The only reason The Guardian figured it out was that they happened to see an IRS invoice from when they paid a company to upgrade one of their devices and provide training on its use.
I would have thought, with The Leveson Inquiry and all, that if a newspaper managed to get hold of such a device they'd keep quiet about it.
Darn, beaten to the draw again. Obviously I need to take a lesson from Uber and embrace 24x7 agility at the speed of the interwebs and abandon my old-economy paradigms.
I wasn't sure if it was an alternate spelling, but - here's protip for timothy - I found this marvelous thing called a google where you can look things up.
I think this comment by one "Infostack" is the winner (no way to link directly to it; just 'like' and 'share'):
The problem with today's internet model is that it lacks settlement exchanges that clear supply and demand both north-south and east-west ex ante.
Robotics/AI is a component category that cuts across the four major market forces which are digitizing everything as we know it, namely: 4K content on demand, 2-way HD collaboration, mobility first, and internet of things. When referencing Robotics/AI, people tend to mistakenly focus on the latter "all things to all people" market exclusively.
Seriously, this guy needs to have his paradigm shifted with a slap round the head followed by a synergistic kick in the nuts.
Slashdot Mirror
No it doesn't.
Indeed. When I read something like "if an ant was as big as a dog it could lift a bus" it makes me spit blood.
No it couldn't. If its legs didn't collapse under its own weight it would suffocate.
Ensure - to make sure that something happens.
Insure - paying premiums, just in case it doesn't.
Why is there a comma after review?
"comprised on"? DonÂt think so.
Isn't that over-egging it a bit? It's been a long time, but isn't it really the same as ancient Greek syllogisms except with symbols instead of words?
What the hell are they intending to do with them?
Depends if they'd been drinking Tennents or not.
I would have thought, with The Leveson Inquiry and all, that if a newspaper managed to get hold of such a device they'd keep quiet about it.
I wouldn't let my property to a rock band. With all the drinking, drugs and wild parties the rent probably wouldn't cover the repairs.
Nice try, but consistency and correctness are different things.
I'm amaized it still works.
Darn, beaten to the draw again. Obviously I need to take a lesson from Uber and embrace 24x7 agility at the speed of the interwebs and abandon my old-economy paradigms.
I wasn't sure if it was an alternate spelling, but - here's protip for timothy - I found this marvelous thing called a google where you can look things up.
Bastard. You beat, me to it.
You should have submitted that as a story - it's better than most of the stuff shitandpiss and his army of cockpuppets post.
Second, we get distracted halfway through a small list.
I think you have to multiply by seven. Or is it divide? No, wait, maybe that's dogs.
That should be "months' worth".
I think this comment by one "Infostack" is the winner (no way to link directly to it; just 'like' and 'share'):
Seriously, this guy needs to have his paradigm shifted with a slap round the head followed by a synergistic kick in the nuts.
It's been a while since Bennet Haselton has contributed a frequent contribution, hasn't it?
Yup. That's two efforts more than the editors make.
Chinks go in your armour, not on it.
Parallel construction doesn't mean using a word wrongly.
You disgusting pervert!
It depends on whether you interpret lighter as having less mass or having less weight.
For an equal mass, the feathers will have a larger volume and therefore more buoyancy, so the [net/apparent] weight will be less.