[By reading to this point you agree with all preceeding views, even those which may or may not contradict themselves and any previously-held beliefs of your own. If you disagree with this statement you are implicitly agreeing with this statement by virtue of having read this statement.]
How wrong you are. Any -true- geek would be touting the benefits of inline assembly over c++.
Wait.. wasn't this originally about girls?
Re:don't tell us what it is then...
on
OQO For Sale
·
· Score: 1
Yes. In detail, with proper footnotes. A bit of witty commentary to liven up the dissertation would be appreciated as well. Also, please elucidate on the topics of Micro-Soft and Apple Computers.
Why would you be averse to switching window managers? I use Fluxbox on my primary linux machine, and either windowmaker or enlightenment on the other two. I can load KDE or gnome, but have yet to find a compelling reason to do so.
Just because they were searched doesn't mean they've been assumed guilty. (Guilty of what, I have no idea...) That won't be known until the evidence is assessed. And the evidence can't be assessed unless the government has access to it. That's sort of the point of a search order.
I was under the impresion that a search order was issued to allow the police (or fbi, or whatever) to look for something specific. They had to prove to a judge that they have a reasonable expectation of finding what they're looking for before they get the warrant, and they can't take or use anything that doesn't apply directly to the warrant. If this is the case, then RackSPace should be able to tell Indymedia, and us, what was siezed and why (as the items in question, and specifically what was intended to be found on the hard drives should be listed on the search order which should have been presented to RackSpace).
Any Law Enforcement people, or Lawyers who can completely invalidate my rather uninformed beliefs?
I'd certainly pay to see that happen. especially if everyone who donated.. say $500 was given the chance to take a shot at the launch vehicle on the way up.:]
(Note: I dont' actually liek or dislike Howard Stern, having never listened to him. I just think that sounds like fun.)
Actually, this might be a great idea. Find something people will pay attention to, and use it to inform them. Make things interesting and people will care, if people care maybe they will care enough to find out more. The problem is, nothing related to the vote is presented in an interesting manner. In many cases the important information seems like it is presented in the driest, longest form possible in an attempt to deter people from paying attention long enough to get any real informaiton from it. Perhaps, if information could be made accessable and somewhat entertaining, people could be encouraged to find out enough to vote intelligently, and to actually feel motivated to vote.
I intend to vote in this election, but not for president (I intend to select whichever option has no chance at all). This is because I don't accept any of the choices presented for that office, but I want to make my opinion known on the more local topics on the ballot. However, I have seveal friends who weren't going to vote (and probably still aren't) simply because they don't care about who is president. None of them even considered the idea that more than that is on the ballot.
I will now end my rambling idiocy. Thank you for reading.:]
The refusal to take sides without -any- good evidence from either side is a cop out or cowardice? You make a good point that true atheism is logically impossible to prove. However, belief without any evidence and no way of testing for truth seems to me to be less a thing to be proud of and more a thing to hide away and never speak of. Yes, I believe India exists, but there's an easy test: I can go there. Now give me an equally simple test for the existance of god.
Slashdot Mirror
Or he could try:
[By reading to this point you agree with all preceeding views, even those which may or may not contradict themselves and any previously-held beliefs of your own. If you disagree with this statement you are implicitly agreeing with this statement by virtue of having read this statement.]
I find your lack of perception of humor disturbing.
How wrong you are. Any -true- geek would be touting the benefits of inline assembly over c++.
Wait.. wasn't this originally about girls?
Yes. In detail, with proper footnotes. A bit of witty commentary to liven up the dissertation would be appreciated as well. Also, please elucidate on the topics of Micro-Soft and Apple Computers.
and now for something completely different...
You forgot about BeOS (pronounced "Poland")
Nah, it's just the topic of discussion. Impossible to tell if someone is trying to be funny or just a bit... how should I say... under-educated.
I usually assume the latter and tell people the former. This seems to work, even when applied to my own posts.
I was intentionally being funny. ignore me fore I have no actual capacity for being humorous.
Where does the carbon we burn go then, if it doesn't increase CO2 levels in the atmosphere?
Most likely the same place it came from. it's not as if carbon were being created from thin air.
Are you agreeing or disagreeing? because I think you made the point perfectly.
Now I feel out of touch with my culture. I shall take 5 seconds to re-evaluate my life. ...
done.
Tasslehoff, is that you under there?
what? I don't ge the reference.
685048, You have been charged and found guilty of the crime of realizing the truth. Report to Re-education Facility 043 immediately.
Why would you be averse to switching window managers? I use Fluxbox on my primary linux machine, and either windowmaker or enlightenment on the other two. I can load KDE or gnome, but have yet to find a compelling reason to do so.
Well I was.. until you woke me up with that observation.
Just because they were searched doesn't mean they've been assumed guilty. (Guilty of what, I have no idea...) That won't be known until the evidence is assessed. And the evidence can't be assessed unless the government has access to it. That's sort of the point of a search order.
I was under the impresion that a search order was issued to allow the police (or fbi, or whatever) to look for something specific. They had to prove to a judge that they have a reasonable expectation of finding what they're looking for before they get the warrant, and they can't take or use anything that doesn't apply directly to the warrant. If this is the case, then RackSPace should be able to tell Indymedia, and us, what was siezed and why (as the items in question, and specifically what was intended to be found on the hard drives should be listed on the search order which should have been presented to RackSpace).
Any Law Enforcement people, or Lawyers who can completely invalidate my rather uninformed beliefs?
Anything besides Girl Scouts, you mean.
I'd certainly pay to see that happen. especially if everyone who donated.. say $500 was given the chance to take a shot at the launch vehicle on the way up. :]
(Note: I dont' actually liek or dislike Howard Stern, having never listened to him. I just think that sounds like fun.)
I was going to mention that, but you beat me to it. I'll just switch off my extra screens now so you don't get distracted by them.
Actually, this might be a great idea. Find something people will pay attention to, and use it to inform them. Make things interesting and people will care, if people care maybe they will care enough to find out more. The problem is, nothing related to the vote is presented in an interesting manner. In many cases the important information seems like it is presented in the driest, longest form possible in an attempt to deter people from paying attention long enough to get any real informaiton from it. Perhaps, if information could be made accessable and somewhat entertaining, people could be encouraged to find out enough to vote intelligently, and to actually feel motivated to vote.
:]
I intend to vote in this election, but not for president (I intend to select whichever option has no chance at all). This is because I don't accept any of the choices presented for that office, but I want to make my opinion known on the more local topics on the ballot. However, I have seveal friends who weren't going to vote (and probably still aren't) simply because they don't care about who is president. None of them even considered the idea that more than that is on the ballot.
I will now end my rambling idiocy. Thank you for reading.
It's all fun and games until someone finds a way to post the goatse image.
Perhaps he meant to say Madden NT?
The refusal to take sides without -any- good evidence from either side is a cop out or cowardice? You make a good point that true atheism is logically impossible to prove. However, belief without any evidence and no way of testing for truth seems to me to be less a thing to be proud of and more a thing to hide away and never speak of. Yes, I believe India exists, but there's an easy test: I can go there. Now give me an equally simple test for the existance of god.
I grok that, and my joy is frabjous.