Maybe Ziff-Davis, and other site owners, should be insisting on sanitized ads. An image, some text, an html link - why should an advertiser require more?
The ads, as served from Ziff-Davis, performed redirects to a third-party site. It was this third-party site which was hosting the malicious pdf files. They probably escaped automatic checking in this manner.
Any advertiser is going to want a click to end up as a vist to their site, one way or another - and once there it's out of Ziff-Davis' hands.
Except that there's no argument about whether the gate's open or not. Just you trying to force people to walk down the path in the manner of your choosing.
Did that come before or after google introduced the ability to get your hotmail stuff (plus yahoo and a bunch of others) into gmail, and then, via imap/pop, into a desktop mail client?
A quick google search found one for just over $31,000 - I'm sure you could do better.
This "jet-pack" is the sort of thing I could see being used to hire out at the beach for 5-10 min trips, just for the ride. Obviously this would depend upon training time and you'd need to tether it, to prevent it being stolen - which rather defeats the purpose of the thing.
The police in the UK have a system fitted to some cars which reads the plates on all oncoming vehicles and automatically checks them against various criminal databases.
Somethings's fubar when you can write "from my teacher's lawyer" without the first response being "wtf, why does a teacher HAVE a lawyer?"
The only time I've ever needed legal assistance (home purchase/sale) I've had to go and get it just for that occasion.
Are we talking about the same Microsoft here?
I'll run up a server with a dozen instances on it, all running on 1 machine and let a dozen people use rdesktop, only need one license.
Good luck with that one.
You'd better make sure that one of the options is "None of the above". I can care enough to cast my vote, but currently if I feel that none of the candidates is sufficiently qualified to do the job then my only option is to spoil my paper.
If I stay at home I get counted as a "didn't care enough to vote", if I spoil my paper I may get counted as "idiot who didn't understand the process", but I've made my mark.
You can't get staff to help with not casting a vote, the process has to be anonymous.
That's assuming that the developer gets paid when the copy is sold at the store.
Since the store must have bought it from a supplier further up the chain, surely the developers have already had their cut. The store's only selling it cheaply because they have only a finite amount of space on the shelves and in the warehouses.
Buying second hand, the sale's already happened and the developers have already been paid.
Nope, did my jury service when I got called.
It's precisely that experience that leads me to make this statement
I believe it's very serious, but I also believe that the majority of people who serve wouldn't hesitate to assume that somebody who chose to remain silent is guilty.
Also, if you remain silent in court this can be assumed as evidence of guilt.
No it can't, not in any court within the United Kingdom. Staying silent may harm your defence, as noted in the caution you are given, but it can never be used as a presumption of evidence of guilt.
That's correct in theory. I wouldn't trust a jury not to presume my guilt were I to stay silent though.
Remember, that jury consists of 12 examples of society's finest, right off the street.
And seeing as the blog entry is dated "Tue Dec 23 2008" and the release of 9.04 is mentioned in the future tense, you didn't consider that this might possibly be a typo?
Slashdot Mirror
There's no such thing as a "Vista PC", just a PC with Vista pre-installed. Just replace it.
Maybe Ziff-Davis, and other site owners, should be insisting on sanitized ads. An image, some text, an html link - why should an advertiser require more?
The ads, as served from Ziff-Davis, performed redirects to a third-party site. It was this third-party site which was hosting the malicious pdf files. They probably escaped automatic checking in this manner.
Any advertiser is going to want a click to end up as a vist to their site, one way or another - and once there it's out of Ziff-Davis' hands.
Except that there's no argument about whether the gate's open or not. Just you trying to force people to walk down the path in the manner of your choosing.
Yes, and they're now rolling out a feature whereby mail with yahoo, hotmail & other providers can be imported into your gmail account.
Spelling and grammar obviously not in that list.
Did that come before or after google introduced the ability to get your hotmail stuff (plus yahoo and a bunch of others) into gmail, and then, via imap/pop, into a desktop mail client?
A quick google search found one for just over $31,000 - I'm sure you could do better.
This "jet-pack" is the sort of thing I could see being used to hire out at the beach for 5-10 min trips, just for the ride. Obviously this would depend upon training time and you'd need to tether it, to prevent it being stolen - which rather defeats the purpose of the thing.
But possibly fun - although it's a lot to pay for some fun.
The web site advertises two models :
155 HP = EUR 99,000 which is $125,116 (£88,122)
215 HP = EUR 119,000 which is $150,392 (£105,924)
so the Telegraph has the prices wrong.
(Exchange rates courtesy of Google)
The police in the UK have a system fitted to some cars which reads the plates on all oncoming vehicles and automatically checks them against various criminal databases.
Somethings's fubar when you can write "from my teacher's lawyer" without the first response being "wtf, why does a teacher HAVE a lawyer?"
The only time I've ever needed legal assistance (home purchase/sale) I've had to go and get it just for that occasion.
Are we talking about the same Microsoft here? I'll run up a server with a dozen instances on it, all running on 1 machine and let a dozen people use rdesktop, only need one license. Good luck with that one.
And three licenses, Microsoft would love it.
You'd better make sure that one of the options is "None of the above". I can care enough to cast my vote, but currently if I feel that none of the candidates is sufficiently qualified to do the job then my only option is to spoil my paper.
If I stay at home I get counted as a "didn't care enough to vote", if I spoil my paper I may get counted as "idiot who didn't understand the process", but I've made my mark.
You can't get staff to help with not casting a vote, the process has to be anonymous.
That's assuming that the developer gets paid when the copy is sold at the store.
Since the store must have bought it from a supplier further up the chain, surely the developers have already had their cut. The store's only selling it cheaply because they have only a finite amount of space on the shelves and in the warehouses.
Buying second hand, the sale's already happened and the developers have already been paid.
How would the cop know it was a judge driving before pulling him over?
No, but you can decide at any point to get off the upgrade roundabout and stick with what you've got, or control your own roll-out of new versions.
Norway has 12 per square km, and a population of only 4.8 million. We don't pay for incoming calls or SMS.
They should definately be payed for lerning speling and grammer.
Nope, did my jury service when I got called.
It's precisely that experience that leads me to make this statement
I believe it's very serious, but I also believe that the majority of people who serve wouldn't hesitate to assume that somebody who chose to remain silent is guilty.
Also, if you remain silent in court this can be assumed as evidence of guilt.
No it can't, not in any court within the United Kingdom. Staying silent may harm your defence, as noted in the caution you are given, but it can never be used as a presumption of evidence of guilt.
That's correct in theory. I wouldn't trust a jury not to presume my guilt were I to stay silent though.
Remember, that jury consists of 12 examples of society's finest, right off the street.
You have seen Steve Balmer?
And seeing as the blog entry is dated "Tue Dec 23 2008" and the release of 9.04 is mentioned in the future tense, you didn't consider that this might possibly be a typo?
To this day I refuse to buy Sony products of any kind due to the rootkit bullsheet back in late 2005
Glad I'm not alone on this one.