actually that is hardly certain at this point. The poor uptake combined with a possible liklihood of the next government canceling altogether make it about a 50-50 bet.
It doesn't compromise your browser, it simply allows unsuspecting users to be tricked. hence why it is a phishing vulnerability e.g. a link supposedly to your bank login page, the page looks identical to your bank login page but sends the details to the link authors server where they can harvest your credentials to later empty your bank account while all the time appearing that you clicked on a valid link if you were not paying attention.
nope, it appears to be that both Chrome and IE have other protections around Data URI's, they both implement them. Chrome does it by preventing redirections.
IE does support Data URI's though??? at least it did, have they removed this functionality or is it merely a more secure implementation than firefox and opera?
Apple do care a LOT. For all their success they are massively lopsided on the revenue/profit front to one product, a consumer based phone that is subject to the whims of fashion and fads of the consumer. This market can evaporate almost overnight for them, they NEED something far more future revenue proof.
That makes jobs the "Gus" of breaking Bad, probably quite appropriate consider both were charismatic likable people on the surface and real evil sons of bitches in actuality. the walter white would be wozniak.
I think you are looking at it from the wrong Angle, The out of character risks Walter takes is putting his partners life ahead of his families and his own in many cases, basically it wasn't his nastiness that was out of character, it was the selfless acts. This is always the part that annoyed me and was really out of character with how he is portrayed.
The world is full of nutjobs that believe in mythical beings, alien reincarnation, deities and probably somewhere the spaghetti monster. Why try to make sense of one more nutjobs ravings?
They're losing ground to camera phones - so they apparently came to the conclusion the reason for that is the OS that's on some of those phones?
A different take is that they realized people like to take photos with smartphones because of the large choice ot applications you have to take the photos. Some apps do filters, some do panoramics, some do selective coloring, etc.
When you can do all that right as you are taking an image, who wants a boring old camera where you do that later?
I think it's about as good idea as can be had to revive the concept of a separate compact camera, which otherwise will be totally subsumed by smartphones in short order.
What would be really interesting, is a DSLR that you could program in this way... You could even have the normal camera control software just as one app, but allow people to write others. As long as other apps could take input from all controls on the camera you could get some great alternate takes on control software for a DSLR.
more likely they realised that as DSLR's got more and more complex it gets increasingly expensive and time consuming to maintain a custom written OS/firmware. People don't use smart phones for photography because of the apps, they use them because they are convenient and on hand. The best camera is always the one you have with you and for most people that will never be a DSLR regardless of OS or applications.
paypal is a real entity that is backed by government financial regulations and protection. Bitcoin has no such backing. If you are defrauded on paypal you have multiple means to recovery your funds or even reversing the transaction altogether.
The scheme was promising 7% return per week. Even among the gullible and greedy it takes a special breed of idiot to believe such guarentees can be anything but a scam.
While I may not agree with the change, the fact that corporate lobbyists can get legislation changed is not an issue or a sign of corruption. Anyone that can present a legitimate and convincing set of logical reasons that the government can agree with should be able to get such changes enacted whether they are citizens or corporations. No idea what happened behind closed doors here so can't really comment whether legitimate logic was presented from IBM and MS.
The discussion was comparing a ford to a bmw. that is most deinitely about the guts. If you want to talk about experience then it is a different paint job and plush seat covers on a ford:-)
IT's a horrible analogy as Apple use the same equipment as everyone else. taking a ford and slapping some BMW badges on it and giving it a new slick paintjob and nicer seats doesn't change the fact that under the hood it is the same vehicle and it certainly doesn't make the hardware perform magically better. Incidently the Retina display is just another part from someone else LG I believe.
Apple's parts are identical to those of a PC, Apple is only another integrator just like Dell, HP et al when it comes to actual computers. Even the iphone is just a set of commodity parts purchased and soldered together in a nice wrapping.
He was hardly test-sailing. He is and always will be the first man in space, definitely one of the biggest achievements for mankind for the 20th century. That doesn't lessen the Apollo mission crews achievement but I would still rank it as more significant than landing on the moon.
It is actually rather sad, even that statement of yours got marked troll. Personally I believe in global warming, but some of the science offered up as proof is abysmal and would be laughed out of the room in many other fields of study while in global warming those that point out such poor methodology get brushed with the denier brush. It is more a religious field than a scientific one nowadays, Regardless of what people believe I think most can agree that cleaning up our act globally is a good thing regardless.
FFS, where do these retards come from, read the damn article or better still read a non tin foil hat version from somewhere like Ars Technica. It is purely an anti malware prevention system that checks if the hash is a known malware when you go to install. There is a lot to hate windows 8 about, but this is actually one of the beneficial features that should help everyone, from the dumb users that install malware to the rest of us that get spammed by the botnets created by that malware.
That isn't a typical fee arrangement for anything but the poorest people (who would have guessed a lawyer would screw the poor for more than rich) that can't afford a lawyer where they offer a percentage fee against the win for those that can't afford the standard rates.
When it comes to high end professional grade software such as those in industrial control systems this is all well and good as the developers can charge for the cost. This is simply not feasible in complex cheap pieces of software, the amount of rigour performed has to cost less than the amount of money they can get for the software. A complex piece of software can and will have literally thousands of bugs even when well engineered and no matter how hard you try their will always be more. Software is a tradeoff between time, quality and cost, if heavy costs are enforced then you will simply see less products and many products die off completely.
you aren't breaking down the door, levering open a lock in many cases is unnoticeable except on closer inspection, especially if you close the door afterwards.
Slashdot Mirror
Yet MS wonders why they have such a comparatively tiny market share of the server market...
You're kidding right??? Their server market share would have to be at or close to an all time high with a majority share.
actually that is hardly certain at this point. The poor uptake combined with a possible liklihood of the next government canceling altogether make it about a 50-50 bet.
It doesn't compromise your browser, it simply allows unsuspecting users to be tricked. hence why it is a phishing vulnerability e.g. a link supposedly to your bank login page, the page looks identical to your bank login page but sends the details to the link authors server where they can harvest your credentials to later empty your bank account while all the time appearing that you clicked on a valid link if you were not paying attention.
nope, it appears to be that both Chrome and IE have other protections around Data URI's, they both implement them. Chrome does it by preventing redirections.
IE does support Data URI's though??? at least it did, have they removed this functionality or is it merely a more secure implementation than firefox and opera?
Apple do care a LOT. For all their success they are massively lopsided on the revenue/profit front to one product, a consumer based phone that is subject to the whims of fashion and fads of the consumer. This market can evaporate almost overnight for them, they NEED something far more future revenue proof.
That makes jobs the "Gus" of breaking Bad, probably quite appropriate consider both were charismatic likable people on the surface and real evil sons of bitches in actuality. the walter white would be wozniak.
I think you are looking at it from the wrong Angle, The out of character risks Walter takes is putting his partners life ahead of his families and his own in many cases, basically it wasn't his nastiness that was out of character, it was the selfless acts. This is always the part that annoyed me and was really out of character with how he is portrayed.
The world is full of nutjobs that believe in mythical beings, alien reincarnation, deities and probably somewhere the spaghetti monster. Why try to make sense of one more nutjobs ravings?
Given one or two seem to be dug out of the ice every now and then perhaps it isn't too late to get a defrosted Mammoth steak.
They're losing ground to camera phones - so they apparently came to the conclusion the reason for that is the OS that's on some of those phones?
A different take is that they realized people like to take photos with smartphones because of the large choice ot applications you have to take the photos. Some apps do filters, some do panoramics, some do selective coloring, etc.
When you can do all that right as you are taking an image, who wants a boring old camera where you do that later?
I think it's about as good idea as can be had to revive the concept of a separate compact camera, which otherwise will be totally subsumed by smartphones in short order.
What would be really interesting, is a DSLR that you could program in this way... You could even have the normal camera control software just as one app, but allow people to write others. As long as other apps could take input from all controls on the camera you could get some great alternate takes on control software for a DSLR.
more likely they realised that as DSLR's got more and more complex it gets increasingly expensive and time consuming to maintain a custom written OS/firmware. People don't use smart phones for photography because of the apps, they use them because they are convenient and on hand. The best camera is always the one you have with you and for most people that will never be a DSLR regardless of OS or applications.
paypal is a real entity that is backed by government financial regulations and protection. Bitcoin has no such backing. If you are defrauded on paypal you have multiple means to recovery your funds or even reversing the transaction altogether.
The scheme was promising 7% return per week. Even among the gullible and greedy it takes a special breed of idiot to believe such guarentees can be anything but a scam.
While I may not agree with the change, the fact that corporate lobbyists can get legislation changed is not an issue or a sign of corruption. Anyone that can present a legitimate and convincing set of logical reasons that the government can agree with should be able to get such changes enacted whether they are citizens or corporations. No idea what happened behind closed doors here so can't really comment whether legitimate logic was presented from IBM and MS.
The discussion was comparing a ford to a bmw. that is most deinitely about the guts. If you want to talk about experience then it is a different paint job and plush seat covers on a ford :-)
IT's a horrible analogy as Apple use the same equipment as everyone else. taking a ford and slapping some BMW badges on it and giving it a new slick paintjob and nicer seats doesn't change the fact that under the hood it is the same vehicle and it certainly doesn't make the hardware perform magically better. Incidently the Retina display is just another part from someone else LG I believe.
Apple's parts are identical to those of a PC, Apple is only another integrator just like Dell, HP et al when it comes to actual computers. Even the iphone is just a set of commodity parts purchased and soldered together in a nice wrapping.
He was hardly test-sailing. He is and always will be the first man in space, definitely one of the biggest achievements for mankind for the 20th century. That doesn't lessen the Apollo mission crews achievement but I would still rank it as more significant than landing on the moon.
It is actually rather sad, even that statement of yours got marked troll. Personally I believe in global warming, but some of the science offered up as proof is abysmal and would be laughed out of the room in many other fields of study while in global warming those that point out such poor methodology get brushed with the denier brush. It is more a religious field than a scientific one nowadays, Regardless of what people believe I think most can agree that cleaning up our act globally is a good thing regardless.
IF someone is not smart enough to work out how to turn it off, then chances are these are the EXACT people that should have this feature on.
FFS, where do these retards come from, read the damn article or better still read a non tin foil hat version from somewhere like Ars Technica. It is purely an anti malware prevention system that checks if the hash is a known malware when you go to install. There is a lot to hate windows 8 about, but this is actually one of the beneficial features that should help everyone, from the dumb users that install malware to the rest of us that get spammed by the botnets created by that malware.
That isn't a typical fee arrangement for anything but the poorest people (who would have guessed a lawyer would screw the poor for more than rich) that can't afford a lawyer where they offer a percentage fee against the win for those that can't afford the standard rates.
When it comes to high end professional grade software such as those in industrial control systems this is all well and good as the developers can charge for the cost. This is simply not feasible in complex cheap pieces of software, the amount of rigour performed has to cost less than the amount of money they can get for the software. A complex piece of software can and will have literally thousands of bugs even when well engineered and no matter how hard you try their will always be more. Software is a tradeoff between time, quality and cost, if heavy costs are enforced then you will simply see less products and many products die off completely.
you aren't breaking down the door, levering open a lock in many cases is unnoticeable except on closer inspection, especially if you close the door afterwards.
or why bother with any of that when a small crowbar will bypass it all.