benzodiazepines. It's commonly used as the recreational drug of choice by Polynesians, so clearly it has pronounced psychoactive effects. I've played around with it quite a lot and find it to be pleasant, albeit mild.

    5-HTP, which is the extract of the Griffonia simplicifolia plant, also invariably boosts serotonin (5-HT) levels in the brain. Whether or not it actually functions as an antidepressant is debated; I found some success using it for anxiety and depression, but that its effects wore off after a few weeks and the dosage needed to be boosted. (I take this, though, as a testament to the fact that depression != low serotonin, which I think is a complete fallacy.)

    Not everything is homeopathic / naturopathic bullshit. Some plants, believe it or not, actually do have medicinal value. What about aloe for skin conditions?

    1. Re:There are "alternative medicines" that work... by psithurism · · Score: 1

      For example, kava is a fairly strong anxiolytic, and doesn't have the addiction profile of benzodiazepines. It's commonly used as the recreational drug of choice by Polynesians, so clearly it has pronounced psychoactive effects. I've played around with it quite a lot and find it to be pleasant, albeit mild.

      5-HTP, which is the extract of the Griffonia simplicifolia plant, also invariably boosts serotonin (5-HT) levels in the brain. Whether or not it actually functions as an antidepressant is debated; I found some success using it for anxiety and depression, but that its effects wore off after a few weeks and the dosage needed to be boosted. (I take this, though, as a testament to the fact that depression != low serotonin, which I think is a complete fallacy.)

      Not everything is homeopathic / naturopathic bullshit. Some plants, believe it or not, actually do have medicinal value. What about aloe for skin conditions?

      Quite right, I love kava and aloe, but personally I could care less if I'm destressing with a placebo or lessening my sunburns with goo that in reality does nothing.

      However, studies are helpful if a product is sold to aid something, and studies are necessary if it is going to be prescribed. What if we resolved the debate about whether 5-HTP works as an antidepressant with a study? Then it could be prescribed without all the "These statements have not been verified by the FDA and this drug is not intended to treat any condition."

      What percentage of the herbs in your typical natural store are useless? I have no idea and neither does anybody else, because not enough actual unbiased scientific studies are done about them so no one has any idea how to use their money effectively on herbal supplements. I know several people who use the "buy them all and something will work" strategy, but that has the caveat of side effects as well as being ridiculously expensive. Others avoid the whole scene altogether and miss many cheap effective aids to their problems. I try a middle ground, but that has the combined downsides of both strategies. The only way to make naturopathic medicines useful is to do more of these studies with the side effect of eliminating many of them as "homeopathic / naturopathic bullshit".

  57. Three things that work by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    (caveat - I work in medical genetics and sit in seminars and discuss papers on what actually works)

    From my viewpoint, the things that really work are:

    1. low-dose aspirin, provided you aren't allergic. Reducing the inflammation response improves a lot of things, and it's one of the few things we see helping in ALL our studies.

    2. caffeine - yup. mind you, there are side effects, but tea and coffee are good. no, the sugar and stevia rushes don't really help you long-term, no matter what advertisers tell you. if you must use sugar, use cane sugar, the less processed the better.

    3. exercise - mild to moderate, gardening counts - this always helps, but excessive exercise is way less effective. forget the perfect abs commercials, just get 15-30 minutes of mild to moderate exercise - of any type - about three times a week.

    Now I'm sure by posting this I'll get lots of people arguing for their favorite drug or supplement or placebo (up to 2/3 of all prescriptions in Canada for example), but you're basically wasting your money and it's not helping you.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  58. Fad supplements by ethicalcannibal · · Score: 1

    Every time one of these fad supplements come out with these claims, I would see half the Alzheimers patients on my med pass get them. This sucks for a few reasons.

    Firstly, there's never any real double blind studies when these things hit the med cart. Family are just hoping upon hope that the claims will work, and their family will be better. These companies prey upon that hope.

    Secondly, it means I, as the nurse, have to find a way to shovel an obviously pointless (and usually HUGE) pill into a dementia patient. Often times these patients are confused and don't want to take a pile of legitimate medications, such as psych meds, heart meds, diabetic meds, and adding another big foul tasting pill on top of that starts pushing it.

    Lastly, there are side effects, even if it's just an upset stomach. Piling on a bunch of useless supplements just increases the chances that there are going to be issues.

    I cringe when each new wave comes around. I've seen it with glucosamine, ginko biloba, fish oil, and vitamin D. I have nothing against things that will help, but so much of it is just marketing.

  59. Re:Untested drug found useless... wonders never ce by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Herbal suppliments, like the herbal viagra, are not subject to FDA rules. Some senator with a herbal suppliment bias was rewarded with this bit of law. Don't expect the government to protect you when they can reward one of their own with a law like this. Science doesn't matter in cases like this.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  60. What Does Prevent Decline with Age: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Piracetam

  61. And when taken regularly from a younger age? by pheloniusdow · · Score: 1

    I wonder if a study which traced the use of gingko over a longer period of time and perhaps, as other posters have noted, in more concentrated doses might find a different result. If the claim is that the compounds in the plant mitigate cognitive decline, shouldn't the participants in the study start taking the plant before they are 72? What is the effect if any when a person regularly consumes gingko from a young age?

  62. WTF? That's not the same thing! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Ginkgo Doesn't Improve Memory Or Cognitive Skills

    "Ginkgo biloba has failed -- again -- to live up to its reputation for boosting memory and brain function. Just over a year after a study showed that the herb doesn't prevent dementia and Alzheimer's disease,

    (Emphasis mine.)

    In other news:
    - Cars have failed — again — to live up to their reputation for quickly getting you somewhere. Just over a year after a study showed that the machine can”t fly or survive outer space, ...
    - Caffeine has failed — again — to live up to its reputation for boosting memory and brain function. Just over a year after a study showed that the substance doesn't prevent dementia, Alzheimer's disease, ...
    - ...

    (I'm not commenting on the rest of TFS. Just those two sentences.)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:WTF? That's not the same thing! by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      The reason that that was presented as an argument that ginko doesn't work as described was because the alternative medicine industry frequently made such claims. And unlike vague claims of improving memory and mental performance, Alzheimer's had a very clear medical definition of symptoms which could be assessed somewhat objectively.

      Alternative medicine, like many pseudosciences relies on moving the goalposts as a means of protecting its arguments from invalidation. Its claims are prone to scope creep by those looking to make a buck, since almost no claim is ever scientifically verified. For modern medicine, verification of basic claims comes before marketing, and unproven claims are not allowed by law. The end result is you don't have scummy claims like those regarding Alzheimer's disease above. The original introducers of ginko giloba never made any such claim about it, but because there was no grounded research about it's subject before it was sold, it was marketed with any extraordinary claim that a savvy businessman thought might catch a few suckers.

      The point of this post is that your analogy is unreasonable because people were making claims about Alzheimer's and Dementia, and another unresearched claim on a similar subject being demonstrated to be false is a reasonable point to note. These days, medical treatment is the realm of science, not intuition, and when things start unsupported by science, there's a pretty slim chance that it really has any medical meaning. The low hanging fruit of natural solutions has already been found(e.g. drink lots of water/juice when you're sick, eat vegetables, exercise frequently: these are all things you'll hear from your doctor in spite of them not being big pharmaceutical cash cows) .

  63. 120-milligram capsules of ginkgo? by dvh.tosomja · · Score: 1

    I always though you are supposed to EAT few hundreds gram of fresh ginkgo leaves like a salad. Perhaps 100g and 0.1g make a difference.

  64. "Again" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ginkgo biloba has failed — again — to[...]

    Again ?!? What, did we forget when it failed the first time? Obviously, we're not taking enough Ginkgo biloba. Wait, I'm confused. I'd better go grab some ginkgo bilo....

  65. What is really going on here by TeTalon · · Score: 1

    Sorry I just have to respond to this.
    First the headline has nothing to do with the story.
    The story is about dementia and Alzheimer's disease and not Ginkgo Doesn't Improve Memory Or Cognitive Skills.
    Also the science of this study is just really bad and ignores what science has been done on Ginkgo Biloba’s affect on the body.
    So what do we know about its effects?
    It increases blood flow in small blood vessels, and the extremities, and in conjunction with other herbs has been used to help reduce blood pressure. (For centuries)
    It has the curious effect of countering the negative effects of too much caffeine.
    It also helps with blood flow to the brain, and can be used to help with mild cases of ADD. (Not HDAD)
    I myself take it for my mild ADD and it does help me to focus.

    Since Dementia and Alzheimer’s are cellular degeneration diseases and not related to blood flow in the brain I am not surprised it was not found to be helpful.
    This is an obvious case of researchers not doing their home work before requesting funding for their study.
    It never fails to amazes me what studies get funding, while other studies doing real science get left behind.
    Big surprise aspirin is also not helpful in the treatment of these diseases either.
    But aspirin and ginkgo do share the same affect of helping with blood flow in the body.

    So let me quickly address the headline.
    Does Ginko’s affect on the body effect memory or cognitive skills.
    Most likely no, unless you are adding large doses of caffeine on sleep deprived subjects.
    Or you are trying to counter poor blood flow in the brain.

    And most likely it is already used in pharmaceutical company’s compounds.
    Pharmaceutical company’s have DOD class security surrounding their products, manufacturing, and IP.

    --

    TeTalon
    You are either a part of the problem, or a part of the solution, which are you.

  66. Hmmm... by Facegarden · · Score: 1

    When I was in 8th grade (late 90's) I took ginko in the weeks leading up to the county math contest. I ended up getting first place in the individual competition for 8th graders. I was never sure if the ginko helped or if I was just talented, but its nice to know it probably wasn't the ginko (not like i expected any difference to be huge, but still!).

    Of course... it was Santa Cruz county... Yes, that Santa Cruz.

    And the sad thing is that after doing all that, then going through high school and college and completing the engineering level math up to differential equations (which i got an A in), I can't remember any of it anymore. At least, not calculus. I can't even remember how to do derivatives!
    -Taylor

    --
    Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
  67. The problem was ... by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 1

    By a freak mischance, the study was done on retired CIA workers who could neither confirm nor deny that they remembered anything.

    --
    Squirrel!
  68. Re:Untested drug found useless... wonders never ce by psithurism · · Score: 1

    What do you mean hopefully herbal Viagra is next? Where have you been for the entire history of human kind. Oysters, bananas, rhino horn, chocolate, dragon bones, authentic mummy flesh, figs, cow's testicles, elk antlers, acai berries...I'm tired of typing, but the point is I can name a dozen natural alternatives to Viagra off the top of my head that have caused unsolicited advertisement since forever. Currently, I already receive the spam you're hoping for from at least the acai peddlers.

  69. Right, and you know what else??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was once kiolled by a drunk driver that was having a lot of booze and he told me that he was not quite impaired by i believed him anyway and knew better but whent in his car with him and then he started driving everywhere like a crazy man ( like ozzy osborn) but was really more impaired than i originally thought in the first place and well he ended up driving real fast and their were some people flashing their lights at him but that made him only want to speed up and i told him to slow down but he didnt like me critizicng his type of driving and therefore sped up a little more and then we encountered this other drunk driver or driver on some sorts of drugs and he started weaving in front of us and we lost him but later came back in contact with him later on in the night when he hit us at an intersection after everyone in the town had sobered up and killed me resulting in the picture above which just goes to show that not every traffic fatality involves alcohol but in reality it can involve a lot of factors such as safety and precautions that must be met like treating trarffic lights like four way stops when there is snow going everywhere as is in the case with the midwest at this point with their led's lights and all but I do not think I will be driving this year so for me this is a non issue and for you too it shoudl also be a non issue as well.

    1. Re:Right, and you know what else??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was once kiolled by a drunk driver

      Well, Folks, we've reached a milestone in Slashdot history: Dead ACs are now posting from beyond the grave.

  70. Would you care to elaborate on that? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    I am not sure what exactly you are saying.

    That a herb has an inconsistent ratio of itself?
    Like an apple having more apple or less apple and more of something else instead?

    If it is a case of a single herb or a single part of the herb (flower, stem, root, leaf, fruit) you measure the weight.
    You know... that same measure we use to measure chemical ingredients used in medicine.
    Except you use grams instead of milligrams as the concentration of chemicals is far lower than in the artificial sources.

    So it is quite safe to have several cups of coffee, but it would probably be lethal to have a single cup of caffeine.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Would you care to elaborate on that? by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      The GP didn't exactly explain it well, but they (I assume) are referring to the manufacturing process. There's a lot of reported issues about QA controls. If you buy a bottle of asprin, it's pretty safe to say that each pill will have very close to the same amount of active ingredient as every other pill. The tolerances are pretty low because of tight regulation.

      Herbals don't have the same level of regulation, if any at all. You have to take on faith that the manufacturer is being truthful that any given pill contains the exact amount, or even of the exact herb, they say it does. If you google "fake herbal medicines" you get report after report of various places selling false herbal medicines.

      Even with a legit manufacturer, it's still up to their own internal processes to get things right because there is almost no external oversight.

    2. Re:Would you care to elaborate on that? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      You are measuring the weight of the entire herb part you harvested. That does not mean it it going to correlate accurately with the amount of active ingredient in the herb. Some plants due to genetic diversity, growing conditions, time since harvest, etc, etc, may have more or less of the active ingredient. So when you take a herb, you may measure the weight of the herb parts, but you are only guessing at how much active ingredient that much weight of that particular batch will have.

  71. Synthetics are often purified "herbs". by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    The pharma industry scan through millions of compounds found in "natural" remedies looking for active compounds.

    Aspirin - willow bark
    Penicillin - bread mould
    Quinine - cinchona bark
    Morphine/Codeine - poppy seeds
    Digoxin - foxglove
    Reserpine - indian snakeroot
    Ephedrine - mormon-tea

    etc etc.

    --
    Deleted
  72. That explains... by couchslug · · Score: 1

    ...why I can't find my damn Ginkgo bottle...

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  73. study control group not exhaustive by ffflala · · Score: 1

    This study gave half the group gingko, and the other half a placebo. It would have been more thorough to include a control group that did not take any supplement at all.

    The study measured certain aspects of cognitive function. It seems reasonable to allow for the possibility that cognition itself --specifically, a belief (or misbelief) that one is taking a supplement or a placebo-- could measurably affect cognitive function.

    After all, it could be that both gingko and placebos are both more effective than nothing at all; particularly since it appears that placebos themselves are somehow becoming more effective. http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/09/07/1526234/Placebos-Are-Getting-More-Effective

  74. The missing step! by Krishnoid · · Score: 1
    Finally, Eastern medical and spiritual traditions provide the solution to a long-standing problem in modern computational theory:
    1. Package alternative medical product.
    2. Add "Gingko Biloba" to the labels of alternative medical products
    3. Products fly off the shelves in exchange for cash
    4. Profit!
  75. The NIH and FDA managers have a revolving .... by Jerry · · Score: 1

    door arrangement with the management of the pharm and food industries, and we are supposed to believe that this study is unbiased?

    It reminds me of the FDA approval for Aspartame, when tests for carcinogenic properties was "improved" by removing the rats that had developed brain cancer from the test groups. This "solution" suggested by former Sec of Defense Rumsfield, and for which he received $6M in salary and bonuses. The only difference is that the Aspartame study "proved" NeutraSweet was "safe".

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  76. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  77. No wonder ... by nevermore94 · · Score: 1

    ... that I could never remember to take it.

    --
    Nevermore.
  78. Manufacturer issue tracker by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Closed: WONTFIX

    Comment: works for me.

  79. can't buy me love by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What herbal remedies do you recommend?

    My drug recommendations all come with the serious urging that you research deeply on your own. That includes my recommendations for plant-derived or synthetic, brand-name drugs. Do you think gobbling down Tagamet and aspirin, just because you can buy them off the drug store shelf, without an understanding of drug metabolization is a good idea?

    For difficulty sleeping or resetting a sleep schedule, for antioxidant effect, plant-derived melatonin. As such a fundamental neurochemical, you'll want to be careful about your usage. A specific effect to be wary of is immunomodulation.

    Kavalactones present in the Kava plant are anxiolytics — they have anti-anxiety effects. They work on GABA receptors, similarly to alcohol, but don't have the same stupefying effects. If using the raw plant, do not take leaves and stems, only the root, macerated in water, per the traditional use. As with all drugs, take in moderation.

    For mental stimulation and performance, caffeine from green tea (or coffee). Also theobromine from cacao. Also cinnamon scent (go ahead, look it up). And again Kava. Flaxseed meal (alpha-linolenic acid, which converts to EPA and DHA — omega-3s), walnuts, etc.

    For bronchodilation, theophylline from cacao.

    For anti-emetic (nausea/vomiting, including motion sickness), ginger (active ingredient zingiberene). Perhaps marijuana.

    For mood, theobromine from cacao, kavalactones from Kava, plant-derived melatonin, caffeine. Plant-derived 5-HTP (beware interactions with MAOIs and SSRIs). I'd suggest looking into St. John's Wort, but I haven't delved deeply into it myself except to note that it's a drug metabolization inhibitor, and so requires special care regarding interaction. The first thing to do with poor mood is not to begin applying drugs anyway, plant-based or synthetic.

    For energy level, caffeine from green tea or elsewhere, theobromine (cacao), cocaine (coca).

    For anti-inflammation, depending on severity, curcumin (turmeric), eugenol (cloves), and zingiberene (ginger), bromelain (pineapple), papain (papaya), alpha-linolenic acid (flaxseeds), cinnamon. Maybe

    For digestion, ginger, pineapple, papaya.

    Surely that's a big enough list that you can find something wrong in it. I know you're looking for chinks in armor.

    Why do you believe that these remedies are effective?

    Reading. Broad-spectrum data factoring (e.g., including absence of certain kinds of information) anchored mostly by published studies (with an appropriate eye towards credibility). You? (Seriously. How do you know about your own choices?)

    How do these remedies compare to the drugs that target the same complaints in both cost and effectiveness?

    Well, gee, which ones? How about the anti-inflammatories... NSAIDs have an issue with promoting GI irritation and stomach bleeding. If you've got ulcers already, IBD or Crohn's or Coeliac Disease, NSAIDs will be pretty hard on you. On the other hand, the degree of inflammation present in autoimmune disorders is probably not the right scenario for trying to address solely with eugenol/zingiberene/curcumin. But back on the gripping hand, adding these to your diet can only help.

    Side-effects and come-down from SSRIs are pretty gnarly, especially in the suicide cases. Make sure not to miss your doses.

    Green tea can be pretty expensive, I admit. But, whatever. Ginger, turmeric, cloves... not that expensive and serve dual purpose as freakin' spices. Kava's pretty pricey, I have to say, but I quite like it. If anyone knows a good source of quality root, please chime in. I expect whole root to be less expensive than capsule or tincture preparations.

    What qualifies you to be making medicinal recommendations to others? Do you have relevant training?

    Do you have the relevant training as a consumer

  80. How does Ginko Biloba work... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    .. for people whose minds haven't already deteriorated?

    Why was the study limited to people 72 and older? I thought Ginko was supposed to prevent the deterioration of mental function. Not restore it to people who may have already lost it. Since the mind is supposed to begin losing some of its function beginning at much earlier ages (I've read that some function begins to be lost in the late 20s), why the heck wasn't the study including younger people?

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  81. Re:Untested drug found useless... wonders never ce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, herbal viagra is very real and effective. It's inert plant material laced with analogues of sildenafil (such as Acetildenafil and Thiomethisosildenafil) that work as PDE5 inhibitors to avoid patent restrictions and prescriptions. Greasy, yes. Fake, no.

  82. You can't trust both by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    What if the Ginkgo really works in a mysterious way which the current technology/analysis can't figure out, e.g. a very complex side effect and these scientists have actually breaks treatment of some clever patients who are wise to keep in "tested chemical drugs" but add Ginkgo to their treatment, consulting their doctor first?

    As I see some real robbery scheme (overpriced natural pills) being in action globally, we can also argue about the mysterious ways of gigantic "real pill" companies. Why the heck I have to read "miracles" of Aspirin every day? Especially if I have a potentially bad stomach and Aspirin, in very unfortunate conditions can kill me in matter of hours? When will these "doctors" talk about it and debunk those billion dollar company backed claims?

    What to do if you read Ginkgo doesn't work, Aspirin or some more advanced pill does miracles? Just keep ignoring it, it is your doctor's business, not you.

    I can just tell these scientists that nobody died because of ginkgo tea. Can they claim the same for OTC pills? For example, what does unneeded amounts of Vitamin A does? What happens if you give "aspirin"just in case to a unlucky guy who lives alone, uses alcohol, sleeps alone and he takes it with empty stomach who just happens to have ulcer risk?

  83. The Tragedy of "The Average" in Practical Medicine by iliketrash · · Score: 1

    I have used ginkgo biloba and for me, it indeed does work. I don't notice it affecting me until I need to think (e.g., it doesn't make me jittery like caffeine can) but then it is like the skids of my mind are greased. I am 54 years old.

    I appreciate that people doing medical research have a hard task, and finding answers to questions such as this can be interesting work, but in a subtle way, once "the answer" is found and practitioners incorporate the findings into their practices, many patients can be harmed. Here's why, and I'll use the ginkbo biloba study cited. A large (ideally) population is studied for a single variable, in this case, susceptibility to ginkgo biloba with respect to cognitive function. The "result" is determined (in this case, it doesn't do anything _on average_) and from that point forward every person is considered average in that one variable. In other words, some people in the study might have been helped by the substance in question while others were not helped or were harmed. But when you go to your doctor, he/she doesn't test you to see which group you fall into: you are automatically assumed to be "average."

    This is possibly the single biggest flaw in the practice of medicine today. In the future, one would hope that more personalized medicine will be practiced as knowledge increases and as individualized (e.g., DNA) testing are available. But it is also possible that a tragic delay will be inserted into the system as governments establish more and more panels to determine the averages and to penalize physicians for practicing outside of the government-mandated guidelines which are set for that average. This is currently being planned in the United States.

  84. gingko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unfortunately they are investigating the wrong things. what should be investigated are the abilities of some chemicals in gingko that act as FAAH inhibitors, like kaempferol, could lead to good non-addictive analgesics or antidepressants.

  85. Same thing... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    but you are only guessing at how much active ingredient that much weight of that particular batch will have.

    You are doing the same with every pill and every chemical ingredient as well. Only difference is the level of purity and the scale at which you measure.
    So you make errors at the scale of 0.01 milligram, but you are using an ingredient potent enough that a single milligram might be a HUGE difference.

    Again... couple of grams of coffee per cup more won't change much, but add a couple of milligrams of caffeine more and the mixture will be a LOT more potent.

    Plants have a smaller concentration to begin with, so you are just fine with much higher measuring error.
    Quality_of_ingredients- or their quantity-wise. Tea spoons are just as usable as a measuring equipment as a micro-scale.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  86. So the problem is in quality assurance? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Three words: Internet Bought Viagra.

    Same thing there. Actually.. no. It is FAR worse.
    You can visually check, smell, taste, feel and compare the ingredients of a herbal tea. Plants are quite well documented and easily recognizable.

    You need a lab and a chemistry degree or two to compare two white pills. All of the quality assurance ends with the packaging.
    You are relying on trust far more with chemicals then with plants.

    Using either without reading the label first and preferably informing yourself about the medicine in case is not a wise thing to do.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:So the problem is in quality assurance? by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      ROFL

      I completely agree. Once it's ground up into a powder and put into a capsule or whatever, whether pharmaceutical or herbal, it turns into a matter of trust, and the need to inform ones self as much as possible.

      Trust is probably a bigger issue though. There have been enough scandals regarding forged pharmaceutical results that I now have a general distrust of most medications, and avoid them unless they are very well known with well established indications/contraindications.

      But even then, Pharmaceutical companies are required by law to maintain a minimum level of quality. Herbal companies don't sell plants. They sell extracts and lotions and pills. And there are virtually no laws or regulations that require Herbal companies to maintain the same level of rigor. They could say that their pills contain 100% plant extract, and in reality it contains maybe 20% extract to maintain the taste/smell, and 80% used cardboard they found on the side of the road, and most people wouldn't be the wiser until the company got caught after the fact.

      It's kinda like being stuck between a rock, a hard place, and a hard place that has just a bit of give to it.

  87. Mixed Results by phred75 · · Score: 1

    I've had mixed success with it as far as cognitive functioning goes. Taken alone, I've noticed a little improvement but nothing drastic. Depending on the brand I would actually get a big of an allergic reaction from it! Im trying a new formula called Memory Essentials. It contains: Alpha-Glycerylphosphorycholine (alpha-GPC) (from soy) - 250 mg Vitamin B6 (as pyridoxine HCI) - 76 mg Folic Acid - 100 mcg Vitamin B12 (as cyanocobalamin, methycobalamin) - 50 mcg Pantothenic Acid (as calcium panthothenate) - 100 mg Phosphatidylserine Complex (from soy) - 100 mg Green Tea Extract (leaf) - 100 mg Blueberry Powder - 50 mg Ginkgo Biloba Extract - 100 mg Giving it a try this month. It;s making a difference no doubt but not sure how big. I'll go without it next month and compare. How ever one supplement that DEFINITLY makes a difference for me is L-Tyrosine as it's a precursor to L-Dopa aka dopamine. My main problem area has always been focus over memory retention. Used to take ritalin as a kid, that shit made me into a zombie!

  88. Re:Untested drug found useless... wonders never ce by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    look no further than Orrin Hatch (R) Utah

    Orrin Hatch did something to *increase* freedom? Unbelievable!

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  89. Re:Untested drug found useless... wonders never ce by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Even a clock running backwards as fast as it can, and trying to push society with it, is right on occasion...

  90. Speaking of cacao: by ReedYoung · · Score: 1
    --
    "I can't imagine how things could get any worse!" (some guy) "That could just be failure of imaginatioÂn on your p
    1. Re:Speaking of cacao: by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      cacao: great

      blueberries: great

      acai: great

      phytonutrients of all kinds: great

      MLM: bad for your health and the health of others