Slashdot Mirror


Steve Jobs Reincarnated As a Warrior-Philosopher, Thai Group Says

Velcroman1 writes "When Apple founder Steve Jobs died after a long fight with cancer last year, software engineer Tony Tseung sent an email to a Buddhist group in Thailand to find out what happened to his old boss now that he's no longer of this world. This month, Tseung received his answer. Jobs has been reincarnated as a celestial warrior-philosopher, the Dhammakaya group said in a special television broadcast, and he's living in a mystical glass palace hovering above his old office at Apple's Cupertino, Calif. headquarters."

223 comments

  1. Who gives a fuck? by RobinEggs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't even posted under Idle; it's posted under Apple.

    We're really so obsessed with Apple that the after-life of it's CEO can make the front page?

    News for Nerds, Stuff that Doesn't Fucking Matter At All

    1. Re:Who gives a fuck? by gagol · · Score: 1, Troll

      Not only is he a fuckin' marketer focused on spending his billions hurting others for his own fun, some nuts claimed he reincarnated! The guy is not even a technologist for *hrist sake! Who is he now so I can start hating him 2 minutes every morning again?

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    2. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You scoff now, but in a year all the dead founders will have suspiciously similar glass palaces over their former headquarters, and you'll all be claiming the design is obvious and no one could design a decent afterlife without it.

    3. Re:Who gives a fuck? by gagol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For the record, I used to admire the guy and even dreamed to work with him. His decisions and general attitude in the last years of his life made him look (in my light) worse than the "evil ibm" he was fighting against in early 80's. The single fact he once stated he would sue the hell out of android with every penny of his personal fortune really helped me put things in perspective, and I pretty much hate him right now... one have to realize the "illusion of grandeur" he was suffering from... and he died from it too by exclusively using alternative medicine to treat a cancer. That says a lot to me, and I think he got what he deserved... Something called Karma maybe?

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    4. Re:Who gives a fuck? by gagol · · Score: 1

      I went from techno-literate urbanite, to a country living human who is enclined technologically, raising his own food. The deep core of Steve Jobs was a little bit how I became, but he ventured away from the true path of nature living! And yes, I live my life with technology, only I have some real good nice time to think about my solutions while feeding animals...

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    5. Re:Who gives a fuck? by diego.viola · · Score: 1

      Ugh, I didn't know there was a "apple" section in Slashdot, this is disappointing.

    6. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's plenty of prior art. The whole concept - palace, hovering high above, warrior/philosopher - reads like a rip-off of Dragon Ball Z or something. I guess they'll have to litigate with Japanese cartoon writers.

    7. Re:Who gives a fuck? by gagol · · Score: 1

      Diego, welcome to the brave new world.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    8. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Beefpatrol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Looks like Microsoft decided Apple is currently a bigger threat to them than Android. They're wrong, of course, but they might not yet know why.

    9. Re:Who gives a fuck? by diego.viola · · Score: 1

      What do you mean?

    10. Re:Who gives a fuck? by gagol · · Score: 2, Funny

      What is easier :

      1. 1- Fight a penguin
      2. 2- Crush an apple
      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    11. Re:Who gives a fuck? by gagol · · Score: 1

      Sci-fi reference + 12 beers do not equal rational thinking (me). But if you don't know the book, read it and think about Apple again...

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    12. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      You scoff now, but in a year all the dead founders will have suspiciously similar glass palaces over their former headquarters, and you'll all be claiming the design is obvious and no one could design a decent afterlife without it.

       
      As long as you do not design your glass palace in the shape of rectangle with rounded corners you'll be fine...
       
      ... or fined
       

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    13. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't even posted under Idle; it's posted under Apple.

      We're really so obsessed with Apple that the after-life of it's CEO can make the front page?

      News for Nerds, Stuff that Doesn't Fucking Matter At All

      Yet slashdot threads about religion seem to drive the most number of comments. Why shouldn't the editors keep posting such stories?

    14. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Sussurros · · Score: 3, Informative

      The early 1980s was an interesting time. I remember Microsoft being our bulwark of defence against the evil IBM empire while Apple were playing panflutes in apple groves and suing the pants of anyone who made anything vaguely compaitible. By the late 1980s there was one very prescient scribe, I can't remember his name because all I get is Dvorak but that is a keyboard and not journalist, who said that he had seen the future and that MicroSoft (they spelled it that way then) would be the one Boss, the True Boss and the only Boss and that William Gates III would be the Dark Overlord. It seemed laughable at the time - but it nearly came to pass.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    15. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Dvorak? Even a blind nut finds a squirrel once a day.

    16. Re:Who gives a fuck? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *sigh* no...Karma determines what happens to you in the next life. It has zippo to do with this life. In this life you accumulate karma (or don't, that's why priests sit on mountaintops and do nothing, to avoid karma) and it determines what you become after your death.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    17. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Brawlking · · Score: 2

      Yoohoo, MS owns patents on parts of Android, and earns royalties on every device sold. That may have something to do with it...

    18. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      3- Smash some windows

    19. Re:Who gives a fuck? by petsounds · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm reading the Jobs bio right now, and it really illuminated the fact that he was always a dick. From a very young age. But he was a dick who had vision. The Macintosh would've never even been made at Apple had Jobs not bullied and yelled his way to victory. But he had no scruples or ethics; he was like the personification of Nietzsche's works. It didn't matter how much you had done for him, he would turn around and stab you if he felt like you were no longer on 'his team'. He screwed Woz over so much that he refused to work with Jobs again. If Schmidt had done his research, he would've known how Jobs would react. It was another psychological trigger for his [biological] parental abandonment that this guy Jobs had welcomed on the board at Apple was now suddenly going to compete directly against Jobs. It was a constant in his life, finding these father figures who would then turn on him (usually because Jobs was an asshole) and he'd go insane. He should've known Jobs would go ballistic and press the red button.

      So, you can hate Jobs for being a dick. He had a lot of character flaws: flaws that made him succeed as an outsider in a very tough corporate game, and made his teams create some stellar products, but also emotionally wound many people in his life. But Steve suing Android -- I think it was psychological stuff he never dealt with. He felt abandoned and attacked in his relationship with Schmidt, and so he lashed out with great anger, as he had done many times throughout his career. He was a brilliant but very psychologically troubled man.

      I do think though that his trip to India and the LSD and Zen meditation, it was all kind of bullshit. The contradictions between that lifestyle and the way he treated others, it's inexcusable. But you know, many of his generation are the same way. They like to think they still embrace hippie culture, like they all share a secret everyone else doesn't have, but it's very superficial.

      But to say Steve "got what he deserved" and attributing that to karma... man, Steve was not a great guy, but not someone that death should be wished upon. And that's not what karma is about. It's not some kind of cosmic schadenfreude. You seem to have a lot of anger in you that you'd be so worked up over a phone. There's more important things in life.

    20. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Karma is when the stupid decisions you make in life (trying to treat cancer with herbal remedies) leads to reality kicking your butt (you die).

      It's not judgmental. It's just fact.

    21. Re:Who gives a fuck? by just_a_monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      I do think though that his trip to India and the LSD and Zen meditation, it was all kind of bullshit.

      But he does have a sweet glass palace now.

      --
      How inappropriate to call this planet Earth, when clearly it is Ocean.
    22. Re:Who gives a fuck? by lxs · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is one interpretation. Depending on the school of Buddhism or Hinduism the interpretations vary. As Alan Watts has pointed out, "Karma" means work or action and that's all it means. Whether the results of your karma are tit-for-tat, nonexistent, on credit or part of a divine system of justice really depends on which robed figure you follow and which mythical creatures you believe in.

    23. Re:Who gives a fuck? by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. However, it would have been interesting to know if he had reincarnated as a Foxconn employee though.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    24. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't even posted under Idle; it's posted under Apple.

      We're really so obsessed with Apple that the after-life of it's CEO can make the front page?

      News for Nerds, Stuff that Doesn't Fucking Matter At All

      Please don't insult the nerds. This is news for apple fanboys, nothing more. However it's sad that even Buddhism is losing it's credibility with nonsense like that.

    25. Re:Who gives a fuck? by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but then you would have probably never learned about Steve's past lives.

      I mean, come on, how often do you get to see renderings of someone's previous AND future incarnations, including them beating someone to death with their bare hands.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    26. Re:Who gives a fuck? by khallow · · Score: 1

      and he died from it too by exclusively using alternative medicine to treat a cancer.

      From what I understand, his particular cancer was considered untreatable. The cheaper thing would have been no treatment aside from pain treatment and psychological counseling, but that's not exactly human nature. At least, alternative medicine would have helped emotionally and perhaps physically through the placebo effect.

    27. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does limit who he can admit as houseguests, however. Balmer, for instance, will never be admitted to Job's palace after he dies. Too many flying chairs.

      Although I suppose if anybody does know anything about patching up windows...

    28. Re:Who gives a fuck? by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      Not correct. His cancer was found early enough to be very treatable. He just chose not to.

    29. Re:Who gives a fuck? by khallow · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess there is some truth to you assertion.

    30. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To compare Jobs to Nietzsche's works insults Nietzsche. Jobs was a corporate Hitler, that is the proper comparison.

    31. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He had pancreatic cancer if i'm not mistaken. Pancreatic cancer has an extremley low survival rate. Somewhere around ~5-20%, depending on type and stage.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancreatic_cancer

      If you knew there was a very, very high chance you wouldn't live, would you want to subject yourself to chemo, feeling miserable, and massivley diminishing you're quality of life on the tiny chance you might survive, or would you want to take a crapshoot that wouldn't make your last years miserable?

    32. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually it's called Dharma if its same-lifetime repercussions. Karma plays into your next life.

    33. Re:Who gives a fuck? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 2

      Actually, nothing fucking happens because religion is bullshit.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    34. Re:Who gives a fuck? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I wonder what Steve Ballmers will be.

      Or Stallmans.

    35. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like some one needs to grok the Bhagavad Gita.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    36. Re:Who gives a fuck? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1, Funny

      sigh* no...Karma determines what happens to you in the next life. It has zippo to do with this life. In this life you accumulate karma (or don't, that's why priests sit on mountaintops and do nothing, to avoid karma) and it determines what you become after your death.

      I've been wondering if I were to post something offensive or trollish as anonymous coward will it cost me karma? On slashdot? In my next life? Are the systems integrated? What if I posted the same garbage without ticking the Post Anonymously button? Would this have a different effect on my next life?

      Are there cool things you can be that require you to have less than excellent karma to qualify for?

      For example if I wanted to be a four headed fire breathing dragon and my (formerly) excellent karma meant I would become a saint or a dolphin or something stupid like that could I mount a trolling campaign just before my death to burn off some Karma?

    37. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, even though I've loved some of Apple's products starting with the Apple II and the original Macintosh I found myself staying away from Apple's products greatly based on the type of person Steve Jobs always was. Silly perhaps, but the truth. My impression of the guy (beyond the reality distortion field, i.e. liar) was of a wanna-be upper-class snob who looked down on all of the little people as either useful peasants or annoyances. Those impressions came from others interactions with him as well as his own words at times. The funny thing is, lots of people seem to love being treated like peasants because it only encourages them to spend their money so they can look like they're part of the upper-class snobbery. He did help drive the creation of some very good products, but I think the snob factor he played off was actually an even more important reason for his success.

    38. Re:Who gives a fuck? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

      Actually, nothing fucking happens because religion is bullshit.

      Actually, parsing your grammar a bit differently, quite a lot happens because religion is bullshit.

      :-P

      --
      "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
      "A four-foot prune."
    39. Re:Who gives a fuck? by tyrione · · Score: 1

      And that's the problem with Isaacson's book. It's a piss poor portrayal of Steven P. Jobs due to its obsessive focus on the Macintosh days with nearly nothing of PIXAR or NeXT. Sorry, but having worked at the latter two we always thought the Mac days group were a bunch of whining douchebags.

    40. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      However it's sad that even Buddhism is losing it's credibility with nonsense like that.

      Hell yes. Just be thankful His Jobsiness (may his turtleneck never sag) wasn't into Feng Shui, or people might start to think that's an utter bag of mumbo cunting jumbo too.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    41. Re:Who gives a fuck? by laxr5rs · · Score: 1

      I was going to write something but this is perfect

    42. Re:Who gives a fuck? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You can easily combine 2 and 3 by throwing apples at windows. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    43. Re:Who gives a fuck? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget: They are android penguins. Probably they dream of electric fish!

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    44. Re:Who gives a fuck? by flydpnkrtn · · Score: 1

      I like how you slipped that nice little '1984' reference in there (the two minutes hate)... classy

    45. Re:Who gives a fuck? by flydpnkrtn · · Score: 1

      I keep avoiding reading Isaacson's book because of all the negative criticism I've read about it... I'm familiar with Jobs' Macintosh (from Andy Hertzfeld's book) Pixar (from another book, "The Pixar Touch") and NeXT days from the various sources online and various videos and homages online to NeXT, so I think I'll skip Isaacson's book. Just out of curiousity and because I was too young to ever have owned a NeXT, I was able to get an OPENSTEP 4.2 VM running in VirtualBox the other day... what an amazing OS for its day

      If I wanted to read more specifically about the Macintosh era of Apple I suppose I'd just pick up "The Little Kingdom."

    46. Re:Who gives a fuck? by 32771 · · Score: 1

      What is it with this green spirituality thing, it feels like there is some parallel culture out there that seems to draw people away from the the true path of engineering and other ephemeral uses of stored energy and minerals.

      Anyway, I admire your decision to go a path that we should have gone half a century ago. I still don't feel ready for it.

      --
      Je me souviens.
    47. Re:Who gives a fuck? by 32771 · · Score: 1

      Right, the whole point of forgetting your past lives is that you can come up with a religion that can come up with the idea of past lives. Now if there wasn't the urge to somehow detect what peoples past lives were like ...

      I can see how people like to go with that idea, but only because the other religions suck much much more.

      --
      Je me souviens.
    48. Re:Who gives a fuck? by petsounds · · Score: 1

      Well, I never worked with Mr. Jobs directly, so I'll take your word on that. But it's also possible that the Jobs you knew was a mellowed-out guy compared to the early days. Time and the right woman can do that to a man. 'Course, time and the wrong woman can turn a man to vinegar...

    49. Re:Who gives a fuck? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Dig a little deeper than Fox not-News propaganda and you find this "That last sentence is exactly the what many critics find fault in the DhammakÄya Movement: give enough money for charity (preferably to DhammakÄya) and you might also reincarnate with your personal living space that coincidentally resembles an Apple Store and with your own personal Geniusesâ¦erm, I mean servants!" http://asiancorrespondent.com/87995/thai-buddhist-cult-claims-to-know-afterlife-of-steve-jobs/.

      You to can get them to make claims about employees of an douche company as a, surprise, surprise, surprise, Apple publicity stunt if you donate enough money. Apple is really developing a decidedly off stench about it, much the same as a festering rotting corpse.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    50. Re:Who gives a fuck? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Even people in Thailand don't give a shit about this. Everyone whose seen this news over here thinks it's stupid.

    51. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you know nothing about the trial or the evidence. Child.

    52. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      I don't know any passage in Nietzsche's work that would support being a dick.

      Nietzsche wasn't without ethics, he just proposed that ethics be based on human nature as revealed by psychology.

        But hey, who cares about facts and stuff?

  2. Re incarnation by ozduo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd like to come back as a tablecloth. Laid three times a day then pulled off afterwards. HA HA!

    --
    I got to the chocolate box before you, that's why the hard ones have teeth marks.
    1. Re:Re incarnation by siddesu · · Score: 2

      Tablecloth reincarnations have sold out, but we are glad to announce the unique Loincloth of Jobs the Warrior Philosopher Reincarnation. Applications are accepted to the left with a certified proof of purchase of any Apple product in the past 6 months. To get your certification for the insignificant $25 fee, bring your receipt to any Genius Bar today.

  3. Yes But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does it have rounded corners?

    1. Re:Yes But by siddesu · · Score: 1

      The glass palace? Most certainly, and all the flats are all touch surfaces.

    2. Re:Yes But by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Yeah. He got a patent on it so nobody else can have one.

    3. Re:Yes But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a bite mark on one side?

    4. Re:Yes But by TimHunter · · Score: 1

      You know, the whole "rounded corners" thing is like the old "your holding it wrong" thing. Funny for a while, then not funny any more. In this case, the funny stopped last Thursday.

    5. Re:Yes But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot about "your holding it wrong" - That's still funny too!
      Your wrong sir, this funniness will not soon be forgotten. The benefits of being a DICK.

  4. It's the prophecy! by Tancred · · Score: 1, Funny

    Finally the one who will be a match for the Philosoraptor.

    1. Re:It's the prophecy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woah!

      RaptorJesus...nuff said.

      Raptor on raptor violence!

  5. Sounds legit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I mean... that's what I plan on doing when I die.

  6. "what happened to his old boss"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    An engineer asked this? No wonder software and engineer don't belong together. Look, it's simple. The material support for the pattern known as Steve Jobs ceased to function, and the pattern collapsed. End of story.

    1. Re:"what happened to his old boss"? by dyingtolive · · Score: 0

      Not just an engineer. An Apple engineer. I think this proves more points about Apple than most Apple people are (or rather, should be) comfortable with.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
  7. In other words... by mrsam · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other words,

    /me puts on his sunglasses

    ... Steve jobs has been uploaded to the iCloud.

    1. Re:In other words... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      +5 funny! Just ran out of mod points, and then I see this. Well played!

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  8. iReincarnation by Lunoria · · Score: 2

    Those Buddhists are in trouble now. I have it on good authority that Apple has patented the iReincarnation app. They are going to have the same fate as Samsung in the next American trial!

  9. Thanks for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Doesn't this belong in idle?

    1. Re:Thanks for that by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, it belongs on Yahoo!

    2. Re:Thanks for that by shugah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Only because there is no category for stupid.

      --
      If you aren't part of the solution, then there is good money to be made prolonging the problem
    3. Re:Thanks for that by blind+biker · · Score: 2

      Only because there is no category for stupid.

      Then it is in the right category ;) (Apple)

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  10. Re:Jesus Christ... by johnsnails · · Score: 0

    He has a Steve Jobs you insensitive clod

  11. Who'd have thought... by russotto · · Score: 2

    ...that there'd be Buddhist trolls. I imagine after they he sent this answer to Tseung, they had a really good belly laugh... "Yeah, I told him that Steve Jobs was reincarnated into an invisible glass house above his former office. And I said when they built the new office, he'd take up a position directly over the center, so he could survey all his creation."

    1. Re:Who'd have thought... by stms · · Score: 2

      They also advised not to throw rocks in that general vicinity as it will break his glass house and invisible glass is a bitch to clean up.

    2. Re:Who'd have thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sometimes Buddhism seems to be more of a philosophy than a religion. It almost sounds like a sane way to live compared to every other religion in the world.

      And then you have these whackjobs talking about floating crystal palaces containing warrior-philosophers. *sigh*

    3. Re:Who'd have thought... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      Well, why not?

      --
      C|N>K
    4. Re:Who'd have thought... by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2

      Naw, let me try to voice a bit of sensitivity.

      Let's just say that the arts of dissecting fundamentalist faiths was perfected during the 20th century, so they are here since the start of the 21st. Those monks were not trolling, it was probably a really "classical" answer to the question. The deep problem with truly fundamental classical religious thought is that by this age, we've lost the respect for the old ways. Of course he's not in a "fancy glass house" at 192487 Dharma Boulevard. I'd garner that there's well over 60% chance that this is a "parable". At my feeble level as a post-modern blended-faith Buddhist, the interpretation might be "Steve Jobs exists as the sum of the memories of anyone who has been impacted by him, and how you view your life since he passes determines how you think of him now that he is gone".

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    5. Re:Who'd have thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of add-on layers to different flavor Buddhist religions. Mystical layers concerning the nature of the afterlife (or even if there was an afterlife) were added to Buddhist institutions from local spirit beliefs most obviously in the tantric-influenced Tibetan schools. These matters were of little interest to Gautama Buddha himself. In his day it was taken as fact that there was an afterlife and that we were all trapped in a birth-death recycling, so he worked with the existing 'technology'. Metaphysical questions were simply irrelevant to solving the key problem of human suffering, the answer to which which lay in his philosophy of the Middle Way. Buddha regarded metaphysical questions as tedious distractions, asked by children who refused to understand that those questions just do not matter, and would refuse to answer - although his disciples assumed that he in fact knew the answers since he seemed to know everything.

    6. Re:Who'd have thought... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      If you're just going to interpret what they say however you want, why bother listening to "parables"? At worst these people are insane, at best they are irrelevant and useless. Why shouldn't we have lost "lost respect for the old ways"?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:Who'd have thought... by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      Hatta, sidestepping that long comment sideways to yours, you're not supposed to interpret things quite "however you want". There's a culture to listening to parables as well. We have a big problem elsewhere when people claim that certain religious groups "aren't authentic". What you just discovered is the difficult clash between "authentic" and "modern".

      There are ways to recast Parables in modern language, and I try to do that. Out of respect for those classical monks, I try not to "slam" them for being Authentic.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  12. Mystical groups that us TV broadcasts by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    Well, these monkeys may believe in reincarnation, but at least they don't believe in karma.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  13. They're lying by cas2000 · · Score: 2

    My numerological and astrological calculations clearly show that Steve Jobs's next incarnation will be as a kitten that I'm going to purchase from a pet shop in suburban Melbourne (NO, I'm not going to say exactly where) in July 2017.

    That gives me time to get the lawyers started on getting inheritance rights for reincarnations. Jobsy the kitten will deserve the best in life, and he's earned it already.

    1. Re:They're lying by Esteanil · · Score: 1

      My numerological and astrological calculations clearly show that Steve Jobs's next incarnation will be as a kitten that I'm going to purchase from a pet shop in suburban Melbourne (NO, I'm not going to say exactly where) in July 2017.

      That gives me time to get the lawyers started on getting inheritance rights for reincarnations. Jobsy the kitten will deserve the best in life, and he's earned it already.

      Good of you to post the date. *starts plotting to deviously pre-empt you in June 2017*

      --
      I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
    2. Re:They're lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Careful... you don't want to cause a time paradox.

    3. Re:They're lying by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      perhaps his preemptive strike triggers a series of event that in fact lead to jobsy the kitten being born at the correct time and place and ending up with his destined owner.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    4. Re:They're lying by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      Statistically, if you believed in reincarnation, your chances are well over 60% that you would get reborn in Africa, India, China, etc with barely enough food to live to be 30... If you werent one of the millions of children that die starving and sick by age 5. globally, your chances of seein AN APPLE, ever, after reincarnation are pretty poor... Let alone the fruity logo.

  14. Sociopath war monger idiot. by gavron · · Score: 1, Insightful

    He didn't play within the rules of society. He went against it.
    He stole a liver to which he wasn't entitled. He declared a thermonuclear
    war on android.

    He was a sociopath. Society's laws didn't apply to him.
    That makes him a sick guy like Iran, North Korea, and other nations that would threaten those weapons.

    Steve Jobs is someone to admire if you're a sick apple fanboy thermonuclear war puppy.
    Good thing he's dead. Now if only Achmedinejad and Kim Jong-Un could only join him, this Earth
    would be a better place.

    So long, Steve "Thermonuclear war" Jobs. Hopefuly your'e enjoying innocent kitties in hell.
    Because you're not in heaven. And you can't rape anyone on this earth.

    E

    1. Re:Sociopath war monger idiot. by dyingtolive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And to make it worse, people won't stop fucking worshiping him.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    2. Re:Sociopath war monger idiot. by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Don't worry, Apple no matter what can do no wrong. Never any wrong. Just ask the people making Apple stuff who keep jumping to their deaths.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:Sociopath war monger idiot. by mark-t · · Score: 1
      You know, I was with you, right up until this...

      Good thing he's dead.

      I certainly didn't like Jobs either, but that's just a bit too insensitive, IMO.

    4. Re:Sociopath war monger idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if only Achmedinejad and Kim Jong-Un could only join him, this Earth
      would be a better place.

      How cute, you think the power vacuum wouldn't attract someone just as bad, if not worse (btw, the only reason you believe Iran and NK are the evilest countries on Earth is propaganda, not that they aren' bad but there are more brutal rulers out there who for certain reasons don't get much bad press). When the king dies, the new king gets to use the crown. He dies and someone else steps up. A country won't change with the death of its leader, people's minds must change or things will stay the same.

    5. Re:Sociopath war monger idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iran, fair point, but how many current dictatorships have seen a full fifth of their population starve to death while the ruling class gets fat in the last 20 years? It's happened before, but you'd have to try hard to find any dictatorship as bad. The only other countries that come close are the ones in Africa where civil war leaves huge numbers dead every year, and that's not really the same thing.

    6. Re:Sociopath war monger idiot. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      but how many current dictatorships have seen a full fifth of their population starve to death while the ruling class gets fat in the last 20 years?

      Sounds a bit like the US. Have you seen what proportion of people are living in genuine poverty there? And these are people who call themselves "middle class" but work eighty hour weeks as a routine, just to keep food on the table.

    7. Re:Sociopath war monger idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy was in terrible constant pain, rotting away from the inside. Death was a blessing. He managed to get his affairs in order before he died. What's not good about him being dead now?

      You don't like a guy, so you want to damn him to years of agony? What kind of monster are you?

      Wishing him to stay alive in that condition is far more than insensitive. You need to take a long, hard look at your personal values, buddy.

    8. Re:Sociopath war monger idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Idiot,

      Iran doesn't have any type of nuclear weapons, nor has it ever threatened anyone to use it. Stop watching Fox news. The only country that uses military threats (Both conventional and non-conventional), and has in fact used them is the the US of A. Troll harder, you may succeed next time.

      And fuck you too.

    9. Re:Sociopath war monger idiot. by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      He didn't play within the rules of society. He went against it.

      Hmm... I guess that covers the "philosopher" side.

      He stole a liver to which he wasn't entitled. He declared a thermonuclear war on android.

      And this the "warrior" one. :-)

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    10. Re:Sociopath war monger idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer to the reincarnation question is fitting: he will have a difficult time archiving the enlightenment as a warrior-philosopher roaming (untethered) in heavens, bounded by a box of class with rounded corners. In fact, that is probably a portal to a level of hell from the Pali canon. The class and steel is cold as hell, after all.

    11. Re:Sociopath war monger idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he still accomplished more than anyone on this site is likely to.

      Isn't that the rub? The world really is unfair.

    12. Re:Sociopath war monger idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so fast. You need these people to feel good about yourself.

    13. Re:Sociopath war monger idiot. by oamasood · · Score: 1

      Your post's low rating of 1, unfortunately, is a sign of how deep the Jobs-worship has become here. Seriously people - something can be insightful that doesn't agree with your opinion, too.

    14. Re:Sociopath war monger idiot. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Your point is so utterly contrary to the context in which I made that remark that I'm not entirely sure if you're being sarcastic or not.

      Giving you the benefit of the doubt, that you didn't even really read the entire post I was responding to, I was actually addressing the tone in which the post to which I responded to was phrased in. It was not "good thing he's dead [so that he's not in any pain]", it was "good thing he's dead [because the world is better off without him]". It was that insensitivity that prompted me to respond as I did. Heck, the post to which I responded above went so far as to suggest that he would be in hell, which, allegedly, is *FAR* worse pain than any suffering that one might endure in this life.

  15. Damn Steve by Osgeld · · Score: 0

    I know your rumoured to do anything to avoid taxes, but this is a little extreme!

  16. Not So Fast by guttentag · · Score: 0

    RMS says Steve Jobs was reincarnated as Windows 8 as punishment for his sins against FOSS in his past life. Personally I think RMS was drunk and just happened to be watching that Superman movie where the bad guys are imprisoned in panes of glass floating through space forever.

  17. Crazy people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let the crazies talk, don't listen to them.

  18. Warrior philosopher? by ThePeices · · Score: 1

    How exactly does this group know that a baby is going to be a warrior or a philosopher when it is not even a year old? Let alone being Jobs Himself?

    If Steve Jobs had been reincarnated it would have to happen after Steve is dead, and so any baby born after the moment of his death is a candidate.

    But this is one hell of an extraordinary claim to make, so lets see if they have some extraordinary evidence to support this claim, then we can that the thought seriously.

    1. Re:Warrior philosopher? by ThePeices · · Score: 1

      Sigh, if only Slashdot had a post edit feature like everybody else.

      "take that thought seriously"

    2. Re:Warrior philosopher? by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      The world is full of nutjobs that believe in mythical beings, alien reincarnation, deities and probably somewhere the spaghetti monster. Why try to make sense of one more nutjobs ravings?

    3. Re:Warrior philosopher? by reboot246 · · Score: 2

      Not just that, but the title "warrior-philosopher" is an oxymoron. No philosopher worthy of the title would ever be a warrior. A warrior may on occasion dabble in philosophy, but he'd never be called a real philosopher.

      A call bullshit on the whole thing.

    4. Re:Warrior philosopher? by narcc · · Score: 2

      No philosopher worthy of the title would ever be a warrior.

      WTF?

      I don't even know where to begin...

    5. Re:Warrior philosopher? by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      Um, Sun Tzu called he wanted to know what planet you happen to live on.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    6. Re:Warrior philosopher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not just that, but the title "warrior-philosopher" is an oxymoron ...

      The ignorance is strong in this one ...

    7. Re:Warrior philosopher? by oztiks · · Score: 1

      Shaolin Temples? Monks? Martial Arts? I.E Lifestyle? Philosophy? Yes, so out of touch are we. Some reading may help you with your ailment of cluelessness.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_martial_arts

      Jump to the bit about how its all structured on Chinese philosophy and also the section on mediation.

    8. Re:Warrior philosopher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you familiar with the works of Shan Yu?

    9. Re:Warrior philosopher? by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      They aren't saying he's on this plane of existence, but a higher one. I'm no expert but looking at the eightfold path and the noble truths it seems hard to believe that he might have "levelled up" by those rules.

    10. Re:Warrior philosopher? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      You are ignornant and uneducated, there are many famous warrior philosophers, especially in asia. Of course a philosopher dosen't have do be a pacifist, and of course there is a proper and legitimate time for violence including warfare.

    11. Re:Warrior philosopher? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Every student should at least recognize the name Sun Tzu and his work "Art of War"

    12. Re:Warrior philosopher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... so?

      GP was a quote from Firefly; in which Shan Yu was a (fictional) historical figure characterized as a "brutal, psychotic dictator" who "fancied himself quite the warrior poet".

    13. Re:Warrior philosopher? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 0

      How exactly does this group know that a baby is going to be a warrior or a philosopher when it is not even a year old?

      What baby? There is no baby involved when you are reincarnated as a divine being in the sky.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  19. Future Adult Swim TV Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we all know where this is going, I look forward to seeing who pitches the show and how it turns out.

  20. doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I checked he was in hell with objective-c

  21. They found the baby seat in a Mercedes SL55 AMG by retroworks · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... Parked in a handicapped parking spot in Bangkok.

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:They found the baby seat in a Mercedes SL55 AMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God isn't dead, he just couldn't find a parking place.

  22. Great Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I too once had a great Karma, a Karma Ghia. It too was reincarnated many times. When I got my Karma, it had no compression. I had traded an old Dodge for it, which had no brakes.
        When we pulled the oil drain and peered inside, we saw quite a mess. Little chunks of twisted metal everywhere. It was terminal. So we just put the oil drain back, and drove the Hell out of it for five years, occasionally adding oil and gasoline.
        It was quite an Educator- I taught four people how to drive in it. It had a nose of Wonder; it was crushed beyond recognition when my two sisters managed to sequentially run it head on into both a Citroen Maserati and a Ferrari 250GT. The other two cars were undamaged.
        It never managed to hover. It did manage to float down a steep muddy hillside. There were mushrooms growing on the back package tray.
        The coil was held in place with a shoelace, and the battery was kept from dragging on the ground with several layers of deteriorated cardboard stashed underneath.
        I don't know its inevitable demise, it was passed on from family to friend, to friend, to friends of friends, to whoever; only the All Knowing DMV in the Sky knows for sure.
        My Karma wasn't Buddhist. I think that it might have been a Lutheran.

    1. Re:Great Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too once had a great Karma, a Karma Ghia. It too was reincarnated many times. When I got my Karma, it had no compression. I had traded an old Dodge for it, which had no brakes.

          When we pulled the oil drain and peered inside, we saw quite a mess. Little chunks of twisted metal everywhere. It was terminal. So we just put the oil drain back, and drove the Hell out of it for five years, occasionally adding oil and gasoline.

          It was quite an Educator- I taught four people how to drive in it. It had a nose of Wonder; it was crushed beyond recognition when my two sisters managed to sequentially run it head on into both a Citroen Maserati and a Ferrari 250GT. The other two cars were undamaged.

          It never managed to hover. It did manage to float down a steep muddy hillside. There were mushrooms growing on the back package tray.

          The coil was held in place with a shoelace, and the battery was kept from dragging on the ground with several layers of deteriorated cardboard stashed underneath.

          I don't know its inevitable demise, it was passed on from family to friend, to friend, to friends of friends, to whoever; only the All Knowing DMV in the Sky knows for sure.

          My Karma wasn't Buddhist. I think that it might have been a Lutheran.

      The correct name of the car was Karman Ghia made by Volkswagen. Karman was the designer, I believe. VW made hundreds of them. Rear-engined like most VW's of the time.

  23. Karma by Viceice · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If anything, he should be reincarnated as a Chinese iPhone assembly line worker.

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    1. Re:Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He may already be at work.

    2. Re:Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are those the ones that they chain to the assembly line, or just paid to be there?

    3. Re:Karma by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

      Or an overmatched defense lawyer in a patent lawsuit.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    4. Re:Karma by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Or a person in a wheelchair that can't find a place to park.

    5. Re:Karma by drkim · · Score: 1

      Both, actually.

      They pay them slightly less than the amount needed to buy a hacksaw.

    6. Re:Karma by chandoni · · Score: 1

      Credit where it's due--Matt Bors' obit for Steve Jobs: http://mattbors.com/blog/2011/10/13/jobs-new-job/

  24. Head's dead, he lives in peoples memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Head's dead, but he lives on in peoples memories.

    Your brain simulates much of the world. You don't actually see all you see, your brain assembles it mostly from memory and recognition. People too, you don't see their details, their faces, don't hear all their words, your brain is constantly projecting your preconception of them and assembling the narrative for you.

    It's a bandwidth saving feature if you will, but it means that part of that person is running on you. It's not 100% on CPU_Main, that person is perhaps only 10% CPU_Main and the rest running in the brains of people around them.

    When the body dies, CPU_Main dies with it, but the rest? No, they live on. They'll even seek to find CPU_Main somewhere else. They'll see CPU_Main in dreams, imagine CPU_Main relocated or rebooted, rather than shut down the co-process.

    These people find comfort in imagining their dead ones live on in others, and it's partly true, they live on in them, because they want to believe they're reincarnated elsewhere.

    Even the Apple haters, are still running their Denigrate_Jobs processes, they too are part of the Jobs program. They too haven't shut that program down.

    1. Re:Head's dead, he lives in peoples memories by ldobehardcore · · Score: 1

      That sounds elegant, but you gotta remember that Inter-Process Communication between human brains is so bad it's laughable. a hundred million fragments of Jobs, never able to connect into anything even slightly resembling who he really was.

      --
      Hectice, baby, Mercator says hello to you
    2. Re:Head's dead, he lives in peoples memories by shaitand · · Score: 0

      A person is nothing but a brain + nervous system which are just brain tendrils. The brain is a bunch of independent logic units responding to each others electrochemical signals and reorganizing based on them. A second brain is more of the same, there is a high speed link between them composed of light and smell. The consequence is that two brains are effectively one large brain. They are separated by that link much like the lobes of your personal pool of neurons so the neurons are going to have more of their pathways based on local input and even more so because interaction with the same pool of neurons might exist more or less frequently.

      Effectively, you, and everyone you interact with are just individual neurons in a much much collective pool of neurons. If a single neuron in your brain dies the impact it had on other neurons does not, it will influence their reactions to stimuli to some extent forever after. The same is true of that larger brain. In a way, there has been a larger brain that has persisted since the beginning of mankind. It used to be separated and localized quite extensively but the pools that were towns have formed faster and faster connections and even the individual members form faster and more efficient connections to more and more people.

      Saying someone lives on in those they've left behind isn't just a figure of speech. It is a literal fact.

  25. Tony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait... Tony Tseung the engineer at Apple? Can we say conflict of interest?? :-)

  26. Oh. by SAShinigami · · Score: 1

    Well, that solves that mystery.

  27. true story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    2: And very early on the first day of the week they went to the tomb when the sun had risen. 3: And they were saying to one another, "Who will roll away the stone for us from the door of the tomb?" 4: And looking up, they saw that the stone was rolled back; -- it was very large. 5: And entering the tomb, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, dressed in a white robe; and they were amazed. 6: And he said to them, "Do not be amazed; you seek Jobs of Apple, who was cancerified. He has risen, he is not here; see the place where they laid him. 7: But go, tell his disciples that he is going before you to the iPhone 5 announcement; there you will see him, as he told you."

    1. Re:true story by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      +5 funny

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  28. Reincarnated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't be reincarnated if you don't have a carnal body. Kinda the definition.

  29. Re:timothy timothy timothy timothy timothy timothy by gagol · · Score: 1

    Yeah, its drinking night for me too tonight. I guess it shows...

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
  30. Re:Jesus Christ... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    Jesus Christ? If he had worshipped Jesus Christ he'd now be a meek angel plucking at a harp. At least multiclass warrior-philosophers can hope to get laid now and then. And kick the ass of anyone who disputes their philosophy.

    At least he didn't worship Inugami the Dog-God. If he had, he'd now be humping some warrior-philosopher's leg.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  31. Pondering by jones_supa · · Score: 2

    What bothers always about the concept of reincarnation (with a carnal body, so not TFA), is that if you don't have any memories or experiences of your past lives, what is left, then? How do they make any impact? An explanation could be that the previous experiences shape life in some way that the person cannot sense.

    1. Re:Pondering by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      or its a load of crap to comfort people

    2. Re:Pondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It looks you are asking a serious question, so I will answer seriously.

      ... if you don't have any memories or experiences of your past lives, ...

      Actually, some people do claim to have conscious memories of past lives. Such cases are more often among young children, between ages 2 and 4. As for adults, sometimes memories apparently resurface in spontaneous "flashes". I believe I have experienced such flashes too, at least 4 times.

      For some credible cases studies of children who claimed to have past-life memories, please check out this book written by a scientist: http://www.amazon.com/Twenty-Cases-Suggestive-Reincarnation-Enlarged/dp/0813908728/

      Also, it is possible that for the vast majority of people, the specific memories of past lives are stored in their subconscious. It may be possible to unearth those memories under hypnosis (which allows one to access one's subconscious). Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Past_life_regression

      How do they make any impact? An explanation could be that the previous experiences shape life in some way that the person cannot sense.

      I believe subconscious memories do make an impact. For example, it is well established that the experiences we have in our childhood shapes our attitudes in adult life, even if we don't remember those specific childhood incidents. This is the basis of [current-life] regression therapy, in which a psychotherapist hypnotizes their patient and regresses them into their childhood, to uncover possibly personality-shaping memories.

      I believe past-life memories work in a similar way. They are in the subconscious, so we are not aware of them, but they do shape our personalities, and our preferences / attitudes in life. I have heard stories in which a person who had died of starvation in a previous life, had, in their current life, a compulsive eating disorder. They just couldn't say "no" to food, because they always worried about the possibility of not finding food later in the day, or the next day. Or somebody who had died in an automobile accident in their previous life, being very scared of sitting inside a car in their present life. Or somebody just not being able to stand a particular person; perhaps due to the second person having done something bad to the first person in a previous life. And so on.

      So, in summary, the effects of subconscious past-life memories probably shows up in personality traits, instant likes/dislikes between two people, fears/phobias, fascination with a particular foreign culture or a particular time of history, etc.

    3. Re:Pondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Studies show beyond statistical doubt that children DO remember. They're just trained to forget by society.

    4. Re:Pondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What bothers always about the concept of reincarnation (with a carnal body, so not TFA), is that if you don't have any memories or experiences of your past lives, what is left, then? How do they make any impact? An explanation could be that the previous experiences shape life in some way that the person cannot sense.

      Hello Jones,

      Actually the fact that many saints, gurus, yoguis and religious leaders believed in reincarnation (or rebirth in Buddhism because there is no soul according to the teachings of the Buddha) is because through meditation it is possible to remember past lives.
      If you are very good at meditation you could even see past lives of other people.

      The Buddha talks about rebirth because he saw the process of beings being born again and again and the influx of their previous actions through meditation right before becoming enlightened, that is when he felt he understood everything that there was to know about spirituality.

      Afterwards he went on to teach other people how to get to this transcendental truth about being.

      Guillermo Ojea

  32. Buddhist version of scientology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This group is a Buddhist version of Scientology before anyone make any generalization.

  33. But if he's dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that he is who people perceive him to be, so if CPU_Main is dead, then he is the statistical average of those fragments.

    In life he was the statistical average of (CPU_Main + CPU_CoProcess1 + CPU_CoProcess2....CPU_CoProcess6000000000)

    In death he's (0 + CPU_CoProcess1 + CPU_CoProcess2....CPU_CoProcess6000000000)

    But its pretty damn similar to what he was in life, I doubt the image perceived of him was much like the real person, even when he lived.

  34. Re:Jesus Christ... by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, in Christianity, you don't become an angel after you die. You become a subject (read: subject, not a citizen) in the Kingdom (not a Republic, so you won't be hugging Jesus like most think; it's a fucking monarchy for Christ's (get it?) sake) in the kingdom of heaven, where you spend eternity trying to fix God's low self-esteem.

  35. a quick (and faulted) primer on bhuddist cosology by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok, if Jobs is floating over his OLD OFFICE, that means he was incarnated as a hungry ghost!

    See, in bhuddist cosmology, there are various gradients of existence. This world, our world, represents the crossroads between the celestial heavens, and the hellish naraka. (Those are plural. There are many of each.)

    The important thing of note here, is that the priests say he was incarnated above his old office. This means here, on the mortal realm.

    In the mortal realm, there are 3 potential kinds of incarnation: Human, Hungry ghost, and Animal.

    Since he is incorporeal, and in the mortal realm, that means he is a hungry ghost. Hungry ghosts are called that, because they have big appetites, but lack any real means to sate them. They are a pitiable form of existence, but can also cause serious problems, such as hauntings.

    Wiki on hungry ghosts

    That he would incarnate into a LOWER incarnation implies he had BAD karma, but not quite sufficient to send him to one of the naraka. (Though the burning flesh naraka might be appropriate if you ask me.)

    So, if you work at apple, you should attempt to appease the late Jobs, by leaving offerings of unmarked bills, and the latest iDevice on his desk. Failing to do so will anger the hungry ghot, and there will be trouble. Burning incense may help as well. But not sandalwood. It's tacky.

  36. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In other news, your dog is now on a farm upstate where it's very happy. That's why it isn't around anymore.

  37. RMS doesn't need to be drunk ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I think RMS was drunk ...

    Doubtful. RMS doesn't need to be drunk to start saying crazy sh*t.

  38. Is that a Bard Warrior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in terms of D&D multiclasses.

  39. Hovering by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    No, he's hovering over the handicap parking spot, his favorite place.

  40. Steves glass castle in the sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wonder if it is made out of gorilla glass or amaled?

  41. He often visited there while still alive . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs stimulated his creativity by "Going to the Magic Kingdom" while tripping his balls off on acid, back in the 70's, when it was still OK for CEO's to trip their balls off on acid.

    Nowadays, most CEO's just act like they should "get their lips away from the crack pipe!"

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  42. Um. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there is any justice in the universe at all.
    Steve is rotting in hell right now where he belongs.

    Had the chance, money, people, tech and influence to change the world for the better in a HUGE way. Or at least technology for the better.

    And instead went for max profits selling inferior tech locked down walled off shiny ithings in primary colors to iidiots for high margins and suing everyone they could. And being one of the biggest corporate douchebags on the planet.

    A lifetime of being a douche. That better not get you a good reward in the afterlife.

  43. Does he have... by Issarlk · · Score: 1

    Does he have an invisible glass car he can park on the handicaped space at Apple's parking?

    1. Re:Does he have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he does, I'm sure it will have ghost number plates... He can have them now they can't issue him a ticket anymore for other reasons.

  44. Re:a quick (and faulted) primer on bhuddist cosolo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You are referring to a cosmology associated with a particular Buddhist strand, but the core of Buddhism requires no such beliefs.

  45. Don't hate the truth. by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    I can understand why Steve Jobs would be upset over the whole Android thing. I don't think it's the right way to handle it, but that's easy for people like me and you to say, since it's not our product.

    Everyone has flaws, it's really nothing to be pissed over. At least Jobs went after big companies instead of buying out and shuttering small potential compeditors the way MSFT did. But he was a complicated man, and he had the good sense to have that recorded for posterity. If he hadent worked to have that biography written, we'd probably be building statues to him today. Most people we idolize don't want us to ever find out the truth about them, but Steve Jobs' legacy was his products, not his image. I wish more famous and powerful people were like him in that regard. There would be a lot fewer statues around today.

    1. Re:Don't hate the truth. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I can understand why Steve Jobs would be upset over the whole Android thing.

      Care to explain? Because I don't understand it at all.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  46. Re:a quick (and faulted) primer on bhuddist cosolo by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

    There's no such thing as "bhuddist cosmology" there being many different schools and branches of Buddhism, which can vary wildly in their spiritual beliefs. Without knowing what school these monks belong to its difficult to interpret their words.

    There's more to the world than what's on wikipedia.

  47. Re:a quick (and faulted) primer on bhuddist cosolo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wikipedia actually talks pretty extensively about how there are many different schools and branches of Buddhism and thus no overriding doctrines...

  48. LMFAO. What a motherfucking retard. by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

    Wait--please don't tell me the moron actually believes this shit.

  49. obligatory: by arbitraryaardvark · · Score: 1

    :They took our Jobs!

  50. So he's got that going for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So he's got that going for him

  51. The world is a better place with him dead by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Informative

    Then who deserves to die? You are just another wannabe hippy. Someone who doesn't love all but who is just to afraid to just admit some people deserve dead. Your like those people who are against the death penalty, not because they believe in human beings but because they don't want to take responsibility.

    We are talking about a man who parked in handicap spaces when he could have build his office to have a drive in office if he wanted to. This person had zero morals and zero empathy. The only people that love him, everyone close to him (READ the reactions to his dead carefully) pretty much said "interesting guy, but ain't gonna shed a tear). Their would have been more reaction of a toaster had stopped working. A human being did not die, a thing died that made some fancy gadgets that will only be remembered in marketing books.

    People say that nobody says that on they wished they spent more time in the office on their deathbed. I think Steve Jobs wished he did.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:The world is a better place with him dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for posting this and having the balls to do so. You hit the nail on the head. I was nearly fired (I shit you not) for saying the same thing at work (so much for free speech and common sense). I hope he's burning in hell for the negative things he's done for general purpose computing. In fact as I'm an atheist I hope im wrong so there is a hell for him to burn in. Consumer predator, not important human.

    2. Re:The world is a better place with him dead by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Then who deserves to die? You are just another wannabe hippy. Someone who doesn't love all but who is just to afraid to just admit some people deserve dead.

      So, let's see if I got what you are saying -- if you don't "love all" that means you absolutely hate some people so much that you must believe they deserve death. That there can be no middle ground where even really big jerks don't deserve death. Where parking in handicap spaces should mark one for death.

      Sounds like you live in a really shitty universe.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:The world is a better place with him dead by lxs · · Score: 2

      That's what you get for working at an Apple store. OTOH wishing eternal torment on someone who has ceased to be seems immature to me.

    4. Re:The world is a better place with him dead by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then who deserves to die? You are just another wannabe hippy. Someone who doesn't love all but who is just to afraid to just admit some people deserve dead. Your like those people who are against the death penalty, not because they believe in human beings but because they don't want to take responsibility.

      Take responsibility in what way, exactly speaking? If an innocent man gets sent to his death, as has happened, who gets punished in what way? Does the jury follow him to the grave? Do all supporters of death penalty draw lots to see who gets to carry the responsibility of an innocent dying? And for that matter, should some philosopher/prophet/whatever come up with an airtight argument for death penalty being wrong even when the accused really is guilty of heinous crimes, will they all turn yourselfs over for whatever punishment murder would then get?

      Or, as is usually the case, does "taking responsibility" mean absolutely nothing?

      Also, I find your idea of sticking a zombie horde on the deserving intriguing. Does the amount of chainsaw fuel inversely depend on the seriousness of the infraction? Or should we simply vary the ratio of quick and slow zombies?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    5. Re:The world is a better place with him dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I was nearly fired (I shit you not) for saying the same thing at work (so much for free speech and common sense)."

      Speaking of common sense - free speech does not extend to work, dumbass. At work you say and do what the boss wants - period! (or you get fired). Welcome to the real world, sorry to burst your happy delusional bubble.

    6. Re:The world is a better place with him dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone deserves to die and we all get what we deserve.

    7. Re:The world is a better place with him dead by drkim · · Score: 1

      He won't be burning in hell...

      Every morning when he wakes up it will be to the Windows 95 startup chime.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSpXEPl3zeU&feature=watch_response

      ...and if he's ever having a great dream, it will get cut off at the best part with a BSOD.

    8. Re:The world is a better place with him dead by drkim · · Score: 1

      ...wishing eternal torment on someone who has ceased to be seems immature to me.

      You have heard about the whole concept of religion , right?

      It's kind of a new thing - some of the kids are into it.

    9. Re:The world is a better place with him dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Thanks for posting this and having the balls
      > to do so.

      Seconded. Because if I was half as shit at writing as SmallFurryCreature (593017), the only time I'd put pen to paper was if I was going to immediately wipe my ass on the latter and flush it out of sight.

    10. Re:The world is a better place with him dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where parking in handicap spaces should mark one for death.

      That's extremely harsh. Kneecapping should be enough, at least for a first offence.

    11. Re:The world is a better place with him dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strangely, it's an MSFT consultancy - I think they're trying to be trendy.

      Indeed it is immature but it's the only way to get people to consider his negative position in society. There is a lot of double-think surrounding Jobs.

    12. Re:The world is a better place with him dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if a guilty killer is set free, and goes on to kill more people, how does that help society?

      Yes, we should do everything reasonable to ensure the innocent are not executed, but we also have a responsibility to society to punish those who are guilty.

  52. Or was he proud of it by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    You presume he saw his own bio the way you did it, as a rather sad man who thought money was everything and whose death was ultimately received as "well, it ain't only the good that die young". Did he see himself as a vindictive petty minded asshole OR did he read it as a glorious tribute to his vision proving how right he was and how wrong everyone else was?

    IF the bio is true, the picture it reveals is not of a man with a lot of introspective capability.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  53. let the guy rest... by just+another+AC · · Score: 1

    Seriously RIP... honour the R and let the guy rest already, without the R Steve just becomes all about IP ... oh wait... good one Apple!

  54. Try this. See if it's a parable. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    http://blogs.wsj.com/searealtime/2012/08/31/thai-group-says-steve-jobs-reincarnated-as-warrior-philosopher/

    Appleâ(TM)s mantra of using technology to bring people closer together also dovetails neatly with the teachings of the orange-robed monks at the Dhammakaya Temple.
    They preach a worldly, tech-savvy form of Buddhism which instructs worshipers that it isnâ(TM)t a sin to grow rich, as long as they contribute a chunk of their earnings to the Dhammakaya cause.

    Material possessions are cool. Just give us money.

    Among other things, he has said the reincarnated Mr. Jobs spends much of his time lounging in a glass palace resembling an Apple store. Phra Chaibul also has said the being formerly known as Steve Jobs is attended by 20 servants, who seem to resemble the Apple store âGeniusesâ(TM)

    The spiritual rewards also appear to be worth the effort, at least according to Phra Chaibul. He says that Mr. Jobs now enjoys sleeping on a floating hover-bed, and when he thinks of a piece of music he would like to hear, it automatically plays. If he is hungry, an aide quickly brings him a tasty treat.

    âoeEverything is high-tech, beautiful, and simple, exactly the way he likes it, and he is filled with great excitement and amazement,â Phra Chaibul says. In fact, the technology surrounding the reincarnated Mr. Jobs works so seamlessly that he has no reason to âoebare his canine teethâ or otherwise exercise the hot temper for which he was known on earth.

    Whatâ(TM)s more, Mr. Jobs was reborn in a younger, more handsome form. Phra Chaibul says he now appears to be around 35 to 40 years old, with a full head of hair. Artist renderings accompanying Phra Chaibulâ(TM)s lectures show a rejuvenated Mr. Jobs living in a photo-shopped, air-brushed utopia where he hangs out with other sprites and revels in the achievements of friends and colleagues he left behind on earth.

    What does a celestial warrior-philosopher need with servants?
    Or glass palaces? Or floating hover-beds? Or tasty treats? Or hair?
    Or pathetically "younger" body of 35-40? Why not go for a viral 19-21 with a wisdom of several lifetimes?

    Probably cause the above mentioned Phra Chaibul is 68 and 35 seems to his unimaginative mind (Really? Afterlife apex for a celestial warrior-philosopher is about auto-playing music and snacks on a floating bed?) like an impossibly distant age when he was "young".

    And if you want to SEE what he actually meant, please step this way.
    Dhamma Media Channel has renderings of all Steve's previous incarnations on display.
    Including an explanation why he died of cancer.

    SPOILER:

     
     

    In a previous incarnation he had beaten to death an "unlicensed doctor" who "gave the counterfeit medicine to his older brother".
    PI Steve (Previous Incarnation Steve) ended up selling his family business AND donating a part of his liver to save his brother.
    "Unlicensed doctor's" death on the other hand "was caused mainly by liver hemorrhage."
    See how it all ties together?
    AMAZOING-OING-OING-OING!

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Try this. See if it's a parable. by tftp · · Score: 1

      What does a celestial warrior-philosopher need with servants? Or glass palaces? Or floating hover-beds? Or tasty treats? Or hair? Or pathetically "younger" body of 35-40?

      The age of 35-40 is believed to be the top of fitness of a man - both mental and physical.

      The servants are necessary to hold the celestial warrior-philosopher down when, after a few years of confinement in an invisible castle in the sky, he realizes that he is a prisoner. But there is nowhere to go, nothing to do, and noone to fight. Nobody can learn about his inventions in philosophy or martial arts. What would you do in such situation? Most people would go insane. Hence the servants (and Haloperidol, I guess.)

  55. Dhammakaya = Scientology for Thais by sterymashe · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised that this heretical Buddhist cult would put out such a ridiculous press release. Thais have told me this group 'Dhammakaya' is an extremely wealthy new age religious organization consisting mainly of educated middle class Thais and the Thai diaspora.

  56. Conceptual deficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reincarnation is not a personality reincarnating as that same personality in another vehicle, It is what is beyond the veil incarnating as what is beyond the veil.
    Who is reincarnating as what? Since the ego is a subset of the superego.
    Of course if you were really bad you might reincarnate as the subconscious, selectively, perhaps arising as an impulse to get the next ipad mini ; )

  57. Oooo....Kay... by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    That's... out there... I mean, if someone on the street told me that, I'd back away slowly and not make eye contact. I'm surprised the Mormons haven't already posthumously baptized him, as is their custom. Then all you'd need is the Scientologists coming out and saying that he was caught in a captured soul trapper device and you could get a fun three-way holy war going on. I'm sure it would be fun, too!

    Ok, you want to play that game, let me see if I can do it. Jobs may have been a very successful man, which would indicate a fairly high amount of Karma. But as tweaked as he got about Android, I don't think he was Crystal Palace material. Maybe brushed aluminium material... Personally, I think he was reincarnated at CowboyNeal. Did you notice that we saw a bunch of articles from CowboyNeal right after he died? And since Slashdot has the limit on Karma, Steve could have been tweaked at Android and still be "Excellent"!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  58. Put the cork on the fork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems their sense of reality has become distorted .. wait a second!

  59. Fox News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this linked to a (*shudder*) Fox News article which in turn links to the original here:

    http://blogs.wsj.com/searealtime/2012/08/31/thai-group-says-steve-jobs-reincarnated-as-warrior-philosopher/

    Fix link please?

  60. Use the right tool.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a practitioner and teacher of yoga, I have to say treating cancer exclusively on alternative medicine and natural remedies, is ripe for disaster, or in this case death. However, fasting has been preliminary proven to help conciderably with many ailments including cancer by boosting the immune system and bodily functions.

    However, I am thinking there may be more to his cancer than just a coincidence. Did the cancer eat him up, just like Apple's products now starts to eat up society mindshare and marketshare?

    In deterministic chaos you will find the same patterns in every layer throughout the whole, similar to a hologram. Yes, you can call it Karma, or you can equally call it "chaos". Cause and effect is the same anyways, and those who claim they know every cause and effect relationship, well let's say you can safely ignore such grandiose claims. Karma is part of every day life, completely natural. It permeates everything, but is not clearly defined by rules and fear, but offer some guidelines and inspiration on how to better oneself.

    Keyword: deficit

  61. Snooki's baby by J4 · · Score: 1

    He came back as Snooki's baby, but I guess that and warrior-philosopher
    don't have to be mutually exclusive.

  62. Karma and Dharma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Karma litterally means "action". However, it has been misunderstood and dogmatized throughout the ages. If you ask saints, "karma" means "action", but in relationship with "cause and effect" and the inner workings of the Mind. It is connected to the "law of attraction", and most other metaphysical "laws", however once you start defining such laws by rules and defined statements (God's "last" words chiseled in stone or book), you actually lose their real significance and practical meaning.

    Karma really encompasses all spiritual understanding, it is that all-pervading. There is nothing outside of karma.

    Of course a falling rock can be said to be an "action", but a rock can't decide for itself what action to take (to any measurable degree as far as we know, although quantum dynamics carry interesting possibilities). So applying karma to "action" alone is meaningless. Instead of "action", you can say "deed", although I prefer "action" since "deed" can rapidly become loaded and abused.

    Karma has meaning when applied to humans, which are thought to possess some understanding and will-power beyond a rock, or even most animals. So traditions like yoga attribute humans to be capable of receiving knowledge, and then modifying their behaviour based on new knowledge. It is debatable to what extent humans really are able to adapt to input of knowledge though ;)

    If you can keep it simple, you can actually have the most brilliant understanding of karma. However, karma is a bit more than just "action", however I commend you for striving to keep it simple.

    I said karma can be said to be "deed", however if you investigate you will find that "dharma" is actually the word connected to "deed", and thus suffers from rigid rules, hero-worship and stagnant belief-systems. If you can find karma to be between "dharma" and "action", you may find new innovative understandings of karma. I believe very few people on this planet, maybe a handful, really understands karma to a real significant and unencumbered degree. Of course, I only concider my understanding theoretical based on past life work, so I am really not among those few. If you ask any of those, they will deny it as well ;)

  63. Re:a quick (and faulted) primer on bhuddist cosolo by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

    No, this particular temple has him reborn as a Yaksha:

    Yaksha (Sanskrit: ààà¥à yaká£a)[1] is the name of a broad class of nature-spirits, usually benevolent, who are caretakers of the natural treasures hidden in the earth and tree roots.

    I'm not being flip here, but it essentially reminds me of a Leprechaun.

    "In Hindu, Jain, and Buddhist mythology, the yaká£a has a dual personality. On the one hand, a yaká£a may be an inoffensive nature-fairy, associated with woods and mountains; but there is also a darker version of the yaká£a, which is a kind of ghost (bhuta) that haunts the wilderness and waylays and devours travelers, similar to the raká£asas."

    According to the temple, Steve Jobs hasn't gotten angry yet, so he's still in the "inoffensive nature-fairy" phase and not the "haunting the wilderness and waylaying and devouring travelers phase."

      However, if he gets angry... watch out!

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  64. Settlements by Yobgod+Ababua · · Score: 1

    Just because you have some patents doesn't mean that they are valid or enforceable.
    Just because you've convinced some companies to license your patents and pay you royalties doesn't mean that they are valid or enforceable.

    The android phone manufacturers that pay MS royalties simply decided that just paying the royalty would be less expensive than fighting the legal battle to (possibly) prove the patents in question invalid. This means that there is, so far, no evidence that the patents in question have any value at all. Given that the SCotUS has been more strongly nudging things in the direction of "You can't patent software processes, stupid", there's a pretty good chance that they are, in fact, worthless. Unfortunately, proving that will require a company with a reason to take a stand, the funds to follow it through, and a top-notch team of patent lawyers.

    1. Re:Settlements by Spaseboy · · Score: 1

      Just because you have some patents doesn't mean that they are valid or enforceable.
      Just because you've convinced some companies to license your patents and pay you royalties doesn't mean that they are valid or enforceable.

      That's pretty much EXACTLY what that means. If you remember (which of course you don't) early versions of Android did not have multi-touch. Android being designed as a Blackberry competitor didn't need it. So Apple uses multi-touch as a main point on their iPhone and suddenly Google adds it. Google doesn't actually infringe on any of these because they don't make their own hardware nor do they sell Android. In the end, manufacturers are free to remove the infringing features from their product, after all, Android is open source so if they choose not to alter Android, it is wilful infringement.

      As a company, why bother to spend money to innovate if you can just copy someone else's work? As an innovator, why bother if companies are going to copy your work and eliminate your market advantage, as well as waste all that R&D money?

      Research is an incredible money sink, companies that take the financial and image risks on new ideas deserve to be protected and rewarded. The idea that all the WELL-KNOWN research and development that Microsoft has accomplished with their Surface project is not worth anything is just asinine.

      BTW, Apple and Microsoft had a patent truce that includes the work MS did in multi-touch.

      --
      "I don't want more choice, I just want nicer things!"
      -Jennifer Saunders as Edina Monsoon
    2. Re:Settlements by grcumb · · Score: 1

      Just because you have some patents doesn't mean that they are valid or enforceable. Just because you've convinced some companies to license your patents and pay you royalties doesn't mean that they are valid or enforceable.

      That's pretty much EXACTLY what that means.

      I don't know whether you're deliberately ignoring the implication the GP was making, so let me spell it out: Until you've successfully demonstrated its value, likely as a result of court action that supports its validity, your patent is worth bupkes. In other words, the granting of a patent is only the beginning of the process of protecting your work, not an end in itself.

      As a company, why bother to spend money to innovate if you can just copy someone else's work?

      Well, I can't speak for everyone, but my reason is because I know I can do better.

      As an innovator, why bother if companies are going to copy your work and eliminate your market advantage, as well as waste all that R&D money?

      Again, because to some of us put the emphasis on quality as a key differentiator in sales success. Secondly, you're suggesting that imitation necessarily destroys market advantage. That's hardly axiomatic. You'll need to demonstrate that this is necessarily the case. And then you'll need to demonstrate that this sufficiently subverts first-mover status in the market to merit legal protection. In other words, does imitation (in the sincerest form of flattery sense; not copying or passing off) so distort the market that it requires legislative and regulatory remediation?

      Research is an incredible money sink, companies that take the financial and image risks on new ideas deserve to be protected and rewarded.

      You state this as if it's self-evident. It's not. It's pretty well established that risk is inherent in market economies. What makes this particular risk special? Why should this one in particular deserve to be mitigated by the state? Can you point to differences in success or failure rates of technological innovation in countries with software patent protection and those without?

      These are serious questions, by the way. We've all seen the logical arguments, and while they're internally consistent, they don't strike me as more compelling than the logic supporting open data and its benefits to the community at large. So, given this ambivalence, I'm going to let the data convince me. One the latter side, we've got Linux, Apache the World Wide Web (and countless other projects that effectively ignore patent protections) encompassing millions of hours of research and development, but I've yet to see any compelling empirical evidence justifying the protections provided by the US software patent system as it currently exists.

      I'm not trolling here. Show me the data and I'll weigh them against what I've already seen and judge them on their merits. I'm open to persuasion.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
  65. Re:a quick (and faulted) primer on bhuddist cosolo by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

    By the way, for obvious reasons, I really, really like this religion.

    If only I could believe in things other than boring old science, I'd be signing up!

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  66. Re:Jesus Christ... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    FSM followers go to the Great Pasta Bowl where they enjoy enjoy stripper factories & beer volcanoes for all eternity. Steve Jobs might make a guest appearance as a meatball.

  67. Mystical glass palace...? by Saint+Ego · · Score: 1

    Nothing about 40 virgins, but a floating glass palace over your old home isn't so shabby...

    --
    Reality is prettier inside my head...
  68. Sept vs April by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    I thought the seasons were six months out in the southern hemisphere, but September is only five months after April. Or are these Thai guys serious? And does the floating glass palace have a big Apple logo like the famous stores??

    --
    John_Chalisque
  69. Warrior Philosopher? Look out Larry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is gonna be good. Ultimate showdown between Larry Ellison and Steve Jobs.

    All we need now is Lo-Wang Shadow Warrior screaming "Who wants some Wang?"

  70. Re:Jesus Christ... by kumanopuusan · · Score: 1

    You're ignoring the fact that angels are consistently described in Christian scriptures as warriors. The first angel mentioned as such in the bible held a flaming sword and the nativity was announced by a host (i.e. an army) of angels.

    --
    Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
  71. Re:Jesus Christ... by werepants · · Score: 1

    No dispute about the monarchy thing, but you are incorrect about the subject/citizen thing. Many verses call believers adoptive sons and daughters alongside Christ. Which is a considerable upgrade from the picture you paint.

    Not saying that you should accept the theology - just saying that you should be factually correct about whatever criticisms you have.

  72. John C. Dvorak by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2

    John C. Dvorak writes for PC Magazine. His August 31, 2012 article is Apple's iPhone 5 Ploy.

  73. All I ever needed to know about Steve Jobs was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he denied his own child, Lisa Brennan.
    WHAT AN ASSHOLE.

    Fuck him, I'm glad he is dead.

  74. Re:Jesus Christ... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    Yeah, well, it's not like I intended for people to take the post seriously. As someone else has pointed out, dead people don't actually become angels in Christian theology, despite the popular notion.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  75. Stoning Jobs by Isra+Figueroa · · Score: 1

    Let's gather some mystical stones, to throw them at the mystical glass palace, using a mystical slingshot; mystical Blue Birds are welcome.

  76. Re:Jesus Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BS. I was brought up in a faith that not only allows for you to become an angel plucking a harp, but to ride on a cloud, and spend your days watching the living like a bad soap opera.

    Its called lay Catholicism....and its a no beliefs barred smorgasbord of uneducated, misunderstood fun. Forget all that boring, debated, scholarly catholicism that you get from those overeducated priests with their doctorates in theology, I am talking about the working class, Catholicism... the kind of understanding of the faith that can only come from sitting in the pews with a hangover every sunday, and tacking anything with a picture of a saint on it up on the refrigerator.

    I assure you this traditional catholic faith allows for a very angelic afterlife.

  77. Sounds interesting by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Could make a good action anime series to hold me over until Bleach continues XD

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  78. Re:a quick (and faulted) primer on bhuddist cosolo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quick somebody call PacMan.

  79. Pretty generous... by oamasood · · Score: 1

    For a guy who said "Let the revenue come in first, then worry about philanthropy" when asked why Apple didn't donate to philanthropic causes.

    Also for a guy who was known to be not someone you'd like to meet in the elevator...

  80. Re:Jesus Christ... by vandamme · · Score: 1

    Maybe you should read Part 2 sometime. The first thing they say is "be not afraid". Total softies, no smiting. They bring good news, let guys out of jail.

  81. Rain by Dabido · · Score: 1

    So, if it starts p!$$!ng down (rain) over his old office, we know what's happening.

    --
    Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  82. and you had to cite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a foxnews article instead of just the wsj source? i apologize for mentioning the obscenity and oxymoron that is foxnews.

  83. stick to food, thailand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats all i really have to say.