Slashdot Mirror


Video Game Characters to Get Out the Vote

Thanks to Gamasutra for the heads up about a political music video starring video game characters that is to start airing on MTV today. The newest "Choose or Lose" video will feature characters from popular video games such as The Sims and BloodRayne and is intended to encourage youth voters to show up at the polls. The video will air for the first time on MTV today on TRL, and afterwards can be seen on the MTV Choose or Lose site. This follows closely on the heels of MTV2's Video Mods series, which uses video game footage for the visuals in music videos.

368 comments

  1. If it takes video game characters by hsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to get people to vote, obviously they don't need to be voting.

    An informed public is far better than one that just votes to vote

    1. Re:If it takes video game characters by BillyZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So you are then implying that gamers are uninformed? Simply because someone needs motivation to vote, does not necessarily mean they are also uninformed.

      --
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
    2. Re:If it takes video game characters by hsmith · · Score: 0

      If the only reason you are going to vote is because a scantily clad animated character convinces you to, i question your ability to make an informed decision.

      i would love to see everyone in america vote, but the fact is people in this country are to inept to see our own demise

    3. Re:If it takes video game characters by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 2, Funny
      It really is somewhat scary. In the beginning gamers controlled games. Then games started controlling gamers. Now games are (somewhat) trying to modify government via their gamers....

      Oh my.... Oh well. Can't talk now. Something is telling me to go play pong....

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    4. Re:If it takes video game characters by aicrules · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think that everyone should exercise their right to vote, whether they're completely informed or not.


      1. They will stop voting.
      2. They will work harder to become informed for the next time!

      Sure there will be people who vote after vote do just what MTV tells them to do, but no one here is a complete automoton. They understand at SOME level what they're voting for, and thus they have a right to have their vote counted.

      I'm not a fan of "slippery slope" arguments, but if you start disenfranching certain segments of people for their perceived uninformed vote, what's to say that next time you won't miss the cut?

    5. Re:If it takes video game characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, common opinion, but a little elitist, and somewhat unsubstantiated.

      There's something to be said for a large proportion of the populace voting, even if it means there is a lot of background noise.

      It has two effects. First: Politicians know they're accountable, and not just to vocal minorities. Secondly, government pretty much hovers around gridlock and ineffective unless there is something important that moves a great mass of people to act in concert.

      I want every idiot voting, for a number of reasons. Not the least of which, I think it is something of an honor and a sacred duty. It'd be nice if people took a little pride in doing it well, but it is a small tragedy to see it abandoned.

      And with the news being what it is, unfiltered talking heads, it takes a lot of effort to be well informed. Much more than it should. There's going to be many more people than just the small population of the well informed voting come November. So why not have the people who at least have a sense of their knowledge gap voting with those who are pretty oblivious?

    6. Re:If it takes video game characters by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1

      I'm not a fan of "slippery slope" arguments, but if you start disenfranching certain segments of people for their perceived uninformed vote, what's to say that next time you won't miss the cut?

      The truth is we DO disenfranchise certain groups. An extreme example... in many cases a mentally retarded man cannot vote. Why not? Because he does not have the capacity to vote. This was his lot in life, he did not choose it. But some people DO choose to have a similar lack of capacity. Are they allowed to vote? ... sure. But I wouldn't encourage them.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    7. Re:If it takes video game characters by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is the standard? How informed is informed enough? When is an opinion enough of an opinion? So voting based on the last yard sign I saw isn't enough. Is listening to talk radio? Reading one newspaper a day? Reading slashdot?

      I respond to every time someone presumes to have some standard on who should vote and who is better off staying home. None of the big shots who presume to tell other people they shouldn't vote ever steps up with some specifics.

      What is the standard for "an informed public"?

    8. Re:If it takes video game characters by land · · Score: 1

      Art Imitates Life: Irrelevant Pop Stars Unite Against Bush (http://www.theonion.com/news/index.php?issue=4040 )

    9. Re:If it takes video game characters by GoofyBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are uninformed how important their vote is.

      If they lack this basic knowledge, how would they know about the real, deep, political issues are?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    10. Re:If it takes video game characters by fatboy · · Score: 1

      What is the standard for "an informed public"?

      When you agree with me, of course.

      --
      --fatboy
    11. Re:If it takes video game characters by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      If it takes video game characters to get people to vote, obviously they don't need to be voting.

      It's not like Mario came out and endorsed a candidate... it would be cool if he did, but it hasn't happened... yet.

      An informed public is far better than one that just votes to vote

      What?!!?!?!

      What do you say to those people out there that vote on one issue like abortion, gay marriage or flag burning... seems to me that no matter where you stand on these issues you must first get a Constitutional amendment or change the makeup of the federal court system to really make an impact. 99,999 times out of 100,000 you are throwing your vote away anyways.

      Personally I think someone that says "Bush is a douche bag, but he's against abortion so I'm voting for him" shouldn't have the right to vote. Neither does someone who says "Kerry is a douche bag, but he's for middle-class tax cuts so I'm voting for him"

      All of the voters, in a perfect world, should make a decision based on all of the issues at hand. Sometimes it is hard to make a choice, but zeroing in on one thing and sticking to that is wrong. Likely you'll get a candidate who just panders to those types of voters and actually does nothing about it.

      BTW, Kerry is a douche bag. (Funny)

    12. Re:If it takes video game characters by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I respond to every time someone presumes to have some standard on who should vote and who is better off staying home.
      Oh, I have a standard on who should vote and who shouldn't... though it's just my opinion, and I am not proposing to impose it or any other standard on voters. Voting should be open to all.

      However, I agree with the guy who says that it's a bit silly to ask people to go vote for the sake of voting, i.e. "go and mark any old box on the ballot with the red pencil". I think uninformed people shouldn't vote, but I do not propose to bar them from voting. Rather, I propose we encourage them to inform themselves, rather than just 'go vote'
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    13. Re:If it takes video game characters by gfxguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So you have someone who is not motivated by current events, not motivated by friends, family, and teachers...

      But they are motivated by a fictional video game character... I agree with the grandparent post.

      I think people ought to be able to demonstrate a basic knowledge of how our election process works, and who their politicians are (senators and representatives). I'm not talking about 100 question test, I'm asking: who are your senators and congressman? Who is your governer? Who is the vice president and speaker of the house? How is a representative elected? How is that different from how the president is elected?

      Also explain to me how a picture ID shouldn't be required for first time voters... we are all concerned about voting machine fraud, what about rampant voter fraud?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    14. Re:If it takes video game characters by inkey+string · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think this is a rather flippant judgement to pass on everyone who passes up their right to vote. The idea that voting should be reserved for some (educated/wealthy/"qualified") elite is disturbing.

      The people who run your country affect everyone in it. The arguments of "if politics affect you, you vote of course" are shallow and miss the real point.

      This ad is obviously aimed at MTVs core demographic with the ability to vote, namely those between 18-25 years old. This is a group in transition between child/teen and adult responsibilities, with all the inherent psychological upheaval.

      The prime message drilled into young people as they grow up (ie high school and younger) is that due to your youth, you lack the necessary qualifications to make certain decisions. You can decide what to wear/eat/consume, but any "important" decisions (namely the decisions that change the alternatives to what one may consume) must be left up to those older and wiser.

      Then, the adult world comes along. You are now old enough to make decisions for yourself! Passing the magic barrier of 18, you can now (fight/fuck/flee) anything you choose!

      This is where the issue arises. It is obvious that a paradigm shift to the degree demanded by society (from forced lack of personal responsibility to forced personal responsibility) cannot take place overnight. One must start at the authority symbols nearest and easiest to usurp. I can do my own laundry! I have my own place! Once accomplished, one can move up the ladder to financial/romantic responsibilities, and so on.

      The problem is that this "ladder" view is flawed. Typically geopolitical and economic concerns are relegated to the very top rungs of perception, with many people living their lives blissfully handing off responsibility. In reality, geo/local politics are intertwined at every step of the ladder. Bought your first car! Ever wonder if the current high price of gas is a result of your chosen leader's interesting foriegn policy decisions?

      Of course not. Why? Because we teach politics in school as a seperate and elite topic. And math, and science, and geography, without the acknowledgement that politics is as much a part of science and geography as math is a part of physics.

      Politics is regarded (and therefore avoided) as an old boys club by the young boys and girls who have the power to change it. Activities such as these "get out and vote" campaigns attempt to empower those who think that their vote and their voice does not and cannot matter.

      The point of democracy is everyone participates, not just those deemed worthy.

    15. Re:If it takes video game characters by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I disagree - there should be some MINIMUM level of knowledge... basic, simple questions, but I won't belabor the point by discussing it...

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    16. Re:If it takes video game characters by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Being completely informed in this modern world requires far more time than any single person has, let alone a person with a normal job and social life. That's why "politician" is a full-time job in and of itself. The problem is that people simply don't care about voting and don't believe that doing it will have any effect.

      We already have B-list celebrities doing voting PSAs, video game characters isn't too far of a leap.

    17. Re:If it takes video game characters by JohnTheFisherman · · Score: 1

      What is the standard for "an informed public"?

      I don't know, but trying to use video game characters on MTV to get people to "just vote, we don't care who for, just vote for anyone/anything" is pretty much the standard for an uninformed voter.

      Of course, some people call you a facist for saying such ridiculous things.

    18. Re:If it takes video game characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the satire sites says that Squarepants
      (star of Carmack's upcoming Squarpants 3D game) says that Bush won last night's debate. Squarepants doesn't get above water much it seems. Plus side though .. Bush has the support of a sea sponge. Til the next debate.

    19. Re:If it takes video game characters by DrEldarion · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think generally people have an idea of who they'd vote for, and even if they don't, they usually know which side shares more of their viewpoints. I don't think people are quite as clueless as a lot of you make them out to be.

      Anyway, who says that the people who sit there watching TV all day are clueless anyway? They may just be really lazy. A commercial like this just might get a few extra people out to the booths.

    20. Re:If it takes video game characters by BillyZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I think people ought to be able to demonstrate a basic knowledge of how our election process works, "
      I thinking going to vote is a pretty good demonstration that they understand how the process works!

      So you have someone who is not motivated by current events, not motivated by friends, family, and teachers...

      But they are motivated by a fictional video game character... I agree with the grandparent post.

      So then what about someone who's not motivated by games, nor family, nor current events, but is motivated by a friend. Is that any better? Do you know who their friend is? What if their friend is an ex-con? What if their friend is a priest? Does it matter who the friend is? What about someone who's not motivated by any of the above but is motivated by some other factor? What does it matter where the motivation comes from? Motivation and Knowledge have absolutely NOTHING to do with each other. Motivating someone to vote is a respectable goal no matter what the means.

      Are you saying that someone who lacks motivation has no right to vote? That because they don't have motivation means their opinions have to be wrong or are simply less important?

      The basis of the voting process in this country is that EVERYONE HAS A VOICE! When this country was founded do you have ANY idea what the illiteracy rate was? Should those people not have been allowed to vote?

      --
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
    21. Re:If it takes video game characters by gfxguy · · Score: 1
      Ok, here you go... in my opinion , people ought not be allowed to vote until they can demonstrate they know:
      1. Who their representative and senators are,
      2. Who their governer is,
      3. Who the current president and vice president are,
      4. The difference between how their vote is counted for their representative and how it is counted for president and vice president.
      I don't think that's too much to ask, and it's something someone can learn reading a piece of paper while waiting on line to vote.

      It's not a matter of being tested for knowledge of all the current issues, which would be pretty ridiculous. I'm just talking about a simple little test about basic knowledge about your own representatives and really, as opposed to penalizing people for not knowing about the electoral college, want to educate them on it.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    22. Re:If it takes video game characters by aicrules · · Score: 1

      in many cases a mentally retarded man cannot vote That might explain why *I* didn't get to vote last election!

    23. Re:If it takes video game characters by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you being facetious? You're talking about the difference between being motivated by a real person or a fictional character?

      Are you going to vote against George Bush because your favorite cartoon character is gay? How about one of your friends or a sibling? Do you really not see the difference?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    24. Re:If it takes video game characters by mcmonkey · · Score: 1
      I don't know, but trying to use video game characters on MTV to get people to "just vote, we don't care who for, just vote for anyone/anything" is pretty much the standard for an uninformed voter.

      Well, I don't know if you are a facist or not, but that is a ridiculous thing to say. What is so unifmored about a non-partisan campaign to get out the vote?

      I believe when enough people do it, voting can make a difference. I encourage everyone I can to vote. And it is more important to me that they do vote, than who/what they vote for. "Just vote, we don't care who for, just vote for anyone/anything" is pretty much my thought on the matter.

      I have my stand on the issues, and I know how I plan to vote, but I'd still rather someone disagree with me and hit the polls on Nov 2 than someone agree me with me and stay home.

      Is that so wrong?

    25. Re:If it takes video game characters by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      An informed public is far better than one that just votes to vote

      What?!!?!?!

      What do you say to those people out there that vote on one issue like abortion, gay marriage or flag burning...


      So what your saying is that people who thing they are informed about ONE thing, and are motivated by ONE thing, are just as good as people who have informated opinions on a variety of subjects?

      Read it again; "an informed public is far better than one that just votes to vote"

      Can you really disagree with that? You can argue that they should still be allowed to vote, but are you going to argue that it's not far better for them to be informed?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    26. Re:If it takes video game characters by Chris+Carollo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Motivating someone to vote is a respectable goal no matter what the means.
      Well that's a bit of a ridiculous statement -- I doubt you'd support my motivating someone to vote via the use of a shotgun.

      I think one of the points that are trying to be made is that voting, in and of itself, isn't a worthy goal. Being informed enough to want to voice your political opinion is the goal that we should be shooting for. If you're voting simply because you feel obligated to or because it's "cool" without taking the time to actually educate yourself on the issues and form a coherent, defensible position...you're doing no favors to your country.

      I've always found the "rock the vote"-type efforts to be somewhat putting the cart ahead of the horse -- voting isn't what we should be encouraging -- developing a political opinion that citizens want to voice is.
    27. Re:If it takes video game characters by BillyZ · · Score: 1

      No one is talking about WHO these people are going to vote for. Are these commercials partison in anyway? I don't know if they are because I haven't seen them. I get the feeling these are going to be more along the lines of, "you're vote is important. Make your opinion count and go vote". I don't think these messages are going to have anything to do with which candidate to vote for. (as that has typically been the stance of the Choose or Loose commercials. non-partison, simply motivation)

      What is wrong with using any possible means to get someone to realise that the system only works when they participate? No matter which candidate the viewer thinks should win, these commercials are promoting participation in our goverment. Why is that a bad thing?

      --
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
    28. Re:If it takes video game characters by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I don't think so - and I think you took the grandparent post way out of context.

      He said nothing about "wealth" or "education", he said if it takes a video game character to motivate someone ("get people") to vote, "obviously they don't need to be voting."

      Obviously, if someone is so unmotivated by real life, there is something else wrong.

      The last line: "An informed public is far better than one that just votes to vote" is just a no brainer that I can't see how anyone can argue against - it doesn't pass judgement, it doesn't claim someone doesn't have the right to vote, it claims being informed is far better than not being informed... I can believe how many people are taking it out of context.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    29. Re:If it takes video game characters by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Maybe they are perfectly well informed and therefore feel that it's more constructive to play Doom3 than to go vote ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    30. Re:If it takes video game characters by allism · · Score: 1

      The popular vote determines who goes to the electoral college. So, even though your vote does not directly influence the outcome of the election, it helps determine the electors, who do determine the outcome of the election.

      Can I ask, wasn't any of this covered in your junion high civics class? I attended an urban, poor school system with a very high minority population but they still covered this stuff...

    31. Re:If it takes video game characters by Above · · Score: 1

      I don't think the poster understands what MTV and VH1 are trying to do.

      Their "choose or lose" campaigns don't push the message that you should go out and vote uneducated. They talk about the issues in a relatively non-partisan way, encourge kids to get educated on the issues, and yes, encourage them to vote. Never have I seen them encourage someone to vote without the facts first.

      The real goal is to get kids to vote as soon as they can, not wait until their 30's when they are settled down with kids and finally realize on their own it's important. MTV and VH1 are doing a good job of making kids realize the issues are important to them, and that if they are educated about them an organized they can make a difference.

    32. Re:If it takes video game characters by Xaroth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds good to me! Just so long as those that are not allowed to participate in the creation of laws due to failing the test are also not bound by those laws that they have no voice in shaping.

      Failing test scores, here I come!

    33. Re:If it takes video game characters by SilentChris · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "They are uninformed how important their vote is."

      Yes, and we all know gamers are the only classification of people this applies to. *rolls eyes*.

      From my perspective, 9 out of 10 of my gamer friends know how to build their own machines, have good-paying jobs, and know their vote is important.

    34. Re:If it takes video game characters by VAXGeek · · Score: 0, Troll

      "I'm not talking about 100 question test, I'm asking: who are your senators and congressman? Who is your governer?"

      You should have to be able to spell to post on Slashdot. I'm talking about POSTER COMPETENCY here!

      --
      this sig limit is too small to put anything good h
    35. Re:If it takes video game characters by Skater · · Score: 1

      I don't really like Kerry or Bush, and the third-party candidates don't fit me either. So, I'd be going to the polls with the mindset of voting for the best of a bad lot, and it's not really motivating me to get out and vote. If there was a candidate I really liked, I'm sure I'd have no problem getting the energy up to put my vote in for him/her - but that's just not the case.

      The video game character isn't helping, especially since I don't watch MTV. :) (I'm not doing Spike TV's "Check Up or Check Out" thing, either.)

      --RJ

    36. Re:If it takes video game characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they are perfectly well informed and therefore feel that it's more constructive to play Doom3 than to go vote ?

      This is a classic example of vote disenfranchisement.

      -- LTK ( http://slashdot.org/~lewstherinkinslayer )
      Now without Kharma-whoring.

    37. Re:If it takes video game characters by goon+america · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who says that non-gamers that vote know anything about real, deep political issues?

    38. Re:If it takes video game characters by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll bite.

      First off, using video game characters to promote voting is not different than any Toby Keith video, warmed over Good Morning America "news piece", Ann Coulter radio "interview", or misinformed blog rehashing other people's opinions before forming their own.

      Secondly, what are the "real" "deep" "political" "issues" you speak of? The economy, of which the president has extremely limited control? Quotas in higher education? Healthcare and social security? Taxes? Iraq? Immigration? National park use? War record? Homeland security? Religion? Elementary education? Tariffs? Outsourcing? Unions? Control over the media? The Patriot Act? DMCA? Broadband for everyone? NASA? Reparations? Bank reform? Abortion? Homosexuality? Your "real" issues are not other people's "real" issues, and vice versa. Some people might vote because Bush is a Republican and they always vote Republican. Or they vote for Kerry because of REAP. Or they vote for X because of BCD, etc.

      To somehow believe that your vote is more important because you have a different level of knowledge of certain issues is a bit ignorant. If you have thorough knowledge on every issue, please make a website with that information to inform others.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    39. Re:If it takes video game characters by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Those who can't take the time to figure out how our election process works and who their representatives are suffer the consequences... this is true wether a test like this is in place or not.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    40. Re:If it takes video game characters by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      But they are motivated by a fictional video game character

      Bah. Elitist bullshit.

      A video game character is no different in this context than an Iowa farmer, a small businessman, Joe SixPack, Soccer Mom(TM), or any other character designed to appeal to a demographic in order to get a vote. What, you think those jawflappers on the "serious" political ads are all real too?

      It's a question of what you react to, not a question of what (or even *if*) you think about politics. Just because you play Halo doesn't mean you don't take the world situation seriously.

      More power to them, sez I. Anybody who can drag the unmotivated out of their chairs and into the booth gets my endorsement.

    41. Re:If it takes video game characters by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Just because you play Halo doesn't mean you don't take the world situation seriously.

      Well, that's exactly what I'm trying to say - if you take it seriously you'd already be motivated to vote... this ad will do nothing for you.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    42. Re:If it takes video game characters by jacobcaz · · Score: 2, Informative
      Also explain to me how a picture ID shouldn't be required for first time voters... we are all concerned about voting machine fraud, what about rampant voter fraud?

      In Indiana first-time voters in each precinct are required to provide proof of identity before they can vote. We moved a year and a half ago, now both my wife and I have to take proof of ID with us to vote this time around. Driver's license, State ID, utility bill with correct name and address are all acceptible (and maybe a few others). Next general election we will NOT have to show this proof as long as we've not moved.

    43. Re:If it takes video game characters by JohnTheFisherman · · Score: 1

      Well, you haven't presented any evidence that this campaign doesn't target uninformed voters - you just like it because it gets out the vote, informed or not, agreeing with you, or not - which is completely separate. You could argue (as you did) that this might be a good thing, but that doesn't mean the voters are now informed. You pretty much acknowledge they aren't informed by trying to encourage them to vote for "anyone/anything," otherwise, they'd probably already have an opinion and a candidate they were at least leaning towards.

      I also think that's a bad thing, because people who are too lazy to pay attention and eventually go out and vote are going to make poorly informed decisions. I certainly don't discourage anyone who cares enough to vote to do so, just that the people who haven't paid attention until MTV showed them some video game characters that convinced them, "by golly maybe I should look into this voting thing" aren't going to have *any* context to make their decision, other than "MTV wants me to vote."

      BTW, the facist accusation (from you, or at least a clear implication and addition to your enemy list) was attached to a previous discussion where I suggested that registering unlikely voters was a bad idea because they leave those registrations open for fraud. If you care enough to vote, you'll probably remember to forward your address, and notice when your absentee application goes missing (as I've had to do personally).

      Also, it's also not really a nonpartisan campagin - they know who tends to watch MTV, and they know how they tend to vote. Viacom is also (just coincidentally!) run by former Clinton cabinet members and heavy Democratic donors. They try to make it look that way, of course.

    44. Re:If it takes video game characters by operagost · · Score: 1, Insightful
      First off, using video game characters to promote voting is not different than any Toby Keith video, warmed over Good Morning America "news piece", Ann Coulter radio "interview", or misinformed blog rehashing other people's opinions before forming their own.
      Yes it is. Those people you mention are real, game characters are not. Any other questions you'd like to beg?
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    45. Re:If it takes video game characters by BillyZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is what is frustrating me.
      Being informed enough to want to voice your political opinion is the goal that we should be shooting for.
      Someones level of motivation and their level of knowledge have absolutely nothing to do with each other. I could be 100% for or against a particular candidate for, by your standards even, "a well informed reason". But just don't think it matters if I vote. Perhaps the couple of elections I witnessed, the candidate I would have voted for, had I voted, got elected so I don't think I need to vote. These are the people that SHOULD VOTE. They have an opinion, they ARE informed, they just don't think their vote counts or matters. You and I know this isn't true, and we're trying to INFORM THEM that it isn't true. Why is convincing people that their vote matters a bad thing?

      --
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
    46. Re:If it takes video game characters by Felinoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are uninformed how important their vote is.

      If they lack this basic knowledge, how would they know about the real, deep, political issues are?


      Most people I've known who don't vote do so not out of ignorence of the vote but of knowladge.

      "My one vote won't make a diffrence"

      It's apathy and what most people don't realise is the wise lead by example. Even when it's a bad example.

      One less vote becomes 50, becomes 1,000.
      But nobody really seams to understand that.

      Your one vote dosen't make for a hill of beans. It's the people who vote folowing your example that make it count.

      However one might wonder what example is set by a yellow circle with an eating disorder.

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    47. Re:If it takes video game characters by The-Bus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So you're arguing that the sender (Toby Keith vs. Luigi) is more important than the message itself?

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    48. Re:If it takes video game characters by BillyZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's rather obvious that someone who already plans on voting isn't going to gain any additional motivation from the ads (of course, even thats arguable. You can re-inforce something someone already knows to ensure they follow through.) The people already motivated to vote are NOT the people these ads target. They are targeting people WITH and opion that DONT plan on voting. The two are mutually exclusive.

      1) You CAN be informed and vote.
      2) You CAN be UNinformed and vote.
      3) You CAN be UNinformed, and not vote.
      4) You CAN be informed, and not vote.

      those who are "uninformed of the issues" are those who are likely not to vote regardless of motivation. These ads, and other "your vote counts" messages are targeted at those who ARE INFORMED but lack motivation. Those that fall into the 4th category are the people these ads truely target.

      --
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
    49. Re:If it takes video game characters by JWW · · Score: 1

      The basis of the voting process in this country is that EVERYONE HAS A VOICE! When this country was founded do you have ANY idea what the illiteracy rate was? Should those people not have been allowed to vote?

      A majority of them weren't allowed to vote.

      You do realize that when this country was founded there was a very large percentage of the population that wasn't allowed to vote, don't you? The principle was there but, it took a long time and amendments to the constition to get everyone the right to vote. And, yes, I know there are still some exceptions today.

    50. Re:If it takes video game characters by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      That's a good thing - but you'd be surprised at how many people are outraged by it (although they are generally the same people who think non-citizens should vote, too, even illegal ones).

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    51. Re:If it takes video game characters by BillyZ · · Score: 1

      ...it's something someone can learn reading a piece of paper while waiting on line to vote.
      or perhaps on a commercial on MTV? Presented by cartoon characters or game characters because it will grab the viewers attention?

      See what I mean by the delivery isn't as important as the message?

      --
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
    52. Re:If it takes video game characters by JWW · · Score: 0

      What, you think those jawflappers on the "serious" political ads are all real too?

      They're not real.

      In fact, if you are anti-corporation, you should really be appalled at this campaign. Video game characters are wholly owned entities of the corporations that created them, these coporoations have been granted a sort of pseudo-person status by the government. Therefore I claim that the video game characters are pseudo persons, and in fact, they are only allowed to say what their owning corporation allows them to say. Do you really think MTV didn't have to _ask permission_ from the corporations to put them in a commercial?

      Nope, real people really does trump video game characters in get out the vote campaigns in my opinion.

    53. Re:If it takes video game characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What difference does it make if the person is fictional? I almost think it's better, because real people come with baggage. Fictional people (animated or otherwise) are tools used to express an opinion, represent a personality type, or to stimulate an emotion. Those are good things when you want to motivate someone.

      I recall a political debate between a major candidate and Murphy Brown. Brown wanted to raise a chile as a single mother, and the politician thought that was a bad example for "family values". Having a commercial with Murphy Brown saying how she wants to vote to keep her right to run her life the way she wants seems perfectly reasonable. Note: Murphy Brown doesn't exist. She's fictional.

      Personally, I probably won't vote. I'm in California, so we're going to go democratic no matter what I do. I am not well informed on political isssues, but I have a good nose for bullshit, so I'm potentially a little less biased by propaganda. I have opinions, but not solid ones, because I'm not an economist or a historian or political scientist. I might vote simply because Pres. Bush has done nothing but piss me off, and I really don't want him to get another four years. Who to vote for? Well, I went through a dozen or so candidates on the ballot in my state, and I didn't like any of them. I can't side with any of them on "the issues", so without seeing them talk and getting a chance to learn how they think, I can't pick one. And that's just for President, which everyone cares about. I don't know who my representative is in the state legislature, and I don't want to spend the months it would take to properly research all the candidates for all the offices I can vote for, as well as all the legislative measures on the ballot.

      So because I want to vote from an informed position, and I don't want to spend months being informed on the hundreds of people and issues on the ballot (not checkmark informed: Real knowledge) I probably won't vote.

    54. Re:If it takes video game characters by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in this case we weren't arguing about wether or not cartoon characters were a good way to get people to vote...

      Being motivated to vote and being informed are two different things... if the content of the ad is "Lara Croft wants you to vote", then that's pretty stupid. If Lara is teaching about the electoral college, then like you said - as long as people learn. What are the current ads teaching?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    55. Re:If it takes video game characters by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >Your "real" issues are not other people's "real" issues, and vice versa.

      I do realize that. Thats why I didn't specify which topic/issue. Its up to the voter to find out what issues are important to him, figure out the two/three/fifty view points are and then vote accordingly.

      The fact that they need some trademarked 256-colour cartoon character best knowned for its ability for jumping for giant spinning coins to remind them to vote makes me question if they are even going have an informed vote.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    56. Re:If it takes video game characters by delus10n0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, 'cause "choose or lose" is totally non-partisan!

      Just check out their site's sections, and you'll see it's clear who they're nudging you to vote for.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    57. Re:If it takes video game characters by BillyZ · · Score: 1

      Being motivated to vote and being informed are two different things
      I agree 100% with this.

      What are the current ads teaching?

      They're "teaching" that your vote is important and that you shold participate in your government by voting. Right?

      --
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
    58. Re:If it takes video game characters by BillyZ · · Score: 1

      "in the begining" I know Women and non-whites weren't allowed to vote. I think the Felon clauses were in place as well. Were there others? Of the, "able-bodied white males" were there restrictions? If I remember right, income, education, rank in society, etc were not considered baring factors in any way.

      (but this wouldn't be the first time I've been wrong ;o) )

      --
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
    59. Re:If it takes video game characters by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      Actually, this might be a great idea. Find something people will pay attention to, and use it to inform them. Make things interesting and people will care, if people care maybe they will care enough to find out more. The problem is, nothing related to the vote is presented in an interesting manner. In many cases the important information seems like it is presented in the driest, longest form possible in an attempt to deter people from paying attention long enough to get any real informaiton from it. Perhaps, if information could be made accessable and somewhat entertaining, people could be encouraged to find out enough to vote intelligently, and to actually feel motivated to vote.

      I intend to vote in this election, but not for president (I intend to select whichever option has no chance at all). This is because I don't accept any of the choices presented for that office, but I want to make my opinion known on the more local topics on the ballot. However, I have seveal friends who weren't going to vote (and probably still aren't) simply because they don't care about who is president. None of them even considered the idea that more than that is on the ballot.

      I will now end my rambling idiocy. Thank you for reading. :]

    60. Re:If it takes video game characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Until the Civil Rights movement, Jim Crow laws kept black voters in the South disenfranchised through a series of literacy tests and property requirements.

      Requiring citizens of this country to prove that they are worthy to vote seems like a step back.

    61. Re:If it takes video game characters by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      They're "teaching" that your vote is important and that you shold participate in your government by voting. Right?

      I don't know, are they? Or are they simply saying "your vote is important!"

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    62. Re:If it takes video game characters by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ,em>Until the Civil Rights movement, Jim Crow laws kept black voters in the South disenfranchised through a series of literacy tests and property requirements.

      Requiring citizens of this country to prove that they are worthy to vote seems like a step back.

      No - it's two extremes... neither of which really functions very well. Asking the very basic, simple questions I've mentioned are hardly a literacy test - you don't have to know how to read or write to answer them correctly. In fact, my intent is not to "disenfranchise" (how I'm beginning to hate that word), it's to inform... I'd rather people attend a five minute seminar before voting. Most people spend more time than that on line anyway.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    63. Re:If it takes video game characters by BillyZ · · Score: 1

      Explain to me the difference between "saying" your vote is important and "teaching" your vote is important? Then explain the difference in "saying" Hillary Clinton is NYs senator and "teaching" that Hillary Clinton is NYs senator?

      --
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
    64. Re:If it takes video game characters by steve_ellis · · Score: 1
      Yes, poll taxes were used (apparently mostly in my home region of the country, unfortunately) (see http://www.bartleby.com/65/po/polltax.html).

      Back to the original subject:

      I believe that voters _should_ be informed in order to vote, but would not argue for any restriction requiring them to be informed--due to the almost certainty of abuse. Consequently, I do not think that people should be blindly encouraged to vote. Uninformed voters are too easy to manipulate.

      I'll not be voting for either GWB or JFK, but I will be voting Libertarian, because I strongly support the platform--despite the fact that Badnarik has essentially no chance of winning. I'd rather not have my vote diluted by a popularity contest amongst people who don't really care who wins.

      If I couldn't find a candidate I felt I could support, I'd leave the position blank, but I'd still show up and vote--because I believe it is important, not because someone told me it is.

      -se

    65. Re:If it takes video game characters by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      You're comparing apples and oranges... the better analogy would be "saying Hillary Clinton is NY's senator and 'teaching' how she became senator."

      Saying the sky is blue and teaching why the sky is blue.

      Your vote is important - but why is it important?

      If someone is so unmotivated that they aren't going to vote because they think their voice is not important, simply telling them "sure it is!" is hardly convincing (or worthwhile).

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    66. Re:If it takes video game characters by BillyZ · · Score: 1

      If someone is so unmotivated that they aren't going to vote because they think their voice is not important, simply telling them "sure it is!" is hardly convincing (or worthwhile).

      So your suggesting it's better to just not say anything? That seems highly irresponsible.

      As far as if the commercial "says" its important or if it "teaches" why its important, your arguments, as are mine, are groundless as we have not seen the actual commercials. But I hardly see how they should be criticized for trying to tell people that their vote is important.

      --
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
    67. Re:If it takes video game characters by jacobcaz · · Score: 1
      That's a good thing - but you'd be surprised at how many people are outraged by it (although they are generally the same people who think non-citizens should vote, too, even illegal ones).

      I personally agree with the verification, but there is some consternation locally about this (mostly on local talk radio). You can show a utility bill, so it's not like they're forcing people to bring a photo ID. Considering that one of our congrerssional districts has been written up for voter fraud I'm all for an extra verificaion step.

    68. Re:If it takes video game characters by Chris+Carollo · · Score: 1
      They have an opinion, they ARE informed, they just don't think their vote counts or matters. You and I know this isn't true
      Actually, I live in Texas, where my vote doesn't count. My hope is that by getting more politically informed, people will get more fed up with the situation and work towards better voting systems.

      But I'm not holding my breath.
    69. Re:If it takes video game characters by Fizzog · · Score: 1

      >> I'd be going to the polls with the mindset of
      >> voting for the best of a bad lot, and it's
      >> not really motivating me to get out and vote.

      Then you should choose to vote for more real choice in candidates.

      Voting for a minor party (*any* minor party) is a vote for more choice. If minor parties get more votes then more minor parties will be formed. One of those new parties may be just the fit you are looking for.

      But it won't happen unless you vote for it.

    70. Re:If it takes video game characters by voteforkerry78 · · Score: 1

      its a feeble attempt to get teens to vote. of course, mtv is mainly watched by preppies who make fun of gamers.....and MTV has no good music. i think its just going to make voting a nerd thing (nerds like me, btw). "the sims" are most certainly not going to persuade people to vote. now maybe a big poster that says: "Fragmeister says vote or else" with a quake symbol in teh background........hell yeah.

    71. Re:If it takes video game characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Utility bill? :P BLECH!

      How about proof of residency with proof of citizenship?

      How about stopping registration far enough away from the vote to actually verify the forms?

      All the chicanery around the vote is because of people enabling vote fraud and building a system that does not do enough to discourage vote fraud.

    72. Re:If it takes video game characters by Medevo · · Score: 1

      I agree totally

      for the USA at least, for a person to be able to write down how many electoral college votes there state has. What if you get it wrong? well, better luck next time.

      Even something as simple as if you buy a 100.00 dollar gift with a 17% sales tax, how much do you have to pay. DEMOCRATICY is based on the idea of an informed and active voter body. Wondering why democraticy is going down the tubes in the western countries, voter apathy and ignorance drives it.

      Medevo

    73. Re:If it takes video game characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, better luck to you next time! If you've learned how to spell "democracy" by the 2008 election, we'll let you vote then.

    74. Re:If it takes video game characters by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      One less vote do not becomes 50. One less vote is only one less vote, nothing more. I'm not a "leader" and if my neighbour don't vote it's not because of what I do, but because of what HE thinks. But you really don't seem to understand that.

      Having said that, I'm not a sheep so I WON'T vote. It's not apathy, it's just that I'm not a moron. I'll vote the day I live in a democracy.

      I know it's hard to resist the temptation, but if you want to live in a democracy, please, don't vote. It only encourage them.

    75. Re:If it takes video game characters by Twisted+Grind · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a great idea! How about we add "Spell: Democracy" to this test of yours? Aw, crap, looks like I've already disenfranchised someone...maybe it's not the best idea after all.

      --
      You know you've lost it when you begin signing physical documents with =^_^=
    76. Re:If it takes video game characters by wikdwarlock · · Score: 1

      This is exactly wrong. I suppose that you'd like a nice, hi def video of the American flag waving in the wind behind you as you tell a room full of people just how important their vote is. To not discredit their single voices. That if each single person votes, their problems will be solved in whole or in part. Right?

      WRONG

      What is important is being a pollitician, a lobbyist, or wealthy enough to affect the same. And the proof is in the scenario I just mentioned. You would have more power over the results of a vote by collecting people in a room and telling them to vote than any one of those other people. If you pick your group correctly, and use the right rhetoric, you will get them to vote for what you want. And this is why it's always, ALWAYS better to be the person who influences others' votes. If President Bush didn't vote in the upcoming election, would anyone still doubt his power over the results? Did the Diebold CEO (or whoever he was) promise to delive one vote to Bush, or many votes? Are the Democrats getting Nader taken off of ballots because they don't want him to vote for himself, or because they want others to not be able to vote for him?

      Anyone with a slight ability in mathematics can see the obvious: a single vote does not matter in large populations.

      --

      "I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer." -Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear
    77. Re:If it takes video game characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then obviosly those people don't need this video to motivate them, which was the parent poster's point you fucktard. If someone needs to be motivated by videogame characters to vote, then a good assumption is that they uninformed to the point they may autocratically vote or vote on how a candidate looks or speaks rather than on their positions and history.

      Also, your use of *rolls eyes* informs me you don't actually deal with people in any form other than digital. The sarcasm in your statement was already apparent, expressing you are rolling your eyes is meaningless. Unless of course you are actually rolling your eyes when you typed that, in which case you are just an idiot.

    78. Re:If it takes video game characters by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1

      If you have thorough knowledge on every issue, please make a website with that information to inform others.

      Done. That was hard ... guess I'll go take a break now.

      --
      Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
    79. Re:If it takes video game characters by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is this: people are voting just to vote most of the time.

      Are they really informed?

      No matter what you try to say or do most voters aren't informed... it is that simple.

    80. Re:If it takes video game characters by operagost · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not. Now you're using a straw man. Perhaps you just missed my point - there is a difference. But it's irrelevant, because in the end they're all just biased PSAs and using cartoon characters is just a more pathetic way of pushing one's agenda.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    81. Re:If it takes video game characters by Skater · · Score: 1

      So, I should vote for a minor party I don't agree with so that maybe down the road someone will form a party I do agree with?

      I'm not sure I buy your logic...

      --RJ

    82. Re:If it takes video game characters by Polotet · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to figure out what you mean by "democracy". Are you really advocating a pure democracy where everyone votes on every single issue out there? I hope not, since in any government larger than that of a small town that system is ridiculous and compltely ineffective. Anyway, the message you send by not voting is not "I want to live in something I choose to call a democracy". The message you send is "I don't care". It doesn't matter if that's your intention, that's what politicians decide you mean. Change has to happen slowly: just vote for the candidate you think is closer to your beliefs. If you don't vote, you lose your right to complain, frankly. Or at least your right to complain and have most people take you seriously. And to any folks in swing states voting for third party candidates, I'd like to quote Howard Dean: "When the house is on fire, it's not the time to fix the furniture."

    83. Re:If it takes video game characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Politicians can't hear you NOT vote - but they pay attention when people start voting in large numbers for other parties.

      If you don't vote, all you are to them is a "voter apathy."

      If you vote, they'll try to reach out to you with their policies.

      It's people like you who are fucking up the system. Not people who vote.

  2. useless link... by BillyZ · · Score: 1

    useless link requires a login! Anyone have a mirror?

    --
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
    1. Re:useless link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For all your pointless login woes...

      BugMeNot.com

      Enjoy :)

    2. Re:useless link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      useless link requires a login! Anyone have a mirror?

      Try this.

    3. Re:useless link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you go
      www.bugmenot.com

  3. Don't blame me by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... I voted for Lara and Sonic

    --
    Free gmail invites

    1. Re:Don't blame me by mirko · · Score: 1

      I'd vote for BJ Blazkowicz because I am supposed to be him when I shoot people in the Wolfenstein Castle.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    2. Re:Don't blame me by Nos. · · Score: 1

      I'd rather see Duke Nukem chair the next debate.

    3. Re:Don't blame me by Ashyukun · · Score: 1

      I'm torn between thinking it would be more amusing for him to be 'moderating' the debate (enforcing the time limits with heavy weaponry) or participating in it. Thinking about that more- I want him in the debates- because he's pretty damn likely to get fed up with both the others and blow them away, and then we could get better choices....

    4. Re:Don't blame me by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      "And if he doesn't answer the question I'll RIP HIM A NEW ONE!!!"

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    5. Re:Don't blame me by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      MARIO IN 2004!

      He'll defeat Osama by jumping on his head several times, and perhaps chucking fireballs at him. I mean, who can argue with fireballs?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    6. Re:Don't blame me by Blacklantern · · Score: 1

      Mario is a distracted flip-flopper. Fighting wars all over (even in his sleep him and his administration are battling evil boss after evil boss). He's created a huge deficit with the funding of his various (sometime unethical) weapons programs; fire-flowers, andro-mushrooms, gene-spliced raccoon morphing, Dinosaur Breeding, and those so-called invincibility stars (containing ecstasy, ephedra, and riboflavin.) No my friend, the real answer is Samus. Samus has proven time and time against that she is a real war hero and can root out the terrorist where they live - in caves. She has proven that she can the full force of her military technology down on the enemy. Yes, Samus is a relentless hero for the Ages and can defend the US against any and all threats. (Brought to you by the Samus/Sophitia 04 presidential campaign).

      --


      "There is only a one in six billion chance that you actually exist"
    7. Re:Don't blame me by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I don't think that Mario was born in the United States.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  4. Here's the thing I don't get about MTV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it that I got old, or does it actually suck as unrepentantly, and unrelentingly as it appears to?

    1. Re:Here's the thing I don't get about MTV. by labmonky · · Score: 1

      oh, it sucks -- or maybe I am just old too.

      --
      ~The JiGgLe in Yo' jElLy
    2. Re:Here's the thing I don't get about MTV. by AvantLegion · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm 23, which I don't think is TOO old for the target demographic. But I am old enough to remember the early '90s MTV of grunge, late-night electronica, Beavis & Butt-Head, and quirky off-beat videos of music you wouldn't necessarily hear on mainstream radio.

      I'm also old enough to vaguely remember '80s MTV, which was an interesting beast that confused my child brain. I think it's funny that Martha Quinn was a sex symbol to some. Now, you have to be an over-polished "model" with 8 pounds of makeup.

    3. Re:Here's the thing I don't get about MTV. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      In short - MTV has sucked since around 1988. MTV2 was only a weak copy of the original MTV, and rapidly faded away as well. Today, Fuse offers some hope as a music video station, at least they play new music.

      Here's a question though - why can you only get Viacom video music stations? Just recently, Mush Music America (why was there a different station for the US? They're in the same time zones and speak the same language for all intents!) became Fuse, whom I do not know the owner of. Why can't my satellite provider offer me Canadian and European music channels?

      Back to the topic at hand, I recall when MTV debuted with all music, all the time. Granted, it was the same 20 videos for a while, and they played a then somewhat cute and dangerous Joan Jet to death. I didn't have cable at the time, but a friend did, and even in the little bit of time we were at his house after school, you quickly got tired of that same small refrain.

      Then something truly wonderful happened. A renaissance of music, as talented artists started sending in videos of their music. (Not the main stream artists of the time, most of them didn't want anything to do with this "video" thing, music was where it's at, baby!) We got all sorts of interesting new acts (Talking Heads, Devo, Concrete Blonde, Eurythmics, even Men Without Hats;) Then the major labels stepped in, and it's been downhill ever since.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    4. Re:Here's the thing I don't get about MTV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pixie girls RULE !

    5. Re:Here's the thing I don't get about MTV. by robochan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      About a million years ago, back in 1992, MTV was actually partially reasponible for getting the 1st President Bush out of office.

      Way back then, the USA had been involved a war in the Middle East. The folks fighting it weren't quite aware of actually who they were fighting for. At that time, a young politician from Arkansas came to light, and MTV went all out - personal interviews, polls to their audience, even a personal audience with said candidate, with questions from the audience. Sure not all the questions were relevant (boxers or briefs?), but the candidate was brought directly to the audience by a fairly major force in their lives - in terms they could relate to. A young candidate being brought to a young voting constituency in a way that had never been seen before. That candidate's opposition basically shrugged that audience off... and paid the price.

      MTV was pretty big back then, but back then they also actually showed videos too. MTV news actually consisted of something more than just record release party announcements. Kurt Loder actually seemed like a real, authoritative, news anchor - or at least sincere one - not some snotty kid in glasses and a t-shirt with a microphone.

      The Rock The Vote campaign they (co)sponsored back then was amazingly effective. It brought a huge voting population onto the scene, which would normally be apathetic, and tried to educate them - at least to some extent, even if it was one-sided. These days it's half-hearted at best. Recycled slogans with little or nothing to back them up.

      I can almost understand why the younger folks are more apathetic these days. I remember a time when I really thought people with important titles, important positions, and who made important decisions were people to be respected and listened to. Now it seems more and more evident the world is a global high school for super rich men with unlimited resources to fling poo at each other, and the only thing we little bitty humans can do is say...
      "Damn. It smells like shit in here."

      --
      ...Rob
      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
    6. Re:Here's the thing I don't get about MTV. by Skater · · Score: 1

      The Simpsons scene where they drag off the VJ that just turned 25 and replace her with an 18-year-old was right on target.

      I miss Martha Quinn!

      --RJ

    7. Re:Here's the thing I don't get about MTV. by TwoPumpChump · · Score: 1

      But I am old enough to remember the early '90s MTV of grunge, late-night electronica, Beavis & Butt-Head, and quirky off-beat videos of music you wouldn't necessarily hear on mainstream radio

      I'm 29, I remember when MTV actually played videos. In long blocks of time, too - not just as bumpers between the 40,000th repeat of Real World. I can vaguely remember such videos as Billy Joel's "Pressure," etc. but mainly I remember the cheesy hair bands. Warrant, anyone? What I missed the most was Head Banger's Ball. (Though I hear they brought it back later on.)

    8. Re:Here's the thing I don't get about MTV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? Hardly.

      The youth vote has never been a deciding factor in American national politics, in no small part because that demographic by and large doesn't vote. The two factors that led to Bush's defeat were:
      1.) The Economy.
      2.) Ross Perot.

      Even with the economy in the toilet, Bush would likely have won if Perot hadn't been in the race.

      As for MTV, Clinton's ratings DROPPED after his MTV appearance, as many older voter (y'know the people who actually VOTE) were turned off by his presentation. The press hammered him mercilessly over the "Boxers or Briefs" question, as well as his performance in general. The consensus was that it made him look less "presidential".

  5. Halo Vote by grunt107 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So for whom is the Master Chief voting? I'll wager Republican, since the military likes to vote that way.

    1. Re:Halo Vote by solive1 · · Score: 0

      I don't want to register for the site, so I can't RTFA, but I doubt the Master Chief would be in the video, because MTV's voting program really is Choose (Democrat) or Lose.

    2. Re:Halo Vote by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1

      So for whom is the Master Chief voting?

      Nice grammar!

      Well done. Well done.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    3. Re:Halo Vote by grunt107 · · Score: 1

      I only like to dangle my participle on the weekends. Or is it 'I only GET to...'?

  6. My Eyes! by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 4, Funny
    Am I the only person that read that as "Video Game Characters get to vote"? I was really starting to get worried there.

    Of course, that could explain the sudden demand for electronic voting....

    --
    Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    1. Re:My Eyes! by SamSim · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if videogames could vote then we'd be at the mercy of the Lemmings, between them accounting for 96% of the voting share.

    2. Re:My Eyes! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Hey, those little guys are pretty tricky!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  7. It's a bit sad... by smaug195 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just think it's a sad statement on your country when you have to use every big name rapper, actor, and now video game characters, in order to get people to just register to vote.

    1. Re:It's a bit sad... by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Kids in high school don't want to watch political debates, they want to watch MTV. Hell, I dont know of much adults that want to watch the debates.

      If this can help us spark a little interest in would-be voters, why not do it.

    2. Re:It's a bit sad... by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Well, the Orcs [Warcraft III, World of Warcraft, etc.] might encourage some of them to vote for the Green Party ;-]

      Orcs are good for the environment!

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    3. Re:It's a bit sad... by Mike+Rubits · · Score: 1

      It's also sad when other countries don't try to appeal to voters.

    4. Re:It's a bit sad... by urmensch · · Score: 0

      Most kids in high school shouldn't be voting.

    5. Re:It's a bit sad... by joranbelar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sad statement? What does that even mean? I realize it's popular nowdays on Slashdot to condescend to Americans, but I don't see how it's sad at all. What's sad is having less than abysmal voter turnout, which in our country has been gradually slipping down over decades to less than 50%. At this point, it's not that people aren't *informed*, it's that they are *apathetic*. If it takes some lights and shiny objects to get them interested again, by using what they are *already interested in*, what exactly is sad about that? I'd say it's a pretty smart way of beginning to reverse the downward slide of voter participation.

    6. Re:It's a bit sad... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You're right, it is sad. It's sad that we'd identify more with fictional chararacters telling us to vote than with the pathetic presidential candidates. On one hand we have Mr. Big Oil who can't form a sentence, and on the other we have Mr. Big Condiments who's never had to work a day in his life, who got a purple heart for a self-inflicted injury... Jesus fucking christ. It's true what Doug Adams said, no one who wants the job is qualified. Has it occurred to anyone else that picking the president by lottery would save a lot of time and money and probably not change anything unless it was for the better? :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:It's a bit sad... by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      If it takes some lights and shiny objects to get them interested again, by using what they are *already interested in*, what exactly is sad about that? I'd say it's a pretty smart way of beginning to reverse the downward slide of voter participation.

      Why is it such a big goddamn tragedy if lots of people don't vote. The election will stil occur, and the people who WANT to vote WILL vote.

      I'd rather not have people who are swayed by cartoon characters and gangstas making decisions affecting my life, thanks, anyway.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    8. Re:It's a bit sad... by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      No, they just make laws that force you to vote instead.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    9. Re:It's a bit sad... by longbot · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's a sad statement on the status of our political system when there's no one worth voting for.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
    10. Re:It's a bit sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Big Condiments who's never had to work a day in his life, who got a purple heart for a self-inflicted injury

      i see we have another freeper in the crowd.

    11. Re:It's a bit sad... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      In this case it would be more like the story "The Lottery", by Shirley Jackson.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    12. Re:It's a bit sad... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Um ... none of Kerry's wounds were self-inflicted; that's a smear that has been thoroughly discredited by the Navy's own evaluation of Kerry's record. And you're right, Kerry has never had to work a day in his life, any more than Bush has -- but he's chosen to do so, consistently, for his entire adult life. Don't get me wrong; if I were able to choose any one person from the entire native-born US population over the age of 35 to be President, Kerry wouldn't be my first choice. But to put him in the same class as the spoiled, lazy, self-indulgent failure we have in office now is absurd.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    13. Re:It's a bit sad... by Kombat · · Score: 1

      If this can help us spark a little interest in would-be voters, why not do it.

      Because you're infusing ignorant, uninformed, angst-ridden teens with a last-minute burst of misplaced civic pride. Suddenly, they feel like they should vote, but they have no idea who to vote for. They didn't watch the debates, they don't read the paper, and they have no idea where any of the candidates stand on any issues, save for perhaps one or two "wedge" issues that may be important to them (to the exclusion of other, more important issues. For example, what's more important? Gay marriages or medicare for seniors? Which do you think a 19-year old cares about?)

      It's dangerous to encourage uninformed people to vote. At best, they guess right and vote for a good candidate. At worst, they're canceling out the vote of an informed person who actually took the time and effort to research the candidates and platforms. Democracy is too important to be left to ignorant, apathetic people.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    14. Re:It's a bit sad... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, I'm voting for Kerry, but not because he'd be a good president. He's so disconnected from the reality of the average American citizen that I think he has no hope in hell of actually identifying with any of us, let alone empathizing. I'm only voting for him because Bush is a frightening megalomaniac who will probably rage unchecked if he gets another term. From that standpoint, I believe they do both fall into the same category: People who should not be president.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:It's a bit sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Has it occurred to anyone else that picking the president by lottery would save a lot of time and money and probably not change anything unless it was for the better? :P"

      Jesse Ventura is proof that an experienced politician is better than Joe Sixpack off the street. Ventura couldn't handle the press. Couldn't keep his foot out of his mouth. Fell victem to dead-end political bickering. Questioned a lot of basic political functioning (some of which is good, too much of which is a waste of time).

      In order to work within the system one has to know how to work the system. While I have a bunch of ideas on How Things Should Be, were I to move into the White House some senator would blindside me in a way I could never prepare for. If ALL the politicians were moved out of DC and replaced with regular Joes then the nation would grind to a halt while everyone tried to figure out how the government worked again.

      Sadly, the U.S. of A. is too large and complex a system to be run by amateurs. Perhaps we need a better abstraction layer?

    16. Re:It's a bit sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that only 50% of the population bother to vote is a reflection of how well we in the US have it. Hard times and desparate circumstances are what breeds political activism.

    17. Re:It's a bit sad... by Wybaar · · Score: 1

      Also like the story "Franchise" by Isaac Asimov. If we were to do something like this in real life, I hope that Diebold wouldn't get the contract to make Multivac, the machine that was used to select the lone voter in the story.

      --
      Y|
    18. Re:It's a bit sad... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1


      i see we have another freeper in the crowd


      Uhhhh... whaddya mean "we," Pinko?

    19. Re:It's a bit sad... by joranbelar · · Score: 1

      I'd rather not have people who are swayed by cartoon characters and gangstas making decisions affecting my life, thanks, anyway.

      Unfortunately, you're not the only one who lives in this country. The elitist attitude of "I don't want all these ignorant yokels screwing up my country" goes contrary to the principle of democracy (albeit not the principles of the founding fathers ;) For decades now, we've been moving away from the IMHO ridiculous position that only 'enlightened' people should get to have a say in our government, and I believe that can only help democracy, whether you agree with their opinions or not.

      Basically, this: The opinions, and votes, of the people you deride count just as much as yours do, and if they happen to need a little encouragement to go out and voice them, so be it.

    20. Re:It's a bit sad... by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      The elitist attitude of "I don't want all these ignorant yokels screwing up my country"

      Well, I don't want ignorant yokels screwing up my country. How can anyone WANT ignorant yokels screwing up their country? Down that path of double thought lies neurosis and an unacceptably high level of cognitive dissonance I am not willing to be burdened with.

      I'll say it again, and say it with spirit:

      "I'd rather not have people who are swayed by cartoon characters and gangstas making decisions affecting my life, thanks, anyway." - Le Marteau

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    21. Re:It's a bit sad... by joranbelar · · Score: 1

      You're straw-manning the issue. My point was that they're not necessarily ignorant yokels at all, and that encouraging someone to vote in this manner doesn't mean they're being "swayed by cartoon characters and gangstas". It's a matter of getting people to overcome their disillusionment, whether the impetus comes from a political candidate, a friend, or Mario, who cares? It might just get some people to get involved, and they might be more intelligent than you give them credit for.

    22. Re:It's a bit sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until your democracy is 200+ years old. Of course it's getting senile...

  8. By all means vote if you have an opinion by cerebralsugar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another get out and vote drive. It's cool they use video game characters. But I can't help but feel these "public service announcments" are politically motivated.

    Before I seem like a troll, lets consider:

    Anyone who is not a felon, at least 18, and not an african american from florida, can register to vote. *drumroll*! I'm just kidding. That last part was uncalled for. But disenfranchised voters is another discussion, and a more serious one. So lets just say, most people who are 18 and not in jail can vote. They have the right. Politically motivated disenfranchising laws aside.

    Why do we care if people vote or not? Why do we try to chide them into it? If you are directly affected by the policies of your elected officials, you will probably vote. If you don't care, why should you be made to vote?

    And then they have these voter drives. Why does MTV care if their viewers vote? I'm guessing somewhere somebody has statistics that shows men 18-24 or whatever their demographic is, is "predominatly left" or "predominantly right". So, lets use propaganda to mobilize them. Lets mobilize a flock of voters that carry our view.

    Its dumb, if you care vote, if you don't, don't. I certainly don't care if you do or not. The only crime is if you do care and you don't vote.

    A much more serious issue is voter disenfranchisement - people who do care, who would vote, who are silenced. That is a huge issue. Why dont we see any commercials with video game charactars that say "voter disenfranchisment is bad"?

    I like civic participation but i'm for civic knowledge first, if you don't care, don't go in and blindly pick because MTV tells you too! That doesn't help anyone.

    --
    Easy guys, I put my pants on one leg at a time. The difference is after I put on my pants I make gold records!
    1. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To paraphrase/add: A vote cast in ignorance can be worse than not casting your vote at all.

    2. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

      People who watch MTV typically don't think for themselves.

    3. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by goneutt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Viacom, as all liberal media, want to redistribute wealth to lower socio-economic classes so that they can consume more and the advertisers can pay more for the commercials.

      This is due to the lower marginal savings rates for people that don't make much or any money, where as wealthier ($75k+) start having a higher savings rate, which means they aren't buying as much as they make. Economics 101 meets Media 101.

      --
      Bacardi + slashdot = negative karma.
    4. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by thrillseeker · · Score: 1
      A much more serious issue is voter disenfranchisement - people who do care, who would vote, who are silenced. That is a huge issue. Why dont we see any commercials with video game charactars that say "voter disenfranchisment is bad"?

      Because it's far less of a problem than one particular party gets sympathy points for making it seem like a problem.

      Why don't we see bipartisan calls for serious jail time for anyone handing out packages of cigarettes (or underwear) to get "homeless" (what used to be called bums) to go cast a vote? What - they all tend to vote for one particular party? Oh, that's ok then, eh?

    5. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but what the hell is your point? The poor shouldn't be allowed to vote?

    6. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      Indeed...Really, I'd rather the MTV-watching 18-year-olds not vote. Those that would cast informed votes probably either are voting already or have a logical reason not to vote that isn't going to be changed by video game characters on MTV.

    7. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by Rallion · · Score: 1

      I was thinking this too. But it doesn't push people in either direction. Unless, of course the programming is like:

      Vote! VOTE FOR KERRY or maybe bush.

    8. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by Unkle · · Score: 1
      Yes, voting or not voting is a personal choice. If it takes someone "cool" to get you to vote, that's what will be done. If only the people who care vote, though, are our elections really a measure of what the people want? Anyone who does not vote does not get their voice heard in choosing our leaders. And most people have some sort of opinion, no matter how dumb the reasons (I remember hearing that some people voted for Clinton because he looked better than his opponents).

      Me, I believe the best reason to vote is to guarantee that you did everything you could to get the guy you wanted in office. I feel justified in complaining about things I disagree with the Bush administration on, because I voted for Gore. IMHO, if you don't vote, while you still have the right to complain, it doesn't mean much, as you did nothing to prevent it.

      --
      Against stupidity, the gods themselves contend in vain.
    9. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest issue is that a lot of people don't realize you have to be registered prior to being able to vote. That's all these programs do, is get you registered and raise awareness of a coming election.

      Once you've gone through the trouble of registering, will you be more likely to vote? Well, at least you can vote. I still wonder why a driver's license/gov issued ID and voter regestration are separate functions, but that's another rant.

      One reason I believe the "liberals" are working hard with programs like these is because the "conservatives" already have their program - churches. I mean when 'god' himself speaks to you via the talking head on the pulpit to go out and vote, and you already have the "flock" mentality anyways, and then they're told vote for guy A.... That's a lot of potential voters. Is it any miracle that Bush's numbers are holding pretty rock steady above 37%?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    10. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by cerebralsugar · · Score: 1

      That brings up a good point.

      If you don't vote, I for one think your opinion is still valid. Maybe only one issue concerns you and both candidates support it.

      Like the patriot act.

      It's not worth voting if they both support it. So I could vote or not vote, it won't make a difference.

      But I sure as hell can raise a voice to get my opinion across afterwards.

      Voting is just one tool to be active in your government people. If I didn't vote , should I still not be allowed to run for a public office? Of course not.

      --
      Easy guys, I put my pants on one leg at a time. The difference is after I put on my pants I make gold records!
    11. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any evidence that this is a regular oocurance?

      Do our existing voter fraud laws not act as an adequate deterrent to this problem?

      Our voting systems do have serious problems. Homeless people being bribed to vote isn't even close to being in the top ten. Get a clue.

    12. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by Ephemeriis · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Personally, I want people to vote because that makes it more likely we'll have a government that actually represents the people it is governing.

      I constantly hear people complain about the current government. They don't like this new law, or that new war, or some guy in office...but when you ask them if they voted they reply with something along the lines of "of course not, it doesn't do any good."

      Yes, I would like it if more people who thought like I do went out and voted...then maybe we'd get a government that works the way I think it should. However, even if the folks I want don't get elected, I'd still be happier if it was a government that more accurately represented the vast majority of the nation.

      yrs,
      Ephemeriis

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    13. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by cerebralsugar · · Score: 1

      I'm with you man, I want a government that represents the vast majority of the nation too. But how would it be better if people just go out and vote for the hell of it because it's "the hip thing to do?"

      --
      Easy guys, I put my pants on one leg at a time. The difference is after I put on my pants I make gold records!
    14. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    15. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I agree that disenfranchisement is a more serious issue.

      Also, am I the only one who finds it disturbing that MTV, a station that makes its money on being unintelligent, is encouraging people to vote? What Britney Spears or whoever the flavor of the month is did over the weekend is not news, and I'm not sure that I want a station that would call it news getting people out to the polls.

      I wouldn't throw all their viewers into the same group (that wouldn't be fair), but I think it's safe to say that most are uninformed, and have little desire of changing that. Isn't that why people watch MTV, because it's light on the brainwork?

      I'm telling you, if these PSAs are successful, then on November 2nd, all the stations will be talking about the landslide victory of our new president, Ja Rule. Except for Fox News.....they'll still be saying that Bush won.

    16. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by Mojojojo+Monkey+Inc. · · Score: 1

      Then vote for a 3rd party like the Libertarians, who oppose the Patriot Act. Every ballot I've seen has more than two options for President, and there's no hired goons standing at the exit polls beating up people if you vote for someone other than a Democrat or a Republican.

      You can complain, protest, write your congressman, and sign online petitions all you want, but unless you *vote* for someone who represents at least some of your values, nothing will change. If there's one million eligible voters out there who don't want to choose either Kerry or Bush, THEN VOTE FOR SOMEONE ELSE!

      Your choice for President may not win, but it sends a more powerful message than *anything* else you could possibly do to get your opinion across.

    17. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1
      I think more voters benefits us all. The less people vote, the less candidates (and the eventual winners) have to work. That's bad.

      If we get down to too few demographics, candidates just have to keep them happy and stay in office for as long as they want... depending on the office. With more demographics, politicians have to be better rounded and keep their entire constituency in mind when campaigning and making decisions.

    18. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by zalle · · Score: 1

      Too bad it doesn't meet Economics 201, not to mention Anti-Delusions 101.

    19. Re:By all means vote if you have an opinion by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1

      Does it count as being disenfranchised if you don't see anyone worth voting for?

      --
      Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
  9. Serious? by Dak_Peoples · · Score: 1, Funny

    I know we are in trouble when videogames idols are persuading America to vote. What character would you personally listen to? I'd love to see Lesiure Suit Larry telling our youth to vote ;)

    --
    This is my signature.
  10. Obligatory Sims quote by bigdady92 · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Musha moy mi la! Fo sha ta nee ra may dah! Losa men tar RISHO!"

    I can hear the masses screaming in pain now.

    --
    Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
  11. Not much to mirror by smaug195 · · Score: 2, Informative

    MTV has announced the release of "Stand and Choose," a non-partisan, animated music video created in co-operation with 12 major video game publishers, and featuring more than 50 video game characters encouraging young people to vote in the upcoming Presidential election. According to the press release, "Stand and Choose" features what are described as "some of the most popular video game characters", including the stars of The Sims, BloodRayne, Mortal Kombat, SSX3, Leisure Suit Larry, Sonic Heroes, SpongeBob SquarePants, Outlaw Golf 2, Crash Bandicoot, Tomb Raider, Unreal Tournament 2004, DRIV3R, Splinter Cell, Tony Hawk's Underground 2, Psi-Ops: The Mindgate Conspiracy, and many more. "Stand and Choose" will start airing as a music video on Wednesday, October 6th, debuting on MTV's TRL, and will also be viewable online on the Choose or Lose section of mtv.com. The video was produced and directed by the producer of the previously mentioned, game related 'Video Mods' show on MTV2.

    1. Re:Not much to mirror by BillyZ · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      (and what is this "must wait 20 seconds after you hit Reply"? It only takes me 2 seconds to type "Thank you."!)

      --
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
    2. Re:Not much to mirror by FatherKabral · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who thinks it a little odd to use characters from Spongebob Squarepants? They may just be trying to plant the seeds, but think about it - if when you were a kid, the Smurfs or TMNT's were telling you it was cool to vote, would it have had any more impact than those same characters telling you not to smoke or do drugs? /takes another drag from cigarette, goes back to reading

    3. Re:Not much to mirror by BillyZ · · Score: 1

      Well, yes and no. There are a lot of adults who watch Spongebob. I'll admit to watching an episidoe on occasion. :o)

      In regards to the smoking thing, it's hard to judge. Typically, kids are rebellious, telling them not to do something often makes them curious about what your telling them not to do. At the same time, kids want to "be grown up" and if you tell them voting is important and something all grown ups should do, then when they turn 18, they might want to vote simply because as a child it was something they saw as a "grown up thing to do"

      JMO.

      --
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
    4. Re:Not much to mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leisure Suit Larry! I hope that this lives up to its potential...

    5. Re:Not much to mirror by Mortanius · · Score: 1

      So let's start figuring out what characters would vote for whom. :-P I mean, it'd seem pretty straightforward to me that Sam Fisher would be a die-hard Bush fan, but beyond that it seems pretty hazy. What would Spongebob care anyway, he lives in a pineapple in the sea, I don't think he's got to be too concerned about taxation and homeland security. He'd probably be more concerned about underwater nuclear bomb tests though, which I guess would put him in the Kerry camp.

      (Slow, slow day at work. :-p)

    6. Re:Not much to mirror by uunh+haun · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't they have done this a little earlier. You know, when there was a chance to still register?

  12. slashdot election campaign by flynt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get ready for Slashdot's election campaign to start airing commercials next week, it's titled "Choose or Loose".

  13. Mario... by Ikn · · Score: 1

    [Intro] Hi kids! In the time it would take me to make Koopa my bitch and show Princess Toadstool MY plumbing, you could have gotten online and registered to vote! [Thumbs up, Mario theme plays]

    --
    I know nothing
    1. Re:Mario... by hsmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hi, I am Troy McLure, you may remember me from such electoral films as...

  14. Hello, I'm the maniac from GTA3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if you want to preserve your second-amendment right to shoot up hookers, get out and vote! Also I particularly like being lectured to by the likes of P. Diddy.

  15. Do we want to encourage these voters? by CA_Jim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If video game or animated characters are needed to get some people out to vote, doesn't this indicate that these people SHOULD NOT vote?

    I'm all for democracy and for maximizing voters ability to gain information from governments so that they are informed voters. But if it requires cartoons and animated characters encouragement to get someone out to vote, that to me implies this person doesn't have the desire or knowledge to vote.

    1. Re:Do we want to encourage these voters? by The+Dobber · · Score: 1


      Maybe we should be focusing the cartoons on the clowns in Florida, showing them how to poke a hole thru a piece of paper.

    2. Re:Do we want to encourage these voters? by bigdady92 · · Score: 0


      You sir are an idiot. As a Florida resident there are no more buttefly ballots and no more hanging chad incidents. All are gone and replaced by scanning machines (think SAT tests here for bubble in the blank) and touch screen machines.

      So this whole crap about Florida being behind the times and having punch card ballots are falsehoods. Turn your crap hate to another state that still is using tech from the '40s.

      --
      Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
    3. Re:Do we want to encourage these voters? by acvh · · Score: 1

      Is this any worse than people relying on Rush Limbaugh or that god-awful Air America to get them out to vote?

      I actually prefer having Sonic the Hedgehog try to rally the turnout, rather than political operatives picking up busloads of senior citizens or inner-city church goers and instructing them exactly how to mark their ballots.

  16. someone correct me: by ShallowThroat · · Score: 1

    Isn't this kind of useless? Wasn't the last day to register to vote a couple days ago?

    --
    The "Insert Quote Here" line is almost as predictable as inserting an actual quote.
    1. Re:someone correct me: by smaug195 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps in your state but every state has a different cutoff in that regard.

  17. Bad Idea by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm all for high voter turnout. But I also think people should be informed before rushing to the ballot box.

    I don't really care for a lot of these recent "get out the vote" efforts. A lot of people who don't vote don't have a clue about who is running. Many can't name the president, and certainly not their congressman. Do they know where each candidate stands on even one issue? Probably not. They do know who just broke up in Hollywood though, and the last person to be kicked off Survivor.

    If these people flock to the polls, they'll simply dilute the votes of people like you and me, who really, honestly, and deeply care about voting. They will probably vote for whoever their friends are voting for. They might randomly pick somebody off the ballot. They'll probably just pick whoever they recognize or like more from the 10 seconds they saw them on TV. Is this a good idea? Not really.

    Convince people to care, then convince them to vote. That's what I say.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:Bad Idea by BridgeBum · · Score: 1

      I'm in the other camp, I'd like to see a larger voter turn out, even if it is mostly made up of uninformed people. (I would actually consider this the norm - how many voters are truely informed? TV debates don't count.)

      I don't think that care-then-vote will work as well as vote-then-care. If you can convince people who don't care to vote, they may come to care in the future. That's the hope anyway.

      --
      My UID is the product of 2 primes.
    2. Re:Bad Idea by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1

      I'm in the other camp, I'd like to see a larger voter turn out, even if it is mostly made up of uninformed people.

      We're increasingly moving toward dumbed-down news with sound bytes and one-liners for political platforms. I think this is a result of the dumbing down of the voting population. I think candidates regularly stretch their position if not lie about it. Both of this year's political conventions, for example, wandered away from much of the party's core beleifs.

      With a sharper, more educated, more caring voting body, they couldn't get away with this. I'm not Nader fan. But his comment about football is stingingly true. What if americans new as much about candidates as about their favorite players?

      We wouldn't have all these sly maneuvers from politicians because they would get caught too often.

      I would like a higher voter turnout - but I think dumbing down the voting body is too high a cost.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    3. Re:Bad Idea by mcmonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm all for high voter turnout. But I also think people should be informed before rushing to the ballot box.

      What is the standard? How informed is informed enough? When is an opinion enough of an opinion? So voting based on the last yard sign I saw isn't enough. Is listening to talk radio? Reading one newspaper a day? Reading slashdot?

      I respond to every time someone presumes to have some standard on who should vote and who is better off staying home. None of the big shots who presume to tell other people they shouldn't vote ever steps up with some specifics.

      What is the standard for "informed"?

      I don't really care for a lot of these recent "get out the vote" efforts.

      I agree a lot of "get out the vote" efforts are silly. (Though the video game characters have more credibility than MTV.) However I strongly disagree with the stand, 'if you have to do ____ to get people to vote, they don't care/aren't informed enough to vote.'

      Someone who votes because Mario told them to is one extreme. What about get out the vote drives by political parties? What about someone who would have missed voting until seeing it in the newspaper on election day?

      I don't buy the idea that an election is some kind of secret club and if you have to be told about it or reminded to vote than you shouldn't.

      If these people flock to the polls, they'll simply dilute the votes of people like you and me

      "These people"? Who are "these people"? What does that mean, "dilute the votes"? What is the standard? How informed does someone need to be before their vote counts? Since you think opinion is so holy and shouldn't be diluted, by what measure do you decide one vote should count and another is just noise?

      If someone registers and votes, they've already demonstrated they care. That's what I say.

    4. Re:Bad Idea by Zedrick · · Score: 1

      "10 out of 10 Terrorists agree - Anybody but Bush in 2004"

      Huh? Not too long ago some Al Qaeda spokesperson in Lebanon issued a statement saying that they hoped he would win the election. He's simply giving them what they want - more angry civilians turning to fundamentalist organisations.

      But anyway, I agree. If people don't care enough to know what's going on, then they shouldn't vote.

    5. Re:Bad Idea by ghostlibrary · · Score: 1

      > What if americans new as much about candidates as about their favorite players?

      That would be hysterical, and most excellent!

      "I'm voting Candidate A, I think he's a first choice draft for the presidency, as he has a 3-1 average for Defense and is pretty good at Economic Recovery when going into a deficit situation."

      "Well, I'm going with Candidate B since I think we're really in a world-market situation, and we need his 5/2 win record against Tariff Actions, I think that'll neatly set the US up for a 4-th quarter Debt Rebound."

      "Yeah, but Candidate C was in a music video, how cool is that!" [silence from the other 2] "Sorry, I don't follow politics."

      --
      A.
    6. Re:Bad Idea by Commander+Doofus · · Score: 1

      Agreed, this does not help democracy. We need people to make informed political decisions, not say "I VOHTED CUZ MARIO SED 2!!!!"

      --
      Want to improve your life? This guy will show you how!
    7. Re:Bad Idea by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1

      What is the standard? How informed is informed enough? When is an opinion enough of an opinion? So voting based on the last yard sign I saw isn't enough. Is listening to talk radio? Reading one newspaper a day? Reading slashdot?

      I respond to every time someone presumes to have some standard on who should vote and who is better off staying home. None of the big shots who presume to tell other people they shouldn't vote ever steps up with some specifics.

      Most people here know the difficulty in implimenting artificial intelligence. Complex judgments aren't easily reduced to a set of clear cut rules. Your request asks for a set of clear cut rules to a problem that requires thought - that's why you don't get the simplistic answers you want. There will always be hairs to split. But a reasonable person knows the difference between someone who should vote and one who probably shouldn't.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    8. Re:Bad Idea by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1
      I have a hard time believing that someone would be motivated enough by an ad to actually get out and vote...but not motivated enough to even find out who they are voting for. I mean, if I'm motivated enough to register and then show up on election day then I'm certainly motivated enough to fire up a web browser for 10 minutes and read the candidates' websites.

      These adds aren't going to bring out the truly apathetic, those folks don't care enough to be influenced. These adds are going to bring out the people who've been paying enough attention to think something ought to be done, but haven't been feeling motivated enough to do something themselves.

      yrs,
      Ephemeriis

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    9. Re:Bad Idea by rabel · · Score: 1

      Andy Rooney summed it up best.

      I prefer more voters than less voters, but ignorant voters is kind-of how we got to where we are today (in addition to the politically motivated disenfranchising as mentioned in a parent post, above).

    10. Re:Bad Idea by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Complex judgments aren't easily reduced to a set of clear cut rules. Your request asks for a set of clear cut rules to a problem that requires thought - that's why you don't get the simplistic answers you want. There will always be hairs to split. But a reasonable person knows the difference between someone who should vote and one who probably shouldn't.

      But that's the point -- "a reasonable person" is in itself open to all kinds of different definitions. IMNSGDHO, anyone who votes for Bush is prima facie not reasonable; obviously, Bush voters will disagree. There is no standard of reasonableness, and thus no standard of who should or shouldn't vote, that all of us can agree on. That's why we have voting at all ... because the alternative is to have Those Who Are Wiser Than Us making all the decisions, and the one thing liberals, conservatives, libertarians, and various permutations and combinations thereof can agree on is that historically, this has been a Really Bad Idea.

      Do I think most of my fellow citizens know what the hell's going on? No, actually, I think most of them are idiots. But experience teaches us that the various kinds of idiocy tend to cancel out, and democracy (or at least a reasonable facsimile -- US democratic republicanism, the UK parliamentary system, et al.) gives the genuinely good ideas the best chance of emerging from the muck and mire. The only alternative, historically speaking, has been to give one group of idiots absolute control. I don't want to live in that world, and neither, I suspect -- although I also suspect we'd agree on very little else -- do you.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    11. Re:Bad Idea by quisph · · Score: 1
      Oh, how I wish I had mod points. You are absolutely correct. There is no magical threshold for being "informed enough." And trying to determine which facts are necessary for "informed voters" to know quickly becomes partisan and very messy. You would have people complaining that their opponents are uninformed or even misinformed because they get their news from, say, FOX News instead of NPR, or from Rush Limbaugh instead of Jon Stewart, or vice versa. The point isn't who's right; the point is that you would never be able to get people to agree to a common standard. It is an unfortunate fact that the people who are the among the worst-informed often consider themselves to be the best-informed, and you'll never be able to convince them otherwise.

      And the opposite is true, too. It was recently discovered that people who get their news from comedy shows like Comedy Central's "The Daily Show" are actually better informed, on average, than people who just watch "the news." Who would have thought it? Before the study was done, a lot of people would have assumed that they were uninformed (or as Bill O'Reilly put it, "stoners and slackers") because they got their news from a comedy show. Again, the point is that even if there is a magic threshold at which someone is adequately informed, we are too ignorant and prejudiced to be able to tell whether someone has crossed it.

      Lastly, the grandparent seems very confident that he is one of the informed voters. I'm not saying that he is or isn't, but I guarantee that someone, somewhere would consider him uninformed. It would be all well and good to exclude uninformed voters as long as HE got to pick the threshold... Maybe not so good for him if someone else did.

    12. Re:Bad Idea by mcmonkey · · Score: 1
      There is no standard of reasonableness, and thus no standard of who should or shouldn't vote, that all of us can agree on. That's why we have voting at all ... because the alternative is to have Those Who Are Wiser Than Us making all the decisions, and the one thing liberals, conservatives, libertarians, and various permutations and combinations thereof can agree on is that historically, this has been a Really Bad Idea.

      Right on. We are (or at least aim to be) a nation of laws, not men. The standard of 'I know it when I see it,' whether applied to voters or obscenity or anything else goes against the very founding principles of the US of A.

      If it can't be spelled out, in black and white, it's not a reasonable standard. Now personal standards and opinions are not held to that test. I'm not going to write a treatise on why I wore the blue shirt today instead of the white one. But matters of law and public policy, such as who can vote, need to be help to a higher standard than, "a reasonable person knows the difference."

    13. Re:Bad Idea by globalar · · Score: 1

      If people cared, voting turnout would not be a problem because the political landscape would arguably be more representative and reflective of their views.

      When people do not care, the voting options which might appeal to them dry up, candidates and parties start fighting over the same words, and they are left with the "lesser of two evils". The majority of voters consolidate into one massive, unmoved and unmotivated block. It is hard to appeal to apathy, though sensationalism, propoganda, war, terrorism, etc. sometimes garner attention.

      This is a vicious cycle. As people have been apathetic in the past, their influence on party politics and candidate selection has dwindled and parties have consolidated into what we have today. It is, basically, an advertising campaign, designed to reach that undecided American block by simply generalizing and flashing names and insults . Issues are secondary, because no one really knows what issue will make an apathetic American vote. Hopefully, something sensational or scandalous maybe.

      Incidentally, this situation is much more extreme in countries such as the Phillipines. Movie stars, talk show hosts, soup opera stars, religious right leaders, and the rich all dominate the government in elected positions. Each election is much like entertainment, though the consequences are sickening. In some ways it is like a soup opera, because the leaders are all related to one another by family, scandal, and/or business. Poverty and corruption are rampant.

    14. Re:Bad Idea by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      They will probably vote for whoever their friends are voting for.

      What if they happen to respect the opinions of their friends? "My friend Jim keeps up with the news. Reads the paper, watches the debates. He's a pretty sharp guy; does a good job. Seems a smart fellow when we go out for a beer after work, too. He's voting for party X. I think I will, too." Why is it silly to choose a candidate based on the opinion of someone you know personally, like, and trust--but respectable to decide based on the warped opinion of a newspaper columnist you've never met and probably has an axe to grind?

      Not all of us have the time or inclination to deeply research politics; some people may find it reasonable to rely on those who do. We already have a representative democracy. Partly this is for historical reasons--direct democracy wasn't even technically feasible until recently in a large, geographically diverse population. Partly, though, electing someone to handle political issues full time in principle allows them to make better-informed decisions on your behalf.

      If you vote the same way as your friend does, you're taking this one step further. I think my friend is a reasonable and trustworthy guy. I believe he will vote for candidates who espouse similarly reasonable principles. Voting the way he does is a way to increase the weight of the opinion of someone I trust. My opinion is still represented, just a little less directly.

      They might randomly pick somebody off the ballot.

      That's okay. If it's really random, those will cancel out anyway. No harm done.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    15. Re:Bad Idea by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      Do I think most of my fellow citizens know what the hell's going on? No, actually, I think most of them are idiots. But experience teaches us that the various kinds of idiocy tend to cancel out, and democracy (or at least a reasonable facsimile -- US democratic republicanism, the UK parliamentary system, et al.) gives the genuinely good ideas the best chance of emerging from the muck and mire.

      That was one of the most insightful responses for why everyone should vote that I've read. "Various kinds of idiocy tend to cancel out," in particular. Thanks!

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
  18. I'm not a member by khallow · · Score: 1, Funny

    Isn't it ironic that I can't view a video encouraging people to register to vote because I'm not registered on that site?

  19. How about making an informed vote? by iceperson · · Score: 1

    The problem with these get out and vote campaigns are that they imply just showing up makes you a better citizen. I'd argue that uneducated/uninformed voters deciding who leads this country is as big a threat to the world as Osama Bin Laden.

    1. Re:How about making an informed vote? by stratjakt · · Score: 0

      These campaigns aren't about altruism, they're about propoganda. MTV will go on and on about democracy and 'having your say', then air a bunch of Kerry commercials, and have one if it's veejays start talking about the poor people in Iraq, etc.

      It goes both ways, every "registration drive" I've seen has some sort of agenda behind it.

      Most eligible voters are not registered dems or republicans, these people swing elections. The pundits in the press give them derisive names like "the soccer moms" or "nascar dads", which is just some elitist bullshit.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  20. apathy? by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Isn't apathy the publics way of saying "we're tired of your bullshit"?

    I mean honestly vote for Bush or Kerry the net result will be the same. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer and the middle class remain terrified about what tommorow will bring.

    I don't think people "forget" to vote or just don't care to. I think they honestly don't think that it matters one way or the other. So long as the sheep [re: public] watch TV and believe what they see the actual vote doesn't matter.

    This vote has long since been decided. So long as Bush and his fellow cronies can push that big bright red terrorist button the masses will fall in line.

    See what I don't get is people go on about how "we are safer with Bushes leadership". Well you know what? Life isn't safe. You could be flying on a terrorist free plane and shit could hit the fan [literally] and boom you're dead.

    You could be waiting in a doctors office when an earthquake hits and you get smushed by a ton of cement, etc, etc, etc.

    It's what you do with your time that makes your life. If people accept "Big Brother" on their street corners with machine guns [like in New York] how free are you to live what precious life you have left?

    Now I won't presume to tell people how to vote. Personally if I lived in the USA I would vote for a non-major party like the Libertarians. Fuck I would vote for Arnold any day. At least he got rich making movies and not foreign policy.

    My dear brotheren Americans cherish what precious commodities of freedom you have left. Another decade of "fighting terrorism" and you guys won't know which way is up. You'll have to turn to polly shore movies to see how "good" life used to be. And that my friends is truly sad.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:apathy? by salvorHardin · · Score: 0, Troll
      Bill Hicks said it best:

      I'll show you politics in America. Here it is, right here. 'I think the puppet on the right shares my beliefs.' 'I think the puppet on the left is more to my liking.' 'Hey, wait a minute, there's one guy holding out both puppets!'

    2. Re:apathy? by Telepathetic+Man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, not voting is just like a vote for one of each of the candidates.

      The better way to show your disgust or lack of confidence in the government is to make a protest or third party vote. I know I plan to vote for Michael Badnarik of the libertarian party and mostly 3rd party for state and local elections. Here in Minnesota, the recent state legislation session got absolutely nothing done due to political deadlock between the two major parties. I think its time that sort of possibility is broken up.

      --
      Just because you can, does not mean you should.
    3. Re:apathy? by Ephemeriis · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Problem is, apathy doesn't do you any good. If you're tired of the same old bullshit, but don't do anything about it and rely on your failure to vote to send a message, nothing is going to change. You need to actually do something to make the same old bullshit go away.

      Doing nothing, being apathetic, refusing to vote in some form of protest just isn't going to get you anywhere.

      yrs,
      Ephemeriis

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    4. Re:apathy? by thrillseeker · · Score: 1
      The better way to show your disgust or lack of confidence in the government is to make a protest or third party vote.

      And, other than stroking one's self-delusion, this will change what?

    5. Re:apathy? by jshark · · Score: 1

      Damn tootin' I'm apathetic. The two party system is nothing but pissing contests and name calling.

      "You did this wrong...Oh yeah? Well you did *THIS* wrong and you're ugly to boot...Well you're ugly AND stupid AND you don't believe in God, so THERE!"

      I wish to hell that Kerry had been able to convince McCain to run with him. That might have at least given the impression that somebody really wants to change things, instead of just changing the heffalump to an ass on the white house lawn. Edwards is a pretty boy, grin-factory who did nothing for NC except to start running for president the second he landed in the senate.

      And while I'm at it, this is 2004 folks. The electoral college is the antithesis of "one person, one vote". Abolish it and let popular vote rule, end of story. More votes == winner, simple, straightforward, to the point. More people wanted this guy (in a gender-neutral sense) to win, so he did.

      [deep breath...]
      /rant

      --
      If you're gonna be dumb, you gotta be tough.
    6. Re:apathy? by forkboy · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the fact that he tried to get McCain to run with him speak volumes? Would any Republican even CONSIDER getting another party as a running mate? Hell no.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  21. mario by crackshoe · · Score: 1

    You know, if Mario or PRincess Peach, or maybe even Sonic in a pinch, told me to vote, i'd consider it. But i have no emotional investment in Bloodrayne or the Sims.

    --
    Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
  22. MTVU by st0ne86 · · Score: 1

    This aired on MTVU at my college a few days ago. It was really neat to see my favorite characters all in one video.. not to mention Lara Croft.. :D

  23. Some people never learned the importance of voting by TrentL · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to be of the mindset that if you need to be encouraged to vote, you shouldn't be voting. But I've since changed my mind.

    No one is born realizing the importance of voting. Somewhere, you are socialized, and you come to believe that voting is important. Maybe it was due to school, or family, or friends. But not everyone has that experience. Some people come from families were there was no pattern of voting. Or their schools sucked and never talked about it.

    So that's why I do support these "unconventional" methods. And I think you should, too. When a large segment of the population feels disconnected from their government, the entire society becomes unstable.

  24. Re:Some people never learned the importance of vot by hsmith · · Score: 0

    There are good and bad points to it.

    I would love to see everyone voting, it should be mandated, or there should be atleast tax breaks for voting. our current set of elected officals are so off base it is sad

    not to mention the fact they pander to the elderly, the young of this country are screwed, we are going to be left with amazing bills due to our parents generation, and who knows if we will still have a country

  25. Reality check by jasmusic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    a) Who do you think MTV wants to see as president? b) Who do you think is underrepresented at the polls? While legitimate, don't believe for a minute that campaigns like these are without partisan motive.

    1. Re:Reality check by C32 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the flipside, are there any conservatives willing to go on record saying they don't want people to vote? (especially young people and minorities (racism++)) :)

    2. Re:Reality check by Eamon+C · · Score: 1

      It's a sad day for democracy when it's considered 'partisan' to encourage people to vote.

    3. Re:Reality check by jasmusic · · Score: 1

      A possible comparison is: "It's a sad day for humanity when it's considered 'partisan' to help out the poor." (as in entitlements)

      Not voting is still voting. A bit ambiguous, but equally valid. It could mean contentment with a way of life, it could mean discontent with the candidates, or it could mean that the non-voter is entirely ignorant about the process or the issues. Why push a square peg through a round hole?

    4. Re:Reality check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which ones? Ones with influence, or crazy rednecks? I'm a neo-conservative, I'm in an inter-racial marriage, I believe in abortion (no late-term, you should have made up your damn mind by that time), I'm all for stem-cell research, and I can't stand a lot of organized religion. The conservatives you are talking about are ancient GOPers from the south. Real political conservativism lies in the reduction of government services and entrustment/enforcement of those services to businesses. My tax dollars pay for DARE, make alcohol and tobacco companies pay. My tax dollars are being diverted from education to supporting people who don't work (not working means you don't make money, if you can't work because of a disability or injury then I'm happy to give you tax dollars, but not working out of apathy/lazieness means you shouldn't make money). Get it?

    5. Re:Reality check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You mean like this:

      "If we do not suppress the Detroit vote, we're going to have a tough time in this election cycle."

      -- State Rep. John Pappageorge, (R-Troy, MI) while discussing election strategy at a meeting of the Oakland (MI) County Republican Party

      or were you talking about less subtle stuff like this:

      THE GREAT FLORIDA EX-CON GAMEHow the 'felon' voter-purge was itself felonious

      There are conservative claims that liberals are trying to supress votes, but they so far seem based on handwaving, rather than documented details like the above two. Maybe it's because Dems have favored populist vote fraud efforts: Vote early, vote often. Nobody gets their feelings hurt, nobody gets disenfranchised, and we still win.

  26. Re:Mario... A member of the Communist party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I seem to remember Mario flying the Red Star every time he annexed a new level in Super Mario Bros.

  27. What next, GI Joe and the Transformers? by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Funny

    Get out the vote?

    Optimus Prime: "Hey Spike, where're you going?"
    Spike: "I'm going to go vote! I have the power to choose clean water, new schools and do my civic duty to the country."
    Optimus Prime: "Now you're talking!"
    Everybody: "Transform the world, Vote!"

    Or maybe a nice Thundercats ad
    Snarf: "Meow, Lion-o you know who Dick Cheney reminds me of?"
    Lion-o: "No Snarf, who?"
    Snarf: "Mumm-ra! That's why I'm voting for John Kerry, he won't blow up Thundara the way Bush/Cheney are!"
    Lion-o: "Wow Snarf, I like our planet. I never thought of it that way. Maybe I should vote in this election."
    Panthro: "Snarf, get your liberal butt out of here!"
    Snarf: "Panthro, you're such a closet homosexual!"
    Everyone: "Hahahahahahaha! Get out the vote!"

    But then we're a generation that was taught environmental rights and wrongs by Captain Planet and the Planeteers...

    No wonder the world laughs at us. We don't watch news programs or stay informed... We have animated characters tell us what to think and how to act.

    1. Re:What next, GI Joe and the Transformers? by gkuz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now I know I'm old. I didn't get a single one of the references in your post. That's scary. Thundercats? Planeteers? Not a damn clue.

    2. Re:What next, GI Joe and the Transformers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thunder, Thunder, Thundercats VOOOOOOOOOOTE!

      "No wonder the world laughs at us. We don't watch news programs or stay informed... We have animated characters tell us what to think and how to act." -the skywise

      Yes, much better to have the animated "journalists" tell us what to think and how to act.

    3. Re:What next, GI Joe and the Transformers? by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lol... whats scary is I can relate totally to this... although I would throw in some Family Guy/Futurama

      Scene: Drunken Clam with Peter and Brian at the bar watching TV
      Peter (Hand on beer): "Holy crap Brian, there's an election!"
      Brian (Sipping martini): "Yeah, doesn't democracy turn your crank?"
      TV - Commercial with monster trucks & bikini babes: "Monday Monday Monday.. vote your mind.. see Bush-zilla go against Scary Kerry!"
      Peter: "Holy crap Brian, there's monster trucks coming to town!"
      Brian: "Yeah, I vote for the babe in the red."
      Everyone: "Get out and vote... or miss awesome democratic action.. Monday Monday Monday."

      Scene: Fry and Leela in the Hall of Heads - Presidents section.
      Fry: "Look Leela! It's former President Bush Jr. and former presidential candidate Kerry."
      Leela: "Weren't those guys the odd couple from your century... destroying countries for oil and imposing Western civility on everyone?"
      Fry (blank look): "Riiight... something like that."
      Bush Jr. Head: "I stand by my decision to defend and pummel their asses!"
      Kerry Head: "I stand by him and say I would have made similar but different decisions that saves lives but costs money!"
      Everyone: "Vote your conscience! Vote for Candidate Blarg from Ceti-Alpha Six!"

      --
      (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
  28. Doom says... by snarkasaurus · · Score: 0

    Go vote slacker boy, or I'll stick this BFG 9000 up your...

    1. Re:Doom says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously moded down by a SLACKER.

  29. Better idea! by IndigoZenith · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe they will expand on their Video Game campaign and start using Porn and Free Beer to get people to vote.

    I want to be encouraged in this way.

    It will motivate me.

    Please?

    --
    "If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried"
    1. Re:Better idea! by Minwee · · Score: 0

      I don't think there is enough beer in the world, free or otherwise, to make me forget the idea of G W Bush / Dick Cheney porn.

      Even John Kerry in the leather mask wasn't that terrifying.

    2. Re:Better idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of a group that recently came to my campus

      Apparently they trade sex for votes against bush, but i think they are going to have the opposite effect than they intend. Associating kerry with prostitution rather than doing anything good for him.

  30. And only two days AFTER voter reg has CLOSED by aristus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In Florida, Ohio and a few other of the crucial States. Good timing, people.

    --
    Sometimes seventeen/Syllables aren't enough to/Express a complete
  31. If nintendo were in charge of voting by revery · · Score: 2, Funny

    you'd have nice rotating blocks (in a tic-tac-toe pattern) with alternating pictures of the candidates (as in the bonus game in Super Mario World after collecting 100 stars).

    If you can make Mario hit the blocks so that your candidate shows up three in a row, your vote counts. Get more than three in a row for multiple votes.

    Get three Nader's and you get a sunflower suit

    If you get no matches, it's a vote for Bowser.

    (I'll leave it to others to come up with the prizes for Kerry and Bush, though I'm looking for something along the lines of Tanooki suit of Mass Destruction...)

    --

    Was it the sheep climbing onto the altar, or the cattle lowing to be slain,
    or the Son of God hanging dead and bloodied on a cross that told me this was a world condemned, but loved and bought with blood.

  32. Choose Or Lose by sweatyboatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think that MTV, while it may be biased towards the left, is mainly interested in motivating young voters.

    The people that run this country are, by and large, over 50. "Out of touch" doesn't begin to cover it. Add to that, the fact that 20-somethings are notorious for not voting. (And for not really caring how the elections turn out.)

    Politicians barely even pretend to listen to the concerns of "young people". If we were to turn out in record numbers in this election (regardless who we vote for) the political system would take notice. And they would speak and act towards the concerns of young people in this country (drugs, AIDS, poverty, student loans, unemployment...) rather than the concerns of older people (estate tax, social security, imprisoning everyone)

    -tom

    --
    It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
    1. Re:Choose Or Lose by DisKurzion · · Score: 1

      Yea...cause...you know... MTV has always been the pinnacle positive influence on young people...

      Remind me again who is (at least partially) responsible for pushing 2/3 of the bad music today?

      http://www.youhavebadtasteinmusic.com/

  33. Re:Some people never learned the importance of vot by TrentL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've seen suggestions that we should conduct a lottery in parallel with the election. When you go to vote, you can choose to contribute a dollar. If your number (or whatever) is chosen, you get the pot. Actually, this might be more enticing if there were 100 or 1000 winners.

  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. MTV's other plan for increasing voter turnout by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    MTV plans to improve voter turnout further by driving people away from the TV during voting hours.

    How? By constantly playing insipid reality TV shows that make each Survivor look like an episode of Nova, and refusing to play music videos altogether.

    It's so crazy it just might work. I know such a plan would stop *me* from watching MTV.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  36. Maybe we should use. . . by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    these characters to help get the youngins into the voting routine.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  37. Sure go out and vote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you give a bozo the power to raid you home for having bootleged copies of movies you cannot go to see to the cinema due you live from a minimun wage working at walmart. Sounds even smart to use the only characters you use to escape reality to bring you back to it.

  38. Hate to say it, but - Your vote does not matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least in US Presidential elections, anyways. It's the Electoral college vote that matters :) (aside from the few states that assign Electoral college vote based on the popular vote)

    (for the record - I would like to see the Electoral college done away with, despite the fact that I wouldn't trust the dumb masses to elect anyone worthy of "governing" me anyways)

  39. Re:Some people never learned the importance of vot by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem in this particular case is that people are not motivated by parents, teachers, other family members, friends, or all the headlines... but they are motivated by a fictional video game character? That is scary.

    The truth is these ads are pointless - if someone's not motivated to vote by real life events, I think a very small number will actually be swayed by a fictional game character. It boils down to just a giant waste of money... another "public service" that was not completely thought through.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  40. In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NRA has selected Duke Nukem as their new spokesperson.

  41. Better ieda - voting by videogame. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Really want to make the vote interesting? Use a slight takeoff on the electoral system.

    Get a number of groups of people together in some online game - say UT2K. Each group is for a different candidate... have a ladder tournement with Kerry and Bush teams starting on oppositse side of the ladder.

    Now simply have teams duke it out, and the winning overall team gets all player votes for its candidate of choice!

    Now that's what I call a real game of Capture the Flag.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  42. To what party would they belong? by Chagatai · · Score: 3, Funny
    Let's see:

    Mario and Luigi: While they are independent contractors and likely own their own LLC for their plumbing business, they would side heavily with the unions. Besides, their gratuitous use of "mushrooms" would tend to look for a party with some liberal laws. My guess? Democratic

    Link: Heavily independent, but believes in the maxim that there is always a damsel in distress. Tends to alter the time-space continuum. Republican

    Lara Croft: Big on guns, big elsewhere, too. Values the ability to use her body any way she pleases and keep her prized possessions to herself. Libertarian

    Donkey Kong: Takes a stand that no one should be in his jungles, going so far as to take hostages and have rescue parties sent in. If you ignore the fact that he is a monkey, he has some decent environmental goals. Green

    --
    --Chag
  43. More disturbing is... by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

    It apparently takes video game characters that appear in Playboy to get people to vote! Freud would have a field day with this one!

  44. Sometimes, any vote is a wasted vote. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    The fact that only 50% of the population bother to vote is a reflection of the lack of political representation.

    http://www.fairvote.org/factshts/wta-va.htm

    --
    Deleted
  45. Re:Can't vote if you're not registered by (trb001) · · Score: 1

    I'll bite...

    The registration process ain't about preventing fraud -- it's about preventing voting.


    How so?

    --trb

  46. Music? On MTV???? by spookymonster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since when does MTV play music videos? I thought they were strictly about reality shows.

    What's next? Objective reporting on Fox News?

    --
    - Despite popular opinion, I am not perfect.
    1. Re:Music? On MTV???? by indianajones428 · · Score: 1

      >What's next? Objective reporting on Fox News?

      Hey, that's an unfair comparison. After all, MTV actually had music videos once.

      --
      When a thing has been said, and said well, have no scruple. Take it and copy it. --Anatole France
    2. Re:Music? On MTV???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gawd, I hope their viewers don't get this confused with MTV's stupid reality shows. People can say all they want about GWB, but just imagine four years of President Puck!

  47. How about Yogi's ark? by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    I was going to start with that, but figured not as many people would get that.

  48. I don't normally quote chunks of song on /. but... by kahei · · Score: 0



    I think my TV's busted
    if not this country's dusted
    'cause I think I saw 7 Mary 3,
    and they were on the MTV
    They were telling the people to rock the what?

    Talentless hippies, Hootie wannabees,
    Southern fried kings of mediocrity

    Now let me get this straight
    you want MTV viewers,
    the worlds biggest losers,
    to vote?

    the idea's wrong
    in fact there ought to be a law
    if you can sit through a Silverchair video
    you shouldn't be allowed to vote at all

    --The Vandals

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  49. Even if it takes church, by Anonymous+Froward · · Score: 1

    or neighbor, or a friend in their local hula hoop club or whatever, to get people to vote, they're still encouraged to vote. At least I think so.

  50. Voting is like the lottery by ThePlague · · Score: 0
    There's an old saying:
    Lotteries are a voluntary tax on people bad at math.

    Likewise, voting is civic responsibility for those equally bad at math.

  51. Not crazy about this... by stubear · · Score: 1

    ...but MTV appears to have a relatively decent site, choose or lose (http://www.mtv.com/chooseorlose/), with information about each party, their candidates, and links to non-partisan sites like FactCheck.org. I'd rather see MTV push this website hard so people have a clue about what's going on and can make a more informed vote instead of rushing out and pulling that lever for the guy they think their favorite rapper would vote for.

  52. Argh. by mcmonkey · · Score: 1
    think uninformed people shouldn't vote, but I do not propose to bar them from voting. Rather, I propose we encourage them to inform themselves, rather than just 'go vote'

    So what is standard? Lots of posts saying uninformed people shouldn't vote, but no body wants to back it with any specifics.

    Ever consider that voting is part of the informing process? Yeah, it's nice to think someone could get informed and then vote. But is it really so bad if someone responds to some "get out the vote" campaign or the political discussions here by going to polls, and then that leads to more research into the issues?

    I wouldn't recommend that going into the poll cold and voting randomly. But I'll take it, if it gets someone who wasn't going to vote into the booth. Because maybe this time it's, 'well, I've got some time to kill until the 'shrooms kick in. Might as well vote.' And then next time it's, 'well, I guess I'll vote again. Might as well read some of the referendum questions ahead of time.' Who knows, some one who wasn't high up on the 'informed' scale might get involved and actually learn something.

    The opposite approach, discouraging people from getting involved and voting, leads to a lot of, 'nope, still too stupid to vote again this year.'

    The uninformed person is the one who thinks voting isn't worth the time or the effort. Discouraging people from voting doesn't target those people, it creates them.

    1. Re:Argh. by Chris+Carollo · · Score: 0
      The uninformed person is the one who thinks voting isn't worth the time or the effort.
      Unless that person happens to be informed enough that they realize just how broken the American political system is.

      I'm living in Texas, so I harbor no illusions that my Presidential vote is going to make a whit of difference. And thanks to the unbelievably blatant and brazen gerrymandering that our lovely Republican leadership has just forced through, even my local Congressional races have become ridiculously one-sided.

      I'll inform myself, and vote, but I realize that it's largely a symbolic gesture. It's sad when my political conversations with my parents (who live in Ohio) hold FAR more political weight than does my actual vote.
  53. Video Game Trivia by eddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The actress Wendy Hoopes who did the voice for "Mona Sax" in Max Payne 2, is currently doing LAX.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  54. Supreme Court declares "vote rocking" illegal by dexter+riley · · Score: 1

    The video will air for the first time on MTV today on TRL, and afterwards can be seen on the MTV Choose or Lose site.

    Having seen this year's candidates, I think this belongs on the MTV "Choose and Lose" site.

  55. This is a good thing by ihaddsl · · Score: 1

    Because it's creating a buzz about voting. For so long the percentage of eligible voters actually voting has been so low in this country that we obviously do need to remind people that democracy will not continue to function (some might say it's not functioning now) if the majority of people do not vote.

    By building up the notion that voting is the responsibility of each citizen, hopefully voter drives like this will reverse the trend of declining voter ranks and bring some change to the current status quo in Politics and elections.

  56. Re:Some people never learned the importance of vot by BillyZ · · Score: 1

    I agree that someone who's not motivated by ANYTHING else and sees these commercials is probably not going to be motivated by the commercial alone.

    What about the millions of fence sitters? The people who are a little motivated by current events; a little motivated by their family; a little motivated by friends. What about when they see hte commercial and this motivates them a little more? Is that a bad thing?

    --
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
  57. Re:Some people never learned the importance of vot by allism · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If choosing your elected officials isn't motivation enough to vote, than you shouldn't be voting. With a lottery, you'd end up with people voting that just went in and marked the first candidate on the ballot in each category, or marked the ballot 'randomly'. It would be a simple matter for election officials to garner a few more votes for their favored candidates by making sure they were first in their categories.

  58. Re:Some people never learned the importance of vot by TrentL · · Score: 1

    It would be a simple matter for election officials to garner a few more votes for their favored candidates by making sure they were first in their categories.

    There is a bias for the first person listed on the ballot. It would be easy to randomly arrange the names.

  59. "Get out the vote" drives very annoying by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1
    Just an attempt for media outlets to buy cheap cred and unassailability by espousing voting in general whilst not actually taking a position.

    Here's an alternative point of view: if you aren't informed and motivated, please don't vote. An uninformed vote is worse than no vote.

  60. Do do-do do do do-do Voting in the USA by jeffs72 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been trying to do a lot of research laely into the candidates for our upcoming election, and discussions I have with other people are for the most part an extremely disappointing experience. I am frankly shocked that people would vote "just to get W out of office" or "I vote for Bush because I hate Democrats" etc.

    I hear a lot of rhetoric about "throwing your vote away". This is usually used as a reason to not vote for Nader, or the Libetarian party, etc. But it seems to me that a vote "just go get bush out of office" or a vote for a party just cause your parents raised you republican or democrat is really the wasted vote.

    I think people have lost the focus that a vote is your own personal voice on how our country should be led. It's a sad state of affairs that we're stuck in this 2 party mentality where often people don't vote because they understand the issues of their candidate, or even know what their candidates' stance on the issues are, but cast a vote solely because it's their family tradition, or their hatred towards the other opponent.

    I really wish that we could push through an electoral reform that would allow for multiple votes (#1 choice, 2nd choice, etc) or something. I think the power of the people has been stolen by this charade where it's not about the issues, or who is really the best leader, or what a political party will do (or not do) for a country, but something that is done in a thoughtless, rote manner.

    I saw excerpts from Faranheit 911 where some protester says "I'd rather vote for a single celled organism than vote for Bush". What does that say about the value of your vote sir? I realise that's his opinion and he's entitled to vote with his opinion, but what does a choice using that methodology do to our country? Is Bush reallly absolutely the worst possible leader of our country? Is there no one worse to be our leader? What if Manson (heck, Charlie or Marilyn) were up against Bush? Is that still his stance? Would you let a convicted murderer lead our country over Bush?

    Don't get me wrong, I don't like Bush very much. I am not convinced he's a good leader or that he's been entirely truthful to the American people, or our allies overseas. I feel the same way about Kerry, and Edwards. I am a little more comfortable with Cheney, but I suspect that's mainly because he's got a ton of experience in dealing with suprise crap, rather than anything else.

    After a little research so far (I registered on the deadline) I haven't really found a platform on either side I care for. I want to use my voice, cast my vote, and not have it 'wasted' by not being cast. So how do I vote?

    I'm against abortion (the CEO of my client was adopted, so was a close friend of my father, and I have a 7 month old daughter so I can't conceive of abortion being a good thing).
    I like the environment and want to take care of it, but I don't want to rely on forgien energy sources either.
    I don't like the UN, I think it's lost it's relevance.
    I think socialising our medical system will be a huge mistake, and the main culprit of rising health costs is the trial lawyers and frivilous lawsuits (see Overlawyered.com for details.
    I think everyone should have the same rights. I think the government should NOT be involved in the institution of marriage at all, it's a religious practice, not a civil one. Calling a domestic union is an insult to religion.
    I don't believe in subsidizing farmers to not grow crops, I want legal marjiuana, I want the war on drugs to end.

    So how should I vote? And do the new electronic voting machines allow me to write in a candidate if mine ends up to have not been popular enough to get listed on the ballot in my area?

    Since some people feel that social or economic background determines voters, here's my stuff: I'll be a first time voter this year. I barely graduated high school and have worked full time since I was 14 years old (50 hour work week

    --
    This article has recently been linked from Slashdot. Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism.
    1. Re:Do do-do do do do-do Voting in the USA by SiW · · Score: 1

      Wow, you got that wrong. Bush is the cocky little guy who truly believes in what he's doing. Cheney is the scary one wielding (and abusing) the power.

    2. Re:Do do-do do do do-do Voting in the USA by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      This guy may not fit your preferences totally, in particular I'm unsure of his stance on abortion, but check out www.badnarik.org and www.lp.org. Those are for the Libertarian candidate and party, respectively. The gist of his platform is smaller gov't and more personal freedom (which fits well with the philosophy in your last sentence).

      I may be telling you things you already know, but others may benefit as well if I am.
      It's hard to find a party that matches your personal values exactly, because there are just too many different people with different interests for that to happen often. I was raised conservative republican but a nonvoter until only a few weeks ago. I realized I didn't like either of the primary candidates, so I wasn't planning on voting this year either, until the Badnarik interview on Slashdot. I was impressed by his honesty, or candidness if you will, and even his defense of ideas that I don't agree with (such as no public land).

      Check him out - he seems to match your views pretty well, and he also seems to have a good head on his shoulders.

    3. Re:Do do-do do do do-do Voting in the USA by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      I've been trying to do a lot of research laely into the candidates for our upcoming election,

      You've already done more that most voters then.

      and discussions I have with other people are for the most part an extremely disappointing experience. I am frankly shocked that people would vote "just to get W out of office" or "I vote for Bush because I hate Democrats" etc.

      It's unfortunate but since there are only two candidates to really choose from, it's hard to find someone that meets your unique political viewpoint, especially if you are independant.

      I hear a lot of rhetoric about "throwing your vote away". This is usually used as a reason to not vote for Nader, or the Libetarian party, etc.

      Which is silly, since just 5% of the vote is needed to ensure that a party gets funding in the next election and is on the ballet in every state.

      But it seems to me that a vote "just go get bush out of office" or a vote for a party just cause your parents raised you republican or democrat is really the wasted vote.

      Well it accomplishes the main objective if you want Bush out of office, but I'd like to think there are better reasons to vote for either candidate.

      I think people have lost the focus that a vote is your own personal voice on how our country should be led. It's a sad state of affairs that we're stuck in this 2 party mentality

      This has been stressed since Perot ran in 92 and scared both sides to death by getting 19% of the vote. Since then the debates have been taken out of the hands of the league of women voters and a phoney debate commision was created to expressly keep third party candidates out of the presidential debates. It also seems strange that in 2000 where many people on both sides of the coin expressed how much they disliked their candidates, it turned into one of the most bitter and devisive elections ever. Most republicans I know disliked Bush, and most democrats didn't want Gore. They went from that to latching on to their candidates when the election was close.

      where often people don't vote because they understand the issues of their candidate, or even know what their candidates' stance on the issues are, but cast a vote solely because it's their family tradition, or their hatred towards the other opponent.

      That does drive me nuts, I've met people on both sides who said yeah I'm going to vote for so and so....yet they wouldn't know their stance on a key issues (immigration, taxes, abortion, etc)

      I really wish that we could push through an electoral reform that would allow for multiple votes (#1 choice, 2nd choice, etc) or something.

      This would be good for the third parties, but what would happen is what happens in the NFL pro bowl balloting with players. They vote their teammates first, then anyone who has no chance of winning second and third that way other people don't get the points/votes for the second place vote.

      I think the power of the people has been stolen by this charade where it's not about the issues, or who is really the best leader, or what a political party will do (or not do) for a country, but something that is done in a thoughtless, rote manner.

      It's basically turned into a tribal warfare type thing. The extremes people believe are crazy too. I don't think Kerry would turn the US into Israel where we would be having terror attacks every day. Nor do I think Bush would start the fourth reich. But you find people who actually believe this stuff...it's crazy.

      I saw excerpts from Faranheit 911 where some protester says "I'd rather vote for a single celled organism than vote for Bush". What does that say about the value of your vote sir? I realise that's his opinion and he's entitled to vote with his opinion, but what does a choice using that methodology do to our country? Is Bush reallly absolutely the worst possible leader of our country? Is there no one worse to

  61. why vote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all these get out the vote advertisements, an important (at least to me) question is not answered. Why should I vote? I DON'T live in a "battleground" state. As such, the electoral votes for my State are ALREADY known in the sense that everyone is pretty damned sure who it is going to go to. I could vote for RMS and the electoral votes will be the same. MY lack of a useful vote is the direct consequence of the "winner take all system."

  62. MTV's Pixel Perfect by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    "The newest "Choose or Lose" video will feature characters from popular video games such as The Sims and BloodRayne."

    Nice to see MTV is continuing their long, happy relationship with Playboy models. Or CG Playboy models. Or... Um, whatever.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  63. Re:So... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    How is this a troll? Overrated might be hard to dispute, flamebait might even be concievable (lord knows there are any number of idiots ready to defend the "system") but troll?

    We need more than just getting the quantity of voters higher. In case no one has noticed.

  64. Where are the A-List characters? by cnladd · · Score: 1

    "The newest "Choose or Lose" video will feature characters from popular video games such as The Sims and BloodRayne..."

    When I first saw this, I thought that the A-list characters would be doing this: Mario, Luigi, Samus, and Donkey Kong; maybe with a cameo by Bowser to help drive the point home.

    If they can't get the best of the best to help push us to vote, then just how important is this, really?

    --

    --
    Welcome to the land of the easily amused...

    1. Re:Where are the A-List characters? by Saige · · Score: 1

      It's done in partnership with EA, so they are only using characters from EA games. It's the same group of games they used for the video game music videos that have been made - which are actually pretty cool, if I must say, even if most of the music sucks. (The video for "Stacy's Mom" is absolutely great)

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    2. Re:Where are the A-List characters? by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      oh yeah! cuz... you know, EA has so many memorable characters.... like: car, soldier, and popular-licensed-image-sports-guy

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  65. Voter apathy == vote of no confidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Maybe the reason we have such abyssamal voter turnout is that our "two party" system doesn't provide an real alternatives to voters. It's all Coke vs Pepsi.

    Face it, the "Republicans" threw fiscal conservatism out the door to pander to the social conservatives, who they they betray. The "Democrats", hell, I can't even tell what they stand for, except "we're not the Republicans".

    Maybe if voting could actually make a difference in where this country is headed, more people would get involved. But as the adage says, then it would be illegal.

    They only way to fix this is to the the voters involved AT THE LOCAL LEVEL where there is still room for some real differentation.

  66. Amen! by mcmonkey · · Score: 1
    Politicians barely even pretend to listen to the concerns of "young people". If we were to turn out in record numbers in this election ( regardless who we vote for) the political system would take notice. And they would speak and act towards the concerns of young people in this country (drugs, AIDS, poverty, student loans, unemployment...) rather than the concerns of older people (estate tax, social security, imprisoning everyone)
  67. MTV U by mondaypickle · · Score: 1

    this has been on MTV-U, MTV-University channel we get at my school, for a couple days already. I saw it in the cafeteria but couldnt hear it at all so I had no clue what it was about.

  68. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  69. If I were a democrat... by bhirsch · · Score: 1

    I would be truly ashamed. It should be embarrassing to a political party when they need to resort to campaigns such as this to gain support. This really adds insult to the injury of the Motor Voter Act.

    1. Re:If I were a democrat... by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1

      Errr.. MTV's Rock the Vote drive has always been non-partisan. Saying the Republicans should be embarassed for resorting to this is just as likely as what you said above.

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    2. Re:If I were a democrat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Errr.. MTV's Rock the Vote drive has always been non-partisan.

      Right. And that's why Donald Rumsfeld's signature is on the fake draft card on their site.

    3. Re:If I were a democrat... by bhirsch · · Score: 1

      There is very little about Rock the Vote that is non-partisan. They stop just short of saying, "Vote democrat and not republican."

  70. I'll start voting when by rabbot · · Score: 1

    They get rid of the electoral college bullshit.

    My vote currently doesn't mean as much as people in other states...and that's the bottom line.

    They need to take a raw count of votes so that everyone's vote will have the same weight.

    Maybe they should focus on that instead of these ridiculous "Rock the Vote" type things.

    1. Re:I'll start voting when by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      Problem with that is who cares about you if you're from Podunk, Iowa? If it's directly proportional, you can bet your arse that the ONLY places that'll see the candidates faces are the big cities.
      I agree that the electoral system sucks, but I think direct popular vote under the current system will introduce its own problems.

    2. Re:I'll start voting when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't vote until they get rid of the Electoral College!! Boo frickety hoo!!

      Seriously, that's the dumbest shit I've read all day. Maybe you should *gasp* try voting for a candidate that opposes the Electoral College? I guess that would make too much sense, though.

    3. Re:I'll start voting when by rabbot · · Score: 1

      What problems do you think having a popular vote system would introduce? I honestly cannot think of any negative aspect of making the system a fair one across the board.

    4. Re:I'll start voting when by Arnos · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I was wondering when someone would bring this up. Though I've voted every chance I got, my States electoral votes still go to the other guy.
      And as for voting for the guy who wants to take that out.... can you name one career politian that really wants to get rid of the electoral college?

      I vote because it's my right, and I came from a regime that did NOT allow it, and so I understand my priviledge to the USA- However don't blow smoke by saying the popular vote will put a President into office. All these ads saying "One vote caused this.." (on MTV) simply don't apply to this REPUBLIC in which we live.

    5. Re:I'll start voting when by rabbot · · Score: 1

      But the whole point is that having the popular vote will put the candidate in office who has the most support by the American people. What's wrong with the person who got the most votes winning the election?

      And of course you're not going to find a polititian who wants to get rid of it...I never said there was or that i'd vote for him.

      But yes...it is your right to play their game, just don't try to get me to play it too.

    6. Re:I'll start voting when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All these ads saying "One vote caused this.." (on MTV) simply don't apply to this REPUBLIC in which we live.

      Sure they do. In 2000, only 537 votes gave GWB Florida's electoral votes, and thus the Presidency (though, yes, the Supreme Court and that partisan cunt Katherine Harris helped quite a bit). So it is indeed still possible, albeit unlikely, that a single vote can decide a Presidential election.

      Having said all this, I would prefer it if popular vote decided all of our elections.

      And I would *really* prefer it if they made Florida (and just for the hell of it, GWB's home state of Texas) announce their results FIRST this time, before any of the other states.

    7. Re:I'll start voting when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, what is the point of this post? All you whiny bastards coming up with a list of things we have to do to please you. Screw you, we aren't courting your whiny ass. If you don't like the system we have then move, STFU, or vote to change it. But don't simper about how your voice isn't heard just because your one measly vote for an unpopular platform isn't given weight over us other, lesser citizens.

  71. Get out the vote not the registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's "Get out the vote!" not "Get out the registration"

    There are always tons of people who are registered to vote but don't actually vote. When I registered this year to vote they suggested that I get an absentee ballot because I would be more likely to vote that way.

    There's a huge difference between getting people to register and getting them to vote. Say everyone in the United States is registered but only 2% vote. That's a lower turnout that having 50% of the population registered if only half of those vote.

    In a sentence: It doesn't matter if people are registered to vote, it matters that they vote.

  72. These video mods are great! by kurokaze · · Score: 1

    Most of them are better than the originals!!!

    I wonder how time these guys spend on developing new animations for these videos.

    And is anyone actually making money off of them?

  73. Wait, this is America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely that should be "choose and lose"...

  74. Popular characters my ass by SiW · · Score: 1

    Yes, popular characters such as Bloodrayne. Who? Oh, you mean the ridiculous-looking female vampire from that mediocre game who is now getting more press coverage than international war crimes because there's a new Bloodrayne game coming out?

    If it wasn't for the fact that they're publishing Guilty Gear and Psychonauts (and published Bomberman Generation), I'd send out a Jiffy bag of fuckings to Majesco.

  75. What's next? by Briareos · · Score: 2, Funny

    Video game characters posing for Playboy?

    Naaah, can't be...

    *g*

    np: Local - They Are Local (Children Of Mu (Disc 2))

    --

    "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

  76. Democrats need the immature vote to win. by glrotate · · Score: 1

    I think it's pathetic commentary on the Democratic party that they feel it necessary to pander to children. While there are many fine upstanding young adults under the age of 25, few have the life experiences and wisdom that are necessary to make decisions about governance.

    The Democrat party caters to these impressionable and immature voters, catering to their adolescent tendancies of rebellion.

    I know my politics are a heck of alot different before I was 25 then they were when I was past 25. I realize now that I was the stereotypical dumb kid, which is exactly what you should be, just not a dumb kid and enfranchised.

    1. Re:Democrats need the immature vote to win. by tukkayoot · · Score: 1
      Yeah, damn those democrats for attempting to appeal to the age group that composes the bulk of our active military. Damn them for appealing to the age group that comprises the majority of college students.

      And as far as I can tell, this particular story has nothing more to do with democrats than it does republicans. It's essentially a voter registration drive, why even bring up the democratic party? While it may be that a young person who's not yet decided to vote, is more likely to vote democrat... that just tells me the republican party, for whatever reason, has lost touch with the nation's youth.

      Besides, is there anybody who really thinks that voting democrat is some sort of act of rebellion? Give me a break. Maybe if their parents are die-hard republicans, but that's about it. As a 24 year old, voting for Kerry for me will be more of an act of resignation... as I won't be voting for the candidate on the ballot who most accurately represents my political views. It's too bad, maybe a true rebellious attitude is what's needed among the populace to allow people to allow people to vote their conscience.

      And at 25 years old, you shouldn't be a dumb kid. At that age you've been (biologically) a fully functioning adult long enough that you should be capable of figuring out what your opinions are and acting on them. Just because your political opinions changed from your youth doesn't mean the views of other adult citizens should be less represented.

    2. Re:Democrats need the immature vote to win. by sexylicious · · Score: 1

      I think it's pathetic commentary on the Democratic party that they feel it necessary to pander to children. While there are many fine upstanding young adults under the age of 25, few have the life experiences and wisdom that are necessary to make decisions about governance. The Democrat party caters to these impressionable and immature voters, catering to their adolescent tendancies of rebellion. I know my politics are a heck of alot different before I was 25 then they were when I was past 25. I realize now that I was the stereotypical dumb kid, which is exactly what you should be, just not a dumb kid and enfranchised.



      You are a fucking idiot. Just because you were an idiot before you were 25 (as you claim), EVERYONE else is an idiot too?

      You making a decision for people that are legally able to smoke, joint the military, and *GASP* vote is plain wrong. What gives you the right to say that what you think and believe is more important or more right than others?

      Some of us actually voted with the full knowledge of what our vote meant back then. Some of us could care less. But to NOT extrapolate that same division through all ages is plain stupidity. I've seen people older than me and younger than me complain, but never vote.

      Thus... the need for a voter drive.

  77. MTV? Does anyone watch that crap any more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly, I can still remember watching actual music videos on MTV as a child. Now it's just another crappy channel that no one would ever buy if it weren't already bundled with basic cable (like HSN, public access, Lifetime (i.e. the Ovary Channel), etc).

  78. Re:Some people never learned the importance of vot by allism · · Score: 1

    And then there would have to be counts at the end of the election to make sure the ballots were truly randomly distributed, since this new lump of bodies who just vote to enter the lottery has been added...

    Bottom line, if someone isn't motivated to show up to vote because of the intrinsic importance of voting, why pay them to do it?

  79. Look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think basing motivation off of a video game character is about as reasonable as having motivation to vote from such issues as
    1.) making the bible the law of the land and ditching the constitution
    2.) creating anti-choice liegislation which infringe on a woman's right over her body.

    1. Re:Look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      2.) creating anti-choice legislation which infringe on a woman's right over her body.

      How is that any better than passing legislation allowing doctors to murder a child that has no say in the matter because it hasn't been born yet? When exactly does a "fetus" become a person instead of a growth that's part of a woman's body? Same coin, other side.
  80. No, Election day is not a Canadian holiday... by Morrisguy · · Score: 1

    Oftentimes the REAL WORKING people out there don't get out to the polls because by the time their commute from work is done, the polls have closed. Doesn't Canada do this???

    No, but if your boss is nice, he/she should give you time off for you to head to your local polling station!

  81. Transformers political theme song by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

    "Demobots wage their battle to destroy the evil forces of the Neocons..."

    Came up with it the other day. It's been stuck in my head.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  82. What'll make me vote. by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

    The day I'll vote (I'm a UK citizen) is when the following apply:

    1 It's free for a candidate to stand for election, not the £ 1000 plus as it is now. Too many frivolous candidates ? If people want to stand on a daft platform that's their right.

    2 There's a mandatory box on the ballot paper that says "none of the above"

    If the majority of citizens nationwide vote for "none of the above" then government should be put on hold for four years. i.e. all current laws/taxes etc. are kept "as is" but nothing new can get implemented and nothing can be changed.

    That way there'd be some incentive for the corrupt, self serving, bastards that end up as MPs to actually promote something positive. If they don't then nobody cares and they don't get to be an MP.

    Personally I think all politicians are shite. As soon as somebody stands up and says "listen to me, I'll lead you" they should be shot, burned, hacked to bits and fed to pigs. Then take the remains and bury 'em in a garlic patch to stop the undead bastards rising up.

    Democracy ? What democracy ? Pah.

    It's all "feather the nest and fuck the rest" (as some rather apt Killing Joke lyrics would say)

    --
    Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    1. Re:What'll make me vote. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'll vote when,... they tel me to vote
      cauze it's uhm mandatory here and i dont want to pay the fine or do the sentance.

      it is a nice for kids perhaps it will spark some intrest in politics.
      i felt sick last elections becauze some of the vieuws i heard in coledge

    2. Re:What'll make me vote. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we'll get right on all of that. Because we desperately want your voice to be heard.

      Fucking whiner.

  83. Great idea by 5m477m4n · · Score: 0

    I think that's a great idea! Last election the 12-17 age range had the worst turnout.

    --

    ---
    Those who can, do
    Those who can't, teach
    Those who don't know how, supervise
  84. Re:National Voting Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, Canada does not do this. Of course, it might have something to do with the fact that in a Westminster Parliamentary System, there is no fixed dates for an election... hell, an election can come with 3 weeks notice, which is a little harsh to impose on employers.

  85. Repeat since modified unfairly:So... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    This is a repeat, since assholes moderated it as troll, when it's quite sincere. Wake up people, not everything controversial is a troll.

    They've artificially reduced our choices to two sellouts that they pick, but voter turnout isn't high enough to legitimize the sham?

    Why not just have them vote for me? It can be the whole Saddam Hussein thing, where 100% of the people vote, and vote correctly.

  86. Coincidence? I think not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MTV started in like 1981, I believe?

    It was cool, in my memory anyway, at least until I started high school in '89. It definitely was sucking by the time I graduated in '93. It seems to be sucking more now than in '93, but it's hard to say for sure since I avoid watching it.

    I heard a figure once: that MTV wasn't in the black until 10 years after it started. That would put the date of profitability at ~1991? And by my own reconing the date of suckability was between 1989 and 1994.

    Now it may well be that the middle-school version of me was unable to tell what was cool. Certainly it would appear that way based on my wardrobe. But I would put forth the fact that MTV was cool when it was "all music, all the time". Now it's "all mass-market corporate force-feed trough, all the time" and that is pretty lame.

    I wouldn't say "MTV sold out" so much as "MTV eventually gained enough value that corporate entities decided they would like to buy MTV out".

    Either way, what once came from a creative heart somewhere now comes from a wallet. It's not too hard to see the difference.

  87. Re:Some people never learned the importance of vot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Illegal. (IANAL). I believe that the ballots must be the same for every voter in a given district (maybe even across a state?).

    Randomization would be thrown out like spoiled meatloaf on a Saturday night.

  88. Don't get out to vote. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stay home and watch a movie or something. MORE POWER FOR ME!

  89. just say no to MTV by hb253 · · Score: 1

    I don't want people who watch MTV to vote. Those who voluntarily watch that inane crap just don't deserve it.

    --
    Self awareness - try it!
  90. Pikachu as next president? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I choose you Pikachu

  91. Re:National Voting Day by cbx_cbx · · Score: 0

    Thats why here in Brazil, our voting day is always at Sundays.
    And weve got 100% eletronic voting.
    The manufactor of the eletronic voting machine is PROCOMP, a company that was bought by DIEBOLD
    The infra-structure is so good, too bad the big mass of the population is analphabet and manipulated by the bad politicians.
    -MY NAME IS ENEAS

  92. Pondering out loud... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

    Personally, I want people to vote because that makes it more likely we'll have a government that actually represents the people it is governing.

    I've been wondering what "the right thing" to do is - vote for who you think is best for you, or who you think is best for the country.

    Certainly, if everybody voted for who they thought was best for them, the end result might actually be the person best for the country... but if not everybody thought like that, then the results might not be truly representative of the will of the people...

    Let me give you an example... let's say the vast majority of the middle class actually liked tax cuts... you'd think that the wealthy liked them, too, because they payed proportionately more because of progressive taxation. However, there's a certain point beyond which you don't really care how much you're being taxed... if you're really set for life, like a lot of the hollywood elite (the Barbara Streisand types, for example), then you might believe you're being magnanimous by voting for someone who would raise taxes... something you believe is better for the country, but not necessarily for you....

    In other words, you could have a slight majority desiring lower taxes - but enough of them vote contrary to that to sway the election...

    Don't mean to make this partisan (it's obvious what I'm talking about), it's the general idea, not the specifics... it could even go the other way, for example, with people at the bottom of the scale who pay no taxes voting for someone who might reduce taxes in hopes that the overall economy might improve.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  93. A corrupt adminsistration by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

    President: Luigi
    Vice-President: Gannondorf, Zelda
    Secretary of State: Samus, Metroid
    Secretary of Defense: Snake, Metal Gear Solid
    Secretary of the Interior: Spyro
    Secretary of the Treasury: Lara Croft, Tomb Raider
    Secretary of Commerce: Sly Cooper
    Secretary of Education: Pikachu, Pokemon
    Secretary of Energy: Sonic
    Attorney General: Tommy Vincenti, GTA Vice City
    Surgeon General: Dr. Mario

    Well, it's not all bad:
    Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff: Master Chief, Halo

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  94. It is horrrible that we must resort to this now by sokoban · · Score: 1

    Who gives a whoop about the election, why do we have to put video game characters in a video to get to see Music Videos on MTV?

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
  95. Where's Duke Nukem? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    "Get out and vote, or I'll kick your pansy ass!"

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Where's Duke Nukem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He'll be ready to convince people to vote right after the release of DNF.
      Don't hold your breath.

  96. Time to vote... Mr.... Freeee mannnnn...... by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 1

    Precinct Person: Your name sir?

    Gordon says nothing...

    Precinct Person: Sir? Your name? Oh - I see it says "Freeman" on that suit of yours. Here is your ballot. Proceed to the voting booth and "use" the voting machine.

    Gordon says nothing...

    Precinct Person: Oh and sir? Please leave the crowbar here.

  97. Video game characters to get the vote? by DaveTheTriffids · · Score: 1

    At first I thought this was going to be something about voter registration fraud.

    Then I thought maybe it was an add-on for The Sims.

    And then ... Oh, wait! get OUT the vote?

  98. Re:Some people never learned the importance of vot by Tyndmyr · · Score: 1
    And what do you have against instability?

    Totalitarianism can be quite stable.

    --
    Support more choices in goverment-Vote 3rd party.
  99. I'm only watching it if ... by unsigned+integer · · Score: 1

    ... Chun Li and Morrigan show up. Rawwrrrr!

  100. Re:Some people never learned the importance of vot by Tyndmyr · · Score: 1
    Nope, some states(at least, but not sure about all), already change the order, though I believe its alternating, not anything resembling random...

    Not that it makes much statistical difference in presidential sized elections.

    --
    Support more choices in goverment-Vote 3rd party.
  101. "if you need x, you shouldn't vote" - what crap! by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

    Encouraging people - any people who are eligible - to vote is not a bad thing, period, end of story. People who vote, even if they suspect their vote doesn't matter, even if they have to hold their noses while doing so, are going to have a higher sense of franchise, are going to have more of a sense of connection to the process, and maybe, just maybe, some of them will take the opportunity to get involved and fix what they feel is wrong. The first step to changing the world is getting your ass off the couch. If it takes Sonic the Hedgehog to do it, so be it.

    --
    Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
  102. Rock Stars and voting by Shant3030 · · Score: 1

    I'm going to vote for Kerry because Dave Matthews told me so.

    --
    100% Insightful
  103. I prefer Aenea's message: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Choose Again.

  104. There's an Election?!?!?! by OneByteOff · · Score: 1

    Damn, didn't notice... I was too busy playing doom3

  105. Aren't voter registration deadlines past? by gatekeep · · Score: 1

    I've heard a lot of noise recently about voter registration deadlines passing. I know the last day to register in Illinois was yesterday, and I seem to remember hearing a large number or other states were approaching their deadlines as well. Is this really going to have any impact if these newly excited would be voters find they can't register?

  106. Am I a voter or a nonvoter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For many (not all) elections, I read up on the issues, head to the polls, look at the ballot, decide there is no candidate among the available choices that I can vote for without feeling like I was abetting the destruction of democracy in America. So I turn in a blank ballot, which I'm sure is counted as "voter error" even though it isn't.

    Voting is important, in theory. In practice, however, I've found it to be a profound reminder of what we've already lost and are unlikely to ever get back. Perhaps you are Canadian and think voting is important--you may be right. But voting in the United States is, more and more frequently, just choosing what kind of bricks to throw onto the sinking ship.

  107. How sad by blueforce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mod this however you like....

    What a sad narrative of our society that it takes cartoon characters from video games to encourage voters to do their civic duty.

    It's depressing to think that these people are going to choose the person to occupy one of the most powerful positions in the world.

    --
    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
    1. Re:How sad by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2, Funny

      According to the media, people do everything that video game characters tell them to do.

      For example, I'm killing a hooker with a rocket launcher right now. If GTA:VC had Ray Liotta voting or going to work, perhaps life would have turned out better for me. For now, I've got to get to the voting station to get rid of these wanted stars.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  108. That's right by centauri · · Score: 1

    ... keep making jokes. That'll win the election.

    Simmons, I want you to poison grunt107's next meal.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
  109. Re:National Voting Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does the USA not have a National Voting Day, in which all Americans get the day off?

    It's part of an intelligence test. The people who are smart enough to go "Hey, boss, I'll be in a little late tomorrow/today because I'm gonna go vote before I come in," get to vote. The stupid and apathetic do not.

  110. apathy? by zxnos · · Score: 1

    perhaps people dont vote because alot of what politicians say is shit.

    as long as i have been paying attention, since the early nineties, it has been the same thing over and over. 'we have to fix this, that and the other thing'

    since both parties want to be the ones to say: 'we fixed that for you' nothing will get done. i want a politician who will have some balls. i wanted clinton to say: 'yeah, i did her. mind your own damn business.' i wanted bush to say: 'iraq violated a dozen or so U.N. resolutions we need to send a message to the world that that is not o.k."

    in closing of this short rant. if politicians could say what really needs to be said and have integrity, more people might just vote.

    --
    always mosh clockwise
  111. Errr, no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Donald Rumsfeld's signature is on the fake draft card because it would be on a real draft card, seeing as how he is the Secretary of Defense.

    Dumbass.

    1. Re:Errr, no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The partisan message being "Donald Rumsfeld will draft you. Elect someone else so Rummy will be out of a job." So yeah, Rock the Vote is partisan.

  112. A voting message from The Sims?! by Brain+Stew · · Score: 4, Funny

    MTV ANNOUNCER: And now, a message from The Sims

    MAN: Fraba dey...huhhh...ka tey do una so
    WOMAN: UNA MOI! UNA MOI! Hmmmmm! [MOTIONS TO STOMACH]

    MTV ANNOUNCER: And that was a friendly reminder from The Sims to get out and vote! Or feed them, I'm not entirely sure, check their aspiration meters...

    --
    "Here's a spoiler: You're will die alone."-Triumph the Insult Comic Dog
  113. this has been going on since the 70s by evilmousse · · Score: 1


    didn't i see one of the pong paddles endorse George McGovern?

  114. At Least Master Chief Gets Good Body Armor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, there are plenty of unhappy soldiers in Iraq who aren't likely to be voting Republican in this election:

    "Dear Dad, Iraq sucks..."

    http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1005-22.htm

  115. Um. Bloodrayne? by superultra · · Score: 1

    I can see the Sims being "cool," but Bloodrayne? Who even played it? And of those who played it, who liked it enough to think, "That'd be a cool movie and/or political statement on MTV." There's a second one coming out (maybe?) and a movie, all to the tune of no one whistling. This smells of money from a marketer's ass to me.

  116. Popular games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The newest "Choose or Lose" video will feature characters from popular video games such as The Sims and BloodRayne

    The Sims had popular characters? and what the heck is BloodRayne...

  117. What about RvB? by thejakeman135 · · Score: 1

    I think that a Red vs Blue ad would be both entertaining and persuasive.

  118. Re:Some people never learned the importance of vot by susano_otter · · Score: 1
    What about the millions of fence sitters? The people who are a little motivated by current events; a little motivated by their family; a little motivated by friends. What about when they see hte commercial and this motivates them a little more? Is that a bad thing?

    Are you kidding me with this? Some voter is torn over the important issues of the day, and it's a cartoon character's urging that finally gets them out to the polls? What kind of person put off taking action until Bloodrayne confirms that it's a good idea? Please explain to me how this is the kind of good judgement that will build a better tomorrow, or why on earth we'd want such a person expressing their opinions about anything.

    "Yeah, I know that voting is, like, important and all, but I just didn't feel like, you know, doing anything about it. But, like, then I was watching MTV, and I saw Mario say that voting was cool, or whatever, and now I'm totally gonna vote. Rock!"

    Don't make me laugh. If the only thing standing between these people and the voting booth is videogame character endorsements on MTV, then don't do us any favors, Mario.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  119. Now hold on a minute... by kjones692 · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that "popular" and "BloodRayne" don't belong in the same paragraph, much less the same sentence.

    --

    Love the Third Amendment?
  120. Get involved--it's fun by writertype · · Score: 1
    As someone who has spent the last few weekends volunteering to sign up voters in Phoenix, I can tell you this is one of the more rewarding experiences I've taken part in. I went door to door in 90 degree heat (hot for October, certainly). One weekend, we were assigned to South Phoenix-- a very poor, Latino area of the city where people kept pit bulls in yards and carfuls of young kids drove by

    Sound scary? It wasn't. Almost to a person, everyone there was extremely appreciative that we were making sure they were registered to vote. Sure, we ran into a number of resident aliens and even a few convicted felons (we have to ask if they _can_ vote; if they can't they usually tell us why). In a few cases, neighbors warned us to avoid going into yards or just to be careful in approaching the local "trouble" houses.

    I even registered one tough guy walking down the street. I probably would have avoided him entirely if I had wandered into the neighborhood accidentally (hell, I probably wouldn't have been there at all). And he turned out to be quite friendly and appreciative.

    I wasn't working for a partisan organization; we'd register Democrats, Republicans, Greens, "no preferance", whatever. The only people who were rude were the odd folks that refused to vote. I had one guy tell me that politics were for other people. When I tried to explain that virtually every aspect of his life had some political bent (welfare, health insurance, even cops on the beat) he would have none of it. It was disappointing, but what are you going to do?

  121. MTV by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1

    I'd think this's going a bit far. What's the legal voting age? 18? I'm 25, and I haven't really watched MTV in years. Isn't the channel mainly for the 12-16 age bracket anyway, now? Or am I just "old"?

    As an aside, now that the bill to reinstate the Draft (Democrat-sponsored) has been killed, has MTV stopped its fearmongering to get the kids to vote (you know, "vote or else they'll draft you and send you off to die!")?

    --
    Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
  122. Vote for Ralph Nader by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    I appreciate having the right to vote. However there is nothing more damaging to know 4 years later you voted for the wrong person. Imagine voting for Bush now, and then end up out of a job with loans and mortgages. You'd be kicking yourself for voting Bush. Vice versa Kerry might be the same. Note, I am not taking sides here!

    It's best to just exercise your vote as a citizen by voting Ralph Nader, Howard Stern or Mickey Mouse.

  123. Hi I'm Joe Camel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have we met?

  124. Re:Can't vote if you're not registered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "How so?"

    Take a look at how streamlined those Canadian elections are. Here is just one example.

    As long as you have ID and proof of residence you can register even on the day of the election. This is not encouraged but entirely possible. It is all the process you really need to prevent fraud and allows for people to vote. Last I checked some states force you to register almost 60 days in advance. Oops there goes the whole last month where people have the most information available and have seen both candidates in at least one debate. Also once registered you can depending on the state be tossed and depending on the state may not be notified. This results in a disapointed and disenfranchised voter. This is to say nothing of the simple standardized ballot that Canadians use.

    AC

  125. Mario a Commie? Damn right by tepples · · Score: 1

    Here's some more evidence that Super Mario is a pinko communist. The anti-Koopa sentiment springs from Mushroom Kingdom propaganda.

  126. Reader apathy by lukestuts · · Score: 1

    I was going to check out the link in the story but I couldn't be bothered.

  127. Height of Hypocrisy by __aalomb7276 · · Score: 1

    Where was the Get Out the Vote! folks when Bill Clinton was running for re-election? I remember they were noticeably silent that year.

    They claim to be non-partisan but they are hypocritices.

  128. Whack the Vote! game will bring out the vote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Not sure if a video help get people out to vote...
    but this free game at http://www.whackthevote.com/ will get people to vote...
    vote for the candidate they don't like with a big hammer!

    BTW, Kerry won by a landslide when I played.

  129. OT by mixmasta · · Score: 1

    Hi,

    I finally read your reply in this other thread:

    here

    I usually get a mail from slashdot when I get a reply. Sorry it took me so long. Maybe this time the mail didn't come or was lost, or I deleted it by mistake. Anyway, I remembered the question and looked back through my log to find the post and any replies.

    So to reply, I appreciate your points and generally agree with you. My project is playing with linux now to address a few of the things you mention, such as including only the best technology for each area (not 5), and good documentation.

    I am just playing at the moment, however, and have no idea if the project has any future. At the very least I am improving my skills.

    -Mike

    --
    #6495ED - cornflower blue